Slashdot Mirror


Auto Warranty Robocall Scammers Busted

ectotherm writes "The nice people behind the recorded phone messages stating 'By now you should have received your written note regarding your vehicle warranty expiring...' — the ones who instantly hang up when you ask for the name of the company — have been busted. Fox News did a little background digging on the four people charged." Don't know about you, but I received three or four postcards in the mail from these scammers, as well as uncountable robocalls. The FTC says they cleared $10M since 2007.

358 comments

  1. My call... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...went something like this.

    "WTH is this? Scammers?"

    *Press 1*

    "Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?"

    "May I ask who I'm speaking to?"

    *click*

    --

    After receiving (and hanging up on) a few more of these calls, I can't say I'm sorry to see their asses getting handed to them in court.

    1. Re:My call... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My first two went like that. Then I tried keeping them on the line as LONG as possible.

      The operators they got were some quick talkers. I raised a very very specific issue with my car and he knew about ALL of them. He knew other people asked about that exact same thing. You also had to know the right buzz words (75k miles. 2-4 years old, etc).

      After I got past level 1 I started giving them VINs from stuff I found on Auto Trader. It was a crap shoot on how long I lasted after that.

    2. Re:My call... by asynchronous13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They called my lab repeatedly while I was a grad student, after several calls I kept a log with time, date, and apparent Caller ID number (which was always bogus) and any info I could get out of the operators. But hey, I was a grad student, so I had time to kill, I just kept them on the phone for as long as possible.

      scammer: Your car warranty is expired, would you like to renew your auto warranty?
      me: expired?
      scammer: yes, wou---
      me: are you sure my warranty expired?
      scammer: yes, would you like to renew your auto warranty?
      me: well, which car are we talking about?
      scammer: The newer one
      me: the new one? i bought them at the same time.....
      ....
      and when I got bored (rare) or sensed that they were about to hang up (usual)
      me: I'd like you to know that I report every one of these calls to the FTC (and I really did: http://www.ftc.gov/phonefraud )

      I think my number finally got blacklisted by their phone operators or something, after awhile they just hung up on me every time. Once the operator just tried to heckle my school's sports team. (its tough to rattle a geek by making fun of a football team) I *always* pressed '1' when I got those calls, must have logged at least 30 calls on the FTC website.

    3. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless they win

    4. Re:My call... by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?"

      "May I ask who I'm speaking to?"

      *click*

      That's better treatment than I got! The one time they called that I wasn't too busy to just hang up, all I got (after sitting through the message and waiting for the "sales rep") was a bored

      "Hello?*click*"

      They hung up on me before I said anything, before they even made any type of pitch. They just KNEW I wasn't going to send them money.

      Another time I was in a seminar class, only 5 people and the professor. We were waiting for one of the other students to show up, when a phone on the wall of the classroom, previously unnoticed, rang. We all looked at each other, then the professor, who looked back at us, just as confused. Thinking there was a greater than zero chance it was something like an emergency announcement or something important, I answered the phone...

      Yes, the classroom's auto factory warranty had run out.

    5. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always told them I was at their house and raping their dog. Not all that creative, but I had fun saying stuff like that to them, knowing there was nothing they could do about it. Just like there was no way for me to get them to stop calling me.

    6. Re:My call... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      It was fairly close to that. I demanded to hear the name of the company they were representing and why they were calling me ... mumble, mumble, when they insisted that my auto warranty needed renewing I told them that I hadn't owned a car (in the United States) in over a decade and no, no one in my family did either and we didn't have formal residence in the US. She ended the call *very* quickly.

      Scammers. I guess I spoke to the Maureen chick, because it was a female voice on the phone I talked to.

    7. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is this guy doing when he posts? His post takes a large amount of grey space and his text is jammed over to the right. Like it is formatted in some cockeyed way. Stop it!

    8. Re:My call... by rednip · · Score: 1

      I did the FTC form for all 3 of my calls, and even got back 3 separate letters back, oddly, all at the same time; You must of had a mailbox full. Seemed rather inefficient, but I guess that the FTC never counted on a scam where they kept calling the same people multiple times.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    9. Re:My call... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Mine went like...

      press 1

      me: Uhh... my car is 1 year old and a company owned lease

      them: *click*

      And that was on my cell phone. The lady I sit next to at work got called on her home, cell AND work phone. I guess I got lucky by only getting called on my cell.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    10. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yesterday I received the post card in the mail. It listed the 2009 ford escape that I bought for my wife less then a month ago.

      They called my work cell about a dozen times. Finally I pressed 1 and, I told them they called a government issued cell phone (true) and asked them if they'd like me to walk down to the state attorney generals office. He just said sorry sir we'll remove the number from our list. Haven't received a call since.

    11. Re:My call... by Kamokazi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kinda off topic, so mod me down if you want, I got karma to spare, but you seemed to indicate you enjoyed messing with these guys, so you might also enjoy one of my favorite pasttimes...messing with 419 Scammers. 419 is the criminal code dealing with Advanced Fee Fraud in Nigeria...long lost relative died and left you millions, you've won the lottery in Nigeria, etc...all that junk you get in your email. It can be a lot of fun to mess with those guys, and the overall goal is to waste their time so they don't scam as many real victims. Most are from West Africa but they can be from anywhere in the world...the number coming from developed nations has increased a lot lately. Check out this site here if it's something you might be interested in trying: www.419eater.com

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    12. Re:My call... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      "May I ask who I'm speaking to?"

      *click*

      Damn! They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?

    13. Re:My call... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Anyone else now getting spam emails about auto warranties? They seem to have just moved online..

    14. Re:My call... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      As an Australian looking at this with an outside perspective, it seems to me that they managed to piss off most of the population of the U.S.

      That's got to be a new low. :-)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    15. Re:My call... by overlordofmu · · Score: 1

      There is no rule in English that says it's improper to end a sentence with a preposition. That is a myth.

      Splitting infinitives is acceptable also.

      Finally, the plural of octopus is octopuses not octopi.

    16. Re:My call... by bluie- · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but I always find it hilarious when someone tries to give you shit about your local sports team when you don't follow or give a damn about sports at all. Even more off topic, but I have a theory that since I grew up playing all kinds of computer games, which are interactive and challenging, watching sports from afar feels like the most boring waste of time that could possibly exist. Thoughts?

      --
      life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think
    17. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, Bush did the same thing without calling us all personally.

    18. Re:My call... by fataugie · · Score: 1

      WHAT?!?!

      You mean I'm not related to royalty?

      Sonofabitch....

      So what happened to that check for processing fees I sent last week?

      --

      WTF? Over?

    19. Re:My call... by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      There is no rule in English that says it's improper to end a sentence with a preposition. That is a myth..

      Well, duh, that's what makes it funny.

      You're one of those people who always have to have jokes explained to you, aren't you?

    20. Re:My call... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Since I grew up playing sports, which are interactive and challenging, playing video games feels like the most boring waste of time that could possibly exist.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    21. Re:My call... by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      check your bank account ;) You'll see

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    22. Re:My call... by qengho · · Score: 1

      "May I ask who I'm speaking to?"

      *click*

      Damn! They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?

      No, it was because he used "who" instead of "whom."

    23. Re:My call... by bluie- · · Score: 1

      Don't get my wrong, playing sports is really fun. But watching them on TV is boring, IMO. Just like watching other people play video games.

      --
      life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think
    24. Re:My call... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Octopussi?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    25. Re:My call... by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, those robo-dialers can connect to strange places. Once upon a time, (while working as a telemarketer) I was greeted by a woman's rather confused sounding "...Hello?" I launched into my spiel but had to stop as the woman burst into surprised laughter. "Do you know where you've called?" ... Turns out I'd reached the emergency phone in an elevator. 8^)

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    26. Re:My call... by atomicdoggy · · Score: 1

      I got hung up on after I told the lady I wasn't wearing any pants, and was rubbing peanut butter on my, umm, self... so that I can make a reeses peanut butter cup when I shove it in her hershey highway....

      I thought that was rude... I was just getting started.

    27. Re:My call... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Nice. I took the "call this number again and I'll F***ing kill you!" approach.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    28. Re:My call... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      ...went something like this.

      "I don't recognize that number on the caller ID"

      If I don't know you, or your number is hidden to caller ID, I don't answer the phone.

    29. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a lot of insulting comments to people here on slashdot. Here are examples:

      "they're still douchebags"

      "How about buying her, you know, a book?
      Drrrrrrrrrr"

      "Unlike the anonymous douche bag below--who's apparently running OO on an IBM XT--for us: OO = total success."

      ____

      Are you always rude or just on slashdot? Are you 6'4" and 250 lbs? I am and I am very polite. I feel no need to belittle people on slashdot to feel big. In fact, to feel big, I crush you with my moral superiority.
       
      *ROAR*

    30. Re:My call... by JoJo's883 · · Score: 1

      Care to trade some of that spare karma for a shiny new car warranty I just bought?

    31. Re:My call... by jae471 · · Score: 1
      Many (perhaps even most) hackers don't follow or do sports at all and are determinedly anti-physical. Among those who do, interest in spectator sports is low to non-existent; sports are something one does, not something one watches on TV.

      ~The Jargon File, Appendix B.

    32. Re:My call... by LordEd · · Score: 1

      http://www.pmoylan.org/pages/auefaq.html

      "Excuse me, where is the library at?" "Here at Hahvahd, we never end a sentence with a preposition." "O.K. Excuse me, where is the library at, *asshole*?"

    33. Re:My call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get the same thing at my gift shop. I have all the time in the world, so for the strictly automated re-fi robocalls I just set the headset on the desk until someone figures out that they're talking to a granite counter. The ones that really bug me are the ones purporting to be from ATT or the Yellow Pages; they run through their script before I can point out that they are the 20th person to call me this week with the same spiel. I do get some satifaction when I tell them that I don't provide my name to unsolicited callers. They start wailing about how their boss won't give them credit for the call. Hey. Your problem, not mine.

    34. Re:My call... by jhsiao · · Score: 1
      If you want to keep these jokers on the line, just sound old and confused.

      Their scam targets the elderly. You might have sounded too young so they just hung up. But if you pretend you're over 65, hard of hearing, and confused how your 2007 Buick Regal's warranty is expiring, they'll be all over you.

      And that's when you string them along for hours...once they do find out that you're not actually old, their fury at being strung along for so long would be delicious.

    35. Re:My call... by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Both worth about the same...

      --

      WTF? Over?

    36. Re:My call... by ectotherm · · Score: 1

      Here is what I did: Sales Rep: Hi, did you call to extend your automobile warranty? Ectotherm: Yes, I did !!!! Sales Rep: Great!! What is the make, model, and year your car was manufactured? Ectotherm: Well, since you called me, shouldn't you know? After all, if you are telling me that my warranty is expiring, shouldn't you already know that information? Sales Rep: Well, your auto company called US and let US know to make you the offer. Ectotherm: Really? Hmmmmmm... Which auto company called you? Sales Rep: YOUR auto company called US and told US to contact YOU because your warranty is almost up. Ectotherm: But my car is only six months old! Is the 3 year/36K mile warranty up already? Sales Rep: >

      --
      "Nature bats last..."
  2. What a deal by pitterpatter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.

  3. The only robot call I got by dmomo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Asked if I had seen a .. Sandra O'Connor... or something like that. I forget.

    1. Re:The only robot call I got by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Funny

      He'll call back.

    2. Re:The only robot call I got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What a day that was!

    3. Re:The only robot call I got by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fuck you, asshole!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:The only robot call I got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one sec, there's someone at the door...

    5. Re:The only robot call I got by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't expect a long conversation, though. The call may be unexpectedly... Terminated.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:The only robot call I got by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Gov. Schwartzenager, is that you?

      --

      WTF? Over?

  4. Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Itninja · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....to never run the same scam over and over? Oh right, because they are greedy crooks.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and there were no criminal charges filed against them.

    2. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      and there were no criminal charges filed against them.

      What I found interesting were the priors for some of these people. You'd expect related charges, but they're totally off-base:

      - indecent exposure
      - obstruction
      - trespassing
      - battery
      - filing a false report of a bomb
      - firearm violations

      That's quite an interesting assortment.

      And although I got robocalled a lot, I never did get any of their postcards. I'm not on the DNC registry.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      Also, because it works.

    4. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not on the DNC registry either, but cell phones are supposed to be taboo for legit marketing companies; the only telemarketing calls I've ever gotten on my cell (I don't have a landline) were from robodialers for this scam. And I got dozens of calls.

    5. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Toonol · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked briefly for a mail order company that dabbled in [legitimate] telemarketing. The trouble is that the phone company won't provide information about whether a particular number is a cell phone or land line. You used to be able to tell, but after number portability went through, you had no way of knowing. We tried not to call them, and if we were told they were cell phones, we would mark them off and never call them again. However, it was impossible to be 100% sure; what was a land line last year could be a cell number this year..

      At least that WAS the situation. Things were in rapid flux. I think the larger data warehouses are putting together lists of cell phone numbers, that you can buy and use to suppress those numbers out of your file; but they're not cheap, and they aren't complete.

    6. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Thansal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is interesting, how were you able to tell?

      The only case where I could be sure if a number was a mobile number or not was in NYC with the 917 area code. It was (and will be) the only mobile area code as after its creation the FCC ruled that you can not have area codes specifically for mobile devices. Also, relatively recently 917 has been switched back to a general area code.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    7. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked briefly for a mail order company that dabbled in [legitimate] telemarketing.

      Sorry, but that's an oxymoron.

      Especially when you later go on to say that you didn't even know anything about the numbers you were calling until you called it. There ain't no such beast as legitimate telemarketing.

      Cold calling should be illegal, period.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Luthair · · Score: 2, Informative

      I once worked for an American cellular company and there was a website (a public one) which could be used to lookup information about any phone number /shrug

      Really though, a 'legitimate' telemarketing company should only be calling people they have an existing relationship with, not blanketing an area code or buying a list of phone numbers.

      On the topic of the story, I had a number of calls from the scammers on my cell but they were always recognizable by the simple fact that the area codes weren't local. (I live in Canada and they were usually California numbers)

    9. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by NevarMore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Playing some devils advocate here...

      Do the math on some of those.

      Bomb threat was in 1991, guilty party is now 36. He was 18.

      The indecent was in 2001, again he was 20. One can technically be charged with indecent exposure for mooning someone or forgetting to latch the door on the crapper.

      No specifics on the trespassing either.

      Battery is a bit more severe, but again no details. We don't know if it was a beating or a fight.

      Firearms, likely in relation to the bomb threat but then again it could be as banal as a minor transport violation.

      You do your time and you make amends. I'm not excusing it, but we sentence people to X years for crimes with the understanding that after X years they've done their time. Not life. Wait until you make a mistake, or rather "get framed", and have that follow you around forever.

      Good show reading the article though, some of those are buried down in the last few paragraphs. I only noted the bullet points early in the artcile

    10. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Informative

      When phones were newer it was just a matter of looking at the first 3 digits in some places. Back in my hometown in the mid 90s almost all of the local land line numbers were sure to be a certain couple prefixes, whereas the numbers you got from Verizon were different

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    11. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by The+Moof · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Despite the FCC's claim about automated dialers calling wireless phones, they will just send you a letter that they didn't find any infractions and cite a 1934 communications act. I received that letter (yesterday) when I reported a company using an automated dialer and recorded message inform me that all of my credit cards were in danger.

      I think the only reason this one had any action was because it had received national notice when a call came through to a senator, interrupting the water boarding hearings in Congress last month. The national news covered it (briefly), and the FCC was questioned about it.

    12. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by whiledo · · Score: 1

      There ain't no such beast as legitimate telemarketing.


      Main Entry:
              1 legitimate
      [...]
      3 a: accordant with law or with established legal forms and requirements

      I think the word you're looking for is "ethical", or, possibly, "nice".

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    13. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are scum, but any of those charges would make you unemployable for life. Dammit, I feel a twinge of sympathy.

    14. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked briefly for a mail order company that dabbled in [legitimate] telemarketing. The trouble is that the phone company won't provide information about whether a particular number is a cell phone or land line.

      If you weren't provided the number by someone who knew whether it was a cell phone, it wasn't legitimate telemarketing. Period.

    15. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Calm your kneejerking. There was no cold calling; only customers with established business relationships were called. We contacted nobody from rented lists, we only contacted people who were customers or had inquired about products within the last 18 months.

      We were legitimate in the sense that: We tried as hard as we could to stay within all laws, we honored completely every request a consumer made not to contact them, and we tried our best not to call a cell phone.

      Every number we called, we already knew the person. But that doesn't mean that the number they provided us was a landline. Sometimes they didn't tell us, sometimes the number changed.

    16. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      The person giving us the number did know. That doesn't mean they told us.

    17. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      I once worked for an American cellular company and there was a website (a public one) which could be used to lookup information about any phone number /shrug

      Did the site provide info about ALL phone numbers, or just the ones owned by that provider? Was it a 1-at-a-time number lookup, or did they allow a verification of 100,000 phone numbers in one big file? Maybe it would have been perfect, and we just never KNEW about it. That wouldn't surprise me. As I said, things were in flux. Really though, a 'legitimate' telemarketing company should only be calling people they have an existing relationship with, not blanketing an area code or buying a list of phone numbers.

      We never did cold calling. Even dealing with established customers doesn't mean that you know that a particular number is a land line, or that a number will stay a land line, or that the change of address you got included a switch from land to cell.

    18. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by samcan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After I complained online to the FCC about the car warranty scammers calling my cell phone, I too received a letter stating that there had not been any infraction. So, I wrote a letter back to them, quoting the information they sent me, stating that it was an infraction. I demanded that they reinvestigate. Still haven't heard anything back from them.

    19. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I received that letter (yesterday)

      about the time the doorknob broke?

    20. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by Luthair · · Score: 1

      It had information from all providers (I believe all of North America in fact, but its been a while so I'm a little fuzzy on that.) The site itself

      If the customer gave you the number then its probably alright to call them on it. That said I suspect despite the rules that legal telemarketing companies state they often don't perform due diligence and intentionally keep/allow numbers that shouldn't be on their lists. Fines don't seem common so their potential cost is outweighed by the cost of maintaining the list and potential gains.

    21. Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn.... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      With the exception of Bill Ayers.

  5. I get the stupid post cards too by Darkk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get the stupid post cards too.. Makes me wonder how they know my Honda warranty is going to expire? Despite the fact I purchased the extended manufactor 2 year warranty? The knew about the first year but didn't know about the extended warranty so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations. Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!!

    However, I never recieved one phone call from folks like that... Hmmm

    1. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 1

      I also kept getting warranty cards, seemingly for vehicles I didn't even own anymore. Glad I ignored them.

    2. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by xx01dk · · Score: 1

      Same here, and I thought it highly amusing since I still had over 40k miles and 4 years left on my super-duper Hyundai warranty. But yeah, good point... they must have had information pertaining to the sale dates and stuff (I'd have been right on the mark on a standard warranty). I wonder how this information is made available?

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
    3. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They didn't know a thing about your warranty. Or your car. The call folks all the time who either have no cars, or ancient cars that haven't had warranties of any kind for years and years and tell them 'your warranty is about to expire'.

      They are cold calls. They haven't done any research. Some of the better ones use the same cold reading techniques that psychics do to trick you into thinking they know what they are talking about. They are hoping you are dumb enough to provide the information to them when the call.

    4. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't know. My warranty expired 2 years ago and I get the cards and calls too. They seem to be mailing/calling people based on year model of the car and normal manufacturer's warranty, then continuing the mailings for several more years in case you got an extended warranty. People figure, "wow, they know when my warranty is up, so they must have gotten some "inside" info from the manufacturer, so they must be legit." It's just a variant of the perfect prediction scam.

    5. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They didn't know a thing about your warranty. Or your car. The call folks all the time who either have no cars, or ancient cars that haven't had warranties of any kind for years and years and tell them 'your warranty is about to expire'.

      These guys yes. Not all of them. I got a postcard with the make and model of my car and they knew exactly what day the manufacturer's warranty was going to expire. I even bought the car second hand, so it wasn't like the dealer ratted me out. I think it must be DMV records correlated by vin with dealer reported original sales, or possibly just DMV records and assumptions that first registration equals a sale on or about the same day,

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They didn't know, they just guessed.

      For example, I got these calls when I had a 2002 Civic, but the car wasn't under my name; I kept getting the calls after I returned the car to my parents and bought myself a 2009 Civic Hybrid... there's no way that's out of warranty already ;) I tried getting someone on the line (to mess with them) after that, but all I got was a perpetually ringing line. Nobody ever answered.

    7. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Zerth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Usually either your bank/car dealership financial office(check the small print) or one of the big 3 credit record places.

      I used to maintain a snailmail catalog list, my boss was frequently considering buying access to lists of buyers of related product X or readers of related magazine Y.

      When I looked through some of the options you could get from, say, Experian, I was rather amazed. Recently graduated nurses or lawyers in practice for 10+ years. Age x to y, married or not, kids or no kids, own home/renting, bought a luxury/economy car this year, household income in 5k increments, how many times they'd moved.

      Freaking specific shit. Didn't beat the ROI on our "please send me your catalog" list, though.

    8. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by fatalwall · · Score: 1

      they were sending me things in the mail for over and over saying my warranty was about to expire when i had just purchased the car three months earlier and it still had 5 years left on the manufacturers warranty.

    9. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by quangdog · · Score: 1

      I never received any post cards or phone calls on my land line or cell phone. I suspect it is because I always buy my cars from a private party and I always pay cash.

    10. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

      Everyone who says they guessed is dead wrong. They dont guess they just spam out the cards. I've gotten a couple of these cards in the mail starting from when my car is less than a year old and I have a 10 year power train warranty.

      The crooks are the ones giving them this information. They should be thrown in jail because obviously they give out my personal contact information without discretion to if I care or not. If a man was passing out your address and the location of all the locks in your house to hobos who walked by him who would you arrest? The hobos or the man?

    11. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I used to get letters relating to this on a fairly regular basis. I also move around quite a bit. My cars would be registered at my permanent address, as would my drivers license show. I never corrected the addresses with the finance companies on cars that I owed money to, usually sending them off to a valid PO box. Basically, no one should not that I own a 19__ car with VIN xxxxxxxxx. Regardless, I'd get crap in the mail, sometimes at multiple addresses within a short period, listing out the year, make, model, and VIN, claiming the warranty was about to expire.

          I bought a city bus to convert into an RV (no, not a school bus). It's parked in a private storage lot. Like, a very private lot, where I know the owners respect the privacy of their clients. All the ever asked of me was to prove that I had insurance on it. They didn't keep a copy of it, they just looked, verified that it was current, and said "thank you". They have my phone number and real name, but not my address(es). I've received warranty expiration stuff on that too. I wish they were legit. The bus has a Detroit Diesel 6v92 Turbo and an Allison transmission. Stuff on that thing can be expensive to fix. I'd prefer to pay a few hundred a year if I knew they'd pay to replace the engine and transmission just because it stopped working. :) Hell, I'd make sure it had a catastrophic failure every few years just to have it mechanically refreshed on their dime. :) Instead, I know it's good for about a million miles. I probably won't put that many miles on in my lifetime, and it only has 20k miles now (mechanically refreshed by the last city that owned it, and I have the logs to reference).

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Macman408 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have one better - I got a warranty card for my brother's car, shortly after I moved out-of-state. It was addressed to my new address, not forwarded.

      I, on the other hand, only own a 1995 Bianchi hybrid with about 10,000 miles or so. Since it's a bicycle, I don't really feel the need to buy a car warranty for it.

    13. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      None sequential twenties?

    14. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Asclepius99 · · Score: 1

      The only problem I have with your theory is that I've gotten many calls from them and I don't own a car (nor have I in the past).

    15. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      The only problem I have with your theory is that I've gotten many calls from them and I don't own a car (nor have I in the past).

      My circumstances are almost as extreme as yours - I haven't owned a car under factory warranty for over two decades and it was totaled (hit & run, not my fault) a long, long time ago.

      They were just calling everybody.

    16. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize there are some legit companies that sell extended warranties, right? They work with the auto companies to get legit client lists, and sell real insurance. You probably got a card from one of them.

    17. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Usually either your bank/car dealership financial office(check the small print) or one of the big 3 credit record places.

      I used to maintain a snailmail catalog list, my boss was frequently considering buying access to lists of buyers of related product X or readers of related magazine Y.

      When I looked through some of the options you could get from, say, Experian, I was rather amazed. Recently graduated nurses or lawyers in practice for 10+ years. Age x to y, married or not, kids or no kids, own home/renting, bought a luxury/economy car this year, household income in 5k increments, how many times they'd moved.

      The good old US, where you have to have a creditcard if you ever want to apply for a loan on something big, and the moment you get one the big 3 sell you out to these kind of guys.

      You know, some of them pinko commie countries have laws about what companies are allowed to do with your personal data...and this kinda crap isn't on the list.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    18. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      The good old US, where you have to have a creditcard if you ever want to apply for a loan on something big

      1. Thats what they want you to think.
      2. It's not true.

      Dig around for the free (its difficult to find since it was removed from the FICO site)[1] version of "Understanding your credit score". It is literally a cheat sheet of what/how/when/why to increase your meaningless credit score, or at least make it meaningless with a top end score. It may be gaming the system, but if someone releases the source code to FICO, then it's relatively easy to see how to increase your score rapidly. FWIW, these are their rules, not mine, so I have no issue keeping my 800 score _without_ owning a single credit card.

      Here is 1 link I found that is similar to the Isaac document, but it's a little different.
      [1] Maybe one of you "wayback machine" experts can dig it up. I dunno.

    19. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by johnwallace123 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's true, the big 3 will sell your information..... if you let them.

      If you want to remove yourself from these lists, you can dial 888-5-OPT-OUT, enter your SSN and opt out of all of these pre-approved credit offers / marketing sales pitches FOR LIFE! It lessens the amount of junk mail and it even helps prevent identity theft.

    20. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you file change of address forms for your bus, even if it has never been at the exact same address as your "permanent" address, it is probably linked.

      I once got mail for a gal with the same last name as me, just because she once lived in the same suburb as me, but moved out a few months before I moved there.

      I filed CoAs, as I was moving a fair bit then, she didn't. Considering the various legal stuff I occasionally got addressed to her, despite never living at an address with anything in common other than the zipcode, I can understand why.

    21. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It wasn't the auto warranty scam, but one of those calls was scarily accurate. My wife had just got off the phone with me telling me that our fridge was leaking water and needed to be replaced. (Came with the house and was quite old so it wasn't completely unexpected.) Literally seconds after I hung up, my work phone rang. "If you own your own home, you need to protect against major appliance failure..." The scammers are spying on me!!!! (Do I need to wrap my phone in tin foil? ;-) )

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    22. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Shoot, I get stuff for my daughter. And she moved out 12 years ago _and_ we moved from Virginia to Colorado since then.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    23. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by jekewa · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I don't own a car, just a couple of motorcycles.

      I ignored the calls (usually ignore calls from "unknown number" or even just numbers I don't know) at first, but they came twice a day...to an office desk phone...to which I had no actual (e.g., phone directory) relationship.

      I eventually answered one, receiving the expected robot. I pressed the number as instructed, intending to tell them to remove the number, knowing it probably wouldn't matter. The kind gentlemen asked me about my car, you know, to be sure we were on the same page. I replied with a "do you mean my 1980 Yamaha, or my 1989 Honda?" He chuckled and said "it must be the Honda; what model is that?" I replied honestly with "the 1500cc Valkyrie Tourer."

      Then he hung up.

      I repeated the exercise during a period of boredom, but this time just kindly told the woman who asked me about my car that I didn't own a car and wasn't planning to buy one, and asked if she'd remove me from their list. She apologized, said it was a done deal and politely hung up. The calls stopped, but only for the rest of the week.

      --
      End the FUD
    24. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations. Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!!

      Do you even read what you type? I boldfaced the relevant items for whoever modded you insightful...

      And they didn't know much, if anything, about your car. They sent me a postcard saying the factory warranty on my car was about to expire. Well, the factory warranty on that car expired about 12 years or 150,000 miles ago, which they could have known simply by checking the year/model they had on the freaking postcard. And I never owned it new, I had bought it used, so it didn't have any warranty, and had actually been totalled out by a drunk driver about 6 months before they started bugging me.

      Sometimes they dig up public records like vehicle registration, then they send a form letter to everyone with a GM car, a slightly different one to everyone with a Honda, etc. Other times they just send a blanket "your car warranty has expired" letter, like the one they sent to my 3 year old nephew.

    25. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Well, it's not related to CoA forms. I don't do them. I notify people I want of my new address. I get too much junk mail delivered to me (like the warranty scams), after I've lived somewhere for about 8 months, direct marketed junkmail accounts for more of my mail than legitimate mail. Not just a little either. I get less than a dozen of pieces of legitimate mail a month (phone/water/power bill, etc), and about a dozen or so pieces of direct marketed junkmail a day.

          Due to a change in living status (lost a job, found a job, lost a job, found a job, etc), I don't have my house any more, so I'm staying with a friend. Only a very few companies have my physical address, including the car insurance company. I haven't been receiving substantial junk mail at my current physical address yet.

          I would suspect that there's a tie-in with one of the companies who had my address (power, water, phones, etc), but I've never been able to positively establish who.

          I've been considering going the spam tracing route with it. I don't that the postal service would cooperate, but I was thinking of assigning a "unit number" for each company that I gave my physical address to. So, each company could have an address like:

          JW Smythe
          14 Hacker Way
          Unit #1150
          New York, NY 10011

          BTW, that is a bogus address that I use a lot online. :) I'm curious how much junk mail ends up in Manhattan with my name on it, that can't be delivered because there isn't a "Hacker Way" anywhere in Manhattan (10011 zip code). There is a Hacker Pl in Nanuet, NY, so I hope they're not getting all my junk mail. :)
       

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    26. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      how much did the bus cost?
      and how old is it?

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    27. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      1982 GMC RTS
          40' long, 8.5' (102") wide
          $2500. eBay auction

          A little something like this originally (not mine). This one has the NYC MTA paint job. Mine doesn't have the yellow lights on the windshield, and only flat windows, no sliders, which is what I wanted. Different cities had different specs on their orders.

          A random example of a completed project (not mine).

          A lot of people prefer the MCI buses (generally retired Greyhound buses), or Prevost buses if they have lots of money to burn. :) I wanted the extra space inside (more than an MCI) and less vertical height outside so I can fit more gracefully down city streets. It hides very nicely in storage lots where there are 53' trailers, or at truck stops. I changed the differential gears for highway driving. max speed was 60mph, which was scary on an Interstate. Now I've seen it up to 90mph with a 3300 pound car in tow (passing on an Interstate, so I could move back to the slow lane and slow back down to 70mph).

          I guess the best part is, when its closer to complete, I can set up to run on WVO. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by harl · · Score: 1

      I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations. Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!!

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      How can digging through public records be an invasion of privacy?

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    29. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Nice.
      I'm still debating what to do when I retire.
      If all goes well I'll be done working in 17 years, then it's time to go do stuff.
      I'm thinking about an RV of some sort to travel the states in.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    30. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        Drop me an email (de-slashdot-obfuscate my email on here, or drop me a line at my site), and I can tell you more about what folks have done, without going way off topic here. :)

          We'll suffice it to say, if you have the time, and the ability (general construction, plumbing, wiring) or the budget to pay someone else to do it, you'll be much happier with a well made one, than you will with almost anything you can buy. If done right, it'll be easier to make changes to also. For example, I had originally I planned for a queen size bed in the back, but now that I'm single again, I'm thinking 2 pairs of bunks may be more reasonable, and allow for "oh shit" moments, like escaping hurricanes. :) Most folks would rather sleep on a reasonably comfortable mattress, than in a sleeping bag on the floor. If plans change again, and I'd already installed the bunks, it wouldn't be all that hard to switch to a queen size bed. Even a king would be doable, but you'd always have to crawl in from the foot of it, rather than having a narrow walking path. Craigslist handles most major cities, so it wouldn't be very hard to find a reasonably priced replacement, and you could even list yours cheap to get rid of it, since there isn't a lot of storage room. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    31. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how this information is made available?

      Must be registration stuff. I got a card for the '87 truck I got inn California) from a guy in Oklahoma. How extended do these warranties get?

    32. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by Zerth · · Score: 1

      That is awesome. Although I imagine maintenance would be costly, to say nothing of fuel. But probably not worse than the equivalent motor home.

    33. Re:I get the stupid post cards too by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          From what I've seen, Class A diesel pusher RV's use Caterpillar or Detroit Diesel engines, commonly noted as Cat or DD, respectively, so you're looking at the same equipment, and any truck repair shop can work on it. Mine is the older DD engine engines, so it is not computerized. The newer ones have significant advantages, but from what I've seen there can be some drawbacks to the computerized DD motors, such as needing the diagnostic tools and possible limitations set in the computer. For example, a metro transit bus may have a max speed of 45mph set, if there are no roads that it would operating on that they would expect the driver to go over 45mph. Some people have reported trouble removing this programming. That's more of a social engineering exercise than an actual problem. You have to ask nice, and prove it's yours, and DD or Cat will do it for you.

          From what I've read, the gas engines are significantly inferior, which makes a lot of sense. Diesel motors are workhorses, great for lots of torque and low RPM's. Gas engines do better at higher RPM's and don't provide the same kind of torque. Gas motors also leave you with more parts (and more parts to break).

          From what I've read from some 1st person accounts, with the upgraded gearing in mine (to allow it to go over 60mph), I should expect 10 mpg from it. A friend of mine bought a very nice 40' Class A with a Cat engine in it, and traveling Florida to Alaska and back he said the best mileage he got was only about 7mpg, with the trip average closer to 5mpg.

          A lot of it has to do with the overall weight, aerodynamics (they're bricks, but how much front surface area are you pushing with?), etc. If you build one out, and are sparing with heavy features, you can still do a very nice job and get good mileage. Towing a hummer, and setting up to carry 1000 gallons of water will hurt your performance. :) Building your own, you get to take your needs into account, rather than just going with what the manufacturer thinks you may want. I can go light on the interior features, because I don't require 4 TV's. Some have that (bedroom, two in the living room, and one in an underneath storage for viewing from the outside). I'd rather have one nice large TV in the living room area, and save the weight (and space) for other things. I'd actually opt to have capacity for extra water and fuel, so I can travel for longer without stopping for either. Mine has a 190 gallon fuel tank, so at 10 mpg, I should be able to cross most of the way across the country, with one fuel stop somewhere towards the end. I also considered a gasoline storage tank, so if someone is following me (like, a friend, not a stalker), we can pick up fuel in the cheapest state, and I can keep fueling them up as we go. Just because I'd want it equipped with it doesn't mean the tanks have to be full all the time. Dumping the waste water, only carrying 20 gallons of fresh water, and not filling the auxiliary fuel tanks could save a lot of weight.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  6. Knew it was a scam very quickly by MrDoh! · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.
    I don't have a car.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by v1 · · Score: 1

      My calls went a little differently...

      "This is the second notice that the manufacturer's warranty on your car is about to expire". Many many of them left on my machine. My car is a 1994 exploder and I don't need anyone telling me about my manufacturer's warranty thankyouverymuch.

      Tho I was never home when they called, to play with them a bit.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by pitterpatter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon. I don't have a car.

      That's fun.

      It was obvious to me for the exact opposite reason. I had five cars. And the youngest of them had been out of warranty for at least 5 years. When I gave them the VIN for the '56 Ford (after thoroughly harassing them for not knowing the VIN on the warranty they were calling about) they wouldn't accept it - not enough characters. They hung up when I said it was a '56. On the next call, they hung up when I gave them a motorcycle VIN. Then they flooded my line with calls - well, 3-5/day - and hung up whenever I tried to connect with a person. Then I started screening calls, and they finally went away.

      I understand that this is an over-reaction, but if they were sentenced to death and I were an executioner I think I would cheerfully pull the switch to fry their brains.

    3. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by DreamsAreOkToo · · Score: 1

      Haha, that's pretty good. I had a similar experience. My car is 11 years old and has over 200k miles on it. (Honda Accord)

    4. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny
      My car is a 1994 exploder...

      If that's a typo, it's certainly one of the most apt ones I've ever seen.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like when they tell you this is your final notice. But still offer to "remove you from their list".

    6. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      obvious to me that this was a scam

      Unfortunately, not obvious to my grandmother. I wanted to fucking kill these people. 6 years ago, I had my grandmother co-sign on a truck to help me get affordable payments. Everything went very well, was perfect on the payments, and eventually sold the truck.

      I would get yelled at ALL THE TIME about these people that kept calling my grandmother about the "truck" and trying to sell her a warranty. It was MY responsibility to get them to stop calling and update their records to get rid of her phone number.

      Of course that was impossible. Could I even explain it to her so that she would understand it was a scam? No. She would forget about that within a week, just in time for the next phone call.

      The only possible way these people could be more annoying is to annoy somebody else that I CAN'T ignore to the point she would drive me batshit crazy.

      I hope they publish this pendeho's address in the court documents. I feel like a road trip.......

    7. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand that this is an over-reaction, but if they were sentenced to death and I were an executioner I think I would cheerfully pull the switch to fry their brains.

      Sad to say, but me too. I would probably add a gleeful giggle as well.

    8. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      I started getting these calls about a year after I bought my first car. The first one went to voice mail, and I didn't really think it was a scam. The day I got my 2nd, 2nd notice... I figured it out.

    9. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by ouachiski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I knew it was a scam when I asked them if they could insure my 10 yr old truck with 175k miles and a blown cylinder and they said they could...

      --
      sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
    10. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.
      I don't have a car.

      Okay, smartypants, if you don't have a car, how do you know when its warranty expires?

    11. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Funny

      fry their brains.

      Really? I'm not entirely sure there'd be much pleasure in it. Certainly, not enough pleasure anyway...

    12. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I kept getting mine about 11 months after I bought a new car, so the timing was particularly good. I imagine that's the person that they're targeting.

      No, I did not fall for the ads because I don't press buttons when some computer calls me.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    13. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they told me that the manufacturer's warranty (5 years) on my new car (2 months) was about to expire...

      I decided to fuck with them, and told them I owned a 2002 Lamborghini Gallardo (the Gallardo, as nice a car as it is, didn't enter production until 2003).... I also kept them on the line for almost an hour being transferred from one "department" to another asking for their corporate mailing address.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    14. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      For me it wasn't just my second second notice, it was my fifth or sixth "second and final" notice. (I never got a first notice...)

    15. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.
      I don't have a car.

      Okay, smartypants, if you don't have a car, how do you know when its warranty expires?

      Moreover, why DON'T you have a car? Was it that the warranty expired and you couldn't afford to repair it?

      Guess you should've taken the call.

    16. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford Pinto... Ford Exploder... same same

    17. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by sdnoob · · Score: 1

      same here... no car. haven't had one in over a decade, either. but still multiple calls *and texts* to cell phones, as well as postcards in the mail advising me that my warranty was expiring.

      odd, that not only have i not had a car in the last 12 years, but i've never paid more than $500 for one either... $300-500 cars don't come with warranties.

      so, my standard reply to these guys has been "I seem to have misplaced my car. If you can find it and get it back to me, I'd be more than happy to carry a warranty on it."

    18. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I kept getting mine about 11 months after I bought a new car, so the timing was particularly good. I imagine that's the person that they're targeting.

      I got one of those kinds of calls in the same time frame after I bought my first car (in 1986). I presume it was legit because they asked me how many miles I had on the car, and I responded with the truth (~25k, I was driving a lot then), they hung up on me - "you're not eligible", click.

    19. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

      Heh, "exploder," good one. I started receiving these robocalls shortly after my Ford Focus spontaneously started on fire (I don't have a clever pun, though). It was still under warranty (2-1/2 years into a 3 year warranty) so the timing was reasonable. However, Ford had refused to cover the fire under the warranty (the bastards never did pay, why, oh why, aren't those jerks in bankruptcy court ... probably because their warranties were worthless). As a result, I really tore into the poor soul at the other end of the phone line: "So, if I extend my warranty will you buy me a new car because it just burned to a crisp?" "Excuse me, sir?" "Unless you're prepared to honor the current warranty I don't ever want to speak with you again (expletive probably deleted)." I only ever received about 4 or 5 calls. I guess you can get off their list if you harangue their employees enough!

    20. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Back in my college dorm days, they used to call me at the dorms ( which had their own separate contiguous block of phone numbers ) to refinance my house. No kidding!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    21. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

      They sent me a card for a 2004 Honda, but I've never owned a Honda in my life. I called the number on the card and demanded to know where they got their info. The guy I talked to kept telling me that they got it from Honda and the DMV, then tried to get info out of me about what car I do own so he could sell me a warranty. We went back and forth for almost 15 minutes (I can't believe I kept him on the hook that long) when I threatened to sue him *personally* for identity theft. Poor dumb guy was so scared (seriously.. how would I know who he was to sue him?!) he gave up the company he was calling for: US Fidelis. I still get pissed when I see their commercials now.

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    22. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Don't own a car. Never have owned a car.

      Don't have a driving license. Never have had a driving license.

      How did you people ever make a reply? I hung up after the 12th word of message.

    23. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also kept them on the line for almost an hour being transferred from one "department" to another asking for their corporate mailing address.

      That rises an interesting question: could we measure the efficiency of artificial intelligence by how long it can keep a phone solicitor busy? That would both act as an improvised Turing test, and help the populace.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    24. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by splatter · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear about your pain. As another former 2x mustang owner and former Ford fan I have to agree. My '00 sucked an intake valve into my motor thoroughly killing it in '05 just a few months out of the warranty period. The dealer wanted some extraordinary fee (can't remember the number) just to look & diagnose it because they had to take the engine apart.

      Would not try and help with the cost, even though it was just out of warranty, wouldn't buy it back as a trade-in without me putting up the cash to diagnose the problem, even though they knew they could put a new motor in it and turn it back around for more then they would have paid me. The car was in cherry condition besides the engine trouble, and they would have gotten another sale from a continued supporter.

      I ended up finding a shop that did a 15 min "yeah engines f'ed" diagnoses & did a complete swap out. Poor thing never did run quite the same as when it was off the line though. I left it behind in FL, assuming it won't pass emission in my new state. Now I drive a Honda, no more:

      Found on road dead
      Fix or Repair Daily

      or my own construction & personal favorite "Fisted over repair deal"

      YMMV

         

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    25. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      I guess you can get off their list if you harangue their employees enough!

      I did this with the "we can reduce your credit card debt" telephone spammers. After our number started receiving multiple calls per day (and this happened to be during a period when I was working from home for several weeks on end) I decided to "press 1 to lower your interest rates."

      I decided the best solution was to waste the time of the girl who took my call ... "misunderstanding" her, asking her to repeat herself, telling her about bizarre invented details of my day-to-day life, giving fictitious account numbers, getting transferred to a "supervisor" who could better help me with my situation. After about 15 minutes of this I finally said "let me explain something to you very clearly: You are a scammer and I hate telemarketers. I have been deliberately wasting your time, and every single time your company calls this number I am going to do the exact same thing again. Unless you enjoy losing money through lost time, I strongly suggest you remove this number from your calling list permanently."

      After unleashing a few choice expletives he hung up.

      Later that day - another robocall. I did the same thing again, this time to a different operator.

      I have never received another call since.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    26. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Man, now I kind of wish I HAD gotten a call from them, so I could mess with them this way... Let's see them try to discuss the warranty on my '74 Dodge Dart :D

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    27. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Had a '97 Contour that blew its tranny in '06. Long out of warranty. I had the tranny replaced, but then the shifter wouldn't lock into gear. This was after they had returned it to me as "work complete".

      I took it back to the dealer and bitched. They gave me a song and dance about how each tranny needs a matching shifter, and how I'd have to pay $1K to replace it.

      They did the work for free when I showed that I was willing to go all the way up the chain to Bill Ford as necessary.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    28. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Maybe he drives a Ford Pinto.

    29. Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought a cheap pre-paid phone, walked out of the store and immediately got my car warranty call. Damn they're good.

  7. Fox news?! by blankinthefill · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so conflicted... Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way? I don't know how to feel!

    1. Re:Fox news?! by ClosedSource · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's some potential explanations:

      Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.
      Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

    2. Re:Fox news?! by plover · · Score: 1

      Or: The sun's gotta shine on a dog's ass sometime.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, even more likely, the people who buy into these kind of telemarketer calls are the same rubes who truly believe that the government is there to help them (and those rubes are on both sides of the aisle).

    4. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... dumb enough ....

      "cum hoc ergo propter hoc" ;)

      Or, properly, "post hoc ergo propter hoc"

    5. Re:Fox news?! by discorob3 · · Score: 1

      you hit the nail on the head with that one! I am conflicted as well... Those fuckers used to call me and leave voicemail on my expensive as fuck ripoff AT and T prepaid cell phone...

    6. Re:Fox news?! by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for that, welcome to google....

    7. Re:Fox news?! by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shit I forgot if you bad mouth FOX news on slashdot it is considered flamebait? WTF? Seriously, if you are that passionate about FOX news you must work for them. FOX has been the basis for jokes for since their inception. Including jokes by FOX shows themselves.

      I find a hard time believing people without some sort of agenda would mod these posts the way they did.

    8. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm so conflicted...

      Liberal media will do that to a person.

      Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?

      Feels good doesn't it? What a relief it is for you, I imagine, not to be lied to by the liberal media you've been watching. Good to know you've seen the light by paying attention to a reliable news source like Fox. There is hope for you yet.

      I don't know how to feel!

      Relief. Relief that you know you can get news without horrible liberal lies.

    9. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's operating systems don't crash at *every* trade show, either. They both still suck.

    10. Re:Fox news?! by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      But the action you must take is clear: under no circumstances are you to follow the link, or read the article. This is Slashdot! And that is Fox News! TWO reasons!!!

    11. Re:Fox news?! by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Shit I forgot if you bad mouth FOX news on slashdot it is considered flamebait?

      It's been that way ever since Rupert bought /. The moderation is now fair and balanced.

    12. Re:Fox news?! by blind+biker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Best Jammie Thomas re-trial coverage in the media This report ticks all the boxes:
      - What happened on the original trial
      - Why there is a retrial
      - What MediaSentry did
      - The dirty things the RIAA did (finally someone in the mass media pointing this out!)
      - Camara's new strategy

      and more.

      The writer of this article did his homework thoroughly. The RIAA gets a good bludgeoning here.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    13. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm so conflicted... Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way? I don't know how to feel!

      Well, Fox News does this quite often. You see, some weasels on the net as well as some of their TV competition (who they are destroying in the ratings mind you) don't like Fox. As such, they smear them. Then disingenuous folks like you pretend to have watched Fox News, even though you haven't, and bitch about them. This is sometimes due to ignorance, other times due to ideology. At which point, you repeat things "you have read about" or "heard about" from various sources with no credibility, or in the case of some outlets, just making stuff up works too. Fox News is by far the most accurate (whether you like the style of some of their commentators or not, yeah, I hate Hannity, too). The one thing that gets me more than anything is Fox will do corrections on those rare occasions when they get something wrong, and get bashed for being honest enough to correct it. All news media makes the occasional mistake (some more than others). Is Fox the only one we are going to piss on about it?

    14. Re:Fox news?! by machine321 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my experience that's not necessarily true.

    15. Re:Fox news?! by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They actually do that all the time. You just don't know about it because you don't get your news about fox news from fox news.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    16. Re:Fox news?! by phud · · Score: 1

      Even a blind nut finds a squirrel now and then

    17. Re:Fox news?! by mortonda · · Score: 1

      such rudeness, and it gets modded up.... calling the OP a blind pig and a dog's ass?

      oh, wait....

    18. Re:Fox news?! by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Hate ta take the wind out of your sails, but...

      Pigs find truffles by smell; I can't imagine that they couldn't do much the same with acorns.

      And a broken digital watch doesn't tell the correct time - or any time - without batteries.

      You might take up Quantum Mechanics Analogies, intstead: Due to quantum fluctuations, a Fox News article from an alternate reality got posted ....

    19. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I realize the whole Fox News thing is a running joke, but the joke is a retarded one. It implies that Fox is somehow different than all the others based on its political bias. That statement is almost entirely incorrect. Fox News is no different from every other main stream media source with the exception that some of those other media sources may not agree with Fox News's particular flavor of political bias.

      The implication of your statement is that other news sources are not politically biased. You are not only wrong, you are staggeringly, mind numbingly, unbelievable wrong. It just shows that you are unable to separate your political views from reality and the greater good. It does not bother me that you can not separate your political views, that is what makes us human. What bothers me is that you seem to utterly fail to understand that just because other news sources give you a version thats been tailored to only show you the thinks about your team that you like, it doesn't mean your team doesn't fuck up all the same. What bothers me is the fact that you can not over come the 'its my team' mentality long enough to form an objective opinion about the subject matter at hand. You are unable to be objective. When people like you vote, it is not a wasted vote, it is a bought vote. Perhaps not bought with currency that can be used but with the currency of your emotions through the use of not only flat out lies, but deception and more commonly simple omission of details that actually do matter. Fox News does this, no argument there. What might be enlightening for you to one day learn is that so do the others.

      If you belief that, you don't deserve the right to vote, and possibly don't deserve the right to make decisions for yourself since having such a belief makes you clearly a complete fucking idiot.

      You don't have to believe Fox News ever. You don't have to agree with them or their stories. As with our right as Americans to free speech there is a responsibility of each citizen to not be a fucking idiot and blindly belief everything someone tells us, regardless of what tv channel, newspaper or retarded blog it comes from. Stop being such a douchebag and being so blinded by your political blinders for long enough to realize 'your guys' are feeding you a bunch of bullshit half stories most of the time as well, or if you don't want to do that, at least stop pretending to have a clue.

      The rest of us get tired of seeing the same retarded statement over and over again, years after the reason it came into being has been forgotten by the people who keep spewing it. It just makes it obvious you're a pretentious trendy asshole without a clue, I personally find it more rewarding if its not so easy for me to figure you out by a single line post.

    20. Re:Fox news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel proud. This might be your first baby step on the path to becoming a free thinking individual.

  8. stop them in less than 2 years next time by Dan667 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know I personally received several hundred calls from these guys. I had numerous people tell me they had received the same types of calls. The FTC can stop patting themselves on the back, the fact that it took this long is embarrassing.

    1. Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time by Erythros · · Score: 0

      I totally agree.....
      I was thinking the same thing as soon as I saw the /. headline.
      With the number of calls I had received over months time, and knowing friends and family had received the same calls again and again, it makes realize that the Do Not Call complaint form is WORTHLESS!!!!

    2. Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time by Asclepius99 · · Score: 1

      Do Not Call really only works with legitimate businesses. But I agree that two years to arrest con artists doing this volume of calling is ridiculous.

    3. Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time by meyekul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly! They should be ashamed that ANY scam of this nature still exists. I mean, by the very basic model of the system there has to be a link between the scammer and the scamee for money to flow, so why can't the authorities just follow the money to its destination? Its like a bank robber who leaves his calling card at the scene of every crime. Would this type of thing work door-to-door? No! Why should virtual scams and thievery be any more tolerated?

    4. Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I agree that two years to arrest con artists doing this volume of calling is ridiculous.

      Arrest? The FTC only sued them and only for the profits. These guys will be back doing it again in a year or two.

    5. Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this has just embarrassed the government beyond reason. We might as well have no telemarketing restrictions or FTC.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  9. And the new scam de jour.... by timpdx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Its funny, as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month, I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff. On my cell, on the do not call list. So it begins again.....

    1. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its funny, as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month, I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff. On my cell, on the do not call list. So it begins again.....

      That's no scammer, that's your local Democratic representative.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      That's no scammer, that's your local Democratic representative.

      You're contradicting yourself there.

    3. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its funny, as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month, I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff. On my cell, on the do not call list. So it begins again.....

      That's no scammer, that's your local Democratic representative.

      And what makes you think it's not both?

    4. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be that's not any ordinary scammer?

    5. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they send the black man asking for change, now these suspicious offers of "affordable health care"!

    6. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by osomoore · · Score: 1

      Its funny, as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month, I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff. On my cell, on the do not call list. So it begins again.....

      That's a scammer, that's your local Democratic representative.

      Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I keep getting robocalls in spanish. I speak french and japanese, but not spanish. Can anyone tell me what these are?

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    8. Re:And the new scam de jour.... by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      I got that one today, too. Dammit!

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
  10. I never got it... by Zakabog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never understood how these scams work, they hang up on you once you ask anything, but don't you need to know where to send your money? If you just give them credit card info won't they need an address for their merchant account or whatever credit card processing system they have? Why does it take so long to catch these people, isn't it possible to just follow the money to the scammers?

    1. Re:I never got it... by drfreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is typical of a con. You "made" them by asking questions. They are not looking for smart people. :)

    2. Re:I never got it... by dmomo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually led them on for quite a while by asking dumb naive questions. I was trying to go so far as to find out where to send the check. I think they wanted a credit card number. I did get a company name at one point, but it was something generic. It didn't come up when I later googled it. I write the name down but must have tossed the paper.

      I wasted a little of their time, and had fun doing it. Does that count for anything?

    3. Re:I never got it... by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you never tried asking them "So who do I make this check out to?".

      I got these calls on my cell phone as well. What always got me was how it was the 2nd notice, when I had yet to get a first one, and the one time I answered the phone they asked me about the make and model of my car. I totaled the last car registered to me in 2005. Nice job, guys!

    4. Re:I never got it... by religious+freak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've had an even stranger experience in the fifteen kabillion calls I've received from these douches (I work from home). I get the call, I press '9' to be connected to an operator, and then I am instantly disconnected. This happens over and over upon every call. EXTREMELY frustrating...

      If you're gonna scam people why the hell don't you connect the d*** call?

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    5. Re:I never got it... by bronney · · Score: 1

      Who is your daddy and what does he do?

    6. Re:I never got it... by dmomo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because you followed directions. They wanna screen out the people who are likely to read the fine print!

    7. Re:I never got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is really odd. I am assuming d*** is a censored damn, but if you're so concerned about damn, why did you not censor hell?

      I mean Jesus fucking Christ!

    8. Re:I never got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus fucking DOUCHE Christ!

    9. Re:I never got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You Americans amaze me - you let everyone see your Bush but totally freak out when a nipple is exposed.

    10. Re:I never got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      because its robodial.
      they have a few operators, but they call hundreds of lines at once.
      they never have enough operators(i wonder why, not enough demoralized crackheads locally?), so you get disconnected usually upon tryin to connect.

    11. Re:I never got it... by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure you never tried asking them "So who do I make this check out to?".

      ...the Car Assurance Support Helpline of course. Just the initials will do.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    12. Re:I never got it... by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      Shame there's no +1 Funny Troll moderation ;-)

    13. Re:I never got it... by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      Well honestly I didn't even know I wrote hell until you pointed it out.

      Sometimes I randomly choose to censor my profanity and sometimes I don't. Just depends on my mood I guess.

      KRUNK!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    14. Re:I never got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause they are already on the line with other suckers and even more suckers will be robocalled in a few secs, your call is pretty worthless, whether you are genuinely interested or not.

  11. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to pay for every incoming call even if they just leave a message and these assholes would call several times a day.

    Burn these fuckers at the stake!

  12. While waiting for the FTC to do anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. From TFA by plover · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Damian P. Kohlfeld, 35, of Valparaiso, Ind., is the owner of Network Foundations, which is based in Chicago. Kohlfeld allegedly supplied the technical know-how for the alleged telemarketing scheme employed by all three companies. The Arizona State University graduate has more than a decade of experience writing software and building computer networks. His latest hit, according to the FTC, was a "spoofing" device that tricked caller ID systems.

    Woo! Go Sun Devils!

    --
    John
    1. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damian P. Kohlfeld, 35, of Valparaiso, Ind., is the owner of Network Foundations, which is based in Chicago. Kohlfeld allegedly supplied the technical know-how for the alleged telemarketing scheme employed by all three companies. The Arizona State University graduate has more than a decade of experience writing software and building computer networks. His latest hit, according to the FTC, was a "spoofing" device that tricked caller ID systems.

      Woo! Go Sun Devils!

      It would be poetic justice if, as a result of this article, Mr. Kohlfeld started to recieve letters and calls from his school's alumni associate hitting him up for money.

  14. Busted only when they bothered someone "important" by foodnugget · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What really bugs me about all this is that despite what were probably thousands of reports to the gov't, nothing was done and nobody really brought it up in the media until they accidentally bothered NY senator Chuck Schumer. Had they not stumbled onto his number, one wonders if they would still be in business.

  15. My scathing email to the FTC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I happen to work, as a contractor, for a VERY high-level (think: one step from the POTUSA) office and I was receiving these calls on my gov issued cell phone. I wrote a nice letter to the FTC about 1.5 months ago. They never even got back to me and I left them my full address. Is there anybody out there?

    1. Re:My scathing email to the FTC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I happen to work, as a contractor, for a VERY high-level (think: one step from the POTUSA) office

      Cough... Bullshit... Cough...

    2. Re:My scathing email to the FTC... by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Why do you call BS? It's very possible. Speaking for myself, one of my neighbors is a Secret Service agent for the VP, and another neighbor is a CIA analyst. These people do exist, you know.

      To the GP: There are harsh penalties for spamming a military domain (harsher than spamming non-.mil); I'd think there would be similar penalties for unsolicited sales calls to government agencies. Instead of a complaint to the FTC, an email to your government client and/or the IT department running your govt-supplied phone might have been a better course of action.

  16. so many calls by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I have so many of these on my vonage voicemail. Any time I did press '1' it would just hang up, I guess they were too busy to bother scamming me.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  17. Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss? by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are all rather familiar with the notion of "cost of doing business" when it comes to fines associated with illegal and/or unlawful activities in business. Quite often, the fines and other punishment are so small and insignificant that it is not a deterrent but is instead factored into the cost of doing business.

    This warranty scam activity was very VERY obvious that it would be shut down at some point. The fact that it went on for as long as it did was pretty amazing all by itself. Who was responsible for the slow response on this? Further, the engineers of this scam made a LOT of money from this. When compared against the fines and other punishments so far, was there a net gain or loss for these perpetrators?

    My point here is that if there was a significant net gain, then the perpetrators won. It doesn't matter that they were shut down. That was a matter of time. It took long enough that they somehow managed to pull in a LOT of money. How much of it did they get to keep? Frankly, I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation. (Note "gross income" before expenses and payroll and the like.) And they need to extract this money directly from the perpetrators. If there are any legal prohibitions that will prevent the government from issuing such punitive measures, then you can see very clearly and plainly what is wrong with U.S. laws governing business. (It would be an effective license to commit fraud and be shielded from punishment.)

  18. These people should be killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs a trial? Let's kill them.

    1. Re:These people should be killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dailykos is that way. Feel free to help yourself to a couple goatse links on the way out.

  19. Knew it was a scam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was crazy, I received a couple of phone calls on my VoIP phone at around 3am Japan time telling me that my warranty was about to expire blah blah blah, I don't even live in the states right now since I'm stationed in Japan. Right away I knew the calls were bogus. I usually hung up on them but they called several other times, still at ungodly times of the night since we're about 15 hrs or so ahead of the US. I hope they catch every single one of the bastards...!

  20. Have fun with them! by squiggly12 · · Score: 0
    I love to mess with them.

    When they call, be very attentive to what they are saying. When they ask what type of vehicle and what not, just say 57 Chevy with oh about 500.000 miles. I can guarantee 6 out of 10 times you will get the automatic hang up.

    Try to be as insistent as possible before they hang up that you really, really need warranty. Listen to them stutter, lol.

    Yes, I'm an ass. My vehicle is a 1995 Chevy with 210k miles. PLEASE GIVE ME WARRANTY NAO! :)

  21. I love scammers..they're so much entertainment. by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had this one company rep call me about how I had won 12 free magazine subscriptions for free - yes, that's right! FREE!. Made some 10 minute spiel about how wonderful it all was. All I needed to do was send $12.95 for some processing fee and I'd get my free, yes FREE! magazines.

    I asked her, "If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $12.95?"

    To her credit, she replied, "Because they're free!" (Can't blame a girl for trying.)

    Soooo, I reiterated my question a few more times until she hung up on me.

    It feels good when I frustrate scammers at their own game. :P

    1. Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a (legit) marketing company tell me I was getting a free watch (for somehow making it through the first round of the [a?] drawing) and three free magazines, so she had me pick three of six or seven magazines. After I picked she mumbled something about how I just needed to subscribe to one of them to get the magazines.

      I refused, because I didn't really want them in the first place; I was then informed I would only qualify to get the free watch if I subscribed.

      I've never understood why these companies can get away with giving people things in exchange for money but still call the things "free". I guess if you don't actually lie (if the words themselves are true) it's legit?

      Somehow I'm not surprised I didn't win the second round of the drawing.

    2. Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Worse:

      "We'll send you your free USB powered Turnip Twaddler as soon as you say yes to the following:
      *generic disclaimer, obviously recorded, speeding up to quadruple billyourcompanyphone50permonth chipmunk mutterings about applicable states* Are you cool with that?"

      /eyes glazed over.

      "That was hard to hear, but it didn't sound like it matt... Hang on, did you say something about billing my company? I'm not authoriz"

      *click*

    3. Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $12.95?"

      They were free as in free speech, not as in free beer :-)

    4. Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the UK and I get regular calls from scammers in Florida telling me I've won a free holiday. My current ploy is to see how long I can keep them on the line with a combination of heavy breathing and confused grunting (Scooby Doo style). The current record is 163 seconds.

    5. Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      You should have asked if you could decline one of the free magazine subscriptions (a $12.95 value!) to pay for the $12.95 processing fee. "Er, well, it's a $12.95 value, but it only costs us $1.95."

  22. Seems easy to draw an evidence trail here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about an Android/iPhone app to report that the last call you received smelled seriously fishy? You could note down what it entailed, when enough keywords match enough other reports the FTC starts prodding the phone company.

    Another possibility would be a way to get a fake credit card number which would come back declined, but would also flag the account as possibly fraudulent. Might help with spam and phishing, as well as this kind of fraud.

  23. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by GGardner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to ftc.gov, violators of the do not call list can be fined up to $16k per call (has the ftc ever fined anyone this much? Anything?) TFA claims they made over a billion calls. I say we hit them up for 1 billion counts @ $16k per call.

  24. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is all the FOX news bashing?

  25. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by erroneus · · Score: 1

    See, that's one aspect of the "shield" built into the plan. They hired another company to do the calls. (More likely, created a company to do the calls.) The perps claimed not to know what the other company was doing. It would be interesting to know if this company existed long before the auto warranty company did.

  26. Incompetence led to their downfall? by GGardner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I don't understand is why I, and so many others, got so many calls. I must have received over 30. If these crooks were in business for two years, and made over a billion calls, they were clearly calling everyone they could reach in the US multiple times. Isn't there some point where they hit diminishing returns? TFA says their mantra was "hang up; next" (perl?), that is to not try to convert anyone who sounded remotely skeptical. But if they give up on the sale two second in, why call that same person back, again and again? Had they not called back people they rejected, I suspect that people would be nearly so upset with them, and the FTC wouldn't have gone after them.

    1. Re:Incompetence led to their downfall? by matria · · Score: 1

      For the same reason Jehovah's Witnesses will keep coming back. Next time they might get a different family member who will listen to them. Or maybe the original people have moved and someone else moved in.

    2. Re:Incompetence led to their downfall? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would make sense if they were calling the same number several months apart. Calling just hours apart, though, as happened to many people, does not fit that theory.

    3. Re:Incompetence led to their downfall? by Thomasje · · Score: 1

      It does, actually. Assuming the number you're calling is a domestic land line, and you're calling during evening hours, chances are good that if you call an hour later, another member of the household will pick up.

    4. Re:Incompetence led to their downfall? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      But that's not what most people are (were) seeing.

      I have read several accounts where the person receiving the call got through to a human and specifically either a) informed the company it was a cell phone and therefore illegal to cold-call, or b) asked the company to remove the number from their list. In either of these cases, federal law requires the calling company to stop calling the customer; calling back three to five times in the next twelve hours does not meet that criteria.

    5. Re:Incompetence led to their downfall? by GGardner · · Score: 1

      1) The JW only have one "product", and can't switch to selling another one.
      2) The JW have only stopped by my house once in the last three years, not 30+ times.

  27. get a clue by shentino · · Score: 1

    What immediately sets off the bullshit alarm with these guys is that they call me even though I DO NOT HAVE A FRIGGIN CAR!!!

    Last time I talked to them I told them

    "stop calling me or I'm calling the FTC"

    1. Re:get a clue by mmalove · · Score: 1

      What we learn from this I think is that although the DO NOT CALL registry is a nice gesture, it's completely lacking in teeth. It should not take two years to catch up to these guys, not in an age where we pretty much get to put up with the NSA spying on anyone they want. An 11,000 dollar fine is not a deterent to a group that believes they are going to take the money and flee the country or otherwise evade prosecution.

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
    2. Re:get a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should not take two years to catch up to these guys,....

      It should not take two minutes. Every fucking call has to be billed to someone. Telco knows that address. Unshackle the dogs at their front door and jail their asses immediately for contempt until they reveal who pays them. Rinse. Repeat.

  28. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, if you turn over enough rocks (3 billion to be approximate), you are bound to stir up some bottom crawlers.

    And that's how Chuck Schumer got involved.

  29. My Mother the Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they asked me the make and model of my car, I said I had a 1928 Porter, which, despite being a fictional car custom built from parts by Barris Kustom Industries, they were willing to extend its warranty!

  30. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by DavidD_CA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yup. I even reported a handful of calls to the FTC (using their website) just a few weeks before Chuck Schumer declared war on these guys.

    I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information". I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said. But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.

    This should be considered a major FAIL for the FTC and the Do Not Call list. Which is a shame, too, because the DNC has been a great success with this exception.

    It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.

    I hope that after these criminals are tried, a second investigation starts to find out why the FTC had their head up their ass.

    --
    -David
  31. I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always take my car in for service at the dealership. I just trade for a new car when the mechanics there tell me it's time to replace the blinker fluid. The mechanics let me in on the auto industry secret that once that happens, it's only a matter of time before everything starts breaking down. It's saved me a lotta hassle. Sure, it's more expensive, but this is one of those instances where you get what you pay for.

    1. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      I'll bite... WTF? blinker fluid?? Man, I hope you're trolling! :P

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    2. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Sulphur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My favorite was the guy who said I needed wiper blades replaced to go with the brakes dragging. When Czars are outlawed, only outlaws will have Czars.

    3. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... when the mechanics there tell me it's time to replace the blinker fluid

      What does your car use for blinkers? Fireflies?

    4. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like how Jiffy Lube wanted to sell me $10 wal-mart wiper blades for $40.

    5. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Did you ever notice the "blinker fluid" seemed to need replacing just when their new car sales were falling below target?

      It's only a matter of time from *right now* that everything starts breaking down on your car, whether you have had your "blinker fluid" replaced or not.

    6. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by ijustam · · Score: 2, Funny

      http://kalecoauto.com/ bringing you fine products such as blinker fluid, elbow grease, and engine oil bypass kit :D

    7. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly! You can replace the blinker fluids yourself and avoid all problems associated with it! Few people know about it so it won't be in the first results from google. Keep searching.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    8. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Frogbert · · Score: 0, Troll

      Let me guess, you're typing that on a Mac?

    9. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by muttsnutman · · Score: 1

      In the good old days, I just used to change my car when the ashtray was full, but now nobody is smoking. Is the filling rate the same for cigarette butts versus gum wrappers and if not does anyone know the conversion factor? I mean I really don't want my warranty to expire...

    10. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried using those third-party blinker fluid replacement kits, but they wouldn't work in my HP printer.

    11. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by cyphergirl · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like how Jiffy Lube wanted to replace my automatic transmission fluid and showed me a dirty round air filter that needed to be replaced. I have a Subaru with a manual transmission and a square air filter (which was brand new at the time, because I had just replaced it myself the previous weekend). The only reason I took it there was because I didn't want the hassle of hauling used motor oil to the recycling center. I still take it there, but they don't even try to sell me wiper blades anymore, because if they even think about it, I tell everyone in the waiting room about the transmission fluid and air filter. Only had to do that once before they got the message.

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    12. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by greed · · Score: 1

      It's a wild-goose-chase thing for the kid mechanic who's new to the shop. (There's a similar military tradition, too.) When you're done, you can get a round tuit.

      I've got a CB radio on my motorcycle, for group rides, but before I got an audio set-up for my helmet speakers, I'd have it on channel 19 when I was going to or from a group event.

      Funniest thing I ever heard on the CB was one trucker saying to another, "Westbound flatbed... you're wasting blinker fluid." He'd left his blinker on.

      And yes, that means there wasn't much funny on the CB. Mostly about bears and discos, even bears at a disco, and strange things like that. (Though "do not get on I290 it's blocked at the Thruway and backed up all the way to 990" was really nice to know.)

    13. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I did let Jiffy Lube replace my air filters once... but it had been two years and I already knew they were quite clogged. I'm glad I did, too; my A/C started working again as a result, just in time for the summer :)

      But I think what we should learn from our two experiences is "know your car". If you know what your car needs you won't get ripped off by people trying to sell you on extra things.

      I do like the rock-chip-repair guys that hang out in the Jiffy Lube lines (at least they do in Utah). They put it through your insurance company, and once the guy just did it for free for me because I had already gotten four or five rock chips repaired by him relatively recently. Yay for legitimate businessmen! If only there were more of them in the world...

    14. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh. You were getting ripped off! Everybody knows blinker fluid is cheap to replace. And there are plenty of other parts with reasonable replacement costs, such as Kuhneutson valves, muffler bearings, and piston springs. You don't have to pay the dealer prices.

    15. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work for my car, it's a VW - it needs metric blinker fluid, which, of course, is really effing expensive! :(

    16. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      In the Boy Scouts, we used to send the new kids on a quest to find a left-handed smokeshifter.

    17. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by rgviza · · Score: 1

      my favorite is the high intensity road flares.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    18. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, my '89 Merkur has a rear window cleaner fluid reservoir with a lightbulb and starburst shape on the cap. I like to ask mechanics if they can top off my blinker fluid... weeds out the humorless ones.

        On-topic, these guys called into our call center ruthlessly and relentlessly. We have several regular and disaster-recovery lines (we're high-availability support for radio automation), and they would walk through them all. Over the past several months, we have taken THOUSANDS of these calls. Our SOP (after a month or two) was to push 1, get a human, then tell them that they were illegally utilizing a paid service and we would cheerfully sue them. That's assuming we would actually get to talk to a human, and also assuming the tech that took the call remembered what to say to them. We would get no calls on that specific external number for about two weeks. Anything else we would say or do would get no results at all; they would just keep calling. Our telco did nothing about it, but of course their hands are tied by federal regulations.

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    19. Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite... WTF? blinker fluid?? Man, I hope you're trolling! :P

      No troll -- the blinker fluid reservoir is just forward of the rearmost muffler bearing.

      At least on pre-2007 cars.

  32. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

    I'll bet good money that it wasn't one company they hired(created) to make the calls. It was one company, then a couple months later a new one, then a couple months later a new one. That way the FCC would always be investigating a closed/bankrupt/nonexistent company, while a brand new one was starting up doing the same thing, with the same people, in a boiler room a few blocks away from the previous one.

  33. So helpful! by seebs · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, this means no money for the people who got the illegal calls, even though they owe us all probably $1,500 a pop.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:So helpful! by wolphman · · Score: 1

      yeah what about all those cell phone minutes they wasted?
      where does the money from an FTC fine end up anyway?

  34. what is NAO? by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 1

    what is NAO?

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
    1. Re:what is NAO? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      its like lawl = LOL . Nao = phonetically spoken Now

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:what is NAO? by jtev · · Score: 1

      It's Now, in Lolspeak. You'd better watch out or ceiling cat will smite you for your lack of understanding of the lulz.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    3. Re:what is NAO? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      or basement cat might come up and eat his toes...

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  35. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sent in a report about this scam several weeks before you sent yours in. They sent me a letter saying "Thanks for your information. We have received many other complaints and we are currently investigating the matter." I provided caller ID information (bogus though it was) and a URL of a website I found where people had been looking in to the same number. I also referenced a few similar calls my sister-in-law had received.

    So... your report probably was incomplete :P

  36. For the record, I... by dosh8er · · Score: 1

    answered the phone once after getting this call ... yeah, guy said i had a 95... sucker... too bad i have a 94... he hung up on me promptly ("have a nice day." I think he said). if we could find the person who's texting me by the name of "candy", i'd be a happy man...

    --
    This useless space for sale, inquire at front desk.
  37. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I even sent in their ANI from our company phone records and still got the incomplete form letter.

  38. The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real problem here is the phone companies. I tried reporting this issue to AT&T a few times, and found them to be singularly disinterested. They wouldn't even tell me who kept calling my cell phone over and over, trying to sell me the same thing over and over. The scammers were clearly robo calling as they didn't know *who* they were calling. I received from a few to several of these calls each week for several months.

    Scams like this undoubtedly generate hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of dollars a year in revenue from long distance and 800 number services, which probably include helping the scam artists hide their contact information from their victims. The phone companies had no interest at all in this problem, even when clearly thousands of legitimate customers complained about it. Not only were they making money from the scammers annoying calls, but the phone company also offered me the chance to pay an additional monthly fee to stop solicitation calls. When I asked point blank, they admitted that the service would not stop the robotic calls about which I'd called to complain. In addition to that, the phone companies were charging air time to victims, when the robotic caller dialed cell phones (like mine).

    The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam, and should be jointly prosecuted with the scammers.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Never attribute to malice what could more easily be attributed to stupidity."

      The phone techs you talk to when you call AT&T have access to a lot of tools and information you may not have access to, but ultimately, they are limited to handling the kinds of issues they have been trained to handle. Getting new material to these techs takes a long time and a lot of work. Chances are, they didn't help you because they don't know how to respond.

      The revenue these slammers generate is a drop in the bucket compared to legitimate AT&T business. Your average scammer's wet dream would be to pull in the kind of money that a single dial up provider spends on their monthly phone bill.

    2. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by hvm2hvm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Never attribute to malice what could more easily be attributed to stupidity."

      I'd go for "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice" since if they get so many complaints but still don't know how to handle them, they obviously don't care enough about customers to try to understand what's going on.

      Allow me a car analogy :P: if you go in the wrong gear in a parking lot and run over someone (because you went in the wrong way) you might say it's not your fault, you're just not that good at thinking. But if you do that 10 times then you may be retarded but you are also not trying to better your driving such that you won't run over people. At that point we're talking about malice.

      --
      ics
    3. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam, and should be jointly prosecuted with the scammers.

      too bad you can't mod someone higher than a 5! parent is right on!

    4. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by necro81 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried reporting this issue to AT&T a few times, and found them to be singularly disinterested.

      Or were they cingularly disinterested?

    5. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by plague3106 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The phone techs you talk to when you call AT&T have access to a lot of tools and information you may not have access to, but ultimately, they are limited to handling the kinds of issues they have been trained to handle. Getting new material to these techs takes a long time and a lot of work. Chances are, they didn't help you because they don't know how to respond.

      And this is totally irrlevent. You call AT&T about a problem, and you should expect them to do something. Saying "oh the poor tech doesn't know anything" is horseshit. He's still a part of AT&T, and by making excuses for the poor tech you're making excuses for AT&T.

    6. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm I find it odd that they sere singularly disinterested, didn't they change their name from cingular a while back?

    7. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Hi, your car analogy warranty has expired. Would you like to renew it?"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    8. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by rxan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The phone techs you talk to when you call AT&T have access to a lot of tools and information you may not have access to, but ultimately, they are limited to handling the kinds of issues they have been trained to handle. Getting new material to these techs takes a long time and a lot of work. Chances are, they didn't help you because they don't know how to respond.

      I worked in a Bell Canada call center before, and from what you're saying, it sounds like you've worked in some sort of call center in your life. While I sympathize with employees, it in no way makes it right.

      The customer service is organized in a non-customer-service way these days -- anything to get them off of the phone. Calls can only last an average of 4 minutes. Any longer than that and you get penalized in some way (unnecessary coaching, failing to get that new position or a raise). The customers have no control over it because every single company does it the same way, through outsourcing.

      I know I'm opening up a new can of worms here, but if the customer service was better then they would have been able to help.

    9. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wouldn't even tell me who kept calling my cell phone over and over

      In most cases, you only have legal access to inbound call records with a subpoena or court order. Your phone carrier is not usually allowed to give you records of who calls you, and the records they can disclose will match the delivered caller ID, and not the actual ANI.

      Current phone switch technology will, in pretty much all cases, only block calls based on the delivered caller ID data, not on the actual ANI. In addition, malformed CID data, such as completely blank data (not zeroes, just empty) or out-of-length data will also slide past call blocking systems. There are also ways to spoof the CID that will make those calls slide by as if they were an emergency services, etc.

      The phone companies had no interest at all in this problem, even when clearly thousands of legitimate customers complained about it.

      It is not the legal duty, or requirement, for a phone carrier to prevent, report, or take any action against a phone scammer. In fact, in most cases they are flat out not allowed to do anything. Any such action has to be taken by a government agency like the FCC, FTC, Better Business Bureau, etc.
      And despite not liking HOW they were using the service, as long as they were paying their phone bill they were just as legitimate as any other customer.

      The scammers were clearly robo calling as they didn't know *who* they were calling.

      There is nothing illegal about using robo-calling. There are some restrictions & limits on its use, but its not illegal and most telemarketing firms use them.

      maybe millions of dollars a year in revenue from long distance and 800 number services, which probably include helping the scam artists hide their contact information from their victims

      As I originally mentioned, your phone company has its hands tied legally when it comes to giving out information about other people's phone calls. You may feel that since it was your phone that received the call you have a right to the information, but you don't... because you don't have right to the information about the other guy's phone, beyond what they chose to deliver over the caller ID. If you want to know more go to fcc.gov and look up the rules on disclosure of CPNI (customer proprietary network information) which will tell you why they aren't able to give that info out even if they provide the phone service to whoever is doing the calls.

      In addition to that, the phone companies were charging air time to victims, when the robotic caller dialed cell phones (like mine).

      Get a lawyer, and file civil suit against the people who called you for damages. The cell company is required to connect all calls which they receive, unless you have that call specifically blocked. In this case, see my point about CID spoofing.

      The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam,

      So what you're saying is that the phone company should be held responsible for the content of all the calls made on its system? Really? Well, besides it being outright illegal to monitor the content of your calls, it's not their responsibility to investigate reports of crime since they aren't law enforcement. Should they also be held responsible for prank calls to 911? How about the lies that a cheating husband tells? It's not like someone called the phone people and said "Ya, we want to run a big scam, you guys want in on it?".

      Seriously, place the blame where it lies. If you advocate prosecuting the phone company for what the scammers did, then by the same token you should also advocate prosecuting your ISP any time someone uses their service to spam, hack, or do anything else illegal or potentially immoral.

    10. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      A few years back Fed Ex was in a similar position. They made a lot of money picking up checks and delivering nonsense objects for scam phone sales companies. The feds threatened to prosecute Fed Ex for conspiracy as thousands upon thousands of daily orders of this nature boosted their sales considerably. After that Fed Ex became more concerned when customers complained. The under current of all of this is that scam phone artists avoid using the US Mail as the postal authorities and federal prosecution are very effective if the mails are used for fraud.
                    The general point being that these phone scams always cross state lines and that gives the feds the ability to jump in if people complain to their senators and representatives as well as law enforcement. By the way scam companies usually avoid calling within their own state as then local police could easily get involved. The big snag being that local politics involves turning a blind eye as money and jobs are brought into the local community by stealing from people in other states. It is also not so rare for local cops to be paid off by phone sales companies.
                      Frankly I have little respect for the sales staff who steal so little. If they really want to steal they should at least be good at it. It's funny how out of work folks will quickly train to sell on the phone for $10. per hour and work their tails off for nothing. Maybe one in one hundred has the ability to really become a grifter.

    11. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I worked for Verizon 10 and a half years fielding all kinds of calls about stuff like this, general repair problems, service order issues and etc. I can tell you first hand that there is absolutely nothing the representative you get on the phone can do about any of this. I even put in a few repair tickets to try to get help from the Central Office tech or a field tech, but there isn't much they can do, either. Congress is finally considering making caller ID spoofing illegal. However, the way the phone system is designed means that robocalls are one of the things that scammers can do to game the system - even if caller ID spoofing were not possible. The system is set up to allow anyone to call anyone else for any purpose - thus the "common carrier" statutes that everyone on /. likes to talk about and accuse the ISP's of breaking.

      There is simply no way of communicating the fact that the rep is receiving lots of complaints about scammers to anyone that can do anything (the FCC and FTC). The reps are not allowed the time to lodge complaints with those two organizations on your behalf - even when the rep has Internet access to those organizations' web sites. So, if you want to lodge complaints about a scammer, you need to do it with the FCC and FTC, because the phone companies and their reps cannot stop the calls themselves or they break the common carrier statutes.

      Generally, the reps have 4 minutes (as a monthly average) to interact with you over the phone. If they exceed this monthly average, then they are disciplined. At Verizon, they generally have only 30 seconds of "work time" (as a monthly average), which is the time they spend doing something after hanging up with you and before becoming available for their next call. It is very easy to exceed these averages and the reps have to work very hard to stay under those averages on every call. If the rep gets too interested in providing actual customer service, they will exceed those averages very quickly and be terminated if they continue to provide actual customer service. So, perhaps you can now understand why they try to get you off the phone so quickly. They are trying to do the best job they can according to the parameters that those who sign their paychecks have defined.

    12. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I tried reporting this issue to AT&T a few times, and found them to be cingularly disinterested.

      Fixed that for you.

    13. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that phone companies are just supplying a service to someone. A large company might have a contract with a phone company as well. The phone company can't terminate service without proof of wrong doing. For this an investigation would have to happen and court orders to the provided to the phone company.

      On a second note, if you're going to blame phone companies then you should also blame electric companies for supplying electric for the auto-dialer. Would they not be just as guilty for supplying a service to these scammers allowing them to run their crap?

    14. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Never attribute to malice what could more easily be attributed to stupidity."

      That is what the malicious want you to think.

  39. Call them back if you like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Network Foundations LLC. 33 North LaSalle, Suite 2110 Chicago, IL 60602 Tel: (312) 235-2400 Fax: (312) 276-8780 Email: sales@networkfoundations.com Florida Profit Corporation VOICE TOUCH, INC. Filing Information Document Number P07000116212 FEI/EIN Number 261281522 Date Filed 10/23/2007 State FL Status ACTIVE Effective Date 10/23/2007 Principal Address 22 PROMENADE AT LION'S PAW DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US Mailing Address 22 PROMENADE AT LION'S PAW DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US M Dunne 1209 Sunland Rd Daytona Beach, FL 32114 (386) 253-7131 Cant really confirm the last number.

    1. Re:Call them back if you like by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      I have a real urge to call them to let them know their warranty is about to expire...

  40. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say we hit them up for 1 billion counts @ $16k per call.

    Judging by your /. number, you've been around long enough to know that insanely-high statutory fines are only valid when the RIAA is the plaintiff.

    Otherwise they're just for show.

  41. Amazing that Chuck Schumer was the only one by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These people robo dialed the hell out of the 202 area code, starting well over a year ago, and not ending until they were busted. I sat in rooms in DC where I'd get this call, and a few minutes later someone else in the room got it, more than once. There were, undoubtedly, many influential federal government employees, Congresspersons, Senators, an White House staffers also victimized by these calls to their cell phones, both government and private. Why did it take this long to put a stop to this? The world may never know.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Amazing that Chuck Schumer was the only one by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      And yet I never got one of these calls on my cell, my landline, or my work phone (all 202).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Amazing that Chuck Schumer was the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why did it take this long to put a stop to this?

      It required effort. Mystery solved.

  42. "The FTC says they cleared $10M" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Seriously: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

    It was *so* obviously a scam - who on earth would give them a single penny? They knew nothing whatsoever about the car whose warranty allegedly expired, and they hung up as soon as you asked them a single question about anything at all. Anything I ever said to them got me disconnected.

    How in the name of all that is holy did they collect a cent from anyone, if anything you say or ask makes them hang up?

  43. Public Execution by n3v · · Score: 1

    Why did we ever get rid of those anyways??

  44. Hang 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to ever put a stop to sub-human scum like these people are public executions. Oh, and make sure the drop isn't more than a few inches, wouldn't want the rope to break their neck and let them off easy. Pure scum.

  45. Scrap metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep trying to tell you! I don't want to extend the warranty on my 1984 Ford Tempo!

  46. Re:They call, they call, they call by hvm2hvm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had to rescan his post 3 times before I found the missing "y"s, they didn't bother me at all when reading it... Good for you for noticing them but who the hell cares he missed them?

    --
    ics
  47. Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These bastards called me on my cell while I was in Montenegro! It probably cost me $12 just to hang up on them immediately! I am sooooo psyched that they are busted!

  48. Mind what you wish for by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam, and should be jointly prosecuted with the scammers.

    No. See "Common Carrier". You really don't want the phone companies to be able to refuse service to anybody...

    The real problem is the government's indifference — took millions of complaints over years for them to enforce the law...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Mind what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "You really don't want the phone companies to be able to refuse service to anybody... "

      I disagree. They should be, and are, able to refuse service to consistent abusers of the phone system itself. It's the law that companies making automated calls like this must have a legitimate phone number provided for caller ID. It's the law that they take you off their phone list if you request it. It's the law that they abide by the do-not-call list.

      They were breaking the law and abusing the phone system from the moment they engaged their robocallers without such requirements being met, which means AT&T (or whoever) had every right to disconnect them upon doing due diligence to investigate the complaints of their customers, or at least threaten to do so if the company making the calls didn't clean up their act.

      Companies that do this kind of business must be flagrantly obvious to a company like AT&T -- there are *millions* of outgoing calls, and the automated nature of them would be easy to detect from the logs. As far as I'm concerned, any company that signs up to do that kind of business should receive special scrutiny. Maybe they should be required to be licensed before they can attach their robocall equipment to the lines and start the calling. Don't follow the rules? You're service is suspended.

    2. Re:Mind what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the sig is lame but it's just a replay of what was seen during the Bush years. Which was the same thing but with Clinton and Bush.

      Likely the poster has a job and is doing just fine. Rather in typical wingnut fashon is just trying to stir up some shit.

    3. Re:Mind what you wish for by Loosifur · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I wouldn't think that you would still be responsible for providing service if the service was used in the commission of a crime, in this case fraud.

      Not to compare apples to boomerangs here, but all I could think of while reading this was P2P file sharing, ISPs and the RIAA/MPAA.

      --
      This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
    4. Re:Mind what you wish for by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Informative

      The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam, and should be jointly prosecuted with the scammers.

      No. See "Common Carrier". You really don't want the phone companies to be able to refuse service to anybody...

      Depending on which part of the OP you're disagreeing with, I'd say you're right or wrong.

      Common carrier status does probably give them legal cover for what they're facilitating.

      But as far as being complicit, there is little doubt.

    5. Re:Mind what you wish for by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree. They should be, and are, able to refuse service to consistent abusers of the phone system itself.

      The problem is the slippery slope. While it's a tired analogy, in this case, it's completely apt... if they can refuse service to consistent abusers of the phone system, how do they define consistent abusers? And what happens when they start making exceptions to that definition, and broadening the rules?

      For a utility like the phone service, it makes more sense that they shouldn't be allowed to refuse service to anybody.

      This particular case is further complicated because, from conversations with my own telephone company about it, they were using a PBX with spoofed information. They kept finding new ways to connect to the phone network, because people kept finding ways to block them.

      It's also worth pointing out that they had expanded their operations into Canada, and had been harrassing Canadians since about February of this year. It's possible that the reason they were caught was because they started breaking international law and treaties that the US has signed with its allies, and not because the US government got millions of complaints about them over several years.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    6. Re:Mind what you wish for by Nerdposeur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You really don't want the phone companies to be able to refuse service to anybody...

      I seem to recall reading in my Terms of Service that if I were to use my infinite mobile-to-mobile minutes to set up a long-distance baby monitor, they would terminate my service. Only "normal conversation" (or some such term) is allowed.

      If they can terminate service in their own interests, they should be able to do it in the interest of their customers.

    7. Re:Mind what you wish for by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do not want the telcos in the business of enforcing the law.
      I do not want the telcos thinking they need to 'evalutate' my use of their service.
      I do not want the telcos spying on me for the government.
      I do not want the telcos in any more of a position of power than they already have.

      We have someone who is in charge of enforcing the law.

      What I want is for those people to step up to the plate more often (and to be allowed to, since more often then not it's a problem with resources on their side that prevents more of this being caught).

    8. Re:Mind what you wish for by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But as far as being complicit, there is little doubt.

      Here are the questions for you with the increasing difficulty levels. The correct answer to all three is "no":

      1. Would you be blaming mass-transit for repeatedly bringing hooligans to your neighborhood?
      2. Would you hold a bus-company responsible for carrying protesters to an illegal protest — despite it being obvious, what they are up to?
      3. Would you hold gun-dealers responsible for the misuse of their wares?
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:Mind what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I know about Obama is that Bush screwed everything up, and Obama is taking the blame from ignorant republicans. (Kind of like Clinton did after Bush #1 screwed everything up. And then Clinton fixed it.)

    10. Re:Mind what you wish for by aquabat · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I know about Obama, is that I had a job, when Bush was President.

      Dick Cheney, is that you?

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    11. Re:Mind what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the first two seem to be a "serve everyone" sort of service. The third one, at least in the US, requires that the dealer perform some due diligence prior to making the sale. Granted that's not a catch-all, but I would certainly hold a gun-dealer responsible if they had sold a gun to a known felon who would've been caught by the rudimentary background checks.

    12. Re:Mind what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See: The Presidents Analyst!

    13. Re:Mind what you wish for by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      I hear you could get service like that, as recent as the 1980s. Too bad.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    14. Re:Mind what you wish for by sjdude · · Score: 1

      You really don't want the phone companies to be able to refuse service to anybody...

      You're right, not to anybody. But corporations are not people. Corporations do not deserve to be treated as if they have the rights of human beings because they are merely legal entities. When society finally gets this right, a lot of other screwed up things will be fixed, too. Just saying...

  49. Withheld by Macrat · · Score: 1

    And now the number withheld calls begin... Mostly calling at 2:00AM.

    1. Re:Withheld by Blue_Wombat · · Score: 1

      What I would quite like is a phone or phone service where calls from a "withheld" number don't go through to me and the phone simply doesn't ring(or to voicemail). That would deal to a lot of these.

    2. Re:Withheld by green1 · · Score: 1

      the phone company does sell that service, all calls from a blocked number are sent to a prompt where the caller has the choice of giving up, or pressing a number to reveal their phone number.... it does cost extra though...

    3. Re:Withheld by Blue_Wombat · · Score: 1

      Don't think you can get thaqt in this country. It ought, however, to design a phone that does this. If a call has a number revealed then the phone rings and goes to voicemail etc as normal. If the number is blocked then the phone just disconnects the call and doesn't ring at all. Or perhaps plays a short "I'm sorry, this phone does not accept calls from blocked numbers, goodbye" message before hanging up. Should not be that hard to do at the phone end.

    4. Re:Withheld by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Most any cell phone that costs more than $0 can do that. The Sanyo in my pocket (which I don't recommend to anyone because it's otherwise a POS) is set up to do that right now, in fact, and cost me about $25...

    5. Re:Withheld by green1 · · Score: 1

      my phone has the option to set specific ring tones for specific callers.
      blocked callers get the "silent" ring tone.

  50. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

    I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information". I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said. But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.

    They're shitting you. I didn't have valid caller id from their call. I'm not sure how I could have identified the voice I ended up talking to. Gee, it sounds female, that eliminates 50% ...

    The police wouldn't followup when an eyewitness had 6 of 7 digits of the license of the driver who hit & runned me and totaled my first new car. Make/model/location out of 10 possible vehicles should mean something, right?

  51. Better than Do Not Call List by Ada_Rules · · Score: 1
    Some of these places clearly do not respect a do not call list policy as they call even when you are on the national list and/or call back even after repeated requests to go on their own do not call list.

    However, they do appear to maintain a crazy list. Drag the call out. Speak slowly and say lots of things that don't make sense. You get to have a little fun and and up on their do not call list...Well, that or the democrats elect you speaker of the house. Either way you win.

    --
    --- Liberty in our Lifetime
  52. Get them to pay you? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    "Yes, I have a car like that, and unfortunately it spontaneously combusted/disintegrated/got eaten by rust ten minutes ago. I'd like to make use of my warranty (you just said that it _was about to_ expire, right, so I still have it right now)?"

  53. This wouldn't have taken so long to crack... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't for the asinine toll-free registration process here. Being as toll-free numbers are registered through "Responsible Organizations (RespOrgs)" - which is an oxymoron to be kind - rather than anything resembling a centralized registry, it is insanely difficult to find out who is actually behind a given toll-free number. RespOrgs have no obligation - indeed they often say they are not allowed - to disclose even a company name or mailing address behind a toll-free number. And with the absurd number of RespOrgs for the toll-free system, by the time someone is able to file a complaint with a RespOrg regarding a toll-free number the company has already changed numbers and RespOrgs (at which point the first RespOrg might not even have the data for the first number anymore).

    Why on earth this is acceptable - especially when traditional numbers are registered and traceable - is beyond me.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  54. Anybody ever press #2 at the menu? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    These guys called me several times. First couple of times I hung up on them.

    Then I told an operator to never call me back, and she said she'd put me on the do not call list.

    Then another guy called, I demanded "What's the name of your company?" immediately, and he said he'd put me on the do not call list and hung up.

    Finally, I listened to the idiotic robo-message in it's entirety, and at the end it said press #2 to be removed from our calling list. So I did.

    I haven't gotten a call from them since.

    It seems their telemarketers are penalized for putting people on the do-not-call list, because they never did. Once I told the auto-dialer to do so, I never got a call back.

    Does anyone else have a similar experience?

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  55. Hmmmm... by Bluesman · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to compile a list of these companies, their owners, and their owners' phone numbers. There are a few things I'd like to try to sell to Christopher Cowart, and I'm sure I'm not alone.

    "Good morning, Mr. Cowart. This morning I have a beautiful jogging stroller for sale that has fallen into disuse since my children have gotten older. No? Ok, talk to you this afternoon!"

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  56. Their Punishment Should Be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.PeopleAreRude.com

  57. Re:Anybody ever press #2 at the menu? by Franio · · Score: 1

    no, I pressed #2 many times and kept getting calls.

  58. Re:I get... the magic phrase by splatter · · Score: 1

    two quick things.

    The other reply is good advice to reduce junk mail and such I have been on it for a while and I can say it helps. Unfortionatly companies that have prior business with you will still sell your info so your treating the symptom not the cause.

    Having been closer then I wish to admit to a group of spamming a-holes for my first job out of college "think senior citizen groups" I learned the magic phrase.

    "Do not rent, sell, or trade any of this information, & please put on your do not mail list"

    This tells them in clear terms they can't weasle out of that you don't want your info sold or traded, and you don't want junk mail catalogs. They trade, rent, and sell your name like a commodity, with competitors lists for more names so don't forget this part!!

    I have also had people recommend and tried although I haven't caught anyone yet, to change your middle initial to something odd as if you had a typo. That way if they do sell your info you will know who the offending party is. FYI the bad guys do this (seed their list) to make sure when they rent or sell your info the list only gets used once.

    You can also contact the post office and let them know you don't want any 3'rd class mail.

    Get your name on the Do Not Call Registry, the Opt out List, and the DMA do not mail list. Inform all the companies you do existing business with your wishes by writing the magic phrase or all your mail correspondence or checks for a few times. This with all for about 6 months and you will notice the difference. Here are links for the Google impaired.

    https://www.donotcall.gov/
    http://opt-out.cdt.org/online/
    http://www.thedma.org/

    Dale (K.O.T.H.) was right in some ways and I always get a laugh at that episode... remember people....DON'T FEED THE BEAST!!

    DP

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  59. Typical of Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is typical government work when conflation is involved. Government is just not established to be involved with the private sector. See bailouts, government healthcare, Do Not Call Lists, digital transition mandate... the list goes on. Anything the government touches in the private sector will wither and die a fabulous death, guaranteed. (Take note how the FTC did nothing, as it took a Schumer's personal vendetta to get anything done.)

  60. Not quite by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real problem is the government's indifference — took millions of complaints over years for them to enforce the law...

    Millions of complaints had nothing to do with it. IIRC, Senator Schumer got one of there calls and the rest is history.

    Note to telemarketer: scrub congressmen from phone list.

    1. Re:Not quite by fataugie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard (I live in NY) that they got his unpublished personal cell phone number....That was what did it.

      I've been getting these assholes on my cell, but not at home phone.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    2. Re:Not quite by harl · · Score: 2, Informative

      They didn't get anything. By all accounts they were not operating from a list instead were simply dialing all possible numbers. Lists cost money and if you war dial you call all the no-call and unlisted numbers.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    3. Re:Not quite by ThinkTwicePostOnce · · Score: 1

      What's his number? I'll put it into my "select call forwarding" so when a repeating scammer calls back, his office can handle it.

      Just helping.

      --
      Hide all sigs: Click HELP+Prefs (top), VIEWING (last on right), DISABLE SIGS (3rd on left) and SAVE (hidden at bottom).
    4. Re:Not quite by fataugie · · Score: 1

      When I said got...I meant hit his number while dialing, not working off a list and targeting it.

      Poor grammar on my part.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    5. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got now means called? *scribbles notes* *does math* At this rate we will replace all verbs with got by 2013.

    6. Re:Not quite by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      As in, "I got a wrong number yesterday".

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    7. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got that right!

  61. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, reporting these guys is usually useless. They spoof the caller ID info (this is where the phone companies should be atomic dope slapped) and the associates, if you get one, are well trained in not telling you anything that would be useful on a report. Full name? Nope. Company name? Nope. Address? Hell no. Return number? Nope.

    In reality, if they were taking it seriously all the FTC would need is your phone number, the time of the call, and your provider. Then they could get records from the provider (ie. AT&T) and know where the call came from, who it's registered to, and so on. The phone companies make damn sure to have that info, because otherwise they couldn't get paid.

    Which, of course, is why the FTC were able to move so fast once Senatorman got called.

  62. Self Help Script..... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Feel free to embellish on this script when you have a little time to play with their minds. Most of the dialog is paraphrased.

    Caller: Hello, Mr. _______. Our records show your auto warranty is soon to expire.
    You: I wasn't aware of that.
    Caller: Would you like to renew your warranty now?
    You: I suppose I should if it's going to expire soon. What do you need, the VIN number?
    Caller: Yes sir.
    You: Hold on. The car is in the garage. I need to go there.
    Caller: OK sir.
    (wait about one or two minutes, or until they wonder where you are)
    You: OK, I got my shoes on, now I can go out to the garage. It's a detached garage.
    Caller: Great, sir.
    (wait another one or two minutes, or until they get concerned again)
    Caller: Sir?
    You: Hold on, I'm unlocking the door to the garage now.
    (Wait 15 to 30 seconds. Idle chat with them to keep them on the line)
    You: Shoot. This is the shed key. It looks the same as the garage key. I always get them mixed up. Let me go get the garage key. I really want this warranty.
    Caller: Very well, sir.
    (Wait one to three minutes. Idle chat to keep on the line. Maybe pretend to talk about issues with your lawn, etc. as you "walk back" to get your key)
    You: OK. That was the right key this time. I'm at the car.
    (At this point you can try, but you may be pushing their patience, to say "The car key is in the house. Let me get it.")
    You: OK. I can read the VIN at the windshield.
    Caller: Go ahead, sir.
    You: 1... W... G... K... N or M...
    Caller: Which one is it sir, N or M?
    You: It's tough to see in here. Let me go get a flashlight.
    (You decide if your flashlight is near you in the garage or WAYYYY back in the house)
    You: M... 3... 4... H... J... 4... 2... 6... 8... 2... 0....
    You: Can you repeat that back for me?
    Caller: That's OK sir. I can't find your vehicle. What is it?
    You: It's a 1974 VW Super Beetle
    Caller: Don't you have any newer cars?
    You: Nope. This is my first car and it still runs great for me. (You may even want to say it's been handed down to you as your first car and it still runs well for you.)
    Caller: I'm sorry sir, we can't help you at this time. We'll take you off our call list.
    You: OK. Sorry about that.
    Caller: **Click**, or "Have a good day sir."

    I did the last six lines for one of them once and I never received another call from any auto warranty company. They apparently took me off their list when I convinced them I only had the Beetle.

    1. Re:Self Help Script..... by type40 · · Score: 1

      I just kept telling them my only car was a 1964 Plymouth Valiant. I told them that I really wanted the warranty coverage incase the push button gear selector went out.

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
  63. Yay!!! by stuntpope · · Score: 1

    I've gotten several of the postcards and some phone calls back when I had a 2000 model car whose warranty was long-expired, and I understood straight away that it was a 3rd party company trying (deceptively, IMO) to get my business. When we purchased a new vehicle in 2008, and my wife got one of their phone calls 2 months later saying our warranty was going to expire that day unless she took action to extend it, she was understandably confused, especially since the caller claimed they were with Mazda. When she told the caller that she didn't know the VIN and she asked some questions, the caller hung up.

    I'm really glad someone went after these scum.

  64. VISA & MasterCard robocalling? by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

    I got a call a couple of days ago from "Visa and MasterCard" offering to help lower my rates. I said, "Which card?"

    They said, "Either VISA or MasterCard."

    "Which issuing bank? CitiBank? Chase?"

    "Either, as long as it's a VISA or MasterCard."

    "This phone number is on the Do Not Call registry."

    *click*

    Has anyone else heard of this yet? Is it a new scam, or did I piss off a legitimate phonesalesthug?

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  65. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    OMG! Someone call Barack Obama and tell him that we found $16 T to balance his budget for the next ten years.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  66. Other telemarketing scams? by avtchillsboro · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else get the calls offering $1000 cash for "debt reversal? Often times several robocalls per day, several different voices (male & female); the script never varies:

    (paraphrasing)

    ..."Hello...this is (caller's first name here) at (scamming institution's name here, e.g "Financial Associates") I'm calling because we've talked before..." (untrue) "...You qualify for Financial Associates's Debt Reversal program--for up to $1000 cash. Now...we've talked before, and maybe at that time Debt Reversal Associates's program wasn't right for you...but I'm looooking oooover yourrrrr fiiiiile, and you definitely qualify. So give me at 866-blah-blah and I will make sure your file gets priority treatment..." (end of call)

    Not sure what their angle is--I've never taken the bait.
    My assumption is that they want to "verify" all my personal info to facilitate identity theft; or at the very least, my checking account # so that they can (ahem) direct deposit that $1000!

    Do any /.s have experience w/these creeps? OTOH--I doubt that many /.s are gullible enough to fall for this scam.

  67. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had dinner with a guy who had his company's merger (in an obscure concrete-related industry) with a larger entity get reviewed by the FTC and turned down (all during Bush Jr's second term). He was understandably annoyed with the FTC, but his description of the FTC's operation was pretty stunning. Apparently they're pretty autonomous and aren't really accountable at all. He even had the backing of a household name Republican Senator with Bush connections and didn't get ANY traction.

    My guess is that the FTC doesn't really give a shit about consumers and has their own agenda. There's probably legitimate reason to provide them insulation from political pressure, but probably not reason enough to prevent accountability.

  68. where is the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION by amoeba1911 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I kept getting these scam calls on my cell phone, and I complained to the FCC but get I kept getting more scam calls. The FCC should have been on the ball about this long ago as they already have strict laws against automated dialing:
    "(a) No person or entity may: (1) Initiate any telephone call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party)using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice;"
    "To any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call."
    Title 47

    When a tiny glimpse of a nipple showed up on TV they were on it instantly even though almost everyone already has one pair of nipples and seeing a third one on TV isn't going to harm anyone. Then there's shit like this where people run telemarketing scam and yank millions of dollars while the FCC just sits there with head in ass doing nothing about it. Perhaps they should change the name from Federal Communications Commission to Federal Censorship Commission because obviously they care about nothing other than preventing people from saying fuck on TV.

    1. Re:where is the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

      No, you will only get action out of this when you call the CELL PHONE COMPANY and proclaim loudly that you will NOT pay for those calls.

      Then the cell company will lobby your Congressman for you.

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
  69. differentiating between malice and incentive by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Given the enormous number of their customers who called with similar complaints, a modern well run help desk (which they do seem to have) would have resulted in this issue floating to the top of the list. This happens on auto pilot for a modern help desk, which reviews categories of unresolved issue types at least every month, probably daily in the case of a phone company.

    In the review session, a manager who gets a bonus based on the percentage of resolved calls says something like: "Hey, we're still getting a boatload of complaints about the auto warranty robo dialers, and we still don't have an answer for this."

    In this case, the issue would float to the top of the list month after month for over a year. The help desk has a huge incentive to at least come up with a "stock answer", because unresolved issues hammer their stats, causing customers to fill out surveys negatively, and eat away at bonus incentives. Heck, if they only received calls from 5% of iPhone using Slashdot readers, then they got enough calls to raise this issue up to the level of senior management.

    I'm guessing at some level a lot higher than the person answering the phone, this question was considered, escalated one more unfortunate career limiting level, probably more than once in the past year. They thought about it. They chose not to act. This kind of thing often results in epic internal bureaucratic struggle, usually between people who have a bonus based on some customer satisfaction metric affected by the problem, and senior management who bet that the customer annoyance will not result in an FCC fine larger than the profit from the questionable activity, which, after all, is conducted not by your organization, but by a customer. I hope one day someone leaks a memo or two, so we can all see that yes, in fact, the issue was raised above the front line help desk.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  70. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by sheph · · Score: 0

    ...And then send everyone that was bothered by these jerks a check for $16k. That might ease the pain.

    --
    I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
  71. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, what we need to do is find out which number belongs to Chuck Schumer so we can put it down as an extra alternative contact number on job applications or when filling out forms on the web. Someone calling about whether you want a job or doing other business is likely to hit the first two numbers and be done. But when running into somebody who's just using that data only to sell it, all those numbers will get used. And those annoying robocalls are getting their numbers from somewhere (If you get hit by one, soon there will be many more.)

    Since the FTC is doing a craptastic bureaucratic job of it, perhaps we should all start putting private numbers of political office holders or corporate bigwigs as number 3 or 4 in our alternate contact methods list.

  72. Re:Anybody ever press #2 at the menu? by green1 · · Score: 1

    I press 2 when it gives me the option... I did notice on one though, if you press 2, and then wait, about 30 seconds to a minute later a voice said "you will now be removed, please stand by" another 30 seconds or so "you have now been removed from our list"
    I suspect they were betting that people will just press 2 and hang up and not wait to be removed.

    either way though, it doesn't seem to have reduced the number of these scam calls...

  73. Re:They call, they call, they call by Theoboley · · Score: 1

    You don't have to buy "Y's" you fool... Pat Sajak gives them away for free.

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  74. they really don't know it by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Informative

    You call AT&T about a problem, and you should expect them to do something

    Honestly, the phone company (AT&T, Verizon, whomever) likely doesn't have the information needed to solve your problem anyways. If you are calling because Bogus Warranty, Inc at 800-555-5555 called you, that's great but your phone company can't even verify that the number belongs to who you think it belongs to; they don't have that information - nobody at your phone company does. And to make it even better, the phone company has no right to access that information.

    You know how when you get spammed, you can run a WHOIS search on evilspammingdomain.com and figure out who owns it? There exists no such tool for 800 numbers. Instead we have a list of hundreds of Responsible Organizations ("RespOrgs") who do toll-free registration. They - and only they - know who is behind the toll-free numbers. But they are under no obligation to share that information with anyone; hence they generally won't do it unless a subpoena is served.

    Though of course the subpoena is useless because by the time someone has obtained it and served it, the customer of the toll-free number has already left for a different RespOrg and the RespOrg who was just served has already deleted the records.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  75. Not VISA, MC, or AmEx by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I suspect I received the same call. In the evening on June 8th I had a call that showed up on my (cell phone!) caller ID as 866-246-2310. It was a robocall in a very conversational tone, calling herself "Erica" or something like that. It offered something for VISA, Mastercard, or American Express. It said "press 1 to talk to an agent" or "press 2 to be removed from our calling list". I pressed 2 and haven't heard anything else yet. We'll see how long it lasts.

    Coincidentally, it appears that the Responsible Organization ("RespOrg") for that number is Marchex Voice Services. You can check the RespOrg for a toll-free by calling Ameritech at 800-337-4194; they can give you the RespOrg ID and phone number. Of course the RespOrg will refuse to reveal the identity of who is using the toll-free number but you can at least call them and tell them about the call.

    So to answer your question, this is indeed a scam. It is actually a very old scam, possibly being run by a new group. I have discussed these problems in journal entries before.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  76. Here you need this MR Carson by RobertLTux · · Score: 1
    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  77. I just ... by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    .. can't comprehend how people really believe they can get away with these types of scams; I'm beginning to think that the population is even dumber than I thought.

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  78. Re: It's malice, not stupidity - here's proof by warmbowski · · Score: 1

    If you read the AT&T writeup on what to do with annoying calls here http://contact.bellsouth.com/acc/ you will see that every branch of this decision tree ends with "you should change your phone number", "you should notify FCC or authorities" or "it may be annoying, but it is probably completely legal and we can do any thing about it". This connotes that the decision was made by AT&T to basically tell it's customers, "it's your problem, not ours".

  79. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information".

    Clearly from the story here, the missing information was telling them you're a US senator or someone important enough to get their asses fired.

  80. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    "has the ftc ever fined anyone this much? Anything?"

    Come on, it's the FTC we're talking about, not the RIAA.

    --
    This sig is false.
  81. then there is the whole... by rgviza · · Score: 1

    ...fact that aftermarket warranties themselves are a big scam even when they are "legitimate".
    You are better off figuring out how much one of these things are, and putting the same amount money monthly in an interest bearing account to save for a rainy day. If you never need it, at least you still have your money ;) If you pay them it's gone. If your car breaks you are no worse off since you have the money.

    Remember they only do this because it's a money maker. It's not to help you avoid repair bills. With these guys you are still paying the repair bill whether or not your car breaks.

    -Viz

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  82. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by HenryKoren · · Score: 1

    These criminals were actively wasting millions of peoples time, even if they did not succumb to getting charged by them, the time it takes to deal with this is significant.

    I received nearly 50 calls from these criminals. I spent a lot of time reporting them to donotcall. This time could have been much better spent elsewhere.

    Last time they called, I baited them by starting to read a bogus credit card to them, but asked for them and managed to speak to a manager of some sort, who refused to identify the company. I managed to hurl as many insults at them as possible before the click. That was satisfying, but nowhere near as satisfying as seeing justice happen.

    I'm overjoyed they have been caught, I had become very cynical about all the time I spent reporting them. Hopefully my reports will help to bolster the case.

  83. Old cars by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

    I was getting these 3x a week...One day, I figured I'd play along. My 3 cars consist of:

    1968 Ford Mustang
    1966 Ford Mustang
    1968 Chevy Suburban

    I told them the make and models, several of them hung up...One asshole, started an argument that I didn't have cars that old...He eventually told me to fuck off and hung up. I laughed for days about that.

    Now if I could only get rid of the carpet cleaning ad, as I have no carpets, ripped them all out and tiled the entire house...But they call when I'm not at home and don't leave a number.

  84. I wouldn't mind the calls... by hachikyu · · Score: 1

    if I owned a car. I am curious how many others are in the same boat.

  85. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by n7ytd · · Score: 1

    They spoof the caller ID info (this is where the phone companies should be atomic dope slapped)

    Caller ID is working for the phone company exactly as planned. You're paying each month to have it delivered to your phone, and they can charge you each month to have your number blocked. Spoofing is beside the point.

  86. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.

    Another point for representation by lottery rather than representation by rich enough to afford becoming a politician but not smart or ambitious enough to do something useful with your life.

    (I'm only half serious, but...)

  87. Hell's Bells. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    The best punishment for these people is have a thousand phones ringing all day, all night for a several years that they can't answer.
    I have been suffering from these phone calls even though all my phones (including all my work phones) are on the "Do Not Call" list. Dying is too good for them.

  88. Does this happen in countries where telecom is.... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    a national service?

    IIRC, Germany just has 'teh phone system'. Would a public/state utility be as susceptible to this sort of abuse? Would the gov't be more able to do something about it? /non-rhetorical question

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  89. Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation. (Note "gross income" before expenses and payroll and the like.)

    You're forgetting they should add on federal, state and any local tax at the maximum allowable rate. Even if they've already paid tax on it.

    Hah! captcha = bleeder

  90. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by lanner · · Score: 1

    Ultimately, this is a failure of the general public of the United States, not of government. The people are foolish and afraid of government, yet there is no proverbial or literal blood of the do-nothing tax-milking government workers. Those employed by the government will do whatever they can get away with, but it's the lack of participation by the general populous that allows them to continue doing nothing and get paid for it.

  91. Re:Does this happen in countries where telecom is. by Shirotae · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are phone scams elsewhere but it seems not to the same extent. In the UK we no longer have a nationalised phone service but the regulatory environment seems to be more successful in keeping the worst excesses under control.

    I sometimes get calls from automated systems but they show up as International on the caller ID. I believe that the regulations for automated call systems are stricter and enforcement harsher here so they only operate from outside the UK jurisdiction. We also get free caller-id if you know how to sign up for it.

    Calls to mobiles are charged entirely to the caller here and mobile numbers have a standard prefix anyway so we do not have two of the elements of the problem.

    I did get some random cold calls on my mobile a while ago claiming to be from my mobile phone company and trying to sell me a new contract. The problem with that was that my phone is pay-as-you-go so there is no contract to expire. I think they were just calling all numbers that were first registered 18 months earlier because that is the usual first contract duration.

    The problem that gets the most coverage here is reverse charged SMS messages where people say they did not request the messages. That seems to have died down a bit now; I believe that was as a result of the regulator making the mobile phone companies get their act together in responding to complaints.

  92. Re:Does this happen in countries where telecom is. by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    +1 Informative. Thanks.

    i like that only the caller pays for cell phone calls.

    It's weird to me that in the US we're supposedly all about competition, but the big players have so much clout that they don't seem to compete at all. So we get crap service and it costs a fortune. Here you *can't* pay less than about 40$ a month. i don't need 1000 minutes a year let alone per month. i'm not a twelve year old girl. The pay as you go systems end up charging you a defacto recurring fee to keep your phone number. i'm pleased as punch that my employer provides me with an iPhone and service.

    Personally, i'd much rather have a nationalized service that charges enough to cover costs instead of charging to line the pockets of investors.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  93. About damn time by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

    At first I just harassed these guys. I had asked them not once, not twice, but 20+ time to remove me from their list. Their numbers changed constantly, and I often get called from out of state customers, thus I would have to answer the phone just to be sure it wasn't a customer.

    When I figured out who it was and I had time, I would give them the impression that I was a wet dream of a sale. Several cars just out of warranty, BMW, Jeep, even a Range Rover; then I would tell them that I wanted to warranty all of them.......and that I'd be paying for it all right now with my credit card. I'd give them accurate VIN numbers (I've got several high-end cars parked up and down the street, and my neighbors would give me a beer for giving these guys hell), and spend at least 45 minutes on the phone with these guys just keeping them on the line with tales about how great these cars are. Then would come the credit card numbers.......which would all be canceled or expired cards that I kept around JUST for the occasion these guys called. This would of course be followed by at least ANOTHER 45 minutes of trying 1 number, ensuring it's correct, then trying another card, ensuring THAT number is correct, getting VISA customer service on the phone, etc.. After I hit the 90 minute mark:

    Me: "How does it feel to have your time wasted?"
    Salesman: "What do you mean, sir?"
    Me: "How much trouble are you going to be in if you've been un-productive for the past hour and a half?"
    Salesman: "Well, yeah I'd be in trouble, but we can make this work, don't worry."
    Me: "You don't like being yelled at by the boss, do you?
    Salesman: "No, I don't, but who does?"
    Me: "*evil cackle* I'll tell you what, I LOVE it when guys like YOU get the proverbial boot to their ass."
    Salesman: "I'm sorry, could you repeat that?"
    Me: "You've just been punked, remove me from your list or I will keep getting reprobate fuckheads like you fired for wasting too much time."
    *click*

    I did that 6 times before I thought they got the impression. Except they didn't stop calling. I think they intentionally put me in every robocaller they had and set it to hang up every time I picked up. They're lucky the FCC got to them first, because last week I got called 54 times in the same day. Yes, that's right, 54 times. I called the number back after the 20th time and left them a message threatening legal action, and was interrupted by them calling me....again. I have long weekends and expendable income, if I found out where these guys were I was going to fly there and take a baseball bat to every piece of electronic equipment in sight, and Miguel if I found out who he was because I'm certain he's the one that put me on every machine. Come to think of it, these guys are lucky they didn't pull that stunt on a much more distemperate guy than me.....people could have been killed.

    --
    Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
  94. Auto Warranty scammers by StewBaby2005 · · Score: 1

    They were trying to sell an extended warranty to the elevator at my work last spring... for real..