Slashdot Mirror


Why Is a Laptop's Battery Dearer Than a Lawnmower's?

Barence writes "PC Pro's contributing editor Paul Ockendon has bought a new lawnmower powered by lithium-ion batteries — part of a recent flood of such lithium-ion-powered garden and workshop tools which are taking over from NiCd and NiMH thanks to lighter weight, longer life and lack of the pernicious 'memory effect.' This is pretty much the same battery technology used in laptops, mobile phones and MP3 players, so volume manufacture is already established. Yet laptop manufacturers charge more per Watt-hour than lawnmower makers. This blog investigates whether such a seemingly ludicrous situation can be justified."

427 comments

  1. Well that's easy... by Firemouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Greed.

    1. Re:Well that's easy... by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you mean capitalism (mostly the same thing, but sure). You know, the whole, priced to what the market will bear nonesense that is the fundemental underpinnings of our economy. In this case, the cost of batteries for garden tools is lower because NiCa and other technologies are still viable alternatives, whereas in the laptop segment they are not. In other words, there are more competitors and a higher supply in one market segment than another.

    2. Re:Well that's easy... by fooslacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or market economics...turns out a lawnmower purchaser is not willing to pay the same for a battery that a laptop purchaser is or perhaps the lawnmower has cheaper non-lithium competitors it must compete with which drives down it's market price. I guess technically that's greed, charging what you can but without it where would we be?

    3. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism. (Supply and demand.) Look it up.

    4. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To be more precise

      Batteries =~ Printer Ink

      Do you think HP makes its profit on the laptop hardware or the new battery you need to buy 18 months later?

    5. Re:Well that's easy... by Firemouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess technically that's greed, charging what you can but without it where would we be?

      Thriving?

    6. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For the same reason that you people will pay more for the same headphones if the package says "digital ready" or some similar bullshit statement on them..

      Because people are stupid enough to pay more for stuff if they are told it's higher tech.

    7. Re:Well that's easy... by captaindomon · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you. I would mod you up but I have already replied to this thread. There is a difference in willingness to pay between a lawnmower purchaser and a laptop purchaser.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    8. Re:Well that's easy... by fooslacker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unlikely, people don't do things for the heck of it.

    9. Re:Well that's easy... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      True, look at North Korea or Soviet Russia.

      "Intellectuals" deciding what batteries "should" cost would be much better.

    10. Re:Well that's easy... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Noooo....

      Laptop batteries are made to higher standards..

      we cant have laptop batteries bursting in flames or exploding. so we pay more for them to be made better!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Well that's easy... by Roberticus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unlikely, people don't do things for the heck of it.

      Says the user posting for the heck of it, on the site created for the heck of it back in the day...

    12. Re:Well that's easy... by superslacker87 · · Score: 5, Funny

      True, look at North Korea or Soviet Russia.

      In Soviet Russia... battery charges you!

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    13. Re:Well that's easy... by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      I only wish that was a fact and not a common delusion.

    14. Re:Well that's easy... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      So basically, we need laptops that are gas-powered? Or push-powered? You know that might make their batteries cheaper, but damn, it'd be awesome to rev up your laptop before playing wow in a net cafe.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    15. Re:Well that's easy... by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Both?

    16. Re:Well that's easy... by Firemouth · · Score: 1

      I understand profit, that's why we're in business, to make money. But charging more for something just because the consumer is willing to pay more for it... I guess that crosses the ethical line for me.

      That's not supply and demand, it's not because it's any better than the other, it's not because its more expensive to make. You're just doing it because you can, and I call that greed.

      But then again, I wouldn't call myself a salesmen, a shrewd businessman, etc.

    17. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean capitalism (mostly the same thing, but sure). You know, the whole, priced to what the market will bear nonesense that is the fundemental underpinnings of our economy. In this case, the cost of batteries for garden tools is lower because NiCa and other technologies are still viable alternatives, whereas in the laptop segment they are not. In other words, there are more competitors and a higher supply in one market segment than another.

      You god damn beauraucrat!

    18. Re:Well that's easy... by anonymousbob22 · · Score: 1

      Mods have no sense of humour? I thought parent post was funny.

    19. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Haven't seen one of those jokes on here in ages.

    20. Re:Well that's easy... by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      So you have refuse all raises you have been offered unless there is a proportional increase in duties.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    21. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were going to go with "They do more testing on a battery that will sit in your lap than one you can toss into the yard in case of fire." ...how naive of me.

    22. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>priced to what the market will bear nonesense that is the fundemental underpinnings of our economy

      Why on earth do you think it's nonsense? You wouldn't ask for whatever wage your employer is willing to give you, and instead would settle to whatever you think is "fair" (assuming that your definition of fair is lower than whatever your employer wants to pay you)?

    23. Re:Well that's easy... by mirkob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I understand profit, that's why we're in business, to make money. But charging more for something just because the consumer is willing to pay more for it... I guess that crosses the ethical line for me.

      That's not supply and demand, it's not because it's any better than the other, it's not because its more expensive to make. You're just doing it because you can, and I call that greed.

      that's where the theory of capitalism fail, if every laptop owner know that it has been ripped of money for nothing in return
      than, maybe, market would work (and low the price),

      but the main component that influence the market today are publicity and obfuscation of real characteristics and flaws of product

      not informed comparison of products, where intelligent and informed people could decide if they want more reliable, more durable or cheaper product of a certain kind and, buying it, influence the market production.

    24. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see the correlation or what you're driving at.

      If I'm being offered a raise, they're voluntarily doing that. If I'm demanding more pay just because my ass groove is more solid in my chair because I've been here longer, that's different.

      That's like asking if the manufacturer would refuse someone offering to pay more for the same product. Not demanding that the customer pay more just because its a laptop not a lawnmower.

    25. Re:Well that's easy... by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe the reason is actually another.

      Laptop batteries sold separately are generally sold after the laptop was purchased, or at least after the decision was made to purchase that particular laptop. People don't generally spend the time to price out more than 2 laptops including all options before picking which one they want, they usually look at the base unit price. Therefore the laptop manufacturer has a monopoly (or close to a monopoly, at least, for some things you can get third-party components) on the sale of laptop options like batteries. A monopoly means being able to charge what the item is worth to the buyer, instead of only being able to charge a little more than the productions costs like in a market with perfect competition. The only challenge is to avoid scaring the cheapskate buyers away that you only make a small profit on without lowering the price for everyone, but differential pricing is solving that "problem".

      Options and spare parts are generally examples of market failures.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    26. Re:Well that's easy... by OttoErotic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      on the site created for the heck of it back in the day... ...whose corporate parent now makes enough money off of ads to justify its continued operation

      --
      "Once in Hawaii I had sex with a 102 year old male turtle. It is difficult to argue that it was consensual." - Steve Ma
    27. Re:Well that's easy... by Thoguth · · Score: 1

      Competing? This is where I find a problem with the simple "greed" answer ... there are a lot of companies that make laptops and laptop batteries. If they could all sell batteries cheaper, then greed should incite one to do that, making his product more competitive and gaining him more sales. If they "can" get away with every company over charging, then the only reason is that laptop purchasers, as a market, really don't care about that much of a price difference.

      And if that is the case, then who cares? Why is the seller guilty of greed for charging a price we are willing to pay, but we're not guilty of the same greed for wanting to keep that price difference to ourselves when it's worth more than that to us?

      --
      The requested URL /iframe/sig.html was not found on this server.
    28. Re:Well that's easy... by Sandbags · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. Laptop batteries are priced higher due to size constraints and weight constraints. Just becaus eit says LiIon does NOT mean that the battery in your laptop and lawnmower are even remotely the same.

      Larger batteries are cheaper to produce.
      Batteries not limited by shape design are cheaper to produce
      Batteries not limited by expensive structural components (lawnmower batteries can be placed in cheap, thick, sturdy casings and noone cares, slim laptop batteries require magnesuim or titanium reinforcement to hold together).

      Arguing why laptop batteries cost more per watt hour is like arguing why Half-A batteries cost more than D-Cells for the same reason. Or why cell phone and camera batters have even larger differences in priceing per watt hour vs laptop batteries.

      Also, every laptop practically has a unique battery, which requires manufacturing, storage, logistics, etc. Lawnmowers are likely using generic cells, like the ones being mass rpoduced for cars and other industrial purposes. A battery is a battery to a lawnmower. They simply cost less. I'd bet half the price or less.

      The fewer of a thing you make, or the more unique it is from other things, the more it costs.

      This is not capitolism, it's logistics, manufacturing, and HARD COSTS.

      STFU, and do some market research before you get on a high horse and spread FUD about things you know nothing about.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    29. Re:Well that's easy... by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, people don't do things for the heck of it.

      Says the user posting for the heck of it, on the site created for the heck of it back in the day...

      And now is making money as a commercial venture.

      It might be better to have said that "People don't do things for the heck of it indefinitely."

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    30. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and with lawnmowers they have to compete with other energy source based lawnmowers. My lawnmower is 'recharged' in about 30 seconds and lasts the entire lawn. Until they have a viable gasoline based laptop battery, laptop battery prices will remain higher per watt-hour.

    31. Re:Well that's easy... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      And what's more: (Score:2, Insightful)

    32. Re:Well that's easy... by Firemouth · · Score: 1

      I didn't write the article ;) I just posted something that was meant to be funny but was instead tagged as Insightful.

      Talk to the mod's!

    33. Re:Well that's easy... by homer_s · · Score: 1

      Is that the same greed that is causing laptop manufacturers to cut prices and add on more features? And why would laptop manufacturers be more greedy than lawnmower manufacturers? And if they can charge higher prices just because they're greedy, why would they stop at this particular price? Why can't they just charge $10,000 per laptop battery?

      Are you sure it has nothing to do with battery size, heat dissipation requirements, logistics, safety requirements, FCC certification costs, etc? Have you looked at all the variables and set your political preferences aside?

    34. Re:Well that's easy... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

      In short, marketing kills real capitalism.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    35. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Segmenting markets, or creating artificial barriers between markets is not capitalism. It's a monopolistic practice.

      In a capitalist system there are no barriers between markets, there's no such thing as a "market segment". Segments are created artificially to line companies' pockets.

      They intentionally avoid things like having laptop batteries work in lawnmowers or vice-versa. In fact... most laptop manufacturers artificially design their laptops and batteries so that a generic battery from someone else cannot be plugged in.

      The logic's wrong.. based on that thinking LCD's should be uber-expensive, because they're really the only viable option for computer monitors.

      Computer keyboards should be really expensive also, those are even more specialized than displays... there aren't other viable input device technologies.

      See the problem?

      It's not about competing technologies it's about many producers trying to sell the most units.

    36. Re:Well that's easy... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Aw yeah, that would be cool. It wouldn't even be that hard to put together. You could get the smallest COTS generator on the market and just plug any old laptop into the 115V socket.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    37. Re:Well that's easy... by Jodka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you ebay stuff, would you prefer the winning bidder be the one who offers the lowest bid? When you shop for groceries do you purchase the lowest quality goods which you can find for the highest price? When you look for job do you seek out employers who sould compensates you at the lowest rate? Do you comparison shop online for the highest prices?

      People who make the opposite of those choices are engaging in, as you describe it, that "priced to what the market will bear nonesense that is the fundemental underpinnings of our economy."

      When you haggle in the market, you being reasonable, it's the other guy who is the greedy bastard. When you try to maximize revenues and minimize costs that is rational self interest. When others do that, it is greed.

      My point is not that you should deliberately make bad choices and act against your own financial self-interest. It is that you are a hypocrite for acting in your own financial interests while criticizing others for doing the same.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    38. Re:Well that's easy... by Firemouth · · Score: 1

      Again, I make a comment in jest and the mods thought it was insightful ;)

      I didn't write the article! lol

    39. Re:Well that's easy... by fooslacker · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. People don't do things for the heck of it indefinitely. ;)

      At a more basic level without specialized labor (aka civilization) and hence trading, people only make one or two or a few copies of something so that they can use it. When you add profit as a motivator they then build things to trade for other things and we all enjoy the progress of the industrious and clever individuals among us.

    40. Re:Well that's easy... by Forge · · Score: 1

      Close. Competition is the key. That Lawnmower and Battery has to compete with Gas powered mowers and plane old gasoline. If the gap got too wide, it wouldn't sell.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    41. Re:Well that's easy... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >You know, the whole, priced to what the market will bear nonesense that is the fundemental underpinnings of our economy.

      Right, because command economy worked so great for the Soviets. Everything has value only because of what markets will bear. Thats a basic premise of capitalism. You wouldnt have a laptop in a non-capitalist system. When I had an Apple //, my Soviet peers had no computer industry and just made copies of US stuff:

      http://histclo.com/essay/war/com/sov/sci/ss-ecomp.html

      Not to mention, all things have value because of markets. Gold and even currency are all commodities whose value isnt determined by a committee of magical unicorns but by markets. You cant have capitalism and arbitrary settings of price.

    42. Re:Well that's easy... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      there are a lot of companies that make laptops and laptop batteries.

      How many companies are selling the end consumer Dell Adamo laptop batteries.

    43. Re:Well that's easy... by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      And don't you get so much value out of this "for the heck of it" service that you are willing to pay for it?

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    44. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A site hosted on an OS released for the heck of it, possibly using a browser that was created for the heck of it (webkit-based) on an OS that was released for the heck of it.

      Communism it works bitches*

      *Disclaimer, this is not universally true do not base the ideals for your state on an anonymous posting on Slashdot.

    45. Re:Well that's easy... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      that's where the theory of capitalism fail...

      No, it's the most fundamental law of economics at work, not at all specific to capitalism: Supply and Demand.

      If you can influence Demand the price goes up. That's what marketing is all about. And surely you don't think that in a controlled economy there isn't marketing? The government controls that too, but it's definitely there. There's nothing unethical about marketing a product as long as it does what you day.

    46. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It easy to understand market dynamics when your reply to everything you don't understand is greed isn't it?

    47. Re:Well that's easy... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I think you mean capitalism (mostly the same thing, but sure). You know, the whole, priced to what the market will bear nonesense that is the fundemental underpinnings of our economy.

      And you propose what exactly as the alternative? Shall the government set the price? What happens if the seller doesn't want to sell at the government set price? If you and the seller conduct the transaction "under the table" on terms agreeable to both of you should you be prosecuted for "illegal purchasing/selling"?

      Nobody is forcing you to buy or sell something that you don't want to. If you don't like the price or you don't want to engage in the transaction then walk away. That is the free market. When the government or any other external agent attempts to interfere with that, anger and violence are very likely to result. For example, in Venezuela the Hugo Chavez government has threatened and harassed warehouse owners and small groceries who refuse to sell milk, meat, and other food products (which are in short supply because of the idiotic policies of that government) at the government fixed price with arrest, prosecution, and imprisonment. The business owners have argued that the government price causes them to lose money and that they will go out of business, but the pleas have fallen on deaf ears in the Chavez government.

      So go ahead and continue to knock capitalism if it makes you feel better, but ask yourself this: would you rather live in Hugo Chavez's socialist paradise in Venezuela? If the answer is 'no' then perhaps you need to rethink your sweeping critique of the entire capitalist system as "pure greed".

    48. Re:Well that's easy... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      lol. I can accept that.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    49. Re:Well that's easy... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      A lack of transparency is what allows stuff like this to happen. I think you're right about the ethics of it, since it's not all that different from scamming someone. IMHO it'd be nice if one could request an honestly (and recursively) itemized price for anything. Something along the lines of $30 base materials, $30 labor, $40 recouping equipment and development investments, $20 marketing, $20 administrative, $40 profit.

      Of course, many of the successful businesses rely on obscene profits on specific items, so they'd never want this. OTOH, it'd be much easier to simply price according to costs and I don't think many consumers would mind reasonable profit margins. It'd also help companies that make higher quality products because the consumer could tell why the price is higher, and see what they are actually paying for.

    50. Re:Well that's easy... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you are looking at individual things (laptops, batteries, etc) in a vacuum, and that is not how a business looks at it. For instance, let's say a laptop (without battery) actually costs $500 to make, with a reasonable profit, and a battery actually costs $100. A business may do a study, and find out that the average laptop will use 2 batteries in it's lifetime. So, on average, a consumer will spend $700 over the life of the product for laptop and batteries. Now they have a decision to make: would a consumer be more likely to pay $600 for laptop/battery, and $100 to replace the battery, or would they pay $500 for laptop/battery and $200 to replace the battery? Either way, you are paying the same price over the life of the product. Now with something like a lawnmower, the battery is probably a smaller piece of the overall cost, and you are probably going to replace the battery many more times over the life of the product, so each battery is priced closer to the 'real' price.

    51. Re:Well that's easy... by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      that's where the theory of capitalism fail, if every laptop owner know that it has been ripped of money for nothing in return than, maybe, market would work (and low the price)

      I'm sorry, but that has very little to do with "making the market work". To the buyers, X-many would buy at each potential price point. To the sellers, Y-many would sell a product at each potential price point. The maximum aggregate net value for BOTH sides is where X=Y. That's supply and demand. Notice that neither side cares about what you're going to do with the product, what profit you're going to make, what the product is worth internally to each individual buyer. Those are black boxes, they go into the formation of the supply and demand curves, but the only output that matters is still the curves.

      What may be true in what you're saying is that some people irrationally assign some value to preventing the seller from achieving a particular profit margin (the logic is they think, "I could be getting this for cheaper! Maybe if I don't buy it, I will"), but it doesn't change what the market, in aggregate, would internally value the product at. By declining a transaction that would have been at a price point lower than their value of it, the buyer is depriving himself of a net gain. It's emotional and irrational.

    52. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent is wrong. You charge what you can AND if it could be done cheaper, someone will see the opportunity and come along and make it for less, sell it for less and take your business from you. That's how it's supposed to work. It doesn't but that's the theory.

      The parent is also a moron for saying it isn't supply and demand. Just not his own narrow definition of it.

    53. Re:Well that's easy... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      In a capitalist system there are no barriers between markets, there's no such thing as a "market segment". Segments are created artificially to line companies' pockets.

      Oh just shut up. Capitalism is a very simple concept. People "raise capital" and then "use their capital to take on risks to their advantage". There is no talk of "barriers between markets" or any other such nonsense. If you save up money, and take a mathematically sound bet with it, you are a capitalist. Indeed, the most successful capitalists are the ones who have found natural or unnatural monopolies, and invested in them heavily.

      There is nothing "artificial" about an agent acting rationally to maximize its profits.

      Capitalism is about the financing of business. Go back to school.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    54. Re:Well that's easy... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When you haggle in the market, you being reasonable, it's the other guy who is the greedy bastard. When you try to maximize revenues and minimize costs that is rational self interest. When others do that, it is greed.

      What *should* happen in a capitalist market is that products are priced at cost + some small profit (less than 5% above the risk-free-rate, for an industry that's stable). Anything other than that is anti-capitalistic. We don't have capitalism in the US. There are tons of barriers to entry, vendor lock in and such that prevent "free" choice. In capitalism, if you charged 15% profit, someone else would come in at 10% and you'd go out of business. Thankfully to those that like to overcharge and pretend that maximizing profit is capitalistic, barriers to entry and other anti-competitive factors keep them happy.

      My point is not that you should deliberately make bad choices and act against your own financial self-interest. It is that you are a hypocrite for acting in your own financial interests while criticizing others for doing the same.

      I want the balance that happens in capitalism. I want to be a well informed consumer with a variety of competitive choices. I want to pay a reasonable profit to them for their work. I don't want the DMCA locking me in to a single brand of ink cartridges. I don't want a software company abusing its monopoly to push a browser, search engine, productivity pack, or such. I don't want collusion between the laptop manufacturers to charge a premium for batteries, when the capacity is available for other applications at a much lower rate. That indicates a flaw in our system that makes it non-capitalistic.

      It isn't about me getting the best and screwing everyone else. It's about the well informed consumer being charged reasonable rates that comes with capitalism, and the apparent lack of some feature of capitalism that lead to the price discrepancy shown here.

    55. Re:Well that's easy... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      You cant have capitalism and arbitrary settings of price.

      Why yes, you can. Capitalism is about financing businesses. If you raise capital, and make a mathematically sound bet with it, you are a capitalist. Capitalism has nothing to do with what the sound bets actually are. Investing in a natural monopoly is a smart move. And investing in a market with arbitrarily fixed prices can in fact be a mathematically sound bet.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    56. Re:Well that's easy... by hhr · · Score: 1

      What ethical line is that? People paying different prices for goods based on how much they want them, is fundamental to capitalism, to supply and demand. There are ethical problems if you gouge; charge thousands of dollars to someone for a bottle of water when they are dehydrated and near death. How else should prices be set? Cost plus some socially approved mark up? What if you find that your goods are continually resold on e-Bay for a much greater price?

    57. Re:Well that's easy... by sjames · · Score: 1

      However, what the market will bear is supposedly pushed down to the marginal cost by a healthy market. Conclusion, the laptop market is unhealthy.

    58. Re:Well that's easy... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      The solution is simple. Think you're being mislead? Not getting enough information? Think something is overpriced? Don't buy it. Work a little harder to look for an item that meets your requirements. Or don't buy at all. I don't see the difficulty here.

      Sometimes going with your principles means suffering some inconveniences.

    59. Re:Well that's easy... by adisakp · · Score: 1

      I understand profit, that's why we're in business, to make money. But charging more for something just because the consumer is willing to pay more for it... I guess that crosses the ethical line for me. That's not supply and demand.

      Actually, technically that is the Econ 101 definition of Supply and Demand. If the supply is limited (i.e. you are the only manufacturer for the battery) and the consumer has a demand for them, then you can charge more for the item. If you charge more than a consumer is willing to pay, demand (and profit) will drop. There's a curve where you maximize profit by increasing price until the drop in consumer demand actually negatively affects your profits and Capitalistic Principles dictate that one should price items at this profit maximizing point.

      If the supply is not limited (i.e. more than one supplier), then the point at which you can maximize your profits becomes much lower than with a monopoly since your competitor can price an item slightly lower than yours and reduce the demand significantly for you. The key with a truly competitive supply side is to find a price point that generates a reasonable profit for you that is still competitive with other suppliers -- this is by no means the lowest point that will generate a profit -- for example, it is common (though often illegal) for competitors to engage in price fixingso so they may both follow through on the profit gauging.

      So Capitalism really only works out for consumers when there is genuine competition among suppliers (without monopolies, price fixing, cartels, corruptions, etc). And since the natural response of a corporation is to maximize profit, not to maximize competition and consumer benefit, that is why regulation of Capitalism is required for it to work in any reasonable fashion.

    60. Re:Well that's easy... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Everything has value only because of what markets will bear. Thats a basic premise of capitalism.

      No, the basic premise of capitalism is well informed consumers choosing from a market with no barriers. "What the market will bear" is a phrase used when the consumers are not well informed (they could get it mail order, but don't know that, so they buy from the guy charging more for the same thing) or barriers to entry (using the DMCA to prevent people from buying 3rd party ink cartridges). If the market will bear an inflated price that is unrelated to the cost of manufacture, then that is not capitalism, else someone else would be offering the identical item for less.

    61. Re:Well that's easy... by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. (no pun intended)

      Dell laptops do not allow a BIOS flash until after a "battery check" is performed, even if the machine is currently plugged in to a transformer/wall outlet. (take the battery out, or have a dead battery, and the BIOS flash will fail)

      There is NO reason to do this except to make sure you have a functioning battery.

      In short, they are forcing the user to buy a new battery if the old one doesn't work, even if the user never intends on unplugging the thing from the wall.

      The worst part? The "live" BIOS flash system Dell uses also allows viruses to infect the BIOS, forcing the user to re-flash if infected.

      Only reason I know this is I worked on a friends laptop, cleaned it of infections only to find out the BIOS was infected as well. When I tried to flash the BIOS, it failed with a message that explained that I needed a battery installed. It was installed, but dead. I basically had to inform my friend that he needed to buy a new battery to disinfect his machine. He opted to buy a new laptop instead. A NON-Dell.

    62. Re:Well that's easy... by sjames · · Score: 1

      How about the batteries in drills and other handheld tools? Those were also compared in TFA and they were even cheaper/capacity than the lawnmower batteries. The battery cannot be too large or too heavy or the drill becomes unmanagable or exhausting to use. They also have to fit well within the shape of the tool and must withstand a much rougher environment than a laptop (other than a toughbook). Batteries for drills present no more and no less opportunity for standardization than laptop batteries.

      Laptops need NOT have unique batteries. They all have the 12,5,3.3V internally just like every other PC in existence. They CHOOSE to custom each model's battery, they COULD design with off the shelf parts. Note how laptops use standard shaped HDs and LCD panels and standard SODIMMS. Inside the laptop battery are standard cells and charge circuits.

      If the market was healthy, they would be forced to standardize to reduce costs and to pass that on to the buyer in exactly the way that they don't all have unique HDs with incompatible pinouts and varying form factors.

      Read all of TFA before telling someone to STFU!

    63. Re:Well that's easy... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Why does cost to manufacture matter to a consumer? Either the thing is worth (to you) the price being charged, or it isn't. If the price exceeds the value (your determination), don't buy it. Even if the cost did matter, how could you possibly calculate it?

    64. Re:Well that's easy... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Everything has value only because of what markets will bear. Thats a basic premise of capitalism.

      Sorry, but I can't let this go, I'm too irritated by how it keeps getting repeated mindlessly.
      Things have value outside of the marketplace, even if $ prices of those things are set by the market. And some things even have value outside of monetary value.

    65. Re:Well that's easy... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      You have too narrow a definition of 'works out for consumers' and/or 'genuine competition'. It could be argued that a lightweight laptop computer with reasonable battery life has in fact 'worked out for consumers'. What got us to the point where we even have such a thing to discuss? Competition. What caused the competition? Capitalism. There is way more to competition than price. If the only competition we had was race-to-the-bottom prices there would be no reason to innovate anything at all (it would cost more to develop a product than you could make in profits, because someone else can always do it cheaper).

    66. Re:Well that's easy... by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The standard battery for my Dell D520 costs $135 from Dell, yet the WONDERFUL knockoff I got from www.laptopbatterystore.com works better than the original and cost $45 (pricegrabber gives the store a pretty good rating too if you google it).

      I've stopped buying the official replacement batteries a long time ago.

    67. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i saw an article once where a guy who needed a new laptop battery.

      the new one was $150

      he got inventive
      he cut open his laptop battery pack and ordered same capacity generic li-ion AA type rechargeable batteries
      it was a 6 cell unit, and the generic batteries were about $6 a pop
      he re-soldiered all the connections and tested it out

      it worked perfectly.

      so $150 or $36 + soldier iron

      will it explode?
      who knows, never saw a follow up.

      but personally, i really dont think that the "smarts" of the laptop battery cost $114 and the cells themselves cost $36
      its probably that the laptop manufacturer can make them for $50-60 and do a 300% up charge.

    68. Re:Well that's easy... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, it does not work that way. New display technogies have varying poewr demans, new processors utilize altering power draw states and sleep modes, chips on board can now be enabled and disabled at will. The laptop batteries do not conform to a simple 12/5/3/1.5 like desktop mainboards do. The DC to DC converters are moving more into the battery and less on the mainboard. Internal power distribution is very complex in a modern laptop.

      Also, new technologes are constantly pushing form factor design, and batteries need to fit to the device. Even if the cells between numerous models could be standardized, the casing, power connector, latch, and more can not be standardized (unless they move to non-removalbe batteries like Apple thankfully realized was not a bad idea).

      Every new motherboard and chipset combo is in a different physical architecture, and the case design is based on that, and battery placement typically a 3rd decision. People are not going to accept some generic, bulky pack hanging off their laptop, nor could you standardize them to fir 9", 10", 13" ,15", 17" well. Some batteries need to be flat and wide, some compact and half an inch thick. They need variable output from 20 to 120 wats, quick charging, good heat disipation.

      No, asking to standardize a battery would mean standardizing a notebook form factor. IBM/lenovo seems to be the only one willing to do that, and look where they sit in the market: obsolete aesthetic design, overweight, and bulky, and near last place beating only the nich players in distribution and saled figures.

      There are essentially 25-30 core laptop designs, and each with varying power requirements (becomeing more divers the larger the machine). Each has a market need. internally, these are too varied to count.

      When CPU/GPU becomes ubiquitous in notebooks (give it 5-10 years), and when miniaturization basically becomes a single-chip hardware architecture, and solid state storage becomes automatic, backended by cloud storage for large datasets, then notebook architecture might settle on 5-10 form factors, and battery designs will simplyfy. For now, they're expensive...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    69. Re:Well that's easy... by sjames · · Score: 1

      They have managed to standardize pinout and form factor for PCMCIA, HD, CD/DVD, LCD panel, RAM, and even touchpads just fine. None of the power management states change the voltage requirements. Desktop machines have power management as well, and they do fine with standardized power supplies.

      The individual cells, BTW are standardized.

      Larger, more power hungry laptops could always take 2 standard battery packs.

      I have owned several laptops over the years, and while the styles have changed, the battery from the one in the late '90s COULD have been made to fit into the one I got a year ago. In any given year, all of the laptops available tend to fit quite neatly within about 3 categories.

      I'm not suggesting that all laptops now and forever accept a single standard battery, but that rather than hundreds to choose from every year, there could be 3 or 4 (preferably called type 1, type 2, etc. with the type printed on the pack). The form fitting outer cover can be handled just like the HD, the pack screws on to the outer cover. If a special latch is needed, it can go there.

      Consider the zillions of unrelated devices that take standard batteries in the sizes AAA, AA, C, D, and 9v.(with the latter going out of style).

    70. Re:Well that's easy... by 2short · · Score: 1


      Batteries for devices with radically different requirements in terms of power regulation, form factor, heat dissipation, safety requirements, and probably a dozen more things, cost different amounts. How could this be? Obviously capacity should be the only factor that impacts battery price, because thats the only factor handled by one bloggers recollection of his high school physics class.

      "This blog investigates" by speculating it must be just price gouging, because obviously people are more vigilant about prices in the tiny electric-lawnmower market than the much more competitive laptop market.

      Oh, the blogger also investigated by asking some PR people, but then he had to post fast, because one actually replied with some stuff, and he didn't think much about that because that would have taken time, and he might have learned something that would get in the way of his rant.

    71. Re:Well that's easy... by coxymla · · Score: 1

      What's probably worse - Apple MacBooks/Pros all halve their CPU speeds if they don't have a battery installed, or if the battery that is installed doesn't hold a charge anymore. Combine this fact with the poor quality of Apple's pre-unibody batteries, and now I have a nice shiny dual-1GHz laptop.

    72. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand profit, that's why we're in business, to make money. But charging more for something just because the consumer is willing to pay more for it... I guess that crosses the ethical line for me.

      That's not supply and demand, it's not because it's any better than the other, it's not because its more expensive to make. You're just doing it because you can, and I call that greed.

      that's where the theory of capitalism fail

      Actually that has nothing to do with the failings of Capitalism. If people are willing to pay a certain price for an item, then that is the value that item holds for them, it's referred to as a fair market price. If you think that the companies are charging too much for these items, then don't buy them or find an alternative. If you buy something and then complain about it being overpriced, you have already agreed that the item was worth what you paid for it, otherwise you wouldn't have purchased it.

    73. Re:Well that's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fitting X watt hours into ahttp://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/12/15/1453200/Why-Is-a-Laptops-Battery-Dearer-Than-a-Lawnmowers?art_pos=17# package that must fit X design that is for a single low volume product.. vs being useful across.. potentially 100,000,000 cordless drills, screwdrivers, and sanders ? gee I wonder why the laptop batteries cost more?

    74. Re:Well that's easy... by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Your idea of what "capitalism" means is rather warped. I suggest re-taking Economics 101, because capitalism does not imply a completely free market, a perfectly informed consumer or any of the other things you seem to think it does. All that capitalism implies is ownership of resources and the ability to trade them. Under this model, people will generally try to end up controlling as much of the resources as possible. Moving over into Game Theory 101, if the expected value of engaging in anti-competitive practices is higher than the expected value of not doing so, then people will tend to engage in anti-competitive practices regardless of whether you think they should or not.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    75. Re:Well that's easy... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      All that capitalism implies is ownership of resources and the ability to trade them.

      You are right, I was taking the "free market capitalism" as the standard. Capitalism is defined where the means to production are privately owned, and nothing more. Price controls are neither capitalistic nor anti-capitalistic, as the means to production are still solely in the hands of private people. And since that was specifically mentioned as something anti-capitalistic, I too the common meaning. "Capitalism" is usually used in the US with "free market" silent but implied, and that's how I was using it.

    76. Re:Well that's easy... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Well the solution is simple then. Make a gas powered laptop, just like the lawnmower.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    77. Re:Well that's easy... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yet at the same time, some computer manufacturers (I'm thinking of Dell here, specifically) have standardized on both power plugs and batteries. I know a lot of laptops also tend to use the exact same (Lite-on) power brick these days, as well. Getting either from third parties, whether "OEM" or work-alike products, isn't all that difficult with the rise of Internet purchases. You have to put extra effort into buying the pricey ones.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    78. Re:Well that's easy... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Exactly. With a battery powered lawn mower, you're competing against $150 gas powered lawn mowers. Yes, the battery powered one will be quieter, but it will also be substantially more expensive

      Considering the battery pack for a Robomower costs $240 or so on its own, they've got to basically sell the things at cost in order to get people even remotely interested in buying one (short of economic/ecology sanctions saying you can't use a gas mower). The battery mowers also have the whole "lifetime" issue to contend with: a gas mower will last years (my dad is still using the same Snapper riding mower that was used to mow the yard since before I was born), costs less to run (compare approx. $70/season for battery vs. less than half as much for gas, given a small/medium yard; I can mow my yard for $10 a season).

      Side note: has anyone seen these battery-powered yard tools? From what I've seen, they're a joke: battery-powered chainsaws barely even compete with an A/C powered hedge trimmer.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  2. Size matters by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason why laptop batteries are more expensive per unit energy than a lawnmower battery is because you're only willing to tolerate a certain physical size for a laptop battery. On a lawnmower, by comparison, an arbitrarily large battery is generally acceptable provided it is not too extraordinarily heavy.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Size matters by robkill · · Score: 4, Informative

      This was mentioned in the article, but not as size, but weight. The power to weight ratio is more important. Density of the individual battery cells, and continuous use vs. burst usage also come into play.

      --
      DMCA - Chilling free speech since 1998.
    2. Re:Size matters by iamhigh · · Score: 5, Funny

      And let's not forget that one of them sits near your balls, which means I am willing to pay a little extra to make sure it doesn't leak or explode. I imagine insurance, increased product testing and more regulations all add to the price difference as well.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    3. Re:Size matters by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      I agree. As someone that bought a netbook simply because I wanted something I could carry on and use on an airplane, size (and weight, as mentioned in the article) matters a lot.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Size matters by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Demand matters more. If people are willing to pay more then the company can charge more. It's called free market.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:Size matters by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Physics has spoiled me for day-to-day life. I parsed "arbitrarily large battery" as "ludicrously large, but not finite".

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Size matters by uradu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would be surprised if that were the case. The chemistry of all these Li-Ion cells is mostly the same, and regardless of the final outside shape of the battery, internally most use standardized cells connected either in parallel or series to achieve the desired current and/or voltage. I bet you that if you took apart that lawnmower battery, inside you'd find the same basic cells as in that laptop battery, just more of them.

      So I would say the lawnmower batteries are mostly cheaper because of some subsidy. Look at other technologies using Li-Ion batteries that are more established, such as power tools: the battery for my Ridgid power drill is $99, which is very much in line with laptop batteries.

    7. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the batteries are next to your balls, I don't think you are using the lawnmower in an approved manner.

    8. Re:Size matters by nightranger · · Score: 0

      how are you mowing the lawn?

      --
      That means turning it over to our tame racing driver, the sig.
    9. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And let's not forget that one of them sits near your balls, which means I am willing to pay a little extra to make sure it doesn't leak or explode. I imagine insurance, increased product testing and more regulations all add to the price difference as well.

      Well given the recent trend of exploding equipment, I'd say that is not something you're actually paying for (even if you think you are paying for it).

    10. Re:Size matters by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget that one of them sits near your balls, which means I am willing to pay a little extra to make sure it doesn't leak or explode. I imagine insurance, increased product testing and more regulations all add to the price difference as well.

      My lead-acid battery powered mower caught fire. Apparently there was a recall that I didn't know about since it was a hand-me-down. Battery terminals can be shorted together through the blade brake if the PCBs flex too much. And the blade brake is just a long piece of somewhat resistive wire intended to be connected to the motor terminals through a DPDT switch when the battery connection was removed, thus stopping the motor faster than if it had to just spin down. The exciting thing is that this could have happened while the mower was stored in the garage. Much more likely to happen during use, since moving it around is more likely to deform the PCB than just sitting there.

      This probably would have been much worse if a lithium battery were shorted out. As it was, I pulled off the cover and broke the circuit, destroying only the blade brake's insulation.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    11. Re:Size matters by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      so you dont buy Dell or sony then.... they comes with exploding as a feature!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Size matters by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      I imagine there's also some lifespan and related warranty issues.

      Laptops see a lot of use and the batteries are probably going through nearly continuous discharge/charge cycles. In contrast a lawnmower would be used maybe weekly or power tools that would be used intermittently. There's probably some relationship to the number of times the battery goes through a charging cycle and the additional cost. Note that even if both items have a 1 year warranty, the fact the laptop's battery goes through more frequent charge/discharge cycles and more frequent use, the risk of a failure requiring a replacement is higher likely resulting in some additional warranty costs that need to be considered.

      I think the original author should have thought through his rant a bit more before he posted it.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    13. Re:Size matters by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      Curiously, Tesla uses laptop cells for their battery pack—the logic being to let others worry about battery technology while they worry about their cars.

      If those nanowire cells with the theoretical 10x power potential don't come to be, they'll start using Bosch batteries... which actually sounds very natural.

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    14. Re:Size matters by confused+one · · Score: 1

      The chemistry is the same but the physical construction and material choices may be different in order to optimize the cell for it's intended use. A battery that needs to supply 3 amps continuously may be constructed differently than a battery that must supply a 100 amp pulse current. For example, one cell may have a simple wire post as an electrode while the other may have a fluted or corrugated metal electrode (increasing the surface area). These differences may not be obvious from the exterior of the cell, which may be made to a standard form factor.

    15. Re:Size matters by amorsen · · Score: 1

      In a free market, companies can't charge more, because competitors will undercut them until the price is close to the manufacturing price. Laptop batteries are a typical example of capitalism without a free market.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    16. Re:Size matters by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Demand matters more. If people are willing to pay more then the company can charge more. It's called free market.

      Maybe it's the opposite.

      Millions of laptops are sold each month, but the number of actual replacement batteries is extremely small - the average consumer laptop is probably going to be used with just the one battery it came with for its lifetime. Each battery works on a small subset of models, so the number of battery configurations is high. And the demand for an individual battery configuration is small. So they're expensive because demand doesn't really warrant the extra costs in packaging/shipping/warehousing spare batteries that'll be different in half a year, and useless in 3 (because lithium batteries usually die from old age). So the few people that buy spares has to pay for the few that'll be sitting on warehouse shelves only to be tossed because they can't be sold. This is why for most laptops it gets extremely difficult and expensive to buy replacement batteries after 2 years or so. Business laptops tend to have a more standard construction, so batteries for the ThinkPads and the like tend to be fairly standard across a line, and businesses buy more batteries.

      An extreme example of the above is how Apple now makes practically no laptops with user-changable batteries (easily, anyhow) - I'm sure they did the math and realized the few users who bought a spare doesn't justify the advantages of going without. And a number of electronics don't come with user-changable batteries anyhow, either - about the only ones that do are where the batteries are standard and used practically across a product line.

      OTOH, people who buy tools tend to buy extra batteries often. Plus the battery design doesn't really change with every new model. So warehouse stock tends to cycle through frequently. Higher demand means each spare battery doesn't have to subsidize the ones sitting on the shelf that'll head to the garbage. Contractors will buy at least one extra spare battery (that charges while they work using the other, and swap as necessary) for each tool. Lawnmowers will probably keep using the same battery to save development costs (since there's no real reason to not to other than gouge the consumer - does it matter that the body of the lawnmower is 20% bigger and heavier because they used the same battery as 5 year's ago model? Not really - and the factory would like to have warehouse stock continually depleted).

    17. Re:Size matters by Again · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget that one of them sits near your balls, which means I am willing to pay a little extra to make sure it doesn't leak or explode.[...]

      For sure. You wouldn't want anything to leak onto your laptop battery so you'd better have everything tested so they don't explode and leak everywhere.

    18. Re:Size matters by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      He's not mowing the lawn, he's "trimming the hedges".

    19. Re:Size matters by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the batteries are next to your balls, I don't think you are using the lawnmower in an approved manner.

      Whole different meaning to "whacking off".

      I had a friend who worked in the ER in a fairly redneck-filled state. I asked her about the weirdest accident she'd ever seen and she said they'd brought in her *cousin*, who had actually managed to injure his penis (and leg and hand and other bits) with a lawnmower.

      There was a moment of silence, and then everyone hearing the story said "HOW??!?"

      She said "I think alcohol was involved..." but that was all we ever got.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    20. Re:Size matters by AvalancheBurn · · Score: 0

      Well you know those midnight naked lawnmower races are all the rage these days

    21. Re:Size matters by tool462 · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's more likely that the Li-Ion mowers have a very strong competitor: gasoline powered motors. They are cheap, simple, and reliable. You can easily get 10+ years out of a gas mower with only some basic maintenance, something that can not be said for any battery powered mower.

      Neither laptops nor hand tools can reasonably operate on anything other than Li-Ion (unless they're tethered to the wall). With no viable alternative, they can get away with charging a higher premium. The margins on mower batteries have likely been pushed to almost nothing.

      And of course, some enterprising person could start a company that disassembles mower batteries and repackages them in laptop-friendly formats and make some money off the price differential. Of course, this would then drive up the demand for mower batteries, raising the price until there is very little margin left for them either.

    22. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously not a fan of Lawn Bowling.

    23. Re:Size matters by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      I think the original author should have thought through his rant a bit more before he posted it.

      Well, it's obvious that he's not an engineer, so I can forgive him (somewhat).

      Physical size, power density, weight, efficiency, maximum current, equivalent series resistance, number of charge/discharge cycles, and consumer regulations differ between the applications, and all have an effect on material and design costs. Of course the battery that's in use constantly with a small form factor will be more expensive in comparison to your lawnmower battery.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    24. Re:Size matters by sjames · · Score: 1

      But weight matters a LOT in a hand held drill. Those were also compared in TFA and came out even cheaper/Wh than the lawnmower batteries.

    25. Re:Size matters by PPH · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for everyone, but my balls hang pretty close to that lawnmower blade.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    26. Re:Size matters by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Apparently, he confused "Get off my lawn" with "Get of on my lawn"

      Ooops.

  3. Coming soon by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lawnmower-to-laptop battery adapter. Wheel Cart not included.

    1. Re:Coming soon by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lawnmower-to-laptop battery adapter. Wheel Cart not included.

      That was also mentioned in TFA .. along with some ludicrous idea about being able to swap batteries on a laptop when their charge had been depleted. Obviously the author is not an Apple fan-boi

      Hmm .. After that statement I think that I will proclaim "OzPeter's law" as a corollary to Godwin's law:

      "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Apple approaches 1"

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on your opinion of Steve Jobs, this is the same as Godwin's law.

    3. Re:Coming soon by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      No, this is a fundamental law of Slashdot commenting. Each article must contain the following topics in the comments:

      1) I, for one, welcome our X overlords
      2) Windows Sucks
      3) Compare X to Apple
      4) Will it run (on) Linux?
      5) Some sort of big brother/tinfoil hat BS
      6) The MPAA/RIAA are douchebags.

      Commenting will continue on an article until these are satisfied, at which point it will decrease at a logarithmic pace.

    4. Re:Coming soon by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      What, has reference to a Beowulf cluster gone out of style?

      I will admit, I don't want to see a reference to a Beowulf cluster of lawn mowers to parallelize the task of doing the lawn....

    5. Re:Coming soon by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      If the Beowulf cluster of lawn mowers could run linux, we would officially have an overlord worth welcoming

    6. Re:Coming soon by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      There has to be a car analogy too.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    7. Re:Coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this?

      "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of telling ozpeter to grow the fuck up, instead of inserting apple this or mac that in whatever conversation he can"

    8. Re:Coming soon by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      My grandfather uses parallel large format electric mowers you insensitive clod.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    9. Re:Coming soon by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      No, this is a fundamental law of Slashdot commenting. Each article must contain the following topics in the comments: 1) I, for one, welcome our X overlords 2) Windows Sucks 3) Compare X to Apple 4) Will it run (on) Linux? 5) Some sort of big brother/tinfoil hat BS 6) The MPAA/RIAA are douchebags. Commenting will continue on an article until these are satisfied, at which point it will decrease at a logarithmic pace.

      Somewhere in a darkened room Natalie Portman can be heard gently sobbing into her bowl of slowly cooling Grits

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  4. Such a what? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    This blog investigates whether such a seemingly ludicrous situation can be justified.

    I think somebody watched Spaceballs yesterday!

    1. Re:Such a what? by pleappleappleap · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or someone has a vocabulary big enough to use the word "ludicrous" without having learned it from a Mel Brooks movie.

    2. Re:Such a what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is password protected, but the password is 12345.

    3. Re:Such a what? by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod Parent -1: Blasphemy

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    4. Re:Such a what? by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's the combination on my luggage!

    5. Re:Such a what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or someone has a vocabulary big enough to use the word "ludicrous" without having learned it from a Mel Brooks movie.

      Inconceivable!

    6. Re:Such a what? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous, that sounds like the combination to my luggage!

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    7. Re:Such a what? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      No, I'm Spartacus!

    8. Re:Such a what? by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 1

      Colonel Sandurz: Prepare the lawnmower for light speed.
      Dark Helmet: No, no, no, light speed is too slow.
      Colonel Sandurz: Light speed, too slow?
      Dark Helmet: Yes, we're gonna have to go right to ludicrous speed.

    9. Re:Such a what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    10. Re:Such a what? by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      If my lawn got mowed at ludicrous speed, I'd be a happy man. I just would want to watch so I could see the plaid streaks flying about my yard.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    11. Re:Such a what? by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      Spaceballs: The Slashdot Thread

    12. Re:Such a what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I'm Brian, and so is my wife!

    13. Re:Such a what? by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or someone has a vocabulary big enough to use the word "ludicrous" without having learned it from a Mel Brooks movie.

      The OP is just noting that the article horribly mis-spelled Ludacris' name, right?

    14. Re:Such a what? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      Mod GP -1: Ludicrous

  5. supply and demand by prgrmr · · Score: 1
    1. Re:supply and demand by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my best guess is that the lawnmower batteries are being sold at a discount in order to establish the market. As soon as the market is established, the prices for lawnmower batteries will probably slowly increase until they're about on par with laptop batteries.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    2. Re:supply and demand by AlecC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think this is likely, because there isn't a lock-in effect with lawnmowers. Having bought a Brand X lawnmower, when you replace it (quite a few years later, hopefully) you will have no need to replace it with another Brand X. The point of initial low prices on things like consoles is to achieve market dominance: games manufacturers make games for the most popular consoles so players buy the consoles which makes them the most popular. The de-factso standard for lawns - flat grass - is in the public domain.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    3. Re:supply and demand by mpe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my best guess is that the lawnmower batteries are being sold at a discount in order to establish the market. As soon as the market is established, the prices for lawnmower batteries will probably slowly increase until they're about on par with laptop batteries.

      Presumably, as with hand held tools, they'll want to make sure that even if the batteries are similar in rating and physical shape they won't actually fit in the "wrong" machine.

    4. Re:supply and demand by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the lawnmower batteries are also proprietary. Once you choose a lawnmower, if you want to replace the batteries you would need to buy the specific battery made for your lawnmower. That's lock-in.

      If anything there would be more lock in with a lawnmower purchase. I only expect my laptop to last 2 - 3 years. I've never really felt the need to replace laptop batteries after that time, as i'm looking for a whole new laptop.

      With a lawnmower, i'm expecting it will last 10 years or longer. My parents have had the same mower for 30 years. If i want that kind of longevity from my battery powered mower, i expect i'm going to have to shop for some proprietary batteries in that time.

      If you want to be really pessimistic, you could assume that the manufacturer will simply discontinue the model of battery for my mower after 5 years. They could force me to buy a new mower every 5 years. They could even pull an apple and integrate the battery into a sleek sexy white lawnmover that is obsolete when the battery fails.

    5. Re:supply and demand by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      I'm not even talking about it along those lines, although I do admit that was my first thought. Basically, I'm saying that this is a new product, and it has to gain market share merely to become acceptable. Therefore, it is priced at a discount in order to expand into the lawnmower market and give electric lawnmowers credibility. Once that credibility is established, there is no longer a need to discount the product, and prices are normalized.

      Think of it like a construction company: A new construction company will underbid everyone else on a contract to the point where there is barely any profit, or sometimes even a loss, in order to establish their name. Once their brand is established, they increase their bid until they are in line with everyone else.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    6. Re:supply and demand by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The de-factso standard for lawns - flat grass - is in the public domain."

      An oversight which will be rectified by a copyright citing Astroturf as prior art.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  6. The Market by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    Because any manufacturer is going to charge the most that you are willing to pay. In lawnmowers, there are cheaper alternatives. With laptops, there are not. Pure market based pricing.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:The Market by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because any manufacturer is going to charge the most that you are willing to pay. In lawnmowers, there are cheaper alternatives. With laptops, there are not. Pure market based pricing.

      While I'm certain that's part of the issue, I think you're missing a more obvious difference - the form-factor.

      A laptop is supposed to be relatively small and portable. Laptop manufacturers will advertise how thick their laptop is, how many pounds it weighs, and how many hours it'll run on a battery. Thus, laptop batteries - while they may be made with the same technology - are as small and dense as possible.

      A lawnmower, on the other hand, has wheels on it. While you'd have a hard time shoving a 1 ton brick around your yard, it probably doesn't make much difference if the thing ways 15 lbs or 25 lbs... It'll still move easily enough. And if you're going to make it self-propelled it'll matter even less. The same thing goes for the size/volume of the thing... It isn't like this thing has to fit into an overhead bin or a backpack. Hell, your cutting deck is already several feet square - the battery probably isn't going to be the biggest thing on it.

      So you've got laptops (and cell phones) where you're trying to build a tiny, dense battery... And lawn mowers where you just need enough juice to run the mower for a couple hours and it really doesn't matter how bulky the thing is.

      And folks are surprised that there's a price difference why?

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:The Market by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just wish some of this technology transfer would work the other way too. I would love to have a laptop powered by a small integrated gasoline/diesel (diesel would probably work better) engine, and would be willing to pay more per hp than for a lawnmower engine. However, I don't want it to also cut grass- the thought of powered spinning blades under my laptop is not appealing.

    3. Re:The Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush you! No economics here!

      Why is it that people who are arguably pretty intelligent fail so miserably at anything involving economics? I suspect that most here just avoid ever taking econ courses, but all of this shit is very simple. I know I avoided the stuff like the plague, but economics and accounting are actually fairly interesting and tend to be very math/logic heavy subjects and I am glad that I went through the classes. I am pretty surprised that so many geeks just lump all business major types into the PHB class and shun them after they themselves spent most of their lives lumped into that geek group and got shunned. Idiot managers are no different than the IT guy that thinks he knows what he is doing and just talks out of his ass.
       

    4. Re:The Market by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, I wouldn't be surprised if the lawnmower variants have some chemistry/construction changes such that:
      1) The cells are slightly larger/heavier per Wh despite similar chemistry
      2) The cells are optimized for a somewhat different charge/discharge regime than a laptop

      The above could easily make significant changes to the cost of the batteries.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    5. Re:The Market by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      While I'm certain that's part of the issue, I think you're missing a more obvious difference - the form-factor.

      Shape is important also. When you are replacing a laptop battery, the new battery has to fit into the space left by the old one. Typically, this means that it has to be made for your exact model of laptop (or at least your model line, if you're lucky). And don't even get me started about laptop AC adapters.

      Power tool batteries are designed to be interchangeable at least between the same brand of tools, and compact size is sacrificed for it. Sure, the drill could be a little smaller if it had a drill-shaped custom battery, but then the same battery wouldn't work in the circular saw.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    6. Re:The Market by Vizzie · · Score: 1

      ...and a very long exhaust hose so you don't kill yourself with the carbon monoxide?

    7. Re:The Market by Rod+Frey · · Score: 1

      Power density is a function of the battery chemistry. Your point holds if we're comparing laptop batteries (where weight matters) with LiOH- batteries to a lawnmower with, say, lead acid batteries. The lead batteries are far heavier (and cheaper) and make sense on the lawnmower.

      But the Bosch machine has LiOH- batteries just like the laptop. The power density is the same. Packaging might make one heavier but, again as the author points out, the lawnmower batteries probably have more robust (and expensive) packaging.

      The answer is nothing more sinister than market segmentation. People will only shell out a XX% premium for a lighter lawnmower, but they'll shell out a YY% premium for a 1lb lighter laptop. So that's what the manufacturers charge.

    8. Re:The Market by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      Moreover, with lawnmowers, some weight is a good thing.

      There are some things where people associate weight with quality(expensive watches, bar glasses, pens, etc). A low weight lawnmower may be associated with being cheap and flimsy. So having the battery weigh more is actually a good thing for the lawnmower. There's probably an optimal point where you want the lawnmower to weigh enough so it feels sturdy (and stays where you put it), but not so heavy that an average person finds it unwieldy.

      In contrast, with a consumer electronic device where lighter is always better and any weight from the battery is a bad thing. So the manufacturer has to spend more money to try to get the battery to way less.

      I think the spokesperson from Sony showed Mr. Ockenden a lot of patience in actually answering his question, rather than just calling him an idiot for comparing laptop and lawnmower batteries, which was fully within his rights to do.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    9. Re:The Market by superslacker87 · · Score: 1
      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    10. Re:The Market by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      With Windows on the laptop, the carbon monoxide is a feature! Introducing the Cloudy Screen of Dea.....

    11. Re:The Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus, laptop batteries - while they may be made with the same technology - are as small and dense as possible.

      It's true that a few high-end laptops use costly lithium-polymer cells made to specific dimensions. But open a regular laptop battery and 99% of the time you'll find it uses bog standard roughly AA or AAA-size batteries. The charging circuit (~ $3)and plastic case do cost something to produce, but the manufacturers are buying at wholesale prices and cranking these things out by the millions; they should benefit from massive economy of scale.

      A battery assembled in China and rebranded by Dell sells for 2x~3x the retail price of the li-ion cells used to make it. The more expensive the laptop, the bigger the ripoff. Grab the same battery direct from China (say, a fairly reputable Chinese company like Agptek) and it will cost about the same, or even slightly less than the retail price of its cells.

      Especially brave or foolhardy adventurers could always pry the dead battery case open and solder in some new cells themselves. Apply too much heat, though, and you end up a bomb. Not to mention that the laptop firmware is sometimes designed to prevent the use of refurbished batteries (each battery pack has a unique ID, and the total capacity of the battery pack as reported by the bios can only go down over time, never up - the battery might be 90% full but the OS will see it as 5% and force a shutdown).

    12. Re:The Market by mpe · · Score: 1

      I would love to have a laptop powered by a small integrated gasoline/diesel (diesel would probably work better) engine,

      You'd probably want a diesel since it dosn't have a spark ignition system to interfer with the laptop. The problem is can you make a purely mechanical diesel engine (plus generator) small enough for such an application. Also your typical small internal combustion engine tends to be very noisy.

    13. Re:The Market by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      a few more points to support you as well:

      Lapop batteries are almost all unique, each one with a different form factor, cell count, charging system, digital charge monitoring, power output, and more. There are thousands of unique bettery designs, likely using dozens or hundreds of different size and type cells, not to mention most now are not even LiIon, but LiPo.

      Lawnmower cells are likely generic cells, used in hindreds of products, simply slapped together inside a unifirm plastic casing. It requires little in the way of charge monitoring or advanced circuits and sensors, and can output quite a bit of heat if it wants to. These 12 and 18v cells are common in tools, mowers, blowers, and even cars. A tiny battery pack needs custom sized flat cells and often includes technology for max power disbursement using special anodes and metals. Lawnmowers? So long as they run from 90% full to 10% full predictible with at least an hour run time, noone really cares. A laptop needs predictable power over a longer period, and also needs to hold a charge better over time (lawnmower can leak juice as it likely takes 30 minutes to full charge on 100 volt where it;s not limited by a motherboard's meager power support and tiny transformer. If it ran 30% down not being used for a few weeks, fine, you allways have edge work and blowing to do and can finish the lawn after a short recharge... Laptops not so much.

      Standard cheap cells
      less critical power maintenance requirements
      Less heat disipation concerns
      Less concern about getting exactly 100% of the power back out of the battery
      No custom manufacturing costs
      No logistics and backstock storage concerns across multiple manufacturers and brands
      cheaper....

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    14. Re:The Market by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      The laptop batteries would have mnore robust packaging. The thin light batteries often require metal reinforcement (likely with magnesium due to the good regidity:weight ratio). Lawnmower batteries have little care for form/function, and can be encased in cheap plastic like a set of 6v batteries fit into a lantern, just snapped into plastic, wrapped, and connected.

      Power density of the material is dependent on the chemistry, but power output, charge, and rain, is also dependent on the types of anodes/cathodes used, their placement inside the pack, the distance from the anode to the exterior wall of the battery, surface area of the anode/cathode, and more. It's a complex design. Lawnwoer users are not exactly concerned about how long their battery lasts from 10% to 1% either, or that the power curve is as close to flat as possible. Your lawnmower could slowly loose power output and up to a point you'd not care, as that curve does not damage sensitive electronics as it would in a notebook. It's hard to brown out a lawnmower, or a drill... Lack of this concern greatly simplifies battery design and cost.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    15. Re:The Market by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasn't imagining a V8 with glasspacks and chromed quad exhaust (but I'm sure some modders were...). If I were to take this idea seriously, diesel would also be better due to the higher energy density, and that diesel engines can be designed to a higher efficiency than gasoline. But if this were ever implemented it would probably not be with a reciprocating engine anyway, maybe some type of pistonless rotary design for simplicity. I think the biggest design challenges would be refueling and safe fuel storage (as has been previously stated elsewhere).

    16. Re:The Market by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      That assumes fixed supply, which doesn't make much sense in a free market. If consumers are currently willing to pay a much higher cost than the cost of production (i.e. quite large profit margin), it should attract new suppliers to undercut them, driving the price down. You know, "invisible hand" and all that.

    17. Re:The Market by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Just because you can open a laptop battery and find bog-standard cells does not mean that that is what the manufacturer bought. Most likely, the laptop manufacturer did not just go to Batteries-R-Us and by whatever was available. Instead, they give the battery manufacturer requirements (tolerance levels, testing levels, maximum failure levels, etc). They also do things like have contracts that say x amount of batteries can be delivered in y amount of time. All of that drives the price up. Also, every time a part is touched the price goes up (shipping, storage, inventory costs, etc are not free). Yes, you can go to a web site and buy something that looks similar, but you are probably buying leftovers, or batteries that failed someones requirements.

      Manufacturing and supply-chain management is a lot more complicated (and expensive) than most people realize.

    18. Re:The Market by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      Having pushed a lawnmower around quite a bit, and having disassembled one for recycling of the parts, I can tell you that the optimum weight for a lawnmower is as close to zero as you can get it. There's no advantage to weight on a lawnmower at all. I pushed the empty chassis without the engine or blade and it still felt sturdy and controllable, just without all the fatigue. Extra weight on a lawnmower just wears the operator out.

      Here's an interesting tidbit - a large portion of the power developed by a lawnmower's motor is used to move air. The airflow is used to make the grass stand up for cutting. The cutting takes very little power unless the grass is too long, wet, or dense.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    19. Re:The Market by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Just because they use the same underlying technology doesn't mean anything else. A Pentium1 and a Core Duo both use the same underlying technology but I'm sure you wouldn't claim they're identical. Hell, even TFA says the lawnmower batteries are heavier.

  7. Are they comparable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watts the energy density?

  8. Current by captaindynamo · · Score: 1

    The lawnmower is drawing a much more amperage than the laptop. You would need a more rugged battery to get the same watt-hours.

    1. Re:Current by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      You would need a more powerful battery to run the lawnmower for as long as the laptop, but that is not what the rating means. Watt-hours compares the capacity of the batteries at even footing irrespective of the voltage or draw of the device. A 10 Volt, 100 Amp-hour battery has the same Watt-hour rating as a 100 Volt, 10 Amp-hour battery.

      The lawnmower battery in the article has nearly 2 times the capacity of the laptop battery and costs 60 british pounds less. The only reasonable explanation for the vast cost difference that I can think of would be the size. Obviously a lawnmower battery can be far larger and heavier than one for a laptop.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    2. Re:Current by captaindynamo · · Score: 1

      Yup. Not only did I incorrectly state what I really meant, I also misread the summary and didn't read the article. Guess that's what I get for slashdotting in the morning before drinking my coffee.

    3. Re:Current by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Remember kids, always drink your coffee before posting, your karma is at stake!

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  9. They charge what they can get away with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the free market. If people are willing to pay $50 for cell phone batteries then that is what you charge, otherwise you're leaving money on the table.

    Look on amazon, you can get cell phone batteries from reputable companies for far, far less.

    And cell phone accessories is an even bigger scam. I wanted another usb cable for my blackberry. From my cell phone company they would charger $30. BestBuy was similar.

    I bought one on amazon for $0.39. Yes, 39 cents for a genuine usb cable (+2.50 shipping). Chargers are $0.99.

    Look, even the genuine stuff comes out of the cheap factories in China, and you're being gouged if you don't shop around.

    1. Re:They charge what they can get away with... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Where I work (which shall rename nameless), it goes like this:

      We buy cheap, Chinese chargers loose-pack from a distributor, for less than a dollar per unit. We put our own clamshell packaging on it. After that, it goes out to the retail stores, for $29.95. We do have a lifetime warranty for our customers on these products...but, sheesh.

  10. Price Fixing? by odin84gk · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Price Fixing? by captaindomon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Price Fixing is not at issue here. Price fixing is only when multiple manufacturers decide to raise a price simultaneously, which is illegal because it is bad for competition and the end consumer. Price fixing only works with commodities that are highly fungible http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungible i.e. gasoline or LCD tvs. With laptop batteries, price fixing isn't necessary because you can't buy a Toshiba battery if you need one for a Dell. Laptop batteries aren't fungible.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    2. Re:Price Fixing? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      While it may not be price fixing it could very well be that you have n major players in a market who all are clever enough to realize that they could all lower their prices by say, 30% and still turn a profit. When all competitors are aware that any attempts at a price war will just end up with them and their competitors in a deadlock and lowered margins for everyone they're likely not to go that route, they might gain some marginal short-term market share but when the other guys dump their prices that will be lost anyway...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:Price Fixing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With laptop batteries, price fixing isn't necessary because you can't buy a Toshiba battery if you need one for a Dell.

      You are correct. You would need to buy a Sony battery if you need one for a Dell (or a Toshiba).

  11. Electric Lawnmower by happy_place · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really like the idea of a battery powered lawnmower, as opposed to the electric lawnmower I had as a kid back in the 70s. My parents were foolish enough to think I could use it without running over the cord... boy did I prove them wrong.

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
    1. Re:Electric Lawnmower by gedrin · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one.

      --
      Moderation : -1 Conservative Viewpoint
    2. Re:Electric Lawnmower by Hey_bob · · Score: 1

      I had similar ideas, and was mighty pleased at the prospect of not having to mow the lawn anymore. Silly me for not realizing that dad would just repair the cord and send me back on my way.

      I had my revenge later.. seemed the motor didn't fair so well on particularly tall and thick grass. :-)

    3. Re:Electric Lawnmower by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I really like the idea of a battery powered lawnmower, as opposed to the electric lawnmower I had as a kid back in the 70s. My parents were foolish enough to think I could use it without running over the cord... boy did I prove them wrong.

      Battery powered lawnmowers are certainly more flexible than corded electrics. No running over the cord, no getting wrapped around a tree or lampost like a tetherball.

      However, there is a strategy for using the corded mower: The corded mower usually had the pushbar hinged in the middle, and it could be flipped over to push the mower the other direction. The idea was you started out close to the power outlet with the cord loosely coiled on the ground like a rope. Then you start mowing back and forth (as the ox plows) normal to the direction the cord is feeding, flipping the handle at the end of the row and mowing the next row, always pulling the cord behind you as you work away from the power source. Some lawns are more suitable to this approach than others. I cannot figure out why this particular design was abandoned for the fixed handle like you find on a gas mower, the flippy-handled mower was a really great idea. My grandmother mowed her little yard with one of these up until her 90th year.

      IMHO, the ultimate in corded electric mower development was a "hovercraft" design. A friend of mine who is a collector of lawnmowers has one of these babies.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:Electric Lawnmower by amorsen · · Score: 1

      The hovercraft design is fine for the middle of the grass, but it's a pain for the edges.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    5. Re:Electric Lawnmower by happy_place · · Score: 1

      wait. Let me get this straight. You're saying they developed a corded hovercraft? Doesn't that limit the range of the vehicle?

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    6. Re:Electric Lawnmower by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      A fixed-handle mower is easier to make and stronger. We had one of the flip-handle mowers. It needed to be repaired every year or so, and every single time, the failure was related to the flip mechanism.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:Electric Lawnmower by noidentity · · Score: 1

      We've got a plug-in lawn mower and I can tell you that even if you run over the cord intentionally, it doesn't cut it up, since it sits at the ground level, below the top of the grass.

  12. Heat? by rekoil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It very well might be that heat dissipation requirements deem that laptop batteries be more efficient (read: latest-generation designs, which invariably will cost more per kWh), where lawnmower batteries can get away with models that throw off more waste heat.

    1. Re:Heat? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      put a bigger fan in it. lol

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  13. Explosions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you pack a battery into 1/3 the space you would ideally want it in it has a tendency to explode. The price discrepancy is trying to minimize the likelihood of it literally burning you. A mower has a lot more space for heat dissipation. It's also less likely to cause third-degree burns on the off chance it does overheat, since you don't use it on your lap.

    1. Re:Explosions. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      since you don't use it on your lap.

      Speak for yourself...

      Best regards,
      Stubby

      --
      That is all.
    2. Re:Explosions. by sjames · · Score: 1

      The battery in a drill goes right next to your hand and is often held inches above your face when in use. Handheld power tools occasionally get dropped off of a ladder as well.

      Unlike laptop batteries, I've never heard of a drill's battery "venting with flame".

  14. More importantly, who wins in a fight? by isThisNameAvailable · · Score: 1

    Will the laptop battery last long enough to hack into and disable the lawnmower's systems before the lawnmower can run it over and make lithium confetti?

    1. Re:More importantly, who wins in a fight? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Will the laptop battery last long enough to hack into and disable the lawnmower's systems before the lawnmower can run it over and make lithium confetti?

      The original article has a link back to a previous one where a phone had a fight with a lawnmower. No damage apparently being caused to the mower in the in the process.

  15. A more important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does your lawnmower support 802.11n?

  16. radio controlled hobby batteries by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some of it is chemistry, and some of it is brand name inflation. Lithium batteries have a range of formulations. The lowest-cost formulations are suitable for low-amperage discharge, while better formulations can be discharged at a much higher current and still maintain a cool temperature and good recharge longevity. Heat is the real enemy here, so cramped cooling-starved long-running applications like laptops also demand better batteries than a weed-whacker that runs occasionally and has a chance of good airflow. In the radio-controlled hobby, there is a huge range of prices for essentially commodity batteries. These are usually Lithium-Polymer, a step above the usual laptop Li-Ion, but the same economics are in play. There are some "well known names" that are sold in all of the domestic R/C retailers. There are some generics sold in Hong Kong that sell for 1/3 to 1/5 the price, and some are even higher quality in longevity testing. Lithium is lithium, so unless there's an amazing return/warranty policy, it's usually not worth the brand name price.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:radio controlled hobby batteries by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree. The cheap batteries that you can get from over seas generally don't hold up very well long term(accepting the fact that almost all LiPo batteries are actually made in China). Just go to rcgroups.com and do some searches there for battery discharge graphs. The top of the line LiPo cells so far are ThunderPower G3 40C which have a very impressive discharge graph. They hold the same voltage as they age during load for 80% of the discharge. After 200+ flights the only thing that changes is the falloff curve at the very end which gets brought in close(less mah over 200+ cycles). I personally use Hyperion G3 35C batteries because ThunderPower doesn't make the 6s 6500mah batteries I want(only up to 5000mah). Hyperion is still very good discharge graphs but the whole discharge curve does slightly go down with age. Hyperion do a very good job of holding voltage during extreme loads like the ThunderPower. If you compare Zippy or any of the other very cheap batteries(1/3 the cost of Hyperion or ThunderPower) you will see there is a big difference between them especially after 50 cycles on them.

    2. Re:radio controlled hobby batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly agree with that, the main difference is energy density and QA/QC controls.

  17. NiMH batteries don't suffer a memory effect by bzzfzz · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's the main reason they replaced nicads in most applications.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_effect

    1. Re:NiMH batteries don't suffer a memory effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read that article you linked to? Almost no NiCad batteries actually experience the memory effect in actual use. Quit spreading misinformation.

  18. Ben says by kenp2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The cost of goods is what the market will bear.." It cost that much because people will pay that much. Expectations are such that consumers are willing to pay more for non-essential "gadgets" in relation to "tools". A person will buy a $2000 dollar laptop but wouldn't dream of buying a $2000 push mower (outside of premium or elite marketing).

    Perception of a product influences price. A battery for a laptop is "techie, electronic, computer related" while a battery for you kid's eleectric car is a "consumable, toy, non-essential" and a battery for a lawnmower is "utlility, get-it-done, tool" in perception.

    Those perception influence product pricing. There is no conventional "miniturization" in Lithium batteries per say that you have to pay a higher costs to shrink the battery, it seems more driven by natural market dynamics.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Ben says by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Yup. Corporations NEVER try to manipulate the market. Never ever. Never ever.

    2. Re:Ben says by rgviza · · Score: 1

      Economics 101: The market is driven by expectations

      If people expect and are willing to pay the price, they will pay the price. Why should they lower prices on an item if people are still buying it?

      The problems start when the manufacturers collude and fix prices. That's illegal http://business-law.freeadvice.com/trade_regulation/price_fixing.htm

      The reason manufacturers spec a different battery than everyone else is so they can fix prices without collusion, sidestepping the price fixing laws altogether.

      Laptop battery form factors and interfaces would be a good candidate for regulatory action which required standardization. It could be framed as a environmental necessity since if a particular laptop doesn't sell at all, and they have a crap ton of spare batteries to dispose of which only work in that laptop, they created a bunch of environmental impact for FAIL.

      It's also a gigantic opportunity for someone to create a set of standardized batteries, then make adapters for each laptop which adjust voltage down or up as necessary, and have capability to adjust the charging to the standard battery's liking.

      The pricing issues are caused by a lack of competition. Such a business would be future proof since as new battery technology matures, and the old batteries wear out, they could sell new standardized batteries that fit in the old adapters. Extrapolate to camcorders, cameras and everything else that uses proprietary battery form factors.

      There's a ton of money to be made here if you could make it work and handle fulfillment. I have several devices packed in boxes which I won't get a new battery for. In a lot of cases the batteries cost more than the original item did.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    3. Re:Ben says by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you forget half of classical economics? Prices are set by an intersection on the supply/demand curve, not by the demand curve alone. And if there is a large profit margin (gap between production cost and market price), it ought to attract more supply, driving down price (the vaunted "invisible hand").

    4. Re:Ben says by sjames · · Score: 1

      Isn't a healthy market supposed to drive price towards the marginal cost?

      Sure, the battery is "techie" and "computer related", but the market will still prefer the $40 laptop battery over the $100 laptop battery of the same capacity.

    5. Re:Ben says by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Expectations are such that consumers are willing to pay more for non-essential "gadgets" in relation to "tools". A person will buy a $2000 dollar laptop but wouldn't dream of buying a $2000 push mower (outside of premium or elite marketing).

      That's an odd statement, because for most modern people, a laptop is a much more essential tool than a lawnmower. How many people outside the suburbs even have lawns? Even if you do have one, you could just pay someone to mow the lawn.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  19. ink cartridges too by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ink cartridges too

    1. Re:ink cartridges too by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      Is that so you can print over the dead spots in the lawn?

    2. Re:ink cartridges too by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Ah, I'd always wondered how they get that striped effect on football pitches!

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  20. Some AA-ish Li cells in a plastic pack... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Basically the only thing on newer laptops is that there is actual circuitry inside of the battery pack now, but it is all very basic and couldn't cost more than a dollar or two at best. I used to work at Radioshack in college (I know, I know, but I was actually intelligent and truly helpful... not a drone) and I once replaced the cells in my Thinkpad 600 right there on the counter with the Li cells we sold... Everyone was amazed that, that was all that was inside of there. People always seem to think because it has to do with a computer it must be magical and exotic. Basically as long as you know how to properly solder them without killing yourself (the ones with tabs help) it's a 5-10 minute job and cost about $10-15.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Some AA-ish Li cells in a plastic pack... by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, look at the battery design of the newer LiPo battery packs, like those used in the Macbook. Each cell has a chip attahced that monitors output, heat, and charge state, and the charging cuircuit in the battery intelligently detects which cells charge/discharge faster than others in order to gain max charge performance as well as a better balanced output load and use closer to 100% of the energy on a flatter discharge curve. This prevents components on the motherboard (which get hot) from having to do this using active resistance, and extends battery life as well. There are entire little computers in battery packs now, and they're getting smarter. many also have buttons that show active charge states even when the battery is not connected. Since power is not based on a curve, but a flat line, traditional battery measuring techniques (like the old meters on AA and C energizer batteries that detect output and heat a wire), don't work. to know the battery state, one must know the number of minutes it;s been running for at a given output, based on the last known charge cycle. it has the be calculated, and the battery itself has to internally understand when to thell the PC to stop charging, or when it's running low.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    2. Re:Some AA-ish Li cells in a plastic pack... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Yes, LiPo is outside of the scope of what I was talking about... and while some laptops are going this way... many traditional laptops and almost all netbooks use 4-6 cells and are very basic.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    3. Re:Some AA-ish Li cells in a plastic pack... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Most notebooks are moving completely away from LiIon. The cost of LiPo is now in line, and the saftey issues alone are woth the minor cost, let alone the smaller pack size/improved density. I've not seen a new non-LiPo smart phone in a while either.

      Yea, the bargain basement Dell crap is still using LiIon, but more likely just to clear out stock or fulfil contract obligations. Still, even the 4 year old MacBook a family memebr has, which is pre-LiPo, has significant amount of chip intelligence built into the pack. I have a 5 year old HP and a 4 year old Gateway notebook, both of which also have on-battery monitoring chips. Even the simpler LiIon notebook batteries typically at least have thermal sensors and a charge sensor. My 4 year old camcorder battery "communicates" with the camera and displays all kinds of data, which is clearly in the battery not the camera as moving it to the other identical camcorder we got the parents for christmas that year displays the same data.

      These batteries are not as simple as they were 5 years ago. However, your comment is mostly correct.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    4. Re:Some AA-ish Li cells in a plastic pack... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Actually my comments are fully correct... I buy laptops for a multinational company and most are HP with a few Sony's... all of them business class, and all are Lion. And regardless of how much intelligence is in there, you can still disconnect it, replace the cells as long as they are the same in all manner, and reattach... the circuitry doesn't know or care and often it is one or two solder points. The electronics in there are easily in the couple dollar range even for a Macbook. Mostly the electronics are now there to keep them from bursting or catching fire since so many recalls have happened.

      I don't see an actual movement away from Lion for a few years yet in all mainstream notebooks/netbooks. It'll happen, but not as soon as you seem to think.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    5. Re:Some AA-ish Li cells in a plastic pack... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Unless the chip detects the increase in capacity and decides to block the charging and tell the laptop that the battery is bad.

  21. It's the energy density, people by Minwee · · Score: 0

    TFA even goes on to admit that the lawnmower battery weighs three times as much as the VAIO's. If you want cheap Li-Ion cells that will run your notebook for under half an hour before giving out, that's fine. Enjoy them.

  22. Regulatory Requirements? by wh1pp3t · · Score: 1
    I am only guessing here as to why -- no sources and no research.

    I am assuming there is more regulation and licencing required on electronic devices than power tools. Hence stricter requirements, increased labor to bring to market and liability concerns.
    OR perhaps the cost of the cell used in laptops is higher from the battery manufacturer (he didn't mention individual cell size).

    Of course, the other option is companies trying to make a few extra dollars/pounds/yen/etc. However, the author of TFA seemed to be on more of a rant than a research mission.

  23. It's about quality, man by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    You're not going to pay top dorrah for a generic Made In China battery for a lawnmower or power tool, but you'll gladly pay a premium for higher quality electrons from a Japanese labeled battery in your iThinkBook. It's still Made In China, of course, but as long as you don't look too closely at it, you won't feel ripped off.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  24. They made cheap lithium-ion batteries for laptops by Kagato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can get cheap lithium-ion batteries for laptops. Third party knock off brands usually sent straight China. They don't work as well and in some cases can even cause damage. If laptop batteries were easy to make the third party market wouldn't be full of bad batteries.

  25. Printers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you are at it, why not trying to understand why the printer's inks are so expensive?

  26. Tolerances by LordKazan · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget that laptop batteries probably have higher quality requirements for smooth power delivery, low heat emission during use, etc when compared to lawn mower batteries.

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    1. Re:Tolerances by coolmoose25 · · Score: 1

      ... Not to mention the fact that I can't remember the last time I used a battery powered lawnmower on my lap - a place of great concern to me... leaving aside the fact that the whirring blades might not bode well for my lap, I can also say that I would not like a battery to spontaneously combust while using a laptop lawnmower.

      --
      Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  27. Chargers.... by quangdog · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that I can charge my lawnmower with my laptop charger? Or, better yet, will my laptop charge in a fraction of the time if I use my lawnmower charger on it?

    I realize that the above is ludicrous, but does Joe Sixpack? How many exploding laptops will we see from some eco-green lawnmower lover trying to implement the above?

  28. Willingness to pay by captaindomon · · Score: 1

    Come on, folks. We all need to learn some basic business concepts. This question, in a different form, comes up every few days. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness_to_pay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand_curve

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
  29. Manual Lawnmower! by afc_wimbledon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Avoids the flex problem, is always charged up, is a lot cheaper to buy and free to run, and as a bonus I get exercise when I cut the lawn! (OK, OK, my *girlfriend* gets exercise when *she* cuts the lawn because I can't be bothered, but the principle's the same!)

    1. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avoids the flex problem, is always charged up, is a lot cheaper to buy and free to run, and as a bonus I get exercise when I cut the lawn! (OK, OK, my *girlfriend* gets exercise when *she* cuts the lawn because I can't be bothered, but the principle's the same!)

      What's she wear when cutting the lawn? No doubt I can understand why it's not you cutting then.

      mod -1 sexist
      mod +1 understanding
      mod -1 chauvanist pig

    2. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Just don't accidentally run over the power source like the electric cord in GP.

    3. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent -1 Liar. If he had a girlfriend he'd know that it's utterly impossible to convince a member of the fairer sex to mow the lawn.

    4. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by gauauu · · Score: 1

      Avoids the flex problem, is always charged up, is a lot cheaper to buy and free to run, and as a bonus I get exercise when I cut the lawn! (OK, OK, my *girlfriend* gets exercise when *she* cuts the lawn because I can't be bothered, but the principle's the same!)

      I dunno, I had one of these. The reason I got rid of it and got a powered mower:
      1. The blade was only about 1/2 as wide as the cutting area of a powered mower. This meant the yard took about twice as many trips to cut.

      2. It took about twice as much effort to push as a regular mower. This would be ok, except combined with #1, meant a LOT more effort.

      3. The manual one worked fine when the grass was dry and relatively short. If the grass got longer (when I was on vacation) or was slightly damp, it wouldn't work well. It also wouldn't properly cut many weeds. Dandelions, in particular, would just have their heads removed, leaving the tall stalk.

      I loved the idea, but in practice, the noise, mess, and expense of a powered mower was absolutely worth it for me.

      (Bringing this almost back to topic, I want a crank-powered laptop!)

    5. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avoids the flex problem, is always charged up, is a lot cheaper to buy and free to run, and as a bonus I get exercise when I cut the lawn! (OK, OK, my *mother* gets exercise when *she* cuts the lawn because I can't be bothered to come out of the basement, but the principle's the same!)

      There fixed that for you!

    6. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      If she were wearing the correct attire, he would very much be bothered.

    7. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Actually a couple of weeks ago my girlfriend was bitching at me to mow her lawn, then when I finally capitulated and said I'd do it she said that she actually wanted to do it herself and she just wanted me to offer to do it.

    8. Re:Manual Lawnmower! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need now is a manual laptop!

  30. Prime example by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Recently I needed a netbook screen replacement.

    1. Official price from maker, more then the actual price of the netbook.
    2. Price from european screen supplier. 120 euro
    3. Price from american ebay, 30 euro

    I paid a small business that buys stuff in the US for customers and had the screen PLUS a 9 cell battery for 120 euro.

    Morale, laptop makers bleed you dry anyway they can. The batteries are something you can't easily buy from others and the laptop makers try to make you believe that any aftermarket battery will eat your family. How else do you think Sony makes its profits (or rather these days, keeps it losses in control).

    Charge what the market is willing to bear, then if not enough buy, charge more so you get more money from the rest. It works... the guy writing the article bought a VAIO. There is one born every minute.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Prime example by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Part of the increased cost is the fact that the EU puts the financial burden of disposing of the battery safely on the seller of the product, whereas in the US no such regulations exist. Futhermore there are taxes to contend with(VAT in the EU is a national tax whereas sales tax in the US varies from state to state and is generally not charged on internet orders), labor is cheaper in the US than it is in Europe etc. The EU wants all these nice protections, but don't pretend there aren't any costs involved. They charge more in the EU because the EU puts a shit-ton of regulations on the companies greatly increasing their costs.

  31. Conratulations. by Inominate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You just spent an entire paragraph explaining the short, simple post you replied to.

    The question posed in the story is simple. Why do computer manufacturers screw customers on battery prices? Because they do, because they always have, and most importantly, because they can.

    1. Re:Conratulations. by gander666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is called market segmentation, and in general it is good. Different segments for the same products/technologies have different values for good intrinsic to them.

      As an example, Taylor Hobson makes a fine stylus profiler. It is the standard in industry and precision manufacturing for determining shape and surface quality for parts. They charge (hypothetically) $60k for this instrument when they sell it to a manufacturer of metal precision components.

      However, the exact same instrument, with a couple of new software features is sold into the Optics production market. The price is ~ 2.5X the price of the same tool sold to the industrial market. They get this premium, because the optics production segment has a different value proposition for the measurements it makes.

      Same thing in laptop batteries. Same technology, but the application is different. Squeezing a few extra watt-hours into a smaller space is worth the premium. Also, you use you laptop much more than you use yard implements, so the perceived value of good life and longer cycles between recharging is a higher value.

      It is irrelevant that they use the same technology.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    2. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do computer manufacturers screw customers on battery prices?

      If that's how you define being screwed, charging as much as you can, then customers do just as much screwing by paying as little as they can.

      You're like these morons bitching about diamond prices but still throwing down a month's salary to buy one. If you don't value it at that price then don't pay that price.

      If you think morality or ethics has anything to do with this then you're doubly stupid.

    3. Re:Conratulations. by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      It couldn't have anything to do with recouping R&D costs could it. Batteries have came a long way in 10 years do you think this happened by chance or were laptop companies investing in R&D to make batteries smaller, more durable, and have a higher energy density. How do you expect them to recoupe their costs?

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    4. Re:Conratulations. by amorsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's good for the manufacturer, for sure, but it's certainly not a free market. In a competitive market, large margins are unsustainable because your competitors will undercut you. Of course as soon as you are talking software, the market is by government fiat not competitive.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    5. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No because the same research is also providing the lawnmower's/powerdrill's. Stop falling for the bullshit you learned in school, companies charge what suckers like you will pay for it, irrespective of costs, hence shoplifters/pirates/R&D/usual excuses do NOT increase the cost of the product.

    6. Re:Conratulations. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Part of the issue is a lack of government enforced standards since the phillips screwdriver.

      Capitalism works well when vendors can't form monopolies easily. Due to legal changes, it's become increasingly easy to form monopolies.

      Imagine if the form factor and plug type for lithium batteries was legally mandated to be 3"x1"x8" with a standard six wire plug.
      In this case, standard lithium batteries would compete based on cost and charge duration. Given standard batteries, it would be very likely that recycling and reuse programs could develop.

      Another perfect example of this is many car subsystems. You don't need 1200 Alternators and Voltage regulators. You probably need at most a dozen alternators for normal cars and trucks. If these were standardized, the cost would be lower. But we've let car makers take the same basic object and attach different custom fittings to it so it can't be reused and you must pay a premium for it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:Conratulations. by gander666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but we really don't have a free market, and cases like this happen all the time.

      Not sure about most major laptop makers, but there is a healthy aftermarket for Apple MacBook batteries. Offering more capacity, or lower replacement values.

      In the case of the instrumentation, it is not a trivial task to build a tool that can scan in one axis, and measure with nanometer resolution in Z with a range of up to 5mm, something Taylor Hobson does quite well. The barrier to entry is pretty high.

      In batteries, the barrier to entry is also not trivial. Unless you are going to buy components and assemble them, you have a pretty hefty investment in production required. The point being that in verticals like that, penetrating the market is not simple.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    8. Re:Conratulations. by bhsx · · Score: 1

      The Phillips head screwdriver is inferior to TORX heads any day of the week.
      Standardization causes stagnation sometimes. Not everything needs to be a government controlled standard, and to do so would destroy research and development in too many segments of industry.
      That being said, I appreciate Korea's stand on making all charges USB compatible. This is doing wonders for electronics consumers the world over.

      --
      put the what in the where?
    9. Re:Conratulations. by amorsen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The laptop "manufacturers" actually just pay some random company to buy components and assemble them. The cell manufacturers have a much harder job, but surprisingly their margins seem much smaller.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    10. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But "market segmentation" still boils down to "because they can".

    11. Re:Conratulations. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I see you have taken Economics 101.
      I raise you common sense and logic.

      Product A should sell for Price X to Customer 1 and Customer 2, to Market Red and Market Blue.

      If you're selling Product A', you can charge for the '. Be it added features, marketing, etc.

      Anything else is gouging.

      Of course, people will bend over and take it up the ass as always. I can't vote with my fucking wallet, because there are a million other wallets who can't keep their flaps closed.

    12. Re:Conratulations. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Batteries have came a long way in 10 years

      HA!

    13. Re:Conratulations. by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Very insightful. I heard a presentation at a large chemical manufacturer, who summed up the whole production stream as:
      Raw component makers on one end, and largely profitable.

      Finished goods sellers on the other end, also quite profitable.

      And in the middle are all the value add people getting squeezed by the titans at both ends. It is what Walmart and their immense power has done to the supply chain, and all the intermediaries have no choice but to continually reduce costs and shrink their margins.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    14. Re:Conratulations. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      The barrier to entry is just a part of a larger equation that still limits what a manufacturer can charge for a product even if there are no competitors around. If the company that has an effective monopoly for some product keeps increasing the price, there is point at which entering the market with a cheaper product becomes attractive, even with very high entry costs. Just because there is only one company serving a particular market, doesn't necessarily mean that the free market is not in effect. As long as there is potential for competitors to enter the market, that company is still constrained by market forces.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    15. Re:Conratulations. by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Right, because forcing all laptop manufacturers to use the same size and shape battery is a great way to encourage innovative designs...at least I will be able to share batteries between my 15" desktop replacement, macbook air, and 9" netbook right?

      Car batteries are much more akin to something like a usb port...they are a small, inconsequential part that could easily fit whatever standard was necessary...car batteries still come in different sizes (and lets face it, the connection method is a lot simpler than a laptop battery) and there are still cars with 6v electric systems on the road (hell, there are even cars with dual batteries these days). In a laptop, the battery is an absolutely vital component (you can't just crank your CPU to get it started) that takes up a large portion of the size and weight of the unit...

      I see no need for government regulation...especially since he is talking about business class notebooks here. The majority of these systems are being bought in large orders by educated customers--if they find Sony's battery systems to be unreasonable, they can always move their purchases to a different vendor (like say, Lenovo) with more widely available affordable replacement batteries.

      --
      Bottles.
    16. Re:Conratulations. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Phillips head screwdriver is inferior to TORX heads any day of the week.

      The Phillips head was developed for use in automated manufacture - it's designed so that the machine driving it will tend to slip the slots rather than over-torque the screw.

      And for that purpose it works really well.

      What it wasn't designed for is screwing by hand, where any other design works better.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    17. Re:Conratulations. by emilper · · Score: 1

      Part of the issue is a lack of government enforced standards since the phillips screwdriver.

      Batteries (of any kind) not regulated by "government enforced standards" ? ... which planet ?

    18. Re:Conratulations. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      And to further that, the Philips head fell out of favour when more accurate automated tools were invented that were much less prone to cam-out, being replaced by posidrive-type heads, which just so happen to be mostly compatible with Philips heads.

    19. Re:Conratulations. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      *much less prone to cam-out and had more accurate torque sensing ability.

    20. Re:Conratulations. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most laptop battery packs still just contain cells, similar in form factor to C-cells. I don't think there are really that many different form factors of cells, it would be too much nuisance to manufacture. Most of the 1000s of battery variations, I believe, are just the packaging. Even if you take apart an electric razor, it's just AA or some other standard-sized cells. It's too bad laptop battery packs don't allow replacing cells, just like putting new D cells in your boom box.

    21. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by selling laptops!

    22. Re:Conratulations. by Twinbee · · Score: 0

      Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if a lack of standards for just about everything is the single biggest factor of wasted work or economy loss ever.

      Every day, thousands of companies are reinventing the wheel for thousands of products and parts. Some need to be improved of course, but I bet the vast majority don't.

      It's a horrible state of affairs and means millions or billions of wasted man hours, and a higher end price for the consumer.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    23. Re:Conratulations. by emilper · · Score: 1

      you should investigate how many regulations have the manufacturers to comply with, from production, to transportation, to disposal ... I suspect the rules are lighter for other products.

    24. Re:Conratulations. by mlts · · Score: 1

      Blecch, the Phillips screwdriver is one of the most brain damaged things ever invented, much less standardized. Torx is far better, spline drive and Bristol set can handle serious torque without rounding out, and even the old square (Robertson) head at least doesn't strip a screw after a few cycles of opening and tightening down. The only reason why that type of screw head became prominent is because it would cam out and strip the screw as opposed to snapping off the screw head, which was important in factories with workers new to the technology, and the fact torque measurements back then were "tighten until it strips then back off a quarter turn".

      I'd like to see a standard in batteries, but it would also have to be expandable. As batteries get embedded controllers to help fine tune the power output from individual cells, what might be a good, standard connector last year may not support the micromanagement needed for optimal power tuning in years to come.

    25. Re:Conratulations. by mlts · · Score: 1

      Problem is, is the mostly compatible nature. If someone is familar with Pozidriv heads and uses the right tool, it works out. However, someone not familar with it and not noticing the four marks that show the differences might just reach for a Phillips screwdriver and likely cam it out.

      This is why I like Torx or Robertson (square heads), because to cam it out, it takes more than reaching for something that "mostly fits" to trash things, although having the wrong sized screwdriver might do some damage.

    26. Re:Conratulations. by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      You just spent an entire paragraph explaining the short, simple post you replied to.

      Thus qualifying themself for an MBA.

    27. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed his point though. It's not screwing given a fair market (that is, not pharmaceuticals or other markets with import restrictions) and millions of people who are willing to pay that much.

      The price of a good is determined by the intersection of a supply and demand curve. Manufacturing costs do not directly factor into it. If this was not the case there would be no such thing as branding.

    28. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would also be screwing products like the Macbook Air which can't incorporate a battery like that.

    29. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most laptop battery packs still just contain cells, similar in form factor to C-cells.

      I presume you mean B or AA... I haven't seen a C-sized laptop battery since 1995.

    30. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just come out and say it. Market segmentation = if you can get away with it, do it. And its all based on the ignorance of that market.

    31. Re:Conratulations. by malakai · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the form factor and plug type for lithium batteries was legally mandated to be 3"x1"x8" with a standard six wire plug.
      In this case, standard lithium batteries would compete based on cost and charge duration. Given standard batteries, it would be very likely that recycling and reuse programs could develop.

      That would pretty much kill innovation. Imagine if early in the Cell phone race, say late 90's early 00's, they standardized the cell phone battery. The smaller form factors would have been locked out of competition because they wouldn't work with the battery size that got chosen. And you have to realize, if you are going to choose a battery size for an industry, it's likely to take at least a year, and more likely 2 years to pick and vote. So your products will come to market with old technology.

      There are countries which tried this. I believe France has rules like this for certain public telecommunication equipment. They all had to support a certain type of power adapter. It kept them constantly a few years behind the market.

    32. Re:Conratulations. by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Price discrimination (e.g. market segmentation) may be good for the producer, but its not good for the consumer. As I learned a long time ago in Econ 101, perfect price discrimination leads to the producer getting all of the economic surplus, leaving the consumer with none. I don't know about you, but, as a consumer, I like being able to capture some of the value surplus in my transactions.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    33. Re:Conratulations. by quanticle · · Score: 1

      That would be the case if these laptop manufacturers were also developing their own batteries. Other than Sony, they're not. They buy battery cells from companies whose sole purpose is to make batteries, put plastic packaging on them and sell them to you as part of the laptop. These same battery manufacturers sell to the tool market as well. If these batteries were really so expensive batteries for power tools would cost more than they do.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    34. Re:Conratulations. by nazsco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it was true when step motors were much more expensive. Hardly the case since some 30yrs.

      Also, phillips now are used to maximize screwing by hand. which is done by using a beveled head in a edged screw. anyway, that's not the point.

      For a more on-topic note, see the screws Nintendo uses on their crap. it's a triangular phillips screwdriver. Openly used for the sole purpose of not letting kids open the damn thing.

    35. Re:Conratulations. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with having a smaller battery form factor.
      You could have a standard specification for the smaller form factor.

      Standards do not kill progress. As others have pointed out here, phillips head standards did not stop screw developments. There are several other screw head types. But there are not *hundreds* of other screw head types.

      Out of the scores of battery formats, few make any difference in performance. It's still essentially 3-5 hours, depending on what activities you are doing. If there was a laptop/battery that had a 24 hour lifespan under heavy use, now that would justify a different format. But having one battery with 3.1 hours of load and another with 3.11 hours and another with 3.09 and all have different shapes and plugs is wasteful.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    36. Re:Conratulations. by Poruchik · · Score: 1

      What it wasn't designed for is screwing by hand, where any other design works better. Ever tried to screw in a nail?

      --
      $signature =~ s/$signature//;
    37. Re:Conratulations. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      If these were standardized, the cost would be lower.

      - here is a question to you then, why should anyone be able to force a manufacturer into any particular 'standard' of an item they are producing?

      AFAIC, as long as there is no misrepresentation of what is being sold (and that's the important part), I prefer that government stays the hell out, it's none of their business what kind of a plug is on a laptop.

    38. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Phillips head screwdriver is inferior to TORX heads any day of the week.

      The Phillips head was developed for use in automated manufacture - it's designed so that the machine driving it will tend to slip the slots rather than over-torque the screw.

      They both suck compared to the Robertson screws.

    39. Re:Conratulations. by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      You must openly build on standards as the need arises, e.g. SD -> mini SD -> Micro SD

      With respect to batteries, there are already de-facto standards on the manufacturing side for certification and testing. My cell phone, digital camera and WiMo PDA of the same era (2006) but different manufacturers all have the same form factor (5 mm x 40 mm x 45 mm, 3.7 V, 1100-1400 mAh) internally, but wrapped in slightly different plasticy bits with contacts in different positions. Remarkably, since our hands are not sufficiently dextrous to manipulate significantly smaller gadgets the same batteries with different connector placements should fit in a modern iPhone or other smart phones. Standardization enables the part to be sold for less than $10 at retail as a generic, while the official branded part demands $40 or more.

      Of course, market disaggregation is good for the vendors (who simultaneously enjoy low costs by being able to source a standard part from China), so they will not choose to aggregate for consumers.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    40. Re:Conratulations. by nazsco · · Score: 1
    41. Re:Conratulations. by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      So is having three different incompatible cell phone infrastructures. There is a lot of waste through-out the technology driven industries. That's the problem with capitalism, you have duplicated efforts competing for your dollar. It's the price we have chosen to pay for freedom to choose despite the fact that cell phone companies could have been forced to build common infrastructure resulting in much better deployment today but the government was hands off and that's what you get. Would we be better off if they had? I have no idea but its the same story for batteries. The only difference is that a new battery standard could be developed today while forming a cell standard would be nearly impossible.

    42. Re:Conratulations. by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      Is there anyone out there that knows what the difference is between a lithium ion laptop battery and a lithium ion powerdrill battery? As far as I know, there are significant production differences between a laptop lithium ion battery is produced and how a powerdrill lithium ion battery.

      And because no discussion is ever complete without a car analogy, Why would a Mercedes V6 engine cost more than a Ford V6 engine.

      How about a computer analogy?

      Why is one 750W power supply so much more expensive than another 750W power supply?


      ============
      The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
      Winston Churchill

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    43. Re:Conratulations. by profplump · · Score: 1

      What if I invented a new battery technology that was 50% cheaper but requires a minimum height of 1.25"? What if I invent a way to get 50% more life out of the battery, but that method requires addressing it as 6 cells instead of 3? Am I just not allowed to complete against the governement-regulated "standard" batteries?

    44. Re:Conratulations. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Not really. It costs X to make a battery, and X+Y to make a bigger battery, where X is the cost of tooling, labor, and overhead, and Y is the cost of the additional materials to produce a larger battery. X is likely the largest factor in the equation, so it doesn't cost much more to make a bigger battery.

      Now I have little doubt that cellphone and laptop batteries are overpriced, but batteries are products, not services. You're buying "a battery" not "n watt hours of power," and it's unreasonable to expect the price to be based on the latter.

    45. Re:Conratulations. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          There are all kinds of screw heads. That's just a sampling though.

          I think what you're describing is a "tri-wing" screw.
      I found another reference for another Nintendo unit using what appears to be a double-square screw.

          My favorite were always the "security torx"

          I thought I'd run into everything, until I needed a #4 phillips. And I thought I had every screwdriver I'd ever need. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    46. Re:Conratulations. by winwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Blecch, the Phillips screwdriver is one of the most brain damaged things ever invented, much less standardized. Torx is far better..."

      Depends on your perspective. I can tell what size Phillips I need at a glance. And I have that size or the size isn't that critical. On the other hand, I HATE torx because they don't have those features.

      If you needed to torque something to spec, what was wrong with bolts, square head, six and 12 point drives, etc. that they needed yet another standard?

    47. Re:Conratulations. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Laptops and lawn mowers are both made in China. China has an incredibly competitive market internally. The answer is that the race to the bottom of the market isn't complete yet.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    48. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That last statement is not true. I've had to tighten and loosen quite a few screws over the years, and simple flat type screwdrivers have the tendency to slip out of the screw. The problem can get especially bad when it's cold so your fingers go numb or when the screw is tiny. Give me a crossed screw any time.

    49. Re:Conratulations. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Capitalism works well when vendors can't form monopolies easily.

      Captialism works quite well when vendors can easily form monopolies, in fact this is where capitalism works best, when a vendor can crush competition force their marketshare to get bigger.

      The free market does not work well when vendors can form monopolies easily. Please don't confuse the two, they are not interchangeable.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    50. Re:Conratulations. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I'd call the first corporatism and the second capitalism.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    51. Re:Conratulations. by GaryOlson · · Score: 1
      LMAO

      I can't vote with my fucking wallet, because there are a million other wallets who can't keep their flaps closed.

      You should print that on t-shirts and sell it.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    52. Re:Conratulations. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Not really, the free market can exist in a socialist state, just not an extreme socialist state (Communism, Agrarianism). The same as the free market cannot exist in an extreme capitalist state (Corporatism as per your example).

      The free market does not lend itself to extremes, that's what's so good about it.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    53. Re:Conratulations. by orasio · · Score: 1

      Free market comments are fun.
      They look beautiful, but they don't describe the reality.
      In this case I have a reason why:

      Patents.

    54. Re:Conratulations. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      I'm not sure the free market is a stable state tho.

      Sort of like democracy, you just need for a strong communistic or fascist party to come to power once and you are probably done until there is a revolution.

      Seems like free markets are an intermediate state.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    55. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Of course as soon as you are talking software, the market is by government fiat not competitive.

      Errr, what? how is the software market "by government fiat" and how is it "not competitive"?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    56. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You must openly build on standards as the need arises, e.g. SD -> mini SD -> Micro SD

      And that makes the standard less useful. As in your example, I have a large collection of standard sized SD cards, so it's annoying to come across a device that uses a mini or micro variant.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    57. Re:Conratulations. by RivieraKid · · Score: 1

      I'd hazard a guess that software patents have something to do with that.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    58. Re:Conratulations. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not done a single bit of research and yet have somehow formed your opinion on the matter. You are an idiot.

      Philips head drivers were designed for use in automated manufacturing. Torque sensing tools were quite expensive thus the philips head was designed to cam out at a certain torque. This solved the problem of over-tightening screws. Philips is actually a good standard and it worked well for its purpose.

      You, acting as an idiot would, made an assumption that was completely unfounded and assumed that the philips head was designed to be used for people driving screws into everything. In this case, yes, torx, richardson (sqare), tri-wing, and posidriv (a.k.a. supadriv) all work better, because they don't cam out and therefore there is less risk of stripping the screw.

      Nowadays torque-sensing machinery is available for acceptable costs and screws other than philips are used for varying reasons.

      There's nothing about a standard that makes anything inherently bad. Your assertion that government standardization results in stagnation is completely unfounded.
      The government used to produce standards for a wide variety of things these standard were called mil-specs. For military specification.
      These standards worked great for engineering. You could make technical drawings and reference whatever mil-spec was appropriate for the application (they specify things like tolerances and whatnot). Clinton, in his effort to balance the budget, removed this program and the government no longer releases mil-specs. So, the private industry took over, made specifications, and now charges fuckloads of money for access to them.
      This means that every machine shop, engineering firm, design firm, etc. now has to spend a large amount of money to use these standards. Before, there was no reason to budget in money to buy specifications. Now, you have to buy multiple different specifications form a number of different providers in order to get any fucking work done. THIS is what's causing stagnation. No one can fucking do any real work without shelling out huge portions of their budget for stuff that was free from the government before. How in the hell is this better?

      Government standards destroy research and development? Seriously? Please, go look some of this shit up before you spout off more nonsense.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    59. Re:Conratulations. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh... the free market works great when vendors can form monopolies. That's the definition. It's a FREE market, with NO regulation.

      Now, consumers suffer when there is a completely unrestricted market thus the free market doesn't work in the interest of the people when companies can form monopolies.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    60. Re:Conratulations. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      "If you're selling Product A', you can charge for the '. Be it added features, marketing, etc."

      Am I the only one that doesn't know what the hell this sentence means? Seriously, I think you missed a word or two in there.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    61. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      OK, care to explain how software patents make software an uncompetitive field? It's an absurd claim, anyone can see that software is highly competitive, particularly in areas contended by patents.

      The "by government fiat" argument is weak, because the whole market is created by government fiat - it's the government that prints the currency, and it's the government that enforces laws against theft, fraud, trademark, etc.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    62. Re:Conratulations. by RivieraKid · · Score: 1

      Without wanting to drift too far off topic, you only have to look at how companies use their overly broad and vague software patent portfolios to stifle competition.

      If patents were specific to a particular implementation and not overbroad, I might be able to agree, but as it stands, in many areas they've devolved into government sponsored strangleholds, effectively removing competition by raising the barrier to entry due to the threat of expensive patent litigation.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    63. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Without wanting to drift too far off topic, you only have to look at how companies use their overly broad and vague software patent portfolios to stifle competition.

      And this makes the software market anti-competitive... how? If it wasn't competitive, they wouldn't have competitors to stifle, would they?

      If patents were specific to a particular implementation and not overbroad, I might be able to agree,

      That's how they are supposed to be.

      effectively removing competition by raising the barrier to entry due to the threat of expensive patent litigation.

      And yet, new competitors enter the software market every day, and it is one of the markets with the lowest barriers to entry. A market where massive companies are constantly threatened by tiny start-ups. Your argument just doesn't add up. It's only about the most competitive market on the planet you're claiming is uncompetitive.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    64. Re:Conratulations. by RivieraKid · · Score: 1

      Although you are trying to ignore this fact, there is a difference between having competitors in a market, and that market being competitive. It's a subtle difference, but it is there.

      I gave you an example of how software patents might stifle competitors - I did not claim they can be used to eliminate competitors and thus create a purely uncompetitive market, though surely even you can see how that can happen.

      Well, at least we agree about how patents are supposed to be. If patents were granted only for the specific implementation, and not for things that are "obvious, for someone skilled in the art", or indeed in the face of prior art that just hasn't been researched properly, as so many are, then I agree, it would be very difficult to use a patent portfolio to manipulate the market. We both know that's not how it works in reality.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    65. Re:Conratulations. by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Copyright is a government-granted monopoly. Software's marginal price is 0, so in a free market the price would be close to 0.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    66. Re:Conratulations. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "'" is a common notation for "prime".

      It's read as "Product A Prime", meaning it's a variant of Product A. You can charge for the "Prime" - the minor differences in the product itself, the cost to develop, advertise, and support it for a new market, etc.

    67. Re:Conratulations. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Forget the size standard. Just standardize on a COTS cell, like 18650 (which is in most laptop cells, anyway).

      It'd have its trade-offs, but you wouldn't be confined to specific dimensions, per se.

      Laptops are probably on their way out as the de-facto computing device in a couple years, anyway.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    68. Re:Conratulations. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Any other design? Try to screw a flathead screw into, well, anything before?

      Star, hex/torx, flathead... anything is better.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    69. Re:Conratulations. by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      I personally appreciate that 4 GB memory cards will remain available for $5 each or less for at least the next decade for all of my new and legacy SD devices through a socket adapter, but I can also see how not being able to choke a new device on a craptastically slow and small but expensive 1 MB card from 2000 could be annoying.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    70. Re:Conratulations. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It was mostly an example for discussion.

      It is very wasteful when the same device is given arbitrary different form factors.

      A good example being cell phone chargers. There should be one- maybe *two* cell phone chargers.
      The current situation is ridiculous. Giving it an arbitrarily different plug shape or voltage makes everything more difficult.

      And it doesn't even net the cell phone company extra bucks, since I get my extra chargers online or from Walmart anyway.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    71. Re:Conratulations. by jgostling · · Score: 1

      What it wasn't designed for is screwing by hand...

      For that there is pr0n.

      Cheers!

    72. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Although you are trying to ignore this fact, there is a difference between having competitors in a market, and that market being competitive. It's a subtle difference, but it is there.

      OK, so what is it? The claim that software is an uncompetitive market is absurd, any way you look at it. Would you please demonstrate this claim?

      I mean, it's not like software is the the only field that has patents, every field has patents. And there are plenty of other markets less competitive than software, and it's not due to patents. Patents are a pretty minor issue in software development, not something that's stifling the industry.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    73. Re:Conratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any other design? Try to screw a flathead screw into, well, anything before?

      Star, hex/torx, flathead... anything is better.

      So, flathead is so bad it is better than itself. ;)

    74. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      That's fucking retarded. Software does not cost $0 to make. It doesn't just write itself. And copyright is not a government-granted monopoly. It's a government-granted right of exclusivity, or temporary ownership. It doesn't guarantee you a monopoly.

      Tell me, are trademarks wrong, too? After all, it costs basically zero to create a trademark, and it is government-granted exclusivity - yet companies make a lot of money from them.

      Is paying for human labor wrong? After all it costs you $0 to perform work, and if it wasn't for government protections, you'd just be working as a slave to somebody.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    75. Re:Conratulations. by amorsen · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything about wrong. I simply stated facts. The marginal price of software IS 0. And copyright IS a government granted monopoly. It's a monopoly that says only the copyright holder can produce that particular software.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    76. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The marginal price of software IS 0.

      Except that it isn't. Where do you get this BS from? Every copy of software sold has support and accounting overheads. Downloaded software requires servers to run.

      Also, the marginal cost of labor is zero - does that mean you should work for free? Or are you just being completely hypocritical in your ideology? If you inherit something, should you give that away for free, because it didn't cost you anything?

      And copyright IS a government granted monopoly.

      No, it's not.

      It's a monopoly that says only the copyright holder can produce that particular software.

      Ummm, that's not what a monopoly is. A monopoly is when a single entity has excessive control over a particular segment of the economy, not their own product. If you're going to argue something, at least get basic terminology right.

      Your argument is like saying I have a monopoly because I own my house, and nobody else is allowed to sell my house.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    77. Re:Conratulations. by amorsen · · Score: 1

      This has gone on several posts too long. I am convinced that anyone reasonable can see what is right in this particular thread.

      The only thing I have to add is that argument by analogy is generally no argument at all.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    78. Re:Conratulations. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The only thing I have to add is that argument by analogy is generally no argument at all.

      Well, I had to resort to analogy, because you couldn't get basic terminology and facts right. You aren't even able to argue the topic directly, you have to resort to lies and propaganda.

      Your argument only makes sense to those who have been indoctrinated into the "copyright abolishment" movement. It's not a rational argument, it's an emotional one.

      Back in the real world, things work very differently to in the fantasy world of "information wants to be free" and intellectual property is accepted on par with other forms of property. But you don't want facts to intrude on your fantasy. So you redefine words, and you abuse words until they have no meaning.

      My "analogies" about physical property" are more than just analogies. I'm talking about how property works. Intellectual and physical property are both forms of property - so why shouldn't they be treated similarly? By your logic of "government granted monopolies" then every piece of property is a government-granted monopoly, as the government grants us that ownership, and protects it with Police, Fire Departments and Armies. So, why would intellectual property be treated any differently?

      Likewise, your idea of business and the economy is bizarre. Businesses strive to make profit, they don't strive to sell something for as close to the marginal cost as possible. Works the same with physical products. If something costs 20 cents to make, a business will still try to sell it for 20 dollars. Why should software be any different?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  32. Not Greed .. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More like "Lack of standards"

    There is no "Laptop battery pack", each laptop seams to have is own wattage/voltage combo that is unique to that model / brand.

    The fact is, there should be a "standard" set of standard "sizes" available, like we have for regular batteries (A, AA, AAA, C, D, 9v, etc).

    It isn't "greed" so much as it is the cost of making a large number of short run batteries. When it costs almost as much to get a battery as it does a new laptop, there is something wrong.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Not Greed .. by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're describing the effect. "Greed" describes the cause.

      It's against the profit interests of laptop manufacturers to standardize batteries because then they'd have to compete with each other on them. Since these batteries are essentially commodity items, the only competitive variable would be pricing. And no producer likes competing on price.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Not Greed .. by blackchiney · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a standard set of sizes for Li-Ion batteries. I cracked open my laptop pack and what I saw was 6 cells of slightly larger than AA cells. A little bit of searching and I found a supplier where a pack of 10 cost $50 w/ shipping. There was space in the case for 2 more so I upgraded the pack from 6 to 8 and adjusted the wiring and thermal probes to match.

    3. Re:Not Greed .. by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Yea, back in the days when laptops started coming out, just before the point where standardization was possible, manufacturers looked at the PC market and the way standardization effected everything and decided that control was better. So there was intentionally no standardization. It costs way more to bring non standard products to market and keeps all companies separate but they can increase price much higher than if the parts were standard. The benefit of the non standardization is that smaller and lighter designs can be brought forth that might not fit in a standards system. Desktops haven't changed in size too much until micro atx came out but 10 different size formats wouldn't be a possibility.

      --
      Balderdash!
    4. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unque to the brand, but rarely to the model. I see generation after generation of Dell, HP, Gateway laptops use the exact same battery packaging. Same with power tools. Each manufacturer may have their own line of tools that share battery packs, but my DeWalt and Craftsman tools can't swap batteries.

      And for that matter, I doubt that a dell battery pack is unique to Dell once you break it open. There are fleets of laptops that use nearly identical battery packs that only seem to vary by cosmetics and attachment mechanisms. I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that they use identical LI cells.

    5. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let's not forget the added amount of safety testing / compliance that must happen with a high power battery pack that actually ends up sitting directly on your lap and flying in planes, etc. I doubt that anywhere NEAR the engineering has to go into a battery for a lawn mower as they need to put into one for a notebook. A battery overheats in a lawn mower and the customer wants a new battery. A battery overheats in a notebook and the internet goes crazy with "exploding / burning notebook" stories and the customers want a bunch of money from the vendor.

    6. Re:Not Greed .. by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Can you give a little more detail about this (which supplier, any problems you had, etc.)? A friend's old G4 PowerBook has a dead battery, and Apple wants over $100 for a new one.

    7. Re:Not Greed .. by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe I'm misinformed, but I was under the impression that the laptop manufacturer designs the computer and chooses the laptop to match. That's why the laptop for my MBP is different from the one for another MBP model released a short while later. The internal electronics dictated the power requirements, which in turn dictated that the newer design required a slightly different battery. Therefor, the hodgepodge of different batteries used in laptops is a function of their differing power requirements and the responsibility of the computer manufacturers.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    8. Re:Not Greed .. by brainboyz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, I'd bank more on the idea that it's an engineering thing. Think about it, if you design a system that needs specific inputs do you want a battery that is designed to efficiently deliver power at that voltage, or do you want a battery that provides a higher voltage and then you get to waste energy (via heat) to bring it down to the appropriate level? When it comes to laptops, battery life and heat levels are key. Converting voltage levels would make things worse on both counts. Add the fact that each laptop has a slightly different form-factor and you need custom shapes too.

      Now, if you want an awkwardly shaped, warmer than usual, and loud laptop that has a shorter than average battery life for the given energy capacity, by all means don't let me stand in your way protesting against the manufacturers for standardized batteries. I'll deal with swapping out a $200 battery every two years or so or not bother so I can upgrade performance, then donate the old laptop so it can be used as a desktop for someone who can't generally afford a new computer in general (they don't care that it only has 2 hours of battery life instead of the original 5).

    9. Re:Not Greed .. by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      Wow, apparently I need a nap. Take every instance of the word "Laptop" and replace it with the word "Battery" except for the first one. (I can't believe I made that mistake 2 times in a row)

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    10. Re:Not Greed .. by Again · · Score: 1

      The fact is, there should be a "standard" set of standard "sizes" available, like we have for regular batteries (A, AA, AAA, C, D, 9v, etc).

      Which come to think about, is a very dumb naming standard. Where's B? How does having two A's represent a smaller form factor? I guess I should be glad that Unix developers didn't name the batteries. We would have a battery called pg and then the next one called more (because it stores more power) and then one called less (because it requires less space). And then someone would make a battery and name it after their favourite household pet (we're going to ignore most). So I'm going to stop complaining.

    11. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot all the other sizes! What about B, E, F, G, and N-cell batteries!? B and N are becomming more common in North America as Asian companies stop redesigning products to use different cells in different countries...

    12. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      18650 is the general standard for Li-Ion laptop cells, ranging between 1.8 to ~ 2.4 aH.

    13. Re:Not Greed .. by koiransuklaa · · Score: 1

      My money would be on that as well. It's quite amazing how standard todays laptops are. As an example, I don't know a single laptop manufacturer* who would design their own boards: everyone just uses Intel reference boards, and as a result all laptops end up very similar to each other.

      *) I think Apple is still the exception here, no doubt because it lets them get the benefits of the non-removable battery.

    14. Re:Not Greed .. by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, there used to be a B-cell battery. But just like the second sister on the ABC's Family Matters, the B-cell battery simply found itself written out of the script.

      Here's what happened. Battery letter designations are based on the size of the battery for common sizes. Hence, A is the smallest, and D is the largest. By that same logic, AA batteries are larger than AAA. Unfortunately for B batteries, however, it wasn't the size that counted.

      The fact is, you never see B batteries around because they just aren't very useful in America. Essentially, the mid-size battery never caught on in products made for consumers, so stores didn't carry them, and the cycle just fed itself. The truth of the matter is that B-cells, like artsy directors and good jazz musicians, are really only appreciated in Europe, where they're used primarily for powering bicycle lamps.

      // And don't forget about the tiny N battery!

    15. Re:Not Greed .. by gknoy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd be surprised if engineers for Sony, Dell, or Asus were unable to design a laptop to work with one of a standardized set of batteries, which differ only in form factor and energy/voltage output. They use commoddity hard drives, CD-roms, and memory chips, after all.

      Sure, it's more challenging short term, but being able to buy generic (or brand-name) batteries would be fantastic (for consumers). Laptop vendors would hate it, though, as others have already said.

    16. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting DC-DC voltage levels can produce more heat. However you miss the fact that computer parts (memory, cpu's chipsets etc) all run at standard and well known voltages. So there should be no problem defining an industry standard battery package. So a series of standard voltage and form factors for laptops that have different current ratings is possible. These could be updated when the technology changes. The voltage of computer components remains stable for a number of years so you would end up with a range of current outputs. The difficulty would be convincing manufaturers to use standard form factors, and of course to give up the ability to set the price on the batters.

    17. Re:Not Greed .. by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Informative

      Laptop batteries all use a standard cell which is slightly larger than AA. What you need are unprotected 18650 Li-Ion cells. You can find made in China cells for $3/ea from places like DealExtreme.

      Just keep in mind you assume all the risk yourself when you rebuild Li-Ion packs. The cells aren't intended to be sold to end users because they must be certified together with the electronics that protect from overcharging and discharging. That said, there isn't nearly as much specialization in cell selection as some posters imply. 18650 cells may be rated for different capacities, but they're all compatible with any other 18650 charger. Just don't mix new and old or different capacities.

    18. Re:Not Greed .. by idontgno · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The designer of the laptop system selects batteries on things like power capacity and form factor/size. But since laptop batteries are, in fact, batteries of cells, the form factor can be customized. You can arrange cells within the battery casing almost at will, as long as you're willing to design the wiring appropriately, so the form factor of the battery becomes something which can be customized. (Also can be standardized, but we've already discussed that.)

      So, all things being equal, you design the battery to best match the available space among the layout of the other components in the laptop casing. And, while you're at it, coincidentally, the battery will be incompatible with laptops of other manufacturers, darn the luck.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    19. Re:Not Greed .. by cheesybagel · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are standard sizes for rechargeable lithium ion cells. But different laptops use packs with different numbers of cylindrical 18650 lithium-ion cells.

    20. Re:Not Greed .. by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      So you're telling me that they also need differently-shaped processors, pci wireless cards, ram sticks, gpu's, usb ports, etc? These are all components with a fixed size and they manage to get them to fit into their design. I'm sure that if a few thoughtfully designed, standardized battery shapes and sizes were mandated, they'd find a nice way to make em fit by adjusting things like speakers, keyboards, motherboard, heatsink/pipes, fans and the like.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    21. Re:Not Greed .. by DwySteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, all the individual cells are the same. In fact the Roomba 400 series (don't know about later ones) has an odd battery pack with an odd connector and odd screws holding it all together. When you get past the triangular slot screws and get the battery open you find... an array of 'C' size NiMH batteries wired in parallel. Which you can replace with similar batteries of equal or greater capacity (NiMH's are finicky about charging rates, Li-On and Li-Poly not as much).

      Actually, I think all of this is getting better. Battery choice was much harder back when you had NiCad or NiMH batteries which were harder to charge. If you wanted to squeeze more capacity in you had to redesign your charge circuit to some extent or make do with charging slower and/or reduced battery performance. The newer chemistries have simpler charging methods.

      But these damn laptops keep getting more powerful despite staying the same size. It's no surprise you'll have to redesign the battery pack every couple of years just to maintain performance and size. With a large garden implement you've got plenty of room to put any old battery in and leave room to spare for your aftermarket enhanced battery pack or future upgrades.

      There just aren't as many pressures affecting those batteries as there are laptop batteries. Until batteries have an excess of capacity there probably won't be standard packs. In the mean time, the gains a company gets from overdesigning the battery outweigh the costs. Especially since people will pay for smaller and longer lasting batteries.

      --
      http://angryee.blogspot.com
    22. Re:Not Greed .. by nxtw · · Score: 1

      There's only so much innovation that can be done when most systems use a variation of the same chipset (for nearly four years, it's been 945[GP]M, [GP]M965, [GP]M45 for most Intel laptops, with the notable exception being recent Apple laptops with nVidia 9400M)

      However major manufacturers certainly do have custom motherboards, although possibly not on the "consumer" models. Dell, HP, and Lenovo still sell systems with proprietary docking stations.

    23. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is bullshit because batteries ARE standardized. The laptop manufacturers take them and put them in none standard cases and sell them for 500% mark up.

    24. Re:Not Greed .. by yurtinus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The battery packs for tools are no more standard than those for computers; however, your battery *components* are. Your 3-cell, 4-cell, etc lithium batteries are going to be built around a standard cell. The Latitude that I have for work uses a six cell battery, 11.1 volt, 56wh. Given its dimensions and capacity, I figure it is- 6x 3.7v 18650 cells at 2500mAh (two sets of three in parallel).

      *I* can buy those batteries for roughly $24, figure cost to Dell's supplier being some fraction of that. Dell charges $150 for a replacement pack. Of course there is more to the battery than cells-- packaging and internal electronics for charging and capacity reporting, though the cost for that CCA will be less than that of the cells.

      Curious-- has anybody tried breaking open a worn out battery pack and replacing the cells?

      --
      +1 Disagree
    25. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you want a battery that is designed to efficiently deliver power at that voltage, or do you want a battery that provides a higher voltage and then you get to waste energy to bring it down to the appropriate level?

      li-ion cell open-circuit voltage is pretty much the same (3.2 or 3.7) for any cell. so you don't have much flexibility to fine-tune the steps in voltage.

    26. Re:Not Greed .. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      If only the real world were that simple. Laptops have vastly different form factors to appeal to different aesthetics, requirements and price points. Companies aren't even going necessarily to the same vendors for all their batteries. Different manufacturers might fit different needs, or another company has offered better prices. Maybe the battery have a standardized process for making these things, but it still needs to conform to the requirements of the client. Perhaps the high price of batteries helps subsidize the overall cost of laptops.

      You can spout that it's all greed, but what the hell kind of idiot would run a company that isn't profitable? Laptops are already pretty damn cheap as it is. Who could have imagined even 15 years ago that we could get a good laptop for $500?

      Some people never seem happy and seem incapable of appreciating what we've got. If anything, the US retail market needs to be less restrictive. If we had the kind of open market you find in Asia, then we'd really see some competitive prices and compelling features. Our economy is a lot more controlled than most people seem to realize and I'm convinced it's why certain large companies are able to control things as much as they do.

    27. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standards help lower or set price?

      HDMI cable or HDMI cable?

    28. Re:Not Greed .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      My experience with Chinese 18650 cells is that a lot of them are crap. The stuff made for RC cars and power tools is usually the worst. Samsung, Moli, BostonPower, Sony all make pretty good cells.

      Also you will find that many laptop packs will run the batteries in a series-parallel arrangement. The cells in parallel need to be matched as closely as possible - ideally from the same lot code. Otherwise what happens is that the weaker cell of the parallel cells will essentially control how much energy goes in during charging, so when the weak cells says "I'm done", the charging will stop leaving the stronger cell with too little charge and the whole pack dies a lot sooner than it otherwise would.

    29. Re:Not Greed .. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd bank more on the idea that it's an engineering thing. Think about it, if you design a system that needs specific inputs do you want a battery that is designed to efficiently deliver power at that voltage, or do you want a battery that provides a higher voltage and then you get to waste energy (via heat) to bring it down to the appropriate level?

      Voltage? Almost all of them operate at the same voltage ranges (somewhere between 10 and 20 volts). It wouldn't be hard to just give three levels in there, 10, 15, and 20, and have them use those. Done. Next problem?

      The answers are always easy. But they just don't do it. Why? Next you'd bring up, say, size. Or capacity. Or weight. All of that can be fixed by the number of cells. Almost all batteries use the same exact cells. So, why the sealed battery? Why not design the case and electronics and sell that for $20, and let me replace the internal cells with whatever capacity batteries I want, or leave them empty (a large number of batteries these days have empty spaces so they can sell the "extended" batteries and not have them protrude, rather than just buying a few more cells and putting them in). They don't want that freedom. There's no difference between an Energizer battery and a Duracell battery. People pick and choose them based on price, availability, or some irrational preference (and not irrational in the sense that the person is insane, but on some anecdotal stories or such that isn't rooted in science). Laptop makers don't want that. So they purposefully spend money to make their batteries more expensive. It's anti-competitive. It directly harms their customers. And they will do it until ordered not to by the government (who has a case to do so based on reducing hazardous waste).

      And the thing that always makes me laugh? When the government does step in, these companies exercising anti-capitalist practices for years will suddenly cling to the idea of capitalism to keep the government from enforcing capitalism on them through a public disinformation campaign.

    30. Re:Not Greed .. by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Have you never seen the inside of a laptop or something?

      You can fit anything you want, it'll just be less efficient as the parent said. Why do you think processors and gpus are most often soldered to the motherboard? The really small laptop even solder ram onto the motherboard and wireless is probably on the motherboard as well.

    31. Re:Not Greed .. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on getting the name right!

      A single cell is not a battery. A battery is 2 or more cells joined together.

      For soem reason the distinction has faded over the last 20 years.

      As usual, I blame the US.

      (-:

    32. Re:Not Greed .. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Laptop batteries all use a standard cell which is slightly larger than AA. What you need are unprotected 18650 Li-Ion cells. You can find made in China cells for $3/ea from places like DealExtreme.

      Say I owned a small guesthouse on a tropical island with intermittent electricity (about 6 hours a day). What would I need to keep a fan and a light going for about 12 hours (until about midday, when guest crawl out of bed) lets assume they are on their own circuit.

      Ideally this would be done on the cheap, 4 rooms but would have to contend with dirty power (coming from a petrol powered generator) and a tropical climate (heat, high humidity). How long would such a battery be expected to last (as in a schedule for replacement).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    33. Re:Not Greed .. by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Laptop batteries all use a standard cell which is slightly larger than AA.

      That's not true at all. Some laptop batteries use flat-packed lithium polymer cells, not cylindrical cells.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    34. Re:Not Greed .. by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Thats a hard challenge for any batteries. The cycle lifetime of LiIon is too short, so they would die inside a year. The high temperature also greatly reduces battery lifetime.

      Such problems are solved industrially by maintained deep-cycle flood lead-acid batteries (like in your car, but maintained more carefully) or by more heavy duty things like molten sulphur batteries or flywheels.

      NiCad or NiMH might do at a pinch, they can last a few thousand cycles best case.... they are also cheaper than LiIon...

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    35. Re:Not Greed .. by Minimalist360 · · Score: 1
      This isn't directed at you, it's just a peeve of mine and I know I'm going off, but hey it's a faceless forum with people using aliases so it's all crap anyway.

      When someone says "should" and talks about how things are "wrong" it usually leads to things sucking and ultimately being either more scarce or more expensive.

      In the 70s the people of America via the US government said "gas SHOULD be cheap" and lo and behold it was so. And of course we ran out and had to ration.

      In the 70s the people of America via the US government (sort of, it was really a private insurer with friends in high places) said "health care SHOULD be cheaper for people" and lo and behold the HMO act was created thus forcing employers to carry HMO options along side their other plans. And of course everyone thinks healthcare sucks here now (and it's more expensive than ever, but that's largely because the American people via Federal and State government say "these tests and these procedures SHOULD be covered for everyone no matter what, but that's a different story).

      In the 90s and early 2000s the American people via the US government said "everyone SHOULD be able to have a house, that the mothertruckin' American Dream and we want people to stop dreaming about it and have it already" and wow holy crap look what happened there. House prices went up like crazy because of all the artificial/subsidized demand, we ran out of houses so we built shitloads of them so people could buy 2 and 3 and speculate, and pop goes the bubble and it's major suckage.

      Everyone that thinks they know everything: please just stop saying SHOULD already and live in the world. Or just say it LESS.

      Also, I don't think it's time to slow innovation in laptop batteries with standards yet. Cos like in 4 weeks someone might come out with a battery that uses different substances and requires (or can have) a different formfactor that could change the game, and it might have completely different voltage, charging, etc requirements and then what?

    36. Re:Not Greed .. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd bank more on the idea that it's an engineering thing. Think about it, if you design a system that needs specific inputs do you want a battery that is designed to efficiently deliver power at that voltage, or do you want a battery that provides a higher voltage and then you get to waste energy (via heat) to bring it down to the appropriate level?

      I take it you haven't disassembled a laptop battery before. Most are the exact same thing: 18650 (about the same size as 2x CR123s) and sometimes 14500 cells (2x AAs). They're about $5 a piece.

      A "laptop battery" is just the circuitry for charge/discharge, along with the cells. It'd make much more sense, and save materials, if the circuitry were built into the laptop with a "standard battery" bay.

      Unfortunately, laptops (and computers in general) have become a disposable item to many people - like a TV. They're easy enough to get for free, in mostly working order. Most people will replace their's with a new one before the original battery dies, and don't use a computer long enough to deplete the battery (if they use it unplugged at all in the first place).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    37. Re:Not Greed .. by maitas · · Score: 1

      Well.. a better option is to use some other form of energy storage (flyweel, etc.).

        The easiest one that you can build yourself (if you are a Slashdot Hobbyst) is the water energy storage.

        Please go to http://www.electricitystorage.org/site/technologies/

      And the chart http://electricity.ehclients.com/images/uploads/capital.gif

      Pumped Hydro is one of the best choices, and very simple to implement.

    38. Re:Not Greed .. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it isn't my guest-house. so such a solution would need to be "push red button to operate". But I intend to visit this place a bit, a great place to wind down with tropical beaches, good food, cold beer and nothing to worry about.

      Basically how much would a flywheel (or other form of energy storage that fits the bill) cost. Size/form factor isn't an issue but weight can become one after a while as it needs to get there by boat.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  33. Actually... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    It's because you can pull-start a lawnmower, so you don't really need a battery. As soon as we have Briggs & Stratton powered laptops, the batteries will be dirt cheap.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  34. Safety Regulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptop batteries are required to meet very strict safety guidelines. I'll bet that lawn mower batteries have very few safety guidelines... which makes sense... a laptop battery exploding is much more likely to hurt someone than a lawn mower battery. All that testing and all those extra safety measures add up to increased cost.

  35. Why original laptop batteries by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    You can buy Sony batteries for GBP220 or you can buy chinese batteries for like GBP40. On my IBM laptop my chinese batteries are working fine for 3 years now, and they still have nearly full capacity.

  36. Reason by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Because they need to prove that an electric mower is at least as good as a gas version (adoption). Also, laptop batteries would be cheaper if you could buy a gas powered laptop.

  37. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is a laptop dearer than a lawnmower?

  38. In other news... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    ... the same bottle of beer is almost an order of magnitude cheaper at your local beverage mart than at an upscale night club. How can that be?

  39. Really? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of all the ridiculously priced items out there, why did he pick these batteries? Batteries for laptops need to be smaller, lighter, and more careful about heat dissipation than those in a lawnmower. The 66% premium sounds about right, just like the premium one has to pay for the rest of a laptop compared to a big old desktop PC.

    If he wants to rant about prices, how about laptop accessories? I wanted to buy a second wall charger for my laptop, but they were charging $75 for it. What about the price of any cable or charger sold at chain stores? Radio Shack, who used to sell packs of resistors to me for 50 cents, wanted me to pay $25 for a USB cable. It's as if they want me to buy everything online.

    And I won't even start on text messages and other cell phone baloney. Ranting about that could be a full time job.

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? What phone plan are you on?

      I get unlimited free text messages every month, subject to a fair-use policy (I cant really send more than 2500 in a month or they tell me off).

      It is the same with data usage on 3G. Switch provider dude!

    2. Re:Really? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I wanted to buy a second wall charger for my laptop, but they were charging $75 for it.

      I damaged the adapter of my Asus EEE. I really had a hard time finding somewhere to get a new one. I didn't trust anything that was on eBay. Most seem to be powersellers from China, and I've already been bitten once by those.

      After searching, really, really, long I found Duracell Direct and found the prices acceptable (even though higher than the eBay ones). The adapter works fine, and if I ever need a replacement battery for laptops and/or cameras, I know where to go.

      (Not affiliated to them, just a happy customer)

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He picked it because it was prompted by the lawnmower. Says right there in the summary, never mind the OP *rolles eyes*.

    4. Re:Really? by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      d'you spend more than $26 per phone ?
      If so, I'll keep my 300 minutes + $0.1/minute overage, $0.2/sms and $0.02//Kb data, and just use it as a phone/wifi device.

      --
      Changa hates change.
    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I won't even start on text messages and other cell phone baloney. Ranting about that could be a full time job.

      Unless you were texting it, in which case you'd need a full time job, just to pay for the texting.

  40. Energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about energy density per volume (Wh/mL) and mass (Wh/kg)

    My home burglar alarm has a 48 Wh battery that cost $14. And guess what? It's somewhat large and heavy.

  41. Profit margins by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    What are the profit margins on lawnmowers and lawnmower accessories? Gross margins on laptops are around 10%. Compare that to things like clothes, furniture, and food which might be 100% or 1000%. Often times electronics retailers profit only from the accessories like batteries.

  42. Power DENSITY not watt hours by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    It's the power density not the watt hours that make the price difference. In other words it's the watt/hours per kg that matters. Laptop batteries are not as dense (heavy) as power tool batteries, their power density is higher (more watt/hours per kg) than power tool batteries.

  43. Lack of standards by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    There is (fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your POV) no such thing as a standard laptop battery i.e. one size fits many. Therefore you don't get the same economies of scale that may occur if there were, say, only 3-4 different laptop battery sizes, with multiple manufacturers cashing after the market.

    I suspect the same thing goes on with power tool batteries but I bet if you cracked open a few designed for different tool brands they'd have many the same components between them, similar to how lantern batteries are basically 4 (crappy) C batteries in series.

  44. Rebuild it yourself by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    Contrary to popular belief, so called proprietary battery packs are actually filled with pretty standard lithium ion cells. These can be purchased on eBay and a variety of other outlets. Even if you can't find the correct size you will find a similar enough model that you can use instead - you might have to solder a few wires but nothing that requires mad skillz.

    So next time you have an expensive proprietary battery pack go bad on you, bust it open yourself and put in a few new cells. This is also a service offered by some companies so you can get new batteries for discontinued equipment - much of this equipment is not worth paying someone to rebuild a battery for but for things like satellite phones (such as the Motorola 9500) it is well worth it.

    1. Re:Rebuild it yourself by geekoid · · Score: 1

      For most people soldiers is mad skillz.

      Of course, the time to do it has value as well.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. Exactly! (And more) by denzacar · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    ...David Sapaeth, a product specialist at Sony VAIO Europe, sent me the following prepared statement:

    "VAIO does use lithium-ion batteries in the majority of its laptops, but they differ from those used in power tools in a number of ways.

    "Power tools typically require a high power output, but for very short periods of time only (long enough to drill a hole, tighten a screw, saw a board and so on). Then they pause again at zero output until the next task. Notebooks require a stable output for hours in a row.

    "If we look at the batteries of a power drill for example, they're ten times heavier than a notebook battery. Notebook batteries are extremely condensed in terms of cells. If we were to use the same cells as power tools in a notebook with the continuous power demand, the cells would likely melt!"

    Also, author of TFA is apparently purposefully trying to be an idiot. Which can happen when you start your rant based on a faulty premise.

    First he acknowledges the problems NiCd and NiMH batteries have, then he ignores it - because that would prove his rant is simply a product of uninformed reasoning.
    In other words - he has no fucking idea what's he talking about.

    I'm grateful for David's response, and he raises some interesting points, but I'm not sure I accept all of them. David claims power tool batteries don't need to deliver continuous power, but that's exactly what the batteries in my Bosch mower do (and my Ryobi strimmer and hedge cutter).

    And these power tool batteries deliver such continuous power at much higher currents - the mower runs flat in about 40 minutes while the similar capacity VAIO battery has six to eight hours, and I've used my mower and strimmer without ever seeing their batteries melt down.

    No, Paul baby, it is not that your lawn mower's battery delivers continuous power at higher currents - it is the fact that your laptop uses far less power at much lower currents.
    And you don't see your battery melt down BECAUSE... well... what parent post said.

    Also, he apparently thinks that when you buy a battery you buy electricity.
    Ummm... No. You are buying PORTABILITY. Not watt-hours but grams, cubic centimeters AND watt-hours.

    That is why it would cost a fortune to replace a car battery with a pile of iPod batteries.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Exactly! (And more) by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      He was running on a deadline, and discovered he had a non-story with very little time before publication, so naturally he was a little hostile to a good explanation. I imagine he'll realize it was a stupid article in a week or two...

      But maybe I'm giving him too much credit.

  46. moot point by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    The world will be out of lithium soon enough

  47. Did You Guys Actually Click To Page 2? by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 5, Informative

    The guy from Sony answered it: size, weight, and output differences. Would someone actually critique that instead of talking about markets, price settings, and conspiracy theories?

    1. Re:Did You Guys Actually Click To Page 2? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Funny

      Click to page 2? Some people barely even read the summary here!

    2. Re:Did You Guys Actually Click To Page 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without knowing the size of the cells used, and their aH it's hard to say, really. Odds are, they are cheaper grade Chinese 18650 cells with lower QA/QC standards, and I'd suspect that the pack design and charging circuit are more rudimentary, which reduces costs again. But, I have had my laptop pack re-stuffed with 2.4 aH cells (9 cell Dell pack) and I paid $4 CDN per cell and a case of beer for the labour, so who knows where the money you spend on a laptop pack really goes. Sure, pack design is costly... but once you begin the manufacturing process, those costs must go down significantly, correct?

  48. Re:They made cheap lithium-ion batteries for lapto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think you are conflating the difficulty of make laptop batteries with the ability of China to deliver goods that actually perform at the task they claim.

    From batteries that catch on fire,
    to drywall full of toxic coal ash,
    to plastic products that are so thin they bend or break when used as intended,
    to pet food containing toxic melamine,
    to cough syrup containing anti-freeze,
    to mechanical toys whose tolerances are so poor that gears chatter instead of engage,
    etc,
    etc,
    etc.

    Chinese products are always cheapened one or two degrees past the point that they function.

    Our stores are now full of the pathetic junk that we used to look down up the Communists for having.
    We just have more choices of junk that they did.

  49. Smaller is usually more expensive. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    True for laptops, laptop batteries, cars, women.

    With exceptions that prove the rule.

    Small + Good = Expensive. Eva Longoria, Tesla, Laptops.

    Small + Cheap != Good. Geo Metro only example needed.

    Feel free to feel offended. Way it is.

    There is the possibility that lawnmowers are just cheaper in some other way, but I'm betting it's about making small batteries fit interesting spaces.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You really need to define good.

      I considered my Geo metro to be good. I put 100K miles on it, never needed a major repair, 40+ MPG, Easy to park, four new tires cost less then 100 bucks.
      The paint job never faded.

      Now, if you want 0-60 in 3.9 seconds, then you are looking at a different care the Chevy Sells.

      Computers are smaller, more powerful, and more useful then ever but there a hell of a lot cheaper then they where 10+ years ago.

      If a rule has exceptions then it's flawed. That's a statement said by people who can't think outside their precious sacred cows.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by value_added · · Score: 1

      True for laptops, laptop batteries, cars, women.

      I don't think that applies to women.

      If you ask a guy or a girl the price of big boobs, they'd both agree the cost is often prohibitive.

      The same applies to big girls. If the rumour that fat girls are easy is true, then they should cost less on a per-date basis, yes? It's possible they actually cost more on a daily basis (care and feeding of a spouse, for example), but I'd like to think that if they're happy to swallow anything they put into their mouth (another rumour), that would more than make up for the extra cost.

    3. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The Metro was not much fun for most people, even for 100k. Acceleration as a suggestion, a ride like a water buffalo, though a buddy tells me the seats were pretty good.

      But my '95 Explorer will go 300k this week. Got the trans rebuilt at 234K, other than that the engine is original, and it sure is a nicer ride than your Metro was. Yes, more expensive. My point is that your Metro needed to go 200K to be such a deal. Otherwise, small + cheap != good.

      I have no sacred cows. I can see past the imperfections, even in logic, though that is more choice than goal.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Well, if we're going down this road...

      Big boobs on a big girl? Not the same return on investment as big boobs on a small girl. Natural is always more expensive, it's the TCO my friend.

      Small girls have significantly higher upkeep:

      Clothes: Size 0 seems to cost mostly the same as size 16, but size 0 girls seem to need a LOT more of them.
      Shoes: Well, maybe not shoes.

      Other maintenance items:

      Competition: Seems like everybody is bird-dogging your cute little girl. This costs in dates, travel, etc, which of course increases competiitive opportunities. A vicious circle.

      Competition: Seems like your little girl is always trying to keep up with her little girl friends. This is expensive.

      And just as an aside, the whole mouth thing has nothing to do with anything. Except maybe cigarettes, and I'm not too sure about those. It's a individual thing, though you should, according to several of my nieces, look for the DSL thing. They claim that's a dead give-away, though I think it's more likely jealousy. They don't much like scrawny actresses. Go figure.

      Oh, then there's the whole small v tiny v scrawny thing. Kinda Eva Longoria v Pia Zadora v Olsen twins. A matter of taste, perception, and relevance.

      Maybe it isn't so simnple after all...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    5. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Small + Good = Expensive. Eva Longoria, Tesla, Laptops.

      The EeePC and Thai Women invalidate your theory.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Bring a Thai woman home and see how this works out. Rentals are usually cheaper in both exotic cars and exotic women.

      And eeePCs seem so cool, but after a while the thrill is gone, the keyboard hurts, and the screen is just too small. Ask my mother-in-law. She would pay more for a better machine. Of course, she's 87 and just got her Facebook page up 2 months ago, so something is working right. Depending on your perspective.

      Expensive is a misnomer. I'm trying to find a good pair of Bluetooth stereo headphones. The Moto S705(?) is cute, and great range, but it's not very good in sound quality and I still have wired headphones involved. Only cost $19 at a TMO store on closeout. My Altec BackBeat 903 sound very good, but sadly is not at all sweat-resistant, and when it gets moist it likes to call the last number over and over and over and over, faster than I can kill the call. and it needs to be blown out to clear the speakers. And the controls fail. I know why it isn't tolerating sweat, and acn't figure out a way to fix it. So... I'm looking at reviews for other headsets and hoping that buying the 'best' pans out. It never failed before, but technology has its own reward.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clothes: Size 0 seems to cost mostly the same as size 16, but size 0 girls seem to need a LOT more of them.

      That’s because size 0 girls like shopping, whereas for size 16 girls, shopping consists of trying to find something (a) their size (b) that looks good and (c) still being fat.

    8. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Bring a Thai woman home and see how this works out. Rentals are usually cheaper in both exotic cars and exotic women.

      Depends on where you buy from.

      If I buy a BMW here in Australia I'll pay through the nose as everything has to be imported from Germany with luxury car taxes to boot. Now if I buy a BMW in Germany I pay significantly less, about the same I'd pay for a decent Toyota here in Australia. The same principal applies to Thai ladies, marry one in the US and you'll pay a premium, do it in Thailand and you'll be the one with expensive tastes.

      Not that I disagree with your point (if you can fly it, float it or ride it then it's cheaper to rent then buy), it's just a bit more complex then that. Once again location applies, it's cheaper to rent a Ferrari in Italy then it is in the US.

      And eeePCs seem so cool, but after a while the thrill is gone,

      EeePC's are good for what they are, they are powerful enough to run a lot of things in a package that is extremely portable for a price that is more then reasonable. It's not a desktop machine, it's an ultra-portable so trying to use an EeePC as a desktop is like trying to fit the square peg into the round hole. Up until the EeePC started the netbook craze an ultra-portable laptop had an extremely high cost of entry.

      Ask my mother-in-law

      Like I said mate, square peg into the round hole. The EeeBox (IIRC name) is better suited as it's an ultra-portable desktop, if the M-I-L has a problem she can bring the box around without the monitor, KB and at home she can have a nice 20" screen, full KB and mouse. Fair enough the EeeBox has only been around for a few months but you could get sub A$600 boxes from Dell for a while now.

      Expensive is a misnomer.

      Expensive shouldn't be confused with value. Value to me is when cost x derived with x being whatever you're trying to do with it. So sometimes something cheap has a greater value then something costly. I tend to buy the A$30 headphones for my MP3 player, they only last about three months but the A$70 sony/senheiser ear buds only lasted 5 months.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Smaller is usually more expensive. by mjwx · · Score: 1
      Lets try this again shall we.

      Expensive is a misnomer.

      Expensive shouldn't be confused with value. Value to me is when cost less than x derived with x being whatever you're trying to do with it. So sometimes something cheap has a greater value then something costly. I tend to buy the A$30 headphones for my MP3 player, they only last about three months but the A$70 sony/senheiser ear buds only lasted 5 months.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  50. Almost as bad as text messaging. by IWaSBoRG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Super expensive laptop batteries have always bothered me. If you've ever taken one apart you know whats inside them. A bunch of AA cells strung together in series. Thats it. They're not top of the line Energizer or Duracell either, they are the cheapest of the cheap AA lithium ion cells mass produced in china or japan or where ever is cheapest at the moment. They are worth no more than $5 in total. Its appalling how much these companies charge for trash. This isn't to say all companies use such shit. There are a few that custom make their own batteries for better performance and size.

  51. The closest thing by tepples · · Score: 1

    As soon as we have Briggs & Stratton powered laptops, the batteries will be dirt cheap.

    I'd imagine that some PC battery backup devices can automatically start a diesel generator when they discharge too far. Is that close enough?

  52. Re:Size matters-yes, and watt hour is silly by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    what is cheaper, 1 gallon of milk or 8 pints?

    basing the 'cost' on watt hours of energy is stupid..
    which has more watt hours? (the lawnmower)
    which has the same one container, one pair of contacts, and one manufacturing point.

    now- (outta my ass numbers) it may take 4 laptop batteries to have the same watt hours as one lawnmower battery.
    so that is 4 containers, 4 contacts, and four manufacturing articles.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  53. Wow by idji · · Score: 1

    Lithium + Lawnmower + Vibration = beautiful fireworks i think.

  54. Manufacturing tolerances by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    I'd hazard a guess that manufacturing tolerances are a cost factor. A 2mm range of variation in battery sizes would probably be unacceptable for a laptop manufacturer, but the lawnmower maker should be able to deal with a much larger variation, as well as a bigger overhead for the casing. It probably costs a lot more to wrap a laptop battery in 1.2mm of accurately made stuff than it does to case a laptop battery in 4-7mm of rough hewn gunk.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  55. Pff. He thinks that’s bad?! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    From TFA, summarizing:

    • Ryobi power / garden tool replacement battery: £1.16/Wh
    • Bosch Rotak 43LI lawnmower battery: £1.50/Wh
    • Sony VAIO TT laptop battery: £2.50/Wh

    Whiner. A Kodak KLIC-8000 lithium-ion digital camera battery comes out to £3.46 / watt hour.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:Pff. He thinks that’s bad?! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Okay, correction needed.

      a) The KLIC-8000 is 3.7 volts, not 3 volts (the CRV3, the non-rechargeable version, is 3 volts).
      b) It costs £29.99 in the UK, so I should use that (instead of the $29.95 it costs in the US).

      That makes it come out to £4.55 / watt hour.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  56. Battery pricing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny this just came up...

    I bought an ideapad s10 with 6 hour (6 cell) battery from Amazon for $312. I just remembered about buying a 2nd battery, as my flight to see my in-laws is 10+ hours. Lenovo wants $39.99.

    I don't think that is unreasonable.

  57. Compare to other types of Energy... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    If I ran a gas station, and I was charging you $8/gallon to fill up a certain type of car, I would be accused of many crimes. I would be fined, thrown in jail, termination of business, or all the above.

    If this were the Electric company charging more on Street A vs. Street B, they would likely suffer the same fate.

    Should battery vendors be overlooked or justify it somehow with weak "Supply and Demand" BS excuses?

    Don't overlook or mistake different types of energy to be "fair". There's still the same air of greed and corruption behind ANY type of Energy provider, regardless of demand.

    1. Re:Compare to other types of Energy... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I ran a gas station, and I was charging you $8/gallon to fill up a certain type of car, I would be accused of many crimes. I would be fined, thrown in jail, termination of business, or all the above.

      No, you would not be accused of any crime. You would not be fined, thrown in jail, etc.

      You just wouldn't get any business from people who drive that type of car. Depending on how many people drive that certain type of car, loss of such business might effect your bottom line and cause your business to fail.

      From the first line of your post, you proved you do not know the first thing about business or the law. Your second shows a similar lack of knowledge about both the history of electric power and the laws governing utility operations.

      Please learn about the topic before you post such drivel.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  58. Bad article by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Laptop batteries are design differently AND there is a minimum 'entry' cost; Something that impacts it less as the Watt hours increases.

    Yes, getting as much as the market will bear is part of it, but it is more complex then Econ 101.

    They are also designed differently. He touches on in in the article, but then tosses it away with an incorrect conclusion.

    Laptop batteries are designed for continuous power for hours.

    His lawnmower does not run for hours without stopping, neither do his trimmers.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Re:Size matters-yes, and watt hour is silly by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Here, I’ll save you the trouble of doing the horrible math.

    Lawnmower battery ... 93.6 watt hours
    Laptop battery ... 87.48 watt hours

    I’ll save you the trouble of even more horrible math and just tell you that it’s about a 7% difference.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  60. It's not like printer ink. It;'s only 65% by Animats · · Score: 1

    It's only 65% more per watt-hour for the laptop battery. That's not a big deal. Laptop batteries have trickier form factors, a lower packaging weight budget, and tougher heat management problems. It's not like ink-jet printer ink pricing, which is a known scam.

    Apple, with their non-replaceable iPod/iPhone batteries, is a much bigger deal. Now that's a ripoff designed to make customers buy a new unit every two or three years.

  61. His prices are insane by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    £220 ($357) for a laptop battery is insane. Even my high-priced 7-cell (60 Wh) ThinkPad T61 battery was $130, or about £1.30/Wh at today's exchange rates - right in line with his lawnmower battery figures.

    I'm not saying that laptop batteries aren't ridiculously expensive - they are. But they aren't as bad as the story makes them out to be, at least not in the US.

    1. Re:His prices are insane by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      at least not in the US

      ThinkPad T/R 14W 9 Cell High Capacity Battery, US: $143.20 (about £88.04)... or £1.05 / watt hour
      ThinkPad T/R 14W 9 Cell High Capacity Battery, UK: £110.34... or £1.31 / watt hour

      That’s not even a terribly large difference... the digital camera battery I looked up was almost twice as much in the UK (£29.99 vs. $29.95).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  62. Standardization by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    Note that none of the power tool makers standardize either. (At least not the ones I've seen/used.)

    Ryobi batteries power Ryobi devices, and not all at that.

    Black and Decker powers Black and Decker.

    Skill powers...etc.

    And it's all about the plastic housing. The batteries are basically the same inside, just piled up to make the voltage they want. I assume, anyhow.

    I want the standardization in the laptop market, yes, but I REALLY want it in the power tool market.

    In the laptop market, I'd settle for a standard DC power in connector with bumps on it to make it only work for matching voltage connectors. Then we could use a nice competitive external battery standard to keep things going in a pinch and cheaply.

    1. Re:Standardization by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Talkin' about rechargeable power tool batteries... the replacements are damn expensive.

      I'm seriously considering just buying the NiCd cells, cracking open the battery cartridges, and doing a little solder-fu. Looks like it would save me about $25 per battery.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  63. Capitalism means never having to say you're sorry by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Ludicrous pricing is the name of the game. Just look at the Kindle. The Kindle is priced the same as a netbook, a netbook which could easily be modified to be a reader AND is a general purpose device.

    Any justified pricing there? No. Sales, however are great.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  64. Trust by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    Oddly, I trust the power tool guys not on this more than I trust the laptop guys.

  65. because they can get away with it by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Why does an ipod/phone sync cable go for $1 to $3.99 online but $20 or more in the store? Because if you're going to the store, you probably need the cable now, can't wait. Bend over and take it, bitch. Capitalism. Apologists will say it's a convenience fee for providing the store, helpful employees, etc. This is the same reason why a TV or printer will sell for damn near cost but the cable to connect them to something useful will be $20 to $100. You don't think about buying the cable before the television (unless you've been burned before) and who wants to get the nice and shiny TV home only to wait a few days for delivery?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  66. iPhone batteries by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    I know iPhone batteries aren't *user* replaceable, but I thought that they could be replaced by an Apple service center? Of course, that's still a pain in the arse (because it means you have to lose the use of your phone for some period of time). Not saying I agree with Apple's design choice, but am I wrong that the battery *can* be replaced by someonen with the knowledge and tools? The way I figure it is, if a service center can replace the battery, then so can I - it just might not be as easy as other phones.

  67. Liablility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me a lot of the cost difference probably relates to liability. The manufacturer has to handle lawsuits when the batteries explode, taking out either a $90 lawnmower or a $2000 laptop containing $100000 worth of data. Seems like the laptop battery manufacturer probably has to pad the price some to handle lawsuits.

  68. you all are idiots by sydres · · Score: 1

    with the insults aside the real reason lies in the fact that a lawnmower is not a laptop a laptop is made up of many extremely delicate components requiring strict tolerances in power output, a lawnmower is made up of brute force motors and rugged circuitry variations in power are not much a concern. so drop the greed/capitalism corporations sticking it to us nonsense and use the brains that God/Allah/ evolution or whomever gave you

    1. Re:you all are idiots by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      1) Try learning to capitalize and punctuate. You might actually at least appear credible.

      2) Have some more Kool-aid. They've got plenty on Fox "news."

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    2. Re:you all are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen asshole there is little to no difference in the batteries. Spare us the ranting uninformed dummy spit

    3. Re:you all are idiots by sydres · · Score: 1

      LOL

  69. Price Fixing Common by Kagato · · Score: 1

    Price fixing has been common in the LCD and IC markets, why not the battery market? Price fixing laws are fairly weak in Asia. Companies don't get in trouble unless they dirty their hands in the US or EU.

  70. Re:Size matters-yes, and watt hour is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "what is cheaper, 1 gallon of milk or 8 pints?"

    What type of gallon are you talking about? US or English?

    Maybe we should just use Litres.

  71. How's this for free martket? by fredjh · · Score: 1

    When Best Buy first opened near me, the audio section had cables, speakers for walkmans/discmans, headphones, etc. You could then mosey over to the computer section, and the IDENTICAL ITEMS (brand and all) were marked higher.

    No, that didn't last long, but it's the same principle: they didn't think people were paying attention, and I'm sure a lot of people bought stuff from the computer section without ever even checking the audio section.

    --
    Stupid, sexy Flanders.
  72. Re:They made cheap lithium-ion batteries for lapto by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
  73. Market segments by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Segmenting markets, or creating artificial barriers between markets is not capitalism. It's a monopolistic practice.

    You keep using that word. It does not mean what you think it means. Market segments are not "artificial barriers", they are simply observed categories. "A market segment is a group of people or organizations sharing one or more characteristics that cause them to have similar product and/or service needs." While it is possible to create a market segment through artificial barriers, this is quite rare and difficult to achieve. Identifying market segments certainly has NOTHING inherently to do with monopolies. Every company uses market segments from the smallest to the largest.

    In a capitalist system there are no barriers between markets, there's no such thing as a "market segment".

    Capitalism has NOTHING to do with the definition of a market segment. You can have a market segment in a planned economy too. Market segments are simply a way to identify a group with similar needs and/or interests. If you don't know who the customer is and what their needs are, you are going to have a very hard time providing a product that customer will be interested in.

    Segments are created artificially to line companies' pockets.

    WRONG, segments are identified to understand who will be interested in a particular product. By your definition anything that contributes to understanding the needs of customers is "artificially" lining company's pockets - whatever the hell that means.

    In fact... most laptop manufacturers artificially design their laptops and batteries so that a generic battery from someone else cannot be plugged in.

    That is an effort to differentiate their product so that they can compete on some basis other than simply price. Sometimes this is a good thing as a differentiated product can potentially serve the needs of a group of customers better. For instance my cell phone has a removable battery but I never remove it so this feature is useless to me. My cell phone could instead be designed to eliminate the extra bulk needed to make it removable and this would serve my needs better. If my phone were instead powered by a standard AAA cell (which would not perform as well and be bulkier) that would eliminate a potential differentiator but it also would likely degrade the performance of the product in the ways that matter to me.

    Batteries have different performance levels, weight and charging considerations that make a standard battery problematic in applications like laptops and cell phones. Eventually they may standardize but right now any battery choice carries engineering trade-offs that can make or break the product. A laptop manufacturer would be stupid to try to standardize their batteries any more than they have to right now. Conversely, power supplies in desktop machines are generally not a useful way to differentiate the product for most consumers and as a result they are highly standard and generally produced as cheaply as possible.

    It's not about competing technologies it's about many producers trying to sell the most units.

    Wrong again. If their goal was to maximize unit sales (instead of profits) they would WANT standardized batteries. This would make the product a commodity (undifferentiated) which would generally result in larger unit sales. You cannot charge as much for an undifferentiated product and you cannot generally expect more than minimal profits. Companies generally try to avoid having undifferentiated products because the profits inevitably go to the lowest cost producer in the long run. This is why computer companies, cellular providers and many other technology based companies try to compete on any basis other than simply price.

  74. NOT form factor / size / shape / voltage. by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    99.9% of all laptop li-on batteries are made up from individual 3.3 VDC 18650 cells, 18mm diameter, 65 mm long.

    Ipods and phone are made with prismatic li-on batteries.

    the 18650 Li-on cell is the D cell of the li-on world.

    Panasonic and Moli used to be the world's biggest manufacturers.

    I used the buy new, bare, 18650 li-on cells for less than 2 bucks each, to rebuild laptop batteries with.

    Generic li-on laptop batteries are available at the factory gates in china for around a buck per 175 mAh

    HTH etc

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  75. A fair deal is a negotiation by sjbe · · Score: 1

    But charging more for something just because the consumer is willing to pay more for it... I guess that crosses the ethical line for me.

    Why? If you offer me a price on something and I agree to it, we both have decided that it is a fair deal. If it wasn't fair then why would I agree to the deal? The seller's goal is to charge as much as possible and the buyer's goal is to pay as little as possible and they generally meet somewhere in the middle. Absent some form of coercion there is no ethical line that has been crossed. If someone asks a price that is more than you are willing to pay you generally have the right to walk away from the deal. The definition of a fair deal is one that both parties are willing to agree to. If it wasn't "fair" in your mind, don't agree to the deal.

    That's not supply and demand, it's not because it's any better than the other, it's not because its more expensive to make. You're just doing it because you can, and I call that greed.

    Turn your argument around. If I try to sell you something why don't you pay me as much as possible? By your logic, if you don't pay me as much as you possibly can for what I'm selling you are being greedy. See? It works both ways which is why your logic doesn't make any sense. You are uncomfortable with the idea that someone might be taking advantage of you but you don't seem to see that you are doing the same thing to them in reverse. Moreover you are presuming that your discomfort means there is some ethical dilemma in play here when there isn't. I'm guessing you don't enjoy negotiating but you do it every day whether you realize it or not. If you decide to not buy something because the price was "too high" in your mind, you are negotiating by your actions. I suppose you can call it greed but you are guilty of the same thing you are accusing the seller of.

    Getting a fair deal is YOUR responsibility. If you are interested in buying or selling something, it is up to YOU to decide what it is worth to YOU. This may involve research and effort on your part. No one else can do that for you even if they wanted to. I have no earthly idea what the maximum or minimum price you would be willing to pay for an iPhone is unless we negotiate. There is no ethical issue in play. It simply is a negotiation.

  76. Markets are actually pretty smart by sjbe · · Score: 2, Informative

    that's where the theory of capitalism fail, if every laptop owner know that it has been ripped of money for nothing in return
    than, maybe, market would work (and low the price),

    Your logic is flawed. If the laptop buyer is offered a price and agrees to it (absent coercion) the laptop buyer has de-facto decided that the value of the product being offered was a fair compensation for the money tendered. A fair deal is one that both parties are willing to agree to - this is the definition EVERY economist you're likely to ever meet uses.

    Furthermore not every laptop buyer wants the same things so their willingness to pay is going to be different. There are some products that sell for prices far beyond what I'd be willing to pay for them and that's ok. The fact that we might pay different prices for the same thing is ok in general because odds are the product is worth different amounts to the two of us. Every time you go into a store and decide to buy or not buy something, you are conducting a negotiation. If too few people are purchasing something at a given price, the price will eventually be lowered. This is how markets work. Sellers adjust prices to match buyer's willingness to pay but the only way to get that information is to offer a price and see if the buyer is interested.

    The biggest flaw in your logic however appears when you turn your logic around. If you don't pay as much as possible for your purchases aren't you "ripping off" the sellers who worked hard to provide you that product?

    but the main component that influence the market today are publicity and obfuscation of real characteristics and flaws of product not informed comparison of products, where intelligent and informed people could decide if they want more reliable, more durable or cheaper product of a certain kind and, buying it, influence the market production.

    Nonsense. There is more information available about products today then there ever has been. I'm guessing you've never tried to sell very much because marketplaces are ruthlessly efficient at adjusting prices to match buyers with sellers. Collectively people are extremely good at deciding what sort of products they want and influencing the market. Individually being informed about your purchases is YOUR responsibility. If you choose to not inform yourself, that is your fault and no one else's. I can't decide for your what you want in a product or what your are willing to pay for it. Only you can decide that.

  77. Crank-powered laptop! by afc_wimbledon · · Score: 1

    (Bringing this almost back to topic, I want a crank-powered laptop!)

    Half of the laptops used for posting here are already ;-)

  78. Voltage by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    In practice, you need some form of voltage converter anyway.
    Because a single Li-Ion cell has a voltage of 3.6V while computer components have voltages anywhere between 1V (ultra low voltage CPUs) to 5 V (USB power supply for external devices, according to Wikipedia). There is no way you can satisfy all these needs from the same battery without some adjusting of the voltages.

    In fact, a quick look at my preferred computer mail order shop tells me that most laptop batteries have voltages over 10 V, which needs to be converted down for any current PC component. TFA is right by the way: those are pretty expensive per watt-hour.

    Which leaves only one valid argument against standardized batteries:
    Custom shapes make it easier for the vendors to build small laptops, because they can adjust the battery to fit into whatever space is left by the other components.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  79. Robomow by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    I very much like the idea of a battery powered robot lawnmower, as the kids have left home and therefore I would otherwise have to mow the lawn myself.

    It worries the dog when it backs it into a corner, though.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  80. So not true about cell size and type. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    LI-PO are NOT all the same. Nicad however were.
    Li-po can be shaped to fit whatever is needed. Often they are flatish rectangles, layered one atop another, side by side, or singularly like in a cell phone. Your modern cell phone uses a 3.7v lipo.

    The standards, when kept, describe the battery. For example, a single cell is 3.7 V. They are labeled by Capacity in Amp hours, Discharge rate (C as in Multiples of Capacity), multiples of S or P or any combination (3s = 11.1v).

    "batteries & battery packs" are made of any number of cells in a configuration such that they meet the demands of the device.

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    1. Re:So not true about cell size and type. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have very flat lithium polymer batteries for the expansion bays of my laptops. But the laptops' main batteries all seem to be lithium ion, and still seem to be made of cells. The Tesla Roadster uses lithium ion cells, too.

  81. You realise the cells inside *are* standardised by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    And you can relatively easily open the battery cases. You may have to be willing to desolder the existing cells, but if you can't be fucked doing that then pay the bloody price and shut up.
     

    --
    Deleted
  82. Not just batteries by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Why are laptop hard drives more expensive than desktop ones?

    I suspect the answer is the same for both questions.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  83. Re:Capitalism means never having to say you're sor by treeves · · Score: 1

    No. They have totally different display technologies, among other things. That is a big reason the power consumption is so much lower. I would rather read on a Kindle than on a netbook, if all I did on it was read, for several reasons.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  84. Who needs batteries? by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    I've just had a BRILLIANT idea! Since you have to move the mower across the lawn to get to the next patch of grass to be cut, you could link up its wheels to drive the blades. You'd probably want to gear it so that the blades spun faster relative to the wheels, and maybe a more efficient blade design would be needed, such as, say, forming the blades into a cylinder rather than a "fan" shape, a bit like a combine harvester. Small and light, it would need no power other than someone pushing it along. I think I'm onto a winner here! Remember folks, you heard about it here first.

  85. Re:They made cheap lithium-ion batteries for lapto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Third party knock off brands usually sent straight China.

    So, what you are saying is they are made by the same guys making the OEM battery for your laptop (but without the OEM sticker on it)?

    They don't work as well and in some cases can even cause damage.

    Oh, yes, you are saying they are made by the same guys, because that sounds like Sony batteries to me.

  86. Re:Capitalism means never having to say you're sor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't doubt that the technologies are different (Kindles seem to work on reflected light), but I don't think the enhanced functionality justifies the price difference when there's a 90% substitute (i.e. the netbook) available.

    I think net tablets will eventually come online after Apple releases their tablet product, after which I expect the Kindle to quietly go the way of the Palm Pilot.

  87. ele by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean we are one step to doing our own petrol to electric car conversions ,i notice a lot of sites with supply everything needed however range with current battery's has been the big issue ... all in all good news in the long run ....

  88. computer manufacturers screw customers by ThePadrinoDotCom · · Score: 1

    Why do computer manufacturers screw customers on battery prices? Because They Can Why we have to have them or do without. The Padrino Dot Com http://www.thepadrino.com/

  89. Free and open standards by spleck · · Score: 1

    Ideally, you would create a new standard for your battery and it would get a number assigned. Then anyone who wanted to use your new battery would be able to grab the free specs and send you an order for 1000s of them. Then another manufacture would also get your specs and start producing their own version of the battery using their own technology, but perhaps offering 80% capacity for 70% price. You would be prompted to optimize your process, cut costs, etc, and voila, competition.

    Instead, you'll produce your fancy technology in a copyrighted, trademarked, restricted form factor and charge an arm and a leg for it. You won't make any money until another manufacturer tries to produce one that fits and you sue them to hell. Meanwhile, a Chinese manufacturer will produce a cheap knockoff with 25% of the performance, but for pennies on the dollar and still make some change.