Slashdot Mirror


Google Toolbar v.4

SpecialSauce writes "Google's gone and released v.4 Beta of their toolbar. Updates include: customizable buttons, smart search box, a bookmark feature that's tied to the users google.com account, and a send to SMS/Blogger/gmail button." Doesn't look like the mac version is updated yet, although the shared bookmarks thing creates unholy lust in my heart. Now if only it would allow you to search multiple search engines like Firefox's built in search.

111 comments

  1. firefox left out for now by jgionet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm really disappointed a Firefox version wasn't released at the same time.

    1. Re:firefox left out for now by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Since this is only a Beta, I wouldn't worry too much about it for now. They're probably concentrating for now on the browser that the most people use, IE. Once the features have stabilized and it's closer to release, I imagine a Firefox version will probably be released.

    2. Re:firefox left out for now by jseale · · Score: 1

      No kidding! You have no idea how inferior this makes us Firefox users feel. Geez! :(

  2. There's a Mac version? by Jim+in+Buffalo · · Score: 1

    Since when was there a Mac version of Google Toolbar? There's one that runs on Firefox, but I thought that was a separate, unblessed project.

    --
    This sig, aah-ah, is comin' like a ghost-sig...
    1. Re:There's a Mac version? by Tx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since when was there a Mac version of Google Toolbar?

      Since many moons ago for Mac Firefox users. Why would the official Google Toolbar for Firefox" be unblessed?

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:There's a Mac version? by TeePOG · · Score: 1

      There are two separate versions of the Firefox Google Toolbar: one available from Mozilla and the other [official] version from http://toolbar.google.com./ Works on Max, *nix and Wind*ws.

  3. mmmm, IMDB by BlogPope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd love to be able to search IMDB of Gracenote from google toolbar

    --
    My other car is a Popemobile
    1. Re:mmmm, IMDB by tpgp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd love to be able to search IMDB of Gracenote from google toolbar

      You can search both of those using Firefox's search engine add-ons (along with thousands more)

      Not that google's tool bar isn't nice and all - but its much better to use something open source that doesn't censor results for opressive regimes

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Tx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd love to be able to search IMDB of Gracenote from google toolbar

      I find quicksearches much better for specialized searches. I just type "imdb " in the address bar, and hey presto, less clicks than using a toolbar.

      In case you don't know about FF quicksearches, you just create a bookmark with e.g. "http://us.imdb.com/find?q=%s" as the location, and "imdb" as the keyword.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Martin+Blank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They are saying that they're filtering things. Go look at Google China and do a search for 'oysters' to see what comes up. Then do a search for 'Tiananmen Square' and look at the bottom of the page for a line that doesn't appear on the first search. There, you'll see the following:

      That translates roughly to "According to the local laws, regulations and policy, some search results are not shown." (That's cleaned up a bit from Google's own translation services.) Hopefully, this will lead the Chinese to ask what's not being shown and, more importantly, why it's not being shown.

      The Chinese people are getting used to the idea of freedom, and the power is slowly slipping out of the hands of the Party as the country reshapes itself. China has always been a bit slow to change, but once a change begins, it's hard to stop it.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Tx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oops, that should have read "I just type "imdb ", guess I made an accidental tag.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    5. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the Chinese doesn't come through. Anyway, there is a line at the bottom of the page. You can run it through Google Translate to verify.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:mmmm, IMDB by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "According to the local laws, regulations and policy, some search results are not shown."

      As someone who has grown up in a country which was behind the Iron Curtain I can tell you that this is more effective in seeding discontent than showing the results. I am rolling on the floor laughing if this is the consession made by Google to the Chinese. The Party has scored an own goal. Several times. I am still laughing... This definitely made my day...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:mmmm, IMDB by quokkapox · · Score: 1
      What happened to , select "Add keyword for this search", then you can do ^T (new tab) type "cddb whatever_cd_name"

      The firefox search engine toolbar thingee is overrated. You can do whatever you want entirely and efficiently from the keyboard.

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    8. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Even better, there's an extension that allows right-click searches to select between those search engines. At the moment I can't find it, however; anyone remember the name?

      There are other extensions that give you a big collection of search choices, but I like the single configuration system.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    9. Re:mmmm, IMDB by avanspronsen · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can :-) With the toolbar installed go to the imdb site. Right click in the sites search field and select generate custom search. You will get a custom button and imdb will be added to the dropdown list of the google search box on the toolbar.

    10. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just type in the GoogleToolbar:

      imdb some like it hot

      Usually the first link is the correct entry into IMDB

    11. Re:mmmm, IMDB by rpresser · · Score: 1

      type "site:imdb.com Paul Newman" into your search box.

    12. Re:mmmm, IMDB by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      its much better to use something open source that doesn't censor results for opressive regimes

      Which would be whom, exactly?

      ALL SEARCH ENGINES that do business in China are filtering results there as per the local laws. The reason Google is being singled out for doing it is because their motto is "Don't Be Evil". We EXPECT evil from the likes of MSN and Yahoo.

    13. Re:mmmm, IMDB by DirtJeans · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you're thinking of the Context Search extension. Very handy.

    14. Re:mmmm, IMDB by bturtle · · Score: 1

      Just as a point of interest, when I checked out your google.cn link, it took me about 2 minutes of casually surfing images to find the famous tank picture on somebody's Chinese blog.
      People don't generally repress well.

    15. Re:mmmm, IMDB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can also do this style address-bar quick-search in IE and Opera.

      PowerToys helps you do this somewhat easily for IE or you can go straight to the registry: Add a new key named "imdb" to HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\SearchUrl, and set the (Default) string to "http://us.imdb.com/find?q=%s"

    16. Re:mmmm, IMDB by jseale · · Score: 1

      A blog/podcast search of some kind would be nice also. Google DOES have its own blog search site, so why not make it easier to access?

  4. Great idea!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if only it would allow you to search multiple search engines like Firefox's built in search.

    Yes, I think Google will get right on that.

    1. Re:Great idea!! by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      The funny part is that it let's you do it already. Those "customizable buttons"? You can make them do pretty much whatever you want, URL-wise, including take the text from the search box and insert it into multiple URLs to grab as keywords for searching them.

      All it takes is a tiny bit of XML.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  5. unholy lust? by NiteShaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    "although the shared bookmarks thing creates unholy lust in my heart"

    dear god do you ever need to get out more....

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    1. Re:unholy lust? by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

      "although the shared bookmarks thing creates unholy lust in my heart"

      dear god do you ever need to get out more....


      Nah man, its cool - some bookworms have an understanding about sharing, and prefer not to be in a binding relationship.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:unholy lust? by minkie · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this is (it appears, anyway) that the bookmarks have to be stored on google's servers. Google already knows enough about me from my searches. I don't need them knowing what bookmarks I've got (I don't use Gmail either, for exactly that reason). What would *really* be cool is if your bookmarks could be stored and retrieved by ftp, then you could put them on any ftp server you trust.

    3. Re:unholy lust? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look, I know that you'd probably be very embarrassed if your friends and neighbors found all your searches and bookmarks for "post-op Asian trannies eating cheetos", but trust me, Google has seen worse.

    4. Re:unholy lust? by coopex · · Score: 1
      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    5. Re:unholy lust? by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      Maybe they could encrypt them in a way that they can only be viewed locally, via a password that's never transmitted.

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
  6. Undocumented Feature by Jumper99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And since everything can be tied to your Google account, Google promises not to share any information gathered with the US Government. They will, however, send all your data to China.

    --
    The opinions expressed here are not mine, but those of these dang voices in my head.
    1. Re:Undocumented Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But it won't make it past the filter if it's incorrectly spelled.

    2. Re:Undocumented Feature by Sporkinum · · Score: 1
      And since everything can be tied to your Google account, Google promises not to share any information gathered with the US Government. They will, however, send all your data to China.


      Which the US government will buy from the Chinese who are more than happy to sell it back to.
      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  7. Software Tie Ins by hamlet2600 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all of Google's amazing technology they don't do a very good job of linking things together. They have "Pack" which has Firefox in it, yet they don't update the toolbar for it! How can you support something in one area, then not integrate it into your existing offerings?? duh.

    --
    Sometimes I wish computers were less friendly.
    1. Re:Software Tie Ins by szembek · · Score: 1

      To me the fact that it's beta is a good enough reason for this. If it was a final release I would agree though.

      --
      nothing
    2. Re:Software Tie Ins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only Google's betas didn't last three years, that might qualify as a good excuse...

    3. Re:Software Tie Ins by e2mtt · · Score: 1

      I agree... huge problem here. Their deskbar, while allowing custom searches, doesn't work with Google desktop search, or Google Maps very well. Most of their software seems to be developed in a vacuum without much cross-referencing between other google products or outside products.

    4. Re:Software Tie Ins by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      They have "Pack" which has Firefox in it, yet they don't update the toolbar for it!

      First off, V4 of the toolbar is in beta. This means it is under development, and Google is choosing to share it with us before it is finished! Why should they take the effort to port it to Firefox before it is finished? Do you expect them to be constantly porting while they develop the thing?

      Second, it's free! You, my friend, are a beggar and a chooser.

    5. Re:Software Tie Ins by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Because the IE googlebar was in a releasable state first, idiot. There's no reason to wait on the Firefox version to release the IE version.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    6. Re:Software Tie Ins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happens when all the programs are randomly developed by different people in the 20% time.

  8. Other Search Engines by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now if only it would allow you to search multiple search engines like Firefox's built in search.

    Actually, according to Google, custom buttons can be easily made to use whatever search engine you want. Even if one isn't in the online gallery, Google claims it only takes about 3 lines of text to create a new button.

  9. But does it have .. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    .. a filter that blocks out things non friendly to the communist government of China?

  10. But.... by Hostile_Monk · · Score: 0

    ...does it run on Linux?

  11. Do people actually log-in when searching Google? by mrfett · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Given all the coverage of the myriad ways in which governments have begun collecting data on their citizen's internet use habits, does anyone actually use these features and log-in to Google.com? You couldn't pay me to use their value-added features. I'm surprised anyone cares about the bookmark feature, as I'm under the impression it only works when you're logged-in.

    It's bad enough they can trace your quasi-anonymous browser. At least they have to work for your identity in that case. I'm not willing to make it any easier for big brother than it already is.

  12. 64-bit windows by Jarlsberg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hmf. Doesn't seem to work well with the 64-bit version of IE. (Not that they claimed it would)

    Installing works fine, but it's gone when I restart the browser, and there's no sign of it in the View->Toolbars menu. Bummer :(

    1. Re:64-bit windows by mooboy · · Score: 1

      My guess is the toolbar successfully installed itself under the 32-bit version of IE. Find the shortcut for that (or go hunt down the .exe) and the toolbar should magically appear.

      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    2. Re:64-bit windows by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Actually, it didn't. I did check that one too. I haven't tried actually installing it with the 32-bit version, though, but since it's a completely separate application, it really shouldn't matter one way or the other.

  13. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by friedmud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some of us don't have _anything_ to hide. I would gladly give all of my surfing data to whomever wishes to have it....

    If they will use it for serving me ads that are about things I like then to me that's a plus.... but I guess that's just me.

    Why all the paranoia? What is everyone doing on the web that they don't want others to see?

    Friedmud

  14. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

    does anyone actually use these features and log-in to Google.com

    If you use gmail or Google Talk then you're logged in. Some people also use Personal Google which requires you to login to be of any use.

    I'm unsure if Google News customization uses cookies or just login. I know it can use login -- if you're logged in then your customizations will be shared to any browser that you login under. I think it used to remember customization by cookies though (and may still if you're not logged in).

    I'm not willing to make it any easier for big brother than it already is.

    And yet you logged into /. instead of posting as an AC... your tin foil hat is slipping.

    I haven't bothered looking at the new toolbar since it's IE only, but one think I've always looked for in "shareable bookmarks" is the ability to partially share -- to either mark some bookmarks as "do not share" or (better) different groupings that can be shared independantly. I know that there's some bookmarks on my home machines that I simply don't want coming anywhere near my work system. Ahem.

  15. And more soon? by lovebyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Soon, we will be able to download music from the toolbar too, probably.

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  16. What about a 64 bit Deskbar? by clustersnarf · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Google Deskbar doesnt work on XP64 for some reason. Even when installing Google Desktop the deskbar option doesn't work.

    I guess that's the price to pay to be on the bleeding edge.

    1. Re:What about a 64 bit Deskbar? by neveragain4181 · · Score: 1, Funny


      Pal, you're just bleeding - there is no edge there.

      N/A

    2. Re:What about a 64 bit Deskbar? by RancidMilk · · Score: 1

      Google should know that people think that BETA means "Beta be perfect"

  17. I'm waiting for v.Everything by Short+Circuit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That will be a toolbar worth getting.

    No more going out and getting a new toolbar every time the standard changes.

    (I may be dating myself, but I'm only 22, I swear. :)

    1. Re:I'm waiting for v.Everything by michrech · · Score: 1

      That will be a toolbar worth getting.

      No more going out and getting a new toolbar every time the standard changes.

      (I may be dating myself, but I'm only 22, I swear. :)


      I had an internal ISA version I got for $250 for being a SysOp "back in the day".

      Don't worry, it wasn't lost on *everyone*.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    2. Re:I'm waiting for v.Everything by jridley · · Score: 1

      I kinda wish I still had my v.everything. I had the sweet external version. Mine was a sysop special from USR, I had to sign an agreement that it was to be used on a BBS (which it was) and I got it for the bargain price of only around $200.

      (I may be dating myself, but I'm only 22, I swear. :)

      Aw, don't feel bad. Heck, I dated myself until I was 24.

    3. Re:I'm waiting for v.Everything by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Checked...eBay's got them dirt cheap. Cheaper than most external modems you might buy retail these days. :)

  18. bookmark synchronization by arabagast · · Score: 1

    I have been wondering about a way to do synchronized bookmarks between my stationary and my laptop. Is there any such tool for firefox wich doesn't involve storing my bookmarks with google (or any other provider), but rather host it on a protected area of my own website ?

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
    1. Re:bookmark synchronization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! It can be found here.

    2. Re:bookmark synchronization by michrech · · Score: 1

      If you are wanting to host it yourself, there is always HORDE and Trean.

      Seems it'd suit several people I've seen post in this thread.

      Horde (and it's "modules") can be found here.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    3. Re:bookmark synchronization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this one?

    4. Re:bookmark synchronization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. Features I'll never use by Shakes268 · · Score: 0

    The only thing I've used the google toolbar for are two things.

    1) Search google

    2) Popup blocking Everything else, I've never found a need for. It's just "there". So, keep adding features I'll never use and I'll consider it bloatware by next version.

  20. Tutorial: Google Toolbar Custom Button by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 4, Informative

    I tried adding a custom button for my project and the whole process was quick and easy. Here I have explained what I did. Hope it helps...

  21. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by whoop · · Score: 1

    http://simpy.com/ does it pretty well. You can mark links public/private, create groups of users (ie your household). One thing I don't like is the firefox sidebar. But a simple bookmark to simpy.com and I can then manually search, enter a new bookmark, etc.

  22. Multiple Search by poeidon1 · · Score: 1

    There is a firefox extension which lets you do the search on different search engines, but I donot know any for internet explorer. However the concept used in clusty search engine looks good.

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
    1. Re:Multiple Search by deviantphil · · Score: 1

      There is a firefox extension which lets you do the search on different search engines, but I donot know any for internet explorer. However the concept used in clusty search engine looks good.

      Yet Another reason to switch to Firefox!

    2. Re:Multiple Search by unforgettableid · · Score: 1
      Yes. It's called NeedleSearch.

      --
      Who do you trust?

  23. Question... Social bookmarking? by dep01 · · Score: 1

    I haven't looked at it, but is google trying to compete with social bookmarking websites like del.icio.us with this new functionality?

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  24. Requested feature by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd love to see Google start to aggregate comparisons of articles. I believe they have this power and it would be very nice to see it implemented.

    My most basic description (of a very difficult process, I'd gather), is to have the Toolbar offer an "Originality" rating. If the article is not like any other article, it is rated 100%. If the article is available elsewhere, it is 0%. You should be able to click the rating and be taken to a Google site that lists the similar articles in date format -- who posted first?

    This might also work to aggregate comparisons of items, or reviews, or something of the sort.

    1. Re:Requested feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be great when browsing MySpace and the like just to see if every teenager is whining about the same issues.

  25. customization issues by szembek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just installed the toolbar and it went well, I for one like the send to Gmail feature. I have however noticed some issues which I hope they change before finalizing this release. The first is that it adds 8 items into the IE context menu with no way to customize which items are there. I personally don't have any desire to access any of these features from the context menu and I would prefer to clean them up out of my context menu. Similarly I would like to remove 'Blogger' and 'SMS' from the Send to drop-down menu because I will never use them.

    (oh and I also used the Google toolbar spell check to correct 3 words in this post before submitting it!)

    --
    nothing
    1. Re:customization issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first is that it adds 8 items into the IE context menu with no way to customize which items are there. I personally don't have any desire to access any of these features from the context menu and I would prefer to clean them up out of my context menu.

      I have the same issue. I've already sent them feedback about it and I hope everyone else does too. The worst part of it is that the items aren't stored in the usual registry place anymore (unlike in past versions) so you can't even remove them manually (that I know of). I've already downgraded because of this issue.

  26. what? by lonasindi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now if only it would allow you to search multiple search engines like Firefox's built in search

    What? It's -google- toolbar....

  27. Google in person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google will be speaking, exhibiting and sponsoring SCALE 4x. For a free expo floor only pass use the promo code "FREE". Or for a discounted full access use the promo code "NEWSP"

  28. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by michrech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why all the paranoia? What is everyone doing on the web that they don't want others to see?

    We are exercising our right to privacy in our own home is what we are doing. If you, as you put it, would "gladly give that up", what other rights are you willing to give up?

    --
    bork bork bork!
  29. Even Google doesn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Get it. I attempted to install the toolbar with a non-admin user account (ever since I was burnt with malware, I never run a admin account unless strictly necessary.) and it installed fine with no error message, but it actually was no where to be found after the installation completed successfully.

    I know I should be telling this to Google but guys, it isn't Microsoft's fault that you are forced to run Admin account since majority of the Windows software is written with this hard coded assumption.

    Sheesh. Why the heck does a Search Toolbar require Admin previliges and why can't it tell me if it does?

  30. "Shared bookmarks creates unholy lust in my heart" by Ythan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use the Bookmarks Synchronizer extension. Saves and loads from any FTP.

  31. Re:I'm sorry. by xaque · · Score: 1

    I think you must be lost. The Jeopardy studio is next door.

  32. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    I think it used to remember customization by cookies though

    That is correct. Google News will remember your customziations by Cookie for your current computer. Google News will also remember your customziations by Login Account, and you can use those Customizations each computer that you log into.

    Same thing with Google Search Preferences really... those can be stored by Cookie or stored by account.

    And then here's the tricky part-- if you log into your Gmail or Google Groups account, your personal preferences for Google News or Google Search will also be loaded from your account preferences. All of Google's web services are tied together.

    Google offers these features to enhance their datamining analysis. A set of sessions tied to individuals will be more accurate then a set of cookies which may be shared by everyone who uses this computer.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  33. This is all well and dandy, by edmicman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but, well, I already use sites like delicous or an FTP bookmark synchronizer. I do have some bookmarks on my google/ig page, which I've used as my start page, but what does this toolbar really gain me? Where the heck is the google calendar so I REALLY organize my life around google? Seriously, that's the one thing that's lacking - gmail's got the email covered, the start page works as a suitable portal (for the most part), but I still am either tied to Outlook through work, or the crapulance that is Sunbird, or trying to integrate my own (webcalendar).

    1. Re:This is all well and dandy, by Mithur · · Score: 1

      Boy, that's true. Google REALLY needs be a good groupware client...

  34. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

    I only signed up to http://www.simpy.com/ yesterday and I'm already a fan.

    I'd always thought about having a shared bookmark facility and only now, ten years later, have I managed to get around to doing it. It's great when you're using several computers at once; all I miss is the really simple list format from clicking Bookmarks in Firefox or IE. Sometimes all I want is a list, devoid of clever tags or links.

    However, now that Google Toolbar is being released with similar functionality, the "average" user will probably use it in preference.

    Will Simpy and del.icio.us be able to compete with the Google Toolbar?

    --
    http://blog.grcm.net/
  35. Yeah..... by doogieb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now if only it would allow you to search multiple search engines like Firefox's built in search. Yeah, like there are other search engines!

    --
    Doogie. If you can read this, my sig fell off
  36. toobars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    am i the only one who detests google toobar.

  37. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    We are exercising our right to privacy in our own home is what we are doing.

    Not that I think THE GOVERNMENT should know what we are browsing, but I'm really curious how you are PRIVATELY BROWSING the internet?

    Seriously? Unless you are running all of these servers on your home LAN, or you go through the headaches required to really anonymize your browsing, you are most definitely not surfing privately in your own home.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  38. "Custom Buttons" by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can already create buttons that function like those in this toolbar using Firefox. You can also move them up to the menu bar to save space. See the bottom of my tutorial on optimizing Firefox.

  39. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by michrech · · Score: 1

    Are you really this stupid, or are you just acting this way hoping for some mod points?

    Unless "the government" specifically starts sniffing my traffic (or some third party they hire), I am in my home, a private setting, looking up things on the internet that no one else will see.

    What part of that is so difficult for you to understand?

    --
    bork bork bork!
  40. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    What is everyone doing on the web that they don't want others to see?

    Paying my credit card bill? Inquiring about the status of my Social Security account?

  41. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by mrfett · · Score: 1
    i don't think i'm being paranoid, just practical. when ppl give governments permission to infringe their rights, those governments ALWAYS abuse the privilege. if you follow a link to an article about the new Palestinian documentary that was nominated for an Academy Award, and that sight happens to be hosted by some group linked to 'terrorism', you could find yourself on a secret list, perhaps unable to fly. This stuff happens to regular people. Between the NSA spying and the regular FBI spying, chances are you aren't too far removed from someone who had been surreptitiously spied on. If your browsing habits make you look like someone who might oppose whatever regime is currently in power, you could find yourself in trouble.

    ok. maybe i _AM_ paranoid. but i think it's just good common sense to support technologies that promote greater privacy, rather than those that further impinge upon it.

  42. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by mrfett · · Score: 1
    And yet you logged into /. instead of posting as an AC... your tin foil hat is slipping.

    ok if Bush is going to subpoena /. for my browsing/posting habits, i'm _REALLY_ in trouble. in all seriousness though, the danger is in these far-reaching requests for user data. the tactic has been to cast a wide net and apparently mine all the data they get for whatever they find useful. that data DOJ collects could be kept for years, long enough to map every detail of it and come up with a pretty accurate portrait of the users' browsing habits. Then they could compare tendencies between terrorist's habits and the users whose data they've analyzed. Google data seems a lot more useful for these purposes than Slashdot data.

    you don't need to be a terrorist to have a matching profile. false positives are all too common in these type of analyses, and in the government's current zeal to identify possible threats, citizens shouldn't think they're immune to these dangers. mishaps happen all the time, and innocent people go to jail (or worse), sometimes for indefinite periods of time while their innocence is being disputed.

    believe me, my tin foil hat is well-secured ;)

  43. [OT] spellchecker extension for Firefox? by adric · · Score: 1

    The only reason I stick with the Google Toolbar is for the spell-check feature. I'd happily go with Googlebar Lite if I could fine a useable standalone spell-checker extension. Unfortunately, neither AspellFox nor SpellBound eem to pass the "does it actually work" test. :(

    --
    not plane, nor bird, nor even frog...
    1. Re:[OT] spellchecker extension for Firefox? by adric · · Score: 1

      Apparently I spoke too soon... it seems that my problems with SpellBound were actually caused by a conflict with All-in-One Gestures. I've disabled the latter for now, and will report the issue upstream.

      --
      not plane, nor bird, nor even frog...
  44. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Why should I let other people know what I'm doing? It's my business, not theirs.

    Besides, the more information you let out about you, the more junk mail and the like you'll get, both email and snail mail. Both are a waste of resources like trees and electricity.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  45. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by rm69990 · · Score: 1

    Since when do you perform these activities through Google.com? I can't say I have ever checked my bank account information, or anything else of the sort, through a search engine.

    I log into Google.com simply because my computer is a single user computer, and I leave myself logged into Gmail.com, which also leaves me logged into Google.com.

    You people are being dumb. Google receives hundreds of millions of search queries a day. Do you honestly think someone is sitting on the other end monitoring *everyone's* search habits. Christ, the company only has 3000 employees. It is done using software that uses the information for targetted ads, nothing more.

    Ever since this whole China thing, everyone is paranoid of Google. Google is following THE LAW in China. Google has no choice in the matter. This is exactly the same as Google not being allowed to show kiddie porn results in the US. Is that censorship? Yes. Does anyone bitch about it? No.

  46. No by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. Last time I installed it I wound up re-installing the OS. I also remember reading an article about the spyware components of the toolbar, though I can't pin it down right now. If anyone can clarify that I would appreciate it. It certainly matches my experience, however.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  47. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Well everything between you and the other end point can see where you are going, so no, its not really private.

    --
    Why not fork?
  48. get a job, sir by mthreat · · Score: 1

    In between your music searches, search for a job on indeed, using their toolbar button.

    "... get a job, sir." -- the big lebowski

  49. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would gladly give all of my surfing data to whomever wishes to have it....

    You don't have to brag about it. Just post your browser history file to slashdot. It's easy to do. Hell, include your bookmarks too. This will be fun.

    Unless you are just talking.

    Thats what I thought.

  50. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by SpecialSauce · · Score: 1

    15 years ago I might have been able to have this same worry, today is much different. Today I have no illusions of privacy. Between magazine subscriptions/library cards/CC's/Mortgage/motorcycle loan/job/ISP/cell phone/drivers license somebody out there knows more about me than I do ;) As long as Google.com does its best to play nice with me and provides value they know all they want.

  51. Yahoo did it first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "although the shared bookmarks thing creates unholy lust in my heart."

    Yahoo did shared bookmark last century in it's yahoo toolbar. Come to think of it, they did/made-popular everything google is catching upto now: toolbar (with customizable button), shared bookmark, customizable homepage, IM, ... there are just too many of them to list all.

    I agree yahoo did not do everything to a perfection, but, at least they were the first to identify and bring many things to the market in a large scale. Coming to think of it, google have done few things very well. RSS reader is half baked, gmail did not have a delete button until 10 days back, groups page is worsening day by day, maps (direction) is not something you'd want to rely on (not as good as mapquest) and the latest joke is the video and pack.

  52. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

    Some of us don't have _anything_ to hide. I would gladly give all of my surfing data to whomever wishes to have it....

    How do you know? Privacy is like Pandora's Box - once you let your information out, it is no longer under your control. If you change your mind, there is nothing you can do to get your privacy back.

    I am reminded of DejaNews, ironically now acquired by Google. When Deja first came-up online there was a lot of consternation by people who had said silly things on usenet in the past, things they were embarrassed by now. In some cases, things that could cause them a lot of trouble now, like openly discussing their use of recreational pharmaceuticals or their participation in fringe sexual activities. When those people originally wrote those articles, they had no concept that later in life it might come back to haunt them.

    How can you know that your surfing activity today won't be of keen interest to someone who wishes you harm tomorrow? You can't.

    Best to keep your options open and keep your privacy today. You can always give it away tomorrow if you really want to.

  53. Centralized bookmarks for Firefox? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

    Is there a good extension out there that will let you keep your bookmarks (and other things like browser history, cookie-database, password database, etc) on a central server? Preferrably one under your own control, rather than one run by a Big Corp?

  54. Re:"Shared bookmarks creates unholy lust in my hea by adtifyj · · Score: 1

    Another way to satisfy the unholy lust is to try Flock. It runs on OSX, and has native bookmark sharing with support for the popular bookmark sharing sites.

  55. Re:Do people actually log-in when searching Google by whoop · · Score: 1

    I looked all over for hacks to Google to do bookmarks, like the ones that can post files in GMail and treat it like a hard drive in Windows, but nothing came up. The personalized Google page allows you to type a few bookmarks, but it's not a complete solution when you have more than ten. You have to prioritize there. With Konqueror being my primary browser, things like Google Toolbar just won't get used that much for me. One of Konq's top features is that Flash doesn't work. That more than makes up for the lack of frills. :)

    Simpy is getting me by for now pretty well. I've uploaded bookmark sets from four computers, one or two browsers each (IE, Firefox, Konqueror). I just go through 5 or 10 at a session, and eventually they'll all be set.

  56. Re:Features I'll never use - Use Opera! by trmcdougle · · Score: 1

    Both of those features (search google & popup blocking) are built into Opera, you might like to give it a go.