Slashdot Mirror


User: JonathanR

JonathanR's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
772
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 772

  1. Re:I never understood this on Flying Faster Without ID · · Score: 1

    So that was one of the other identifying marks that the military used to identify Zarqawi

  2. Re:The Hit on Record Meteorite Hits Norway · · Score: 1

    And since we will all die some day anyway, what would it really matter if the human race was annihilated?

  3. Re:It's how you distribute the energy. on Record Meteorite Hits Norway · · Score: 1

    So it would be better to compare it with the Sedan Nuclear test?

  4. Re:Survival of the Fittest on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 1

    The one day you speak of has occoured numerous times already, as all of my grandparents are now deceased. Do I feel like an asshole because they all contracted a terminal illness and died? No, sad tho' their parting may be, death is part of life, and life is about living, more or less, within the constraints of our life-situation. I accept that at some point I'll contract some illness and die. I won't be expecting the system to harvest embryos for my benefit.

  5. Re:Survival of the Fittest on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how you connect heart murmurs and cretinism, but I'll forgive your ignorance this time.

    My position on this issue is not supporting infanticide or euthanasia, as you would infer. Rather, I'd suggest that growing a bunch of embrios for the sake of harvesting stem cells to patch up weary old human bodies is to me much like buying a new Mercedes Benz as a source of sheetmetal for patching an old Chevvy clunker. I'm questioning the resource utilisation for keeping clapped-out humans alive. At some point you just have to let them die, not develop some lab based sub-race (the embrios) to support the fetally-developed human oligarchy.

  6. Re:Survival of the Fittest on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 1

    To what extent should resources be spent helping a weak individual survive. What is your definition of survival? We will all die at some point.

    Why should our society permit killing some embrios and conversely spend squillions creating others? It's a selfish notion, both ways.

  7. Re:Morality? on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 3, Funny

    But then how does she cash in his life insurance? This is a pretty clear-cut moral decision.

  8. Re:Is it worth it? on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 1

    Oh for some mod points. +5 Insightful

  9. Re:Survival of the Fittest on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Compare the medical costs of pregnancy termination with medical costs of both IV fertilisation practices and supporting pre-term babies. Then think of how much is spent making old people live longer. Somehow I think western society has got it's priorities all wrong.

    Just because it can be done, doesn't mean it should.

  10. Survival of the Fittest on Harvard Scientists to Clone Human Embryos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever happened to survival of the fittest? Is all this technology assisting with breeding a race of second rate homo sapiens?

  11. Re:Why IT? on Starting an Education in IT? · · Score: 1

    As a professional Mechanical Engineer, I almost agree. Much of IT is solving real-world problems of other disciplines, thus IT is (sweeping-generalisation-alert) a support function in most organisations (that aren't IT service organisations).

    I think it is possible to be both a 'real world discipline' engineer and an IT proponent.

    You'd be surprised how many non-IT discipline engineers have no clue how to use computers to make their life simpler. Most don't even know how to use (horror!) MS excel to any decent effect, let alone write themselves any C code to do stuff.

    If you become a pure IT specialist, you'll be forever solving other peoples problems and subsequently bitching & moaning about how they have no clue how a computer works.

    The only problem with this is the frustration of having to work with someone elses kludgy spreadsheet hack (and often are not even worth the "hack" nomenclature).

  12. Re:DO on Starting an Education in IT? · · Score: 1

    +6 Insightful

  13. Re:Oy, the usual hydrogen myths on Hydrogen Fuel Balls from a Gas Pump? · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have thought steam reforming of methane (Natural Gas) was a particularly nasty process, which is how most hydrogen is produced nowdays. More particularly so, given the context of most other petro-chemical processes.

  14. Re:The Fingers-crossed-crew on NASA Hopes Discovery's Move Is Not The Last · · Score: 1

    Why the imperative to continue the human race? What would it really matter if the species homo-sapien became extinct? I'm sure other species would celebrate.

  15. Re:It's not 1984 if everyone can watch everyone on London 2006, Meet London 1984 · · Score: 1

    Wot, toilet bowl cam too?

  16. Re:50% between bonds and money market on Examining the New Bubble · · Score: 1

    Yes, but they're called dividends.

  17. Re:Mod parent up! on Self-Censoring 'Chinese Wikipedia' Launched · · Score: 1

    Yeah, The US's trade deficit and China's trade surplus will eventually cancel out and "poof", both the US and China will disappear. Then you won't be able to distinguish either of them

  18. Re:Fight your own battles. on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    If the AMA and Bar associations are anything like Australian versions, then their MO is to artificially limit the supply of professionals, in order to keep their members' revenues high. The trade unions work against supply/demand balance, by artificially keeping members revenues high, without doing anything to limit labour supply.

  19. Re:Fight your own battles. on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    High personal debt is just bringing tomorrows economy forward to today. As with everything, there are limits, which once reached, bring no further benefits. The only way from there is a correction to long term averages.

  20. Re:Queue the oppologists on Email Bomber Faces Retrial · · Score: 1

    And shouldn't they cue not queue

  21. Re:Just Reading. on Teaching Engineers to Write? · · Score: 1

    Are you posting that on /. for others to proof read?

  22. Re:Duh *bangs head against wall* on New Piracy Loss Estimate · · Score: 1

    Send the studio an invoice for your time spent watching the adverts.

  23. Re:Bill again! on Bill Would Outlaw Digital Receiver Recorders · · Score: 1

    Bill must have been trained by bin Laden. Lots of indications that Bill will be prosecuted, but I don't think that he's been apprehended yet, let alone a trial date set.

  24. Re:Fixing non-problems on Microsoft May Delay Windows Vista Again · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What proportion of people actually upgrade their OS without upgrading hardware? I'd say that MS only has the market share because, for the majority of people, upgrading hardware results in a default of the latest version of MS OS.

  25. Slashdot Account on Deep Brain Stimulation as Depression Treatment · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Isn't this just a subsidised Slashdot account?