Turn off the internet, and make it illegal to receive any news that isn't officially state mandated, state protected, state owned, and state run.
Even that won't give this judge what he wants, because people would still be able to use pencils, pens, or other mark making tools to do such things as 'paraphrase' news sources.
This judge is an idiot, and because he has power, he is a dangerous idiot. He should be removed for the safety of the American people in particular, and the safety of the internet in general.
Indeed, some of the most physics-accurate games I've played, have been some of the most generic and dull in memory. Greater physics can add to a game, but/designed/ physics, is what makes a game/fun/.
If it is encrypted, it will not bypass the filter. It will be blocked, because it is encrypted. The innocent have nothing to hide, the innocent have nothing to fear. Are you innocent? Only criminals use encryption. Trust the government.
Yeah, 'help' the creators of content, by preventing people from listening to it.
Sorry, but fuck the ASCAP, they're at least as bad if not worse than the RIAA. And if you/support/ anti-artist organizations like the ASCAP, then I look upon you with suspicion.
Alright, what the hell does 'remote-control autonomous' even mean? I think we're getting scammed by calling it that. If it's just 'remote control', then I doubt very much it's what could be called 'robot'. Robotic, maybe, but otherwise it's just humans against humans.
What, then? Remove the people and leave it up to machines?
Human beings, by virture of being/alive/, with experience of life and personalities are by their very nature inevitably Ideological, in everything they do.
I hope the kid never gets an actual illness, because if that's the way the parents 'take care' of their child, I'd call that 'negligence likely to cause death'.
Slashdot Mirror
So, China just fobade anyone who does any work on the inernet from receiving payment of any kind for their services.
Wow.
No, seriously, I'm impressed.
Turn off the internet, and make it illegal to receive any news that isn't officially state mandated, state protected, state owned, and state run.
Even that won't give this judge what he wants, because people would still be able to use pencils, pens, or other mark making tools to do such things as 'paraphrase' news sources.
This judge is an idiot, and because he has power, he is a dangerous idiot. He should be removed for the safety of the American people in particular, and the safety of the internet in general.
You mean, free-riders like... Slashdot.org?
Alright, genius, if it's so simple for you, then how exactly do you solve the problem of fraud?
Indeed, some of the most physics-accurate games I've played, have been some of the most generic and dull in memory. Greater physics can add to a game, but /designed/ physics, is what makes a game /fun/.
What, you didn't even read the /summary/?
I know, this is Slashdot, but 'some basic info about it' is /right there/.
This is America, where children are the Enemy.
If it is encrypted, it will not bypass the filter. It will be blocked, because it is encrypted. The innocent have nothing to hide, the innocent have nothing to fear. Are you innocent? Only criminals use encryption. Trust the government.
Sue them for that amount, x45,000.
Then maybe they'll take this seriously.
What the hell does any of that incomprehensible gibberish mean?
'Default good lol 'cause like computers are hard'?
Seriously?
And to carry on your thought, suicide is even cheaper. You're not a good person, are you?
Yeah, 'help' the creators of content, by preventing people from listening to it.
Sorry, but fuck the ASCAP, they're at least as bad if not worse than the RIAA. And if you /support/ anti-artist organizations like the ASCAP, then I look upon you with suspicion.
Alright, what the hell does 'remote-control autonomous' even mean? I think we're getting scammed by calling it that. If it's just 'remote control', then I doubt very much it's what could be called 'robot'. Robotic, maybe, but otherwise it's just humans against humans.
Does it have AdBlock Plus?
I'll gladly wait 5 minutes for my browser to start, if that means I never see any ads of any kind ever.
You don't want SCOTUS to be run by humans?
What, then? Remove the people and leave it up to machines?
Human beings, by virture of being /alive/, with experience of life and personalities are by their very nature inevitably Ideological, in everything they do.
It cannot be seperated from anything.
So the kid was cured by sugar-water?
I hope the kid never gets an actual illness, because if that's the way the parents 'take care' of their child, I'd call that 'negligence likely to cause death'.
"But color blindness is hardly disabling, it's merely an inconvenience."
You're not color blind, are you?
Yeah, thought not. I guess calling someone a hypocritical asshole is hardly insulting, it's merely an inconvenience. You hypocritical asshole.
Smiley face! :)
You want no plugins, huh?
So you're going to give me built-in AdBlock Plus, Noscript, Flashblock and Element Hiding Helper?
No?
Then I'm sorry, but most people who care about plugins in the first place, just won't bother.
How about Germany? Britian?
And yet it's /still/ better than watching TV.
Also, because it works.
What are you talking about? Just save the cookie. Problem solved.
This is how market competition is supposed to work.
Evil or not, a Google without competition inevitably stagnates.
Yes. Fortunately, as usual, the summary has /nothing to do/ with the /actual/ article that it's referencing.
True, true, and I admit I was also misled by the misleading, inflammitory summary. Such is Slashdot these days, I suppose.