Yes, I encourage you all to do what you can of this Patriot act, and while your at it can you please send someone to take your president away from here, his version of freedom he has brought with him is wreaking havoc on our beautiful city. And those 2 meter steel fences are so 1984.
Oh really? I thought fighting the system was to raise awareness of issues that are borderline rights issues, which is exactly what has been achieved. By every measure this has been an extremely successful case of fighting the system, regardless of the technicalities.
Thank God for C#? Oh please, the B-sharps have more of an influence on Java than that pretender of a programming language. Micrsoft couldn't even invent it's own DOS for heaven's sake.
Dead right, IT geeks can be fickle and dislike major change (or pefer thing their way). It's been a prblem for years and is almost impossible to change without a major round of restructuring. Culture comes from the top, if you were to look anywhere look at the CTO/CIO, thats the font from which the rich liquid of IT culture flows.
"Stop framing this in your American, Australian, or even your Roman-Dutch value assumptions."
We all need a frame of reference, and right now I would prefer my Western one over any third world shite.
Dont make dumb generalisations about what people believe. Are you simply reflecting your own dumb narrow mindedness as to how you comne about making decisions. Corby is innocent, that's what people believe, because it is far more likely the case, and on top of that the whole process was a show trial in a joke of a justicew system. Whether you believe her innocence or not, at least have the sense to come up with valid reasons, not some dumb ass half cocked attempt at peurile logic.
She didnt see her bodybag after she checked it in at the airport and until she picked it up at Bali, and if you followed her story you would know she immediately realised something was wrong. Apart from that your argument is insufficient as it begs the question. ie "she's guilty because she knew she was commiting a crime". Duh.
Ever consider the possibility she is innocent? How unlikely is it that baggage handlers are not involved, or do you think that they, their employers (ie Qantas) and any other agency are more concerned with their reputation than trying to free an innocent victim.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, I encourage you all to do what you can of this Patriot act, and while your at it can you please send someone to take your president away from here, his version of freedom he has brought with him is wreaking havoc on our beautiful city. And those 2 meter steel fences are so 1984.
that plane has completely missed the runway.
Oh really? I thought fighting the system was to raise awareness of issues that are borderline rights issues, which is exactly what has been achieved. By every measure this has been an extremely successful case of fighting the system, regardless of the technicalities.
but I bet they just love hacking away at old dos boxes.
Thank God for C#? Oh please, the B-sharps have more of an influence on Java than that pretender of a programming language. Micrsoft couldn't even invent it's own DOS for heaven's sake.
Dead right, IT geeks can be fickle and dislike major change (or pefer thing their way). It's been a prblem for years and is almost impossible to change without a major round of restructuring. Culture comes from the top, if you were to look anywhere look at the CTO/CIO, thats the font from which the rich liquid of IT culture flows.
What is Google?
Big bubbles no troubles.
"Stop framing this in your American, Australian, or even your Roman-Dutch value assumptions." We all need a frame of reference, and right now I would prefer my Western one over any third world shite.
In that case, there were many other issues that would reinforce the defense, yet the judge (so called) dismissed them outright,.
Dont make dumb generalisations about what people believe. Are you simply reflecting your own dumb narrow mindedness as to how you comne about making decisions. Corby is innocent, that's what people believe, because it is far more likely the case, and on top of that the whole process was a show trial in a joke of a justicew system. Whether you believe her innocence or not, at least have the sense to come up with valid reasons, not some dumb ass half cocked attempt at peurile logic.
HOw is that any grounds for guilt? Glad I dont inhabit your world, we'd all be in prison for association.
She didnt see her bodybag after she checked it in at the airport and until she picked it up at Bali, and if you followed her story you would know she immediately realised something was wrong. Apart from that your argument is insufficient as it begs the question. ie "she's guilty because she knew she was commiting a crime". Duh.
Ever consider the possibility she is innocent? How unlikely is it that baggage handlers are not involved, or do you think that they, their employers (ie Qantas) and any other agency are more concerned with their reputation than trying to free an innocent victim.
An exchange for Schappelle Corby?