i saw one at a computer market printing and it looked ok
but i also saw one that looked in an awfull state with air everywhere in the tubes etc.
theese systems are probablly most practical with printers that don't use disposable heads. but on those printers you have far more to lose if you do f*ck up the head. is it worth it?
your post sounds like even more BS than his (btw stop being a fucking coward and get an account). where did you get this crazy idea that its possible to "replay" ssl transactions?
if you use ssl that doesn't matter the whole POINT of ssl is it treats the network as basically untrusted that includes the wireless part.
to do a mitm on ssl you need a root cert thats installed in the users browser which means you either need a comprimise the users system or comprimise a root ca (which won't be easy),
ubuntu shows that debian unstable is a fantastic package source for a huge volume of software.
the issue i find with debian though is that they are far too uptight about bugs in non-core software and they even consider removing a package from the release preferable to having a version with a bug that meets thier definition of release critical.
ubuntu otoh seperates packages into those they care about and "universe" packages which are availible if you wan't them but they don't care too much about them.
source is 15 ia64 is 15 i386 is 14 amd64 (unofficial) doesn't seem to have been built yet (according to the announcement when built it should appear at URL:http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/s arge-amd64/) other architectures i haven't checked myself but i belive they are all 13 or 14 (depending on mow much is missing and how big binaries for those architectures are etc)
p2p networks vary hugely in the quality of the hash used. i belive some use crc32 which is known broken.
others use things like md5/sha1 which until recently have been considered virtually unbreakable.
theese attacks are against sha1 and md5 but they do not give the capability to make a collision attack against a block of an existing torrent or similar they could only be used in a bait and switch manner if that.
so not hugely relavent for now possiblly very relevent if the breakage gets worse.
iirc at least the P4 has overheat protection (tested by toms hardware by removing the heatsink from a running cpu) so ir should survive an incident like that.
.com,.org and.net are supposed to exist for international sites.
if a site wants to appeal to an international audiance they are going to want a url that everyone can actually type! that means basic latin letters, numeric digits and a few other charactors that are availible on almost every computer keyboard. nothing more.
maybe the fix is to introduce some kind of language tlds for say sites named in chineese that aren't specific to china.
There is a top level domain.us but when did you last see anyone using it? seen it a few times but it isn't used a great deal.
Let me guess: you're an American? english actually;).com,.org and.net are supposed to exist for international sites. if a site wants to appeal to an international audiance they are going to want a url that everyone can actually type! that means basic latin letters, numeric digits and a few other charactors that are availible on almost every computer system. nothing more.
maybe the fix is to introduce some kind of language tlds for say sites named in chineese that aren't specific to china.
There is a top level domain.us but when did you last see anyone using it? seen it a few times but it isn't used a great deal.
until those who run the major domain registries can come up with sensible rules for IDN (which imo means no international stuff in.com/.org/.net and only stuff appropriate to the language in question in the cctlds) then IDN is just going to be a paradise for troublemakers
of course the regsitries don't care because all they care about is selling as many domains as possible which the current don't care policy promotes.
if i were running a dns server i'd be very very inclined to set it up to simply block requests to IDN urls.
in this case (cameras) raw reffers to the fact its the raw unprocessed data from the CCD
this has to be processed to convert it to a form that we would recognise as an image file. This can happen either on the camera or on a PC.
However This conversion process may well not be fully reversable (due to rounding errors) and bloats the data considerablly (CCDs generally make a red green OR blue value at each location image files generally have red green AND blue at each location so turning CCD output into an image file always involves interpolation) so from an archivists point of view its best to keep the raw data unfortunately that raw data is often in a closed format.
they could just use an unecumbered format like png
BUT the advantage or "raw" is its the closest you can get to what actually came out of the cameras CCD. because of the way CCDs work this will be about a third the size of the resulting image (assuming they are uncompressed or compressed using a lossless algorithm that gets roughtly the same compression on both).
well on one box i just upgraded from woody-sarge aptitude dist-upgrade wanted to remove sendmail:/ (and i tried upgrading sendmail first aptitude still wanted to remove it)
apt-get dist-upgrade wanted to remove sendmail and apache and some other stuff:(
in the end i ended up using apt-get upgrade then upgrading some stuff manually then trying both forms of dist-upgrade again and at that point apt-get dist-upgrade gave me a sane upgrade (aptitude still didn't)
then after that just a couple of packages that apt-get dist-upgrade had still decided not to upgrade and i was done
lukilly i'm kinda used to fighting with apt-get from trying to keep knoppix hdinstalls up to date;)
p.s. the comment posting delay is getting worse. yesterday it was 15 minuites now it appears to be 30 is this some anti-crapflooding measure or something?
well the reccomendation is in the release notes still and personally if i was upgrading a remote box i'd be following thier instructions to the letter.
a local unimportant box may allow for a more gung-ho attitude.
jigdo allows the load to be spread over more mirrors (since it can use any debian mirror not just those that have the cd images) but its still downloading from thier mirrors.
bittorrent otoh gives most of the load to the downloaders.
Slashdot Mirror
i saw one at a computer market printing and it looked ok
but i also saw one that looked in an awfull state with air everywhere in the tubes etc.
theese systems are probablly most practical with printers that don't use disposable heads. but on those printers you have far more to lose if you do f*ck up the head. is it worth it?
your post sounds like even more BS than his (btw stop being a fucking coward and get an account). where did you get this crazy idea that its possible to "replay" ssl transactions?
if you use ssl that doesn't matter the whole POINT of ssl is it treats the network as basically untrusted that includes the wireless part.
to do a mitm on ssl you need a root cert thats installed in the users browser which means you either need a comprimise the users system or comprimise a root ca (which won't be easy),
though to be fair the reccomended upgrade process seems to take a dislike to those who use an alternative mta.
7 52557 for more detail on the fun upgrade i had on a box with sendmail.
see my post at http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=151857&cid=12
i've heared reports of similar issues with postfix dunno exactly where right now though
ubuntu shows that debian unstable is a fantastic package source for a huge volume of software.
the issue i find with debian though is that they are far too uptight about bugs in non-core software and they even consider removing a package from the release preferable to having a version with a bug that meets thier definition of release critical.
ubuntu otoh seperates packages into those they care about and "universe" packages which are availible if you wan't them but they don't care too much about them.
out of interest why are you downloading the full cd set?
are you just a collector who wan'ts a full set or is there some other reason for wanting all of them?
source is 15s arge-amd64/)
ia64 is 15
i386 is 14
amd64 (unofficial) doesn't seem to have been built yet (according to the announcement when built it should appear at URL:http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/
other architectures i haven't checked myself but i belive they are all 13 or 14 (depending on mow much is missing and how big binaries for those architectures are etc)
KDE still seems to be there to me.
s .pl?keywords=kde&searchon=names&version=all&releas e=all
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_package
not all that related at least not YET
p2p networks vary hugely in the quality of the hash used. i belive some use crc32 which is known broken.
others use things like md5/sha1 which until recently have been considered virtually unbreakable.
theese attacks are against sha1 and md5 but they do not give the capability to make a collision attack against a block of an existing torrent or similar they could only be used in a bait and switch manner if that.
so not hugely relavent for now possiblly very relevent if the breakage gets worse.
iirc at least the P4 has overheat protection (tested by toms hardware by removing the heatsink from a running cpu) so ir should survive an incident like that.
I know my managers have acccess to my phone logs
just logs of what calls you made or actual recordings of the content?
btw on *nix you can link a file into multiple dirs provided they are on the same filesystem.
make sure you deal with your /etc/apt/sources.list if you don't wan't to end up following the new testin (etch)
Let me guess: you're an American?
;)
.com, .org and .net are supposed to exist for international sites.
.us but when did you last see anyone using it?
i'm english actually
if a site wants to appeal to an international audiance they are going to want a url that everyone can actually type! that means basic latin letters, numeric digits and a few other charactors that are availible on almost every computer keyboard. nothing more.
maybe the fix is to introduce some kind of language tlds for say sites named in chineese that aren't specific to china.
There is a top level domain
seen it a few times but it isn't used a great deal.
Let me guess: you're an American? ;) .com, .org and .net are supposed to exist for international sites.
.us but when did you last see anyone using it?
english actually
if a site wants to appeal to an international audiance they are going to want a url that everyone can actually type! that means basic latin letters, numeric digits and a few other charactors that are availible on almost every computer system. nothing more.
maybe the fix is to introduce some kind of language tlds for say sites named in chineese that aren't specific to china.
There is a top level domain
seen it a few times but it isn't used a great deal.
is money grabbing registries.
.com/.org/.net and only stuff appropriate to the language in question in the cctlds) then IDN is just going to be a paradise for troublemakers
until those who run the major domain registries can come up with sensible rules for IDN (which imo means no international stuff in
of course the regsitries don't care because all they care about is selling as many domains as possible which the current don't care policy promotes.
if i were running a dns server i'd be very very inclined to set it up to simply block requests to IDN urls.
in this case (cameras) raw reffers to the fact its the raw unprocessed data from the CCD
this has to be processed to convert it to a form that we would recognise as an image file. This can happen either on the camera or on a PC.
However This conversion process may well not be fully reversable (due to rounding errors) and bloats the data considerablly (CCDs generally make a red green OR blue value at each location image files generally have red green AND blue at each location so turning CCD output into an image file always involves interpolation) so from an archivists point of view its best to keep the raw data unfortunately that raw data is often in a closed format.
they could just use an unecumbered format like png
BUT the advantage or "raw" is its the closest you can get to what actually came out of the cameras CCD. because of the way CCDs work this will be about a third the size of the resulting image (assuming they are uncompressed or compressed using a lossless algorithm that gets roughtly the same compression on both).
i'm sure the appollo missions used pure oxygen and they had the astronauts in it for quite long periods
maybe that was at least than atnospheric pressure though.
as per my earlier post at http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=151857&cid=127 52557 i HAD to use apt-get upgrade because both aptitude dist-upgrade and apt-get dist-upgrade misbehaved.
apt-get is really kinda ignorant of the whole releases thing it just sees new packages availible and trys to install them.
what exactly did running apt-get upgrade break? that sounds like a bug in some package.
p.s. i do think its stupid that they make the default sources.list use stable/testing/unstable rather than woody/sarge/etch/sid
well on one box i just upgraded from woody-sarge aptitude dist-upgrade wanted to remove sendmail :/ (and i tried upgrading sendmail first aptitude still wanted to remove it)
:(
;)
apt-get dist-upgrade wanted to remove sendmail and apache and some other stuff
in the end i ended up using apt-get upgrade then upgrading some stuff manually then trying both forms of dist-upgrade again and at that point apt-get dist-upgrade gave me a sane upgrade (aptitude still didn't)
then after that just a couple of packages that apt-get dist-upgrade had still decided not to upgrade and i was done
lukilly i'm kinda used to fighting with apt-get from trying to keep knoppix hdinstalls up to date
sounds like a dodgy mirror
5 /06/msg00003.html
if you tell bittorrent to download on top of the partial copy you have already it should work out what parts are intact and download the rest for you.
alternatively you may wan't to hold off getting the full dvd images until a certain issue with them is fixed see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/200
p.s. the comment posting delay is getting worse. yesterday it was 15 minuites now it appears to be 30 is this some anti-crapflooding measure or something?
i'm sure sarge full cd sets only started fairly recently (less than a year ago iirc) because the installer was in heavy development until then.
dunno about what happened regarding cd sets before woody release though.
well the reccomendation is in the release notes still and personally if i was upgrading a remote box i'd be following thier instructions to the letter.
a local unimportant box may allow for a more gung-ho attitude.
jigdo allows the load to be spread over more mirrors (since it can use any debian mirror not just those that have the cd images) but its still downloading from thier mirrors.
bittorrent otoh gives most of the load to the downloaders.