Slashdot Mirror


Best Man Rigs Newlyweds' Bed To Tweet During Sex

When an UK man was asked to be the best man at a friend's wedding he agreed that he would not pull any pranks before or during the ceremony. Now the groom wishes he had extended the agreement to after the blessed occasion as well. The best man snuck into the newlyweds' house while they were away on their honeymoon and placed a pressure-sensitive device under their mattress. The device now automatically tweets when the couple have sex. The updates include the length of activity and how vigorous the act was on a scale of 1-10.

272 comments

  1. First by SparafucileMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    First!

    130KG. 45 seconds.

    1. Re:First by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd look kinda goofy all by yourself. I think it was a pressure sensor made for Two.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      130kg is still 65kg per person (on average), which is quite reasonable actually... I don't know how much you weigh, but I am certainly FAR closer to 65kg than to 130kg.

    3. Re:First by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Reread that -- he's using metric.

      --
      $ make available
    4. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      130kg (286lbs) is still 65kg (143lbs) per person (on average), which is quite reasonable actually...

      Hey! According to the FAQ Slashdot is US centric! Please use pounds.

      And.. also... we're pretty heavy as a nation! :P

    5. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reread that -- he's using metric.

      So that means he gave up?

      *dodge*

    6. Re:First by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You?re post #1 ? Action concluded at 12.43GMT. Duration: 0.37 s. Frenzy Index: 3 (funny). Judge?s Comment: "Is that it?"

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:First by SimonInOz · · Score: 3, Informative

      One thing we do know - newlywedsontjob ... that's Northern England, for sure. ("There's trouble at t'mill", etc). Cuts it down a bit.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    8. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      nah this one you gotta come last to win.

    9. Re:First by julesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know how much you weigh, but I am certainly FAR closer to 65kg than to 130kg.

      I suspect the average geek is closer to 130. FWIW, I'm 83kg, but only because I've been on a prolonged diet. This time last year I was approaching 100, i.e. closer to 130.

    10. Re:First by selven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, we are also intelligent-people centric, and intelligent people tend to use internationally recognized units whose ratios actually make sense.

    11. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ratios make sense? What is:

      10/2, 10/3, 10/4, 10/6?

      vs.

      12/2, 12/3, 12/4, 12/6.

      I'll keep my US centric ratios, thank you very much.

    12. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...intelligent people tend to use internationally recognized units..."

      You don't have a job do you. You work in whatever units you have to. If that means you need to use english mass measurements on a sensor built with housings in metric and IC's in english then that's what you do.

      You may convert in your head, but you use whatever you have to.

      "...whose ratios actually make sense"

      This statement doesn't make sense.

      PS: Intelligent people don't need to use units at all. In the end you can usually break everything down into a unit less value anyway...

    13. Re:First by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really need to divide a foot into inches all that much? You know that's the *only* part of the US system that uses 12 right?

      Are there 12 feet in a yard? No? You mean you're suddenly dealing with 3/2, 3/3, 3/4, 3/6? Huh.

      How many yards are there in a mile? 12? 24? What? 1760? That doesn't even make sense. How is that related to the glorious "everything is divisible by the factors of 12" scheme? The factors of 1760 are 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 16, 20, 22, 32, 40, 44, 55, 80, 88, 110, 160, 176, 220, 352, 440, 880, and 1760.

      So, to compare:

      Metric:
      1 centimeter
      10 centimeters = 1 decimeter
      10 decimeters = 1 meter
      1000 meters = 1 kilometer

      Imperial:
      1 inch
      12 inches = 1 foot
      3 feet = 1 yard
      1760 yards = 1 mile

      Yeah. Awesome.

    14. Re:First by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dividing is much easier in metric than imperial. If you have 7 meters and you want to divide by 3, you get 2.33 meters. Someone well acquainted with normal math can do that in his head. if you have 7 feet and you want to divide by 3, you have to awkwardly do it manually - take 2 feet and you have 1 foot left, divide that by 3, that's 4 inches. People who do architecture all their lives can do it, but normal people, and calculators, can't.

      Also, 7 kilometers / 3 = 2 km, 333m and 7 meters / 3 = 2 m, 333mm, but:

      7 miles / 3 = 2 miles, 1760 feet
      7 feet / 3 = 2 feet, 4 inches
      7 inches / 3 = 2 inches, 21/64 of an inch (that is how imperial nails and screwdrivers work...)

      Once you think about it, metric makes a lot more sense in every way.

    15. Re:First by selven · · Score: 1

      95% of jobs have nothing to do with systems of measurement and can be done without knowing what centimeters and inches are.

    16. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tha's nuttin'; I rigged my bes' fren's car to blow up when he an' 'is new wife drove offen on der honeymoon! Haw Haw Haw!

    17. Re:First by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. We're one of the last to use this awful system. Going metric would be much simpler, and we wouldn't have as many Shuttle explosions.

    18. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then perhaps you should use units that make sense. Pounds-force would be a somewhat reasonable unit to measure "vigorousness" of sex. Kilograms (mass) don't really make any sense at all.

    19. Re:First by selven · · Score: 1

      What the heck is "pounds-force"?

    20. Re:First by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Can you guys also consider getting rid of volume as well?
      I mean why have a completely different volume standard, even from Imperial?
      EG: 1 US gallon = Imperial: 6 pints + 13 fluid ounces + 1 fluid drachms + 49.824 minims

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    21. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then quit calling your beer a "pint"!!!

    22. Re:First by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      "approaching 100", so you mean like, 97ish? 97 is closer to 65...

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    23. Re:First by moniker127 · · Score: 1

      What is so special about the number 10? if we're going to adopt a more sensible system of measurements, why not adopt a more sensible system of numbers?
      Why base 10? The only reason is because we (most of us) have 10 fingers!
      Why not base1 2? 12 is easily divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8, not just 2 and 5!
      We already use the terms dozen and gross! Why shouldn't these terms be the base 12 equivalents of ten and hundred?
      With a base 12 system we can represent higher numbers with fewer digits.
      So why don't we switch to a base 12 metric system?
      Because it is a pain in the ass! We already do all our math, all of our measurements, and all of THINKING in our archaic base 10 system, and it would be more efficient to stay with a 4 wheeled car than to waste the effort switching to 3 wheels and save a whole wheel!

    24. Re:First by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Dividing is much easier in metric than imperial. If you have 7 meters and you want to divide by 3, you get 2.33 meters. Someone well acquainted with normal math can do that in his head. if you have 7 feet and you want to divide by 3, you have to awkwardly do it manually - take 2 feet and you have 1 foot left, divide that by 3, that's 4 inches. People who do architecture all their lives can do it, but normal people, and calculators, can't.

      Also, 7 kilometers / 3 = 2 km, 333m and 7 meters / 3 = 2 m, 333mm, but:

      7 miles / 3 = 2 miles, 1760 feet 7 feet / 3 = 2 feet, 4 inches 7 inches / 3 = 2 inches, 21/64 of an inch (that is how imperial nails and screwdrivers work...)

      Once you think about it, metric makes a lot more sense in every way.

      If you have 7 feet and divide by 3, you still have 7.33.. feet, and you can write it that way. To write 7 ft. 4 in. is more accurate, but the two are synonymous.

      Likewise to 7 meters divided by 3 is 7.33.. meters or 7 meter 3 decimeters 3 centimeters...3 nanometers...etc.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    25. Re:First by selven · · Score: 1

      I agree base 10 is not superior, and would prefer if we all switched to base 9, base 16 or whatever. But the imperial system isn't a base 12 one, it's a messed up base 12/3/1760 one.

    26. Re:First by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Going metric would be much simpler, and we wouldn't have as many Shuttle explosions.

      That's really funny. I think you may be referring to the incident on Mars though.

      What's so ironic is that it was not the English system or the Metric system that caused the incident, but the lack of communication and cooperation between the two teams responsible for different systems.

      So you could say Metric would have stopped the incident, but perhaps it is our human failings that caused it, not a choice of a measurement.

    27. Re:First by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Intelligent people recognize that an infatuation with units does not actually make sense.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    28. Re:First by selven · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why everyone should learn metric - it's objectively superior and there's no reason to hold onto Imperial.

    29. Re:First by Shagg · · Score: 1

      it's objectively superior

      I think you missed my point.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    30. Re:First by selven · · Score: 1

      No, I simply disagree with it. If every small thing is too small to matter, we'll never have any progress.

    31. Re:First by Shagg · · Score: 1

      If every small thing is too small to matter, we'll never have any progress.

      Yes, you did miss the point.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    32. Re:First by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 1

      I get where you're coming from, and I generally agree with you. But there's a few bumps:

      I've never seen anything expressed in "decimeters." Usually height of a person is given in centimeters. Whaaa? I have no idea! That unit is too small to be able to estimate. I can't imagine estimating things the size of a human being in centimeters. I can tell you in feet an inches though.

      If you want to use decimeters, then it makes more sense, but otherwise, metric uses nothing that compares roughly to a foot.

      Now, I can step off a room and tell you almost precisely what the dimensions of the room are: with my foot and shoe, it is almost exactly 12 inches (exactly 1 foot!). How do YOU do that in metric?

      I'm really asking, not being facetious or sarcastic.

      Also, many games are measured in 100-yards. American football (not soccer), the 100-yard dash, etc. Well 100 meters is a bit farther than 100 yards... What do you want? Re-calculate all the distances to be the fractional equivalent to meters? That's just dumb.

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    33. Re:First by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 1

      If you have 7 feet and divide by 3, you still have 7.33.. feet, and you can write it that way. To write 7 ft. 4 in. is more accurate, but the two are synonymous.

      Likewise to 7 meters divided by 3 is 7.33.. meters or 7 meter 3 decimeters 3 centimeters...3 nanometers...etc.

      I don't think divide means what you think it means.

      7 meters divided by 3 is 2.33 meters.
      7 feet divided by 3 is 28 inches (2 ft 4 in)

      --
      Harald
    34. Re:First by DougJohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since you're not being facetious, my arm span is almost 2m, so I spread my arms out and fingertip to fingertip. If I can do it twice, that's 4m (you get the drift). It's a lot easier to do than the foot shuffle.

      When I spread my hand from thumb to tip of my little finger is about 20cm (near enough, I'm over on that, and under on the arm span, but we're estimating here and I know how much extra, so I just put my thumb a little inside where my pinky was the previous time)

      For height, it's really just a matter of training. You're accustomed to thinking about it in feet, so you can judge more accurately in feet. You're probably just as inaccurate in the inches as I am in the cm (or maybe I'm off by 1 more... who knows) when estimating. That's why they're estimates, not measurements. I bet I'm pretty good at estimating heigh in meters though! (That person over there is about 2m... and person unless they're a child, in which case they're about 1m!)

      For games, it's kind of arbitrary anyhow, but so far as I can tell, even USA track meets are done in m.

      American football is the only game I can think of that uses Yards, but I admit I have no idea how big a basketball court is, nor how far between baseball plates. Fortunately google knows.

      Court is 15m wide by 28m long, in the USA it's 50ft x 94ft.

      Baseball plates are 90', but bizarrely there's apparently no standard for where the home run fence is (I guess that's some Imperial uncertainty)

    35. Re:First by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I've never seen anything expressed in "decimeters." Usually height of a person is given in centimeters.

      Sure it's given in decimeters, people just phrase it as "1.8m".

      If you want to use decimeters, then it makes more sense, but otherwise, metric uses nothing that compares roughly to a foot.

      Did you really need a whole new thing for "more than ten inches, less than half a yard"?

      With metric you can get a convenient measure at any scale with tens, hundreds, and tenths of a "common" unit (usually the unprefixed unit or kilo-).

      Now, I can step off a room and tell you almost precisely what the dimensions of the room are: with my foot and shoe, it is almost exactly 12 inches (exactly 1 foot!). How do YOU do that in metric?

      Most people can measure out a pretty reliable 1m stride (about 1/3 longer than a normal walking stride for an average male). Keeping in mind that most people don't have feet that are exactly a foot long, the whole heel-toe thing isn't that convenient for most.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    36. Re:First by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      Why stop there? Since you don't want to think any, why are we dealing with 60 seconds to a minute, 60 minutes to an hour then suddenly 24 hours to a day? Then 7 days make up a week? Then 4 weeks, no sometimes it's 5 week... er something makes up a month. 12 months that vary in days make up a year. But it isn't really a year, we need a leap day every 4 years, except for centuries, except for 2000 for some reason. WTF?

      Yes, we need seconds, 10 seconds make a minute, 10 minutes make an hour, 10 hours make a day, 10 days make a week and 10 weeks make a year. So simple even a cave man could do it.

      Except a cave man couldn't do it. Not even close.

    37. Re:First by selven · · Score: 1

      You are right, but you've abandoned the argument of the AC to whom I was responding - that dividing 12 is more convenient than dividing 10.

    38. Re:First by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 0

      Do you really need to divide a foot into inches all that much? You know that's the *only* part of the US system that uses 12 right?

      Are there 12 feet in a yard? No? You mean you're suddenly dealing with 3/2, 3/3, 3/4, 3/6? Huh.

      How many yards are there in a mile? 12? 24? What? 1760? That doesn't even make sense. How is that related to the glorious "everything is divisible by the factors of 12" scheme? The factors of 1760 are 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 16, 20, 22, 32, 40, 44, 55, 80, 88, 110, 160, 176, 220, 352, 440, 880, and 1760.

      So, to compare:

      Metric: 1 centimeter 10 centimeters = 1 decimeter 10 decimeters = 1 meter 1000 meters = 1 kilometer

      Imperial: 1 inch 12 inches = 1 foot 3 feet = 1 yard 1760 yards = 1 mile

      Yeah. Awesome.

      I understannd this, however how many MPH (Miles Per Hour) or (Kilo Metres Per Hour) do you think this guy is doing? I want to know what the atmouspheric pressure is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_(unit) also how many Newton's is he/she using at the moment? what is the Ratio between slamming or her on top. Really I need a Geek to answer this as my mind boggles at the thought! I already have bad karma, but entertaining is excellence.

      --
      All cows eat grass!
    39. Re:First by vtstarin · · Score: 1

      45 second! impossible

    40. Re:First by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Conventional units are all based on rule of thumb measurements. Not precise. Not accurately measured into tenths. Using rule of thumb and eying it, you can accurately enough divide things into twos, threes and fours (see the conversions between units). Now that rulers and tape measures and whatnot that agree with each other are readily available, the metric system makes more sense.

      As for the mile, it comes out to 1609 meters or so, which is no nicer than 5280 feet, so I don't see your complaint. A mile is 1000 paces of the Roman legions (mile comes from mille just like milli- does). Given the Romans built the extensive road system and their legions made good use of their long distances, it was a convenient rule of thumb measurement to use.

      The conventional system wasn't meant to measure to 5 significant figures, more like 1 or occasionally 2. I agree it is obsolete given widespread education, and support the use of metric. My point is it is very useful when kept in context, and it still maintains its intuitive use (again, when using 1 or 2 sig figs)- it will understandably be hard to move away from it.

    41. Re:First by julesh · · Score: 1

      "approaching 100", so you mean like, 97ish? 97 is closer to 65...

      98. Which is closer to 130. :)

    42. Re:First by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      "I've never seen anything expressed in "decimeters." Usually height of a person is given in centimeters. Whaaa? I have no idea! That unit is too small to be able to estimate. I can't imagine estimating things the size of a human being in centimeters. I can tell you in feet an inches though."

      The nice thing about the metric system is that the conversion between the units is so easy that it doesn't really matter what unit it's in. You don't even need to think (at all!) to convert between millimeters, centimeters, decimeters and meters... If someone tells you they're 1682mm tall, you know right away that they're 1.682m. It doesn't really matter, what you use, because the obvious choices are all easy to interpret...

      If you want to use decimeters, then it makes more sense, but otherwise, metric uses nothing that compares roughly to a foot.

      "Now, I can step off a room and tell you almost precisely what the dimensions of the room are: with my foot and shoe, it is almost exactly 12 inches (exactly 1 foot!). How do YOU do that in metric?"

      Hmmm, let's see... using an object with known dimensions to measure another object. What a new concept!

      My steps are roughly a meter apart. I know how to use a tape measure. What was the problem again?

      "Also, many games are measured in 100-yards. American football (not soccer), the 100-yard dash, etc. Well 100 meters is a bit farther than 100 yards... What do you want? Re-calculate all the distances to be the fractional equivalent to meters? That's just dumb."

      Why would you have to recalculate? Nobody would be stopping you from measuring certain things in archaic units, if you were so inclined. I'm pretty sure that somewhere out there, the people who built an NFL stadium used *gasp* converted metric units and managed not to break anything... I hardly think that the 40-yard-line (is there such a thing? :P) actually being the 39.99997-yard-line is that much of a problem ;)

      Or are you worried that people are going to start saying Twenty-three-point-seven-two-meter-line in football? :D

    43. Re:First by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      "As for the mile, it comes out to 1609 meters or so, which is no nicer than 5280 feet, so I don't see your complaint. A mile is 1000 paces of the Roman legions (mile comes from mille just like milli- does). Given the Romans built the extensive road system and their legions made good use of their long distances, it was a convenient rule of thumb measurement to use."

      So Roman legionnaires moved 1.609m every step? Those guys must have been huge, or on stilts...

      Are you sure about that?

    44. Re:First by markbthomas · · Score: 1

      A pace is traditionally two steps. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_(length)

    45. Re:First by jaf0 · · Score: 1

      judging from the times, looks like it doesn't start before 3pm GMT. _but_ then they've had an early morning encounter on a Monday, too.

    46. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First!

      130KG. 45 seconds.

      Dude, your wife must not be very happy. 45 seconds, seriously!?

    47. Re:First by orasio · · Score: 1

      Also, many games are measured in 100-yards. American football (not soccer), the 100-yard dash, etc. Well 100 meters is a bit farther than 100 yards... What do you want? Re-calculate all the distances to be the fractional equivalent to meters? That's just dumb.

      Soccer is not a sport!!
      Association Football is the most valuable heritage (apart from the railroads) that we got from the English in South America.
      You shouldn't be putting new names on other people's sports. Otherwise, you'll hear us doing the same with yours: "oh yeah, Sissy-Ball players look funny, with their padding and all"

    48. Re:First by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1
      No, it means exactly what I said. The difference is the two measurement systems. The fact that you divide 7 by 3 doesn't change - in both cases it is still the 2 and 1/3rd; however, as it applies to the measurement systems:
      • Metric can capture the full extent of the 1/3rd of a meter through the repetitive break down and infinite numbering system (e..g 2 meters 3 decimeters 3 centimeters, etc.).
      • Imperial can capture a more specific value as 1/3rd of 1 foot is defined as 4 inches exactly.

      However, in both cases, it can be represented as simply 2.333... of either meters or feet and still be correct.

      You are right in that I had a typo in the following:

      Likewise to 7 meters divided by 3 is 7.33.. meters or 7 meter 3 decimeters 3 centimeters...3 nanometers...etc.

      It should have been:

      Likewise to 7 meters divided by 3 is 2.33.. meters or 2 meter 3 decimeters 3 centimeters...3 nanometers...etc.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    49. Re:First by Dayofswords · · Score: 1

      In one of my classes a person asked why we still use inch, feet, etc. Response "We're too lazy and stupid". Followed by a "God bless America, cause no else will" from the back.

      --
      Someday we'll hit the human carrying capacity. And the band will just play on.
  2. ROFLLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROFLCOPTER

  3. Beowulf by jmcbain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.

    1. Re:Beowulf by nametaken · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gross.

    2. Re:Beowulf by bytethese · · Score: 1

      No need to imagine, just hook it up at the AVN Awards...

    3. Re:Beowulf by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Imaging being the guy that has to clean a Beowulf cluster of these!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Beowulf by aitikin · · Score: 1

      I believe that would be called an orgy.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  4. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They’re on the job! #2 - Action commenced at 15.50GMT. Weight: 151KG.

    They’re on the job! #3 - Action commenced at 15.13GMT. Weight: 151KG.

    They’re on the job! #4 - Action commenced at 19.14GMT. Weight: 151KG.

    and later...

    They’re on the job! #5 - Action commenced at 09.33GMT. Weight: 152KG.

    Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from? 4 times in and they are already experimenting with sex toys?! I just don't know what to say as a virgin, unmarried slashdotter.

    I guess the only fitting comment is "pics or it didn't happen"

    1. Re:Um... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Although I admit this is a response deserving of a 'whoosh...', people tend to eat and drink things y'know? Your weight varies by a good +/- 1 kg throughout a typical day.

    2. Re:Um... by peektwice · · Score: 5, Informative

      Another possible 'whoosh'... but I think it's because she's married now, and no longer has to look good for the wedding. It happens EVERY time. Woman works out like crazy for months to fit into a particular dress size, then once the wedding cake hits her gullet, the fat starts piling on. To be fair, men get fatter too, but we don't "false advertise" for the wedding.

      --
      Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet that She found a 1 pound heavier sex partner for the 5th time.

    4. Re:Um... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

      Either a bottle of champagne. Or a riding crop.

    5. Re:Um... by selven · · Score: 1

      Different combination of bedsheets, clothes, etc?

    6. Re:Um... by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

      I highlighted the word that might shed some light on the situation ;)

      Yes, I'm going to hell......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:Um... by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hah! Further proof of the secret buggy whip manufacturer conspiracy!

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    8. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find out in 9 months.

    9. Re:Um... by daveime · · Score: 5, Funny

      1kg of the stuff ? I find that a bit hard to swallow !

    10. Re:Um... by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Keep practicing!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    11. Re:Um... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

      Wedding cake is very fattening...

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Um... by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 1

      Since when does a riding crop weigh 1 kg? One of these, maybe.

    13. Re:Um... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      African or European?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    14. Re:Um... by lul_wat · · Score: 1, Funny

      Um. This is kind of awkward to tell you. You don't usually wear clothes while having sex.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    15. Re:Um... by Deisatru · · Score: 5, Funny

      1kg of the stuff ? I find that a bit hard to swallow !

      Thats what she said!

    16. Re:Um... by von_rick · · Score: 1

      Their cat jumped on the bed.

      --

      Face your daemons!

    17. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try chewing?

    18. Re:Um... by von_rick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does role-playing and fantasy mean nothing to you?

      --

      Face your daemons!

    19. Re:Um... by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Three-way! Kinky.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    20. Re:Um... by Killer+Orca · · Score: 1

      Does role-playing and fantasy mean nothing to you?

      So you're telling us that a wizard did it?

    21. Re:Um... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I put on my robe and wizard's hat...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    22. Re:Um... by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Digital camcorder fell from it's perch?

    23. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and she gets up and hurries for the door...

    24. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yikes. You're quite the bitter loser.

    25. Re:Um... by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fact that she's still able to speak is a miracle of evolution.

    26. Re:Um... by fwice · · Score: 1

      Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

      I put on my robe and wizard hat.

    27. Re:Um... by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      ...and she gets up and hurries for the door...

      ._. I read "furries"

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    28. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is not any food so fat as the wedding cake, they say.

    29. Re:Um... by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      Theyre on the job! #5 - Action commenced at 09.33GMT. Weight: 152KG.

      Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

      How accurate can such a sensor be anyway?
      I think you would need sensors under each of the feet of the bed, and then average over quite some time to get any accuracy.
      How expensive are presure sensors that could do this?

      Has anyone done this before? The fact that the previous three measurements are exactly equal makes me suspect that someone simply fakes the tweets. Even my body scale is less exact than this.

    30. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or as bitter.

    31. Re:Um... by Zorque · · Score: 1

      I guess I shouldn't expect any different from Slashdot, but congratulations! You're a sexist!

    32. Re:Um... by mlk · · Score: 1

      A persons weight varies by 2.2kgs a day.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    33. Re:Um... by fearlezz · · Score: 1

      151.9KG and 152.0KG are less than 1 glass of wine away from each other.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    34. Re:Um... by crimperman · · Score: 1

      > Where did those extra 2.2 pounds come from?

      Clearly the groom was trying to impress the first four times but after that he reverted to being British and left his socks on

    35. Re:Um... by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      "false advertise" for the wedding.

      I don't know if it's true, but I was told a long time ago that a particular witchcraft act was still on the statute books, and basically if a man had never seen his wife without makeup until after wedding he could divorce her!

    36. Re:Um... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Another possible 'whoosh'... but I think it's because she's married now, and no longer has to look good for the wedding. It happens EVERY time. Woman works out like crazy for months to fit into a particular dress size, then once the wedding cake hits her gullet, the fat starts piling on. To be fair, men get fatter too, but we don't "false advertise" for the wedding.

      My wife lost about 10lb in the weeks following our wedding. So did I, in fact. Let's just say the secret is overloading the sensor under the mattress. ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    37. Re:Um... by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Why did I have to think of this when I read your comment: http://bash.org/?104383

    38. Re:Um... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You mean this yellow slicker I bought is going to be useless?

    39. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about sex after food?

    40. Re:Um... by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      lol, I can't beleive I actually read that.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    41. Re:Um... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Maybe we'll also find out if it's true that sex stops after marriage. It's been 4 days already, seems like a long time for newlyweds.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    42. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People everywhere thank you for your 10 second diagnosis. You make life better. Seriously, you do. No, seriously.

    43. Re:Um... by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      No, he's quite the bitter gainer.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    44. Re:Um... by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      So, a twitter DOS attack will help you lose weight?

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    45. Re:Um... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      And Slashdot still collectively wonders why it can't get laid.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    46. Re:Um... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Probably because that's what he was referring to? Hence, it's what you were supposed to think of? This wasn't a real question was it?

    47. Re:Um... by OneHungLo · · Score: 1

      Does role-playing and fantasy mean nothing to you?

      If you're bringing 1kg of dice into the bed, maybe you need to scale things down a notch.

    48. Re:Um... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      It's a well-known fact that women are susceptible to an allergic reaction to gold and diamond. A typical symptom is excessive bloating.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    49. Re:Um... by Zorque · · Score: 1

      "10 second diagnosis"? That sounds exactly like what the comment I replied to was doing! "All women are lying bitches who get fat as soon as the wedding's over." Good job defending a bigot, though.

    50. Re:Um... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Lunch.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    51. Re:Um... by dysan27 · · Score: 1

      My theory? They're christening the rest of the house.

    52. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having been married for a long time, and observing the world around me without the cloud of being a woman, I can assure that my diagnosis is more than 10 years in the making.

    53. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe the point was that "I make obvious observations" is not useful. You didn't contribute to the dialog in any constructive way, the post you're bitching about was probably meant as a joke, and your defensiveness suggests overcompensation.

  5. With friends like these, who needs enemies? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    The friend is breaking the cardinal rule of pranks. Everyone must get a good laugh *before* spilling the beans.

    So to recap:
    1) Spit the seed
    2) Tweet the deed
    3) Spill the beans

    Otherwise, the newlyweds are just going to screw elsewhere.

    1. Re:With friends like these, who needs enemies? by 56 · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, you would know that he's kept the twitter account anonymous, and hasn't told them yet.

    2. Re:With friends like these, who needs enemies? by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hope they aren't /. users.

      Wait, they can't be, they are having sex ;) n/m.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:With friends like these, who needs enemies? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Spit the seed

      What if the wife wants to swallow it instead?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:With friends like these, who needs enemies? by k_187 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you've found a keeper

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    5. Re:With friends like these, who needs enemies? by pacificleo · · Score: 0

      you surely live up to your name

      --
      somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
  6. Groom doesn't know by lazylocomotives · · Score: 1

    If you check the bed's twitter, the best man says that the groom does not know yet. I may have missed something, but I don't think so.

  7. Double blinded sex by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately (well, maybe fortunately) all parties in this hack are anonymous. Otherwise, the new groom could rig up an automatic bed bouncing machine and become a sexual legend of Web 3.0.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Double blinded sex by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Children jumping on the bed: "They're at it again! Weight: 37kg."

      --
      signature is pants
    2. Re:Double blinded sex by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      I sincerely doubt this joke will last that long into the marriage.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Double blinded sex by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      It may happen sooner than you think. I found their wedding album on Facebook and if I'm not mistaken the bride's father was wielding a 12 gauge.... ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Double blinded sex by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah I wonder where the power supply and internet connection was from.

      Maybe 15 minutes of very vigorous motions on the bed could supply enough energy to send out a tweet or two. I guess they could have had a battery powered sensor that just did radio comms on start and stop, then the relay is elsewhere.

      Anyway from the tweets it seems like it stopped already since the last post is: "# They're on the job! #5 - Action commenced at 09.33GMT. Weight: 152KG. 1:33 AM Dec 14th from Power Twitter". There's no "they're off the job" message and that's days ago.

      --
    5. Re:Double blinded sex by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      After warming up, they finally are having a marathon session.

      22 minutes isn't bad compared to average (I've read 15 minutes is the average for many males) but women are capable of (and often need!) so much more than that.

      And men, the more you give, the more you get in the long run.

      Of course, no one wants a steam hammer just hammering away dully. You have to switch it up a bit.

      Every man should read Donald Hicks book.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Double blinded sex by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      22 minutes isn't bad compared to average (I've read 15 minutes is the average for many males) but women are capable of (and often need!) so much more than that.

      Not necessarily intercourse, though. Many women get sore and uncomfortable after more than 10-15 minutes of that. And of course, since this is Slashdot, how many of us men are in good enough shape to go for that long, anway?

      The trick is to realize that the clock starts as soon as you go down on her. 25 minutes of oral + 5 minutes of intercourse counts as a 30 minute session.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    7. Re:Double blinded sex by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      The trick is to realize that the clock starts as soon as you go down on her. 25 minutes of oral + 5 minutes of intercourse counts as a 30 minute session.

      25 minutes of oral? One of us is doing something wrong...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    8. Re:Double blinded sex by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The trick is to realize that the clock starts as soon as you go down on her. 25 minutes of oral + 5 minutes of intercourse counts as a 30 minute session.

      There's no "trick", you're done when you're done. If it takes ten minutes to wring her out, that's cool. Usually it takes longer; to paraphrase Robin Williams, pack a lunch and stay for a while. I've known women to be focused on or to neglect any particular part of the experience and be as happy as you can expect a woman to be in a state of post-coital bliss. Every human is, thankfully, quite different for all the apparent similarity.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Double blinded sex by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      There's no "trick", you're done when you're done. [...] I've known women to be focused on or to neglect any particular part of the experience and be as happy as you can expect a woman to be in a state of post-coital bliss.

      I think we're in agreement here. I wasn't offering a recipe for sex, I was illustrating the point that "women are capable of (and often need!) so much more than that" doesn't necessarily mean you're failing if the motion sensor only registers 15 minutes.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    10. Re:Double blinded sex by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Women get sore and uncomfortable because they are not lubricating.

      My current (and prior) girlfriend have (and had) regular sessions of one to over two hours. If a female is coming every few minutes they keep lubricating. As a male, it's best to get a smooth pyrex toy and to edge instead of climaxing. When things get to hot for you, then you switch over to the toy. When you calm down, she's still red hot and you resume. When she has a climax, you need to rest for 15 to 20 seconds, stop moving, stop stimulating her but not much longer and then resume and take her higher. Pyrex also requires less lubrication.

      But the goal is to entertain her, to bring her pleasure, not a relentless series of orgasms so be playful. When you are finally done, she needs to curl up and stay down for 10 minutes or she will probably have a rush and get a headache when she stands up. Bring her some water and pet her.

      Read some articles on tantric sex and edging. If you do this as a male you will be rewarded with some of the best orgasms of your life. The longer you edge, the more it spreads to the rest of the body. As a male, I think the goal is fully hard and on the edge of climaxing until I reach that state.

      I highly recommend a massage table over a bed. Beds are just about the worst possible place to have sex. A massage table can be adjusted to the perfect height, it's soft but firm compared to a bed which is squishy. You can put her right up to the edge and stand up instead of laying down, this also lets you get a lot more dance-like hip action and swaying left or right and by bending the toes or going tippy toe you can literally hit every spot inside her. The G spot (on top under the clitoris) is important, but once awake, there are many other highly reactive areas inside.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  8. As one getting married in 11 days... by Elros · · Score: 1

    I will have the hide of anyone foolish enough to try this on me!!!

    1. Re:As one getting married in 11 days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11 days? Man, my mail order bride didn't come with delivery tracking, who's your supplier?

    2. Re:As one getting married in 11 days... by eihab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As one getting married in 11 days...

      Well let me be the first on Slashdot (maybe?) to say: CONGRATULATIONS!

      I don't know you or how long you knew your fiance, but I just want to wish you all the best in your journey. It will be fun :)

      Ignore the AC above, he's mad because he was raped in an alley yesterday.

      And yea mods, you can mod this off-topic. There goes Karma :\

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
  9. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new pressure-sensitive, tweeting devices.

  10. This is weak even for slashdot by syousef · · Score: 1

    "Neither the friend nor the couple are known. In fact, who knows if this is even real, and who cares, it's hilarious."

    What's next? Fart jokes? Unverified of course!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      An invasion of privacy is hilarious?

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    2. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next? Fart jokes?

      From The Article:

      Before I go any further I should say 90% the tech is ripped from http://bit.ly/kvALJ with a load of motion sensing tech added instead.

      Follow the link. It's a fart detecting chair.

    3. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by peektwice · · Score: 1

      Does not anonymity grant privacy?

      --
      Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
    4. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've rigged my finger to tweet when it's pulled.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by awyeah · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's nothing funny about invasions of privacy.

      But there's so many things that make this story hilarious.

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    6. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. Onlooker,

      It is not the invasion of privacy that is funny here. Move along, you need not be concerned.

      Signed
      The Humor Police

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    7. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      An invasion of privacy is hilarious?
      It's called a prank. Pranks are funny. EOM

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    8. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's no invasion of privacy, since names are undisclosed. The only information that you get is that someone, somewhere, is having sex right now. If this comes as a surprise to you, I really have no further advice.

    9. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Sure, they're undisclosed to us.. but the best man still set up a monitoring device in someone elses home, and surely he knows the couple..

    10. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      An invasion of privacy is hilarious?

      It is very easy for me to imagine that at some point in your life you've laughed at somebody getting their pants yanked down or maybe at embarrassing photos of people.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      Fart jokes actually came first, per one of the earliest tweets in the stream, he based his design upon a fart detecting office chair over at instructables(twitter-style shortened, just because).

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    12. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I guess a mitigating factor here is that nobody except a total loser would ever bother reading posts on Twitter anyway, so the invasion of privacy was more or less meaningless...

    13. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    14. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of farts...in your general direction.

    15. Re:This is weak even for slashdot by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I did the same for my penis.

  11. Like most Twitter feeds... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this feed won't be updated much after a few months.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Like most Twitter feeds... by oldspewey · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Like most marriages, this feed won't be updated much after a few years.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Like most Twitter feeds... by shri · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, lets hope it does not get updated every time the husband is on the golf course. :)

    3. Re:Like most Twitter feeds... by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Well, lets hope it does not get updated every time the husband is on the golf course. :)

      If he golfs, then that'll be the only time it will get updated.

      As the saying goes: "Do you still have sex, or do you already play golf?"

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:Like most Twitter feeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really matter? It is a proven fact that, from the first date on; everytime you get a piece you

      put a bean in a jar; keep this up for 2 years after the marriage; then take a bean out of the jar after

      every piece; YOU will NEVER empty the jar. :)

    5. Re:Like most Twitter feeds... by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Aw, shoot... My jar is going to be empty when I get married. How am I going to take a bean out on my honeymoon?

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  12. Dude needs a little more staying power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently he can't go more than 140 seconds.

    Hopefully, things will get better when the novelty wears off. And it will wear off.

  13. It'll be even more hillarious by shadowblaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the device starts tweeting while the husband is at work.

    1. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about a sudden decrease/increase in the measured weight ? That would be entertaining too.

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

      If one of my friends pulled this sort of crap on me, I wouldn't get mad and tell everyone, just ask him for the twitter username and keep close tabs on it...

    3. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have to worry about your newly wed bride doing someone else while you toil away at work, the relationship is already over.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

      Lucky me, I'm not married, and it was a joke.

    5. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm cheating on my wife, so I'm really getting a kick out of these responses.

    6. Re:It'll be even more hillarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are an expert in human behaviour...not.

  14. Only one sensor? by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    The best man snuck into the newlyweds' house while they were away on their honeymoon and placed a pressure-sensitive device under their mattress.

    So it only measures sex on the bed. How boring is that? That leaves out the walls, floor, couch, kitchen counter, pool table, the whole rest of the house and car sex un-Tweeted.

    And, if you're Tiger Woods, the private jet, the yacht and the putting green.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Only one sensor? by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

      "and the putting green."

      kind hard to hide a sensor there, dear, given how tightly shorn the grass is on the green.

    2. Re:Only one sensor? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      That's why you put the sensor in the hole.

    3. Re:Only one sensor? by DinDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      That leaves out the walls, floor, couch, kitchen counter, pool table, the whole rest of the house and car sex

      Ah yes, first stage of sex in a marriage.

      Second stage is after a few years, pretty much confined to the bedroom.

      Third stage kicks in around twelve or fifteen years. That's where you pass each other in the hallway and say "Fuck you!"

    4. Re:Only one sensor? by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      It will probably be found, Tiger has been putting it in every hole he can.

    5. Re:Only one sensor? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Third stage kicks in around twelve or fifteen years. That's where you pass each other in the hallway and say "Fuck you!"

      Way to ruin a good punch-line

      You're supposed to say "Hall Sex", and only after you get the "wtf is Hall Sex" look, explain it.

    6. Re:Only one sensor? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And next time you are at your newlywed friends home consider how many times they have had sex and left bodily fluids on the couch you are sitting on.

    7. Re:Only one sensor? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      So it only measures sex on the bed. How boring is that? That leaves out the walls, floor, couch, kitchen counter, pool table, the whole rest of the house and car sex un-Tweeted.

      Also what is the setup of the sensor? I'm assuming it's not a mattress sized sensor, if they're doing it on the side of the bed that could throw off the sensor. Gentle missionary style sex directly on top of the sensor would register as more vigorous sex than hard and fast doggy style sex at the foot of the bed. Plus you can get the mattress resonating without it being too hard, that would probably throw off the scale.

      Unrelated note, it's probably good that I have Christmas break coming up and won't have to worry about calibrations on the equipment at lab for a few days. I've started getting a bit obsessive.

    8. Re:Only one sensor? by Hillview · · Score: 1

      You forgot the ceiling? o_0

      --
      -Troll, Flamebait, and Offtopic are NOT equivalent to disagreement.
    9. Re:Only one sensor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, if you're Tiger Woods, the private jet, the yacht and the putting green.

      You forgot the golf cart - and the bunkers

    10. Re:Only one sensor? by IAmRenegadeX · · Score: 1

      The three stages of sex as couples age:

      Tri-weekly
      Try: weekly
      Try weakly

    11. Re:Only one sensor? by Fumus · · Score: 1

      I'd say shouting "fuck you" is closest to oral sex.

    12. Re:Only one sensor? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I'd say shouting "fuck you" is closest to oral sex.

      Don't laugh - I knew a young engaged couple who thought that "oral sex" meant you talked about it or talked dirty.

      That was an awkward conversation, trying to explain oral sex to them while keeping a straight face AND not throwing in a bunch of "honeymoon" jokes.

      Comparable to the time (this decade) when I was trying to explain Godwin's Law to someone, and it was obvious I wasn't getting the concept across - she finally asked "Who's Hitler?" THAT was a real conversation-stopper! Even her hubby went "WTF?!? You don't know who Hitler was? You're kidding, right?" (*mumble* lousy elite private-school education */mumble*).

  15. False positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many low-intensity sex sessions are actually false positives caused by tossing and turning.

    1. Re:False positives by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder how many low-intensity sex sessions are actually false positives caused by tossing and turning.

      But doesn't that count as foreplay?

    2. Re:False positives by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      What the hell is that?

    3. Re:False positives by bronney · · Score: 2, Funny

      wait a minute.. you're saying tossing and turning on a bed with someone isn't sex??! Damn it I thought I scored.

  16. Not all too unrealistic. by MrCrassic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, let's get the obvious out of the way:

    • What is this doing on Slashdot?
    • How is this news?
    • How does this matter? At all?

    Now that I've aired that out, this isn't too unsurprising of a read, considering how a former girlfriend I had told me of people she knew who would AIM while doing in doggystyle, record themselves having sex, reading, etc. etc. etc...

    1. Re:Not all too unrealistic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're that bad that she IM'd durring secs? That's epic.

    2. Re:Not all too unrealistic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol if you think that's bad, I've been worse!!! :-p -mrcrassic

  17. Hmm by ShooterNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how does the device work? For instance, how are these weight measurements being made? If you just put a load cell under the middle of the bed, it isn't going to measure the total mass. You'd need to use 4 load cells - one at each corner of the mattress. And the Mattress has to have a frame, like a box spring. Or you could use 1 load cell, but you'd have to build a special framework under the bed for it.

    The next part is how do you translate these weight and vibration readings into a "sex detector". Where do you set the threshold, such that if someone just rolls over or even flops on the bed it doesn't set it off? Lots of ordinary acts, from scratching an itch to sitting up might create vibrations in the system that would fool a simple script into detecting "sex".

    Plus, some sex acts create a lot more vibration that others. Position also matters quite a bit.

    This is an interesting problem. I think it's solvable, to a reasonable level of accuracy. But you'd have to calibrate the system, which would require something that most slashdotters don't have access to....

    1. Re:Hmm by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The sex detection part is some fairly trivial signal processing. You need a band pass filter with a passband of about 0.5-3 Hz (at a guess; better numbers exist, but I haven't tried googling them). Then you need to detect extended signal within that band; there are a variety of options for this, any of which are likely to work.

    2. Re:Hmm by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's a pretty trivial filtering problem. It looks like it's all based on a set of load cells, so the question is if you look at the down forces on, say, the four corners of your bed what does sex "look" like? Fourier transforms would convert running measurements to frequency measurements. I'd say you look for a minimum of 5-10 seconds of oscillations at a given frequency (anything from maybe 1 to 10Hz). You then require a 2+ minute span of continuing recurrences. Filter out total weights that indicate only one person (or, you know, don't). Figure peak, average, and maybe std deviation of the frequency/ampitude spectrum recored for the "event" and use those numbers to do your "grading".

      This is the reason *I* went to college.

    3. Re:Hmm by rockNme2349 · · Score: 1

      This is the reason *I* went to college.

      You too!?

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This. This is why I read Slashdot.

    5. Re:Hmm by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, here I was wondering if you could identify different positions from the spectrum, and apparently everyone else is already been thinking about it in those terms. For once, sex comes up on Slashdot in a way that's hilarious rather than creepy.

    6. Re:Hmm by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      10 Hz?! I must be doing it wrong. Are you sure you aren't programming an epileptic fit detector?

      2+ minute span? Now I *know* I'm doing it wrong...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Hmm by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then you need to detect extended signal within that band...

      Um, aren't they British?

    8. Re:Hmm by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      For once, sex comes up on Slashdot in a way that's hilarious rather than creepy.

      So, I was strolling down to the kindergarten.....

      --
      SSC
    9. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. I've learned a lot about sex on this site.

    10. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This? This is why I read Slashdot?

    11. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would just setup a camera with motion sensing...

      Wow, I even creeped myself out.

    12. Re:Hmm by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      You know you're on Slashdot when this is what passes for a sex discussion.

    13. Re:Hmm by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting problem. I think it's solvable, to a reasonable level of accuracy. But you'd have to calibrate the system, which would require something that most slashdotters don't have access to....

      An oscilloscope?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that Kalman filters make the best estimators of a system's state. For best results, use an unscented Kalman filter, which works even without knowing the underlying probability distribution.

    15. Re:Hmm by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      I would love to know what sort of weight sensor he used.
      Unfortunately the lack of technical details and the fact that he tweets the exact weight, without any indications of preprocessing, makes me suspect a fake.

      Anyone know what pressure sensors and processing you could use to get the exact weight?

    16. Re:Hmm by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      But you'd have to calibrate the system, which would require something that most slashdotters don't have access to....

      don't be insensitive, there are enough slashdotters that can afford an inflatable doll

       

      --
      ---
    17. Re:Hmm by pacificleo · · Score: 0

      Same here .slashdot never fail to give me new perspective on a seemingly insurmountable problem

      --
      somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
    18. Re:Hmm by pacificleo · · Score: 0

      Heh, here I was wondering if you could identify different positions from the spectrum.

      heat map variation sensor make a more elegant solution IMHO . with a little knowledge of topography of room you can do a relistic 3 D modeling of scenario .

      --
      somethings are best left unsaid , I am one of those things
    19. Re:Hmm by Eivind · · Score: 1

      That's not gonna cut it. Not for "sex", for "intercourse" perhaps, but I'm not sure there's much of a pattern to detect, other than random movement, from oral sex, for example.

    20. Re:Hmm by julesh · · Score: 1

      Um, aren't they British?

      Duration: 22 m.41 s
      Duration: 15 m.55 s
      Duration: 15 m.31 s. Frenzy Index: 9 (thrash metal).
      Duration: 22 m.05 s.

      Guess not.

    21. Re:Hmm by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      You know what I meant. The only way to be sure your sex detector works would be to test it. Try different things on the bed with the connected equipment and record the data to use it to fine tune your code. That would mean, among other things, you'd want to have 2 partners who are similar in mass to the actual couple actually have sex on the bed in different positions. Most slashdotters would of course want to get their hands dirty with this part and would just need a female partner...which the meme around here is...

    22. Re:Hmm by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose if the female in this couple liked to lie there like a dead fish, an inflatable doll just might allow for an adequate facsimile for calibration purposes. Suppose if this were a catholic couple...

    23. Re:Hmm by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say something about how the Slashdotter in question would have to be around 150 kilogram to compensate for the lack of mass in the doll...and then I remembered which website this was again.

      Carry on!

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    24. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Figure peak, average, and maybe std deviation of the frequency/ampitude spectrum recored for the "event" and use those numbers to do your "grading".

      Std deviation? Thats gonna be a bit more invasive that just hiding a load balancer under the bed!

    25. Re:Hmm by Sifonki · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as they are married, STD deviation should remain minimal.

    26. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legs up, relaxing deep tension with knees bent just a little can do 10Hz easily for more than 2 minutes... try it yourself but tell your partner first or she will can the paramedics :)

    27. Re:Hmm by Gwyn_232 · · Score: 1

      I think you're over-engineering the problem, all you need is a spycam.

    28. Re:Hmm by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, 3 Hz?! I've been married for almost 10 years and have 2 kids, so maybe I'm not exactly in my prime sex life, but 3 Hz! Damn, man! That passes chafing and you start worry about friction burns.

    29. Re:Hmm by rwv · · Score: 1

      You then require a 2+ minute span of continuing recurrences.

      They could change their rhythm faster than two minutes. Or, if he's the average slashdotter, he could finish in less than a minute.

      Point is.. you haven't figured out all the variables yet.

    30. Re:Hmm by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      But, can it really distinguish sex from, say, bed jumping?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    31. Re:Hmm by indros13 · · Score: 1
      Indeed. This would be a great xkcd cartoon.

      Slashdot nerd: "The sex detection part is some fairly trivial signal processing. You need a band pass filter with a passband of about 0.5-3 Hz (at a guess; better numbers exist, but I haven't tried googling them). Then you need to detect extended signal within that band; there are a variety of options for this, any of which are likely to work."

      Normal person: "obviously this is a big joke, since he doesn't have to prove to anyone that he's done anything more than set up a Twitter account."

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    32. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use load cells? Personally I think this is another great use of the accelerometers in a Wiimote. Since its already talking to the laptop, it kicks in the webcam which can then steer visitors to the feed. Users can take snapshots, and vote on the best ones. And relatively thinking, Wiimotes and netbooks are fairly cheap.

      Um, not that I would do that kind of thing.... Uhhhh....

    33. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he would have to calibrate the device whilst they were in the act of coitis.

  18. Sounds interesting... by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, I want one, that sounds awesome. I wouldn't have it tweet when I'm having sex, but I'd probably keep some sort of online log that would graph the weight, volume, temperature (though that might be greatly skewed by the friction of the mattress constantly rubbing against the device) and if I can have motion sensors I'd have it log "the motion of the ocean."

    Not that the data would serve much purpose other than to say "Hey check out what I made."

    1. Re:Sounds interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There's something to put in the baby book...

    2. Re:Sounds interesting... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      I was going to say something very mean here, but I can't bring myself to do it.

      *nerd solidarity*

    3. Re:Sounds interesting... by fotoguzzi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent up!

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    4. Re:Sounds interesting... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      Okay.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    5. Re:Sounds interesting... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      While your at it, attach the same sensors to your toilet... yes, you too can be a twitter shitter!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  19. Thanks advertising agencies of the world by whrde · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has a very, very high likelihood of being an advertisement for the pads he links to. Such a pity that advertising agencies have destroyed my ability to believe things :-(

    1. Re:Thanks advertising agencies of the world by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      I suspect a fake as well, but where does he link to any pads?

  20. Seriously by Escaflowne · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is anyone else getting sick of samzempus purposely marking an idle article as 'science' or 'technology' that is clearly idle just so it gets more views? We already know you mis-tag articles purposely so they get more views (most people filter out idle), but seriously do your job correctly.

    Most of us come on this site for relevant technology and science news and do our part by filtering out articles we are not interested in. I for one do not appreciate when this particular moderator purposely bypasses my filter on a near daily basis just to get more views or 'prestige' within the site. If anything you're becoming more infamous as being the moderator that posts useless things. /rant

  21. The plot plotted... by copponex · · Score: 1

    if time=x and frequency=y

    f(x)= 1/x

    x: (0, infinity)

  22. Fun Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a fun experiment to do with one of these devices: Correlate the amount of alcohol consumed with the weight placed on the sensor.

  23. Old news.. by nanospook · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This news is like a week old *yawn*

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  24. How funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the weight all of a sudden doubled or tripled.

    1. Re:How funny... by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      Give it a couple of years...

  25. Good application of a Wiibot by ctmurray · · Score: 1

    Seems like a Wiimote, like the ones we were reading about the other day would work better than a simple pressure sensor.

  26. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a use for Twitter!

  27. 1-10 isn't good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    For newlyweds it should go to 11.

  28. my wife is an odd duck by Coraon · · Score: 5, Funny

    When she read the article her first words were "Where do we get one of those?" O.o

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    1. Re:my wife is an odd duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not quite sure if she will take kindly to being called a duck... Though I suppose there are worse things to be called...

    2. Re:my wife is an odd duck by mqduck · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not quite sure if she will take kindly to being called a duck

      I take offense to that!

      --
      Property is theft.
    3. Re:my wife is an odd duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my wife is an odd duck

      Where do I get one of those?

    4. Re:my wife is an odd duck by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

      When she read the article her first words were "Where do we get one of those?" O.o

      Funny, I laughed and called out the RSS summary to my wife who was playing with our kid in the next room and she had the same response!

      I said "Don't you think thats a little personal?"

      She replied "Not with one of these!" and shot me a big grin =D

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    5. Re:my wife is an odd duck by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      my wife is an odd duck

      Where do I get one of those?

      Russia.

      --
      -
    6. Re:my wife is an odd duck by maciarc · · Score: 1

      When she read the article her first words were "Where do we get one of those?" O.o

      You may already have one. How long have you been married?

  29. Thrust limit? by palmerj3 · · Score: 1

    140 thrust limit?

  30. Only a matter of time by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

    Only a matter of time before someone puts one of these in a motel room that rents by the hour.

    --
    I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    1. Re:Only a matter of time by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I am proud to be an American where at least I know I'm free, as long as I follow the party line and carry my ID.

      It's a misconception that you need to carry your ID in the United States. There is no law requiring it. And before you pull up the "papers please" guy, the law in question in that case required him to identify himself when asked. It didn't require him to produce ID. "Officer, my name is Mr. X" would have been sufficient.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Only a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no law *requiring* that you present ID when asked by the law, BUT if you refuse you can expect to spend the night (at least) in jail. They didn't become cops to be told by some random geek what they can and can't do, they're cops because they want to be able to tell YOU what to do. At best you'll be charged with something innocuous and then once you've been sufficiently inconvenienced to make the point clear the charges will be dropped. If you look Latino you might end up with a one-way trip to Mexico unless your fingerprints show up on a registry somewhere. Piss them off badly enough and you might end up charged with 'Obstructing an investigation' and/or 'Resisting arrest'.

      There doesn't have to be a law, the consequences just have to be annoying enough to make you comply.

    3. Re:Only a matter of time by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There's no law *requiring* that you present ID when asked by the law, BUT if you refuse you can expect to spend the night (at least) in jail

      If your answer is "fuck you pig, I don't have to show you ID", then yes, you are going to jail.

      My answer is "I don't have any ID on me, but my name is X". It has the virtue of being the truth. I don't feel compelled to carry my drivers license with me everywhere I go. It lives in my car unless I need it for something specific. It's for driving after all....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  31. Reliable wireless connection ? by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

    I wonder how you can get a reliable connection out into the world. Local WLAN ? Random open hotspot ? Someone might actually find that an unknown device on the local lan. A cellphone/pager would be a waste.

    --
    "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  32. "Everybody Knows".... by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    there's gonna be a meter on your bed, that will disclose.. what everybody knows!..

    never thought it would be LITERAL.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  33. Reply: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Reply: "Get your own, bastard! And thanks for the iPhone."

  34. Bedbugs and Twitterboxes by macraig · · Score: 1

    I wonder how often the new bride and groom will be inclined to turn the mattress? This will tell us something about their housekeeping skills, too. Will the bedbugs find the Twitterbox before they do?

    1. Re:Bedbugs and Twitterboxes by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      Depends on the size of stain.

    2. Re:Bedbugs and Twitterboxes by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bedbug. Perfect name for this device.

  35. Frequency and trend study by figona · · Score: 1

    current frequency .008 Hz, Amplitude 3 inches
    Study reveals that amplitude is inversely proportional to frequency

    1. Re:Frequency and trend study by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      No, no, it should be "amplitude is inversely proportional to time between activations".

      Which means amplitude is proportional to frequency of activations. In fact, I think it's exponentially proportional.

      As most Slashdotters here will testify from their tremendous personal experiences, right?

  36. Disingenuous? by QuePasaCalabaza · · Score: 1

    Normally you'd expect someone nerdy enough to create something as complex as this to document their build with pictures and short blurbs about the materials and sensors used. I find it odd that this so-called nerdy creation does not contain any information about the build itself outside of "Hey you know this guy that built a twitter connected fart sensor, well I used some stuff like that". Who knows why he would want a bunch of twitter followers interested in pseudo-voyeurism, but I think this feed is not genuine.

  37. Advice to newlyweds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Get a sheet of paper, write the times that you had sex. Better make that two sheets.
    2) Cross out the times when you had sex someplace other than the bed.
    3) Check each time against the page: http://twitter.com/newlywedsontjob
    4) If there are no times left, examine tyour bed.

  38. wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So here's a site I use to find everything that's anything to do with privacy, invasion thereof, and all manner of other well reasoned ideas, go to show this page to female acquaintance; sees this crap (privacy minded.Sd/.)
    No thought What kind of invasion is that to a woman?. 5*funny it's not. Thanks.

  39. Can get awkward... by nicodoggie · · Score: 1

    ...when it turns out, they haven't been having sex the past few days

    1. Re:Can get awkward... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      they haven't been having sex on that bed the past few days. Really not that awkward.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  40. Why is this in the newspaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This smells like a hoax to me. When this turns out to be viral advertising for some stupid movie about two people who just got married, the reporter is going to look like an idiot, and it doesn't matter that he said he doesn't know if it's real or not. He still put it in an article with the Washington Post's name on it.

  41. UK Media misses scoop by crimperman · · Score: 1

    What interests me is that this is a British man and the *Washington Post* has the story first.

  42. I read by abcjared · · Score: 1

    Pleasure sensor

  43. Good use of twitter by uneek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, this is really evil

  44. What, no Twitpic? by kriston · · Score: 1

    If there's no Twitpic, it didn't happen.

    --

    Kriston

  45. Friendly advice by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been married twice, so let me tell you something important. They say that the first year of marriage is the hardest. Don't worry, that's not true. It's the last year that's the hardest.

    Good luck!

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    1. Re:Friendly advice by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Yes, but some times those are one and the same.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  46. Let's hope... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that it only goes off when they're both at home...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  47. tweet frequency by drmitch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oddly enough, the frequency of tweeting on the account is dropping like a rock.

  48. Geeks are not sexist! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    No way. Never.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  49. Like a bad joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope it doesn't start tweeting while the husband's at work...