A Manson and Jim Jones Jesus burger! Two cooked patties with a raw patty in the middle covered in tomato sauce and held together with a nail in a serving board.
My boss grew up poor and we got into a horrible argument with him yesterday. Another coworker was dating this girl who was broke and didn't have a computer to finish college.
Is she hot? smart enough to talk to and have anything to offer or is she one of these 'take take take chicks'?
He had 2 spare laptops at home. We both argued he shouldn't give them to her as they are Macs and worth a lot.
Set them up so she can use them and invite her around. No, you can't take them home.
Also it was just 1 date.
Translation: he is a pussy. Grow a set.
It got bad as we were accused of being heartless bastards.
Sounds to me it went like this: 'Hi I'm resonabley hot and if you like my ass and titties you might get to touch them if you let me take this computer home. You'll never see me again because I really despise pussy whipped pussys". Which he is because he has no balls.
There is a difference between being heartless and having enough self respect so that you are not manipulated because you are a male with testosterone. Here is my reason I like to fuck: I have a penis it is that simple. It is not a leash, it's a cock. This is how this conversation works:
M:Yeah, I got a mac you can use do your studies on
F:OMG, you're a life saver, can I use it
M:Sure, come on over and I'll split a pizza with you. I'll probably be chilling watching a movie or something while you study
F:Oh, do you mind if I take it home?
M:I'd prefer not, it has the death star plans on it and my boss would kill me if I let it out of my sight. It's cool if you use it though. I'll be home wednesday, but you'll have to leave around 11 so I can go to sleep.
Now this doesn't neccesarily mean she is going to fuck him but at least she knows he's not a push over and she can choose yah or nah, no pressure and no big deal if she isn't really into him. Rub one out the first few nights before she comes around so you aren't all clingy and desperate. Have some dinner, civilized but not fancy, show her the computer, then just leave her alone and watch TV or something you normally do. Offer some tea, coffee or water. Make sure there is some not too loud back ground noise if the loo is within earshot and it is clean. Comfortable, not fussy. Throw her out when it comes time.
At least he won't be down a laptop and she gets to kick off her studies win-win. Maybe down the track she finds another way and doesn't hang out, or maybe it works for her. If your house doesn't look like a shit hole (get a cleaner in every couple of weeks) and you don't stink (have a shower ffs) she might come back because you're a good option or you might decide you don't like this girl and aren't you glad you didn't hand over a mac just to find out you have no balls and move on anyway.
At the very least a guy like that is going to get some experience talking to her for a little while and seeing if she has anything to offer or is just gold digging. It's an opportunity for sex, if the moment is right or she wants to stay longer, kiss her, then fuck her like a man that has needs. No commitment, it's not love, just a fuck. Nothing heartless about keeping your self respect.
You post casually bypasses the main issue of *radionuclides* being released into the environment from these accidents. pu-239 is fatal at doses of 1 microgram, an iron analogue when presented to a metabolism, is an inhalant in the form of plutonium oxide causing lung cancer and highly water soluble in the form of plutonium chloride and when absorbed in the body causes leukemia. There a plethora of other radionuclides released in these accidents.
You speak of radiation exposure as if it is the main issue. It is not. You speak of *external* radiation exposure as if it is the only thing possible. It is not. Internal radiation exposure from the radionuclides released from these plants occurs from bioconcentration of these radionuclides in the food chain. This progressively increase the likely hood of gestating cancer, passing on transgenic disease from genetic mutation that don't kill the person but damage their reproductive germ and statistical reductions in the birthrate of human beings from failed pregnancies as a long term and permanent consequence of these accidents.
and can even be used to improve health.
From the first paragraph of the article:might provide a useful treatment modality for certain neurodegenerative diseases. Not *can*, *might*. It's not a radiashun health spa where you get a triated water enema and come out feeling superb, it's a medical treatment that may work or it may not work.
If you are genuinely concerned about the environment and climate change, look to ecological conservation groups and leading climate scientists, which uniformly support nuclear.
Based on flawed information supplied to the IPCC by Vatenfal on the energetic returns of nuclear power whilst ignoring the peer reviewed study with contributions from major universities around the world, including CERN.
Uranium mining is in the noise of todays mining activities, and would remain so even if we stopped mining coal.
You have to crush 500tons of rock to extract 1kg of uranium. Acid leech mining dissolves rock and it is pumped to the surface. You choose between a highly energy intensive mining process that creates copious amount of water soluble radium that pollutes water tables or megalitres of radioactive sulfuric acid, which also pollutes water tables. Specifically what do you propose been done with these mine tailings?
It can also be extracted directly from seawater,
Which takes so much energy that it is pointless extracting it in the first place. Specifically which technology does this without using a lot of energy?
and from rare earth mine tailings which also contain thorium.
to power reactors make make a completely new waste stream based on thallium 233
Nuclear fuel is so energy dense that you barely need any at all;
nuclear plants only reach an efficiency of 0.3% so can never extract all of the energy from the uranium
the worlds entire yearly energy demand could be met with byproducts from a single small rare earth mine.
It would seem it is not possible to have a reasoned conversation about the issues with nuclear power without being down modded. If we can even talk about the issues the the likely hood of an accident is closer to %100.
Embrittlement of the reactor and key metal components from Neutron bombardment exposed to radiactive isotopes is the key factor that limits the lifespan of nuclear reactors. These are called "S" class facilities.
In the early phases of the facilities service life (roughly 10 years) is when basis design issues are mostly exposed and shaken out and stabilize for the bulk of the service life of a nuclear reactor facility. In the "old age" (40+ years) of the facility is when the embrittlement of the functional parts of the "S" class facilities makes them more prone to failure. I wonder if this study factors 'for-profit' institutions operating these older facilities by pushing them to their limits and ignoring or actively lobbying against safety improvements, as we saw from TEPCO. Looking at it for that perspective I think the likelyhood of a INES 7 type accident at somewhere like Indian Point or Palo Verde is higher than other plants who operate their processes with more discipline.
Of course the question is whether these utility companies operate these plants if the Price Anderson act wasn't there to take the brunt of the liability of an accident from them. Franly, I'd prefer legislation in place to position the board members of these companies and their families close to the, often very beautiful, places these plants are built. It might be an interesting way to ensure they feel the consequences of any safety related decisions they make and tip the odds in favour of preventing an accident from happening.
South Australia is very progressive on a lot of issues. In terms of a addressing baseload power issues SA has very high reserves of geo-thermal power in the form of Hot Dry Rock however the issue of funding the cable infrastructure to make that energy available as electricity has been something they have been trying to solve for a long time. From my understanding they want to establish alluminium smelters powered by geothermal energy to make it feasible.
You're probably right about them asking for problems by taking those risks however I think this is something they are aware of and endure as one of the issues they encounter in
taking a leadership role.
True if the intensity is too much. The same can be said from industrial air pollution, traffic, the neighbours cooking food that I don't like etc. etc.
Yes cigarette smoke in a car is too strong, but smoke from the neighbours? The smoke won't hurt you, yet you can smell it.
A super soaker full of urine is a reasonable countermeasure. Simply collect the urine and spray it on and around their windows. They can smell it, but it won't hurt them.
There are many smells in the world, and many tastes.
Which is why more people should smoke tobacco, as you won't be able to smell the urine, shit and dead bodies in the city. As a side benefit it would be cover for people smoking weed in public. That way their smoking had a purpose, they smoked for someone else's freedom. Noble tobacco smokers.
In that sense, I would asume that substituting marijana for tobacco, would be an improvement.
Just like with cigarettes, forcing others to smoke passively should not be allowed.
An improvement worthy teaching in schools. Make smoking compulsory and taught in schools because people who don't smoke are not pulling their weight in the hospital system. We need participation.
It's hard work, however it's much easier to recover a deleted file on Windows than it is to recover an encrypted file. *If*, and that's a big if, you knew where it was.
It's also amusing that like most on the American Left
It's amusing that some people think there is an American Left. You have two branches of one political party, Right wing and More Right wing and this is spreading all around the world.
The two party system in general is a complete failure. Even the Westminster system of independence has been devolved into a two party system. The common thing in these systems is politicians seeking power, they make deals so they can secure more power over the populous.
In the meantime structural issues that require actual political skills like diplomacy, compromise and negotiation are absent and issues that affect peoples day to day lives, like infrastructure, hospitals, education and employment are all used as carrots to attract and deceive voters to *more*of*the*same* candidates who bows their head in the church of the corporcracy.
Unless corporate lobbying and funding is removed from the political landscape, nothing will even begin to change, no one will be informed and freedom and democracy will remain an illusion. This is how your vote is made to not matter and that is exactly what the power brokers of this world want.
I switch between languages several times a day, sometimes I use two at once, doesn't everybody who codes? I have a method for understanding the capabilities of a language by implementing some design patterns when I learn a new one, which is pretty fun to do. I have no shame, I am a geek!
Sometimes the features of one language teach you something new that you can apply to other languages. Learning is addictive, it's why I love programming.
Is it just me or does anyone else get the feeling that these odd questions are being asked by recruiters trying to figure out how technologists work?
The question is, why is this a common practice in the US?
Because it is easier to scare people into telling politicians that they want their rights taken away than it is to argue why they should be taken away.
Do they need more people in prison for slave work?
Always. A slave workforce competes with the civilian workforce and drives down wage costs. An all round win win for those with the capital.
Do they get a bonus for case numbers?
Probably.
Do they think catching a few unstable people benefits the society?
No, but they are certainly easier to manipulate than sane normal people who would say "I'm not doing that, are you fucking crazy"
It's considered to be within the spectrum of normal human behaviour so that it doesn't even warrant attention. Perhaps 21st century ideas of "equality" are considered regressive in the 23th century, kind of like the 19th century pushing it's values onto us today?
Slashdot Mirror
Hell, one time I got an ass chewing from my doctor for not having *enough* salt in my blood.
That's quite an...unusual...way of testing for salt in the diet.
I eat plankton...
That's it!
A Manson and Jim Jones Jesus burger! Two cooked patties with a raw patty in the middle covered in tomato sauce and held together with a nail in a serving board.
You're welcome
How would anyone be able to tell? What can be more disgusting than a McDonalds hamburger and fries that looks the same after 6 years?
Eating it.
In Star Trek TNG, captains were red shirts.
DOH, I'm handing in my communicator now.
Is she hot? smart enough to talk to and have anything to offer or is she one of these 'take take take chicks'?
Set them up so she can use them and invite her around. No, you can't take them home.
Translation: he is a pussy. Grow a set.
Sounds to me it went like this: 'Hi I'm resonabley hot and if you like my ass and titties you might get to touch them if you let me take this computer home. You'll never see me again because I really despise pussy whipped pussys". Which he is because he has no balls.
There is a difference between being heartless and having enough self respect so that you are not manipulated because you are a male with testosterone. Here is my reason I like to fuck: I have a penis it is that simple. It is not a leash, it's a cock. This is how this conversation works:
M:Yeah, I got a mac you can use do your studies on
F:OMG, you're a life saver, can I use it
M:Sure, come on over and I'll split a pizza with you. I'll probably be chilling watching a movie or something while you study
F:Oh, do you mind if I take it home?
M:I'd prefer not, it has the death star plans on it and my boss would kill me if I let it out of my sight. It's cool if you use it though. I'll be home wednesday, but you'll have to leave around 11 so I can go to sleep.
Now this doesn't neccesarily mean she is going to fuck him but at least she knows he's not a push over and she can choose yah or nah, no pressure and no big deal if she isn't really into him. Rub one out the first few nights before she comes around so you aren't all clingy and desperate. Have some dinner, civilized but not fancy, show her the computer, then just leave her alone and watch TV or something you normally do. Offer some tea, coffee or water. Make sure there is some not too loud back ground noise if the loo is within earshot and it is clean. Comfortable, not fussy. Throw her out when it comes time.
At least he won't be down a laptop and she gets to kick off her studies win-win. Maybe down the track she finds another way and doesn't hang out, or maybe it works for her. If your house doesn't look like a shit hole (get a cleaner in every couple of weeks) and you don't stink (have a shower ffs) she might come back because you're a good option or you might decide you don't like this girl and aren't you glad you didn't hand over a mac just to find out you have no balls and move on anyway.
At the very least a guy like that is going to get some experience talking to her for a little while and seeing if she has anything to offer or is just gold digging. It's an opportunity for sex, if the moment is right or she wants to stay longer, kiss her, then fuck her like a man that has needs. No commitment, it's not love, just a fuck. Nothing heartless about keeping your self respect.
I'm sorry but this barely looks similar to this.
Yeah, a red shirt would never live long enough to sit in a captains chair.
You post casually bypasses the main issue of *radionuclides* being released into the environment from these accidents. pu-239 is fatal at doses of 1 microgram, an iron analogue when presented to a metabolism, is an inhalant in the form of plutonium oxide causing lung cancer and highly water soluble in the form of plutonium chloride and when absorbed in the body causes leukemia. There a plethora of other radionuclides released in these accidents.
You speak of radiation exposure as if it is the main issue. It is not. You speak of *external* radiation exposure as if it is the only thing possible. It is not. Internal radiation exposure from the radionuclides released from these plants occurs from bioconcentration of these radionuclides in the food chain. This progressively increase the likely hood of gestating cancer, passing on transgenic disease from genetic mutation that don't kill the person but damage their reproductive germ and statistical reductions in the birthrate of human beings from failed pregnancies as a long term and permanent consequence of these accidents.
From the first paragraph of the article:might provide a useful treatment modality for certain neurodegenerative diseases. Not *can*, *might*. It's not a radiashun health spa where you get a triated water enema and come out feeling superb, it's a medical treatment that may work or it may not work.
Based on flawed information supplied to the IPCC by Vatenfal on the energetic returns of nuclear power whilst ignoring the peer reviewed study with contributions from major universities around the world, including CERN.
Uranium mining is in the noise of todays mining activities, and would remain so even if we stopped mining coal.
You have to crush 500tons of rock to extract 1kg of uranium. Acid leech mining dissolves rock and it is pumped to the surface. You choose between a highly energy intensive mining process that creates copious amount of water soluble radium that pollutes water tables or megalitres of radioactive sulfuric acid, which also pollutes water tables. Specifically what do you propose been done with these mine tailings?
It can also be extracted directly from seawater,
Which takes so much energy that it is pointless extracting it in the first place. Specifically which technology does this without using a lot of energy?
and from rare earth mine tailings which also contain thorium.
to power reactors make make a completely new waste stream based on thallium 233
Nuclear fuel is so energy dense that you barely need any at all;
nuclear plants only reach an efficiency of 0.3% so can never extract all of the energy from the uranium
the worlds entire yearly energy demand could be met with byproducts from a single small rare earth mine.
It would seem it is not possible to have a reasoned conversation about the issues with nuclear power without being down modded. If we can even talk about the issues the the likely hood of an accident is closer to %100.
Embrittlement of the reactor and key metal components from Neutron bombardment exposed to radiactive isotopes is the key factor that limits the lifespan of nuclear reactors. These are called "S" class facilities.
In the early phases of the facilities service life (roughly 10 years) is when basis design issues are mostly exposed and shaken out and stabilize for the bulk of the service life of a nuclear reactor facility. In the "old age" (40+ years) of the facility is when the embrittlement of the functional parts of the "S" class facilities makes them more prone to failure. I wonder if this study factors 'for-profit' institutions operating these older facilities by pushing them to their limits and ignoring or actively lobbying against safety improvements, as we saw from TEPCO. Looking at it for that perspective I think the likelyhood of a INES 7 type accident at somewhere like Indian Point or Palo Verde is higher than other plants who operate their processes with more discipline.
Of course the question is whether these utility companies operate these plants if the Price Anderson act wasn't there to take the brunt of the liability of an accident from them. Franly, I'd prefer legislation in place to position the board members of these companies and their families close to the, often very beautiful, places these plants are built. It might be an interesting way to ensure they feel the consequences of any safety related decisions they make and tip the odds in favour of preventing an accident from happening.
Just like everything else than can be.
That RT has become a major source of news that you can't get on most major news channels.
Yes, because they represent the interests of people as opposed to the interests of capital.
South Australia is very progressive on a lot of issues. In terms of a addressing baseload power issues SA has very high reserves of geo-thermal power in the form of Hot Dry Rock however the issue of funding the cable infrastructure to make that energy available as electricity has been something they have been trying to solve for a long time. From my understanding they want to establish alluminium smelters powered by geothermal energy to make it feasible.
You're probably right about them asking for problems by taking those risks however I think this is something they are aware of and endure as one of the issues they encounter in taking a leadership role.
Just cough on them. Then apologize saying the smoke made you cough. I call it a fuccough.
True if the intensity is too much. The same can be said from industrial air pollution, traffic, the neighbours cooking food that I don't like etc. etc.
Yes cigarette smoke in a car is too strong, but smoke from the neighbours? The smoke won't hurt you, yet you can smell it.
A super soaker full of urine is a reasonable countermeasure. Simply collect the urine and spray it on and around their windows. They can smell it, but it won't hurt them.
There are many smells in the world, and many tastes.
Which is why more people should smoke tobacco, as you won't be able to smell the urine, shit and dead bodies in the city. As a side benefit it would be cover for people smoking weed in public. That way their smoking had a purpose, they smoked for someone else's freedom. Noble tobacco smokers.
In that sense, I would asume that substituting marijana for tobacco, would be an improvement.
Just like with cigarettes, forcing others to smoke passively should not be allowed.
An improvement worthy teaching in schools. Make smoking compulsory and taught in schools because people who don't smoke are not pulling their weight in the hospital system. We need participation.
That means you take the infected thing away from any "windows guru"
Kind of like an "oxy moron". I know what you mean I've seen the damage they cause.
It's hard work, however it's much easier to recover a deleted file on Windows than it is to recover an encrypted file. *If*, and that's a big if, you knew where it was.
Seriously, if you're a great programmer then you've got to have at least some degree of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. C and OCD go hand in hand.
The only problem with the acronym for people with OCD is that it is not in alphabetical order.
It's also amusing that like most on the American Left
It's amusing that some people think there is an American Left. You have two branches of one political party, Right wing and More Right wing and this is spreading all around the world.
The two party system in general is a complete failure. Even the Westminster system of independence has been devolved into a two party system. The common thing in these systems is politicians seeking power, they make deals so they can secure more power over the populous.
In the meantime structural issues that require actual political skills like diplomacy, compromise and negotiation are absent and issues that affect peoples day to day lives, like infrastructure, hospitals, education and employment are all used as carrots to attract and deceive voters to *more*of*the*same* candidates who bows their head in the church of the corporcracy.
Unless corporate lobbying and funding is removed from the political landscape, nothing will even begin to change, no one will be informed and freedom and democracy will remain an illusion. This is how your vote is made to not matter and that is exactly what the power brokers of this world want.
I switch between languages several times a day, sometimes I use two at once, doesn't everybody who codes? I have a method for understanding the capabilities of a language by implementing some design patterns when I learn a new one, which is pretty fun to do. I have no shame, I am a geek!
Sometimes the features of one language teach you something new that you can apply to other languages. Learning is addictive, it's why I love programming.
Is it just me or does anyone else get the feeling that these odd questions are being asked by recruiters trying to figure out how technologists work?
The question is, why is this a common practice in the US?
Because it is easier to scare people into telling politicians that they want their rights taken away than it is to argue why they should be taken away.
Do they need more people in prison for slave work?
Always. A slave workforce competes with the civilian workforce and drives down wage costs. An all round win win for those with the capital.
Do they get a bonus for case numbers?
Probably.
Do they think catching a few unstable people benefits the society?
No, but they are certainly easier to manipulate than sane normal people who would say "I'm not doing that, are you fucking crazy"
It's considered to be within the spectrum of normal human behaviour so that it doesn't even warrant attention. Perhaps 21st century ideas of "equality" are considered regressive in the 23th century, kind of like the 19th century pushing it's values onto us today?