Slashdot Mirror


Free the iPhone from AT&T

Acererak was one of several readers who noted that DVD Jon has released information on unbricking an iPhone. You sacrifice all cel phone functionality of course, but you have an iPDA that will work on your WiFi. Currently the hack is windows only but it doesn't look very complicated.

314 comments

  1. Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by HouseArrest420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you pay that much money for a PDA, when you can get other devies whose only purpose it to be a PDA for less?

    --
    This is Slashdot! Give me the latest gadget, bug, or OS project! This ain't english class so don't confuse the two!
    1. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 5, Funny

      hy would you pay that much money for a PDA, when you can get other devies whose only purpose it to be a PDA for less? Because of the "I" prefix.
      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    2. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by thebrieze · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cool factor, User Interface, Wifi, Almost full featured browser, Full screen, Video player.

      Granted its still an expensive, but there isn't another device that does all of the above with quite as nice a user interface, and which has quite as much cool factor.

    3. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by appleguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just a PDA. It's a SWEET solid state iPod... In fact, it;s currently the only flash based iPod that can play videos; and it has a kickass screen and touch interface to boot... the iPhone is apple's best ipod to date. While the price may seem high, there is clearly a demand for an iPhone-like iPod, and I imagine one at a lower price point than the iPhone will be released soon. Time will tell if the new ipod has any connectivity features built in (wifi, bluetooth, etc), but I hope so!

    4. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because it is an iPhone. If you have one, you are hip and cool. You are important and beautiful. If you don't, you are a loser. Basically it is like middle school but with more money.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by highwaytohell · · Score: 0

      so you can be the cool Mac dude being all aloof and shit while us weenies use our Windows Mobile Devices? Jeez, havent you learnt anything yet. You have to forsake functionality to be cool! Being cool is what matters, man!

    6. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by niceone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, because you get to have a cool iPhone.

      This mod has a couple more advantages for the slashdot crowd:

      1) you won't have to talk to people.
      2) it makes it harder for 'them' to track you

    7. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tapwave Zodiac :)

      Cool factor > Still looks cool to this day!

      User interface > Yup its pretty nice touch screen interface

      Wifi > With an SDIO card yeah

      Almost full featured browser > yup got that too

      Full screen > tis a pretty big screen

      Video player > hardware mpeg4 decoder built in :D

      plus it plays emulators and has tonnes of over features :)

      f*ck the iphone get a Zodiac off ebay now!

    8. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cool factor, User Interface, Wifi, Almost full featured browser, Full screen, Video player.

      I think the phrase you are looking for is "prosthetic eNis".

    9. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Funny

      iPeen

    10. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by newr00tic · · Score: 1

      Agreed, nice points.

      --
      A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    11. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      User interface > Yup its pretty nice touch screen interface

      But is it multi-touch?

    12. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because the way you get to be "DVD Jon" is by bragging about trivial "hacks" to high-profile Apple hardware and services.

      OK, you get to be him by taking credit for someone else's DVD player hack. But you stay "DVD Jon" with noisy, pointless attacks on Apple gear.

    13. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      You just described every PDA released in the past 5 years.

    14. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Bemopolis · · Score: 5, Funny

      YEAH! Someone should find a way of making the iPhone work without having to sign a 2-year contract with AT&T. Even if they have to sacrifice the cellphone functionality. I sure hope that when someone does that it becomes a story on SLashdot. Of course then, I'd probably have to respond to someone too dense to Read The Fucking Title.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    15. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot...I just snorted cereal milk through my nose.

    16. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by BigFoot48 · · Score: 1

      Man I hate those tube models!

    17. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by dudeX · · Score: 1

      Reminds of an early 90's SNL fake commercial depicting a kid playing with a Macintosh, showing off the things he printed out on his LaserWriter, with the end slogan was "Apple Computer: The Power to Crush Other Kids"

    18. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool factor, User Interface, Wifi, Almost full featured browser, Full screen, Video player.

      Define fullscreen. If this is one of the things that sets the iPhone apart from other phones and PDAs does that mean they're not using the entirety of the screen on them?
    19. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 2) it makes it harder for 'them' to track you

      Geek Nr.992278, just made an post on /. from wifi hotspot at 27.83

      As long as you keep visiting, you're never hard to track.

    20. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nokia N700 or the new N800 does all of that.

      No it does not play DRM locked iTunes music but it does everything else including play doom.

      Oh and it's been out for far longer than the iPhone.

      does it have the yuppie metrosexual iconic look? No but in a way kinda, every time I use mine with my phone (BT data) or for other reasons (far bigger screen than the iphone so movies rock and makes websurfing very tolerable) I get tons of questions about it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    21. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Zaatxe · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The difference between a man and a boy is the price of their toys."
      -- My mom

      --
      So say we all
    22. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, calling somebody dense is funny, but asking to read the original post without abusing anybody is flamebait?? Bravo, bravo!

    23. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Won't there eventually be a way to run VOIP on the iPhone, making it an ipod, wifi browser, PDA, and VOIP phone? Now that would be good, dontcha think?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    24. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by wealthychef · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Synchronization is important to me. I hate my Treo 700p because it sucks as a phone, but I need it because it syncs my calendars and contacts with my Mac. The only reason I don't buy an iPhone yet is I haven't been able to see one in person.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    25. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Rayaru · · Score: 1

      Full screen meaning that the screen takes up the full width of the device. It doesn't mean that other PDAs don't use their own full screen, but rather that those other PDAs' screens are tiny in comparison to iPhone.

    26. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by fatlaces · · Score: 1

      Do you use 'Sir' because you read too many fantasy novels, or because you wish you were smart?

    27. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, we usually called it the ePenis. Also, it was common for the ePenis-wavers to have a .sig of something like "ePenis++".

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    28. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Sparks23 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I admit, from toying with one that a friend picked up, the N700/800 tablets look quite nicely usable. They do not, however, look like something I can slip into my purse, or the pocket of my jacket, for easy transport as a phone. (Especially as they need a Bluetooth phone to use for GPRS connectivity, and don't do normal GSM calling.)

      I haven't taken the plunge and enslaved myself to AT&T for an iPhone, but I know that my desire for it is a tradeoff of several things. Windows Mobile just plain feels like I'm fighting with my PDA most of the times (I will spare you my rant on the astonishingly poor UI design of the Connection management screen in WM5), and most of the more-usable PDA-type devices are, like the N700, just too darn BIG to carry around conveniently for me, especially if I also have to carry a phone with me.

      So all flashy 'woo' factor aside, the iPhone seems to have a very usable interface, do most of what I actually want from my PDA-phone (with, alas, the exception of IM... what were you THINKING, Apple?) and would fit in my jacket pocket much more conveniently. It's just that (ugh) AT&T requirement that's kept me from taking the plunge; T-Mobile's been fairly good to me.

      --
      --Rachel
    29. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by solitas · · Score: 1


      I read in one of the opening-day articles that someone bought an iPhone and added it to her existing ATT contract ($10 a month for each additional phone) - maybe have a friend who's got an ATT contract who would let you do the same?

      I know right now that if _I_ go put another phone on _my_ ATT contract that's what it'll cost, and I can't see why the iPhone would be any different...

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    30. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Someone should find a way of making the iPhone work without having to sign a 2-year contract with AT&T.

      They have. At the activation screen, enter 999-99-9999 as your Social Security number. AT&T will do a credit check, deny you, and then offer you a pre-pay deal, with no 2-year contract.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    31. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by fr4nk · · Score: 0

      It makes you feel special.

    32. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you keep visiting, you're never hard to track. He could just post anonymously and use a proxy like Tor.
    33. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on if you like some Symbian based smartphones (N91,N92,N93i,N95, 9500/9300 Communicators, some of the E series). They range from just as expensive, or the price of some small laptops- but are usually not iCrippled.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    34. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not, however, look like something I can slip into my purse Dude, it's a European carry-all! You wanna get beat up by the cool kids?

      Oh, and don't try pretending you're a woman.
    35. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, we usually called it the ePenis.
      But since we're talking about Apple, shouldn't it be the iPenis?
    36. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by *weasel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I carry my n800 in my pocket all the time.
      Of course, I'm a pretty big guy and I don't wear tight pants - so YMMV.

      In the winter, I've got coat pockets that make it even easier - in the summer, my shorts tend to have those big superfluous pockets, so that's a no-brainer too.

      And the important part of 'the n800 is bigger' is that the nokia's screen is 800pixels wide.
      Despite what Jobs would have you believe, the real internet is not 480 pixels wide, nor is it browsed by zooming in and out and sidescrolling as a matter of course.
      As a mobile browser the iphone is far ahead of other phones, but it's still a ways behind opera (with flash) on the n800.

      The n800 also has 2 SD slots, a usb port, a non-recessed-to-hell headset jack, is infinitely hackable and has a superior landscape thumbboard. Taken together it's exponentially better as a mobile platform. Particularly for anyone on this site.

      The only advantage the iphone has over the n800 is integrated phone capability.
      If you take that out (as DVD Jon has) the iphone costs far too much for far too little.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    37. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone + DVD Jon Hack = iDon'tPhone

      Another great product brought to you from the people that gave us iDrankTheCoolAid

    38. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Better web browser, better video player.

    39. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      A clever hack its own justification!

    40. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Sparks23 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the phone is the main advantage from a technical standpoint. My point was more that different form-factors work differently for different people. :)

      I like what I've seen of the N800 for mobile browsing from a technical standpoint, but despite the beauty of the large screen, it's too bulky for me. I have smaller hands than many gadgeteers do, and the N800 doesn't fit my hand nicely. Nor does it fit well into the pocket of any of my jackets, and so I have to admit if I had one, it would probably get left at the house most times. The iPhone, for instance, doesn't do nearly as wide a variety of things as the N800 does, but I /could/ stuff it into a pocket of a jacket or purse, and it would handle both basic browsing /and/ phone in one device.

      The N800 has far more impressive capabilities technically; it's just not a package that would be as-useful to me and my style of mobile computing, personally, as an iPhone-type device would be. (Whether or not that's the iPhone itself is not necessarily relevant to my point.)

      --
      --Rachel
    41. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    42. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Boo hoo hoo, I haven't got my e90 yet.

      The phone that makes an iPhone look cheap.

      Come to think of it an iPhone is cheap compared to an e90.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    43. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pwnd

    44. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by nanosquid · · Score: 1

      Well, there aren't actually a lot of small, light, hi-res PDAs, and the iPhone's UI is actually better than all of them. Strange as it sounds, the iPhone is probably more valuable to some people as a PDA without an AT&T service contract than as a cell phone.

      Still, nice as it is in some ways, as a non-extensible device, it's probably overpriced for that purpose at $600. And it's really stupid that the device can't be used with other carriers anyway, in particular given the price.

    45. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      The cellphone angle is one of the only negative features of the iPhone, IMHO. All I have in that dept is a Tracfone which recently 'expired' because I hadn't paid it a wit of attention in over a month. Of course, for the money spent on an Iphone I could get other alternative PDAs that have all the features I want minus cellphone functionality. I could even get a newer-generaton Newton (mine is a Newton 100) on eBay. For true portability I could just spring the big bucks for a new battery for my PowerBook 165c. Now, that would be a cool portable to use. With Claris Works on it, it's a great little machine. It's a little short on memory, though. Springing another 100 bucks on full-up memory for it would correct that, though. Since we're talking about spending $$ on Apple-branded bling and all.

    46. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Read The Fucking Title

      Ahem. You must be new here.

    47. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by maeka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, it;s currently the only flash based iPod that can play videos...

      I'm obligated to point out that the first generation Nano can play MPEG 1 and 2 videos full speed if you use Rockbox firmware.
      Yea, the screen is small, and I'm totally ignoring your larger point.
      It just needed to be said.
    48. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by StikyPad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What's L got to do (got to do) with it?

    49. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by HouseArrest420 · · Score: 1

      If you want to pay 600 bucks for a nice user interface....give me your money and in 3 days I'll make one the way you want it. And I'll even make it for any PDA you want. That'll be 600 well spent. Your reasons.....were....well....not good enough. The best explaination I've read so far for buying one of these things was the guy who said, "because of the I prefix", but I dont think an I is worth that either....maybe an S, that way my phones sorta named after me, "Hey honey, can you grab my Scott-Phone" Now that would be pimp.

      --
      This is Slashdot! Give me the latest gadget, bug, or OS project! This ain't english class so don't confuse the two!
    50. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that really sounds like my PSP

    51. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      ...until you factor in that it's a) unlocked and b)a smartphone / PDA combination. Yes, it's expensive - but it's par for the course for a Communicator to be $1000 at launch. Right now, the Series 80 predecessors- the 9500/9300i- are now down to half their cost, but had everything you could throw in a phone at the time that was top end (Class 10 EDGE, full bluetooth support, up to 2GB MMC).

      The iPhone would be closer to an enhanced 8800/8600, where features are cut out, and replaced by fashion.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    52. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      iPeen, not to be confused with ballPeen which in this context sounds like it would be excessively uncomfortable.

    53. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by josquint · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, we usually called it the ePenis.

      But since we're talking about Apple, shouldn't it be the iPenis?

      --
      The bill to ban circumcision [mgmbill.org]

      We there's comment to sig correlation if I ever saw it!
    54. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by urlgrey · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly.

      While the possibilities offered by the iPhone seem to be pretty far-reaching without the "Phone" in "iPhone", you've essentially bought yourself a circa 1999 Palm Pilot with better resolution and color.

      Speaking of a PDA, it would allllmost make sense for a "data only" version. Heck, how many people use their phones only for SMS as it is.

      In either case, my bet (and hope) is on the phone/network being opened up for third party apps. None of this though makes up for the fact that running this app disables the phone portion which really doesn't make sense IMHO.

      --
      Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
    55. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Haha! someone marked that flamebait - bet they bought an iPenis.

      Hey Apple fanboi - mine will be bigger than yours!

      Red or "Mocha" - that's the only question.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    56. Re:Yeah make it worthless, then I can afford one!! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Nah, you have to factor in:
      1. unlocked
      2. Installable Apps
      3. Better comms (3.5g instead of falling off the Edge)
      4. GPS
      5. expandable memory
      6. replaceable battery
      7. Better camera
      8. Qwerty Keyboard!
      9. So big and heavy you can beat an envious iPhone fanboi to death with it
      10. RED! (Or "Starbucks" if you prefer).
      11. Available to many non-Americans (If they happen to live in a Gulf state or Finland).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  2. Screw the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me the chance to buy the device as the next-gen iPod!

  3. DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by hoyeru · · Score: 0

    Hopefully Apple will do so and we will have another round of lols.

    --
    fuck karma, I like saying the truth better
    1. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Why would Apple care if these devices aren't being subsidised, they still get their sale. If anyone is to sue it'd be AT&T.

      On its own this development will only cater for those who are not interested in the phone component, but if he can find a way to unlock it then it'll be a lot more useful.

    2. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      If it happens widely AT&T will either drop it entirely or start selling it at its full price. At the moment they make a loss every time someone does this. If it's half a dozen slashdotters wanting to turn their new phone into an overpriced 4GB ipod then that's not going to affect much. If a full hack comes out and thousands of people do it... then expect AT&T to react.

    3. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by yellowcord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Who's taking a loss? Apparently the mark-up on the 8 GB version is 55%.

    4. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by Imsdal · · Score: 1
      Doesn't the fact that the article you quote gives the price of component with five (5!) significant figures tell you all you need to know about it? Also, since when is development costs 0?

      That said, I fail to see how AT&T stands to lose from morons turning their expensive toy into an iPod. They still have to pay their monthly fees. If I were AT&T, I'd encourage that behaviour. Talk about free money!

    5. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by orasio · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the fact that the article you quote gives the price of component with five (5!) significant figures tell you all you need to know about it? Also, since when is development costs 0?

      It's stupid to try and price an item by the price you think the components cost, ok.
      But it's a nice number to guess, with 1 or 2 signifcant figures.
      Development does have a marginal cost of 0.
      When you are trying to know the benefit of a sale, it would be price - marginal costs. The development cost is a sunk cost, so it is irrelevant to each sale, because it won't change.

      That said, I fail to see how AT&T stands to lose from morons turning their expensive toy into an iPod. They still have to pay their monthly fees. If I were AT&T, I'd encourage that behaviour. Talk about free money!
    6. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Why would Apple sue him, and why would you consider it to be funny?

    7. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by Hamilton+Lovecraft · · Score: 0

      Development is not a sunk fixed cost except to a very very crude approximation. It increases roughly linearly with time-on-market. Bug discovery and feature demands are going to come in proportional to roughly log(number-of-users); Apple now has a bunch of fulltime permanent employees working on improving iPhone.

      --
      step 3: god dammit, it doesn't work
    8. Re:DVD Jon is really asking to be sued again by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Because he is a way-cool internet lolster, who substitutes glibness for the insight he lacks.

  4. Why "Of course"? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is it assumed that phone functionality must be sacrificed? Why can't another SIM be used?

    1. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does it have a pop-out SIM card slot?

    2. Re:Why "Of course"? by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      The iPhone doesn't use SIM cards. You have to "activate it" via iTunes.

      It has a sim card, but it's a weird one.

    3. Re:Why "Of course"? by jonwil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The iPhone almost certainly contains a network lock (where it will refuse to talk to any SIM card that isn't from AT&T)

      The interesting question would be if you could use any AT&T SIM card in the iPhone after activating it with this hack (or if not whether the hack could be changed so that becomes possible). If so, this allows you to completely avoid the "lock-in contract" by obtaining whatever the "I already have a suitable phone and I just want an AT&T SIM card with no lock in contract" plan is.

    4. Re:Why "Of course"? by mzwaterski · · Score: 4, Informative

      The iPhone doesn't use SIM cards.

      It doesnt? http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305 746
    5. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse a naive question from a foreigner, but is that legal in the US? Locking a device to vendor that way is a blatant anti-competitive maneuver, isn't it?

    6. Re:Why "Of course"? by linuxci · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPhone doesn't use SIM cards. You have to "activate it" via iTunes.

      It has a sim card, but it's a weird one. No it's a standard SIM card. The phone is just locked so it can't accept other SIMs. Once you have your AT&T account setup you should be able to use your iPhone SIM is any unlocked GSM phone.
    7. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Locking a device to vendor that way is a blatant anti-competitive maneuver, isn't it?

      Anti-competitive? Perhaps. But there are certainly many competitors in the cell phone market, both for phones and service.

      Illegal? Not blatantly. It's a common practice in the US to sell a locked cell phone at a discount with a one or two year service contract. If you want an unlocked cell phone you usually just have to pay more.

      Of course, the iPhone is unique that you can only buy it locked to AT&T, but I don't that makes it illegal per se. Someone would have to file a lawsuit and a judge would have to decide.

    8. Re:Why "Of course"? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > so it can't accept other SIMs ...and by 'accept' you mean that they will physically fit, but the phone won't work.

      I wonder what would happen if my old AT&T SIM card, from my cancelled contract a few years ago, is put into it...perhaps I could sell it to some iPhone owner :)

      --
      Max.
    9. Re:Why "Of course"? by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I personally think it is fair that a telco wants you to sign up for a 2 year contract when they give you a subsidized phone, especially when they want to give you an expensive phone at (what appears to be) a bargain.

      What I think is a little unfair is paying full price for the device and being locked in for 2 years to a company that appears is not subsidizing the phone. AT&T must have wanted the lock-in for them to justify spending money on the extra services the iPhone offers such as video mail, which they would have made money on anyway if they were first to market or offered the best service.

      In a truly competitive market the iphone would be free to connect to any telco (and because the phone meets FCC requirements they should not legally be allowed to turn the customer away). Problem is, the Telco's are too accustomed to locking down their services and features and couldn't bear the customer having a choice.

      IMHO of course.

    10. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, I hope US follow the EU here, but then, I also hope to get a girlfriend. Not gonna happen.

    11. Re:Why "Of course"? by inviolet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good post. Just one gripe:

      In a truly competitive market the iphone would be free to connect to any telco (and because the phone meets FCC requirements they should not legally be allowed to turn the customer away). [emphasis added]

      Don't equate 'truly' with 'instantly', or else you'll inadvertently summon the regulators, akin to accidentally blurting out Beezelbub's name and having him appear before you in a cloud of cinders.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    12. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm prety sure that in the UK/Europe, it is illegal to tie sims to networks or handsets.

    13. Re:Why "Of course"? by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Good point. the only problem then is where do you get an iPhone without actually signing yourself up for the contract.

      And the only way I can think of would be buying one second hand, meaning someone else signed up to the contract, meaning you are buying a stolen phone.

    14. Re:Why "Of course"? by wmacgyver · · Score: 1

      already tried it. iPhone gives a "It's an invalid SIM card, please activate your iPhone using iTunes."

    15. Re:Why "Of course"? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pretty much all phones in the UK are sim-locked. It's legal to get it unlocked by a slightly dodgy bloke on a market stall for a tenner though.

    16. Re:Why "Of course"? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      Of course it does, all GSM phones do. It's part of the standard.

    17. Re:Why "Of course"? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question - if this hack unlocks it, does it also remove the sim lock? And if not, could it.

    18. Re:Why "Of course"? by philask · · Score: 1

      Eh? I haven't bought a locked phone for years... I think you meant to say "Pretty much all basically free phones given away by the networks because you're getting locked into a 12 or 18 month contract are sim-locked".

      I get all my phones from places like Expansys who sell a complete range of sim-free phones.

    19. Re:Why "Of course"? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. I got my M600i unlocked on eBay. However, I said pretty much all. How many people do you think buy SIM-free phones compared to those who get them subsidised?

    20. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have nevbver been here(UK). no its illeagal for there to be NO WAY of moving, but they can charge to unlock your phone..... wait a few months... then a crack will be out

    21. Re:Why "Of course"? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's a choice: DON'T BUY IT.

      Jesus. /. drives me nuts sometimes. Everybody wants an iPhone for 99 cents, with 10,000 free minutes a month, unlimited texting, unlimited bandwidth, and a personalized letter from Steve Jobs thanking them for making a difference in the world. How the fuck is any of this unfair? There are other phones. There are other PDAs. Want a competitive market? Get Samsung to make a hot phone, and hook it up to another network. Talking about how you don't have a choice is truly idiotic.

    22. Re:Why "Of course"? by Belacgod · · Score: 1

      Also, most cell phones provide basic functionality, so what usually happens is that you choose your carrier, sign a 2-year contract with them, and get a heavily-discounted phone, then in 2 years repeat the process. Only a few phones are worth going about it the other way.

    23. Re:Why "Of course"? by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You misunderstand consumer electronics. Person buys phone and wants to use it with Verizon. Verizon is a CDMA carrier, not GSM. The phone will never work with Verizon. Do you feel like you would like to be the support person explaining this on the phone to the customer that just bought a $500 paperweight and believes it is his right to have the phone work for him?

      So then the guy goes down the street to T-Mobile (a GSM carrier) and gets a SIM card. The phone now works. But the really nifty voicemail feature doesn't work. Neither is there a button on the phone that works with the voicemail features that T-Mobile has. Would you like to be the support person at T-Mobile or Apple that gets to explain this? Again, the customer just spent around $600 for something that does not work completely.

      People want things that work 100% and aren't going to like it much when the spend lots of money and can only be told that 98% of what they bought will work. And absolutely nothing can be done about it.

    24. Re:Why "Of course"? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      Good point. the only problem then is where do you get an iPhone without actually signing yourself up for the contract.
      You walk into any AT&T or Apple Store and buy one. The phones aren't activated in the store, you activate them at home on your computer via iTunes. There are numerous articles about how you can simply use a bad SSN which causes the credit check to fail and iTunes lets you create a prepaid GoPhone month-to-month account instead to use the iPhone. You DON'T need to sign a 2 year contract with AT&T to even use the cell phone functionality of the iPhone, you just have to keep some service with AT&T or likely the next update pushed out via iTunes would deactivate your phone if you don't have service.
    25. Re:Why "Of course"? by K8Fan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which begs the question - if this hack unlocks it, does it also remove the sim lock? And if not, could it.

      This hack doesn't do anything about the phone part of the iPhone. All he did was patch around the activation step and fool the rest of the iPhone into thinking it has already been activated. But I'm pretty sure that someone will take the software apart and figure out how to use it as a standard quad-band GSM phone via the SIM card. The question is if it will have web access via the carrier's data network...and if it would be any faster than AT&Ts EDGE system. The real tragedy would be losing the very cool "Visual Voice-mail". I wonder if Asterisk could be made to serve a Web 2.0 emulation of it?

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    26. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I hope US follow the EU here,

      *shrug* You don't have to buy a locked phone in the US. You can buy virtually any phone unlocked (just like the EU), you just pay more for it.

      Of course people being what they are, they want it cheap and unlocked.

    27. Re:Why "Of course"? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I personally think it is fair that a telco wants you to sign up for a 2 year contract when they give you a subsidized phone, especially when they want to give you an expensive phone at (what appears to be) a bargain.

      Exactly. Vodafone UK literally gives its phones away for free on most mid range packages for 12 or 18 months contract. You can even get something such as a Palm Treo 750v for free if you so desire. A Palm Treo allegedly costs $600 according to Palm's own site, but you get it for nothing since Vodafone recoup the money from your contract and any calls you make beyond the plan.

      That neither Apple nor AT&T do this probably has a lot to do with greed. They know they can rape hype befuddled early adopters and get away with it.

    28. Re:Why "Of course"? by blincoln · · Score: 1, Funny

      People want things that work 100% and aren't going to like it much when the spend lots of money and can only be told that 98% of what they bought will work. And absolutely nothing can be done about it.

      The cell carriers and phone manufacturers could... I don't know... agree on a standard network and phone API.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    29. Re:Why "Of course"? by samuel4242 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it subsidized and it's just so expensive that the subsidies only bring it down to $600?

    30. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I think is a little unfair is paying full price for the device and being locked in for 2 years to a company that appears is not subsidizing the phone.

      Where did you see mention that $500 was the full price of the phone mentioned?

      I rather doubt $500 is the full price of the phone, but rather half price. All the cellphones I've seen with similiar featuresets were above 500 EUR, infact just the pretty nice chunk of memory and diskspace on the device along with wifi and touchsensitive screen.. I'd estimate the price of the phone on a retail market would be 1000-1200 eur.

      Or would be if it had 3G, I don't think you'd be able to sell a GSM/EDGE phone for that price here.

    31. Re:Why "Of course"? by Kankraka · · Score: 1

      As far as I know (as a canadian, i'm only able to go on what others have said) the iPhone refuses AT&T sim's that are on prepaid. I don't know how that works, because the SIM would still be at&t branded.. When activating a phone at my store, prepaid or otherwise, we just grab from a pile of sim cards. Prepaid or postpaid makes no difference in the sim, so I really don't get how it's doing it :|

    32. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I think is a little unfair is paying full price for the device and being locked in for 2 years to a company that appears is not subsidizing the phone.

      Given that you can't buy the iPhone without the plan, what's to say there's not a subsidy already?
    33. Re:Why "Of course"? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Good point. the only problem then is where do you get an iPhone without actually signing yourself up for the contract. At an Apple store. You don't sign any contract there. You only chose your contract when you activate the phone at home via iTunes (where you "sign" it with your SSN and CC info). Or you use the hack - in which case you don't have contract.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    34. Re:Why "Of course"? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      As every(?) other phone out there can have the simlock removed, I'd think so. However, every other phone needs that facility as they're sold on different networks and thsu can't put the simlock in hardware, so perhaps the iPhone is locked-down harder.

      I doubt it'd be possible to make it faster, as it doesn't support 3G. I don't think the speed is a result of the network - it's the phone.

      Perhaps this might help with the visual voicemail.

    35. Re:Why "Of course"? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      If the phone is unlocked you should be able to use it with T-Mobile. If I had an iPhone I'd give it a try. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    36. Re:Why "Of course"? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Subsidised? You've gotta be kidding me. The carriers aren't subsidising one cent of the iPhone, and Apple is already making a hefty profit without their subsidies. AT&T knows they have an inferior product, and they're scared shitless that people* will recognise this and avoid their network while wanting the Gadget du Jour. They're using the lock-in to force their service on people. This is what's typically known as a "monopoly", and under different circumstances it would be illegal.

      *"people" being the folks who actually went out and bought this thing last weekend. Personally, I'm waiting until it's no longer locked to AT&T's network, because I *already* realise that AT&T sucks.

      p

    37. Re:Why "Of course"? by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Informative
      >>>I rather doubt $500 is the full price of the phone, but rather half price.

      People who do this for a living came to a different conclusion

      FTA's:

      Portelligent estimates that the cost of the materials used in the iPhone add up to about $200 for the 4-gigabyte version, which sells for $499 and about $220 for the 8-gigabyte version, which sells for $599. Their estimate doesn't include costs of final assembly, but it does give some insight into the gross margin on the device. Historically Apple's gross margins have run ball park of 50% plus or minus a few points. "We had taken a speculative stab at what the costs would be back in January, when the phone was first announced and we were pretty close to the mark,"
    38. Re:Why "Of course"? by calvy · · Score: 1

      If anyone else is wondering, last night I stuck a SIM card from my buddy's Blackjack in my iPhone. It complained, saying "incompatible SIM, please connect to iTunes for activiation". So that's why you can't just do this. I had the same thought though, obviously. For a second I was wishing I had waited a week before activating mine.

    39. Re:Why "Of course"? by Hamilton+Lovecraft · · Score: 0

      Where's the monopoly, FFS? Every third comment on any iPhone-related post is telling me how there are a dozen other better cheaper touch screen cell phone PDAs available.

      --
      step 3: god dammit, it doesn't work
    40. Re:Why "Of course"? by Varun+Soundararajan · · Score: 1

      I think its still of not much use, until we have something much more holistic..

      Why even if the 2 parts of the hack (SIM unlock , iTunes activation ) arrive, still it may not be great:

      1) You will anyway use ITunes to sync your music with the iPhone. After knowing the whole enormity of the hack, Apple developers can patch their software and push them as update on iTunes.. So the rule of the thumb should be that you shouldnt upgrade your iPhone's software at any cost. That prevents you from patches to the bleeding edges, like fixed ringtones in the iPhone.. etc..

      2) If they want, they can go a step further and in the update stealthily write some program to check if the phone is genuine (like WGA Stuff).. I dont think Apple will do that, but thats very much possible under their EULA

      3) Assuming you get access the file system of iPhone, it still may not help you in terms of the music, and you would be forced to try iTunes (until good & stable alternative for iTunes for iPhones arise)..

      But this is the first step forward for those who want to get rid of AT & T. Lets see how it evolves..

      --
      Cribbing at Slashdot is of no use, get back to work..

    41. Re:Why "Of course"? by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Verizon is a CDMA carrier, not GSM. The phone will never work with Verizon. Do you feel like you would like to be the support person explaining this on the phone to the customer that just bought a $500 paperweight and believes it is his right to have the phone work for him?
      If a Verizon rep sold a GSM phone then damn sure the customer should get an explanation from customer support!

      So then the guy goes down the street to T-Mobile (a GSM carrier) and gets a SIM card. The phone now works. But the really nifty voicemail feature doesn't work. Neither is there a button on the phone that works with the voicemail features that T-Mobile has. Would you like to be the support person at T-Mobile or Apple that gets to explain this? Again, the customer just spent around $600 for something that does not work completely.

      You just proved my point. There is no need to lock it to a carrier because the carriers that do offer all the services will get the most iPhone customers anyway.

      As for spending money on something that does not work completely that is what the American cell-phone market has been doing for years - and the average consumer honestly just does not realize it. Those that have lived outside the USA (UK, NZ, AUS) will know exactly what I mean.

      And as for your comment about me not understanding consumer electronics, you are 100% right. I have lived in the USA for three years and still don't understand how consumers put up with it. I've lived in those countries I listed above for enough time to speak from actual experience (more than 2 years each) and with exposure to a wide range of markets I can honestly say those other markets have more consumer choice in the phone vs carrier game. In the USA the different companies offer choices that you can take or leave, but the real choice is not up to the consumer.
    42. Re:Why "Of course"? by Taxis · · Score: 1

      Here's a tip: DON'T CLICK ON IT. I think they are just criticizing the cellular provider of this PDA that has been a hype machine for the last year. The subject of what you are going to read is advertised in the topic. Why did you click on it if it was obviously going to make you mad? Don't need to go around calling people idiotic for holding a legitimate discussion.

    43. Re:Why "Of course"? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Perhaps it subsidized and it's just so expensive that the subsidies only bring it down to $600?

      I doubt it. Plenty of phones offer everything that could conceivably make the iPhone expensive, only for much less. Sure they may look less stylish, but at the end of the day the iPhone is just a glorified phone / PDA and there are plenty of them to make valid price comparisons to. From my example the Treo 750v has a touch screen, keypad, does quad band GSM and even 3G. Even if you were to look at the differences such as the 8Gb memory, that probably only less than $50 onto production costs since you can buy 8Gb USB keys retail for $70 these days. I don't actually think the Treo is a better phone (it is in some ways and worse in others) but it is suitable for making price comparisons.

      I really doubt that the iPhone costs anywhere close to $600 to manufacture. And even if it did, those phone plans could and should have slashed $400 off the price. At least.

    44. Re:Why "Of course"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's legal to get it unlocked by a slightly dodgy bloke on a market stall for a tenner though.

      That sounds eerily similar to a "Boy George Special".

    45. Re:Why "Of course"? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      It's not unlocked, it's activated. There is a difference.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    46. Re:Why "Of course"? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      People want things that work 100% and aren't going to like it much when the spend lots of money and can only be told that 98% of what they bought will work. And absolutely nothing can be done about it.

      Hmm. Recheck your reality.
      By the overall quality, especially software-wise, of my last few cellphones (Ericcsson T68i, Siemens/BENQ EF81, Nokia N73) I can tell that most people have long been brainwashed into not complaining about all those little annoyances that sum up to this "2% lack of functionality" that you mention.

      If people would actually complain then my T68i UI wouldn't have been slow as molasses, the EF81 wouldn't have been the piece-of-trash it was and my N73 wouldn't "crash sometimes when taking photos or just randomly".

      This applies to pretty much every tech gadget that you can buy nowadays, with only very few notable exceptions like the ipod.
      I think this is a symptom of the "windows generation". Joe Sixpack simply doesn't get to expirience properly engineered hard- or software very often, consequently he doesn't expect much more than "almost working" from his hitech gadgets.

      "Welcome to 2007 and thanks for beta-testing the product you paid for."
    47. Re:Why "Of course"? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that it costs so much to manufacture, it's a simple case of supply and demand, that is, how much they can sell them for. They can charge $600 and the subsidy and lock it down* and still sell them like hotcakes.

      Early-adoption devices are usually a rip-off and when the hype is strong, they're more of a ripoff because rich people need them to feel like they're the shit. For these people, it has little if anything to do with the quality of the product (though quality helps build hype).

      *I'm sure AT&T paid Apple a good deal in one way or another to have what is essentially the successor to the iPod locked to their service, and really, the lock-down lowers choice which should lower cost.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    48. Re:Why "Of course"? by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're wrong. And very right.

      From a consumer perspective, lock-ins are very, very bad. So not buying (while being a choice) is not acceptable. On the other hand, I'm from Sweden where subsidized phones are an option, but in no way standard (since most of us are clever enough to figure out that an we'll pay for the phone anyway after N months while at the time being trapped and forced to pay the ransom money to get our phone to work with another network). My guess is that the iPhone will NOT be tied to a network in Europe, since we are to vigilant to cope with something like that as consumers.

      Fact is, this is probably the thing that could turn most fanbois in to something more of a clever consumer. Or at least I hope so. The iTunes lock-in with the iPod wasn't so bad. iTunes is available on at least two of the major platforms and workarounds could be found in the wild for the rest of them pretty quickly. The iPhone on the other hand proves that (surprise!) Apple is in this for the money. Their money. And your's, if you give it to them.

      Your speach about having a choice is idiotic, because people want the iPhone. You have a lot of choices in your life, but you will sacrifice some principles simply because you want to lead an exciting life as well. The fact is that you can vote with your dollars, but noone will care because the stupid mass is always larger than the smart one.

      Anyway, I'm rambling like the drunk viking I am. And I can tell that WE discovered America first... so.. you know.. it should be called Viking States of America... yeah... *blurb*

    49. Re:Why "Of course"? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      what they probably did was use a sim card with a nonstandard preload image (sim cards can have very different amounts of memory and different serial numbers)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    50. Re:Why "Of course"? by trenien · · Score: 1
      What's really interesting are the places where such hardware lock-in aren't authorized by law, or only for a short time.

      For exemple in France you can ask to have your phone unlocked after 6 months of contracts. They can't refuse, and neither can they stall: if you took the time to get the IMEI number (#06#), it takes 5 minutes, top.

      The reasoning is that if the phone needs a longer time to get paid, it was sold for too low a price which is akin to hidden costs.

      I'm pretty sure there are similar rules in most EU countries.

    51. Re:Why "Of course"? by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      I think the people who complain probably won't be getting one themselves. Complaints are still legitimate when thousands of other people are being locked into such deals. In the very general sense, when a "bad" product which /.ers complain about (and don't purchase) is taken up by the mass market, it adversely affects everyone else too (in the way that arguably Windows, DOC and MP3 format, etc, have).

    52. Re:Why "Of course"? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Quite a difference. It can't be that hard to unlock though. Or so I'd imagine. The unlock code is just a code sequence like serial numbers or credit card numbers. If those can be generated I'd think that unlock codes shouldn't be any harder.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    53. Re:Why "Of course"? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      The monthly service fee for the contract is padded to offset approximately $200 for a new phone every two years. (The iPhone plans cost the same as AT&T's normal "Nation" plans plus unlimited smartphone data.) It doesn't matter if that $200 goes to pay for the manufacturing cost of the phone or if it's pure profit. It's money leaving your pocket either way.

    54. Re:Why "Of course"? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      shrug* You don't have to buy a locked phone in the US. You can buy virtually any phone unlocked (just like the EU), you just pay more for it. Unless you want an iPhone, in which case, no, you can't.
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  5. Right by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So "unbricking" the iPhone means losing cell phone ability. What kind of unbricking this is?

    How about a guide how to free my PC from Internet security vulnerabilities. By blowing up my modem with a hand grenade.

    1. Re:Right by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I understand the idea correctly this allows you to use it without activating it and having a mandatory contract. This does not remove the SIM lock though. If a hack comes out to unlock the SIM lock these two will make a total unlock possible. Anything else aside, this allows you to use the iPhone for something without registering for 2 years contract while you are waiting for the second hack.

      The latter is only a matter of time, after all you do not expect a device with a general purpose OS where everything runs as root to last long, do you?

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Nick: "Inflammable means flammable? What a country."

    3. Re:Right by linuxci · · Score: 2, Funny

      The latter is only a matter of time, after all you do not expect a device with a general purpose OS where everything runs as root to last long, do you? What's Windows got to do with this? :)

      Seriously, what makes you think everything runs as root on the iPhone?
    4. Re:Right by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1, Insightful
      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    5. Re:Right by arivanov · · Score: 1

      At least one of the tech sites (forgot which one, see the iPhone coverage on the Reg, links from there), posted that Safari runs as root based on the UID in memorydumps caused by nuking it the recent Safary vulns. Same for a couple of othr apps which they have managed to coredump. It is only a matter until one of them gets exploited.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    6. Re:Right by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, linking to a Slashdot story from yesterday is "insightful" now. Perhaps "informative", but "insightful"?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:Right by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

      "By blowing up my modem with a hand grenade"

      I hereby defy you in a game of Worms ! you seem to be in the proper mindframe 8)

      --
      It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    8. Re:Right by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      How about a guide how to free my PC from Internet security vulnerabilities. By blowing up my modem with a hand grenade.

      In order for this to be effective folks, you must remain beside the active grenade at all times in order to be certain the vulnerabilities have been removed (among other things).

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    9. Re:Right by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      I'll raise you a guide on how to free your "peecee" from security vulnerabilities (at last the overwhelming majority of them) by not using any software or platforms produced by Microsoft on it.

    10. Re:Right by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Didn't Apple use some sort of fake security thing to throw people off ages ago ?

      The real account must be named "grandma", no hacker would ever think to look there.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    11. Re:Right by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey moderators! You downmodded the wrong post!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    12. Re:Right by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Cingular had an exclusive market with the Samsung blackjack. it took only 20 days before the things started showing up on the grey market 100% unlocked.

      The iPhone will start showing up on ebay in "New unlocked!" form shortly. Apple did not design the cellphone portion of the phone. It's a standard module or chipset and someone will discover what unlocking tricks are needed to get it fully unlocked and flashed to factory defaults for the cellphone portion so that the provider cant re-lock it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I did a symbol dump. I can't say if safari runs as root or not, but It looks like it's chdir'd and only has access to itself and it's cache/tempory files. It may even be jailed which would further limit buffer exploits (I've heard leopard will include FreeBSD jails, but I'm not sure if that's true or not). Binaries are signed and md5 hashed, so it will take more than a safari exploit to exploit them.

    14. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, enter all nines for the social security number, fail the credit check, and sign up for the lowest pay-as-you-go plan. Cancel the plan, the non-phone functions still work. No contract with AT&T required, no cute hacks, nor anything the least bit illegal.

      I don't really see the point of this myself, but claiming that the contract is mandatory isn't correct... though, to be fair, neither AT&T nor Apple is going out of their way to advertise the fact that a contract-free pay-as-you-go plan is available, right through iTunes registration.

    15. Re:Right by arivanov · · Score: 1

      You are underestimating Apple's desire for B&D engagement with the consumer. They are the most lock-in mad company in the world. Compared to them microsoft are a bunch of harmless share-all hippies.

      I will bet a case of beer that the Apple portion of the iPhone verifies the GSM portion flash contents on startup and/or refuses to use it if a strong cryptographic checksum does not match. As the iPhone itself is with certificate chains all over the place and everything is meticulously signed, breaking this and making it use unsigned image for the baseband will not be as trivial as with most GSM handsets which are yet to learn the wanders of DRM and PKI.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    16. Re:Right by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If I understand the idea correctly this allows you to use it without activating it and having a mandatory contract.

      Right. So what does that have to do with "unbricking"? That would be if you got a D.O.A iPhone and managed to bring it back from the dead. Bricked = not working.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:Right by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Given the iPhone doesn't do anything until activated (including iPod/wifi functionality), it is essentially a brick.

      By hacking the activation process, it's now useful for iPod/wifi functionality. In other words, no longer a brick.

    18. Re:Right by dangitman · · Score: 1

      By hacking the activation process, it's now useful for iPod/wifi functionality. In other words, no longer a brick.

      But you could do the same thing without hacking the activation system, using iTunes and signing on for the AT&T plan. It's a pretty big strectch to call the hack "unbricking" - when pretty much everybody buying it intends to use it for phone calls, and were aware of the contracts and activation process.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  6. His name isn't rocket science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has a real name and it isn't difficult either. Let's all say it, "Jon Lech Johansen." There, wasn't that easy?

  7. Right-Nose wars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called, cutting off one's nose to spite one's face. It's rather common with these, "I'm gonna git The Man" battles.

  8. The iPod video in like 3 months, $399 by gig · · Score: 1

    On the day of the iPhone launch Steve Jobs confirmed that OS X is also in "some iPods we've been working on."

    > there are people who want an iPhone to use it as an iPod and WiFi device without having to enter into a 2-year AT&T contract).

    Just wait a few months and get a bug-fixed OS X in an iPod video with the same screen and Wi-Fi and Safari and 100 GB disk.

    1. Re:The iPod video in like 3 months, $399 by kabz · · Score: 1

      Or you could read one of the many iPhone articles available on the net, and simply 'fail the credit check' with ATT and go month to month on the go phone plan.

      The *really* scary thing is that if there's just the *tiniest* hint that an iPod without a cell phone is lame, then everyone is going to want an iPhone, or whatever v2.0 looks like. iPhone totally *rocks*, even the battery life is great.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    2. Re:The iPod video in like 3 months, $399 by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      "...and simply 'fail the credit check' with ATT and go month to month on the go phone plan."

      I still want, no need, the ability to connect to another network. I travel enough to need the ability to put a SIM card in for the country I'm in at the time. So i'd love to use your technique to get my hands on the phone, but will certainly need the (inevitable) hack to use another SIM.

      I've been looking for a device that has wi-fi web, phone, and all the features the iPhone offers (including cool factor) but gives me freedom. Closest I can get is the Nokia n95 or the open-Moko. Am still looking though.

    3. Re:The iPod video in like 3 months, $399 by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      If you've been reading, AT&T included special features not available with any other phone or on any other network. None of this is going to work on a different network. It is not in Apple's interest to have significant features (voicemail, for one) not work on their phone.

      Will you be able to put a different SIM card in eventually? Probably. But not right away.

      Will other carriers pick up the feature set? Probably not.

    4. Re:The iPod video in like 3 months, $399 by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      I just want the phone part to work on other networks, I'm not worried about the video mail etc. Its the camera, wi-fi web browser and decent music player, plus the great UI that I'd like. I also dont care what services the other companies decide to offer for the iPhone, weather its just calls or voicemail, videomail and all that. If they are competitive on price, coverage, features, or service, then they'll capture some of the market.

    5. Re:The iPod video in like 3 months, $399 by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      I second that sentiment, on this extra long reply thread I've clicked into.

      And if you judge from wiki, there are almost as many hackers beavering away to understand how iPhone works so that goal can be accomplished, as there are people who bought the iPhone in the first place.

      If someone manages a SIM unlocked iPhone, the sales of the product would double overnight, and FedEx will use up 5 years of carbon credits flying them to all corners of the planet.

  9. Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by MCSEBear · · Score: 5, Informative
    From Ars Technia -- November 24, 2006

    The newest list of exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is out, and the Register of Copyrights is recommending six exemptions this time around. If you've been hankering for the legal authority to remove Sony's rootkit or to unlock your cell phone, then this will be big news. If you were hoping for the ability to make backup copies of your legally purchased DVDs, you're (still) out of luck.

    Exemptions are allowed for 1) the educational library of a university's media studies department, in order to watch film clips in class; 2) using computer software that requires the original disks or hardware in order to run; 3) dongle-protected computer programs, if the the dongle no longer functions and a replacement cannot be found; 4) protected e-books, in order to use screen-reader software; 5) cell phone firmware that ties a phone to a specific wireless network; and 6) DRM software included on audio CDs, but only when such software creates security vulnerabilities on personal computers. You are allowed to unlock your cell phone no matter what Apple or AT&T think about it. They can't sue DVD Jon for breaking their bullshit attempts to control hardware that they have sold. The purchaser can do what they want with their own phone.

    Whole article is at: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061124-8280 .html
    1. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by catxk · · Score: 1

      That makes me wonder how it can even be legal to lock a phone in such a manner. To make an effort to limit consumer freedom never sounded right, and in the light of your post, it sounds like syntax error.

      --
      Don't be crazy anymore!
    2. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by MCSEBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's just a function of the fact that telecoms have buckets full of money and congress-persons like buckets full of money.

      You notice that congress never said telecoms can't reduce consumer choice by locking cell phones. Instead, the head of the copyright office decided to make an exemption to the DMCA to cover unlocking cell phones. Perhaps the telecoms forgot to offer the head of the copyright office enough buckets full of money. Heck, I suppose it's even possible that this official is honest and has the consumers best interests in mind.

      Sadly, the US totally lacks a political party that is willing to protect consumers when there is the possibility of gaining access to said buckets full of money. There was a lot of talk about network neutrality from the Democrats before they took control of congress. Now that they are in power and those buckets full of money are in the offing, they seem to have suddenly shut the fuck up about the importance of network neutrality. Sigh. Libertarians, anyone?

    3. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      There was a lot of talk about network neutrality from the Democrats before they took control of congress. Now that they are in power and those buckets full of money are in the offing, they seem to have suddenly shut the fuck up about the importance of network neutrality.


      That's called pandering, and it's what all mainstream politicians do to get elected before going back to doing the same crap they always did. It's also why Hillary and McCain started campaigning so early this year; they needed to do a lot of pandering to get the people they wanted to vote for them to forget what they actually stood for.
    4. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not a legal thing, it's a commercial thing. SIM locking makes a lot of sense and is one of the features that allowed for such a massive and fast rollout of ubiquitous GSM communications. Essentially it means the providers can heavily subsidise the price of the phone, making an advanced piece of electronics extremely cheap (and therefore affordable to lots of people), while still turning a profit. Everybody wins. But without locking, subsidising such a phone is equivalent to simply giving away money - so robust locking (a form of DRM in a way) is pretty important if you value everybody having a mobile phone. As phones usefulness is very much related to how many people have them, I'd say that's pretty important, especially as many countries now have laws around how long a phone can remain locked for and on some contracts (like mine) after you've had it for a year you own the phone and can get it unlocked.

      Now, in this case, there are some things that aren't really clear. The first is how much AT&T are subsidising the cost of the phone. My Sony Ericsson W800i, which is now about 2 years old and has most of the features (if not the nice ui) of the iPhone cost me 30 UK pounds when I bought it on contract (locked for a year), which is about $60. But the high end iPhone costs 10 times that. I can well believe it's more expensive to make, as it's newer, has a nicer screen etc, but is AT&T subsidising the cost at all? If they are then I guess Apple have serious problems with the manufacturing price. If they aren't doing so then the original rationale for allowing locking (which is otherwise an unwarranted distortion of the free market) disappears, and it should be looked at closely.

    5. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by MCSEBear · · Score: 1

      Pandering, Lying

      Tomato, Tomahto

      I still say it's time to toss both of the current lying ass parties out and give someone else a try.

    6. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by MCSEBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think Sim locking makes sense to any reasonable person. Now if a provider wants to subsidize the cost of a cell phone and then make me reimburse them for ONLY the cost of said subsidy if I cancel my contract early, that makes perfect sense.

      In any event, AT&T is not subsidizing the cost of the iPhone in any way. Locking the iPhone to their network when they are not paying any portion of it's cost for the consumer is just plain evil. Apple, by extension, is also guilty.

    7. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by pdboddy · · Score: 1

      Giving away free money?

      Sorta like how Google gives away free searches? :P

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    8. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by jack_csk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps others have already told you - the Telecoms don't have to sim-lock the phones they sell to earn the profit. Instead, the Telecoms just have to bind the customer with a contract.

      In other words, the sim-lock defendings are nothing but BS from the Telecoms. They just don't want to admit that they are so greedy.

    9. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      On a lot of contracts if you void it, you pay the cost of the phone and then it's unlocked for you (if that was a part of the package you signed up for). Locking isn't here to screw you over, it's to ensure that if the phone company pays for the cost of the phone they get to make their money back on your calls. If your phone company IS screwing you over, go to a different one. Or just buy the phone yourself unlocked - this is perfectly feasable for many phones (iPhone excepted) but most people prefer to get it as part of their contract and amortize the cost over a longer period of time.

    10. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The subsidy is based on the idea that you'll use your shiny new phone a lot. People who get a phone cheap and then hardly make any calls are money-losers for the phone companies, they're balanced out by those who use their phones a lot. This balancing has tremendous benefit for society - it means I can basically assume somebody will have a mobile phone regardless of their personal wealth, because the actual equipment is so damn cheap. Without locking, people would sign up for a contract to get a phone that is subsidised on the assumption of usage, then immediately swap the SIM for a cheaper pay as you go module. Now the original phone company is losing money because they bought you a phone but you aren't making any calls with them.

      Now you could argue that any business model that involves (temporarily!) tying the phone to the company who paid for it is somehow immoral or wrong because it sounds like DRM, but that's an argument that won't carry much weight outside of slashdot. The system has worked well for a long time and has meant everybody can afford a phone regardless of their usage. Are there alternative business models that don't involve locking, yes of course, but would they allow poorer people who want a phone but don't use it much to be a part of the system ... probably not.

      I'll repeat the point I made above - I'd be interested to know why Apple did an exclusive deal with AT&T. What's in it for AT&T is obvious, but what's in it for Apple if AT&T aren't subsidising the price and hoping to make their money back by attracting high-paying power users? I can't see any reason why Apple would do that if not to reduce the price for the consumer significantly, which is what sim locking is normally about, so it makes sense. If AT&T are not subsidising the product in any way, then I would also join those wondering what the point is. I'd really like to see a citation for your claim that AT&T don't subsidise the iPhone. Is that announced anywhere?

    11. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are allowed to unlock your cell phone no matter what Apple or AT&T think about it.

      What does unlocking a phone have to do with circumventing copyright protection? Surely the DMCA does not apply and it would be legal whether or not the DMCA had exemptions covering it, as long as you're not interfering with the built-in copy restriction measures of the phone?

    12. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by MCSEBear · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think you're a bit confused because you're used to living in the EU where regulators actually force companies to refrain from bending over and ass fucking their consumers quite so much. Here in the US the telecoms are so certain they have Congress in the palm of their hands that telecom executives actually brag about it in public speeches!

      "The former CEO of AT&T, Ed Whitacre, had some interesting remarks to make about Net Neutrality during his parting speech. Choice quotes include his plans for getting anti-neutrality legislation through: "Will Congress let us do it?" Whitacre asks his colleagues. "You bet they will -- cuz we don't call it cashin' in. We call it 'deregulation.' http://slashdot.org/articles/07/06/06/1220258.shtm l

      Here is information on AT&T's failure to subsidize the iPhone and the progress being made to break the Sim lock on iPhone.

      Efforts to unlock Apple's iPhone continue, with hackers claiming "very significant progress".

      The locked iPhone only works with AT&T's EDGE network, and cannot be used with mobile services from other providers. Locked phones are generally used to help operators recoup the cost of subsidising handsets for their customers, but AT&T is not subsidising the iPhone, which is priced at either $499 or $599 (£250 or £300), depending on the model. Instead, the phone is locked because AT&T has a five-year agreement with Apple to be the sole iPhone provider in the US.

      Unlocking the iPhone would be a boon for users locked into a contract with another US carrier, or for users outside the US who want an iPhone. While initial signs indicate an unlocked iPhone is possible, hackers must first overcome several challenges. One of those involves circumventing the authentication process in iTunes that both lets users register for an AT&T service plan and turn on the phone's features, including its camera and music player.

      By Monday evening, US time, hackers had made headway towards circumventing the activation process. But the phone remained locked at the time of writing.

      "We have been fairly successful in spoofing iTunes activation processes. This should allow us to activate the phone," poster gj wrote on the iPhone Dev Wiki, one of several websites tracking efforts to unlock the phone. "It may in fact also prevent the SIM locking from occurring in the first place ... though we haven't verified this yet."

      These advances allowed hackers to set and read data on the iPhone, including the ability to query whether a phone has been activated. "The rest of our work is legwork really, in understanding how certain functions operate with the rest of the phone," the site said, adding hackers are close to the ability to browse system files on the iPhone, a key step towards unlocking the handset.

      Once the activation problem has been overcome, hackers will be faced with other questions. For instance, does iTunes have the ability to recognise a phone that was not activated for use with the AT&T network? If so, how will iTunes react?

      After these questions are resolved, hackers can focus on unlocking the handset itself. That task is made easier by the iPhone's use of a removable SIM (Subscriber Identity Module), a smart card that contains a user's phone number as well as storage space for contacts and messages, instead of one that was hardwired into the phone. The use of a removable SIM card means the iPhone is locked using its firmware, which can likely be cracked. http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=9 956

      It's also been reported in many places that AT&T is giving Apple a portion of it's revenue from monthly iPhone service plans. I don't think either company has confirmed that, but it would explain why Apple was willing to give AT&T a five year exclusive on the iPhone even though AT&T does not pay any part of the cost of the device for consumers.
    13. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that should be

      Tomadeduh, Tomato

      old chap

    14. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by Jeremy_Bee · · Score: 1
      Great post and deserving of the "informative" mod, but this part...

      They can't sue DVD Jon for breaking their bullshit attempts to control hardware ... doesn't make sense to me.

      To not know that unlocking a phone is perfectly legal in most countries, and to believe that any encryption or hiding of the lock will stop the average hacker for long, apple would have to be run by complete idiots (it's not).

      I think it more likely that the lock is only there at AT&T's request and to make the deal happen. There is almost zero downside to Apple if the iPhone is unlocked and a considerable upside as well. If the iPhone is unlocked eventually, I predict Apple will not bother to "re-lock" it unless it is also part of the AT&T contract to do so.

    15. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Everybody wins.

      Everybody wins? I'm sorry, having mobile phones affordable enough for teenagers to afford is not good for anybody. How is it a good thing the way that people use these things on public transport, in cinemas, in school classes, while driving?

      It's a fucking travesty. Everybody would be much better off if mobile phones were still rare, ultra-expensive, and only owned by the occassional person who really needed it for work.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    16. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by G-funk · · Score: 1

      No, SIM locking only makes sense for pre-paid subsidised phones. Contract phones have this thing called a contract, that requires you to pay wether you like it or not. Incidently, outside of the US, where you all get absolutely shafted by cell phone providers, nobody SIM-locks non-prepaid cells. And after 6-12 months of continued use, most providers will unlock your prepaid phone for a nominal fee (like $40 or so).

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    17. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      Without locking, people would sign up for a contract to get a phone that is subsidised on the assumption of usage, then immediately swap the SIM for a cheaper pay as you go module. Now the original phone company is losing money because they bought you a phone but you aren't making any calls with them.
      I'm confused, in the states are you able to get a contract that doesnt actually oblige you to pay anything? what does the contract actually accomplish for the phone company? the way you describe it makes it sound no worse than pre-paid accounts in that you only pay for what you use
      Here in Australia if you get a phone contract, you're agreeing to pay $X per month in exchange for $Y worth of calls, whether or not you make those calls. If you get a phone on contract and put a pre-paid sim in it you're still gonna be paying $X every month even if you never make a call. either that or you'll have to pay out the contract which usually costs as much as $X times the number of months left in your contract.
      --
      TIAEAE!
    18. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Yes but that's the base rate. Usually you pay $X per month for Y calls, and if you make more calls, you pay for them as well. I know many people on contracts who spend hundreds of dollars a month on their phones - it's certainly not an all-you-can-eat deal. Usually the incentive for using a contract is that you get nicer hardware, that it's more convenient billing wise, and that the actual calls themselves can be cheaper (because you get free minutes/texts every month).

    19. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Er, so I watched the video with Ed Whitacres quotes in it. You realise that it's a cartoon, right? I can well believe this is what AT&T actually thinks but please - quoting things he "said" which are actually satire is really stupid.

    20. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Australia is different.
      I had Vodafone when Ericsson R-320s was in vogue (2000 olympics).
      I paid $55 per month and got $55 worth of free calls (although my bill came to $200 every month).
      It was a 2-year contract, and although i could swap out the SIM with another cheaper SIM (optus crap, i didn;t know then they were crap), my bill would still say $55 and it continued to say it for another 2 years.
      Once the 2 years were up, i stopped receiving any bills. No automatic extension, etc.
      Nothing.

      The R-320s was never SIM locked. NEVER.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    21. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense to me. It's Economics 101. AT&T had to make changes to it's network in order to work with the iPhone and it had to give up control to the phone manufacturer over aspects of the phone that it had never done with other phone manufacturers in the past. All of that comes at a cost and AT&T would have been irresponsible to incur those costs without the chances of turning a profit. That profit comes by having users of the iPhone locked into a two year contract. You don't like it, then don't buy an iPhone. Problem solved.

  10. Re:HEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    No - it runs BSD (Mac OS X).

  11. Re:tag: !unbricking unlocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlocking would be misleading, as that could mean he's broken the SIM lock.

  12. Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    In order to justify his name he should do Blue Ray and HD DVD stuff. Does he have anything against Apple Computer and/or Steve Jobs?

    1. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      The guy is a modern-day Robin Hood. You still have to respect his "stick it to The Man" talents, regardless of what he calls himself or who is today's choice for "Sherriff of Nottingham"...

    2. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He earned his name long ago. He has no need to 'justify' himself to anyone, and he certainly doesn't owe us anything. He can do whatever he damned well pleases, and you should be thankful for anything that happens to help you, instead of disrespecting him for the stuff that doesn't.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he have anything against Apple Computer and/or Steve Jobs?

      What red-blooded Earthican doesn't?

    4. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      COCKSUCKER

    5. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      He earned his name long ago. He has no need to 'justify' himself to anyone, and he certainly doesn't owe us anything. He can do whatever he damned well pleases, and you should be thankful for anything that happens to help you, instead of disrespecting him for the stuff that doesn't.

      Showing your gratitude means you're weak. You gotta hate things. Hate Windows, hate Oracle, hate IBM, hate Intel, hate RIAA, hate Exxon. Hate the government, hate DVD Jon. Hate some guy who made a million by selling pixels on his home page and so on.

      It's a survival technique. Now, of course, I kinda like Linux. I contributed a brightness adjustment to the "paste" icon in the KDE file manager, so by extension this puts me in the same group with the guys who created the Linux kernel.

      But I'm not gonna tell you I like Linux. I'll just instead tell you you're an idiot for not using Linux, otherwise it means I'm weak.

    6. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0

      Does he have anything against Apple Computer and/or Steve Jobs?
      He is basically interested in breaking the 'lock' of 'locked' devices.

      If he is focusing on Apple, it may be because Apple and Steve Wonder have released products after products which are completely locked in with them or some other entity like AT&T?? You know... just may be?
    7. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In order to justify his name he should do Blue Ray and HD DVD stuff.

      Totally agreed. And he better do it quick, I'm on the phone talking with the head of the Name Giving Commission, and they're seriously considering taking his name back.

    8. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple?

      Because HD formats aren't worth anyone's attention.
    9. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by drifterusa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, taking from the evil technology innovators and giving to the impoverished geeks who can't survive without the latest gizmo delivered on their terms. Robin Hood my ass!

    10. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by neonmonk · · Score: 1

      I hate you cause I'm alpha.

    11. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Wite_Noiz · · Score: 1

      I contributed a brightness adjustment to the "paste" icon in the KDE file manager

      Gah! So you're responsible for that travesty?! ;)

      (hehe, captcha is 'abhors')
    12. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robin Hood your ass!

    13. Re:Why is DVD Jon focused on Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple earned it's name long ago. Apple has no need to 'justify' itself to anyone, and it certainly doesn't owe us anything. It can do whatever it damned well pleases, and you should be thankful for anything that happens to help you, instead of disrespecting it for the stuff that doesn't.

  13. Unlock?? by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am much more looking forward to unlocking the iPhone so you can use it with any GSM card - including those up here in the great white north.

    1. Re:Unlock?? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if that becomes possible, I think you'd lose the "Visual Voicemail" feature (email-like random access to voicemail messages) since they said at the launch that it required AT&T back end development, and minimally has to be closely tied to the AT&T way of retrieving voice mail messages.

    2. Re:Unlock?? by Zebedeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're right!
      The iPhone is totally useless without this "Visual Voicemail" feature!

    3. Re:Unlock?? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Are iPhones going to be sold in Europe? Many countries either outlaw locking or require access to the unlock key for unsubsidized GSM phones.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Unlock?? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Since I don't have (or ever see a need for) even regular voicemail on my cell phone I realy don't give a crap about visual voicemail :P

      If I don't answer my phone, call my house. If I don't answer that, leave a msg. If I don't call back, I didn't want to talk to you.

      If the call isn't important enough to dial again to leave a message than it wasn't important enough for me to answer the cell for anyways.

    5. Re:Unlock?? by dr00g911 · · Score: 1

      As the owner of an iPhone, it would appear that "visual voicemail" is actually some type of push email service that delivers audio files to the phone, ie once a voicemail has been received, the phone can be in airplane mode (all radios off) and I can still listen to the messages.

      I'd imagine that those unlocking the phone will have to sacrifice this part, no matter how clean and reliable the hack.

  14. Or... by dwightk · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Like anyone can even know that
    1. Re:Or... by sholden · · Score: 1

      Still gives your details to AT&T^H^H^H^HNSA for the paranoid...

    2. Re:Or... by donnacha · · Score: 1
      No, the whole point is that some people don't want to give their SSN and details to AT&T which you have to do if you activate it normally, even if you intend to cancel. They will keep those details forever once they have them.

      Also, the credit check can be a problem for some and, even though your activation fee is refunded, you still have to cough it up in the first place and, then, wait for the refund check or whatever.

      Screw all that, just buy an unactivated phone and spend 5 minutes activated it yourself at home for free.

    3. Re:Or... by dwightk · · Score: 1

      Riiight... the NSA doesn't have your name and Social Security Number...

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    4. Re:Or... by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      I canceled my service in a day since I couldn't get an AT&T signal at my house. They told me on the phone that I had 14 days to return the equipment to the store or I'd still be charged early termination.

  15. Apple cares because they get a slice of the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    monthly fees from AT&T for all subscribers on the iPhone plans.

    That's one of the many reasons Verizon told Apple to go pound sand.

    1. Re:Apple cares because they get a slice of the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      500,000 units sold in one day. That's one of the many reasons Verizon wishes they hadn't.

  16. Wait.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    You're saying people are already bricking their iPhones?

    1. Re:Wait.... by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      Yes. Activation = Bricking.

      Its funny some of the hippies were pissed off when it took them 24 to 36 hrs in queue for, er, bricking their phone.

    2. Re:Wait.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      I thought 'bricking' meant screwing it up in some way to that it didn't respond any more. ie: turning it into a $500 'brick'.

    3. Re:Wait.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Read my above description of what I thought bricking is. I thought 'unbricking' meant repairing the damage.

  17. Re:tag: !unbricking unlocking by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    Something else then. Someone gathered the activation codes. Either way, not unbricking.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  18. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we ACs don't get points to award.

  19. A better idea by ThisIsWhyImHot · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you just buy the iPhone and not activate it? Now all you slashdotters will be able to get girls phone numbers and have an excuse when you don't call them!

    1. Re:A better idea by Magneon · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't use it for anything at all without activating it... ...without this hack.

    2. Re:A better idea by mst · · Score: 1

      Getting a girl's phone number? This is Slashdot, remember!

  20. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm interested in a hack that allows tunring my nano into a phone. Let me know when this happens...

  21. Re:People will actually do this by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    Voice quality is quite good in the phone itself. The quality of network varies depending on your location. I've been in the Washington D.C. area and it was clear. In Toronto, roaming with Rogers has also been great.

    I doubt that most will cancel their service.

    --
    -Stu
  22. Anyone care to unbrick the server? by peektwice · · Score: 1

    Looks like nanocr.eu is groaning under the ./ effect.

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  23. iPhone - phone - introducing the "i" by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    Genius, so you take a phone and "unlock it" thus meaning it is no longer a phone.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:iPhone - phone - introducing the "i" by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      Was it really a phone? Did people really buy it because it was a phone?

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  24. And this "Begs the Question" by JamesP · · Score: 0

    Unlocking the iPhone will become trivial in the following weeks. However, what to do with the 2 year contract you signed at the time you bought it???

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:And this "Begs the Question" by Yosho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, what to do with the 2 year contract you signed at the time you bought it???

      You don't sign a contract at the time you buy it. Have you been ignoring all of the previous iPhone discussions?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  25. iPhone shuffle by Elsapotk421 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll take one!

    --
    We came,we saw, we kicked it's ass!
  26. Re:People will actually do this by linzeal · · Score: 1

    We don't even have their "service" here, not till 2012.

  27. voip by metroplex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    would a voip webapp be feasible? then the iphone would be pretty cool even whitout gsm functionality

    --
    "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
    1. Re:voip by extrasupermario · · Score: 1
      Well lets look at the hurdles:
      • 1. Most VoIP platforms are run over UDP; the browser is TCP.
      • 2. The browser would need to access the mic hardware; Flash has a Microphone object in actionscript but it needs to be used with a Flash Communication $erver. Javascript, to my knowledge, has no native access to the mic.
    2. Re:voip by Ryandav · · Score: 1

      there is one out already, i forget the name but someone was using this service for dialing internationally. Oh here it is: Talkety
      http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/06/28/talkety.iph one.voip/

      if the rate is cheaper than the long distance charges AT&T charges, it may make sense to use. Its not Skype, but its close.

      --
      Check my Go-related blog for beginners: DGD
    3. Re:voip by extrasupermario · · Score: 2, Informative

      Talkety does not use VoIP to connect to the iPhone, but a call back mechanism that connects two or more phones via normal phone lines. VoIP is only used in between. You will still need the AT&T contract to use Talkety

    4. Re:voip by anethema · · Score: 1

      would a voip webapp be feasible? then the iphone would be pretty cool even whitout gsm functionality It would be very nice, but as of now the safari in the iPhone does not support java or flash so it seems unlikely it would be possible to make a voip app using it. Heres to hoping though!
      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  28. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, he does have an interest in Apple products...

  29. Re:Or... Not by nbritton · · Score: 1

    You forgot step 2... Pay $200 to get out of the contract you signed with AT&T.

  30. Re:Or... Not by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Interesting



    Cancel within 4 days and you get the activation fee refunded; and since you are within 30 days there is no early termination fee.

    Essentially you are buying a very expensive iPod/WiFi web browser.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  31. Re:Or... Not by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Wow, way to comment without actually reading the source material! You have, IIRC(this may also depend on the state) 14 days after signing to cancel out of a cell phone contract for whatever reason(most people do it because they get crappy service in their area) without paying a termination fee.

  32. Re:Or... Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, if you cancel within 30 days there is no 150$ fee.

  33. Windows Only? by srwalter · · Score: 2, Informative

    There doesn't appear to be anything windows-only about this hack. The Phone Activation Server is written on .NET. If this is anything like DVD Jon's other .NET programs, it will have no problem running under Mono in Linux. The only other part to the hack is to redirect a hostname to 127.0.0.1, which is also easily done in Linux.

    I'd be happy to verify this theory if someone wants to send me an iPhone ;)

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4
    1. Re:Windows Only? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hex editing the windows iTunes binary.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Windows Only? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's being awfully picky :)

  34. Re:Or... Not by Joebert · · Score: 1
    Are you sure ?

    Per AT&Ts terms of service: If you cancel your AT&T service within 30 days you do not have to pay an early termination fee; and if you cancel within 3 days you get a refund of your activation fee.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  35. OT: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know that "arguement" is actually spelled "argument"?

    HTH

    HAND

  36. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trust != like

  37. I have one by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It involves an elastic band, a free cell phone from the carrier of your choice (look around. They all have at least one model that's free) and your nano..

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:I have one by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Super Glue is far better.
      Damn where are the mod points when you need them.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  38. The service providers are the problem. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My hope is that the iPhone would bring into the limelight how restrictive all mobile phone service providers are. They do nothing but restrict progress and rip off the consumer. I think they're responsible for why phones in the US market lag behind the rest of the world in terms of technology. If US consumers had access to what's available elsewhere I think people would generally be less impressed by the iPhone.

    To me the activities the US carriers engage in is just as bad if not worse than DRM. It's a big problem and unfortunately I don't see many people calling attention to it.

    1. Re:The service providers are the problem. by bnenning · · Score: 1

      My hope is that the iPhone would bring into the limelight how restrictive all mobile phone service providers are. They do nothing but restrict progress and rip off the consumer.

      Exactly right, I was hoping Apple would challenge the system. The iPhone has the potential to be a fantastic mobile computer, but Apple is apparently willing to let AT&T call the shots and just split the profits.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:The service providers are the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A could not agree more. Carriers in general try to sell their services and will do anything they can to restrict you from getting them elsewhere. SIM locking should just be made illegal. Or you could just make bundling contracts and phones illegal. Actually where I live it was the other way around. Phones and contracts were not bundled and the competition between carriers was so tough that they had financial problems in keeping the technology of their network up to date.

      Wi-Fi is a good example of carriers trying slowdown progress. Carriers are terrified of VoIP and have done everything they can to stop Wi-Fi/VoIP from becoming a mainstream feature. iPhone does have Wi-Fi and an unlimited data plan but no VoIP or SDK.

  39. Re:Your sig by michrech · · Score: 0

    homo? The first (and only) time I've seen the text in the sig you replied to was from "Mr/Mrs Garrison" (if I've spelled that correctly) in South Park. I believe it was from an episode called "Bloody Mary", but I could be wrong. I tried to search for a clip (in English!) on youtube, but my search skills have failed me.
    --
    bork bork bork!
  40. Of course its a pathetic PDA.... by soulhuntre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously.

    No to-do list? Check.

    No copy & paste? Check.

    Lousy web compatability? Check.

    No video recording? Check.

    Lousy camera? Check.

    Did I mention Apple couldn't figure out CUT & PASTE? Check.

    No removable memory card? Check.

    Applications buggy and crash prone? Check.

    Lets face it, the thing is a dog.

    --
    --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
    1. Re:Of course its a pathetic PDA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No real buttons/keyboard? Check.

      In terms of a cell phone, glass smeared with face sludge? Check. I don't have one but I've seen several on TV and they look like petri dishes.. gross!

  41. Re:the number 1 reason..... by deesine · · Score: 1

    Feeling negative today?! Relax, eat a hotdog, drink a beer; it's independence day!

    --
    damaged by dogma
  42. Re:Or... Not by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    GP has offended apple by not reading source material !! omgWTF.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  43. Re:Your sig by badran · · Score: 1

    This sounds right.... :) ... Bastards...

  44. Its very hard to understand this by Budenny · · Score: 1

    What is hard to understand is, why they thought it was sensible to tie the phone to one network. Evidently they did not need to do this to generate sales. So why did they not simply allow people to buy and register with whoever they wanted? The margins seem to be high enough, the demand was there? What was the point? In fact, would they not have sold more if they hadn't locked it to one network?

    Its true they control the customers' network choice. But why do they care which network he/she chooses? Does anyone have a simple explanation of this?

    1. Re:Its very hard to understand this by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sprint and Verizon each use phones specifically tailored for their service. Unlocked phones that'll work with both are a rarity and never quite work well. For it to be unlocked it'd have to be GSM, which leaves AT&T and T-Mobile. Features on the phone that Apple wanted to implement were carrier dependent (visual voicemail, etc)

      Also the main reason: I'm a T-Mobile dealer that also sells unlocked phones. Both AT&T and T-Mobile want absolutely nothing to do with you if you're using an unlocked phone. They will literally get you off the line ASAP if they hear you're not using one of their branded phones... Plus typically some features are only locked to carrier locked/branded phones. This doesn't quite translate well to the "Mac experience" being "It just works, and if it doesn't we'll take care of it for you" So for them to offer the "experience" that makes Apple products unique.... they'd have to pair up with a carrier.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    2. Re:Its very hard to understand this by mla_anderson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Should be pretty obvious why they have the network lock: visual voicemail. Visual voicemail is a major change to the carrier's voicemail system, to get a network to agree to make the change Apple has to agree to the lock-in.

      For me, the visual voicemail is the big win for the iPhone, the ability to have random access to voicemail is great. The other features are pretty, but visual voicemail is what makes me drool.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    3. Re:Its very hard to understand this by cuzco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Visual voicemail is cool but, it hardly justifies such an odius 5 year AT&T lock-in. I'd would gladly give up visual voicemail for an iPhone that could be used with any provider. Think about that. Apple can't sell an iPhone that works with any other provider FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. That's an eternity in the tech industry and in 5 years, you better believe that all other major phone manufacturers will have easily surpassed the iPhone in terms of elegance and ease of use. Apple isn't going to sit on their thumbs for the next five years but they showed other phone manufacturers how to make a simple elegant device. They gave away the store with this AT&T deal.

    4. Re:Its very hard to understand this by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Visual voicemail is a major change to the carrier's voicemail system, to get a network to agree to make the change Apple has to agree to the lock-in.

      How is it a major change, unless the carrier's voicemail system is a pile of crap? All it should involve is making some basic information available to the phone instead of the back-end voicemail system and responding to the phone's navigation commands instead of having a tone-controlled back-end system that the user calls up from their phone. IE moving the UI from a server at AT&T to the phone.
      Again, unless the existing voicemail system was a poorly-designed relic of the 80s, it should already be at least halfway there so that the back-end UI layer (that you call up from your phone) and the back-end data layer can be on separate machines.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:Its very hard to understand this by joto · · Score: 1

      Again, unless the existing voicemail system was a poorly-designed relic of the 80s

      Your attempts at making this sound unlikely failed. For all I know, it was designed in the 60's, with industrial robots controlled by a valve-computer exchanging audio tapes, and pressing "record", "play", "rewind", and "stop" on commercial tape recorders. Since then the system has been extended in various ways, and now relies entirely upon rebuilt toy robots, "my first sony" tape recorders, and lots of duct-tape and steel-wire, as well as a customized and overclocked TI graphical calculator that controls everything that isn't controlled by the valve-computer or the web-management interface which runs on an original PC XT with special drivers.

    6. Re:Its very hard to understand this by ross.w · · Score: 1

      3(Hutchison) and I think most other 3G carriers in Australia have this already. It's not exclusive to Apple.

      The fact that no-one actually bothers to use it is another issue.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    7. Re:Its very hard to understand this by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      First of all, Apple had to agree to this in order to get AT&T to work with them, which Apple really needed.

      If Apple wants the iPhone to work on two major US carriers (AT&T and T-Mobile) instead of one, they'll have to make some changes. Support for non-visual voicemail, support for T-Mobile's EDGE network if it's not identical to AT&T's, etc. This will take a little bit of time.

      If Apple wants the iPhone to work on all major US carriers, they'll have to make some rather more significant changes. Support for the above, plus CDMA, UMTS, etc. This will take a lot of time.

      I think it will be at least three years before Apple could really be ready to support Verizon and Sprint properly, and that's if they actually work on it for the next three years. By not thinking about that for the next two years, it gives them time to work on international GSM support, HSDPA, and general bugfixes and feature enhancements. Then they can spend the next three years getting CDMA to work, so when the five year agreement is done, they'll really be ready to go.

      And hopefully during that time, other phones will add support for AT&T's visual voicemail service, and then other carriers will add support for those phones by setting up their own visual voicemail service that will be compatible with what Apple and AT&T worked out. Better for everybody.

      So five years from now, Apple should be ready to sell an iPhone for $500 that works with any cell network without a contract. In the mean time, they're pulling in wads of cash to help fund development, and they don't have to try to do too many things at once. Remember, Apple pulled people away from working on Mac OS X to help with the iPhone so they could get it released on time...

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  45. What a pointless waste of time... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    If there's wi-fi available I'll use my iBook thank you very much (it's always in my purse). If there's not wi-fi I want a cell phone with 3G.

    1. Re:What a pointless waste of time... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Something about the idea of a goth biker who always carries an iBook in her purse makes me smile.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  46. Re:HEY by nneonneo · · Score: 1

    To be precise, it's "OS X" (Apple dropped the Mac prefix on the iPhone according to the crash logs (http://daringfireball.net/misc/2007/06/MobileMail -2007-06-29-204206.crash)

  47. Re:Your sig by jcorno · · Score: 0

    It's from the movie. At the time, it was Mr. Garrison.

  48. Re:Your sig by hypertex · · Score: 1

    The first (and only) time I've seen the text in the sig you replied to was from "Mr/Mrs Garrison" (if I've spelled that correctly) in South Park. I believe it was from an episode called "Bloody Mary", but I could be wrong. I tried to search for a clip (in English!) on youtube, but my search skills have failed me.


    Here's the audio. It's from the movie: South Park: Bigger, Longer And Uncut (Animated)

  49. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IPhone is going to be sold in other countries as well. AT&T isn't in every country so the phone will work with other configurations of carrier networks... what means the phone functionality configurations may be written somewhere and be changed.

  50. Would like to use iphone sans data plan by jaypaulw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to use the iphone as an ipod and a phone and save $20 /month on the data plan. (save $480 and not give up that much) Any hacks for that?

    1. Re:Would like to use iphone sans data plan by tftp · · Score: 1
      One easy solution to that is to buy a generic cell phone for $0, and an iPod. The advantage is that you don't need to hold an iPod in your hand when you make calls, and you don't need to mess with your phone when you change songs on the iPod. It might be actually valuable because a typical phone and an iPod are usually smaller and lighter than an iPhone (not even mentioning smaller iPods.)

      Myself I have a generic cell phone which maybe can play music but I never even cared to find that out. The phone is small and I have it with me when I want to. I also have a very good PDA with WiFi, Bluetooth and SD/MMC and CF slots, and 640x480 (VGA) LCD. I use it occasionally to browse the Web, but usually it runs my GPS navigation software. The PDA definitely can play music if I want to, and it does it very well. I can even use my BT headset to listen to it :-) though it's a loss of quality. I also have a tiny, cheap Flash-based (SD card) music player that runs on 2 AAA batteries, if I really want a super-portable device for an occasion.

      My point is that one might be better off using specialized devices for their intended purpose. For example, iPhone's 4GB storage is good for, say, 500 songs, or 30 CDs. Probably less. And if you want video then an episode of a show will weigh 500 MB easily; far more if it is a full length movie. That wouldn't be a problem with a HDD-based iPod. Similarly, the generic phone will cost you about zero and you can pick and choose the provider as much as you want. Is it really that important to have touch screen instead of buttons to dial a number? I don't think so.

  51. iTunes by delepster · · Score: 1

    I think I saw that, anyways, you cannot get to iTunes with this hack.

  52. thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was scrolling through all the replies hoping someone had remembered this, I mean it wasn't all that long ago and there was a host of articles about it. Apparently, one can just get the phone, then go "sorry, switching providers, this coverage is not good and customer service is dismal" or something like that. It might take a small claims case to get the point across, but it is past time that corporations are knocked down a peg on what they claim to be able to do, as opposed to what the law really says.

    Frankly, I think we need one more law, completely unbundle hardware from the telcos. There's no need and it is consumer unfriendly. Let the telcos compete on providing service, period. Let them buildout wireless and fiber to the premises. Get them out of the locked down locked out hardware business.

    Bad car analogy time..how would folks like to buy a car that by "contract" would only run on one brand of gas?

    Anyway, I hope people who buy this iWhatever try it if they want to, small claims court is quite cheap.

    The public and the government broke up ATT for several good reasons, we need to keep the pressure on them and the rubber stamp FCC all the time or eventually we'll be right back where we started.

  53. My Palm TX rocks by samuel4242 · · Score: 1

    Well, it only rocks when I play the right MP3, but it does almost everything that the Apple phone does except connect with the cellular network. The webbrowser isn't as nice, but it's really pretty good. And it's only about $250 now. The Nokia 770 and 800 are also quite nice. I've seen the 770 for $140 these days. I have to agree. If you don't want a phone, there are many other choices that are pretty nice.

    1. Re:My Palm TX rocks by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      Here is a Palm T|X running iPhone Imitation launcher. It can also run Picsel Browser, which gives you a great web browser with screen zooming etc. The major Apple-related downside to the thing is that instead of playing iTunes-DRM-encumbered audio, it plays WMA-DRM-encumbered audio. Same goes for video. The only other downsides it has are:
      a) nobody's written an SD card driver (yet) that can enable the T|X to use 8/16/32GB SD cards (currently max 4GB storage plus 114MB internal)
      b) the screen is the classic single-point sensor type, limiting the UI compared to the iPhone
      c) no built-in microphone (one can be added) -- the TX works great as a SIP phone.

      Like the iPhone, it suffers from a built-in battery. Some soldering, plastic forming and a third party battery are needed to overcome this. It also has a limiting 20MB for "ram" and "cache".

      On the plus side, you can do whatever you want with the device once you've bought it, and lots of people have written software to improve it.

  54. Obvious followup by UltraAyla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it get me the iPoon?

    1. Re:Obvious followup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably get you the iFuckedintheass because that's how apple users roll.

  55. Monthly Service by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Dont you still have to sign a 2 year contract when you buy it? Sort of hard to 'free' yourself from that part. And with how most people that buy these things, in 2 years they wil lwant the new nice shiny model anyway, instead of releasing it from ATT.

    ( and last i heard, a "brick" was a totally hosed device, being tied to a single provider doesnt make it hosed, just restricted )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Monthly Service by celery+stalk · · Score: 1
      No, you don't sign anything, except maybe a CC receipt when you buy it. The 2 year contract comes when you use iTunes to activate the phone with AT&T.

      Yes, that is the normal definition of a "brick". However, until you activate it, the iPhone essentially _is_ a brick, as you can't do anything with it (...So I understand. I haven't seen one myself yet.)

      --
      aaaand...whee!
  56. What do you mean, "of course" by Idaho · · Score: 0, Troll

    You sacrifice all cell phone functionality of course


    I don't see at all how this would be "of course". Why can't you simply install a different SIM card? I can see how you would "of course" lose the AT&T-specific subscription services but not "all cell phone functionality".

    That just makes no sense whatsoever (except in the USA perhaps?)
    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  57. Then they should clarify that it's a subsidy by Solandri · · Score: 1

    I personally think it is fair that a telco wants you to sign up for a 2 year contract when they give you a subsidized phone, especially when they want to give you an expensive phone at (what appears to be) a bargain.
    If that's the case, then they should reduce my monthly bill after the 2-year contract expires. Right now they have me paying for the subsidy forever, meaning they're getting more money than if they had charged me up-front for the phone, on top of trapping me in a 2-year contract.
    1. Re:Then they should clarify that it's a subsidy by burndive · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then they should reduce my monthly bill after the 2-year contract expires. Right now they have me paying for the subsidy forever, meaning they're getting more money than if they had charged me up-front for the phone, on top of trapping me in a 2-year contract.

      The wireless companies are willing to trade you a significant discount off of the retail price of a phone in exchange for a two-year contract. They are willing to do this because the cost of the phone discount is recuperated over the life of the contract.

      Regular monthly fees are based on this assumption. If your contract is up, and you do not plan on canceling your contract in the next two years, you have two options: (1) exchange your two-year loyalty for a phone discount (to use or sell on eBay), or (2) pay the same price anyway, and keep using your old phone. Only an fool would choose option 2, because option 1 costs the same amount of money, and it comes with a free phone (or a discount on an expensive phone).

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    2. Re:Then they should clarify that it's a subsidy by burndive · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then they should reduce my monthly bill after the 2-year contract expires.
      "Should"? This is capitalism. They "should" make as much money off of consumers as they can, and those who don't get a new contract when their current one expires, because they don't notice that they're still making payments on their handset are just the type of perfectly exploitable "suckers".
      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is LEGAL.... DUH by sm4096 · · Score: 0

    the steps
    1 call customer care and explain calling to request subsidy unlock code
    2 explain paid full retail, or use for international calling
          -(first get transfer to IPC/Fraud if 3 months serve if no international roaming enabled)
    3 explained date purchased, price
    4 *#06# give imei and model
    5 write down date request made on
    6 wait up to 1 week
    7 follow up

    The long winded version...
    I worked for At&t wireless then , Cingular , and finally had to answer calls New At&t... Cingular (its all the same to me) unlocks phones for people that pass a credit requirement and enable the sim to work internationally. Its easiest to enable after 3 months of service otherwise you have to get apply for international service thought the fraud department.

    They policy is to unlock phones if the full retail price was paid for the phone. That policy may have changed as of a month ago but I doubt it. Why don't some of you people call in just ask them to do it.
      As a side-note the new At&t let up on their policy of not unlocking phones locked to what was At&t wireless. To qualify for(At&t assistance) unlocking those all you need is to verify the account, and it be in good standing or closed in good standing and the contract when that phone was purchased to be expired(can do it without asking for international service). Go-phones request for unlock code can be done after 3 months of service.

    The reason that At&t locks the phones is subscription fraud. If they are locked then they can be used only on the At&t network and then they can be either shut down and also tracked if stolen (Every now and then a phone sold was not entered as sold and the account it was used with was shut down). As the system records both IMEI(phone) and ICCID(sim) for each call it becomes possible to catch people who do subscription fraud or claim to loose the phone for insurance purpose but still have it. It was interesting to search for ssn to check pending orders and people trying to order 16 new lines. I then call At&t subscription fraud department and have them check it out fraud after call is done before going to next call. Oh yeah, and I found most reps have not read thought the company policy to unlock the phones if they changed it recently or not so they may be a bit clueless in going about how to request unlock. *#06# gives you imei (its also under the battery on the box, and as well on the paperwork), you need model of phone. Turnaround time is 5 days they can email instructions if you give them email address. If the request is denied or delayed or you missed the call they will have either the unlock code or the reason in the notes. Follow up calls go a lot quicker if you tell them the date you made request for unlock code.

  60. Why risk it? by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to just use 999-99-9999 as the SS# when signing up for AT&T, which allows you to buy a prepaid phone plan? Then you pay $30, get access to the iPhone, have no AT&T contract, and can even use it to make phone calls if the mood ever strikes you. You also don't miss out on the software updates and new features Apple has already said are coming, and someday when someone offer unlocking for $50 you can get that done as well.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  61. What's the point? by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

    You get an iPhone without the phone part. Gee, DVD Jon, can you figure out a way to make my computer play tunes, but not do Excel or Word? If somebody can actually figure out a way to use it with another provider, great. Until then, there will be an iPod-only varieties in this configuration sure as shootin'.

  62. Re:Fuck DVD Jon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go eat an Apple and masturbate in your own feces, fanboy

  63. Why "Of course" I'll complain about complaining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Here's a tip: DON'T CLICK ON IT."

    Is that anything like RTFM, or "write your own?"

    "I think they are just criticizing the cellular provider of this PDA that has been a hype machine for the last year. "

    Don't insult our intelligence. People WANT the iPhone without AT&T. Period! They're not going to get one without the other.

    "The subject of what you are going to read is advertised in the topic. "

    "iPhone","AT&T". What did we miss?

    "Why did you click on it if it was obviously going to make you mad?"

    Better question. Why can't you all clean up your act? It's not that it hasn't been mentioned before.

    "Don't need to go around calling people idiotic for holding a legitimate discussion."

    Pfft! Slashdot has some funny ideas what constitutes a "legitimate" discussion. Yes it's idiotic to complain about not having a choice when one does indeed have one.

  64. Apple's not that dumb by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    They gave away the store with this AT&T deal.

    I don't think Apple is that dumb. We know they have a 5-year exclusive for the iPhone on AT&T. But I really doubt they have a 5-year exclusive on any device that uses a mobile network. e.g. the iPod Mobile. It seems clear to me that Phase 2 is already in progress.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  65. Yeah, right. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is.... DUH by twitter · · Score: 1

    They policy is to unlock phones if the full retail price was paid for the phone. That policy may have changed as of a month ago but I doubt it. Why don't some of you people call in just ask them to do it.

    So, you are telling me that ATT is going to tell me how to use a Sprint SIM in an iPhone?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  66. not quite by sm4096 · · Score: 0

    That question is just dumb. It would not be possible at all with sprint because sprint is cdma/EVDO and At&t is GSM/edge,hsdpa. It may be doable with t-moble sim. However At&t customer service will not help you set it up. We will just allow the phone with other carrier's overseas (voice). The real problem will be trying to get the data features to work. I have had mixed success getting other carriers phones working on At&t when At&t had not sold those phones before. If they had sold them before its as simple as going to the device tutorials and inputing the settings if I cant over the air program. If it is a unsupported customer owned and maintained (coam) device that we have not tested (losts of testing) and sold configured prepared documentation for then the best I can do is suggest trying settings on our website from a similar phone from the same manufacturer that we have sold. I found mixed results with getting other carriers (gsm)equipment work with At&t(data). I will not be surprised if someone manages to get it working on t-mobile or some other gsm service. www.phonescoop.com tells you what companies have supported and sold equipment. That tells you settings for said phone are easily available. Other then that dif carriers settings and menu will be organized differently. Here is the deal if the phone is unlocked you can make calls. Where you to call customer care and to try to get some phone working from sprint here is what I would tell you. If we had supported that phone

  67. No, the network is dumb. by twitter · · Score: 1

    That question is just dumb. It would not be possible at all with sprint because sprint is cdma/EVDO and At&t is GSM/edge,hsdpa. ... [list of other non free trivia, failures and rudeness]

    As if such a divide was reasonable and inevitable instead of anti-social and intentional. The spectrum belongs to everyone and things should just work. They would work if the spectrum were reasonably reallocated.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:No, the network is dumb. by sm4096 · · Score: 0

      Yes and if they designed my pcmcia slot to play cd's... but it is not and at one point standards are made and we have to live in reality. It would be cool if everything worked together. Yes they are all essentially using cdma but their implementations are different. You can pop a sim from one gsm phone to another unlocked or compatible to another and turn it on and receive calls on that device. With cdma you do that with settings and call the company to do it. I do see the advantage of separate networks. There is at least competitions to improve networks. There is also the matter of choice for the consumer. If everyone worked on one networked they would received the same service what would be the point of trying to improve network quality from acceptable to something more?

    2. Re:No, the network is dumb. by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      not to be a bother but a good chunk of the transceiver is completely different (and btw the programming is also different) now it is possible to have a hybrid phone
      (gsm/cdma or cdma/iden or gsm/iden) but then things get NASTY.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  68. Why is geeks focused on sticking things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still laughing at the "sticking it to the man" part. $600 dollars for the phone and you don't have all the functionality. Now who's sticking it to whom?

  69. Show stopper - can't sync contacts/calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on Outlook 2003 (on Windows XP) with IPhone.

    Yesterday I activated two Iphones for two corporate types who want to migrate (inspite of my suggestion to the contrary) from BB to Iphone just because of the cool gadget factor.

    Was on hold with Apple's tech support first for 15 minutes, and then 2 hours regarding the problem and in the end there is no solution short of reinstalling XP.

    This is the first time I had to deal with Apple tech support, but besides trying to relate to me as a geek, they were almost useless. The converstation went something like this: try all possible enable/disable combination of the Itunes plugins in outlook... blah... blah... blah... sorry it is not Apple's fault. I then asked about logs... response... we're not Windows people....blah...blah...blah...we have no idea about logs in Windows. In other words, thank you for joining the IPhone-on-MS-guinea-pig-program at the entry level price of $600.

    Other than that, I can't type for shit on the keyboard, especially the u, i, o, p letters.

  70. Re:Yeah, right. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is.... D by sm4096 · · Score: 0

    sorry just forget all that... sprint doesn't have sims

  71. Re:Yeah, right. Re:Unlocking a Cell Phone is.... D by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    No. Sprint is going to tell me how do i Sprint SIM in an iPhone after throwing out AT&T SIM.
    Anyway Sprint service is far better than AT&F crap.
    (FYI: Sprint is CDMA, so no SIM is inolved.)

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  72. Cel phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey CmdrTaco, real editors spell check AND proof-read. Get your SHIT together and you might stop embarrassing yourself some day.

  73. You can buy unlocked phones of course. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In normal shops mind you, no need to go to Ebay for that. They are expensive, but that was to be expected.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  74. Skype for Mobiles by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Like Skype for Windows Mobile? Works great.

    --

    Da Blog
  75. Youtube doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot use the Youtube app if you unlock the iPhone functionalities (not the SIM) by DVD Jon's method. There seems to be another barrier to overcome.

  76. Visual Voice Mail depends on AT&T and ALU AnyP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that will not work at this time. The AnyPath messaging system used for the iPhone, which also happens to be used for all of AT&T/Cingular voice messaging, does not support third party applications getting messages off the AnyPath.

  77. Why there is no IM client on the iPhone by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    It was a bone thrown to AT&T so they could sell fat text messaging plans, or gather fat fees from people who go over their limit and end up paying per message.

  78. Here's how I freed an earlier AT&T-only phone by thinelvis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe someone with an iPhone can see if this works.

    I can confirm that it worked with an earlier AT&T-only phone on the pre-Cingular version of AT&T Wireless (circa 2002 version).

    The phone is the Siemens S46. The unlock technique is simple.

    Find somewhere without a cell signal. In my case, this is a corner of my basement, as long as the phone is in an old coffee can.

    Turn off the phone.

    Remove the AT&T SIM card.

    Replace with a different SIM card.

    Turn the phone back on.

    Confirm you have no signal.

    Dial 911.

    Because the phone, by law, MUST make 911 calls, even without a SIM, the phone will eventually unlock and seek other GSM signals. With this phone, the Siemens S46, you can then stop the outgoing 911 call, attach the T-Mo signal, and you're in.

    There you go.