Are you saying in 2025 they will decide that red lasers are better than blue after all despite blue and even higher (violet? UV?) having the ability to store more data??? Is it some sort of retro thing? Like getting a turntable? Red lasers are better for the acoustical quality, man, you can totally hear the warmth its so much better and old and different!
It's similar to people thinking that everyone who drinks is an alcoholic who throws their life away...there's a difference between drinking occasionally and binge drinking regularly, a huge difference./. nerds of course hate them for daring to do anything they've been taught is illicit
hey AC have I made you cry recently, by any chance, under your real username? sorry about that, I like to rip apart the dumb fucks on this site with my excellent karma and clear worldview so yeah, sorry about that but thanks for the anonymous love
hey dude are you being racist? cultural differences? some cultures just treat women like shit and if you dont like it or disagree then you arent open minded!
finally, someone says it. more people need to get this through their heads. its like the twisted idea that white knighting women clicks with feminism and somehow it will all end in sex and true love
I know a woman who later claim that a consensual makeout session was forced sex despite admitting that it was just an awkward makeout session. She describes a guy as "raping" her because they made out and she didn't really like him. When pressed she says "not actual rape". I know other girls who have done this too. The idea that men can be tossed around and slandered and used is sexist and the common woman seems to believe that this is acceptable. When mentioned, women will deny this is related to women as a gender and that some people are just bad. They also act as though men can't be victims and that a few men falsely accused of rape is acceptable because so many times it goes unreported. This illogic basically states that men can be torn apart by women at random because some men do bad things.
i think people may have missed the joke.. i was replying to feminist-mom who was replying to someone implying moms cant use computers so i decided to say "no women cant do it either" to troll the other half of her username.. i thought the joke would be obvious but instead a lot of bitter/.ers decided white knighting a possible female (and maybe getting some!!) was more important than reading comprehension and the ability to detect sarcasm. maybe feminist-mom will message you a kiss on the cheek guys!
The entire situation is BAD from the start. Whatever stupid fucking 30 year old who needs a 13 year old has already fucked up the 13 year old's life to some extent and that is why we are talking shit about them so there is no defense and you pretty much admitted this.
You're right. Teenagers can all have sex with each other without creepy old men breaking into the circle of newfound love and excitement. A 13 year old can have sex with someone just as not ready as they are.
Yeah, well, that was 2000 years ago. A lot of other things have also changed. Including lifespan. And scientific advances. And not dying from diseases we now see as trivial. But cool.
Polanski probably isn't a pedophile in the sense he doesn't like prepubescent girls, as a 13 year old would have hit puberty. But in our society, 13 is still too young for people much older than her. Don't point to older societies or views because you can go talk about cavemen times all you want but keep in mind you would be lucky to reach 25 or 30. Age is much more spread out now and a 13 year old should be hanging out with other 13 year olds, not creepy old men. It is always disgusting and predatory when an older man finds his way in with a young girl who just hit puberty. Sexually, the attraction may not have been deviant but the motives and acts were in the sense that he abused his position of authority to corrupt a minor. As long as 13 year olds don't have adult rights and have to obey adults and are still treated like children, they are not of age to have sex with (unless you are the same age or within 3 or 4 years).
You've obviously never submitted to the App Store. I can promise you that no matter how legit your application is, it will get rejected at least once a version.
They already do this. Apple painstakingly makes sure, in anywhere from 2 weeks to a month it seems like to me, that your app is acceptable and will reject you for the slightest infraction forcing the process to start over.
There is a VERY strict vetting process that causes many legitimate developers to go back to the drawing board time and time again. That would not work.
Slashdot Mirror
Are you saying in 2025 they will decide that red lasers are better than blue after all despite blue and even higher (violet? UV?) having the ability to store more data??? Is it some sort of retro thing? Like getting a turntable? Red lasers are better for the acoustical quality, man, you can totally hear the warmth its so much better and old and different!
Hey now what about Snow Crash?
A Skynet joke? On my Slashdot?
It's more likely than you think.
It's similar to people thinking that everyone who drinks is an alcoholic who throws their life away...there's a difference between drinking occasionally and binge drinking regularly, a huge difference. /. nerds of course hate them for daring to do anything they've been taught is illicit
Um, is there some sort of politeness thing I'm missing here? Is the casino going to be offended if I make money?
hey AC have I made you cry recently, by any chance, under your real username? sorry about that, I like to rip apart the dumb fucks on this site with my excellent karma and clear worldview so yeah, sorry about that but thanks for the anonymous love
hahahahahahaah
ahaah
nope but apparently the person in the article does
hey dude are you being racist? cultural differences? some cultures just treat women like shit and if you dont like it or disagree then you arent open minded!
finally, someone says it. more people need to get this through their heads. its like the twisted idea that white knighting women clicks with feminism and somehow it will all end in sex and true love
by the way i understand why my post is dumb (despite the actual events occurring)
I know a woman who later claim that a consensual makeout session was forced sex despite admitting that it was just an awkward makeout session. She describes a guy as "raping" her because they made out and she didn't really like him. When pressed she says "not actual rape". I know other girls who have done this too. The idea that men can be tossed around and slandered and used is sexist and the common woman seems to believe that this is acceptable. When mentioned, women will deny this is related to women as a gender and that some people are just bad. They also act as though men can't be victims and that a few men falsely accused of rape is acceptable because so many times it goes unreported. This illogic basically states that men can be torn apart by women at random because some men do bad things.
i think people may have missed the joke.. i was replying to feminist-mom who was replying to someone implying moms cant use computers so i decided to say "no women cant do it either" to troll the other half of her username.. i thought the joke would be obvious but instead a lot of bitter /.ers decided white knighting a possible female (and maybe getting some!!) was more important than reading comprehension and the ability to detect sarcasm. maybe feminist-mom will message you a kiss on the cheek guys!
no, just women in general
hahahaha of all the days to not have mod points :/
The entire situation is BAD from the start. Whatever stupid fucking 30 year old who needs a 13 year old has already fucked up the 13 year old's life to some extent and that is why we are talking shit about them so there is no defense and you pretty much admitted this.
You're right. Teenagers can all have sex with each other without creepy old men breaking into the circle of newfound love and excitement. A 13 year old can have sex with someone just as not ready as they are.
Yeah, well, that was 2000 years ago. A lot of other things have also changed. Including lifespan. And scientific advances. And not dying from diseases we now see as trivial. But cool.
Maybe 13 year olds can have sex with other 13 year olds and you can stop crying in your basement because they get more action than you..hm?
Polanski probably isn't a pedophile in the sense he doesn't like prepubescent girls, as a 13 year old would have hit puberty. But in our society, 13 is still too young for people much older than her. Don't point to older societies or views because you can go talk about cavemen times all you want but keep in mind you would be lucky to reach 25 or 30. Age is much more spread out now and a 13 year old should be hanging out with other 13 year olds, not creepy old men. It is always disgusting and predatory when an older man finds his way in with a young girl who just hit puberty. Sexually, the attraction may not have been deviant but the motives and acts were in the sense that he abused his position of authority to corrupt a minor. As long as 13 year olds don't have adult rights and have to obey adults and are still treated like children, they are not of age to have sex with (unless you are the same age or within 3 or 4 years).
You've obviously never submitted to the App Store. I can promise you that no matter how legit your application is, it will get rejected at least once a version.
they do you fucking idiot, how about you know what you're talking about before talking about it
They already do this. Apple painstakingly makes sure, in anywhere from 2 weeks to a month it seems like to me, that your app is acceptable and will reject you for the slightest infraction forcing the process to start over.
There is a VERY strict vetting process that causes many legitimate developers to go back to the drawing board time and time again. That would not work.
There's a $100 yearly fee to develop for iPhone.