what a ridiculous point of view, that only a school can provide safety knowledge, including of flammable fuels. Hell, mine didn't. Yes, many "progressive socialist" types in our education system believe only they can do that, but of course they are ivory tower fools who would cut their own fingers off if you gave them a knife and a chunk of wood to whittle. hahahaha!
I have a shocking revelation for you from my experience, uneducated people in third world countries (I have relatives in that situation because of what their countries went through while they were growing up) know that gasoline and diesel fuel are highly flammable, and those with any brains know not to smoke or have open flame while pouring fuel.
Why call that "true cluster deployment", there are many types of clusters and I reject your notion that "shared storage clustering" is the One True Clustering (*snort*). It's a huge administrative burden, and in the real world doesn't deliver its claimed "N-times" performance scaling, and when problems arise a nightmare to troubleshoot. yes, part of my job is to work with Oracle RAC. Instead of going that route, better (cheaper, easier to admin, better performance) to get N times the machine and N times performance SAN, that will whoop RAC's ass any day of the week.
There is no "useless" crap being introduced here, these are higher end features that many need and have been waitnig. Just because you as say a small business or hobbyist or startup venture need a small set of database features, remember there are others who are needing bigger features, and as your needs grow over time so you may need these things too.
You can stick with a particular postgresl version of a distribution that is still getting fixes and patches, for example the postgresql 8.1.9 in Redhat / Centos / Scientific Linux 5.x
Meanwhile, there are applications in big business that need and want the synchronous replication. There are geolocative applications needing nearest neighbor indexing. There are applications that handle multiple character sets that need multiple collations of table data.
I myself have clients that need synchronous replication with a couple stand-by servers, we've been making do with an inferior "bandage application" approach to do the same thing.
News for you, you are a prude. That's fine, but in general people, of the more normal variety, can do whatever the hell they want in a game including "evil" or "naughty" things
Kind of sad commentary on the fucktards who think killing innocent people is fun. Even if it is in a video game, it reflects your values.
So being an actor in a play as "the bad dude", or enjoying a novel about an assassin is bad, or watching a movie about a terrorist is bad, or killing a character you don't like in Sims3 by putting furniture around the pool is bad, or playing Leisure Suit Larry in the Land of the Lounge Lizards (late 80s game, I think) to seduce as many women as possible in an evening is bad? your viewpoint is ridiculous, it reflects your absurd values. Plenty of normal people like escapist entertainment where they get to play or imagine themselves the crazy or bad or naughty or slutty person.
Am-241, while only producing 1/4 the power of Pu-238 for a given volume, will output for centuries with its nearly 500 year half life. Much better for long term missions.
a Pu-238 battery is not a nuclear reactor. It's just a heat source and some thermocouples to make electricity from heat. Pu-238 only gives off alphas which can be stopped by sheet metal, or your skin for that matter.
Not my experience, Bacula is simple. I set it up after one hour of reading and couple hours of work the first time. then did exercises of various types of backups and restores. Then later in the week installed it at client with eight servers who has been using it successfully ever since, including some important restores after some massive employee mistakes wiped out large chunks of data.
actually, no not rich and no house and some industrial hazards nearby including railways to ship dangerous things, but nowhere near the danger of leaking fuel lines. But back to the point at hand, if one lives in city that is lax about building shacks/squatting on private property (or most anywhere else), one can choose to avoid those things which leak flammable or explosive or poisonous liquids or gases. Unless one is trying to take advantage leaks, or intends to make leaks, which I strongly expect is the case here, given much precedent. Failing that, one can avoid walking around the leaky pipe while smoking. Or avoid those dimwits who do. Or not flick butt into pool of fuel. Somewhere along this line we pass from dangerously foolish, roar right on past recklessly stupid, to suicidal and mass homicidal level of imbecility. I frequent places poorer than the capital of Kenya, yet people somehow are smarter about avoiding danger.
CmdrTaco himself posted many dupes, old stories, incorrect headlines, etc. As long as the money from the eyeball clicks keeps coming in, the editors don't care now, CmdrTaco didn't care toward the end of his position either.
In other news, 30 coal miners die each year in the U.S. alone and no one gives a rats ass
There are far more deaths among the *users* of those fuel sources than the producers. In the USA 36,600 deaths from automobiles, 1000 from railroads, 140 from aircraft....and even 1,000 annually of the green bicyclers get slaughtered by those using the fuel to get around. Do you give a rat's ass about that? no? then shaddap...
100 utter and total fools, with no regard for there own life, ran *toward* rather than *away* from a leaking fuel line, to collect a bucket or cup of fuel. Some of these *complete idiots* were even stupid enough to be smoking while collecting the highly flammable fuel, and some topped even that astounding level of moronic sensibility by allowing children to accompany them, when any normal human with a shred of decency in his heart would have at least driven the soon to be doomed youths far away.. A supreme imbecile amongst them threw his glowing cigarette butt into a pool of fuel collecting in a sewer, tragically earning the Darwin award for them all.
There, you bleeding hearts, how do you like my take on the situation?
that's silly, craft did not "totally lose its bearings" nor did it "have to land". they might have needed GPS for particulars of mission if accurate location coordinates wanted, but they don't need GPS to either fly, attack things, snoop, harass the enemy, etc. Airplanes and ships don't need GPS to do their thing; that's true in the military and true in commercial world and true even for lowly amateur pilots with single prop planes. You don't get to operate those things without proving you CAN function without GPS and other electronic aids.
The civilian naval vessels, yeah, it's possible they don't have anything other than GPS.
I wouldn't say such a thing in a room with captains and navigators of commercial ships, might get your lights punched out. They don't rely on GPS, can always navigate "old school yo", same as 150 years ago. They still have their sextants, compasses, charts, chronograph, etc.
nope, sometimes can get a "skip re-entry". that can change orbital inclination under some conditions. for the shuttle orbiter, up to 0.8 degrees change was possible.
you miss the point, the energy required to run one of those is massive compared to the very slight amount of fusion energy that is output. They call that third generation fusion power for a reason.....and we're still working on making generation one work. making aneutronic fusion a viable energy source will require energies and containment far beyond our abilities even if we get d/t to work. I would guess that would be a century out if even possible.
Slashdot Mirror
FUD back at you, when most apps require the Metro, that won't be a useful solution.
what a ridiculous point of view, that only a school can provide safety knowledge, including of flammable fuels. Hell, mine didn't. Yes, many "progressive socialist" types in our education system believe only they can do that, but of course they are ivory tower fools who would cut their own fingers off if you gave them a knife and a chunk of wood to whittle. hahahaha!
I have a shocking revelation for you from my experience, uneducated people in third world countries (I have relatives in that situation because of what their countries went through while they were growing up) know that gasoline and diesel fuel are highly flammable, and those with any brains know not to smoke or have open flame while pouring fuel.
Why call that "true cluster deployment", there are many types of clusters and I reject your notion that "shared storage clustering" is the One True Clustering (*snort*). It's a huge administrative burden, and in the real world doesn't deliver its claimed "N-times" performance scaling, and when problems arise a nightmare to troubleshoot. yes, part of my job is to work with Oracle RAC. Instead of going that route, better (cheaper, easier to admin, better performance) to get N times the machine and N times performance SAN, that will whoop RAC's ass any day of the week.
There is no "useless" crap being introduced here, these are higher end features that many need and have been waitnig. Just because you as say a small business or hobbyist or startup venture need a small set of database features, remember there are others who are needing bigger features, and as your needs grow over time so you may need these things too.
You can stick with a particular postgresl version of a distribution that is still getting fixes and patches, for example the postgresql 8.1.9 in Redhat / Centos / Scientific Linux 5.x
Meanwhile, there are applications in big business that need and want the synchronous replication. There are geolocative applications needing nearest neighbor indexing. There are applications that handle multiple character sets that need multiple collations of table data.
I myself have clients that need synchronous replication with a couple stand-by servers, we've been making do with an inferior "bandage application" approach to do the same thing.
News for you, you are a prude. That's fine, but in general people, of the more normal variety, can do whatever the hell they want in a game including "evil" or "naughty" things
Intel and AMD are both massively lagging behind in the state of the art. PPC whoops their ass
Kind of sad commentary on the fucktards who think killing innocent people is fun. Even if it is in a video game, it reflects your values.
So being an actor in a play as "the bad dude", or enjoying a novel about an assassin is bad, or watching a movie about a terrorist is bad, or killing a character you don't like in Sims3 by putting furniture around the pool is bad, or playing Leisure Suit Larry in the Land of the Lounge Lizards (late 80s game, I think) to seduce as many women as possible in an evening is bad? your viewpoint is ridiculous, it reflects your absurd values. Plenty of normal people like escapist entertainment where they get to play or imagine themselves the crazy or bad or naughty or slutty person.
compared to the rest of the craft, weight is negligible in any case
so do I, and for production server I only run packages, but we love Debian and have on our workstations/laptops too, so let's boogie!!
./configure --with-gnu-ld --with-python --with-perl /usr/local/pgsql/data /usr/local/pgsql/data
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres -D /usr/local/pgsql/data >logfile 2>&1 &
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/createdb test
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql test
lsb_release -a
LSB Version: core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Release: 6.0.2
Codename: squeeze
sudo apt-get install libreadline6-dev zlib1g-dev python-dev libperl-dev
tar xvfz postgresql-9.1.0.tar.gz
cd postgresql-0.1.0.tar.gz
make
sudo make install
sudo adduser postgres
sudo mkdir
sudo chown postgres
su - postgres
psql (9.1.0)
Type "help" for help.
test=# select * from pg_database;
datname datdba encoding | datcollate datctype |datistemplate dat
allowconn datconnlimit datlastsysoid datfrozenxid dattablespace
datac
template1 10 6 en_US.UTF-8
template0 10 6 en_US.UTF-8
postgres 10 6 en_US.UTF-8
test 10 6 en_US.UTF-8
(4 rows)
test=#
How about a probe that can remain electrically fully powered for 50 years? Pu-238 will have 66% of original power, but am-241 will be 93%.
after 25 years, you'll find your pu-238 battery is down to 80% of its original output, but the am-241 is still 96%.
actually, that would be far beyond their abilities to produce, and at any rate useless for a bomb. while fissionable isn't fissile.
Am-241, while only producing 1/4 the power of Pu-238 for a given volume, will output for centuries with its nearly 500 year half life. Much better for long term missions.
a Pu-238 battery is not a nuclear reactor. It's just a heat source and some thermocouples to make electricity from heat. Pu-238 only gives off alphas which can be stopped by sheet metal, or your skin for that matter.
Not my experience, Bacula is simple. I set it up after one hour of reading and couple hours of work the first time. then did exercises of various types of backups and restores. Then later in the week installed it at client with eight servers who has been using it successfully ever since, including some important restores after some massive employee mistakes wiped out large chunks of data.
actually, no not rich and no house and some industrial hazards nearby including railways to ship dangerous things, but nowhere near the danger of leaking fuel lines. But back to the point at hand, if one lives in city that is lax about building shacks/squatting on private property (or most anywhere else), one can choose to avoid those things which leak flammable or explosive or poisonous liquids or gases. Unless one is trying to take advantage leaks, or intends to make leaks, which I strongly expect is the case here, given much precedent. Failing that, one can avoid walking around the leaky pipe while smoking. Or avoid those dimwits who do. Or not flick butt into pool of fuel. Somewhere along this line we pass from dangerously foolish, roar right on past recklessly stupid, to suicidal and mass homicidal level of imbecility. I frequent places poorer than the capital of Kenya, yet people somehow are smarter about avoiding danger.
CmdrTaco himself posted many dupes, old stories, incorrect headlines, etc. As long as the money from the eyeball clicks keeps coming in, the editors don't care now, CmdrTaco didn't care toward the end of his position either.
some illegally built their shacks right over the pipeline in an industrial area, yes.
In other news, 30 coal miners die each year in the U.S. alone and no one gives a rats ass
There are far more deaths among the *users* of those fuel sources than the producers. In the USA 36,600 deaths from automobiles, 1000 from railroads, 140 from aircraft....and even 1,000 annually of the green bicyclers get slaughtered by those using the fuel to get around. Do you give a rat's ass about that? no? then shaddap...
100 utter and total fools, with no regard for there own life, ran *toward* rather than *away* from a leaking fuel line, to collect a bucket or cup of fuel. Some of these *complete idiots* were even stupid enough to be smoking while collecting the highly flammable fuel, and some topped even that astounding level of moronic sensibility by allowing children to accompany them, when any normal human with a shred of decency in his heart would have at least driven the soon to be doomed youths far away.. A supreme imbecile amongst them threw his glowing cigarette butt into a pool of fuel collecting in a sewer, tragically earning the Darwin award for them all.
There, you bleeding hearts, how do you like my take on the situation?
that's silly, craft did not "totally lose its bearings" nor did it "have to land". they might have needed GPS for particulars of mission if accurate location coordinates wanted, but they don't need GPS to either fly, attack things, snoop, harass the enemy, etc. Airplanes and ships don't need GPS to do their thing; that's true in the military and true in commercial world and true even for lowly amateur pilots with single prop planes. You don't get to operate those things without proving you CAN function without GPS and other electronic aids.
The civilian naval vessels, yeah, it's possible they don't have anything other than GPS.
I wouldn't say such a thing in a room with captains and navigators of commercial ships, might get your lights punched out. They don't rely on GPS, can always navigate "old school yo", same as 150 years ago. They still have their sextants, compasses, charts, chronograph, etc.
nope, sometimes can get a "skip re-entry". that can change orbital inclination under some conditions. for the shuttle orbiter, up to 0.8 degrees change was possible.
you miss the point, the energy required to run one of those is massive compared to the very slight amount of fusion energy that is output. They call that third generation fusion power for a reason.....and we're still working on making generation one work. making aneutronic fusion a viable energy source will require energies and containment far beyond our abilities even if we get d/t to work. I would guess that would be a century out if even possible.
the worse that can happen with gen iv reactor is it gets tripped offline, pissing off the stockholders.