Single instances do not form a pattern. I have seen a number of instances where there was no trace of that and none where it was. I do have seen several instances where female engineers were incompetent and disrespected for it, but much, much more where they were competent. This is not a gender issue.
This gender-BS is now pervasive. Of course what these people want is not attainable as it is nonsense. That does not stop them from predicting/claiming/demanding that they are right at every occasion.
Which is: The people governing us are corrupt, self-absorbed arseholes with the mental capacity of 5 year olds but the trickery and manipulative abilities of experienced psychopaths.
And the people voting for them are too stupid to see these characteristics? Or do you think smart people fall for those con-artists?
And on the site of the population: Be thankful that "something is being done" and too stupid to see that nothing effective is actually being done and it is all for sgiw and for entirely different reasons than stated.
People in democracies have the government they collectively deserve. No I wish there was one country where "stupid" was not the norm of the population, but apparently, we non-stupid ones have to suffer with the rest.
This is not about security. This is about giving money to people that do not deserve it (like "intelligence" agencies that have consistently messed up their job) and about giving the appearance of "doing something". In the end, it boils down to a stupid population.
Does not help. Linux is making competent people a lot saver, but it will do nothing for incompetent ones, unless they are willing to pay for professional system administration. The difference is that even with professional system administration, Windows remains a problem, while Linux is not. But without it, they are both insecure.
Germany had a Thorium reactor in the 300MW range. They never managed to work out the kinks. Apparently this technology is extremely hard to get to work right.
Indeed. And as the population is even dumber than usual (because they are kept in fear), nobody notices that forensics has no preventative value whatsoever and does make nobody any more secure. The problem is that forensics can also be used to discredit people. Example: Have a presidential candidate that want to cut NSA or CIA funding? Just see what you can dig up on them, and there always will be something.
Slashdot Mirror
Except to fully qualified morons, this is not a subjective issue.
Sounds about right...
Thanks and moron yourself. It is an Ubuntu problem.
What kind of moron writes these articles?
So it is an Ubuntu problem, not a kernel problem.
I think you are a superficial moron that is unable to differentiate between important and unimportant things.
Ah, no? Ubuntu may well maintain their own patch-set, as, for example, Red Hat is doing. And they may be way behind the official kernels.
These people have to rely on single data points, as the problem basically does not exist. So they lie.
Single instances do not form a pattern. I have seen a number of instances where there was no trace of that and none where it was. I do have seen several instances where female engineers were incompetent and disrespected for it, but much, much more where they were competent. This is not a gender issue.
Which versions have the vulnerabilities and where are they fixed? Did Ubuntu use an old, out-of-date kernel?
Old stereotype, still untrue.
Funny. I have an engineering PhD in the CS field, which makes me an engineer. No certification involved and perfectly legal.
This gender-BS is now pervasive. Of course what these people want is not attainable as it is nonsense. That does not stop them from predicting/claiming/demanding that they are right at every occasion.
I already did by identifying you as a "fuckup". Which you clearly are.
Which is: The people governing us are corrupt, self-absorbed arseholes with the mental capacity of 5 year olds but the trickery and manipulative abilities of experienced psychopaths.
And the people voting for them are too stupid to see these characteristics? Or do you think smart people fall for those con-artists?
And here we have a nice specimen of "stupid population" at work. Note how it makes absolute statements that are completely irrational.
And on the site of the population: Be thankful that "something is being done" and too stupid to see that nothing effective is actually being done and it is all for sgiw and for entirely different reasons than stated.
People in democracies have the government they collectively deserve. No I wish there was one country where "stupid" was not the norm of the population, but apparently, we non-stupid ones have to suffer with the rest.
This is not about security. This is about giving money to people that do not deserve it (like "intelligence" agencies that have consistently messed up their job) and about giving the appearance of "doing something". In the end, it boils down to a stupid population.
Slander term used by people that think normal is somehow icky. (The variety of fuckups in the human race is both endless and astonishing....)
The first "T" in THTR-300 stands for "Thorium". Do some minimal research before spouting complete bullshit.
Does not help. Linux is making competent people a lot saver, but it will do nothing for incompetent ones, unless they are willing to pay for professional system administration. The difference is that even with professional system administration, Windows remains a problem, while Linux is not. But without it, they are both insecure.
One of those BS artists. Nice.
Germany had a Thorium reactor in the 300MW range. They never managed to work out the kinks. Apparently this technology is extremely hard to get to work right.
Indeed, very true. And I have zero doubts that his is being done.
Indeed. And as the population is even dumber than usual (because they are kept in fear), nobody notices that forensics has no preventative value whatsoever and does make nobody any more secure. The problem is that forensics can also be used to discredit people. Example: Have a presidential candidate that want to cut NSA or CIA funding? Just see what you can dig up on them, and there always will be something.