The sensitive device will annoy customers of the emitting device too though. So a highly *successful* sensitive device could impose a de facto RF emissions limit in its market that was lower than the regulatory one.
A turing machine isn't just the head and the tape, its those things plus a state transition table. The microcontroller is doing the state transition table part.
By "workaround" he didn't mean a technical solution where you implement something different to avoid infringment. He meant a legal solution where you look for an argument that says you're not infgringing.
Someone had a causal theory that corruption was responsible for certain voting patterns. They invented a test that could perhaps falsify the theory. The test did not falsify the theory.
Is it proved? No. But the correlation (failure to falsify) makes it a reasonable thing to believe unless/until it goes down to a better theory or a better test.
"I doubt Linux is moving off of GPLv2 anytime soon, though. I doubt most GPLv2 projects are,"
Its not a problem with most projects. Its only a problem with projects like the kernel where the "or later version" clause is missing.
They were trying to evolve an oscillator, but some circuits "cheated" by evolving a receiver instead, and feeding them oscillations picked up from a nearby computer: It has always been the age of the parasite.
Yeah, and the character who listened and learned from the POV character escaped all kinds of near-death nonsense and scored a higher quality GF to boot, whereas the character who did not listen or learn ended up eaten by cannibals pretty much on his first scrape.
...and more particularly, trying to avoid being in the last 2.5%. (Who cares if you're unusually near the start of a long successful run of flights? But best not to be unusually near the end of a short one!)
It would be unusual to be among the last 5% of space tourists to fly before they lose one. Not particularly unusual to be in the last 20%. Hence, if you want a routine space visit where it would be unusual if you died, go for 39th or later.
a fair auction isn't one where you pay the maximum price *YOU* would be prepared to pay for something... its where you pay the maximum price *THE NEXT HIGHEST BIDDER* would have payed for it.
Shilled auctions DEFRAUD the bidder of the difference between those prices. Period.
Oh and btw (not directed at parent poster...) shilling is NOT equivalent to setting a reserve price on an auction. Reserve prices are set before an auction starts and represent the lowest price the seller would be willing to sell for. Not the same thing AT ALL.
...then its a bit inaccurate. Teh moon was flung out of orbit cuz we were dumping nuclear waste on it and it all got a bit too close together and went bang.
Kirk: "To boldly go..."
Koenig: "I used to run a garbage dump. But I f*cked it up."
No it doesn't. Thats not how science works. How it works is that *NON*-correlation equals *NON*-causation.
Scientists try to falsify various theories by finding a NON-correlation with the observed facts. The thing is, climate scientists are failing to falsify the theory that we're causing the warming, and succeeding in falsifying all the competing theories.
Except for "pirates" (or lack thereof).
(BTW I'm pretty sure that the pirates theory could be shot out of the water too if somebody could be bothered to pay it -- ooohhh -- a few thousand times more attention than it deserves. The reason it doesn't deserve it is because nobody has proposed a plausible *mechanism* for the pirate die-off causing the warming. Other theories -- eg the sun warming up explaining it all -- *have* plausible mechanisms, *have* recieved attention, and AFAIK *have* been falsified to the satisfaction of the vast majority of scientists in the field).
Slashdot Mirror
The sensitive device will annoy customers of the emitting device too though. So a highly *successful* sensitive device could impose a de facto RF emissions limit in its market that was lower than the regulatory one.
"multimodal multitouch gaming"???? Sod that. How about... "Two pods, one pad".
a line:
______________________
a "ring" called "A":
__A_____A_____________
and another "ring" called "B":
__A_____A___B_____B__
lift "B" into the second dimension:
_____________B_____B__
__A_____A_____________
slide "B" across:
_____B_____B___________
__A_____A_____________
drop "B" back onto the line:
__A__B__A__B_________
"A" and "B" are now "linked" in the 1D universe.
A turing machine isn't just the head and the tape, its those things plus a state transition table. The microcontroller is doing the state transition table part.
By "workaround" he didn't mean a technical solution where you implement something different to avoid infringment. He meant a legal solution where you look for an argument that says you're not infgringing.
Someone had a causal theory that corruption was responsible for certain voting patterns. They invented a test that could perhaps falsify the theory. The test did not falsify the theory.
Is it proved? No. But the correlation (failure to falsify) makes it a reasonable thing to believe unless/until it goes down to a better theory or a better test.
*spit* on our new behaviour predicting overlord.
Dang it.
How did it manage to dodge that?
I was asked "What is the embedded equivalent Hello World?" -- my answer "Hello LED" went down fine.
"If I got a penny for every time someone bought something online..."
Or perhaps they'll resort to that old faithful the inanimate carbon (nano-)rod:
, 39147421,00.htm
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/emergingtech/0,1000000183
It looks like they might be planning to pump liquid between the layers:
t ml
http://www.zurich.ibm.com/st/cooling/integrated.h
"I doubt Linux is moving off of GPLv2 anytime soon, though. I doubt most GPLv2 projects are,"
Its not a problem with most projects. Its only a problem with projects like the kernel where the "or later version" clause is missing.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2732
They were trying to evolve an oscillator, but some circuits "cheated" by evolving a receiver instead, and feeding them oscillations picked up from a nearby computer: It has always been the age of the parasite.
Nappy or no nappy.
Yeah, and the character who listened and learned from the POV character escaped all kinds of near-death nonsense and scored a higher quality GF to boot, whereas the character who did not listen or learn ended up eaten by cannibals pretty much on his first scrape.
...and more particularly, trying to avoid being in the last 2.5%. (Who cares if you're unusually near the start of a long successful run of flights? But best not to be unusually near the end of a short one!)
It would be unusual to be among the last 5% of space tourists to fly before they lose one. Not particularly unusual to be in the last 20%. Hence, if you want a routine space visit where it would be unusual if you died, go for 39th or later.
The last time I took LSD was at the Stonehenge Free Festival in 1983 (AD).
I can confirm that, even then, there were still little tiny dancing people living in the area.
Little tiny dancing people... and a dog with a human head.
a fair auction isn't one where you pay the maximum price *YOU* would be prepared to pay for something... its where you pay the maximum price *THE NEXT HIGHEST BIDDER* would have payed for it.
Shilled auctions DEFRAUD the bidder of the difference between those prices. Period.
Oh and btw (not directed at parent poster...) shilling is NOT equivalent to setting a reserve price on an auction. Reserve prices are set before an auction starts and represent the lowest price the seller would be willing to sell for. Not the same thing AT ALL.
...then its a bit inaccurate. Teh moon was flung out of orbit cuz we were dumping nuclear waste on it and it all got a bit too close together and went bang. Kirk: "To boldly go..." Koenig: "I used to run a garbage dump. But I f*cked it up."
F*ck all ov thee above. I'll take the Lexx.
"We'll also enforce nappies be worn by anyone between age 9 to 90!"
That's not a bad idea.
After all... they're worn by people under 9 and over 90.
I think the evil mirror /. (that'd be digg) are already busting his server.
"Correlation doesn't equal causation"
No it doesn't. Thats not how science works. How it works is that *NON*-correlation equals *NON*-causation.
Scientists try to falsify various theories by finding a NON-correlation with the observed facts. The thing is, climate scientists are failing to falsify the theory that we're causing the warming, and succeeding in falsifying all the competing theories.
Except for "pirates" (or lack thereof).
(BTW I'm pretty sure that the pirates theory could be shot out of the water too if somebody could be bothered to pay it -- ooohhh -- a few thousand times more attention than it deserves. The reason it doesn't deserve it is because nobody has proposed a plausible *mechanism* for the pirate die-off causing the warming. Other theories -- eg the sun warming up explaining it all -- *have* plausible mechanisms, *have* recieved attention, and AFAIK *have* been falsified to the satisfaction of the vast majority of scientists in the field).
...its a symbiant not a parasite.
So the real story here is that women have symbiants that parasitise men.