why don't they just make it clear: anybody goes through the security gate, please take off your bulging diaper and place in in the tray (just like taking out laptop, jacket, shoes, etc..)
that'll make travelers less damned surprised
in order to make others respect Google's licensing terms, Google must first obey the open source license that applies to Android: don't delay releasing their Honeycomb source code
it seems possible, but giving ISP the right to inspect my data doesn't sound safe to me. The prospect won't be good as they can tamper with my data header and later with the data itself. Once they can make one step onto your data, they'll go further.
the lead engineer is obviously not an incompetent guy. It is this company's problem in which the new grad is overpaid, or the lead engineer is currently underpaid, or the whole management is under appreciate their existing staff (based on how they value who's upholding their core business vs. someone new who may bring in some new add-on value)
It's like "don't ask, don't tell" (but everybody knows about it) [j/k]
I think you're right since talking about it doesn't bring about any good public relation value
Slashdot Mirror
this seems like a desperate move to raise revenue for the company by stripping out gamers' benefit...
oh those oversensitive people.. do something else
why don't they just make it clear: anybody goes through the security gate, please take off your bulging diaper and place in in the tray (just like taking out laptop, jacket, shoes, etc..) that'll make travelers less damned surprised
in order to make others respect Google's licensing terms, Google must first obey the open source license that applies to Android: don't delay releasing their Honeycomb source code
it seems possible, but giving ISP the right to inspect my data doesn't sound safe to me. The prospect won't be good as they can tamper with my data header and later with the data itself. Once they can make one step onto your data, they'll go further.
the lead engineer is obviously not an incompetent guy. It is this company's problem in which the new grad is overpaid, or the lead engineer is currently underpaid, or the whole management is under appreciate their existing staff (based on how they value who's upholding their core business vs. someone new who may bring in some new add-on value)
No, but that doesn't mean you talk about it.
It's like "don't ask, don't tell" (but everybody knows about it) [j/k] I think you're right since talking about it doesn't bring about any good public relation value