From a quick look through the YouTube ToS, Viacom may actually be allowed to use his work without asking for permission (assuming they are a YouTube affiliate): http://youtube.com/t/terms 6.C. "by submitting User Submissions to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its successors' and affiliates') business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the YouTube Website (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels."
It's possible Viacom really dropped the ball on this and are indeed infringing; but Chris should really be careful how he treads.
I have a GA-K8NXP-SLI (2005) and that boots off of my SATAs just as fast as my old PATAs. True, the RAID controller for my non-boot SATAs takes a few seconds; but that's normal for a RAID ROM. I realise this is more of a consumer board than server, it just seems odd to me that you can still be having such issues two years on.
Also, I've installed both XP-SP2 and Vista Home Premium directly on to my boot SATA without needing an extra floppy. I admit I was worried about this (in the past, I've had trouble installing to SATA; and I don't have a floppy drive), but it was completely transparent.
The cables are the deal winner/breaker. SATA cables are a massive improvement from the oversized PATA/Molex ones, but I've yet to find a make of cable that actually feels sturdy enough to survive frequent plug/unplugs.
Also, why didn't they think about allowing drive daisy-chains, when they drew up the SATA spec? Not needing to attach each drive directly to the mobo would be a real space saver.
For a phone/video/music device, that battery-life isn't going to be enough for a lot of people. And since you can't just swap the battery to get more life, long-distance travel seems almost out of the question (at least, if you want to watch a film or listen to audio while you travel).
Guildenstern: What's the first thing you remember? Rosencrantz: Oh, let's see... The first thing that comes into my head, you mean? Guildenstern: No -- the first thing you remember. Rosencrantz: Ah... No, it's no good. It's gone. It was a long time ago. Guildenstern: No, you don't take my meaning. What's the first thing you remember after all the things you've forgotten? Rosencrantz: Oh, I see... I've forgotten the question.
Tell that to my DVD player. I think it's a sorry state of affairs when we're forced to sit through so much advertising/legal rubbish, watch a pathetic animated menu system that is considered a feature, watch more disclaimers, and then finally get to the movie.
More related to your comment (and assuming deliver to a computer), WMV (and probably others) already give the content generator the ability to prevent fast-forward. There are ways of removing this, of course, but it's yet another feature in "modern" entertainment.
there is so much more features in Outlook Unless I'm mistaken, Thunderbird replaces Outlook Express, not Outlook. There are huge differences between those two.
I agree that I'd like Thunderbird to handle more of Outlook's work, but there are extensions (like Lightening) that are slowly doing that.
the answer was at the bottom At least put some effort in! Account Settings > [account] > Composition & Addressing > Select: start my reply above the quote
Personally, I use Thunderbird because I find it very quick and easy to use. I do get the occasional inbox/email corruption, but that's why I keep my profile folder regularly backed up (something that's hard to do with Outlook Express).
I would guess that dead and obese people are as good workers. As you've probably read, China does appear to have more of a interwebs addiction problem than the rest of the world.
I've heard loads of metaphors about why x86 will be around for years to come, but none of the really hold. An engine is black-box - petrol in, kinetic energy out (simply) - whereas the architecture on a processor is not.
AMD and Intel can make as many additions to x86 as they like, but if they stop supporting the existing instruction set, they'll sell nothing.
I'm sure Linux would be compiled on to a new architecture overnight, but I doubt MS would move any time soon - and their opinion holds a lot of weight on the desktop.
I like the way that sounds like an accusation. "I say, there, he's released one of those web-a-majoo-dahs I've heard so much about. "Oh, wait, ignore that; it's in some kind of foreign language. "*derisive laughter* Why would he bother?"
Slashdot Mirror
Interestingly, their "Signals vs Noise" blog is powered by PHP: http://www.37signals.com/svn/index.php
(Freaky. Captcha is 'signal')
From a quick look through the YouTube ToS, Viacom may actually be allowed to use his work without asking for permission (assuming they are a YouTube affiliate):
http://youtube.com/t/terms
6.C. "by submitting User Submissions to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its successors' and affiliates') business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the YouTube Website (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels."
It's possible Viacom really dropped the ball on this and are indeed infringing; but Chris should really be careful how he treads.
Bluegrass band?
Okay, that's enough coffee for you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaurs_(TV_series) ?
Or, say, an advert stating that not upgrading your "office suite" to the latest Microsoft offering will make your business less productive.
My mother died from a placebo overdose, you insensitive clod!
Seriously? How old is your hardware?
I have a GA-K8NXP-SLI (2005) and that boots off of my SATAs just as fast as my old PATAs. True, the RAID controller for my non-boot SATAs takes a few seconds; but that's normal for a RAID ROM.
I realise this is more of a consumer board than server, it just seems odd to me that you can still be having such issues two years on.
Also, I've installed both XP-SP2 and Vista Home Premium directly on to my boot SATA without needing an extra floppy.
I admit I was worried about this (in the past, I've had trouble installing to SATA; and I don't have a floppy drive), but it was completely transparent.
The cables are the deal winner/breaker. SATA cables are a massive improvement from the oversized PATA/Molex ones, but I've yet to find a make of cable that actually feels sturdy enough to survive frequent plug/unplugs.
Also, why didn't they think about allowing drive daisy-chains, when they drew up the SATA spec? Not needing to attach each drive directly to the mobo would be a real space saver.
What a scary, scary thought...
I quite liked this non-event: [...] much less than an order of magnitude greater [...]
Gah! So you're responsible for that travesty?!
(hehe, captcha is 'abhors')
From what I've read, it's one built-in battery.
For a phone/video/music device, that battery-life isn't going to be enough for a lot of people.
And since you can't just swap the battery to get more life, long-distance travel seems almost out of the question (at least, if you want to watch a film or listen to audio while you travel).
Guildenstern: What's the first thing you remember?
Rosencrantz: Oh, let's see... The first thing that comes into my head, you mean?
Guildenstern: No -- the first thing you remember.
Rosencrantz: Ah... No, it's no good. It's gone. It was a long time ago.
Guildenstern: No, you don't take my meaning. What's the first thing you remember after all the things you've forgotten?
Rosencrantz: Oh, I see... I've forgotten the question.
Freaky, that's the exact excuse I used for failing my CS binary course
But... what would we call them then?!
Tell that to my DVD player.
I think it's a sorry state of affairs when we're forced to sit through so much advertising/legal rubbish, watch a pathetic animated menu system that is considered a feature, watch more disclaimers, and then finally get to the movie.
More related to your comment (and assuming deliver to a computer), WMV (and probably others) already give the content generator the ability to prevent fast-forward.
There are ways of removing this, of course, but it's yet another feature in "modern" entertainment.
There are huge differences between those two.
I agree that I'd like Thunderbird to handle more of Outlook's work, but there are extensions (like Lightening) that are slowly doing that. the answer was at the bottom At least put some effort in!
Account Settings > [account] > Composition & Addressing > Select: start my reply above the quote
Personally, I use Thunderbird because I find it very quick and easy to use.
I do get the occasional inbox/email corruption, but that's why I keep my profile folder regularly backed up (something that's hard to do with Outlook Express).
Oh, you play by those rules? ;)
Are you purposefully being difficult?
Is this a private game, or can anyone join in?
The Sun reports it as "China Chin-less" Ay thank you. I'll be here all week. Try the veal
I'm an emo, you insensitive clod! /cries in to pillow
Remember kids, emo-splats make you look great!
I would guess that dead and obese people are as good workers.
As you've probably read, China does appear to have more of a interwebs addiction problem than the rest of the world.
I've heard loads of metaphors about why x86 will be around for years to come, but none of the really hold.
An engine is black-box - petrol in, kinetic energy out (simply) - whereas the architecture on a processor is not.
AMD and Intel can make as many additions to x86 as they like, but if they stop supporting the existing instruction set, they'll sell nothing.
I'm sure Linux would be compiled on to a new architecture overnight, but I doubt MS would move any time soon - and their opinion holds a lot of weight on the desktop.
RISC ftw!
"It's in Russian."
;)
I like the way that sounds like an accusation.
"I say, there, he's released one of those web-a-majoo-dahs I've heard so much about.
"Oh, wait, ignore that; it's in some kind of foreign language.
"*derisive laughter* Why would he bother?"
Can't believe there are no obligs on this one