No kidding, with the ActiveX/Popup blocking capabilities of IE and SP2, that number would have fallen right to 0.00% or so. What a delightly FUDdy article.
Sharp objects like dust? I've noticed many more tiny scratches on my iPod than my Pocket PC/Phone, and I use it constantly. Plus, God forbid you EVER slide your iPod in the same pocket as your keys or some loose change.
However, it's not the GPL 3's DRM section per se that concerns Torvalds.
"Just to make it clear: It's not actually the new section 3 ('3. Digital Restrictions Management.') That I object to, like some people seem to think. That section I don't even worry too much about. The part of the GPLv3 that I'm most worried about is the new parts to section 1."
The specific section that Torvalds has trouble with reads:
"Complete Corresponding Source Code also includes any encryption or authorization codes necessary to install and/or execute the source code of the work, perhaps modified by you, in the recommended or principal context of use, such that its functioning in all circumstances is identical to that of the work, except as altered by your modifications...."
According to Torvalds, this "is the one that seems to disallow digitally signed binaries (or rather: you can sign the binaries any way you want, but you have to make your private keys available)."
That's interesting, because I just started up Visual Studio and created a windows project. Built the default app in Release mode and started it, memory use went to 11MB (loading the runtime), then after about 10 seconds settled in at under 1MB.
The in-store repairs are completely detached from the "on-site" services they provide. (IIRC, Best Buy sends their cameras and some other electronics off to some service center for repair)
If that was the argument being made, he should have said one DOMAIN, not one country. Just because the suffix is.cn doesn't mean the rest of the world isnt supposed to be using it.
If that was the case, all you europeans get off del.icio.us ASAP!
Sorry, but if *anyone* sends me an executable without a thorough explanation as to why they sent it and what it's for, I'd be out of my mind to open it and so would you.
You have to remember, the WMF processing code was created long before SDL existed, and when few people thought cancelling a print job could have unintended consequences.
Many companies offer special incentives or benefits to businesses that certify, or hire certified employees. Major examples of this would be HP, Microsoft, and Cisco Systems.
Who says .NET apps can't be open source? Don't be so dense.
Some people don't want 4-8 machines taking up space in their computer room? (As if they don't already)
I'd prefer 1 machine that can do the same.
Uhh, I'm sure if MS tries hard enough *NOTHING* norton does to prevent being deleted will be enough.
No kidding, with the ActiveX/Popup blocking capabilities of IE and SP2, that number would have fallen right to 0.00% or so. What a delightly FUDdy article.
Use the symantec removal tool to get rid of NIS 2005. It's available on their website.
The reason it exhibits this behavior is because otherwise, it would be WAY too easy for viruses to disable antivirus if it didn't fight back.
Sharp objects like dust? I've noticed many more tiny scratches on my iPod than my Pocket PC/Phone, and I use it constantly. Plus, God forbid you EVER slide your iPod in the same pocket as your keys or some loose change.
They will probably use the same method they used to prevent the iPod video's screen from succumbing to scratches.
Oh, wait...
So... how does a blurb about printf relate to .NET?
Don't forget to bold it!
I meant I created a "Windows Forms Project", a console project would have taken 1/10th of the memory.
From TFA:
..."
However, it's not the GPL 3's DRM section per se that concerns Torvalds.
"Just to make it clear: It's not actually the new section 3 ('3. Digital Restrictions Management.') That I object to, like some people seem to think. That section I don't even worry too much about. The part of the GPLv3 that I'm most worried about is the new parts to section 1."
The specific section that Torvalds has trouble with reads:
"Complete Corresponding Source Code also includes any encryption or authorization codes necessary to install and/or execute the source code of the work, perhaps modified by you, in the recommended or principal context of use, such that its functioning in all circumstances is identical to that of the work, except as altered by your modifications.
According to Torvalds, this "is the one that seems to disallow digitally signed binaries (or rather: you can sign the binaries any way you want, but you have to make your private keys available)."
That's interesting, because I just started up Visual Studio and created a windows project. Built the default app in Release mode and started it, memory use went to 11MB (loading the runtime), then after about 10 seconds settled in at under 1MB.
The in-store repairs are completely detached from the "on-site" services they provide. (IIRC, Best Buy sends their cameras and some other electronics off to some service center for repair)
I'm going to fathom a guess that you've never even purchased an on-site Geek Squad service. Where's the mod category "pointless and misinformed"?
Sorry, but in a similar situation, something tells me you'd be feeling the same way as him.
That is, until Nvidia releases the Geforce 7900 GTX :)
If that was the argument being made, he should have said one DOMAIN, not one country. Just because the suffix is .cn doesn't mean the rest of the world isnt supposed to be using it.
If that was the case, all you europeans get off del.icio.us ASAP!
Sorry, but if *anyone* sends me an executable without a thorough explanation as to why they sent it and what it's for, I'd be out of my mind to open it and so would you.
Wrong:
e &hl=en&btnG=Search+Images
l r=&cr=countryCN&q=tiananmen+square&btnG=%E6%90%9C% E7%B4%A2
Image results for "tiananmen square"... you'll notice very different results even though both requests originate in the US.
http://images.google.com/images?q=tiananmen+squar
http://images.google.cn/images?svnum=10&hl=zh-CN&
That is exactly how Microsoft does their programming now, it's called the Security Development Lifecycle.
You have to remember, the WMF processing code was created long before SDL existed, and when few people thought cancelling a print job could have unintended consequences.
Sorry but Gates does a commendable job of keeping Microsoft and the Gates Foundation two very separate entities.
We need a mod category for "baiting the untold OSX masses".
Now we will just have to sit and wait for Steve Gibson's assessment that Apple intentionally left these exploits open as a backdoor to the system!
Hahaha, I can see it now:
Your position in the queue: 1430
Estimated Time: 2 hours 15 minutes
Many companies offer special incentives or benefits to businesses that certify, or hire certified employees. Major examples of this would be HP, Microsoft, and Cisco Systems.