The reverse is true to tho. Some attempt suicide- regret it then-- but then attempt suicide again later.
It depends on the reason. Is life shitty? Just lost your child? Just got fire?
Or is your brain just shitty? Constant suicidal impulses even tho life is going well? On a drug that enhances those impulses? Always in pain? Always depressed regardless of medication? Always feel like life is pointless even when nothing is wrong?
Sometimes the problem is chemical and there is little we can do to help the people. Sometimes, it's a permanent solution to a temporary problem and we can help those people.
And as you say, sometimes attempting and really facing death makes the person realize they don't want to die.
Also, a lot of suicide decisions are based on impulses. There are many stories of people who took a suicidal action and then regretted doing so. Like the one about people in the emergency room screaming they want to live after they shot themselves or the guy who jumped off a bridge and realized the second after he did so that he wanted to live.
For all we know, that day was like any other. The co-pilot went to work thinking he was handling it. The pilot left the cabin and the co-pilot was unexpectedly overpowered by the urge to kill himself and he locked the door. No planning necessary.
On the parent topic- yes I think they should video and that video should be checked when a plane crashes or has an incident but wiped otherwise when a plane lands without incident.
100 day moving average. Some folks use the 100 day exponential moving average. Results are similar. They tend to get you out of the market for the worst dips - and get you back in before missing too much of the rise. But-- you should never get out 100%. It's more like reducing to 25% invested (maybe 20%). Very hard emotionally to put money back in if you go to 0% in. Scaling up an existing position is much easier.
Unless you are in 15% of jobs- you'll be forced to retire.
Good thing is, worst case you'll get about 85% of your social security benefits. This could be fixed if they raised the limit to 500k salary and raised the tax by 1%. Pretty small change so the problem is partially theatrics.
Bad thing is, those will only cover about 70% of your needs so you will need something to fill that gap. Medicare looks in trouble. It could be fixed if the U.S. offered to pay for medical school in return for lower cost service as germany does to doctors. And if we broke the medical school cartel and ramped up the number of doctors like we did during world war 2.
Save hard- as in 50%. I did and was able to retire at 51- not on social security for another 16 to 19 years.
Another stock market decline is coming soon (probably in calendar 2015). Hopefully 20-30%- but it could be another 50% hit. When the 100dma crosses back above the 300dma again after the bottom- that's when you put the money in and let it rise for years without having to do anything. That will multiply your savings.
So California Pacific lays off 500 existing IT workers to replace them with H1B workers who will be paid 2/3 the cost, forces the existing workers to train their H1B Infosys replacements if the u.s. workers want their severance- and forces them to sign NDA's if they want their full severance.
And people wonder why millenials are doing poorly in this kind of environment. California Pacific's layoff seems blatantly illegal (how can you say you need H1B's because you can't find american workers with the skill set when you are LAYING OFF EXISTING WORKERS to replace them with H1B's????) but many other companies are doing the same thing by eliminating jobs at site "A" and immediately starting up the jobs at site "B".
Look- if the companies were foreign companies- we might protect workers or at least get lower prices. But as it is we are expected to pay full prices for the product here while the company uses discount labor.
Here is a blatant obvious case-- will someone do something about this? At least the conservative talk radio is finally mad about the issue. In the past it was only the democrats. How many jobs have to go before something is done?
Why enter a field when you are directly competing with people who can go home and live well on $15k a year?
Aye... sort of irritating that the article on California Pacific laying off workers to replace them with H1B's from Infosys doesn't get approved for anyone submitting it and this gets approved twice. Laying off u.s. workers to replace them with H1B's. That sounds directly illegal and could be a tipping point in the struggle against H1B's since conservative talk radio is riled up over it too for a change.
fundamentally I share your pessimism tho for different reasons. Short of getting the population down to under 5 billion (and 11 billion is looking more likely), it's going to end badly. The particular cause is the only question.
But... on a day to day basis, LED bulbs are a win, win, win. High quality light, energy consumption so low they pay off in under a year under normal usage, and instant on.
I also have to say that the possibility for nuclear power is over. It's never been a significant share of world power generation and while nuclear is great- nuclear plus humans has a terrible record- essentially a major accident every 10 to 12 years with a resulting loss of use of real estate for hundreds of years.
Coal is actually worse (seam fires) and results in the loss of entire small towns and hundreds of square miles of real estate but it is well established.
Solar is projected to be down to.36 cents/watt by 2024. At those prices-- why not use it? It's like LED's. Lower than current power generation prices for several countries, it provides energy during the periods of highest power usage, has lower water usage, lower pollution profile (tho I'm wondering what is hidden from us that will become apparent in mass production). It's prices are still dropping rapidly (in part due to temporary subsidies). Installations are rising logarithmically and have passed an inflection point towards exponential growth.
The nice thing is- everyone benefits. If solar cuts oil demand by 5%-- that has a huge effect on the price of oil overall. Same for coal.
Perhaps someday, they will design an inexpensive reactor system that is reliable combined with a breeder reactor to reduce waste to 1-3% quantity. I think smaller would be better. And based on the new autoshut down modules. And with no way stupid or careless humans can fuck things up.
But really- 11 billion people is no meat for most people (which is not as good as vegans project), lower quality of life, and a fairly pointless existence with the high automation we have coming (sitting around consuming food and entertainment- no real work to do for most).
If we don't hit the brakes, we hit the tree at 60mph. If we do hit the breaks, we hit the tree at 30mph.
Either way, we hit the tree, so why bother braking?
Or we can lock the brakes, go into a skid, flip the car, and burst into flames while rolling down the embankment because we lost control of the car while we were overdoing it.
It's a complex situation. Slowing down fossil fuel usage and output by 10% might be cost effective, slow the curve, give more time for other solutions. Also, producing solar tends to lead to solar being cheaper in the future. Which means it can replace more fossil fuel. As a bonus- inexpensive solar power depresses the price of fossil fuel and so the more expensive oil isn't drilled and pumped yet. So less expensive home heating, fossil electricity, and gasoline.
I'm just saying I can understand why people stop voting when the game is rigged so well that less than 1% of elections matter whether they vote or not (and that was for a state rep position- nothing national).
Sure- some people will play against overwhelming odds- or vote when it rarely matters. But I hope you can see how many just say, "Screw it- I'm going to sleep in, go on vacation, just work over time, stop beating my head against the wall because of some tiny chance that it might make some tiny difference".
Voter turnout is higher when it matters.
I vote. But I can easily understand how disillusioned (and effectively disenfranchised) voters stop voting.
It's clear to most of us when our vote matters (turnout rises) and when it doesn't (low turnout).
In my district- I've had ONE vote in 17 years that mattered. The rest came down just the way the gerrymandering predicted. I either voted with a 60/40 or higher majority or with a 40/60 or lower minority.
In the one vote, the race was by 31 votes. It was contested and maybe if it had been 30, it might have been contested longer. And turnout was high because it was clear the challenger might unseat the incumbent (and did.. barely).
Perhaps if we had term limits...
But really modern computers can predict the outcomes from districts fro years at a time.
Silver and Wang predicted almost all of the elections for the last two cycles before the vote.
If it is clear which way the vote is before we go to the polls (and it almost always is) then why go vote?
Cloning introduces hundreds of mutations. Many clones die because of those mutations so it is likely that non fatal mutations would affect performance as well.
We can't competently confirm actual guild and have repeatedly pardoned people on death row as well has evidence that some people executed may have been executed.
Sure-- keeping an innocent person in prison for life is horrific. But killing an innocent person was a big thing the founding fathers were clearly trying to avoid.
actively collecting cats and making sure all cats get fixed would have a greater reduction of bird deaths by orders of magnitude. cats kill BILLIONS of birds a year in the united states alone.
Two years ago my neighbor woke me up because the gas line broke where it entered my house. Quarter inch think steel pipe. 70 years of flexing with the climate. Could have been a huge explosion when I turned off the fluorescent light (apparently that could have caused a spark. fyi!).
And there have been some large neighborhood scale explosions over the last few years (I notice them now on the news after my incident).
The problem with gas is the same with nuclear is not the same with solar.
an aging solar power solution will simply fail to work.
an aging gas or nuclear solution (with designs in place- not the new designs) can fail spectacularly.
If they use the new smaller nuke designs which automatically fail quietly in combination with solar, it might work.
A problem with solar and nuke- is heat pollution. You are taking energy from one area and moving it to another area. The amounts are small compared to the larger climate- but.1degrees is small but can be the difference between water boiling or freezing. There are some signs that wind is having slight effects on climate too. It's extracting energy and moving it elsewhere. That seems similar to a tall forest growing in the same location tho.
I know. And Nuclear is in second place for the amount of land rendered uninhabitable too!
Coal wins that, rendering multiple cities uninhabitable and with multiple Chernobyl sized areas rendered uninhabitable by coal seam fires plus ongoing smoke pollution covering huge areas.
Nuke plants- great in theory. Nuke plants + Human Operators- an accident waiting to happen. The current average appears to be one major accident per decade.
We need to use smaller nukes with modern designs. And we need to back those up with a few reactors which will consume their waste and reduce it to much smaller quantities.
But when anyone solves the battery problem- nukes are dead dead dead and alternative energy of all kinds makes much more sense.
You mean the heritage of beating blacks with an inch and a quarter thick stick and then making the blacks that survive quote scripture that praises the white for beating them them? No. You mean the heritage where judges and ministers said that blacks were ordained by god to be slaves? Again, No.
Dickenson festivals in waistcoats- sure.
Knights on shining armor at the renfest- sure.
White/asian/black/latino pride is merging so much faster than when I was growing up. But it still has a long way to go.
As far as sexual fetish pride- you show me a person whose rabidly against a particular fetish- I'll bet you dollars to donuts that person wants to or already is practicing that fetish. Be it Haggard, or The Faye's, or Republican officials, etc. etc. etc.
Let go of your hatred. Live your own life. Pass on the good things about your heritage to your children.
Slashdot Mirror
The reverse is true to tho. Some attempt suicide- regret it then-- but then attempt suicide again later.
It depends on the reason. Is life shitty? Just lost your child? Just got fire?
Or is your brain just shitty? Constant suicidal impulses even tho life is going well? On a drug that enhances those impulses? Always in pain? Always depressed regardless of medication? Always feel like life is pointless even when nothing is wrong?
Sometimes the problem is chemical and there is little we can do to help the people. Sometimes, it's a permanent solution to a temporary problem and we can help those people.
And as you say, sometimes attempting and really facing death makes the person realize they don't want to die.
And yea... we were going to end the surveillance program anyway... yea! That's the ticket!
And we were going to stop illegal wire taps and sneaking back doors into our commercial products.
Yea... because our girlfriend... Candice Swanepoel didn't want us too.
Here in the states, LED bulbs are down to $11 to $13.
Still... good to hear 10% less energy usage.
As long as they 3100-3200K light and not that wierd 2900K stuff I might try one.
And they better give an honest 850-900 lumens for the "60 watt" variety!
Also, a lot of suicide decisions are based on impulses. There are many stories of people who took a suicidal action and then regretted doing so. Like the one about people in the emergency room screaming they want to live after they shot themselves or the guy who jumped off a bridge and realized the second after he did so that he wanted to live.
For all we know, that day was like any other. The co-pilot went to work thinking he was handling it. The pilot left the cabin and the co-pilot was unexpectedly overpowered by the urge to kill himself and he locked the door. No planning necessary.
On the parent topic- yes I think they should video and that video should be checked when a plane crashes or has an incident but wiped otherwise when a plane lands without incident.
100 day moving average. Some folks use the 100 day exponential moving average. Results are similar. They tend to get you out of the market for the worst dips - and get you back in before missing too much of the rise. But-- you should never get out 100%. It's more like reducing to 25% invested (maybe 20%). Very hard emotionally to put money back in if you go to 0% in. Scaling up an existing position is much easier.
Unless you are in 15% of jobs- you'll be forced to retire.
Good thing is, worst case you'll get about 85% of your social security benefits. This could be fixed if they raised the limit to 500k salary and raised the tax by 1%. Pretty small change so the problem is partially theatrics.
Bad thing is, those will only cover about 70% of your needs so you will need something to fill that gap. Medicare looks in trouble. It could be fixed if the U.S. offered to pay for medical school in return for lower cost service as germany does to doctors. And if we broke the medical school cartel and ramped up the number of doctors like we did during world war 2.
Save hard- as in 50%. I did and was able to retire at 51- not on social security for another 16 to 19 years.
Another stock market decline is coming soon (probably in calendar 2015). Hopefully 20-30%- but it could be another 50% hit. When the 100dma crosses back above the 300dma again after the bottom- that's when you put the money in and let it rise for years without having to do anything. That will multiply your savings.
So California Pacific lays off 500 existing IT workers to replace them with H1B workers who will be paid 2/3 the cost, forces the existing workers to train their H1B Infosys replacements if the u.s. workers want their severance- and forces them to sign NDA's if they want their full severance.
http://www.computerworld.com/a...
And people wonder why millenials are doing poorly in this kind of environment. California Pacific's layoff seems blatantly illegal (how can you say you need H1B's because you can't find american workers with the skill set when you are LAYING OFF EXISTING WORKERS to replace them with H1B's????) but many other companies are doing the same thing by eliminating jobs at site "A" and immediately starting up the jobs at site "B".
Look- if the companies were foreign companies- we might protect workers or at least get lower prices. But as it is we are expected to pay full prices for the product here while the company uses discount labor.
Here is a blatant obvious case-- will someone do something about this? At least the conservative talk radio is finally mad about the issue. In the past it was only the democrats. How many jobs have to go before something is done?
Why enter a field when you are directly competing with people who can go home and live well on $15k a year?
Aye... sort of irritating that the article on California Pacific laying off workers to replace them with H1B's from Infosys doesn't get approved for anyone submitting it and this gets approved twice. Laying off u.s. workers to replace them with H1B's. That sounds directly illegal and could be a tipping point in the struggle against H1B's since conservative talk radio is riled up over it too for a change.
Too many devices.
Multiple tablets, roku, smart tv, multiple laptops, multiple computers.
If I change the password on one, I have to change them on all. If I have to change my system on one, then I have to write the passwords down.
It's not even "dumb". It's just reality.
However, so far- I've never had a password cracked and I haven't had a virus since "Your Amiga has Come Alive!" back in the early 90s.
I'm just not worth the effort most likely.
fundamentally I share your pessimism tho for different reasons. Short of getting the population down to under 5 billion (and 11 billion is looking more likely), it's going to end badly. The particular cause is the only question.
But... on a day to day basis, LED bulbs are a win, win, win. High quality light, energy consumption so low they pay off in under a year under normal usage, and instant on.
I also have to say that the possibility for nuclear power is over. It's never been a significant share of world power generation and while nuclear is great- nuclear plus humans has a terrible record- essentially a major accident every 10 to 12 years with a resulting loss of use of real estate for hundreds of years.
Coal is actually worse (seam fires) and results in the loss of entire small towns and hundreds of square miles of real estate but it is well established.
Solar is projected to be down to .36 cents/watt by 2024. At those prices-- why not use it? It's like LED's. Lower than current power generation prices for several countries, it provides energy during the periods of highest power usage, has lower water usage, lower pollution profile (tho I'm wondering what is hidden from us that will become apparent in mass production). It's prices are still dropping rapidly (in part due to temporary subsidies). Installations are rising logarithmically and have passed an inflection point towards exponential growth.
The nice thing is- everyone benefits. If solar cuts oil demand by 5%-- that has a huge effect on the price of oil overall. Same for coal.
Perhaps someday, they will design an inexpensive reactor system that is reliable combined with a breeder reactor to reduce waste to 1-3% quantity. I think smaller would be better. And based on the new autoshut down modules. And with no way stupid or careless humans can fuck things up.
But really- 11 billion people is no meat for most people (which is not as good as vegans project), lower quality of life, and a fairly pointless existence with the high automation we have coming (sitting around consuming food and entertainment- no real work to do for most).
sometimes, it's enough just to say something... even if only a few others (or no one else) gets it.
It's well known that shading a roof lowers air conditioning costs.
However, shading a roof might slightly raise daytime heating costs.
If we don't hit the brakes, we hit the tree at 60mph.
If we do hit the breaks, we hit the tree at 30mph.
Either way, we hit the tree, so why bother braking?
Or we can lock the brakes, go into a skid, flip the car, and burst into flames while rolling down the embankment because we lost control of the car while we were overdoing it.
It's a complex situation. Slowing down fossil fuel usage and output by 10% might be cost effective, slow the curve, give more time for other solutions. Also, producing solar tends to lead to solar being cheaper in the future. Which means it can replace more fossil fuel. As a bonus- inexpensive solar power depresses the price of fossil fuel and so the more expensive oil isn't drilled and pumped yet. So less expensive home heating, fossil electricity, and gasoline.
I'm just saying I can understand why people stop voting when the game is rigged so well that less than 1% of elections matter whether they vote or not (and that was for a state rep position- nothing national).
Sure- some people will play against overwhelming odds- or vote when it rarely matters. But I hope you can see how many just say, "Screw it- I'm going to sleep in, go on vacation, just work over time, stop beating my head against the wall because of some tiny chance that it might make some tiny difference".
Voter turnout is higher when it matters.
I vote. But I can easily understand how disillusioned (and effectively disenfranchised) voters stop voting.
It's clear to most of us when our vote matters (turnout rises) and when it doesn't (low turnout).
In my district- I've had ONE vote in 17 years that mattered. The rest came down just the way the gerrymandering predicted.
I either voted with a 60/40 or higher majority or with a 40/60 or lower minority.
In the one vote, the race was by 31 votes. It was contested and maybe if it had been 30, it might have been contested longer. And turnout was high because it was clear the challenger might unseat the incumbent (and did.. barely).
Perhaps if we had term limits ...
But really modern computers can predict the outcomes from districts fro years at a time.
Silver and Wang predicted almost all of the elections for the last two cycles before the vote.
If it is clear which way the vote is before we go to the polls (and it almost always is) then why go vote?
But you'll be able to get almost a whole book on one little tape.
When we get to VR5, then the tech will be ready.
Cloning introduces hundreds of mutations. Many clones die because of those mutations so it is likely that non fatal mutations would affect performance as well.
Exactly.
We can't competently confirm actual guild and have repeatedly pardoned people on death row as well has evidence that some people executed may have been executed.
Sure-- keeping an innocent person in prison for life is horrific. But killing an innocent person was a big thing the founding fathers were clearly trying to avoid.
My thought is some energy that would have reflected back into space is captured and emitted as heat that can't escape as easily.
It's small now but I don't know how significant a factor it could become if solar became ubiquitous.
actively collecting cats and making sure all cats get fixed would have a greater reduction of bird deaths by orders of magnitude.
cats kill BILLIONS of birds a year in the united states alone.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
So perhaps each power plant could fund an animal patrol officers in large cities they serve.
Two years ago my neighbor woke me up because the gas line broke where it entered my house. Quarter inch think steel pipe. 70 years of flexing with the climate. Could have been a huge explosion when I turned off the fluorescent light (apparently that could have caused a spark. fyi!).
And there have been some large neighborhood scale explosions over the last few years (I notice them now on the news after my incident).
The problem with gas is the same with nuclear is not the same with solar.
an aging solar power solution will simply fail to work.
an aging gas or nuclear solution (with designs in place- not the new designs) can fail spectacularly.
If they use the new smaller nuke designs which automatically fail quietly in combination with solar, it might work.
A problem with solar and nuke- is heat pollution. You are taking energy from one area and moving it to another area. The amounts are small compared to the larger climate- but .1degrees is small but can be the difference between water boiling or freezing. There are some signs that wind is having slight effects on climate too. It's extracting energy and moving it elsewhere. That seems similar to a tall forest growing in the same location tho.
I know. And Nuclear is in second place for the amount of land rendered uninhabitable too!
Coal wins that, rendering multiple cities uninhabitable and with multiple Chernobyl sized areas rendered uninhabitable by coal seam fires plus ongoing smoke pollution covering huge areas.
Nuke plants- great in theory.
Nuke plants + Human Operators- an accident waiting to happen. The current average appears to be one major accident per decade.
We need to use smaller nukes with modern designs. And we need to back those up with a few reactors which will consume their waste and reduce it to much smaller quantities.
But when anyone solves the battery problem- nukes are dead dead dead and alternative energy of all kinds makes much more sense.
Actually, parts of california (san diego) are classified as semi arid.
To your comment-
http://extras.mnginteractive.c...
It's been pretty wet since 1600. But it was pretty dry before that.
Humans don't really think on a time scale of 500 year cycles. You can have an entire civilization rise and fall during a 500 year period.
You mean the heritage of beating blacks with an inch and a quarter thick stick and then making the blacks that survive quote scripture that praises the white for beating them them? No.
You mean the heritage where judges and ministers said that blacks were ordained by god to be slaves? Again, No.
Dickenson festivals in waistcoats- sure.
Knights on shining armor at the renfest- sure.
White/asian/black/latino pride is merging so much faster than when I was growing up. But it still has a long way to go.
As far as sexual fetish pride- you show me a person whose rabidly against a particular fetish- I'll bet you dollars to donuts that person wants to or already is practicing that fetish. Be it Haggard, or The Faye's, or Republican officials, etc. etc. etc.
Let go of your hatred. Live your own life. Pass on the good things about your heritage to your children.