Don't waist your time. Your in a world where people call computers hard drives, websites call applets --made up of widgets-- widgets, and "professionals" call everything from a windowing system to an application that correlates data an operating system.
So... because they dedicated their product to a platform dedicated to displacing them with their own "flash" they have lost. I'm glad TFA expanded on that. He could have just written: If they would have gone full force at becoming cross platform with Linux and OSX flash would have become a popular cross development platform.
/-- So if could reuse it would lead to 100 times reduction in cost.
If they can (launch + re-assemble + launch) * 100 at no additional cost for repairs they need to let the engineers of the world know wtf they are making this rocket out of. I don't know of any substance or design that allows for that much use. These guys probably have private shark tanks with full laser gear so I'm not going to completely discount them. Regardless, the numbers sound way fishy.
You can request a browser to send you any cookie you like. A pluggin or applet is not necessary. Access to the information needed to decrypt the cookie requires the pluggin/applet/MIM attack.
It turns out you don't need anything but to request the encrypted cookie from the browser. If you can decrypt the cookie with data from an exchange you just request a peek at the cookie, decrypt it,...profit. A pluggin would be an easy way to grab information for decryption though. As to your reference to Chen, I'm sure he would agree that a compromised pluggin shouldn't mean your data is at any greater risk than adding a user to a machine.
Exactly. We are already paying for medicare to protect people in emergencies. Why not pay more to get full health care protection. Dictating the money has to go to the private sector just leaves medicare hanging.
A large portion of their user base installs a flash blocker that allows them to decide if they want to view a flash file or not. I don't get why they don't pick up on these things. Having the functionality in the browser is great. Having the ability to make a decision is even better.
The reaction to XUL pages on the web was horrible, "just drop support". I hope they bring it back and warn the user about the dangers on a site by site basis with both instead of dropping support.
Something that can decrypt a cookie can just look at your cookies directly from your machine. If you install an evil Java pluggin it could decrypt and expose the content of your encrypted cookies without you knowing about it.
Technically everything from an a href to 80% of what was in HTML alpha is in the HTML5 spec so I guess they are "using HTML5". OMG Slashdot is using HTML5!
Design flaws are not bugs. Hmmmm. Maybe if I say it the other way. Bugs are not design flaws. Nope. Still not making sense. Maybe I need to put on a suite and tie.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't waist your time. Your in a world where people call computers hard drives, websites call applets --made up of widgets-- widgets, and "professionals" call everything from a windowing system to an application that correlates data an operating system.
sweet!
The sentence I quoted is saying they do not have the expense of replacing, repairing, or maintaining the rockets in 100 launches.
That's not a dog. That's a burro. Dogs can jump. But seriously. Really cool bot. I hope they can program it to jump.
So... because they dedicated their product to a platform dedicated to displacing them with their own "flash" they have lost. I'm glad TFA expanded on that. He could have just written: If they would have gone full force at becoming cross platform with Linux and OSX flash would have become a popular cross development platform.
/-- So if could reuse it would lead to 100 times reduction in cost.
If they can (launch + re-assemble + launch) * 100 at no additional cost for repairs they need to let the engineers of the world know wtf they are making this rocket out of. I don't know of any substance or design that allows for that much use. These guys probably have private shark tanks with full laser gear so I'm not going to completely discount them. Regardless, the numbers sound way fishy.
You can request a browser to send you any cookie you like. A pluggin or applet is not necessary. Access to the information needed to decrypt the cookie requires the pluggin/applet/MIM attack.
It turns out you don't need anything but to request the encrypted cookie from the browser. If you can decrypt the cookie with data from an exchange you just request a peek at the cookie, decrypt it, ...profit. A pluggin would be an easy way to grab information for decryption though. As to your reference to Chen, I'm sure he would agree that a compromised pluggin shouldn't mean your data is at any greater risk than adding a user to a machine.
See also Firefox v183
Is it 2012 already?
People get turned away. http://www.thenation.com/article/counting-census
Exactly. We are already paying for medicare to protect people in emergencies. Why not pay more to get full health care protection. Dictating the money has to go to the private sector just leaves medicare hanging.
A large portion of their user base installs a flash blocker that allows them to decide if they want to view a flash file or not. I don't get why they don't pick up on these things. Having the functionality in the browser is great. Having the ability to make a decision is even better.
The reaction to XUL pages on the web was horrible, "just drop support". I hope they bring it back and warn the user about the dangers on a site by site basis with both instead of dropping support.
Something that can decrypt a cookie can just look at your cookies directly from your machine. If you install an evil Java pluggin it could decrypt and expose the content of your encrypted cookies without you knowing about it.
My guess is there wasn't a way to take advantage of NPAPI. ie. You had to write native Java apps to integrate other types of content.
Technically everything from an a href to 80% of what was in HTML alpha is in the HTML5 spec so I guess they are "using HTML5". OMG Slashdot is using HTML5!
Shouldn't this read, "replaced Flash with HTML Canvas"?
I mean that sincerely but Microsoft has already implemented their legal stance, "It is not up to us. It is up to the vendor".
That is WAC! Does this mean JIL is into BONDI?!? OMFG!
It would be nice if they listed the challenges specific to each book.
"Often the polling places are in elementary schools or a church basement or some place that doesn't really have a great deal of security."
At least they are not in the hands of someone with a political agenda.
This highlights the danger of software that needs to be updated.
Oh please. There is no way a geometric storm could eff
Design flaws are not bugs. Hmmmm. Maybe if I say it the other way. Bugs are not design flaws. Nope. Still not making sense. Maybe I need to put on a suite and tie.
If you want a good relationship with your customers you force them to do something against their will.