You are authorised to log into the computer using the account(s) you have been issued. You are not authorised to log in using a password belonging to the CEO or the janitor.
The use of any other credentials is not authorised and so be prepared for a discussion with police, Feds or some sort of spook if you do.
Psychopaths and sociopaths are not the same thing. FB falls into the latter group.
A psychopath gets pleasure from causing you pain - physical, emotional, financial or whatever.
A sociopath just does not give a s%&t what happens to you as long as they get what they want. They do not get pleasure from hurting you but they are not worried by it and are ready for that at any time.
FB does not specifically intend to spread your privacy from here to Antarctica but, if they can increase their bottom line by doing so, they don't seem to have a problem with it.
Organisations who feel it is their specific task to destroy your privacy and feel satisfaction for having done so even when it of no specific benefit to them better fit the "psycho" description. They also exist.
Perhaps you are referring to "Project Fear" which is when every time someone gave out information that the Brexiters didn't like they pretended it was just a scare tactic.
Now we have been blocked from our, and our childrens, future prosperity by 37.4% of the electorate. If someone tried to declare a strike based on this ballot, they would be in court fast!
No. What meany older people in southern Britain wanted to stop people with brown skin fleeing here. Trashing the economy seemed like a good way of removing the incentive.
They are a nation after all.
We will probably not remain so. The SNP has already said that another separation referendum is appropriate. Since the EU was one of the winning factors last time, I am not confident. Will Wales and Ulster ignore this?
There may well be an obesity "epidemic" but until they start to classify an adult with a BMI of 18 as "morbidly thin", I will not see some identifications of "morbidly obese" as anything than a fashion statement.
As far as he is concerned, anything that he does not get a cut of is not fair.
He is displaying what is called a "sense of entitlement". Apparently, this is a psychological disorder commonly found in extreme conservatives and other sociopaths.
That said, I have never used an illegal substance in my life, have never smoked (probably the reason for the first statement) and probably haven't been drunk and legless since I was a student,
If my employer, a hospital, thought that I had been abusing, I would let them test me only if they signed an undertaking to make a substantial charity donation on my coming up clean. If they think that I have broken the law, they should tell the police.
If I showed up under the influence(s), the police should be involved. If someone is tested and fail, HR can deal with it after the courts.
Enjoy your surveillance state and complete lack of privacy in the UK.
I take it you have disbanded the NSA, FBI abd every other criminal TLA in your country?
People in most of the EU, even in the US/corporate friendly UK, have more privacy than you. They all would appear to have better internet privacy than you.
There is a difference between whining and boasting...
is the sole reason why I'm voting for the UK to leave the EU!
(Just joking, probably...)
And its another reason why I'm voting to stay....
A governmental organisation that it not, by default, automatically on the side of the seller instead of the consumer? Great! This, of course is why the most right wing, big money, parasites are keen to get us out so that we can head downhill to what people in the US have to put up with.
Emojis (? Emojii ?) and emoticons are two distinct things.
Emoticons are the simpler to use option and emojii cost more to use on some contracts. Some systems will try and substitute an emoji for an emoticon. YPYMATYC
you've still got the USSR, China, Cambodia, etc...
Other than the words of lying politicians and their friends, there is little evidence that the USSR was, or China is left wing. I don't think that Cambodia really demonstrated communism either, just how to kill lots of people you don't like. That is pretty much a conservative idea.
Whatever you may call them, they are all pretty extreme regressive societies - regressive being the opposite of progressive. People in the west who call themselves "conservatives" are usually no such thing. They want to do away with the veneers of civilization that stop the strong harming the weak, Thatis the opposite of progressive,,i.e. regressive.
Slashdot Mirror
More people voted to leave than to stay. How is that not democratic?
Because 37.4% of the electorate voted for Brexit and 62.5% didn't but we seem to be doing it anyway.
You are authorised to log into the computer using the account(s) you have been issued. You are not authorised to log in using a password belonging to the CEO or the janitor. The use of any other credentials is not authorised and so be prepared for a discussion with police, Feds or some sort of spook if you do.
No, because you're not sharing your password.
...basically you're shouting at psychopaths...
Psychopaths and sociopaths are not the same thing. FB falls into the latter group.
A psychopath gets pleasure from causing you pain - physical, emotional, financial or whatever.
A sociopath just does not give a s%&t what happens to you as long as they get what they want. They do not get pleasure from hurting you but they are not worried by it and are ready for that at any time.
FB does not specifically intend to spread your privacy from here to Antarctica but, if they can increase their bottom line by doing so, they don't seem to have a problem with it.
Organisations who feel it is their specific task to destroy your privacy and feel satisfaction for having done so even when it of no specific benefit to them better fit the "psycho" description. They also exist.
Have you heard of "Shorting"? Bankers will be making a pile on this self inflicted financial screwup.
There's no legal reason to overturn it or attempt to overturn it...
There is nothing to overturn. The vote is purely an advisory - an opinion poll only.
The Bremain campaign wasn't any better...
Perhaps you are referring to "Project Fear" which is when every time someone gave out information that the Brexiters didn't like they pretended it was just a scare tactic.
Now we have been blocked from our, and our childrens, future prosperity by 37.4% of the electorate. If someone tried to declare a strike based on this ballot, they would be in court fast!
All the British want is control of their borders
No. What meany older people in southern Britain wanted to stop people with brown skin fleeing here. Trashing the economy seemed like a good way of removing the incentive.
They are a nation after all.
We will probably not remain so. The SNP has already said that another separation referendum is appropriate. Since the EU was one of the winning factors last time, I am not confident. Will Wales and Ulster ignore this?
Some banksters wanted a Brexit.
You need a falling market to do a lot of shorting and the faster it falls, the more profitable.
We are allowing 37.4% of people to decide the future for 100% of us.
That is what percentage of our electorate is being allowed to throw our future under the bus.
Not many people sure, but they are very influential. When I can see the ribs and collar bones of models then well, they are seriously unwell.
Also if 18 is morbid, 20 is still pretty unhealthy and there are lots of these.
There may well be an obesity "epidemic" but until they start to classify an adult with a BMI of 18 as "morbidly thin", I will not see some identifications of "morbidly obese" as anything than a fashion statement.
As far as he is concerned, anything that he does not get a cut of is not fair.
He is displaying what is called a "sense of entitlement". Apparently, this is a psychological disorder commonly found in extreme conservatives and other sociopaths.
I thought they used the good old Wampum.
Ahhh... Nostalgia.
#5 Not the same 6 letters followed by an incrementing number .
That said, I have never used an illegal substance in my life, have never smoked (probably the reason for the first statement) and probably haven't been drunk and legless since I was a student,
If my employer, a hospital, thought that I had been abusing, I would let them test me only if they signed an undertaking to make a substantial charity donation on my coming up clean. If they think that I have broken the law, they should tell the police.
If I showed up under the influence(s), the police should be involved. If someone is tested and fail, HR can deal with it after the courts.
That will give them a somewhat limited market. The US population is around 4.5% of humanity.
So much for global domination...
If a user wants or doesn't want to use cookies, then they have already instructed their browser to take the appropriate action
That is true for people here but you should talk to some users sometimes...
Enjoy your surveillance state and complete lack of privacy in the UK.
I take it you have disbanded the NSA, FBI abd every other criminal TLA in your country?
People in most of the EU, even in the US/corporate friendly UK, have more privacy than you. They all would appear to have better internet privacy than you.
There is a difference between whining and boasting...
Seriously, do i have to comply when i operate in the u.s?
Only if you want our money. If you have enough traffic, you are at liberty to geofence to your hearts content.
is the sole reason why I'm voting for the UK to leave the EU!
(Just joking, probably...)
And its another reason why I'm voting to stay....
A governmental organisation that it not, by default, automatically on the side of the seller instead of the consumer? Great! This, of course is why the most right wing, big money, parasites are keen to get us out so that we can head downhill to what people in the US have to put up with.
Emojis (? Emojii ?) and emoticons are two distinct things.
Emoticons are the simpler to use option and emojii cost more to use on some contracts. Some systems will try and substitute an emoji for an emoticon. YPYMATYC
you've still got the USSR, China, Cambodia, etc...
Other than the words of lying politicians and their friends, there is little evidence that the USSR was, or China is left wing. I don't think that Cambodia really demonstrated communism either, just how to kill lots of people you don't like. That is pretty much a conservative idea.
Whatever you may call them, they are all pretty extreme regressive societies - regressive being the opposite of progressive. People in the west who call themselves "conservatives" are usually no such thing. They want to do away with the veneers of civilization that stop the strong harming the weak, Thatis the opposite of progressive,,i.e. regressive.
This will discourage normal IT nosiness. This will make sure that more with such pictures get away without being detected.
Is that the intended consequence?
The NRO has come out as criminal like the rest of the US alphabet soup.
What is even remotely surprising about them being criminals like the CIA, NSA, and every other TLA you can think of?
Impressive that this rather cool badge actually admits it though...