Another one. I have not mentioned race at all. You don't even know what race I am. White Muslims are Just as Capable and likely to be terrorists as brown ones, and there are plenty of brown victims, the peaceful Coptic Christians for example
How many times a day does the average man think about sex again?
pr0ntillion
When looking at women, wearing Google glasses?
Huh? What was that again?
It won't be long before a combination of AI and graphics will be able to assess the woman's body type and produce a "clothes free" enhanced reality image..... Just don't look at Ann Widdecombe
Or your Google glasses automatically beaming audio and video to the police when you say a phrase that indicates you're being mugged.
Or to the secret service when you are criticising the government. Or to the RIAA when you make an open invitation to come and watch a video at your house (an unlicensed public performance).
Behold! Chrisq feels the need to tell everyone just how much of a racist fuck he is. You are the problem, not the Muslims.
Behold dave420 feels the need to show everyone what an idiot he is. I have not mentioned race at all. You don't even know what race I am. White Muslims are Just as Capable and likely to be terrorists as brown ones, and there are plenty of brown victims, the peaceful Coptic Christians for example
Arabs or blacks? They are always them in Paris in this kind of incident.
Don't get confused, I am not being racist, and I don't mean all the arabs or blacks do these things, what I mean is that the 95% of people who do that in Paris (in Paris, I don't mean other cities or countries, which I don't know), are arabs or blacks.
When I was there I saw lots and lots of incidents like that.
They are almost certainly Muslims, and naturally assume that the guy with glasses is from the security services and interested in their terrorist plots. Hopefully the real security services are monitoring them undetected.
Dumb phones are still going, but how long they will last is anyone's guess.
Well, basically, I think they will last for a very long time.
At least until a smart phone becomes cheaper than a dumb phone
I use a "dumb" phone to accept my SMS confirmations for bank transfers etc. That way I can use the banking site from my smart phone without worrying about some malware creating transactions and confirming them by intercepting the SMS. There is also the advantage that I always have a back-up phone, my dumb-phone batteries last about a week in standby and on PAYG it has nearly zero cost (I have to make a call or sent an SMS within 3 months to keep it active).
What really spins my head here is the concept that someone would report trolling on the internet to the police. The kind of person that would do such a thing is surely the worst on earth.
Pedestrians and cyclists are rarely hit on highways, which would be more or less the only place where faster car speed would come into play.
UK statistics: Four percent of traffic fatalities are on motorways. Of these, 20 percent are pedestrians.
Realistically you are not going to be able to design a car that can hit a pedestrian at 70mph, and pobably not avoid them either. This is why it is illegal for a pedestrian to go on a motorway. 20% of 4% is a very small number. Whenever I have heard of pedestrians killed on motorways it has been exceptional circumstances, one man blind drunk taking a turn down a footpath, a young thief running away from police, a man with early Alzheimer, and a young woman who's car broke down. You would be much better spending resources on making cars safer for the many more lower speed impacts that occur in urban and suburban environments.
The British government actually makes a substantial amount of money off of the Royal family, not the other way around:p
Rubbish - this is royalist propaganda based on assumptions that nobody would visit castles if there wasn't a royal family (in fact 8.5 million people visit the Louvre compared to 1.8 million visiting Windsor castle so there could be a substantial increase if it was fully open) and that all the fisheries, farms and businesses owned by the royal family would be completely unused.
Let me be the first to come with a car analogy:
What is a driver's life worth?
That is actually a very good analogy. At the time of the Apollo space program safety features in cars were largely seen as a waste of money, by both manufacturers and consumers - people all felt that they were great drivers so it wouldn't happen to them.
An astronaut life isn't worth shit, now that the u.s. government has privatized everything to the British royals.
That gives me a great idea. Send the Royal Family into space. That way if they don't come down it saves a fortune on the honours roll to the UK, and we'd probably have as many tourists visiting Buckingham Palace as the French do to the Louvre.
If someone needs to have their every movement tracked, they shouldn't be out of prison.
I agree absolutely, but where this should be used is where it is a punishment and deterrent, not to prevent people who are likely to commit another crime. In this case all they need to do is add an extra day on the end to make up for the one when they were not monitored.
We also had a crash in France recently (Orange was down for a whole day), and it made little to no difference on anyone's life -- except control freaks who had to know where you were all the time
i bet that's what the monitored criminals were saying!
If the locked gate is on a right of way you are perfectly entitled to bring some bolt cutters and remove the lock
But make sure you leave the lock hooked on the gate (or otherwise obviously associated with it) after opening it. After all, you don't want to be accused of theft. (Or, if there's a name and address on the lock, mail it to its owner saying that they must've "accidentally" left it somewhere and you're just returning it.)
Good point, also I should point out that if you can easily get around the obstruction you should do so (i.e. if there is another unlocked gate even if the rigt of way goes through the locked one), and you should cause the minimum damage necessary to be able to pass the obstruction - in other words if there is a £20 lock on a cheap chain, cut the chain!
Then it cannot replace HTTP and should be withdrawn, or it's been wrongfully sorted in under "HTTP/2.0 Proposals"
The IETF HTTPbis Working Group has been chartered to consider new work around HTTP; specifically, a new wire-level protocol for the semantics of HTTP (i.e., what will become HTTP/2.0), and new HTTP authentication schemes.
Good point - unless there are particular reasons that a "niche protocol" for highly interactive sites is better than a general purpose one then a replacement that covers all uses should be covered. In fact I have come round to agreeing with TFA: "SPDY Should Be Viewed As a Prototype"
TFA is talking about in reverse proxies (of which Varnish is one of many), which are very commonplace. In fact, you're seeing this page through (at least) one, as Slashdot uses Varnish.
Publicly cached data is outside SPDY's use-case. It is aimed at reducing latency, and its main target is rich "web application" pages. Now it may well be possible to design a protocol that supports caching as well as reduced latency, but this is not what SPDY was designed to do.
For instance identifying the standardized HTTP headers, by a 4-byte length and textual name, and then applying a deflate compressor to save bandwidth is totally at odds with the job of HTTP routers which need to quickly extract the Host: header in order to route the traffic, preferably without committing extensive resources to each request....
It seems to me that routing based on header is doing entirely the wrong thing. In any case, according to wikipedia:
TLS encryption is nearly ubiquitous in SPDY implementations
Which rather makes routing on content infeasible (OK you can forward route behind the SSL endpoint, but this doesn't seem to be what he's talking about)
So you're encouraging Facebook to not only eavesdrop and collect this data but use ethnic profiling as well? I guess you also want FB to pay particular attention to Catholics with the high rate of abuse by the church? Or those involved in athletics?
You're a brainwashed moron.
I am more concerned that the main abusers don't get left out because they use a language other than English. If they catch some Catholics and Athlete pedos as well then all the better.
OpenCycleMap offers me a route that I know includes a locked gate, so isn't usable. Google suggests a route down a dangerous dual carriageway, so while viable it wouldn't be a good idea. It's getting there but at the moment I wouldn't trust either of them to suggest a route on roads I didn't know.
If the locked gate is on a right of way you are perfectly entitled to bring some bolt cutters and remove the lock
Slashdot Mirror
Another one. I have not mentioned race at all. You don't even know what race I am. White Muslims are Just as Capable and likely to be terrorists as brown ones, and there are plenty of brown victims, the peaceful Coptic Christians for example
Speaking of the RIAA, what will happen if you wear the glasses at the movies...?
They turn opaque
How many times a day does the average man think about sex again?
pr0ntillion
When looking at women, wearing Google glasses?
Huh? What was that again?
It won't be long before a combination of AI and graphics will be able to assess the woman's body type and produce a "clothes free" enhanced reality image. .... Just don't look at Ann Widdecombe
Or your Google glasses automatically beaming audio and video to the police when you say a phrase that indicates you're being mugged.
Or to the secret service when you are criticising the government. Or to the RIAA when you make an open invitation to come and watch a video at your house (an unlicensed public performance).
This case is irrelevant.
Windows 95 is history.
No this case is relevant because WordPerfect is history.
Behold! Chrisq feels the need to tell everyone just how much of a racist fuck he is. You are the problem, not the Muslims.
Behold dave420 feels the need to show everyone what an idiot he is. I have not mentioned race at all. You don't even know what race I am. White Muslims are Just as Capable and likely to be terrorists as brown ones, and there are plenty of brown victims, the peaceful Coptic Christians for example
Arabs or blacks? They are always them in Paris in this kind of incident.
Don't get confused, I am not being racist, and I don't mean all the arabs or blacks do these things, what I mean is that the 95% of people who do that in Paris (in Paris, I don't mean other cities or countries, which I don't know), are arabs or blacks.
When I was there I saw lots and lots of incidents like that.
They are almost certainly Muslims, and naturally assume that the guy with glasses is from the security services and interested in their terrorist plots. Hopefully the real security services are monitoring them undetected.
Give me $400 and I'll get one. There - I saved them $50
Dumb phones are still going, but how long they will last is anyone's guess.
Well, basically, I think they will last for a very long time.
At least until a smart phone becomes cheaper than a dumb phone
I use a "dumb" phone to accept my SMS confirmations for bank transfers etc. That way I can use the banking site from my smart phone without worrying about some malware creating transactions and confirming them by intercepting the SMS. There is also the advantage that I always have a back-up phone, my dumb-phone batteries last about a week in standby and on PAYG it has nearly zero cost (I have to make a call or sent an SMS within 3 months to keep it active).
If you are making an embeded system such as a robot, house control system, etc. this will be cheaper than buying a full computer.
What really spins my head here is the concept that someone would report trolling on the internet to the police. The kind of person that would do such a thing is surely the worst on earth.
Yes, I'd report them ... oh wait.
It's a piss ant little island with more fibre than most densely populated nations and for what? the whole six inbred people that live down there?
Actually its population is about the same as that of Whyoming.
Pedestrians and cyclists are rarely hit on highways, which would be more or less the only place where faster car speed would come into play.
UK statistics: Four percent of traffic fatalities are on motorways. Of these, 20 percent are pedestrians.
Realistically you are not going to be able to design a car that can hit a pedestrian at 70mph, and pobably not avoid them either. This is why it is illegal for a pedestrian to go on a motorway. 20% of 4% is a very small number. Whenever I have heard of pedestrians killed on motorways it has been exceptional circumstances, one man blind drunk taking a turn down a footpath, a young thief running away from police, a man with early Alzheimer, and a young woman who's car broke down. You would be much better spending resources on making cars safer for the many more lower speed impacts that occur in urban and suburban environments.
The British government actually makes a substantial amount of money off of the Royal family, not the other way around :p
Rubbish - this is royalist propaganda based on assumptions that nobody would visit castles if there wasn't a royal family (in fact 8.5 million people visit the Louvre compared to 1.8 million visiting Windsor castle so there could be a substantial increase if it was fully open) and that all the fisheries, farms and businesses owned by the royal family would be completely unused.
Let me be the first to come with a car analogy: What is a driver's life worth?
That is actually a very good analogy. At the time of the Apollo space program safety features in cars were largely seen as a waste of money, by both manufacturers and consumers - people all felt that they were great drivers so it wouldn't happen to them.
An astronaut life isn't worth shit, now that the u.s. government has privatized everything to the British royals.
That gives me a great idea. Send the Royal Family into space. That way if they don't come down it saves a fortune on the honours roll to the UK, and we'd probably have as many tourists visiting Buckingham Palace as the French do to the Louvre.
If someone needs to have their every movement tracked, they shouldn't be out of prison.
I agree absolutely, but where this should be used is where it is a punishment and deterrent, not to prevent people who are likely to commit another crime. In this case all they need to do is add an extra day on the end to make up for the one when they were not monitored.
We also had a crash in France recently (Orange was down for a whole day), and it made little to no difference on anyone's life -- except control freaks who had to know where you were all the time
i bet that's what the monitored criminals were saying!
If the locked gate is on a right of way you are perfectly entitled to bring some bolt cutters and remove the lock
But make sure you leave the lock hooked on the gate (or otherwise obviously associated with it) after opening it. After all, you don't want to be accused of theft. (Or, if there's a name and address on the lock, mail it to its owner saying that they must've "accidentally" left it somewhere and you're just returning it.)
Good point, also I should point out that if you can easily get around the obstruction you should do so (i.e. if there is another unlocked gate even if the rigt of way goes through the locked one), and you should cause the minimum damage necessary to be able to pass the obstruction - in other words if there is a £20 lock on a cheap chain, cut the chain!
Then it cannot replace HTTP and should be withdrawn, or it's been wrongfully sorted in under "HTTP/2.0 Proposals"
Good point - unless there are particular reasons that a "niche protocol" for highly interactive sites is better than a general purpose one then a replacement that covers all uses should be covered. In fact I have come round to agreeing with TFA: "SPDY Should Be Viewed As a Prototype"
TFA is talking about in reverse proxies (of which Varnish is one of many), which are very commonplace. In fact, you're seeing this page through (at least) one, as Slashdot uses Varnish.
Publicly cached data is outside SPDY's use-case. It is aimed at reducing latency, and its main target is rich "web application" pages. Now it may well be possible to design a protocol that supports caching as well as reduced latency, but this is not what SPDY was designed to do.
For instance identifying the standardized HTTP headers, by a 4-byte length and textual name, and then applying a deflate compressor to save bandwidth is totally at odds with the job of HTTP routers which need to quickly extract the Host: header in order to route the traffic, preferably without committing extensive resources to each request. ...
It seems to me that routing based on header is doing entirely the wrong thing. In any case, according to wikipedia:
TLS encryption is nearly ubiquitous in SPDY implementations
Which rather makes routing on content infeasible (OK you can forward route behind the SSL endpoint, but this doesn't seem to be what he's talking about)
So you're encouraging Facebook to not only eavesdrop and collect this data but use ethnic profiling as well? I guess you also want FB to pay particular attention to Catholics with the high rate of abuse by the church? Or those involved in athletics?
You're a brainwashed moron.
I am more concerned that the main abusers don't get left out because they use a language other than English. If they catch some Catholics and Athlete pedos as well then all the better.
OpenCycleMap offers me a route that I know includes a locked gate, so isn't usable. Google suggests a route down a dangerous dual carriageway, so while viable it wouldn't be a good idea. It's getting there but at the moment I wouldn't trust either of them to suggest a route on roads I didn't know.
If the locked gate is on a right of way you are perfectly entitled to bring some bolt cutters and remove the lock
The Muzzies are coming!
The Muzzies are coming!
Everyone keep calm
They're violent and they're evil,
And they mean to do us harm
This is on topic for once. I just hope that Facebook pay particular attention to conversations in Urdu.