Women get sore and uncomfortable because they are not lubricating.
My current (and prior) girlfriend have (and had) regular sessions of one to over two hours. If a female is coming every few minutes they keep lubricating. As a male, it's best to get a smooth pyrex toy and to edge instead of climaxing. When things get to hot for you, then you switch over to the toy. When you calm down, she's still red hot and you resume. When she has a climax, you need to rest for 15 to 20 seconds, stop moving, stop stimulating her but not much longer and then resume and take her higher. Pyrex also requires less lubrication.
But the goal is to entertain her, to bring her pleasure, not a relentless series of orgasms so be playful. When you are finally done, she needs to curl up and stay down for 10 minutes or she will probably have a rush and get a headache when she stands up. Bring her some water and pet her.
Read some articles on tantric sex and edging. If you do this as a male you will be rewarded with some of the best orgasms of your life. The longer you edge, the more it spreads to the rest of the body. As a male, I think the goal is fully hard and on the edge of climaxing until I reach that state.
I highly recommend a massage table over a bed. Beds are just about the worst possible place to have sex. A massage table can be adjusted to the perfect height, it's soft but firm compared to a bed which is squishy. You can put her right up to the edge and stand up instead of laying down, this also lets you get a lot more dance-like hip action and swaying left or right and by bending the toes or going tippy toe you can literally hit every spot inside her. The G spot (on top under the clitoris) is important, but once awake, there are many other highly reactive areas inside.
After warming up, they finally are having a marathon session.
22 minutes isn't bad compared to average (I've read 15 minutes is the average for many males) but women are capable of (and often need!) so much more than that.
And men, the more you give, the more you get in the long run.
Of course, no one wants a steam hammer just hammering away dully. You have to switch it up a bit.
wages 1940 $1,725.00, 1950 $3,210.00 , 1960 $5,315.00,1970 $9,400.00 , 1980 $19,500.00 , 1990 $28,960.00 , 2008 $40,523 Note the big discontinuity start at 1990. I see a smaller increase in 1960 looking at this fresh. at my company this year, no raises, no bonuses, but there are numerous "promotions" in the executive ranks-- no change in duties. It's just a slimy way of giving themselves raises.
house 1940 $3,920.00, 1950 $8,450.00 , 1960 $12,700.00 , 1970 $23,450.00 , 1980 $68,700.00 , 1990 $123,000.00 , 2008 $238,880 More than doubled in 1980, so we were less able to afford houses. It went from 2 years salary to 3 years salary- to 4 years in 1990 to 6 years in 2008.
car 1940 $850.00, 1950 $1,510.00 , 1960 $2,600.00 , 1970 $3,450.00 , 1980 $7,200.00 , 1990 $16,950.00 , 2008 $27,958 , Cars stopped doubling in 1990-- people probably couldn't afford a 32000 car or perhaps the spike in 1990 was an aberation since 7200->14400->28800.
meat 1930 12 cents , 1940 20 cents , 1950 30 cents , 1960 45 cents,1970 70 cents , 1980 99 cents , 1990 89 cents , 2009 $3.99 , Meat has gone up a lot since 1990- but that may be a reaction to the dip in 1990's (so ranchers had less incentive to raise new cattle)
Meanwhile the GINI coefficient has climbed from from 39.6 to 46.6 (dropping from 47 in 2006) putting the United States very high in the list of countries with unequal income distribution.
Now say they make simulated Kabuki actors with a computer. All the art and craft is just computer rendered recordings of bits and pieces of real actors. Would even the most fabulously perfect kabuki performance under those conditions have any emotional impact at all?
If they really trained a shark to jump over the boat, then that scene is impressive.
If they animated a scene of a shark jumping a boat, it has about as much impact as the animation of the waves around the boat. It's not real. I know it's not real. There's no suspense.
You don't spend five pages of a book describing the incredibly close jump of a shark over the desperately maneuvering boat before the shark heavily splashes in to the water and the boat zooms away. Because it would be pointless.
It's okay to have a shark jump over a boat, but why are you making a big deal of it, showing multiple cuts of the shark jumping over the boat, when we all know it's not real and so we don't care.
If an actor jumped 30' down onto a moving platform-- we are tense, we know it's real to some extent.
Perfect example was the old "gone in 60 seconds" vs the new "gone in 60 seconds". The 80' jump over the semi trailer was obviously animated-- so why do I care? The original, with lower production values, was much tenser because someone really did that.
I completely agree. There is no point in having a "making of special" unless you did something other than rendering and com-positing everything in a computer.
In 2002, the top-paid garbage collector made $66,000. Almost half of that was overtime pay. Another garbage collector made $62,000. Three others had annual pay of more than $50,000.
One reason overtime is so high is because these guys can start collecting overtime while they're still on their regular eight-hour shift.
---
Also, no forced holiday work, and probably better status than most IT people. Many IT people I know must work either thanksgiving or christmas each year. And every other holiday is viewed as an installation opportunity by the business.
I left IT as a worker and have been recommending against entering the field for the last 6-7 years.
There are many other fields you can go into which have better hours, more women (better dating prospects), higher status (better dating prospects, more parties paid for by the company, more quality company travel to nice locations), and no forced holiday work.
IT has sucked as a field badly since SOX (so about 2001-2002). It sucked before that, but it was more of a trade off. I know some "developers" who get to program 1 week and spend the next 5 testing and filling out documentation.
My point was to all the people I've met who were strongly for or against something, until the slightest bit of personal cost was involved and then they flipped.
Like the jurors who change from guilty to innocent (or vs versa) because they are tired of arguing after three, whole, hours.
Like people who are soft on crime for philosphical reasons, until they are robbed. Or hard on criminals until they experience the wrong side of the justice system.
If principles are principles, then personal experience shouldn't modify them so easily.
Most people do not know what their real principles are. They don't know what they would suffer enormously for rather than give them up. They don't know what beliefs they would easily resist the greatest temptation rather than surrender them. You know.. like the old joke about knowing what kind of woman she was-- you are just dickering on price now.
And so in my experience, most strongly held principles fall very quickly which gives me a very dim view of most people's "principles".
These are raw $, not adjusted for inflation from a site i looked up a few weeks a go that summarized prices for milk, bread, cars, housing, salaries, and a basket of other things.
What they showed was that from 1940-1980's, every 10 years, everything doubled (wages AND cars AND bread). Starting in 1990, prices continued to double, but wages only rose 50% per 10 years.
I left comcast because their *digital* signals were worse than standard TV over the antennae.
Dish has gone the other way-- their signal *looks* crisp, but there is a lot more blockiness than there used to be. I used to have blocky outbreaks perhaps 1 or 2 times in 40 hours of viewing. Now I get blockiness 1 or 2 times per 10 hours of viewing.
I notice less and less flash adds since installing firefox with adblock and noscript.
The remaining ads, I have a psychological blindness to so my adblocker is really saving them bandwidth.
The only ads I "see" any more seem to be Geico ads on television. I'm not a Geico customer and I've never been one. I'm a 21st century customer so this is odd. Oh..and I do see ads on Boardgamegeek for a game that I'm already looking at. I look at the game, and i see an ad "buy for this price at blaah". But even then, I turn on all adds, quickly scan for price and enter test orders at the lowest three vendors (to flush out shipping differences).
Part of the my overall attitude is that the wealthy have squeezed me so hard on pay and shipped so many friends jobs overseas that I worry about my security , that I'm saving 40-50% of what I make and will do so until I have a fairly large pile of cash. Perhaps once I'm safe, I'll feel like buying again.
With prices up 200-400% and wages up 50%, I have to be selective.
Oh.. and I do see the ski email ads from steamboat in my inbox. But, do you really want to ski at the same resort over and over and over and over..
On the other hand, for many people expressing their anger doesn't release it but causes it to grow larger. For many, the best way to kill anger is to smother it and get away from the anger source.
Also, criminals often start with small deeds and escalate to larger ones over time as they grow comfortable with each level of misdeeds.
It would probably take a personal tragedy or personal stalker in your own life to change your opinion. Most people's strongly held beliefs hold up less than two weeks in those circumstances.
Perhaps you would be in the tiny percentage who actually hold true to their beliefs under personal pressure. I'd even bet 10 bucks even money that the professor was a fan of free speech in the abstract as well.
Being a mechanical device, the hand brake is not "all or nothing". I drive at 50mph all the time with one hand and my handbrake is to my right between the seats.
It is scary that you don't have a failsafe. "Pull this red button to disconnect the wires from the engine" or something.
Sorry, but the guy who killed people last time had posts that were ignored and the authorities were taken to task for ignoring them. I understand your point. I agree with them some. But real world events have eroded those rights because the authorities are placed in a no win situation. "He killed people and you did NOTHING. We are going to sue you for doing nothing!" vs "He only SAID he was going to kill people, he didn't REALLY mean it."
Besides, being banned from school is not government jail time. Schools can ban you from lots of things that the government couldn't ban you from.
And if I were just to "say" things like this about co-workers, I'd be let go and banned from the premises. And I'm forewarned of that in the employee handbook that I signed.
There is a difference between facebook which is a public expression and the equivalent of standing outside the lecture hall and holding a sign with these statements and writing it in your diary or saying it privately to a few friends over drinks.
For every few thousand cases where some dumb student posts an angry comment and it means nothing, there's the next case where the student then stabs their professor in the throat. Where do you draw the line?
Either we say freedom of speech is important or we say any threat is to be taken seriously.
Now, if the students want to protest this action, I recommend that thousands of the students at the university ALSO post "I also want to stab the professor and the chief of police in the throat with a mortuary knife". When confronted with a massive civil unrest protest of this kind, the police and authorities usually fold. The university will quickly ban one student but would never ban 100 students, much less several thousand students.
As with ALL civil unrest, you have to be prepared to take the punishment tho. It's always possible the university would indeed ban several thousand students.
It is very wasteful when the same device is given arbitrary different form factors.
A good example being cell phone chargers. There should be one- maybe *two* cell phone chargers. The current situation is ridiculous. Giving it an arbitrarily different plug shape or voltage makes everything more difficult.
And it doesn't even net the cell phone company extra bucks, since I get my extra chargers online or from Walmart anyway.
I'm not sure the free market is a stable state tho.
Sort of like democracy, you just need for a strong communistic or fascist party to come to power once and you are probably done until there is a revolution.
Seems like free markets are an intermediate state.
Slashdot Mirror
Women get sore and uncomfortable because they are not lubricating.
My current (and prior) girlfriend have (and had) regular sessions of one to over two hours. If a female is coming every few minutes they keep lubricating. As a male, it's best to get a smooth pyrex toy and to edge instead of climaxing. When things get to hot for you, then you switch over to the toy. When you calm down, she's still red hot and you resume. When she has a climax, you need to rest for 15 to 20 seconds, stop moving, stop stimulating her but not much longer and then resume and take her higher. Pyrex also requires less lubrication.
But the goal is to entertain her, to bring her pleasure, not a relentless series of orgasms so be playful. When you are finally done, she needs to curl up and stay down for 10 minutes or she will probably have a rush and get a headache when she stands up. Bring her some water and pet her.
Read some articles on tantric sex and edging. If you do this as a male you will be rewarded with some of the best orgasms of your life. The longer you edge, the more it spreads to the rest of the body. As a male, I think the goal is fully hard and on the edge of climaxing until I reach that state.
I highly recommend a massage table over a bed. Beds are just about the worst possible place to have sex. A massage table can be adjusted to the perfect height, it's soft but firm compared to a bed which is squishy. You can put her right up to the edge and stand up instead of laying down, this also lets you get a lot more dance-like hip action and swaying left or right and by bending the toes or going tippy toe you can literally hit every spot inside her. The G spot (on top under the clitoris) is important, but once awake, there are many other highly reactive areas inside.
After warming up, they finally are having a marathon session.
22 minutes isn't bad compared to average (I've read 15 minutes is the average for many males) but women are capable of (and often need!) so much more than that.
And men, the more you give, the more you get in the long run.
Of course, no one wants a steam hammer just hammering away dully. You have to switch it up a bit.
Every man should read Donald Hicks book.
You?re post #1 ? Action concluded at 12.43GMT. Duration: 0.37 s. Frenzy Index: 3 (funny). Judge?s Comment: "Is that it?"
Not what I'm saying...
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/70yearsofpricechange.html
Dropping the great depression...
wages ,1970 $9,400.00 , 1980 $19,500.00 , 1990 $28,960.00 , 2008 $40,523
1940 $1,725.00, 1950 $3,210.00 , 1960 $5,315.00
Note the big discontinuity start at 1990. I see a smaller increase in 1960 looking at this fresh. at my company this year,
no raises, no bonuses, but there are numerous "promotions" in the executive ranks-- no change in duties. It's just a slimy way of giving themselves raises.
house
1940 $3,920.00, 1950 $8,450.00 , 1960 $12,700.00 , 1970 $23,450.00 , 1980 $68,700.00 , 1990 $123,000.00 , 2008 $238,880
More than doubled in 1980, so we were less able to afford houses. It went from 2 years salary to 3 years salary- to 4 years in 1990 to 6 years in 2008.
car
1940 $850.00, 1950 $1,510.00 , 1960 $2,600.00 , 1970 $3,450.00 , 1980 $7,200.00 , 1990 $16,950.00 , 2008 $27,958 ,
Cars stopped doubling in 1990-- people probably couldn't afford a 32000 car or perhaps the spike in 1990 was an aberation since 7200->14400->28800.
meat ,1970 70 cents , 1980 99 cents , 1990 89 cents , 2009 $3.99 ,
1930 12 cents , 1940 20 cents , 1950 30 cents , 1960 45 cents
Meat has gone up a lot since 1990- but that may be a reaction to the dip in 1990's (so ranchers had less incentive to raise new cattle)
Meanwhile the GINI coefficient has climbed from from 39.6 to 46.6 (dropping from 47 in 2006) putting the United States very high in the list of countries with unequal income distribution.
Now say they make simulated Kabuki actors with a computer. All the art and craft is just computer rendered recordings of bits and pieces of real actors.
Would even the most fabulously perfect kabuki performance under those conditions have any emotional impact at all?
EXACTLY.
If they really trained a shark to jump over the boat, then that scene is impressive.
If they animated a scene of a shark jumping a boat, it has about as much impact as the animation of the waves around the boat. It's not real. I know it's not real. There's no suspense.
You don't spend five pages of a book describing the incredibly close jump of a shark over the desperately maneuvering boat before the shark heavily splashes in to the water and the boat zooms away. Because it would be pointless.
It's okay to have a shark jump over a boat, but why are you making a big deal of it, showing multiple cuts of the shark jumping over the boat, when we all know it's not real and so we don't care.
If an actor jumped 30' down onto a moving platform-- we are tense, we know it's real to some extent.
Perfect example was the old "gone in 60 seconds" vs the new "gone in 60 seconds". The 80' jump over the semi trailer was obviously animated-- so why do I care? The original, with lower production values, was much tenser because someone really did that.
I completely agree. There is no point in having a "making of special" unless you did something other than rendering and com-positing everything in a computer.
Film's 24fps.
My brain formed on film. It understands film.
When they try to go for "reality" on digital, it looks fake to me. And there is the difference between "more realistic" video and film.
Just like there is a difference between a painting and a photograph.
Digital is okay for a pixar film. My brain doesn't map out digital flaws tho- it highlights them.
I've never been aware of wobble, snow, etc. I do see the print id dots sometime, now that I'm aware they are there.
Film has the effect of heightened reality, of chocolate milk+ (i.e. baileys irish cream).
Digital still feels a bit sterile to me at this time.
I'm sure they will get it down with time... or people who are used to film will die.
Oddly, I watch tons of TV on my computer and it's not an issue there. Really only on huge screens. Perhaps they just need higher resolution.
http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/2390330/detail.html
In 2002, the top-paid garbage collector made $66,000. Almost half of that was overtime pay. Another garbage collector made $62,000. Three others had annual pay of more than $50,000.
One reason overtime is so high is because these guys can start collecting overtime while they're still on their regular eight-hour shift.
---
Also, no forced holiday work, and probably better status than most IT people.
Many IT people I know must work either thanksgiving or christmas each year. And every other holiday is viewed as an installation opportunity by the business.
I left IT as a worker and have been recommending against entering the field for the last 6-7 years.
There are many other fields you can go into which have better hours, more women (better dating prospects), higher status (better dating prospects, more parties paid for by the company, more quality company travel to nice locations), and no forced holiday work.
IT has sucked as a field badly since SOX (so about 2001-2002). It sucked before that, but it was more of a trade off. I know some "developers" who get to program 1 week and spend the next 5 testing and filling out documentation.
I'm not impressed with stunts that aren't real.
I'm not impressed with special effects that are the point of the story instead of serving the story.
I'm an sf fan and a cameron fan but I only have mild interest in watching this film.
I feel like there is no genuine buzz and all the buzz is manufactured.
The first run place I go is still film. If you are in the middle in the top 5 rows, you can hear it going clickety clickety.
The image is still superior to digital for me. There's no "grid".
I mostly agree with you.
My point was to all the people I've met who were strongly for or against something, until the slightest bit of personal cost was involved and then they flipped.
Like the jurors who change from guilty to innocent (or vs versa) because they are tired of arguing after three, whole, hours.
Like people who are soft on crime for philosphical reasons, until they are robbed.
Or hard on criminals until they experience the wrong side of the justice system.
If principles are principles, then personal experience shouldn't modify them so easily.
Most people do not know what their real principles are.
They don't know what they would suffer enormously for rather than give them up.
They don't know what beliefs they would easily resist the greatest temptation rather than surrender them.
You know.. like the old joke about knowing what kind of woman she was-- you are just dickering on price now.
And so in my experience, most strongly held principles fall very quickly which gives me a very dim view of most people's "principles".
These are raw $, not adjusted for inflation from a site i looked up a few weeks a go that summarized prices for milk, bread, cars, housing, salaries, and a basket of other things.
What they showed was that from 1940-1980's, every 10 years, everything doubled (wages AND cars AND bread). Starting in 1990, prices continued to double, but wages only rose 50% per 10 years.
I left comcast because their *digital* signals were worse than standard TV over the antennae.
Dish has gone the other way-- their signal *looks* crisp, but there is a lot more blockiness than there used to be. I used to have blocky outbreaks perhaps 1 or 2 times in 40 hours of viewing. Now I get blockiness 1 or 2 times per 10 hours of viewing.
I notice less and less flash adds since installing firefox with adblock and noscript.
The remaining ads, I have a psychological blindness to so my adblocker is really saving them bandwidth.
The only ads I "see" any more seem to be Geico ads on television. I'm not a Geico customer and I've never been one. I'm a 21st century customer so this is odd. Oh..and I do see ads on Boardgamegeek for a game that I'm already looking at. I look at the game, and i see an ad "buy for this price at blaah". But even then, I turn on all adds, quickly scan for price and enter test orders at the lowest three vendors (to flush out shipping differences).
Part of the my overall attitude is that the wealthy have squeezed me so hard on pay and shipped so many friends jobs overseas that I worry about my security , that I'm saving 40-50% of what I make and will do so until I have a fairly large pile of cash. Perhaps once I'm safe, I'll feel like buying again.
With prices up 200-400% and wages up 50%, I have to be selective.
Oh.. and I do see the ski email ads from steamboat in my inbox. But, do you really want to ski at the same resort over and over and over and over..
It sounds like you are one of the *few* whose principles do not change. So I apologize.
Yes,
On the other hand, for many people expressing their anger doesn't release it but causes it to grow larger. For many, the best way to kill anger is to smother it and get away from the anger source.
Also, criminals often start with small deeds and escalate to larger ones over time as they grow comfortable with each level of misdeeds.
Of course, I don't expect you to agree.
It would probably take a personal tragedy or personal stalker in your own life to change your opinion.
Most people's strongly held beliefs hold up less than two weeks in those circumstances.
Perhaps you would be in the tiny percentage who actually hold true to their beliefs under personal pressure.
I'd even bet 10 bucks even money that the professor was a fan of free speech in the abstract as well.
Being a mechanical device, the hand brake is not "all or nothing". I drive at 50mph all the time with one hand and my handbrake is to my right between the seats.
It is scary that you don't have a failsafe. "Pull this red button to disconnect the wires from the engine" or something.
Sorry, but the guy who killed people last time had posts that were ignored and the authorities were taken to task for ignoring them. I understand your point. I agree with them some. But real world events have eroded those rights because the authorities are placed in a no win situation. "He killed people and you did NOTHING. We are going to sue you for doing nothing!" vs "He only SAID he was going to kill people, he didn't REALLY mean it."
Besides, being banned from school is not government jail time. Schools can ban you from lots of things that the government couldn't ban you from.
And if I were just to "say" things like this about co-workers, I'd be let go and banned from the premises. And I'm forewarned of that in the employee handbook that I signed.
There is a difference between facebook which is a public expression and the equivalent of standing outside the lecture hall and holding a sign with these statements and writing it in your diary or saying it privately to a few friends over drinks.
It's worse than that. Many of these cars are "fly by wire" now with no direct mechanical connection between the pedals, shifter, and the engine.
I suppose I would have tried the hand brake- but that could also be really just a signal to the computer to slow down.
I think you've made a grave error if you believe your post will be modded up. More likely it will be buried 6 feet under.
For every few thousand cases where some dumb student posts an angry comment and it means nothing, there's the next case where the student then stabs their professor in the throat. Where do you draw the line?
Either we say freedom of speech is important or we say any threat is to be taken seriously.
Now, if the students want to protest this action, I recommend that thousands of the students at the university ALSO post "I also want to stab the professor and the chief of police in the throat with a mortuary knife". When confronted with a massive civil unrest protest of this kind, the police and authorities usually fold. The university will quickly ban one student but would never ban 100 students, much less several thousand students.
As with ALL civil unrest, you have to be prepared to take the punishment tho. It's always possible the university would indeed ban several thousand students.
It was mostly an example for discussion.
It is very wasteful when the same device is given arbitrary different form factors.
A good example being cell phone chargers. There should be one- maybe *two* cell phone chargers.
The current situation is ridiculous. Giving it an arbitrarily different plug shape or voltage makes everything more difficult.
And it doesn't even net the cell phone company extra bucks, since I get my extra chargers online or from Walmart anyway.
Good point.
I'm not sure the free market is a stable state tho.
Sort of like democracy, you just need for a strong communistic or fascist party to come to power once and you are probably done until there is a revolution.
Seems like free markets are an intermediate state.
I'd call the first corporatism and the second capitalism.