of course, replication without automation has been around even longer. My father worked in large U.S. tool and die maker that routinely used their milling machines to make more milling machines, with a lot of blood, sweat and tears of very skilled machinists. Amazing what they did before CNC, complex curves by various tricks of the trade.
ignorant point of view, tech been used by industry for decades. As it becomes within reach of home user many things are possible. I was once manager of a group that made power switching systems for buildings and military installations, and whenever Motorola would go into prototyping mode for new cell phone lines all my projects for transfers switch enclosure would get backed up, all the mom & pop prototyping shops for miles around Chicago would be backed up.
in the 19th century, they also had tin foil that could be cut out and adhered to a sheet of paper or fabric or wood or plaster wall......god damn, this article's "invention" is so fucking banal
Metal antenna can be made cheaper than their silly exotic inks, and are far more durable. For a few bucks, one can make a homemade conductive ink with graphite, fixer and solvent, that's an old kid's experiment from decades ago, can brush that stuff on clothing or paper or a wall and use as antenna or as wires to connect circuit elements. a bit more versatile than this article's ivory tower dweebs and their complicated way of making something less useful, more expensive, less durable....I give this ten RepRaps on a scale of pseudo-geek stupidity
in the 19th century they had pencils that could put graphite on paper, you can draw your very own antenna (or circuit conductors) for less than ten cents of materials. You can make your own conductive ink too. These things have been part of fun science experiments for kids for decades, I did them 35 years ago. Steam engines are thousands of years old, by the way.
more broadly, so does every conductor in an RF field. We'd better outlaw file cabinets, metal kitchen utensils, pocket change and reinforced concrete buildings.
Gee, an antenna converts radio waves to AC. This phenomenon has been quite well known since the 19th century.
For something a little more modern, and a whole lot better than a fucking printed antenna, you can use a metal fractal antenna for wide band coverage.
Don't just throw an abbreviation such as UAV out there, without putting its words in parenthesis (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle). UAV can also stand for other things, like Upper Atmospheric Vehicle. Most TLA (three letter acronyms) are overloaded (TLA also means Two Letter Acronym)
No commercial database system fully implements the relational model, because parts are absurd for real world use. The tables of the relational model are a minuscule subset of the possible hierarchies, not the upside down world view you seem to hold, and the relational systems show their limitations in very poor query response against multiple levels of the data structures. The AI systems of which I speak have their recent origin in the late 90s, unlike the fossilized 60s systems (and moreover the ancient 1970s relational model) you mention. You are an advocate because that's all you know.
What a cowardly waste of money. A lawyer's reply denying wrongdoing, promising counter-suit for false allegations and expenses incurred thereof, is the way to go.
You must have limited experience, relational model fits only set-based data well. There are plenty of hierarchical data structures for which the relational model is a terrible fit and give abysmal performance for both storage time and queries. I've seen this time and again in my three decades of working with relational databases. A client of mine has been working with medical AI systems for a few years, one early discover was relational model is absolutely an inferior representation for most knowledge base ontologies,
it doesn't work that way in a police state. It won't matter what those in favour do, dirt will be collected on everyone. Your hypothetical sheep lover only gets exposed if he falls out of favour.
It is you who have limited exposure with java if you haven't run into horrendous portability issues (out of the blue, ever use jaxp on weblogic for ppc?), or the backwards incompatibility issues between versions ( better check out that list for this latest release, by the way). Scalability is purely a matter of architecture, not language choice. I've worked on a fair share of massive code base projects. My choice of silly words for the IBM drones is just a nice way of warning about the consulting sewer that eats time, money and project deadlines, I'm 47 and you're welcome.
haha, ruby more a hobby at time I chose nick, still consider it a fun language though for a living have had to use many others. Been doing mostly python with C libraries as of late.
and other kicker that's on topic, in 1969 she won the inaugural "computer sciences man of the year" award from the Data Processing Management Association. uh huih, IT doesn't have gender bias....
But she had a PhD in mathematics from Yale; not your average person, male or female. She did more than develop successful programming language, she conceived of the compiler in an era of jump-wire programming, that's programming as we know it. And moreover the intention of the design of her language was to have something of which an intelligent non-programmer could follow the explanation as a simple quasi-english. And though we mock the successor, COBOL, of her language (which she also help design), remember that unlike most languages today it allows one to exactly specify representation in storage and disk, while now we struggle with portability issues largely revolving around lack of that.
The person who first conceived of the compiler (and yes built some too) was a woman (Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper). Anyone who programs in a language, even symbolic assembly, instead of op codes should thank her.
That said, where are all these women? Not at my company, not at my clients which are huge multi-billion dollar operations.....there are some IT women, but not many, less than 5%. I always thought it was because women were smarter about the big picture and gravitated to better paying things like accounting (the CPAs and business management women I've known for almost my whole life are pulling down way more than me now)
Women are no different than men, a group of women will have misandry, chauvinism, sexism, stereotypes, and desire superiority instead of equality. This fact renders 99% of feminist rants, and rants on their behalf, as a hypocritical pile of B.S.
Slashdot Mirror
of course, replication without automation has been around even longer. My father worked in large U.S. tool and die maker that routinely used their milling machines to make more milling machines, with a lot of blood, sweat and tears of very skilled machinists. Amazing what they did before CNC, complex curves by various tricks of the trade.
ignorant point of view, tech been used by industry for decades. As it becomes within reach of home user many things are possible. I was once manager of a group that made power switching systems for buildings and military installations, and whenever Motorola would go into prototyping mode for new cell phone lines all my projects for transfers switch enclosure would get backed up, all the mom & pop prototyping shops for miles around Chicago would be backed up.
in the 19th century, they also had tin foil that could be cut out and adhered to a sheet of paper or fabric or wood or plaster wall......god damn, this article's "invention" is so fucking banal
Metal antenna can be made cheaper than their silly exotic inks, and are far more durable. For a few bucks, one can make a homemade conductive ink with graphite, fixer and solvent, that's an old kid's experiment from decades ago, can brush that stuff on clothing or paper or a wall and use as antenna or as wires to connect circuit elements. a bit more versatile than this article's ivory tower dweebs and their complicated way of making something less useful, more expensive, less durable....I give this ten RepRaps on a scale of pseudo-geek stupidity
in the 19th century they had pencils that could put graphite on paper, you can draw your very own antenna (or circuit conductors) for less than ten cents of materials. You can make your own conductive ink too. These things have been part of fun science experiments for kids for decades, I did them 35 years ago. Steam engines are thousands of years old, by the way.
more broadly, so does every conductor in an RF field. We'd better outlaw file cabinets, metal kitchen utensils, pocket change and reinforced concrete buildings.
Gee, an antenna converts radio waves to AC. This phenomenon has been quite well known since the 19th century. For something a little more modern, and a whole lot better than a fucking printed antenna, you can use a metal fractal antenna for wide band coverage.
really, what model? I"ve only seen tens of milliwatt chips.
Don't just throw an abbreviation such as UAV out there, without putting its words in parenthesis (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle). UAV can also stand for other things, like Upper Atmospheric Vehicle. Most TLA (three letter acronyms) are overloaded (TLA also means Two Letter Acronym)
No commercial database system fully implements the relational model, because parts are absurd for real world use. The tables of the relational model are a minuscule subset of the possible hierarchies, not the upside down world view you seem to hold, and the relational systems show their limitations in very poor query response against multiple levels of the data structures. The AI systems of which I speak have their recent origin in the late 90s, unlike the fossilized 60s systems (and moreover the ancient 1970s relational model) you mention. You are an advocate because that's all you know.
a vastly smaller number of people than will be put out of work by them, by a factor of thousands at least
you should have noticed by now the Democrats are also the bitches of the Robber Barons; we have oligarchy
What a cowardly waste of money. A lawyer's reply denying wrongdoing, promising counter-suit for false allegations and expenses incurred thereof, is the way to go.
You must have limited experience, relational model fits only set-based data well. There are plenty of hierarchical data structures for which the relational model is a terrible fit and give abysmal performance for both storage time and queries. I've seen this time and again in my three decades of working with relational databases. A client of mine has been working with medical AI systems for a few years, one early discover was relational model is absolutely an inferior representation for most knowledge base ontologies,
oh, there were Tea Party members on this panel? do you have their names?
I have confidence in the next generation when it comes to despicable habits, democrats will continue to fantasize; Republicans will pay to do it.
it doesn't work that way in a police state. It won't matter what those in favour do, dirt will be collected on everyone. Your hypothetical sheep lover only gets exposed if he falls out of favour.
Did you know for most financial analysis applications compiled COBOL will run faster than C?
It is you who have limited exposure with java if you haven't run into horrendous portability issues (out of the blue, ever use jaxp on weblogic for ppc?), or the backwards incompatibility issues between versions ( better check out that list for this latest release, by the way). Scalability is purely a matter of architecture, not language choice. I've worked on a fair share of massive code base projects. My choice of silly words for the IBM drones is just a nice way of warning about the consulting sewer that eats time, money and project deadlines, I'm 47 and you're welcome.
haha, ruby more a hobby at time I chose nick, still consider it a fun language though for a living have had to use many others. Been doing mostly python with C libraries as of late.
and other kicker that's on topic, in 1969 she won the inaugural "computer sciences man of the year" award from the Data Processing Management Association. uh huih, IT doesn't have gender bias....
But she had a PhD in mathematics from Yale; not your average person, male or female. She did more than develop successful programming language, she conceived of the compiler in an era of jump-wire programming, that's programming as we know it. And moreover the intention of the design of her language was to have something of which an intelligent non-programmer could follow the explanation as a simple quasi-english. And though we mock the successor, COBOL, of her language (which she also help design), remember that unlike most languages today it allows one to exactly specify representation in storage and disk, while now we struggle with portability issues largely revolving around lack of that.
The person who first conceived of the compiler (and yes built some too) was a woman (Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper). Anyone who programs in a language, even symbolic assembly, instead of op codes should thank her.
That said, where are all these women? Not at my company, not at my clients which are huge multi-billion dollar operations.....there are some IT women, but not many, less than 5%. I always thought it was because women were smarter about the big picture and gravitated to better paying things like accounting (the CPAs and business management women I've known for almost my whole life are pulling down way more than me now)
Women are no different than men, a group of women will have misandry, chauvinism, sexism, stereotypes, and desire superiority instead of equality. This fact renders 99% of feminist rants, and rants on their behalf, as a hypocritical pile of B.S.
Just about anything else, in my broad experience with over a dozen languages and even more hardware/OS platforms