you have to watch with that... why isn't the phone company an accesory do every drug deal made or arranged over the phone..
they have common carrier status.. as far as i am concerned websites should have it too as they don't discriminate on who can view it.. (if they do then they lose that status)
you have to watch out about having double standards
personaly i like redirecting ports on my computer to other hosts.. some of them hard set others randomly. it makes things intresting when some one scans it
Re:Unfounded Criticism
on
iPods at War
·
· Score: 1
if you also note that i didn't insult you nore do i like being insulted.
i was pointing to the gulf war.. that was the other bush's war..
the "War on Terror" is fictitious at best as there is no real target and will never end and until it does end you can't pull stats for it as they will normalize over time..
if you lack the basic ability to realize you can't reasonbly stat something that hasn't ended then you need not insult people for making a simple comment.
Re:Unfounded Criticism
on
iPods at War
·
· Score: 1
"trying to enjoy what may be the last months of his or her life"
you have to watch out with that comment.. as more active duty soilders die durring peace time than war do to things like drunk driving and the so forth..
take at look at the stats for the gulf war.. beeing at war was safer than being at home..
if you don't have the screen on or the back light you can run for over a day and more if you only run wifi or bluetooth...
i have a dell axim x30 with the extended battery - internal wifi.. i have turned on the wifi and logged into aim and forgot.. it went to sleep (cut the screen off) but it kept the wifi going.. came back to it a day later and the battery was at around 30-40
if you design something to last you can pull it off..
i got mine when i was 15.. but then again i was working 40 hours a week and paid my own bill.. my parents objected but because i was paying for it they didnt' say anything
personaly i every time i read anything he writes i have this odd feeling that if he was infront of me i would bash his head in with my monitor... it isn't because of violent games... it is because i hate assholes
"me with a copy of Bully so that I and others can analyze "
Assumeing that A means one.. did he just publicly emit that he plans on comitting copyright violation by either making copies and passing them out OR conducting a public preformace of a copyrighted work.
I agree the should and may do that but with putting 4 die on one chip unless they can shrink it alot i don't know how many they will get per wafer and the chances of one core having issues is much higher and will cause lower yeild - sure it will get better as time goes on but the yeild issues are sure too effect price marks for the 4 core cpu's that are made with out issues
2 years isn't that long of a time compared to SCSI drives - life span is important, sure SATA drives are cheep compared to SCSI and can be replaced more often but do you account for the man hours and/or loss of production do too having to replace drives at the end of their life cycle.
give SATA 5-6 years being stable in the market and i am sure that they will evolve and take over - i like the ideas that drive SATA but it has not yet proven it's self over SCSI yet, so when required to put something into production that needs max reliability people still use SCSI and they will.
I think intel's approche is has advantages over AMD's while AMD will have all the cores talk and use a nice cache space being on a single die - intel is going to attach two dies to one pice meaning they will more than likly have a lower defect rate in quad core cpu's as they don't have the compounding effect of having one core/die bad and throw away a good one.. I am willing to bet that AMD is going to have yeild issues with this method.. and while preformace will be better the cost will be higher do to the yeild issues.. although i wish them the best of luck
it is limited to the number of physical cpu's not cores or thread paths..
this is why you can have say dual p4 xeon's with HT enabled and XP will show 4 thread paths but you are not violating license - that and XP really doesn't care.. as it has no idea.. and isn't hard coded to die
Back in the day the number of CPU's ment the number of threads that could be proccessed meaning the amount of work that could be done.. In essence One nice 4 CPU server could do the work of 4 smaller severs, software writers realized that if the licensed it per computer that large companies would buy once license and run it on a big box and not on several smaller boxes and get the same work done but with the software company not getting as much money.. so they made it so that you have do pay per cpu OR pay a whole lot for one server no matter the number of cpu's
and you question about RAM- somethings do have it but it is more in how much can be stored - for example the only real diffrence between exchange 2000 ent and standard editions was thathte standard had a limit on the size the store could be and how much memory it would use for caching..
not true.. SCSI is still alive an working and will continue for along time..
SATA is just starting out and will have may years ahead of it - but it will have to prove it's self
there hasn't been a worth wile SATA disk on the market long enough to prove the reliability of them above scsi.
on top SATA lacks alot of the higher end functions that SCSI offers.. this is why for large amounts of storage via SATA to data centers you will see the SATA drives in a box that is then connected to the servers via iSCSI and fiber chanel.
sure for the desktop/workstation/small server market yes scsi is going away but when you use the true abilitys of what makes SCSI great SATA drives have a long way to go.
Slashdot Mirror
you have to watch with that... why isn't the phone company an accesory do every drug deal made or arranged over the phone..
they have common carrier status.. as far as i am concerned websites should have it too as they don't discriminate on who can view it.. (if they do then they lose that status)
you have to watch out about having double standards
to be honest.. at work.. i don't care.. at home i mind..
if they are only doing this for government we can assume that the people using it are at work there for he has a good argument..
you translation isn't justified with this story
personaly i like redirecting ports on my computer to other hosts.. some of them hard set others randomly. it makes things intresting when some one scans it
if you also note that i didn't insult you nore do i like being insulted.
i was pointing to the gulf war.. that was the other bush's war..
the "War on Terror" is fictitious at best as there is no real target and will never end and until it does end you can't pull stats for it as they will normalize over time..
if you lack the basic ability to realize you can't reasonbly stat something that hasn't ended then you need not insult people for making a simple comment.
"trying to enjoy what may be the last months of his or her life"
you have to watch out with that comment.. as more active duty soilders die durring peace time than war do to things like drunk driving and the so forth..
take at look at the stats for the gulf war.. beeing at war was safer than being at home..
i would.. for a chance at being on mars - i would go one way.. and being the first to go would just be an added bonus..
anything to get off this planet...
you are thinking of sitting there and using it..
.. i have turned on the wifi and logged into aim and forgot.. it went to sleep (cut the screen off) but it kept the wifi going.. came back to it a day later and the battery was at around 30-40
if you don't have the screen on or the back light you can run for over a day and more if you only run wifi or bluetooth...
i have a dell axim x30 with the extended battery - internal wifi
if you design something to last you can pull it off..
the thing is it can be used in reactors .. jsut not the normal.. breader reactors or pebbel reactors will work with it
what i ment was they objected (obviously saying something) but did not stop me as i was the one paying..
sometimes things sound better in your head than when typed (make that most things)
i got mine when i was 15.. but then again i was working 40 hours a week and paid my own bill.. my parents objected but because i was paying for it they didnt' say anything
you can always add driver support into the 2k install cd.. it isn't that hard
if you have ram do what you do for a live cd.. disable page file.
yes but to software .. you can't tell the diffrence unless you are tring too. and before HT .. there was no need to
no where did i see him request such a licence.. it was only a request for a copy of the game
personaly i every time i read anything he writes i have this odd feeling that if he was infront of me i would bash his head in with my monitor... it isn't because of violent games... it is because i hate assholes
they way it sounds to me is that take two should take him to court for threating them
"me with a copy of Bully so that I and others can analyze "
Assumeing that A means one.. did he just publicly emit that he plans on comitting copyright violation by either making copies and passing them out OR conducting a public preformace of a copyrighted work.
me things someone needs to send him a nasty gram
I agree the should and may do that but with putting 4 die on one chip unless they can shrink it alot i don't know how many they will get per wafer and the chances of one core having issues is much higher and will cause lower yeild - sure it will get better as time goes on but the yeild issues are sure too effect price marks for the 4 core cpu's that are made with out issues
thank you... someone understands what i am trying to point out..
manhour costs are far higher than drive costs
my mom used to kick my ass on the NES..
"That's over 2 years old"
2 years isn't that long of a time compared to SCSI drives - life span is important, sure SATA drives are cheep compared to SCSI and can be replaced more often but do you account for the man hours and/or loss of production do too having to replace drives at the end of their life cycle.
give SATA 5-6 years being stable in the market and i am sure that they will evolve and take over - i like the ideas that drive SATA but it has not yet proven it's self over SCSI yet, so when required to put something into production that needs max reliability people still use SCSI and they will.
I think intel's approche is has advantages over AMD's while AMD will have all the cores talk and use a nice cache space being on a single die - intel is going to attach two dies to one pice meaning they will more than likly have a lower defect rate in quad core cpu's as they don't have the compounding effect of having one core/die bad and throw away a good one.. I am willing to bet that AMD is going to have yeild issues with this method.. and while preformace will be better the cost will be higher do to the yeild issues.. although i wish them the best of luck
it is limited to the number of physical cpu's not cores or thread paths..
this is why you can have say dual p4 xeon's with HT enabled and XP will show 4 thread paths but you are not violating license - that and XP really doesn't care.. as it has no idea.. and isn't hard coded to die
Back in the day the number of CPU's ment the number of threads that could be proccessed meaning the amount of work that could be done.. In essence One nice 4 CPU server could do the work of 4 smaller severs, software writers realized that if the licensed it per computer that large companies would buy once license and run it on a big box and not on several smaller boxes and get the same work done but with the software company not getting as much money.. so they made it so that you have do pay per cpu OR pay a whole lot for one server no matter the number of cpu's
and you question about RAM- somethings do have it but it is more in how much can be stored - for example the only real diffrence between exchange 2000 ent and standard editions was thathte standard had a limit on the size the store could be and how much memory it would use for caching..
not true.. SCSI is still alive an working and will continue for along time..
SATA is just starting out and will have may years ahead of it - but it will have to prove it's self
there hasn't been a worth wile SATA disk on the market long enough to prove the reliability of them above scsi.
on top SATA lacks alot of the higher end functions that SCSI offers.. this is why for large amounts of storage via SATA to data centers you will see the SATA drives in a box that is then connected to the servers via iSCSI and fiber chanel.
sure for the desktop/workstation/small server market yes scsi is going away but when you use the true abilitys of what makes SCSI great SATA drives have a long way to go.