I assume you mean Giga and Mega and not milli and what ever g is.
24GWh for 10 billion.9GWh for.8 billion
10 /.8 = 12.5
Works out at about 11.25GWh for 10 billion.
Now Nuclear plants will not have a demand during the night so not all of the 24GWh will be used. (say 6 hours of no demand) so works out about 18GWh of usable power.
In 2008, total worldwide energy consumption was 474 exajoules (474×1018 J=132,000 TWh). This is equivalent to an average power use of 15 terawatts (1.504×1013 W) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption
$4-5 for solar. * 6 (4 hours of production so need 6) = $24-30 $8 for wind * 5 (20% production) = $40
Battery
1 watt for 48 hours /.3 Depth of Dischage =.16Kwh * $200 = $32
$96 total
According to a pdf i found.
500 kV double circuit transmission line (Capacity per circuit 2500 MVA-3500 MVA) $1.8M per km
or roughly $1 / 1300Km for power lines to transmit 1 watt..018 / watt for the transforms * 11 for each bit of solar and wind being spread out =.2
---- FINAL CONCLUSION ----
So for less them the cost of just getting a single watt panel into space on a space elevator: 6 watts of solar (about 24 watts/day) 5 watts of wind (about 24 watts/day) 2 days of storage at 1 watt/hour spread out over 1300Km
Honestly, it'd probably be much easier just making a HUGE ass magnifying glass in space that sends it to a solar panel in space, then beam it back down to surface in the most efficient non-interacting beam. (or deadly high energy beam and just put up a no-fly zone)
The problem would be cooling because space is inert, you'd need to have a huge cooling station behind it that is kept in constant shadow to dissipate heat quick enough for such a huge industrial-scale design like that.
But, it is entirely doable with the right funding and people behind it. There are a few space solar projects going right now. Varying distances along their project timeline. There is still time for us to be space truckers. Soon. Soon.
You need to keep the magnification on the panels, that means the cooling is always in shadow as a result. Still a large structure though.
Slashdot Mirror
Republicans 53.8% of the seats on 48.0% of the vote
Democrats 46.2% of the seats on 49.2% of the vote.
How would making the seats an individual vote stop that applying to the presidential election?
I assume you mean Giga and Mega and not milli and what ever g is.
24GWh for 10 billion .9GWh for .8 billion
10 / .8 = 12.5
Works out at about
11.25GWh for 10 billion.
Now Nuclear plants will not have a demand during the night so not all of the 24GWh will be used. (say 6 hours of no demand) so works out about 18GWh of usable power.
Probably the same assumption you are making where the nuclear plant is going to have customers willing to buy the power all the time.
It is not just wind turbine that produce the power but also the nuclear plants they can't turn off.
Nuclear plant:Base load power
Pumped Storage: Peaker plant
You cannot allocate it to fossil fuels. If it was a solar factory you could not allocate it to renewable.
If there was a free market, no one (outside of Brazil) would grow plants for fuel-ethanol. It's just too expensive at the moment.
Australia has a large sugar ethanol production as well.
Of course no one would produce corn ethanol is my opinion.
What was the one before then?
highest bidder sets the value.
high value = lots of tax.
Well the power eventually turns back into heat.
But
174 petawatts (PW) hit the earth from the sun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy#Energy_from_the_Sun
In 2008, total worldwide energy consumption was 474 exajoules (474×1018 J=132,000 TWh). This is equivalent to an average power use of 15 terawatts (1.504×1013 W)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption
15TW/174PW= .8%
If it becomes cheaper in the future then you could get another system to go with your current system?
According to http://www.emcore.com/space-photovoltaics/space-solar-cells/
135.3 mW/cm^2
84 mg/cm^2
1.61W/kg
Cost of space elevator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator_economics#Cost_estimates_for_a_space_elevator
$220/kg up into space
$136.65 per watt in space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_per_watt
$4-5 for solar. * 6 (4 hours of production so need 6) = $24-30
$8 for wind * 5 (20% production) = $40
Battery
1 watt for 48 hours / .3 Depth of Dischage = .16Kwh * $200 = $32
$96 total
According to a pdf i found.
500 kV double circuit transmission line
(Capacity per circuit 2500 MVA-3500 MVA)
$1.8M per km
or roughly $1 / 1300Km for power lines to transmit 1 watt. .018 / watt for the transforms * 11 for each bit of solar and wind being spread out = .2
----
FINAL CONCLUSION
----
So for less them the cost of just getting a single watt panel into space on a space elevator:
6 watts of solar (about 24 watts/day)
5 watts of wind (about 24 watts/day)
2 days of storage at 1 watt/hour
spread out over 1300Km
www.lowenergydevelopments.com.au/index.php?route=product/product&path=59_77&product_id=314
$200usd $0.90/watt
They sense the grid by changing the supply slightly.
If that triggers a large change in voltage they realize that the 'grid' they connect to is small and then shut down.
So don't get a 24KW system, Size your system to provide about the same power you use over the day and use the grid when you are using a lot of power.
7.5 * 12 . you don't generate during night. = $190
10 grand for a 7.5KW system is not a lot.
I did hear a story about a cyclone. The roof were the panels were held. the other side of the roof did not.
Sounds like a story i read.
Their was a private organization regulating the food vendors.
If they did not have their seal then customers would not buy from them.
As their is no companies that can survive without customers then customers have to pay through the company for it.
Lets assume you are a person earning $60/hour.
$3 would buy you 3 minutes/year for you to check all the service stations.
even if you only got $6/hour that still only gets you 3 minutes a month..
I know of one telephone company that had buried copper in NY. They had a large problem with the storm.
It sounds like you need to reduce the amount spent on them that they don't get and give it to them instead.
For me it is my game that I am developing and tried to compile under a virtual box Ubuntu. .
Honestly, it'd probably be much easier just making a HUGE ass magnifying glass in space that sends it to a solar panel in space, then beam it back down to surface in the most efficient non-interacting beam. (or deadly high energy beam and just put up a no-fly zone)
The problem would be cooling because space is inert, you'd need to have a huge cooling station behind it that is kept in constant shadow to dissipate heat quick enough for such a huge industrial-scale design like that.
But, it is entirely doable with the right funding and people behind it.
There are a few space solar projects going right now. Varying distances along their project timeline.
There is still time for us to be space truckers. Soon. Soon.
You need to keep the magnification on the panels, that means the cooling is always in shadow as a result. Still a large structure though.
technically you only need to file if you earn more then $18,200 and also it does not pay for the NBN(that is funded by bonds)
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2012/03/impact-of-curtailment-on-wind-economics
10 percent of wind power in Texas was not generated
What if your behavior off-duty reflects badly on the company?
>mined from the ground using diesel equipment
I think they are nuclear too in that scenario.