That's like saying that an aeroplane doesn't have propellers, and than claiming that you really meant to write jet aeroplane. Pardon my lack of telepathy, but I responded to what you wrote, not what you thought.
FWIW I have found that it's MORE expensive to eat healthy food than it is to eat junk.
If that means paying the premium for microwave ready-meals labelled as low calorie/bio instead of ordinary ones, you might be right. If it means cooking yourself, from basic ingredients, no way.
society as a whole is better off if there are opportunities available to those who cannot compete in the job market based on their (lack of) intelligence.
Sounds like a justification for the existence of lawyers.
republic refers to the structure of it (divided into states within a federal union)
Bullshit. The Republic of Ireland isn't divided into anything like states (provinces yes, but in effect they're barely counties). Belgium is divided into federal regions that have a fair degree of autonomy (even to the extent of speaking different languages), but it's a monarchy.
somebody who had a chronically stupid idea that WAS indeed found to be completely stupid
I've seen this argument many times, it's just a special case of affirming the consequent. Or to put it another way: Sure, they thought Einstein was a crackpot, and he turned out to be a genius. Likewise with Darwin. But just because everyone laughs at someone doesn't mean he's correct. Just ask Bozo the clown.
For every visionary there must be hundreds of delusional nutters and misguided amateurs; but history doesn't remember them, or if it does only as footnotes.
Slashdot Mirror
Do you get wafers with it?
That's like saying that an aeroplane doesn't have propellers, and than claiming that you really meant to write jet aeroplane. Pardon my lack of telepathy, but I responded to what you wrote, not what you thought.
... he can go about his business? Anyway, the Buddha that can be found in wikipedia is not the true Buddha. Or something.
The example you cited is two siblings. It says nothing about what the difference between the IQs of two unrelated people will do over time.
Are you a creationist, by any chance?
The poorest area's what? If you're going to shill for M$, at least do it grammatically, you four-figure fucktard.
If only someone could coin a catchy, pithy word for the phenomenon of coining pithy, catchy words for things.
People weren't that short back then. Heck, they weren't that short in the middle ages. It's just they didn't think about it when they designed things.
If it is, then that's the sunbed industry fucked.
Maybe the tendency to blame things on genes is genetic too.
No, on second thoughts, you probably couldn't.
So for you (and all the other hard of thinking people out there), it's pretty hard to kill someone with a nuddie mag.
For every visionary there must be hundreds of delusional nutters and misguided amateurs; but history doesn't remember them, or if it does only as footnotes.
Strawman argument. Come back when you've learned the difference between speech and an action (singke or double? - Ed).
Er, like whoosh or something.