Thoreau advocated civil disobedience, but I think he'd be appalled to see it exercised in a case like this.
That just shows what an idiot you are if you actually think anything anywhere near that stupid.
If anything he'd be appalled by your cowardice and your ignorance. He would not be appaled by someone showing some balls and standing up for their rights.
So when you don't know a damn thing about a subject, don't just make up idiotic lies to try and pretend you know something. You've proven yourself a fool when you could have just kept your idiotic mouth shut and kept that fact to yourself.
Bald faced lie. He went about it in exactly the right way.
Instead of talking with the employee who wanted to inspect his bag, he left the store and got into a waiting car.
His business with the store ended at the register. As he had no other business with the store or any of its employees, he had no reason to say anything to the employee and was perfectly correct to head out to his car with his legally purchased property.
To any reasonable person, that is going to look just a little suspicious.
No, to a coward or a fool, it might look suspicious. To a *reasonable* person (this category clearly does not include you) it looks like a person engaging in commerce and then leaving the premises when it's concluded.
Your big failure here is thinking that excercising your rights is an unreasonable thing. That is not just stupid and cowardly, it demonstrates you to be a subject rather than a citizen. Common sense tells you, that I purchased these items, the guy at the store is just doing his job, just co-operate.
Yep, you have proven absolutely beyond any possibility of a doubt that you are a coward and a subject. The fact that you think that cowardly bootlicking filth you spewed is even sane demonstrates your complete failure as a citizen of a free society.
You are pathetic and your painful death would be purely a win for this nation.
Maybe you'd like to share your idea's on how a shop might better secure themselves against theft? All I ever hear is people wailing about how their rights are being infringed...
That might be because this guy's right were *very* fucking seriously infringed. That's the relevant fact, shithead. It isn't my job to help a shop with their security. Where you got the batshit insane idea that that idiotic mewling of yours is even in any way relevant is beyond me, but rest assured, you're wrong on every particular and yet you don't have the common courtesy to shut your fucking mouth after it is demonstrated to you repeatedly.
Grow some balls and act like a citizen, not a subject you cowardly fuckwad.
Just because you can get away with something doesn't mean that you should.
Except, you dim witted cowardly douche, he didn't "get away" with anything. The store attempted to get away with something and he refused to let them pull one over on him.
Those are the facts of the matter, Arguing the complete opposite of the facts makes you look like a real piece of shit, you know that, don't you?
Are you really that fucking stupid, or are you that eager to bend over at any opportunity? Or is it both?
The one certain thing is that you have very serious problems with basic reasoning and integrity. You should look into those before you open you mouth in public.
He chose to act like an arrogant prick and cause the kids and father in the car lots of grief.
He chose to act like a *citizen* of a free society. Apart from having to deal with the vile criminal actions of the store personnel, he had the courage to stand up to a dirty scummy cop who actively chose to violate the law.
Now, you're quite obviously a weak willed coward with no redeeming characteristics. If that were not true then you would not be spouting your vile cowardly lying hatred of a patriot standing up for your rights and my own. I suspect you realize how truly lacking you are in any sort of courage, honor and integrity, for why else would you whine like a little bitch about how a man stood up for what's right? Because you know damn well that you do not have the balls to act like a man. You like to bend over at any opportunity because you have no courage. Sorry, but you've demonstrated quite clearly who and what you are in your idiotic baseless attack on a patriot.
Seriously, you aren't man enough to lick this patriot's boots. Kindly go die in a fire before your vile cowardice seeps any further into the public consciousness you worthless,weak, cowardly pussy.
It's hard enough to get a decent ale in the US when you are legally allowed to.
Did you just post that message from 1980? Seriously, you might consider moving to.......I dunno.... anywhere in America I've been in the last 10 years or so. All of those places have plenty of good beers.
I can't believe he would possibly think this would attract people to science! I very nearly didn't do Physics at A-Level because GCSE science was too easy.
Look, all this A level/GCSE stuff is confusing to the non British. Could you put this in terms everyone will understand. OWLs and NEWTs would be the way to go;-)
Yes, actually there was. You claimed that we don't have financial muscle because China can threaten to crash our currency. Except, there's no value to a threat that destroys them too, because we know they won't follow through on it, so yes, actually, you were wrong
Except you ignore the fact that we were just pressuring them on trade, they did make that threat and we did back down.
You didn't make a point, you were fearmongering because you're ignorant.
and you won't be ignorant anymore. (at least not on this subject)
So your idea of a rational point is ignoring current events and pointing to an old, poorly written opinion piece?!?
Sure, Sparky, live in your delusional fantasy world where year and a half old opinions you agree with actually matter and a knowledge of real current events is ignorance.
Yep, you're a shining example of how the stupidity, cowardice, and ignorance of the typical American allows the most insane policies to continue.
Except that would ruin their economy and the world's too.
Did I say it was a good idea? No, in fact I didn't.
Other than being completely wrong though, you have a point.
By which you mean I am correct, but you are unable to address the point so you just made a snarky remark without actually adding anything to the discussion. Congratulations.
Except that would ruin their economy and the world's too.
Other than being completely wrong though, you have a point.
It might well do that, but it doesn't change the fact that by taking out massive loans to fund a worthless war we have shifted the balance of power very much to their side.
So, no, there was nothing wrong in what I said. Of course, addressing the actual point instead of snarking off would involve you actually knowing what you're talking about so I didn't really expect that.
The vituperous way you attack Christianity and the revisionist way you view historic facts are proof positive of the same propensity, even in yourself.
You're the only one trying to revise history. Deal with the fact that The Catholic Church has always been an instrument of brutality. Do not whine like a little bitch about how other groups are bad too. That is a cowardly deceitful approach and I will not put up with it. I have contempt for lying cowards.
Persecuting/ridiculing current Christians and their dogma because of the actions of people seperated not only by generations of time, but also by the great societal changes of the recent era would be akin to me ridiculing you because some of your evolutionary ancestors were cannibalistic.
What a completely idiotic statement. The people back in history are the ones who made up the religion. It's theirs. Now if you want to go under the same name then you have to deal with the liabilities.
Those liabilities include the fact that the entire fairy tale was made up and promoted through brutal torture and murder. Yes, Genghis Khan was brutal. No, that has nothing to do with the subject.
You stepped up to defend the most brutal evil group of thugs in our species history, now defend them or admit that you're a liar. Quit trying to shift the blame, Coward.
Your ire is outdated due to the time of your birth by a few lifetimes at least.
OK, so If I rob your house and rape your family, but I get away with it then I'm a good guy all of a sudden? What a retarded argument. The fact is that the wealth and power of the Church is entirely due to ill gotten gains stolen from the corpses of innocent people tortured to death in the name of their religion. *their* religion. Not yours. You had nothing to do with creating it. If you choose to affiliate yourself with such an evil organzation, then man up and deal with the consequences which include having decent human beings despise you for the evil that you actively choose to promote. Including raping little children which is one of the current favorite activities of the church.
Persecuting/ridiculing current Christians and their dogma because of the actions of people seperated not only by generations of time, but also by the great societal changes of the recent era would be akin to me ridiculing you because some of your evolutionary ancestors were cannibalistic.
That would only be true if I went around promoting cannibalism in this day and age. Something amusingly enough., the Catholic Church actually does.
I might be able to suggest a certain other religion that is performing your most hated of acts throughout many countries of the world right now.
You might, but again all you're doing is acting like a coward by trying to point the finger elsewhere as opposed to being a man and standing up for yourself.
Given the fact that we're headed the same way in the US right now due entirely to Christians forgetting the foundation of this country in order to push their purely hate based religion on the decent citizens of this country.
So again, deal with the negative facts about your own bullshit de;lusional fairy tale before trying to address anything else. I'm really sick to death of dealing with idiotic cowardly bullshit like your response.
the problem is that even when in deficit, the US has incredible economical and financial muscle.
Well, except, of course, when China threatens to crash our currency. Then we start licking their balls very nicely since we've been completely sold out to them by the current pack of thieves in Washington.
Maybe, but I'm not afraid of being **sued** by the Catholic church, nor of having their internal intelligence agency declare me a "suppressive person" and have me followed and spread false rumors that I'm a pedophile. The allegations against S**tologists are serious and chilling.
Yes, but that is a very recent development/. It was only in the 1920s that the Catholic Church officially condemned torture for heretics.
So a couple thousand years of doing much much worse than the Scientologists have ever done does not make the Catholic Church any less sleazy, disgusting or evil.
There is no doubt in my mind that, historically, the papacy has been influenced, and inhabited, by power-seekers. But most of them? Over centuries? Could it really be that most were not believers?
*Of course* it really could be like that. It is a vanishingly small possibility that it could be any other way.
Seriously, think hard about what it is that makes you feel that the possibility is unlikely. Now consider that nowhere did a fact enter into your calculations. That is because damn near *every* fact demonstrates that cynicism, brutality, and siding with power and against the people is the only way to gain power in an institution like the Catholic Church which exists now as it always has throughout its history in order to promote its own power and that of those who run it.
The vast majority of the beliefs and dogma of the Catholic Church as well as the actual texts that comprise the bible (new testament) came to be via political power struggles. You have 2 opposed groups. One declares some obscure assinine point of dogma to be absolute truth and declares their opponents heretics and has them tortured and murdered.
That is the history of the Catholic Church and of the Christian religion as a whole.
What's truly sad and pathetic is that so many people claim to be "believers", yet they can't even be bothered to check into the basis of their faith. All you need to do is study a bit of history to know that what I said is true. In fact, how could it possibly have come about any other way?
I'm sorry if you do not like what the facts are, but you do not have a right to your own facts.
Anti-Catholic bias is at the root of a number of libels, including, for example, the wide-spread belief that people in the middle ages didn't realize the earth was round
No, that's stupid, and deeply dishonest. Anti-Catholic (and anti-Christian) bias exists because of well over a *thousand fucking years* of burning innocent people alive just because they didn't buy into an idiotic fairy tale that a bright child could poke major holes in. We're talking about the most brutal evil organization that has ever existed.
Cowardly trying to hide behind idiotic lies about "flat earth" just proves absolutely that you are a deeply dishonest person who will defend evil with lies because you don't have the courage to look honestly at reality.
Seriously, Sparky, The organization you are lying to defend is guilty of centuries of torture and murder in order to promote and defend their own power and no other reason.
Well, no offense, but simply because you don't actually know what any of those symbols mean.
Your "proof" would only work if we were restricting ourselves to *finite* sets. < and > do not mean what you think they do in this case. |A|<=|B| *is defined* as "There exists a one to one function from A -> B". These are cardinal numbers, not integers. Stating it differently you could say that if there is a one to one function from A to B *and* there exists a one to one function from B to A, then there exists a bijection (one to one and onto) between the 2 sets.
You'll note that I said that it *seems* really freaking obvious, but it isn't.
Ooo, good guess, but it turns out I'm not any kind of moron at all, but thanks for asking.
So you say this and then directly contradict yourself in your next sentence..
But for the record, I'd rather have a high school principle shoving his beliefs on me than the Supreme Court shoving their beliefs on me, as I can always find a new high school principle.
Except that the principle is the only one shoving beliefs. The SC in this case is merely saying "look you anti American cunt, no shoving your bullshit beliefs on decent people".
Yet you think that preventing an asshole from shoving their beliefs on others is a form of oppression which is what I asked. So, yes, you have proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that you are *exactly* the type of moron that I guessed that you were.
You could have just said "yes" and it would have saved time and you'd look a little less stupid right now.
What??? A high school principle who wouldn't obey the dictates of the Supreme Court? BURN HIM! ALL MUST OBEY!!!
Let me guess, you're the type of moron who thinks that not being allowed to shove your idiotic beliefs on decent people means you're being oppressed, right?
Wouldn't Congress just become more dangerous if they understood science?
More dangerous than now where they just pass laws based on the voices the bottom of the barrel of our society hear in their heads? I seriously doubt it.
Can we please oh please oh please call them death rays?
Yes, but only if we can take Integration to be the primary operation over Differentiation so we're no longer stuck with differentiation and anti-differentiation and instead have integration and disintegration. Math class would be much more popular if kids knew they'd get to disintegrate things.
Where's the part about faking a terrorist attack to invade Iraq?
Nowhere. As I stated in my response to the reply to my first post here I'm claiming nothing of the sort.
You spew bullshit this deep and accuse this guy of being dishonest?
Let me see if I understand where your twisted little mind is trying to mislead us now:
I made a simple statement of fact. That was responded to with a gross misrepresentation of what I said. I then clarified my point to demonstrate that that, in fact, had nothing at all to do with what I said as is quite obvious. After all of that, you then step up and make the same exact false claim as to what I said when it's all right there to see.
Now, we've had long discussions about your problems with honesty and reasoning skills, so I'll just point out that this is yet another clear cut example of you lying.
You are projecting yourself onto him.
No, that would be you onto me.
You accuse him of using a strawman fallacy, when all he did was call you out on what you said. Then you deny saying it. Let's see what you are denying:
No, I *never* said that the administration planned or was in any way involved with 9/11. Where did I say that? Let's see it, liar.
Oh that's right, I didn't. Hence his claim that I did *is* a strawman. I deny saying what I didn't say, and that is all. No surprise you fail to understand the distinction given your well established problems with critical thinking skills.
When are you going to start claiming it's the same as raping children. That's one of your favorites.
Slashdot Mirror
Thoreau advocated civil disobedience, but I think he'd be appalled to see it exercised in a case like this.
That just shows what an idiot you are if you actually think anything anywhere near that stupid.
If anything he'd be appalled by your cowardice and your ignorance. He would not be appaled by someone showing some balls and standing up for their rights.
So when you don't know a damn thing about a subject, don't just make up idiotic lies to try and pretend you know something. You've proven yourself a fool when you could have just kept your idiotic mouth shut and kept that fact to yourself.
This guy went around things the wrong way
Bald faced lie. He went about it in exactly the right way.
Instead of talking with the employee who wanted to inspect his bag, he left the store and got into a waiting car.
His business with the store ended at the register. As he had no other business with the store or any of its employees, he had no reason to say anything to the employee and was perfectly correct to head out to his car with his legally purchased property.
To any reasonable person, that is going to look just a little suspicious.
No, to a coward or a fool, it might look suspicious. To a *reasonable* person (this category clearly does not include you) it looks like a person engaging in commerce and then leaving the premises when it's concluded.
Your big failure here is thinking that excercising your rights is an unreasonable thing. That is not just stupid and cowardly, it demonstrates you to be a subject rather than a citizen.
Common sense tells you, that I purchased these items, the guy at the store is just doing his job, just co-operate.
Yep, you have proven absolutely beyond any possibility of a doubt that you are a coward and a subject. The fact that you think that cowardly bootlicking filth you spewed is even sane demonstrates your complete failure as a citizen of a free society.
You are pathetic and your painful death would be purely a win for this nation.
Maybe you'd like to share your idea's on how a shop might better secure themselves against theft? All I ever hear is people wailing about how their rights are being infringed...
That might be because this guy's right were *very* fucking seriously infringed. That's the relevant fact, shithead. It isn't my job to help a shop with their security. Where you got the batshit insane idea that that idiotic mewling of yours is even in any way relevant is beyond me, but rest assured, you're wrong on every particular and yet you don't have the common courtesy to shut your fucking mouth after it is demonstrated to you repeatedly.
Grow some balls and act like a citizen, not a subject you cowardly fuckwad.
Just because you can get away with something doesn't mean that you should.
Except, you dim witted cowardly douche, he didn't "get away" with anything. The store attempted to get away with something and he refused to let them pull one over on him.
Those are the facts of the matter, Arguing the complete opposite of the facts makes you look like a real piece of shit, you know that, don't you?
Are you really that fucking stupid, or are you that eager to bend over at any opportunity? Or is it both?
The one certain thing is that you have very serious problems with basic reasoning and integrity. You should look into those before you open you mouth in public.
He chose to act like an arrogant prick and cause the kids and father in the car lots of grief.
He chose to act like a *citizen* of a free society.
Apart from having to deal with the vile criminal actions of the store personnel, he had the courage to stand up to a dirty scummy cop who actively chose to violate the law.
Now, you're quite obviously a weak willed coward with no redeeming characteristics. If that were not true then you would not be spouting your vile cowardly lying hatred of a patriot standing up for your rights and my own. I suspect you realize how truly lacking you are in any sort of courage, honor and integrity, for why else would you whine like a little bitch about how a man stood up for what's right? Because you know damn well that you do not have the balls to act like a man. You like to bend over at any opportunity because you have no courage. Sorry, but you've demonstrated quite clearly who and what you are in your idiotic baseless attack on a patriot.
Seriously, you aren't man enough to lick this patriot's boots. Kindly go die in a fire before your vile cowardice seeps any further into the public consciousness you worthless,weak, cowardly pussy.
It's hard enough to get a decent ale in the US when you are legally allowed to.
Did you just post that message from 1980?
Seriously, you might consider moving to.......I dunno.... anywhere in America I've been in the last 10 years or so. All of those places have plenty of good beers.
They ship lamers packed in buses. Morons are sent via shipping container I think.
;-)
I laugh every time I see a bus load of Lamers going down the road
I can't believe he would possibly think this would attract people to science! I very nearly didn't do Physics at A-Level because GCSE science was too easy.
;-)
Look, all this A level/GCSE stuff is confusing to the non British. Could you put this in terms everyone will understand. OWLs and NEWTs would be the way to go
You tell yourself whatever you need to if it makes you feel better.
But you're still wrong.
Right, because the voices in your head said so?
Look, when you don't know anything about a subject you should keep quiet instead of proving yourself to be a fool.
Continuing after it's already been demonstrated is just silly.
Yes, actually there was. You claimed that we don't have financial muscle because China can threaten to crash our currency. Except, there's no value to a threat that destroys them too, because we know they won't follow through on it, so yes, actually, you were wrong
Except you ignore the fact that we were just pressuring them on trade, they did make that threat and we did back down.
You didn't make a point, you were fearmongering because you're ignorant.
Read this
http://www.stlouisfed.org/news/speeches/2005/11_0
and you won't be ignorant anymore. (at least not on this subject)
So your idea of a rational point is ignoring current events and pointing to an old, poorly written opinion piece?!?
Sure, Sparky, live in your delusional fantasy world where year and a half old opinions you agree with actually matter and a knowledge of real current events is ignorance.
Yep, you're a shining example of how the stupidity, cowardice, and ignorance of the typical American allows the most insane policies to continue.
Except that would ruin their economy and the world's too.
Did I say it was a good idea? No, in fact I didn't.
Other than being completely wrong though, you have a point.
By which you mean I am correct, but you are unable to address the point so you just made a snarky remark without actually adding anything to the discussion.
Congratulations.
Except that would ruin their economy and the world's too.
Other than being completely wrong though, you have a point.
It might well do that, but it doesn't change the fact that by taking out massive loans to fund a worthless war we have shifted the balance of power very much to their side.
So, no, there was nothing wrong in what I said. Of course, addressing the actual point instead of snarking off would involve you actually knowing what you're talking about so I didn't really expect that.
The vituperous way you attack Christianity and the revisionist way you view historic facts are proof positive of the same propensity, even in yourself.
You're the only one trying to revise history.
Deal with the fact that The Catholic Church has always been an instrument of brutality. Do not whine like a little bitch about how other groups are bad too. That is a cowardly deceitful approach and I will not put up with it.
I have contempt for lying cowards.
Persecuting/ridiculing current Christians and their dogma because of the actions of people seperated not only by generations of time, but also by the great societal changes of the recent era would be akin to me ridiculing you because some of your evolutionary ancestors were cannibalistic.
What a completely idiotic statement.
The people back in history are the ones who made up the religion. It's theirs. Now if you want to go under the same name then you have to deal with the liabilities.
Those liabilities include the fact that the entire fairy tale was made up and promoted through brutal torture and murder. Yes, Genghis Khan was brutal. No, that has nothing to do with the subject.
You stepped up to defend the most brutal evil group of thugs in our species history, now defend them or admit that you're a liar.
Quit trying to shift the blame, Coward.
Your ire is outdated due to the time of your birth by a few lifetimes at least.
OK, so If I rob your house and rape your family, but I get away with it then I'm a good guy all of a sudden? What a retarded argument.
The fact is that the wealth and power of the Church is entirely due to ill gotten gains stolen from the corpses of innocent people tortured to death in the name of their religion. *their* religion. Not yours. You had nothing to do with creating it. If you choose to affiliate yourself with such an evil organzation, then man up and deal with the consequences which include having decent human beings despise you for the evil that you actively choose to promote. Including raping little children which is one of the current favorite activities of the church.
Persecuting/ridiculing current Christians and their dogma because of the actions of people seperated not only by generations of time, but also by the great societal changes of the recent era would be akin to me ridiculing you because some of your evolutionary ancestors were cannibalistic.
That would only be true if I went around promoting cannibalism in this day and age. Something amusingly enough., the Catholic Church actually does.
I might be able to suggest a certain other religion that is performing your most hated of acts throughout many countries of the world right now.
You might, but again all you're doing is acting like a coward by trying to point the finger elsewhere as opposed to being a man and standing up for yourself.
Given the fact that we're headed the same way in the US right now due entirely to Christians forgetting the foundation of this country in order to push their purely hate based religion on the decent citizens of this country.
So again, deal with the negative facts about your own bullshit de;lusional fairy tale before trying to address anything else.
I'm really sick to death of dealing with idiotic cowardly bullshit like your response.
the problem is that even when in deficit, the US has incredible economical and financial muscle.
Well, except, of course, when China threatens to crash our currency. Then we start licking their balls very nicely since we've been completely sold out to them by the current pack of thieves in Washington.
Maybe, but I'm not afraid of being **sued** by the Catholic church, nor of having their internal intelligence agency declare me a "suppressive person" and have me followed and spread false rumors that I'm a pedophile. The allegations against S**tologists are serious and chilling.
Yes, but that is a very recent development/. It was only in the 1920s that the Catholic Church officially condemned torture for heretics.
So a couple thousand years of doing much much worse than the Scientologists have ever done does not make the Catholic Church any less sleazy, disgusting or evil.
There is no doubt in my mind that, historically, the papacy has been influenced, and inhabited, by power-seekers. But most of them? Over centuries? Could it really be that most were not believers?
*Of course* it really could be like that. It is a vanishingly small possibility that it could be any other way.
Seriously, think hard about what it is that makes you feel that the possibility is unlikely. Now consider that nowhere did a fact enter into your calculations. That is because damn near *every* fact demonstrates that cynicism, brutality, and siding with power and against the people is the only way to gain power in an institution like the Catholic Church which exists now as it always has throughout its history in order to promote its own power and that of those who run it.
The vast majority of the beliefs and dogma of the Catholic Church as well as the actual texts that comprise the bible (new testament) came to be via political power struggles. You have 2 opposed groups. One declares some obscure assinine point of dogma to be absolute truth and declares their opponents heretics and has them tortured and murdered.
That is the history of the Catholic Church and of the Christian religion as a whole.
What's truly sad and pathetic is that so many people claim to be "believers", yet they can't even be bothered to check into the basis of their faith. All you need to do is study a bit of history to know that what I said is true. In fact, how could it possibly have come about any other way?
I'm sorry if you do not like what the facts are, but you do not have a right to your own facts.
Anti-Catholic bias is at the root of a number of libels, including, for example, the wide-spread belief that people in the middle ages didn't realize the earth was round
No, that's stupid, and deeply dishonest. Anti-Catholic (and anti-Christian) bias exists because of well over a *thousand fucking years* of burning innocent people alive just because they didn't buy into an idiotic fairy tale that a bright child could poke major holes in.
We're talking about the most brutal evil organization that has ever existed.
Cowardly trying to hide behind idiotic lies about "flat earth" just proves absolutely that you are a deeply dishonest person who will defend evil with lies because you don't have the courage to look honestly at reality.
Seriously, Sparky, The organization you are lying to defend is guilty of centuries of torture and murder in order to promote and defend their own power and no other reason.
Yeah, well nullspace eunt domes!
these scientists seem to delight on admitting they are baffled at the drop of a hat.
;-)
Come now, they haven't been baffled at the drop of a hat since Newton
How so?
Well, no offense, but simply because you don't actually know what any of those symbols mean.
Your "proof" would only work if we were restricting ourselves to *finite* sets. < and > do not mean what you think they do in this case.
|A|<=|B| *is defined* as "There exists a one to one function from A -> B".
These are cardinal numbers, not integers.
Stating it differently you could say that if there is a one to one function from A to B *and* there exists a one to one function from B to A, then there exists a bijection (one to one and onto) between the 2 sets.
You'll note that I said that it *seems* really freaking obvious, but it isn't.
I'm not even going to try. But I do think that some things that are intuitively obvious can be the very devil to prove - ask any mathematician!
Notation: let |A| be the cardinality of set A and |B| be the cardinality of set B.
Theorem:
If |A|<=|B| and |B|<=|A| then |A|=|B|
Proof:
Nowhere near as easy as you'd think given how freaking obvious it is.
Ooo, good guess, but it turns out I'm not any kind of moron at all, but thanks for asking.
So you say this and then directly contradict yourself in your next sentence..
But for the record, I'd rather have a high school principle shoving his beliefs on me than the Supreme Court shoving their beliefs on me, as I can always find a new high school principle.
Except that the principle is the only one shoving beliefs. The SC in this case is merely saying "look you anti American cunt, no shoving your bullshit beliefs on decent people".
Yet you think that preventing an asshole from shoving their beliefs on others is a form of oppression which is what I asked.
So, yes, you have proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that you are *exactly* the type of moron that I guessed that you were.
You could have just said "yes" and it would have saved time and you'd look a little less stupid right now.
What??? A high school principle who wouldn't obey the dictates of the Supreme Court? BURN HIM! ALL MUST OBEY!!!
Let me guess, you're the type of moron who thinks that not being allowed to shove your idiotic beliefs on decent people means you're being oppressed, right?
Wouldn't Congress just become more dangerous if they understood science?
More dangerous than now where they just pass laws based on the voices the bottom of the barrel of our society hear in their heads? I seriously doubt it.
Can we please oh please oh please call them death rays?
Yes, but only if we can take Integration to be the primary operation over Differentiation so we're no longer stuck with differentiation and anti-differentiation and instead have integration and disintegration. Math class would be much more popular if kids knew they'd get to disintegrate things.
Where's the part about faking a terrorist attack to invade Iraq?
Nowhere. As I stated in my response to the reply to my first post here I'm claiming nothing of the sort.
You spew bullshit this deep and accuse this guy of being dishonest?
Let me see if I understand where your twisted little mind is trying to mislead us now:
I made a simple statement of fact. That was responded to with a gross misrepresentation of what I said. I then clarified my point to demonstrate that that, in fact, had nothing at all to do with what I said as is quite obvious.
After all of that, you then step up and make the same exact false claim as to what I said when it's all right there to see.
Now, we've had long discussions about your problems with honesty and reasoning skills, so I'll just point out that this is yet another clear cut example of you lying.
You are projecting yourself onto him.
No, that would be you onto me.
You accuse him of using a strawman fallacy, when all he did was call you out on what you said. Then you deny saying it. Let's see what you are denying:
No, I *never* said that the administration planned or was in any way involved with 9/11. Where did I say that? Let's see it, liar.
Oh that's right, I didn't. Hence his claim that I did *is* a strawman. I deny saying what I didn't say, and that is all.
No surprise you fail to understand the distinction given your well established problems with critical thinking skills.
When are you going to start claiming it's the same as raping children. That's one of your favorites.