I wonder whether Universities will eventually become administrative hubs for online courses, with on-site work mostly limited to research level students. On one hand this would be great for affordability, but on the other the brighter undergrads who would have picked up much more than the course from the research students will be limited to the syllabus
I've always wondered, why not just 0%? Why allow someone to knowingly decrease their ability to drive?
Many countries have a nominal 0 limit, but in practice have to allow very small measures. There is a small amount of alcohol in bread, cheese, ripe fruit, and many other things.
good to know that while the country is almost 17 trillion in debt that such important endeavors take priority
What do you mean - they can now say "17 trillion dollars in debt is close to two dollars in debt when you consider infinity, the mathematicians say so!"
Those mestizo half-breeds really weren't born with a full box of marbles--destroying a temple for road gravel. And Obama wants to flood our country with these tawny height challenged brainiacs.
So since these half-breeds are inferiour to their ancestors who built the great temple in the first place, presumably it was the influx of Western European genes that lead to this inferiority?
They don't want to go to court, though, they just want the money.
They're betting that people would rather pay the go-away fee than risk being outed as a porn watcher to their neighbours. After all, even if you're innocent, the court case would cost you a fair bit of time and money, and the neighbours will have different standards of proof than a court.
But you have a piece of paper saying that it could have been them!
No I assume that when I give them a long list of people who I have seen in the neighbourhood and insist that I want to assist in the crusade for justice, and how I expect it was that google camera car they will drop it.
"The list of possible suspects includes you, members of your household, your neighbors (if you maintain an open wi-fi connection) and anyone who might have visited your house
So you just say it must have been a neighbour or visitor, ask them to add all the visitors to neighbours' houses, the post man, delivery men, etc. and let them get on with it. If they go to court quote their own words - it could have been any of these!
Yes, Saudi Arabia is bad, but anything that keeps the Muslims under control is better than letting them have their way.... which is not giving them freedom but allowing them to murder, kill, and rape others as well as killing eachother and removing freedoms under sectarian Sharia militias.
No. You should never be monitoring people for believing something or subscribing to an ideology. All you should be worried about is whether or not the law is being broken or not. There is nothing wrong with saying "I want this country to be under Sharia Law and will work to make it happen" as long as the methods you use are Legal. The government should only care when the methods are illegal in nature, the goal itself (communism, democracy, islam, etc.) is irrelevant.
If there were a reasonable probability that they would act within the law then I would agree. The thing is they say that they do not recognize Western laws.
Fascists have always been of the left. Leftest continue to deny it.
Actually I think it is a two-dimensional situation, as illustrated by Political Compass. Though I don't know how accurate their assessments of the individuals is, I think the principle that either left or right wing politicians can be authoritarian is true.
BTW I do not consider myself to be authoritarian in general, its just that the expressed intention of Muslims to undermine our societies necessitates extraordinary measures. The freedoms of non-muslims should be protected as far as possible when a hostile group has declared war on us.
Slashdot Mirror
Have they no decency? Sounds like a bunch of sicko and perverts!
On the other hand you do get the bulk discount vouchers for rubber gloves and Vaseline
Now you don't have to worry about global worming, because as the world warms you will move closer to the pole.
I wonder whether Universities will eventually become administrative hubs for online courses, with on-site work mostly limited to research level students. On one hand this would be great for affordability, but on the other the brighter undergrads who would have picked up much more than the course from the research students will be limited to the syllabus
I've always wondered, why not just 0%? Why allow someone to knowingly decrease their ability to drive?
Many countries have a nominal 0 limit, but in practice have to allow very small measures. There is a small amount of alcohol in bread, cheese, ripe fruit, and many other things.
in 90% of all accidents with injuiries the main cause is that at least one party involved was driving too fast
Evidence?
If neither of them were moving they would not have had an accident ;-)
That show is maybe one step ahead of your mom saying "just one puff of pot could be your last"
If I'd taken my mom's pot it would have been!
good to know that while the country is almost 17 trillion in debt that such important endeavors take priority
What do you mean - they can now say "17 trillion dollars in debt is close to two dollars in debt when you consider infinity, the mathematicians say so!"
'When I use a word ... it means just what I choose it to mean â" neither more nor less.'
Too late, I have pictures of the Sphinx being destroyed ...
visit www.goatse.cx to see
I think you are mixing up sphinx and sphincter.
Those mestizo half-breeds really weren't born with a full box of marbles--destroying a temple for road gravel. And Obama wants to flood our country with these tawny height challenged brainiacs.
So since these half-breeds are inferiour to their ancestors who built the great temple in the first place, presumably it was the influx of Western European genes that lead to this inferiority?
Well its not a good time for pyramids, with the Muzzies threatening to destroy the Egyptian ones.
They don't want to go to court, though, they just want the money. They're betting that people would rather pay the go-away fee than risk being outed as a porn watcher to their neighbours. After all, even if you're innocent, the court case would cost you a fair bit of time and money, and the neighbours will have different standards of proof than a court.
But you have a piece of paper saying that it could have been them!
You assume they want to go to court.
No I assume that when I give them a long list of people who I have seen in the neighbourhood and insist that I want to assist in the crusade for justice, and how I expect it was that google camera car they will drop it.
Who cares unless you live in Utah or in a monastery?
However the Utah thing is relevant as they watch more porn per capita than anywhere else in the U.S....
I thought you were kidding, but it's true.
They can know I watch it, just as long as they aren't telling everyone I watch the wrong type.
another brony?
"The list of possible suspects includes you, members of your household, your neighbors (if you maintain an open wi-fi connection) and anyone who might have visited your house
So you just say it must have been a neighbour or visitor, ask them to add all the visitors to neighbours' houses, the post man, delivery men, etc. and let them get on with it. If they go to court quote their own words - it could have been any of these!
I'm your TV viewing habits.
Shit, you found the spycam !
These guys need serious professional help, derision, and ridicule.
the participants in the "arab spring" used a variety of tools to facilitate and coordinate their activities
I'm glad you used quotes around "arab spring", in reality it has turned out to be an islamist winter.
Something I learned many, many years ago watching Apple's amazing marketing division at work. Leak. Leak early, leak often.
Pst ... don't tell anyone but there's going to be a great new HURD desktop.
Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship, they rule by an army inducing terror on a populace, not because the populace chose the leadership.
The problem is that in Muslim countries the political system they chose is invariably worse. Libya is worse than it was under Gaddafi, Egypt is worse now than under Mubarak, Iraq is worse than under Saddam Husain, and Afghanistan is infinitely worse off than it was under Soviet rule.
Yes, Saudi Arabia is bad, but anything that keeps the Muslims under control is better than letting them have their way .... which is not giving them freedom but allowing them to murder, kill, and rape others as well as killing eachother and removing freedoms under sectarian Sharia militias.
She was part of a brony group in high school
I take it the op was a success then (brony = bro pony).
We have lots of Muslims in the UK, a large number of whom say they would like to overthrow democracy and introduce Sharia law. Following them is a positively good idea.
No. You should never be monitoring people for believing something or subscribing to an ideology. All you should be worried about is whether or not the law is being broken or not. There is nothing wrong with saying "I want this country to be under Sharia Law and will work to make it happen" as long as the methods you use are Legal. The government should only care when the methods are illegal in nature, the goal itself (communism, democracy, islam, etc.) is irrelevant.
If there were a reasonable probability that they would act within the law then I would agree. The thing is they say that they do not recognize Western laws.
I am not him, in fat before you posted his name I was not aware of him.
Look here: http://slashdot.org/~Chrisq/friends
Yes, I added it after reading the post telling me about him
Fascists have always been of the left. Leftest continue to deny it.
Actually I think it is a two-dimensional situation, as illustrated by Political Compass. Though I don't know how accurate their assessments of the individuals is, I think the principle that either left or right wing politicians can be authoritarian is true.
BTW I do not consider myself to be authoritarian in general, its just that the expressed intention of Muslims to undermine our societies necessitates extraordinary measures. The freedoms of non-muslims should be protected as far as possible when a hostile group has declared war on us.