Dont place a live mic in your work and dwelling. Enjoy communications with people you enjoy to talk to.
Dont have gps track you. Use a map.
Cover that web cam. Use a cam with people you want to cam with.
Dont use a free OS from an ad company. Ensure a real OS can block ads and tracking.
Dont use a free OS from a brand that supported the NSA and GCHQ. Stop supporting brands that wont secure their own products, services, networks.
Dont use a free OS from a brand that never had the skill to detect the NSA and GCQH deep in its products. Stop supporting brands don't have the staff skills to secure their own products.
Dont use a free browser from an ad company. Look into the ad blocking of different browsers.
Dont use a free map product from an ad company. Use a map.
Dont buy VR hardware from an ad company. Look into who is making the VR product.
When buying product with a CC online try and buy locally with cash first.
Look around for who can do maps. A gov, another project, another brand. Be ready to swap over to any of them for when an ad company starts to set up a new price structure.
When the RAM is set in a factory and the device used is sold with a set amount?
The OS, other consumer applications and browser then all start using more RAM to keep the consumer safe.
How many times does 10% start to add up to a lot of RAM that was not used before?
design fix all this?
No more slow CPU, no more extra RAM used, no more OS software to protect from CPU security flaws. Back to fast and secure CPU design work.
Anyone have a design time line for when this will all be fixed in the CPU again?
AC a city cant keep paying for ever more homeless policies.
For that ever more tax would be collected by the city.
People with wealth then have to move to better parts of the USA just to keep any profit. To have the ability to invest and grow their brands.
AC re "incomplete understanding"
People can see the results of such politics all over the USA Parked RV, tent cities, many different kinds of trash, drug use, changes to the way police have to work.
The idea is to keep supporting code that can do one thing and do it well.
With logs, that people can see working and find errors.
Thats what would be good to return to.
The US extends the nuclear plants by not doing inspections and proving paper work to say the nuclear plant can just keep working.
Trying to keep a tower and turbines working "somehow" is a cost that everyone has to support.
The parts that may not fit. Parts no brand has anymore. Engineering per tower to say the entire old structure and new parts will work together.
Thats a lot of new engineering and experts when a new tower thats totally new and approved is ready. With all the years of design improvements.
The alternative is to wait so a person can have their bags searched AC. They wait for their lawyer. The costs has to fax a document allowing a bag search.
The US courts have faced all the same questions over decades. About rights, searches, lawyers and bags. The result is a bag can be searched, a person questioned. No court is going to allow one person to stop the inter connecting flights of 1000's of people waiting for one fax, lawyer.
Most advanced nations have the ability to educate only their best to become doctors.
That allows for the very best experts to be on duty every shift. People who are experts and who know what they are doing.
Specialists who are peer reviewed and who know their work.
Passing test and exams is one way to ensure the person on duty could learn and can learn. Keep learning over the many years of their profession.
That lets people who will need constant support during their shift and working hours change to other academic areas of study.
The US nuclear power generating infrastructure had the "atomic" weapons out the side door to add to the funding part.
Different parts of the USA wanted to virtue signal about supporting wind power.
The math was done and now more money is needed.
Who can pay? The energy users now have to cover past design costs? Tax payers?
Not if everything new got designed expecting a subsidy to cover this decades costs. Now that subsidy could only be for brand new green projects. Not new money for work on any existing turbine.
Who would pay for that "big market for upgrades"?
New products would sell a whole new design of turbine. That only worked with a new tower. The full set for a new project.
Who wants to produce "upgrades" when entire new full cost towers and turbines could get full new subsidy payments?
Why spend profits doing work on old turbines when new projects make a profit?
Thats engineering professionals to say existing structures are still ok and will still work. Trying to find new parts and pay workers to take apart an old design?
Design and build a new set of towers/turbines and move to the next project. Engineering experts know every part is new, workers know it all fits together.
When that happens everyone wants "Other People's Money" to design new energy projects.
Other People's Money to select a site, design and build.
To keep production working and ensure a profit so future projects can be provided for.
Then to cover most of the cost of decommissioning.
At some time the projects run out of that free money.
The cost of energy has to allow for all the costs of past and new turbines and set a market price for the full cost.
A gov cant just step in and virtue signals about energy production and offer another generation of "Other People's Money".
That would depend on the new design and the quality and design of the old foundations.
What was "allowed" in the past. What is needed now. What is now a standard. What was done in the past as a unique design to ensure a full subsidy got provided.
New standard parts may not fit as they expect new standard foundations and new standard towers...
Re "another turbine in its place"
That "another" could be from a new company with a new ways of getting a full subsidy that the old design could not work with...
Lots of reasons why decommissioning has to be done in the way it is. Tax. The way a new full subsidy has to be for a full new design of the entire new project.
Fitting a new part of a new project while getting new money onto an old project might be two different projects doing the math on who gets what fraction of new money.
Better to start again so everyone can work out the new money and the best engineering.
How was the movement of goods done before "online" and in 2018?
The 1980's mall. The 1980's store with experts and the prices they could offer per sale.
The huge brands in malls the 1980's could buy in at low prices, use TV/print to build up demand and get people to need a product.
Delivery all over the USA of the same product was computer controlled. The shop and mall still had to accept the product, find a place to display it and sell it.
The "online" trick was to connect that same exisiting order network to a new computer in consumers home. The consumer became the "store" requesting 1 product along with a short list of other items.
That will keep working if delivery stays at a low cost per item.
Lots of people all want the same new product that can be pre positioned all over the USA in 2018.
Shopping as a fashion statement becomes a social status again. The car, the clothing, the ability to be seen spending. To meet friends while spending.
Coffee culture becomes shopping culture again.
The experts in a store who add to the enjoyment of spending and buying.
Lots of ways to compete, just not on shipping and price.
Same. SSD, GPU, lots of RAM, Windows 10 are all ok for now.
Some clear direction from the CPU design over the security issues and then its time to upgrade.
Once any advance nation has that level of experts then they write their own books.
Every doctor has their results peer reviewed. Not getting what all the other doctors can do on average? Time for a look at that doctor and their results.
All kinds of issues per doctor quickly show up as all the other staff work to the best standards and their results are better.
When doctors need stop and use a computer when they should know that to do something in the level of education has to be considered.
AC GRU is the last group in Russia, the Soviet Union that would be allowed to do anything spy related outside Russia.
A spy in the UK was accepted by the GRU and the GRU was told to hand the spy over to people in the Soviet Union with the ability to protect such a spy.
The GRU wanted the glory and attempted to use the spy as a GRU spy.
The spy in the UK had access to a photocopy machine with no paper counter, no camera and could make unlimited photocopies of MI6/GCHQ level documents kept in a vault. The only limit was the weight of paper in a bag at any one time.
The spy was caught by the UK and the GRU lost the spy who could have advanced further up in the UK spy/mil sector for years.
Russia understood only its best experts would get to spy in the USA, UK and not get caught.
When the USA media talks of advanced spy methods and the GRU its domestic fiction.
Test anyone who wants to become a doctor.
Have anyone interesting in entering medicine in the USA pass exams before getting accepted into starting any US medical education.
Accept only the very best. Cant pass an exam on merit and be in the top percentage? Consider further university education outside medicine.
Keep the testing and standards up until the medical professional has gradated.
The person now allowed to practice medicine in the USA should be able to understand, learn and study at a very advanced level for decades.
Make entry into any field of specialization in the USA even more difficult. More exams to sort the best from the best and constant peer review.
Want to work in the USA as a doctor? Pass the same exams as the US doctors did to the same standard.
Such a system has a few unexpected results.
Doctors face no competition and can enjoy can set and good wages due to their advanced level of education.
The medical profession would have the tested ability to study, learn to a very good academic standard. No letting demographics set getting into medicine.
The "sitting around a table" is peer review. That is what ensures the experts can look aver all the work in their teaching hospital and track all the results of all their staff.
The why would the US mil/gov tell the world that they can track in real time back to any person?
Thats one law enforcement method any advance nation will now totally avoid.
The USA just gave up on decades of easy collection ability.
When the US gov talks of how it collected information in real time, its fake news.
Read about a US collection project 30 to 50 years later, that might be true.
West German and now Germany has accepted energy from the Soviet Union and now Russia going back many years.
The only policy West Germany was not happy with was any East German control over such exports from the Soviet Union.
Germany now accepts Russian energy due to price and the cost of an existing pipeline network.
Slashdot Mirror
Dont place a live mic in your work and dwelling. Enjoy communications with people you enjoy to talk to.
Dont have gps track you. Use a map.
Cover that web cam. Use a cam with people you want to cam with.
Dont use a free OS from an ad company. Ensure a real OS can block ads and tracking.
Dont use a free OS from a brand that supported the NSA and GCHQ. Stop supporting brands that wont secure their own products, services, networks.
Dont use a free OS from a brand that never had the skill to detect the NSA and GCQH deep in its products. Stop supporting brands don't have the staff skills to secure their own products.
Dont use a free browser from an ad company. Look into the ad blocking of different browsers.
Dont use a free map product from an ad company. Use a map.
Dont buy VR hardware from an ad company. Look into who is making the VR product.
When buying product with a CC online try and buy locally with cash first.
That would depend on the price range and brand of vehicle? What other brands are making a product range at that quality and price?
Look around for who can do maps. A gov, another project, another brand. Be ready to swap over to any of them for when an ad company starts to set up a new price structure.
Ad brands who give away free OS my not like brokers not showing their OS approved ads.
When the RAM is set in a factory and the device used is sold with a set amount?
The OS, other consumer applications and browser then all start using more RAM to keep the consumer safe.
How many times does 10% start to add up to a lot of RAM that was not used before?
design fix all this?
No more slow CPU, no more extra RAM used, no more OS software to protect from CPU security flaws. Back to fast and secure CPU design work.
Anyone have a design time line for when this will all be fixed in the CPU again?
AC a city cant keep paying for ever more homeless policies.
For that ever more tax would be collected by the city.
People with wealth then have to move to better parts of the USA just to keep any profit. To have the ability to invest and grow their brands.
AC re "incomplete understanding"
People can see the results of such politics all over the USA Parked RV, tent cities, many different kinds of trash, drug use, changes to the way police have to work.
Charles Proteus Steinmetz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and the field of magnetic hysteresis.
made by an ad company to ensure the consumer gets their ads?
The idea is to keep supporting code that can do one thing and do it well.
With logs, that people can see working and find errors.
Thats what would be good to return to.
The US extends the nuclear plants by not doing inspections and proving paper work to say the nuclear plant can just keep working.
Trying to keep a tower and turbines working "somehow" is a cost that everyone has to support.
The parts that may not fit. Parts no brand has anymore. Engineering per tower to say the entire old structure and new parts will work together.
Thats a lot of new engineering and experts when a new tower thats totally new and approved is ready. With all the years of design improvements.
The alternative is to wait so a person can have their bags searched AC. They wait for their lawyer. The costs has to fax a document allowing a bag search.
The US courts have faced all the same questions over decades. About rights, searches, lawyers and bags. The result is a bag can be searched, a person questioned. No court is going to allow one person to stop the inter connecting flights of 1000's of people waiting for one fax, lawyer.
Most advanced nations have the ability to educate only their best to become doctors.
That allows for the very best experts to be on duty every shift. People who are experts and who know what they are doing.
Specialists who are peer reviewed and who know their work.
Passing test and exams is one way to ensure the person on duty could learn and can learn. Keep learning over the many years of their profession.
That lets people who will need constant support during their shift and working hours change to other academic areas of study.
The US nuclear power generating infrastructure had the "atomic" weapons out the side door to add to the funding part.
Different parts of the USA wanted to virtue signal about supporting wind power.
The math was done and now more money is needed.
Who can pay? The energy users now have to cover past design costs? Tax payers?
Not if everything new got designed expecting a subsidy to cover this decades costs. Now that subsidy could only be for brand new green projects. Not new money for work on any existing turbine.
Who would pay for that "big market for upgrades"?
New products would sell a whole new design of turbine. That only worked with a new tower. The full set for a new project.
Who wants to produce "upgrades" when entire new full cost towers and turbines could get full new subsidy payments?
Why spend profits doing work on old turbines when new projects make a profit?
Thats engineering professionals to say existing structures are still ok and will still work. Trying to find new parts and pay workers to take apart an old design?
Design and build a new set of towers/turbines and move to the next project. Engineering experts know every part is new, workers know it all fits together.
When that happens everyone wants "Other People's Money" to design new energy projects.
Other People's Money to select a site, design and build.
To keep production working and ensure a profit so future projects can be provided for.
Then to cover most of the cost of decommissioning.
At some time the projects run out of that free money.
The cost of energy has to allow for all the costs of past and new turbines and set a market price for the full cost.
A gov cant just step in and virtue signals about energy production and offer another generation of "Other People's Money".
That would depend on the new design and the quality and design of the old foundations.
What was "allowed" in the past. What is needed now. What is now a standard. What was done in the past as a unique design to ensure a full subsidy got provided.
New standard parts may not fit as they expect new standard foundations and new standard towers...
Re "another turbine in its place"
That "another" could be from a new company with a new ways of getting a full subsidy that the old design could not work with...
Lots of reasons why decommissioning has to be done in the way it is. Tax. The way a new full subsidy has to be for a full new design of the entire new project.
Fitting a new part of a new project while getting new money onto an old project might be two different projects doing the math on who gets what fraction of new money.
Better to start again so everyone can work out the new money and the best engineering.
How was the movement of goods done before "online" and in 2018?
The 1980's mall. The 1980's store with experts and the prices they could offer per sale.
The huge brands in malls the 1980's could buy in at low prices, use TV/print to build up demand and get people to need a product.
Delivery all over the USA of the same product was computer controlled. The shop and mall still had to accept the product, find a place to display it and sell it.
The "online" trick was to connect that same exisiting order network to a new computer in consumers home. The consumer became the "store" requesting 1 product along with a short list of other items.
That will keep working if delivery stays at a low cost per item.
Lots of people all want the same new product that can be pre positioned all over the USA in 2018.
Shopping as a fashion statement becomes a social status again. The car, the clothing, the ability to be seen spending. To meet friends while spending.
Coffee culture becomes shopping culture again.
The experts in a store who add to the enjoyment of spending and buying.
Lots of ways to compete, just not on shipping and price.
Same. SSD, GPU, lots of RAM, Windows 10 are all ok for now.
Some clear direction from the CPU design over the security issues and then its time to upgrade.
Once any advance nation has that level of experts then they write their own books.
Every doctor has their results peer reviewed. Not getting what all the other doctors can do on average? Time for a look at that doctor and their results.
All kinds of issues per doctor quickly show up as all the other staff work to the best standards and their results are better.
When doctors need stop and use a computer when they should know that to do something in the level of education has to be considered.
AC GRU is the last group in Russia, the Soviet Union that would be allowed to do anything spy related outside Russia.
A spy in the UK was accepted by the GRU and the GRU was told to hand the spy over to people in the Soviet Union with the ability to protect such a spy.
The GRU wanted the glory and attempted to use the spy as a GRU spy.
The spy in the UK had access to a photocopy machine with no paper counter, no camera and could make unlimited photocopies of MI6/GCHQ level documents kept in a vault. The only limit was the weight of paper in a bag at any one time.
The spy was caught by the UK and the GRU lost the spy who could have advanced further up in the UK spy/mil sector for years.
Russia understood only its best experts would get to spy in the USA, UK and not get caught.
When the USA media talks of advanced spy methods and the GRU its domestic fiction.
What will the USA do when real skilled lawyers show up and request discovery again?
Test anyone who wants to become a doctor.
Have anyone interesting in entering medicine in the USA pass exams before getting accepted into starting any US medical education.
Accept only the very best. Cant pass an exam on merit and be in the top percentage? Consider further university education outside medicine.
Keep the testing and standards up until the medical professional has gradated.
The person now allowed to practice medicine in the USA should be able to understand, learn and study at a very advanced level for decades.
Make entry into any field of specialization in the USA even more difficult. More exams to sort the best from the best and constant peer review.
Want to work in the USA as a doctor? Pass the same exams as the US doctors did to the same standard.
Such a system has a few unexpected results.
Doctors face no competition and can enjoy can set and good wages due to their advanced level of education.
The medical profession would have the tested ability to study, learn to a very good academic standard. No letting demographics set getting into medicine.
The "sitting around a table" is peer review. That is what ensures the experts can look aver all the work in their teaching hospital and track all the results of all their staff.
The why would the US mil/gov tell the world that they can track in real time back to any person?
Thats one law enforcement method any advance nation will now totally avoid.
The USA just gave up on decades of easy collection ability.
When the US gov talks of how it collected information in real time, its fake news.
Read about a US collection project 30 to 50 years later, that might be true.
West German and now Germany has accepted energy from the Soviet Union and now Russia going back many years.
The only policy West Germany was not happy with was any East German control over such exports from the Soviet Union.
Germany now accepts Russian energy due to price and the cost of an existing pipeline network.