This is why I'm going with a 5x1 portrait setup. I want the peripheral but when you're doing 3x1 landscape you don't have very much vertical fill.l With 5 screens you can wrap them a bit better and have them completely fill your peripheral. Some games work excellently with setups like this. Take iRacing, for example. Which has an advanced multimonitor configuration option. An amazing and affordable setup would be running quintuple 27inch 1080p screens. I've got 3x1 portrait at 21.5" each and it's quite nice. While this is all personal opinion, I've been toying with this for a while and considered a lot of options and reasons thus far.
Big issue, though. If you don't have a method to rotate your monitors you will KICK yourself. Gameplay compatibility goes through the roof in 3x1 portrait as the aspect ratio without correction is under 16:9.
Ugh, yeah. I've been meaning to do a video on the "fisheye" effect since it seems few people get what's going on. I've wondered if perhaps there's a way to modify the Direct3D layer such that you can set up 3+ cameras from the same point. The geometry associated with the cameras should reflect the geometry of the user's setup. In this, We'd be able to pull away from the binocular effect a bit and make the game feel closer to a virtual reality setup. Really, the game is assuming a flat panel and you should probably adjust your setup to fit that if you're looking for immersion.
Widescreen Gaming Forum has a pretty complete list. From my experience, most modern games support the ultrawide aspect ratio. Though, I'm starting to find it preferable to handle things in 3x1 portrait. The AR ends up close to 16x9 but I've got almost 4K of resolution sitting in front of me. I've got some strong consideration to switch it up to a 5x1 setup. On that, games are usually incompatible because of extreme aspect ratios. Sometimes there's a hard pixel limit but usually it's that the game wasn't designed to handle anything wider than 16x9. And then you have the games that do handle it but just poorly. Such that the more extreme your AR the more awkward the game. So 5x1 portrait is going to put you around 16:5. Not too shabby and will handle a large number of games and most new games. I have quite the Steam list. I only buy on sales. And I double check widescreen lists to ensure compatibility. I can tell you that triplehead gaming is pretty feasible these days and I'd very heavily recommend it for the immersion factor. Racing simulators are so intense now.
Laws exist to protect the liberties of others as defined by basic doctrine. It's not an issue of morality. It's an issue of defining where the lines of property and person are drawn. It is an issue of liberty, first and foremost.
My current resolution is 3240x1920. Though I play games at 3510x1920 with bezel correction on. I'm considering grabbing another two monitors and upping to 5400x1920. When playing GTA 4, which is not a new game, it takes up over 900MB with the settings around modest. When upping to two new monitors, I think having 4 GB would be substantial enough. 8 GB would future-proof you a bit.
Is that hardcore? Maybe. But I don't consider it to be. I consider it to be enjoyable. And enjoyable requires well over a gigabyte per core.
From our current understanding, a Dyson sphere is impossible. Considering the rotation, the centers of rotation should collapse into the star. Though maybe this isn't so with one that isn't rotating.
I'm already imagining a convenient system. You could have all of the servers submerged with an engine lift to roll around and pick up the servers. One could design the server racks to be serviceable from that situation. But a portable lift is a cheap and easy to use piece of equipment. I'd hope no one is lifting this stuff out with their hands.;)
Read the article. It's mentioned that there's a proper magnet along with the spring. Also, "ride quality" seems to be, in this case, a measure of the force transfer between the road and the passenger. The less the passenger experiences, the better the "ride quality".
I'm willing to say both of you guys are half-right. The Flynn effect shows that average IQs rise over tiem. But 100 is where most tests try to keep the average. Every now and again test scores are usually adjusted to reflect this.
Thank you. I've been saying for a long time that as a society progresses technologically there will be a natural transition from capitalism to communism simply by virtue of the fact that so much will be automated that there will be people incapable of adding to society. We can either let them starve and maintain capitalism or ease into socialism to feed these people. But no matter what it's a slippery slope.
Somewhat often the switch controls a light on the opposite side of the wall. Usually while entering a room with no windows or turning on a light outside. Though I will admit to having lived in a house with the most confusing electrical system I've ever encountered. A fuse blowing in an unrelated room would take out an entire wall of a room that's not connected. But only a single wall.
Either way, there are plenty of example cases where one can flip a switch that doesn't turn on lights that can be seen from the switch. Also, a switch could turn on power to a socket. Or perhaps break power on a socket, which has great potential to cause problems.
I'm not sure if this is a Windows thing. I've seen plenty of people go to flip a switch in attempt to turn on the lights, fail, and go to the next switch. The issue is that they don't toggle things back to their initial state. It's simply poor systems practice. In this case, you're liable to find the lights on in another part of the house and waste some electricity. In some more dire scenarios, say when a gas system is turned on, it could result in death. It's just dumb to do and people sometimes don't think through situations as thoroughly as they should. But I don't think you could blame this action on Microsoft or Windows.
I work in education in Texas. And let me tell you, there are budget problems up the ass. I work as a TA in a physics department. There used to be two of us. We lost a guy and I lost 33% of my hours for a 66% cut overall. Considering all of our current problems, seeing Amazon pull out really hurts.
Also, our sales tax is 8.25%
No no no. There is no scientific method. It's just a silly thing they teach children in school to create a structure around science. But science is structureless as the process of developing science is the process of creating structure in and of itself. There is no structure to science because science is structure. Make sense?
These little glitches aren't excuses for why alarms failed to go off at all. If a second was missed here or there, I'd understand. But the alarms failed to work. What does your code look like if these library updates are what causes this sort of problem? I expect a device to work as intended independent of these small anomalies. The device didn't know it would happen or that it did happen and no desynchronization in the Earth's rotation should cause the alarm system to fail. Nor would the desynchronization event affect the time system outside of being off from "official time" by a couple of seconds.
So let's be honest. The coders at Apple just fucked up hard.
The simple issue is that with a majority-rules system like we have with our current Congress, we'll end up in a binary. Always down to two parties, doesn't matter who they are. If we were to actually function appropriately we parties, we'd have Parliament. But we don't, and it seems the be problematic grouping all of our political ideals into two distinct dichotomies. As if people can't think outside of those to group sets.
Or we can have a no-party system and consider political parties to be criminal organizations. That might not be so bad. At least we'd stop arguing about whether the country looks better painted red or blue.
I can't help but agree with you more. I admit upfront that I have pirated a significant number of games. All because the price points are higher than I'd pay. It's not that I wouldn't buy the product, it's that I would never buy the product at what they're asking. Since these Steam sales started, I have purchased a large number of games that I had previously pirated. Yes, these are sales for games I have beaten and have no intention of playing again. This isn't about greed. This isn't about getting stuff for free or cheap. This is about an appropriate consideration of the value that the 20-something demographic puts into games. A bigger demographic than it used to be. A demographic not consisting of soccer moms willing to drop 80 dollars into Mortal Kombat 3 (a number I remember hearing as a kid at a Hollywood Video). I remember that era. I see remnants today. But that era is dying as gamers are growing up.
These publishers wouldn't have seen a cent from me if these sales never occurred. This effect should be appreciated.
Slashdot Mirror
This is why I'm going with a 5x1 portrait setup. I want the peripheral but when you're doing 3x1 landscape you don't have very much vertical fill.l With 5 screens you can wrap them a bit better and have them completely fill your peripheral. Some games work excellently with setups like this. Take iRacing, for example. Which has an advanced multimonitor configuration option. An amazing and affordable setup would be running quintuple 27inch 1080p screens. I've got 3x1 portrait at 21.5" each and it's quite nice. While this is all personal opinion, I've been toying with this for a while and considered a lot of options and reasons thus far.
Big issue, though. If you don't have a method to rotate your monitors you will KICK yourself. Gameplay compatibility goes through the roof in 3x1 portrait as the aspect ratio without correction is under 16:9.
Ugh, yeah. I've been meaning to do a video on the "fisheye" effect since it seems few people get what's going on. I've wondered if perhaps there's a way to modify the Direct3D layer such that you can set up 3+ cameras from the same point. The geometry associated with the cameras should reflect the geometry of the user's setup. In this, We'd be able to pull away from the binocular effect a bit and make the game feel closer to a virtual reality setup. Really, the game is assuming a flat panel and you should probably adjust your setup to fit that if you're looking for immersion.
Widescreen Gaming Forum has a pretty complete list. From my experience, most modern games support the ultrawide aspect ratio. Though, I'm starting to find it preferable to handle things in 3x1 portrait. The AR ends up close to 16x9 but I've got almost 4K of resolution sitting in front of me. I've got some strong consideration to switch it up to a 5x1 setup. On that, games are usually incompatible because of extreme aspect ratios. Sometimes there's a hard pixel limit but usually it's that the game wasn't designed to handle anything wider than 16x9. And then you have the games that do handle it but just poorly. Such that the more extreme your AR the more awkward the game. So 5x1 portrait is going to put you around 16:5. Not too shabby and will handle a large number of games and most new games. I have quite the Steam list. I only buy on sales. And I double check widescreen lists to ensure compatibility. I can tell you that triplehead gaming is pretty feasible these days and I'd very heavily recommend it for the immersion factor. Racing simulators are so intense now.
Laws exist to protect the liberties of others as defined by basic doctrine. It's not an issue of morality. It's an issue of defining where the lines of property and person are drawn. It is an issue of liberty, first and foremost.
My current resolution is 3240x1920. Though I play games at 3510x1920 with bezel correction on. I'm considering grabbing another two monitors and upping to 5400x1920. When playing GTA 4, which is not a new game, it takes up over 900MB with the settings around modest. When upping to two new monitors, I think having 4 GB would be substantial enough. 8 GB would future-proof you a bit.
Is that hardcore? Maybe. But I don't consider it to be. I consider it to be enjoyable. And enjoyable requires well over a gigabyte per core.
But you haven't mentioned at all how far apart the contractions are. Should we be going to the hospital yet!?
From our current understanding, a Dyson sphere is impossible. Considering the rotation, the centers of rotation should collapse into the star. Though maybe this isn't so with one that isn't rotating.
I'm assuming you're a believer. Honestly, I hate deistic religions. But your views on the subject just earned you some respect points in my book.
I'm already imagining a convenient system. You could have all of the servers submerged with an engine lift to roll around and pick up the servers. One could design the server racks to be serviceable from that situation. But a portable lift is a cheap and easy to use piece of equipment. I'd hope no one is lifting this stuff out with their hands. ;)
Read the article. It's mentioned that there's a proper magnet along with the spring. Also, "ride quality" seems to be, in this case, a measure of the force transfer between the road and the passenger. The less the passenger experiences, the better the "ride quality".
I suspect I've encountered people in the games who have 10^100 or more.
A googol? A whole googol? I suspect Facebook's servers don't have that much storage space.
I'm willing to say both of you guys are half-right. The Flynn effect shows that average IQs rise over tiem. But 100 is where most tests try to keep the average. Every now and again test scores are usually adjusted to reflect this.
Thank you. I've been saying for a long time that as a society progresses technologically there will be a natural transition from capitalism to communism simply by virtue of the fact that so much will be automated that there will be people incapable of adding to society. We can either let them starve and maintain capitalism or ease into socialism to feed these people. But no matter what it's a slippery slope.
I've been getting a lot of mod points lately. Unfortunately, I have none right now. But you'd have more your way if I did.
Somewhat often the switch controls a light on the opposite side of the wall. Usually while entering a room with no windows or turning on a light outside. Though I will admit to having lived in a house with the most confusing electrical system I've ever encountered. A fuse blowing in an unrelated room would take out an entire wall of a room that's not connected. But only a single wall.
Either way, there are plenty of example cases where one can flip a switch that doesn't turn on lights that can be seen from the switch. Also, a switch could turn on power to a socket. Or perhaps break power on a socket, which has great potential to cause problems.
I'm not sure if this is a Windows thing. I've seen plenty of people go to flip a switch in attempt to turn on the lights, fail, and go to the next switch. The issue is that they don't toggle things back to their initial state. It's simply poor systems practice. In this case, you're liable to find the lights on in another part of the house and waste some electricity. In some more dire scenarios, say when a gas system is turned on, it could result in death. It's just dumb to do and people sometimes don't think through situations as thoroughly as they should. But I don't think you could blame this action on Microsoft or Windows.
I work in education in Texas. And let me tell you, there are budget problems up the ass. I work as a TA in a physics department. There used to be two of us. We lost a guy and I lost 33% of my hours for a 66% cut overall. Considering all of our current problems, seeing Amazon pull out really hurts. Also, our sales tax is 8.25%
People getting more upset doesn't justify double standards.
No no no. There is no scientific method. It's just a silly thing they teach children in school to create a structure around science. But science is structureless as the process of developing science is the process of creating structure in and of itself. There is no structure to science because science is structure. Make sense?
I wish I could Like you post.
We call those modpoints here. ;)
These little glitches aren't excuses for why alarms failed to go off at all. If a second was missed here or there, I'd understand. But the alarms failed to work. What does your code look like if these library updates are what causes this sort of problem? I expect a device to work as intended independent of these small anomalies. The device didn't know it would happen or that it did happen and no desynchronization in the Earth's rotation should cause the alarm system to fail. Nor would the desynchronization event affect the time system outside of being off from "official time" by a couple of seconds.
So let's be honest. The coders at Apple just fucked up hard.
The simple issue is that with a majority-rules system like we have with our current Congress, we'll end up in a binary. Always down to two parties, doesn't matter who they are. If we were to actually function appropriately we parties, we'd have Parliament. But we don't, and it seems the be problematic grouping all of our political ideals into two distinct dichotomies. As if people can't think outside of those to group sets.
Not something I considered but now you've got me hoping. ;)
Or we can have a no-party system and consider political parties to be criminal organizations. That might not be so bad. At least we'd stop arguing about whether the country looks better painted red or blue.
I can't help but agree with you more. I admit upfront that I have pirated a significant number of games. All because the price points are higher than I'd pay. It's not that I wouldn't buy the product, it's that I would never buy the product at what they're asking. Since these Steam sales started, I have purchased a large number of games that I had previously pirated. Yes, these are sales for games I have beaten and have no intention of playing again. This isn't about greed. This isn't about getting stuff for free or cheap. This is about an appropriate consideration of the value that the 20-something demographic puts into games. A bigger demographic than it used to be. A demographic not consisting of soccer moms willing to drop 80 dollars into Mortal Kombat 3 (a number I remember hearing as a kid at a Hollywood Video). I remember that era. I see remnants today. But that era is dying as gamers are growing up.
These publishers wouldn't have seen a cent from me if these sales never occurred. This effect should be appreciated.