Slashdot Mirror


Six Multi-Service IM Clients Reviewed

mikemuch writes "It's been a while since AOL stopped trying to jam third-party IM clients, and their use is now a fairly common desktop experience. ExtremeTech has posted a roundup of free alternatives to the standard IM software from the big boys — AIM, Yahoo Messenger, and MSN (now Windows Live) Messenger. The products are a mixed bag, some of them Web 2.0-based, like the excellent meebo and the ad-heavy eBuddy. Most give you combined message windows with tabs. GAIM is now Pidgin, Meetro tries to get you chatting with locals, and Trillian, now at version 3.1, remains the client to beat."

258 comments

  1. And on Mac OS X... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...as noted in the article but not in the summary, the "client to beat" is the excellent free, open source, GPL-licensed, and highly customizable Adium (more info).

    (The summary does mention the other five of the six clients reviewed in the article.)

    1. Re:And on Mac OS X... by imamac · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It' been a while since I've tried Adium ad I wasn't impressed with it's interface design. It seems I should try it out again, if it is indeed the one to beat.

    2. Re:And on Mac OS X... by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1
      Your posts more misleading than the /. summary, the conclusion of the article isn't that at all, only that adium is the best for the Mac.

      From TFA "For pretty much every capability of the standard IM clients plus extras like extensive message history and emotiblips, get the paid version of Trillian If you're a Mac user, your chief alternative at this point is Adium. Two more choices along these lines are the PCMag.com-recommended SightSpeed and the Swiss Army knife-like Raketu."

    3. Re:And on Mac OS X... by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      arg, tired, didn't spot your posts title till after I'd submitted, I'd only seen the text, sorry :(

    4. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      It hit 1.0 a while back (currently at 1.0.4, I think), and it's definitely the one to beat.

      My only gripe with it so far is that it won't kick my Yahoo user off another client in the (frequent) case that I forgot to shut down my IM client at work and try to use it at home. It has no problem ousting MSN or AIM, and other clients have no trouble with Yahoo either, so I know it's possible. Probably just a bug.

    5. Re:And on Mac OS X... by chrispl · · Score: 1

      As a recent convert from Windows and Trillian, Adium really impressed me. Fast, non-bloated, gorgeous UI, very customizable. The only thing that Trillian has it beat on is support of video and audio chat.

      Also, it satisfies my need of having an animated Domo-kun in my dock letting me know if I have any IMs.

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    6. Re:And on Mac OS X... by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, Adium kicks ass, though what's with the lack of offline messaging support in MSN? It's one of the most-used features of the app, but yet Adium lags far behind in that regard. It's the only thing that sucks about this otherwise tremendously awesome app.

    7. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      My only gripe with it so far is that it won't kick my Yahoo user off another client
      I think that may be on Yahoo's end. I know Gaim/Pidgin can't do it. Not sure about Kopete.
    8. Re:And on Mac OS X... by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      You're aware that basically everything in the interface (as well as sounds) can be changed, right? I don't like the default contact list, either, but I use the iPhoto color scheme with about a 50% opacity and the included Large iChat list layout, and I love it. As for message windows, I don't even know what the default is, but there are plenty included (Smooth Operator is my favorite--I think it's included by default--but there are also ones that look like iChat and a whole bunch more). I also got the iBubble dock icon (which simulates that of iChat) because I like it a bit better.

      That said, all these things are just my personal preference, but I encourage you to explore some of the different appearances and message stlyes included, or go to adiumxtras.com for more. You'll find something you like.

      --
      R.Mo
    9. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Isn't adium just a ripoff of gaim/pidgin with a mac-looking skin?

    10. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Nexx · · Score: 1

      trillian can....

      maybe trillian reverse engineered?

    11. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think you should put it that negatively.

      Gaim/Pidgin is broken into two components. It has a library part and a UI part. Most Linux users think of these as one product, but Adium uses the gaimlib backend but then has a very polished Mac frontend that uses it.

      It also incorporates OTR messaging, pretty robust logging features, good account-management ... all in all, its frontend and UI are far better, IMO anyway, than Gaim's is on Linux or Windows. (And it's better than the vendor-supplied clients, obviously ... but sending scraps of your own flesh by carrier pigeon are also better than those bloated nightmares.)

      As far as a user is concerned, Adium is an entirely different product from Gaim/Pidgin, because even though it uses the same communication libraries, all the UI is different.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    12. Re:And on Mac OS X... by jerkface.us · · Score: 1

      Kopete does it.

      --
      Fortune favors the bold.
    13. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      I thought that adium was basically gaim restyle to match OSX, in which case it would sort of be cheating to list it separately from gaim/pidgin. I didn't realize there were any other differences..

    14. Re:And on Mac OS X... by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Gaim 2.00-0.31.beta6.fc6 does. . .

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    15. Re:And on Mac OS X... by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Yaknow, one thing that bugs me about GAIM/Pidgin though. . . when they moved to GTK2, they took out the checkboxes for key-combinations. I always set my messengers to send on ctrl+enter. I used to have a checkbox, now I have to edit a configuration file. This is not progress people.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    16. Re:And on Mac OS X... by fungai · · Score: 1

      How right you are. I recently moved to Windows after 5 years on the Mac, and thought I'd easily find a IM multi-protocol client on Windows. However, nothing comes close to Adium (I miss you my little ducky!).

    17. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Last time I tried it on Pidgin 2.0 it didn't work.

      As for dealing with a .gtkrc file for stuff, I definitely agree. I'm using Gaim now (Pidgin hasn't made it into the Ubuntu repositories), but I'm definitely looking forward to the progress Kopete should be making in the next year or two.

    18. Re:And on Mac OS X... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a recent convert from Windows and Trillian, Adium really impressed me. Fast, non-bloated, gorgeous UI, very customizable. The only thing that Trillian has it beat on is support of video and audio chat.

      Yup, it this is certainly a major feature that is missing. Up until now the developers of Adium have not wanted to touch this, since they say this is not in their realm of expertise. Since Adium is using libpurple, this support will likely come once it is incorporated into the library. This is something which is getting some focus, but I don't know the exact timeline.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    19. Re:And on Mac OS X... by cephal0p0d · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Adium rocks!

      --


      ~!J!
    20. Re:And on Mac OS X... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Thought you can always choose "send later".

      I've never understood why people started to use MSN thought, the lack of offline messages for so long time was a major drawback, the fact that like 30% of your messages never seems to be able to connect is another. Damn I hate that shit, to bad everyone uses it :(

    21. Re:And on Mac OS X... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Adium uses the same libs for im as gaim/pidgin so that's not that weird...

    22. Re:And on Mac OS X... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Care to tell why you switched?

    23. Re:And on Mac OS X... by fungai · · Score: 1

      Care to tell why you switched?

      I've started travelling extensively the last year, and my 17" MacBook Pro became a pain to drag around. Apple didn't have a notebook that I found suitable (small & light) for my needs, so I bought a 12", 1.5kg Dell Latitude D420 with built in cellular modem. I still use a Mac at home for the photos, music etc. However for work the Windows machine will suffice. In fact at the moment I have no music/photos etc on my work notebook. I think the Dell hardware is pretty cool. Vista however is driving me a bit nuts. You never know after sleep which device will wake up and which not, my wireless constantly drops and I miss the elegance of OS X.

    24. Re:And on Mac OS X... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      The fact that it can't receive file transfers is the only thing that bothers me.

  2. One word by darkwhite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kopete?

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    1. Re:One word by brilinux · · Score: 1

      I have used Kopete, and was impressed, though there were some features that I found to be rather annoying, such as how conversations seemed to take up a lot of screen space and it seems to make you want to click a lot... it has been a while, though... perhaps I will go back and give it another whirl.

    2. Re:One word by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      I've used kopete for some years now, but I'm getting increasingly irritated with certain things about it. I'm hoping KDE 4 brings some genuine innovation back into the client, because it used to be my favourite for a reason - I just feel like development has stagnated lately.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    3. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choose a different theme, there are loads available. Big eye candy OS X style right down to minimal text.

    4. Re:One word by The_Unforgiven · · Score: 1

      Any reason for this? I use Kopete and won't claim it's the greatest ever, but I like it. What don't you like?

      My only real complaint is that I can't see a way to do away messages longer than one line (not a big deal, though), and that coming back from away leaves the auto-respond message up. Minor annoyances, maybe even just options I haven't found the switch for.

      --
      http://wsulug.org
    5. Re:One word by biscon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      well how great for you. Care to explain why? otherwise I think you should shut your mouth when the grownups speak

    6. Re:One word by etheranger · · Score: 1
      I use gaim^H^H^H^H pidgin and kopete. Kopete has some nice features that have yet to be put into pidgin (msn status messages, for one) and integrates nicely with the rest of KDE, mainly KMail and KAddressBook, but at least on my system there are some annoying bugs and missing features.

      File transfers sometimes work, more often than not they download v e r y s l o w l y, and then for some reason save an empty file. With regards to sending, there's no indication in any way that you're sending a file until it's accepted. Given the hit and miss functionality of the requests, there's no way of knowing if the request got through.

      The IRC module is sadly lacking too, many commands (/whois, i mean come on...) don't work and for some reason it sometimes doesn't register nick changes. The statistics plugin, enabled by default, also slows down the startup time by an increasing amount for some reason. A while ago it got to the point where the program actually started doing something useful about 5mins after it was called.

      IMO, kopete is good, but lacks a lot of polish.

    7. Re:One word by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Its brilliant with dual monitors. The big windows become a feature.

      I usually have chat windows the full height and half width of the screen.
      Important chats go on one side and non-important ones on the other.

    8. Re:One word by Ornedan · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Enter for line break instead of send in Kopete.

    9. Re:One word by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      I use Kopete because in my mind the only other choice I care to consider is Gaim, and I hate GTK with a passion. Also, I have a bias towards using KDE applications when running KDE, for the shared library benefit. Indeed, kopete's pretty fast because of it. There were some serious bugs in it in older versions, such as duplicating your entire buddy list, and some connection issues, but most of those have since been fixed. I still won't recommend it as a great client, but it's the one I prefer.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  3. bsflite by John+Nowak · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want a very lightweight text-based IM client for *nix, try bsflite. I've been very happy with it.

    1. Re:bsflite by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That's just AIM, though. The article is talking about multi-service clients.

      I'd just about kill for a command-line client that worked /well/ with Jabber, AIM, and MSN.

    2. Re:bsflite by vhogemann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try centericq then...

      Despite the name, it does MSN, Yahoo, AIM, Jabber(gTalk)... and ICQ.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    3. Re:bsflite by dave1g · · Score: 1

      GAIM -Text is now called finch, this is an ncurses text mode interface to all the networks that pidgin supports

      http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/Using%20Finch

    4. Re:bsflite by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      This is nice, thank you.

    5. Re:bsflite by dave1g · · Score: 1

      oops i think I meant to send this to you

      GAIM -Text is now called finch, this is an ncurses text mode interface to all the networks that pidgin supports

      http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/Using%20Finch [pidgin.im]

    6. Re:bsflite by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I'd tried it before and found problems (I think it was SSL not working, but I could be misremembering). Seems to work well, now, so thanks for reminding me of it!

      I'm also going to look into Finch. Options are a wonderful thing.

      Thanks again!

    7. Re:bsflite by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I'll definitely check that out! If it supports jabber chats and SSL, I may well be sold!

    8. Re:bsflite by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Very nice... that might replace my bitlbee setup if it's any good...

    9. Re:bsflite by cyanid3 · · Score: 1

      You should consider BitlBee, an IRC gateway for all the major networks. All you need is an irc client like irssi, and a bitlbee server, either setup on your own PC, or a public bitlbee server.

      BitlBee Official page
      BitlBee on Wikipedia

      --
      loldongs dongslol
    10. Re:bsflite by ChazeFroy · · Score: 1

      A CLI client that supports OTR would be even nicer. OTR has a proxy, but it's GUI-only. While you can run the OTR proxy with a CLI client, it kind of defeats the purpose of not having to need X.

  4. Miranda? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Informative

    What about Miranda? It starts out minimal, supports all the regular IM service, and lets you extend it as far as you want with addons (there are many to choose from).

    1. Re:Miranda? by flakier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Beats the bloated trillian hands down. Not only that, source is free =) I can't believe it wasn't part of the article

      --
      --
    2. Re:Miranda? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      I just cannot get Miranda to talk to my employer's email disaster -- Lotus Notes 7.0.2 (or previous versions of Notes for that matter). My co-workers who use GAIM? Plug & play baby, plug & play. I haven't the heart to uninstall Miranda because I've invested so much time and effort trying to configure it to work (don't tell my managers...) and because I'm a bit of an anarchist. For now I just limp along with the lamer than lame Notes IM client.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    3. Re:Miranda? by smtrembl · · Score: 1

      Miranda is more than "minimal", it's also very practical. Not everybuddy needs a big yatch, an helico and a limousine to cross from office to office, and when we need to switch for transpotation means fast, without getting all pimped up each time, Miranda does it flawlessly.

    4. Re:Miranda? by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      Miranda is one of the most configurable, versatile and minimal multi-platform IM's out there... I've been using it since the early days and I'm rather disappointed in this ExtremeTech for not including it in their "review". It's also been around longer than some of these other clients they discuss, supports practically every protocol and has plugins that surpass the abilities of most of the other IM's they reviewed. The only thing that's missing is the eye candy of the more bloated IM's... so maybe ExtremeTech is run by kids?

    5. Re:Miranda? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. My favorite thing about Miranda is that it runs very well from a USB thumb drive. Put it with PortableFirefox, PortableThunderbird and a few other flash-friendly apps and you can take your entire internet desktop with you.

    6. Re:Miranda? by uolamer · · Score: 1

      ya, it reminds me of the basic interface of the first versions of ICQ, ive been using it for some time, works very well. Only issue i have had is Yahoo disconnects me often enough. Installing a few add ons made this thing quite nice.
      Clients Homepage

      --
      s/©//g
    7. Re:Miranda? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Does Miranda do AIM buddy icons yet? Last I played with Miranda, it was a PITA to set up with any resemblance to Gaim's functionality. It *was* nice having a microscopic memory footprint, though.

    8. Re:Miranda? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      Miranda Rocks... but its Windows only bit is irritating...
      I know it may *be usable* under WINE but its not the same.
      Is it THAT hard to port it to linux?

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    9. Re:Miranda? by Xeriar · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I load up Miranda (~200 contacts between AIM, ICQ, YIM, MSN, and GTalk), it takes up a whopping three megabytes of RAM.

      Occasionally group features and file sends get broken for some protocols (sadness) but nothing beats its footprint.

    10. Re:Miranda? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      I dunno, is it? You've got the source, you've got the power.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    11. Re:Miranda? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      get torpark instead of portable firefox. Its has more functionality essentually and is better Yes it is firefox. just in a different wrapper go find it and have a look at it torpark is amazing

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    12. Re:Miranda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miranda's AIM development has been suspended for quite a while. The latest releases actually outright removed functionality (AIM Chat).

    13. Re:Miranda? by Llynix · · Score: 1

      Miranda ftw

    14. Re:Miranda? by Mystra_x64 · · Score: 1

      Miranda's code tied with WinAPI...

      --
      Quick way to get 30% Funny 70% Troll: defend Opera browser on /.
    15. Re:Miranda? by remmelt · · Score: 1

      Have used it, interface is really nice because it's so small. I have yet to find any skin for Trillian/Kopete/Gaim that is comparable. It also lets you adjust stuff in a better way: say you want to make the font a bit smaller, there is one setting that does that for the entire program. You don't need to alter the skin or whatever. I never really got that to work right on Trillian or Gaim and Kopete is just hellish in that regard.

      The downside is that it doesn't always receive ICQ messages from other clients, most notably Trillian. Tried and tested method: send ICQ from Trillian to Miranda and sometimes it just won't get there. Has been like this for years, too. Might not be Miranda's fault but is still very very annoying.

    16. Re:Miranda? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      Torpark (actually XeroBank now) isn't necessary unless you need anonymous proxied internet access. It's also slower than PF and, depending on how paranoid your IT staff is, it won't even run on some workstations. Not knocking your choice, just clarifying that it's not necessarily better depending on what you need.

    17. Re:Miranda? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      Actually you can choose to disable Tor at the click of a button. But when I used it it was preferably because at least it gave the choice to which I preferred.
      But fair criticism, you are right it might not be the BEST thing, but my personal preference would be to be able to tunnel through most conent filtering etc.
      Anyway... cheers I didnt realise it had changed its name,..

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    18. Re:Miranda? by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what AIM buddy icons involved, but there's been massive icon packs available to simulate the look of IM's for years now. I know, at least 7 years ago, I had glass / glossy looking icon sets that looked similar to ICQ, MSN and AIM so I could differentiate between networks, but it looked considerably better.

    19. Re:Miranda? by X-rated+Ouroboros · · Score: 1

      There were definitely some protocols that supported buddy icons by default the last time I upgraded. Turning them off was so relatively painless that I honestly don't remember if the AIM protocol was one of the one's doing it.

      If you want a fancy look, IEView allows fairly arbitrary customization of how messages are displayed.

      --
      Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
    20. Re:Miranda? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      As I understood it, Miranda used the AIM TOC and TOC2 protocols, which are hopelessly outdated. There was work on supporting the current OSCAR protocol, but it looks like it still doesn't support buddy icons. It may be superficial of me, but that was and is a major check mark against using Miranda for me. Which is a shame, because otherwise it seemed awesome...it was fast and light and small. But I just don't understand why it's AIM support is so much further behind EVERY other multi-service IM client out there.

      I eventually came to the conclusion that it really depended on how you grew up with IM. If you started off with ICQ (which ironically I did, but eventually moved to AIM), then Miranda's look and feel is right at home. However, if your IM experience is based on AIM, Miranda feels very foreign. Something like Gaim/Pidgin fits that mold a lot better. Really, my only complaint with Gaim is the memory footprint, and I bet a lot of that is from using the GTK+ libraries. If only someone would make a Windows-native IM client based on the Gaim libraries, then we'd be set!

    21. Re:Miranda? by doti · · Score: 1

      Is it THAT hard to port it to linux? That would be a bless. I tried virtually all non-kde/gnome client out there, and choosed Gaim as the one that sucks less. (It can be compiled gtk-only, without gnome. I wish there were a gaim-gtk package for my distro.)
      Miranda is one of the few softwares I miss from my Windows days.
      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    22. Re:Miranda? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      you CAN use it with WINE if you miss it THAT much.... ...but I dont think it works perfectly...
      P.s. check out pidgin

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    23. Re:Miranda? by doti · · Score: 1
      The inconvenience of running wine is greater than the inconvenience of running Pidgin instead of miranda.

      P.s. check out pidgin Did you read my post? Or didn't you know that Gaim is the old Pidgin name?
      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    24. Re:Miranda? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      The inconvenience of running wine is greater than the inconvenience of running Pidgin instead of miranda.

      fair enough

      P.s. check out pidgin Did you read my post? Or didn't you know that Gaim is the old Pidgin name? Neither. I just prefer Pidgin's interface to gaim's
      You might not - its just my opinion.
      sorry for making myself sound stupid.... ;)
      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    25. Re:Miranda? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Well, if only MSN actually worked, or does it now? Earlier I thought it had a hard time sending messages quite often. Thought of course I get that in adium all the fucking time aswell so it might just be that MSN sucks major donkey ass.

      Also it doesn't support webcams, or does it? I guess that might be an issue for some people.

  5. Trillian... by morari · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using Trillian for years and still like it the best. Gaim is nice in it's simplicity and cross platform use however. I keep trying Kopete but never use it frequently enough to adjust to its little quirks.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    1. Re:Trillian... by J44xm · · Score: 1

      I like Trillian a lot as well. I tried Gaim a few months back, but it couldn't handle Japanese for me, whereas Trillian does just fine with it. I wonder if this has changed in Pidgin or not.

    2. Re:Trillian... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Same here for Trillian (Basic). It's not that bloated. In Linux, I use Gaim/Pidgin. If Trillian existed in Linux, I would use it too.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Trillian... by Darundal · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't. Gaim supports so many more protocols than Trillian does (although Trillian does have a nicer UI). However, I don't like the idea of forking out $25 for the ability to use gtalk.

    4. Re:Trillian... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it has missing features like Gtalk. Gtalk is useless for me to due to my speech and hearing impediments.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Trillian... by brian.gunderson · · Score: 1

      I've also been a Trillian user for a couple of years, and am quite happy with it. The only problems i really have are related to reconnection after idle-timeouts... Anyone else have these same issues?

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    6. Re:Trillian... by Longwalker-MGO · · Score: 1

      I also have used trillian for many years. I would like to modify the article as stated above... trillian is not NOW on 3.1 it is STILL on 3.1.

      When was last update, 5-6 months ago?

    7. Re:Trillian... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Gtalk (Google Talk) is Jabber/XMPP based so it's actually text.

    8. Re:Trillian... by thebigbluecheez · · Score: 1

      I have also been using Trillian for quite a while, and in spite of its shortcomings I can't/won't/don't want to change to another client.

      My main qualm with Trillian is a lack of support for Skype. Unfortunately I'm trapped on a low speed, high latency internet connection while studying abroad, so I only use Skype for chatting (but not voice or video). The best Trillian could do was offer me a plugin that added everything happening in the Skype message box to my normal tabbed chat box.

      Has Trillian come any further since I used this plugin? Can you now log directly into Skype without having to load the Skype program? Right now I don't need voice chat functionality, but I would like one less program running.

      --
      I like your Macs, but I don't like your Mac users. (with apologies to Gandhi)
    9. Re:Trillian... by Darundal · · Score: 1

      If you have speech and hearing impediments, then can you explain what features Gtalk and Pidgin are missing that make them worthless to you, as both support actual text chat?

    10. Re:Trillian... by antdude · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone who uses Jabber. Everyone seems to be using AIM, MSN, or Yahoo! (mostly at work). ICQ used to be hot many years ago, but people seem to have left it.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    11. Re:Trillian... by isaachulvey · · Score: 1

      I've been using Trillian ever since I can remember and it is definitely the best. I love how it draws very little CPU and being able to use MSN and AIM at the same time in the same interface.

      --
      Isaac
    12. Re:Trillian... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and how many of the extra protocols do you actually use?

    13. Re:Trillian... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      AIM and ICQ is compatible. Isn't MSN and Yahoo to? Or what is the other major client which are compatible with MSN?

      Anyway the ICQ client looks like shit.

  6. There's no great client. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am quite disappointed by the choice of clients. MSN's client is bloated and I've asked them to add an option to STOP THOSE STUPID WINDOWS FROM BLINKING when you get a message when it was back in version 4. It's something like 11 now, and I have yet to see that little option.

    Miranda IM is small and fast, but lacks in features and it has this annoying thing where the send control is disabled for a while after you send a message.

    Trillian is the best of all but still has many bugs (slow, can't disable video/audio plugins which I never use, it doesn't update MSN names, it doesn't use upnp or let you forward ports yourself, etc etc).

    Pidgin is rather nice but it lacks many features as well (ctrl+tabbing through windows never worked for me, pressing escape doesn't close the window, it constantly gets moved to the second screen, is rather slowish, etc).

    It's too bad that with this many clients there isn't a great one. Trillian comes close, but it does need a bit of improvement still.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:There's no great client. by kevlarcoared · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In my opinion the msn client is ctually very good for everything except memory usage and how much CPU power it uses when it logs in (very annoying on dodgy wireless with a slow laptop). I tried pidgin, it crashed on me with in half a hour both times i used it, i haven't touched it since. I plan to try trillian when i get around to downloading and installing it, hopefully i will be pleasantly surprised, i never liked the old versions of it (about 3 years ago was the last time i used it)

    2. Re:There's no great client. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Well, MSN doesn't support tabs, which is very annoying. Trillian is better than MSN by leaps and bounds, and Pidgin did crash for me in the beta but the final version seems to run well...

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    3. Re:There's no great client. by T-Bone_142 · · Score: 1

      If all you require is a messenger client that accesses the .NET Messenger Service (Windows Live Messenger) then give aMSN Messenger a try. aMSN has most of the features of WLM (including web cam support), a vary active development team and isn't extremely bloated like lots of IM clients.

      --
      "In Soviet America, Passport Stamps You!"
    4. Re:There's no great client. by otomo_1001 · · Score: 1

      Adium is damn good. Open source, but mac only so there is that bit.

      It has convinced everyone I know that im's a lot to get a mac. One was a trillian user as well.

    5. Re:There's no great client. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would like to retract some of what I said. I just downloaded the latest Miranda version to see how far it had gone and I must say that I am impressed. There are many plugins and it loads in under half a second on my 5 year old machine. I am confident that once I wade through the hundreds (literally) of options, I will have it working just the way I like it. I urge you all to try it. There is even a tabbed windows plugin, it looked good in the default install, I changed an option and now it looks like crap (literally, it's light brown).

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    6. Re:There's no great client. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Trillian 4 seems pretty sturdy, and the featureset matches most of the native clients. Sadly all but critical fixes for the 3.x series seem to have ceased in favour of v4 development, but on the plus side it looks to be set to re-affirm Trillian's place as 'the best' of the multi-IM clients.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    7. Re:There's no great client. by deftcoder · · Score: 1

      You can use Control-W to close windows.

      Control-W also closes most dialog windows on Windows, GNOME/KDE, etc.

      --
      Peace sells, but who's buying?
    8. Re:There's no great client. by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      option and now it looks like crap (literally, it's light brown).


      Hey, at least it matches my Zune! ;-)
      --
      Common sense is not so common
    9. Re:There's no great client. by General+Melchett · · Score: 0
      Try messenger plus to get tabs in windows live messenger, works a treat for me. It also some nice scripts, and a nice 'contacts on the desktop' feature. It installs over the top of the standard windows live client.


      Well worth a look.

      http://www.msgpluslive.net/

    10. Re:There's no great client. by sdhoigt · · Score: 1

      > Pidgin is rather nice but it lacks many features as well
      > ctrl+tabbing through windows never worked for me,
      Works fine here.

      > pressing escape doesn't close the window, it constantly gets moved to the second screen,
      I'm not sure I'd want that option. But I thought there was an option to toggle that one.

      > is rather slowish, etc).
      It's actually one of the speediest apps I use in my daily grind.

      I've been using Gaim/Pidgin pretty solid on Windows/Linux for ~3 years, and you didn't mention any of the problems I've had. (*me hides*)

    11. Re:There's no great client. by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      Trillian is the best of all but still has many bugs (slow, can't disable video/audio plugins which I never use. . .).

      Close Trillian, open "C:\Program Files\Trillian\plugins" and rename "av.dll" to something else.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    12. Re:There's no great client. by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Some of the early 2.foo beta gaim's were notoriously crash prone. I kept using 1.5 till late in the 2.foo beta series, beta5 I think. The earlier ones were unusable because of the crashing.

      The recent pidgin releases seem fine though, so you might try it out again.

    13. Re:There's no great client. by resiak · · Score: 1

      ctrl+tabbing through windows never worked for me, pressing escape doesn't close the window, it constantly gets moved to the second screen, is rather slowish, etc

      Hrm:

    14. Re:There's no great client. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Haha, I pity you :P I found a great theme on the Miranda site, and now I'm a convert.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    15. Re:There's no great client. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wellcome Brother. ;P
      Feel free to choose from over 1000's of plugins and extensions.
      Make it suit you with gazillion of themes,skins, smilies, you name it.
      And be FREE. :)

    16. Re:There's no great client. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      That's very true, I have loaded it with plugins that do everything I ever wanted and I still can't get used to the fact that windows open AS SOON AS I click on the contact. This never happened with Trillian...

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  7. what? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1, Troll

    "and Trillian, now at version 3.1, remains the client to beat"

    *pffffft* Oh, that's hillarious. ... ... ...
    Wait, you were serious?
    I've never liked Trillian, mostly because of it's ridiculous bloat, general non-conformance to any UI standard, costs more to be useful (Jabber), etc...

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    1. Re:what? by flakier · · Score: 1

      So true, why do people keep showing it the love

      --
      --
    2. Re:what? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Bloat? Where's the bloat, holmes? My kid runs it on a PPro 200, running windows 2000. Other than starting up, it's responsive and hell, doesn't even need installed (no COM junk!).

      Do you equate skinability with bloat?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:what? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      On my PIII 700MHz running Win2k, it's unusable. Are you running the latest version?

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's OK, they'll fix it Soon(TM):

      The developers of Trillian were infamous for missing deadlines. During the long wait for Trillian "0.64", they coined the term "Soon(TM)", which gained notoriety as development time became longer and longer in later versions. As of May 2007, it has been twenty-seven months (more than two years) since the last stable release of Trillian.


      I don't use Trillian (or Windows, even), but do people really tolerate this? I get impatient when one of my favorite programs goes a month without any updates. They all have blogs and mailing lists where the developers gush about the latest cool thing they're working on. And next week, "apt-get upgrade" gives it to me.
    5. Re:what? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      "Other than starting up, it's responsive"... and other than that one unfortunate mishap, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?

      Trillian takes longer to load than just about anything I've used (except Borland Developer Studio), and it slows the whole machine down while it does so. It's ridiculous because there doesn't seem to be any good reason - it's an IM client, not a game that has to cache hundreds of MB worth of textures.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    6. Re:what? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Also, honestly, there's one thing that really pisses me off about Trillian: it doesn't store user settings/logs in the user profiles. It actually stores login information and logs in the program folder. So obviously if you have a multi-user system and you log in using Trillian, all the other users will automatically have access to your account and chat transcripts.

      I'm sorry, but any programmers still doing this sort of thing is completely incompetent. I don't see how anyone can take that piece of software seriously.

  8. adless, one page by froggero1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:adless, one page by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Your link automatically redirects. What you need to to is just click "print" underneath the "Options" Column beneath the article.

  9. pidgon/gaim is the only open source one, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why would I use some adware instead of open source?

    1. Re:pidgon/gaim is the only open source one, right? by ArcticFlood · · Score: 1

      Adium is open source but Mac only (based on libpurple). meebo isn't open source, but is also based on libgaim (now libpurple). Finch is Pidgin for the console. And then there's always the possibilities of using Jabber with a transport or using Bitlbee.

      --
      This is here so you don't ignore the last two lines of my posts.
    2. Re:pidgon/gaim is the only open source one, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miranda is open source and vastly preferrable to Gaim on Windows. Sadly, it's Windows-only.

    3. Re:pidgon/gaim is the only open source one, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miranda is GPLed.
      And has more than 1000 plugins.
      And nice community too ;P

  10. Trillian? by loconet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In this day an age where Linux on the desktop is more and more common, I don't consider an IM that only works on Windows a serious contender.

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Trillian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well 10 times 0 is still 0 and all that.
      Windows is still king and will remain king for a while to come.

    2. Re:Trillian? by Kooshman · · Score: 1

      I think it's more important that it only runs on Windows, not less. It puts yet more pressure on the cross-platform and Linux developers to measure up.

      Pretty much every tool I use would run the same or better on Linux, minus the gaming habit, except Trillian. It has all the all the features I use and a small and clean UI. Not to mention the multi-megabyte chat logs covering over a half-decade I have that would need to be cleanly imported to any replacement. It is emblematic of exactly the kind of small, nagging problem of rolling over to Linux gives. Oh, and when an IM client can run on 90+% of desktops, I think it can be reasonably counted as a "serious contender."

      Does anybody know if there's been decent progress towards getting Trillian to run better under WINE? That would be a good stopgap, being just annoying enough to keep running to keep interest in Linux native replacements.

    3. Re:Trillian? by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      You're right, Windows is definitely a niche market.

    4. Re:Trillian? by westlake · · Score: 1
      In this day an age where Linux on the desktop is more and more common, I don't consider an IM that only works on Windows a serious contender.

      you might not. but in the larger market of IM users, how significant is Linux?

    5. Re:Trillian? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Adium only works on OS X.
      Now THATS a niche market. ..but good on them for filling it...

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    6. Re:Trillian? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      That's elitism on your part, then. Linux is still a niche market, from everything I've seen (I think it's even smaller than Mac, but could be wrong on that point). Windows is the platform of choice if you want to reach the vast majority of your potential users, it's just how it is. Is it good to support more than one platform? Absolutely. Does supporting only Windows mean you aren't "a serious contender"? Absolutely not.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  11. Trillian? Client to beat? by ultramkancool · · Score: 0

    Trillian is a hunk of crap, how is trillian the client to beat? It can't even come close to many other clients. Anyways, they didn't mention the best IM client on earth: bitlbee

    1. Re:Trillian? Client to beat? by noisehole · · Score: 1

      +1

      bitlbee ftw!

      if you're on irc 24/7 and using irssi within screen, bitlbee is just unbeatable

  12. bitlbee, hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this really a Unix nerds site, or just another Windows/Mac GUI hangout in disguise?

  13. bitlbee by weteko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I personally enjoy bitlbee quite a bit more than any other IM client. Just connect with whatever IRC client you like and there you go! Perfect integration with emacs, no blinky lights, no nothing.

    --
    If man has no tea in him, he is incapable of understanding truth and beauty
    1. Re:bitlbee by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      I had never heard of this prior to your post. I'll have to look into it, it looks quite clever.

    2. Re:bitlbee by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 1

      Bitlbee + irssi over ssh is my drug of choice.

      However, MSN stopped working. Oh well.

    3. Re:bitlbee by weteko · · Score: 1

      That is indeed strange. MSN+bitlbee works fine for me.

      --
      If man has no tea in him, he is incapable of understanding truth and beauty
  14. Trillian by hattig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I found Trillian to be a horribly bloated, very unstylish, and difficult to configure application.

    It seems that the only pluses it has is that it does modern internet communications media (voice and video) on these networks. I'm hoping that they've fixed the configuration system too since I last tried it.

    Adium on the Mac is pretty damn good, and deserves the 8/10. 9/10 and 10/10 would be Adium with voice and video support respectively. The interface styles are all very sophisticated and configurable, and it's simply very usable.

    And that's what matters, usability. I'd far rather have fewer features that I can use simply, quickly, and easily rather than more features that are exposed poorly via the interface. Of course I'd rather have usability and all the features, but I think that Adium (and the libpurple it's based around) will get voice, video and other proprietary features support at some point.

    1. Re:Trillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the fact that Adium and Pidgin can talk to each other w/ OTR-messaging encryption. I wish more programs would support this.

    2. Re:Trillian by jamestks · · Score: 1

      > I found Trillian to be a horribly bloated, very unstylish, and difficult to configure application.
      Second that. I myself am a Miranda fan.

  15. WinCE? by kmahan · · Score: 1

    How about a port of Pidgin or some other open source (ad free) messenger for WinCE 5 (on an HTC Wizard)? The software that comes with the TMobile MDA blows (and uses SMS).

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
    1. Re:WinCE? by MysticOne · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend Octro. I found it a few months back and have been very happy with it for the most part. It's a Jabber/GTalk client, but it works fine with transports to other networks and (if I'm not mistaken) the Octro people supply some as well. It also can use Google Talk's VoIP and I *think* allows access to the PSTN as well. Right now it's free because they're still testing it, and I think it's supposed to be commercial later, but it's definitely worth it. Oh, it supports file transfers too. I use it on my T-Mobile SDA.

  16. Yahoo features by Frankie70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Yahoo client has some features all of
    which aren't available on the other clients.

    - At login time, itself you can invisible. In
    some other clients, I have tried, you have first
    login as visible & then change to invisiblw

    - You can be invisible overall, but just visible
    to one person or a group of people.

    If I find a client in both of these features
    are available, I'll switch.

    1. Re:Yahoo features by antdude · · Score: 1

      Trillian v3.1 can do this too for its ICQ, MSN, and AIM component. I log in invisibile as default.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Yahoo features by Omnedon · · Score: 1

      The Yahoo client resets invisibility every time the connection cycles. I may be invisible at login, but if I set to show myself as visible to a specific person, it only lasts for one connection. If my internet fails, Yahoo will reconnect afterwards, but I will be invisible to all again.

      Does the same with showing timestamps.

    3. Re:Yahoo features by rychean · · Score: 1

      Pidgin works

    4. Re:Yahoo features by n3tfury · · Score: 0

      um, you can do that with msn messenger.

    5. Re:Yahoo features by Nodamnnicknamesavial · · Score: 1

      Why dont you just block people you dont like instead?

      --
      I have spoken'eth.
  17. What about Kopete by elrendermeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oddly missing were a host of good Linux offerings like Kopete (the built in kde client).

    1. Re:What about Kopete by MadAhab · · Score: 1

      True. I've got nothing against gaim - I quite liked it when I use it. But since I'm primarily KDE desktop, Kopete works quite nicely.

      If one of them offered features the other didn't, I could easily change my mind.

      I've been using IRC since forever, I was a five-digit ICQ user (and still a 5-digit ./er). My issue with chat is that it's not a social hook-up for me - it's a communication pipeline like having a cell phone.

      And so, Gaim and Kopete are both great. I use AIM, because I must, I use jabber, I use my GMail account over jabber. I've had other IM accounts that worked fine, too. Granted, I'm a FreeBSD user so voice chat is a hassle I haven't hurdled, but for plain old IM, both clients work well enough that I'd be happy with either one... It's not like I even give a shit about avatars or whatev.

      Bottom line: if you want fancy shit, you had better use the same software as your mates. If you want a direct text comm tool, life is good.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  18. Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by Demona · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should have called it PING: Pidgin Is Not Gaim.

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
    1. Re:Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by binaryspiral · · Score: 0

      Ping was already taken... silly.

      http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ping

    2. Re:Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by zalas · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about: Pidgin Is Definitely Gaim In Nature
      ?

    3. Re:Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      thats pretty amazing.............

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    4. Re:Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by Spadgos · · Score: 1

      GINA: GAIM is not AIM

    5. Re:Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just... wow. You win slashdot.

    6. Re:Just as a middle finger to the lawyers by Billy+the+Impaler · · Score: 1

      Rejected proposal: Gaim Is Not AIM

      Would you use an IM client called GINA?

  19. ebdy sux? fck tht plz dei k thx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u suxor nwbi adz r ez 2 dfeet

  20. SIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like a biased review. Another missing good instant messenger is SIM

  21. E_NOT_RECURSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry but I had to throw an exception on this one; all that trouble and it's not even a recursive acronym? Should try to go for triple recursion!

    PING Is Not GAIM
    GAIM Ain't Incorporating a MOP
    Move On to PING

    YMMV

    1. Re:E_NOT_RECURSIVE by beyondkaoru · · Score: 1

      if we are to keep with unix tradition, constants must have unnecessarily truncated names.

      therefore i propose that it should be E_NO_RECURS

      --
      the privacy of one's mind is important.
      you do have something to hide.
  22. Trillian is one of the worst IM clients anywhere by reidconti · · Score: 0

    How on earth can anyone sanction Trillian? Sure Windows UI is not the greatest thing in the world, but damn, it's as if the authors of Trillian tried their best to make it conform to no UI standard on the planet. The behavior of alt-tab with respect to chat windows and the buddy list is asinine, options are impossible to find, it's just.. downright TERRIBLE.

    I use Adium on the Mac and really couldn't be happier. I wish there was something similar to use on my Windows laptop.

  23. In Soviet Russia... by feedmetrolls · · Score: 0

    Message sends you!

    --
    You are reading a sig. Cancel or allow?
  24. QQ by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    QQ and ICQ are very popular in China. I'm not sure why, but I thought I'd mention it.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:QQ by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      ICQ/Livejournal are the primary IM networks /social networking in RUSSIA (no not soviet russia - REAL russia)

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    2. Re:QQ by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      In REAL RUSSIA, they are probably annoyed at all the IN SOVIET RUSSIA, "foo" foos YOU jokes.

  25. No, that doesn't work - it's PIG by BKX · · Score: 1

    pig = pig IS gaim

    now that would piss off some lawyers.

  26. That's the problem with generality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just IM clients that suffer from this problem. Much of the software that tries to act as a general framework often is far inferior to targeted solutions.

    Take NetBeans. Years ago, when it focused on only being a Java IDE, it was actually rather quick and efficient. Compared to JBuilder, it was extremely fast. But time has passed, and it has moved towards becoming a general-purpose application development framework. Yes, this does mean that it can now work with other languages and technologies. But the major downside of that has been significant performance loss.

    On even a very fast, modern multi-core system with 2 GB of RAM, NetBeans can best be described as extremely slow. I suspect that part of this has to do with the use of Swing, which isn't exactly known as being the most resource-friendly GUI framework. Beyond that, the NetBeans architecture is very complex. This complexity may very well reduce the performance significantly.

    Although it probably won't happen, I would like to see NetBeans return to its Java IDE roots. Say to hell with trying to be some ultimate framework. Instead, it could provide us with a sleek, effective Java development tool.

  27. Agree with the article by moneyning.com · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. I use Trillian Pro and love it. I can chat with different users and do not need 73 different icons to do so. It comes with keyboard short cut, supports most features too.

    --
    Visit Money Ning Blog for great personal finance articles!
  28. Interesting... by helmutvs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any one else notice that the only product that got their little "ExtremeTech Approved" logo was Trillian Pro, which costs 25 dollars? An interesting choice for a list of Free clients.

    --
    There are no uninteresting things. There are only uninterested people.
    1. Re:Interesting... by fbartho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used the free version of Trillian for around 3 years before I paid so I could play with the devkit to try to make a plugin. Learned alot from it, messed around with it a good deal, and have yet to see anything better on Windows. I use it to manage 3 aim names 1 yahoo 1 icq 1 msn 1 gmail(gtalk via jabber) 1 livejournal(jabber) accounts that are always connected, and then occasionally use it to access 3 other accounts. I like it's logging, I have around 6 years of conversations with some of my friends, soon to be 7. The only features of the full version I really use today is a message splitter plugin that deals seamlessly with things if I happen to accidentally send a message that is too long. I will seriously consider buying Trillian at it's next release, but the free version is really great.

      I've played with gaim at different times, and I really like it for the fact that it works on many Operating systems, have played with Gaim on Debian, redhat, OSX and windows, but it yet hasn't cut it for me. I don't have time to try to help the project myself right now, but if I had to point at the client with the most potential, it would be GAIM if enough people in the community were to push it, it could outpace Trillian. AdiumX I've enjoyed for mac, but I don't have much stellar to say about it. It's visually quite pleasing.

      All of the clients I've tried have had very frustrating experiences with file-transfer to other non-identical clients. Trillian seems to work best with trillian, gaim with gaim, and adiumx with adiumx. Ditto for Video/Audio and finally, possibly the most frustrating, is the non-existence of a good encryption system that is client independent. If somebody does put that out there, so that clients can interoperate in complete secured privacy, I would switch over immediately, and advocate the encryption of all my e-mail.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
  29. No shock on trillian. by kinglink · · Score: 1

    I've been using trillian. Not for months, but YEARS! I've destroyed computers in shorter periods of time, and all I can say is Trillian is amazing. They don't ask for money, they don't try to cheat or guilt you, but their pro offerings are worth the cash if you need it. I've rarely had crashes (mostly when doing odd things) and in the last year their internet transfers are blazing fast (90K+ to AIM users).

    Basically I want NOTHING more from trillian. It does everything it should in Basic and does it all well. It had tabs before the rest, it had logging before the rest. These are two of the most important niceties I've seen.

    Trust me here, grab the basic, if you aren't happy think about the Pro but it's bar none the best out there, and I really have tried them all.

    1. Re:No shock on trillian. by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      "They don't ask for money"
      unless you want Jabber support, which is more important to me than any other protocol. All of their free (and mostly open) competitors offer Jabber without charging $25 for it.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:No shock on trillian. by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

      The only place I know that uses Jabber is work. Trillian basic is what's been working for me for years as well. Perhaps the pro version is bloated, but I never had a problem with it back on my 400mhz Celeron(ok, I had a gig of ram, but still). It was version 3.1 as well.

    3. Re:No shock on trillian. by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      FYI Google Chat uses Jabber. Now you know two. I loaded up the Google suite on my Blackberry and now have a "unified buddy list" on my phone for free. Keeps my minutes usage and SMS charges down -- especially once I added the free AIM SMS gateway addresses to that unified buddy list. Just find an open AIM gateway in the Jabber world, and register it with your Google Talk roster using Psi.

      Works really well.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    4. Re:No shock on trillian. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      The only place I know that uses Jabber is work. Trillian basic is what's been working for me for years as well. Perhaps the pro version is bloated, but I never had a problem with it back on my 400mhz Celeron(ok, I had a gig of ram, but still). It was version 3.1 as well.

      I believe that iChat also uses Jabber (at least our Mac folks use it to talk to our Jabber server).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    5. Re:No shock on trillian. by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      iChat uses AIM, Jabber and "Bonjour" (a "zero config" lan chat client, I think it's also based on jabber. Anyone who's logged in on your lan will automatically appear in your bonjour buddy list. it's pretty cool, but mac only).

    6. Re:No shock on trillian. by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about services, I'm talking about people.
      None of my friends or coworkers use Jabber outside of the workplace. I don't use Gmail or Google Talk, or IM on my phone. I understand it's available, but I just don't need it.

  30. No plugins in Adium? by Dekar · · Score: 1
    Plugins:

    Adium - No

    Oh right, they call them Xtras, so I guess they do not count...

    1. Re:No plugins in Adium? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's OK, according to the table at the end of the article, Pidgin can't be installed on Windows, even though they tested using the Windows version.

      Which I think tells a lot about this report's accuracy.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  31. Trillian Astra (Trillian 4.0) by etherlad · · Score: 1

    Just 'cause no one else seems to have mentioned it:

    Trillian Astra, a.k.a. Trillian 4.0, is in alpha-testing at the moment.

    You can check out a feature preview here. The memory footprint and speed are two of the things they've really worked on with this version, and it's got some pretty funky Web 2.0 functionality happening, too. (q.v. Trillian Mini, this video, etc.)

    --
    Soylens viridis homines es
    1. Re:Trillian Astra (Trillian 4.0) by apankrat · · Score: 1

      It requires Apollo/Flash to run "properly" (whatever it means). They are also moving towards ad-supported and bundled "partner" software model as per this post in their blog.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
  32. Pigdin and the windows version by AntiTuX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone else notice that they stated that there wasn't a windows version of Pidgin?

    1. Re:Pigdin and the windows version by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Figures, I posted a reply to someone else commenting on that before I saw your post.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Pigdin and the windows version by SoulGrind · · Score: 1

      Someone did mention it - At work, I run Pidgin on Windows XP SP2 with all the trimmings. On my Mac I use AdiumX. On My Ubuntu box, I use GAIM (I haven't looked into upgrading to Pidgin yet).

    3. Re:Pigdin and the windows version by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      Pidgin worked ACE on my copy of windows before I accidently nuked it and swapped it for kubuntu. I figured pidgin would be identical. Well it is ...almost Pidgin on windows has a plugin which lets you do cool things with transparency.....(anyone know if you can get it fdor linux or what it is called?) I can't seem to find the sssssame plugin on linux. Additionally, Pidgin isnt in the ubuntu repositories.... :( On windows pidgin looks SLICK on linux... less so(or maybe just everything looks so amazing it just looks average.

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    4. Re:Pigdin and the windows version by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone else notice that they stated that there wasn't a windows version of Pidgin?


      I noticed it. But they did remember to mention that the Mac installation was "complicated".
      I also saw them mention that the Yahoo mail checking didn't work. Hmmm, works fine for me.
    5. Re:Pigdin and the windows version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Yeah, in the table at the end. Amazingly, they somehow managed to get a Windows version:

      You can download the source if you're into compiling your own software, or get a prepackaged version for Windows and Fedora Core... We downloaded the Windows installer.
    6. Re:Pigdin and the windows version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get transparency in linux you need have aiglx, xgl or the nvidia drivers installed and with something that can use them. So you need Beryl or compiz (or what ever their merger is called).

  33. Email notification? by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

    Do any of these have email notification? My main reason for running Yahoo! messenger is for that. I have only one contact on it who I actually talk to.

    1. Re:Email notification? by freehunter · · Score: 1

      Trillian shows my AIM mail, even though I don't use AIM mail, so I am sure it would show Yahoo! and Hotmail, as well, if that is what you use.

    2. Re:Email notification? by transwarp · · Score: 1

      Do any of these have email notification?
      Trillian does. I used to use it to let me know about yahoo and hotmail/MSN.
    3. Re:Email notification? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Pidgin does. I use it to let me know when I have mail on my GMail account through Google Talk.

      Unfortunately, there IS a drawback. It only lets you know about GMail when you first log on. I'm not sure if it treats other email services the same way or not.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    4. Re:Email notification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Pidgin for GMail notification. It notifies me whenever I receive an email, not just when I log in.

  34. gaim is still my fav by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

    i think i just like it cuz its simple, the ui hasnt changed much over time and tabbed chat window plus integration of multiple types of accounts works smoothly and seamlessly. Pigin now looks nicer i think. Plus finally for windows version you can minimize to sys tray, in linux that was ofcourse already happening but i use both OS's and i hate when going back into a windows environment and little things just bug me after being easy and not annoying in linux.

    --
    Balderdash!
    1. Re:gaim is still my fav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There had been a System Tray option in the preinstalled WinGaim plugin since I started using Gaim (at least a few years).

  35. naim too. by antdude · · Score: 1

    From Debian's package: "A console client for AOL Instant Messenger and IRC. Naim is a console-based client for AOL Instant Messenger, IRC, and Lily. It supports the TOC protocol and can store its buddylist on AOL's servers."

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:naim too. by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      The difference, of course, is that naim is horrible. And it's console-based, not command-line.

    2. Re:naim too. by gharris · · Score: 1

      Really? I used to use naim exclusively. Run it behind a screen session and you can just ssh into the server, resume and pick right back up. Feature-rich and easily extended. Granted, I haven't used it in a few years, so things may have changed, but I used to love it.

      --Glenn

  36. Oh really... by pb · · Score: 1, Troll

    Trillian, now at version 3.1, remains the client to beat.


    What, did they release a Linux version? No? Then it's already been 'beaten', as far as I'm concerned...
    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  37. Psi by Inmatarian · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of Psi ( http://psi-im.org/ ). It's not a multi-service client in the strict sense, but if you find yourself a good jabber server with the right transports installed, it's just as good, if not better, than a multi-service client.

  38. Re:On Gaim/Pidgin by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Someone help me...I can't for the life of me figure out where this "enable/disable" thing came from. It's not intuitive, it's somewhat crude, and a pain in the rear. It's not that way on the Linux version, but someone who did the windows port thought it was a good idea. I strongly disagree. A simple "log in/log out" would be a welcome step forward.

  39. telnet by dominious · · Score: 1

    we all know that true geeks use telnet for IM with other geeks

  40. Re:have you heard the latest? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Funny

    That was 2000 years ago! It's improved since then. Have him try it again.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  41. What about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A free AIM client for Windows Mobile 6?

    Agile messenger and their pay by the month crap has to go.

  42. Re:Apple is a commercial product. by die444die · · Score: 1

    Apple is a company, not a product.

    --
    die444die
  43. I vote trillian....barely by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Trillian has been 3.1 for well over a year and hasn't changed unfortunately.

    I still use it, but with trepidation after discovering the hack-job workaround it uses to process aim:// links that no one ever uses.

    See I had this problem with my old computer that, something...some nefarious process was causing my RAID array to access once every second. And since it was four heads seeking every second it was pretty loud despite my efforts to build a quiet box. So I used Sysinternals freeware FileMonNT to find out WTF was accessing my HD and lo and behold it was fucking trillian. Trying to read some goddamn file that didn't exist every two seconds, followed by NTFS filesystem logging a second later. Hence disk access every second.

    I actually contacted cerulean studios about it and asked if they had any plans to fix it. One of their developers responded: "No."

    Thanks guys!

    Glad I didn't buy the "Pro" version...

    --

    Question everything

  44. meebo.com for me by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    I have been using meebo.com for months now. It is great to have my full IM chat logs available any where. At work, home, pizza hut (they have free wifi), my parents house, anywhere. It just works great.

    1. Re:meebo.com for me by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      I dont really like web based systems because I feel hemmed in and restricted. Aand I do. I dont like meebo. But compared to ALL the rest(if any good comparisions exist) its a damn site better.(no pun intended) I just wisssh the would make it FREE(as in freedom)

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  45. Adium? by ronchie02 · · Score: 1

    Adium... "Group chat support Only join existing" I must be schizo then when I make those chat rooms....

    1. Re:Adium? by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 1

      I've been doing that in Gaim/Pidgin since 1.0 or one of the subversions of that.

      And yet, there, in Gaim/Pidgin, it says "Only join existing".
      WTF?
      The only downsides to Pidgin is lack of voice and video.
      Also, Pidgin is not for Windows? What are they smoking???

    2. Re:Adium? by SoulGrind · · Score: 1

      What are YOU smoking? I've been using Pidgin on Windows XP Professional SP/2 for a couple of months now - Oh if only /. allowed screen shots...

    3. Re:Adium? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      What are YOU smoking? It's the *article* that (apparently, according to a couple other posts too) says that Pidgin isn't available for Windows.

    4. Re:Adium? by dave1g · · Score: 1

      http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2142654 ,00.asp article shows a screen shot from XP so I dont see where it says that....

    5. Re:Adium? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Yes, the article is inconsistent and stupid. See the table at the bottom of the last page of the article.

  46. Several More Words by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kopete, Miranda, Proteus, Fire.

    Their list of 6 is pretty sparse..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Several More Words by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Fire

      ...was absorbed into Adium. It no longer exists.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Several More Words by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Didnt know that ( i switched to Proteus when fire started having troubles with msn ).

      Looks good, so add that to the 'missing list'.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. Re:Apple is a commercial product. by Daychilde · · Score: 1

    So is "IBM", but people knew what one was referring to back in da day...

    --
    A cheerful little bird is sitting here singing.
  48. Trillian is slow by VGfort · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try having 200+ or 400+ people on Trillian and its slow as hell to load. Pidgin, loads them all up within a few seconds. Trillian is awesome, but I got tired of it having to load.

  49. Amsn is great... by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

    Amsn is great if you need a .NET/MSN client. But someone should design some better skins for it in my opinion, still the default ones definitly aren't going to create problems with the memory.
    They are really dedicated to what they are doing and are very good.
    If you have to transfer someone who uses MSN to **ix or OSX this is what you should give them.
    You can even get an Amsn Plus plugin for those who want it.....

    --
    www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  50. Re:Trillian is one of the worst IM clients anywher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize that Adium is just a Mac-ified Gaim/Pidgin right?

  51. Ok, Mr. Sassy Pants by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    well how great for you. Care to explain why? otherwise I think you should shut your mouth when the grownups speak

    ... Because that was such a grown-up thing to say. Save your hostility and condemnation for when people do something like... well, what you just did.

  52. polite question: by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

    but have you tried pidgin/Gaim/miranda/ANY of the others?

    --
    www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  53. It happens that by scwizard · · Score: 1

    People gotta make money I guess... Just don't let the media tell you what client to use, decide for yourself.

    --
    ~= scwizard =~
  54. Gaim or gaim... by Dreoth · · Score: 1

    In the spirit of the old irc channel... It's Gaim or gaim, NOT GAIM. :)

    --
    Fear the turtle farming ninja!
  55. My imaginary perfect IM by shaitand · · Score: 1

    No advertising.
    Support for ICQ, AIM, MSN, and YAHOO.
    Support for encrypted messaging with others using the same client (this should work out of the box with automatic key generation).
    Support for voice and video features of the above networks.
    Support for voice conferences ala ventrillo.
    The ability to backup and import settings directly from the menus.
    The ability to categorize contacts but all contacts should be dropped into a single default list unless you move them manually.
    Creating multiple accounts on each network.
    The ability to configure status, default status changes after a period of time (including disabling), auto-reponses, etc.
    On windows the program should minimize to the system tray rather than the task bar.

    That's it, fancy text, avatars, graphical smilies, and all other make my text pretty features shouldn't be implemented until the actual functionality is already in place.

    1. Re:My imaginary perfect IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kopete?

      Once it's ported to Qt4/KDE4 you should be able to run it on windows without hassle - of course, one of it's best functions is the seamless integration with the KDE address book/Kontact. To some people Kopete is a bit clunky, but IMHO it's the best IM client I've used in terms of functionality, configurability and UI. I've also decided I can't live without tabbed chat windows, although obviously Kopete isn't the only IM client to do this.

  56. Be cautious of Trillian by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    Trillian is great, and was so at the beginning, but I feel the company has grown too big and they cannot excell as much as they once did.

  57. P.S. by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Of course the IM needs to be GPL'd, free as in beer, and available for windows and linux. (Sorry BSD guys, I think your project is a waste of resources UNTIL the day that the borg is toppled and real healthy competition can begin.)

    1. Re:P.S. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. Most products that support both Windows and Linux are usually almost trivially ported to BSD. (I tried FreeBSD and it's not bad but I still prefer Linux)

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:P.S. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Hey, the BSD guys can have a port and Solaris too for all I care. It just isn't a requirement for being my perfect imaginary IM.

  58. X-forwarding GAIM (now Pidgin) by Pejorian · · Score: 1

    I use a single copy of GAIM on all my computers. The actual program runs on an old PIII 900 I keep in the basement at home, and I use SSH on my Linux machines at home and at the office, and Cygwin SSH on my Windows machines, then I X-Forward GAIM to whatever computer I'm working on. This way I keep all of my chat logs in one place and I have a unified experience across all platforms. Works well, except on a slow Internet connection; but those are getting increasingly rare...

    --
    - Murphy's Corollary: - It is impossible to make things foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
  59. telnet.... pffft... we use netcat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    telnet.... pffft... we use netcat -AC

  60. Re:Miranda? Adium X! by mjwise · · Score: 1

    Miranda is generally good, although I think it's fairly byzantine from a configurability point of view. You can do darn near anything with it, but finding the right place to change such-and-such a setting can be pretty difficult (and a lot of the defaults seem to suck). And unless you're willing to a decent amount of time in it and download and configure modules for it, you're probably better off with something like Pidgin.

    Adium X has all the visual and functional appeal of miranda to me only with a lot less required effort. It actually makes being stuck on a slowboat G5 powermac at work bearable. Now I would just like to see a cross-platform version of it...please?

  61. MS Messenger Messes up defrag even after uninstall by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    Having uninstalled Messenger I had to use the command-line utility FSUTIL USN to remove the USN journal in order to get efficient disk fragmentation back on my NTFS pre-formatted disk. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311724 - use method 2.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
  62. Re:On Gaim/Pidgin by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Enable/Disable is in the Linux client too, has been for a while now. But don't complain about the UI was more user friendly in the old versions or the developers will ask for a objective reason other than "it was more like other IM clients, or it made more sense, or it felt better" They seem to have a "what do the users know, besides we're open source developers and they aint paying us so we don't care anyway" sort of attitude One of the developers said to me that he really didn't care if anyone used it or not. My thoughts on that were that if he felt that way why release the thing in the wild.

    They're among the most user-indifferent devs I've ever come across.

  63. Trillian has poor jabber, and OTR is not a plugin by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

    For Windows, Trillian is lacking in two key areas when compared to Pidgin:

    First, the Jabber module is shit. I mean seriously, absolute and complete garbage. It crashes constantly, takes up huge amounts of CPU, and that's when it works at all. This makes Trillian a non-starter for my work, since Jabber is a required service. It also makes Trillian worthless for Google Chat or any other jabber-based service.

    Second, Pidgin has OTR as a plugin. OTR messaging (http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/) works with any client if you run it as a proxy, but with Pidgin it's really transparent. OTR is chat's killer app, especially if you're using an employer-owned chat server that might happen to log all traffic.

    I'll gladly sacrifice video chat and all the rest of that crap nobody ever asked for in exchange for a deniable, secure encrypted communications.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  64. Re:Trillian has poor jabber, and OTR is not a plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OTR is academically interesting, but it's hardly useful enough for most people to be a "killer app". Very, very few people need explicitly fakable logs: for most people who desire privacy, standard encryption techniques work fine.

  65. Use text-based IRC with an IM Gateway (Bitlbee) by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

    With a Bitlbee gateway running on one of your own machines (or even a public gateway) you can use pretty much any IRC client you like!

    1. Re:Use text-based IRC with an IM Gateway (Bitlbee) by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Shame your comment got lost out here, bitlbee is a fantastic client that I've been using for years now. Also the integration in IRC is nice. You have to trust the bitlbee server your password, though. And no file transfers, but I just tell people to mail me their stuff.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  66. Short answer: none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Six IM clients, and none of them can do voice with yahoo or google. Too bad, looks like I still have to keep those running.

  67. Re:On Gaim/Pidgin by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Good god - that has to be one of the most incredible steps BACKWARD I've ever seen. I used to love Gaim. Now I'll use something else, because I hate the enable/disable junk, and worse, I can't stand developers who don't have a clue (and refuse to get one) with respect to usability issues.

  68. Let's be honest: by crhylove · · Score: 1

    They all suck. Now, I'm a big Pidgin fan, but only because it stands an inch higher out of the sewage that currently is instant messaging:

    Encryption? Good luck. Maybe with a bunch of hacking and fucked up text files.

    File Transfer? Maybe! Pray? Forget anything over 20 kbps, no matter HOW fat your pipe is.

    Voice chat? NO! The major ones offer it, MSN, Y!, AIM, but none use speex, and ALL suck.

    Video chat? YEAH RIGHT! The grainiest, crappiest, darkest, glitchiest.... Plus crap Audio! Hurray!

    Ctrl+Scroll wheel to enlarge fonts? NEGATIVE!

    MySpace IM integration? Supposedly in the NEXT version of Trillian. Despite 1.8 BILLION users or whatever.

    Interoperability? pffft. Don't get me started.

    Play Video games with friends? Maybe you'll get checkers with the SHITTY rules on MSN.

    No ZSNES, No Mupen, No Hearts, Spades, Cribbage, Chess, Checkers, Texas Hold'em....

    Granted, on Pidgin I can talk to AIM, MSN, Y!, ICQ, Google Talk (not actual talk of course!), ICQ, and some others, but I still can't voice chat, video chat, play ZSNES, or Mupen with my online friends. It's sad when the best client still lacks 20 of the most obvious and fun options that should have been in ALL of them from the get go.

    The state of IM right now is horse shit. Pure, unadulterated, CRAP. MAYBE the SOC MySpace plugin will help Pidgin even farther, but still no Zsnes, Speex, or x264, I'm sure.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Let's be honest: by someone300 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Though, XMPP (commonly known as Jabber) stands to be able to solve these problems. I suggest you try getting involved with that project. Check out some of their specifications: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/

      Examples include: XML-RPC, SOAP, geolocation, vcards, nested sub-groups. Metacontacts: these are the sort of things that Pidgin and Adium are so great at doing, where you combine multiple accounts of the same people into one. Officially supported user mood, activity, tune, avatars, gaming, browsing, encryption, message formatting with XHTML rather than the sort of hack applications for other protocols such as MSN Plus-style applications.

      Officially, things like transports work fine to combine your IRC, MSN, AIM, etc. all into one at the server side. It's distributed and inter operable, and the server admin can make his/her own rules for corporation use and such, like no talking outside the business unless you're on breaks. Officially, the file transfer spec has stuff for breaking through firewalls using WebDAV, or if not possible, fallback on sending it through the server (obviously would be throttled though). It supports transfer resuming too. Even things like encrypted offline messaging is supported.

      Voice and video works with RTP... using codecs such as Speex for voice and Theora, x264 for video, again using things like STUN to set up the session. SVG whiteboards are in the works too.

      The protocol is fabulous, and clients are busy implementing it all. Don't think that Pidgin's jabber performance is representitive of the protocol, it's very out of date and crappy. I think work is going into this though. The hard part is GUI-ifying the features of XMPP, especially when clients such as Jabber insist of doing it with perfect integration to the systems.

  69. Running MSN in a VM by fa2k · · Score: 1

    I still prefer the official MSN client. I actually keep a Windows VM going just for that, and for opening office docs and DRM'ed/proprietary videos. The client has some features that Gaim (it's not called Pidgin on my Ubuntu system yet) lacks, like webcam, and it *doesn't pop up windows in the foreground when I'm doing something else*. I can't believe that people put up with that.

  70. What about a new app written around libpurple? by boteeka · · Score: 1

    I like Pidgin because it's available on the platforms I use (these would be Linux and Windows), it has support for the protocols I use (and a shitload of other protocols which I don't use, but I could if I wanted to). Most people say that it lacks video/audio support and they're right, but I'm not really interested in these two features, so this doesn't make a difference.

    The thing which I doesn't like about Pidgin is that it forces simplicity at a point where I almost could say that it's a proof of concept application. Everything is minimalist about Pidgin, the last thing that made it a little bit nicer was that the buddy images now have rounded corners and your image is shown up next to the status switcher dropdown.

    Pidgin could've been so much more appealing if the developers wanted to, but no, there is almost no control about how the buddy-list looks-like, not even color themes or something.

    It may seam that I'm bashing Pidgin, but take a look at Adium, for example. It has lots of ways to customize the interface and how it works AND it looks nice, it is visually appealing. I know that Pidgin can be themed using GTK themes, but you can't theme ONLY Pidgin to be different from the rest of your apps on the desktop.

    So, I'm basically proposing for somebody who has the capability and time to think about, and come up with a new "front-end" for libpurple, like Adium did, and create a new IM client which IS NICE and CAN BE CUSTOMIZED. It would be a different team for the user interface (the front end) and the pidgin team for the back-end (libpurple) which could work in collaboration.

    Maybe I am too utopist but now, when the desktop eye-candy is becoming more popular, we should have a nicer IM client too.

    Please note that eye-candy does not need to be obtrusive, and CAN help usability too.

  71. Windows + Jabber + Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I'm looking for is a decent messaging client that runs on windows and provides video chat capability. Specifically I'd like something that uses Jabber/XMPP that will work with Google Talk. I know there's supposed to be a plugin (Festoon) for the Google Talk client but I think that's just too hard for my dad to figure out how to install.

  72. Interoperability... by JohnLowHanger · · Score: 1

    ...among IMs is the #1 reason most Windows-using folk I know won't touch Ubuntu - even though they really like what they see in Ubuntu and don't enjoy the idea of ever moving over to Vista. While they fully appreciate that there are a whole host of interoperable IM clients for GNU/Linux-based distributions, the interoperable features they most want are: voice and video conferencing, and Windows-alike Remote Assistance direct from the IM client. The #2 reason most Windows-using folk I know won't touch Ubuntu - even though they really like what they see in Ubuntu and don't enjoy the idea of ever moving over to Vista - are commercial computer games ports. There's just not enough of them for GNU/Linux. Suffice it to say, 99.99% of all computer owners I know and teach are not geeks - just cutting and pasting is an enlightening and enabling experience for these people - and if GNU/Linux is ever going to enter these peoples lives in the mainstream, it has to offer #1 and #2. But they will, generally, be satisfied with #1 in the short-term.

  73. What? NO command line? by m1sha · · Score: 1

    but what about (http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/) and finch(http://pidgin.im/pidgin/home/) for those who despise the bloated whale that is the X windowing system.

  74. Just happens to use "Gaim" code by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought that adium was basically gaim restyle to match OSX, in which case it would sort of be cheating to list it separately from gaim/pidgin. I didn't realize there were any other differences..

    Other than the common dependency on the same library, known as libpurple (as it is now known), they are very different. You should think of Adium as third-party IM that happens to use libpurple. Adium has already used other libraries for features that libpurple just didn't implement well or at all. The Adium developer work closely with the developers of the Pidgin/libpurple project, ensuring fixes, bug reporting et al.

    It should be noted that the separation into Pidgin and libpurple is recent, but that an unofficial libgaim had existed before this separation, and this is what Adium used. The Pidgin team, at about the same time as Gaim got renamed, split the UI and the core logic into two units, in order to facilitate development. There are now three projects that officially used libpurple, these being Pidgin (UI for Linux, Windows and possibly others, where X11 is present), Finch (CLI UI) and Adium (MacOS specific).

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  75. my bad by biscon · · Score: 1

    Hey I was drunk, which in my culture, is a valid excuse for almost anything ;).
    Anyway you're right and my apologies to the GP, I just hate when people don't back/explain their claims (at least when I don't agree with them).

  76. Web based: OneTeam ? by mremond · · Score: 1

    What about OneTeam ?
    OneTeam is working on all platforms with a Firefox 2 browser. It offers a native user friendly interface. Only our MSN gateways have been plugged for now, as it is in public beta and we will open gateways one at a time.

    I am participating to OneTeam development but I am suggesting it here because it is still little know and we are working on improving it every day, so if you have feature requests, suggestions, criticism or praise, it is very welcome :) The forum to comment is here: http://www.process-one.net/en/forum/viewforum/9/

    OneTeam web client is in beta on http://oneteam.im/

    --
    Mickael Remond http://www.process-one.net/
  77. Re:Miranda? Adium X! by Salmar · · Score: 1

    Now I would just like to see a cross-platform version of it...please? I think that's much easier said than done, simply because Adium is designed for Mac OS X, which has very specific GUI controls and uses Objective-C for event handling. I don't think it was ever intended to be cross-platformm, anyway...sorry. :/
    --
    This is not the signature you're looking for.
  78. AimPro? by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

    Not multiprotocol, but it definitely doesn't include everything that is wrong with the regular aim client. It also has xm radio, voice chat, and video chat built right in. Last time I checked pidgeon forgot to add video support. Plus no ads.

  79. No video by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I like Adium a lot, but it seems it won't get any video support until gaim/pidgin 3.0 which I guess is a major drawback for some people.

    Also, does anyone know if it's possible to get contacts from all supported networks in iChat in the same contact list? 2-3 contact lists suck.
    Over here in Sweden most people use MSN but if iChat didn't looked like shit and used multiple contact lists I would use it anyway (it doesn't support MSN, only AIM/ICQ, Jabber and its own.)

  80. Lol by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    A valid excuse indeed :) - it's all good.

  81. Google Talk is my multi-service client by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

    By following the method described here and my own private Jabber server, I have all of my contacts (MSN, AIM, Yahoo, and GTalk) available in one place - GTalk. No matter what machine or OS I'm on, I always have my IM contacts available. It's not fancy, shiny stuff is minimal, but it works.