*giggle* Reminds me of the time I hosed my laptop so thoroughly I only had 'ed' to recover/etc/fstab. Had to browse the ed man page with one laptop while working on the other.
Exactly. It used to be a real problem, and at my uni in 2003 or so, I'd insist everyone built their servers and patched them offline. Some didn't listen to me and got owned during install.
These days, you turn on the firewall on XP SP2 or 2003 and don't have the problem. (As the OP said, just don't browse the web while you're doing a server install.)
Screw the hippie crap with wind, solar, etc., we are outta time. Build nuke plants.
All very well for base load, but those things take a bit of time to spin up and down. What are you going to do when the superbowl comes on telly? Things like hydro come in pretty useful for burst demand.
Looks like dnsmasq doesn't randomise source port either - just wondering if you checked that as well? (Sorry, have read CERT advisory, couldn't see it mentioned.)
What about if Telecom NZ forces you to buy Telecom NZ phones to plug into your infrastructure, buy connectivity from Telecom NZ instead of third party ISPs? Would the government have a right to get involved then?
It's called abusing a monopoly - leveraging your existing dominance in one market to force another product on a different market. It's illegal pretty much everywhere.
Or immediately after att.com starts resolving to the IP of goatse.cx ?
So did pretty much every damn thing. Just sayin'.
I'm no geologist, but as I understand it, a river is traditionally liquid.
PS. You wimps who don't like living on the edge can always use 'testing'.
No he didn't. Just gnore me, it's been a long week.
He said SMART people.
I hate patents for one very good reason: reading patent applications is about as boring as you can get without taking a degree in economics.
No software patents means I won't have to read another patent again EVER. And that's good.
They also have more patents than anyone else if I recall correctly.
Absolutely. Their 'back door' sounds like my out-of-band control network.
kthxbye
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/7451/poster68251050mx9.jpg
What did the poor openBSD devs do to deserve this?
No, you haven't - I used to work there and the only power outages we had were caused by transformers blowing up, not by problems further upstream.
I grant you, too many Maori in prison, and Telecom sucks. But telcos suck everywhere :(
Kiwi's have a bit more sense than a lot of people when it comes to justice - retribution is necessary, but so is rehabilitation.
Oh, by the way, Stephen Hawking is an "armchair physicist" in that sense.
*giggle* Reminds me of the time I hosed my laptop so thoroughly I only had 'ed' to recover /etc/fstab. Had to browse the ed man page with one laptop while working on the other.
You broke my sarcasm meter.
I'm OK - I run ARM Linux :)
These days, you turn on the firewall on XP SP2 or 2003 and don't have the problem. (As the OP said, just don't browse the web while you're doing a server install.)
cheers,
All very well for base load, but those things take a bit of time to spin up and down. What are you going to do when the superbowl comes on telly? Things like hydro come in pretty useful for burst demand.
Particularly when it's a transcendental number, and thus unachievable on any image which has, like a whole number of pixels. Dur!
About the only true thing the Bush administration has said and they issue a grovelling apology.
Having checked again, I'm guessing dnsmasq is OK because it doesn't do recursion?
Looks like dnsmasq doesn't randomise source port either - just wondering if you checked that as well? (Sorry, have read CERT advisory, couldn't see it mentioned.)
It's called abusing a monopoly - leveraging your existing dominance in one market to force another product on a different market. It's illegal pretty much everywhere.
Can't we turn Florida into a crater the size of Florida?