Slashdot Mirror


On the Humble Default

Hugh Pickens sends along Kevin Kelly's paean to the default. "One of the greatest unappreciated inventions of modern life is the default. 'Default' is a technical concept first used in computer science in the 1960s to indicate a preset standard. ... Today the notion of a default has spread beyond computer science to the culture at large. It seems such a small thing, but the idea of the default is fundamental... It's hard to remember a time when defaults were not part of life. But defaults only arose as computing spread; they are an attribute of complex technological systems. There were no defaults in the industrial age. ... The hallmark of flexible technological systems is the ease by which they can be rewired, modified, reprogrammed, adapted, and changed to suit new uses and new users. Many (not all) of their assumptions can be altered. The upside to endless flexibility and multiple defaults lies in the genuine choice that an individual now has, if one wants it. ... Choices materialize when summoned. But these abundant choices never appeared in fixed designs. ... In properly designed default system, I always have my full freedoms, yet my choices are presented to me in a way that encourages taking those choices in time — in an incremental and educated manner. Defaults are a tool that tame expanding choice."

339 comments

  1. It's not my fault by cjeze · · Score: 3, Funny

    response by default

    1. Re:It's not my fault by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Red Foreman! You leave that boy alone!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    2. Re:It's not my fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and here I was thinking that that was default

    3. Re:It's not my fault by Klistvud · · Score: 3, Funny

      This race-to-the-first-post is getting tiresome. The Admins should modify their software: by default, every first post should be deleted, so that the 2nd post becomes 1st. Then, the 1st post should be deleted, so that the 2nd post becomes 1st. Then, the 1st post should be deleted, so that the 2nd post becomes 1st. Then...

      That would simplify SlashDot and make it more user-friendly, making AJAX and other complex technologies virtually obsolete.

      --
      Intellectual Property: an immaterial non-entity, most fiercely contended by those with no proper intellect to speak of.
    4. Re:It's not my fault by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It should just default to AC saying 'First Post!'

    5. Re:It's not my fault by shentino · · Score: 1

      It should be done randomly so that it doesn't just get written off.

      Then we never know if you really did post first, and we thus won't care.

    6. Re:It's not my fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first post 'tradition' is a childish game that only the players thereof care about in the first place.

  2. It's not default... by realnrh · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... of de programming language that your code doesn't compile!

    --
    Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
  3. Slashdot defaults by IntlHarvester · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do the defaults on slashdot still require posters to manually type HTML codes for line breaks?

    I always thought the misleading options on the posting form were a pretty funny newbie filter. Welcome to slashdot, RTFM.

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    1. Re:Slashdot defaults by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh! I remember my first post. It was all neatly formatted, and then I pressed the Submit button, and it came out as a huge wall of text.

      Ahh, good times.

    2. Re:Slashdot defaults by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Really? HTML formatted vs "plain old text" made sense to me.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:Slashdot defaults by omnichad · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Except that "Plain Text" still allows all the same HTML tags, and does a lousy job of formatting line breaks.

    4. Re:Slashdot defaults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? HTML formatted vs "plain old text" made sense to me.

      Except that plain old text is really just html with newlines replaced by <br>

      Go ahead, try displaying some unequalities like x < 1 without replacing the < with &lt;

    5. Re:Slashdot defaults by BookMama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh-oh, I'm a newbie. So the forums on slashdot don't work like the forums on most websites?

      That is the most user-unfriendly interface mistake.. to not match what the user expects based on their other experiences.

      Is there no preview message to clue people in?

      Ah.... so I just did a preview message and I see what you mean. Okay, so I'll toss in a few HTML breaks to make paragraphs and...

      much better. Guess I got lucky reading this early

    6. Re:Slashdot defaults by gravyface · · Score: 1

      And would it kill them to put in a WYSIWYG toolbar (tinyMCE, fckeditor, etc.)?

      --
      body massage!
    7. Re:Slashdot defaults by RalphSleigh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, because those things are evil, and soon result in huge piles of nested font tags and random stylesheet fragments everywhere.

      Don't even ask what happens when someone pastes a word document into one, it makes me weep .

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    8. Re:Slashdot defaults by vic-traill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And would it kill them to put in a WYSIWYG toolbar (tinyMCE, fckeditor, etc.)?

      I don't know about Taco, but it might kill me. If we can't get away from JS editor toolbars on /., then they truly have taken over the world, I suppose.

      I think a little manual markup is good for the soul, myself. Strictly IMHO.

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    9. Re:Slashdot defaults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x 1

    10. Re:Slashdot defaults by theCoder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot was written in the late 90s when there were no other web forums (or at least not many) and BBcode didn't exist (ah, good times!) Back then, everyone knew that to bold something you used <b>, not [b]. And Slashdot does have a post preview -- just some people choose not to use it :)

      Frankly, I don't see what's so hard about using HTML in your posts. It's not any harder than something like BBcode (mostly just use angle brackets instead of square brackets). HTML is harder on the server side since Slashdot has to parse it and figure out what's OK HTML, like <b>, and what's bad HTML, like <script> (though if /. filtered out some of its own scripts, that would be good too).

      Choosing "Plain Old Text" as the posting method is usually the easiest. You don't have to use <br> or <p> to do line formatting, but you still get to use other HTML stuff. You do have to use &lt; and &gt;, though, which can be annoying. And to bring this post on topic, I don't know why that isn't the default option for posting. I'm pretty sure you can set it to be in your user options, because it's always what is set by default for my posts.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    11. Re:Slashdot defaults by gravyface · · Score: 1

      They're both highly-customizable -- you can restrict the toolbar to the same subset of tags permitted on /.

      --
      body massage!
    12. Re:Slashdot defaults by gravyface · · Score: 1

      I don't mind when I'm on my desktop, but on my eeepc, fat-finger-follies ensue.

      --
      body massage!
    13. Re:Slashdot defaults by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, there's a way to automatically parse line breaks?!

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    14. Re:Slashdot defaults by Goaway · · Score: 1

      HTML is harder on the server side since Slashdot has to parse it and figure out what's OK HTML

      Not so. Nothing prevents you from treating HTML the exact same way you treat BBcode. Parse it into an internal representation that can't represent dangerous code, and then output fresh new HTML which just accidentally happens to be the exact same for valid input.

    15. Re:Slashdot defaults by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't see what's so hard about using HTML in your posts.

      It's not hard to use HTML when it's needed. The pointless thing is having to use HTML to just have paragraphs.

      Choosing "Plain Old Text" as the posting method is usually the easiest.

      Indeed - which is why it seems mad it's not the default...

    16. Re:Slashdot defaults by maxume · · Score: 1

      How do you want it to be different?

      Blank-line-implies-paragraph is pretty straightforward in my opinion. It even looks like one way of making paragraphs in ASCII (or a typewriter, if one has ever used such a contraption).

      I suppose a mode or tag that acted more like 'code' but didn't set a monospace font would be useful. They could call it preformatted or something.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Slashdot defaults by omnichad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Except that it doesn't seem to do line breaks at just CR/LF. Every time I've tried to use it, I get extra line breaks in unwanted places.
       
      I love blank-line-implies paragraph, and code to that principle all the time.

    18. Re:Slashdot defaults by maxume · · Score: 1

      I formatted that post using plain old text and blank lines to imply line breaks. In the rendered html, each block of text is wrapped in a p. So as far as I can tell, it is using blank-line-implies-paragraph.
      Maybe a single line break does something different (this sentence is a test).

      Yep, the single line break got transformed into a br tag.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    19. Re:Slashdot defaults by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Probably what they do now. But in the old days, Slashdot suffered from a whole bunch of HTML-related exploits that would have just been impossible on a BBcode site.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    20. Re:Slashdot defaults by roscivs · · Score: 1

      Not so. Nothing prevents you from treating HTML the exact same way you treat BBcode. Parse it into an internal representation that can't represent dangerous code, and then output fresh new HTML which just accidentally happens to be the exact same for valid input.

      Yeah, but a brain-dead bbcode parser can: (a) remove all angle brackets from the post, (b) replace all known bbcode with the proper html tags. Any unrecognized bbcode tags simply are left alone. You can't get that brain-dead simple with an HTML parser.

      --
      ~ roscivs
    21. Re:Slashdot defaults by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't see what's so hard about using HTML in your posts. It's not any harder than something like BBcode (mostly just use angle brackets instead of square brackets).

      The big difference between the way Slashdot treats HTML, and pretty much all boards treat BBcode, is how they handle input that includes metacharacters, but that isn't tags.

      With BBcode, square brackets aren't really metacharacters. It specifically only recognizes formatting tags ([b], [/i] etc), and leaves the rest alone. This means that you can actually use square brackets, and they will be displayed normally, unless they happen to form a formatting tag (which isn't likely in typical input, though [i] can be fairly common in code - but even then all you need to do to make it verbatim is to put an extra space).

      Slashdot HTML, on the other hand, does treat angle brackets as metacharacters in all contexts, dropping them silently even when they otherwise have no effect. Now angle brackets aren't very common except for code, but they're very common in code (and, this being Slashdot, posting code inline is reasonbly common occurence). And there's no easy way to escape them, either. HTML character references plainly suck in typing convenience - we're talking about 4 replacement characters, one of which requires Shift to type.

      What would be handy is something like <ecode>, but for inline code (<tt> doesn't cut it because it still requires you to escape < and >).

    22. Re:Slashdot defaults by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      By my logic, "Plain old text" is what you'd use to if you wanted to tell someone <br> is the tag you use for newlines.

      And when I signed up, the default was HTML formatted; entering new lines showed up fine in the Preview, but was one huge paragraph once submitted.

    23. Re:Slashdot defaults by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I do not actually post that much so I never bothered to change the defaults. I just use the HTML tags.

      This may sound stupid but it reminds me a little of the earlier days of the internet. It was a bit harder to do things back and I didn't have the knowledge of how things worked. It was a strange and fantastic new world that had opened up before me where tons of knowledge was at my fingertips. The possibilities fascinated me.

      Not that the Internet isn't great now.... Even with all of the bad things about it there are several orders more of knowledge to be had...but the early days of my browsing will always be a special memory for me.

    24. Re:Slashdot defaults by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that parser will also output massively broken HTML on demand.

  4. Look at our financial system by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

    More and more are taking the choice to default than ever before.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Look at our financial system by patro · · Score: 1

      Yep, in the current economic situation it's not a wise thing to talk about the default.

      The Chinese read Slashdot too, you know.

    2. Re:Look at our financial system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love default passwords on adsl and wifi routers ;)

  5. On a related note by realnrh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If I request in this comment that people not respond to it, for how many people will the default behavior be responding to it? Please do not respond to this comment.

    --
    Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
    1. Re:On a related note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Default behavior is to respond to this comment.

      Please do not respond to this response.

    2. Re:On a related note by causality · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please do not respond to this response.

      OK.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:On a related note by dword · · Score: 1

      I wonder what would happen if I responded to your comment.
      (of course, one of the /. defaults is linking to xkcd)

  6. What? by MrMista_B · · Score: 0

    What the hell does any of that incomprehensible gibberish mean?

    'Default good lol 'cause like computers are hard'?

    Seriously?

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do any of your linux folks know if one always had to roll their own kernel back in the day, or could one get a generic one?

      I never used linux, but still remember the good old default-less days when installing freebsd required you to type in the number of heads/sectors in your hard drive, and the horizontal refresh rate of your monitor.

      That horizontal refresh was a real bitch the first time around. And you'd have to sit down and figure out that it had something to do with the number of your screen pixels and the desired frame rate. No reasonable defaults. No nothing, just an empty field taking numbers 0-999, and if you calculate wrong, your system boots to a blank screen, and you have to reinstall and try again.

      That's the beauty of a default: it'll just freaking work. Not ideally, but good enough to get you going and let you change it later on, at your own pace.

    2. Re:What? by Jurily · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the beauty of a default: it'll just freaking work. Not ideally, but good enough to get you going and let you change it later on, at your own pace.

      Wrong. That's hardware detection. And it's gotten so good I don't even have an xorg.conf anymore.

    3. Re:What? by AlterRNow · · Score: 1

      I have an SLI system and ( I believe my motherboard is damaged ) most of the time the second card isn't "present" so sometimes when I boot, there are 2 cards, sometimes one. Now, when this second card magically appears, xorg can't figure out which one is the primary device ( I'm fairly sure the first one would be a good default ) and I get "no screens found" in the logs and X won't start. Took me a little while to figure that out and fixed it with a Busid line in xorg.conf.

      Probably would have fixed it faster if I'd actually looked at the logs straight away and I'm fortunate to have multiple computers ( quick google search led me to the answer ). I'm guessing the problem arose from the second card not being present during the installation.. so the hardware detection still has some ( minor but significant ) gaps.

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you make VGA the default.

    5. Re:What? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      You could certainly get a default kernel as far back as 1995 - if there hadn't been a default kernel you couldn't have installed a working system anyway. But back then there were no kernel modules - everything was built in - so if you wanted a smaller kernel (to not take up so much of your 256kB RAM, say) you had to build the kernel to match your requirements.

      But default kernels pale into insignificance against the vast amount of configuration you had to do when you installed a new linux system. You had to configure pretty much everything. I remember it taking me a couple of days to get a server installed and set up (in about 97) - nowadays it would take an hour or two. Admittedly that's partly because i know a lot more about it now, but mostly it's due to usable defaults.

    6. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, give up trying to get dual-head to work in Linux. Once you sort your hardware problems out, you'll only discover all of the software problems like dialog boxes popping up half on one, half on the other.

    7. Re:What? by AlterRNow · · Score: 1

      I never said I had a dual-head setup, I said I had ( intermittent :P ) SLI.

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    8. Re:What? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Nevermind "hardware detection".

      There just aren't that many possibilities out there. You can present the end user with
      a list of the most likely candidates and have them just select one. If they hardware is
      good you don't even have to worry about them destroying it with bogus values.

      Nevermind "hardware detection", how about presenting a menu?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  7. Bollocks by tonyr60 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Default was first used in computer science in the 1960s because that is when computer science, as we knew it, began. It was picked up from common usage outside of computer science, and was general use well before then. Unfortunately I am old enough to remember it as a common term in the 1950s. For example the default land area for a house (at least in my part of the world) was a quarter of an acre and it used to be referred to as the default area.

    1. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    2. Re:Bollocks by EricX2 · · Score: 1

      I had to explain what default meant to my dad a few years ago... to him it meant this:

      Failure to perform a task or fulfill an obligation, especially failure to meet a financial obligation: in default on a loan.

      Although from your subject I'm guessing your part of the world and my part of the world are far apart... :)

    3. Re:Bollocks by JakartaDean · · Score: 1

      Wow, they made 'em big where you lived. Each house is almost 11,000 square feet? Are you sure you didn't mean the average mansion?

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
    4. Re:Bollocks by Deltaspectre · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the contrary, these houses had traded much of their living space for this thing called a yard. Not to be confused with the measurement, a yard was the area generally unused by the house left grassy.

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    5. Re:Bollocks by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember running into this type of issue at my first programming job, almost thirty years ago. I told my boss (the owner of the company) that in order to get the software to do what he wanted, we had to change some of the defaults on the computer. He insisted that I was wrong, because he hadn't missed any payments on any loans, and I was never able to get him to understand that the term had a different meaning when you're talking about computers. Still, he wasn't a techno-phobe by any means, he was computerizing his business long before it became common.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:Bollocks by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was picked up from common usage outside of computer science, and was general use well before then.

      Phew, for a moment there I thought that before computer science was invented, everything came in random configuration.

      This whole story is a waste of space. Slow news day I guess.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We were using it in England back in the 1500's...

      Even as soon as thou canst, for thou hast to pull at
      a smack o' the contrary. If ever thou be'st bound
      in thy scarf and beaten, thou shalt find what it is
      to be proud of thy bondage. I have a desire to hold
      my acquaintance with thee, or rather my knowledge,
      that I may say in the default, he is a man I know.

      William Shakespeare

    8. Re:Bollocks by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. The author implies that mechanical systems built before the 1960s came without built-in functionality or options. For an obvious example, take the toaster: since the dawn of the bread-toasting craze, it has included a "browning" control. This mechanical control, be it a knob, slider, or switch, had a base setting which was calibrated at the factory. This was its "default" position for optimum toasting. You could always change it up or down, as you desire, and return it back to its original setting.

      "Defaults", as we know them, have always been there, though perhaps not called as such. The term "default" technically means "failure to act", and throughout its history has had negative connotations, which is why the author may not have seen it in the same context when reading pre-computer nomenclature. "Base settings", or "factory configurations" are synonymous in this context.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    9. Re:Bollocks by dzfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, the term has exactly the same meaning when talking about computers, you just need to put it in context and use it correctly. "Default" means "failure to act", so a loan "default" means you failed to make payments. When talking about computers, the proper term is "default configuration", which means you have not changed it (or failed to change it) from its factory settings.

      Using "default" without qualification is ambiguous unless the context is expressely clear; you do not know if your boss bought the computer with a loan, for example. I bet that had you said "default configuration" instead of just "default", it would have sounded much less of a financial term, perhaps prompting him to ask you to explain what it was. However, I can see this working only from the beginning, when establishing context; as soon as he takes hold of a financial context, his concerns and bias will taint and load the term from then on.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    10. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the OP is in New Zealand where I also live. What he says is true. Unfortunately it's also lead to a lot of people stuffing 1/2 more houses behind their own house as land values went up which is unfortunate

    11. Re:Bollocks by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      The two meanings aren't that far apart: a program's default action is one it performs if the user fails to provide a required piece of input. Still, it would be cool if your bank paid your mortgage for you when you failed to meet a payment.

    12. Re:Bollocks by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Default *land* area. In other words, default size of the plot of land you built your house on. Not the size of the house.

    13. Re:Bollocks by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      ...we had to change some of the defaults on the computer. He insisted that I was wrong, because he hadn't missed any payments on any loans...Still, he wasn't a techno-phobe by any means, he was computerizing his business long before it became common.

      He probably just thought that "computerizing" is what you do to open wounds, when your company is hemorrhaging.

    14. Re:Bollocks by McDutchie · · Score: 1

      Actually, the term has exactly the same meaning when talking about computers, you just need to put it in context and use it correctly. "Default" means "failure to act", so a loan "default" means you failed to make payments. When talking about computers, the proper term is "default configuration", which means you have not changed it (or failed to change it) from its factory settings.

      "Have not changed it" and "failed to changed it" are totally different in meaning. The difference is in the existence of an obligation not satisfied. There is no obligation to change default configurations; in fact, pretty much the opposite is true, as it's widely expected most users will stick to the default configurations which are expected to be sane and functional. So, with the "fault" taken out of the "default", there has definitely been a fundamental semantic shift in this word.

    15. Re:Bollocks by ferd_farkle · · Score: 1

      This faux etymology is refuted in about 45 seconds on teh interwebz.

      from Dictionary 2.26.0, and from The Century Dictionary; 'an encyclopedic lexicon of the english language':

      " Cooks could make artificial birds and fishes in default of the real ones. --Arbuthnot. "

      John Arbuthnot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      "John Arbuthnot, often known simply as Dr. Arbuthnot, (baptised April 29, 1667 - February 27, 1735), was a physician, satirist and polymath in London. ..."

    16. Re:Bollocks by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Wrong again. The word implies an expectation, not an obligation, to act. In the case of a loan, the expectation coincides with an obligation; however, this is the nature of a loan itself, not of the concept of "default". In the case of computer configurations, the expectation is regarding the options the user can customize. The fact that most users won't is a matter of choice, convenience, or inertia; and not an inherent limitation of the technology nor of the term.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    17. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Default" means "failure to act"

      Interesting. As a non-native English speaker I had my own interpretation by dissecting the word into "de" as in the prefix "un-" and "fault" as in "failure".

      So a default for me always was something that prevents a program from failing, e.g. no parameter was given or parameter is out of range invokes the default and the program keeps running.

    18. Re:Bollocks by McDutchie · · Score: 1

      Wrong again.

      "Again"? What's that supposed to mean?

      The word implies an expectation, not an obligation, to act.

      Various dictionaries disagree with you.

      In the case of computer configurations, the expectation is regarding the options the user can customize.

      There is no expectation that users change the default; it's an option. The expectation is that most users won't. Even if we accept that "default" in its original meaning never implied an unsatisfied obligation, there is still a semantic shift.

    19. Re:Bollocks by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Close. It actually comes from the Old French word "defaute", or latin "defalta" or "defallere", meaning a deficiency or failure: de (completely) + fallere (to fault or fail).
            http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=default
            http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-default.html

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    20. Re:Bollocks by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 1

      There is no expectation that users change the default; it's an option. The expectation is that most users won't. Even if we accept that "default" in its original meaning never implied an unsatisfied obligation, there is still a semantic shift.

      In a few days another user is going to post a story on IT security mistakes and the number one is going to be default passwords. People will complain about users not changing the defaults and suddenly someone is going to quote this post about that users are not expected to change the configuration. If users were not expected to change them they would not be made available. The fact that the majority of users are to inexperienced to do so intelligently doesn't matter.

      Taken as a general term referring to the software which will be installed on multiple computers some with multiple users. The default configuration is a failure to act. I do not think its correct to think of the default configuration as a instance term as its uniform across all instances of a software. Where when a configuration is no longer default then it becomes victimized and individual, but likely not unique. To sum this all up I think its wrong to say the expectation is that users will not change the default, but that at least a few users will.

      --
      Momento Mori
    21. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *giggle* you said taint

    22. Re:Bollocks by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      Well, I think of the computer usage of "default" as perhaps originating from switch statements (or at least, switch statements provide a suitable analogy). If none of the expressed conditionals in the switch statement is matched, then you execute the default case. It's not so much a question of expectations because there is no implied expectation that a particular case condition will be met. Here it's clear how the term "default" came to be applied: "Failing W, X, and Y, do Z." Same thing with user preferences: "Failing the detection of a user override, do this."

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    23. Re:Bollocks by Keith_Beef · · Score: 0, Troll

      I do not consider "dictionary.com" to be a good authority on the definition of English words, nor to give good exa,ples of English usage.

      You may choose to have a different opinion; in which case you will be wrong.

      Next time you wish to appear pedantic, put a little more effort into it, old chap.

      K.

    24. Re:Bollocks by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      A yard is paved. I think you mean a garden or a lawn...

      K.

    25. Re:Bollocks by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      When talking about computers, the proper term is "default configuration", which means you have not changed it (or failed to change it) from its factory settings.

      For real estate mortgages, the default configuration is that the bank owns "your" house, and it probably always did own it. It's just that they were willing to play make-believe, and go along with the pretense that you did own it -- at least in theory.

    26. Re:Bollocks by drissel · · Score: 1

      When I moved to Texas, my defaults had to change. I knew it when some phrase would bring me up short ... like "snow ski" - the default is water ski ... "water well" - default is, of course, oil well. One that I can't get over after 40 yrs is "Paris, France". The default, at least in N Texas, is Paris, Texas.

      Regards,
          Bill Drissel

  8. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Defaults have been around for a long time. For example. When an electrician installs your light switch, the default is for up to mean ON, and down to mean OFF. To flush most toilets, push Down on the lever. etc

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That is NOT what default means. That's called STANDARD.

      Default is when you DON'T choose an option and then it's already set in some way _exactly because_ you did not choose any.

      That's what default means. When an option is set because you did not set it yourself. It's NOT the same as _standard_.

    2. Re:Anonymous Coward by fbjon · · Score: 1

      That is a standard, not a default. A default is a common initial setting, e.g. all light switches starting out in the 'off' position when installed (which is a terrible example).

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:Anonymous Coward by omnichad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like the light switch being in the OFF position when it's first installed. Not that you can see it, because the lights are off.

    4. Re:Anonymous Coward by diskis · · Score: 1

      Not in all countries. In some countries the light is turned on by flipping the switch down. Gets confusing for the first few weeks.

    5. Re:Anonymous Coward by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      It would not be a setting if there were not a choice to be made. Again, "default" is what you get if you choose to not choose.

    6. Re:Anonymous Coward by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It would not be a setting if there were not a choice to be made.

      Yes?

      Again, "default" is what you get if you choose to not choose.

      That's pretty much what I said. Choosing not to choose is the same as accepting the initial setting.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    7. Re:Anonymous Coward by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Sometimes they are on the wrong side of the door, too. I can't count the number of times I slapped my hand to the right of the doors in my old house.

      Right is the standard here.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    8. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When an electrician installs your light switch, the default is for up to mean ON, and down to mean OFF.

      And here we have an example: An American thinks his local usage is just "the default" for everyone. Light switches, for instance in Australia, are up for off and down for on. (Cue Simpsons jokes).

      And in some countries, the default side of the road is the left, not the right! Some countries DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH!! Believe it or not.

      Back to computer defaults: It really, really pisses me off when software defaults to Letter size paper, Imperial (non-metric) measures, MDY dates, American spelling. Often WITHOUT EVEN MENTIONING OR ASKING THE USER. And so 90% of people in the world (okay, 90% of the computers in other countries I have personally seen) are set up with these inappropriate settings. So print jobs are weirdly distorted, spelling is mysteriously "corrected", spreadsheet dates are scrambled. Etc, etc. All thanks to "User friendly" install defaults.

    9. Re:Anonymous Coward by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Those are not "default" since, by their nature, they eliminate choice. Your example would be a default if my car was pre-configured to drive on the right side of the road on my failure to choose which side; but allow me to alter this state once I take control.

      Likewise, your light switch example is flawed: I am not given a choice to select whether up is on or off; this selection is done by the electrician based on cultural conventions and standards.

      On these two examples, the initial configuration is permanent, and as such it is not based on my failure to act, which is technically what the word "default" means.

      An example of a default is if I am allowed to select a color for my brand new car, but failing to do so, it comes in generic black. In this case, black is the "default color". Another example, which means the same thing but which people tend to confuse as a completely different meaning, is if I have a mortgage on my home and due to my failure to pay it on time, the bank claims ownership and evicts me. This is a case of "loan default". Both examples involve my failure to act in some expected way.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    10. Re:Anonymous Coward by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the right? Nonsense. They are on the side by the handle, opposite the hinges. And which way the door is hung depends on the configuration of the rooms.

    11. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be confusing?

      On == Light. If the light isn't there, the switch isn't on.

      (Though, have you ever wondered whether a light was off or on when you were about replace it? Forget what I just said.)

    12. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Likewise, your light switch example is flawed

      That wasn't my example. Take it up with whoever said it was.

    13. Re:Anonymous Coward by Klistvud · · Score: 1

      Cars should be designed so as to run right smack in the middle of the road by default, unless the user changes the default -- to accomplish which, a reasonably complex procedure should be put in place, in order to avoid accidental/unwanted changes to the sane defaults.

      Alternatively, cars could be produced to run on the right side of the road, whereas trucks could be produced to run on the left side by default.

      That would avoid the localization problems mentioned in the above post. Similar solutions could be provided for other localization problems (for example: by default, in place of light switches, there should be two live wires protruding from the wall, leaving it to the user to change that default configuration). And so on.

      --
      Intellectual Property: an immaterial non-entity, most fiercely contended by those with no proper intellect to speak of.
    14. Re:Anonymous Coward by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      An American thinks his local usage is just "the default" for everyone. Light switches, for instance in Australia, are up for off and down for on. (Cue Simpsons jokes).

      Woah! Woah! Are you telling me that some countries have standards for light switch positions? Such enlightenment!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    15. Re:Anonymous Coward by ScentCone · · Score: 0, Troll

      It really, really pisses me off when software defaults to Letter size paper, Imperial (non-metric) measures, MDY dates, American spelling. Often WITHOUT EVEN MENTIONING OR ASKING THE USERL

      Well, maybe you should use properly licensed, regionalized software, instead of pirated warez based on stuff published for U.S. users? Or, maybe there should be something like a major Australian software company that sees things the way you'd prefer them? Then you can gloat when pirated copies of their products don't make any damn sense to people in other cultures.

      Really, it's simple. Just don't buy products you don't like, and don't bitch if you're using stuff you haven't paid for. You can either roll your own, or pay someone who makes something the way you like it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:Anonymous Coward by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Countries that don't speak English are, by default, terrorists. Don't you watch the news?

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    17. Re:Anonymous Coward by psm321 · · Score: 1

      It bothers us Americans too. Almost any open source office app has A4 paper by default, even if you have American localization, which means weird prints until you figure that out.

    18. Re:Anonymous Coward by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

      And here we have an example: An American thinks his local usage is just "the default" for everyone. Light switches, for instance in Australia, are up for off and down for on.

      Where did the AC assert that? Up-on/down-off is certainly the default in the US, and slashdot is a US-centric website by its own admission. I see nowhere where the AC expressed the opinion that this applied "for everyone" outside the US.

      Your rant about English is also unwarranted. Did an English-speaker kick your puppy recently?

    19. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Well, maybe you should use properly licensed, regionalized software, instead of pirated warez based on stuff published for U.S. users?

      Maybe you should fuck off and die?

      I'm talking about LICENSED software installed on corporate desktops, dipshit.

    20. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I see nowhere where the AC expressed the opinion that this applied "for everyone" outside the US.

      Of course not, because he doesn't know or care anything about other countries.

      Your rant about English is also unwarranted. Did an English-speaker kick your puppy recently?

      Another demonstration that Americans think their "English" is the only English.

      I'm a native English speaker. Just not American English. So when I write "Aluminium is silver in colour", I don't want little red squiggles under the words. OK?

      And I DO know how to localise my software and I have. But as I said, most people just accept the defaults, which are American, and I can't count the number of times I've had to fix this, or the messes that resulted.

    21. Re:Anonymous Coward by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      Actually, cars are preconfigured to work better driving on one side of the road or the other, by means of selecting which side the controls are on. It's also for the fun of watching the wipers come on when you meant to activate the turn signal.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    22. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light switches, for instance in Australia, are up for off and down for on. (Cue Simpsons jokes).

      Now I know why the power switch of my Techniworm Moccamaster coffee maker is the way it is. It was made for the Australian market, didn't get delivered there and was then sold in Europe. The pain was considerable as I was forced to think in the Australian way for a single household item.

    23. Re:Anonymous Coward by ScentCone · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm talking about LICENSED software installed on corporate desktops, dipshit.

      Which is why I mentioned the other options, you know? Why are you bitching about software made in another country, instead of bitching about the fact that nobody in your country can be bothered to make something superior, and better suited to your tastes? Oh, I know. Because you're a caustic person who'd rather come out swinging at what about another country "really pisses me off" instead of talking about how unhappy he is that none of his countrymen are in the mood to compete with their own products, or demonstrate enough of a demand for regionalized printer drivers and user interfaces to cause it to happen.

      I'm talking about LICENSED software installed on corporate desktops, dipshit

      And instead of complaining about your corporate IT department's unwillingness to procure and configure your tools the way you want, you just decide that those damn foreign companies are what really piss you off? I can see that you're a joy to work with.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    24. Re:Anonymous Coward by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point, they are indeed pre-configured as such, but this configuration is not alterable. Therefore it is not a default configuration which occurs by inaction of the buyer, but which he can override; it is the standard configuration prescribed by cultural or legal policies.

      You see, "default" implies inaction, which in turn implies that some action will override or avoid it.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    25. Re:Anonymous Coward by maxume · · Score: 1

      Your tone is close enough to serious to scare me a little bit.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats failure to set up regional settings when setting up your computer. nearly 99% of Operating Systems have that option.

    27. Re:Anonymous Coward by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid of any arbitrary geographic region that has the ability to speak, the particular language doesn't enter into it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    28. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mean to be a prick, but you're bitching about Americans being American on an American website. We don't give a fuck, because you're essentially our guest here. You're welcome to come in, but too bad on you if you want us to be expansively multicultural just to make you feel absolutely welcome. You can adapt to the way it is here and suffer, or you can bitch and suffer, or you can get along without making such a big deal about it, but those are your only options.

    29. Re:Anonymous Coward by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of 3 way switches in my house, so up or down doesn't mean squat.

      I've been in a lot of countries where the right or left side of the road doesn't really matter, neither do lanes... go figure.

      Microsoft is a US company so the default would be English (United States). If you don't like that default, build your own software empire in the UK. Speaking of which are there any mainstream products being produced outside the US? I mean we have all the major players, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter. What have you guys made lately? Its our internet, if you don't like it, make your own!

    30. Re:Anonymous Coward by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      Oblig. Rush lyric:

      If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    31. Re:Anonymous Coward by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      If you have a lamp plugged into a switched outlet, and the lamp is not shining, it's nice to know if the problem is the wall switch or the lamp switch. If you can tell the wall switch is on or off just by looking, then it's easier. Otherwise you may have to try one, then the other, then back to the first one.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    32. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

      Not quite. If there are choices A, B and C, and I choose not to decide, I haven't made a choice between A, B or C. Through every day, there are a million choices that you choose not to make, and it doesn't make sense to call them "choices made".

    33. Re:Anonymous Coward by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Thats failure to set up regional settings when setting up your computer. nearly 99% of Operating Systems have that option.

      Unfortunately, no. There really is a lot of software that totally ignores locale settings, and just assumes that every user spells month first in dates, prefers to see time with "AM" and "PM", and measures his beer in pints, and the length of his penis in inches, as God intended all good American people to. And, yes, this can be freaking annoying.

      In fact, sometimes it can break things completely. My favorite, albeit quite old, example of that is the installer generator that came with VB6. Now that one actually did use the locale (it was itself written in VB, which does that by default), both when installer was generated, and when it was run. When generating installer, it wrote a date into its configuration file - using the locale of the developer box. If the installer was then run on another machine with a different locale, it would try to parse that date as if it was in US format (apparently, developers didn't realize it could actually vary...). Of course, since most other locales have either day or year first in the date, at best, it would parse it incorrectly, and at worst, it would just fail (and crash).

      I would be really glad if all software out there just picked up my locale settings, and configured itself accordingly (by the way, IIRC, on Windows at least, locale settings also include paper size). For that, however, developers have to recognize the existence of locales in the first place, and quite often they are very much ignorant of the fact that, in some places, things are different. Most often, I see Americans doing that; though Western Europeans are often similarly ignorant about text encodings, thinking that everything beyond Latin-1 is a useless luxury.

    34. Re:Anonymous Coward by waveclaw · · Score: 1

      And here we have an example: An American thinks his local usage is just "the default" for everyone. Light switches, for instance in Australia, are up for off and down for on. (Cue Simpsons jokes).

      Local usage? There is a wiring pattern called a traveler circuit used with three-way or four-way switches. It's used to hook one light to two switches among other things. It's very common in America since we have these things called houses that often come with long hallways.

      One of the side effects of this is that when you flip one switch to on or off, you invert the meaning of the other switch. So, if one switch was up for on and down for off then flipping the other switch makes it up for off and down for on.

      When an electrician installs your light switch, the default is for up to mean ON, and down to mean OFF.

      While I've yet to see a house in America with toggle-switch lighting controls facing sideways, it is certainly possible to install them or change them to be so. But as even a quick search on Wikipedia would reveal, the direction has a lot to do with city/state/country zoning ordinances and more than a little cultural inertia.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    35. Re:Anonymous Coward by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      First, "whoosh", since my post was intended as a cultural reference and apparently you didn't get that from the "Oblig. Rush lyric" (i.e., it didn't really merit a pedantic response).

      Second, as pedantic responses go, yours fails. If you *choose* not to decide, that is definitely a choice. If you simply *fail* to decide, then that is not a choice. The two are not the same thing.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    36. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Why are you bitching about software made in another country, instead of bitching about the fact that nobody in your country can be bothered to make something superior,

      Doesn't matter what superior software I suggested, the AMERICAN managers insisted it had to be Microsoft.

      I can't turn the software world upside down, I can't affect IT policy on a corporate, let alone national level. I can however see how small thoughtless decisions made by insular assholes like yourself make my life UNNECESSARILY harder.

    37. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You are missing the point, they are indeed pre-configured as such, but this configuration is not alterable.

      If you're talking about light switches, it is (usually) easy to alter this. Takes a screwdriver and 1 minute. Manufacturers obviously like to sell the same product in all markets.

    38. Re:Anonymous Coward by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      thoughtless decisions made by insular assholes like yourself

      Insular? I make do with products from all over the world, and have no problem dealing with the idiosyncratic ways in which their countries of origin impact their design and function. The insular person (you) is the one that bitches about things not being perfectly tuned to his own, smaller environment. You want things to be just so, for you, in your local way. I personally don't get in a twist over print size defaults like "A4" when I'd really rather it was more like 8.5 x 11, which is my default. But you know, it doesn't get me apoplectic like does you, and I certainly don't find it to be "those damn Germans" etc who "really piss me off" ... because, I don't get really pissed off over that sort of thing. It's a shame you do - what a waste of life.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    39. Re:Anonymous Coward by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      The insular person (you) is the one that bitches about things not being perfectly tuned to his own, smaller environment.

      You prove your insularity by referring to the world outside the US as a "smaller environment".

      Bigot, learn ISO standards and put your narrow-mindedness behind you.

    40. Re:Anonymous Coward by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      is the one that bitches about things not being perfectly tuned to his own, smaller environment.

      So the world is "tuned to your own 'larger' environment" and anyone else has to to suck it up.

      And guess what, we do, because we have to. Doesn't mean we have to like it, or wonder why Americans SELLING SOFTWARE TO OTHER COUNTRIES, can't be fucked to find out what the standards are.

      because, I don't get really pissed off over that sort of thing.

      Of course not, because it does what YOU want.

      It's a shame you do - what a waste of life.

      And you were the asshole who said "Well, maybe you should use properly licensed, regionalized software, instead of pirated warez based on stuff", so don't lecture me about being pissed off. Arrogant, ignorant jerks like you invite it.

    41. Re:Anonymous Coward by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You prove your insularity by referring to the world outside the US as a "smaller environment".

      No, I referred to Australia as a smaller environment. Which it is. Significantly.

      Bigot? From the dictionary: "one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance"

      Now, which of us finds the product of the other's country to be that which "really pisses them off?" Right. That's you. Not that you're really using the word correctly, but in the slightly twisted context that you're using it, you're the one exhibiting exactly what you're complaining about. If you were less of the "narrow minded" that you're complaining about, you'd recognize that it's your own narrow mindedness that thinks the rest of the world should be catering to you. Here's narrow-minded: having a hissy fit when a foreign company's products reflect the fact that they're from a foreign country. Why those annoying, lazy foreign bastards! Who cares if you sound like a bigot when you say that, right? They're too lazy and foreign to do what you want!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    42. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where exactly did he say that the light-switch thing applied to the whole world?

      He didn't specify planet Earth either. I'm sure the Martians are pissed.

      His point is still valid, up = ON. The fact that up = OFF somewhere else doesn't change the fact that it is a default.

  9. Not only that by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    ... but them damn defaults are also responsible for a good number of security vulnerabilities. Default passwords and what not.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defaults passwords aren't the problem.

      The problem was stupid password defaults like system, root, admin, and the like that never got changed - instead of being randomized and requiring the user to change it to something he or she knows in order to have any reasonable access to whatever user level.

      Granted, if you're an idiot and don't change the password after you initially log in you are still screwed. Either way it's the user's own fault for not having a clue. At least with the latter option, nobody else will be able to log in again though. :P

    2. Re:Not only that by Spatial · · Score: 1

      The password for one of the billing systems at my workplace is literally 'default'.

    3. Re:Not only that by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that helped a lot; I'm in now!

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  10. Bah-loney by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't subscribe to his crazy theory. If defaults are to be defined as a configurable initial state, then they've been around for a lot longer than he's claiming. He's just writing for the sake of reading his own words.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Bah-loney by mapkinase · · Score: 4, Funny

      "He's just writing for the sake of reading his own words."

      That's default motivation for writing.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:Bah-loney by dword · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If defaults are to be defined as a configurable initial state, then they've been around for a lot longer than he's claiming.

      As far as I can see, his point is that only in the past half century humans have started to consider default as a valid configuration and engineers carefully tweaked the default to be what most of their customers needed.

    3. Re:Bah-loney by stephanruby · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a French person, I resent what the author is implying. Defau(l)t is a french word. It means "inaction", "failure", or "inactive state". And if anybody invented "inaction", we certainly did. We have prior art. It's part of our cultural heritage. And you guys, you were just lucky that we even taught it to Great Britain in the twelve century, for without that specialized knowledge, that special concept of defaults would never even have arrived in America!!

    4. Re:Bah-loney by oldhack · · Score: 1

      "As a French person, I resent wh ... "

      Have you no shame?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    5. Re:Bah-loney by bostei2008 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't default in English also mean "to go bankrupt"? Someone defaulting on the credit you extend to him means he won't pay it back?

      Somehow that usage of "default" always confused me (as a non-english-speaker). So, is "defaulting on a credit" the default?

    6. Re:Bah-loney by stephanruby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heaven's no, that nasty word comes from Old English. We had nothing to do with that one.

    7. Re:Bah-loney by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      But this is also false. As an example, consider a toaster, which comes with a "default" setting representing the optimal "browning" temperature calibrated at the factory, with a mechanical control allowing you to alter this temperature.

      For a pre-1960s example of such magical use of a default, I hereby present to you the Toast-O-Later; just one of a myriad devices of its time, going back to the 1920s and 1930s:
              http://www.jitterbuzz.com/indtol.html

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    8. Re:Bah-loney by dtmos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are apostrophes misused in French, too?

    9. Re:Bah-loney by julesh · · Score: 1

      Doesn't default in English also mean "to go bankrupt"? Someone defaulting on the credit you extend to him means he won't pay it back?

      Somehow that usage of "default" always confused me

      Think of it this way: a default is what happens if you don't do anything. In terms of credit, you don't pay it back if you don't take steps to pay it. In terms of a computer application you get the programmer's guesses as to what you're most likely to want to happen if you don't set it up to your own requirements.

    10. Re:Bah-loney by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I am fairly sure default wasn't originally intended as the "configurable initial state". But more of a "Safe Mode" settings where things can work and you can put your configurations back. So default was actually a state when an error occurred. However over time people started to realize for most of their usage the default configuration was rather optimal for their needs thus started to change the meaning of the word from a failure state to a preconfigured initial state.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Bah-loney by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      i nveer reda wath i worte msyelf.

    12. Re:Bah-loney by sorak · · Score: 1

      As a French person, I resent what the author is implying. Defau(l)t is a french word. It means "inaction", "failure", or "inactive state". And if anybody invented "inaction", we certainly did. We have prior art. It's part of our cultural heritage. And you guys, you were just lucky that we even taught it to Great Britain in the twelve century, for without that specialized knowledge, that special concept of defaults would never even have arrived in America!!

      You may have invented it, but we perfected it!

    13. Re:Bah-loney by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Jamai's!

      (sorry)

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    14. Re:Bah-loney by descil · · Score: 1

      And here I thought the default motivation for writing was wanting to deliver a message. What a fool I am!

  11. Default is way older by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    We might not have called it that, but default solutions and default products have been around since the invention of mass production. From then on, there was a "default" product, a standard product that works as the default if you didn't order something specifically different.

    Hell, even the spanish inquisition had a default verdict.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Default is way older by BluBrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, even the spanish inquisition had a default verdict.

      Well, I didn't expect the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:Default is way older by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

      As long as nobody brings up Nazis, we're all okay

    3. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one expects the Spanish inquisition!!

    4. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition!

    5. Re:Default is way older by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Nobody did

    6. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You never expect the spanish inquisition! Kids, learn your pop culture refs.

    7. Re:Default is way older by dzfoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

      Oh gawd, sorry.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    8. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wooosh

    9. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our default is surprise.

    10. Re:Default is way older by exolon42 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hell, even the spanish inquisition had a default verdict.

      Well, I didn't expect the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!

    11. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as nobody brings up Nazis, we're all okay

      D'oh!

    12. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noone expects the spanish inquisition!

    13. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    14. Re:Default is way older by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      I blame society.

    15. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, even the spanish inquisition had a default verdict.

      Well, I didn't expect the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    16. Re:Default is way older by zindorsky · · Score: 0, Redundant

      (Really? No takers? Huh. Well, a geek's gotta do what a geek's gotta do:)

      NO ONE EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!!!

      --
      If the geiger counter does not click, the coffee, she is not thick.
    17. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, even the spanish inquisition had a default verdict.

      Well, I didn't expect the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

    18. Re:Default is way older by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Holy redundancy. I hope all you Monty Python echo chambers feel clever for knowing a popular quote.

    19. Re:Default is way older by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      No one expects twelve different instances of geeks saying "No One expects the Spanish Inquisition!!1!!!!!1!111!!!!one1!", 9 or so of which get modded down as redundant.

      Oh, wait.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    20. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oblig: Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition (to come up in this context)!

    21. Re:Default is way older by arabagast · · Score: 1

      Hell, even the spanish inquisition had a default verdict.

      Well, I didn't expect the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

      nobody expects the spanish inquisition!

      --
      Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
      Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
    22. Re:Default is way older by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      But everyone should have expected many replies to be modded as Redundant.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    23. Re:Default is way older by kamochan · · Score: 1

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.

    24. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition.

    25. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lick my baals. :-/

      Now go back to digg.

    26. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I didn't expect the spanish inquisition to come up in this context!

      Of course... nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    27. Re:Default is way older by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Nobody expects the Redundant moderation to be this redundant... oh, and the Spanish Inquisition.

    28. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the decades I worked for IBM we were bedeviled by defaults. The equipment arrived with the defaults in place but the manuals had recommended settings which were necessary for it to work. The defaults were never the same as the recommended settings, ever.

    29. Re:Default is way older by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      So far, that makes over twenty variations on the exact same punchline. Now THAT, I did expect. My work here is done!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    30. Re:Default is way older by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Surprise. Surprise and redundancy. And a dedication to old jokes... I'll come in again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get it! You got modded funny since "nobody expects the spanish inquisition"!

    32. Re:Default is way older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition

  12. wow zzz by cathector · · Score: 1

    > Choices materialize when summoned. [rest elided]

  13. Bah-um? by pasakie · · Score: 1

    i thought da fault came from cali... 'neath etsy.

  14. Do you suppose he wrote it to be judged by you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Res Judicata trumps Default judgments of all shape and form.

    Mr. Bill, YOU are hereby sentenced to 4 more years of
    (.) Fark
    (.) Digg
    (X) 4chan
    where you will
    (.) moderate
    (X) passively view and learn to live in harmony with
    (.) profit
      all journalists documenting
      (.) technology
      (.) Apple art
      (.) home surgery
      (.) Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail...
      (X) Other (please fill-in below)

          Private Administrative Remedies
         ________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    1. Re:Do you suppose he wrote it to be judged by you? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's creative.

      * A Plea for Attention from Bill, Shooter Of Bul
      [ ] I am committing suicide
      [ ] I am getting a tattoo
      [x] I am running away
      [x] And this time I mean it

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  15. 1960's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked, Computer Science has been around since way before the 1960's.

    1. Re:1960's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the writer means "software engineering" instead of computer science? It's an understandable confusion, since the modern CS curriculum is basically there to churn out software engineers, with perhaps a few watered-down courses on computer science thrown in.

    2. Re:1960's? by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      Not at my school... I was under that impression as well, but most of the courses here ended up being algorithms and math related...

    3. Re:1960's? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Computer Science has been around since way before the 1960's.

      Yes, but prior to that the concept of a default was likely unnecessary. At least until the 1950s, most software developed was pretty-much single purpose, and configuration options weren't really necessary. Data entry was typically performed using punched cards/tape, so a user-interface default is something that didn't apply, either.

  16. A good translation for default to other languages by codekavi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Non English speakers / translators!

    Did you have trouble translating the word "default" into other languages? How difficult/easy was it to find a translation for "default" for user manuals in, say, jp or cn or fr?

    Asking because I had trouble figuring out a good word for it in Hindi. Still not sure if we have the right word.

    Do note that /. only allows ascii in posts.

  17. On the not so humble paean by tgv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does convoluted writing add credibility to your statement?

    Does not knowing the slightest thing about cognitive psychology help you get attention?

    Not in the rest of the world, but on /. it gets you to the front page.

    1. Re:On the not so humble paean by mtremsal · · Score: 1

      That's a little harsh.

      Convoluted writing was annoying (since English isn't my mother tongue) but TFA was a decent read IMHO.

    2. Re:On the not so humble paean by iHal · · Score: 1

      @ TGV - Agreed; well on the first part of point two (... that's just me being nice to the poster). If anything, the concept of "default" is a discovery, not an invention as the post claims. If you look at biological and cognitive systems you see "defaults" everywhere...instincts, reflexes, prepotent responses... are all terms used to describe "default" behavior or functioning in biological systems; and they've been around since before the 60's ... or so I've been told ;)

    3. Re:On the not so humble paean by tgv · · Score: 1

      As to the discovery of "default", the word exists since the 13th century, according to Merriam-Webster:

      Etymology: Middle English defaute, defaulte, from Anglo-French, from defaillir to be lacking, fail, from de- + faillir to fail
      Date: 13th century

      and the expression "in default of" means "in the absence of". The word "default" was simply chosen by computer scientists to describe what happens in case of absence of specification.

      But then again, the whole 13th century probably took place somewhere in the 60's.

  18. In fashion everywhere I work by xcut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ever since Lehman Brothers, the default has definitely been making a comeback. Let's see how much money I lost today.

  19. A few examples by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't know if defaults really appeared in the 1960's in IT, but this guy has a point : computers and others toys have become so somplex these days that the quality of a device or application often lies in the choices made by its designers. A few examples:
    • Apple is excellent at producing things which "just work", among others because the default values are chosen with care, and only a few can be overriden with a configuration GUI. Some people like it, some hate it.
    • FireFox is a great browser because its default values are also chosen with care, so that an "out of the box" FireFox is easy to use and relatively safe at the same time. Contrarily to Apple, however, FireFox's default settings can be altered; this can be done at different levels (native configuration GUI, extensions, or about:config) depending on the user's capabilities. What makes FireFox great is that it is at the same time a good browser for beginners AND for advanced users.
    1. Re:A few examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SENDMAIL.... it works!!

    2. Re:A few examples by kamochan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      macbook:~$ man defaults

      DEFAULTS(1)               BSD General Commands Manual              DEFAULTS(1)

      NAME
           defaults -- access the Mac OS X user defaults system

  20. root word of Default is "fault" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not On or Off, silly.

    default only continues along that choice of flaw. All "courts" I've ever had go after me would try to misplace their trust as though they are helping me do evil, by taking common mistakes and misconceptions out of my control and then slandering and libeling them to be an abstract of character with implicit admittance on my behalf to make me out as a wicked man through the Doctrine of Principal and Agent.

    Do not trust, and by all means court(v.) the corportate court(n.) executing that administrative task with unclean hands and bad faith!

  21. Default is for wimps... by yourassOA · · Score: 5, Funny

    No real geek/nerd would ever even consider using the default settings. Only real men use the default, real geeks use their own settings. Thats why none of their shit works.

    1. Re:Default is for wimps... by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, but insightful as well. I see so many geeks bitch about how stuff is made wrong (yeah, I've done this too :P), but it's really because we have some ridiculous setup that is probably unique to us in all of the world.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:Default is for wimps... by lsommerer · · Score: 1

      It's true. Even when I write my own software, I always make sure the setting that *I* will be using are not the default settings. Only wimps use the default settings.

    3. Re:Default is for wimps... by slash.duncan · · Score: 1

      And we're PROUD of it, too!

      Normal? You callin' me normal? 'Dem's fightin' words! ANYTHING but normal! At /least/ be considerate enough to say I'm abnormal!

      =:^)

      --
      Duncan
      "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master,
      and if you use the program, he is your master."
      R Stallman
  22. Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm trying to think of something prior to 1950 that had an overridable, configurable default. It's hard. Business telephone systems had some configurable defaults, but setting them up required physical wiring. The same was true of Plan 55-A Teletype message switching. IBM plugboard-wired tabulators didn't really have defaults as we think of them today. Machine tools had adjustable speeds and feeds, but no real defaults. Jacquard looms didn't have defaults. Linotypes didn't have defaults. Chain-programmed embroidery machines - no.

    The closest thing I can think of was General Railway Signal's NX signaling system for controlling railroad interlockings. This 1930s system may have been the first "user-friendly interface". An NX system controlled multiple switches and signals in an area (an "interlocking") preventing conflicts. Interlocked signal controls had been around for years, and they handled the safety issue, but before NX, it was the user's responsibility to figure out the desired path from A to B. With an NX system, you selected an "entry" point where a train was going to enter the interlocking, and all the reachable "exit" points would light up. The "reachable" logic took into account other trains that were in the interlocking area. When the operator selected an "exit", the NX system would pick a path between the entry and exit, routing around other trains or even track locked out of service.

    A default "best" routing was hard-wired into the system, but the operator could override the default routing manually, by picking some intermediate point along the path as the "exit", then selecting that as an "entry" and picking the final "exit".

    That's the oldest system I know of with a real "default" mechanism.

    1. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard.

      Look for complexity. carburetor; came with default jets, default choke settings, etc. phones (traditional land line); default area code. transmissions; overdrive by default, non-overdrive if commanded. High end CB radios would ship with certain presets by default. tape recorder; default recording speed, high speed, higher speed.

      Does any of that really compare to what the writer has mind; complex systems with thousands of designer configured defaults? Not really.

      The point is that we're using systems that far exceed our capacity to configure from scratch. We're still figuring out how to cope with this mess as well. It's easy to put a system in a non-working state by playing with the knobs too much. Often it's hard to revert the damage. That isn't stopping anyone from piling on more and more knobs. Designers often make very poor default choices as well.

    2. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Mechanical railway signals had a default setting - horizontal (meaning stop). It required tension on a wire to pull them into the up (go) state. Thus if the wire broke it would cause a delay rather than a disaster.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      How about a fancy 1930s toaster, with a "browning" knob, pre-set at the "center" for optimal toasting?

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's a fail-safe rather than a default.

    5. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to think of something prior to 1950 that had an overridable, configurable default. [...]

      Trousers.

      Default length is about 33" nowadays. You can turn them up or hem them, your choice.

      Did you mean something technological: How about the tune in a player piano (aka pianola) - the default music program. The needle on a sewing machine. The gearing ratio on a pedal bike. The governor weights (ie speed) of a steam engine ...

      Something electronic? Possibly the receiving frequency of a crystal set or the gap on a morse key?

    6. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      The law has been a set of default configurations more or less since the invention of the contract. By default, you cannot trespass on another man's land. By default, the damages you can recover for breach of a contractual agreement are limited to the amount that the breaching party could have foreseen you would incur.

      Others have mentioned product defaults. The default Model T color was black. (Of course, that one was only user-configurable with a paint brush.) There were also service defaults. You had to buy an Air Mail stamp to get your letter off the ground.

      As to configurable systems like you mentioned, though, while I am not personally knowledgeable about anything earlier than that I am sure that others existed. It is next to impossible to come up with a process that does not have a default configuration, and it is human nature to desire the ability to change that configuration to suit oneself.

      The article is stupid and so is the editor who approved it for the main page. But we already knew that before getting to the text of the summary. This belongs on Idle, at best. I thought that Idle was added to keep all this crap in one place, but of course the editors would all have to be bright enough to put idle nonsense there for that plan to work. Maybe the default category should be set to Idle.

    7. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a model T Ford (1908)?

      By default, you got a black shell on wheels with a motor.

      If you wanted to pay extra for a custom configuration you could get things like a shiny hood ornament, a cargo bed in place of the back seats, or a starter motor.

    8. Re:Pre-1950 systems with configurable defaults. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about an automobile? I'm sure that when you buy a car, the wipers, lights and radio tend to be in the off position by default. Likewise, most all power tools and machinery are sold in the default state of being turned off.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by codekavi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Asking because I had trouble figuring out a good word for it in Hindi. Still not sure if we have the right word. Forgot to add: the closest translation I could come to was "pre-decided" and that doesn't seem to mean the same thing as "default" - it should actually be a word or phrase that means "pre-decided but modifiable to something else".

  25. Land Area by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    Each house is almost 11,000 square feet?

    Land area means the land the house sits on, not only the house. A quarter acre is not really that large.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Bunch of Wank by Hecatonchires · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The limited production in ages past meant that EVERYTHING was default. Want a car? Here's a Model T. It comes in black. Want bread? It comes in white. Sliced. (Wooo!) Defaults aren't new, they are a return to an older, simpler time, when many of your choices were assumed based on limitations.

    --

    Yay me!

    1. Re:Bunch of Wank by omnichad · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a default if it can't be configured.

    2. Re:Bunch of Wank by addsalt · · Score: 0

      The limited production in ages past meant that EVERYTHING was default. Want a car? Here's a Model T. It comes in black.

      Is it valid to call a variable that cannot be changed a default? A default setting implies that it has the possibility of being changed, therefore not the default setting. Only now when you can get a car in 10 different colors could the default be black.

    3. Re:Bunch of Wank by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Once you got your black Ford Model T, you could always slap another coat of paint on it.

      Granted, it would be difficult to un-slice bread though.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    4. Re:Bunch of Wank by ExRex · · Score: 1

      Sliced! That's not the default for bread. That's an option.

      --
      The closer you are to the code, the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb
  27. Re:tienanmen by BobReturns · · Score: 1

    Well... It would have worked if you'd spelt it right.

    tiannanmen

  28. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by gzipped_tar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quite easy in Chinese. Since /. is too US-centric to tolerate Unicode, I'll just post the Unicode codepoints for these two characters: U+9ED8 and U+8BA4. Look them up in a Unicode table ;)

    This Chinese word for "default", in a more literal translation, means "tacitly accepted/recognized". It has nothing to do with the financial meaning of the word "default", which translates to a completely different word in Chinese.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  29. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

    Sorry for replying to myself, but on a second thought, I found that the phrase might be translated more accurately as "accepted without an explicit choice/decision". Anyway, I hope you get the idea ;)

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  30. This is bull by LS · · Score: 4, Informative

    But if you are looking for another computer word that has made it into common usage, how about "reboot"? It's now used to describe starting anything over from scratch, especially in things like movies. For instance, the new Star Trek movie has been called a reboot by several movie critics.

    I can imagine a time far in the future where "reboot" is listed in the dictionary with the etymology saying "origin unclear, borrowed from computer terminology". 95% of people will not know that it comes from the REpeating the action of BOOTstrapping a computer. Bootstrapping or booting a computer comes from the term "to lift oneself up by the bootstraps", which is impossible and refers to the apparent chicken and egg problem of a computer loading itself up with software.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:This is bull by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      My son plays a lot of computer games and most have a pause function. I have noticed that the games he plays in the playground with other kids have also acquired a pause function.

    2. Re:This is bull by pbhj · · Score: 1

      But if you are looking for another computer word that has made it into common usage, how about "reboot"? It's now used to describe starting anything over from scratch, especially in things like movies. For instance, the new Star Trek movie has been called a reboot by several movie critics.

      I can imagine a time far in the future where "reboot" is listed in the dictionary with the etymology saying "origin unclear, borrowed from computer terminology". 95% of people will not know that it comes from the REpeating the action of BOOTstrapping a computer. Bootstrapping or booting a computer comes from the term "to lift oneself up by the bootstraps", which is impossible and refers to the apparent chicken and egg problem of a computer loading itself up with software.

      LS

      I assumed it came from the use of a bootstrap to aid putting on a boot. The bootstrap aids the preparation of the computer for use.

      As opposed to say the "hadron bootstrap" which fits the quote you give.

      If you hold your bootstraps, jump and pull, you'll realise you can lift yourself up by applying an angular change that temporarily increases the height of your centre of gravity. The ultimate result is a face full of floor however.

    3. Re:This is bull by ari_j · · Score: 1

      The real question is which end people in that time will eat their eggs from, and whether they will have read Gulliver's Travels and be both curious and smart enough to connect lifting oneself up by the bootstraps with the term 'reboot' on their own.

    4. Re:This is bull by maxume · · Score: 1

      This tempts me to find a sharpie and start relabeling game controllers with a timeout button. Hearing someone say 'pause' to stop a playground game would make my ears feel strange.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:This is bull by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      And that's what I like about booting my computer up when I start work. If you manage to do the impossible as your very fist act in the office, the rest of the day is a piece of cake.

  31. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, the financial meaning of default comes from the original meaning which is the default reconciliation of a (loan) contract when its terms are breached.

  32. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by davidgay · · Score: 1
    Well the French word starts with d, contains an f, and ends in t. And it isn't borrowed from English either. Hmm...

    David Gay

  33. No defaults before computers? Oh come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Machines shipped with an on/off switch set at the factory to off. Customers plugged it in, switched it to on.

    Cars delivered to customers after dealer prep which included rolling down the windows.

    Forms that read "If shipping address is same as billing address, leave blank. Otherwise fill in shipping address"

    Lots of defaults from long ago.

    1. Re:No defaults before computers? Oh come on. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      But the author is claiming that they weren't called defaults before computers.The author's claim is consistent with what I know, but I am young enough to be unwilling to say that he is definitively correct.
      However, none of the arguments made so far on here that he is wrong succeed.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  34. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by PearsSoap · · Score: 1

    In French, it's usually par defaut, which is unsurprising considering the number of words we share.

    The etymology of the word is more apparent in French: it can be understood as de faute, literally "by lack [of something better/else]". You could translate the whole thing as "because of lacking-of-something-betterness".

  35. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

    I have seen it translated as equivalent of pre-set or initial-settings or factory-settings.

    --
    -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
  36. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Do note that /. only allows ascii in posts.

    Yeah, about that.....I asked for UTF8 and as a result we got strange bars and colored dots. Careful what you ask for on slashdot. They just might do something. I still remember the horror of the pink ponies....

    --
    Qxe4
  37. Re:constant verdict by pr100 · · Score: 1

    The Spanish Inquisition had a constant verdict - even simpler than a default one.

  38. Very cool TED talk by Chatsubo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recall watching this TED talk a while ago that touches on the subject of how defaults heavily influence our decisions. Cool stuff:

    http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_ariely_asks_are_we_in_control_of_our_own_decisions.html

    --
    > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
  39. How hard can it be? by Tinctorius · · Score: 1

    Just toggle the switch if you don't like the current setting for the light. Works on multiway switches too.

    1. Re:How hard can it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets hard when you're living in a house that was wired by the landlord's brother-in-law's friend and half the switches go one way, and half the other, sometimes when they are right next to each other.
      Okay, it's fine when you're awake, but when you've staggered out at 4am to deal with some of the beer you've drunk, tripped over the cat, and stepped in something warm and soft, you really don't want to be trying to figure out which way to toggle the damn switches!

    2. Re:How hard can it be? by speilberg0 · · Score: 1

      It can't seriously be that hard can it? The lights are obviously off so you just need to flip the switch to the opposite setting.

    3. Re:How hard can it be? by TCM · · Score: 1

      Don't you have any rooms with two switches for the same light? As in, each one toggles the light regardless of its state?

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  40. sometimes you only get the default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i buy a car, its appearance is the default, and nothing else. (sure i can make some modifications myself, but only to some extent, and that is not the point).
    when i buy clothes, same thing (not much choice in different sizes either).

    note to the industries: we want additional flexibility in customizing our products.

  41. Read Nudge by A+Pressbutton · · Score: 1

    I recommend Nudge by Thaler&Sunstien The book discusses how people structure defaults for the choices you make, from the positioning of goods in a supermarket to healthcare to choosing a school and (sort of) attempts to describe a philosophy for working out what default is a 'good' default to present. I largely agree with them. Default choices have been set since time immemorial. Default religion (in the UK) :- Church or England, a few hundred years ago if you chose a non-default religion you may well have experienced adverse consequences.

  42. Re:tienanmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean those chinese filters are way strict on spelling?

    Free Teebet, then.

    And free the western world from its financial system too, debt is slavery.

  43. Methinks someone has been reading the Economist by adamkennedy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you read The Economist, you may have noticed a recent review of the book "Nudge".

    I have more than a sneaking suspicion the original poster (and TFA) have been reading this as well.

    Suffice it to say that the shallow commentary here pales in comparison to the jaunt through behavioural economics that the book provides. If you can get past it's focus on public policy and just absorb all the core information, the book provides good advice than you'd ever think existed on the art of defaults.

  44. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Tinctorius · · Score: 1

    I often see it translated as "standaard" (adj.), mostly as "standaardwaarde" ("standard value") in Dutch. A more accurate translation would be "verstekwaarde" (literally "default value"), but I doubt many users would understand that word nowadays.

  45. "Default" is REALLY old by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    Default is what happens when you don't show up to meet your obligations, legal or otherwise. You are making the "none of the above" choice.

    This is a concept that goes back a REALLY long ways.

    1. Re:"Default" is REALLY old by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Default is what happens when you don't show up to meet your obligations, legal or otherwise. You are making the "none of the above" choice

      Exactly so! Which is why it is such a bad choice for labeling the factory settings of software, or anything else, for that matter.

      A better choice would have been the word "preset". As in 'The software installs with preset configuration values which can be changed through the Preferences menu.'

      Unfortunately, the decision to use the word "default" had to be made a long time before the first electronic thesaurus by some geeks who knew much more about artificial machine languages than they did about the language that came out of their own mouths. They made a poor choice, and now we are stuck with it.

      --
      Will
  46. Modern life in 1225 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From an etymology dictionary:

    c.1225, "failure, failure to act," from O.Fr. defaute, from M.L. defalta "a deficiency or failure," from L. dis- "away" + fallere "to be wanting." The financial sense is first recorded 1858; the computing sense is from 1966.

  47. Defaultss by ebolaZaireRules · · Score: 1

    Default settings seem to be something that few people get right...

    They should more or less be failsafe, and there should always be a 'reset defaults' option (for when you **** if up)

    if stuff doesn't 'just work', it needs better defaults (or a better autoconfig)

    a 'default password' should be criminal. Nothing should work till its changed... though that does tend to remove 'password' from your list of passwords.

    --
    The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
  48. Dunno... I didn't RTFA ;) by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But defaults aren't automatically good. Good defaults are good. Bad defaults aren't ;).

    So what are good defaults for configuration? I think of it as a form of compression.

    The most common+safe+useful settings should be the default. The trouble is figuring out the right balance of safety and usability for your product or system.

    It's not easy to get right, and that's why a lot of stuff is crappy or just mediocre[1] ;).

    For many things it doesn't have to be just "default vs ADVANCED mode with zillions of settings".

    It could be: Small, Regular, Large, Extra Large, Custom/Advanced. With Regular being the default selected option.

    See the compression of the decision tree? You don't want most of your users to have to make too many unnecessary decisions. Even if they can make the decisions - it's more work for them and makes things more error prone.

    McD doesn't have their staff ask users the details of what they want upfront- they don't ask whether you want ketchup, pickle etc. The sets are listed and there's Regular and Large (and supersize?). Any further customization if possible is on demand.

    And they go "Will you have fries with that" even if you already said "No" or "yes" to fries... Hmmm maybe McD isn't such a good example ;).

    [1] The dev gives up thinking really hard about what the default should be, picks the first somewhat usable one and replies with "WORKSFORME" if users complain.

    --
    1. Re:Dunno... I didn't RTFA ;) by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      But defaults aren't automatically good. Good enough defaults are good. Bad defaults aren't ;).

      Fixed that for you.

  49. This is utter bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kevin Kelly is an idiot for writing it and thinking anyone would believe it. kdawson is a flaming moron for believing it.

    Defaults have been around for centuries. Fire kdawson now.

  50. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English language has so very very few words that I would imagine translating FROM English to some other language would rarely be a problem.

  51. In Icelandic by Exception+Duck · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Icelandic
    It is "SjÃlfgefiÃ" or "Sjalfgefid"(since the special characters get fubar) which translated literally to English, would mean "Given by itself".

    I think it's a very old word, since it also can mean "taking something for granted".

    1. Re:In Icelandic by Novus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean "Sjálfgefið". HTML entities seem to work.

  52. shitty fuck that i dont give the fuck shit about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously

  53. UI: The Good, The Bad and The Lame by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    A good UI is not one that limits options of the user, but one that has sensible defaults, and options tiered by theme and frequency of use.
    A bad UI is either too stuffed with options to navigate, or simply has no good defaults.
    A lame UI is one that purposely limits options "because the user could be confused". (an unchecked checkbox "[ ] advanced options" won't confuse an inexperienced user, but lack of it will irk advanced user to no end. Yes, Gnome, I'm looking at you!)

    If you know your UI is bad, but have no clue how to make it good, simply make it so customizable that the blame of "not making it good" can be passed on the user.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:UI: The Good, The Bad and The Lame by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I've used a few linux liveCDs from Knoppix 3.x to Mythbuntu 8.10, and none of them is usable on a laptop by default. The touchpad settings are hypersensitive with all manner of gesture recognition autohover malarkey enabled.

      The first time I used one I just moved the cursor from one side to the other and it opened dozens of files. Took me half an hour to close theem all and then very carefully creep the cursor to where I could change the bloody settings.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  54. Proper definition of the word "default" by recrudescence · · Score: 0

    default: from the jamaican, "de fault widdis machine is yoo, man!"

  55. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Novus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Assuming we're talking about the noun "default", it translates very differently to different languages. For example, Finnish uses constructions based on "oletus-" ("assumed"), such as "oletusarvo" (default value) or "oletusselain" (default browser). In Swedish, "förvald" ("preselected") is used for default somethings (e.g. "förvalt värde" for default value) and a default in general is a "förval" ("preselection").

    Spend enough time using a translated computer system or studying or practising CS in a language and you'll pick up the terminology. The problems start when translators have decided to translate things differently. For example, both Windows and Mac OS have "File" menus, but Finnish Windows calls them "Tiedosto" ("File") and Finnish Mac OS (IIRC) calls them "Arkisto" ("Archive").

  56. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    How difficult/easy was it to find a translation for "default" for user manuals in, say, [...] fr?

    'Default' actually COMES from french. The translation is défaut. Surely you could've found that out pretty easily.

  57. Oh bullshit. by niteshifter · · Score: 1

    I've got a feeling I'm one of the few (maybe the only) here who has ever programmed an analog computer. They had default settings, be they operational amplifier (electronic) or shaft/cam/lever (mechanical) designs.

  58. Tales from a open source game dev by Tei · · Score: 1

    Is true.

    I started my quake engine from a different engine. There are like 3 different designs for a quake engine: faifhfull to the original, eyecandy and e-sport. Faifhfull engines are as similar to the carmack one as posible, ...as similar as what is delivered, since the intention of carmack is unknom. Eyecandy engines are as pretty as posible, with better textures, particles, colors and effects. And e-sport engines make the game as fast as posible, easy to sport enemyes,... most screenshots of a e-sport engine look somewhat like Tron from the disney Tron movie.

    Since I am in the eyecandy camp, my first release whas the original engine (tomazquake) with different "defaults". Most stuff that can be modified, was setting to "eyecandy". Like shadows-on, use better particles, etc.. That was already a different engine. A project start with a different taste, and everything grows around it. And a "Default" is this taste in the world.

    ----

    Bonus comment:

    Some applications grows soo big (soo bloated), that the "defaults" is what define the application, since most people will play with the default, but changing these can be something else. In some ways (not really true)a "distro" is a different "defaults" for Linux.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  59. Perhaps the first default? by DigMarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this is going to start a brushfire:

    ORIGINAL SIN.

    1. Re:Perhaps the first default? by julesh · · Score: 1

      I know this is going to start a brushfire:

      ORIGINAL SIN.

      Erm... I'm not Christian, but as I understand it Original Sin was an intentional act, and therefore cannot in any way be considered a default.

    2. Re:Perhaps the first default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... I'm not Christian, but as I understand it Original Sin was an intentional act, and therefore cannot in any way be considered a default.

      As I understand it the 'Original Sin' of Adam and Eve was like the initial post-install customization that set the default for all subsequent humans to 'Sinful' useless they change it by believing and worshipping. Or something like that. It's pretty barking, especially the fact that the 'Sin' was to want knowledge. Pretty much says it all about most religions. Non-approved knowledge is evil. Don't ask the 'wrong' questions. Don't think about the 'wrong' things. Just trust in almighty whatever.

    3. Re:Perhaps the first default? by DigMarx · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Christian either. I guess it was an intentional act by "Eve" but according to the RCC it seems everyone who's not the Virgin Mary has the bit set to 1 on first boot. Regardless, I wasn't trying to be too serious.

  60. Defaults can be real time savers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've ever tried ordering a meal at the Mac (or most fast food restaurants) for that matter,
    you'll appreciate defaults. Unless you REALLY try, you'll always get a counter questions from
    them.

    Unless you effort, you'll get a conversation like this:

    me>Can I have a big mac meal?

    them> What would you like to drink with that?

    me> A coke please.

    them> Diet or regular?

    me> Regular please.

    them> Small, medium, large?

    me> Ehm.. medium I guess. That's 400ml right?

    them> Ehm... I don't know.

    me> Anyway, medium.

    them> Would you like fries with that?

    me> That's part of the meal, isn't it?

    them> Eh, yes. Small, medium or large?

    me> Medium please.

    them> That'll be [price].

    Even if you *do* effort, they'll manage to come up with counter questions:

    me> I'd like a non-supersized big-mac meal- medium fries, medium regular coke with ice.

    them> Is that all?

    me> Yes.

    them> That'll be [price].

    me> Thank you.

    them> Oh, by the way, do you want any cheese on that?

    Or you get the Blonde with a Very Small Memory:

    me> I'd like a non-supersized big-mac meal- medium fries, medium regular coke with ice.

    them> Sorry, did you say a supersized big mac meal with medium fries and medium regular coke?

    me> No, I don't want it supersized. I told you.

    them> All right. Do you want any ice?

    Then there's the Stubborn Salesman:

    me> I'd like just a Big Mac please.

    them> Would you like fries with that?

    me> No, just a Big Mac please.

    them> What would you like to drink?

    me> Nothing. I'd just like a Big Mac please.

    them> Do you want any cheese on that?

    me> No, just a Big Mac please.

    them> Would you like to supersize that?

    me> No.

    them> Anything else?

    me> No, just a Big Mac please.

    It would be SO much easier and faster if I could just go

    me> I'd like a meal number one please. That's all.

    them> That'll be [price].

    1. Re:Defaults can be real time savers by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      The reason they do that is because they're always bound to get stupid people who order a Big Mac and come back to complain they wanted a large, not a medium (the default). Asking if you wanted it supersized was more of a marketing thing, but there's always the people who are just so stupid they complain when they order item A and item B and get item B and item A.
      They need an ordering system that forgoes the cashier entirely and presents all the options plainly, so it's obviously your fault when you screw up.

  61. *Real* geeks by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Real geeks submit comments using their own home-grown browsegmentation fault

  62. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

    Why "default" rather than "standard"? Why are people constantly giving words multiple meanings? bastards.

  63. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    A million is very very few?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  64. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by mvdwege · · Score: 1

    And because some people don't know a word, we just give up.

    You know, sometimes I get so damn tired of this country.

    Mart

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  65. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by codekavi · · Score: 1

    'Default' actually COMES from french. The translation is défaut. Surely you could've found that out pretty easily.

    Yes, but etymology doesn't tell me what word is commonly used in software user manuals for the $LANG, or how close the word used is to the English meaning.

  66. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by WetCat · · Score: 1

    In Russian, this has been split into two meanings:
    - "po-umolchaniu" - this is about computer or equipment default settings
    - "defolt" - about financial situations.

  67. What I'd really like... by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    ...is for there always to be a "restore itemised factory defaults" function as well as the usual "restore the whole fucking lot and sacrifice all the customisations you've spent months getting right" function.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  68. Definition by Peet42 · · Score: 1

    "Default" - the state of Windows configurations that need to be changed.

  69. Stupid defaults by troon · · Score: 1

    Of course, if you're going to use defaults, it's a good idea to choose them wisely...

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  70. In Other News by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Another invention of computer science is spreading rapidly to the world at large. Genetic algorithms have been adopted by organic objects having the peculiar ability to temporarily operate on a self-organizing principle based on reverse entropy. They have been observed following this process in order to alter their nature, and one would assume to improve it, over time. This improvement to "life" is called "evolution", and in all but the simplest of these objects is carried out through the act of information recombination called "sex". Obviously computer science is responsible for the creation of these concepts, and "life" owes its nature to this field.

    Another creation of computer science is to be investigated for its role in the creation of creation. The effect on hardware when confronted with an overpowering surge of energy is called a "bang". Computer science is to investigate how big of a bang would be required to result in reality.

    In the beginning was the void. Computer Science looked across the face of the void and said "Let there be Bits." And there was Bits. And thus did Computer Science create all that is, and ever shall be, for ever and ever, End Of Line. Let us bow our heads and program.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  71. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by oxygen_deprived · · Score: 1

    In Hindi, default will roughly translate to "poorva-nirdharit",which is identical to pre assigned.

  72. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by laron · · Score: 1

    In German, the default is to simply use "default", at least in the context of computers. An alternative would be "Werkseinstellung" literally "factory setting2

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  73. default shakespeare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that the concept of default is particularly new.

    grep -i default complete_shakespeare.txt
            knowledge, that I may say in the default 'He is a man I know.'
        Are penitent for your default to-day.
        CHARLES. Duke of Alencon, this was your default
            And Talbot perisheth by your default.

  74. The concept is 'choice' - defaults follow by St.Creed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The concept of default arrived when choices started to appear. The 'default' paintjob on the T-Ford was black. No sense in calling it default then. When choices appear you also have people saying 'duh, i don't care'. Hence the default (cheapest) option provided by the producer. Did someone really need a whole article for this?

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  75. Humble Default? I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I particularly remember the one from John McEnroe.

    The one where the chief umpire of Wimbledon, after being called on the court totally unnecessarily, simply said

    'Mr McEnroe, please play'.

    'What? Please F** y*** M***'

    'Default Mr McEnroe!'

  76. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    I often deal with Romanian and Russian translations - both these languages have an equivalent for 'default'.

    See the suggestion of another poster, find an equivalent expression, such as "factory settings".

  77. It's from Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computer Science has added a new meaning to the word - a preset value. Before that, "default" had to do with financial obligations. It came to English a /long/ time ago, from Old French "defaut", which means "to fail", and back to Latin "fallere", which means "disappoint".

  78. Time-out and other truce terms by tepples · · Score: 1

    I have noticed that the games he plays in the playground with other kids have also acquired a pause function.

    Time-out was in professional sports long before the early 1980s, when it spread to home video games. And it's not even called "pause" or "time-out" on every playground.

  79. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Asking because I had trouble figuring out a good word for it in Hindi.

    Don't most Indians speak English too?

  80. Obligatory Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homer: Default? Woo hoo! The two sweetest words in the language: de-fault! De-fault! De-fault!

  81. Defaults existed before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the restaurant. What's listed in the menu is the "default" settings for the preparation, but you could say, "No sour cream," or "extra spicy."

  82. Deafult position by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

    I asked the guy who did the electrics in our loft to please make sure all the switches started in the ON position. Take that, determinism!

  83. Defaults _MUCH_ older -- Wills by redelm · · Score: 1
    Defaults are much older than the information age. They've existed wherever there is choice. One very common one is the division of property after death -- a Will. All societies have a "default" way of handling this is there were no instructions (the person died intestate). But also have provisions for deviating from this default.

    Getting married without a prenup is like dying without a will -- works great so long as the default law fits your situation. Otherwise, someone takes advantage of the default law.

  84. Re:tienanmen by Quothz · · Score: 1

    Try Tiananmen perhaps?

    For Pete's sake, folks, the word is transliterated. There's no single correct spelling in English. If you can't live with that, you can conform to the manual of style of your choice. But don't flame over it.

  85. Two greatest words in the English language! by ahow628 · · Score: 1

    DE FAULT!

    1. Re:Two greatest words in the English language! by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Wow, it took over 6 hours since the story got posted for someone to make the requisite quote.

  86. Re:tienanmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Shanghai two weeks ago. I read the Wikipedia article about the Tiananmen Square massacre on my hotel-room internet with no difficulty at all.

    (Captcha = looked)

  87. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Quothz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't most Indians speak English too?

    About 10% of them do, which is enough to make them numerically the country with the second-most English speakers. Of those, about a third speak it as a third language. My experience tells me that about half (with a very wide margin of error) of Indian English speakers can read it well but not have a functional conversation with a native English speaker. About a third of the population is entirely illiterate.

    I suspect English language skills correlate fairly well with computer literacy, since both are the product of the higher education not available to many of the population. Since it's certainly not a one-to-one correlation, I'd stick with Hindi.

  88. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Pah, humbug. The french don't even have a word for entrepreneur.

  89. Nonsense by PGC · · Score: 1
    My first google hit regarding background on default :

    http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=default

    -------------
    c.1225, "failure, failure to act," from O.Fr. defaute, from M.L. defalta "a deficiency or failure," from L. dis- "away" + fallere "to be wanting." The financial sense is first recorded 1858; the computing sense is from 1966.
    -------------

    How I see it, all the word 'default' means is the state an object is in if you don't mess with it. e.g. the default position of a football is on the centre of the playing field, until one of the players kicks it. They didn't need computer science for that.

    Please keep your rants to your blog.

    --
    The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    1. Re:Nonsense by clam666 · · Score: 1

      I don't know who you are but referencing sports metaphors proves you're an imposter.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
  90. It's a natural concept too. by Metasquares · · Score: 1

    What about the laws of thermodynamics? They seem to establish a default state of the universe which may only be altered with an input of energy.

    1. Re:It's a natural concept too. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Flux? I suppose after heat-death, that state will quickly become the particular state that lasted the longest, but it won't dominate time for just a few billions of years (if time even exists at that point, for all we know time is a result of the way we perceive changes in the universe).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  91. Default response (obligatory) by ultraexactzz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    NOBODY expects the spanish inquisition!

    --
    Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
  92. defaults in common language by psm321 · · Score: 1

    Apparently default isn't as commonly used as I thought. I asked what toppings came on a burger by default at a restaurant once and got a blank stare. Coworkers who were there later told me that default was too technical a term (which surprised me)

  93. Re:tienanmen by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 2, Funny

    tienanmen
      tienanmen tienanmen tienanmen tienanmen
      here, they may look at it no more, talk freely

    Oh, everybody in China knows what Tiananmen Square is. It's a beautiful plaza in Beijing, not secret or forbidden at all. Nice tourist spot. Mao's mausoleum is right next door. You should go there sometime.

    And in Tiananmen Square, in 1989, nothing at all happened. Why do you Westerners use that name as if it's some sort of forbidden thing?

  94. Definition: default by russotto · · Score: 1

    Default: What you should do on student loans when you can't make payments on both them AND the rent.

    (not me, some story I saw on one of those newsmag shows).

  95. Re:tienanmen by ponraul · · Score: 1

    When they want to refer to the massacre, they usually call it "May 35, 1989" since the actual date is usually filtered.

  96. I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!

  97. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Saija · · Score: 1

    In Spanish its "Por Defecto"(By default), like "Opcion por defecto"(default option) and so on...

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
  98. Re:tienanmen by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Tiamat's scarier.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  99. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by moose_hp · · Score: 1

    In (mexican) spanish we use to translate default to "por defecto" (very roughly translated as "by defect") or "por omision" ("by omission") I don't think we have a single word with the exact meaning as default (however, that don't stop many bad translators to use "estandar" ("standard") instead).

    --
    DON'T PANIC.
  100. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

    "Default" was a poorly chosen word in this context, even in English. It has too many negative connotations; it suggests that a user who hasn't changed the factory settings has failed in some way. "Preset" is a synonym in this context, and a better word, since it is neutral.

    Does Hindi have a term equivalent to "preset"?

    --
    Will
  101. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had trouble figuring out a good word for it in Hindi. Still not sure if we have the right word.

    try pUrvapaksh (loosly equivalent to a priori condition)

  102. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try something like "basic (ground-level) state"

  103. No defaults before computing? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My car is turned off by default. So was every one that came off Ford's assembly line, including the Tin Lizzy. That predates (digital electronic) computing by decades.

    My car also steers straight ahead by default. Any properly aligned vehicle will do this. In the absence of a command to do otherwise, all steering systems return to center.

    Any momentary switch has a default. Your doorbell doesn't ring unless given input to cause it.

    And so on.

    Jeez. Just because they weren't CALLED defaults didn't mean they weren't there.

  104. default for fixed systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :) Interesting - I always thought that unchangeable (fixed) systems are always in their default state - the only state they could have. Only mutable systems have to define the term "default", but the state is inherited by all systems.

  105. Defaults are hard by hedronist · · Score: 1

    In 1974 I was talking to Pentti Kanerva about a text editor he had written for a TENEX system at Stanford. I asked about the possibility of adding a new command and he said 'sure, but not until you tell me the default behavior.' It turned out he had lots of requests for new features, but when put to the test the requesters couldn't articulate what the default should be in any one of a number of different situations.

    His point was that adding new features was relatively easy, but getting the defaults correct was considerably harder because it had to do with discerning the user's intent. 35 years later I still think this was one of the more insightful things I've heard.

  106. That's no default! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the US, having a light-switch up for on is not the default. It is the legally required setting. You cannot install the switch the other way without breakng a law called The National Electical Code. Likewise, you can't drive on the left side of the road in the US without break the vehicle code. Of course, one is more likely to be prosecuted than the other. But believe me, if you do your own wiring, the inspector will not sign off your bulding permit until you comply.

  107. Default is a *simplification*! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I agree, that a good set of defaults is the best thing a software can have. But most deveolpers are not thinking this to the end.
    Defaults are the solution, for the perfect merger, of freedom, and simplicity (which is closely related to efficiency, but not the same, and often confused). That's why they are so important.

    Two examples are Gnome and KDE, the old arch rival friends.

    Gnome decided, that the most important part, is simplicity. But their developers thought, you could not reach this, without removing freedom. So they hard-coded options, which also saved them the time to implement the other options. But in the end it was a pointless loss of efficiency and freedom, because of laziness and that false dichotomy.

    KDE decided, that freedom is the most important part. But their developers thought, you could not reach this, without removing simplicity. So they added every option and feature they could think of, which unfortunately killed it for users who just want to use it, and not do a thousand decisions every time they use something with an obvious default. In the end, this was pointless too, because of the loss of efficiency and simplicity, because of that same false dichotomy.

    If you now think, that I show no respect for their hard efforts, to make a good desktop environment, you are wrong. I love their hard work, that they are doing entirely *for free*. So I can't make any demands anyway, and so can't you. But you can inspire them with your ideas for improvements!

    And my idea here, is that you can have both. Without any losses. Freedom and simplicity.
    Trough actually allowing choices, and implementing options. (I think you can do much better there, Gnome developers!)
    And then choosing the absolute best defaults. These are the defaults that are determined by the usage patters of your user base. And nothing else. (I think you both can do better there, KDE and Gnome developers!)
    And then there is a second level of defaults. Those of the specific user.

    The idea is that you only change the things, where your preferences differ from the usual. Of the user base. And of your own usual usage.
    Apart from that, those choices and options have to be completely out of the view and not disturb you in any way (I think you can do much better there, KDE developers!), but be available in the blink of an eye.

    And finally, to perfect it, and actually make a step beyond the basics that are know for decades, offer a hierarchic set of presets.
    On the fist level, offer people to download and activate one of many presets for the whole of KDE or Gnome, on installation. And let them make their own.
    On the second level, offer a choice and the creation of presets for specific applications and application groups. Just by having a preset on-line browser on the first start, and giving you an export and publish function for your configuration state.
    Those global presets could be created out of those specific presets, by bundling them.

    That way, a designer could choose the (in)official "Designer" master preset, but the "Kenny's DVD authoring presets" group, for the burning and video applications. And then only have to set one single option, to reach his state of perfection, in terms of efficiency without playing with that thing all day long, just to be able to use it like he wants.

    As a final thought, I hope at least someone will be inspired by this.
    Remember that I wrote this, to improve the state. Not to to slam anyone. So I also hope that I'm not misunderstood.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Default is a *simplification*! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Gnome decided, that the most important part, is simplicity. But their developers thought, you could not reach this, without removing freedom. So they hard-coded options, which also saved them the time to implement the other options. But in the end it was a pointless loss of efficiency and freedom, because of laziness and that false dichotomy.

      What you describe is pretty much exactly OSX.

      In fact in OSX its worse than Gnome.

      Want to change the color of the 'gumdrop' buttons on the windows? You have to hack the KERNEL.

      There is (third party) software for OSX which allows you to change stuff like that. Behind the scenes it hacks the kernel for you. Sometimes, when theres an OSX security update, your mac no longer boots.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  108. Ahh, the inspiration for my username... by default+luser · · Score: 1

    ...Or should I say, luser name?

    I love the concept of "default." It means I don't have to think about %99 the things I do on a daily basis, simply because the defaults are good enough. Without this concept driving design and development, we would have never gotten this far with technology, as each extra layer would have added way to much complexity for the user.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  109. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  110. Re:tienanmen by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

    å©å®é--ååoe (å©å®é-å£å)
    Here you go in unicode :) Just to make sure they get it.
    & # x 5 9 2 9 ; & # x 5 B 8 9 ; & # x 9 5 E 8 ; & # x 5 E 7 F ; & # x 5 7 3 A ; ( & # x 5 9 2 9 ; & # x 5 B 8 9 ; & # x 9 5 8 0 ; & # x 5 E E 3 ; & # x 5 8 3 4 ; )
    When previewing it didn't look right, so I added the html symbols if someone else knows how to post it correctly.

  111. TinyMCE makes clean code! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I'll have you know that TinyMCE makes very clean and minimal code (XHTML strict compliant). Of course it still outputs a horrid nightmare when you paste a Word document into it, but to say it's not good because it can't handle that is like saying a car's unsafe because it doesn't protect its occupants in a top-speed head-on collision with a runaway freight train.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  112. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    How did you manage to type 2 instead of a quote? Are you posting from a Commodore 64!?

  113. Only 10% of users even consider changing defaults by Xoc-S · · Score: 1

    I was at a meeting at Microsoft recently. A program manager on Visual Studio said that in their metrics, only 10% of the people ever open the Options dialog in a program, much less change anything. For that reason, the default configurations have to be right, and it takes a very strong argument to add the feature to make changing the default configurations even possible.

  114. Knobs with Detents by metallurge · · Score: 1

    You know, mechanical knobs which have a default position which you can feel, a detent. (What I am describing is not a switch, but a variable resistor or capacitor). The most common place we will have seen these today is in a L-R fader or a F-B fader in a car stereo. Analog equalizers also frequently have a detent.

    Adjustable pushbutton radio tuners are another example.

    These are two contenders for non-digital forerunners of "defaults".

    What I'd like to see is a rotary optomechanical knob with software-controllable detents. Preferably also with a springloaded push switch, a springloaded pull switch, and a joystick mode.

    For all that digital makes possible, the mechanical interface to so many of our digital devices is simply horrible.

  115. Bullshit navel-contemplation/-aggrandizing nerds by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    "Default" as a concept is the result of INDUSTRIALIZATION and mass production.
    To suggest that somehow this is a result of computerization is amazingly naive.

    --
    -Styopa
  116. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In german we use "standard" (literally) or what would translate to "factory set"

  117. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by onemorechip · · Score: 1

    Because "standard" implies something more?

    "Standard" implies there was a deliberative process involved, which isn't always the case with "defaults".

    "Default" could have just been what made sense to the programmer on one particular day, and he or she just left it at that.

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  118. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by fbartho · · Score: 1

    Forgive a non-hindi speaker, Is there a concept of prefixes to words? If so can you use pre-suggested?

    It would be awkward in English, but it wouldn't be incomprehensible there. Is it the same in hindi?

    --
    Gravity Sucks
  119. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by trickycamel · · Score: 1

    Also pretty easy in Russian. Literally translated, means something like "in the event of silence" or "when unspecified."

    --
    Sig? What sig?
  120. Re:tienanmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in Tiananmen Square, in 1989, nothing at all happened. Why do you Westerners use that name as if it's some sort of forbidden thing?

    What do you mean nothing happened, we all saw it here in the rest of the whole world!!

  121. Re:tienanmen by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    For Pete's sake, folks, the word is transliterated. There's no single correct spelling in English. If you can't live with that, you can conform to the manual of style of your choice. But don't flame over it.

    Pinyin is well-established as the system for representing Chinese in our alphabet. It is not a matter of choice or opinion. The place is called "Tiananmen". The only debate is on whether there should be an apostrophe after the first n to represent the syllable boundary.

  122. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess what, German keyboard layout has " on shift-2... also slash on shift-7 and backslash on f*in altgr + key-right-of-0. LOTS of fun typing paths.

  123. Re:A good translation for default to other languag by codekavi · · Score: 1

    poorva-nirdharit Oh yes! poorva nirdharit or poorva-niyojit should do fine.

  124. This is good history of ideas by adpads · · Score: 1

    This is good Foucauldian history. The author has an excellent point about a nearly invisible way that choice is structured in our age. The fact that the word 'default' has a long etymology, like all words do is natural enough - and even that the technology had a predecessor in the way that NY subway trains were routed in the 1930s only serves to reinforce the author's point. Nothing is ever born out of nothing: it evolves - repetition with a difference. What the author has identified is a really important aspect of the management of knowledge in our age (all the more clearly so because it appears so 'basic' to us), and I think it's really insightful.

  125. Re:tienanmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, it was funny, have a laugh, and stop karma whoring

  126. Re:tienanmen by Quothz · · Score: 1

    Pinyin is well-established as the system for representing Chinese in our alphabet. It is not a matter of choice or opinion.

    First off, Hanyu Pinyin does not romanize into the English alphabet: It comes close, but used strictly it returns words which the untrained - but literate - American cannot pronounce.

    As far as "no choice" goes, there's Hanyu Pinyin, EFEO, Gwoyeu Romatzyh, Latinxua Sin Wenz, Chinese Postal Map Romanization, Tongyong Pinyin, Wade-Giles, Yale, Legge romanization, and Simplified Wade. And that's just for Standard Mandarin romanization. A transliteration from Cantonese or Chinese Mandarin, for example, will likely return a different result.

    While Hanyu Pinyin is the system officially adopted by the ISO and China for Mandarin romanization, its use in the United States is spotty at best. The press generally uses an Anglicized bastardization of it, but actual Chinese people who studied it before immigrating often find it useless and burdensome. (Which is why we had that uproar in Texas some months ago.) The inability of Pinyin to render speakable English words makes it, essentially, China's government masturbating in a hot tub next to the UN, with the press taking photos which it edits heavily before release.

  127. Re:tienanmen by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    First off, Hanyu Pinyin does not romanize into the English alphabet:

    That's fine. I didn't mention this English alphabet.

    It comes close, but used strictly it returns words which the untrained - but literate - American cannot pronounce.

    You've started to talk about an irrelevant nationality.

    As far as "no choice" goes, there's Hanyu Pinyin, EFEO, Gwoyeu Romatzyh, Latinxua Sin Wenz, Chinese Postal Map Romanization, Tongyong Pinyin, Wade-Giles, Yale, Legge romanization, and Simplified Wade.

    And Hanyu Pinyin is the standard one. It's like Unicode versus legacy encodings, or metric units versus legacy units.

    And that's just for Standard Mandarin romanization.

    Which is what we're talking about.