No, it's being used. Medical research, high end computing apps, military usage.
Win 7 just installs the stack. Utilization of IPv6 on Win 7 servers is fairly low, but we even encapsulate IPv4 traffic over IPv6 at major universities and military lines. Mostly I've seen it used on Linux boxes, personally.
I don't know what artificial reality you guys are living in, but IPv6 is running in many research universities worldwide, and on virtually every Linux box in the military and university community.
The fact that it's not being provided by your local residential networks is not our problem.
That said, one of the problems is that, when submitting research papers, you have to deposit your putative genes and all into the common databases, and some researchers have a nasty habit of kicking out a fast paper based on those newly submitted sequences before yours finishes the 38th draft before being published.
As to diagnosis, we're getting fairly good at that, but as another poster confirmed, we can't ascertain it exactly without taking your brain, which we don't do until you die and are no longer using it. In fact, for the best research, we really need to flash-freeze your brain within two hours of death.
Basically, Verizon and Google are working on - even if they deny it publicly - a deal whereby they can charge people "user fees" to get their Google search faster, over the common Internet.
The only way to do that is to "shape" traffic - which is corporate "code" for SLOWING down all traffic for people who don't pay MORE MONEY to use the Internet.
actually, as you know, the UW is one of the primary research universities, especially in the fields of genetics, biochemistry, microbiology, nanotechnology and many other fields. I'm referring to growing actual surgical replacement tissues, to modifying actual genetics - cutting edge techniques - pick up any issue of Science or Nature or check PloS.
My point is that you're suffering from the same lack of foresight that we had back in the 80s about magnetic memory and disk storage. What we think of as "storage" back then and what we think of as "storage" now continue to shift their frames of reference. Most data and information storage techniques continue to evolve. We know that data storage and information storage using DNA and other biochemical processes is not just possible, but provable and can be implemented. That we artificially restrict our concepts of "how" we store and access data, and protect it from degradation/error, and encyrpt it, only shows our own limitations, not the actual limitations of science.
graphite can be produced by biochemical means too.
You have no idea how advanced things are... here at the UW we hold patents on biofilms for solar cells, adaptive taggants that target cancers and glow in the dark to aid in surgical removal of cancerous tissues, and we even grow living tissue.
All DNA is is just a storage system for information that is read by organic mechanisms. It even has self-repair mechanisms and adaptive repair and most biochemical pahtways have 2-3 backups in case stuff happens. A lot of what people used to think was 95 percent noise in DNA is actually overlapping instruction sets activated by silencing and other RNA sequence readers and activators.
You're thinking old tech. Wetware is where it's at.
I just told you that multiple readers can work on multiple strands - how do you think you "think", by the way... it's a biochemical process and your nerve cells are what let you "hear" and "see".
Buffering is not a big deal with access. You are already limited by your perception limits.
The limits on recording may not approach the Dirac effect, but there is a heck of a lot of information, especially with siRNA, miRNA, mRNA, and other modifiers that allow multiple usage of DNA strands to adapt and record.
Music-playing microbes could store more data than there are songs in the world from the beginning of time until now. In each microbe.
When setting up multi-country dev for open source, consider having people from different countries do review, test and check. In this way the final code is usually very good.
The stories I could tell you about buildings that look - in front, as if they were high tech research labs - but inside they're just hollow shells.
Remember, if you're a project manager for an Open Source app, don't just accept the Yes response when you assign tasks - and don't accept the code until you've had someone else validate it functions per spec.
There are some fine and brilliant coders and scientists in China - just be aware that it may be a problem sometimes.
While I've seen China do a lot of innovative things, one thing I've learned from Western scientists working in China is that you should Verify first, before trusting.
Remember, the normal response to any question there is "Yes", even when they intend to do absolutely nothing.
most games are a waste of time. However, we have to realize that games like Sorority Life are a combination of turn-based combat FRP combined with asset/treasure/collection modes.
Similar to the first combat games, where we actually collected DP or HP on each segment of clothes/armor, before Steve Jackson, Mike Williamson and myself moved away from that with less precise hit/bodypart allocation systems that were more fun to play.
Clicking on cows is another form of game - we get that with Happy Island, Island Paradise, FrontierVille, FarmVille. Sometimes the cows are crops/buildings - basically each object is a counter that has levels/size/animation for it representing resources given, rating, value.
Note that a game like SororityLife or any other game can have mini-games inside it that are variants of other games, such as Bejeweled or variants of spelling crosswords or hangman or the Death Pit in Monty Python's Meaning of Life game.
Good simulation game - but it doesn't simulate all the FB games, just a large class of them.
So you confirm that you fail regularly in your attempts at relationships with women? Interesting;)
Sex 5-20 times per week with one women I was common law married to for five years plus one marriage for a year following a year being engaged... no, based on US stats, I've done pretty well.
Whatever, dude, the point is that you project your inner core self into your gaming, when all it is is just a game and pixels at that. The difference between Ms PacMan and PacMan is... the bow and lipstick.
Those who worry about other's sexuality are frequently overly concerned about their own.
I comment a bunch on the Washington Post site, usually clicking on the comments for stories by radical extremists like Charles Krauthammer and other fools who write there.
But I don't usually read more than the first paragraph of their tripe.
So you're saying they rate these fools higher when all they do is infuriate Patriotic Americans?...
Wow.
Flawed business model. If I lived in DC, I'd be using their columns to line bird cages with. And any ads next to them I wouldn't buy stuff from.
Slashdot Mirror
Is that too many geeks think it's funny to talk in high squeaky voices.
I prefer Argon myself.
Our state constitution is very clear on that and many court cases have been won.
So if you're following someone and they happen to go through WA, be aware that any decent lawyer will get the wiretap results invalidated.
No, it's being used. Medical research, high end computing apps, military usage.
Win 7 just installs the stack. Utilization of IPv6 on Win 7 servers is fairly low, but we even encapsulate IPv4 traffic over IPv6 at major universities and military lines. Mostly I've seen it used on Linux boxes, personally.
I don't know what artificial reality you guys are living in, but IPv6 is running in many research universities worldwide, and on virtually every Linux box in the military and university community.
The fact that it's not being provided by your local residential networks is not our problem.
That said, one of the problems is that, when submitting research papers, you have to deposit your putative genes and all into the common databases, and some researchers have a nasty habit of kicking out a fast paper based on those newly submitted sequences before yours finishes the 38th draft before being published.
As to diagnosis, we're getting fairly good at that, but as another poster confirmed, we can't ascertain it exactly without taking your brain, which we don't do until you die and are no longer using it. In fact, for the best research, we really need to flash-freeze your brain within two hours of death.
As we all know, it doesn't just work for Banana Republics, Trust Busting works for the US Too Big To Fail firms.
That much we can learn from monkeys.
They also like to hoard bananas like Sen. Ted Stevens did, and take other monkey's bananas for their own private gain.
Which they return in the form of poop.
Basically, Verizon and Google are working on - even if they deny it publicly - a deal whereby they can charge people "user fees" to get their Google search faster, over the common Internet.
The only way to do that is to "shape" traffic - which is corporate "code" for SLOWING down all traffic for people who don't pay MORE MONEY to use the Internet.
Be afraid.
Be very afraid. ... no ...
More afraid than that.
This is very Unplus Good.
actually, as you know, the UW is one of the primary research universities, especially in the fields of genetics, biochemistry, microbiology, nanotechnology and many other fields. I'm referring to growing actual surgical replacement tissues, to modifying actual genetics - cutting edge techniques - pick up any issue of Science or Nature or check PloS.
My point is that you're suffering from the same lack of foresight that we had back in the 80s about magnetic memory and disk storage. What we think of as "storage" back then and what we think of as "storage" now continue to shift their frames of reference. Most data and information storage techniques continue to evolve. We know that data storage and information storage using DNA and other biochemical processes is not just possible, but provable and can be implemented. That we artificially restrict our concepts of "how" we store and access data, and protect it from degradation/error, and encyrpt it, only shows our own limitations, not the actual limitations of science.
All your data is belong to us.
graphite can be produced by biochemical means too.
You have no idea how advanced things are ... here at the UW we hold patents on biofilms for solar cells, adaptive taggants that target cancers and glow in the dark to aid in surgical removal of cancerous tissues, and we even grow living tissue.
All DNA is is just a storage system for information that is read by organic mechanisms. It even has self-repair mechanisms and adaptive repair and most biochemical pahtways have 2-3 backups in case stuff happens. A lot of what people used to think was 95 percent noise in DNA is actually overlapping instruction sets activated by silencing and other RNA sequence readers and activators.
You're thinking old tech. Wetware is where it's at.
I just told you that multiple readers can work on multiple strands - how do you think you "think", by the way ... it's a biochemical process and your nerve cells are what let you "hear" and "see".
Buffering is not a big deal with access. You are already limited by your perception limits.
RNA splicers can run on multiple copies of DNA segments at the same time, churning out segments and proteins in response to the events.
You do realize your OLED TV is a biological device, don't you?
The limits on recording may not approach the Dirac effect, but there is a heck of a lot of information, especially with siRNA, miRNA, mRNA, and other modifiers that allow multiple usage of DNA strands to adapt and record.
Music-playing microbes could store more data than there are songs in the world from the beginning of time until now. In each microbe.
When setting up multi-country dev for open source, consider having people from different countries do review, test and check. In this way the final code is usually very good.
The stories I could tell you about buildings that look - in front, as if they were high tech research labs - but inside they're just hollow shells.
Remember, if you're a project manager for an Open Source app, don't just accept the Yes response when you assign tasks - and don't accept the code until you've had someone else validate it functions per spec.
There are some fine and brilliant coders and scientists in China - just be aware that it may be a problem sometimes.
While I've seen China do a lot of innovative things, one thing I've learned from Western scientists working in China is that you should Verify first, before trusting.
Remember, the normal response to any question there is "Yes", even when they intend to do absolutely nothing.
This is Facebook, not Diablo.
most games are a waste of time. However, we have to realize that games like Sorority Life are a combination of turn-based combat FRP combined with asset/treasure/collection modes.
Similar to the first combat games, where we actually collected DP or HP on each segment of clothes/armor, before Steve Jackson, Mike Williamson and myself moved away from that with less precise hit/bodypart allocation systems that were more fun to play.
Clicking on cows is another form of game - we get that with Happy Island, Island Paradise, FrontierVille, FarmVille. Sometimes the cows are crops/buildings - basically each object is a counter that has levels/size/animation for it representing resources given, rating, value.
Note that a game like SororityLife or any other game can have mini-games inside it that are variants of other games, such as Bejeweled or variants of spelling crosswords or hangman or the Death Pit in Monty Python's Meaning of Life game.
Good simulation game - but it doesn't simulate all the FB games, just a large class of them.
So you confirm that you fail regularly in your attempts at relationships with women? Interesting ;)
Sex 5-20 times per week with one women I was common law married to for five years plus one marriage for a year following a year being engaged ... no, based on US stats, I've done pretty well.
Whatever, dude, the point is that you project your inner core self into your gaming, when all it is is just a game and pixels at that. The difference between Ms PacMan and PacMan is ... the bow and lipstick.
Those who worry about other's sexuality are frequently overly concerned about their own.
You like to play games where you look at almost-nude males
No I don't. I just don't play games.
Anyway, the games you play are not the way I know that you are gay. I know that you are gay because you have a facebook account.
LOL. Most people do.
Try playing the game, you'll understand.
There's no animation in it. You stick to your FPS games and I'll do what I like.
Do you know how I know that you are gay?
LOL. I'll tell the 40 or so women I've slept with and my two ex-wives what you said.
You're just uptight. You like to play games where you look at almost-nude males - I like to play games where ...
There is no Cow Level.
My character Muffy in Sorority Life has special Paris clothing and hot cars.
Plus I think she's the US Ambassador to the UN or something.
Mostly I use my special powers to beat up French chix tho.
Now excuse me while I go back to clicking on my cows and sheep on Island Paradise and FrontierVille.
I comment a bunch on the Washington Post site, usually clicking on the comments for stories by radical extremists like Charles Krauthammer and other fools who write there.
But I don't usually read more than the first paragraph of their tripe.
So you're saying they rate these fools higher when all they do is infuriate Patriotic Americans? ...
Wow.
Flawed business model. If I lived in DC, I'd be using their columns to line bird cages with. And any ads next to them I wouldn't buy stuff from.