Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Now Runs On 300M Active Devices; Upgrade To Cost $119 After July 29

On Thursday (May 5), Microsoft announced that Windows 10 is now running on 300 million active devices, up from 270 million monthly active devices as of March 30. The feat comes nine months after Microsoft released Windows 10, the latest version of its desktop operating system, after offering it for months to developers. The company also announced today that Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 (as well as Windows 8) users with a valid license wouldn't be eligible for the free upgrade starting July 29. After July 29th, Microsoft says, users will be able to continue to get Windows 10 on a new device, or purchase a full version of Windows 10 Home for $119.

Windows 10 offers a range of interesting features including virtual digital assistant Cortana. While these features and a substantial boost to performance and speeds could be a big reason for the fast adoption of Windows 10, it's also no secret that Microsoft continues to push Windows 10 update to computers ... sometimes even when users don't want that.

192 comments

  1. After the 29 will the simi forced updates come wit by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    After the 29 will the simi forced updates come with a bill? Stop working and say you needed to pay after updating and the time to go back is over as well.

  2. The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by thebes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They damn well better issue a patch to remove all the nagware then. Yes I know it can be disabled, but it shouldn't be there to begin with.

    1. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely. Logging into Outlook.com these days tends to result in full-screen ads being displayed, if you aren't blocking them.

      Really, you didn't think the same people who were selling Windows 8 to people a few months earlier were going to give something away for free, right?

    2. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      They damn well better issue a patch to remove all the nagware then

      Here's a datapoint: I did not qualify for an upgrade so had to pay full price for Win10. It nags me about Office 365 all the time. I don't want to rent software, and have no need for that software, but it keeps doing it.

      I wouldn't hold my breath.

    3. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Disable all notifications in Settings > System > Notifications and actions. Disabling all of the notifications removes all of the stupid nags.

    4. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      When I use free software, I expect lousy default settings. When I pay for software, I expect the defaults to be appropriate for reasonable human beings.

      I've never met a reasonable human being, perhaps by definition, who wanted to pay money for ads and nagware.

    5. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we know that the logic isn't built into the code to stop after July 29th? Anyone set their date after that time to test it? Or maybe it doesn't check the LOCAL time but instead whatever time Microsoft says it is.

    6. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disable all notifications in Settings > System > Notifications and actions. Disabling all of the notifications removes all of the stupid nags.

      Until Microsoft helpfully enables them all again for you. Microsoft knows best, of course. Don't worry, soon you'll love Big Brother.

    7. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      There's an app installed by default called "Get Office" that causes these occasional popup notifications that are advertising Office 365.

      You can just delete this app or disable notifications for it in particular (it's also good to know you can control notifications on a per-app basis) and you won't see those "Get Office 365" popup notifications anymore. You certainly don't have to disable *all* notifications, as I actually like them for things like news, mail, etc.

      It's annoying that they make you do this, but not nearly as hard to fix as the GWX thing. Some people have claimed that it comes back after you delete it, but that hasn't been my experience. Sigh... Microsoft is really bound and determined to make sure their users hate their guts with this heavy-handed crap. I completely agree that users shouldn't have to do this to make their system usable.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never met a reasonable human being, perhaps by definition, who wanted to pay money for ads and nagware.

      People pay for cable TV.
      People buy ad-supported Kindles all the time.

      I'm sure there are other examples.

    9. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Software you've paid for shouldn't have any ads at all. This is outrageous

    10. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, we can hope. If they do that I'm pretty sure APK can teach us how to fix our HOSTS file so that it pulls the time from your *own* server.

    11. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the next forced update and forced reboot reverts your changes and/or ads more nags/advertisements.

      Best bet is to forget about Windows 10 altogether. The entire OS is one big marketing platform that prevents the user from controlling his/her own machines.

    12. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead, shoot the messenger. Only now you don't get useful or critical notifications either.

    13. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It nags me about Office 365 all the time.

      Unpin the Get Office365 program from the start menu and under System > Notifications, disable the notifications from the app.

      This is not a Windows 10 issue. Every computer I've bought for the last 10 years comes with this "feature". The only thing new is the notification pane and the sound it makes when the notification pops up.

    14. Re: The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remove it and stop fucking whining. Jesus.

  3. Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we will finally be able to stop worrying about Windows 10 installing itself unwanted?

  4. Fast Adoption? EH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean FORCED adoption. Microsoft doesn't give you much of a choice. It's either 'Stick with what you have, but we ain't supporting it anymore' or 'Get the new operating system.'

  5. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I personally doubt that Microsoft will actually follow through with that, which would obviously stipulate an end to the forced 10 upgrades. Since when has Microsoft been known to stop doing something incredibly annoying once they start?

  6. no wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they're pushing windows 10 so fucking hard right now... NOBODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND would actually pay $119 for this shit after july.

    hell, even free it's been so tough a sale they've had to resort to using malware-like deceptive windows, and forced installs when you still decipher them properly.

    1. Re:no wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody in their right mind would download it for free!

      Windows 10 still phones home regularly, sending who-knows-what data about you and your documents to Microsoft. Because Microsoft refuses to discuss exactly what data is being transmitted, and because the packets going back to the mother ship are encrypted so we can't look at them for ourselves, the only safe assumption is that your private data, every keystroke you type, and the contents of your files are being vacuumed up to feed the NSA machine.

      Microsoft could end the speculation very easily by offering an option to transmit telemetry data in the clear, so people could examine what's being sent. If it's truly innocuous statistics, like "User 1659028 ran NOTEPAD.EXE," they shouldn't have any problem doing that. If, instead, the packets are more like "User 1659028 ran NOTEPAD.EXE to open file \\corpsan\trade_secrets\CocaColaRecipe.txt whose contents are..." then I can see why Microsoft wants the packets to stay encrypted. They don't want anyone knowing what's being collected and that's the part that's deeply troubling.

    2. Re: no wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would rather have Windows upload your personal information unencrypted?

    3. Re: no wonder by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      I would rather have my OS not upload any of my data at all. That's why I won't ever use Windows 10.

  7. Why is there a donut hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "users with a valid license wouldn't be eligible for the free upgrade starting June 29. After July 29th, Microsoft says, users will be able to continue to get Windows 10 on a new device, or purchase a full version of Windows 10 Home for $119. "

    What are users supposed to do between June 29th and July 29th? Maybe they could spend their time proofreading shitty slashdot submissions

    1. Re:Why is there a donut hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the submitter just made up the June 29th deadline. There's no mention of that date on any of the linked pages listed in the summary. All say that July 29th is the cutoff for the free upgrade.

    2. Re:Why is there a donut hole by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      Forced downgrade to Windows Me. By July 29th, these users will pay $238 to "Please God, stop the pain"

    3. Re:Why is there a donut hole by msmash · · Score: 1

      My bad, folks. It's indeed July 29. Thanks for pointing it out -- have fixed it.

  8. Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean the sneaky and unwanted upgrading of Windows 7 and 8 systems will stop on that date?

  9. $119 for Spyware? Where do I sign up???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSy5mEcmgwU

  10. In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft has removed the capability of even system administrators to block/remove the Windows App store in Windows 10, even in the Pro version. Whereas previously it was possible to use registry edits or GPO to remove/block the app store and other forced start menu tiles in Windows 10, a recent Microsoft update has eliminated that capability and re-enabled these features.

    Some smart people said; just block the update. But, that's not an option in Windows 10 either. With this new "feature" the only way to prevent users access to teh app store and the willy nilly installation of apps is to use teh MUCH more expensive Enterprise version of Windows 10.

    1. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you use DNS to block the store?

    2. Re:In Other News... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why the fuck would you remove an app store?

      In a controlled computing environment, system administrators don't allow unauthorized software to run on the network without being tested first. An app store would be a huge security risk if users were able to download and install their own software.

    3. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "System Administrators" would imply THEY own the machine not the users. As such, it's well within their right to remove unwanted software from the system.

      Also, the app store is a potential infection vector for malware (even the Apple App Store is not immune to that risk, although Google Play is more likely), it could also be used to install tools that could allow bypassing controls / restrictions put in place on the system by the admins. (Oh, great Bob's watching a movie again instead of doing his damn job, Grandma Lily installed an app that changed the default program for web browsing so now she can't use "the Twitter", or Sally is installing a network sniffer.) So there is a reason to prohibit or remove applications from the system that could be a source of future problems. (Users really are idiots sometimes.)

    4. Re:In Other News... by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Informative

      I hate these fucking system administrators removing anything they please. Fuck them. Why the fuck would you remove an app store? Are you fucking nuts? Better hand out fucking chromebooks to users if you do not want them to be able to use their laptops.

      The Windows Store has been plagued with malware for years now: http://www.howtogeek.com/19499...

      A sysadmin would be a lunatic to let anybody on his network into the WinStore!

    5. Re:In Other News... by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      Agreed... and in that case of a said controlled network environment, they should probably be running Windows Enterprise Edition anyway.

    6. Re:In Other News... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I bet that at the same time as you have this opinion, you also blame parents whose kids buy SmurfBerries for their games. Through an app store.

      Maybe, just MAYBE, parents would like a way to keep little Timmy from installing every single game from the app store onto the computer? Or should kids just be kept away from computers until they're 18 now?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:In Other News... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as the telemetry - it bypasses even the HOSTS file.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    8. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's against the point, which is a valid one. In case you're wondering however, you can disable the app store (and edge) by disabling UAC/LUA. They simply refuse to run if LUA is off.

    9. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it use the IP numbers recorded internally?

    10. Re:In Other News... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      That's not "Malware". That's just useless overpriced shitware.

      The whole point of the Windows Store is to sandbox applications from acting as malware. An IT Manager should prefer them finding shitware that is sandboxed than shitware on Downloads.com that probably actually does have viruses.

      Also that story is 2 years old. Thankfully Microsoft purged the store of shitware ages ago.

    11. Re:In Other News... by chiefmojorising · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I *want* an app store?

    12. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a business environment, the user shouldn't be installing anything on a work computer. What self-entitled kind of twat are you to think otherwise.

    13. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they should be running Linux.

      Microsoft must be destroyed; the assets seized, the employees executed and their heads placed on pikes (as a warning to Apple and Google), and the buildings razed leaving no stone atop a stone.

      I know, I know... never happen. I can dream, damn it.

    14. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    15. Re:In Other News... by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      Ideally users should be able to install and make use of any tool that allows them to achieve their goals without causing problems for the organization. We happen to live in an environment that requires more caution than that due to immature systems (systems that are insecure and have brittle dependencies), but the ideal is not self-entitled, it's efficient and optimal.

    16. Re:In Other News... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone sane WANT the app store? If someone is that dumb they can just re-enable it.

    17. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same kind of self-entitled twat that goes to work to do his bills, chat on the phone, and bang his secretary. The kind that believes that what is in their immediate vicinity is under only THEIR control. And rightly so, because (as they well know) the Universe orbits a small point located approximately 4 inches inside of their skull.

    18. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still disable it just like you could in windows 8 - With A GPO.

      For some reason they removed that template from the win10 ADMX template package but if you apply the GPO from the windows 8.1 package it works. The associated registry key, added manually, also works just fine.

      The real reason for the confusion is that there is a new version of windows - LTSB. It's win10 without the app store, smart screen, or any of the "new windows experience" environment at all. It's pretty much an evolved version of 7.

      It's also on a different code branch than the mainline 10 and is intended not to change as much. It won't get new features and enhancements at the same rate. I've got a feeling most business large enough to have a volume license will adopt this version.

      http://windowsitpro.com/windows-10/understanding-long-term-servicing-branch-and-current-branch-windows-10

      Microsoft probably wants to keep windows consistent across versions in it's main branch (That means app store and everything) - But it finally got the message from it's large customers when win8 adoption in the enterprise never topped 8%

      Business customer not large enough for volume licensing? Tough shit. You don't give Microsoft enough money for them to care.

    19. Re:In Other News... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as the telemetry - it bypasses even the HOSTS file.

      DNS based filtering currently works great. While I wouldn't put it past them to override DNS settings, use IP literals or eventually brick your system if "telemetry" transmission is interfered with... so far it is by far the easiest method especially if you have multiple windows systems on your network. It only requires minimal effort in creating a few fake zone files.

      However this is all ultimately a lost cause. I don't trust MS anymore and no amount of technical workarounds will change that. The best way to bypass telemetry really is to stop using Windows.

    20. Re:In Other News... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has removed the capability of even system administrators to block/remove the Windows App store in Windows 10, even in the Pro version. Whereas previously it was possible to use registry edits or GPO to remove/block the app store and other forced start menu tiles in Windows 10, a recent Microsoft update has eliminated that capability and re-enabled these features.

      the store is installed on my win10 pc, but the store icon is not on my start menu, or task bar, or otherwise visible unless I go looking for it. So its there, but its hardly an issue.

      I don't think I'd personally want to remove the app store... because I do use exactly one app... Netflix.

      But sure I can see businesses potentially wanting it removed... it sounds like for now this works:

        crack open PowerShell and run Get-AppxPackage â*windowsstore*â | Remove-AppxPackage

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

      But I wonder what Microsoft is thinking here. If the business is large enough to put its users on Active Directory to get policy management, its large enough that it doesn't want its users playing angry birds and solitaire.

    21. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ideally users should be able to install and make use of any tool that allows them to achieve their goals without causing problems for the organization.

      In most industries employees must use the tools provided and request additional tools as they are needed. In organizations that deal with personal data it is required by law.

      If you want to give your employees a warm fuzzy feeling you can set up an isolated BYO network and let them "achieve their goals" on their own.

    22. Re:In Other News... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Good lord, if allowed, half my users would determine that their goals involve reading facebook.

    23. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of these system administrators have also been asked by upper management to prevent employees from using business equipment for personal use. A lot of companies expect their employees to use their computer for official business only and not for personal use such as logging into their personal Facebook account while on company time. This is why a lot of administrators have removed the games from previous versions of Windows since a business doesn't want their employees to spend all day on a business system playing solitare. There is also the concern that they can open up security holes or that the software they install will need an update but the employee who downloaded this software will not patch the software leaving their system vulnerable and since they don't know this employee has this vulnerable software on their system, this could lead to someone breaking into their system.

  11. you ain't see nuttin' yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait till they start rolling out the lights-out update to all the "discontinued" OSes.

    1. Re:you ain't see nuttin' yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You mean the one that cuts the running speed in half?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:you ain't see nuttin' yet by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      They can try. I disabled the Windows Update service (Windows 7) and related files.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  12. Incorrect summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The summary states the free eligibility ends on June 29th, but the articale says July 29th. I'm pretty sure the Microsoft blog's date is correct - i.e. July 29th.

  13. For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It will be free because Microsoft's sleazy, malware-like tactics have convinced me that a move to Linux is in my future. And that upgrade will be free.

    .
    At this point, I cannot see myself relying upon Microsoft when Microsoft has shown me that it is unworthy of my trust.

  14. Click here... by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Click here to install now.

    Click there to install 5 minutes from now.

    Force the window closed to install anyway.

    Hold the ACPI power button down to force the power off, and install when you reboot.

    Pull the power cable to see this dialog again.

  15. Windows 10 offers a range of interesting features by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Forced updates and unpredictable that can brick your computer, extensive data harvesting of you and your family, possible subscription fee in the future ...

    Yes, quite an interesting range of "features"

  16. Thank you for upgrading by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Congratulations, your computer has been upgraded! Please find the invoice for your upgrade in your Documents folder. You may enter a credit card number now, or wait until your free evaluation is completed. Thank you for using Microsoft!

    *You may revert to your previous windows for 30 days. After the 30 day free evaluation is completed, your old system files will be deleted and you will be required to enter your credit card number to continuous using your machine.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  17. change your credit card #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    June 30th they will charge the CC in your MS account to push the upgrade to you because you know you really wanted it

    1. Re:change your credit card #'s by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      That was your first mistake, giving Microsoft your CC number...

    2. Re:change your credit card #'s by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 1

      Who needs to give them anything?

  18. On July 30th... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    On July 30th, you just know that there's going to be some goober out there who tries to upgrade, gets hit with the fee, and then bitches up and down because he thought that his computer was going to update automatically and he shouldn't have to pay the upgrade fee.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:On July 30th... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can rest assured that, starting tomorrow, there will be a new nag screen reminding everyone of exactly how long it is until its no longer free. The same nag screen will let you schedule an upgrade any time between now and 30 seconds from now. Clicking cancel or remind me later will bring back the nag screen in 30 minutes. At the start of July, it will go from one nag screen per nag event, to two. You will have to cancel twice before getting back to your desktop, and a week later it will go to 3 and so on.

      By the time July 28th rolls around, users will basically either let it upgrade, or spend two solid days clicking "not now" so there will be no practical way to make the claim that they werent aware of the lapse of the free offer.

  19. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a good point.

    After July 29, involuntary automatic upgrades to Windows 10 will include automatically searching the user's data (local or cloud-based) for credit card numbers or other financial accounts to bill for the upgrade. Expect a Windows Update KB patch in July to implement this additional feature in the GWX subsystem.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  20. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    What do you mean by "possible"? Also, if anyone believes that 10 is the last one they'll ever release .... hahahahaha!

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  21. obligatory by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    No way. A grand, minimum, or I'm staying on 7.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  22. Repeat cycle by Lose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The forced upgrade cycle gave the usual OEM's ample time to roll out Windows 10 devices and most consumers will simply move to Windows 10 by way of failed or slow computer forcing their hand to upgrade that way. By that momentum alone Windows 10 adoption will continue to rise steadily.

    Windows 7 will continue on as the new Windows XP in the professional space and we'll all repeat the painful process of resisting unwanted change for the next ten years.

    1. Re:Repeat cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we won't.

      We're tired of this shit.

      Alternative OS here we come.

  23. Upgrade To Cost $119 After July 29? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    orly? my upgrade from Win7 to Debian will cost exactly $0.

    1. Re:Upgrade To Cost $119 After July 29? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would cost me a lot more than $0 if I found myself stuck on Debian, and no longer able to run mainstream software.

    2. Re:Upgrade To Cost $119 After July 29? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which mainstream software do you need to run?

  24. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

    That was the first thing I wondered to. Will I finally have some PEACE AND QUIET after July 29th without having to use GWX Control Panel?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  25. $119 to upgrade by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much it costs to get them to stop bothering me about upgrading?

    1. Re:$119 to upgrade by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you upgrade now, it's FREE. After June 29th, it will be $119.

  26. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    extensive data harvesting of you and your family

    Your smartphones are already doing that anyway, sucker. They have telemetry out the wazoo.

    And Google is in a far better position to correlate user data than M$ is since they have a near monopoly on search and free email.

  27. my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't allow most users to upgrade. If they allowed more people to upgrade, it seems like support would be easier. Instead, they only allow a few editions of 7 and 8 to upgrade.

    1. Re:my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. They don't want people to upgrade which is why they so severely limited it.

    2. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Is it Opposite Day. They WANT everyone on win10

    3. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Is it Opposite Day. They WANT everyone on win10

      If that was true, why do they not allow Enterprise Edition to upgrade? Why do they not allow any but two previous versions of Windows to upgrade? They've proven they don't want people to upgrade. They're embarrassed by 10 and are trying to limit the number of people that will think negative about them after the bad experience of using it. That is why they're blocking over 90% of the editions/version combinations of Windows from upgrading.

    4. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbass, if they wanted people to upgrade,, why aren't they allowing us to upgrade? I have nine Windows machines in my household, and Mucrosoft doesn't allow a single one to upgrade to 10. They don't want people to run 10. They don't even allow you to upgrade to it if you pay.

    5. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be new here...

    6. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Is it Opposite Day. They WANT everyone on win10

      That's BS, and you know it. Microsoft is ashamed of 10 so they're trying to bury it. I manage nearly 400 computers at work, and a few months ago when we needed a machine running 10 to test on, I found-out that Microsoft is so ashamed of 10 that they don't allow any of the versions/editions of Windows that we have to upgrade to 10. They're ashamed of it. That's why they don't want people to use it. That is why they're blocking upgrades.

    7. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they wanted is to upgrade, they wouldn't require us to upgrade to 7 or 8 first. Also, they wouldn't limit the editions allowed to upgrade.

    8. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they wanted is to upgrade, they wouldn't require us to upgrade to 7 or 8 first. Also, they wouldn't limit the editions allowed to upgrade.

      Not allowing the good editions of Windows to upgrade is pretty slimy. We paid the most for a copy of Windows, so we should have gotten 10 first. Instead, Microsoft doesn't allow us to upgrade. I have six Windows machines between my wife and three kids. Not a one is upgradable to 10. Microsoft has decided that they don't want people running 10.

    9. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you guys just fucking morons? They're giving away free upgrades. Just because you can't get a free upgrade path directly from some OS greater than 15 years old doesn't mean they don't want you running win 10.

    10. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL
      "Microsoft is putting upgrade prompts on my copy of Windows! M$ BAD"
      "Microsoft isn't allowing me to upgrade on my copy of Windows! M$ BAD"

      Stay predictable, Slashdot

    11. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No theyre just customers that bought overpriced editions of w7/8/...

    12. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll Much?

    13. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're complaining no free upgrade on XP machines? Fuck off.

    14. Re: my question is when will they start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you donâ(TM)t mention what version tells us they are Vista, XP, or pirated. You're getting no sympathy here. Stop spamming.

  28. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd almost suggest Microsoft could extract the value by installing Bitcoin mining software on everyone's PC, but there's no way they'd do that without inventing their own proprietary "M$Coin" first.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  29. This is good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the moment I'm saving nothing by not upgrading from Windows 7. From July 29th I'll be saving $119!

  30. My prediction for Win10's growth after July 29 by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    It will stop.

  31. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    Of course Windows 10 will be the last version of Windows, in the same way that Mac OS X was the last version of Mac OS.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  32. Yeah, I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-software-update-breaks-windows-7-for-some-users/

    Key quote: "On its support document, Microsoft took the opportunity to market Windows 10." Is it really any wonder that Win10 is running on so many devices, considering Microsoft's "advertising" techniques have graduated from nagging and tricking customers into upgrading to outright breaking their machines and suggesting an upgrade as a fix?

  33. No way by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    I didn't want it when it was free, I definitely wouldn't pay 120 dollars for it.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  34. I Switched by jwymanm · · Score: 1

    From Windows 10 to Linux on everything at home and even at work. I run Windows 7 in a VirtualBox VM at work to handle specific Active Directory tasks only. Touchscreen Dell 23" monitor hooked up to a brand new Skylake system with 4k monitor and another 4k LG TV on the integrated intel and nvidia video cards. Everything works. Striped Samsung 850 ssds with archlinux, btrfs snapshots of root with that cool __current/__snapshot disk layout for easy reverting. All free and just amazing. Synergy even works better between Linux Linux. Running ZFS for 60tb of storage.. multiple VPNs. Soon Mycroft AI on top of it all. Life is good!

    1. Re:I Switched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How'd you manage to get Skylake and 2 x 4k monitors for free? NVIDIA cards too? You a thief?

  35. Not Sure What to Do by Maltheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have serious privacy concerns over Windows 10, but I do run it on my gaming-only box, figuring there isn't too much to harvest anyway. I also have a Win 7 and Win 8.1 machine which I've been reluctant to upgrade because of this. Especially after watching Windows 10 wipe out my privacy settings and restore the defaults.

    That being said, Windows 10 is so much faster at starting up and coming out of sleep and will likely be the only version receiving updates in the future. I would love to upgrade my other boxes for free, but I just can't bring myself to do it.

    1. Re:Not Sure What to Do by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      https://www.oo-software.com/en...

      That, plus telemetry blocking at the firewall level have placated my concerns, personally.

    2. Re:Not Sure What to Do by maugle · · Score: 1

      Hah, one of the URLs is "choice.microsoft.com". That's a lovely bit of doublethink from the people trying to force their software down everyone's throat.

    3. Re:Not Sure What to Do by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Nah, Bollocks

      Do a bare metal backup of your machines. In-place upgrade them to 10. Restore the previous OS.

      Yoy your machine's "fingerprint" is on redmond's database.

      In the future, when you feel like it (or when upgrades to 7 and/or 8.1 cease), you can go again to windows 10.

      Is this hassle worth $119 (or more, if you go pro)? That is for you to tell.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    4. Re:Not Sure What to Do by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I did. Main reason is that I didn't trust the rollback feature (you know the one you can click within 30 days) I did it for all Win7 machines I manage. I do know one or two machines from acquaintances that run Ubuntu, that have a 7 license. I should do those too, just pro-forma, but... Whatever, if they really want Windows back instead of Ubuntu, they can buy new machines. If I hadn't installed Linux, they should have bought new machines any way.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  36. Also in the news... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    In unrelated news, an Apple spokesperson announced that they have to increase prices for their computers come August, citing an expected serious increase in demand for their products.

    Also in the news, in an unparalleled and before unheard union between Linux distributors they all announced that no later than in mid-July they expect their new release to hit the market. Asked what sparked this sudden union of all distributions our reporter was informed that "the time is right, this is going to be the year of Linux on the Desktop. And this time for real".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea and I hope MS implements it. Legality shouldn't be a problem; they can put a clause in their EULA about it. It probably won't fly in the EU so they better block it there, but in the US it won't be a problem.

  38. 'The feat', my ass! by kheldan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Their so-called 'feat' of installing on 300 million devices is on the same list as talking about 300M computers being infected with malware and becoming part of a bot-net! How many of those 300M devices were voluntarily, intentionally installed, and how many of them had it forced on them or snuck in while the owner wasn't looking? Microsoft is nothing but a gigantic scammer.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  39. Great news! by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    This is fantastic news. This will presumably mean they'll stop their asshat nagware campaign, cause they can't have it both ways. If they don't, I bet there will be a sudden spike in popcorn sales as people sit back to watch the fireworks.

    1. Re:Great news! by JeffOwl · · Score: 2

      This is fantastic news. This will presumably mean they'll stop their asshat nagware campaign, cause they can't have it both ways. If they don't, I bet there will be a sudden spike in popcorn sales as people sit back to watch the fireworks.

      I think you give them too much credit. The nagware will continue but it will not update automatically. Or maybe it will. I would hope that they are not this evil, but... It could update automatically and then at the EULA screen give you the option to pay. If you decline the EULA or don't pay it will then revert back to 7 or 8. Rinse repeat every month or so.

    2. Re:Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even better--just log you off/shutdown if you decline the eula/key purchase

    3. Re:Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my guess, too.

    4. Re:Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are still giving them too much credit. Getting you to install W10 will always be a higher priority over getting you to pay for W10. This is just a pitch to get a "last minute" boost in installs before they quietly never mention charging for upgrades again.

  40. Huh? Story Title Is Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upgrade To Cost $119 After July 29

    The upgrade is free - before, during and after July 29.

  41. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like they need any more ways to slow Windows down. they do a fine enough job of that already with all the spying and data collecting and updates that tie up a computer (and your internet*) for hours at a time.

    * Granted, we don't have the fastest internet here.. 1.5m/512k dsl (for $65).. but when Windows 10 updates, you're fucked. That computer won't browse anything while it's downloading (and at T1 download speed that 4 gigabyte 'update' takes a little while).. and neither will any other PC or device, not even a simple predominantly-text site.. any QOS that might exist in Windows 10 (older Windows wasn't like this) is absolutely and totally broken.

    Makes you want to get into your car and drive into a brick wall, with the hope that your (captcha:) airbag explodes in your face.

  42. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not take a page from Apple? Start looking for all documents, upload them to OneDrive, and automatically delete the one on the local storage without user permission. Once the user has paid the $119 ransom^W upgrade to Windows 10, they can access their files.

  43. I find your faith in Microsoft... disturbing. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    You assumed that when you disabled it, it's really disabled.
    Let's not forget the dodgy Win10 Upgrade disable that didn't quite... disable.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:I find your faith in Microsoft... disturbing. by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      No, no, not a simple "check this checkbox to disable". Blocked the service initialization and removed the related WU files, WU cannot even start now and I do not check for updates anymore as a result.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  44. It's worse than that by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    All Win7 update stops, even though security updates are available.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  45. This might work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they paid me $119 to upgrade. So that I could then uninstall it and destroy every remaining trace of my computer and its hard drive afterwards.

    $119 for nothing - win win for everyone!

  46. This is what they said they'd do last year by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    So, the news is that Microsoft intends to do what they said they would do one year ago. Microsoft keeping their word is indeed news. And the $119 price is only what they want you to pay. NewEgg puts the Home version on sale for $79 often. There is no compelling reason for users to upgrade from the far more bug free Windows 7 and 8.1 (ugly sure, but more bug free), to Windows 10.

  47. Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Posting anon for obvious reasons. The plan internally is to continue to offer it for free indefinitely after the existing period expires. I expect an announcement will come in July about the extension. MS doesn't want Windows 7 to be like XP where people stay on it until they are pried away.

    1. Re:Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about getting Windows 10 for free, period?

      Windows XP user here.

    2. Re:Microsoft employee here by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      What about getting Windows 10 for free, period?

      Windows XP user here.

      There's no plan to offer it for free. No matter what they're going to harvest your personal information, sell it to whomever they want, and use your computer as an advertising billboard.

    3. Re:Microsoft employee here by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Posting anon for obvious reasons. The plan internally is to continue to offer it for free indefinitely after the existing period expires.

      This is what I expected -- in one form or another. It just makes sense given their goals. The only reason to have the free period even "end" was to try and motivate people to upgrade today because it's going to cost something tomorrow.

      I also wouldn't be surprised to see them let the deal end, then reintroduce it a month later for another year "due to the demand/excitement/whatever". That gives them another year of "time is running out".

      BUT, having said all that, I'd also expected the cheap upgrades ($20 iirc) from 7 to 8 to persist indefinitely as well, but they didn't; and I never understood why. Nobody, but nobody, ever would pay $80-$100+ to upgrade from 7 to 8/8.1 so why discontinue the 'deal' price?

    4. Re:Microsoft employee here by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why don't they want people to stay on Windows 7 or 8? Is the reason only to make Microsoft money, or is there an actual possibility that they care about their customers? Sure, Honda wants me to buy a new car every year but I don't give in to their plaintive whines either.

    5. Re:Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing purchase price and properties of the product. This thread is about the Windows 10 purchase price.

    6. Re:Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Honda re-flashes your car every time you get service to have your navigation/infotaiment remind you that there is new model available every time you start the engine.

    7. Re:Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting anon for obvious reasons. The plan internally is to continue to offer it for free indefinitely after the existing period expires. I expect an announcement will come in July about the extension. MS doesn't want Windows 7 to be like XP where people stay on it until they are pried away.

      Thanks. You're cool. Your employer is a malware host. Tell your shitweasel bosses that I'd happily pay $119 - if I could turn off the telemetry and selectively choose which downgrad*cough*upgrades I could accept.

      Until then I'm running Win7 - checking every patch for malware - which gives me four years to migrate to FreeBSD or Linux.

    8. Re:Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they want people to stay on Windows 7 or 8?

      Because AGILE! Evergreen! Nobody needs backwards compatibility because AGILE! EVERGREEN!*

      Is the reason only to make Microsoft money,

      Yes.

      or is there an actual possibility that they care about their customers?

      +6, Hysterically Funny!

      * Note: "Agile" and "Evergreen" are how they say "because fuck the user, that's why" in Redmond. We would also accept "Because some fucking retard in UX decided that after Aero was done and VISUAL ALL YOUR MENU OPTIONS ARE IN CAPS LOCK STUDIO and The Flat Design Totally Not Known As Metro had also run its course, they need to go back to 320x200x256 VGA because wrist computing is the next fad in UX."

  48. Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies... by PingSpike · · Score: 1

    This is a pack of lies. The stink of desperation wafting off of Windows 10 is so strong it would knock a buzzard off a shit wagon. The free offer will be extended...because it was so successful! As an act of good will toward our users! There's no way this nightmare will end after only one year.

  49. Slashdot the Fox News of the tech industry by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 0

    That game streamer didn't have windows 10 installed during the stream he had the Windows 10 TH2 update from october installed during his stream. That means he was deferring upgrades for 6 months and never once bothered to patch his system. Sorry but I fully support Microsoft ensuring that their OS doesn't splinter into 30 different versions that developers have to support. Not to mention avoiding patching known security flaws for 6 months is just a terrible idea on a "regular" workstation.

    And no Windows 10 isn't spying on you. It's been demonstrated numerous times that if you turn off analytics it's not sending home any data. There was one report where a moron saw his network card's repeated DNS requests and went all tin-foil-hat that they were nefarious. Sorry but that's how networking works. It's not an evil scheme to steal your personal info.

    1. Re:Slashdot the Fox News of the tech industry by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why not just permanently defer an update? Not all updates are necessary, and there are indeed updates that negatively impact the computer. Defering a security update may be a bad thing but deferring some shitty Microsoft update saying "here, I fixed a bug in Windows Server 2016 that you don't own, so you have to reboot NOW!", or "I changed the UI again just because I can, so reboot NOW!"

      What about that sneaky advertisement for Windows 10 that was hidden inside a security update for IE? This proves Microsoft can not be trusted.

      As customers our first and only concern is about US. We do not care about Microsoft's needs and it is not our job to help them out. They treat us like shit so why should we care about their own headaches? Wha's wrong with 30 different versions? So they have to hire more developers, big deal. If the customers aren't treated with respect then the customers will leave.

    2. Re:Slashdot the Fox News of the tech industry by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      And no Windows 10 isn't spying on you. It's been demonstrated numerous times that if you turn off analytics it's not sending home any data.

      You can't turn it off. There is no off button.

      https://technet.microsoft.com/...

      There was one report where a moron saw his network card's repeated DNS requests and went all tin-foil-hat that they were nefarious. Sorry but that's how networking works.

      There was one report where Microsoft said they will install a Remote Access Trojan on your computer by default and use it to download whatever data they felt like from you without your KNOWLEDGE or CONSENT.

      https://technet.microsoft.com/...

      But ignore all that... those documents were written by morons and are obviously are not credible.

      It's not an evil scheme to steal your personal info.

      Nag screens, forced updates, telemetry/spyware shit. Microsoft has literally become the Internet malware our friends call and ask us to uninstall from their computers.

  50. Re:For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I humbly submit for your approval Bunsenlabs Linux. A continuation of Crunchbang linux, debian based with Openbox as the WM. Very configurable and screaming fast even on older hardware. If you love rich desktop environments, maybe opt for a Solus-Project install with their own Budgie desktop. If you want pure eye candy, Elementary OS or Deepin might do the trick.

  51. Update vs upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a difference between updating (patching) Windows 10 and upgrading to Windows 10. Your last link implies an upgrade when the user was actually interrupted by an update (patches).

  52. Re:Fast Adoption? EH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which is the same as every OS release... ever?

  53. Why put up with this? by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

    The first and last time a computer of mine boots Windows it will be to download a shiny new linux iso. I have no idea why people put up with Microsoft's tactics. Windows 7 was not a horrible OS, but their strongarm installation tactics for 10 would seem to turn almost any user off. Guess people will keep swallowing while MS keeps shoveling.

    1. Re:Why put up with this? by iampiti · · Score: 1
      • Too scared of the alternatives
      • Used to it
      • Tied to Windows-only software
      • Some even like Win 10
  54. Does this mean the user isn't the product anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're asking for money now, surely they will be removing the spyware and ceasing to sell everyone's profile to advertisers, right? Right?

  55. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think all the data collecting is for? It's for blackmailing people into "choosing" to subscribe monthly to Windows 10.

    Microsoft was very active at writing software that helps sift through photographs to identify child porn. A worthy and noble cause, of course... but did you think that Microsoft would be content with the PR benefit of doing that? Hell no. Windows 10 will collect your data and look through it not just for child porn pictures, but any nudity it can find. Then you'll get a nice notice about how big a shame it would be if someone found out about those pics on your -- that is, on Microsoft's -- machine, and for the standard low monthly subscription rate to Windows, everyone can just forget about all that unpleasantness...

    Am I lying? Of course I am. Just like Microsoft lied when you trusted them to not stick ads in their "security upgrades". Just like their astroturf teams lie in thousands of posts all over the tech boards, including this one.

  56. The other way by rossdee · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost to downgrade from Win 10 back to Win 7 ?

    1. Re:The other way by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      $38 (32-bit) or $49 (64-bit): http://www.amazon.com/Windows-...

      Also plan on 2 days to install the 200+ Windows Updates.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    2. Re:The other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably need a Volume License windows license with software assurance, so probably somewhere in the neighborhood of $400-$500

  57. Re:Fast Adoption? EH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went with the "get the new operating system" option. Er, actually that was the "get A new operating system" option. I got a Mac.

    Thousands for Apple, not one cent for Microsoft.

    (if, or when, Apple goes too bad, then I'm buying an Amiga and telling the internet to fuck off)

  58. Substantial boost in performance??? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    On what universe does Windows 10 offer a substantial boost in performance? Windows 10 shipped on lower end laptops and netbooks is unusable.

    1. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      In fact here's an old Slashdot story covering the comparison between Windows 10 and Windows XP on an old netbook: https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    2. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by eumoria · · Score: 1

      on a high end gaming pc there is a performance increase but i manage ~50 laptops for my organization that were designed with 8.1 in mind and Win10 is like a sidegrade. I don't see a performance increase or decrease it's pretty much the same. If the unit was designed for 8.1 it is very usable but performance boost? If you don't have an enormous GPU and Skylake you're not going to see that optimization.

    3. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      In the real world.

      I have an old Asus eeePC netbook. I put an SSD in it and it runs pretty fast with it.

      • XP Home - came with it, ran OK.
      • Vista-installed, but took over 2 minutes to boot. Unusable.
      • Windows 7-had similar performance to XP.
      • Windows 8-wouldn't install on 1024x600 screen.
      • Windows 10-fastest version of Windows on there yet, by far. Taking 768MB out of the working set of a 2GB memory machine does wonders.
      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you measure in telemetry reporting per second, W10 is really killing it.

  59. LinuxFTW by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    My Upgrade from Windows 7 to Linux Mint was absolutely free.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  60. I don't believe them by Paco103 · · Score: 1

    The entire reason to make it free was to resolve the split user base, which costs them money by maintaining old versions as well as all their development partners for having to support multiple versions. My suspicion is they're trying to get everyone on a common base and start moving to a model more like Mac, with more frequent, far cheaper upgrades. I think the "deadlines" are mainly to encourage people to "hurry up and get it done"

  61. Re:For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29.. by charronia · · Score: 1

    I recommend going for a popular distribution like Ubuntu or Debian. Because they are the most popular, they tend to have the broadest support. This includes things like drivers and software packages.

  62. yay, my nightmare is over July 29th! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    software forkers and their malware trying to push Win10... I will be shed of them! woohoo!

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  63. Little Snitch by swell · · Score: 1

    Most geeks have sanitary protection on the net to prevent rogue sites from gifting you with malware. How many have protection from within?

    For many years Mac users have had available a program that prevents installed software from 'calling home'. When I installed MS Office, I told Little Snitch not to let Office connect to any MS servers. As a result I hear nothing from MS- no sales pitch, upgrade offers, etc. I'm using Office 2008, so that's 8 years of peace. Very few apps are allowed to connect to their source and those that are allowed are typically limited to forums, tech support, add-ons, etc.

    Even on the Mac, updates often include crapware, adverts, new limits on how the software can be used or the requirement to pay for functions that had been free. I seem to have no such control on my new Android phone which updates apps and system software whenever someone else wants.

    Little Snitch is a tiny utility even more important to me than AdBlock and LastPass. I can't imagine living without it.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  64. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    Yes. On July the 29th there will be no semi-forced upgrades to Windows 10.

    On July 30th, Microsoft will announce Windows 10.1, and announce that it's free for Windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10 users. To upgrade, just reboot your PC, and the new operating system will be installed automatically.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  65. I don't want it even when it is free.. by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    I don't want it even when it is free.. what on Earth makes them think I'm going to be willing to pay them for it later?

    because seriously - the only windows 10 I am going to use is a VM I need to test customer windows 10 specific issues...

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  66. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by iampiti · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and I don't like there either. I shouldn't be forced to have this crap on my destkop system.
    I'd pay money if I was guaranteed that Google would stop spying me on my Android phone. Also to be able to be root with official support(no, exploits aren't good enough because they're security holes by definition and because obiviously only work on the hw/sw version combos which haven't removed those holes)

  67. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when has Microsoft been known to stop doing something incredibly annoying once they start?

    Have you seen Clippy lately?

  68. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Wait...they FORCE me to upgrade and then bill me for it? Now THAT'S innovation!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  69. Laughing my ass off... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Everytime one of these Windows 10 stories comes out and I read the story and the comments (yes I do BOTH.. I know its out-of-style on /. ) I can't help myself... I nearly fall out of my chair laughing at both those who MUST use MS products, and those who only *think* they do.. The articles all seem to be surprised at how much of an asshole MS has turned out to be, and oh the comments.. they're priceless.. The MS trolls are soooo precious.. Great entertainment for those of us who left the MS ecosystem years ago and now only use Linux or Mac.. In my case, its Linux.. I retired in 2010 after supporting MS products since 1991. Even in 2010, it was becoming clear that MS considered *your* pc to actually be THEIR pc, and I decided around 2011, I was done with MS.. Now after 5 years of being MS-free, those of you still using Windows (or ANY MS product, for that matter) is great entertainment for those of us who DON'T.....

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    1. Re:Laughing my ass off... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I nearly fall out of my chair laughing at both those who MUST use MS products, and those who only *think* they do..

      Sadly there are plenty of niche apps that only work under Windows. Maybe some of them will work under WINE, but I've worked at places using legacy apps for which there are no viable Linux alternatives. It sucks, frankly. They're pretty locked into the Windows world for those programs.

      This whole forced-upgrade debacle leads me to believe that there is or will be a market for those apps in a Linux ecosystem. The good news is that most of those apps can be moved to the web, and then Microsoft's hold on these companies will be substantially reduced (or maybe eliminated).

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Laughing my ass off... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I've found a LOT of them, if they won't work under Wine, they may very well work with Crossover, which is a paid "version" of Wine, which is under heavy development. It *does* cost ~$40, but when you're not paying for Windows, its a small price to pay to be able to use s/w you're familar with under Linux...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:Laughing my ass off... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      It *does* cost ~$40,

      That's nothing if it allows you to use a niche app which may have cost some company $40K or more to buy, or $100K to develop. It's basically the cost of a coffee break or two for a manager.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  70. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to kindergarten you wanker. Come back when you've learned that "Steve did it too!!" isn't a valid defense.

  71. Two words, Microsoft... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Two words, Microsoft...Linux Mint.

    Go ahead, I dare you. I dare you to force my PC to upgrade to Win 10.

    I've already been using it on my laptop in anticipation of this, and so far it works great for me.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  72. Linux Recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering Microsoft seems bound and determined to force Win10 down our throats, it's time for me to learn Linux and I'd appreciate your recommendations.

    I'm a Win7 pro user with no plans of upgrading to win10 (if that's ultimately even possible). I'm not a gamer but I do enjoy trying out new programs (which I realize may be reduced somewhat in Linux). Other than that, I largely use my computer for the basics -- email, occasional shopping and surfing for information/relaxation/watch watch videos. Telegram is my messenger of choice. Programs I hope to keep are: Malwarebytes Anti-malware, WinPatrol, Spybot S&D, Glary Utilities, CC Cleaner, Revo Uninstaller and Firefox/Opera) I will be checking these for compatibility once I have decided which Linux I'll be using.

    I have two questions: (1) Which version of Linux would you suggest is the simplest to learn? (2) Once I'm comfortable with that one, which version do you see as the best/most effective and why.

    My priority is getting the Linux recommendations, however, privacy and security are important to me. My go-to sites include KrebsonSecurity, askwoody, black viper and slashdot. Please feel free to make recommendations for good sites also.

    I apologize for putting 2 different topics up, but I consider them kinda related so I hope it's okay. Thanks for your help.

    1. Re:Linux Recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd try either Ubuntu or Mint, in the case of Ubuntu, the best version, IMO, is 14.04, the previous LTS (Longterm Support) version (its supported for 5 years). There is a new LTS just released this month, 16.04, but its best to wait till the first point release (in July) to go there.. LTS versions are released every two years, and the versions inbetween are only supported for 9 months, so with those, you're on a constant upgrade treadmill.. As for Mint, its going to Mint 17.3 and since its based on Ubuntu, you're getting the Ubuntu-y goodness and since its based on Ubuntu 14.04, I *believe* its also an LTS.. Somebody call me out if I'm off on that... Both great ways to get started with Linux...

  73. after the 29. by luther349 · · Score: 1

    everyone starts pirating windows again.

    1. Re:after the 29. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ive never used an original windows, i dont upgrade to windows 10 in part because im a consumated pirate, i would feel dirty to use the real deal, i want to know theres a russian or chinese dude that made something thats inside my computer now, fighting the nsakey for dominance, I know i could upgrade now, use one of those programs to extract the key, format and install a super brand new w10 with a real key, but thats not COOOOOL

      sometimes at night, i hear voices coming from the computer, they sound like fighting
      "downloading telemetry data to utah command center, starting at 3:30" (military voice)
      "herroooo white demong you die nowwwwwwwwwww, yankee go home!!!" (mr chow voice)
      "telemetry data interrupted, trying again" (military voice again)
      "sucka blyat trying to sleep here, i have big hangover and i crashed my lada, stop making noises or i invade!" (russki and me are in a closest timezone than hamburger and boosaknoodle, so we are both sleeping)
      "i see you downroad iso for debian whiteboi, dont you know it nao has the systemD and ancient chinese curse will fall on you? you so gay! gayer than poettering!!!!!" (mr chow voice)
      "looking for isis contacts on hotmail... hotmail account not available, target seems to have no hotmail acc, changing startpage to bing as punishment" (military voice again)
      "friend, you dont zeem to hyave ultimate aimbot for installed battlefield 4, tomorrow after operation in syria i install, yes?, only semall paypal payment? add me on telegram or vk" (russkibro again trying to sell me cheats)

      you dont get that with an original windows copy, way more interesting experience than watching belfiore new hairstyles

  74. Re: For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already couple of years in. People deserve this and linux delivers.

  75. Back-to-School Blitzkrieg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, if back-to-school PC sales aren't good enough, there will be news of "massive" Windows oopsies that can only be fixed by $119 tithing, or by buying new hardware.

  76. Re: Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there anything ms hasnt copied from apple?

  77. Re:For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29.. by dnormant · · Score: 2

    I had an 80GB SSD and a 4TB data drive. One day I found that my 80GB C; drive was full. Turns out MS was "Preparing" me for my free Windows 10 upgrade. I figured SSDs were getting cheaper so I bought a 500GB. I installed Debian on it and I'm using the old 80GB as my swap partition.

    No regrets.

  78. Not so fast Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Java is installed in over 3 billion devices in the world.

  79. Been Running Xbuntu Exclusively for Months by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    For the last couple of years I've been booting back and forth between windows and Linux, Windows for gaming and Linux for just about everything else. I'd been debating moving to Windows 10 at some point, but after hearing about how much of a general pain in the ass it is, I decided to see if I could stay in Linux full time. It's been remarkably easy. Quite a few of the games in my Steam library have Linux versions. About the only one I actually miss that won't run is Skyrim. And I suppose at some point I should jump through the necessary hoops to install Dwarf Fortress on the Linux side. I'd been having some trouble with Hibernate/Suspend and accessing files on my Android phone, but installing the Xbuntu bits of Ubuntu seems to have solved those.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  80. Windows 7 Retail by packrat0x · · Score: 1

    Is there any way to upgrade Windows 7 OEM license to Retail?

    --
    227-3517
  81. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, Apple pretty much did just that. You remember when Google got in trouble with the EU for recording too much wifi info while its street view cars were driving around taking pictures? The reason they were recording wifi info was to correlate the SSIDs with physical locations. That way, even if your GPS is off, Google can make a pretty good guess at your general location.

    When Apple ditched Google Maps, they didn't have their own database of SSID locations. The first year they paid for a database from Skyhook. The next year, they used their own database. How did they mysteriously generate this database without sending around Apple street view cars to record every wifi hotspot's SSID? By secretly logging iPhone owners' locations and nearby SSIDs, and having the phones send the info back to them. Essentially, Apple turned all iPhone owners into unpaid contractors who traveled around recording the locations of every SSID on Earth. Given that they got away with it, while Google got sued by the EU for trying to do it the non-evil way and paying to send their own cars around to record it, I expect next time Google will just secretly harvest the data from its users.

  82. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Yes, Microsoft will shut up and quietly upload info about everything you do with your computer, keystrokes, file names and times, apps used etc.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  83. Re:For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using the old 80GB as my swap partition.

    I know it's a small drive, and you're probably using as disposable at this point, but be aware that using an SSD for swap may cause the drive to fail more quickly due to the limited number of write operations that an SSD can perform in its lifetime.

  84. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    That will give them a somewhat limited market. The US population is around 4.5% of humanity.

    So much for global domination...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  85. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Oh please, that assumes that everyone worldwide is equally wealthy, which obviously isn't the case. How much of MS's revenues come from the US? A billion villagers living in mud huts in Africa aren't viable customers for MS. (And the Africans' economies are improving and they're becoming more technological, but even so, they, along with most 3rd-worlders, are skipping PCs for the most part and going straight to mobile devices, which don't use MS software. And the people who do use PCs are using pirated software.)

  86. Users and advertisers split the bill by tepples · · Score: 1

    Software you've paid for shouldn't have any ads at all. This is outrageous

    Why should they be any different from newspapers and magazines, which have both a price and ads?

    Say it costs $30 per user to develop, market, distribute, and maintain a particular application. Users aren't willing to pay more than $15, nor are advertisers. So a publisher might adopt the same model used by newspapers, magazines, pay TV, and Hulu Plus: make users and advertisers split the bill.

    1. Re:Users and advertisers split the bill by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I prefer to pay full price and to have clean software. Windows was this way up to now.
      Microsoft no longer makes a version of Windows I like I guess I'll have to go elsewhere

    2. Re:Users and advertisers split the bill by tepples · · Score: 1

      The form letter would then be that there aren't enough users willing to pay full price for an ad-free version of an app other than iampiti to warrant the additional cost of maintaining two SKUs.

  87. runs on ... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 now runs on 270 million computers. 260 million of them installed without permission. 250 million of them are trying to get their old system back ...

    I plan to get Windows 10 when I get a new computer ... in about six years. If Microsoft is still alive. 8-(

  88. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by LiENUS · · Score: 1

    Google got sued because they were logging more than just SSID and location. They were getting packet dumps of unencrypted networks.

  89. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by doccus · · Score: 1

    Yes the forced upgrades are to stop.I can't recall where I read it though, yesterday. Personally, though, I have never seen such an absurd business model. Firstly, keep in mind that M$ is a *software* company that has historically derived a large percentage of it's profit from sales of windows.
      For them to, then, give away free copies to everybody that wants them, and then after everybody that acually *wanted* one has a copy, theyy start charging over a hundred bucks to the rest who actually *didn't* . I mean, can you imagine i a car company did that? Or any other software company? It woulkd most certainly ruin them.
    Bu you know what. "I don care! You hear dat Loocy? I don care"