sorry. my company runs a recruiting division. You realize for any one real job there are a dozen other recruiters who see it and post something slightly different, in the hopes that if a candidate contacts them they can then "sell" the contact to what they hope is the original job source? all those dice and monster listings are mostly that type of bullshit virtual job. It's a huge mistake to assume Dice listings indicate actual demand or percent of industry use.
no, the point was the particular composites Boeing has made have more problems than other smaller aircraft's.
and let's deal with your Hollywood inspired total misconceptions. the truth is, contrary to Hollywood movies, you can shoot a jet's fuselage full of holes with handgun and no one will die and the cabin won't even depressurize, the pressure system can easily compensate for that . You can shoot a window and no one will be sucked out "Goldfinger" style. That's why air marshalls use standard ammo and not frangible "safety slugs".
that meme only applies to stress puppies. I've noticed sales and marketing and most executives live that way, shrieking and arms flapping and spittle flying over every minute incident. sucks to be them, but then they exist solely for the entertainment of normal level-headed people.
didn't notice audio problems in my Ubuntu machines. ha, some of us are more focused on tasks to not be running two multimedia apps at once. were you playing WoW at the same time too? kids these days.
what till he finds out all the virgins in paradise were all porked out thousands of years ago, what the faithful get now is refurbished virgins. Kind of like retreads on a truck tire.
not error, misconception. Engineers and scientists hate those. Simplifying for a general audience while still educating is a grand thing, but care to be accurate still taken. So be glad we give a shit,
but it is indeed based on assumptions, and the actual parent post is in the scientific spirit, while replies such as yours are in the "prestigious people said so, thus it must be true" category. If you delve to the root of the generally accepted age of the earth, you will find statement such as "The best age for the Earth comes not from dating individual rocks but by considering the Earth and meteorites as part of the same evolving system in which the isotopic composition of lead, specifically the ratio of lead-207 to lead-206 changes over time owing to the decay of radioactive uranium-235 and uranium-238".
in other words, most of solar system considered to have about the same age (an assumption with some evidence suggesting it likely is true), and the decay of isotopes used to date not being affected by any outside source during that time (another assumption with good evidence, but perhaps unknown forces in Universe modified decay rates at certain times?)
no, it doesn't take any *useful* concepts from either of those languages. It's merely a weakly typed semi-OO (all objects are associative array, ew) langauge with a truly crappy implementation of closures as inner functions.
now that's funny, calling a middle management role a "leader", they are more administrative assistants than anything else. most of their roles used to be done by someone called "head secretary or "office manager"
doctor 1 (proud member of clay county illinois kkk): "these niggers score low on standardized IQ tests and talk funny, must be mentally ill. I recommend we euthanize!"
doctor 2 (proud member of republican party in L.A.): "these beaners don't talk like regular people, and dress weird on religious holidays. must be mentally ill. I recommend we euthanize!"
And some panel gets to judge who has "sound mind" or not? Someone disagrees with the current fashionable consensus of the very political scientific community, they're judged insane? Or the current fashionable consensus of the the very political scientific community gets proved wrong, so we should put down all those scientists and their politician activists who used the stuff to promote their agenda?
most of what bloggers do is "editorial comment". when I write opinion I link to the original source. if a popular blogging site does that, it helps the news organization. One way "the press" is kept in line and alternate viewpoints presented (most news places have a "slant" or agenda to the way political or religious news is presented.
a good cartridge recycling outfit will clean the nozzles, and brag and be happy to show the equipment. clogged nozzles plus heating makes the ink "explode" out the breathing holes. never had a problem with my recycled cartridges
no wailing, the complaint of "climatologists" from 1992 to 2005 was that Antarctica was gaining weight because of global warming causing increased precipitation. Now they want to whine when they claim its losing.
but some of us have memories. over last ten years, we remember when there was increased rain and hurricane intensity and they cooked their climate models to say that's because of global warming. then there was drought and they cooked their models again and said see, it's because of global warming. then there was drought in some places and rain in others, and once again they came forth with new models to prove that was because of global warming.
where is your evidence of "anthropogenic change", you are aware we are now at 1934 levels of average global temperature and *falling*. Why is the scientific method and uncooked data so hard for the climate alarmists to understand?
And sea levels have been rising for the past 10,000 years, for most of that far more rapidly than today, good thing the rate decreased a couple thousand years ago. Again, what is so hard to understand?
And the Antarctic ice has been *building* since the 1960s, save for on the peninsula (half of one percent of the land mass) the alarmists have cherry-picked as their "poles are melting" wailing sound bite.
the alarmists must massage and model and cook the books, then they understand
Slashdot Mirror
sorry. my company runs a recruiting division. You realize for any one real job there are a dozen other recruiters who see it and post something slightly different, in the hopes that if a candidate contacts them they can then "sell" the contact to what they hope is the original job source? all those dice and monster listings are mostly that type of bullshit virtual job. It's a huge mistake to assume Dice listings indicate actual demand or percent of industry use.
no, the point was the particular composites Boeing has made have more problems than other smaller aircraft's.
and let's deal with your Hollywood inspired total misconceptions. the truth is, contrary to Hollywood movies, you can shoot a jet's fuselage full of holes with handgun and no one will die and the cabin won't even depressurize, the pressure system can easily compensate for that . You can shoot a window and no one will be sucked out "Goldfinger" style. That's why air marshalls use standard ammo and not frangible "safety slugs".
that meme only applies to stress puppies. I've noticed sales and marketing and most executives live that way, shrieking and arms flapping and spittle flying over every minute incident. sucks to be them, but then they exist solely for the entertainment of normal level-headed people.
didn't notice audio problems in my Ubuntu machines. ha, some of us are more focused on tasks to not be running two multimedia apps at once. were you playing WoW at the same time too? kids these days.
small warplanes, tactical fighters. The issue is the size of the components, plagued with uniformity problems for years.
rather an achievement, in between times the airframe and primary structure cracks and it falls out of the sky.
no worries, the sky won't fall in 2012 either, the earth will break up and fall into the sky.
what till he finds out all the virgins in paradise were all porked out thousands of years ago, what the faithful get now is refurbished virgins. Kind of like retreads on a truck tire.
not error, misconception. Engineers and scientists hate those. Simplifying for a general audience while still educating is a grand thing, but care to be accurate still taken. So be glad we give a shit,
but it is indeed based on assumptions, and the actual parent post is in the scientific spirit, while replies such as yours are in the "prestigious people said so, thus it must be true" category. If you delve to the root of the generally accepted age of the earth, you will find statement such as "The best age for the Earth comes not from dating individual rocks but by considering the Earth and meteorites as part of the same evolving system in which the isotopic composition of lead, specifically the ratio of lead-207 to lead-206 changes over time owing to the decay of radioactive uranium-235 and uranium-238".
in other words, most of solar system considered to have about the same age (an assumption with some evidence suggesting it likely is true), and the decay of isotopes used to date not being affected by any outside source during that time (another assumption with good evidence, but perhaps unknown forces in Universe modified decay rates at certain times?)
that's better than a mean, horned rinocryte tilting at you
no, it doesn't take any *useful* concepts from either of those languages. It's merely a weakly typed semi-OO (all objects are associative array, ew) langauge with a truly crappy implementation of closures as inner functions.
you can say "I'm not that guy, I'm sexconker on slashdot". everything will be fine then
not quite, the various javascript,Ejscript,ActionScript are dialects of it, which means it has significant variations from the standard.
does anthing use the real ECMAScript.
also, geek card not required, language is a pathetic throwback to 1980s c++ type language.
now that's funny, calling a middle management role a "leader", they are more administrative assistants than anything else. most of their roles used to be done by someone called "head secretary or "office manager"
Bush and Cheney indeed had forced people into special centers, where some were given "treatment", some of a medical nature.
exactly:
doctor 1 (proud member of clay county illinois kkk): "these niggers score low on standardized IQ tests and talk funny, must be mentally ill. I recommend we euthanize!"
doctor 2 (proud member of republican party in L.A.): "these beaners don't talk like regular people, and dress weird on religious holidays. must be mentally ill. I recommend we euthanize!"
And some panel gets to judge who has "sound mind" or not? Someone disagrees with the current fashionable consensus of the very political scientific community, they're judged insane? Or the current fashionable consensus of the the very political scientific community gets proved wrong, so we should put down all those scientists and their politician activists who used the stuff to promote their agenda?
1982 called and wants your signature about 2019 back.
most of what bloggers do is "editorial comment". when I write opinion I link to the original source. if a popular blogging site does that, it helps the news organization. One way "the press" is kept in line and alternate viewpoints presented (most news places have a "slant" or agenda to the way political or religious news is presented.
a good cartridge recycling outfit will clean the nozzles, and brag and be happy to show the equipment. clogged nozzles plus heating makes the ink "explode" out the breathing holes. never had a problem with my recycled cartridges
my Ubuntu 9.10 does that too. helpful when I plug in my usb camera too
no wailing, the complaint of "climatologists" from 1992 to 2005 was that Antarctica was gaining weight because of global warming causing increased precipitation. Now they want to whine when they claim its losing.
http://www.k8science.org/news/news.cfm?art=1773
but some of us have memories. over last ten years, we remember when there was increased rain and hurricane intensity and they cooked their climate models to say that's because of global warming. then there was drought and they cooked their models again and said see, it's because of global warming. then there was drought in some places and rain in others, and once again they came forth with new models to prove that was because of global warming.
where is your evidence of "anthropogenic change", you are aware we are now at 1934 levels of average global temperature and *falling*. Why is the scientific method and uncooked data so hard for the climate alarmists to understand?
And sea levels have been rising for the past 10,000 years, for most of that far more rapidly than today, good thing the rate decreased a couple thousand years ago. Again, what is so hard to understand?
And the Antarctic ice has been *building* since the 1960s, save for on the peninsula (half of one percent of the land mass) the alarmists have cherry-picked as their "poles are melting" wailing sound bite.
the alarmists must massage and model and cook the books, then they understand
maybe he's a pirate, then it makes sense