Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Passes EU Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing

A week ago, we posted news of the delay that the Raspberry Pi Foundation faced because of a requirement that their boards be tested to comply with EU regulations. Now, the word is in, and the Raspberry Pi passed those tests without needing any modifications. From their post describing the ordeal: "The Raspberry Pi had to pass radiated and conducted emissions and immunity tests in a variety of configurations (a single run can take hours), and was subjected to electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing to establish its robustness to being rubbed on a cat. It’s a long process, involving a scary padded room full of blue cones, turntables that rise and fall on demand, and a thing that looks a lot like a television aerial crossed with Cthulhu."

137 comments

  1. Cool for cats. by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank goodness it passed the cat rubbing test. We Europeans love rubbing electronic devices on our cats.

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
    1. Re:Cool for cats. by zammer990 · · Score: 0

      And perhaps now, pies on cats...

    2. Re:Cool for cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I hope the Raspberry gave the EU the ....never mind.

    3. Re:Cool for cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Over here we rub cats on our electronic devices. You guys have it all backwards.

    4. Re:Cool for cats. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2

      Be honest, how many cat hairs are on your main home workbench right now?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    5. Re:Cool for cats. by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      Mrs Slocombe, is that you?

    6. Re:Cool for cats. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have always felt that in the interests of fairness and equal opportunity toward all phenomena of physics, that every facility that has antistatic workstations should also have prostatic workstations. Such a workstation could consist of a bench with the work surface covered with cat's fur and with a full set of hand tools made of glass.

    7. Re:Cool for cats. by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh come on, if you invoke Mrs. Slocombe, you have to let her talk about her pussy...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRJlItzalJY

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:Cool for cats. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      The good Dr. Robert J. Van de Graaff has your prostatic workstation needs covered.

      In fact, I'm pretty sure that he is now a major factor in semiconductor production: during the later stages of their diffusion, when the punk-ass new microprocessors think they know everything, the wise old 8086s tell them: "Now kids, if you exhibit any of the undocumented errata for your model number during your rated lifespan, Dr. Van de Graaff will come for you, and with him comes the Vcore transient from which their is no waking..."

    9. Re:Cool for cats. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      We Europeans love rubbing electronic devices on our cats.

      The vibe I get is that it's a quite understandable translation error.

    10. Re:Cool for cats. by Chrisq · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thank goodness it passed the cat rubbing test. We Europeans love rubbing electronic devices on our cats.

      Well my GF always wants me to rub devices on her pussy

    11. Re:Cool for cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot: "Prostatic" term present twice in a thread, still no goatse guy in sight. Something's wrong in the universe today.

    12. Re:Cool for cats. by DeBaas · · Score: 2

      Well my GF always wants me to rub devices on her pussy

      Sorry to hear your natural equipment doesn't do it for her.

      --
      ---
    13. Re:Cool for cats. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      So...you're doing a cat scan of all electronic devices?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:Cool for cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I though they changed that to bunny furs?

    15. Re:Cool for cats. by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear you don't understand the pleasure multiplier that properly used toys can bring to the bedroom. I feel bad for you girlfriend.

    16. Re:Cool for cats. by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      don't have a girlfriend, wife won't let me have one ;-)

      --
      ---
    17. Re:Cool for cats. by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 1

      Who needs cats when you have chinchillas?

    18. Re:Cool for cats. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      So...you're doing a cat scan of all electronic devices?

      Actually, it was a PET scan.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    19. Re:Cool for cats. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      don't have a girlfriend, wife won't let me have one ;-)

      Oh, you have a wife. I'm sorry.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    20. Re:Cool for cats. by twosat · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's to test internet access, don't you know that The Internet is Made of Cats http://www.rathergood.com/cats

  2. Two turntables and a mirophone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHERE IT'S AT

    got a frosty!

    1. Re:Two turntables and a mirophone by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2

      WHERE'S THE CAT

      ...

      *CLAP*

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:Two turntables and a mirophone by Threni · · Score: 2

      We'll send you the cat as soon as Farnell finishes v7 of their price matrix, assuming they've read any of the last 20 mins emails they've been sent about the requirement that they sell to end users.

  3. RASPBERRY PI FOR EVER !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can name that tune in ONE NOTE !!

  4. Pics? by walkerp1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one that desperately wants to see pictures of the Cthulhu antenna?

    1. Re:Pics? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Funny

      The EU just want to be sure that the devices won't pick up any transmissions from the great old ones, what with the approach of may-eve and all.

      Other little known tidbits: in addition to the cone shaped undulating turntables, and the chtulu antenna, the device has to withstand being in the same room with a drunken MP reading select passages from the necronomicon backwards, while rubbing on cats.

      They are very thurough is the EU.

    2. Re:Pics? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      The best picture I could find was http://www.emtest.com/service_support/Links_testinglabs.php but it only hints at the strange geometries.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  5. South Park did it. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bad kitty! That's my Pot Pi! No! You're a bad kitty!

  6. Scary padded room by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

    full of blue cones, turntables that rise and fall on demand, and a thing that looks a lot like a television aerial crossed with Cthulhu.

    Also, cats.

  7. Scary???? by pe1rxq · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Am I the only one scared by these guys?????
    They think they can design a PCB yet are scared of some simple measuring equipment. (I have been involved with and designed several products which had to go through CE testing and that stuff is NOT scary if you known what they are doing).
    I really hope the summary is just joking about the antennna.... if not: stay away from Raspberry Pi: it is designed by clueless idiots.

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    1. Re:Scary???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was written by the PR person, not the engineers.

    2. Re:Scary???? by Psychotria · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I actually thought the comment was tongue-in-cheek, so, no I am not scared by them.

    3. Re:Scary???? by chispito · · Score: 4, Funny

      The PR person is a food blogger who does this for free in her spare time because she is married to one of the foundation Trustees. Cut her a little slack.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Scary???? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm terrified by people who use multiple punctuation marks. Mostly because it indicates that they're probably a 13-year-old girl, an incredibly dangerous group of people to be talking to on the internet.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:Scary???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they had already built 10000 of the things and their distributors were refusing to sell them until they passed CE. So if there was _one_ mistake that required hardware modification then the entire batch of 10000 had to be repaired (again, since they already had to replace the ethernet port) or scrapped. Not to mention the angry community members who have *already* paid for their pi.

      So maybe you dont need to be a "clueless idiot" to feel a little nervous.

    6. Re:Scary???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if not: stay away from Raspberry Pi: it is designed by clueless idiots.

      That's just lame...

    7. Re:Scary???? by Zapotek · · Score: 2

      Irrispective of who wrote it I think that it was meant as a joke, which I personally found funny and lol'ed a bit. My my so touchy....

    8. Re:Scary???? by KreAture · · Score: 2

      The interesting thing is they were forced to do this at all.
      Farnell in Norway does NOT sell to end users, only companys and developers, and as such the boards are not supposed to be forced to adhere to this testing.
      It smells like some competitors have gotten their will here, and it's nice to see that they didn't win. Now the sales will be even better from the get-go.
      I already know of several projects that may use the pi as a base-platform now that it passed the tests.

    9. Re:Scary???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded "funny"?

    10. Re:Scary???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain why she is so arrogant and clueless,and why the raspberry pi foundation keeps her around although she is so detrimental to the project.

      Nepotism: now with more condescending attitude

    11. Re:Scary???? by makomk · · Score: 1

      Farnell in Norway does not sell devices other than the Raspberry Pi to end users. There was a big PR campaign by the Raspberry Pi Foundation to market the device to ordinary end users, then a big backlash when they changed their distribution plan and only businesses would be able to order it in many countries, so they managed to convince Farnell and RS Electronics to start selling to ordinary consumers in countries where they normally don't.

    12. Re:Scary???? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Farnell in Norway does NOT sell to end users, only companys and developers

      They are making an exception for the Pi. Anyway just because farnell refuse to sell to end users in your country doesn't mean they do that everywhere.

      It smells like some competitors have gotten their will here

      I find it far more likely that someone in legal simply got worried when the saw the massive volumes stacking up and realised that the vast majority of those sales were almost certainly going to people who were not going to use it as a development board.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    13. Re:Scary???? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I'm terrified by people who use multiple punctuation marks. Mostly because it indicates that they're probably a 13-year-old girl, an incredibly dangerous group of people to be talking to on the internet.

      That's not a troll, it's true (as well as being funny) because you never know when one of those thirteen-year-olds will turn out to be a 57-year-old FBI agent.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  8. Not really a red tape delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since everything that wants a CE mark needs to comply with EMC I don't really see it as a problem. I don't want my rasberry pi device killing my pacemaker.

    1. Re:Not really a red tape delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it does, your problem is with the manufacturer of the pacemaker.

    2. Re:Not really a red tape delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Not when one of the FCC regulations is "must accept interference". No seriously, that's actually a requirement.

    3. Re:Not really a red tape delay by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Not when one of the FCC regulations is "must accept interference". No seriously, that's actually a requirement.

      I don't think that pacemakers would qualify as Part 15 devices; but Part 95 ones. Those have a much shorter list of things they aren't allowed to interfere with; but they are still required to deal with interference(that and, obviously, building life-critical systems that can't handle a little RF would be a Bad Thing even if it were legal.)

    4. Re:Not really a red tape delay by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      You're both semi-wrong here: The testing was for EU regulations, nothing to do with the FCC. Though they may want their own tests done in addition.

    5. Re:Not really a red tape delay by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      They also did FCC (US), Canadian and Australian (don't know the acronyms) testing at the same time.

  9. OMG, this is news?! by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't every product, everywhere, pass this test?

    So, this is worthy of the front page why?

    1. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Psychotria · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sure that not every product passes this test, otherwise the test wouldn't be necessary :p

    2. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Originally the foundation didn't think the Pi needed a CE mark as other electronics boards like the Beagleboard don't (It is not a finished consumer product) but the distributors (Farnell and RS I think) thought otherwise and refused to ship until the boards had a CE mark.

    3. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      You sir do not understand the state.

      I most certainly DO understand the state. What I don't understand, however, is what you're talking about.

    4. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the story, apparently the hub/switch they had the pi attached to for part of the test couldn't pass it...

    5. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      This slashdot posting is part of the 'Raspberry Pi Trainwreck-Launch' series. Collect 'em all!

    6. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, there are only 1,000,000+ people (http://www.guardian.co.uk/educ..intcmp=122) anxiously waiting for this. Due to the increased interest and attention this testing has been brought forward, delaying the release. And unlike originially planned, the UK BIS decided that the RPi couldn't be sold without it. So quite big news actually.

    7. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, we had one product not passing the test because it was emitting high frequency radiation. It required only some extra shielding, but it didn't pass the first time.

    8. Re:OMG, this is news?! by introcept · · Score: 1

      Doesn't every product, everywhere, pass this test?

      Not always, unless you design a PCB with the test in mind there's a good chance that it will emit or be sensitive to RF noise. Most electronics simply deal with it by ignoring RF in the design and sticking offending electronics in a shielded enclosure, which isn't an option for a bare-bones PCB.

      A good experiment is to put AM radio set next some of your cheaper electronics and see if you can 'hear' them while powered up.

    9. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 2

      Doesn't every product, everywhere, pass this test?

      So, this is worthy of the front page why?

      No, they don't. A buddy worked for the Norwegian testing agency NEMKO (he mostly tested phones and monitors), and prototypes frequently fail this kind of testing. These products are from the largest electronics manufacturers in the world. Manufacturers would frequently fly in technicians who were able to modify the prototypes onsite with a pretty basic toolkit. Some are rejected anyway, others pass after modifications, but even some of the best engineers in the world apparently can't get it right on the first try (or they realise that they took too many shortcuts to save on cost).

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    10. Re:OMG, this is news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't you put a metal shield around a set of components on a PCB. Ok that isn't actually a question because I have seen components (or perhaps groups of components) encased in a metal shielding on PCBs, it may make the design trickier since they are cramming a lot into a small space on a budget, but it can be done in general terms at least.

  10. zeno's arrow (incremental progress) by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    holy shizznit another slashdot update on the raspberry pi, which is incrementally moving forward from the last update! next update - "raspberry pi recieves email status update." holy cow people, this is like xeno's arrow - with each update, we are making less and less progress towards the goal.

  11. Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to by bsa3 · · Score: 1

    Pictures of the cat or it didn't happen.

  12. Re:Oh good! They did some testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an idiot.

  13. Serious Question... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Could someone enlighten me on why the testing would include ESD sensitivity?

    Devices that don't die when you pick them up on a non-humid day certainly are nice; but(outside of safety-critical medical and controls applications) dropping dead if handled without ESD precautions doesn't seem like a safety risk, or a greater RF emissions violation than the spark doing the killing, or otherwise troublesome in a regulatory sort of way. Likely to annoy customers, quite possibly; but not likely to do much harm in the process...

    1. Re:Serious Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't take too much ESD to zap a microprocessor or memory chip. It's not about harm to person, but making sure the device is slightly robust enough to be given to...consumers.

    2. Re:Serious Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone enlighten me on why the testing would include ESD sensitivity?

      It's all part of the CE electromagnetic compatability regulations needed to sell electronics in Europe. It specifies that the device has to be capable of operating in conditions it's likely to be exposed to, or at the very least be able to recover from transient conditions.

      It just makes sure all devices play nicely together.

    3. Re:Serious Question... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Basically some useless bureaucratic hoops that the EU, but almost no one else in the world, sees fit to make manufacturers large and small jump through.

      I don't understand why this board needed certification at all, frankly. Since it's sold as a PC board, why don't they just market and sell it as a component, rather than a system? Then it would only be subject to RoHS and WEEE legislation, not EMC.

    4. Re:Serious Question... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Gee, if only there were a way for consumers to make quality- and fitness-for-purpose decisions on their own. We could call it... oh, wait, I know -- a market!

    5. Re:Serious Question... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because once the nanny state gives up and lets the free market handle aspects of product quality that don't impact anyone other than the purchaser, we might as well all pack up and move to Somalia.

      Seriously. Were you people shaken as infants?

    6. Re:Serious Question... by s-gen · · Score: 1

      The sensitive device will annoy customers of the emitting device too though. So a highly *successful* sensitive device could impose a de facto RF emissions limit in its market that was lower than the regulatory one.

    7. Re:Serious Question... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      (Shrug) You seem to have your own little argument going with someone only you can hear. All I'm saying is, when government sets up needless and costly bureaucratic roadblocks, the less choice we all have as consumers, and the more we pay. I don't recall any widespread consumer demand for ESD immunity standards, do you?

      Here's an idea. How about if the government worries less about ESD immunity of consumer products, and more about fraud prosecution and banking oversight? Because it seems that they cannot, in fact, do all of these things at once.

    8. Re:Serious Question... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 4, Informative

      The issue is with the distributors, not the RaspPi people.

      Farnell and RS got nervous when they realized how many of the boards they would be shipping. There is not the same requirement for low volume eval boards they sell as engineering prototypes.

      The Foundation always planned on obtaining the CE mark for the Raspberry Pi boards during the main launch, which will come in the future when schools have their curricula worked out and huge numbers of the finished devices (in enclosures mostly) will be going out to schoolchildren. Right now the boards are seen as a preliminary release. The Foundation had CE certification on the schedule. Just not this soon.

    9. Re:Serious Question... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Its sort of a cabal arrangement. The big established device manufacturers collude with the regulatory bureaucrats. They do so to insure there is always a substantial barrier to entry to protect themselves from those meddlesome low budget startups with their market-disturbing innovations.

        Big companies have whole departments dedicated to "handling" the compliance/regulatory stuff. Its just good (borderline monopolistic) practice to operate that way, and defend the regulatory requirements in a bellicose tone any time the requirements are questioned.

      I worked for years in the medical device field. The big companies know very well how to design and package a device with no more complexity than a simple AM/FM Radio into a product Insurance companies can be billed $800-1000 for.

    10. Re:Serious Question... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Is it not a worthwhile effort to save consumers from losing money on devices that drop dead under normal use? I can see the argument about whether the Raspberry Pi counts as a "finished product", but if we were talking about, say, a television remote, it would be unacceptable to have to take ESD precautions just to change the channel.

    11. Re:Serious Question... by pmontra · · Score: 0

      I misclicked the options when moderating. I wanted to mod you as informative but clicked troll and Slashdot doesn't let me change it. The only way to undo moderation is posting a comment so I do. Sorry for that.
      I'd wish I could file a bug or a feature request.

    12. Re:Serious Question... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Basically some useless bureaucratic hoops that the EU, but almost no one else in the world, sees fit to make manufacturers large and small jump through.

      Really? Try selling an electronic product in the USA without complying with FCC regs about EM interference.

      Back in the "good old days" of the 80s, before the CE requirements were imposed in the UK, you could forget listening to FM radio within 100' of your BBC Micro or Sinclair ZX81. Those products had to have their cases re-designed with extra shielding before they could pass FCC regs and be sold in the USA. Seemed silly at the time, but with the number of computing devices present in the modern home or office it would be chaos without some regulation.

      The only reason there is a problem with the Pi is that the mass-media interest and huge pre-orders have spooked the electronic component suppliers who signed up to distribute it to "developers" (ISTR the launch slashdotted their online stores). The CE cert is their first line of defence against claims from parents that the Pi they bought for Little Johnny is interfering with their telly, or blew up when their cat walked past. If, back in the day, Apple had found Apple 1 kits selling like iPads do today, they'd have had similar worries.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    13. Re:Serious Question... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      To give people who haven't been following closely or paid too much attention to the trolls, what is the difference between engineering prototype for developers and the finished product? The finished product is for school kids and comes in a plastic case, yet to be designed (or at least produced). The plan was to certify the finished package, which may or may not have required the plastic to include a conductive coating on the inside.
      All of the first 10,000 Rpi's were just PCB's intended for developers for writing drivers, testing peripherals, and producing educational software for the final product. This made sense for 10,000 boards. But when over 200,000 people tried to buy, it be came clear, the boards were going to find their way to the general public, so better safe than sorry, the powers that be decided they must be certified, even in their "unfinished state".
      Now that they have passed the certification tests, this makes it much easier for small scale manufacturers (mom and pop shops, makers...) to use the RPi for other purposes legally. THIS IS HUGE if you are into this kind of thing.

    14. Re:Serious Question... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Really? Try selling an electronic product in the USA without complying with FCC regs about EM interference.

      The topic is ESD immunity, not EMI; do try to keep up.

  14. Re:Oh good! They did some testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I smell a pre-orderer....

  15. Test chambers by cookd · · Score: 3, Funny

    After the testing you will be baked and then there will be cake.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    1. Re:Test chambers by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      After the testing, you will be baked...

      Is that from huffing the kittens?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  16. Re:2 months after official launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The curve for early adoption of this gizmo is steeeep!

  17. Most Consumer Products by andersh · · Score: 5, Informative

    All electronics that are going to be sold, as finished products, in the European economic area (EEA) have to be tested and comply with European standards. It's the short answer, and I'm skipping a lot of details.

    The problem the Raspberry-foundation faced was that it was initially not a "finished" product, more of a DIY kit. Once it became clear it was more of a "consumer" product it had to comply and be tested.

    The same applies in the US where the FCC has the same role, but labs do the actual testing in both jurisdictions.

    1. Re:Most Consumer Products by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It's still a bogus requirement for this devices by any means. It's an open circuit board. The emitted radiation thus depends entirely on the end use. Many electronics wouldn't pass without a metal case surrounding them. Not to mention that none of the other development platforms which are sold in a similar way (Beagle board, Arduino, STK500 etc) require this certification.

    2. Re:Most Consumer Products by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      It's still a bogus requirement for this devices by any means. It's an open circuit board. The emitted radiation thus depends entirely on the end use. Many electronics wouldn't pass without a metal case surrounding them. Not to mention that none of the other development platforms which are sold in a similar way (Beagle board, Arduino, STK500 etc) require this certification.

      I guess. but they're dodging taxes by it being a finished product? at least that's what was used as one reason for skipping production in eu. something about there being import tax on components but not on finished products. you can't exactly claim it's a finished product in one form and that it's an unfinished project board in another form...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Most Consumer Products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was because it was a development board and not a consumer product that it was not supposed to need CE testing. It had nothing to do with if it was 'finished' or not. Surely a Beagleboard would constitute a 'finished' product too. So the 'tax dodging' and their reason for building the unit abroad should be irrelevant.

      The excuse given by the CE is essentially that because the unit is popular it is not a development board but a consumer product. Apparently there could not possibly be 10,000s of people working in IT or with a hobby interest in this just like Arduino et al. It was probably bureaucracy for the sake of it, that's the EU way. Though the conspiracy theorist in me thinks the CE was likely set upon them by someone(s) within the EU organisation. Them having the same stunted reasoning and half grasp of facts as yourself and wanting to punish the project.

  18. CE certifications..... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFA:

    A cute story. Radiated immunity testing involves hitting the Raspberry Pi hard with narrow-band EM radiation, while checking (amongst many other things) that the device is still able to send Ethernet frames to a hub. The first time the team did this, the light on the hub stopped blinking: no frames were making it through. They did it again: still nothing. Finally, they discovered that the hub (which, I should point out, gave every appearance of being CE marked, so it should have been able to get through these tests itself) was being knocked out every time somebody pressed the button. Jimmy used a longer cable, put the hub outside the field, and found that the Raspberry Pi got through its immunity tests with no problems at all.

    Too bad their CE certified ethernet hub failed the CE testing.... remember kids, this is what you get when you buy cheap stuff from cheap manufacturing countries.... oh wait!

    1. Re:CE certifications..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      CE stands for China Export doesn't it?

    2. Re:CE certifications..... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Just for curiosity's sake, I have to wonder if the hub itself was flawed and fraudulently labelled(also, was it a real, live, hub? those must be getting hard to come by...) or if it was one of the 'qualification tests with a decent wall-wart adapter, ship with the cheapest piece of shit that doesn't catch fire when plugged in' jobs that could be compliant with the right swapping...

    3. Re:CE certifications..... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      sometimes the CE is fake and its thought to be, instead, 'china export'.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:CE certifications..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Placing a CE mark on something that doesn't pass CE tests can be done, but it makes you liable for any damage it might cause. With the CE mark you say "I swear it passes CE tests", if it doesn't, and people find out, you can get into serious trouble.

    5. Re:CE certifications..... by TuringCheck · · Score: 2

      Actually both CE and FCC certify a single device at a time. That hub (or more likely switch these days) may have survived the EM interference when connected to something else.

      A computer with all its accessories connected will typically not pass the CE / FCC tests even if each part individually would pass. Even more, not all possible configurations are tested.

      In a test session the manufacturer will usually connect a non-standalone device to a product known to have best EMI immunity and low emissions. They will also carefully select an operating mode most likely to pass the test (lower clock frequency, minimum programs loaded). Did some of those myself :-(

  19. CE mark requirements by andersh · · Score: 1

    To quote a source on the web:

    "If a product is not susceptible to ESD and fast transients, for instance, it will not fail as readily during normal use. This is not only important from a performance standpoint, but from a safety and legal liability standpoint as well. Therefore, it is useful to use interference generators in the product design and development stage, as well as in the CE mark certification process. "

    http://www.conformity.com/artman/publish/printer_166.shtml

  20. Changing hands... by andersh · · Score: 1

    They do have about 2000 in their hands now.

    http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/945

    1. Re:Changing hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. When do they get them to Element14's hands?

    2. Re:Changing hands... by citizenr · · Score: 0, Troll

      They do have about 2000 in their hands now.

      http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/945

      So they "have" 2000 boards 2 months after "official launch", during which they claimed they already gave 10000 boards to distributors? Nice.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    3. Re:Changing hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      "they claimed they already gave 10000 boards to distributors"

      Errr.... NO.

      The first batch of 10000 was produced. When these arrived in the UK, the Foundation performed full functional testing on samples from the batch (as compared to electrical tests carried out at the factory) and discovered that the manufacturers had substituted a certain component between the first manufacturing samples and batch production. All the production was returned to the manufacturer for rework, which has taken some time. Reworked stock is now in the UK and going into distribution. Delivery is now contingent on RS and Farnell receiving copies of the test results so they are satisfied in their own minds that the Raspberry Pi can be sent out. Neither RS Components or Farnell have had "a 10k batch" to hand. Ever.

      Its all on the Raspberry Pi forum you know. Whats "nice" is your complete lack of knowledge and comprehension. :-)

  21. Re:2 months after official launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a charity and this is the first time they have gone through this process. There are bigger companies still have this issue. With pi they are just being more transparent about it.

  22. Re:2 months after official launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certification avoids stories like "It was discovered today that Raspberry Pi computers interfere with insulin pumps..."
    [captcha: breaks]

  23. Re:2 months after official launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 months after official launch, and Rasppi foundation sold exactly TEN (10) boards, each at ~$1000 on Ebay auctions.
        No other Raspberry Pi board exchanged hands, NOT A SINGLE ONE.

    To paraphrase Wernher von Braun*:

    We can sell a Raspberry Pi in Europe, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming.

    ----

    *"We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming."

  24. Thank goodness it passed the test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm going to use these to make internet connected disposable pirate radio base stations. :D

    1. Re:Thank goodness it passed the test by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I have wondered... if you could set up, say, ten of these in a dispersed area, and switch from one to the next every tenth of a second or so... time it right and the recievers shouldn't notice, but it'll really screw with anyone trying to use a tracker.

    2. Re:Thank goodness it passed the test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're suggesting FM broadcast, you're dealing with a step phase shift every tenth of a second. Yes, you can "time it right" for one point (say, equidistant from all ten) but at other points it will vary considerably. I'd have to run the math (which I can't be arsed to do) to put numbers to it, but I'm pretty sure you'd get audible buzz at some multiple of 10 Hz on some receivers.

      More importantly, note that a lot of cheap FM receivers have pretty poor AM rejection, thus the volume will "throb" through ten values related to the distances, repeating every second. Even for receivers with perfect AM rejection, the noise floor will throb in the opposite pattern (louder for faint signals), so I really don't see this as a feasible solution.

      Oh, and people tracking you down? With a high-gain antenna (e.g. Yagi-Uda), guess what, the needle on my S-meter is pulsing up and down at 1 Hz -- So I sweep more slowly and just watch for the strongest peak. Then I'll move toward that signal (making it even stronger), until I get to it. Yes, I could be "stuck" equidistant between the two nearest ones -- in which case I'll pick one of the directions at which I get an equally strong signal, and go. Then it's stronger, so I keep following it.

      It would pose a problem for old-school DF with a loop antenna, where I'm trying to null out the signal, and these are preferred for DF per se (because antenna nulls are steeper than peaks, it gives you more accurate direction), but it's not like the FCC guys only have one trick in their bag, and a lot of fox-hunters do primarily use Yagi-Udas because the waving an antenna in front of you is a lot easier/more intuitive, particularly while moving, than holding a loop overhead and sweeping for the null.

  25. Re:Oh good! They did some testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really not that complex of a device, if any Dick and Jane manufacturer can whip out Arduino clones making this isn't too much harder. It's a populated PCB for crying out loud, not a OpenPandora. It's not that hard. This is like saying that woodchips are vaporware...

  26. Raspberry Pi passes ALL tests. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just the CE, but the FCC, the Aussie one and the Canadian one. Others too? Probably as they'll have much the same requirements as the leading ones.

    D'you think the Foundation would spend time and money reserving a registered test chamber to perform just the CE tests when there's worldwide demand to service? Now the production lines can leap into full spew mode and deluge the planet with Raspberry pi!

  27. Spiky chamber photos by midgetpoker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In case anyone's interested, the chamber referred to is fairly similar to this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ethicsgradient/sets/72157606434322104/ which is the EM anechoic chamber at my old job. No cthulhu antenna but all the spikes you can eat.

  28. Re:Cat got your tongue? (something important seems by fireshipjohn · · Score: 2

    There you go http://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/mooncakehelpsout.jpg

    (from a forum thread 'Pi's and small fuzzy animals. How will you keep them apart? ')

    Your welcome.

  29. R-Pi question by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    When you build an ARM device like the Raspberry Pi, PandaBoard, does it include a BIOS or similar low level firmware?

    1. Re:R-Pi question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It contains a bootloader. Usually "u-boot".

    2. Re:R-Pi question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      U-boot is the typical bootloader found on many ARM devices and the code that is first executed when the CPU starts up from power-up. However, in the case of the Raspberry Pi, the GPU contains proprietary code that loads the Linux kernel into memory from a FAT partition on the SD card and boots the ARM device. U-boot could be made a secondary bootloader, but the RPi is capable of booting Linux up from a properly configured SD card without a bootloader running on the ARM device first.

    3. Re:R-Pi question by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      The details vary but ultimately there does have to be some firmware located in a place that is non-volatile and directly accessible to kick off the boot process.

      Older devices used paralell flash directly on the data bus. The bootloader was then executed directly from this flash and went on to load the kernel.

      Most recent arm devices have a very small boot program on the chip itself. This chip then reads a bootloader from somewhere (usually NAND flash or SD card) which in turn loads the kernel.

      The Pi is a bit unusual in that the GPU starts first. The GPU starts from a small peice of code on the chip itself, reads it's firmware from the SD card (in several stages) and then loads the kernel, resets the SD card device and starts up the arm core.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:R-Pi question by spatular · · Score: 4, Informative

      Generally there is a small ROM embedded in CPU that loads another bootloader from NAND, SD card, SPI Flash, etc. On Atmel ARM chips that bootloader must be small enough to fit into embedded SRAM. Than bootloader initializes SDRAM and fetches U-Boot into it. U-Boot in turn may initialize wider range of devices and then load Linux kernel.

      All boot process is very SoC- and board-specific. Bootloaders must be compiled for selected CPU and board components, and Linux kernel should also have board description down to what types of chips are installed as autodetection is usually very limited.

  30. who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    cares? wft is up with all these 'Raspberry Pi' stories?

    1. Re:who? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      You, obviously. We put them up to annoy you. I vote we have a Raspberry Pi week to annoy all the haters!

  31. Re:2 months after official launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Then why did they keep pretending that they have people who are experienced in these things? This "charity" keeps telling the story differently every time. They know what they're doing, it's the first time. The official shop will be on their home page, you can't order from them at all. They'll ship worldwide from day one, their distributors refuse to sell to private individuals until the waiting queues are already months long. The distributors have 5000 boards each, the first 2000 boards have just arrived from the factory. The official distribution will probably be Ubuntu, Ubuntu doesn't support the CPU at all. Being a charity isn't an excuse for leading people on.

  32. CE is self certification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    CE is a self certified stamp, you just say 'it passed' stick the CE label on it and that's it. What Raspberry Pi people have done wrong is to ACTUALLY PERFORM THE TESTS.

    This is the first time I've actually heard of anyone doing that actual tests!

  33. One Size Fits All by andersh · · Score: 1

    No, actually, the Beagleboard is not a "finished" consumer product as far as I know. That's the major difference between the two. Finished products for sale to consumers are subject to taxes, whereas partially assembled products are not to the same degree.

    The CE certification is not an evil conspiracy at all, every major country in the world has this type of legislation and testing!

    The CE mark is just a one-size-fits-all procedure. If you have it tested in any [approved] European lab it will be accepted in every other European market! You don't have to have it tested in every country in Europe to sell it there. Think of the huge savings!

    If you're English or British I can understand your deep seated and unfounded skepticism of all things EU, but this is not one of them.

    1. Re:One Size Fits All by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The problem with the one-size-fits-all approach is that it has horrendously failed here.

      Regardless of whether the Beagleboard is a "finished" product for taxation purposes or not, the fact is the Beaglebaord and the Raspberry Pi are very similar in purpose, use, and even packaging (exposed PCB with no case), yet one requires CE certification and the other doesn't.

      It's not a conspiracy, it's simply inconsistency of application where a product does not fit into the clearly defined rules on what requires CE certification. My opinion still is that the product does not fit into a category of devices requiring CE certification, and those categories are far more detailed than "finished product".

  34. ASAP? by andersh · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, I only know what I read on their website. As far as I can tell they're shipping them out as soon as possible subject to their certification papers being "approved" by the distributors in question. The CE certification itself is official and valid so there really is no reason for further delays.

  35. This must be disappointing for them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you possibly hype vaporware if all your excuses errr... problems get solved so quickly !

  36. Re:2 months after official launch???? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

    Third? We're just one step below second. That's... blue, right?

  37. Wish I could get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose it is what is called a high class problem that both vendors say they have sold out of RP.

    I hope the next production run is bigger. These look like great little computers for so many possible projects.

  38. No, he's got it right by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's backwards in Europe because of Coriolis forces.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. Can you actually buy these things? by Memroid · · Score: 1

    Their site http://www.raspberrypi.com/ has had the same "Down for Maintenance" message for at least a month. Is it actually possible to purchase one of these (in the US)?

    1. Re:Can you actually buy these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Raspberry Pi boards are being distributed through RS Components and Farnell as the charity would have to set up a massive logistics organisation. The store at http://www.raspberrypi.com/ is for selling items to help in general fundraising for the charity but is currently not a priority as they are working flat out to get the manufacturing and distribution running at the pace they need to meet the unexpectedly high demand. Hope that helps.

  40. Legal Cover by andersh · · Score: 1

    The problem with the one-size-fits-all approach is that it has horrendously failed here.

    I disagree. The fact that you can have it certified by one lab and have it accepted everywhere in Europe is not the issue. I don't really see why you object to that? That's a different matter from when and what products need to be certified. I fully understand your complaint in that regard.

    I would hazard a guess at "we're covering our backs" is the real reason for the certification. Farnell and others probably didn't want to take any chances. I don't know who demanded what exactly but I did read as much on their blog.

    It's helpful if you have some legal cover regardless. After all this is going to end up in schools and homes literally everywhere around the world. I would also rather do it just-in-case before something happens. The certification might not be necessary, but it sure is useful. As a "consumer" I don't mind it either.

    The point being that CE certification and the mutual recognition is a good thing, when it applies another matter. The previous comment "attacked" it in general, which I find unreasonable. You wouldn't want to sell this device in the US without FCC approval either.

    1. Re:Legal Cover by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sorry I wasn't talking about the one lab - accepted everywhere bit, that's actually quite good when it works, but rather the basic vague guidelines that are supposed to apply to everything from a toaster to a building elevator. The CE certification covers a wide yet quite specific array of products, and being a "finished product" as a lot of people are arguing over is not one of the criteria.

  41. Ah, I see by andersh · · Score: 1

    I see :) I suppose there will always be problems with this kind of legal framework, it's hard to create laws that are both capable and flexible.