Re "That will show ads are being non-discriminatory."
Have to double the ad buy so at least some of the ads will get to people who may use the product?
Who is going to want to pay for ads all over social media to random people?
How many random people have to see a totally unrelated ad so that it becomes an approved ad?
Double the ad buying cost to cover a virtue signal count?
People only have so much to spend to pay to place ads.
Who wants to see their ad budget for set ads getting used on people who will never buy that product?
For a product/service not even in their area?
the ads have to work in the way the person paying for the ad wants.
Thats the service and that is their money to spend.
Why pay for and send out ads to people who will not want such ads?
Thats less ads for people who might be interested in the ads?
For that ability to really get the ads to a set of interest people filters, rules are needed.
Don't try and sell products to people who will not buy that brand, can't afford that brand, live in the wrong area to use that brand.
Say a smaller company has a few vans and a set range of service from a central location.
One person has a van and wants to sell a service to a range of people within set distances.
All kinds of different math goes into the reasons why service and product exists and will not exist all over a city, state, nation.
The other problem is what is a person doing to make an ad show?
Using social media/the internet to look up news, gossip, fun, games, cosmetics, cars, trucks, vans, holidays, banking services, a new home?
Only one ad can be displayed at a price point any one time so make sure that ad will get a persons interest and attention.
All data, past use, profile and what is ad is paying for is considered.
What will sell to that person in that hour, moment in time?
No past history due to blocking, a new account? Some ads can be set to display. Some ads want more user info before they can be placed.
Nobody wants to spend their ad budget balancing out average user counts to virtue signal. They want every ad they pay for to get seen by a set of people they know might buy a product.
The UK has GCHQ to find the comments.
A nice police interview to suggest a change of topic online. To understand why the comments got published.
A list of words that are no longer legal to use in a friendly illustrated booklet.
Words that now have to be used in the UK. Further police contact is then not needed if a change in the persons social media use is detected.
Should that not alter the persons views than further action will start.
A longer police interview at work? Police interviews with everyone connected with the person who published the comments. Who used the wrong words after getting the illustrated word booklet from the police.
Still publishing comments, views and links online? Found a new VPN service and using a UK bank and UK CC for that VPN service?
The MI5/6 and the SAS to take further action to prevent any further use of social media.
Freedom after speech.
The freedom of the press.
To publish and comment.
Is a movie review about an actors skills abhorrent material? The political nature of the low quality SJW script?
Is abhorrent for Catalonia to be mentioned in a way Spain finds not legal?
Would Argentina like to correct the history of the Falkland Islands?
Germany like to filter all history, art and political news about Germany? No commenting on the results illegal immigration into Germany?
Do French political leaders not like funny cartoons? No funny political memes about France?
Would a faith find blasphemy to be abhorrent material?
A cult would see their protected teachings online line for free as abhorrent?
Undercover filming/photography of US farms is an abhorrent act in some US states? UK to remove that US news too?
Talking about DRM removal?
Talking about junk and weak crypto math passed for consumer use by the intelligence services?
Comments on UK whistleblower material?
The role of the SAS, MI5/6 in Ireland and the UK?
So much people/mil/gov/lawyers/faiths/cults/NGO's/think tanks/NATO would find abhorrent material.
lenjoy that total control over the life of their citizens.
Welcome to a totalitarian Communist gov.
Contrast that with the freedom of the real China, Taiwan.
The taxes, "advice" and rules of a UK tyranny.
In the US the people have the freedom to enjoy what they want in their own "household".
The pursuit of Happiness.
on the wireline paper insulated monopoly NN protected networks.
Bring some new innovation and speed into your community.
Stop thinking the federally protected monopoly networks are finally going to be upgraded.
Get community broadband in to your community.
Allow some innovation and free market competition.
Escape past the federal NN laws and rules that kept your network slow.
When their other internet is a paper insulated wireline telco protected by NN laws? Yes they do need new tech.
Games that download in full. Then need tens of more GB as a new patch days later.
The GCHQ and 5 eye nations will do.
For every law in the USA, another way to collect it is found.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance was for Foreign but 4 hops collected it all.
1. "Malicious" would be the difference between a person installing software to find/track their own smartphone and pushed down malware.
2. Most nations police/gov/mil have had that support for decades. File access, live mic, camera... voice prints.
3. A person installing software to find/track their own smartphone. ie expected results.
4. Pushed down onto the smartphone if its malware.
Re "any description of the attack vector"
Hours in the ER due to an "accident" then result in other medial issues? Hours waiting for further tests and digital results.
The result is the way the person responds to the unexpected event..
Dissidents who are trusted and well connected in a protest movement at an important time in history can have an induced medical issue stop all their protesting.
Finding an expert. Making an appointment. Waiting. Calling friends and family.
Do they go with private health care? Use their nations free gov health care?
The time, stress, contacts made, questions, introspection can be just what a security service wants to slow a charismatic protest leader.
The security services of a nation can sit back and see what such a digital event induces.
Wealth family and friends offer support? Some other unexpected NGO, think tank, foundation, cult, faith group, union, charity, another gov offers totally unexpected and open ended support?
Why is this person getting so much expensive health care from unexpected and not seen before supporters?
The person falls back on 100% gov health care in their nation like any very average person?
Both results are of interest to police and security services watching protesters, dissidents, investigative journalists.
An induced medical emergency can uncover a lot about a persons supporters and once well hidden funding.
Who is really so interested in seeing them recover and is willing to invest in that health care?
The "digital" file is sent to any outside expert. By some network.
The expert can sit at their desk and see the file on a computer.
ie totally not part of the same network that did the scan.
Does your ISP give out a few free email accounts?
Create a new account just for using social media.
Ever have to hand it over? Then the social media brand get nothing but your used once for social media email.
Of criminals and illegal migrants?
The people who use fake and shared parts of an ID to drive?
That the "active investigations" all over the USA that needs tech like vehicle license plates to find.
Slashdot Mirror
Re "That will show ads are being non-discriminatory."
Have to double the ad buy so at least some of the ads will get to people who may use the product?
Who is going to want to pay for ads all over social media to random people?
How many random people have to see a totally unrelated ad so that it becomes an approved ad?
Double the ad buying cost to cover a virtue signal count?
People only have so much to spend to pay to place ads.
Who wants to see their ad budget for set ads getting used on people who will never buy that product?
For a product/service not even in their area?
the ads have to work in the way the person paying for the ad wants.
Thats the service and that is their money to spend.
Why pay for and send out ads to people who will not want such ads?
Thats less ads for people who might be interested in the ads?
For that ability to really get the ads to a set of interest people filters, rules are needed.
Don't try and sell products to people who will not buy that brand, can't afford that brand, live in the wrong area to use that brand.
Say a smaller company has a few vans and a set range of service from a central location.
One person has a van and wants to sell a service to a range of people within set distances.
All kinds of different math goes into the reasons why service and product exists and will not exist all over a city, state, nation.
The other problem is what is a person doing to make an ad show?
Using social media/the internet to look up news, gossip, fun, games, cosmetics, cars, trucks, vans, holidays, banking services, a new home?
Only one ad can be displayed at a price point any one time so make sure that ad will get a persons interest and attention.
All data, past use, profile and what is ad is paying for is considered.
What will sell to that person in that hour, moment in time?
No past history due to blocking, a new account? Some ads can be set to display. Some ads want more user info before they can be placed.
Nobody wants to spend their ad budget balancing out average user counts to virtue signal.
They want every ad they pay for to get seen by a set of people they know might buy a product.
Re "they start using the policy "
The UK has GCHQ to find the comments.
A nice police interview to suggest a change of topic online. To understand why the comments got published.
A list of words that are no longer legal to use in a friendly illustrated booklet.
Words that now have to be used in the UK. Further police contact is then not needed if a change in the persons social media use is detected.
Should that not alter the persons views than further action will start.
A longer police interview at work? Police interviews with everyone connected with the person who published the comments.
Who used the wrong words after getting the illustrated word booklet from the police.
Still publishing comments, views and links online?
Found a new VPN service and using a UK bank and UK CC for that VPN service?
The MI5/6 and the SAS to take further action to prevent any further use of social media.
Freedom after speech.
The freedom of the press.
To publish and comment.
Is a movie review about an actors skills abhorrent material? The political nature of the low quality SJW script?
Is abhorrent for Catalonia to be mentioned in a way Spain finds not legal?
Would Argentina like to correct the history of the Falkland Islands?
Germany like to filter all history, art and political news about Germany? No commenting on the results illegal immigration into Germany?
Do French political leaders not like funny cartoons? No funny political memes about France?
Would a faith find blasphemy to be abhorrent material?
A cult would see their protected teachings online line for free as abhorrent?
Undercover filming/photography of US farms is an abhorrent act in some US states? UK to remove that US news too?
Talking about DRM removal?
Talking about junk and weak crypto math passed for consumer use by the intelligence services?
Comments on UK whistleblower material?
The role of the SAS, MI5/6 in Ireland and the UK?
So much people/mil/gov/lawyers/faiths/cults/NGO's/think tanks/NATO would find abhorrent material.
with Taiwan and it would have all been great.
Japan, South Korea, the Philippines. Nations that like and support US freedom.
VPN.
With advanced crypto that no 5 eye nation has the skills to counter.
lenjoy that total control over the life of their citizens.
Welcome to a totalitarian Communist gov.
Contrast that with the freedom of the real China, Taiwan.
The taxes, "advice" and rules of a UK tyranny.
In the US the people have the freedom to enjoy what they want in their own "household".
The pursuit of Happiness.
The US can do domestic collection and the Foreign in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance.
Multitasking.
on the wireline paper insulated monopoly NN protected networks.
Bring some new innovation and speed into your community.
Stop thinking the federally protected monopoly networks are finally going to be upgraded.
Get community broadband in to your community.
Allow some innovation and free market competition.
Escape past the federal NN laws and rules that kept your network slow.
Looks over to Lifebook.
When their other internet is a paper insulated wireline telco protected by NN laws? Yes they do need new tech.
Games that download in full. Then need tens of more GB as a new patch days later.
The ads. Think of the ads on another OS in the OS.
Free trade.
The US and Uk "have" to accept equal and tech trade products from China.
Thats how its getting in to the USA and EU.
The GCHQ and 5 eye nations will do.
For every law in the USA, another way to collect it is found.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance was for Foreign but 4 hops collected it all.
1. "Malicious" would be the difference between a person installing software to find/track their own smartphone and pushed down malware.
2. Most nations police/gov/mil have had that support for decades. File access, live mic, camera... voice prints.
3. A person installing software to find/track their own smartphone. ie expected results.
4. Pushed down onto the smartphone if its malware.
Re "any description of the attack vector"
Hours in the ER due to an "accident" then result in other medial issues? Hours waiting for further tests and digital results.
The result is the way the person responds to the unexpected event..
Dissidents who are trusted and well connected in a protest movement at an important time in history can have an induced medical issue stop all their protesting.
Finding an expert. Making an appointment. Waiting. Calling friends and family.
Do they go with private health care? Use their nations free gov health care?
The time, stress, contacts made, questions, introspection can be just what a security service wants to slow a charismatic protest leader.
The security services of a nation can sit back and see what such a digital event induces.
Wealth family and friends offer support? Some other unexpected NGO, think tank, foundation, cult, faith group, union, charity, another gov offers totally unexpected and open ended support?
Why is this person getting so much expensive health care from unexpected and not seen before supporters?
The person falls back on 100% gov health care in their nation like any very average person?
Both results are of interest to police and security services watching protesters, dissidents, investigative journalists.
An induced medical emergency can uncover a lot about a persons supporters and once well hidden funding.
Who is really so interested in seeing them recover and is willing to invest in that health care?
The "digital" file is sent to any outside expert. By some network.
The expert can sit at their desk and see the file on a computer. ie totally not part of the same network that did the scan.
Does your ISP give out a few free email accounts?
Create a new account just for using social media.
Ever have to hand it over? Then the social media brand get nothing but your used once for social media email.
Of criminals and illegal migrants?
The people who use fake and shared parts of an ID to drive?
That the "active investigations" all over the USA that needs tech like vehicle license plates to find.
People who could pass their exams on merit.
They have the skills to learn to code.
Ada.
PRISM.
Its that time between going full robot and the lowest wages of skilled humans.