Cleared academics will have the 'net'.
Support staff and students can make do with the filter as they do at home.
They have all the tax payer funded catalogues, electronic databases and journals for free... why do they need the net?
If a student needs to do research on the 'net' they can do it in the library under the new CCTV.
Violent material some expanded films and videos, computer games, publications and 'web' gov classification team.
Extremist and terrorist related content - police/MI5/6
Anorexia and eating disorder websites, suicide related websites, alcohol, smoking - Medical teams.
Add in the public–private partnerships and faith based groups, business, foreign diplomats, multinationals, legal teams, NGO's... contractors..
They could do it in a very quick way.
Your "fringe political content" link would be flagged to say wikipedia and would not be displayed in the UK. A point would be added to your isp's tacking database
So the actions of big pharma, UK mil, UK gov, agribusiness, oil, countries the UK loves, organ harvesting, deaths would be blocked/protected as "a matter before a court" can be now.
Citation needed would be an invite to memory hole.
In a very short time, interested/trusted parties could delink any historical or political or news reports/sites.
More news would be locked behind pay walls, sites could be blocked per 'page' by 24/7 global sock puppets.
Your "ability to link" is reduced to freedom to speculate in the UK.
Return to work after clicking too much on a site over the weekend and you get the "violent material, extremist and terrorist related content, anorexia and eating disorder websites, suicide related websites, alcohol, smoking, web forums" chat.
Your isp reported to your local gov who informed your boss again.
Too many chats and your job is gone, security clearance gone and your on some community protection list for life.
What the Soviet Union and China had/have to ban, the UK gov can shape with private sector "community standards".
...seriously? I think most govs see forums as a gateway.
Post enough and a user becomes liked, builds trust and the same interests gets strangers chatting. A useful person who is respectful or productive might get invited into darker time limited/ or "alphanumeric" chatrooms where they are further tested..
Beyond that is encryption and historically hard to track, invites into user generated chatrooms that last hours with very few members.
So from the govs view, stop the meetings, stop the easy entry, stop the introduction chats, stop the sites using the First Amendment to push the limits of 'art', 'politics', 'food', 'war', 'sex', 'faith', 'computing'...citizen journalism
Or the long term exposure to "thoughtcrime" material thats upsetting to new gov/mil staff exposing the actions, corruption, deaths, theft, lies...of the organisations they entered.
Drones with made in Japan optics.
Components made in Philippines, Vietnam and Laos.
A bit like any pro/consumer* camera but new Warlord friendly prices.
*autoland is extra
A Germany sending another "sealed "one-carriage train" to Russia" ~ Lenin?
An Cold war like entry and exit from the Soviet Union? http://naomiwolf.org/2013/06/my-creeping-concern-that-the-nsa-leaker-is-not-who-he-purports-to-be/ was the main one I saw.
Later http://naomiwolf.org/2013/06/some-aspects-of-snowdens-presentation-that-i-find-worth-further-inquiry-an-update/
On the protest side:
A plant by the police or MI6/5/CIA/KGB/FSB would have worked in the Cold war.
ie What a private detective/press can find, or other defectors can confirm about a person can be shaped.
People dont need an expert photographer, publisher, press credentials to get ideas out so planting a person in a group is detected due to direct action "ranting" or everybody in the group just goes on working on their own projects.
On the gov side:
The same with most Governments worldwide - they know all the tricks now and are much more aware of been played by a Moscow or Washington or London.
The trade done and mil bases are shared/telcos optical is split.
The big US brands helped.
Encryption standards give your gov plain text on most systems.
We know how whistleblowers are treated before trial, the charges presented and prison system that awaits.
Counterintelligence organisations and agencies world wide would have warned their leadership to what the NSA and a US telco deal is about.
Australia signed and helped, China and Russia signed and ~air gapped.
I would imagine: https://startpage.com/eng/press/pr-pfs.html seems to be a hint. ..."a different "per-session" key for each data transfer"
Get creative with the tech your site offers more often and keep up with ideas about how "historical traffic" can be used later.
Keep users pw safe from easy social engineering, or outdated weak security that even the tech press can hack in weeks on pro/consumer hardware.
When the court order comes, be ready with a legal team.
In theory you might just see a new server for a few years and get to make notes about how to run it/who to call if the lights change:)
Keep your staff away from that, never talk about it and your fine.
No US defence lawyer will ever have US court standing to ask about 'methods' again so its all fine.
The same master key would be used as the 1/2 of your visit to a site 'everytime'.
So with the key, your hidden urls would turn back to plain text months, years later via a stored server/logs.
The way around that seems some form of "per-session" key.
ie decrypting each separate search or use vs a key for all historical traffic via a court order for the key - even for an unrelated user:)
A typical politician may respond well to the positive reinforcement too:
- find the one member of the press who knows of the intern thing
- State jobs via Federal and private "government" contractors to take back to the electorate
- getting family members cushy jobs
- insider trading, legal now for staff:)
- Elite educational places found, huge fees altered to free scholarships.
- Offshore "trusts" permanently hidden from any US tax efforts
- etc.
For this gen insider trading seems to work well.
How do they sleep at night?
Considering what they are allowed to read at work and how 'free' they feel to read at home i.e. compartmentalized.
This news will come as funding = legality. That feeling of retroactive telecom immunity vs say starting a next gen Church Committee.
"world wide responsibilities" where mapped out and taken care of during the cold war. The USA has bases, camps, forts, agreements as needed around all the nations it wishes to 'contain'.
Any global gaps in "signal intelligence" where fixed long ago.
The "domestic data" aspect is new and seems to need a new location, a new vetted domestic workforce, lots of cooling water and power supply.
The USA dislikes huge raw encrypted movements around the world.
The USA likes to get the data in bulk, work on it near the first safe downlink and send a tiny fraction of well encrypted data all the way back to the USA.
Moving raw bulk "signal intelligence" back to the USA in a few steps is a total waste of effort due to great regional support thats been in place for years.
Why the raw "signal intelligence" effort in the USA? There are less international links to worry about this time. The "signal intelligence" is going to be local.
What "rumor" cold?
Why would any spy agency hold "24-hour video and audio recordings" on every person?
You get a file, work, school, crime, links, where seen on the 'net', hops to other people of interest, past clearances, links to any one with a clearances.
Political insights, weaknesses, funding....
No service would store video and audio recordings as they have computer code to do that long term vs huge per frame/endless audio.
Another trick is to turn the 'voice' into text. So the data per person needed for the "size" of people of interest in the USA is usable as reported. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Core showed what could be done in the early 1980's is the NSA is hoping to keep a bit more that the "essence" this time.
The next step for the NSA is a small file for every human with enough space for a days internet links, chats, text for life.
That can bed expanded as they get politically active:)
The file per person would allow any persons digital life to be tracked back to the first 'connection' of interest.
In the past all that could be done was to track telephone numbers, fax, computer use and voice prints as found or via contact with a past person or group of interest.
The past sorting was very quick and left a very small amount of data to be sent to the US from any distant super computing location (UK, Australia)
ie the NSA is not after http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-06/24/gchq-tempora-101 long term.
They don't want 'big' content long term, they need space for all your ip's used, ports, apps used keywords, links, times, locations, connections to people - all very tiny amounts of text like info for now ie the "initial filter" will go for your pic, movie, sound, text - not keeping it, but might give a facial recognition code string to everybody in the pic. You only need a good voice print every so often...
Data size has never been the issue, legality, domestic commercial 'help' have been.
What is holding all the sites back from better password as mentioned the md5(salt+md5(password))?
What do website admins think of "Here is a 25 GPU cluster that can go after MD5 hashes" arstechnica.com efforts?
Power and CPU time per user is the expensive over many users over years with new encryption?
Lack of easy software upgrades? ie would users have to re join as "new" encryption is added?
Good encryption is expensive per site? Needs hardware upgrades or next gen cpu?
Where do some of the top military in most of the "freedom" loving, rule of "law" countries get parts of their military college years? The USA.
What hats do the "foreign ones" put when not running an isp/telco?
Run an ISP all week, fill in that military service record book over the years and are always helpful to US requests...
Re: How are the Chinese doing this?
The same way the US tracks protesters/anti war groups or faith based charities are examined, Russia tracks the press/CIA/MI6 funded NGOs or dissidents.
You find the 'easy' local groups, raid them and see what their admins are doing. Build up picture of their networks and then legend your sock puppets/long term infiltrators for the international supporters.
Sock puppets get people taking, long term infiltrators build trust with the admins and become helpful leaders in the online communities.
Later when the network is mapped out, leadership and top posters named more direct option are open to the gov.
Philippines and Vietnam both has historical issues with China and the quality of their computer networks would be expanding for trade, military upgrades and tourism.
Trade and tourism would usually be some front end based on Microsoft as hinted with the mention of "Microsoft Word vulnerabilities were exploited, the payload decrypted and then executed"
MS (made in the USA) is the way in for the NSA, China and any other group it seems.
Re the greatness and legality of 'Note the GCSB will seconded there staff to the relevant agency while they do the work."
There is one amazing reason my most countries try and keep their foreign, military grade staff well away from any domestic crime operations.
Police talk to the press for fame or cash, police talk to criminals due to cash or blackmail or obscure links that where never uncovered.
Organised crime and embassies may not be able to blackmail or entrap clandestine agency staff but police services very open to long term tracking due to court and basic work habits.
We have seen what it all looks like in the UK with the National Criminal Intelligence Service, Government Telecommunications Advisory Centre.
Tasked to go after email, encrypted files by organised crime, cell phone tracking, later voice prints.
Warnings about press contacts in the police and court issues where ignored.
Courts have to be sealed, legal staff for the defence need clearances - you have a spy case setting for a 'big' drug case?
Courts are open, legal staff for the defence go after 'police support staff' about their standing as experts... clearances - you have a spy trail setting for a drug case? Crime adjusts to cell tracking, voice prints, internet logs, they find better admins or just bait the tracking systems.
Police and their press contacts can out last any anti-corruption squad (~CIB3) efforts and any independent journalists lose funding or just stop reporting.
Re: Is there any evidence that this is being done because of US pressure?
The US does not pressure, it allows better trade deals and more international standing if you are "good".
The NZ SAS also get to play with quality toys and generations of NZ spies felt happy that no Soviet agent was safe in NZ.
Re: The "blame the US for everything bad that happens" - Moscow and Washington have swapped out so many govs and protected a lot of bad groups over so many years.
The NSA "news" has been around since the 1970's but with Snowden you have one more layer exposed to the press.
So think of it more as 40-30 years of investigative journalism vs a pile-on behaviour.
Re New Zealand's government decided on it's "own" to do what?
What was considered around the 'Signals Intelligence Authorities' in 1946?
The UKUSA intelligence treaty? Shall we say done with the agreement, letter signed and memoranda by ~1953?
GCSB got the diplomatic telegrams, telephone satellite communications from France, Japan and the Philippines... along with the South Pacific island states.
NZ got Fiji, Vietnam, Laos, 1980's South Africa and Argentinean naval communications.
ie 2nd party status is like a drug to NZ and if they have to spy on their own, so be it.
NZ had always played its part so well and was rewarded with huge upgrades ~satellite receiving stations.
Recall Rainbow Warrior? NZ asked for a lot of info from France via the US and Australia wrt to Paris telephone numbers.
Think NZ got much help back ?
Say a citizen in NZ protests, asks questions, uncovers corruption, reports on NZ help with extraordinary rendition:
Will have the same legal standing as staff from France, Japan, Philippines, the 1980's South Africa and Argentinean military?
So if your writing a tell all book about NZ role in extraordinary rendition, dont do searches from your home computer;)
Slashdot Mirror
Cleared academics will have the 'net'.
Support staff and students can make do with the filter as they do at home.
They have all the tax payer funded catalogues, electronic databases and journals for free... why do they need the net?
If a student needs to do research on the 'net' they can do it in the library under the new CCTV.
Violent material some expanded films and videos, computer games, publications and 'web' gov classification team.
Extremist and terrorist related content - police/MI5/6
Anorexia and eating disorder websites, suicide related websites, alcohol, smoking - Medical teams.
Add in the public–private partnerships and faith based groups, business, foreign diplomats, multinationals, legal teams, NGO's... contractors..
They could do it in a very quick way.
Your "fringe political content" link would be flagged to say wikipedia and would not be displayed in the UK. A point would be added to your isp's tacking database
So the actions of big pharma, UK mil, UK gov, agribusiness, oil, countries the UK loves, organ harvesting, deaths would be blocked/protected as "a matter before a court" can be now.
Citation needed would be an invite to memory hole.
In a very short time, interested/trusted parties could delink any historical or political or news reports/sites.
More news would be locked behind pay walls, sites could be blocked per 'page' by 24/7 global sock puppets.
Your "ability to link" is reduced to freedom to speculate in the UK.
Return to work after clicking too much on a site over the weekend and you get the "violent material, extremist and terrorist related content, anorexia and eating disorder websites, suicide related websites, alcohol, smoking, web forums" chat.
Your isp reported to your local gov who informed your boss again.
Too many chats and your job is gone, security clearance gone and your on some community protection list for life.
What the Soviet Union and China had/have to ban, the UK gov can shape with private sector "community standards".
...seriously? I think most govs see forums as a gateway. ...of the organisations they entered.
Post enough and a user becomes liked, builds trust and the same interests gets strangers chatting. A useful person who is respectful or productive might get invited into darker time limited/ or "alphanumeric" chatrooms where they are further tested..
Beyond that is encryption and historically hard to track, invites into user generated chatrooms that last hours with very few members.
So from the govs view, stop the meetings, stop the easy entry, stop the introduction chats, stop the sites using the First Amendment to push the limits of 'art', 'politics', 'food', 'war', 'sex', 'faith', 'computing'...citizen journalism
Or the long term exposure to "thoughtcrime" material thats upsetting to new gov/mil staff exposing the actions, corruption, deaths, theft, lies
Yes AC Australia was big on the eating disorder websites aspect.
http://www.news.com.au/technology/australia-to-become-net-nanny-state/story-e6frfro0-1111117886418
What parts of Latin America is the United States currently trying to annex? :)
Fun with the "currently" term.
Need a history lesson in that part of the world Cold?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_United_States_foreign_regime_change_actions in list form with dates
The US goes for "security arrangements" now and likes to "lease access" under the banner of "hunting drug traffickers and guerrillas"
Its the same as having a U.S. military base, just the base is still all part of "Colombia".
Cold if you want to understand China "now" and their thinking, recall the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars
The use of drugs, silver and terms of settlement has shaped China and its political thinking.
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War might be good reading too.
Recall the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War ?
Drones with made in Japan optics.
Components made in Philippines, Vietnam and Laos.
A bit like any pro/consumer* camera but new Warlord friendly prices.
*autoland is extra
A Germany sending another "sealed "one-carriage train" to Russia" ~ Lenin? An Cold war like entry and exit from the Soviet Union?
http://naomiwolf.org/2013/06/my-creeping-concern-that-the-nsa-leaker-is-not-who-he-purports-to-be/ was the main one I saw.
Later http://naomiwolf.org/2013/06/some-aspects-of-snowdens-presentation-that-i-find-worth-further-inquiry-an-update/
On the protest side:
A plant by the police or MI6/5/CIA/KGB/FSB would have worked in the Cold war.
ie What a private detective/press can find, or other defectors can confirm about a person can be shaped.
People dont need an expert photographer, publisher, press credentials to get ideas out so planting a person in a group is detected due to direct action "ranting" or everybody in the group just goes on working on their own projects.
On the gov side:
The same with most Governments worldwide - they know all the tricks now and are much more aware of been played by a Moscow or Washington or London.
The trade done and mil bases are shared/telcos optical is split.
The big US brands helped.
Encryption standards give your gov plain text on most systems.
We know how whistleblowers are treated before trial, the charges presented and prison system that awaits.
Counterintelligence organisations and agencies world wide would have warned their leadership to what the NSA and a US telco deal is about.
Australia signed and helped, China and Russia signed and ~air gapped.
I would imagine:
..."a different "per-session" key for each data transfer" :)
https://startpage.com/eng/press/pr-pfs.html seems to be a hint.
Get creative with the tech your site offers more often and keep up with ideas about how "historical traffic" can be used later.
Keep users pw safe from easy social engineering, or outdated weak security that even the tech press can hack in weeks on pro/consumer hardware.
When the court order comes, be ready with a legal team.
In theory you might just see a new server for a few years and get to make notes about how to run it/who to call if the lights change
Keep your staff away from that, never talk about it and your fine.
No US defence lawyer will ever have US court standing to ask about 'methods' again so its all fine.
The same master key would be used as the 1/2 of your visit to a site 'everytime'. :)
So with the key, your hidden urls would turn back to plain text months, years later via a stored server/logs.
The way around that seems some form of "per-session" key.
ie decrypting each separate search or use vs a key for all historical traffic via a court order for the key - even for an unrelated user
A typical politician may respond well to the positive reinforcement too: :)
- find the one member of the press who knows of the intern thing
- State jobs via Federal and private "government" contractors to take back to the electorate
- getting family members cushy jobs
- insider trading, legal now for staff
- Elite educational places found, huge fees altered to free scholarships.
- Offshore "trusts" permanently hidden from any US tax efforts
- etc.
For this gen insider trading seems to work well.
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Plumbers of today would have another layer of US wide access now and never have to move away from their desks. :)
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would give them any Los Angeles psychiatrist files with a few clicks:)
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gemstone of today would be quality sock puppets
How do they sleep at night?
Considering what they are allowed to read at work and how 'free' they feel to read at home i.e. compartmentalized.
This news will come as funding = legality. That feeling of retroactive telecom immunity vs say starting a next gen Church Committee.
"world wide responsibilities" where mapped out and taken care of during the cold war. The USA has bases, camps, forts, agreements as needed around all the nations it wishes to 'contain'.
Any global gaps in "signal intelligence" where fixed long ago.
The "domestic data" aspect is new and seems to need a new location, a new vetted domestic workforce, lots of cooling water and power supply.
The USA dislikes huge raw encrypted movements around the world.
The USA likes to get the data in bulk, work on it near the first safe downlink and send a tiny fraction of well encrypted data all the way back to the USA.
Moving raw bulk "signal intelligence" back to the USA in a few steps is a total waste of effort due to great regional support thats been in place for years.
Why the raw "signal intelligence" effort in the USA? There are less international links to worry about this time. The "signal intelligence" is going to be local.
The other metric is http://www.geek.com/apps/nsa-data-center-will-use-1-7-million-gallons-of-water-per-day-to-read-your-email-1562152/ or power needs.
What "rumor" cold?
Why would any spy agency hold "24-hour video and audio recordings" on every person?
You get a file, work, school, crime, links, where seen on the 'net', hops to other people of interest, past clearances, links to any one with a clearances.
Political insights, weaknesses, funding....
No service would store video and audio recordings as they have computer code to do that long term vs huge per frame/endless audio.
Another trick is to turn the 'voice' into text. So the data per person needed for the "size" of people of interest in the USA is usable as reported.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Core showed what could be done in the early 1980's is the NSA is hoping to keep a bit more that the "essence" this time.
The next step for the NSA is a small file for every human with enough space for a days internet links, chats, text for life. :)
That can bed expanded as they get politically active
The file per person would allow any persons digital life to be tracked back to the first 'connection' of interest.
In the past all that could be done was to track telephone numbers, fax, computer use and voice prints as found or via contact with a past person or group of interest.
The past sorting was very quick and left a very small amount of data to be sent to the US from any distant super computing location (UK, Australia)
ie the NSA is not after http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-06/24/gchq-tempora-101 long term.
They don't want 'big' content long term, they need space for all your ip's used, ports, apps used keywords, links, times, locations, connections to people - all very tiny amounts of text like info for now ie the "initial filter" will go for your pic, movie, sound, text - not keeping it, but might give a facial recognition code string to everybody in the pic. You only need a good voice print every so often...
Data size has never been the issue, legality, domestic commercial 'help' have been.
What is holding all the sites back from better password as mentioned the md5(salt+md5(password))?
What do website admins think of "Here is a 25 GPU cluster that can go after MD5 hashes" arstechnica.com efforts?
Power and CPU time per user is the expensive over many users over years with new encryption?
Lack of easy software upgrades? ie would users have to re join as "new" encryption is added?
Good encryption is expensive per site? Needs hardware upgrades or next gen cpu?
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2013/06/25/ssl-intercepted-today-decrypted-tomorrow.html
More the options to get logs in real time or over time.
~"all previous searches would be revealed where logged traffic is available"
So the US has the big firms covered and has set up a "standard" to get into any other server/telco/network if needed.
Where do some of the top military in most of the "freedom" loving, rule of "law" countries get parts of their military college years? The USA.
What hats do the "foreign ones" put when not running an isp/telco?
Run an ISP all week, fill in that military service record book over the years and are always helpful to US requests...
Re: demonstrated they are willing to fight governments: after been exposed by brand.
Legal dept, boss, admins at the big telcos and computer firms just did their jobs once shown 'paper' to make it all legal.
A few http://au.businessinsider.com/the-story-of-joseph-nacchio-and-the-nsa-2013-6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
Re: How are the Chinese doing this?
The same way the US tracks protesters/anti war groups or faith based charities are examined, Russia tracks the press/CIA/MI6 funded NGOs or dissidents.
You find the 'easy' local groups, raid them and see what their admins are doing. Build up picture of their networks and then legend your sock puppets/long term infiltrators for the international supporters.
Sock puppets get people taking, long term infiltrators build trust with the admins and become helpful leaders in the online communities.
Later when the network is mapped out, leadership and top posters named more direct option are open to the gov.
Philippines and Vietnam both has historical issues with China and the quality of their computer networks would be expanding for trade, military upgrades and tourism.
Trade and tourism would usually be some front end based on Microsoft as hinted with the mention of "Microsoft Word vulnerabilities were exploited, the payload decrypted and then executed"
MS (made in the USA) is the way in for the NSA, China and any other group it seems.
Allowing your foreign intelligence and national critical infrastructure teams to spy on citizens seems like news for nerds :)
Re the greatness and legality of 'Note the GCSB will seconded there staff to the relevant agency while they do the work."
There is one amazing reason my most countries try and keep their foreign, military grade staff well away from any domestic crime operations.
Police talk to the press for fame or cash, police talk to criminals due to cash or blackmail or obscure links that where never uncovered.
Organised crime and embassies may not be able to blackmail or entrap clandestine agency staff but police services very open to long term tracking due to court and basic work habits.
We have seen what it all looks like in the UK with the National Criminal Intelligence Service, Government Telecommunications Advisory Centre. Tasked to go after email, encrypted files by organised crime, cell phone tracking, later voice prints.
Warnings about press contacts in the police and court issues where ignored.
Courts have to be sealed, legal staff for the defence need clearances - you have a spy case setting for a 'big' drug case?
Courts are open, legal staff for the defence go after 'police support staff' about their standing as experts... clearances - you have a spy trail setting for a drug case?
Crime adjusts to cell tracking, voice prints, internet logs, they find better admins or just bait the tracking systems.
Police and their press contacts can out last any anti-corruption squad (~CIB3) efforts and any independent journalists lose funding or just stop reporting.
Re: Is there any evidence that this is being done because of US pressure? ;)
The US does not pressure, it allows better trade deals and more international standing if you are "good".
The NZ SAS also get to play with quality toys and generations of NZ spies felt happy that no Soviet agent was safe in NZ.
Re: The "blame the US for everything bad that happens" - Moscow and Washington have swapped out so many govs and protected a lot of bad groups over so many years.
The NSA "news" has been around since the 1970's but with Snowden you have one more layer exposed to the press.
So think of it more as 40-30 years of investigative journalism vs a pile-on behaviour.
Re New Zealand's government decided on it's "own" to do what?
What was considered around the 'Signals Intelligence Authorities' in 1946?
The UKUSA intelligence treaty? Shall we say done with the agreement, letter signed and memoranda by ~1953?
GCSB got the diplomatic telegrams, telephone satellite communications from France, Japan and the Philippines... along with the South Pacific island states.
NZ got Fiji, Vietnam, Laos, 1980's South Africa and Argentinean naval communications.
ie 2nd party status is like a drug to NZ and if they have to spy on their own, so be it.
NZ had always played its part so well and was rewarded with huge upgrades ~satellite receiving stations.
Recall Rainbow Warrior? NZ asked for a lot of info from France via the US and Australia wrt to Paris telephone numbers.
Think NZ got much help back ?
Say a citizen in NZ protests, asks questions, uncovers corruption, reports on NZ help with extraordinary rendition:
Will have the same legal standing as staff from France, Japan, Philippines, the 1980's South Africa and Argentinean military?
So if your writing a tell all book about NZ role in extraordinary rendition, dont do searches from your home computer