Well, it's two wider, isn't it? It's not nineteen. You see, most blokes, you know, will be serving at nineteen. You're on nineteen here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on nineteen on your rack. Where can you go from there? Where?
15 years ago, back when we had CRT's for monitors, this was widely studied. 24 fps was used for movies as it was the minimum frame rate required for people to detect motion. 60 fps was determined to be the rate at which 85% of people could no longer detect frames. I remember one person we tested could detect frames up to about 85 fps. I'm not sure where these other numbers came from (i.e. 120fps, 240 fps, etc).
Being a doubter I had always questioned the ban on electronics. This was until one time we couldn't land due to interference. The landing systems were inoperable. We were unable to land until the stewardess found the person whose device was causing the interference. After the flight I did some research and found that faulty grounding in the plane can result in devices causing interference with the electronics. In our case it wiped out the landing navigation. I doubt this is the case with all planes but I can speak of at least one.
It's not the terrorists that scare me. It's the security checkpoints at the airports. They do any and all things to you and have the backing of the government.
Since when did it become a crime to be a Christian? Why can't people accept that there may be other ways to look at things other than their own? How many times has "science" gotten it wrong? It seem like every time. Scientist keep revising and changing what is true. You have to agree with the latest scientific fad or you are labeled "stupid". Seriously? Are people that afraid of other beliefs that you cast out others because they believe differently? I would think if you truely believed in your beliefs you would feel sympathetic towards others who do not. Using name calling is typically a sign of weakness and a last resort when you don't have any good arguments to make.
The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution states that, when there is a conflict, Federal law always trumps State law. So these measures are a nice gesture but ultimately useless. Too bad, I agree with them in principle, just not in execution.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I looked outside and it looked like there was a huge nuclear reactor in the sky spewing radiation towards the earth. I wonder if that could have anything to do with it. I also heard that Mars, Pluto, the moon and other solar bodies are warming up as well.
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/1997/11.06/BrighteningSuni.html
It's not even our will. It's the governments grab at power. Taxing and censoring the Internet becomes much easier when you can shut sites down at will. We'll see who's going to get voted out next election.
Yes, wholesalers refuse to buy power at twice the cost from a nuclear plant. Thus the nuclear plant is not built as they would not be able to sell the energy. Only plants that can be competitive are built as they are the ones the banks will fund.
Having worked in the power plant industry, the issue with nuclear plants in the US is the amount of regulations. This makes them cost twice as much to build and run as they would bring in. Natural gas followed by coal were the two most profitable, although emmissions regulations are driving the profitability out of these as well. What will be left is whatever the government desides to subsidise.
As a hiring manager for software development, I typically have a need and am looking for a person who can fill that need. The schooling is less important than three things: 1) How quick do you learn / how intelligent are you? 2) How well do you already know the skills? 3) How well do you fit inpersonality wise with the existing culture?
Slashdot Mirror
Well, it's two wider, isn't it? It's not nineteen. You see, most blokes, you know, will be serving at nineteen. You're on nineteen here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on nineteen on your rack. Where can you go from there? Where?
15 years ago, back when we had CRT's for monitors, this was widely studied. 24 fps was used for movies as it was the minimum frame rate required for people to detect motion. 60 fps was determined to be the rate at which 85% of people could no longer detect frames. I remember one person we tested could detect frames up to about 85 fps. I'm not sure where these other numbers came from (i.e. 120fps, 240 fps, etc).
http://www.10paperairplanes.com/how-to-make-paper-airplanes/08-the-champ.html
We will never need more than 256KB.
Being a doubter I had always questioned the ban on electronics. This was until one time we couldn't land due to interference. The landing systems were inoperable. We were unable to land until the stewardess found the person whose device was causing the interference. After the flight I did some research and found that faulty grounding in the plane can result in devices causing interference with the electronics. In our case it wiped out the landing navigation. I doubt this is the case with all planes but I can speak of at least one.
It's not the terrorists that scare me. It's the security checkpoints at the airports. They do any and all things to you and have the backing of the government.
Everything is made out of triangles these days. The question is how many triangles can the sun push.
Since when did it become a crime to be a Christian? Why can't people accept that there may be other ways to look at things other than their own? How many times has "science" gotten it wrong? It seem like every time. Scientist keep revising and changing what is true. You have to agree with the latest scientific fad or you are labeled "stupid". Seriously? Are people that afraid of other beliefs that you cast out others because they believe differently? I would think if you truely believed in your beliefs you would feel sympathetic towards others who do not. Using name calling is typically a sign of weakness and a last resort when you don't have any good arguments to make.
The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution states that, when there is a conflict, Federal law always trumps State law. So these measures are a nice gesture but ultimately useless. Too bad, I agree with them in principle, just not in execution.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
42
Go Rand Paul! It's time we no longer have to be terrorised by the people supposedly protecting us.
I looked outside and it looked like there was a huge nuclear reactor in the sky spewing radiation towards the earth. I wonder if that could have anything to do with it. I also heard that Mars, Pluto, the moon and other solar bodies are warming up as well. http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/1997/11.06/BrighteningSuni.html
It's not even our will. It's the governments grab at power. Taxing and censoring the Internet becomes much easier when you can shut sites down at will. We'll see who's going to get voted out next election.
Did we stop producing ice for the past few hundred years? That would seem to indicate global warming has been happening for quite a while.
It used to be a scientific fact that the earth was flat.
42
Yes, wholesalers refuse to buy power at twice the cost from a nuclear plant. Thus the nuclear plant is not built as they would not be able to sell the energy. Only plants that can be competitive are built as they are the ones the banks will fund.
Having worked in the power plant industry, the issue with nuclear plants in the US is the amount of regulations. This makes them cost twice as much to build and run as they would bring in. Natural gas followed by coal were the two most profitable, although emmissions regulations are driving the profitability out of these as well. What will be left is whatever the government desides to subsidise.
As a hiring manager for software development, I typically have a need and am looking for a person who can fill that need. The schooling is less important than three things: 1) How quick do you learn / how intelligent are you? 2) How well do you already know the skills? 3) How well do you fit inpersonality wise with the existing culture?
They could use the super-slippery material from Harvard University, the one used to end the Ketchup Conundrum.
Use sealed bearings and don't breath the lunar atmosphere?
I love living in the future.
It's good to see them making some good decisions. I was getting very worried at the path they were headed down.
Move along. No intelligence here.
This is extremely impressive. That's better quality than I got on my first TV.