No it is not. And if you would get your information from serious sources instead of FoxNews then you would know what socialism means. Feel free to read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... It might provide a good start for understanding the term.
No. Socialism requires that private property is converted into public property which is then lent (often without a fee) to people. In socialism you can have a planned economy. However, this is not compulsory. Alternative models are based on management by the, for example, the employees of a company. For more details please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... before you say anything else about socialism which you learned from FoxNews. Thanks.
These accomplishment come with a price. Drivers have higher income so that they can support their family. In addition companies have to pay for healthcare and obey regulation which prohibit then to try a race to the bottom with the income of employees. Also drivers must be educated properly . And many more. The principle or method used to implement these rules differ, but the bottom line is. You cannot play with employees' income and you cannot ripoff passengers, like Uber does occasionally.
We are proud of our social accomplishments and we do not like people who mess with it. Especially, when they think they do not need to work inside the law. It might be acceptable in the US to fuck the law and the people and make profit from it. Here, we do not like it. And frankly enough international companies are doing it. Therefore, we fight against that. Even though our governments are not really into it. Even though, they encouraged some companies to pay some taxes and accept the local laws.
This is only a part of your coding style. In most cases the part where the braces go and the indentation are part of the company or language code style. And it should be identical for everyone in your organisation. They can be enforced by checkstyle (in Java). The style also includes the use of any kind of design pattern. For example, do you implement factories in the same class or in a separate class. Do you use sub interfaces in Java.
I would more go in the direction that a software engineer (a real one) needs to know the following: - Modeling - Software Architecture - Requirement Engineering - Enough to talk to the database guys what he wants as data model stored - Project management - Programming - Continuous integration and delivery - Software versioning and building As a FB programmer you need to know only a subset mainly programming and using the tools in CI and VCS. In modern companies also modeling. For AI a total different skill set is required. It is like being a baker and switching to butcher.
If you want to earn money with it, forget it. A software engineer is a completely different type of computer scientist than data mining and machine learning. You could get another master program on that. But why wasting your 15 years of experience? You need to relearn all the logic stuff from university and couple it with statistics and signal processing. All in all this is heavy duty math stuff.
You misunderstood my argument on the use of the word geek. It looks like it is used nowadays for everyone who is into something. However, I would define it more like the forth definition of geek in the urban dict http://www.urbandictionary.com...
The thing is. The more inprecise the term becomes the less meaningful it is. In the article it could easily be replaced by fan.
My doorknobs, actually they are more like lever, are perfectly fine. They do not need to be computerized. I do not need a screen in my tables. At the work place there are too many things placed on them. And at home. The table is for eating. If there would be a screen in it, like in my tablet, then it would have to be cleaned intensively after every meal. And when I am eating, I am eating. I do not need to surf the net. And if I want to, I could still use my phone or tablet or notebook. I also do not need a computerized toilet. Maybe when I am old and in a home, there will be such thing.
And beside all that. It would require energy and resources like hell. We already have a resource problem. How about a working energy distribution system?
This is especially true if people use a bacon based diet. The more the better. As we already know that such diet will kill you soon, it reduces the population and therefore the source of resource wasting.
If you doubt that then you might also doubt the calorie based metric. What a bunch of loonies.
You know, putting the truck in a container or car carrier is only one piece of the puzzle. They cannot ship them in via the Mediterranean Sea, as that part of Syria is controlled by Assad and other non ISIS groups. Lebanon will also not work. And I doubt Israel allows the cars to cross. Therefore, the car must go around Africa or use the Suez Canal and then to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and/or Irak. alternatively, they could go through Turkey. But Turkey is our ally and would never ever do such thing.
If you look at the fears associated with Syrians, you can clearly see that they are similarly mad. For example, people have claimed in the same statement that those Syrians will take our jobs and are too lazy to work. It can't be both. Furthermore, they claim that they are uneducated and that is will cost well educated Germans their jobs. Its was also claimed that they get more money from the state than poor Germans (which is wrong). It was claimed that they eat your pets and goats which is also wrong. In total they claim any rubbish to get rid of them, just like these solar panel haters.
Wrong such people would be demonstrating in Germany as part of the "Partiotic Europeans against the Islamization of the occident" (PEGIDA for "Partiotische Europäer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes"). They are similar nut cases. With the right speech they would also be against communist solar panels.
Obviously they are nuts. Solar panel do not scare young people. However, a minimum of 405 idiots might just do the trick. Solar panel do also not suck energy from the sun. We all know that if they do not know that then they never really paid attention to the topics at school. But there is a positive side to that. First, the range of total nut cases is only between 405 and 809. It may be even lower, if people did not vote and if there are any children left. Second, we could promote the town to people who have similar ideas of "reality" and concentrate them in North Carolina. And third, now the town has at least one thing on Wikipedia for what they are famous for. I wonder why such small village is called a town.
Yes Belgium has some issues. For example, they actually do not want to part of Belgium. It would be best they had a referendum and become part of France, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. Italy is a totally different thing. Their main problem is the weak law system. Look at Berlusconi, he cheated and got away using many different tricks. And they have a problem with compromise. However, it got better in the last couple of years. And it most likely will become better in future. They should also give more autonomy to their regions. Europe is in fact an place where many different ethnicities live together. And many nations are arbitrarily combined. For example Spain, Portugal was once part of it for similar reasons Catalonia is a part of Spain. There is also tension in how to balance central and regional power.
However, there are also positive examples of a representative proportion parliaments: Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark, Finland.
In the UK the primary idea is that the government makes the laws and the parliament has to support them. In Scandinavia the parliament is the main source of law and the government can only propose laws and has often to convince the parliament to say yes. This is especially true when they have a minority government. In Germany this is a little different, as the parliament elects the chancellor which is usually only done if you have a stable coalition to back that vote. And in addition to prevent fragmentation of the parliament they have an entrance criteria for a party to the parliament which requires 5% of the votes.
On the continent many countries use proportional representation based on lists of candidates. And usually parties must form coalitions to govern. This is not necessarily a problem as long as political parties are able to compromise. It even allows to make the process of democratic consensus more transparent. For example, in Germany the conservative party is in a coalition with the social democrats and they worked out a treaty for this coalition which is a compromise between both party programs. In addition Germany has direct candidates. So the first all winners of a direct seat go to parliament and then they check if this fits the proportional representation scheme. And if it does not the under represented parties can seat additional politicians from their list.
The strangest thing about the UK is that only 30% voted for the Tories, but the they got over 50% of the seats. How is this in any way fair and democratic? Sadly, the UK converts back to a feudal society. I loved to stay in the UK every now and then, but if this development continuous it will be Manchester all over again.
If this is the alternative, I chose death. Oh now you make me envision a teenage room inhabited by a college student. Dirty socks, pizza, underwear, a little box with his personal stash. I rather move to South Africa. They are friendly people for the most part and they are perfectly far away from the US, Europe and Australia.
Slashdot Mirror
No it is not. And if you would get your information from serious sources instead of FoxNews then you would know what socialism means. Feel free to read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... It might provide a good start for understanding the term.
No. Socialism requires that private property is converted into public property which is then lent (often without a fee) to people. In socialism you can have a planned economy. However, this is not compulsory. Alternative models are based on management by the, for example, the employees of a company. For more details please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... before you say anything else about socialism which you learned from FoxNews. Thanks.
These accomplishment come with a price. Drivers have higher income so that they can support their family. In addition companies have to pay for healthcare and obey regulation which prohibit then to try a race to the bottom with the income of employees. Also drivers must be educated properly . And many more. The principle or method used to implement these rules differ, but the bottom line is. You cannot play with employees' income and you cannot ripoff passengers, like Uber does occasionally.
We are proud of our social accomplishments and we do not like people who mess with it. Especially, when they think they do not need to work inside the law. It might be acceptable in the US to fuck the law and the people and make profit from it. Here, we do not like it. And frankly enough international companies are doing it. Therefore, we fight against that. Even though our governments are not really into it. Even though, they encouraged some companies to pay some taxes and accept the local laws.
In C this is true NULL is defined as 0. However, in SQL the semantic of NULL is "value not set".
Idiot. Morocco is not Saudi-Arabia or is Canada like Mexico?
http://www.desertec.org/ They tried to launch an initiative to build solar power in north Africa. However, they did not succeed so far. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
This is only a part of your coding style. In most cases the part where the braces go and the indentation are part of the company or language code style. And it should be identical for everyone in your organisation. They can be enforced by checkstyle (in Java). The style also includes the use of any kind of design pattern. For example, do you implement factories in the same class or in a separate class. Do you use sub interfaces in Java.
I would more go in the direction that a software engineer (a real one) needs to know the following:
- Modeling
- Software Architecture
- Requirement Engineering
- Enough to talk to the database guys what he wants as data model stored
- Project management
- Programming
- Continuous integration and delivery
- Software versioning and building
As a FB programmer you need to know only a subset mainly programming and using the tools in CI and VCS. In modern companies also modeling.
For AI a total different skill set is required. It is like being a baker and switching to butcher.
If you want to earn money with it, forget it. A software engineer is a completely different type of computer scientist than data mining and machine learning. You could get another master program on that. But why wasting your 15 years of experience? You need to relearn all the logic stuff from university and couple it with statistics and signal processing. All in all this is heavy duty math stuff.
You misunderstood my argument on the use of the word geek. It looks like it is used nowadays for everyone who is into something. However, I would define it more like the forth definition of geek in the urban dict http://www.urbandictionary.com...
The thing is. The more inprecise the term becomes the less meaningful it is. In the article it could easily be replaced by fan.
Because every moron is called a geek nowadays. Star Wars fans are not geeks. They indulge in a fantasy story. There is no tech involved.
My doorknobs, actually they are more like lever, are perfectly fine. They do not need to be computerized. I do not need a screen in my tables. At the work place there are too many things placed on them. And at home. The table is for eating. If there would be a screen in it, like in my tablet, then it would have to be cleaned intensively after every meal. And when I am eating, I am eating. I do not need to surf the net. And if I want to, I could still use my phone or tablet or notebook. I also do not need a computerized toilet. Maybe when I am old and in a home, there will be such thing.
And beside all that. It would require energy and resources like hell. We already have a resource problem. How about a working energy distribution system?
You can eat almost everything of a cow, sheep, chicken, and pig. Beside the bones and the furr which can be used for knifes and clothes.
This is especially true if people use a bacon based diet. The more the better. As we already know that such diet will kill you soon, it reduces the population and therefore the source of resource wasting.
If you doubt that then you might also doubt the calorie based metric. What a bunch of loonies.
You know, putting the truck in a container or car carrier is only one piece of the puzzle. They cannot ship them in via the Mediterranean Sea, as that part of Syria is controlled by Assad and other non ISIS groups. Lebanon will also not work. And I doubt Israel allows the cars to cross. Therefore, the car must go around Africa or use the Suez Canal and then to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and/or Irak. alternatively, they could go through Turkey. But Turkey is our ally and would never ever do such thing.
You are watching too much "real" News on Fox.
If you look at the fears associated with Syrians, you can clearly see that they are similarly mad. For example, people have claimed in the same statement that those Syrians will take our jobs and are too lazy to work. It can't be both. Furthermore, they claim that they are uneducated and that is will cost well educated Germans their jobs. Its was also claimed that they get more money from the state than poor Germans (which is wrong). It was claimed that they eat your pets and goats which is also wrong. In total they claim any rubbish to get rid of them, just like these solar panel haters.
Wrong such people would be demonstrating in Germany as part of the "Partiotic Europeans against the Islamization of the occident" (PEGIDA for "Partiotische Europäer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes"). They are similar nut cases. With the right speech they would also be against communist solar panels.
Obviously they are nuts. Solar panel do not scare young people. However, a minimum of 405 idiots might just do the trick. Solar panel do also not suck energy from the sun. We all know that if they do not know that then they never really paid attention to the topics at school. But there is a positive side to that. First, the range of total nut cases is only between 405 and 809. It may be even lower, if people did not vote and if there are any children left. Second, we could promote the town to people who have similar ideas of "reality" and concentrate them in North Carolina. And third, now the town has at least one thing on Wikipedia for what they are famous for. I wonder why such small village is called a town.
Yes Belgium has some issues. For example, they actually do not want to part of Belgium. It would be best they had a referendum and become part of France, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. Italy is a totally different thing. Their main problem is the weak law system. Look at Berlusconi, he cheated and got away using many different tricks. And they have a problem with compromise. However, it got better in the last couple of years. And it most likely will become better in future.
They should also give more autonomy to their regions. Europe is in fact an place where many different ethnicities live together. And many nations are arbitrarily combined. For example Spain, Portugal was once part of it for similar reasons Catalonia is a part of Spain. There is also tension in how to balance central and regional power.
However, there are also positive examples of a representative proportion parliaments: Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark, Finland.
In the UK the primary idea is that the government makes the laws and the parliament has to support them. In Scandinavia the parliament is the main source of law and the government can only propose laws and has often to convince the parliament to say yes. This is especially true when they have a minority government.
In Germany this is a little different, as the parliament elects the chancellor which is usually only done if you have a stable coalition to back that vote. And in addition to prevent fragmentation of the parliament they have an entrance criteria for a party to the parliament which requires 5% of the votes.
On the continent many countries use proportional representation based on lists of candidates. And usually parties must form coalitions to govern. This is not necessarily a problem as long as political parties are able to compromise. It even allows to make the process of democratic consensus more transparent. For example, in Germany the conservative party is in a coalition with the social democrats and they worked out a treaty for this coalition which is a compromise between both party programs. In addition Germany has direct candidates. So the first all winners of a direct seat go to parliament and then they check if this fits the proportional representation scheme. And if it does not the under represented parties can seat additional politicians from their list.
The strangest thing about the UK is that only 30% voted for the Tories, but the they got over 50% of the seats. How is this in any way fair and democratic? Sadly, the UK converts back to a feudal society. I loved to stay in the UK every now and then, but if this development continuous it will be Manchester all over again.
If this is the alternative, I chose death. Oh now you make me envision a teenage room inhabited by a college student. Dirty socks, pizza, underwear, a little box with his personal stash. I rather move to South Africa. They are friendly people for the most part and they are perfectly far away from the US, Europe and Australia.
Absolutely.