Also your argument That, of course, is their decision to make, by the right of the fact that they created it. is flawed. This implies that if you have an idea it belongs to you alone. This is not free either.
It's not an "idea". The root servers are owned and operated by private and government entities in the US.
At last I must say that capitalism != open market != freedom.
Capitalism requires open markets, and open markets occur wherever people are free.
But instead of going into detail here:-) read about free market and capitalism. And I might also refer to Noam Chomsky.
the US has largely been for stability and anticommunism, even at a high cost in freedom and oppression.
The unsavory people the US actually did give support to over the course of the Cold War were supported in opposition to greater evil of the USSR, because the cost in freedom and oppression from not opposing the USSR was far greater.
Now the land (like most other wealth) is owned disproportionately by the wealth elite and by corporations.
You must be counting well over half the population of the US as "the wealth elite".
We're only about 50-100 years away from the point where the poor rise up, kill the rich, and wealth gets redistributed somehow, and it is not going to be pretty, unless something changes.
Commies have been saying this for over 100 years now.
Have you ever read the definition of consciousness? It doesn't mean being human, or being worthy of life or anything like you must think. The assumption and ignorance you spout is frightening.
Consciousness is not defined by adherence to a particular political ideology. You defined your political opponents as being of "lower consciousness", and also implied that they simply aren't as "intelligent" and "enlightened" as people like yourself, being so wise and benevolent.
YOU DON'T HAVE A FUCKING CLUE!!!! Do you know that the lists of the
Memorial Society include everyone, who was ever accused of anti-soviet
activities during the whole history of the Soviet Russia/Soviet Union?
FUCKING LIAR! You imply that these are lists of innocent murdered
victims, but it also includes people who were jailed and even includes
people who were accused and released 2 weeks after!!! Like Ivan Abakumov
- arrested 25.01.1919, accused as a member of a counter-revolutionary
mutiny. The case stopped on 06.02.1919. Rehabilitated in 2002. This is
just a random example [astrobl.ru].
Fine. I misinterpreted that list as having given names of people
actually killed. But is it unreasonable to assume that a large
percentage of those listed by the Memorial Society were unjustly killed
by Stalin's apparatus?
In fact, it is not unreasonable to assume such. The MVD estimates
prepared for the 20th Party Congress of the CPSU reported that around
681,692 people were executed during 1937 and 1938 alone. Soviet defector
Vladimir Petrov reported handling hundreds of NKVD communiques demanding
execution quotas as high as 10,000 each.
In any case, it is estimated that Stalin's purges made up only 10% of
those who were killed under his regime.
ALL YOU FUCKING IMPERIALIST PIGS LIE ABOUT THE SOVIET UNION. You are
trying to inflate the numbers and fake them in any way you can, only to
present the Soviet Union in a bad lie. You can't do it without
fabricating evidence. THE 100 MILLION FUGURE IS A LIE, THE 40 MILLION
FIGURE IS A LIE. They are based on fabrications, twisted evidence and
have nothing to do with reality.
As much as you fervently wish they were, they are not lies, nor are they
fabrications, as you would know had you even looked at my references.
They are estimates based upon the work of historians and scholars far more respectable than lunatics like yourself.
That entire populations of people disappeared during the time of Stalin
is fact. Stalin, for example, deported most of the population of Estonia
to the camps. When they were sent back to Estonia, there were
considerably fewer Estonians. Repeat for Belarusan and Ukrainian Poles,
Crimean Tatars, etc.
Go ask some Estonians and Ukrainians yourself if you doubt what I'm saying.
And Solzhenitsyn is a fucking scum, an anti-semite, he was an
informer in the camps
Yet more of your ad-hominem attacks are duly noted.
and his books are 1) labeled as fiction
_The Gulag Archipilago_ is not "labeled as fiction".
2) fucking lies.
How scholarly of you.
I can't say anything good about Robert Conquest either, in case you
were wondering. Real figures say nothing at all like that shit
hawaii.edu site says, but who cares about real figures, when you can
repeat some government-sanctioned anti-communist propaganda.
Rumell's work has not been "sanctioned" by any government, for obvious reasons.
And if you are going to count people who died in a famine as victims
of communism,
All famines and mass-starvations of the 20th century occurred in places
either destroyed by war, or firmly under the control of people like
yourself who have violently suppressed private property rights in the
means of production; Ukraine under Stalin, Mengistu's Ethiopia, North
Korea, etc.
would you please count the 24000 who die every day (according to UN
reports) as victims of imperialism/capitalism. That would make it about
130 million since Soviet Union has collapsed. You can also add 200
million dead during that period from easily preventable deseases and
lack of clean water. Capitalism is more responsible for the deaths of these people than communism for those who died in 1930s from hunger.
Total bullshit.
People do not die from easily preventable diseases and the lack of clean
drinking water in any reasonably capitalist nation. The only places we
see such human suffering are, again, in countries destroyed
If your goal was to provide ironic support to the parent, you've succeeded. What occurred in NO is from start to finish due to government incompetence on all levels - but weighted more towards the City and State.
Indeed, it was government that prevented private charities such as the Red Cross from assisting those who were imprisoned in the Superdome.
If you believe communism is inherently totalitarian, you are a moron,
because communism abolishes the state when it's achieved.
Karl Marx intended terror and mass-murder. His writings condemn private
property, free speech and freedom of religion as "bourgeois freedom". He
put forth his own perverted vision of "freedom", defined in such a way
that Cambodia under Pol Pot (the purest Marxist ideologue of them all)
would have been a bastion of "freedom".
But then, you probably believe Pol Pot's Cambodia with the killing fields
and Ho Chi Minh's North Vietnam with 5 percent execution quotas were
both bastions of "true freedom".
100 millions is an obvious lie. Almost no people were killed (i.e.
hundreds or thousands at most) during forced collectivization.
You're a commie democide denier, no better than a Nazi holocaust denier.
Referring to the Soviet genocide of peasants during the 1930s collectivizations, R.J. Rummelwrites:
The Soviets now appear to admit to this genocide. In the Moscow News, a Moscow published, English language newspaper, was recently written: "In what amounted to genocide, between five and ten million people died during the forced collectivization of farming in the early thirties." (Ambartsumov, 1988)
According to Rummel's midrange estimates, 1,733,000 were killed by the Great Terror (though a Wikipedia article on the Great Purge claims that the Memorial Society released the names of 1,345,796 specific victims), 1,400,000 in deportations, 3,306,000 in and during transit to camps, and 5,000,000 through famine during the 1930s.
The absolute lowest estimated total for all murders committed by Marxist states
is 40,472,000. Of that, the table states that the USSR alone was responsible for 28,326,000 of those deaths. Rummel remarks that it's highly unlikely
that the total for Soviet democide is so low. The figure of 100 million
dead due to communism is given by Rummel as a most likely estimate.
The totals themselves were compiled by Rummel from numbers given by
respected writers and historians. For the USSR, this includes Robert
Conquest and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. A breakdown of the Soviet democide
estimates, along with their sources is here, with
the methodology for these estimates given here.
You are brainwashed by your school, by the media, by the politicians.
I learned very little about the crimes of communists in school, and next
to nothing about it from politicians and the major media.
You are a total and utter moron, I feel sorry for you. However, I am
not angry at you at all, because it's not your fault that you are so
stupid and you are not the only one. Many (most?) Americans (and many
Europeans as well) are taught lies in schools and grow up to believe
them. You don't know anything true about history, just fabrications and,
alas, you appear sadly unable to free yourself from this cage of lies.
You are psychotically disconnected from objective reality.
I've backed up my statements with citations traceable directly back to their original sources. You, on the other hand, present nothing but ad-hominem attacks.
I suspect you are either a troll, the privileged child of some hard-line former member of the CPSU or other nomenclature, or simply a blood-crazed psychopath.
Young women killed for dating. Limbs amputated for petty theft. Makeshift courts deciding the fates of members of local Muslim communities. The Western world has grown accustomed to hearing about the brutalities of Islamic law. However, these primitive practices are no longer limited to the remote tribal areas of Pakistan, the backward kingdom of Saudi Arabia, or oppressive, mullah-dominated Iran. Today, thanks in large part to a massive flow of immigration from Muslim countries, sharia law and medieval customs are becoming increasingly common in the heart of Christian Europe.
Noor Khan awoke one morning last September to a knock on her bedroom door. Several people, most of them strangers, stood clustered outside. It was Noor's wedding day, and she was the last to know.
A relative visiting from Amsterdam pushed forward in introduction her son, a pleasant-faced young man named Munir (like Noor's, his and other names have been changed to protect Noor's identity). This was Noor's husband-to-be. Noor's brother Ali embraced her, squeezing so tightly it hurt. "Don't embarrass me," he whispered. But when Noor, then 17, objected, he exploded. "I'll kill you. I'll do it right now, I don't care," Noor says he shouted. Munir and his companions went downstairs and Noor began sobbing uncontrollably.
Capitalism has been so successful essentially because one of the first things it did was to corrupt democratic politics with money.
Saying that money corrupts politics is like saying a dog wading through a pool of shit contaminates the shit.
More amusing, however, is your implication that "Capitalism" is this big, secret conspiracy of rich people "imposing" private property in the means of production upon the poor, impoverished masses who are crying out for socialism.
So laws became a tool for the rich to perpetuate the system, instead of a way for the majority to realize their will. It took a combination of mass public outcry and courageous leaders to implement things like the Pure Food and Drug Act, and labor laws (both of which have subsequently been attacked by less-courageous leaders).
There is nothing "courageous" about it. These "brave" laws were enacted by politicians and bureaucrats looking to expand their power over others, and were supported by various special interests who sought to hobble their competition through regulation and rent-seeking.
Don't confuse communism and totalitarian systems as those created by Lenin, Stalin & Co. that were called "communism".
Lenin and Stalin did try implementing communism, and Western commies portrayed them as having been successful as they rationalized and denied their crimes. All communist totalitarian states were modeled after the organizations Karl Marx himself helped create.
Marx himself intended totalitarianism and mass-murder. He condemned private property, free speech and religious freedom as "bourgeois freedom". He put forth his own perverted vision of "freedom", defined in such a way that Cambodia under Pol Pot (the purest Marxist ideologue of them all) would have been a bastion of "freedom".
I was going to reply to your other post, but I guess this thread will do just as well.
Lenin and Stalin certainly intended totalitarianism, as communism/socialism is inherently totalitarian. Being the single most murderous ideology in human history, over 100 million people were killed as a result of forced collectivization and trying to destroy private property rights in the means of production.
Between 1917 and 1987, the USSR murdered 54,769,000 people in domestic democide, and murdered around 10,000,000 people in genocide.
From 1949-1987, PRC China murdered 35,236,000 people in domestic democide, and 375,000 people in genocide.
Cambodia's Khmer Rouge, led by the purest Marxist ideologues of them all, was the most violent communist regime, having murdered 2,035,000 people - around 28 percent of the Cambodian population.
Most of the rest of your post is bullshit, falsely portraying the USSR as a "world leader" in science and education (it wasn't), and a place where people could "develop his/her potential without limit", (it certainly wasn't). Especially absurd was your assertion that the Soviet Union "supported global peace". Try telling that to people who lived in Czechoslovakia and Hungary during the Soviet dominations, or any other place where the USSR supported totalitarian regimes.
Enforcing standards is not going to work, the problem is with capitalism itself. When you base the economy on exploiting others, no wonder that psychopaths ran amok. In Soviet Union bosses were generally just normal people, they were paid on average 50-100% more than the rank and file and they cared about people they worked with. That means no large scale or random firing, sanatoriums and everything for the workers and generally a friendly and a relaxed atmosphere. Remove the private ownership of means of production and the profit motive and you instantly make society better.
You are a psychopath. And a deluded psychopath at that.
Well over 100 million people were killed when people like you tried to destroy private property rights in the means of production. Those who, despite this massive death count, are still pushing these murderous ideas are the true psychopaths.
Sorry for my mistake!!! The real number should have been 5,000,000 people killed just in Vietnam.
The U.S. did not kill 5 million people in Vietnam, nor was the war in Vietnam caused by the U.S.
People like you want to give us the impression that all deaths in Vietnam were peaceful civilians killed by the aggression of the Evil Americans who specifically targeted and bombed schools and nurseries full of women, children and infants.
Those who are not communist psychopaths or rabid anti-Americans use the following figures:
* Around 700,000 North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong killed and/or missing
* At least 70,000 North Vietnamese civilians killed by Allied bombings
* Around 250,000 South Vietnamese Army killed and/or missing
* Anywhere from 800,000 to 1,500,000 South Vietnamese civilians killed and/or died of starvation, wounds, disease, drought, friendly fire, atrocities etc.
Other estimates are that around 100,000 North Vietnamese civilians were killed by U.S. bombings. Most figures state around 1 million civilians killed on both sides during 1957 to 1975.
Recently I was talking with someone from another country. When I said that the U.S. government had killed 3,000,000 since the end of the Second World War, he said, "11,000,000". He's right. The lower figure includes just those killed directly by the U.S. government. The higher figure includes people who died because of indirect events caused by the U.S. government.
It sounds to me that you and your friend are simply repeating deranged communist bullshit.
For example, the U.S. government (not the people) bombed Cambodia. It is credibly estimated that the violence that happened after caused the deaths of millions of people.
Bullshit. It was Pol Pot who caused the deaths of millions of people by imposing the purest Marxist regime ever to exist. The U.S. bombing of Cambodia played no role in his rise to power.
Me and a couple of pals from the former bath-party in Iraq feels that the only way to stop America from occupying Iraq is to use a nuclear device on Washington. We are glad to learn from your post that you as an American will understand our action and not condem us for it. Ps. We hope that you do not live in Washington D.C. and if you do we advise you to move out of town next Sunday.
Moral equivalence from a deranged psychopath, presupposing that the Saddamite regime had a "sovereign right" to murder, rape and torture Iraqis.
The Japanese were our enemy, the Jews were the enemy of Hitler.
Did Jews acting on behalf of a Jewish state attack a German naval base and try to conquer Europe, raping and pillaging everything in their path?
The Japanese were civillians, the Jews were civillians.
Were the civilian Jews killed by Hitler living in militarily defended cities in a Jewish state serving as centers of military logistics and production?
Sure, there was the Inquisition, the Counter-Reformation, etc. Christian extremists did kill far more people in the last 500 years than Islamic extremists did in the last 5 years.
The relevant comparison is to compare the death count for both religions for the past 500 years.
I have little doubt that within this time period, or even the past 1,000 years, various Muslim psychopaths have been responsible for more democidal killings than Christian extremists.
Most people in the U.S. don't want to know how corrupt their government has become. In this thread from yesterday, someone claims "Christianity has matured - it's a peaceful religion" when the U.S. government, a government of a Christian country, has killed more than 3,000,000 people since the end of the Second World War.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not an "idea". The root servers are owned and operated by private and government entities in the US.
At last I must say that capitalism != open market != freedom.
Capitalism requires open markets, and open markets occur wherever people are free.
But instead of going into detail here :-) read about free market and capitalism. And I might also refer to Noam Chomsky.
Noam Chomsky is a totalitarian psychopath.
Commies have only obtained power through either conspiratorial coups, or by usurping popular non-communist revolutions.
The unsavory people the US actually did give support to over the course of the Cold War were supported in opposition to greater evil of the USSR, because the cost in freedom and oppression from not opposing the USSR was far greater.
Bullshit.
You must be counting well over half the population of the US as "the wealth elite".
We're only about 50-100 years away from the point where the poor rise up, kill the rich, and wealth gets redistributed somehow, and it is not going to be pretty, unless something changes.
Commies have been saying this for over 100 years now.
It's even less likely now than it was then.
Consciousness is not defined by adherence to a particular political ideology. You defined your political opponents as being of "lower consciousness", and also implied that they simply aren't as "intelligent" and "enlightened" as people like yourself, being so wise and benevolent.
Psychopath.
No wonder leftists murder so many people when they attain absolute power.
Fine. I misinterpreted that list as having given names of people actually killed. But is it unreasonable to assume that a large percentage of those listed by the Memorial Society were unjustly killed by Stalin's apparatus?
In fact, it is not unreasonable to assume such. The MVD estimates prepared for the 20th Party Congress of the CPSU reported that around 681,692 people were executed during 1937 and 1938 alone. Soviet defector Vladimir Petrov reported handling hundreds of NKVD communiques demanding execution quotas as high as 10,000 each.
In any case, it is estimated that Stalin's purges made up only 10% of those who were killed under his regime.
ALL YOU FUCKING IMPERIALIST PIGS LIE ABOUT THE SOVIET UNION. You are trying to inflate the numbers and fake them in any way you can, only to present the Soviet Union in a bad lie. You can't do it without fabricating evidence. THE 100 MILLION FUGURE IS A LIE, THE 40 MILLION FIGURE IS A LIE. They are based on fabrications, twisted evidence and have nothing to do with reality.
As much as you fervently wish they were, they are not lies, nor are they fabrications, as you would know had you even looked at my references. They are estimates based upon the work of historians and scholars far more respectable than lunatics like yourself.
That entire populations of people disappeared during the time of Stalin is fact. Stalin, for example, deported most of the population of Estonia to the camps. When they were sent back to Estonia, there were considerably fewer Estonians. Repeat for Belarusan and Ukrainian Poles, Crimean Tatars, etc.
Go ask some Estonians and Ukrainians yourself if you doubt what I'm saying.
And Solzhenitsyn is a fucking scum, an anti-semite, he was an informer in the camps
Yet more of your ad-hominem attacks are duly noted.
and his books are 1) labeled as fiction
_The Gulag Archipilago_ is not "labeled as fiction".
2) fucking lies.
How scholarly of you.
I can't say anything good about Robert Conquest either, in case you were wondering. Real figures say nothing at all like that shit hawaii.edu site says, but who cares about real figures, when you can repeat some government-sanctioned anti-communist propaganda.
Rumell's work has not been "sanctioned" by any government, for obvious reasons.
And if you are going to count people who died in a famine as victims of communism,
All famines and mass-starvations of the 20th century occurred in places either destroyed by war, or firmly under the control of people like yourself who have violently suppressed private property rights in the means of production; Ukraine under Stalin, Mengistu's Ethiopia, North Korea, etc.
would you please count the 24000 who die every day (according to UN reports) as victims of imperialism/capitalism. That would make it about 130 million since Soviet Union has collapsed. You can also add 200 million dead during that period from easily preventable deseases and lack of clean water. Capitalism is more responsible for the deaths of these people than communism for those who died in 1930s from hunger.
Total bullshit.
People do not die from easily preventable diseases and the lack of clean drinking water in any reasonably capitalist nation. The only places we see such human suffering are, again, in countries destroyed
Indeed, it was government that prevented private charities such as the Red Cross from assisting those who were imprisoned in the Superdome.
The school of Austrian economics is the only valid school of economics that exists.
Everything else is bullshit.
Karl Marx intended terror and mass-murder. His writings condemn private property, free speech and freedom of religion as "bourgeois freedom". He put forth his own perverted vision of "freedom", defined in such a way that Cambodia under Pol Pot (the purest Marxist ideologue of them all) would have been a bastion of "freedom".
But then, you probably believe Pol Pot's Cambodia with the killing fields and Ho Chi Minh's North Vietnam with 5 percent execution quotas were both bastions of "true freedom".
100 millions is an obvious lie. Almost no people were killed (i.e. hundreds or thousands at most) during forced collectivization.
You're a commie democide denier, no better than a Nazi holocaust denier.
Referring to the Soviet genocide of peasants during the 1930s collectivizations, R.J. Rummel writes:
According to Rummel's midrange estimates, 1,733,000 were killed by the Great Terror (though a Wikipedia article on the Great Purge claims that the Memorial Society released the names of 1,345,796 specific victims), 1,400,000 in deportations, 3,306,000 in and during transit to camps, and 5,000,000 through famine during the 1930s.
The absolute lowest estimated total for all murders committed by Marxist states is 40,472,000. Of that, the table states that the USSR alone was responsible for 28,326,000 of those deaths. Rummel remarks that it's highly unlikely that the total for Soviet democide is so low. The figure of 100 million dead due to communism is given by Rummel as a most likely estimate.
The totals themselves were compiled by Rummel from numbers given by respected writers and historians. For the USSR, this includes Robert Conquest and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. A breakdown of the Soviet democide estimates, along with their sources is here, with the methodology for these estimates given here.
You are brainwashed by your school, by the media, by the politicians.
I learned very little about the crimes of communists in school, and next to nothing about it from politicians and the major media.
You are a total and utter moron, I feel sorry for you. However, I am not angry at you at all, because it's not your fault that you are so stupid and you are not the only one. Many (most?) Americans (and many Europeans as well) are taught lies in schools and grow up to believe them. You don't know anything true about history, just fabrications and, alas, you appear sadly unable to free yourself from this cage of lies.
You are psychotically disconnected from objective reality.
I've backed up my statements with citations traceable directly back to their original sources. You, on the other hand, present nothing but ad-hominem attacks.
I suspect you are either a troll, the privileged child of some hard-line former member of the CPSU or other nomenclature, or simply a blood-crazed psychopath.
Commie bullshit. Lots of nitpicking, but mostly bullshit.
Leftist hatred of Fox News stems from the fact that FNC allows people to the right of Stalin to express their viewpoints.
One example:
And another:
Saying that money corrupts politics is like saying a dog wading through a pool of shit contaminates the shit.
More amusing, however, is your implication that "Capitalism" is this big, secret conspiracy of rich people "imposing" private property in the means of production upon the poor, impoverished masses who are crying out for socialism.
So laws became a tool for the rich to perpetuate the system, instead of a way for the majority to realize their will. It took a combination of mass public outcry and courageous leaders to implement things like the Pure Food and Drug Act, and labor laws (both of which have subsequently been attacked by less-courageous leaders).
There is nothing "courageous" about it. These "brave" laws were enacted by politicians and bureaucrats looking to expand their power over others, and were supported by various special interests who sought to hobble their competition through regulation and rent-seeking.
Lenin and Stalin did try implementing communism, and Western commies portrayed them as having been successful as they rationalized and denied their crimes. All communist totalitarian states were modeled after the organizations Karl Marx himself helped create.
Marx himself intended totalitarianism and mass-murder. He condemned private property, free speech and religious freedom as "bourgeois freedom". He put forth his own perverted vision of "freedom", defined in such a way that Cambodia under Pol Pot (the purest Marxist ideologue of them all) would have been a bastion of "freedom".
Lenin and Stalin certainly intended totalitarianism, as communism/socialism is inherently totalitarian. Being the single most murderous ideology in human history, over 100 million people were killed as a result of forced collectivization and trying to destroy private property rights in the means of production.
Between 1917 and 1987, the USSR murdered 54,769,000 people in domestic democide, and murdered around 10,000,000 people in genocide.
From 1949-1987, PRC China murdered 35,236,000 people in domestic democide, and 375,000 people in genocide.
Cambodia's Khmer Rouge, led by the purest Marxist ideologues of them all, was the most violent communist regime, having murdered 2,035,000 people - around 28 percent of the Cambodian population.
Most of the rest of your post is bullshit, falsely portraying the USSR as a "world leader" in science and education (it wasn't), and a place where people could "develop his/her potential without limit", (it certainly wasn't). Especially absurd was your assertion that the Soviet Union "supported global peace". Try telling that to people who lived in Czechoslovakia and Hungary during the Soviet dominations, or any other place where the USSR supported totalitarian regimes.
You are a psychopath. And a deluded psychopath at that.
Well over 100 million people were killed when people like you tried to destroy private property rights in the means of production. Those who, despite this massive death count, are still pushing these murderous ideas are the true psychopaths.
The U.S. did not kill 5 million people in Vietnam, nor was the war in Vietnam caused by the U.S.
People like you want to give us the impression that all deaths in Vietnam were peaceful civilians killed by the aggression of the Evil Americans who specifically targeted and bombed schools and nurseries full of women, children and infants.
Those who are not communist psychopaths or rabid anti-Americans use the following figures:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_casualtie s :
* Around 700,000 North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong killed and/or missing
* At least 70,000 North Vietnamese civilians killed by Allied bombings
* Around 250,000 South Vietnamese Army killed and/or missing
* Anywhere from 800,000 to 1,500,000 South Vietnamese civilians killed and/or died of starvation, wounds, disease, drought, friendly fire, atrocities etc.
Other estimates are that around 100,000 North Vietnamese civilians were killed by U.S. bombings. Most figures state around 1 million civilians killed on both sides during 1957 to 1975.
It sounds to me that you and your friend are simply repeating deranged communist bullshit.
For example, the U.S. government (not the people) bombed Cambodia. It is credibly estimated that the violence that happened after caused the deaths of millions of people.
Bullshit. It was Pol Pot who caused the deaths of millions of people by imposing the purest Marxist regime ever to exist. The U.S. bombing of Cambodia played no role in his rise to power.
Moral equivalence from a deranged psychopath, presupposing that the Saddamite regime had a "sovereign right" to murder, rape and torture Iraqis.
Did Jews acting on behalf of a Jewish state attack a German naval base and try to conquer Europe, raping and pillaging everything in their path?
The Japanese were civillians, the Jews were civillians.
Were the civilian Jews killed by Hitler living in militarily defended cities in a Jewish state serving as centers of military logistics and production?
You are deranged.
If I was alive in 1945, I would have paid money to see him burn to death.
Smoke that in your pipe.
The relevant comparison is to compare the death count for both religions for the past 500 years.
I have little doubt that within this time period, or even the past 1,000 years, various Muslim psychopaths have been responsible for more democidal killings than Christian extremists.
Citation?
Bullshit.