Slashdot Mirror


Spam King and Family Dead In Murder-Suicide

Lt.Hawkins was one of many readers sending in word that the escaped spam king discussed yesterday was found dead in Colorado, after apparently killing his wife and 3-year-old daughter. A teenager was injured, and an infant was found alive in the car.

1,081 comments

  1. I understand running away from prison... but by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't believe someone would be so upset over being institutionalized (for their own actions, no less!) that they'd feel the need to kill their family as well as themselves.

    What a sad state of affairs.

    1. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by the4thdimension · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Psychologically speaking, the very act of going to prison(even if its minimum security)can be highly damaging. There is no telling what caused this guy to snap but its likely that he didn't sit there and stew about it and decide to do it on his own. It was likely a snap decision brought on by q pretty high amount of stress and depression.

      Not justifying it, just stating that its not so cut and dry as a simple choice to kill your family.

    2. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It takes someone with a minor god complex. "I'm the only thing that matters to my family, so they're better off dead." I know some people here will celebrate the spammers death, but I would have rather seen him in a 8x10 cell.

    3. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Truly, this guy was a EPIC level scumbag.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      He got tired of having his box filled with unsolicited male?

      (Shamelessly stolen from Fark)

    5. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Trigun · · Score: 1

      One open to the public, with sharpened stick rental nearby.

    6. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by KGIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the whole killing of his wife is a bit over the top and goes to show how he truly was a monster with no morals. He could have just killed himself and done us all a favor. Now he's hated even more, which is going some.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    7. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe someone would be so upset over being institutionalized (for their own actions, no less!) that they'd feel the need to kill their family as well as themselves.

      It does happen. Many people suddenly realize what a mess they have made of their lives and how difficult it will be to rejoin normal society.

      Moral of the story: don't break the eleventh commandment.

      What's the eleventh commandment? Thou shalt not get caught.

    8. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by sbenson · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Maybe he was insecure about his MaNH00d and needed quality pi||s cheap.

    9. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jank1887 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Optimum: 8x10 cell, family alive. Not as good, but tolerable: dead by his own hand, family alive. Absolutely horrible: him dead with wife and his 3 year old child.

      As a father of 3, I cannot fathom what drives a person to do that to their own child. An adult can create conflict that may drive you to retaliate. A 3 year old cannot.

    10. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Tiber · · Score: 5, Funny

      if only he had used canadian antidepressants! I am sure I could find the mail somewhere which had extremely good rates from a company called International Pharmacy.

    11. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no telling what caused this guy to snap but its likely that he didn't sit there and stew about it and decide to do it on his own.

      If he was still alive and having to defend himself in court, he'd probably plead temporary insanity.

      Insanity means without reason or utterly foolish. Something must have really snapped in his head, put him on another plane of consciousness.

      That's all I can think of. I can't believe a father would really kill his innocent little child. I want to believe that he would not have done so in even a remotely reasonable state of mind. He must have really lost it.

      My condolences to those affected. :(

    12. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by b0ttle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's so easy to criticize behind computer screen. No one knows what he's been through. Nothing justifies the killing of his wife (maybe she agreed?) and daughter (this one has no maybes), but we just don't know what really happened, and never will. So I prefer not to judge.

    13. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I think the whole thing stinks. Who goes to all the trouble to escape jail so they can kill themselves when they succeed? It's not like there isn't a long list of people with motive to kill him and tidy up the witnesses. If the teenage girl was shot but escaped and is coherent enough to talk, why do the authorities talk about the "apparent" gunman? That seems to me the sort of language you use when all you have is circumstantial evidence.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    14. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Snowgen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the teenage girl was shot but escaped and is coherent enough to talk, why do the authorities talk about the "apparent" gunman? That seems to me the sort of language you use when all you have is circumstantial evidence.

      Just because a witness says something happened a certain way doesn't at all mean that's what really happened. No doubt the investigation is ongoing.

    15. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It isn't just prison, but institutionalization in general.

      Once upon a time, I was put into a "mental health facility" (loony bin) after a drawn out period where I started seeing spiders coming at me in all directions (an extreme phobia of mine). Today, we have found out that this condition only emerges when I don't sleep at least 6 hours a night, and stress contriubutes largely to my ability to sleep. Well, about a day into this place, I was literally going nuts. They had TVs, but you weren't allowed to watch them... ever. The only game they had was a deck of cards... with 35 cards. They took away your shoes and most common clothing, where most of us had to wear a hospital gown... the place was at a constant 60 degrees F. There was one hallway... 84 steps from end to end. The only thing to do there was drink coffee and smoke. I never did either before I went there, but when the coffee cart came out, you grabbed one. There was nothing else to do. When smoke break came along, you smoked one. There was nothing else to do.

      I started coming up with games to play with myself around the place to try and keep what sanity I had left. I got locked into solitary for playing "Die Hard" and being too "loud and obnoxious, which stirs up the other patients" I was told. The first visitation from my wife I was allowed to have, I had her get a lawyer and get me the hell out of there.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    16. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't believe a father would really kill his innocent little child.

      This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal. If he was self-centered enough to make his living by fraud and theft, then it's not that much of a stretch for him to decide that if he was going to off himself, he'd take a few people with him.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by giafly · · Score: 1

      Obviously he hated other people, or he'd never have been a spammer. Killing those around him was part of the same mind-set.
      I hope sellers of spamvertized products take note.

      --
      Reduce, reuse, cycle
    18. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      Especially after said family helped him escape from prison.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    19. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Retroactive Darwin Award.

      I know, I know, that's not cool, flame bait & all that, but I know I'm not the only one thinking it.

      It's not really funny....it just....is.

      --

      Question everything

    20. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Noexit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I spent a week in a loony bin myself once. We had the same problem with the cards. Apparently nobody in there ever played with a full deck...(wait for it)...

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    21. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually the only mental problem he had worthy of attention was ADD, apparently.
      From TFA:

      She noted Davidson had been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A condition of his sentence was that he undergo mental health counseling..

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    22. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have no problem judging. He was a degenerate scumbag and I'm glad he's fucking dead.

    23. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you didn't even use your chance to visit the resident holder?

    24. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Xtravar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How do we know someone else didn't do it and then make it look like a murder/suicide?

      That was my first thought when I saw the headline.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    25. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by careysub · · Score: 1

      Wow. Such a monstrous act is a shock to any normal person, but it makes sense that the "spam king" would turn out to be a genuine conscienceless sociopath.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    26. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He had every right to do himself in, but killing his wife and daughter is beyond the pale. This kind of thing makes me wish I believed in hell.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    27. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dan541 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It takes someone with a minor god complex. "I'm the only thing that matters to my family, so they're better off dead." I know some people here will celebrate the spammers death, but I would have rather seen him in a 8x10 cell.

      Im glad he's dead.

      Shame about the Wife tho.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    28. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by elnyka · · Score: 1
      This guy was a fucking coward. There is people in this world who have to go through horrible shit, picking up their lunch from garbage cans, living in shantytown houses made out of carton boxes, and you don't seem them flippying out, killing their children in the process.

      Fucking weak-ass yellow belly spineless coward, that what he was. RIP for the poor child, and I hope this coward rots in hell for this.

    29. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the 3 year old sang Barney songs all they way back from the prison.

      It's horrible. Killing himself would've been fine but his wife and 3 year old. Maybe he figured anyone who would help out a spammer escape deserved to die.

    30. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a father of 3, I cannot fathom what drives a person to do that to their own child.

      This person was obviously not in their right mind. Anyone that could harm a child, let alone their own child is severely disturbed.

      An adult can create conflict that may drive you to retaliate.

      A 'family exterminator' truly believes that they are the center of the universe for their family. In their minds, they believe that they are helping them by preempting any suffering that they could experience. I also would not be surprised to learn that the spammer blamed everyone except for himself. Car wreck, the other driver. Late for work, the news reporter didn't mention traffic. On the larger scope; Financial ruin, the feds. Jail time, congress set him up. etc, etc.

      It's a twisted view of reality that is based around the assumption that he is all that matters and that his family can not survive without him.

    31. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Excuse me...as a former member of the Jihad to Destroy Barney the Purple Dinosaur, that's far, far over the top.

      A child died yesterday for no apparent reason than the father decided life wasn't worth living for himself- and then decided that it wasn't worth living for his wife and kids either.

      As much as I dearly love making bad jokes about Barfme, the Purple Potty Scrubber, what you posted was vastly over the top. Find something else to make jokes about, k?

    32. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what you essentially say is that a criminal, no matter how "trivial" or unrelated to homicide his transgression may be, is by the very fact that he broke a law a potential mass murderer?

      Good lord! The RIAA is right, the internet is full of potential terrorists!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    33. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      great, now every email administrator that gets Spam is a suspect... (except John C. Dvorak's)

    34. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...I would have rather seen him in a 8x10 cell.

      You bring up a good reason to be against the death penalty. Best to keep the inmate alive as long as possible. If I was a violent criminal, I feel I would prefer death to a lifetime in prison. Unless I could set myself up real nicely with a private cell, kitchen*, cable, and internet. And had control of the contraband flowing in and out.

      *Thinking of Pauly cooking up those gourmet dishes.

      --
      What?
    35. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by DTemp · · Score: 1

      Hymm, I think it is a big stretch. Sure, sending spam and trying to defraud people into buying stocks (I believe that was the nature of most spam he sent) means you have a certain kind of sociopathology, however there are different kinds of criminals. You can't use the term criminal in a psychological context to refer to everyone in jail. I would venture to say most individuals in jail right now for drug possession are not criminals in this sense.

      Honestly, I would spam every single email at my college right now if it would make me 100 bucks. Since its my first time, I'd probably just get an email from the IT people saying to cut it out. The email wouldn't promote anything illegal like swindling stocks.

      But even if I was a hardcore spammer, that doesnt mean it would be a small stretch to move into murder. Seriously.

    36. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Time to institute what I've been demanding for years...a shoot-to-kill order in "apprehending" all spammers in the first place.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    37. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      He got tired of having his box filled with unsolicited male?

      No, that was yesterday's gag. Today, it seems he was actually worried about having his wife's inbox filled with unsolicited male!

      (She not only gave sexual pleasure to a spammer, she helped propagate its DNA. If she and her kid didn't want the bullets, they should have opted out...)

    38. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did. He said he waited for his wife to come visit.

    39. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've read that one thing that people who commit these types of crimes have in common in an obsession with their image with others. They'll steal, cheat, whatever to get the money to splurge in attempts to impress others. They'll also never admit their faults because that would break their self image. Going to prison, even briefly at a mild one, may have been too much to reconcile with his "wealthy high tech tycoon" image. When he decided to kill himself he saw his family as extensions of himself and it wasn't that much of a stretch to want to take them with him and kill them first.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    40. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ADHD I don't buy.

      BPD/NPD, I DO, especially based on his conduct all throughout. A Borderline or a Narcissist would do each and every thing he did.

    41. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by wattrlz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must be new here. Judging is what we do.

    42. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I'm saying that someone who's demonstrated this kind of self-centeredness is more likely to kill additional people as opposed to only killing himself.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    43. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by somersault · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he believed that if they all died at the same time they'd go off to be together? Or perhaps he was just a complete dick.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    44. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it is a stretch. we're all criminals and you're pretty fucked up in the head if you think fraud and theft are a short distance from killing your family.....

      I generally hold your comments in high regard, but this is the stupidest thing you've ever written.

    45. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Email spammers are inherently and universally sociopaths. It is not unreasonable to consider that any given email spammer would, if it could be profitable, commit murder.

    46. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I've never understood how such places (be they prisons or other institutions) are in any way suitable to help people actually recover/change. I am curious how you got in there in the first place - was it a voluntary commitment? (Feel free to ignore, it's none of my business - but your story piqued my curiosity.)

    47. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what you essentially say is that a criminal, no matter how "trivial" or unrelated to homicide his transgression may be, is by the very fact that he broke a law a potential mass murderer?

      Every single person alive, innocent or guilty, is a potential mass murderer.

    48. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal.

      That's not fair. There are many criminals, who are also fathers, who love and don't harm their children.

      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    49. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Canadian antidepressants tend to require the use of an inordinate amount of Visine and Oreos, he may not have had ready access to these suppliments.

    50. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by wattrlz · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are plenty of people out there, mainly the elderly, who really want to believe things. These people could have lost a good deal of money on spammed stocks and other things, possibly ruined themselves financially. Someone could have bought v!4gr4 and poisoned himself. This guy wasn't stupid. He had to have inured himself against the possibility that he was going to hurt someone just like the guys who sweet-talk little old ladies out of their life savings.

    51. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by DirkGently · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a feeling that he broke out specifically to kill his wife. She probably told him she was filing for devorce, or that she was getting regular stuffings from the pool boy or whatever. If he was already near the mental edge, it wouldn't have taken much to push him over the edge. The kid, though? Hard to say. Situations can get very ugly, very quickly.

      --

      I keep trying to pick fights, but I can't shake this Excellent karma.

    52. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only game they had was a deck of cards... with 35 cards.

      Playing solitaire till dawn with a deck of 51,
      Smoking cigarettes and watching Captain Kangaroo,
      So don't tell me I've nothing to do...

    53. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I smell BS, major BS, his wife helps him escape, but he ends up killing her, makes no sense at all.
      But...someone trying to get his passwords, and was using his wife and kids to torture in front of him until he broke....that sounds plausible, or even cops have shoot out when catching up with spam king, and end up killing civilians in the process, and blame the guy...not like he can defend himslef now..., ey?

      Cops are such noobs.

    54. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      What the article didn't mention was that he was shot at 101,897 times. 1,566 of the shots hit, the rest either missed or bounced back at the shooter. The bullets were marked as coming from China but actually originated in the US. I think the killing was done by a rogue bot net.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    55. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You know what the problem with this world is? Too many touchy feely sensitive types telling me what is ok and what is not ok to poke fun at.

      I'll joke about what ever the fuck I want.

    56. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by b0ttle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, I'm new on posting comments, been reading them for some time. But I'm also judging, not him, you.

    57. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was not self-admitted, else I could have signed an AMA (Against Medical Advice) waiver and gotten out. I had been working 16+ hour days at work for a month and I was cracking hard. I was actually doing a paid research study for people with psychosis, and I was doing a test in an MRI machine. The spiders started coming out of every crack and I couldn't move, obviously. I couldn't help but panic and I trashed and screamed, everything I could do to get out of there away from the spiders/ They had me admitted because I was "a probable danger to myself and others".

      I also have to add this little bit, because it is hard for people to comprehend situations like this if they never have experienced it... When you have a psychotic episode, you can not tell it isn't real. You can even try and reason with yourself that "This can't possibly be happening", but ultimately, every other part of your brain is telling you it is.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    58. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by mblase · · Score: 1

      A big part of the "kill-my-family" thing, I imagine, comes from the societal expectation (welfare notwithstanding) that the man of the family should be a provider. If the husband is dead, who will take care of his wife and child? For that matter, how will they take care of themselves while he's in federal prison, and how will he earn a productive living after he gets out? Ergo, if it's his responsibility to care for them, and he can't care for them, it's also his responsibility to end their suffering.

      It's one tragedy that he followed this line of reasoning to commit double-murder before his suicide. It's another that his wife helped him escape, only to killed by the husband she agreed to help. It's a third that a three-year-old daughter should end her life just as it's begun because of such foolishness.

      The entire world, every individual in it, should take note of this horror and try to ensure it never happens to anyone they know.

    59. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally understand what your saying. I can't comment on what it is like for prison, but i was in outpatient for over a year, and we ate lunch with the inpatient group every so often. and that place sucked. I'm glad i was voluntary and outpatient. The inpatient are was stark white, cold, void of anything stimulating, and they had the patients so drugged up that they were completely checked out. As they say the lights were on but nobody was home. It was surreal, i can't even express how weird it was to see people that were like zombies they wandered aimlessly around, you could try to talk to them but you'd get nothing from it, and at times you could probably way and hand in front of their face and get no response. If you were even partially sane i feel for you.
      By the way the spider thing would suck. Having an auditory hallucination myself, i feel that i can sympathize. By the why what was your Die hard game?

    60. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ODiV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal.
      I agree this guy was a complete selfish asshole, but you're treading on dangerous ground here. There aren't two different types of people: "criminals" and "non-criminals". Someone being a criminal doesn't make them morally corrupt and somehow more able to commit murder/suicide.

      With the ways the laws are lately, we're pretty much all criminals. That doesn't make us any more or less likely to do something insane like this.

      What this guy did was a not uncommon response to his type of situation. There are psychological factors at work that we should work to understand instead of dismissing this as just the actions of a criminal and sweeping them under the rug. That doesn't help anyone.

      It's similar to our reaction to the Columbine shootings. When someone does something that far off from our own moral compass we label them as the Other. They were "monsters" and that's how they did what they did. Well no, sorry, they were human beings. Identifying them as monsters doesn't do anything constructive to prevent similar tragedies in future.

    61. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by GooberToo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Email spammers are inherently and universally sociopaths. It is not unreasonable to consider that any given email spammer would, if it could be profitable, commit murder.

      So what does this statement say about the majority of CEOs in corporate America. Keep in mind, several studies have show CEOs sociopathic behaviors in regard to their decisions.

    62. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sounds like the Big Brother house.

    63. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by arcade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      after a drawn out period where I started seeing spiders coming at me in all directions (an extreme phobia of mine). Today, we have found out that this condition only emerges when I don't sleep at least 6 hours a night,

      That's interesting. I don't have the phoebia, but I experience a lot of stuff during sleep deprivation, and it includes spiders!

      To be more exact, I've been to quite a few computer parties, and a common theme is that you quite simply do not sleep for as long as you can in the beginning. After around 40-50 hours, I start getting interesting effects.

      1. I start hearing people calling my name, from random directions - over the sound (lots of music at computer parties).
      2. I start seeing spiders running over my keyboard, and also shadow-sized (Babylon5) spiders walking around.
      3. I start feeling that a person is looking over my left shoulder, reading my screen.
      4. I start feeling cold.

      Only point number 3 caused me to be startled from time to time - but since there was nobody there I was only startled for about 1-2 seconds. ... I usually found that I would go find my bedroll around ~50 hours, as I didn't like the effects.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    64. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Goobermunch · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can't believe a father would really kill his innocent little child.

      This kind of murder-suicide is a relatively common experience (murder-suicides being highly uncommon events in the first place). Customarily, they are committed by Caucasian men. The shrinks and the profilers believe that this particular type of murder is an insidious relative of a "vanilla" suicide. The male figure feels shamed due to personal and professional failings and feels that he is unable to provide for his family. In a state of depression he determined to kill himself. However, the basis for the suicidal impulse is the fear of being unable to care for the family, a result guaranteed by the suicide. Therefore, the perpetrator, as "patriarch" decides to commit suicide for the entire family. That way, he can prevent them from dealing with the consequences of his failings and his suicide. These cases often appear in connection with financial failures.

      --AC

    65. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by spads · · Score: 0

      A time or two I have hallucinated spiders while on the very brink of sleep. Now, I've got brown recluse under my bed, so maybe I wasn't so far off!

      One thing's for sure, you never want to commit yourself. Don't surrender your own control to another human. There is nothing worse. I don't care what color coat he/she wears. You're afraid you might do yourself or someone else harm? Go find who/what made you unhappy, and destroy it!

      --
      Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
    66. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Well, if I was dragged into appendix surgery without having appendicitis, it would also suck pretty badly and I would hope someone would bring a lawyer to get me out. On the other hand, if I was constantly hearing voices telling me to kill the doctor, watching TV, wearing shoes or watching a guy playing "die hard" would give me some unnecessary ideas. Not that your "looney bin" was great, but you would hate even the one fantastic for schizophrenics and suicidally depressed. You need a completely different clinic for hypnagogic hallucinations.

    67. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unfortunately his spawn rate is awful and everyone already had the gear he dropped.

    68. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by moosesocks · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I can't believe a father would really kill his innocent little child.

      This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal.

      You, sir, have been watching too much Batman.

      Do you really believe that humans are divided evenly between "criminals" and "good guys"?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    69. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by TobyRush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. And -- psychologically, not legally -- it's never really as simple as { criminal | !criminal }, is it? My guess is that he was more like William H. Macy's character in Fargo... it started out as a smallish transgression made by someone in a stressful financial tight spot. "I'll just do this one thing, and then I'll be able to get out of this hole and be back on track."

      I'm just saying that there are a lot of different depths of criminal behavior, and a hardened Lex Luthor-type criminal wouldn't let a 21-month prison sentence affect him like this. Not defending him, but this guy sounds a little more like someone I might see on the golf course or at church or something.

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    70. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I, for one, am sorry to hear about Spam King's passing. I never read any of his books, but I watched "The Shining" once on TV. America has lost one of its most prolific horror writers. ....

      What? Oh. Sorry. Never mind.

    71. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He is self-centered (or rather, more self-centered than the average Joe) because of what? Because he sent out spam emails and didn't care that he got on your nerves? By that logic, every cold calling CCA is also a self centered bastard who's ready to pop any second.

      And yes, they're annoying as hell (maybe more than even spammers), but that doesn't make them more likely to go on killing sprees than the average Joe.

      I fail to see the connection between being a spammer and being a murder-suicide in the making. Basically, we're all self-centered. Do I care about your wellbeing? Not really. Do you care about mine? I doubt it. Does that mean we will leap at each other's throat the moment we spot each other? Dunno about you, but I won't. Usually, people don't care too much about people they don't know.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    72. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I think the whole thing stinks. Who goes to all the trouble to escape jail so they can kill themselves when they succeed?

      If you read the circumstances of his "escape" you'd know that he was in a minimum security "prison." He literally walked away. No jumping of fences, no evading slavering dogs, no digging tunnels under walls.

      In that context, you can probably understand that the decision to commit a murder-suicide wasn't all that hard. He figured his lavish spam-financed life was over, hence there was no reason to live. He probably rationalized that he was doing his family a favor by killing them since they would be unable to enjoy the lavish lifestyle his spam money had provided up to that point. It's a stupid rationalization, but that's the most likely scenario. If you consider this guy was probably a very materialistic jerk, it makes a twisted kind of sense.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    73. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professor Farnsworth: Oh, don't worry Fry, I too once spent a nightmarish time in a robot asylum. But now it's nearly over. So long!

    74. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you never know. maybe his wife and kids were assholes. in all likelihood they were.

    75. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      When I read the story it caused me to think about watching court tv on more serious crimes. A number of killers who could careless about their victim sit in their chair with no emotion when hearing the gruesome details of their crime, but when they find out that they will have to spend the rest of their life in prison they bawl like a baby. It is a tragically what has happened to this family, but this guy had no regard for other people when he was sending spam so I wonder if this is how this guy worked too?

    76. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by mordenkhai · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am only have a mild arachnophobia. If I see a small spider across the room I dont flip out, but once its gone I get really nervous and jump if anything touches me. Once at home I was asleep and rolled over facing the wall I saw a large spider on the wall so I jumped outta bed turned the lights on but it was gone. I ripped the room apart, not damaging anything but dismantled the bed etc, and since I couldnt find it I slept in a different room wrapped in blankets. If I ever had an episode where I saw spiders crawling out of everything, I'd probably flip out and kill shit ninja style until the police got me, although it may look more like star wars kid. That sounds terrifying!

    77. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      my reaction would be to drink that brain down to nothing.

      it wants to fuck with me? fine. but it's going down with me.

      i guess that only works if you see your body as the enemy ;x

    78. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Rival · · Score: 1

      Obviously he hated other people, or he'd never have been a spammer. Killing those around him was part of the same mind-set.

      I'm sorry, but what? You and the others on this thread who are trying to draw a connection between spamming and murder seriously need to put things into perspective.

      I dislike spam as much as anyone, but it is mass-advertising. Yes, is a nuisance, it incurs costs to prevent and clean, and can be used to perpetrate other crimes like stock pumping. But good grief, the guy wasn't peddling child pornography or trying to incite hate crimes or something -- he was being an unethical advertiser. Pushing "items such as watches and perfume" and "promoting a penny stock". (FTFA)

      I'm not trying to defend the guy -- far from it! But I don't think he was sending out spam because he hated other people; I think he was doing it to make an easy buck. To say that it is a logical progression from spamming to murdering makes me seriously question your judgement.

      That being said, what Davidson did is as inexplicable as it is inexcusable. If he was too cowardly to face the consequences of his choices, so be it. But killing his wife and child is, as jcr said, beyond the pale. Yes, his wife needed to answer for helping him jailbreak (and perhaps assisting in his prior business ventures; I don't know.) But it was not his place to try her for those actions -- and certainly not with the death penalty. And killing his completely innocent 3 year old daughter? This was truly madness.

      If I had to guess, I'd say the guy decided to take the shady route of bilking a little money from a lot of people, got caught, freaked out, and snapped. But I don't really care why he did what he did; I'm just sad for the loss of his wife and child. It is a tragedy.

    79. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      How about the fact that a felon had easy access to a gun?

      Apparently his wife wasn't packing heat for the showdown and neither was that 3 year-old.

      The most common cause of death by gunshot: an irate / crazy family member.

      Now, if he had only gone on a shooting rampage of the Spamhaus top 100.....well, the story might have been somewhat less somber.

    80. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was about to say that. If there is money in it and the chance to get caught reasonably small, some company will certainly do it. Hell, if murder was legal you'd have murder agencies pop up left and right, if the money is right.

      If it is profitable and either legal altogether or at least the chance to get caught is small enough (or the fines well within the profit margin), a company will do it. The formula for profit is income minus expenses, morals doesn't exist in that equation.

      And while every person may have moral concerns, they don't apply as soon as a company can absorb that moral problem. A worker there could have moral qualms because he does something he knows is "wrong", but he has to do it, he has to bring home money to feed his kids. A manager who lays off a worker he knows can't get a new job and thus is threatened with poverty might have moral concerns over it, but he can brush that aside and see that this way he can continue employing those other 10, and if he didn't lay off the one, the company might lose profit and cut the whole branch, making 12 people (i.e. the 11 and him) lose their jobs. The top management might even have moral concerns, but they can shift the blame on the investors who want first and foremost money for their investment, and the managers are responsible that this money is well invested money. The investors in turn don't even know what they invest in, they just hand money to their bank, trusting the bank to multiply that money. And the investors working at a bank might even know that a company is doing "evil things", but they have to put their moral concerns aside, they have promised their customers to do the best investments they could so they have to invest in the "evil" company, because it's the most profitable one.

      You see, nobody to blame, no moral problem for anyone. Everyone can shift the blame on someone and morals don't play a role anymore, even if they did for a single person, the moment you can shift it on someone else, it's all fine, after all, you don't do evil, you're forced to, by the circumstances.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    81. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      I mean, you escape from prison because you want to keep your life! If you hate your life, you stay in prison.

      Perhaps someone took the whole "spammers and their families should be killed" thing too seriously?

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    82. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Optimal: not having to feed and house the guy.
      Less than optimal: millions of dollars in legal fees to get the death sentence... which wouldn't have been justified anyway for the crime this guy was convicted of.

      Sounds to me like he did us a favor. It's a tragedy that his wife and child had to be punished for being involved with the scumbag, but as you alluded to, that was his bad decision. He was an idiot through-and-through.

      It's a moot point now, but I'm actually curious whether the wife knew how this guy made his money. I hope not... if she did, how did she stand to live with herself? If somebody in my family was a spammer, I don't think I'd be able to conscience letting them get away with it. There are anonymous tip lines for that sort of thing.

    83. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by bryce4president · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Usually, people don't care too much about people they don't know.

      I think your base assumption is flawed. If this was true then the Red Cross wouldn't exist, neither would other charitable organizations that receive money from everyday people and disperse it to others in need. If people didn't care too much then they wouldn't give too much. But the fact of the matter is that the people of this world care very much about the well being of others. I'm sorry that you don't, but I think I'm speaking for the majority of people when I say that I do.

    84. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Exactly what you think it does. Sociopathy isn't some neato keen disorder that might help you make 8 or 9 figures a year with no consequences, sociopathy is literally doing whatever the fuck you want without regards for how it affects other people, except in so much as how you think those effects might affect you. Do you really think being a CEO would stop a sociopath from murdering someone if he thought it would help him and he could get away with it?

    85. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by huckamania · · Score: 1, Troll

      Where as non-caucasian males would, customarily, just walk away with no guilt and no feelings of any responsibility?

      Sounds pretty racist, any way you want to try to advance that argument.

    86. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      True. And -- psychologically, not legally -- it's never really as simple as { criminal | !criminal }, is it?

      Good, because if it was, everyone would be a criminal, or is that statement not meant to be taken literally?

    87. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It's not like there isn't a long list of people with motive to kill him and tidy up the witnesses.

      I haven't followed this story long enough to know this, but was there any perceived threat of that? If so, this guy was stupid to break out; at least he would have been safe on the inside (and it wasn't like he was in with the really bad criminals anyhow). If he was worried about the safety of his wife and kid, that sounds like something for the witness protection program to take care of... breaking out was stupid.

      Good investigative procedure requires that they take this stuff into account, but I think it's more likely they'll find out that he just went bonkers... makes you wonder what sort of quality control was involved when they made those pharmaceuticals he was vending, though. He just might have been dumb enough to try them...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    88. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speak for yourself, heathen!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    89. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Basically, we're all self-centered. Do I care about your wellbeing? Not really. Do you care about mine? I doubt it. Does that mean we will leap at each other's throat the moment we spot each other? Dunno about you, but I won't. Usually, people don't care too much about people they don't know.

      Swift one there, Ayn! I guess that those firemen walk into your burning house to pull you away from a horrible death for the pay. Likewise the physicians, therapists and the other adherents to the social compact.

      Public interest lawsuits, seat belts, vaccines - yep, you have hit the nail on the head: everybody is exactly like you.

    90. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Rub1cnt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone else see this as odd? He's found dead, no questions, no nothing? Anyone else think this could have been a pro hit?

      --
      Remember, it's not paranoia if they really ARE out to get you... :)
    91. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dmala · · Score: 1

      How do we know someone else didn't do it and then make it look like a murder/suicide?

      Because there is a victim and eyewitness that is still alive? And it was a teenage girl, not a sysadmin, so I think idea that she did it and then shot herself in the neck to avoid suspicion is pretty far fetched. Most teenage girls I've spoken to are not *that* upset about spam.

    92. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I think you overstated your case.

    93. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by lag00natic · · Score: 1

      Oh, this is priceless. This poor, poor man was 'damaged' by the cruel punishment of that horrible 'institution' of prison. Maybe we should have been more compassionate and sent him on a retreat somewhere where he could meditate about what he had done in a low-stress environment to holistically nurture him out of his depression while consuming only organic food. What a load of crap! He is NOT a victim, he is a criminal and a beast for taking the lives of his family. This was a selfish and senseless act that can NOT be justified what-so-ever.

    94. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He is self-centered (or rather, more self-centered than the average Joe) because of what? Because he sent out spam emails and didn't care that he got on your nerves? By that logic, every cold calling CCA is also a self centered bastard who's ready to pop any second.

      Jesus, let's have a little reading comprehension here, can we? That's not his logic at all. His logic is that the more a self-centered bastard someone is, the more likely they are to commit a few murders before committing suicide, IF they reach the point of suicide.

      I've worked in telemarketing. About half of them are just regular schmoes, but the other half, well, let's just say that if they were suicidal, you wouldn't expect them to stick a gun in their mouth at home, they'd more likely bring it in to work first and "share".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    95. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal.

      That's not fair. There are many criminals, who are also fathers, who love and don't harm their children.

      Indeed. I admit to being a criminal. I've stopped cracking accounts illegally, I've stopped buying/smoking weed, I no longer brew up explosives/build bombs, etc - I'm a married/employed father now and am no longer willing to accept the risk associated with those juvenile habits. But, I still drive ~10% over the speed limit most times. Most people speed - Cops maybe even worse than the rest of us. I've even been known to jaywalk. Most of us are criminals in one way or another.

      But that does not imply that I'm remotely violent with my children. It would take an inconceivable brain fracture for me to ever become an intentional threat to my family. As a matter of fact, the only scenarios where I could envision myself becoming violent would be in defense of them, myself, or another innocent - In that order.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    96. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Myopic · · Score: 1

      What does it mean to "literally go nuts"?

    97. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree with you that it sounds wrong, but if you take 'go nuts' as slang for 'go crazy' then i think it fits

    98. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Spassoklabanias · · Score: 0

      There aren't two different types of people: "criminals" and "non-criminals". Someone being a criminal doesn't make them morally corrupt and somehow more able to commit murder/suicide.

      Maybe you mean "mentally ill" instead of "morally corrupt"? To me a criminal is morally corrupt (or there's something very wrong with the laws that gouvern us), but he's not necessarily a schizo.

    99. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Plenty of nutcases go undiagnosed. Case in point is the astronaut (referred to by several commenters in the aliens story) who was charged with attempted murder.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    100. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You, sir, have been watching too much Batman.

      Do you really believe that humans are divided evenly between "criminals" and "good guys"?

      Let's take an example. Those who don't even know me but try to rob me (for whatever fucking reason they have) is definitely a criminal in my eyes. Yes, their family may be starving to death, but I do not know that and I am not the reason for that, so robbing me can not be justified. No matter how you look at it, he is a criminal. Now if he robs the people directly responsible for his misery, he is not.

      So, yes, in most of the cases, you can at least know who is criminal. What you don't know is how many of the 'good guys' are criminals.

    101. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The first visitation from my wife I was allowed to have, I had her get a lawyer and get me the hell out of there.

      By the way, I'm sure you know this but for everyone else reading this you do have a right to counsel at civil commitment proceedings. If you can't afford one the state is obligated to secure one. If you're ever in that situation demand one immediately, and if they ignore you keep demanding it, and if they still ignore you get a wife, relative, or friend to call the local public defender or legal aid office. And beyond a short evaluation period (72 hours or less), they need a court order to commit you.

    102. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      I think the argument might be that this sort of behavior is common to certain cultures that Caucasians spring from? Then again, the "man as provider" cultural norm is fairly common, so I'm not seeing where it gets narrowed to Caucasians either.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    103. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Psmylie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I had a friend who was committed a few times because she would hurt herself. We would go to visit her, and each time I couldn't help but think that, if I got stuck in such a place, whatever my mental state was on the way in, I'd be insane on the way out.

      It's not anything like a normal environment. Adults get treated like misbehaving and retarded children. Inmates fight over the stupidest things, probably out of boredom... What TV show was on could lead to actual violence. While I don't doubt that being in a place like that encourages people to leave as soon as possible, I don't see how it can possibly help someone with a real problem.

      Hopefully, there are places that are better than the one I visited.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    104. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Going to prison, even briefly at a mild one, may have been too much to reconcile with his "wealthy high tech tycoon" image.

      Which is odd, because I think if you spin it right, going to a mild club fed for a couple years could bolster that image.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    105. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by king-manic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Email spammers are inherently and universally sociopaths. It is not unreasonable to consider that any given email spammer would, if it could be profitable, commit murder.

      It is in certain contexts, and they do. See BlackWater.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    106. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      He didn't go through all that much trouble. He was at a minimum-security federal prison camp, and walked off the premises. His wife was waiting at the side of the road for him, and they just drove off.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    107. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    108. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Psmylie · · Score: 1
      Sleep deprivation isn't fun... I had all those symptoms and more during my various bouts with insomnia. The "hearing your name" thing was the worst for me. After missing enough sleep, I was almost convinced that there were ghosts talking to me.

      Not to mention the extreme mood swings and destructive behavior I'd sometimes exhibit. Anyone who's gone 2 or more days without sleeping will, I bet, seem crazy to a psychiatrist. After 3 days, they'll seem crazy to anyone.

      I remember reading about some DJ quite a while back (1920's, maybe?) who, for charity, went without sleep for a number of days. When he was on the air, he was fine. Off the air, he'd see spiders, hear voices, have mood swings, etc. I guess his personality changed drastically after that, too. Moral of the story, don't deprive yourself of sleep on purpose because you want to see what it's like.

      One thing, though... I never thought they were spiders. I thought they were just bugs of some unknown type, which actually managed to freak me out more. Spiders I can handle, but mystery bugs can be anything

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    109. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by eepok · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered what it would be like to be admitted as an undercover "patient" in such an institution with the ability to scream a safe word and quickly be whisked away back to safety.

      Your description kinda decreases my curiosity.

      Kinda.

    110. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      A man who made a business of lying and scamming people. He probably convinced her to let him out so he could do the action.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    111. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      why do the authorities talk about the "apparent" gunman?

      Because the guy probably thought some Russian mobsters were going to get him a job in Russia, but they really had a contract to kill him and make it look like a murder-suicide.

    112. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does it mean to "literally go nuts"?

      Yeah, it's hard to be literally nuts, although the colloquialism "go nuts" doesn't apply. If he had said literally going crazy, that would make sense as he really was going crazy.

      Using the word "literally" is partly correct.

    113. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by PIBM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you were to check who are the ones donating most, you'd see that it's often (not in all cases, no) people who have suffered / had relative suffer of what they are giving for.

      We had a cancer case in my wife family, and suddently everyone started talking about having given money to help fight cancer, someone at the PHD level changed direction to go fight it, and all.

      So, having seen that, and heard that before, I believe many people basic reason to give isn't that they are simply thinking about the well-being of the whole planet, but more about helping on something you are aware of. In the case of blood giving, it's either that, or they are Homers wanting donuts =)

    114. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny
      Found it:

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tripp

      The man's name was Peter Tripp, and it was 1959... I should have Googled before posting, but I'm a little out of it... I didn't get much sleep last night.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    115. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surely anyone could see that he had a problem - all his recent spam just reads "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"

    116. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, his wife needed to answer for helping him jailbreak (and perhaps assisting in his prior business ventures; I don't know.) But it was not his place to try her for those actions -- and certainly not with the death penalty.

      Yeah, I'm certain he killed his wife as punishment for helping him escape from prison.

    117. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Most teenage girls I've spoken to are not *that* upset about spam.

      But I'm pretty sure they'd shut up fast if they just witnessed a russian spam-mob hit and survived.

    118. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Why escape from prison if people are out to get you? If he was worried about his safety, he should have stayed in prison. If he was worried about his family's safety, I'm sure the witness protection program could have done something.

      Basically, if we assume the guy didn't do it, there are two possibilities left.

      First, some of his shady "business partners" might have been out to get him. If so, he might have had reasonable cause to fear for his family's safety, but in that case he definitely should have gotten the witness protection program involved. Assuming this was his motive for escaping, trying to take matters into his own hands was completely nuts: even if he'd been successful and saved his family, he would have still faced a harsh sentence for escaping prison. Since he was unsuccessful, he and his family ended up dead anyway. It was a lose-lose scenario.

      The other possibility is vigilantism, but that's more of a risk to him personally. I very much hope that no vigilante - even somebody so misguided as to chase the guy down and kill him - would go after his family, who by all rights were innocent of any crime. If somebody was just looking to get him personally, escaping from prison was stupid, and going to his family was the stupidest thing he could possibly have done - if the hit man finds him then, there are witnesses to deal with.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    119. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      I've never understood how such places (be they prisons or other institutions) are in any way suitable to help people actually recover/change.

      I cannot talk about other institutions, but I know for sure that, at least historically, the prison system wasn't thought as a way to help people recover or change, and this probably extends to other cases.

      The original notion was that, when someone becomes a threat to society, you had to protect society by removing the threat. In nomadic societies for instance, where having prisons isn't feasible, this was accomplished by, for example, cutting the hands of a thief so that he couldn't steal anymore, or castrating a raper so that he couldn't rape anymore, or throwing the criminal out from the tribe so he could live by his own rules (and most probably die alone and hungry in a few days anyway), or by simply killing him, and so on and so forth.

      Sedentary societies, on the other hand, could afford places for criminals and other anti-social people. In the old Hebrew system, for instance, you had the very curious concept of special cities for non-intentional assassins, where they would live for, if I remember correctly, 3 years, after which they could come back to their villages (if they were still alive, of course).

      Prisons, thus, were this: just a way to remove the threat someone represents by removing his from contact from the remaining of society. Whether they would be well cared for in there, whether they would get out worse or better, whether they would get out at all (for the most part there was no concept of proportionality between crime and imprisonment time, those in power just kept the condemned away for as long as they wish), were all very secondary concerns.

      Thus, it's no surprise that institutions built around that model, or in any case still derived from it, don't fit well (if at all) with the current notion that imprisonment should rehabilitate the imprisoned. The best you can do while still keeping within the the older model is to try to be somewhat fair by linking the imprisonment time and harshness with the crime, but that's it.

      Please notice, in addition, that the notion that the judicial system can work as a platform for rehabilitation, rather than as a system to preserve society from anti-social individuals, is itself still highly hypothetical. Thus it's no surprise that governments in general aren't willing to put tons of money into developing an alternative system with unclear results. All I know is that, being neither a psychologist nor a psychiatrist, I have no position on the subject.

      In any case, my point is that, understood from its own perspective, the way the prison system works makes sense. It only doesn't if analyzed from some other set of principles.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    120. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where as non-caucasian males would, customarily, just walk away with no guilt and no feelings of any responsibility?

      Why would you say that? The GP is pointing out that when placed under similar levels of stress and feelings of guilt and inadequacy people in other cultures (surprise!) behave differently.

      Sounds pretty racist, any way you want to try to advance that argument.

      Why do people insist on labeling any perception or documentation of differences between races or cultures as "racist"? People are different, that's why we can make such distinctions as race in the first place! Furthermore, to posit that all races are equal/identical in all ways is ridiculous. For example, I'm a white guy and my girlfriend is African. I have to wear sunblock ... she doesn't. Is that a racist comment?

      This kind of automatic negative reaction to any mention of racial differences immediately eliminates legitimate discourse, because now the dialog shifts from communication to accusation and defense. That, actually, is often the point of crying "racism!", because it puts the other guy on the defensive, even if he happens to be right. Maybe especially if he happens to be right.

      If the facts bear out what the GP is stating (i.e., that there are such differences) then his comment is not racist, but informative. And if he's wrong, then he's probably just misinformed. Personally, I saw nothing inflammatory or racist in his commentary. At least, I'll reserve judgment before making any accusations.

      Japanese males, for example, tend to commit suicide in silence, alone. Well, traditionally they do: I read somewhere that that has been changing. Regardless, am I saying that suicidal Japanese men are a. inferior or b. superior to their Western counterparts? The answer is c. neither ... I was making an observation.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    121. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by edisrafeht · · Score: 1

      The post refers to statistics in the data and has no racial bias in the text. You are looking too hard.

    122. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      Hey, I have seen no causative explanation for why it is more common among white males.

      However, given that the American middle class skews more toward Caucasian, I can speculate that anxiety about falling out of that socio-economic group gnaws more heavily upon members of that ethnic group. But that's idle speculation.

      Statistically, it's mainly white males who perpetrate these crimes. In addition, and I did leave this out of my previous point, it tends to be middle class and upper middle class heads of household who perpetrate these kinds of crimes.

      --AC

    123. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by imskeptical · · Score: 1

      This episode points to sentencing spammers to more secure facilities. This one is now been proved a danger to himself and others.

      Spamming is a crime where there is no victim; rather there are hundreds of thousands/millions of them. The scope of crime is way beyond armed holdup of a corner grocery (albeit the individual impact may be less)

    124. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by tobiasly · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree this guy was a complete selfish asshole, but you're treading on dangerous ground here. There aren't two different types of people: "criminals" and "non-criminals". Someone being a criminal doesn't make them morally corrupt and somehow more able to commit murder/suicide.

      Have you read Confessions of a Former Spammer? These assholes do things like scrape emails from support websites for recovering gambling addicts and then send them invitations to online gambling sites. This is more than just fraud or theft. They prey on the weak and vulnerable for their own profit. And they do it in the most cowardly way possible, where they never even have to meet or see their victims.

      You're correct in that these types of generalizations aren't really productive, but I think it's a rather safe assumption that anyone who has made millions off of spam aren't just a thief but truly a sociopath. They know that they're ruining the lives of others; they just don't care.

    125. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by scott_karana · · Score: 2, Funny

      What we're not telling you is that Slashdot was behind the hit... :)

    126. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by phoenixwade · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have no problem judging. He was a degenerate scumbag and I'm glad he's fucking dead.

      Since this remark was modded troll, I had this weird visual of an 8' tall regenerating green monster blowing smoke off of a hand buzzer....

      I-need-lots-more-coffee.....

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    127. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've worked in telemarketing. About half of them are just regular schmoes, but the other half, well, let's just say that if they were suicidal, you wouldn't expect them to stick a gun in their mouth at home, they'd more likely bring it in to work first and "share".

      You were happy when I brought in donuts for everybody. Now I bring in bullets to share and you're upset? Geeze, people are so flighty and fickle, such hypocrites, sometimes it just makes me want to snap!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    128. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by amokk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well shit. Armchair psychologists like you are what give the science a bad name. You have no bloody idea what you are talking about. Your logic is so flawed that what you're saying isn't even wrong. It doesn't make enough sense nor is it sufficiently coherent to even have a truth value applied to it whatsoever.

      PLEASE stop posting this line of trash.

      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
    129. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if murder was legal you'd have murder agencies pop up left and right, if the money is right.

      it was and they did. toss in a little torture, too.

      just think of all the scandals in iraq - and i'm not talking about pictures and the like. i'm talking about healthy prisoners leaving in body bags.

      the "press" preferred to talk about pictures and humiliation, as opposed to the body bag counts, for obvious political and national reasons.

    130. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Email spammers are inherently and universally sociopaths. It is not unreasonable to consider that any given email spammer would, if it could be profitable, commit murder.

      Maybe I missed something, but how was killing his wife and kid profitable?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    131. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone else think this could have been a pro hit?

      Why would they bother killing the 3 year old child?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    132. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ejasons · · Score: 1

      As much as I dearly love making bad jokes about Barfme, the Purple Potty Scrubber, what you posted was vastly over the top. Find something else to make jokes about, k?

      He was trolling, and you, out of all of the thousands of Slashdot reader, were the only one not to have enough self restraint to keep from feeding him. Congratulations...

    133. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand the meaning of the word potential don't you?

    134. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by TornCityVenz · · Score: 1

      This is the same guy who could rationalize being the spam king...go figure.

      --
      I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    135. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he made more sense than that.

      I think a point was made that the crime had to entail a lack of empathy. This is also a serious contributor to violent crimes. Empathy is not often considered as important (well, it's not often considered at all), but when it comes right down to it may be one of the most important factors allowing civilization--yet the amount any given person has varies widely.

    136. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by cowscows · · Score: 1

      The reality is that for better or worse, cultural boundaries can often be drawn right alongside racial boundries. There's generally a long set of historical circumstances that have created those conditions.

      Acknowledging that those boundaries exist is in no way inherently racist, that's just how the world works. It's just important to remember that the specifics of a culture are primarily result of the circumstances that it was formed in, and not a result of the genetic makeup of the particular race that constitutes that culture. Race and Culture are very strongly correlated, but neither one is a result of the other. They're both results of the same large scale issues.

      The correlation between race and culture is not surprising, but it is unfortunate. There are perfectly valid criticisms to be made about any culture you care to look at. It's a shame that it's so hard to separate race out of it. The connection allows the critic to fall into the trap of blaming race which isn't helpful and just leads to real racism. It also allows the criticized to deflect criticism of their culture by calling it racism, basically invalidating the message by invalidating the messenger.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    137. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      What he is saying is everything we do is driven from a selfish motivation. Firefighters derive a sense of satisfaction from protecting people and that is why they do it. The reason we do or don't do one action or another is predicated on the perceived risk / reward. When somebody pisses me off to the point I would derive great pleasure at inflicting extreme bodily harm I still refrain from such as I perceive the resulting outcome (or risk) of incarceration or retribution more undesirable than the pleasure I expect to receive from the activity. The less someone has to lose the more apt they are to do something risky (dangerous, humiliating, criminal) to "survive". Edward Davidson's "perception" of his situation was obviously quite grave.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    138. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Your must live under a rock. Have you ever sat behind a 3 year old in the movie theatre? On a bus? Yeah, it's different when it's yours, you can tell them to be quiet. But asking someone else to quiet their child is some great sin.

    139. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by lysse · · Score: 1

      By that logic, every cold calling CCA is also a self centered bastard who's ready to pop any second.

      Yep, that pretty much sums it up...

    140. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      I think you've seen one too many episodes of "Law and Order."

      jeff

    141. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by bugeaterr · · Score: 1

      Suffering from E.D.(Erectile Death)?
      Reanimate your phallus with Frankencock XL! (Now in liquicaps!)

    142. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Those kinds of places aren't designed to help people get better. Rich folks go to different places, to get better (sometimes). Poor folks go to institutions like he described as a way of warehousing them. It is simply to remove them from "respectable society" so "normal" people don't have to look at or deal with them.

      In the 1980s, they shut down many of these institutions, which means most of the people who used to walk those halls are now walking the streets, which leads to a greater chance of involvement with alcohol abuse, drugs, prostitution, etc. Mental illnesses of all types have less of a stygma than they did 30 years ago, but we have a pretty far way to go before we can really say we are trying to "treat" everyone who suffers from mental illness and is poor.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    143. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by gnick · · Score: 1

      Actually the only mental problem he had worthy of attention was ADD, apparently.

      From TFA:

      She noted Davidson had been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A condition of his sentence was that he undergo mental health counseling..

      No. The only mental problem that he had been diagnosed with worthy of attention was ADD. Obviously, there was a little more going on.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    144. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by b0ttle · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the connection between being a spammer and being a murder-suicide in the making. Basically, we're all self-centered. Do I care about your wellbeing? Not really. Do you care about mine? I doubt it. Does that mean we will leap at each other's throat the moment we spot each other? Dunno about you, but I won't. Usually, people don't care too much about people they don't know.

      Sad but true, that's one of the world's worst problem.

    145. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by UncleTogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Next time, do what I did:

      Chart the staff...while they're charting during shift change.

      They look at you for a sec and scribble. Look right back at them, note the lack of eye contact, and write that down. Watch them again and repeat.

      You'd be amazed how weirded out they get when they notice someone observing THEM... and the fact that it's while they're charting just makes it more delicious!

      Other fun activities:

      Invent an imaginary friend, but ONLY react to it in the presence of ONE staff member. They'll get weird looks when they talk about your imaginary friend, as no one else has seen it but them, and YOU don't have ANY idea what they're talking about...

      At night, on a sleepless wing, do the "chicken". This requires enlisting some help. Start clucking from the room nearest the staff's station. When you hear them draw near, stop. The next room will take the cue and start clucking. They'll go bananas trying to figure out who to bust.

      Convince your roommate that he's hearing voices at night... by whispering into your pillow.

      Remember, folks, the trick to staying entertained is creativity!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    146. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now he's hated even more? That's great and all but he's dead so I'm pretty sure he doesn't give a fuck. Think before you type.

    147. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by lysse · · Score: 1

      Would anyone be the least bit surprised by a discovery that some significant percentage of CEOs have a significantly lower "murder threshold" than the population as a whole...?

    148. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      That is happening because people lost concept of responsibility for their action in the afterlife.

      If he had known that he would be repeating suicide for eternity feeling exactly the same as when he did it for the first time he would not do that (I briefly described afterlife punishment for suicide in Islam).

      I cannot see other effective solutions against suicide problem in the society.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    149. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by lysse · · Score: 1

      He didn't kill his teenage daughter, despite shooting her in the neck; she was presumably then able to relate what had happened.

    150. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if murder was legal you'd have murder agencies pop up left and right, if the money is right.

      If murder was legal, I'd just do it myself. Shit, it's not like I'm going to jail for it. Why would I need an agency?

    151. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by gnick · · Score: 1

      I've got a feeling that he broke out specifically to kill his wife. She probably told him she was filing for devorce[sic], or that she was getting regular stuffings from the pool boy or whatever.

      If you're filing for divorce or taunting your imprisoned husband by telling him that you're sleeping around, you leave him in jail - You don't help break him out.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    152. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered what it would be like to be admitted as an undercover "patient" in such an institution with the ability to scream a safe word and quickly be whisked away back to safety.

      I've always wondered if I could get myself committed (as a completely sane person) unbeknownst the the institutional staff, and see if / how long it would take them to realize I was sane and let me out.

      But if the opportunity ever came up, I doubt I'd do it. I simply don't have enough faith in the system that they'd diagnose me as sane before they drove me insane.

      I think that's reflected in your need for a 'safety word', but having a safety net would probably help keep you sane.

    153. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Yes, when I've been involuntarily committed for a mental illness where I see one of my greatest fears pouring out of every orifice, my first thought will be to have some snarky, anarchic fun too.

    154. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mr+Abstracto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Usually, people don't care too much about people they don't know.

      I think your base assumption is flawed. If this was true then the Red Cross wouldn't exist, neither would other charitable organizations that receive money from everyday people and disperse it to others in need. If people didn't care too much then they wouldn't give too much. But the fact of the matter is that the people of this world care very much about the well being of others. I'm sorry that you don't, but I think I'm speaking for the majority of people when I say that I do.

      If people usually cared about people they don't know, there would be no need for the Red Cross and other charitable organizations to exist in the first place.

    155. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps non-Caucasians don't just to the conclusion that his death necessitates their's? I didn't see anywhere that it was implied non-Caucasians just walk away with no guilt.

    156. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      I have no idea where you got that from the GP's statement. It seemed to me he was just referring to the statistics on this type of event (murder-suicide). Nothing racist there. Data isn't racist. It just is.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    157. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What afterlife? Spare us your boogeyman superstition please...

    158. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Unlike downloading copyright protected songs, theft and fraud are assaults on human dignity. When your job requires you to devalue other human beings, it's not much of a stretch to move on to murder.

      Though I'm sure this was a "crime of passion" and he was likely not in a reasonable state of mind at the time.

    159. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're confusing cultural differences, which are real, with racial differences, which are illusory. Yes, in the predominant "black" culture in the US, it is more socially acceptable for men who don't feel they can adequately provide for their families to abandon them; I believe statistics show there are proportionally more black single moms. That doesn't mean all people with dark skin buy into this cultural norm. A large number of caucasian men also abandon their families -- there is just more of a stigma attached to it in their culture. Also, the genes for African external physical characteristics are dominant genes, so saying the behavior of "blacks" in America is caused by their race, when many of them are in fact of predominantly European, not African decent, is just bad science. I'm a redneck married to an African woman from Sierra Leone. Cultural, Africans are different from American blacks. American blacks assume I am biased against them and shy away from socializing with me until after they get to know me. Africans have been dealing with diversity for so long that it is second nature for them; they make no assumptions about me and welcome me with open arms. Of course, the Africans immigrants I deal with are some of the best and brightest people from Sierra Leone and Nigeria who had the motivation and means to emigrate to the US. They are not necessarily representative of the average person from their countries. Does acknowledging cultural differences I've observed with my own eyes make me a racist?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    160. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a different AC. (Actually, a registered user posting as AC for reasons that will become obvious.)

      I have to agree with the parent post. I've been through depression, and not just the "I have the blues" type, but severe, clinical depression complete with suicide attempts, being taken to the hospital, etc.

      I can understand being that depressed that someone would try to kill himself, but as a parent I cannot understand how ANYONE could want to kill his own child. I'm sorry, but I simply cannot understand it. I love my children too much. (In fact, they are one of the main reasons I'm still alive.)

    161. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      As a father of 3, I cannot fathom what drives a person to do that to their own child. An adult can create conflict that may drive you to retaliate. A 3 year old cannot.

      Your kids must have been extremely atypical as 3 year olds, or you must have an atypically lousy memory.

      3 year olds are programmed to drive you out of your fucking mind. It's in their genes. I don't think that's what happened in this case, however.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    162. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Cabriel · · Score: 1

      Speculatively, I would assume that he thought he would try to lead his family to a life of hiding that he would be happy with, but didn't stop to think if anyone else would be happy with it. He may have gotten into an argument with his wife about whether he did the wrong thing and things went downhill from there.

      What I'm trying to say is that he probably didn't escape with the intent of murdering his family. That was probably something he didn't plan.

      I'm sad that I'm so late to this discussion that this comment will be a long ways down the list and no one will likely see it. I don't get how so many people could misunderstand cause-and-effect. :(

    163. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by drodal · · Score: 2, Funny

      come on, that was funny mark them up.

    164. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I guess that those firemen walk into your burning house to pull you away from a horrible death for the pay.

      they do it for a myriad of reasons. money, retirement, perks, etc... are very valid reasons. so is personal challenge and feeling elite and part of a special brotherhood. peer pressure may come into play, too. societal status also helps motivate people. helping other people is also a frequent why they do it, too.

      if you don't think compensation isn't a primary issue for firemen then i suggest you sit down during contract negotiations between the city and the fireman's union.

      even so, you don't counteract the GPs point. we are fundamentally selfish. if you don't think so, it is because your selfishness has blinded you and wants to selfishly feel like you aren't selfish. does that mean we can't do good? did ted bundy never do any good - EVEN GOOD TO WHICH HE RECEIVED NO RENUMERATION?

      does that mean ted bundy wasn't *fundamentally* selfish?

      Likewise the physicians, therapists and the other adherents to the social compact.

      i grew up around doctors and i can tell you they are often very self centered and selfish - just like all people. money and status is often very important to them.

      Public interest lawsuits, seat belts, vaccines - yep, you have hit the nail on the head: everybody is exactly like you.

      he didn't say *exactly*. he said people are fundamentally self centered and selfish. apparently, you don't pay much attention to the world that surrounds.

      public interest lawsuits are often all about attorney's being unreasonable to drive up their fees. al gore spends $30k a month on gas and electricity and burns more CO2 in one private jet flight than the average person does ALL YEAR!

      is al gore acting selfish spending $30k and flying in private polluters while lecturing everyone else to cut down on CO2 emissions?

      do you think you could convince him he was being selfish? no? is that because he's so selfish? btw, some estimates have al gore making $100 million off of global warming issues - and that's a good thing given his $30k per month energy bills and private jets.

      oh, and his energy bill is UP 10% year over year.

      oh, the earth has cooled since 1998, but al gore won't tell you that freely... it doesn't bring in quite the same cash as global warming does.

      most people miss the FUNDAMENTAL premise of the bible.

      to put it simply, either you care for other people EQUAL to yourself or else society will be severely damaged over time. any society, any time.

      while the concept of god isn't falsifiable, the specific god of the bible can be falsified - it would only take for people to live selfishly and live in constant peace and prosperity. do that and the god of the bible has been falsified.

      it has never been done and never will be done so long as vanity and selfishness rule the day - even with some good done inbetween for whatever reason.

      the GP and the god of the bible have 270 MILLION people who died in the 20th century as a result of selfish war to support his view people are fundamentally selfish.

      once you get done counting to 270 million, all the while pondering each individual death, get back to us and explain how people aren't generally selfish in nature. also consider that lots of "good works" were done while those 270 million people were dying.

      contrary to your belief system, the only true difference between you and the GP is that the GP has a better understanding of how people operate, including himself, and has the ability to honestly portray it and you either don't have that understanding or can't get beyond your self centeredness to articulate it.

    165. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Hollis Brown
      He lived on the outside of town
      Hollis Brown
      He lived on the outside of town
      With his wife and five children
      And his cabin fallin' down

      You looked for work and money
      And you walked a rugged mile
      You looked for work and money
      And you walked a rugged mile
      Your children are so hungry
      That they don't know how to smile

      Your baby's eyes look crazy
      They're a-tuggin' at your sleeve
      Your baby's eyes look crazy
      They're a-tuggin' at your sleeve
      You walk the floor and wonder why
      With every breath you breathe

      The rats have got your flour
      Bad blood it got your mare
      The rats have got your flour
      Bad blood it got your mare
      If there's anyone that knows
      Is there anyone that cares?

      You prayed to the Lord above
      Oh please send you a friend
      You prayed to the Lord above
      Oh please send you a friend
      Your empty pockets tell yuh
      That you ain't a-got no friend

      Your babies are crying louder
      It's pounding on your brain
      Your babies are crying louder
      It's pounding on your brain
      Your wife's screams are stabbin' you
      Like the dirty drivin' rain

      Your grass it is turning black
      There's no water in your well
      Your grass is turning black
      There's no water in your well
      You spent your last lone dollar
      On seven shotgun shells

      Way out in the wilderness
      A cold coyote calls
      Way out in the wilderness
      A cold coyote calls
      Your eyes fix on the shotgun
      That's hangin' on the wall

      Your brain is a-bleedin'
      And your legs can't seem to stand
      Your brain is a-bleedin'
      And your legs can't seem to stand
      Your eyes fix on the shotgun
      That you're holdin' in your hand

      There's seven breezes a-blowin'
      All around the cabin door
      There's seven breezes a-blowin'
      All around the cabin door
      Seven shots ring out
      Like the ocean's pounding roar

      There's seven people dead
      On a South Dakota farm
      There's seven people dead
      On a South Dakota farm
      Somewhere in the distance
      There's seven new people born

      -Bob Dylan

    166. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "He is self-centered (or rather, more self-centered than the average Joe) because of what? Because he sent out spam emails and didn't care that he got on your nerves?"

      he did worse than that, he bought up gobs of a penny stock, heavily promoted it (via spam) as a good investment, and dumped it for millions of dollars.

      that's a bit more than just clogging up everyone's in boxes with spam. I realize a lot of spam is scams to dupe the mentally deficient, but the reason he got in jail was for his abuse of the stock market, totally illegal.

    167. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most people miss the FUNDAMENTAL premise of the bible.

      No, they get it quite well:

      If you're on our side, bow down to the king and be his slave. If you're on the other side god isn't with you so you are less than human therefore subject to rape, torture and murder on a whim with no need for feeling bad about it.

      Now, people claiming that all the goody goody bullshit has anything to do with the fundamental premise are fools who completely miss the purpose. That's the snake oil.

    168. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by joggle · · Score: 1

      Well, a witness lived so I doubt that it was a pro hit.

    169. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      if only he had used canadian antidepressants! I am sure I could find the mail somewhere which had extremely good rates from a company called International Pharmacy.

      I was so determined not to laugh. No matter how awful the participant was, a murder/suicide like this is nothing but a tragedy. But damm, that's funny.

    170. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by pathological+liar · · Score: 1

      It's a little hard to determine motive in a situation like this, but I've heard an explanation that made sense to me in the context of families where the father is the sole bread-winner and facing financial ruin. They start contemplating suicide because they've failed as a provider. They start thinking about taking their families with them to spare them (their families, or themselves) the shame of being exposed as a failure, and maybe because "if I can't provide for them, how can they provide for themselves?"

      As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, maybe that's a narcissistic thing

      I have no numbers or citations to back me up, nor can I remember where I heard it, so, uh, take all of that with a grain of salt... but it's food for thought.

    171. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by maxume · · Score: 1

      Is that where you met the gentleman with the buffalo?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    172. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and your psychology phD is from where, exactly?

    173. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by edschurr · · Score: 1

      they had the patients so drugged up that they were completely checked out. As they say the lights were on but nobody was home. It was surreal, i can't even express how weird it was to see people that were like zombies they wandered aimlessly around

      How do you know they weren't just ill? See catatonic schizophrenia specifically.

    174. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by sideshow · · Score: 1

      If the teenage girl was shot but escaped and is coherent enough to talk, why do the authorities talk about the "apparent" gunman?

      Because we are lucky enough to live in a country where (most of the time anyway) a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

      He would be the "apparent gunman" until a judge/jury said otherwise.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    175. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a discussion on the radio (BBC R4) a while back about a psychiatrist/chologist who wanted to observe the process of being admitted to a hospital. aha, my google-fu worked the 2nd time:
      http://www.layscience.net/?q=node/129

    176. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the connection between being a spammer and being a murder-suicide in the making. Basically, we're all self-centered.

      Making one's living through large-scale fraud isn't even a vaguely normal amount of self-centeredness. You have to be pretty fucked up. Which sort of fucked up, I dunno, but if he's sufficiently narcissistic, he may have a very limited empathy for other people. My layman's understanding is that narcissists can see family members more as extensions of themselves than true individuals. Perhaps he saw killing his family as just part of the job of ending it all, not realizing that they would feel otherwise.

      Of course, we'll never really know, so I'm just speculating, but it seems plausible to me.

      Do I care about your wellbeing? Not really. Do you care about mine?

      Yeah, I do. Maybe it's corny, but I care about my fellow humans. I care about my family, my city, my nation, my world. I also care about myself, but that's definitely not the only thing I care about.

    177. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Lorean · · Score: 1

      Murdering your own genes is a huge leap away from screwing over non-relatives.

    178. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simple. The cold calling folks are doing a job without intentionally breaking the law. Spammers often commit multiple illegal acts (compromising other people's computers, obfuscating sender information, violation of opt-out laws, etc.) to make money. The second you cross the line into believing that laws don't apply to you because you're making boatloads of money and believe you can buy your way out of jail, you've crossed into sociopathic (if not psychopathic) territory.

      There's also the remote possibility that the murder-suicide was staged (i.e. he made the wrong people mad by informing on them). Either way, suicide or hit, it's sad that dirtbags always end up causing so much collateral damage.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    179. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great- I will not smoke and I hate coffee!

    180. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, firemen have no other incentive than kindness to go into fiery buildings.

      Do you even believe yourself?

    181. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You've just judge us.

      Funny how easy it was, isn't it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    182. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      So, all we need to do it convince them that killing themselves would be profitable.....

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    183. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What he is saying is everything we do is driven from a selfish motivation. Firefighters derive a sense of satisfaction from protecting people and that is why they do it.

      This is a rhetorical trick that has always annoyed me. By definition, all motivation for action is at some point internal. To say that all motivations are therefore equally selfish is idiotic.

      Let's assume that:

      • Attila the Hun liked killing people.
      • Torquemada liked torturing people.
      • Mother Teresa liked helping people.
      • Gandhi liked making the world more just.

      That they are all personal motivations is undeniable. Calling them equally selfish, and saying that therefore people are equally selfish is a trick where you confuse two different meanings of selfish.

      We are born with a capacity for compassion, in the same way we are born with a capacity to run. Whether we choose to develop those capacities is up to us.

    184. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by huckamania · · Score: 1

      You focused entirely on race/sex and left out the socio-economic data point. You also didn't provide any data at all or where you got your data from.

      Does the data take into account that there are more caucasians in the US then other races? Does the data take into account that there are more caucasian families in the US or that a greater proportion of minority families do not have a father in the house? Is the data only from the US? Without a citation or the raw data, these questions are unaswerable.

      I seriously doubt that the data will even back up your initial assertions, as the number of these types of crimes are not very great.

    185. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Do you just wait behind bushes so you can jump out as scream racist?

      The post listed some fact. These case are usual Caucasian males.
      Just like serial killers are usually Caucasian males.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    186. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Email spammers are inherently and universally sociopaths.

      This is probably true for the people who start and run high-volume spamming rings. But I think it's important to remember that there are quite a number of ordinary people who get caught up in these things.

      One of the weird things about large corporations is that they can disconnect us from the consequences of our actions. People say, "Oh, it's just a job," and thereby absolve themselves of any responsibility. When I think about it, it scares the hell out of me.

      Take our current financial crisis. There are an ocean of mortgage brokers, real estate agents, bankers, politicians, financial traders, and investors who helped make this happen, who drew paychecks while setting the rest of us up to take the fall. How many of them feel responsible? As far as I can tell, almost none of them.

    187. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      Horse pucky!

      The Maslow-influenced / Ayn-Randian motivation does not square with the biological imperative of survival. Cooperation for mutual survival is well established in human behavior and is now being identified in other species as well. The leading new field is cooperation among microorganisms - see, http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v4/n8/abs/nrmicro1461.html

      The selfish jerk operation of humankind is contra survival. e.g. the subject of this thread.

    188. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Does acknowledging cultural differences I've observed with my own eyes make me a racist?

      Yes. You must be completely color(culture/religion/etc) blind.

      "Wow, Locke, I have to say your wife is really nice. How long has she been living in America?"

      "Huh?"

      "Well I mean she's black and has that African accent... I think she said she's from Sierra Leone? When did she leave?"

      "I have no idea what you're talking about."

      See then you wouldn't be racist.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    189. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by darkfire5252 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Swift one there, Ayn! I guess that those firemen walk into your burning house to pull you away from a horrible death for the pay. Likewise the physicians, therapists and the other adherents to the social compact. Public interest lawsuits, seat belts, vaccines - yep, you have hit the nail on the head: everybody is exactly like you.

      There is a difference between caring about 'people' and caring about 'an unknown person'. Firemen, physicians, etc, clearly care about people a great deal. Those who donate to the Red Cross are trying to help people. However, if you take a fireman aside and tell him "Jim Bob in Kentucky has died", the odds of him shedding a tear are very low. Similarly, if you told me that a woman in Florida read my post and thinks I'm mentally ill, would I care? Hardly.

      People often care about people. People often care about humanity. But do people often care about every actual instance of 'some person they don't know' ? Not hardly.

    190. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Email spammers are inherently and universally sociopaths. It is not unreasonable to consider that any given email spammer would, if it could be profitable, commit murder.

      Granting, arguendo, that this is true (which is granting a lot), I don't see how it applies here. While murder could conceivably be undertaken for profit (e.g., murder for hire, murder as part of an insurance fraud scheme, etc.), its pretty hard to see how the murder part of a murder-suicide is "profitable".

    191. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'm speaking for the majority of people when I say that I do

      No, you're only speaking for yourself... unless the majority of people think that you in particular care about others.

    192. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, keep in mind that IBM in Germany built the machines for managing the concentration camps, wrote the software, printed the punch cards, and even sent people on site to do service. The service contract payments went to IBM in New York, not to IBM Germany. Now, you can argue all day whether that means the IBM of today should be held responsible for that, or for that matter if the Krups of today should be held responsible for making gas chambers, but either way you just have to remember not to expect morality from a corporation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    193. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For example, I'm a white guy and my girlfriend is African. I have to wear sunblock ... she doesn't. Is that a racist comment?

      Your girlfriend? She's not property, you patriarchal phallocentric sexist pig!

    194. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about "first thoughts"?

      I'm talking about the period AFTER you're stabilized, and BEFORE you get out... Tends to be the longest amount of time, and you know darn well there's nothing to do in those joints.

      Hell, for kicks I walked off-campus and left an "involuntary" commitment for a few months... it was a LOT more therapeutic and eye-opening than the "see a shrink for 5 minutes every two weeks" routine at the state nuthouse.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    195. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Of all the responses I'll respond to yours. Yes, now he's hated even more. It is not usually the person who is hated that is going to "give a fuck." It is the people who hate them. If they cared about being hated they probably wouldn't have done the things that they did to get themselves into a position where they were hated to begin with. So, well, I did think before typing. I usually do, just not always very well. But yes, he's hated even more. That impacts his remaining family in many ways surely. That makes the people who already hated him have even more animosity and while he doesn't care now, surely, he quite likely didn't care before.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    196. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tragedy + Distance (or time) = comedy

      Search Google for "Towery" for a good example.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    197. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Smauler · · Score: 1

      FRY : Help me! For God's sake, help me!

      FARNSWORTH : Oh, don't worry, Fry. I too once spent a nightmare-ish time in a robot asylum. But now it's nearly over. So long.

    198. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      It's odd. I've never been an easy sleeper. Sometimes it takes me hours to fall asleep, but once there, I'm a damn log. Because of this, I often just don't sleep at all unless the circumstances are conducive. One time I took Amtrak, not realizing the movement, staying in a sitting position, and numerous other factors would keep me awake for the three day trip. I've heard the stories of hallucinations and various other problems with lack of sleep, but I never had any. To be honest, I was somewhat despondent over it, actually. I mean, if I was going to be exceptionally tired and sleep-deprived, I should at least get some entertainment out of it.

      I've never pushed it past three days, and I'm certain there are varying levels of deprivation to sleep, but you're lucky you know your own cutoff. :)

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    199. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Digital+End · · Score: 1

      I for one care about your well being.

      It sounds cheesy, but I do. If you were in a cave somewhere with a rock on your leg, and I knew about it, I would be upset and I would want to help you. As such, the fact that you're not starving to death cold and alone makes me happy. This is because I value the lives of all people... because I'm not a crazy ass sociopath.

      But with all things, ballence. If you were hungry on the street because you spent your last $5 on another hit of crack, I wouldn't give a damn... in fact I might laugh at you.

      As such I can't give a damn that he's dead. He was a person who didn't give a damn about the safety, security, or privacy of anyone he didn't know personally. Him offing himself saves money on prisons and food. However, that he took the lives of his family... that is the real loss.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    200. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

      Public interest lawsuits => lawyers
      seat belts => government
      vaccines => pharmaceutical corps

      I don't think you gave very good examples to back up your side of the argument here...

    201. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I'll call Pascal's Wager on that, and throw out a prayer to Satan to rape them both with flaming porcupines for eternity.

      I always liked the old Greek myths of eternal torment. Having to push a rock up a hill only to have it roll down every time. Being up to your neck in water, thirsty, yet having the water recede when you bent over. Being hungry with a fruit tree within reach, then having the branches rise out of reach when you tried to grab them.

      To make his eternal punishment fit his crime, I'm thinking put him in a room with a cannon and a big, red button. Tell him that all he needs to do to get out is push the button, but the cannon will continuously fire razor blades shaped like little envelopes at him. Let him get right up to the button and just as he's about to press it, shift the walls around so that he's on the wrong side of the room. Make him turn around and start again. For all eternity he will suffer millions of tiny cuts each which hurts the same as a similar injury would when he was alive, but he can never die of his injuries. For all eternity, his freedom will be just out of reach. Physical pain combined with mental anguish.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    202. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      I just posted the links to mutual cooperation as an aspect of species survival. Joe in the Caucasus Mountains may have no idea that you exist, but his care in packing and sending foodstuffs into general commerce is not directly correlated to personal gain (see, China's food exports) - his care is motivated by a cooperative survival instinct. The whole of our market-based commerce can come tumbling down where too many greedy fools destroy the safety margins/fail-safe nets. See, 1929, bank runs, the 1932 and 1934 SEC Acts, the current collapse of the housing market, the prior GWB collapse of the S&L market.....

      The October 1987 market crash - all are examples of the failure of cooperation (and, deregulation to foster anti-cooperative practices).

      http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v4/n8/abs/nrmicro1461.html

      The cooperative- survival system extends from micro organisms through the ecosystems to the top of the chain (US). What is fruit but a cooperative way to spread a plant's genome through food for another organism?

      Why do chimps groom each other (yes, they are small society animals and the risk of a contagion becoming established in one individual makes grooming a "self interest") but mobility within social groups (females) makes most grooming an unnecessary duty for one or more Chimps - yet we don't see that expressed in the communities - the cooperative society survives.

      Birds routinely have lookouts - who forgo feeding opportunities to safeguard the flock - once again, the behavior is detrimental to one individual, but increases the survival of the entire group.

      Cooperation in complex, multi-species organisms is well established in so many organisms that even I can't list them all - from Lichens to the bacteria in our gut - Selfish motivations do not favor survival (consider pathogens that kill the host - eventually they die because they destroyed their food supply - and, with things like Smallpox, more advanced organisms create vaccines and destroy the selfish bacteria.

    203. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hell, look at Christopher Reeve. He didn't do shit to help paralyzed people until he was.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    204. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      You are being judgmental - a norm in this society.

      If the Crack-addicted individual had access to free medical care and drug support as Europe does, the drop off in drug-related crime and addiction would rapidly pay for itself.

      This man was seriously ill - two innocent lives could have been spared (not to mention his) had we proper safeguards in place.

      Prisons are the most regulated aspects of our society - i view this tragedy as nothing less than a failure of the prison system.

    205. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a hard time feeling pity for people falling for pump'n'dump scams. It's not like he used a gun to get those people to drop their money on him. He used their own greed against them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    206. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Most of the devastating fires in the towns surrounding where I live were started by bored volunteer fire fighters who want to be heroes.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    207. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Mother Teresa liked making people suffer."

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    208. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Apparently a mod couldn't tell that was a joke, so just to beat this to death: I'm kidding.

    209. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, the fact that the baby survived (in a car, away from the scene of crime) actually supports the theory of a murder instead of murder-suicide.

      Think about it: You're a husband and father, determined to take your family with you on your way out of this world. Would you "forget" about one of your kids?

      Now you're a hitman. Priorities: Kill target(s), kill potential witness, get out of there as fast and quiet as possible. Target dead, witnesses dead, killing the baby would require you to go out to the car, just to kill a witness that most likely is none.

      What sounds more plausible?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    210. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Isn't the "biological imperative of survival" inherently selfish? Just because you do good deeds does not make your motivation for doing them any less selfish. I give to charity and volunteer because it makes ME feel better about myself. I cooperate with society because if I don't I won't get something I need to survive. Your argument actually supports my position.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    211. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dave562 · · Score: 1

      If you're making it look like a murder suicide, you'd do the kid too. However the summary says something about an infant and a teenager left behind. That pretty much rules out a professional hit setup to look like a murder-suicide.

    212. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd expect that kind of comment from a Sony fanboy.

    213. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is, perhaps another possibility: He simply didn't like his family. People like that do exist. They are shackled with unwanted children, bad step-kids, etc. It could be all kinds of revenge motif going on inside his head. No one will know what went through his head, but it could be something something as simple as pure hate for the world, and everyone in it.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    214. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Jherico · · Score: 1

      Anyone else see this as odd? He's found dead, no questions, no nothing? Anyone else think this could have been a pro hit?

      Even assuming some mafioso got fed up with junk mail enough to decide to call in a hit on someone who had ALREADY been sentenced to prison, killing an entire family including a 3 year old doesn't strike me as very 'professional'. Occam's razor says he did it himself.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

    215. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      "Pro hit" eh? Perhaps you watch too much CSI?

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    216. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      Public interest lawsuits don't necessarily benefit lawyers - and the benefits to the public are far, far greater than any benefit to a lawyer. The E-911 tax scam that the Telecos ran - taking $96.00/per phone line/yr gave the telecos windfall profits - hundreds of millions - who else but public interest law firms (frequently on operatiing grants) could, or would bring suits of this nature?

      In Missouri last year a massive Riparian Rights public interest case cam down benefitting farmers throughout the region. The Public Interest law-firm did put in for attorney's fees - but when the class rep tried to divert the fees to his own pocket, the firm waived all $8meg of fees rather than let one greedy schmoe with standing take fees as his. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the right to reject fees. So, there is a classic example of the tug of war between the selfish and the cooperative. The Class Rep benefitted by the clarification and preservation of his riparian rights (as did hundreds of other farmers) but he couldn't be unjustly enriched by attempting to take fees that were not his. Ultimately, the PI Law firm spent $8meg to make water rights available to thousands without a penny coming to them.

      As for seat-belts - read: Unsafe at Any Speed, Ralph Nader - that book lead to lawsuits and, finally, government regulation.

      Vaccines - search Polio - fully government funded research. Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus vaccines were all government grant funded. Research was not performed by "big pharma" - they didn't exist.

      The same applies to Smallpox and the world eradication of that disease (last confirmed case 1976) - all done through US and WHO cooperation.

    217. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing justifies the killing of his wife (maybe she agreed?) and daughter (this one has no maybes), but we just don't know what really happened, and never will.

      No maybes huh? So you're saying that the daughter definitely agreed then?

    218. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by LrdDimwit · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense. Nobody wanted the donut holes, they don't want the bullet holes either.

    219. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      You are trying to attach their motivation to the action they are known for instead of the reason (actual motivation) they chose to do the things they did.

      * Attila the Hun liked killing people.
      The love of power has been the motivation of mankind since there was a mankind

      * Torquemada liked torturing people.
      Again, throughout history men have done atrocious things believing they were acting on God's behalf. You may not understand their motivation but to them it was the most important thing in their existence.

      * Mother Teresa liked helping people.
      If she was anything like I am she derived a great deal of satisfaction in helping people and even greater heartache when she could not.

      * Gandhi liked making the world more just.
      Here again his actions were motivated by the desire to be "free". To that end he determined a course of action he believed had the best chance of success.

      These look like good examples in support of my OP.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    220. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Adults get treated like misbehaving and retarded children. Inmates fight over the stupidest things, probably out of boredom...

      Sounds a lot like college.

    221. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      Does acknowledging cultural differences I've observed with my own eyes make me a racist?

      Yes.

      Haven't you paid attention to how you are suppose to think,feel and speak? Everyone is completely equal regardless of race, religion, culture, height, weight, gender. Everyone is a special little snow flake who can be anything and do anything they want.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    222. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by CETS · · Score: 1

      That's not true. Quite often the scale of the assistance needed (e.g. fire, earthquake, hurricane, mudslide, flood, blizzard, etc.) is beyond the capacity of people who care about people, and requires the logistical capability and specific training and knowledge this charitable organizations have.

    223. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by joggle · · Score: 1

      A teenage girl survived too.

    224. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      You have entirely missed my point.

      If she was anything like I am she derived a great deal of satisfaction in helping people and even greater heartache when she could not.

      Yes, that would make it a personal motivation. That all motivations are personal at some point in the causal chain is a tautological observation. By definition, all individual actions can be linked to personal motivations.

      However, given the full spectrum of human motivations, you can rank them on a spectrum of selfish to selfless. Claiming that all motivations are selfish because they can be seen as personal is absurd, a misleading trick of words. I've seen Randites pull this trick for 20 years, and it is getting old.

    225. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Misconception about Ayn... there. You should read what she had to say on the ethics of emergencies (I think a chapter of the Virtue of Selfishness deals with that)... hardly the total bastard you make her out to be. Essentially, she considers it moral to help another human being on the potentiality that they may be someone who shares your values... so long as the risk to yourself is manageable (don't jump in the water to save a drowning man if you can't swim).

    226. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dumb bitch. I could have made her feel like a woman and also treated her like one

      I don't believe you.

    227. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by eepok · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Catch-22 and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest as a mashup done by Stephen King.

    228. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      No.

      The biological imperative of survival of the species outweighs the individual. Microbial cooperation is the clearest example of this fundamental fact.

      It isn't my argument - it is the fundamental core of the latest studies showing that individual is irrelevant to the survival of the species and the norm is cooperation within the species and, in some cases, extra-species cooperation (symbioses) lead to the best survival outcomes.

      Your selfish motivation assumes that your genome has relevance in the greater survival of the species. That fact, in and of itself, shows that the value of your survival is grossly overvalued (as is mine, and most other living, thinking beings) by personal bias.

      Ultimately, not even the worst puppy shits in its own bed. The fact of the murder-suicide that lead this thread indicates the fact that Humans are capable of behavior worse than that of a small, furry animal. The sick puppy who eliminated himself from the genome, took his offspring and spouse with him, effectively eliminating the branch of the genetic diversity of humanity that he comprised.

    229. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

      --A TRUE AC!

    230. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, some people can not be rehabilitated. The penal system is meant to hand out punishment for crimes committed and turn them into 'productive members of society'. This probably does not happen very often. The fact of the matter is that some people will commit terrible crimes. Repeatedly. In that circumstance, it is better to put them down like the animals that they act like. A civilized society depends on respect for your fellow man.

    231. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by prockcore · · Score: 1

      If he was still alive and having to defend himself in court, he'd probably plead temporary insanity. Insanity means without reason or utterly foolish.

      Insanity isn't a medical definition, it's a legal one. Insanity means he doesn't know what he was doing was wrong. That's it. It's very hard to prove that you thought there was nothing wrong with killing your wife and child. Not that you thought it was the best way to deal with your problems, or your only option, but that there wasn't anything *wrong* with it.

      Let's put it this way, the insanity plea has only been allowed in fewer than 1% of all cases. Of those, only 26% were successful, of those, 90% were previously diagnosed with a mental illness of some kind.

      We do the math, and even if the judge allowed him to pursue an insanity defense, the odds of him being acquitted is 2.6%

    232. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      In two seconds of googling, I was able to locate this:

      http://www.springerlink.com/content/t64u02292024k516/

      I'm sure additional research could lead to additional information, but I have a hearing to get to this afternoon.

      --AC

    233. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insensitive clod! I am already a mass murderer!

    234. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by brkello · · Score: 1

      Despite being modded up, I think you are horribly wrong. Wanting to skirt around some laws and send a bunch of e-mail to make money has nothing to do with killing people. There are tons of examples (recent even, enron, politicians) of people acting selfishly, going to prison, and not killing people. The fact that he spammed has NOTHING to do with him being more likely to kill his family rather than just himself. This is just a stupid Internet opinion that lacks any bit of logic, facts, or tact.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    235. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If you can't rehabilitate them, at least you can have the "pleasure" of making them suffer for as long as possible. Death is an escape from that suffering. Those who torture people are sometimes very careful to keep their victims alive. Besides all that, there's always a chance that you have the wrong guy. And our systems carry the very heavy baggage of prejudice and corruption. Two very good reasons to abolish the practice. Civilized society does not kill an unarmed person that's locked up in a cell.

      --
      What?
    236. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      7, 5, and 2
      I perfectly understand the urge. It's that cliff-dive from urge to action that is inconceivable. And yes, I don't think this was because the 3yr old just wouldn't stop singing the Barney song.

    237. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by huckamania · · Score: 1

      Contains no useful data except a summary that repeats the same information that started this thread.

      "More accurately called homicide-suicide, the most common scenario involves an estranged white male in his 40s killing his spouse and possibly children before committing suicide."

      I asked for data, this aint it.

    238. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Racism is about denying people equal opportunity based on the color of their skin. Acknowledging the fact that we are different, physically and culturally is not racism.

      Acknowledging that many Chinese natives are crappy drivers in the US is not racist (even if white people often see it that way.) Most of my Chinese friends agree that there are a lot of bad Asian drivers out there. Assuming someone is a bad driver because they are Chinese, and treating them like a bad driver before seeing them drive is racist. Denying someone a license because they are Chinese would be racist.

      Driving in China or Taiwan is very different than driving in the US. Someone who learned over there will suck over here. Likewise, most US drivers couldn't handle driving in Taiwan. Are they inferior because of it? Nope. They are just different.

    239. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by hazem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wanting to skirt around some laws and send a bunch of e-mail to make money has nothing to do with killing people.

      The problem is that his behavior was much more than simply skirting the law to make some money. His actions show a total and blatant disregard for safety and wellbeing of other people. He was glib about the problems he caused by clogging up mail servers and he had no problem sending e-mails for scam medicines that could actually endanger people's lives. His actions indicate that he was probably a psychopath. It's so much more than just being selfish or a moderate criminal. His behaviors and patterns of thinking indicate a total lack of regard for other human beings.

      It's then not much of a leap to extrapolate from his ordinary disregard for human life when he's "feeling good" to taking out his family when he's under extreme stress.

    240. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I lived two blocks away from her - 800 West End Avenue - in the 1960's - and I had more than a few discussions with her about her "Objectivist" views.

      Fascinating thing, her royalty revenues had ceased - those were 26-year copyright terms prior to the 1976 amendments - and she was quite happy with her Social Security check and her rent-controlled apartment on Manhattan's Upper West Side.

      Her public pronouncements were not the life that she lived. Objectivists are self defeating and John Galt is a character lifted from French post-modernist literature - pure infringement.

      She also benefitted from free medical care - treating her lung cancer. Amazing that she accepted that which she would have denied others....a hypocrite of the first order.

    241. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they ever would.

      If your in there, you must be insane, or you wouldn't be in there.

      I was stuck in one of those places as a kid (ADHD/Conduct Disorder, but mostly nasty custody maneuvering), and it really is a case of "give a man a hammer and everything looks like a nail". I was pretty normal compared to most of the kids in there (no risk to self or others, no behavioral problems), but was treated badly anytime I said this (must be a sign of a disorder), anytime I got my parents to bring me a book (books were pretty much verboten), and anytime I refused to participate in group activity (got put in a padded room for not wanting to go swimming). Add to this the constant drug shifting (about 5 medications in the month I was there), and you start to see why you CAN'T be considered sane in such a place.

      They expect you to be bat-shit, and therefore everything you do is proof of such. This was a semi-private place, and cost a good deal, I can only imagine what the various state systems are like.

    242. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voluntarily spent ONE night in a mental health facility after a stress breakdown.

      I had scheduled for one week, but left after one night because let me tell you, I was scared straight.

      I have not been nearly as stressed, and I have found it MUCH easier to cope with life since I know what awaits me if I don't keep it together.

    243. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by LatencyKills · · Score: 1

      Had to reply to this because you touched on firefighters, and I happen to be one, at least as a volunteer in my town. Do I do it because I care about people? Meh, maybe. I really do it because it needs to be done - it's a way to contribute to my community without joining the PTA. But on the whole I have to agree with the assertion that people don't care much about each other. Sure, there are exceptions, the Red Cross being an excellent one, but the number of people who actually donate their time to the Red Cross is a vanishly small percentage of the population. I'll also add that caring is somewhat a matter of distance. A car accident outside my front door involving my neighbors is bad, one across town involving people I don't know is less so. An earthquake in China? Awful, but not really on a visceral level.

      --
      Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
    244. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > He got tired of having his box filled with unsolicited male?

      Ya know, it's kind of sad that +5 is the limit for upmods. There should be some kind of glowing award for mods that might make it to +100.

      It's sad he killed his wife and a kid, but I guess being a rogue ALA The Riches catches up to you eventually.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    245. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by huckamania · · Score: 1

      I'm not holding my breath for any relevant data. Here's the best I could come up with...

      I'm guessing that you are using this one study to back up your claims, which is pretty pathetic, cause the authors don't seem to agree with you at all.

    246. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by wilson_c · · Score: 1

      He is self-centered (or rather, more self-centered than the average Joe) because of what? Because he sent out spam emails and didn't care that he got on your nerves? By that logic, every cold calling CCA is also a self centered bastard who's ready to pop any second. ...
      I fail to see the connection between being a spammer and being a murder-suicide in the making.

      What he did, vis-a-vis spam, wasn't merely annoying. It was a criminal act. He knowingly acted in a criminally fraudulent way in order to annoy people. He didn't care that he was breaking the law to deceive people into receiving his crap and that is sociopathic behavior. Does that make him homicidal? No, of course not, but it does seem that a selfish asshole in business is more likely to act like a selfish asshole when it comes to suicide too.

      As an OT aside: dude, 21 months in a minimum security facility and he couldn't hack it? He was still going to come out a wealthy man. And he had to take his family out with him. What a pussy.

    247. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Off course, Like any other Christian.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    248. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by huckamania · · Score: 1

      A study from the Washington, D.C.-based Violence Policy Center indicates about 10 such cases occur each week in the United States. Statistics are hard to come by, however, because no single agency records murder-suicide cases, experts say. "The FBI tracks homicides and the (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) tracks suicides. There is no mechanism that puts those together," said Kristen Rand, legislative director for the Violence Policy Center. The nonprofit group used a news clipping service to collect information on murder-suicide cases that occurred throughout the nation during the first half of 2005. "It's really the most comprehensive data collection of murder-suicide events in the U.S.," Rand said. While experts say murder-suicide crosses all age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds, they have detected some common characteristics among the perpetrators. There is often a history of domestic violence; pre-existing mental health issues, including past suicide attempts; and a strong, emotional attachment to the victim.

    249. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      What part of "usually" don't you understand?

      (Your) firemen, (your) doctors, etc. are not "the usual strangers". And all of them combined, whether yours or not, are not "the usual strangers", either.

      Nor does it affect you, either, buddy. Unless every damned murder you hear about on TV every night has a deeply personal effect on you. But if that's the case I'd go see a psychiatrist.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    250. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by rleibman · · Score: 1

      I've read both biographies of her (Nathaniel and Barbara's) and both depict her as a miserable human being, inconsistent and at points irrational: they are probably true. Yet, what I try to judge is her philosophy, not her flawed character, though I have many disagreements with her philosophy I still admire it and its been a big influence in my life. As far as accepting SS, and "free" medical care... as a tax payer I don't have much problem with *me* getting back the money I've been giving month after month, I'd much prefer to not have to give it in the first place, but there's no inconsistency with getting at least *some* of what you deserve back and Objectivism.

    251. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Every single person alive, innocent or guilty, has broken the law

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    252. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Well although the "We eat 8 spiders in our sleep a year", thing is generally accepted as a myth, because there are no sleep studies done.. I did read a report from a coroner that stated that over 90 percent of analysis of stomach contents come back with insect dna.. so he thinks it may be greater than 8.

      Sleep tight.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    253. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      You admit a commitment to to the community is your motivation - and, as a volunteer, you don't get paid. Sounds a lot like the cooperation that leads to the survival of the species, possibly at the cost of your own life (or, a serious shortening thereof).

      Are you going to tell me that while you don't care about people, that lack of concern extends to people trapped by fire? Are all of your fire-fighting duties limited to preservation of property? Life never enters into the equation?

      Disasters are relative: the earthquake in China might be a serious problem for you if your parents were attending the Olympics and died in an earthquake that collapsed their hotel.

      Moreover, why fight fires over PTA? The loss-of-life risk factors are grossly shifted towards the firefighting position. Do you have a death wish or just a low tolerance for boring meetings?

    254. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by incubuz1980 · · Score: 1

      I have never wished for mod points until now... (positive)

    255. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Most likely it was a guy named Bubba that had a 12 in surprise for his "wife" back in the cell."

      I highly doubt "Bubba" would be serving time in a minimum security prison. They don't call it federal "pound you in the ass" prison for nothing!!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    256. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by arcade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sleep deprivation isn't fun...

      Well, I certainly agree that it's not fun if you're having trouble sleeping. For me, it has been quite fun experiences though. The reason? Because I don't have trouble sleeping. Trying to stay awake for as long as time as possible to observe the effects was fun. At least for me.

      The "hearing your name" thing was the worst for me.

      It wasn't _bad_ for me, but it was damn annoying, as I always started looking for the person shouting until I realized it was the sleep deprivation that caused it. Looking for which person is shouting at you with 4000+ computer geeks around you is.. interesting.

      Moral of the story, don't deprive yourself of sleep on purpose because you want to see what it's like.

      You might be right that it's a dumb thing to do - for me it was just interesting, as I knew I could just give in to sleep at any moment I wanted. Hasn't affected me badly in any way that I can tell .. except giving me interesting experiences. :P

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    257. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with SS/ Medicare (Medicare a 1965 law) - yet contribution to SS was voluntary for much of her revenue stream. She was a free-rider and she knew it.

      Her "philosophy" was a mishmash of other's works and she knew it. So, intellectually dishonest, a free rider and a denier of the Objectivist view when her own self interest was on the line.

      Frankly, she has puled off a scam that continues after her death- quite an accomplishment - especially when her contemporaries include Scientology and the Cult of L-Ron the Great, Winning Friends and Influencing People and a slew of Christian cults (that Ayn hated with a passion), oh, did I forget Mary Baker Eddy & Christian Science?

    258. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "He was a criminal. If he was self-centered enough to make his living by fraud and theft, then it's not that much of a stretch for him to decide that if he was going to off himself, he'd take a few people with him."

      Hitler had a dog. Hitler was a psychotic lunatic. Therefore anyone with a dog is a psychotic lunatic. That is some bulletproof logic there!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    259. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nitpick: spiders aren't insects.

    260. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Public interest lawsuits, seat belts, vaccines"

      ... are all about profit, not caring about someone else. And lord knows there has never been a doctor or lawyer that went into the field for the money!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    261. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Wanting to skirt around some laws and send a bunch of e-mail to make money has nothing to do with killing people.

      That's not what spammers do. They don't send out "a bunch of e-mails"; they hijack millions of machines to send out billions of messages, each and every one of which is likely to be an attempt at fraud. The sheer volume of this crap makes e-mail a less useful tool for everyone and causes not insignificant costs to those organizations who must use it.

      To be a spammer requires being a self-centered psychopath. It requires not caring about the consequences of your actions to other people, just as long as you receive benefit from them. In other words, just the kind of guy who decides to take his family with him to his grave.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    262. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the jaywalkers, and people who tear the tag off the mattress too. If you are going to kill one non-violent criminal, you better get them all!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    263. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dauthur · · Score: 1

      That's Carol Burnett's quote.

    264. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      i'm a former prosecutor, son of a Psychiatrist (mother) and Attorney (father) and hold advanced degrees in science and law.

      I think that the Judicial system, medicine, government funded research into public interest matters (including, of course, public defense), radio spectrum allocation, viral disease propagation and a litany of other areas all fall within the scope of the social compact.

      China is the breeding ground for Influenza - like it or not, we have humans, ducks and pigs in close proximity and that is the source of each year's new Influenza variant. The H5N1 variant (close to the 1918 strain) jumps to a forth specie - chickens. That strain is potentially a slate-wiper.

      Public health authorities have to be aware of the latest variants and act appropriately, so Chen Li, a farmer in Sichuan Province, is of great interest to you and your family. Remember that it is but one 18 hour flight from China to Denver...

      In 1918 one of the Influenza points of origin was Ft. Riley, KS - because we were bringing home infected, solders injured in WWI.

      The scope of public interest / social compact duties is ever expanding - not contracting.

      It takes neither a physician nor a fireman to be aware of the dangers to themselves and their communities and the need to take prompt action. As a non-firemen I'll turn in a fire alarm, but my skill set doesn't include putting out fires in large structures. Still, my duty to a piece of property and the potential inhabitants thereof is, at a minimum, to report the fire.

      The same duties apply to those of us who see a man with a gun walking away from a prison - bent on homicide and suicide.

      The duties also apply to those who see the aircraft passenger showing signs of the flu....

      How about a child playing with a loaded gun? Would you walk away from a 4 year-old with a loaded handgun, or would you remove the weapon?

      What about a drunk driver on I-25? Going to call in the fool or wait to see who he kills?

      I believe that all doubt has been eliminated. We are each charged with the duty to act in a cooperative manner to preserve the species.

    265. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Too lazy to Google it, but my assumption would be that the insect DNA (if said story is true) is from food, not spiders eaten in your sleep. Bugs end up in processed food.

    266. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What he is saying is everything we do is driven from a selfish motivation. Firefighters derive a sense of satisfaction from protecting people and that is why they do it.

      While this is true, it also stretches the definition of "selfish" so wide as to be useless, since it now covers every imaginable motive. So, we either limit the word "selfish" to its common meaning of approximately "done for personal gain, not including triggering the positive reinforcement mechanism of social instincts" or stop using it completely due to it being redundant. Defining selfishness so widely it covers every possible motive and then arguing that every action has selfish motives is pointless; of course it's true, since it is a tautology, for that definition of selfishness.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    267. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      The second you cross the line into believing that laws don't apply to you because you're making boatloads of money and believe you can buy your way out of jail, you've crossed into sociopathic (if not psychopathic) territory.

      I wonder how the ratio of murder-suicides to suicides contrast between CEOs and the average.

      --
      Fnord.
    268. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      You are all about Profit. Up until the 1960s no hospital in the US could turn a profit. It was illegal. The same with "mutual insurance companies,"

      I know many, many physicians, attorneys and scientists who work in low or no-pay positions because that is their reason for having become the physician, lawyer, scientist in the first place.

      Doctors Without Borders is but one example of physicians placing themselves in high-risk positions to work for no money to better lives of strangers.

      Ivy-league law graduates can command a 6-figure starting salary - yet, every year, there are those who go to work as Legal Aid and Public Defender counsel.

      FAIR, the EFF and hundreds of other legal operations exist as non-profit/no profit operations.

      The Union of Concerned Scientists has fought nuclear proliferation for decades - all without pay for staff and members.

      I can go on, St. Jude's Children's Hospitals, founded by Danny Thomas, remain free to the children needing care.

    269. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Where as non-caucasian males would, customarily, just walk away with no guilt and no feelings of any responsibility?

      More likely, for reasons only covariant with, rather than caused by, race (note that these types of patterns are normally identified within the US, not globally), non-caucasian males are more likely (amont other things) to be:
      1) Not the immediate support of their family (a consequence of the higher incidence of broken homes in, e.g., the African-American community), or
      2) From a background wherein financial misfortune is seen as more normal and expected and less a sign of personal failure (a consequence of the higher incidence of poverty in many non-Caucasian groups).

      These types of factors in the social context would, if the explanation given by GP were the major motivation for this
      type of suicide (which seems plausible and I've seen some things that support, but I'm not real familiar with the specifics), be things that would reasonably expected to make these kinds of murder-suicides less prevalent among non-Caucasian males.

      Sounds pretty racist, any way you want to try to advance that argument.

      Observing factual patterns in behavior that differ by race is not "racist". Assuming, without (or, a fortiori, contrary to) evidence that any such factually observed patterns must be inherent in differences between the races rather than, e.g., a product of social experiences whose distributions are, for whatever reason, different among racial groups, OTOH, is racist. Noticing the differences in behavior patterns is the first step to looking for the explanation of the differences and seeing what lies beneath them. Deliberately ignoring the patterns would have a racist impact/

    270. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IIRC, the level of sociopathic behavior in CEOs is disproportionately high compared to the general population, so that would be an interesting question to ask.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    271. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. The cold calling folks are doing a job without intentionally breaking the law. Spammers often commit multiple illegal acts (compromising other people's computers, obfuscating sender information, violation of opt-out laws, etc.) to make money. The second you cross the line into believing that laws don't apply to you because you're making boatloads of money and believe you can buy your way out of jail, you've crossed into sociopathic (if not psychopathic) territory.

      Ah, so legality dictates morality and what's good for society? That explains why Nelson Mandela was only recently removed from the American governments list of terrorist - what a sociopath!!!

    272. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      and for every exception to the greed rule you can come up with, there are hundreds where the motivation WAS greed.

      And don't try to make it personal - you don't know me or have any idea what I am about. I may or may not be all about the profit, but you certainly have no way of knowing, and I wouldn't presume to know such things about you either. I am by no means condoning greed as a motivation, or declaring it as my motivation. Merely pointing out that it does exist, and there is no shortage of it.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    273. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Even assuming some mafioso got fed up with junk mail enough to decide to call in a hit on someone who had ALREADY been sentenced to prison, killing an entire family including a 3 year old doesn't strike me as very 'professional'. Occam's razor says he did it himself.

      Unless, of course, the mafioso wanted to send a message to all other spammers, in which case killing the entire family would be exactly the thing to do.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    274. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      Here's some data for you:

      http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/12/suppl_2/ii33

      Specifically, let me call out the following information: "The majority of victims and perpetrators involved in homicide/suicide incidents were non-Hispanic white."

      However, the study (which deals with all kinds of murder-suicides, rather than what is referred to as a "Family Annihilator" murder) notes that "the percentage of African Americans involved in homicide/suicide incidents is higher than their representation in participating states (approximately 16.7% in both years)."

      However, other studies have found that "A significant shift in the characteristics of location, perpetrators, and victimology of such events between the two cohorts is demonstrated: events changed from urban, multiple victim events with a majority of white perpetrators to rural, dyadic events in which victims did not live with perpetrators, the majority of whom were black." Murder-Suicide in Central Virginia: A Descriptive Epidemiologic Study and Empiric Validation of the Hanzlick-Koponen Typology.

      Adjusting for the differences in murder-suicide types, we can infer that the multiple victim family event is more common among whites than blacks.

      This is not a normative statement. I cannot explain the reasons why these men do what they do. I can hypothesize, as I have done, but at the end of the day, the data supports the conclusion that white men are more often the perpetrators of this kind of violence then black men. Sadly the perpetrators of these crimes are rarely available for post-event interviews.

      I'm not a forensic psychologist, or an epidemiologist. I have read some reputable secondary sources on this subject in the course of working in my field and am relying on the experts for that information, much in the way that I rely on experts in explaining the intricacies of stellar fusion or string theory. If you care to provide contrary data, I would be more than happy to review it and revise my understanding of this kind of homicide.

      --AC

    275. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by loraksus · · Score: 1

      After 40-50 hours, that is completely normal, even if you take excessive amounts of caffeine / stimulants or non stimulant drugs such as modafinil or adrafinil. Even if "desire for sleep by drowsiness" is totally eliminated, it really isn't all that pleasant and you'll find you want to sleep because of the effects.
      I also tend to find myself bored fairly easily.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    276. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the connection between being a spammer and being a murder-suicide in the making.

      Lack of empathy. Kinda like this:

      Do I care about your wellbeing? Not really. Do you care about mine? I doubt it.

      The fact that you think everyone feels the same way you do speaks volumes.

    277. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His inbox was so filled with SPAM that he missed an important chain mail and received the curse at full blaze.

    278. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Darwin awards are, by definition, given post-mortem... no need to be retroactive.

    279. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      OMG, I just watched the Shining, and if I had mod points I would devise some method by which I could give them all to this post.

    280. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Well, here's a scenario:

      1. Spammer goes to jail for 21 months and doesn't like it.

      2. He arranges with a confederate to be waiting at an airport with an airplane and his money stash the day he busts out.

      3. He busts out, makes his way to the airport, and finds the friend and money left without him.

      4. Now all he has is a free ticket to a real pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

      5. He now has a good reason to off himself. And he suspects his wife of complicity, so he offs her too.

      rj

    281. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      It's so easy to criticize behind computer screens.

      We judge based on actions. With what magical metric do you judge by?

      I'm judging that a man, causing minor irritation to almost everybody with email (and a massive headache to most sysadmins), killed his wife and three year old daughter after escaping from prison, before killing himself.

      And to tell you the truth, I feel pretty qualified to say that he is a jackass.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    282. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by RJBeery · · Score: 1

      YOU DAMN POTHEADS!!

    283. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Be honest, do you care whether I live or not?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    284. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Well the actual callers are just poor shmucks trying to get some coins like the rest of us, but I'm pretty sure the big boss who sits and devises the bollocks they call us about is a right rotten cunt.

    285. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Touchy feely sensitive types?

      Bullshit. If I saw you and you're like this in real life, I'd probably lay you out.

      Not so touchy feely, eh?

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    286. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Nah, if Slashdotters were capable of pulling off a hit like this, George Lucas would have been found mysteriously dead with a Jar Jar Binks plush toy shoved down his throat long ago.

    287. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

      The 'missing' connection isn't that he was a spammer, but that he spammed illegally -- that is, he demonstrated a criminal/narcissistic mindset. It was that flawed character and thought process that induced him to include his wife and child.

      --
      --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    288. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...if he happens to be right"

      Oh, so now you're sexist too!

    289. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      What's worse than finding a spammer's dead baby in your kettle?

      Not finding it.

    290. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      I thing that part of the problem of this argument is that people are defining "selfish" differently. If I give some money to charity, I understand my personal motives and perceived benefits I get, I define this action as selfish as opposed to altruistic. Someone such as yourself may define that same action as cooperation as opposed to selfish. From my perspective, let me say that cooperation for mutual benefit is not altruism as I understand it. From your example, the bird who acts as lookout doesn't do that all the time, they exchange some feeding time for protection from predators. That behaviour is no more detrimental to the individual bird than saving money is detrimental to a human. I give up the use of this money now so I can benefit later. Buying insurance is probably a better example.

      In any case, as long as we define "selfish" differently it probably won't be possible for us to agree on whether it is acceptable or desirable. I agree with you about cooperative-survival systems but they fall within my definition of self-interest. The real difference we are talking about is not one of motivation but of understanding and the ability to put long term benefit ahead of immediate gratification. The person who won't cooperate with people may get immediate benefit but will likely lose out in the long term as people who do cooperate will through experience become unwilling to include the other in the cooperative system. There may be exceptions to this, but it does stand as a general principle.

      My own personal experience is that a bit over ten years ago, I decided I needed to undertake a major overhaul on how I lived, much of the needed change being in the area of cooperation, working with people, relationships, etc. I have found that it is pretty pointless for me to try to be "good". It just doesn't seem to produce results for me in terms of changing my behaviour, especially long term. Much of the behaviour we term "good" is because it enables a society to operate well, which has a definite benefit to the individual. Politeness, the rule of law, making sure others benefit in their transactions with you, there are all sorts of actions which may have no immediate benefit but produce a better life. The more I understand this, the more I act in that way. The more I act in that way and the longer I do it, the greater my benefit. I have better relationships, more wealth, many benefits. From an observers perspective, maybe I've become "good" or less "selfish". Certainly more pleasant to be around, but honestly, I don't detect this "unselfishness" or "goodness" in myself, but better understanding, hopefully some wisdom. Others have benefited by having a more pleasant me, but I did it for myself.

      I had a friend in AA and went to a meeting as an observer, one point they made strongly: you won't give up the drink for others, you will only do it for yourself. I found it interesting that they had come to the same conclusion as I had.

    291. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by huckamania · · Score: 1

      I just don't think you can draw conclusions from these types of actions. A single event could skewer the results in any number of ways. I haven't looked at the link you provided, but I will. I know the study I looked at was for a very short period of time and included one-off events like the Virginia Tech shootings. Also, they relied on news clippings, which normally don't include things like the race of those involved.

      I'm sure that if you look at things like bee stings or lightning strikes over a short period of time you could make similar declarative statements that would be equally erroneous.

    292. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      In general I think people don't understand what the word "racist" means. In many cases it would be more appropriate to use the term "bigot".

    293. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The reality is that for better or worse, cultural boundaries can often be drawn right alongside racial boundries. There's generally a long set of historical circumstances that have created those conditions.

      This is perhaps especially true in the US between "White" and "Black" culture (moreso than other lines of combined race and culture), as a direct consequence of the legacy of first slavery and then the de jure segregation that followed it in a substantial portion of the country until past the middle of last century.

    294. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't one still argue that such a person is not really interested in the other's well-being, but is simply donating money to charitable organizations in order to feel better about themselves? Thus the reason behind the donation is not to help others, but to help oneself?

    295. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said the Columbine kids were monsters? It's those damn jocks that caused the problem.

    296. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Slur · · Score: 1

      Yes, and appropriately enough, his outbox.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    297. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Basically, we're all self-centered.

      We are? I know some people are, but there are many who aren't. Sounds like you're just making excuses for yourself.

    298. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Aw, cmon! Are we going to have these discussions again?

      The guy was a convicted criminal, and the simplest explanation is that he killed his wife and baby...

      I, for one, hope he gets large pineapples stuck hourly into his ass for the rest of eternity

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    299. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmm. The Red Cross. People helping people. The same people that helped me after a house fire (that I wasn't even around for, leaving me completely exonerated).

      Helped me with a little plastic baggie of assorted cheap toiletries and a laundry guide.

      Very caring.

      (BTW, I was a gold card, gallon club donor to them...)

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    300. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jamesh · · Score: 1

      truly a sociopath. They know that they're ruining the lives of others; they just don't care.

      That was my first thought too. And now, the 'good life' is permanently out of reach to him, and he's facing sharing a jail cell with a guy who's been taking the very stuff the spammer has been pushing (viagra, penis pills, etc), and he want's the easy way out. If he killed off his whole family then maybe you could think he had some noble (to his deranged mind) intention of preventing them from living in poverty after all their wealth gets taken away, but he only killed his wife and one of his kids.

      Of course, it's always risky forming conclusions about motives from brief press releases...

    301. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by negRo_slim · · Score: 0

      Reanimate your phallus with Frankencock XL! (Now in liquicaps!)

      FRANKENCOCK HUNGRY!

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    302. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No problem ... besides I just learned a new word, phallocentric.

      She'd agree with you anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    303. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind who brought the topic to the table, greed-boy.

      The vast majority of people are far more likely to be self-sacrificing than greedy. Studies have shown, time and again, the the poorer a person is the more they donate to charity, support destitute family members and, yes, strangers and are willing to go out of their way to assist the less fortunate.

      Humans are basically decent. Rich humans are basically willing to ascribe personal flaws to the poor to justify their own wealth - most often the result of luck.

      You believe what you want and your world is a nasty and brutish world.

      I know who will stand for the weak, the sick and the powerless and I'm pleased by what I see.

    304. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by sjames · · Score: 1

      Even the most prolific CCA will never manage to annoy MILLIONS of people during a career. A spammer does that EVERY DAY. It truly takes a special level of self-centeredness to do that.

      Of course, there's a big threshold between annoying and killing.

      As for people in general caring for others, distance does (naturally) create a detachment. That is necessary for our mental health since at any given time, many are dieing or injured. We couldn't function if we felt all of them "up close"

      At the same time, most people find seeing a total stranger badly injured to be a traumatic experience.

      At greater distance, the suffering of strangers becomes more abstract but most people aren't exactly indifferent, it just doesn't ruin their day.

      If you choose ice cream rather than cake this evening, I am truly indifferent. I truly don't care even the slightest bit. If you get hurt tonight, I'm not indifferent. Were it up to me, all else being the same, I would certainly vote no to your injury. But honestly, I won't be all broken up over it either.

    305. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're thinking about this rationally, and that's your mistake. When someone goes insane (even temporarily, or becomes blind with rage) they stop thinking rationally. If you cease to act rationally, how can you predict with your rational mind what you would do?

      For example: when I get really, _really_ mad I often look for the nearest inanimate object and smash it. Thankfully I get that made only very rarely, but when I do that is my reaction. I am thankful that my gut reaction is to smash some*thing* rather than some*one*. At the time it has happened, I seem to have little control over what I do.

    306. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Now that I have had a bit more time to think about it and go back through? Someone mod the parent (not my post but the one above this as they seem to get that confused) up. I think it is interesting but not informative, informative is impossible with this type of story.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    307. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      He who has the power to define, rules. H. Newton 1968

    308. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And that detachment is exactly what happens with spam. He sends out billions of mails to mail addresses, most (if not all) of which he doesn't even know anything about. Not even whether they actually exist, and certainly not what person is behind it. Of course he knows that some of those mails will land in some inboxes, and some will be read, some will even fall for his ploy, but there's still a degree of distance that makes it anything but tangible.

      It's like buying crap that's been made in some sweatshop. Sure, you know that some poor worker in some backwater country had to slave for it, but still, you buy it without thinking about it, that you actually support a company that supports a repressive regime because it faciliates their making of cheap crap. It's cheap. You don't know the guy who had to sew your shoes for half a cent a pair, you've never seen him, you can even credibly claim you don't care about him, despite knowing that he exists and that you made a system like this actually possible by buying this pair of shoes.

      But he's far away, removed from you not only by miles but also emotionally far enough that you don't care about him. And even if you do, a lot of people don't, or the business model couldn't work as well as it does.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    309. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      To be a spammer requires being a self-centered psychopath. It requires not caring about the consequences of your actions to other people, just as long as you receive benefit from them. In other words, just the kind of guy who decides to take his family with him to his grave.

      Huh, so you're saying spammers are the same as the folks who set up their businesses near rivers for the run-off? Know a lot of mill owners who murder-suicide?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    310. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Be honest, do you care whether I live or not?

      Well, I've enjoyed some of your posts, so Yes, I do care. The general answer, though, is no...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    311. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Whether or not this trend you state is true, does this the "not able to provide for family" even apply here? I thought "Spam King" had accumulated considerable wealth that wasn't confiscated. People were concerned that he'd already transferred money out of country and was going to jump to some country without an extradition treaty with the US.

    312. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by ya+really · · Score: 1

      You can assume that being in prison, there is most likely not much to do there. As such, think of the situation as being like a small town, only worse. In small towns, everyone knows everything about everyone and gossip is everywhere. Imagine what that situation would be in prison. Most have little to nothing better to do than dig up or make up gossip/rumors about others to see how far they will go. Aside from that, camps are not quite club fed. There are plenty of drug traffickers and those who were once in low and medium security areas. White collar convictions might be only 10%, if that. Then you have a bunch of uneducated low lives who will just go along with the mob mentality. Who knows what they might have done for fun just to see this guy snap. Most likely not physically beaten or harmed, but there are plenty of other ways to get to someone.

    313. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll show you touchy feely with mah dick in yo mouth.

    314. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      I said the perp "feels shamed due to personal and professional failings and feels that he is unable to provide for his family."

      I think that incarceration and being know around the world as "Spam King" might be sufficient to 1) show personal and professional failings and 2) might engender feelings that one is unable to provide for ones family. We don't know where he hid his assets. He could have put them all into offshore accounts. He could have bought dinner at Morton's every night. Hell, he could have paid cash for his house and cars.

      I'd still argue he fits the profile for a family annihilator type murderer.

      --AC

    315. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by kocsonya · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I'm a white guy and my girlfriend is African. I have to wear sunblock ... she doesn't. Is that a racist comment?

      Man, that's not just racist but also sexists! Next you will declare that one of you is not a Christian!
      With such lack of morale, you probably don't even think about the children!

    316. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jackspenn · · Score: 1

      So by your reasoning anybody who "kills their family", must be insane and therefore is not punishable?

      I can see it now ...

      Defense Lawyer: Ladies and gentleman of the jury, the Prosecutor alleges my client killed his wife and children. If my client did not do this we should let him go free so he can get medical treatment to get beyond this terrible event. But if my client did do this, clearly by the very disgusting nature and violence of the crimes themselves he must have been insane to have committed them and therefore needs medical treatment. Lets not put him in jail for life or death, no no no, lets put just him in a hospital until he is betterand by better I mean a doctor signs a form saying he can leave, which will happen when he either convinces the DR he is feeling much better now or his insurance runs out.

      --
      Respect the Constitution
    317. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by jackspenn · · Score: 1

      > This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal.

      That's not fair. There are many criminals, who are also fathers, who love and don't harm their children.

      Oh yes and by that you must be referring to the criminals that only harm other people's families.

      --
      Respect the Constitution
    318. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Idaho · · Score: 1

      So what you essentially say is that a criminal, no matter how "trivial" or unrelated to homicide his transgression may be, is by the very fact that he broke a law a potential mass murderer?

      I'm not the OP, but rather, I would suggest the lesson to learn here is even worse: every human being is a potential mass murderer.

      How do you think it came to be that our ancestors survived instead of others...are you sure this never involved fighting (killing) so that they could stay alive; sometimes, at the "expense" of others?

      All animals display similar behavior (fighting for territory, mates, etc.). It's just one of those things that you don't have to like, but that doesn't make them any less true.

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    319. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolling you call it. Troll you I will.

    320. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      By that logic, every cold calling CCA is also a self centered bastard who's ready to pop any second.

      And yes, they're annoying as hell (maybe more than even spammers), but that doesn't make them more likely to go on killing sprees than the average Joe.

      That would make a very interesting statistical study. It's quite possibly a transitive relationship, too.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    321. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by soulfury · · Score: 0

      Psychologically speaking, the very act of going to prison(even if its minimum security)can be highly damaging. There is no telling what caused this guy to snap but its likely that he didn't sit there and stew about it and decide to do it on his own.

      To be pounded in the ass in prison can be very psychologically damaging.

    322. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What, they wait for him to escape from prison (and know exactly when he escapes, and where he is), and then put a hit out on him? Not likely.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    323. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Why would they waste money putting a contract on him, or going to the trouble and risk of faking a murder-suicide, when he was already in prison?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    324. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dangitman · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, what's with you and this "Russian spam-mob" shit? Tell me - what does this Russian spam-mob have to gain from having a convict killed? How could it possibly be worth the effort? Wouldn't they be more concerned about making money?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    325. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Because club fed doesn't strike fear into the heart of their competition.

    326. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he pissed them off. Maybe he caused them to lose a lot of money and they wanted to send a message to others. Why are you so vociferously against the theory?

    327. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Meski · · Score: 1

      Must! resist! Urge to check this on snopes is becoming too great!

    328. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      1. I start hearing people calling my name, from random directions - over the sound (lots of music at computer parties).

      I start getting that one at around the 24 hour mark. It weirds me out enough that I've never gone more than about 28 or 30 hours without sleep.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    329. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Charitable organizations mainly exist of people with over-inflated egos. Whether those egos are used for good or evil purposes (as determined by the majority) is often the limus test for whether something is a charity or organized crime.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    330. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      For someone who claims to believe in the decency of human nature, you sure seem ready to pass judgment on someone you don't even know. But I guess it is much easier to label someone than to practice what you preach. Just try to remember what someone once told me - humans are basically decent. That theoretically means we can have a philosophical discussion without trying take things too personally, or being offended by an opinion that differs from yours.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    331. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by tgv · · Score: 1

      I finally begin to understand why you're labelled "Anonymous Coward" when you don't use your ID to leave a comment. It is simply appropriate.

      And you Sir (the possibility that you're actually a woman is too remote), are a prime example of a coward. Have you got any idea what it is like to have children? How painful a story like this can be? Because we are not text processing robots. We try to imagine what happened and find an explanation. You were trying to give an explanation, as a matter of fact, and a "funny" one at it, just to make your own, disquieting worries go away. Perhaps you thought of your father or mother. How they were when you were just three. You looked at your childhood's pictures. Then you imagined one of your parents killing the other one and then you. Disturbing, isn't it? Is that why you tried to make a joke?

      Did you ever look into the eyes of a three year old after you punished him/her? I'm talking about three minutes alone here, nothing more serious than that. How even that can affect them? And how much they will assure you afterwards that they love you very much and will never do it again? Did you see the picture in the NY Times of the Iraqi girl after her parents being killed by (American) gun fire? Do you still think you were funny?

      Step forward, admit the joke was in bad taste.

    332. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      My point.

      Read the posts - you brought greed and fundamental selfishness to the table.

      I have not heard one word about philosophy in this whole thread, save for the Objectivists - who don't rise to a philosophy - their beliefs are more an excuse for self centered acts that make them free riders, and a burden on others than a "philosophy'".

      I give you whole classes of endeavors that are inherently altruistic and you respond with, "Oh, yeah, well I can name hundreds of exceptions" and that takes the conversation to the classic logical fallacy of Reductio ad absurdum. I steered us away from that slippery slope and now you engage in the ad homonym fallacy.

      This isn't a discussion, it is a series of statements containing logical fallacies that up until now I've attempted to resolve by showing the error underlying the fallacy - rather than call attention to the fallacy.

      Your last post leaves nothing to discuss but the chain of fallacies.

    333. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Myopic · · Score: 1

      He went nuts; he literally went crazy. He did not literally go nuts; he figuratively went nuts.

    334. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by FnordX · · Score: 1

      Or, at least, until the coroner/crime scene investigative unit said so.

      If there's no one to charge for the crime, it's not going up to a judge or a jury.

      --
      ____________________
      Clouds in the Sky,
      Water in a bottle
    335. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by Digital+End · · Score: 1

      Odd, consitering I've never seen anyone have a problem finding rehab or medical care during their time on crack.

      I'm not saying this to be combative, I have had to stand by and watch friends go thru this madness before, and they had no intrest in recovery untill they slammed head first into their own personal bottom of the barrel. When they needed care, they went to the emergancy room and got care... never paid for it though. When they finally got help, it was also free. You misunderstand addiction friend, it's nothing you can really see unless you watch your father literally chain himself to the bathroom in your house because he knows when he comes down he is going to want more crack... so take your snarky comments about my being judgemental and the 'norm' in this society and mind your arrogance.
      _____
      Regardless though, in referance to the meat of your comment... there WERE safeguards. He was arrested and as I understand it, he escaped. They didn't exactly expect this level of crazy from a paper pusher, which granted maybe they should have. Most of the time the system works, we don't get to hear about the majority of cases where guys DON'T get out and kill their familys, we just hear about it when they do. I don't think that randomly throwing more safeguards at the problem is any business of ours or lawmakers... if more safeguards are needed the people on the ground level... the officers and the facility who he escaped from, should know it. I trust their judgement more then people who have never worked there.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    336. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by grolaw · · Score: 1

      I know "the system" far better than you do. My parents were a psychiatrist and an attorney - both working for the Bronx Criminal Court system in the 1960-70's - you may remember the Heroin influx at that time.

      I grew up in NYC at one of the most incredible periods of recent history.

      My sisters and I have avoided addicts and addiction - and all of us have doctoral degrees and all of us have made it to (and, past ) 50 years of life.

      The government, starting with Nixon and accelerating with Reagan until we have no state mental facilities and local facilities have been cut or eliminated. Medicaid, for all intents and purposes, doesn't exist and drug treatment programs have been invaded by "faith-based" alternatives to medicine.

      Eighty-five percent (85%) of our prison population has a diagnosed mental illness - and today, our prisons are the mental health wards.

      We have retreated to the days of snake pits and the mad woman in the attic.

      You make assumptions that there are a "majority" of cases where guys don't get out and kill their families. There are no statistics for the null set. I'll agree with you that there may well be a certain number of people who might have the impulse, but did not act - however, I cannot agree that the comprise the majority (or, even a significant minority) of cases.

      Turning to your faith in "officers and the facility who [sic] he escaped from" - the facts speak clearly that your faith is misplaced.

      Most prison staff have HS degrees. Management may have a baccalaureate- few have higher education. With the shift to "for profit" prisons we have seen the educational standards, and professionalism, decrease sharply. Federal Courts in several states have ruled that the incarceration of state prisoners in out-of-state for profit facilities is unconstitutional.

      Missouri was barred from sending state prisoners to Texas-based private prisons. And, remember that these facilities provide fewer services - mere warehousing - no medical care - and that lead to the federal court decisions against them. A prisoner is entitled to a level of medical care - a level that does not sink below "deliberate indifference" and the for profit facilities had no care - well below the standard.

      We have more people incarcerated in the US, as measured by total prison population, and per capita, than any other nation. Most are non-violent offenders and they should be handled differently than the murderer that started this thread.

      The mentally ill have different needs - and nothing in prison will help them. Drug addiction and the "war on drugs" ought to be handed to the medical community to be treated for what it is: a public health issue.

    337. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Maybe Santa Claus had him whacked by the tooth fairy and a compassionate conservative? That has as much evidence to back it up as your theory.

      What I'm puzzled at, is how obsessed you seem to be with this theory, which has absolutely no evidence to back it up.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    338. Re:I understand running away from prison... but by dangitman · · Score: 1

      "Club fed"? WTF? You really think that prison is a pleasant place to be?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  2. beware by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 5, Funny

    spam kills

    1. Re:beware by Victor_0x53h · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is your family on spam.

    2. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I'd only enlarged my penis, this wouldn't have happened!

    3. Re:beware by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      beware (Score:5, Funny)

      by appleLaserWriter (91994) Alter Relationship on Friday July 25, @09:07AM (#24333167)

      spam kills

      Man, where's '+1 Tasteless' when you need it? Funny....but tasteless.

    4. Re:beware by Tiber · · Score: 1

      it tastes sweet!

    5. Re:beware by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be more of a SpamAssassin?

      Anyway, I'm very sorry for the innocent. Dead and alive...

    6. Re:beware by Dogtanian · · Score: 0, Troll

      spam kills

      Call me sensitive, but the whole case stopped being less "funny" and more tragic when it turned out he'd killed his three-year-old daughter.

      This was at Score:5 (Funny) when I started this comment, and it seems to have gone down abruptly to 2. Guess I'm not the only one who thought this. Still, who were the insensitive fucks who modded this shit up in the first place?

      Probably the same vermin who make eugenically-moralising comments like this one. Sick, nasty fucks.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:beware by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      New ads maybe?

      "Before SpamAssassin", "After SpamAssassin"?

    8. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny....but tasteless.

      Welcome to slashdot...

    9. Re:beware by Matt+Edd · · Score: 1

      Correction: Funny AND tasteless.

    10. Re:beware by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      I've always thought it kind of tastes like ham.

    11. Re:beware by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should have realized something was up when the guy started writing his own filesystem...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:beware by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      In related news, ReiserFS is particularly good with small files, for example those on mail servers.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    13. Re:beware by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the whole case stopped being less "funny" and more tragic when..

      The two are orthogonal. There's no limit to how sad something can be, while still being joke-worthy. Put a million babies and puppies into a slow shredder that takes 10 minutes to kill each one as they scream in agony and horror while their parents watch, and someone might find something funny to say about it. The thing is, making the joke doesn't mean they're the insensitive monster you say they are. It just means they saw a funny angle. Don't make me quote Mel Brooks.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    14. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tasteless?

      Forget what website you are at perchance?

    15. Re:beware by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      beware (Score:5, Funny)

      by appleLaserWriter (91994) Alter Relationship on Friday July 25, @09:07AM (#24333167)

      spam kills

      Man, where's '+1 Tasteless' when you need it? Funny....but tasteless.

      50% Funny
          40% Overrated
          10% Underrated

      Well, there it is!

    16. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone call Jack Thompson!

    17. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfffft, please. The best humor is always tasteless. If you're laughing, you're going to hell with the person that made the joke. Don't try to put yourself "above it" or some lame crap like that by calling it "tasteless" so you can feel better about laughing.

      That's intellectually dishonest to yourself and everyone around you.

      You found it funny. Laugh and quit justifying laughing. Cripes, I have no idea how that gets modded insightful...

      And for the record, I think it's fucking hilarious.

    18. Re:beware by Merk · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I hope this has an effect on spam. Maybe Spammers will see this and think "wow, this guy got that messed up after getting caught? It's not worth it" or maybe they'll say "Wow, look at how little sympathy there was for him, do people really hate spammers that much?" and stop. Most likely though, if you're the sort of person who sends spam, you're probably a sociopath with no empathy, and you'll probably just say "what a loser, he couldn't hack it in the real world" and try to prove your manliness by doubling your spam output.

    19. Re:beware by pdwalker · · Score: 1

      yeah, definately true.

      It brings to mind the old joke about "How many Jews can you put in a Toyota".

      Absolutely tasteless. Horrific really. And yet, layered over that massive amount of horror is that little grain of humour.

    20. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spam kills

      but who's buying ?

    21. Re:beware by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      There's no limit to how sad something can be, while still being joke-worthy.

      "(Joke) Worthy" is subjective, and that's all that can be said about it. However, while those involved in tragedies may make jokes about it at some stage, they typically don't do so on the same or following day.

      And being able to find humour in something doesn't necessarily make it not insensitive.

      The dead babies example is quite abstract, and perversely the quantity takes away the tragedy (you know what Stalin said about the difference between a single death and a million).

      This whole thread is fucking depressing anyway. Either the Slashdot crowd is seriously blinkered to anything else by its hostility to spammers, or it really shows how eugenically-oriented, right-wing and downright hateful it fundamentally is. Modding my comment down as a troll was one thing- a look at my history probably would have shown otherwise, whether you agreed with the sentiment or not- but that could be rationalised as bad modding. The fact that most of the views in the other direction got modded up (even if just as "funny") says more, however.

      I half expected some rationalisation about why his wife deserved it, but I really didn't expect this reaction to- and even endorsement of- the death of a three-year old child.

      You can mod this one as a troll too (and some smartass probably will).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    22. Re:beware by evilphish_mi · · Score: 1

      what does "right-wing" have to do with any content of this thread? Slashdot is one of the leftist websites I visit on a regular basis. Or do you just associate anything you don't like with "Right-Wing"?

    23. Re:beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put a million babies and puppies into a slow shredder that takes 10 minutes to kill each one as they scream in agony and horror while their parents watch, and someone might find something funny to say about it.

      I'll get the tortilla chips!

  3. Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It wasn't necessary for him to take them with him. May he burn in hell.

    1. Re:Coward. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're just jealous because he went one better than you. Right, Hans?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    2. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As an atheist, it does make me wish there really was a hell for guys like this.

      The christians have it so easy sometimes :)

    3. Re:Coward. by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it.

      I always say when certain undesirable people kick the bucket, I wish there was a hell so people like them could go to it.

    4. Re:Coward. by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always say that I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell," and he lesbian that doesn't use a dildo... but they both seem to be very elusive specimens.

    5. Re:Coward. by DustyShadow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But I bet you never say "I wish there was a heaven for that guy" when someone dies in a really heroic act.

    6. Re:Coward. by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you were going for comedy points, but it's more a force of habit and generally accepted "curse phrase" by society than a religious affirmation.

      --
      I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
    7. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the more appropriate religious expression "holy shit"!

      If you an FSM believer, you can say "Bob damn it".

      Though I imagine his noodliness would ignore your request.

    8. Re:Coward. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Mornin'

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    9. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says, "Go to Hell" anymore?

    10. Re:Coward. by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      I used to. They are expressions and expletives, figures of speech whose literal meaning is not what most people reach for when using them, but still that meaning is there.

      So I've gotten used to not use such expressions. I will say "damn it" by itself. I use the word "goodness" instead of "God" or "mon dieu" (the equivalent in french).

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    11. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good slang is good slang. Also, that's what you get for being raised/indoctrinated in a country where those phrases are part of the vernacular.

    12. Re:Coward. by BlackBloq · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea my lez friend said she didn't get the whole didlo thing...then she said she came around to the idea... (true joke).:P

    13. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'd like to meet a Christian who doesn't judge others. Looks like we're both out of luck, eh?

    14. Re:Coward. by krizzi · · Score: 0

      I think it's a pity there isn't a hell for him to go to
      -Christopher Hitchens

    15. Re:Coward. by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Find an Atheist who grew up in a country where Christianity does not pervade the culture. Like, say, China. And see if they still say whatever the local equivalent of "God damn it" is.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    16. Re:Coward. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Using the phrase "god damn it" doesn't indicate a belief in either God or Hell. It's just a figure of speech, a well-understood way to indicate frustration or anger.

      Similarly, if I were to say "oh, fuck this" while writing code, it doesn't really mean I want to go and have angry sex with it.

      Curses aren't meant to be taken literally; they have a meaning that's far more than the sum of the individual words used in them.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    17. Re:Coward. by pfleming · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I always say that I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell," and he lesbian that doesn't use a dildo... but they both seem to be very elusive specimens.

      Atheists will say "god damn it" (noticed you used the lower case "god" there) because we know it riles up Christians - thou shalt not take the lord's name in vain. For us it's just a phrase, kind of like "fuck you"

    18. Re:Coward. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But a dildo isn't a man ..

    19. Re:Coward. by johnbr · · Score: 1
      I'm an Atheist, and I don't say 'God Damn It'....

      I say 'Gosh Darn It!' Wouldn't want to be sacrilegious.

    20. Re:Coward. by areReady · · Score: 1

      Jesus H. Rollerskating Christ, the mere fact that I don't believe in Christianity doesn't mean I can't love to use their paragons as god damned epithets.

    21. Re:Coward. by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok. But what about the plastic cock?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:Coward. by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous because he went one better than you. Right, Hans?

      To Hans after killing his wife before going to jail: You're doing it wrong.

    23. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the South Park approach and go with "science damn it" from the "Go God Go" episodes. Takes conditioning but the religious phrases can be replaced.

    24. Re:Coward. by skeeto · · Score: 1

      You don't worship/believe in Greek gods (or maybe you do?), but you still call that red-colored fourth planet "Mars", don't you? :-P

      Saying "god damn it" is simply a mythology reference.

    25. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a lesbian doesn't mean that vaginal stimulation doesn't feel good. I'm a straight guy who likes when my g/f penetrates my asshole. I've never fantasized or had feelings toward men, and I have tried. I'm simply not gay I guess. It's the same way for lesbians, they are attracted towards women, their physiology remains the same though.

    26. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lesbians are very elusive indeed.

    27. Re:Coward. by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      I'm an Atheist, and I don't say 'God Damn It'....

      I say 'Gosh Darn It!' Wouldn't want to be sacrilegious.

      My sarcasm meter sucks on the net, but by default if you're an Atheist, you can't be sacrilegious towards a deity really, can you?

      I know there's the IPU and FSM that we all bandy about to illustrate the hilarity in believing something that can't be proven, but nobody really believes in the sanctity of them, do they?

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    28. Re:Coward. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, it's reducing man to one of the two parts on him that a woman is interested in.

      (the other one's his wallet)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:Coward. by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I too am a non-believer and I still use the references. It apropos cultural memetics... and everyone knows what I mean rather than if I were on about Odin or something just to be different.

      I have taken to saying "I swear to Dawkins, ..." though.

    30. Re:Coward. by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Nope, just wish I could go out like him.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    31. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known lesbians that don't use a dildo.

      And I am an athiest, but I do say "god damn it" and "go to hell", but I prefer the less common and more heretical "jesus pig fucking christ"

    32. Re:Coward. by johnbr · · Score: 1
      sacrilegious - grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred; "blasphemous rites of a witches' Sabbath"; "profane utterances against the Church"; "it is sacrilegious to enter with shoes on"

      It doesn't have to be sacrilegious to my personal beliefs - it just has to be sacrilege to someone.

      But in any case, yes, I was trying to be amusingly sarcastic.

    33. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >>>"I'm a straight guy who likes when my g/f penetrates my asshole"

      You sir, are a gay.

    34. Re:Coward. by spuke4000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok. But what about the plastic cock?

      Do I detect the start of a new /. meme?

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
    35. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an atheist. After watching an Episode of South Park, I've been making an effort to change some of my phrases by replacing "god" with "science".

      Examples:
      "God bless you" -> "Science bless you"
      "God Damn it!" -> "Science damn it!"

    36. Re:Coward. by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      As an atheist, I prefer to blasph

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    37. Re:Coward. by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny

      God dammit, Slashdot!

      As an atheist, I prefer to blaspheme dead religions. "By Odin's beard!"

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    38. Re:Coward. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buddhammit!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    39. Re:Coward. by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the atheist isn't particularly cowed by the Third (or second for RC) commandment of a non-existent entity and there's more to sexuality than how you go about it and with what.

      --
      Notmysig
    40. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, christian heaven sounds like it pretty much sucks, really.

      "I wish you had an eternity of smug, sexless boredom with a bunch of uptight pricks". Not what _I'd_ wish on some guy dieing heroically.

      Maybe. "Man, I wish a busty Valkyrie could come to take that guy to Valhalla.". Or "The Danann should totally invite the guy to Tir na nOg".

    41. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't worship/believe in Greek gods (or maybe you do?), but you still call that red-colored fourth planet "Mars", don't you? :-P

      Mars is a Roman god... (Ares would be the Greek equivalent.)

    42. Re:Coward. by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if I were to say "oh, fuck this" while writing code, it doesn't really mean I want to go and have angry sex with it.

      Are you sure?

    43. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an atheist, it does make me wish there really was a hell for guys like this.

      Well, duh. Why do you think religion was invented in the first place? Because people saw injustice and it drove them mad with grief. They couldn't take it, so they came up with this idea that, in the end, everybody gets what's comin' to 'em. Santa is watching you.

    44. Re:Coward. by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Considering all the religions around the world, anything you can possibly do is sacrilege to someone.

    45. Re:Coward. by boarder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Man, I hope so.

      Ok. But what about the plastic cock?

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    46. Re:Coward. by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I might think "Have a good time in Valhalla" or something similar, though.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    47. Re:Coward. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      They aren't interested in me, my wallet may be empty but my penis are still alive.

      So you must be wrong, it seems they only want the wallet :/

    48. Re:Coward. by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Why would you wish the remainder of eternity without pr0n and the insipid company of the likes of Pat Robertson on anyone?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    49. Re:Coward. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      It's funny how all of us think of Valhalla is a much better time than Heaven is.

      We're taught from an early age that Heaven is the ultimate, but when people rattle off a list of the amenities there, we quickly go "oh...wait...that? we're being stuck up assholes for that? ...

      fuck that."

    50. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would always like to meet the gnostic who can prove any particular god exists.

      (As for your lesbian comment, your experience with pornography is not indicative of real lesbian culture. Those pictures are made for heterosexual consumption.)

    51. Re:Coward. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Universally speaking (almost everyone from Sub-Saharan bushmen to people in Indonesia), irrespective to religion and cultural upbringing, curse words usually evolve around three things:

      1.) your mama
      2.) fecal matter
      3.) wishing untimely death

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    52. Re:Coward. by bogado · · Score: 1

      Well, I and many atheist I believe do say stuff like that, but those are idiomatic expressions. When people say "god damn it" or simply "damn" they are not trying to damn anything or ordering a superior being to do anything, I don't think that even most religious people mean those sentences as literally as you are suggesting.

      I always were against literalism, fighting words is meaningless, what good is to ban, for instance the "n" word to such extent that even I am afraid to use it as example here without offending anyone, when the racists and intolerant people will simply choose another word to mean the same hatred and filthy as the other one.

      But this is beyond the case, just because I use "god" don't mean I believe in a bearded man, it is a convention. If I am pissed about something, I may say "god damn it", and I can be sure that you will understand it. In my, humble, point of view this don't make me less then an atheist for using idiomatic expressions.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    53. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always say that I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell," and he lesbian that doesn't use a dildo... but they both seem to be very elusive specimens.

      And I always say I'd like to meet a true christian will a firm grasp of logic and reason, but they too are elusive.

    54. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always say that I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell," and he lesbian that doesn't use a dildo... but they both seem to be very elusive specimens.

      id like to meet the guy that says, "suck my dick!" to to friends and enemies alike and really means it.

    55. Re:Coward. by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      Some would say eating meat is sacrilegious.
      Some would say drinking alcohol is sacrilegious.
      Some would say pre-marital sex is sacrilegious.

      On the other hand, some would say that NOT eating meat is sacrilegious.
      Some would say NOT drinking alcohol is sacrilegious.

      It's better to just do what you feel is acceptable, because grown men with imaginary friends are usually the wrong people to decide what is acceptable and what isn't.

    56. Re:Coward. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Meh... it's not like they're in danger of believing in it just because they used the words. Quite frankly I wish they'd be as permissive of the ten commandments: some of them are rules that everyone has to follow anyway (killing and stealing are illegal, unless maybe you hold a public office), and the ones that go beyond the normal legal requirements are still fine for people to believe in if they want to - that's part of religious freedom. It's not like they're required to believe in God because they happened to see a plaque sitting on somebody else's desk.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    57. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, if I were to say "oh, fuck this" while writing code, it doesn't really mean I want to go and have angry sex with it.

      Man, I REALLY REALLY wish my office mate shared your point of view. Don't get me started on his idea of protecting against insertion attacks...

    58. Re:Coward. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if I were to say "oh, fuck this" while writing code, it doesn't really mean I want to go and have angry sex with it.

      Unless you're programming the Woman in the Red Dress, of course.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    59. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a common phrase for cursing doesn't make one a believer.

      Using a dildo to get off, doesn't make a lesbian like the rest of the package that a real dick comes with. (See parent)

    60. Re:Coward. by stinerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I do.

      What was the bet?

    61. Re:Coward. by gnick · · Score: 1

      I used to. They are expressions and expletives, figures of speech whose literal meaning is not what most people reach for when using them, but still that meaning is there.

      Spot on. How many people say "Holy shit!" and are literally invoking the image of a pile of shit worthy of hymns and praise? Or say "Aw fuck it!" and mean it as a demand that somebody immediately engage in intercourse with whatever the object/situation of frustration is?

      I say "God damn it" from time to time despite not believing in any particular gods. But, I think that my intended meaning is communicated so I see no reason to change my habits.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    62. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guy approaches girl and asks for her number, girl says "no, I'm a lesbian." Guy: "So, if you're interested, I consider myself an expert on the use of large penis-shaped tools..."

    63. Re:Coward. by gnick · · Score: 1

      You don't worship/believe in Greek gods (or maybe you do?), but you still call that red-colored fourth planet "Mars", don't you? :-P

      Mars was Roman. But point taken.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    64. Re:Coward. by tomthegeek · · Score: 1

      "Jesus Christ, man! There's just some things you don't talk about in public!"

    65. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always say that I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell,"

      Atheists and agnostics don't stop living with the English language.

      Example: "Fuck! This fucking fucker's fucked!" Content -> I am working on Windows. Sincere References To Sex -> zero.

    66. Re:Coward. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I always say that I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell,"

      If I dropped the religious curses from my arsenal, I wouldn't have a complete strategic spectrum. I'd have nothing between 'Oh bother' and 'Fuck!' They fill in a useful range of mild swearing, without which my selection of expletives would be far poorer. Normally if I drop something heavy on my toe I would shout 'fuck!', but if I do so in comparatively polite company, well, that's what Christ's there for, isn't it?

      That said, I don't think I've ever told anybody to go to hell. I'll tell them either to fuck off or to piss off, depending on how much I didn't like them.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    67. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are closeted.

    68. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya know, I read the story yesterday about the guy convicted finally for assisting in the death of the little blind, cerebral palsy 8 year old girl who was put into a tub of water so hot she suffered 3rd degree burns over her entire body and they did not take her to a hospital for 8 days until she became 'unresponsive'...

      and yes, I did at that moment hope there was a heaven and that she was in it because if anyone deserved an afterlife of peace and love, that little girl does.

    69. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems sort of contradictory. If a god, an omniscient being, exists and goes about damning people from time to time, it stands to reason, if you really, truly believe in him, that you would not presume to tell him his business. An omniscient, all-powerful god already knows, by his very nature, who to damn and who not to damn. So what are you doing when you say these words?

    70. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf... guy was a retard

    71. Re:Coward. by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      I personally wish that they didn't die in the act.

    72. Re:Coward. by DarkWicked · · Score: 1

      I don't know about lesbians but as for atheists not saying "god damn it" or "go to hell", it's quite easy to find as it's mostly dependent on the language and culture, not the religion. These expressions exist in french too for instance, but they aren't commonly used and sound quite ridiculous and outdated.

    73. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For #1, we call those "sayings" or maybe just to piss off the xtians
      For #2, ask your girl how pleasuring a clit-sized cock is to her

    74. Re:Coward. by SL1200MKII · · Score: 1

      That is mad funny! Wish i had points to mod you!

    75. Re:Coward. by Azuma+Hazuki · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't own any toys...exception that proves (tests) the rule?

      --
      ~Eien no Inori wo Sasagete~ Searching for my Hatsumi...
    76. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'd like to meet the Atheist who doesn't say "god damn it" or "go to hell"...

      Travel outside the USA.

      Sorry, I can't help you with the lesbian question though.

    77. Re:Coward. by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      Easy. I'm one. I do not say 'God damn it', or 'Go to Hell', but I use 'demons take you/it'.

      That does not mean that I believe any more in demons than I believe in gods. But in my language, the quasi-religious swearwords are the mild ones. When we get really angry, we reach for imaginative sexual imagery.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    78. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand what "gay" means. Gay people aren't required to have anal sex to maintain their status as a gay, and straight men aren't disallowed from all anal penetration to maintain their status as straight.

      Methinks you're a little too caught up in traditional notions of sexuality - unless you were just trying to be funny by using "you're a gay" as an insult.

    79. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I've actually thought about that.

      So no, I don't say "god damn it" or "Jesus Christ" (I'll use baby jesus sarcastically) anymore.

    80. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. But what about the plastic cock?

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.

      hehe plastic cock, you're anal... hehe

    81. Re:Coward. by mischi_amnesiac · · Score: 1

      There is that old german joke: A man dies and finds himself in hell. He is suprised by the fact that it isn't forever burning lava, but instead attractive women, gambling, joy and fun. Then the devil leads him to a room. Inside are people getting tortured and are screaming in pain. He asks the devil: "What is that?" The devil answers: "That are just the catholics. They like it that way."

      --
      "Die endgueltige Teilung Deutschlands - das ist unser Auftrag." - Chlodwig Poth
    82. Re:Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume I wouldn't be able to get online in paradise, so I say eternity would suck in any case.

  4. This quote says it all by iamhigh · · Score: 5, Informative

    "What a nightmare, and such a coward," U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said. "Davidson imposed the 'death penalty' on family members for his own crime."

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    1. Re:This quote says it all by LordKaT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the fundamental problem with being institutionalized in America: it's all about vengeance, not social rehabilitation.

    2. Re:This quote says it all by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay. This was one guy who should have been sent to a pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:This quote says it all by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's the fundamental problem with being institutionalized in America: it's all about vengeance, not social rehabilitation."

      That's right - the US penal system killed that little girl and her mother.

      Asshole.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be so selfish and thoughtless as to send billions of Emails for unwanted services that would only ever reap a profit from the desperate and gullible takes a certain kind of person.

      I'm not equating spamming with murder, but to be a spammer of this magnitude you must already be a sociopath anyway.

    5. Re:This quote says it all by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The guy was in a minimum security farm prison, if you ask me it had a lot more to do with social rehab than vengeance. The guy wasn't going to be able to access an uncontrolled computer in the two years he was there, if they wanted vengeance they may have sent him to a maximum security prison for longer than two years.

    6. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty much. Seriously, the US prison system breeds criminals - if you're not one going in, you sure as hell will be coming out.

    7. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, His horrible, awful crime of sending electronic text to people. Punish him..burn him in hell, force him to be so desperate that he commits suicide...over some text in you inbox. Shame on you all!

    8. Re:This quote says it all by florescent_beige · · Score: 0, Troll

      Quoting a line from TFA is informative. Hm.

      True, he might be a coward, I didn't know him. But I found that comment by the prosecutor to be tawdry. This is a complete tragedy from A to Z and now isn't the time for some bureaucrat to be spouting off his moralizing judgments about someone's character as if life is some lame religion comic book.

      But I guess the bureaucrat feels safe because nobody would dare defend Davidson. Surprise, Law & Order flunkie, you don't have to like Davidson to recognize a pandering wannabe hero to the kind of people who need to understand the world by pinning a label (written in crayon) to everything, even if it is a corpse.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    9. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree.. Whatta looser. Can't even have decency to die alone.

    10. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's right - the US penal system killed that little girl and her mother.

      Asshole.

      You can throw all the pejoratives you want, the fact remains that the US penal system does an excellent job of making petty criminals into hardened criminals. Never mind issues like prison rape. This guy may have been serving in a minimum security facility but he US penal contains a number of penal facilities that are such hell-holes that being sent there could be construed as cruel and unusual punishment.

    11. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Funny

      if you're not one going in

      Que?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:This quote says it all by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't seriously believe that everyone sent to prison is a criminal, can you?

    13. Re:This quote says it all by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are no guilty men in prison, haven't you heard? Everyone in there is innocent...

    14. Re:This quote says it all by phaggood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > if they wanted vengeance they may have sent him to a maximum security prision

      You mean like this guy, who Pennsylvanians gave life w/o possibility of parole for *not* killing a cop (he was unarmed and hiding, his bank-robbing partner had the gun and got the death penalty).

    15. Re:This quote says it all by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you ever been in the "farm system" (as you so daintily put it)? Let me tell you what life is like behind the bars at the "farm system":

      Dorm living with fully grown men. These "dorms" are sometimes the size of a gymnasium. A gymnasium full of grown men. Fully grown, under enormous stress, living in close quarters. Honestly, you'd have much less stress living in a car.

      2 minute showers, enforced.

      Scheduled bathroom times. Gotta shit? Hold it until shit time, which is usually at the start of the day and the end.

      Forced labor. They don't even bother matching you up with work from your skillset. Too fat? Go work in the yard. Too stupid to know how to kill someone with a knife? Kitchen work.

      This "farm system" isn't about rehabilitation, it's about "serving your time" and getting the fuck out.

      That's not rehabilitation, it's life structure enforcement. Rehab means breaking a person down into their individual pieces, examining all of those pieces, finding out what's wrong, and then learning to live life with the knowledge that you have a problem.

    16. Re:This quote says it all by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      This guy was at Club Fed, not PMITA prison. not much vengeance there.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    17. Re:This quote says it all by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      the US prison system breeds assbandits - if you're not the one going in, you sure as hell will be "coming out"

      There - fixed that for ya. ;-P

      Seriously, what an asshole. Sure, he had a right to overreact and blow himself away if he really wanted to but to take his family with him? World of being a shithead. Then again, I guess being a spammer he was probably one of those "The world revolves around me" types.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    18. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't seriously believe that everyone sent to prison is a criminal, can you?

      As in 100%? Of course not. But I think "innocent man sent to jail" is very, very rare.

      Now don't get me started on why I don't think that you should go to jail for drug crimes, but that's another matter.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There are no guilty men in prison, haven't you heard?

      I'm sure there are a few, but hardly enough to warrant a concern that they are turned into criminals! Talk about addressing the wrong problem... concentrate on keeping the innocent out!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re:This quote says it all by alterami · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If only the prison system rewarded the spammers instead of punishing, the spammer might still be with us today. Think of the spammers.

      The good thing to come out of this story is the taxpayers won't have to pay his free room and board and free food at the prison. Maybe spamming should be a capital offense, or if not, I think that convicted spammers should be forced to read at least 10,000 spam emails a day.

      I feel sorry for the kid, but the parents are to blame. The wife had to know this guy was a spammer.

    21. Re:This quote says it all by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      In this particular case, he *was* a criminal going out, by the sheer means of getting out...

    22. Re:This quote says it all by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Oh, shut the fuck up.

      This shithead was put in a prison camp with so much security that he was able to escape by simply getting into his wife's car and driving off.

      He was serving a whopping 21 months in Club Fed. Vengeance, my ass.

      I bet you are one of those stupid bleeding hearts that believes crime stems from low self-esteem. Here is a clue for you: After 20+ years of basing correction on the idea that criminals have low self-esteem, sociologists and psychologists actually tested the theory and found out that most, all most all, criminals have extremely high self-esteem.

      Who ever modded you insightful should not be allowed to mod ever again.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    23. Re:This quote says it all by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      And yet didn't his wife help him escape? Makes him even more psychotic to cook up a scheme with her to get him out just to kill her....

    24. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is exactly right. If someone kills your mother you want that person jailed for life. If people feel like the government will not serve justice, they will take the law into their own hands; you might go out and kill your wife's murderer. We will then have pure anarchy.

      The main point of incarceration IS retribution, not rehabilitation.

    25. Re:This quote says it all by abstract+daddy · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that rape should be decriminalized or at least tacitly approved, yet you have a problem with this guy offing his family?

    26. Re:This quote says it all by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That wasn't the point. Studies have *shown* that the prison environment is actually *more* destructive to the rehabilitation of criminals. Rather than focus on incapacitation, we should be focusing on rehabilitation, which, dollar for dollar, has a *much* higher rate of return than prison. I'm not saying we should keep murderers out of prison, but unarmed robbery? Please, just help the people actually survive, or, if they do it for the 'thrill' help them with that. It works something like 30% better than prison.

    27. Re:This quote says it all by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      This guy was at Club Fed, not PMITA prison. not much vengeance there

      AND he had conjugal visits! /but he was a VERY BAD person...

    28. Re:This quote says it all by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      The problem in this case isn't about vengeance, social rehabilitation, it's about a different thing that the prison system ought to be doing, keeping the public safe from the inmates. Questions need to be asked about a system that put someone so mentally ill that he wanted to muder his own 3 year old daughter in a prision that he could get out of.

      Another factor that doesn't appear to have been taken into account is that the prison system is also ment to be a deterrent to committing crime. Should the system really be sending out a message that if you make millions by spamming you'll get to keep most of it after a 2 year stint in a prison you can easily get out of?

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    29. Re:This quote says it all by oni · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that our prisons don't do rehab. What changes would you make to them to accomplish: "breaking a person down into their individual pieces, examining all of those pieces, finding out what's wrong, and then learning to live life with the knowledge that you have a problem."

    30. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL but I'm pretty sure that being involved in the commission of a crime where anyone is killed, regardless of whether you or your accomplice actually pulled the trigger is considered murder.

      It isn't like they invented the law just for this case. The idea is that conspiring to commit the crime creates the situation that enables the murder to happen.

      Really, this is an example of where the prison sentence has little to do with vengeance or rehabilitation, it has more to do with discouraging others from doing the same.

    31. Re:This quote says it all by Knitebane · · Score: 1
      It's the fundamental problem with being institutionalized in America: it's all about vengeance, not social rehabilitation.

      Actually, the American prison system isn't about vengeance or rehabilitation.

      The Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments even for those people who have committed cruel and unusual acts. So vengeance has strict limits on it.

      And it's obviously not about rehabilitation. If it were, no one would get out of prison until they had been rehabilitated. There wouldn't be any set length sentences, they'd be incarcerated until they were no longer likely to commit the crime were jailed for committing.

      --
      "...history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." --Ghandi
    32. Re:This quote says it all by Graff · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let me tell you what life is like behind the bars at the "farm system"

      You mean that people get PUNISHED for committing crimes? The horror!

      As far as the punishment goes it is pretty mild. The military gets treated rougher than these guys do and there are a lot of jobs out there that are harder on a person. Yeah the farm system isn't a "country club" as some people put it but it certainly is pretty trivial for jail time.

      I'd say that just about anyone can easily tough out 2 years in the farm system without much trouble. It's pretty obvious that this "spam king" was very psychologically damaged and managed to fly under the radar in his psych evaluations. He should have been put into some sort of institution and watched closely for his stay but no system is perfect. Lets face it, some people are VERY good at hiding their problems and they can pass as normal until some extreme stress causes them to break, as it did here.

      Anyways these farm systems are not meant to completely rehabilitate prisoners, the assumption is that these prisoners are people who made bad choices and aren't hardened criminals. Supposedly all these people need is a punishment to show that there are consequences to committing their crimes and that the farm system is enough of a deterrent for them to stop committing crime. Does it work? I don't know about that I do know that we need to have both mild and severe punishments for different levels of offenses and the farms serve as about as mild of a punishment as we can easily create.

    33. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever been in the Military? Hmmm. Dorm living. Lots of grown men. I think you are an idiot, if you think dorm living is as stressful as living in and 8X10 cell and only getting out a few hours a day for exercise.

    34. Re:This quote says it all by Debased+Manc · · Score: 1

      Well now, if that was truly the case the scumbag would sat in death row with his family still alive.

      If low-security, open prisons are your definition of 'institutionalized' you've got a real problem with reality there.

    35. Re:This quote says it all by tsstahl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As in 100%? Of course not. But I think "innocent man sent to jail" is very, very rare.

      Now

      How about a 10% error rate? Gov. Ryan commuted the sentences of all Illinois death row inmates after DNA testing exonerated ten percent of them.

      Personally, I don't consider a ten percent error rate on death sentences 'rare'.

      I'm also willing to bet that you are not an American black male of average build and average height living within 5 blocks of a Martin Luther King Drive.

      In my experience, the more heinous the act, the more desire exists for SOMEBODY to pay for it, the higher likelihood of someone being made the fall guy.

    36. Re:This quote says it all by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      This guy was in a minimum-security rehabilitation work camp.

      It's not the prison systems fault in this particular case.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    37. Re:This quote says it all by Nef · · Score: 1

      And he led a trite and meaningless life...

    38. Re:This quote says it all by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      And yet didn't his wife help him escape? Makes him even more psychotic to cook up a scheme with her to get him out just to kill her....

      Well we've all known or heard about women totally in love with complete psychotics. Look at all the mail convicted killers get.

      But I wasn't sure from the article yesterday if she was helping him escape or he more or less forced her to go along. I suspect someone with his personality would be very controlling over his family. Yesterday, it sounded like he used her to get out and then ran off to parts unknown. So you'd think that would have meant law enforcement would have put a watch on their home to see if he came back there.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    39. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only partly about vengeance. It's also largely about profit, and disenfranchising the poor (particularly if they're also black).

      The profit part is particularly scummy. Slave labor! Seriously:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/05/us/05prisoners.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

      a copy that doesn't need a NYT login is here:

      http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0705-10.htm

      The market has been evolving over the past couple of decades:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Cite&page=Prison-industrial_complex&id=223976554 [note graphic]

      And to think, 28 years ago, comedy films like Airplane! used to joke about the Turkish prison system. Of course, that was before 9/11.

    40. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't disagree with your assessment of prisons in the US, I think this guy is not a great case to cite. He was in a minimum security federal prison camp. From the original article:

      Minimum security institutions, also known as Federal Prison Camps (FPCs), have dormitory housing, a relatively low staff-to-inmate ratio, and are work and program-oriented. FPCs are generally located adjacent to larger institutions, where inmates help serve the labor needs of the larger institution.

      He escaped by jumping into his wife's car, which gives you an idea of how relaxed these places are.

    41. Re:This quote says it all by z00_miak · · Score: 1

      "Dorm living with fully grown men. These "dorms" are sometimes the size of a gymnasium. A gymnasium full of grown men. Fully grown, under enormous stress, living in close quarters. Honestly, you'd have much less stress living in a car."

      Oh noes, Not fully grown men! WTB midget prison.

    42. Re:This quote says it all by operagost · · Score: 1

      Pittsburg (no "H") is in California.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    43. Re:This quote says it all by sheph · · Score: 1

      There have been studies though showing that some people just can't or won't be rehabilitated. What do you do with those people? You can't have them running the streets. I think you are correct when it comes to low level crimes like petty theft, drug abuse, crimes of desparation,etc. However, when you are talking about murderers who do it for fun (thrill killing), child molesters that "can't help themselves", rapists, career criminals, etc. you aren't likely going to be able to rehabilitate these people, and society is honestly better off without them. I'd be ok even with giving these types of offenders a second chance (mostly because I'm a big fan of forgiveness), maybe after several years of rehabilitation (which you're right -- that should be the focus), but after that if they do it again it should be the death penalty. Just my 2 cents.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    44. Re:This quote says it all by tb()ne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2 minute showers?!? Living in dorms?!? Waiting to shit?!? That's outrageous!

      Or maybe that's why it's called punishment - it's not supposed to be pleasant. I won't defend the deplorable conditions in PMITA federal prisons or deny that they're just making bad people worse or deny that they make no significant effort to reintegrate prisoner with law-abiding society. But you haven't convinced me that there's anything deplorable going on in the "farm system." Most of your description sounds like boot camp in the military

      That's not rehabilitation, it's life structure enforcement. Rehab means breaking a person down into their individual pieces, examining all of those pieces, finding out what's wrong, and then learning to live life with the knowledge that you have a problem.

      Oh, so we should have just turned him over to the Scientologists?

      The "problem" that a lot of these people have is simply that they are criminals and they will happily break the law if they think they can get away with it, not that they have some psychological problem that will be cured by counseling or psychotherapy. And fear of consequences is more of a deterrent than realizing you didn't get enough attention from mommy. I would be interested to see some statistics on repeat offenses for white collar criminals who spend time in Club Fed, as opposed to those who spend time in PMITA federal prison.

    45. Re:This quote says it all by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

      Quoting a line from TFA is informative. Hm.

      True, he might be a coward, I didn't know him. But I found that comment by the prosecutor to be tawdry. This is a complete tragedy from A to Z and now isn't the time for some bureaucrat to be spouting off his moralizing judgments about someone's character as if life is some lame religion comic book.

      But I guess the bureaucrat feels safe because nobody would dare defend Davidson. Surprise, Law & Order flunkie, you don't have to like Davidson to recognize a pandering wannabe hero to the kind of people who need to understand the world by pinning a label (written in crayon) to everything, even if it is a corpse.

      Oops that accidentally got modded troll, so there it is again just in case there is someone here who isn't afraid of ideas they don't agree with.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    46. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been in the "farm system" (as you so daintily put it)? Let me tell you what life is like behind the bars at the "farm system":

      Dorm living with fully grown men. These "dorms" are sometimes the size of a gymnasium. A gymnasium full of grown men. Fully grown, under enormous stress, living in close quarters. Honestly, you'd have much less stress living in a car.

      2 minute showers, enforced.

      Scheduled bathroom times. Gotta shit? Hold it until shit time, which is usually at the start of the day and the end.

      Forced labor. They don't even bother matching you up with work from your skillset. Too fat? Go work in the yard. Too stupid to know how to kill someone with a knife? Kitchen work.

      This "farm system" isn't about rehabilitation, it's about "serving your time" and getting the fuck out.

      That's not rehabilitation, it's life structure enforcement. Rehab means breaking a person down into their individual pieces, examining all of those pieces, finding out what's wrong, and then learning to live life with the knowledge that you have a problem.

      Dorm living huh? Close quarters with fully grown men? 2 minute showers you say? Forced labor.

      Sounds a hell of a lot easier than what thousands of men and women do every fucking day serving in the Military.

      He fucked up. He was due to pay his price. I do feel VERY sorry for the turn of events that took an innocent family from the world. But don't sit here and make me try and feel bad about ANY living quarters and tax dollars I have to spend to house these scumbags. IMHO, They should eliminate death row completely and put ol' Sparky on pay-per-view.

    47. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to real prisons in California. And I can tell you, I would have loved to be in one of those federal camp snoopy's. Oh yeah, I was not allowed next to an uncontrolled computer for about 5 years ;P.

    48. Re:This quote says it all by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Rehab means breaking a person down into their individual pieces, examining all of those pieces, finding out what's wrong, and then learning to live life with the knowledge that you have a problem.

      Sounds like Marine Corps boot camp.

      Semper Fi!

    49. Re:This quote says it all by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? Have you ever been to one, or is that just what you think it is like? I ask because you apparently don't know anything about the American correctional system.

      Your little forced labor comment is the big clue. There is no forced labor. It was ruled unconstitutional.

      Oh, and those dorms, they sound a lot like boot camp barracks.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    50. Re:This quote says it all by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      But I think "innocent man sent to jail" is very, very rare.

      Not rare enough. And many are still inside.

      --
      What?
    51. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is most definitely a vengeance issue. The Cruel and Unusual clause does not prevent the life w/o parole or death sentences. I mean, what purpose does a death sentence serve other than vengance? True life w/o parole is significantly less costly.

      For those few people who are considered so dangerous that escape risk is considered such a problem that normal Life w/o parole is not n option, then we have SuperMax style prisons. Consider that nobody is going to escape from one of those. After all there was only one escape from Alcatraz, and it is still debated if the guy actually made it. Alcatraz is fairly low security compared to the SuperMax prison.

    52. Re:This quote says it all by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "........a *much* higher rate of return than prison. I'm not saying we should keep murderers out of prison, but unarmed robbery?"

      agreed. Let the punishment fit the crime. The guy's crime is he sat at a PC and sent out unsolicited emails, he shouldn't be in the same jail as a murderer or rapist or any violent offender.

      but the guy should have ran. "His bank account deposits from 2003 to 2006 totaled $3.5 million". He had plenty of cash, he could have escaped to some little south american country and became a hermit and no one would have bothered searching for a non-violent (until now) convicted spammer with a 21 month sentence to serve.

      A don't tell me he couldn't cross the border because illegal immigrants do it all the time.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    53. Re:This quote says it all by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      There are no guilty men in prison, haven't you heard? Everyone in there is innocent...

      Red was guilty, "Only guilty man in Shawshank."

      I'm assuming that's the reference you were going for.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    54. Re:This quote says it all by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. Seriously, the US prison system breeds criminals - if you're not one going in, you sure as hell will be coming out.

      there, before the grace of 'god', go I.

      or to that effect.

      ANY of us would get 'ruined' - probably irreversably if we were thrown 'in the hole'. hmmm, bad choice of words, there. or was it?

      we act all surprised when gitmo prisoners 'tell' us that if they ever get let out, they will seek revenge. but its not surprising.

      the US prison system (or really any country's prison system) is not at all meant to FIX anything other than to remove someone from society. that's all it ever does.

      I do wonder - suppose you or I were framed or were somehow put in a situation where we were forced to go to that hellhole known as prison. how many of us would come thru the other side intact? probably less than 1% (taking a wild guess).

      spamming sucks - but once someone is threatened with a punishment worse than death (yes, it is) - its not hard to understand someone NOT wanting to go thru a prison sentence.

      that never explains his killing spree. but it does explain A LITTLE BIT of why he would snap when faced with a jail sentence. I think that's quite normal for humans to want to do ANYTIHNG THEY CAN to avoid being raped in prison, etc etc.

      this is as much a statement about our prisons as it is about this particular nut-case.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    55. Re:This quote says it all by orielbean · · Score: 1

      This is why many european countries don't imprison for life or have a death penalty. Their standard for prision is to rehab, and life/death sentences do not pretend to offer rehab of any sort; so it goes against the spirit and mission of their justice systems.

    56. Re:This quote says it all by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that boot camp is designed to do the very thing he wants - break down a person to enable a better rebuild.

      Stress leading to a breakdown of the individual, good healthy work and discipline - doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.

      Mix in some training/counseling as necessary and you should be good.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    57. Re:This quote says it all by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Now don't get me started on why I don't think that you should go to jail for drug crimes, but that's another matter.

      But it's not another matter. Some kid gets put away at 18 for distribution of marijuana. Maybe he only serves a year -- but that's a felony charge. He will /never/ hold a job as a professional in any industry which does a background check; and if a background check does not get done, he will always have the threat of getting fired hanging over his head if his employer finds out. (He can't admit up front, because many corporate policies prohibit hiring such 'criminals'). This is in addition to the experience of being in prison itself. Our not-so-hypothetical criminal is now essentially banned from most jobs which would allow him to live in a decent neighborhood, nevermind support a family without living hand-to-mouth.

      This system of ours makes it very difficult to live a productive, normal life once you have been branded as 'criminal' for /any/ reason. And that's before we even get started on the sex crime laws.

      Somewhat offtopic: Frankly, I would love it if every politician who has publicly admitted to doing drugs at some point were brought up on charges - you can bet this 'war on drugs' would end real fast.

    58. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no guilty men in prison, haven't you heard? Everyone in there is innocent...

      Didn't do it. Lawyer fucked me.

    59. Re:This quote says it all by Dimitrii · · Score: 1

      That's right - the US penal system killed that little girl and her mother.

      They do have some responsibility as they let him escape. But that is as far as I would put it.

    60. Re:This quote says it all by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      well, it is one of the greatest movies of all time... so, yes; i think its worthy of a reference or two.

    61. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Gov. Ryan commuted the sentences of all Illinois death row inmates

      Ironic. Think he'll come out as a criminal? :)

      While I agree that there is a big problem with the justice system - especially for people with brown skin - saying that those 10% were "not criminals" when they went in is disingenuous. For instance, Anthony Porter was the one who kicked the whole thing off. He may not have murdered those two teenagers, but he was a gang member. His case is a total travesty of justice, but he was still a criminal before he went to prison.

      But whatever the problems with US prisons, THIS case is not an example of them. He didn't need to go to federal prison-light to learn how to pull the trigger on a handgun.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    62. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      While I agree that there need to be improvements in our criminal justice system - you have to put the numbers in perspective.

      There are well over 15,000 murders each year in the US. Being lazy and just using that number back to 1973 would give you half a million murders. Those 129 people freed since 1973 constitute 0.03% of the murders. Of course, 1/3 never get solved so the number might be better expressed as 0.04% of solved murders.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    63. Re:This quote says it all by corbettw · · Score: 1

      The guy was only in there for a few weeks, it's hard to believe he was "institutionalized" in that short a time period.

      What I think is more likely is, he was convinced (for whatever reason) that his family couldn't survive without him. That if he weren't around, they would be better off dead. That seems to be the usual rationale used by "family destroyers" (or at least that's what I learned from Law & Order).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    64. Re:This quote says it all by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Google "doctrine of complicity". You might learn something.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    65. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I 100% agree with you, but the issue of conditions inside the prisons is still something that you'd want to address - with or without the war on drugs.

      When a drug dealer gets sent to prison, the criminal justice system worked just fine - but the laws that they are enforcing are stupid and counter-productive.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    66. Re:This quote says it all by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      well, it is one of the greatest movies of all time... so, yes; i think its worthy of a reference or two.

      I couldn't agree more, but I wish they would have started with Red's parole hearing instead of Andy's court room scene, it would have been less jarring of a transition.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    67. Re:This quote says it all by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...you have to put the numbers in perspective.

      The perspective I use is that of the innocent person. I consider that to be quite reasonable. If it was ever to happen to you, I doubt you will spend your time worrying about the statistics. If the numbers are all that matter, then I don't know what else to say.

      --
      What?
    68. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What a nightmare, and such a coward," U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said.

      Yes, the United States is this when it imposes the "death penalty" on anyone. Same for anyone else. Muder is murder no matter who does it.

    69. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I never said that! I do think that the criminal justice system is flawed, and that realistic improvements can be made.

      But it is foolish to think that you can design a perfect system, and you do have to accept the occasional miss or just give up altogether.

      Personally, I think prosecutors and police are way too cozy. Some police will walk in and say to the prosecutor, "What do you want me to say?" This is not the way to help a court find the truth.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    70. Re:This quote says it all by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      I think you can safely assume they're not talking about the original topic, this far down.

    71. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Rather than focus on incapacitation, we should be focusing on rehabilitation..."

      Prison is not supposed to be a therapy session with Dr. Phil. People living within the law pay good money to get that kind of "rehabilitation".

      "...which, dollar for dollar, has a *much* higher rate of return than prison."

      When you stop viewing people as investments, you might realize that your thinking is idealistic. I know prison guards at Angola. They've told me horror stories involving flying feces. TLC and sympathy will not change hardened criminals.

      I could just imagine the judge's verdict, "Sir Spam-a-lot, you have just been sentenced to 25 years of therapy for the murder of your wife and three year old daughter. I wish you well on the road to recovery."

      My opinion: unrealistic, never gonna happen.

    72. Re:This quote says it all by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, it was uh...punishment for breaking the common laws of society. Not a vacation at the hilton. Personally, I think we should skip some steps and use some of the Islamic punishments. Get caught stealing? Only twice...once for each hand. Murder someone? We send 'ya out back with the victim's family. They get weapons. You don't.

      Cruel? Yep. Unusual...not really. The "Bible" is full of fun situations like these. Personally I'm sick of hearing how prisoners live better lifestyles than I do. Same with welfare. Got annoying when I worked security for $7.00/hr at rent controlled apartments only to see that over 80% drove Cadalliac Escalades or sports cars. Am I whining? Perhaps a little. I just don't see why people who can't be bothered to get a job (why would you? They sat at home and made more $$ than I did.) and only pay $30 a month for a 2-3 bdrm apartment get all these benefits. People in jail want golf courses and weight rooms and Cable TV, SCREW YOU. Here's some bread, some water and some bare walls because in case you missed it....THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE PUNISHMENT.

      I think you can go one of two ways. 1.) "Rehabilitate" people. I think this was the idea behind the golf courses and cable tv. As it sits, I think this takes the fear factor out of prison. Sounds more like a resort to me.
      2.) Give the people who want to actually learn something the opportunity to do so, the rest of them can sit and stare at the walls. It's punishment. Just like when you were a kid and had to sit in the corner.

      *shrugs* My 2cents.

      A.A.M

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    73. Re:This quote says it all by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Cry me a river. I know men in working conditions in rigs up north who have it way worse, and have to contend with -70 degree temperature. Cry cry whine whine, 2 minute showers? Some of those roughnecks don't shower for weeks.

      Psh, they wouldn't last 10 seconds in the doghouse. I'm tired of babying our criminals. You do the crime, you do the time.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    74. Re:This quote says it all by ethanms · · Score: 1

      You can't seriously believe that an innocent person (wrongly) sent to prison should _not_ be vilified for killing his wife and young child, and shooting an innocent bystander, after he escapes... can you?

    75. Re:This quote says it all by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      No doubt. Oorah!

    76. Re:This quote says it all by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      You forgot to check the "Post Anonymously" box

    77. Re:This quote says it all by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      If you'll read the GP I was replying to, then you'll realize that I was not implying that at all.

    78. Re:This quote says it all by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

      I think you are referring to a State prison system camp. Federal prison camps are much different - not as bad as what you described. A fucking cakewalk when compared to a fenced in or walled in prison. Federal Facilities are not as bad as state prisons, the problem with the federal system is that, you don't exactly have to commit a crime to end up in there, the conspiracy laws for example only require one or two jokers getting on the stand and saying that you agreed to commit a crime. If the crime in question carries a mandatory life sentence, you'll get it, and that's it, nothing anyone can do for you. Happens all the time, families against mandatory minimums probably has plenty of info about real cases. Oh, and the jokers on the stand can be johnny and paco, who had a long rapsheet and were up for 25 years after being caught selling crack near a school, they will say or do anything . . .

      --
      SARAVA!
    79. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... that's kind of the idea, isn't it?

    80. Re:This quote says it all by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the idea. Unfortunately, theory and reality don't often intersect.

    81. Re:This quote says it all by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 1

      Gov. Ryan commuted the sentences of all Illinois death row inmates after DNA testing exonerated ten percent of them.

      It's worse than that. The minimum error rate is 10%. It is actually likely to be a higher rate, since DNA evidence that can overturn every false conviction is not necessarily available, and the appeals process may have blocked other legitimate attempts to overturn unsound convictions.

      --
      Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
    82. Re:This quote says it all by sponga · · Score: 1

      I kow it truly is some candyass shit and lazyness.

      Personally I am sad that people like these are a drag on society, no wonder we are getting fatter and less productive. Cannot handle a little roadside cleanup labor, no wonder we have these fools who sit in front of the computer with their snickers bar and diabetes galore.

    83. Re:This quote says it all by lysse · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "waiting to shit" thing is probably classifiable as torture. We're talking about basic, necessary biological needs that can make a person sick if they're fucked about with.

      Now, 2 minute showers and living in dorms is unpleasant, sure, but not degrading or cruel in quite the same way (you can still sleep, you're still , and as you correctly point out, prison ain't supposed to be pleasant. But controlling when people can use the toilet is a much higher level of brutality, and achieves no purpose whatsoever except to make them feel, well, shitty.

    84. Re:This quote says it all by MaxEmerika · · Score: 1

      I believe that's what AC was saying: if you're innocent when you go to jail, you won't be by the time you come out.

    85. Re:This quote says it all by lysse · · Score: 1

      ...er, "(you can sleep, you're still getting cleaned off)" even.

    86. Re:This quote says it all by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      Rather than focus on incapacitation, we should be focusing on rehabilitation, which, dollar for dollar, has a *much* higher rate of return than prison.

      As so many prisons are partially privatized, I think there's a whole different type of "return" we're talking about here. It's in the best interest of the local economy, food and equipment suppliers, etc. to make sure the inmate comes back. An example: collect calls from my brother in state jail (Illinois) run 25 cents per minute, $2.00 for the first min. This is run through a private company, NOT one of the typical wired phone companies. Many other services to the jail system are provided by the companies with the most ties to politicians or bureaucrats - maybe that's an Illinois thing, not sure.

    87. Re:This quote says it all by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Punishing someone who is actually innocent has the same deterence factor on the general public as punishing the guilty.

      It's the principle by which terrorism works.

    88. Re:This quote says it all by xanadu113 · · Score: 1

      There are "crimes" that shouldn't be crimes as well:

      Growing pot to help your chemotherapy, for one..

      --
      -Myke
    89. Re:This quote says it all by geekoid · · Score: 1

      AS it's turning out, it's not that rare.
      Especially when convicted on 'eye witness' accounts.

      It's is so sloppy, it is specifically why I am against the death penalty. At the very least use the federal guidelines for the death penalty.

      "Big X, little x, what begins with X? X ray and xylophone. X...x...X" :)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    90. Re:This quote says it all by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      So if I kill someone next week, I can leave the signed confession with your name on it?

      Since it doesn't matter, just confess now and I'll schedule something next week. Heck, I'm lazy, let's just postulate a corpse and generate public outcry for your execution.

      Is the absurdity getting through?

      I do believe in capital punishment and the deterring effect. However, there has to be a whole lot of checks lined up before we can 'safely' exercise that deterrent. A single innocent found after the fact undermines the system.

    91. Re:This quote says it all by ethanms · · Score: 1

      Oops, didn't see that, guess I'm guilty :^)

      To stay on topic... by definition if you are convicted and put in prison (whether you are innocent or not) you are now a criminal.

      Being considered a criminal by society is based on the judgment of other members of society--by extension there are many people out there who are not yet branded as being criminals but who have committed crimes.

      Wiggum put it best when he said "I'd rather let a thousand guilty men go free, then chase after them".

    92. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in 100%? Of course not. But I think "innocent man sent to jail" is very, very rare.

      Depends on the value of n. IIRC, for low values (e.g., N=1), 50% may be innocent. For a "high" value of 10, 10% maybe innocent. With a million imprisoned, that would be 100,000 innocents in the US. That is probably about right. There are lots of people found innocent only by virtue of DNA retesting. Consider all the people locked up without the benefit of evidence to exonerate them. It is at least 0.3%.

    93. Re:This quote says it all by nietsch · · Score: 1

      You're the second person comparing it to 'boot camp'. The fact that it is institutionalised does not mean that it is good or acceptable. I tough you guys would have learnt by now what happens when you put two separate groups together and mark one group as bad and put the other in power. Oh well maybe a population also gets the prisons they deserve.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    94. Re:This quote says it all by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      You sure quote me to saying "farm system" a lot when I never mentioned the second word once.

    95. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now don't get me started on why I don't think that you should go to jail for drug crimes, but that's another matter.

      How is that another matter? Possession means one cop found this little baggie 'on your person'. This is unlike being framed for a real crime which requires a dead body or the transport of stolen goods. Anybody a cop wants off the streets and fits the profile of a user or dealer, is easily sent away.

    96. Re:This quote says it all by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, prisons get the population they deserve.

      You can be as relativist as you want, but it won't change the fact that the people in prison generally are bad.

      Maybe you think rapists, thieves, and murders are good people, or worse yet, think that they are good people who do bad things (my sister used that one).

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    97. Re:This quote says it all by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree with the blogger that you linked. You'd have to be a buffoon to argue that our justice system doesn't need serious improvement - especially in terms of racial treatment.

      However, the original point I was trying to make had nothing to do with how many errors are acceptable. I was trying to say that "innocents" coming out of prison as criminals isn't a huge burden on society. Even with a rate of 0.3%, we are not facing some epidemic of innocents-turned-criminal. And that's assuming that they are all non-criminal to begin with and they all turn to crime.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    98. Re:This quote says it all by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      I don't advocate rehabilitation for violent offenders, because they usually have deep-seated issues, such as sociopathy or psychopathy, that prevent them from being able to function normally. And rehabilitation isn't "a therapy session with Dr. Phil" (or Dr. Fuck Phil). And the thing is, prison IS an investment; we are investing in making sure that criminals don't recidivate. In that context, rehabilitation is cheaper, because for every dollar spent on rehabilitation, that is, on average, about $1.30 cents that are NOT spent later on on incarceration, for a total savings of 30 cents per dollar spent on rehabilitation.

      The prison 'culture' has been shown to create hardened criminals, and rehabilitation has been shown to lead to lower recidivism rates.

    99. Re:This quote says it all by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      I suppose if you take the technical definition, then yes everyone in prison is by definition a criminal. I believe, though, that the technical definition relies on the naive view that the criminal justice system works with any reliable accuracy.

    100. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What a nightmare, and such a coward," U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said. "Davidson imposed the 'death penalty' on family members for his own crime."

      but no mention of total incompetence from the authorities responsible for detaining him.

      its government protecting its own incompetence above all else... who said people aren't selfish?

    101. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the anonymous person, #24333369, didn't say s/he believes everyone sent to prison is a criminal, but said if one isn't a criminal going in, they sure will be coming out.

    102. Re:This quote says it all by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      An example: collect calls from my brother in state jail (Illinois) run 25 cents per minute, $2.00 for the first min. This is run through a private company, NOT one of the typical wired phone companies. Many other services to the jail system are provided by the companies with the most ties to politicians or bureaucrats - maybe that's an Illinois thing, not sure.

      Nope, it's not just an Illinois thing. Here in Arizona, it's the same way. Prisoners can call people outside, but the person outside has to pay for it (collect), and it can't be a cellphone. One of my wife's friends had to get a landline installed just so her POS son could call her from jail, and the charges are horrendous.

      America is just as corrupt as Mexico; Americans just haven't admitted it yet.

    103. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just like saying penal... =p

    104. Re:This quote says it all by Darby · · Score: 1

      Many other services to the jail system are provided by the companies with the most ties to politicians or bureaucrats - maybe that's an Illinois thing, not sure.

      While Illinois is certainly notable for its corruption, the private prison system is truly one of the worst threats we face.
      The prison industrial complex including private prisons, guard unions, police and other law enforcement etc is one of the largest lobbyists we have. Guess what their only real option for increasing profits through lobbying is?

      Inventing more crimes, increasing penalties for existing crimes and encouraging recidivism. Remember those aren't human beings entitled to live their lives after paying their debt to society, they're a liability on the balance sheet and the prison industry is damn well *entitled* to profits at your expense regardless of human rights or the cost to society, don't you know?

    105. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Marine Corps boot camp.

      Well, except that the prisoners are put where they can't hurt our society. Marine boot camp is where you get trained to hurt our society.
      Rather than getting all gung ho and whine about that, you might just ask yourself when the last time the US military was used to defend this nation.
      WW2 is the most recent you could possibly choose. So kindly quit the loser wank fest and deal with the fact that our military is a liability and those that join up are only ever used as weapons for a few scum.

      So no, you've never defended me and no it's a damn lie that without you running around on my dime because you couldn't find a real fucking job or a way to make yourself useful to society that I'd be speaking some foreign language now.

      Those are bullshit propaganda lies which you're most likely too fucking stupid to have seen through.

      In short fuck you and fuck every other single one of the scumbag leeches who comprise the US military. Please go get killed by an IED in some other people's country while you're trying to fuck them for the benefit of BushCO to America's detriment.

      You people are a fucking disgrace.

    106. Re:This quote says it all by Charbax · · Score: 1

      It doesn't discourage others to do the same. Every sociological and psychological study show that prison is not a deterrent, and death penalty is even less so. The more people you put in your prisons, the more revolt, the more crime, the more chaos you get in your society.

    107. Re:This quote says it all by gknoy · · Score: 1

      He didn't say that it was a GOOD thing -- merely that from the perspective of "motivating people not to break the law" punishing people who may not be guilty (but that the general public believes to be) is just as motivationaly effective as punishing the truly guilty.

    108. Re:This quote says it all by Charbax · · Score: 1

      Those so-called "minimum-security" prison farms exist for one reason only, there is not enough budget to let every inmate have their own cell. So they simply call the thing minimum security cause they haven't got enough money to pay salaries to have more guards.

    109. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the fundamental problem with being institutionalized in America: it's all about vengeance, not social rehabilitation.

      I know the US, but sadly, vengeance is a good generic way to thwart crime. Or at least to advertise the thwarting of crime. By "vengeance" I mean the normal human reaction toward evil doers who harm society in some way, getting paid back by harm that is of equal or greater measure.

      The world is causal. We can argue all day about free will and the effects of rehabilitation..etc, but in the end of the day punishment is society's quick answer to the question of determinism in a criminal's mind. If you do action X, we will preserve ourselves and our belongings and social order by collectively imposing appropriate action Y on you. Appropriate means hundreds of years of experience show human instinct deems it appropriate, as well as contemporary legislation. We don't do it to make you better (although that is always nice, if possible) or to satisfy some philosophical dogma (even though that's how our law may be phrased). We do it because we evolved to recognize that the only way to maintain order with respect to "harmful beings" is to punish them, and to make that threat well known to them.

      If you really want a more advanced, civilized system, you have to come to grasps with the fact that no two people are the same. Some criminals are ready to be rehabilitated and re-qualified to participate in society from day one. Some are hardened by decades of violence and stupidity and primal, vicious views of the world. Some (like the spammers) are intelligent but no less disgusting and possibly more deceiving to psychological examination. The resources necessary for something like a complete upheaval of the US institutions would be possible if we hadn't wasted so many billions of dollars on completely pointless wars, but that's just one of the potential advances the Bush administration has denied US citizenry.

    110. Re:This quote says it all by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Maybe you think rapists, thieves, and murders are good people

      Do you think pot smokers are bad people? Roughly 20% of prisoners, ~250,000, are there for non-violent drug offenses, most of them for very small quantities (possession less than 2oz, or sale less than 0.5oz).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    111. Re:This quote says it all by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I know I'm feeding a troll, but I don't care.

      If I saw you, you'd be dead. And I'm not joking. You see, I'm getting "the rest of those waste of genes out of the human pool". You should understand.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    112. Re:This quote says it all by flablader · · Score: 1

      Oh, so we should have just turned him over to the Scientologists?

      Actually, that might not be a bad idea...

    113. Re:This quote says it all by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Exactly! That's the issue here.

      My theory is that "hard criminals" who commit truly violent crimes know immediately they've fucked up, and that they're going to be doing time. They knew it before they even did the crime. It was something they accepted internally as they were in the act.

      But spamming? Seriously, I think it's wrong, but why did this guy get jailtime for it? That would've made me snap, too. I mean, I've probably infringed on copyright before, but if the feds came in here and carted me off to jail for 2 years, I don't know that I wouldn't go batshit insane, too.

      Don't get me wrong: killing your family is truly demented. But I'm going to guess this guy lost his mind somewhere along the way, and it's probably because he was facing two years in prison for sending unsolicited 1's and 0's across the interwebs. Maybe he did hurt some people financially, but he certainly can't repay that "debt" to those people if he's locked up and unable to make money legitimately. And if he can make millions from spam, I'm going to guess he can probably make money through more legitimate means, too.

      I blame this one on out fucked up criminal justice system than I do the guy.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    114. Re:This quote says it all by karmatic · · Score: 1

      You can't seriously believe that everyone sent to prison is a criminal, can you?

      Well, then we just need to make being imprisoned illegal, don't we?

    115. Re:This quote says it all by karmatic · · Score: 1

      You mean that people get PUNISHED for committing crimes? The horror!

      When looking at a "corrections" system - it's important to look at _why_ one should be doing this:

      1) Protection. Some people are too dangerous to allow in the general populace.
      2) Deterrent. This helps with the cost-benefit analysis of criminals - "Is this robbery worth 5 years?" If not, they aren't going to burglarize. Note: This only works as far as it factors into calculations. If it's a "heat of the moment" kind of thing, the criminal might not be thinking about the consequences.
      3) Restitution. If there is a victim, restitution should be made as much as possible.

      As far as the actual "punishment" part - why? The crime has been committed, and can't be undone. You can't deter this crime, only future crimes. What does "punishment" get you other than a sense of smugness?

      I'm pro death penalty, but not because of the "revenge" aspect. Sometimes, people need to be put down for the same reasons that rabid dogs do. It shouldn't be emotionally satisfying, though.

    116. Re:This quote says it all by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      A cop got killed in the process of this moron committing a felony -- that's 1st degree murder everywhere I've ever lived (even if it's not a cop).

      The only problem with the justice here is that the taxpayers of PA have to support this shitsack for the rest of his life.

      Here's hoping it's a short one.

    117. Re:This quote says it all by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      "What a nightmare, and such a coward," U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said. "Davidson imposed the 'death penalty' on family members for his own crime."

      Its interesting to see a federal prosecutor equate murder with the death penalty.

    118. Re:This quote says it all by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      2 minute showers?!? Living in dorms?!? Waiting to shit?!? That's outrageous!

      Or maybe that's why it's called punishment - it's not supposed to be pleasant.

      "Punishment" -- making someone's life unpleasant for unpleasantness's sake -- is not a legitimate goal of the justice system.

      Locking someone up for a period of months or years is enough of a deterrent already. Telling him to wait till the end of the day to use the bathroom is just rubbing salt into the wound, poking a mad dog with a stick. Don't be surprised when he bites back.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    119. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say "penal" some more. Also, I bet you could work it in to one of those "unsolicited male" jokes.

    120. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until former Broward County, Florida sheriff Ken Jenne is released from the minimum security federal penal farm in southwestern Virginia later this summer, after serving a year for various racketeering charges that he pleaded guilty to. The guy was an unapologetic asshole to begin with, so it will be interesting to see how much he's changed...

    121. Re:This quote says it all by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      If they are not bad people, why did they break the law? Do they think they are above or beyond the law?

      Maybe they shouldn't break the fucking law, dumbass.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    122. Re:This quote says it all by Graff · · Score: 1

      As far as the actual "punishment" part - why? The crime has been committed, and can't be undone. You can't deter this crime, only future crimes.

      You said it, deterrent. If you commit a crime you will be punished. That fact has to be made clear. If someone commits a crime, gets caught, and gets away without any punishment at all then they will not be deterred from repeating the crime. In addition, other people considering doing a similar crime will see that there isn't any penalty and thus will not be deterred.

      Now there are different levels of crimes and so there should be different levels of punishment. You don't hand out the death penalty for stealing a candy bar from a store because then you might as well just commit the biggest crimes you can whenever you do anything wrong. After all, why get just a candy bar when killing the owner will get you everything he has and the same penalty if you are caught?

      Yes, there are people who want punishment to be revenge but that's the wrong reason for punishment. That doesn't make punishment wrong, it makes the desire to punish wrong.

      There is one more reason for the penal system that you left out: Correction. That is, actually teaching people positive ways to fit into society and to become productive members of it. Unfortunately most penal systems (not just the one in the United States, it is a worldwide problem) are very hit-or-miss with actual correction.

      A lot of prison populations actually bring a person further from being a positive member of society by putting them in close contact with other criminals and twisted minds. Unfortunately this is mainly a money problem, it would just cost so much to provide each prisoner with the best therapy, surround them with positive people, keep them separate from other criminals, etc. It's too bad too, I honestly think that a lot of criminals would respond well to the proper environment but never really got a chance. This doesn't mean I'm soft on crime, I believe in punishment and protecting the public, but it does mean that I don't think all the criminals should simply be discarded without a good attempt at correction.

      As for the proven murders, molesters, and psychopaths without remorse, I'm all for the death penalty. Some people do need to be permanently removed from society and I don't think that permanent residence in lockdown is a solution.

    123. Re:This quote says it all by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      If they are not bad people, why did they break the law? Do they think they are above or beyond the law?

      Are you for real? You think the law defines morality? What the fuck have you been smoking? By your definition EVERYONE in the US is a "bad person" because we have all broken the law one way or another. And Rosa Parks, she is burning in fucking hell that evil bitch. and those founding fathers holy shit there ain't a hell hot enough for them.

      You think the law defines morality?

      You think the law defines morality?

      You think the law defines morality?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    124. Re:This quote says it all by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Some philosophical thoughts on "deterrence,"

      MR. PINK: I don't wanna kill anybody. But if I gotta get out that door, and you're standing in my way, one way of the other, you're gettin outta my way.

      MR. WHITE: That's the way I look at it. A choice between doin ten years, and takin out some stupid motherfucker, ain't no choice at all. But I ain't no madman either. What the fuck was Joe thinkin? You can't work with a guy like that. That mother-fucker's unstable. What do you think? Do you think he panicked, or ya think he's just trigger-happy?

      Me, I go by the old bumper sticker slogan WWMBD? (What Would Mr. Blond Do?)

      Truthfully, rehabilitation is the only choice for a sane society, pity I don't live in one.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    125. Re:This quote says it all by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      Right, and this is the thing that people miss. Unless you are planning on putting someone away for good for every crime that causes someone to do "hard time" then the goal should be to turn that person around. We know what abuse does to people. Best case scenario? The person comes out hardened, having deadened themselves to the abuse they suffer while inside. A more effective and vicious criminal. Worst case scenario? You have a person released into the general society whose a convicted felon, and has a harder time getting an honest job than a person who was never sent to prison. Naturally this person falls back into crime, but maybe prison scares him/her very much even so. Maybe he'll "suicide by cop" rather than go back, and take a few civilians out with him/her.

      .

      But then our prison system serves a political purpose that has nothing to do with deterrence (in the sense that people think) or rehabilitation. It's purpose is to keep the average citizen falling in line with whatever an authority figure tells them, no matter what kind of authority figures they are: Police Torture in Chicago.

      FORMER HOMICIDE DETECTIVE Frank Laverty, who died of cancer on December 5, will be remembered for turning the Chicago Police Department on its head. Perhaps that's too mild a statement. In standing up for an African-American teenager the state wanted to put to death, a young man he'd never met, he wasn't just turning the department on its head but bouncing it a few times for good measure.

      Laverty shook loose a secret of police record keeping. Twenty-five years ago, in violation of the law, detectives maintained "street files"--documents that weren't turned over to defense lawyers because they contained inconvenient truths that could hamper the prosecution of the men or women the police had decided were perpetrators. Thanks to Laverty, that widely accepted practice came to an end.

      Seriously, people don't want to know about this stuff as long as they aren't on the receiving end, and I'm actually surprised at the number of young men in our society who are open homosexual sadists (usually among the hard right "family values" crowd, too). It's the most chilling thing that comes up again and again in articles like these. We're really not very far from the circus atmosphere of Elizabethan executions when you come right down to it.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    126. Re:This quote says it all by Graff · · Score: 1

      That's the way I look at it. A choice between doin ten years, and takin out some stupid motherfucker, ain't no choice at all.

      That's the example of not enough deterrence. Kill a guy and only get ten years, which isn't enough to stop Mr. White. Now, for some people ten years is enough, and for others it isn't. The point is that you have to have some serious penalty and it has to be enough that it would cause a large percentage of people to pause before they commit the crime. Of course that brings up the matter of how large a penalty for each crime, something that is hotly debated and is tough to get a consensus on.

      Then there's the class of criminals such as Mr. Blond, people who don't apply logic to the penalties for doing a crime. For those sort of people it often doesn't matter what the penalty will be, they are committing the crime in any way they see fit. That's the sort of person who would kill for a pack of gum if they really wanted it and they wouldn't look back. There is no deterrence with them and probably very little chance of rehabilitation, maybe there is medical treatment but even that can be a crap shoot. With those sort of people you probably just have to use the death penalty and permanently remove them from society. Yes, you can lock them away forever but I don't think that's doing the person or the society that has to pay for his imprisonment any favors.

    127. Re:This quote says it all by Fish+(David+Trout) · · Score: 1

      Or maybe that's why it's called punishment - it's not supposed to be pleasant

      Wrong.

      The punishment is, was, and always has been, to simply be locked up. Period. To be separated from society, unable to move freely through it. THAT has ALWAYS been "the punishment", and ONLY that. Nothing more.

      The punishment has NEVER been to have to wait hours before being allowed to got to the bathroom.

      The punishment has NEVER been to only be allowed 2 minutes for a shower.

      The punishment has NEVER been to be treated like a dog, to be beat mercilessly, raped, fed tasteless food, denied prompt and proper medical treatment, or other wise treated inhumanly or with disrespect.

      The punishment has ONLY ever been to be locked up.

      Separated from society.

      Period.

      --
      "Fish" (David B. Trout)
    128. Re:This quote says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The prison system has been fucked up for so many years it really can't be considered unusual anymore. Cruel most definitely but unusual it is not.

    129. Re:This quote says it all by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      rehabilitation, which has a *much* higher rate of return than prison.

      Shouldn't our objective be to reduce the rate people return? ;-)

    130. Re:This quote says it all by tb()ne · · Score: 1

      The punishment is, was, and always has been, to simply be locked up. Period. To be separated from society, unable to move freely through it. THAT has ALWAYS been "the punishment", and ONLY that. Nothing more.

      I see. So prisoners should really have all the amenities of home. Contemporary accommodations, cable and internet (broadband, of course), etc.

      The punishment has NEVER been to only be allowed 2 minutes for a shower.

      Oh. I don't know where you are getting the official definition of "The Punishment" but does it prescribe how long and how often prisoners shall be allowed to shower?

      The punishment has NEVER been to be treated like a dog, to be beat mercilessly, raped, fed tasteless food, denied prompt and proper medical treatment, or other wise treated inhumanly or with disrespect.

      I'm sure that's exactly how Martha Stewart described her incarceration at Club Fed.

      Tasteless food? Yeah, that really would be inhumane and disrespectful. We probably should allow prisoners to have catered meals, tailored to their culinary preferences. We wouldn't want them to have a less than ideal dining experience during their vacation.

      As I posted earlier, I don't defend the conditions in the fed pens but what you are describing (brutal beatings, rape,..) doesn't sound like Club Fed to me. And as long as people aren't treated inhumanely (our definitions may differ), I have no problem with prisoners living in less than homey conditions.

    131. Re:This quote says it all by LaskoVortex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You have an anger problem.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    132. Re:This quote says it all by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You have a stupidity problem.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    133. Re:This quote says it all by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      No boot camp is much tougher than that, well in my country at least. When I went through it we had a guy who was a prison guard, he lasted about 2 or 3 days before he dropped out/disappeared claiming it was much tougher than what his prisoners go through.

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  5. Sad... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    I guess that's what happens if you get into a pound-in-the-ass federal prison. You'd rather die than to ever return there.

    Alas, cowards don't like to die alone and bring along the family :-(

    1. Re:Sad... by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess that's what happens if you get into a pound-in-the-ass federal prison. You'd rather die than to ever return there.

      But he was at one of those white-collar resort prisons. That's why he was able to escape.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Sad... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Even worse then...

    3. Re:Sad... by CompSci101 · · Score: 1

      The thing is that it wasn't a FPYITA prison. It was a minimum (no?) security prison that the guy basically just walked out of.

      This guy was an asshole of such epic proportions it's ridiculous. His sentence was less than 2 years, and he felt the need to kill his young wife and baby girl as a result? What a selfish prick.

      --
      The Sun is proof that we can't even do fire properly.
    4. Re:Sad... by metanoia3 · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you read the previous article:

      Davidson was housed in a minimum security facility. Minimum security institutions, also known as Federal Prison Camps (FPCs), have dormitory housing, a relatively low staff-to-inmate ratio, and are work and program-oriented. FPCs are generally located adjacent to larger institutions, where inmates help serve the labor needs of the larger institution

      I doubt his life was that terrible during the time he spent there. But then again, I can't speak for his ass.

    5. Re:Sad... by turbidostato · · Score: 0, Troll

      "The thing is that it wasn't a FPYITA prison [and] His sentence was less than 2 years"

      I'm with you it seems ridiculous. In fact, I think it looks so ridiculous it's time for the tinfoil hat: what do you think it's less surprising? A millionaire that probably isn't lacking (lots of) funds in some fiscal paradise who scapes from a low security prision that looks more like a summer camp than a prision only to kill himself, his wife and daughter within 48 hours, or an action from his crime sindicate fellows in order to avoid the guy to sing like a canary to the feds about them and to send a very clear message to others that might be looking for such a way to go out the gang?

    6. Re:Sad... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "But he was at one of those white-collar resort prisons. That's why he was able to escape."

      That's why the "resort prisons" should not exist. Prison should destroy those is does not deter, and "slap on the wrist" incarceration does not do that.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if he was caught laundering money, he wouldn't have gone to white-collar resort prison... He would've gone to a federal 'pound-me-in-the-ass' prison.

    8. Re:Sad... by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      But he was at one of those white-collar resort prisons. That's why he was able to escape.

      Actually this is why:

      Spam King: "Hi. Excuse me. Um, I'm actually supposed to be getting out of prison today, sir. Yeah."
      Prison Guard #1: "You're in the wrong line, dumb ass. Over there."
      Spam King: "I'm sorry. I am being a big dumb ass. Sorry."
      Prison Guard #1: "Hey, uh, let this dumb ass through."

    9. Re:Sad... by Charbax · · Score: 1

      He was in a prison farm, so-called minimum security prison, but that has nothing to do with security level, that has to do with budget. There is no budget to allow every prisoner have his own cell, they are stacked by the hundreds in big dorm rooms.

    10. Re:Sad... by mlopes · · Score: 1

      He probably had spamed his inmates who probably were anxious to get back to him.

    11. Re:Sad... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Even if they can't put them in individual cells, couldn't they build a wall around the whole place?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. The King is dead by Daimanta · · Score: 1, Funny

    Long live the (Spam) King!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  7. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Celebrating someone killing their family. Fuck you.

  8. Re:Good by JasonWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WTF is this? There is a dead woman and child and you pop off at the mouth calling them things like "crotch fruit?" After seeing such comments the only conclusion I can extract is that I hope you never breed, we need less people on this earth that act like you just did.

    --
    Your television will not tell you when to start the revolution.
  9. Movie?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, now I'm going to be bombarded about the commercials for the movie about this guy's dramatic end...

    I can picture some of the scenes now, he's reading his daughter clearly insane with Joker:

    I do so like
    green eggs and spam!
    Thank you!
    Thank you,
    Spam-King-Man!

  10. This story has such a happy ending by Zen · · Score: 1

    that apparently /. decided we needed to hear it twice! Either that, or somebody forgot to read the followup link attached to the original story.

    1. Re:This story has such a happy ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that apparently /. decided we needed to hear it twice! Either that, or somebody forgot to read the followup link attached to the original story.

      Actually, I don't go back and read old articles much. I guess you have more time than me. If you have time, a second story gives you another forum to mock self-righteous fools.

  11. A couple more details by j_snare · · Score: 4, Informative

    I saw another article that linked to this one http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_9985333 that had a couple of other details.

    It sounds like they weren't just a big happy family...

    1. Re:A couple more details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Media and prosecutors have dubbed Davidson "The Spam King" for years for his prolific anonymous e-mails selling a raft of products.
      A raft of products? Where do they get these units of measurement?

    2. Re:A couple more details by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      The same place they get "feet" and "yards" and "stone"

    3. Re:A couple more details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those details are not supportive of the "sounds like they weren't just a big happy family" beyond what this event, as presently interpreted, tells us. Lots of conjecture and not much facts.

      The fact remains, based on the details given to us, that this could have been done by someone else. Not all that likely, but possible.

  12. Very typical psychopath by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't care about anyone (millions of people inconvenienced by his spam), doesn't have a conscience and leaves a trail of misery and destruction behind.

    Psychopaths are very charming but still, girls, try not to marry one.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Very typical psychopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... but... he promised me that they'd get bigger if I took this supplement!

    2. Re:Very typical psychopath by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would have said sociopath, not psychopath, but I think your point is valid.

    3. Re:Very typical psychopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Doesn't care about anyone...., doesn't have a conscience and leaves a trail of misery and destruction behind."

      Sounds like the modern business world doesn't it?

    4. Re:Very typical psychopath by GregAllen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Psychopaths are very charming but still, girls, try not to marry one.

      I would say "sociopath". There are female sociopaths, too.

      The same comment applies to boys: try not to marry one. Especially you young, unsuspecting geeks out there. She is very charming, but don't ignore the red flags. Just see my .sig to know where it could lead you. :)

      --
      Please help find my missing daughter: FindSabrina.org
    5. Re:Very typical psychopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to think we are the psychopaths who put people in jail when we have been "inconvenienced".

    6. Re:Very typical psychopath by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      While I still think the correct term is "psychopath" (please check the checklist ) I completely agree with you that psychopaths are found among women as well!

      And I would really love to help you - I love children in general, and my sister has a niece whom is like my own child, so even though I can not entirely comprehend how a father can feel, I can at least somewhat come close to sharing your emotions. I live in Finland, so it's unlikely I'll be of any help to you. I can only tell you not to give up, use your smarts as much as possible, stay focused. And good luck!

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Very typical psychopath by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      I'd hope you know better, though. Just because abuse isn't physical doesn't mean it's innocuous. Perhaps a better punishment would have been five-ten years of probation with proscriptions against using a computer, but the fact is he did more than just inconvenience people: his organization was responsible for hijacking people's machines to make botnets, he avoided taxes, etc. etc.

    8. Re:Very typical psychopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had money, and that's all some women care about.

    9. Re:Very typical psychopath by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Psychopaths are very charming but still, girls, try not to marry one.

      Then who's going to change them?

    10. Re:Very typical psychopath by FeatureBug · · Score: 1
      The story of your daughter is sad, but don't give up hope of finding her. From my knowledge I am very confident that universal fingerprinting and identity cards will be introduced in Mexico for both residents and aliens, as it will be eventually at a later date in the US and other countries too. Fingerprinting per se won't help find your daughter or Dara (unless Dara has a record from a previous conviction?), but forcing all residents and aliens of Mexico to go thru a full identity checking process by the authorities has a very high probability of finding Dara and your daughter and exposing any false identities. I can't give you a definite timescale, but the political wheels are already in motion.

      You've written her a very nice letter. I am sure she won't forget you. I wish you all the best in your search, and hope your reunion is not much longer delayed.

  13. What a complete and utter tosser by bestinshow · · Score: 1

    This is a terrible tragedy.

    It also shows what the type of people who send spam are, if they would consider killing their own wife and daughter, presumably in order to keep their own freedom. Condolences to everyone except the spammer.

  14. What a cowardly motherfucker! by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I'd rather kill myself than spend time in the pen. And since I'm God's gift to man, my family has no reason for livingh after I'm gone, so I'll take them with me."

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  15. So this is the guy that inspired the name... by insomaniac · · Score: 5, Funny

    SpamAssassin

    --
    The way to corrupt a youth is to teach him to hold in higher value them who think alike than those who think differently
    1. Re:So this is the guy that inspired the name... by sweede · · Score: 1

      Pure genius...

      --
      I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
    2. Re:So this is the guy that inspired the name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was going to refrain from making an "Opt Out" joke, but apparently the gloves are off...

    3. Re:So this is the guy that inspired the name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone needs to work on the filter accuracy - it looks like there were two false positives.

    4. Re:So this is the guy that inspired the name... by florescent_beige · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      SpamAssassin (+5 Funny)

      Too bad it wasn't you and the 4 or 5 people that modded you funny in the car with him. (-1 Troll)

      Awww did daddy hurt the poor widdle moderators feelings? Awww poor widdle poopy ur such a cute widdle moderator yes you are!

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    5. Re:So this is the guy that inspired the name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know there is some jokes that are funny and other s that arent,

      i dont know if the people doing all the joking have kids but i have a 3 yeard old and this story just makes me so sad,

      So have some respect for a child'death

    6. Re:So this is the guy that inspired the name... by xaositects · · Score: 1

      with over-zealous Bayesian bullets

  16. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mod me down if you like, but DEATH to all spammers. I'm glad he took his crotch-fruit with him, so they won't grow up to spam like daddy.

    I'm not sure if you're aware of this but you weren't the victim in this story. I know, I know, it's very hard to consider other people but there is a 3 year old girl dead, a middle aged woman dead and an injured teen. All of them (to our knowledge) completely innocent.

    They most likely have other family members and friends, I think you should consider these people to be the victims in this story, not you. Our thoughts and condolences should go out to them, not some nepotistic sentiment that they would automatically become their felon of a father.

  17. Damn... by Stanislav_J · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good riddance to him. But how sad for his family. Why do assholes like this feel the need to take others along with them when they decide to check out? It's times like this when I'm sorry to be an atheist -- I want to believe that he's burning in Hell. Mere nonexistence is not a sufficient punishment for him.

    So much for spammers being "non-violent" criminals...

    --
    "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
    1. Re:Damn... by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

      When I saw the escape article yesterday, I was hoping he'd die in a firey, bloody shoot out.
      It's a shame that he killed his family though, what a dirt bag.
      Oh well, for everyone who cursed the spam in their inbox hoping that the person who sent it would die, they got their wish.
      Ok - who's the next biggest spam king?

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    2. Re:Damn... by houghi · · Score: 1

      So much for spammers being "non-violent" criminals

      That should probably be that spam is a non-violent crime. As long as the act of sending Spam results in him killing his family, there is no relation between the two.

      Sadly many people who have not commited any crime kill their own family and many spammers don't kill their family.

      Because two things happen it doesn't mean they are related. Next you will say that the color of his car is linked to violent crimes.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Damn... by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Sadly many people who have not commited any crime (apart from murder, obviously) kill their own family

      Fixed.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    4. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's times like this when I'm sorry to be an atheist -- I want to believe that he's burning in Hell.

      Paradoxically, if you were truly religious (meaning ... if you believed that "some benevolent supernatural omniscient omnipotent being is controlling reality and knows what it is doing, so I don't have to care about anything myself and just be as I was created"), you wouldn't want to believe that. You would be deeply sorry for him.

    5. Re:Damn... by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      It's no big suprise that someone who made a living being inconsiderate and harrasing people in a total lack of anything other than profit *SPAM PROFIT mongering and self engorgement should want to act in such a way.

    6. Re:Damn... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I am religious. I do believe in a "benevolent supernatural omniscient omnipotent being." I think that all that being wants from us is to be good people. (My own personal religious beliefs include more than that, but all I expect out of others are for them to be good people.) I guess you can summarize my position as being: Try to leave this world a little better than it was when you entered it. I strive to do this. Sometimes I succeed in my efforts, sometimes I don't.

      Edward Davidson did *not* improve the world when he spammed people and he *CERTAINLY* did not when he took the reprehensible action of shooting his wife, shooting his 3 year old daughter, shooting a teenage girl and leaving a 7-8 month old in a car seat presumably to die from neglect. Ideally, I would have liked to see him serve out his sentence and then become a positively contributing member of society. Much less ideally, he could have chosen to just commit suicide. But to kill his wife, and innocent child, and leave two more children for dead is just reprehensible. I feel deeply sorry for his victims (dead and injured) and for the families left with the loss/hurt. I'm not usually a vengeful man, but I seriously hope that there's a fire pit somewhere that says "Reserved For Edward Davidson."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:Damn... by gosand · · Score: 1

      So much for spammers being "non-violent" criminals...

      By this dumbass logic, all programmers are murderers.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:Damn... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      You make the mistake of expecting sociopaths to think like non-sociopaths, and they won't. Read The Sociopath Next Door to gain some insight on what amounts to a different mind, with a different set of values. Atheism or theology doesn't really come into the equation; it's a different set of behavioral circumstances that about 90% of don't share with the ostensible other 10%. You're not seeking hell for this man, you're seeking a post-event justice that's unlikely. This makes you understandably mad and angry.

      Spammers fit the same 90/10 profile, and each is capable of violence while sociopaths and the otherwise psychotic will see no limitations to impose violence, because in their world, guilt and consequences are absent. To them, no harm no foul, only a twisted sense of 'justice' within their context (and not in ours). It's truly sad.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    9. Re:Damn... by Spatial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's times like this when I'm sorry to be an atheist -- I want to believe that he's burning in Hell. Mere nonexistence is not a sufficient punishment for him.

      I'm not. Eternal punishment for finite crimes can never be fair.

      It wouldn't benefit him, us, or the people killed. It's just hatred, no good at all.

    10. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do assholes like this feel the need to take others along with them when they decide to check out?

      Well, let's see. You firmly believe that life is not worth living - that the human condition involves so much suffering that oblivion is overwhelmingly preferable. The thing you want more than anything is to die and be embraced by sweet oblivion. The one thing that is stopping you is the thought of how much suffering your death will cause your family. You are devastated by the thought of the loneliness your daughter will feel growing up without a father.

      So...you kill everyone. Problem solved: you get to die and your loved ones don't have to suffer your loss (bearing in mind that you haven't taken anything of value away from them by killing them because life isn't worth living anyway).

      I'm not saying I agree with that - just something to think of next time you try to talk someone out of suicide by telling them about how much suffering their death will cause their loved ones.

    11. Re:Damn... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Edward Davidson did *not* improve the world when he spammed people "
      arguable,
      Spammers have created a whole billion dollar industry to try to stop unwanted emails.
      That's a lot of jobs and tax dollars.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Damn... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll admit that that point is arguable, though I would disagree that any jobs created offsets his repeatedly annoying people and concealing where the annoyances came from. Still, by killing his wife, 3 year old son, and seriously injuring that teenage girl, he was not improving the world, but selfishly taking as many people as he could out when he killed himself.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  18. Dumb by raedeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Putting mentally unstable people in minimum security is a bad idea

    1. Re:Dumb by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Putting mentally unstable people in minimum security is a bad idea

      Did law enforcement and/or the courts have any reason to believe that he was mentally unstable? And no, sending out spam doesn't make you mentally unstable, it just makes you greedy.

  19. The sign on the way out by the4thdimension · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Attention: You are now escaping. Please turn back immediately."

    1. Re:The sign on the way out by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      A reminder: At the end of the rehabilitation, cake will be served.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    2. Re:The sign on the way out by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      "we're going over the hedge tonight"
      "not in these pants I'm not"

      ah National Lampoon...

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    3. Re:The sign on the way out by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      It's so delicious and moist!

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  20. Jackass by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are celebrating because a man killed his family? You need some serious help.

    If they'd put him in a medium or max security prison where he couldn't have escaped this would never have happened. He also didn't deserve death for what he did; the jail time and fines/restitution was plenty.

    1. Re:Jackass by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "He also didn't deserve death for what he did; the jail time and fines/restitution was plenty."

      Don't you mean his FAMILY didn't deserve death? Because whether or not he deserved it is moot - he did it to himself.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Jackass by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know he did, but what I meant was even his death isn't something to be celebrated. The man was obviously deeply disturbed. Implying that someone like him should die (and that implication has been made many times here on /.) is just whacked.

    3. Re:Jackass by R2.0 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "The man was obviously deeply disturbed."

      I disagree. He chose to take his own life - that doesn't mean he was mentally ill. If it does, that means that all of the advocates for assisted suicide are accomplices to murder.

      He chose to kill others. Again, that doesn't mean he was mentally ill. People kill family members all the time and they know EXACTLY what they are doing, or are "in the heat of the moment" which implies NOT using your thought processes, be they irregular or normal.

      He may well have been mentally ill - sociopathy or psychopathy comes to mind. But his murderous actions are not conclusive evidence of either.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:Jackass by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think I said disturbed, not mentally ill in the sense of a formal diagnosis. I am not a psychologist, but anyone who kills his wife and 3 year old as part of a murder-suicide is disturbed in my book. It was already pretty obvious based on his actions in the past that he had sociopathic leanings.

    5. Re:Jackass by Kadin2048 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I disagree.

      That he killed his family, especially his children, is a tragedy.

      That he killed himself, though? A fitting end to a wasted life. It's a pity he didn't do it earlier, but I'm still glad he did it, just to save society the money that would be required for his incarceration. Had he just stopped at killing himself, I'd have given him a small margin of respect for finally doing one thing right.

      The guy was worse than just a waste; he was a net drain. Society is better with him dead.

      Not everyone is a special, wonderful snowflake. The world is not a better place for everyone being in it. There are quite a few people around who've made it their life's purpose to steal and destroy, and their deaths are nothing that I'm going to mourn.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:Jackass by Frastolator · · Score: 1

      "I disagree. That he killed his family, especially his children, is a tragedy."

      What is wrong with people, jeez! Wake me up when the human race returns.

    7. Re:Jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The man was obviously deeply disturbed. Implying that someone like him should die (and that implication has been made many times here on /.) is just whacked.

      He deserved death for killing his family. I don't think that's whacked.

      I just wish he was dead and his family wasn't.

    8. Re:Jackass by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      You say you are not a psychologist, but you are making diagnoses of a person's state of mind based on his actions, and proposing that he be treated in accordance with that state of mind.

      You use the term "disturbed", which you associate with "not mentally ill in the sense of a formal diagnosis". But you want to treat him as if he WAS mentally ill.

      It reminds me of the phrase "drinking problem" - it covers bad habits and irresponsible behavior as well as alcoholism, yet the solution for everyone seems to be "treatment".

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:Jackass by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Anybody, in this laymans opinion, who kills his family is deeply disturbed. What part of that is so hard to understand? It doesn't matter if the disturbance was recent or existed forever. Disturbed is disturbed, and killing your family is disturbing to say the least. It wasn't an excuse for his behavior. If there is a hell I'm sure he's got a special spot reserved.

    10. Re:Jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheering at his death is whacked?

      The guy stole time and resources from me and most other users of email. He and his brethren cost me extra money, and gave me more anxiety. He helped cause some of the brightest minds on the internet to waste their time and talent trying to come up with ways to thwart his illegal activities. And he and his ilk essentially stole money from senior citizens who believed his emails, and from all their dependents. It's hard to feel sympathy for him. I'm glad you're such a kind person, caring for someone who has done so much evil...my religion says I should do that too. But me, I've got difficulty resisting the urge to rejoice.

    11. Re:Jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are SO TIRED of e-mail spam, they celebrate and joke when a spammer dies.

      So far I know of 2 'dead spammers', this one and a guy in Russia.

      It's a tragedy all around from lost time and productivity to lost lives....

    12. Re:Jackass by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      you're right of course. i'd let him off the hook for a million paper cuts and a lemon juice shower.

    13. Re:Jackass by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "Implying that someone like him should die (and that implication has been made many times here on /.) is just whacked."

      I disagree completely. If he had somehow survived his suicide attempt, I would gladly be on the jury to convict him of murder, and subsequently feel no remorse in condemning him to death.

      Some will argue that he is sick, "disturbed", etc. I would argue that anything that would commit those acts is not human and deserved of no greater regard than an animal that kills humans. Put them down like a rabid dog and forget about it.

      For this you call me "whacked." Fine. However, in my eye spending money to rehabilitate or imprison a person who murders their family or children while there are starving people in the world is a gross misappropriation of funds.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  21. What a weak, cowardly little man... by Red+Samurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    "Davidson, 35, was sentenced in April to 21 months in prison and ordered to pay $714,139 in restitution to the IRS after pleading guilty to falsifying header information to send spam e-mail, tax evasion and criminal forfeiture."

    So, all it took for this guy to snap was 21 months and a shitload of debt? He must've known the consequences if he was ever caught. If you ask me, he killed in the wrong order.

    1. Re:What a weak, cowardly little man... by Bigbutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn, it wasn't even a shitload of debt. The article said he had 3.5 million in the bank and half a million in gold, etc.

      Hell, pay me 3 million dollars to sit in White Collar prison for 21 months.

      I've had several job queries from a local (Thornton Colorado) spam company. The first time I did a little research on the company and turned it down. Now, each time I get pinged by a headhunter, I reply that I don't work for spamming companies.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:What a weak, cowardly little man... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know, this made me ponder: When is the first RIAA victim going to snap?

      Same position. Debt 'til death do you part and maybe or not a few months of prison time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:What a weak, cowardly little man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, all it took for this guy to snap was 21 months and a shitload of debt?

      I spent 12 months in a PDC and jail combined. I eventually learned to adapt, but when I was finally let go it was like I was in control of my life for the first time. Your freedom may not be valuable to you, but I know it is to me.

  22. Amazing by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really wouldn't expect this kind of action out of a guy who built his entire living on annoying the public and ripping off the unwitting...

    [/sarcasm]

    The fact is that this guy was a half a step above a common thief. He probably had a serious feeling of entitlement and couldn't bear the fact that he had lost it all and would be forced to seek a legitimate job after his stay in the pen.

    I feel bad for his family but he got what was coming to him. He was probably no different than most street thugs and we see this kind of violence in that community every day.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  23. Re:Woo! by BVis · · Score: 1

    You mean "three down". I'm all for social Darwinism, but this retard took people with him. Sadly, this isn't an atypical result; seems every couple of weeks you hear about a drunk driver who whanged into some poor bastard's minivan and killed people, but walked away without a scratch on themselves. This seems analogous, except for the suicide part.

    Plus, as much as I hate spam, I'd rather see this guy rot in a cell than dead.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  24. TGIF by Wiarumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and it was such a pleasant Friday morning until I heard this news.

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I would be willing to take a lifetime of spam to spare the life of his wife and daughter. The positive news of the story (the spam king is gone for good) pales in the shadow of this tragedy.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:TGIF by khuber · · Score: 1

      No, I like this ending. It has a certain poetic justice. The wife was presumably complicit in his spam business and tax evasion unless she was being deceived for five years. Children being raised by these two crooks would not exactly be an asset to society.

    2. Re:TGIF by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I don't know about the rest of you, but I would be willing to take a lifetime of spam to spare the life of his wife and daughter. The positive news of the story (the spam king is gone for good) pales in the shadow of this tragedy."

      But it's not about you, or me. It's about protecting society, and in that war there will be some unintended consequences imposed by the perps who object to being punished.

      A useful consequence is that the public can now associate "spam king" and murder/suicide instead of merely what the public see as annoying email. The effects of the "tragedy" are confined to those who knew and have reason to miss the casualties. The effects of spam are far broader, and spammers should be hated in consequence. This will help.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:TGIF by torgis · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I find it reprehensible people are able to celebrate this guy's death knowing full well that he first shot his wife and both of his daughters. I, too, would gladly manually filter a lifetime of spam if it would somehow reverse this man's stupidity. Nobody deserves to die for sending an email, ever, under any circumstances. Or, for that matter, billions of emails. Anyone who thinks differently needs to take a long, hard look at their morality. If such a trade-off is acceptable to you, the least of your worries is a few hundreds imaginary letters in a digital mailbox somewhere.

    4. Re:TGIF by Holi · · Score: 1

      What positive news? I am actually sickened by you all today. Life is sacred, life is precious. For all of you to be chearing a man's death is horrifying. His actions were reprehensible, but I still will never applaud a person's death.

      I've been around enough death in my life, it is never positive.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:TGIF by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The wife was presumably complicit in his spam business and tax evasion unless she was being deceived for five years.

      Even that doesn't matter. She was OPENLY complicit in his jailbreak.

    6. Re:TGIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just like negotiating with terrorists you will get your wish of "a lifetime of spam" and the hostages get killed anyway.

    7. Re:TGIF by wreave · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to take a lifetime of spam

      This has already been arranged.

    8. Re:TGIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The child, yes. The wife, no. She knew this man better than any of us, married him, and even had a kid with him. She knew how he was making his money and didn't have a problem with it. When he went to prison, her choice was to help him break out. Fuck her; she's scum. She's nowhere near as much as a scumbag as the spam king but still is scum nonetheless. The child's death is the real tragedy here.

    9. Re:TGIF by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Children being raised by these two crooks would not exactly be an asset to society.

      There are many children who may or may not be an asset to society. That doesn't merit hoping for their death! Give them a chance to grow up and make something good of themselves, or even just be average.

    10. Re:TGIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't say without knowing the kid. Maybe he was a real dick.

  25. Jesus by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It should also be a lesson to all you married folks out there that feel you should help your spouse break jail... even you aren't clear of the line of fire. I am sure you can apply this metaphor to friend-of-the-quiet-guy-at-the-post-office and such, but this is so screwed up, my reality detector is going nuts.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Jesus by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It should also be a lesson to all you married folks out there that feel you should help your spouse break jail...

      No offense, but that doesn't really come up all that often.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  26. yes... by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Undeniably tragic, but you expected a spammer to act like a normal human being? Its only a shame he wasnt married to Sanford Wallace instead of to an innocent...

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  27. Bastard! by Woldscum · · Score: 0, Troll

    May he burn in Hell.

  28. Suicide by caffiend666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Suicide is the ultimate statement of self-empowerment and control. We now know for sure, this man was unconcerned about disrupting countless lives, and now even destroying them; for his own sense of peace, prosperity, and control. What he feared most was being out of control of his own life, and didn't care about the lives of others. A person unconcerned about disrupting millions of lives for five seconds at a time, could not be bothered to have his interrupted for a few months. Poetic in a monstrous pig way.

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
    1. Re:Suicide by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up! He's described the characteristics of a sociopath very succinctly.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  29. Is this a new trend?! by Neodudeman · · Score: 1

    Why oh Why does this continuously happen? It seems like it's a fad among the rich and sleezy!

    Absolutely ridiculous! What comes over these people?!
    What is it that tells them, "Kill yourself, and while you're at it, kill your wife and kill your daughter."

    Where is the rational behind that?! Oh, I know.

    It's up KoolAid man's delicious cherry ass, because it DOESN'T EXIST!!

  30. Bad problems by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently this guy had a lot worse going on inside than just spamming people. There are plenty of spammers that would never dream of killing anyone.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Bad problems by Henkc · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of spammers that would never dream of killing anyone.

      Oh yes? You know a few, do you?

    2. Re:Bad problems by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Apparently this guy had a lot worse going on inside than just spamming people. There are plenty of spammers that would never dream of killing anyone.

      Nail, meet head. This guy obviously had serious issues. Left to roam free, he was essentially a sociopathic con-artist. Up the pressure by jamming him into a box, and he committed an even more sociopathic act. None of this excuses his crimes, mind you, but neither does it exonerate a society that basically ignores (and occasionally rewards) sociopaths until they finally do something sufficiently heinous to warrant imprisonment. And then our standard response is to make a great deal of empty noise about what a terrible person the sociopath is, mostly to reassure ourselves that we are not terrible like him, but nothing is really improved thereby.

      What will probably not receive much attention, speaking of practical matters, is the lax security at the prison that made this whole sorry scene possible.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  31. People said the same at Saddam's death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And when Ian Huntley or Mira Hindley die, there will be people who are singing the praises of their deaths.

    This is only considered bad here because they killd their family.

    Well, how about considering it as "someone kills a child and dies". In that case, wouldn't people be saying "Good! He desrved to die"?

    1. Re:People said the same at Saddam's death by neokushan · · Score: 1

      That depends entirely on where your moral line of when-is-it-right-to-kill lies.
      For some people, killing is never acceptable, even for those who murdered thousands of people, for others it's justified to kill someone just for breaking a minor law.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    2. Re:People said the same at Saddam's death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That depends entirely on where your moral line of when-is-it-right-to-kill lies.
      For some people, killing is never acceptable, even for those who murdered thousands of people, for others it's justified to kill someone just for breaking a minor law.

      No kidding. A pacifist here.

      Nobody really deserves to die. Not for those people. After living a long life and suddenly becoming sick and in pains, I think that people deserve a right to die. But deserving to die because of having done bad things?

      Nobody benefits from his death. Not at all. He doesn't even get punished from his death, at all! There is no benefit in him dieing to anyone or harm to him but still he just "Deserved to die"? is there ANY LOGIC AT ALL behind that? It is disgusting how little distance we have gained to the medieval lynching crowds...

      People also seem to have forgotten why laws even exist. Punishment is a bad word, the reason for it to exist is not to punish people.

      Punishments are for one thing only: To keep people from breaking the law. Thus, rehabilitation is as good as a prison sentence or better: Person won't commit that crime again. However, we also have punishments because just rehabilitations won't keep people from committing crime the first time, they need to fear the bad consequences (or utopistically, just love the society enough to not want to do it but that isn't happening).

      Punishing the person who has committed a crime, the actual suffering inflicted on a person after already having done something bad, isn't the purpose of punishments. It is just the only mean to partially (it's not that crimes didn't exist) achieve the goal for what we know...

    3. Re:People said the same at Saddam's death by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      Punishing somebody is only worthwhile if you think someday they'll come around and start acting in a socially acceptable way. Obviously there was no need to keep that piece of shit around.

    4. Re:People said the same at Saddam's death by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that I've ever celebrated someone's death. When word hit that Saddam Hussein was executed, I didn't celebrate or even smile. I was just relieved that it was over. The same thing happened when word of his sons deaths was released, and when Jeffrey Dahmer's murder was announced (though that was tempered with some frustration that he would not serve his sentence). The same thing happens when murderers are executed. I personally have no reason to celebrate, as I was not directly affected by it. I don't know that I would even if it directly affected me or someone I knew.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:People said the same at Saddam's death by FnordX · · Score: 1

      Some people may "deserve" to die, but it is never our job to make sure that they do. There's always people out there who say that So-and-So should be killed, but if they were the one who had to actually look that person in the eye and kill them, they never would be able to.

      I always preferred what some of the native tribes in the pacific northwest would do, exile someone to an island, and leave them there. At that point, they're out of society, and their survival relies entirely on their own means.

      --
      ____________________
      Clouds in the Sky,
      Water in a bottle
  32. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chastising someone for celebrating someone killing their family. Fuck you.

  33. yes yes YES!!!!! by CdBee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank god, somebody actually gets it. I sit here in Europe gritting my teeth at all the Americans flooding the web chatting cold-bloodedly about killing criminals or locking them away for life, with no apparent conception of the idea that people can be reformed or that punishment ought to be appropriate rather than exemplary if you want people to respect the law.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See that's the problem...going to prison isn't group therapy. It is punishment. You did something wrong, now you have to suffer the consequences. IT IS NOT ABOUT REHABILITATION. If it was we would send them to betty ford where they would have sessions everyday about what they did and why it was wrong. We don't. We lock them all together and keep them there (or try to) until either a board deems them fit for release (for good behavior, etc) or their sentence is up. Bottom line...its punishment, not therapy. Get. It. Through. Your. Head.

    2. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by R2.0 · · Score: 1, Troll

      "Thank god, somebody actually gets it. I sit here in Europe gritting my teeth at all the Americans flooding the web chatting cold-bloodedly about killing criminals or locking them away for life, with no apparent conception of the idea that people can be reformed or that punishment ought to be appropriate rather than exemplary if you want people to respect the law."

      Wrong story to post this on - he was in a minimum security prison for a few years, not the Federal Pen for life.

      And how exactly does one reform such a person? Maybe the same way smug self righteousnesses is cured?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Instead, we have criminals being jailed and released the next day because that way we don't have to spend so much money on prisons. Thus, in Spain we have attracted mafia from all the world, because the weather is good and our law was written by morons like the above poster, who think that serial killers and reoffending sexual assaulters will behave exemplarly after 10 years in jail.

    4. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Ummm...This guy was in a minimum security prison. He escaped during a conjugal visit. He then went on to kill his wife and an innocent child.

      And the point you take from this is that our prisons are barbaric? What the hell do use for prison in Europe? Eurodisney?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by m509272 · · Score: 1

      You don't get it. This scum bag was sent to MINIMUM security prison for TWO years (with good behavior, even less). It's practically like being locked up in your house. HE MAKES MONEY illegally annoying millions of people and now it was his turn to be annoyed. He chose his path.

    6. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      What the hell do use for prison in Europe? Eurodisney?

      Dude, have you even been there? The chair looks merciful by comparison.

    7. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are so much more refined than us Americans, that's the real reason for your post, isn't it? Give yourself a pat on the back.

      2 years minimum security for what he did is hardly exemplary.

    8. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, by focusing on incapacitation and punishment, they breed a culture that is so far from reality that it makes it *more* likely someone will recidivate. The favors, the enforced schedules, the "i don't give a shit" attitude of those who are there to maintain order. All of it makes for a terrible environment to put criminals in, especially for long periods of time; you want to breed more hardened criminals, that's the way to do it.

    9. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, then when they come out of prison as worse criminals than when they went in, we all pay the price.

    10. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's pretty much just as wrong as you are.

      It's about both...and some people call it justice, not vengeance, it depends on your point of view, which is your own, and not right or wrong. And there's also the little bit about stiffer penalties preventing the crimes from happening in the first place, so you don't have to rehab them.

      And what punishment is appropriate? If you intentionally kill someone, why do you deserve to live? If you rape someone, why should you be let free to do it again? Yet we don't kill every murderer, and rapists go free after some time. Some reform, but a large percentage do it again, despite rehabilitation programs in the prison system.

      Sure, some punishments are too harsh, but most are quite appropriate. Minor crimes involve a short amount of jail time, which is often cut even shorter due to lack of space in the jails across the country. There are much worse things to worry about than real criminals getting punished for real crimes. You should be worrying about all the government efforts to turn fairly innocent people into criminals. CC surveilance in the UK, internet snooping in other various contries, etc.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    11. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Debased+Manc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, death penalty's bad - just imagine what a state his family would be if they'd executed him.

      Oh wait...

    12. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Like so many in Europe respect the law. I hate to tell you this, but even your own governments don't respect the law.

      You know why so many European countries opposed the Iraq war? It was because every single country that opposed the war had contracts with Hussein's government to start pumping and processing oil as soon as the trade restrictions were lifted.

      Tell me, how do you explain the Paris riots if Europeans are so law-abiding?

      Oh, and the kiddie porn industry. And, the thriving child prostitution industries in Eastern European countries, the customers of which are primarily Western Europeans?

      Let's not forget drug use so massive that countries just give up on enforcing their laws.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    13. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by DriedClexler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rehabilitation is good ... for people who WANT to be rehabilitated.

      If you had a poor family background, child abuse ... yeah, you deserve rehab.

      If were fed bad ideas growing up about morality ... yeah, you deserve rehab.

      If you had a known, tested-for mental illness with a physical component ... yeah, you deserve rehab.

      The spam king was NONE of that. He grew up just fine. He knew exactly what he was doing, and he just didn't give a damn. His final acts while alive demonstrate exactly the values he held: he was more important that others and was willing to shove them aside at every opportunity to further his own interests, and he would do whatever it took to manipulate others into doing his bidding.

      What would rehabilitation do? Teach him that stealing is wrong? He knows that already. Teach him how he hurt others? He knows that. How to be a productive human being? He is. How to engage in mutually-beneficial economic transactions with others? He did it all the time. How to empathize? He's not interested, and he damn well had the chance to learn how to, every moment of his life.

      I can understand your dislike of those who reject prisoner rehab, but you must make room for the possibility that some are well beyond that.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    14. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget drug use so massive that countries just give up on enforcing their laws.

      I think this is a misguided effort, but I agree on most of the other points.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    15. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      And yet any story about the MPAA/RIAA suing people for huge sums of money attracts howls of outrage.

      Break the law by spamming and they want you locked up for life or killed; break the law by infringing copyright and they want either a slap on the wrist or copyright to be abolished.

    16. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that something is seriously, seriously wrong with the world when the majority of comments on here seem to be leaning in the "lock 'em up and throw away the key" direction. "Scum bag" "Monster" and all sorts of other words to dehumanize people. Think about that word for a second. De-humanize. That means to make a person seem somehow less than human and less worthy of dignity and respect. I guess it's easier to make people disappear for a while if they aren't really people, right?

      And then you wrote HE MAKES MONEY illegally annoying millions of people.

      Wow. Annoying people. Really? Really?? I am no fan of spam. And understand that it uses up a significant fraction of the bandwidth of mail servers. I get it. But -- that makes him scum? That makes him less than human?

      This is not the world I grew up in. We have become much, much harder. We've lost our humanity. We've lost our compassion. (It's ironic, really, since this is happening in a culture where the majority claims to follow a dead guy whose entire message was about compassion and forgiveness...)

      It's only getting worse. Thought crimes. People disappearing. Deciding to write off people once they make mistakes. It's only getting worse. And history shows that none of us are safe as we race headlong down this slope.

      I'm posting anonymously because I am, in fact, a coward. This is not my world anymore. This is insane.

    17. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is disturbing that you think someone pointing out a problem (there is) and pointing out a solution (there is) is smug and self-righteous. The Europeans have solved this problem. If people like us cannot admit there is a problem or that there is a solution (is it really that bad that someone else found the solution?), then there can be no hope for progress. May as well go back to living without the benefits on modern life, if we are not going to be a solutions-oriented people.

      Look up per-capita imprisonment rates for the U.S. if you still think there really is not a problem.

    18. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Most American want reform as well, it's just that the internet has given a stage to loud mouths, and the rest of us get drowned out.
      A prime example is Evolution.
      A small percentage of people dis like evolution, but it seems all religions do and all Americans.

      The fact there their is an anti-science and education movement going on right now doesn't help.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Rehabilitation is good ... for people who WANT to be rehabilitated.

      Good reply.

      I do understand the grandparents frustration though. There is a lot of pure brutality in some of the postings here on slashdot about prison and what prisoners "deserve" . And which seems to echo with how a large part of the prison system is run in the US. I can stand the occasional prison rape joke, even if I personally don't find them funny, but the problem is that they aren't just jokes any longer. Some people actually agree with it, considering it just punishment.

      Still, in this case we are dealing with a sociopath that would be near impossible to rehabilitate. even with extensive psychological care.

    20. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "It is disturbing that you think someone pointing out a problem (there is) and pointing out a solution (there is) is smug and self-righteous. The Europeans have solved this problem. If people like us cannot admit there is a problem or that there is a solution (is it really that bad that someone else found the solution?), then there can be no hope for progress. May as well go back to living without the benefits on modern life, if we are not going to be a solutions-oriented people.

      Look up per-capita imprisonment rates for the U.S. if you still think there really is not a problem."

      No, the Europeans haven't "solved this problem", because they don't HAVE the same problem. European nations tend to be culturally monolithic, with greater class stratification and higher welfare rates to keep the lower classes happy. For an example of how Europe deals with ethnic dissimilarity and the unsatisfied poor, look up the history of the Former Yugoslavia - that's the raw Europe under the veneer.

      Also, the OP was using a situation that has NOTHING to do with his post - The US has a problem with it's justice system, but that didn't cause him to kill his wife and kid. The prison system didn't make him do it; he was at a low security prison farm, and he didn't learn how to kill there.

      But hey, since the story had the words "US" and "Prison" in it, why not bring up irrelevant crap to score points? After all, it works (just like spam does).

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    21. Re:yes yes YES!!!!! by captaindirtnap · · Score: 1

      OR, it could just be the difference between breaking the law and not breaking the law?

  34. Re:Woo! by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

    Celebrating someone killing their family. Fuck you.

    I second that.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  35. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i celebrate the death of any filthy human.

  36. More guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there were even more guns in America. That's the only way I can think of reducing gun crime.

    1. Re:More guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there were even more guns in America. That's the only way I can think of reducing gun crime.

      I don't like guns either and I live in a country with strict regulations, but they're not the problem in this case.
      So what if he had no gun? Would only having a kitchen knife have prevented him from stabbing his wife and daughter?
      He might have, as most of these assholes, failed to kill himself with a knife, but I really doubt that an asshole like that cares all that much about the weapon he uses.
      Don't shift the blame.

    2. Re:More guns by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because without a gun there's no way this sociopath could have killed his wife and 3yo daughter.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  37. It seems moral bankruptcy is indivisible by phunctor · · Score: 1

    --
    phunctor

  38. U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article :

    "What a nightmare, and such a coward," U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said. "Davidson imposed the 'death penalty' on family members for his own crime."

  39. spammers... by zx-15 · · Score: 1

    Not to be cold and uncaring, but apparently what most people think about spammers is true.

  40. Tougher on crime by scubamage · · Score: 1

    Jwait til the parties responsible for his sentencing get an earful about it. The judge/da will both probably catch a ton of flack for putting a sociopath in a minimum security resort instead of a real prison. I see this potentially snowballing into tougher penalties for all spammers (good thing) but potentially worse penalties for other computer-related infractions as well (bad thing).

  41. A thousand words... by joedoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the comments here yesterday about this guy escaping from the can, I expressed surprise at the thuggish, almost murderous look the guy had in his recent mug shot.

    The guy's a spammer, I thought, but he looks like a serial killer.

    Now I feel really creepy about what's he's done to his family. I don't care about what happens to him; he should suffer for all eternity for killing his wife and child.

    I just don't understand the brain activity that would make him do this for 21 months in the can. He's white collar; he may have received parole after a few months for good behavior.

    Maybe it's misfiring synapses, but I just don't get it.

    --
    Joe Dougherty, Florida, USA
    The words I thought I brought, I left behind. So, never mind.
    1. Re:A thousand words... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Probable too much dopamine.
      Just a guess.

      http://biopsychiatry.com/violence.htm

      Sadly, I feel I must post this, becasue there is a certien loud mouth minority group that will will say stupid shit if I don't.

      Understanding the brain and how different chemicals cause people to behave in certain ways in no way excuses the actions of the person.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:A thousand words... by Phantom+Gremlin · · Score: 1

      I just don't understand the brain activity that would make him do this for 21 months in the can. He's white collar; he may have received parole after a few months for good behavior.

      I don't know where you're from, so you may not be familiar with US law. And /.'s display of posts really gets screwed up when there are so many comments. So maybe this has already been said, but anyway ...

      In the US federal prison system there is no longer such a thing as parole. You must serve about 80% or 90% of your sentence (you can get a little time off for good behavior). So, no, this guy could NOT get out after a few months of jail time.

      Still, the guy already served three months. Let's say he had another 15 months to go. That doesn't seem like an insurmountable hardship. But, clearly, spammers are quintessential sociopaths. I don't think the average person can easily understand their "brain activity".

  42. Re:Let me be the first to say by Mortice · · Score: 1

    Sadly, you're not the first. You are a cock though.

  43. Shame about the family by starry+starry+knight · · Score: 1

    Maybe he clenched a little over all the inbox jokes and cracked... now all our inboxes are a little safer.

  44. Business Opportunity for you dear friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dearest Friend,

    I represent the estate of deceased spam king EDWARD 'EDDIE' DAVIDSON and have the sum of $3,000,000 deposited in a safety deposit box in Lagos which I am prepared to offer you the sum of not less than 20% for simple transfer to your bank account.

    Please provide your bank details for immediate transfer. Also, please provide your daytime office telephone number, fax number and a copy of your passport so we may verify your true identity.

    Many blessings of the lord upon you and your family.

    DR MBOTO NGYANY

  45. Re:Let me be the first to say by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

    That's looking at the silver lining, I suppose. Makes you look like an arse, though.

    And, for the record, the child would not necessarily grow up to be like her father. Genetics only plays part of the role (environment playing a part as well).

  46. Posted yesterday by PadRacerExtreme · · Score: 1

    Yesterdays' story was updated already with this.

    --
    Just remember - if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off.
  47. Re:This is on all of us by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    Damn, no wonder this country's going down the tubes. You don't "appease the crazy", you institutionalize them so they can be treated. Once they're well, return them to society so they can lead productive lives.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  48. Re:Good by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
    There are many ways that sociopathic mental illness manifests itself. One way is through being an amoral spammer and murderer of your family members (and suicide).

    Another way is celebrating the death of innocent children in internet posts.

    Sick people both.

    --
    This space available.
  49. You're a shitsack. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yes, let's kill little children because they lived on ill-gotten gains.

    I could support some sort of punishment for the wife (not death thought!), but innocent children who didn't have any say in their dad being a a spamming scumbag?

    You may be the most misanthropic person on Slashdot, and that means a lot, especially coming from me. Even those VHE wackos don't hold a candle to you.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:You're a shitsack. by computerman413 · · Score: 1

      His wife did deserve to be arrested, as she helped him escape. However, the shootings were unwarranted.

  50. Call for respect by vawarayer · · Score: 1

    No matter if you agree with his acts or not... We're talking about killings. Please use a bit of respect.

    1. Re:Call for respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Wow man, the Spam King just killed himself and his family."

      "Wow, Awesome! Respect!"

      Is that what you mean?

    2. Re:Call for respect by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Seriously, why? Because people die? People die pointlessly at every moment, by the dozen. Somewhere on this planet. In a war, in "ethnic cleansings", from famine or diseases. Do we care? No. Why? Because we'd go nuts if we did care about all the suffering going on.

      Joking is human's way of dealing with something he cannot change that would kill him a little inside if he let it get too close. In atrocities like this, you can only do two things if you want to remain mentally sane, joke about it or ignore it altogether. The moment you think about it, you can only realize two things: First of all, it happened, happens and will happen again. And second, there's nothing you can do about it.

      That's why people joke about it. That's why the best jokes about governments always came from dictatorships. Germany's best political jokes are from thet 1940s, and the best political jokes until 1990 were out of Eastern Europe. That's how people defend mentally against horrible events they can't change.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. the tags on the previous story are pretty funny... by VMaN · · Score: 1

    From http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/24/1259238

    the summary reads:
    "
    Bobfrankly1 writes "The FBI, IRS, and the Rocky Mountain Safe Streets Task Force are helping the US Marshals search for escaped 'Spam King' Edward 'Eddie' Davidson. He apparently jumped in a car with his wife, changed clothes at home, and hasn't been seen since."

    Update: 07/24 22:20 GMT by T : It seems that Davidson has been found, victim of a murder-suicide which also left two others dead.
    "
    And the hilarious tags are: spam, wanteddeadoralive, preferablydead, oops, it (tagging beta)

  52. Get a grip by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    He removed himself and his spawn from the gene pool.

    You're saying a three year old kid is responsible for the crimes of their father?

    Cry if you like but he paid his debt to society back.

    If you're arguing that, what debt to society did the child have? Being related to him? Then every time we arrest a criminal, we should also arrest his family and charge them for his crime.

    In ancient Japan it was honorable to take one's life after the shame of defeat.

    And to kill one's children too? It's a slippery slope to claim that blood relation to a criminal is by itself a valid reason to punish someone for a crime they didn't commit.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  53. Re:Woo! by Trigun · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... seems every couple of weeks you hear about a drunk driver who whanged into some poor bastard's minivan and killed people, but walked away without a scratch on themselves.

    Ergo, evolution wants us to be drunks. You wouldn't happen to have a Ph.D., would you? Because I really could use a doctor's note.

  54. Socialist story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the internet is of socialism, always wrong...snapping a spammer is a great idea. No mercy. Congrats to the agents/whoever who came up with "spam king". Excellent. to call him a real pansy is justified. King my ass. I wonder what the next "act" will be. I hope its well written and snaps a few more tards with computers...Remeber, all cars suck if you see them advertised on the net, real world over there ---------->
      Oh no. did I just anti-spam spam. Who is the anti-spam spam king?

  55. The wife by HEbGb · · Score: 1

    That's some "thank you" to the wife for helping him escape! Ungrateful SOB.

    1. Re:The wife by geekoid · · Score: 1

      TO make a clean escape, you always have to kill the people that aid you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. Re:Good by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

    Do you think they're equally sick? Because as far as I can see one group aren't actually harming anyone.

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  57. horrible by jonfr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is horrible. He kills his family because he has to go to jail.

  58. Possession by bdasd5 · · Score: 1

    Hans! Get out of this body!

  59. unstable or knew what was coming by Monoman · · Score: 1

    From another article on the subject "Assistant U.S. Attorney Tim Neff said Davidson had become a "consultant" to the FBI investigating other spammers."

    This guy may have been nutso or crossed the wrong folks in his line of work.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  60. Re:This is on all of us by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Funny

    So is that why you Americans re-elected Bush? :D

    *twists open the throttle on the Karmacycle* WEEEE!!!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  61. You know any spammers? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    If so please turn them into the authorities, or better yet an angry mob of geeks.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  62. Mafia ties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of spammers are involved in organized crime. See also the spammer that scared BlueFrog out of business with their ties. Not all of them though.

    Not that it excuses him, but I'd look into this further. Murder suicide over a spam conviction? Something just isn't right.. there's more to it.

    1. Re:Mafia ties by boarder · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was thinking when I read the blurb. I've been told by numerous Russian friends that you do NOT mess with the Russian mafia under any circumstances... they are the most ruthless people you'll ever meet. And, like you said, spam is generally controlled by the mafia.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
  63. Okay, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You may not judge, but murder is NEVER okay. Delivering death? Maybe. But not murder.

  64. Spammers in real life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are the same bastards than in electronic one. Sad for the family.

  65. Who was it that wanted... by AioKits · · Score: 1

    Who was it that wanted this guy to get the death penalty again? Well, he got it and it only cost the lives of his family. Hope you're happy.

    While I agree this guy was scum, annoying and probably the largest weasel in existence, I still can't bring myself to believe that he's done anything worthy of terminating life. Maybe I'm just soft on crime.

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Who was it that wanted... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I still can't bring myself to believe that he's done anything worthy of terminating life."

      He died as he lived: not giving a damn about what you think.

    2. Re:Who was it that wanted... by AioKits · · Score: 1

      He died as he lived: not giving a damn about what you think.

      If I was going to make this statement with the hopes of hearing his opinion on my thoughts, I probably would have timed it so he was alive when the statement was made. Unless... Your him back from the grave... Zombie!!!

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    3. Re:Who was it that wanted... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      If he had got the death penalty, or even put in a prison with any semblance of security, two other people might not be dead now.

  66. Re:Good by archont · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This just goes to show what kind of people spammers are. I only regret he died so quick. There are few people I hate as much as spammers. Rapists can't control their immediate desires, drunken drivers commit crime out of stupidity. Racists are intolerant because that's often what they've been taught and child molesters admit they don't know why they're doing it. But people like this man do. They know perfectly well what they're doing. They coldly and deliberately capitalize on the very minimal amount of trust they are given. They abuse a system for their own greed. And they only do so safe behind the anonimity of the internet. Even thieves have to look their victims in the eyes and make an effort. They risk being caught - spammers are too cowardly to deal with that risk, and too cowardly to deal with the consequences of their actions. Spammers should be dealt with nothing else than extreme prejudice. Those are the kind of people who would feel just fine about devastating society for their own gain, if only they'd have initiative. Every time I read about something bad happening to a spammer I feel a little happier inside.

  67. huh. by uxbn_kuribo · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Chris Benoit was in the spam business. I can't wait to see if FOX News links spamming with brain damage.

    --
    No portion of this post may be rebroadcast without the express, written consent of Major League Baseball.
  68. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you asshole

  69. Grateful words to him... by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    Pisser. Coward. Chicken. Low-end. F**ker.

    You deserve my darwin award for the year. Maybe even for the century, you yellow.

  70. Re:Woo! by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, because in modern America, we're still responsible for the missteps of our parents. That child had NO reason to be killed.

  71. Less Spam Kings by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Maybe spam king junior will grow up to find a different path in life than junking up my email inbox.

  72. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can you make sure someone posts a notice when *you* die? I'd like to celebrate *that*.

    Pussy.

  73. A king, not THE king by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The positive news of the story (the spam king is gone for good) pales in the shadow of this tragedy.

    Except that there are many, many, more spam kings around. This guy was just one fish in a large, toxic pond. While the world is better off with fewer spam kings, the loss of one of them is statistically insignificant.

    Add that to the fact that he took his wife and child out with him, and there is almost no real silver lining to this story.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  74. Re:Woo! by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Go fuck yourself. That 'humor' is irresponsible, reprehensible, and, above all, unfunny.

  75. Just reading the comments here changed my thoughts by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Initially, I was considering "taking back" my previous suggestions that a death penalty be imposed for hardcore spammers. I had gone into great detail about my reasoning behind the notion, but it could easily be summed up by a conclusion that people who go through the extreme measures that spammer go through to circumvent various security measures, hack on private users' PCs to create botnets, and have generally caused the vast majority of the crap that endangers the systems and services around the planet (some of which are 'critical' and/or sensitive in nature) are nothing short of antisocial psychopaths and should be considered dangerous. People have commented that my conclusions are extreme, but I have to disagree. You have to consider what it takes (or what has to be missing) for a person to work so hard to cause so much damage and care so little about it. It's nothing the average 'business man on the street' would be capable of doing even if he were skilled enough to pull it off. It is the characteristics that enable the behavior of a spammer that mark him as an antisocial psychopath.

    But as I was saying, I was considering retracting my previous suggestions because now that I see in the news a story of an actual dead spammer, I feel a bit sickened. And not sickened by the additional death and injury exclusively, but by the situation as a whole, leaving me uncertain that I would want spammers put to death. Truthfully, I'm still not sure, and am more certain that it was simply anger and frustration over the whole problem of spam to begin with. But one thing I am more certain about than ever before:

    Spammers are DANGEROUS people.

    The characteristics that indicate they have no moral boundaries to commit crimes, elude and evade security measures, hack into private computer systems and create networks of compromised computer systems used to create hell on a global scale, are the same characteristics of mass murderers. Before you disagree with me on this point, break it down for yourself. If you see major differences between the mentalities of the two (spammers and mass murderers) please detail them here. I'm not afraid of being wrong. I just don't think I am in this case.

  76. Re:Good by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    It's sad that the woman died, but it really sounds to me like it's the result of her own poor decisions. She was the one driving the car. She was the one that made the choice to aid in his escape. Had she not made that poor choice, she'd be alive.

    You must realize, though, that her "punishment" for helping him escape was far beyond the scope of her crime. I seriously doubt she could have possibly expected her husband to kill her and her child.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  77. Re:Good by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

    A 29 year old woman isn't quite middle aged. :/

  78. Relax, it's just Karma whoring by ClientNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    No worries, he's just doing the usual "find a way to blame the USA and get free Karma" bit.

    I've found that reading the news a few hours later in the day helps with this. The kiddies on the US-bashing bandwagon who mod-up comments like his tend to be among the first on Slashdot; if you wait a while, the grown-ups (who have actual jobs and don't roll in until lunchtime) will mod them back down a bit.

    (He says at 8:54 AM local... :-D)

    1. Re:Relax, it's just Karma whoring by LordKaT · · Score: 1

      No it's not karma whoring. Read the rest of my posts.

      I'm trolling you :D

    2. Re:Relax, it's just Karma whoring by ClientNine · · Score: 1

      No it's not karma whoring. Read the rest of my posts.

      I'm trolling you :D

      Yeah, but the mods don't get that. They modded up your troll comment as insightful, and marked down me pointing it out as a troll.

      Gotta love slashdot.

      Doesn't matter what the content is-- point is you said something critical of the US, so it's insightful; I said something critical of your post, so it's a troll.

  79. Re:Woo! by BVis · · Score: 1

    I agree. I know programmers/IT types/Slashdot readers are a cynical lot, but I don't really think this is the time or place to make flippant jokes about irresponsible behavior. Pesty thing, that first amendment; you've got to take the good with the bad.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  80. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dead child, bad all the way around. potential lost. the wife? meh. she bailed him out. she knew him. roll the dice, pay the price.

    as it were.

  81. Re:Good by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

    You must realize, though, that her "punishment" for helping him escape was far beyond the scope of her crime. I seriously doubt she could have possibly expected her husband to kill her and her child.

    It doesn't matter. When you make poor choices and put yourself, and your family for that matter, in positions like that - you run the risk of bad things happening. It's a sad thing that she died, but given her poor choice it's not surprising.

  82. narcissism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    concern for self is so overwhelming, that it transgresses even the desire to live

    and murdering a 3 year old child? of yours? your wife?

    "if i can't have them, no one can"

    selfishness to the umpteenth degree. no concern but for self, like a psychological black hole

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:narcissism by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      selfishness to the umpteenth degree. no concern but for self, like a psychological black hole

      Isn't that the primary defining characteristic of a sociopath, after all?

  83. Re:Woo! by RobBebop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a lot to be said of the value of human life. It is priceless. It is a gift.

    But a man who would earn his fortune in the despicable business of Spam? That is not a gift.

    And the woman would would choose such a man as her partner? Unless she had no idea what his business was, she isn't innocent either.

    Women (and men) need to learn to identify certain undesirable traits in the partners they choose. It is a choice to be with a criminal (yes, Spam is a crime), and there should be less sympathy for somebody who took that risk.

    I am not saying the wife deserved it. I am just saying she knew what kind of relationship she was getting into when she started it.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  84. The right metaphor for the right time by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, "Flying Spaghetti Monster damn it!" doesn't really roll off the tongue that well, plus he's not as much into fire and damnation. So, you know, it would end up a bit on par with, "Dear Enemy, I curse you and hope something slightly unpleasant happens to you. Like an onion falling on your head."

    And the Invisible Pink Unicorn is too cute to be taken seriously when it comes to damning, so that one's out of the question too.

    Tooth fairy? I suppose she could get scary if you speak with your head under your pillow, but a damnation that depends on that is kinda unreliable.

    Santa Claus? What's he going to do if he damns you? Bring you a lump of coal? With the prices of energy lately, being damned by Santa might actually be a blessing these days, if you know what I mean.

    So, you know, as non-existent personifications go, the Christian god wins hands down. Now _that_ guy can damn properly. It still doesn't mean we _believe_ in him, but he's the right non-existent guy for the job.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by operagost · · Score: 1

      Your entire post isn't very funny because it misses the whole irony of an atheist invoking the name of a nonexistent being. A joke about how "Oh my Dawkins!" or "Charles R. Darwin!" would be the most appropriate for an atheist would be much more entertaining.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by digitig · · Score: 1

      And the Invisible Pink Unicorn is too cute to be taken seriously when it comes to damning, so that one's out of the question too.

      Although I find that "Go spin on the IPU's horn" has a certain allegorical and surreal appeal to it...

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    3. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Charles Darwin are you a fucking retard.

    4. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A joke about how "Oh my Dawkins!" or "Charles R. Darwin!" would be the most appropriate for an atheist would be much more entertaining.

      By Darwin, I think we've found our expletive for this case!

      (The guy did, after all, not only remove himself from the gene pool, he also terminated his offspring before they reached breeding age. If that's not Darwinning oneself, I don't know what is :)

    5. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Moraelin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nah, Darwin is no good for a damning. SRSLY. Evolution takes something like 10,000 generations to do anything at all. So, you know, hoping that evolution damns something or someone, is somewhat _lacking_ in short-time motivation and satisfaction. How's evolution going to damn someone? Make sure that his/her descendants devolve into Orcs? Some people aren't even deterred by what smoking will do to them in 20 years, what makes you think they'd take a damnation seriously that might have an effect in 200,000 years?

      Plus it's a bit like damning the wrong person. I can't say I feel any kind of satisfaction at the fact that his kids got shot. Au contraire? So why would it be any satisfaction to contemplate evolution damning his grand-grand-grand-[...]-grand-grandson?

      So, nah, Darwin is no good for damning.

      You might be able to squeeze, say, Schroedinger into a very nerdy curse, or maybe Descartes, but not Darwin ;)

      But more seriously (ok, ok, not really;) yes, so we atheists somethimes have to reach for expressions that just happen to carry a certain meaning. Even it ends up using non-existent people for certain jobs. Like my imaginary cat, here. But I digress. Otherwise there would be a bunch of things and meanings we can't say as effectively and/or conveying the same meaning.

      Plus, we'd have noone to talk to during sex. I mean, "Oh, Dawkins, I'm coming!" might get the missus _seriously_ worried. By the time you finished explaining who Dawkins is and why you shout his name during sex, the mood is all gone, lemme tell ya ;)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    6. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And the Invisible Pink Unicorn is too cute to be taken seriously when it comes to damning, so that one's out of the question too.

      Oh yeah, you'll think that right up to the moment you get impaled on his invisible pink horn!

      It's the best kind of curse -- the kind that has your enemy laughing right up to the moment of their comeuppance!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      So, you know, as non-existent personifications go, the Christian god wins hands down. Now _that_ guy can damn properly. It still doesn't mean we _believe_ in him, but he's the right non-existent guy for the job.

      Honestly, I'd have to go with "The bolt of Tash falls from above!"

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by HoppQ · · Score: 1

      Belgium, man, Belgium!

      --
      My sig will be released in 2015 third quarter. Rating pending.
    9. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Santa Claus? What's he going to do if he damns you? Bring you a lump of coal?

      What, you haven't seen Die Soldaten?

    10. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, Darwin is no good for a damning. SRSLY. Evolution takes something like 10,000 generations to do anything at all.

      Wow, so it must take a lot of faith to believe in something you'll never see.

      What religious nutjobs those Darwinists are!

    11. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK... but what about the plastic cock?

    12. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by alien9 · · Score: 1

      christ, teeth fairy or easter bunny: clear scams. Indeed, Santa is real, I saw the bastard at the mall.

    13. Re:The right metaphor for the right time by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      Santa Claus? What's he going to do if he damns you? Bring you a lump of coal? With the prices of energy lately, being damned by Santa might actually be a blessing these days, if you know what I mean.

      Hey, man, don't mess with the Krampus!

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  85. guess that proves... by pooberry · · Score: 1

    I guess that proves what kind of person it takes to make a career out of spamming. I always knew spammers were assholes, but now there's solid evidence.

  86. Re:I can only blame the US government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. It's a financial burden that is imposed, so a financial fine should be imposed in return.

    Too bad I have to post this anonymously for fear of being modded down by zealots.

  87. Vicious Cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When one lives without ethics, it is not surprising that they will die without honor.

  88. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we need *less* people on this earth that act like you just did."

    Fewer.

  89. Sad joke comming your way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Dont't look behind you now, but there's a huge spider

    1. Re:Sad joke comming your way by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      ...But is it red?

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  90. How sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that his wife paid for helping her husband with her life, and possibly watched him kill their child.

    How sadder still that an innocent child who couldn't control who he/she got for parents suffered at their hands, and quite probably spent their last seconds on earth wondering why daddy hurt mommy.

  91. Re:beware of the SpamAssassin power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spam kills

    His SpamAssassin Rules had to be wrong

  92. Re:Good by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Do you think they're equally sick? Because as far as I can see one group aren't actually harming anyone.

    Dubious argumentative technique. He didn't say that they were, and it doesn't justify "celebrating the death of innocent children", which may not "harm" anyone in itself, but demonstrates an underlying sociopathic mentality that probably goes further.

    Or perhaps not, if the latter group are the type of weasels who only spout off distasteful bullshit like this behind the security of a keyboard and Internet connection.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  93. Didnt even know it was a domain... by ForCripeSake · · Score: 1

    Hmm...this would explain why I started getting ads for stocks, jewelry, and perfume from Ed@FieryBowels.hell

  94. Psychopaths by mlwmohawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A spammer, most salesman, most cops, most all lawyers, in fact, anyone who's living involves taking advantage of another human being is, on some level, a psychopath.

    Does this surprise me? No. Am I sad for the family, you bet.

    We as a society celebrate monetary success above all. That is what psychopaths are best at.

    Just remember the words of Chief Seattle: "We are all poor, because we are all honest."

    1. Re:Psychopaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychopaths are people who use manipulation, violence and intimidation to control others and satisfy selfish needs. However, they have a chronic inability to feel guilt, remorse or anxiety about any of their actions.

      Police, salesmen, lawyers and other professions that use legal coercion to force people to comply with societal rules will attract psychopaths for that reason.

      However, only a small percentage in these professions is a psychopath. Most professionals in these groups suffer from depression and guilt and remorse...which is why there is such high job dissatisfaction.

    2. Re:Psychopaths by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

      Doing what's good for me at the expense of others? What a concept.
      I guess you're saying we're all psychopaths.

      --
      They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
    3. Re:Psychopaths by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot, Did yo even think about what you wrote at all?

      First, spamming doesn't take advantage of anybody, neither do police officers, sales people, or attorneys.

      Sure people in those profession do, but it's nt a profession thing.

      In fact, can you name 1 group that is devoid or people that take advantage of others?

      What do you do?

      "That is what psychopaths are best at."
      what? That's not correct at all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Psychopaths by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot, Did yo even think about what you wrote at all?

      Like that sentence will make someone take you seriously.

      First, spamming doesn't take advantage of anybody,

      Seriously? Who pays for the wasted bandwidth of spam? Do you really think those adds are for reputable products?

      Rant all you want. While some hyperbole is involved with most all slashdot posts, not so much as you protest, I think in this one.

    5. Re:Psychopaths by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Psychopaths are people who use manipulation, violence and intimidation to control others and satisfy selfish needs. However, they have a chronic inability to feel guilt, remorse or anxiety about any of their actions.

      Yes.

      However, only a small percentage in these professions is a psychopath. Most professionals in these groups suffer from depression and guilt and remorse...which is why there is such high job dissatisfaction.

      Know many cops? Know many lawyers? Have you ever seen cops "high five" for smashing a kids face into the ground? Have you ever seen lawyers gloat over threatening a person with a law suit just to shut him up and laugh about it?

      I have, and if you knew how many sociopaths and psychopaths are in these fields you'd be scared shitless. Trust me, cops and lawyers are not your friends.

    6. Re:Psychopaths by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Trust me, cops and lawyers are not your friends.

      So all those people I met in law school and still socialize aren't my friends? That's kind of depressing, maybe I should notify them about that.

    7. Re:Psychopaths by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1


      So all those people I met in law school and still socialize aren't my friends? That's kind of depressing, maybe I should notify them about that.

      I would bet that they are not. Invite them over, say you have a case of cold beer, and say "bring a paint brush, we're painting." A "friend" would absolutely be there. Will your lawyer friends? Cops? Huh! I doubt it.
       

  95. My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is, he was poking the teenager, the baby was his, and this was somehow known to the law, and they were about to charge him as a sex offender.

  96. Re:Woo! by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative

    We aren't celebrating that he killed his family, if anything we're celebrating he killed himself, but most of us probably just joke about it.

  97. Spammers by pleasegetreal · · Score: 0

    I can't say I'm surprised that a major league spammer is also a demented psychopath. Is anyone truly surprised?

  98. Re:Let me be the first to say by skulgnome · · Score: 1

    This may be. I definitely agree with the "mostly made" answer to all "born or made?" type issues.

    In any case it appears that I rejoiced prematurely: it seems he only wounded his other daughter, and a surviving infant was recovered from their car. Still, even they wouldn't have been too high a price to pay for one dead spammer.

    (also, I'm rated "Troll"? are the moderators on their collective period or something, or are they suffering from the five geek social fallacies?)

  99. Chill ppl by huit · · Score: 1

    A guy annoys people. The government restrict his freedom for 2 years for doing so. He freaks out and escapes, kills those around him and then himself. My conjecture that he freaked out, but this is the only way I can percieve the case when his previous crime was simply annoying ppl and he precipitously committed murder-suicide. Having seen it all laid out I have sympathy for the man and his family. I also feel angry that diverse people are treated to a common punishment (imprisonment) for such a wide range of socially unnaceptable behaviour.

  100. Re:Good by mooreti1 · · Score: 1

    Mod you down? Get some help, man, as well as a heart and brain from the Wiz. Moron.

    --
    Oh, for the days when sig's didn't have to be cute...hey, wait a sec.
  101. Double standard? by holiggan · · Score: 1
    So... Let's see if I understand it correctly: if a teenager downloads a couple of Britney Spears albums (or as much music as he can get his hands on), "it's all right", "he didn't actually hurt no one", "downloading is not theft", "everybody does it", and so on.

    On the other hand, if a guy sends email messages (granted, we are talking about an awesomely huge number of messages, but still they are just messages), people start calling for his head, "death to all spammers" and stuff? I don't get it. Really.

    In what way is spam diferent from downloading stuff from the net? I mean, "moraly", if you want. Spam is just email messages. Plain and simple. Zeros and ones. The guy didn't steal anything, he didn't harm anyone. What, spam clutters your mailbox and prevents you from finding those really important emails full with PPTs with naked chicks? Oh, ok, them...

    I think that things are getting out of hand on the matter of punishing spam. Remember that for the politicians, there ain't much diference between a spammer and a downloader ("they both are turning our internet on a terrible place for our children!!"), so one of these days, the way things are evolving, they might take the next logical step and actualy punish downloaders the way they punish spammers.

    I mean, come on! If the guy was blackmailing someone, or doing actual harm to IT infrastructures, that's one thing. But in terms of "damaging" the infrastructures with the load that spam generates, he's no diferent from the emulers and torrenters out there.

    --
    "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
    1. Re:Double standard? by The+Assistant · · Score: 1
      I'll focus on the comment:

      The guy didn't steal anything, he didn't harm anyone. What, spam clutters your mailbox and prevents you from finding those really important emails full with PPTs with naked chicks? Oh, ok, them...

      You're saying this doesn't hurt anyone? By sending out massive amounts of email, you are adversely affecting network throughput. This, in turn, may cost a business additional money to pay for a better service, costlier equipment, or to decide not to spend the extra money. Either of these choices may cause the business to experience a financial hardship, which then leads to the failure of that business. No harm?

      What about the content of those emails? What if the content of one or more of those emails contains a link to a website with malware? An unknowning recipient thinks that the idea sounds good, clicks on the link, and then ends up with the results of that malware. They end up either paying someone to fix the problem, give up and toss the internet experience, go buy a new computer, or some other option that costs one way or another.

    2. Re:Double standard? by holiggan · · Score: 1
      I'll edit your comment so I can show youo what I mean:

      You're saying this doesn't hurt anyone? By distributing massive files using P2P, you are adversely affecting network throughput. This, in turn, may cost a business additional money to pay for a better service, costlier equipment, or to decide not to spend the extra money. Either of these choices may cause the business to experience a financial hardship, which then leads to the failure of that business. No harm?

      What about the content of those files? What if the content of one or more of those files contains malware/virus? An unknowning user thinks that the lasted flick at the theaters is a good target for downloading, fires up his torrent/emule client, downloads it, tries to open it, and then ends up with the results of that malware. They end up either paying someone to fix the problem, give up and toss the internet experience, go buy a new computer, or some other option that costs one way or another.

      See? If we think about it, P2P and spam are technically "siblings". Ok, you might say that P2P is not just used for piracy, there are legitimate uses for P2P, etc. Well, there are legitimate uses for bulk messaging as well, and as long as either is done in a law abiding way, things should go smoothly.

      Notice that I'm not condoning spam (or P2P), it's just that if we start to go down the slipery-slope, we might end up with legislation banning any activity on the internet that evolves contacting more than 2 hosts at the same time. Hey, better yet, we might end up with legislation that "bans" people from having internet access... oh wait, they're doing it already in France... and UK is next.

      --
      "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
  102. Re:Good by Amisinthe · · Score: 1

    we need less people on this earth that act like you just did.

    Would you make the same comment to the spam king? If so, you're kind of agreeing with the person you responded to without intending to.

  103. Re:Good by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    It really makes you wish there was a (-1, Go Back To Fark.com) moderation, eh?

  104. All this proves... by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

    is that this waste of human flesh should have been put down at birth. What a douche.....not just for being a spammer but also for being an arse-hat and taking out his innocent family along with him. There cannot be enough suffering of this arse to make it right. /he is nothing but a worthless sniveling coward

    --
    . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
  105. death preferable to 21 months? by tsstahl · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I could do 21 months standing on my head amidst a bed of glass. 700k fine to the IRS? Pfft, try and collect it.

    Why couldn't the whack job bass turd start with the barrel at his own head first.

  106. Is it surprising that spammers are sociopaths? by rcasha2 · · Score: 0

    Is it surprising that spammers are sociopaths?

  107. WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. It's not like he was going away for life in a super-max prison or something like that, for being a serial killer. The stupid bastard was going away for less than two years for being a scammer and a spammer! Not worth taking your own life, LET ALONE THE LIFE OF A CHILD AND YOUR WIFE! I hope he's gone to The Special Hell for this.

    Oh, and BTW: Shame on you if you're making jokes about this. This has gone from being an amusing triumph of justice over one of the nastiest spammers on the planet, to a true tragedy culminating in the murders of innocents. It's nothing to be joking about, and it's NOT FUNNY. Mod me down all you like for chastising, I really don't care.

    1. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when you think about it, getting all bent out of shape about someone that you essentially know nothing about is kind of silly as well. To me, this guy was a nutjob, end of story. Yeah you've got the headline and the child killing. People die in horrific ways every day. Take a glance at Iraq. I hope somebody is brave enough to crack jokes when I die.

    2. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an asshole is genetic, so he was doing god's work by taking himself and his little shit out of the gene-pool.

    3. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you really held the conviction of your belief in that statement, then you wouldn't hide behind "Anonymous Coward", would you -- any of you who would post such things as "Anonymous Coward". :p

    4. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Laughing at evil is one way to reduce its power:
      "The Devil, the proud spirit, cannot endure to be mocked." - St. Thomas More

    5. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Forgive me, but in the context of your comment, your signature is hilarious.

      (and I don't think this is particularly funny, but hundreds of thousands of people died yesterday. Thousands of those deaths were surely tragic. I refuse to mourn the ones I notice more than the ones I don't)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst, maybe you should take your sig a little more seriously or change it.

    7. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      I think he is being sarcastic about not making jokes. Unless there is some other reference to the "the special hell" than Firefly I am unaware of.

    8. Re:WHAT... THE... FUCK!!!?! by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 0, Troll
      Point taken about the sig. ;-)

      Don't get me wrong though: it's not like I'm lighting candles every day for all the people in the world that die in some tragic, senseless way -- but I will feel sadness if reminded of the fact. If this spammer had just offed himself, I'd be the first one to say "good riddance!"; but he took some other lives down with him, and making jokes about the whole thing is tasteless at best.

  108. Time to change the sentancing limits/requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not usually a fan of the death penalty, but I'm beginning to think that making an exception for spammers (if just as a preemptive measure) mightn't be that bad an idea.

  109. As a father of four by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 0, Redundant

    let me be the first to call him a FUCKING COWARD!!! No ponies. What monster can kill a three year. There is NO REASON ON EARTH!

    Sorry we just buried a 2 month old nephew that doctors here in Phoenix gave up on, he was supposed to be still born but the little champ held on for 9 weeks to the day.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  110. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That child had NO reason to be killed.

    I'm telling the truth at grave risk to myself.

    The family was killed by an anti-spammer (SpamAssassin V6.66) from the future. The AI in the antonymous systems detected the Spam Gene in both parents meaning they both had to be /dev/null'd before they could reproduce again. A sweep of the car indicated the daughter carried the gene from both parents. That, unfortunately, sealed her fate.

    The teenager was not a carrier but hit by shrapnel. Were she a carrier SA V6.66 would have also terminated her processes.

    Hmm I smell ozone.. there's a bright light in my backyard.... Oh shit...

  111. Re:Woo! by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

    if anything we're celebrating he killed himself, but most of us probably just joke about it.

    I'm sorry that you have so little value for a human life. Please don't misunderstand; I'm pro death penalty. However, his crimes certainly did not warrant his death let alone his families lives. In my opinion, anyone that celebrates his death ignores his final crime and should be held in the utmost contempt.

  112. Spam is nothing... by Pecisk · · Score: 1

    ...comparing to taking innocent people's lifes. Even if they are your family. Especially if it is your family.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  113. As a father of zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me say thanks for contributing to the overpopulation problem, asshole. Four is bad enough, but you're still trying to pop out more? It's only a shame that the doctors didn't tie your wife's tubes when they gave up on your kid.

    1. Re:As a father of zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're a complete (and illiterate) idiot. BTW, you may also wish to look up the word "nephew".

    2. Re:As a father of zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and I'll name him after you, second though Limp Dick Liberal Prick is just too long. Here's hoping you never darken a child's life jackass

    3. Re:As a father of zero by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

      So your an advocate of child murder? Or just an Anonymous coward who parents ignored too often? Honestly they really do hate you but don't mention I said so.

      Nephew From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Nephew is a term referring to the son of one's sibling. Sons of siblings-in-law are also informally referred to as nephews, even though there is no blood relation. The word nephew is derived from the French word neveu.[1]

      * Nephew = son of your sister or brother.
      * Niece = daughter of your sister or brother.
      * Nephew(-in-law) = son of your sister-in-law or brother-in-law.
      * Niece(-in-law) = daughter of your sister-in-law or brother-in-law.

      * For details of this and other family relationships, see the entry at cousin.

      OK Asshole?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  114. Did he do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if someone else saw him and shot, but was a bad aim and accidentally killed the girl and the mother as well... after all if your going to kill your whole family why not kill the baby, and the other girl too?

    Its worrying that nobody questions the reported "facts".

  115. Murder suicide by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's my opinion that the people who commit murder/suicides are doing it in the wrong order. They should commit the suicide first.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  116. Possible warped view of protection by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

    Given how closely tied spam is to organized crime, he could have felt that his trouble with the law may have brought retaliation upon his family and that killing them was somehow his warped way to protect them from people he felt may come after them.

    Again, this in no way justifies his actions. Just trying to understand how someone could get into such a warped mental state.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  117. Something wrong with this story by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    Sure the guys was a little looney in noggin - but it's one thing to send some emails and another to kill people. If there were more people there then why are they not dead? Doesn't smell like team spirit.

  118. Good Spam filter by gilbertopb · · Score: 1

    Someone know what anti-spam software was used to kill the bastard? Of course, someone missed to configure: Tools=> Options=> Innocents in Family not included.

    --
    Information technology means all information.
  119. Re:Let me be the first to say by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

    My guess would be that you were modded a troll because you rejoiced over the fact that a guy had killed (or attempted to kill) his kids.

    No matter what you think about nature vs. nurture, killing kids is definitely not something to rejoice about in any circumstance and will most definitely get you modded as a troll.

  120. Have you ever been in the army? by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, there may be more than you wrote there, I wouldn't know, never been to jail. But what you do write, is no worse than army life anywhere in the world. And some even use conscription to inflict it on almost every male. Not that I defend conscription or anything, but it's not living hell either.

    Dorm living with fully grown men. These "dorms" are sometimes the size of a gymnasium. A gymnasium full of grown men. Fully grown, under enormous stress, living in close quarters. Honestly, you'd have much less stress living in a car.

    A lot of barracks out there pack a lot of grown men in a large confined space. Maybe not gym sized, but nevertheless. And they're under stress. Tough shit, learn to cope.

    Frankly, I'm not exactly an extrovert myself, but I really don't get the "OMG, it's a big place with lots of men" mentality. So was the army, so is the office, etc. Most of human history happened that way. Whether you'd be packed with a lot of agricultural workers in little more than a big barn, or packed in a small house together with your extended family, or as a soldier in a longship/tent/barrack with at _least_ 8 or 10 members of your squad/decuria/watchamacallit. Go back to prehistory, and you'd be sleep with a lot of men, women and children in the confined space of a cave. It may seem like the end of the world if you spend your life in a basement trying to avoid contact with other humans, but it's not. Most humans are actually made to be social people. Being in a crowd won't kill you.

    2 minute showers, enforced.

    Well, the navy manages to live on even more inconvenient showers, to conserve water. It's giving up a bit of comfort, no doubt, but it's not the end of the world.

    Scheduled bathroom times. Gotta shit? Hold it until shit time, which is usually at the start of the day and the end.

    Ever pulled guard duty in the army? You're supposed to stand there and not desert your post until your time is up. This also means you can't go to the bathroom whenever you wish.

    Forced labor. They don't even bother matching you up with work from your skillset. Too fat? Go work in the yard. Too stupid to know how to kill someone with a knife? Kitchen work.

    Well, tough shit, sherlock. Noone asked me if my aspirations or skill set were perfectly matched to running with an assault rifle up hill, or operating a big loud AA gun. Nor if, say, cleaning the floor is against my religion.

    Plus, that's the story of most people's lives even outside prison. You're rarely in a position to get your ideal dream job, or most people's work day would consist of getting blowjobs and surfing for porn. Instead most people get what's available. The guy behind the counter at the gas station or the one frying your burgers at McDonalds also aren't really paired to the best match for their aspirations and skills.

    And again, if you look at human history, it used to be even worse.

    Basically, I don't know. If you'd be telling me that there's something inherently humiliating or inhuman about the work they're asked to do, ok, I might even show some sympathy. But, basically, OMG, they're like Army Lite, with actually less stress and effort than the real Army... heh... dunno, fails to move me much.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trash logic. First of all, joining the army is voluntary, right? That makes a hell of a difference. Hopefully the people who volunteer know what they are getting into and are motivated enough to stand it. Quite probably a lot of criminals do not make such deliberate considerations, and fuck the clichés a about heat and kitchen and so on.

      Second reason it's crap thinking is that just because something else is in a comparable way, doesn't mean it's a *good* way. So *even* if life in the army is living in a hell hole and you *didn't* make an informed choice to join, (conscript or whatever) that's does NOT per se mean it *has* to be like that.

      (I wonder why I cared about this, it's not like I'm going to get any kind of intelligent reply anyway. :/ )

    2. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      Shoot, we used to think being in prison would be a lot nicer than what we had.

      Only two guys to a room and your own head. Color TV. No forced marches, drill, an hour for recess every day. Sounds like cake compared to what we had.

    3. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      And again, if you look at human history, it used to be even worse.

      So did pretty much every damn thing. Just sayin'.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    4. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me point out that a criminal is still a citizen of the US regardless of the crime, and is entitled to basic rights. It can be reasonably argued that that is cruel and unusual punishment. Being in a foriegn country doesn't elicit you getting US rights, let alone being a US Soldier. You lose citizen rights when you join the army, and thats why a general can send you to be a meat sheild if they don't like your face. You might be right though. What you describe is not so much punishment, so much as part of being a killing machine. Hmmm, I wonder why the US penal system turns people into hardened criminals.

    5. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I'm not exactly an extrovert myself, but I really don't get the "OMG, it's a big place with lots of men" mentality.

      Oh, I see - because you don't have a problem with it, no one else should. Frankly I'd like a cute girl to "peg" me with a strap-on, so if a cute girl comes up and does that to you - you've no reason to complain.

    6. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Not that I defend conscription or anything, but it's not living hell either.

      On the contrary: it is living hell if you're forced into it.

      You talk about how this stuff is no different from what goes on in the navy or the army. In case you haven't noticed, the United States has a volunteer military these days: people sign up to be subjected to all that, knowing what it is and believing it'll make them stronger. People who don't want to be subjected to it don't join the military.

      Even in the past (or in other countries where people are still forced into the military), the proper response wouldn't have been "see? prison is no worse than the army!". Rather, it would've been "oh my god, the army is as bad as prison!"

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    7. Re:Have you ever been in the army? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Let me point out that a criminal is still a citizen of the US regardless of the crime, and is entitled to basic rights. It can be reasonably argued that that is cruel and unusual punishment

      Can it? That's just the thing I'm disputing.

      Look, I'm not for cruel or unusual punishments. If a point can be made that those people there are being put through something particularly cruel or degrading or horrifying, fine, then it should stop. No doubt about it.

      I'm just saying that what the GGP post described, doesn't sound particularly horrible. At the very least, it's not worse than the _normal_ prisons, which are accepted everywhere as _not_ counting as cruel and unusual punishments, as defined in that convention.

      I'll also point out that the conventions on the topic are pretty clear, not just some philosophical concept. What counts as cruel and unusual is rather extreme stuff like torture, mutilation, simulated execution (waterboarding is usually accepted to fit that category too, btw, since it creates the impression of being killed, and the extreme psychological trauma associated with it.) It's not about inconveniences like that you don't like sharing the room with other people. You can't just think up your own ideal treatment standards, and proclaim anything else as cruel punishment.

      Also, it doesn't just apply to US citizens, but it's an international treaty and applies to any human being automatically. If the US Army were doing something to its soldiers that fit the bill, it would be a violation nevertheless.

      Hmmm, I wonder why the US penal system turns people into hardened criminals.

      Does it? Last I heard of a test being administered, the vast majority of people in jail score already anywhere between borderline sociopathic and outright psychopath. You know, from the start. So I just have to wonder which is cause and which is effect. Does prison turn them into heartless criminals, or is it what got them into prison in the first place? And do they land back in prison afterwards because the first term in prison did something to them, or merely because they're still the criminal kind of sociopaths?

      We don't actually know of a way to turn normal adult people into sociopaths, nor a way to cure sociopathy. We have some hints as to what sometimes causes a child to start exhibiting sociopathic behavious. (Hint: disproportionately harsh and cruel punishments applied arbitrarily and inconsistently, seem to help. Drives the point home very early that a lie is better than getting punished.) But even there it's not guaranteed. And nobody knows how to treat it, especially not in adults. Psychotherapy doesn't actually work on sociopaths, it just often convinces/trains them to hide it better.

      It's not just the US. Nobody else knows how to create or cure sociopaths either. We all, humanity on the whole, really haven't figured out anything short of (A) putting them away for a while, if they do anything criminal, and (B) making crime not too tempting.

      Well, ok, we sorta know how to do some brainwashing, although that's hit and miss and traumatic. It pretty much involves getting the person to completely cave in under stress, and you can reprogram him from there, with various degrees of success. It's cruel, traumatic, and leaves deep scars on someone's mind. I think that on the whole prison is less cruel than that, at least in most of the western world.

      So, seriously, if you have any hard data that you can cure those people by other means, we're all very very interested. Please do publish that stuff, and we'll all give up on prisons in a jiffy. Seriously.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  121. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trigun? What type of name is that! I bet you masturbate to kittens while dreaming about your forever delayed immigration to japan! Piss off and go masturbate some more in your mother's basement, you loudmouthed twat!

  122. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the thing...we should only punish people for what they have done wrong...not what they think.

    As a culture, most of us agree that the death penalty is reserved for people who have committed murder. You can't execute child rapists or thieves or people who get parking tickets.

    So, unless you can prove in a court of law that spammers have murdered someone, they shouldn't face the death penalty.

  123. Re:Reaping what you sow by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How's that a troll? The guy was a sociopath. Read the definition and see if it's not a perfect fit. The innocent child's death is horrible, but the wife married someone borderline criminally insane and enjoyed the fruits of his fraud. That doesn't mean she deserved to die, but she's no more blameless than someone who tries to beat a train through an intersection. What did she think would happen? Even though he got rich defrauding millions and annoying billions, he'd treat her with respect and dignity?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  124. Re:Good by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 0

    I work in Chicago. Let me know if you'd like to meet and tell me that in person.

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
  125. I suppose he was violent all along by randolph · · Score: 1

    I guess he never got caught before. Wow.

  126. Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, since many have pointed out that there is a sociopathic component in spamming, it is not all bad that he helped clean up the gene pool a little on his way out. He was a problem, but now he's not. His kid probably had the genes, too, and his wife had something wrong in being attracted to a sociopath enough to mate with one.

    When reading the title about a spam king checking out, my first thought was Bill Gates who would also bring great relief by moving on.

  127. Let me be the first to say... by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

    HAr-HAr!

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  128. So Who Were The Kids? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    Have any of the news articles made it clear who the 3 kids in the story are? TFA makes it clear that the dead 3 year-old was Davidson's daughter, but they keep calling the older girl "a teenage girl" and the infant "a 8 month-old boy" and such. Since they aren't attaching a family relationship to Davidson, I'm left wondering who they are and what their involvement is.

    Why would an unrelated teenage girl and an infant be with a guy about to kill himself and his family? What else was going on here besides a jailbreak and a murder-suicide?

    1. Re:So Who Were The Kids? by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      What else was going on here besides a jailbreak and a murder-suicide?

      Police policy of not identifying minors to preserve some semblance of privacy?

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    2. Re:So Who Were The Kids? by Y.A.A.P. · · Score: 1

      Have any of the news articles made it clear who the 3 kids in the story are? TFA makes it clear that the dead 3 year-old was Davidson's daughter, but they keep calling the older girl "a teenage girl" and the infant "a 8 month-old boy" and such. Since they aren't attaching a family relationship to Davidson, I'm left wondering who they are and what their involvement is.

      Why would an unrelated teenage girl and an infant be with a guy about to kill himself and his family? What else was going on here besides a jailbreak and a murder-suicide?

      TFA notes that court documents do not identify his girlfriend/wife, just note that he has one in order to shield her from repercussions from his crimes.

      TFA also notes that he has three children, but does not identify them. Parse this information and you should have all your answers.

  129. The collective will of his victims... by mi · · Score: 0, Troll

    The "eat shit and die, spammer!" — an expression, no doubt, uttered millions of times in this scumbag's general direction — must've had its effect, finally... I wonder, if any feces were, indeed, found in his mouth...

    Awful, that it had to include his family too... Must curse less the next time I get spammed...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:The collective will of his victims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awful, that it had to include his family too

      No, that is a good thing. I don't want that guy's inferior DNA spreading.

  130. selfish jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a selfish jackass. He could just have disappeared on his own, killed himself and let his family move on with perhaps (and quite likely) a better person.

  131. Re:Let me be the SECOND to say... by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

    Crap. Not only am I a jerk, I'm not the first jerk. That ruins everything.

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  132. In The Ghetto XXXI (Special Guest Star: Grandma) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A burning wet fart scalded Vlad's colon and rectum as he twitched awake. Vlad laid in bed, shaking at the horrible images that had danced through his sleeping mind. Sweat streamed from his forehead, trickled through his greasy scalp and soaked his pillow. This had been the worst nightmare yet. Vlad had dreamt that he was married to a 400-pound bag of soul-sucking gelatin. Living in a double-wide trailer filled with Jerry Springer moments, his only joy was his two sexy sons.

    Vlad slipped out of bed and tip-toed into the next room. There, Grandma slept peacefully, snoring and farting in her usual comforting way. Vlad slipped under the covers with her and immediately felt his sense of security return. Grandma always made everything better. A loud, low rumble escaped from her buttocks. Vlad pulled himself lower down the length of the bed so that his nose rested against Grandma's ass. He inhaled deeply as the gas wafted around him and put him back to sleep. Vlad savored every moment, even in his sleep, for he knew tomorrow the other kids in his class would remind him of his countless inadequacies.

    * * * * * * * * *

    Vlad belched forcefully, sending chunks of hamburger helper spewing out into the living-room. The orange plastic of the couch stuck to his fat pale legs and his stained briefs bathed him in a rich sampling of unique Lockwood odors. At the opposite end of the couch, Reza sat in her usual spot. The cushion was practically non-existent, compressed as it was from her unimaginable mass.

    "Oh Vladdie-Pop, I'm so glad Grandma has come to stay with us since little Vaginez came along! It is so nice to have some help around the house!"

    "Yo, you fat cunt, I'm trying to watch the new Eminem video. One more word outta you, and your fat ass'll be laid out on the fuckin' floor for the next month."

    Reza quivered at the thought of another merciless beating by her dear Vladdie-Pop. The last time he had "corrected" her, she had spent 22 hours huddled in the shower, weeping as the scalding water pelted her rubbery body. She had lost a whopping 1/2 pound that day. She spent the entire next day eating, fearful of her body wasting away to further displease her beloved.

    Reza's ruminations were interrupted by a terrible screeching from Marticock's Chamber. Vlad's fleshy head reddened with rage. He just wanted to watch television. Why did everything always have to work against him? He turned to Reza, with a terrifying scowl on his face. Reza felt a pang of terror shoot through her massive gut and she frantically dislodged herself from the indentation in the couch.

    Reza thudded across the double-wide's paper-thin floors, "Grandma! Grandma!"

    Grandma Lockwood was sitting on the toilet relieving herself of the Metamucil she had consumed for breakfast, "don't worry, dear, I'll take little Marticock out for a nice walk and he'll be fine!"

    "Oh Grandma," Reza blubbered.

    Grandma Lockwood soaked a rag in some Clorox and cleaned her rump of the liquified feces that had spattered up from the toilet. She applied a thick coat of Johnson's Baby Powder and then pulled up her stockings. She flushed the toilet, which immediately backed up and spilled out over the floor.

    "Reza, honey, you wanna clean up my shit while I take little Marticock for a nice walk?"

    Reza was only happy to clean up in the bathroom. It would give her a purpose, a valid reason to be away from Vlad. Though she could never admit such a thing to herself, at a subconscious level she would do anything to avoid being with her Precious Love.

    Grandma Lockwood prepared the grocery cart by throwing some used Taco Bell napkins in the bottom to make a nice nest for Marticock. She then lifted Marticock from his crib, careful not to agitate his pummelled rear, and placed him comfortably in the nest. She wrapped herself in her Eminem shawl - a Christmas gift from her grandson - and pushed Marticock out the door.

    With Reza scrubbing furiously in the bathroom and Grandma Lockwood and Marticock strolling outside,

  133. Pulling a Hans by fsterman · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have quite enough jazz to be a /. meme.

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  134. Error: Order of Operations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just once, I'd like to see these murder-suicide perpetrators do The Right Thing (TM) and *start* with the suicide!

    1. Re:Error: Order of Operations by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like the old blond joke, eh?

      Blond comes home, finds her husband in bed with another woman. She bursts into tears, pulls a gun from the bureau, and points it at her head. The husband shouts, "No, don't shoot!" The blond replies "Shut up! You're next!"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Error: Order of Operations by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Just once, I'd like to see these murder-suicide perpetrators do The Right Thing (TM) and *start* with the suicide!

      How do you know most of them aren't doing that already?

    3. Re:Error: Order of Operations by brkello · · Score: 1

      It blows my minds that mods would moderate this as insightful instead of funny. Obviously, if a murder-suicide perpetrator did 'The Right Thing', we'd have no idea since it would be considered a suicide. Ugh, explaining the joke always kills it :P

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    4. Re:Error: Order of Operations by karmatic · · Score: 1

      It blows my minds that mods would moderate this as insightful instead of funny

      You must be new here.

      Slashdot no longer gives karma for "Funny", but does give karma for "Insightful". This can lead to situations where a combination of "funny" (which doesn't give karma) mods, combined with "overrated" mods (which aren't subject to metamoderation) can result in a loss in karma for a relevant, and funny, statement.

      As such, some people choose to mod funny things insightful.

  135. Re:I understand running away from prison...but by tolken4 · · Score: 1

    "It's so easy to criticize behind computer screen. No one knows what he's been through. Nothing justifies the killing of his wife (maybe she agreed?) and daughter (this one has no maybes), but we just don't know what really happened, and never will. So I prefer not to judge." Really, I mean really? Are we to the point where we can not judge a man who murders his family? If not that, then what is judgment reserved for anymore. When did judging become a bad word in this country? Don't answer that, I know when. I mean, get off your everyone has a reason to be sad, mad, or disenfranchised kicks and just say the guy was twisted. A selfish narcissist who killed his wife and 3 year old. Go ahead, say it now, say it to yourself out loud it will feel good. For once in your life, stop trying to understand or empathize with an asshole like this country has taught us to do for to long. Just say, jeez what an asshole. That's it, no news coverage, no understanding, no feeling for him, no if only he had the right meds... Just jeez, what an asshole and I feel sorry for his family. THE END>

  136. Re:Woo! by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I don't even know what he have done so I don't really care, I just notice that some people seem happy. And I guess we all have had to pay for his traffic generating and storage wasting activities.

    Also since he didn't got killed but rather killed himself I see even less problem with it. The people believing it was good that his wife and kid died are probably easy to count.

  137. Davidson had been diagnosed with attention deficit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the article:

    "Davidson had been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A condition of his sentence was that he undergo mental health counseling."

    Take a look at the side affects of ADHD medication. The meds he was taking probably made him nutzo. I place the blame entirely on the medical staff who treated him.

    He only had to do 21 months... he should have been able to do that standing on his head. Blame the meds.

  138. Re:I can only blame the US government by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
    Don't be afraid, my cowardly friend, for there is nothing to fear here. Will your life end if you are 'modded down'? Will there be any consequence at all for speaking your mind forthrightly under your true false name?

    Don't give these things more weight than they deserve...

  139. GOOD RIDDANCE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only more spammers would kill themselves we'd be a lot better off.

  140. Re:the tags on the previous story are pretty funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I was the first to add the wanteddeadoralive tag yesterday.

    I didn't realize I had such power.

  141. Are we all guilty? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    Maybe he read too many of our "pound me in the a$$" prison jokes and freaked out?

    Did we cause his ultimate demise?

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  142. Attention world: spammers are scum by kent_eh · · Score: 1, Informative

    Prosecutors said that from 2002 to 2005, Davidson's business, Power Promoters, and his subcontractors would spam people's inboxes with e-mails promoting items such as watches and perfume. From 2005 through part of 2006, he sent thousands of e-mails from his home in Bennett, sometimes with false information
    The bodies of "Spam King" Edward "Eddie" Davidson, his wife, and 3-year-old daughter were found in an SUV parked in a farmhouse driveway in a rural part of Bennett, about 25 miles east of Denver. Authorities said Davidson was the apparent gunman.

    Here's more reason to never do anything to financially support spammers.
    They are scum.
    They have no morals
    They have no limits to their behavior.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    1. Re:Attention world: spammers are scum by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Please, this is one guy who snapped, it doesn't ahve to do with spam anymore then a school shooting has to do with games.

      Most spammers don't go out and kill anybody.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Attention world: spammers are scum by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      >Most spammers don't go out and kill anybody.

      No they don't.
      They just infect and hijack computers, sell bogus merchandise, and generally try to scam everyone out of as much money as possible.
      Maybe they're not all murdering scum, but they are scum.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  143. The lowest form of life on the planet by nickull · · Score: 1

    That's all I can say about him. The woman and child didn't deserve this.

    --
    "Question everything, including this!" - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
  144. Re:Good by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
    "Do you think they're equally sick?"

    Where the fuck did I say equally?

    Seeing the world in absolutes, black/white, either/or instead of as various shades of gray is itself often a sign of mental illness.

    --
    This space available.
  145. Re:Good by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    I work in Chicago. Let me know if you'd like to meet and tell me that in person.

    Yeah there ya go... great way to show you're not mentally unstable.

    "You might be unbalanced and violent."
    "YOU WANNA STEP OUTSIDE AND SAY THAT?!?!"

    --
    This space available.
  146. Cursing is a very low-level reflex by alispguru · · Score: 1

    What you say when you drop something heavy on your foot is mostly determined by your upbringing. I'm a militant agnostic and still say "God DAMMIT!" in situations like that.

    If I'm more in control, I can sometimes redirect to "What in the name of the six healthy sheep is going on?"

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  147. Why we punish, why we forgive by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most humans have a natural desire for justice and fairness. This is evolutionarily advantageous, it helps us build functional societies. Punishment is a tool. It is never 'right,' or 'good' to punish, those are moral judgments. Sometimes, it is effective, that is all we need say about it.

    This was no more right or wrong than a rat eating its babies, or a lion killing an antelope. Shit happens. We punish transgressions like this not because the act is wrong or bad, but because it is ineffective, it doesn't work for society, and we are programmed to uphold what is right.

    All punishment starts from within. It usually starts from a moral judgment or a feeling that something is not right with the universe. But right and wrong don't exist outside the minds of sentient beings.

    You know the saying, "Judge not, lest ye be judged?" One will not make moral judgments against another unless one thinks that making moral judgments is a good thing. If you think it is a good thing, you will do it to yourself.

    There is no place you can hide from your own judgment. People who make moral judgments are trapped in their own skulls with a monster they can't hide from or defend against. They use their own power against themselves.

    This man has no capacity to damage society anymore. There are therefore only two possible reasons to hope for a Hell for him to suffer in. One obviously faulty reason is the hope that his suffering will restore some kind of balance to the universe. But his actions never had the power to put the universe out of moral balance. Nothing does.

    The other reason is the hope that his suffering in hell will somehow deter others. Which might be true if there were any kind of proof it was happening, but there isn't.

    Wanting to punish this dead man only reinforces the desire to punish in general. It tells the part of our brain that makes judgments and metes out punishment that it is doing the right thing. And some day, all that righteous anger, pain, and humiliation will be directed internally, at the person making the judgment, as soon as they fail to live up to their own internal rulebook.

    Don't get me wrong, discernment is a good thing. Knowing what works and what doesn't, and why, is a good thing. And fortunately, doing 'good' does not require moral judgment, only discernment and self interest.

    Perhaps the worst thing about moral judgment is that it gets in the way of true discernment. If one thinks that certain things are inherently evil and need to be punished, one will have a hard time honestly recognizing when one is doing those things. I said there was no defense against the monster in our heads, that is not quite true. One can lie to oneself.

    But if one refrains from judgment, both internal and external, one can really, honestly look at one's actions, decide which are effective and which ineffective, and reward the effective actions. Reward is the only motivator for new behaviors.

    Wow, long rant. And I will admit, forgiveness is hard. It is much easier to give in to the feelings of anger and moral righteousness. I still do much of the time. But I don't judge myself for judging myself. :)

    So don't judge this guy. Realize his actions were part of a larger pattern, that they weren't effective, that they did not bring him what he wanted, that they are detrimental to society, and that those sorts of actions should be punished only to help society function better, not because they were evil. He is now beyond the ability to harm society, and beyond our ability to witness his punishment, so all practical reasons to wish for punishment are gone.

    What is left is only the mind's desire to judge everything in the universe, and harm that which is judged evil. Acting on that desire is harmful to the self.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Why we punish, why we forgive by b0ttle · · Score: 1

      This was no more right or wrong than a rat eating its babies, or a lion killing an antelope. Shit happens. We punish transgressions like this not because the act is wrong or bad, but because it is ineffective, it doesn't work for society, and we are programmed to uphold what is right.

      I agree with almost all you've typed, but not on this. You're putting humans in the same level of rats. Murder may be ok for animals, but it clearly isn't for humans. Consciousness and intelligence come with responsibility, we don't see rats flying probes to Mars.

    2. Re:Why we punish, why we forgive by spun · · Score: 1

      Certainly consciousness and intelligence come with responsibility. But why? I postulate that there is no external scale for anything, that all measurements are made with scales constructed within any given system. There is no good or evil external to the sentient mind. There is also no external scale that says we are better than other animals.

      We do need to punish transgressions such as this because it is effective to do so. Some people can only reason based on a primitive and immediate understanding of self interest. They need to understand that they will be punished for things that harm society, because they can't see the larger reasons not to do so.

      There is no reason to punish a rat for eating its babies or a lion for killing its food. It won't accomplish anything useful to society. That is the difference between us and animals, not some arbitrary moral rule.

      The root of this dilemma boils down to agency and free will. We feel that conscious agents with free will should be held to a different set of standards than processes that do not possess free will. We feel that they COULD have made a different choice, and only by punishment can we induce them to make different choices in the future.

      But free will is an illusion. In order for free will to exist, there must be a disjuncture between will and reality. The self, in this theory, is postulated as self-existing, that is, it exists apart from the rest of reality. That is false. Self and reality are like the faces and vases illusion. Look at it one way, you see external reality, look at it another, you see the self, but they are really just two ways of looking at the same thing.

      Does this mean agents don't make choices? Of course they do. But this process is an emergent phenomenon and choices are conditioned by experience. We can look at the conditions that lead to a person making a choice that is detrimental to society, and figure out ways to remove those conditions so that in the future, agents do not make those detrimental choices.

      Free will contains an inherent paradox. Either will is influenced by 'external' reality or it isn't. If will is separate from reality, and not influenced by it, then the self is incapable of learning. If will is an emergent property of reality, and conditioned by it, it makes no sense to put qualifiers on it and claim, well, in THIS situation, this person could have chosen differently. Either self is entirely conditioned by reality, or it isn't, and if it isn't, then how do we learn from our actions?

      I think self itself is an illusion. There is no little man inside my head, looking out through my eyes and listening through my ears. The sense of self is just another sense. It serves to orient the internal mental model of the universe. When a sentient needs to know who these sense impressions and thoughts apply to, the sense of self points to the internal model of the self and says, THAT is who these thoughts and senses apply to.

      In a movie, the sounds are actually another track on the film. If you think of our senses as a movie, then the sense of self is just another track on the film, it is not someone watching the film.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Why we punish, why we forgive by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Certainly consciousness and intelligence come with responsibility. But why? I postulate that there is no external scale for anything, that all measurements are made with scales constructed within any given system. There is no good or evil external to the sentient mind. There is also no external scale that says we are better than other animals.

      Spot on! Good and evil are constructs of our society, and we're so used to "having them in our head" that it's very hard to think about it in any other way. There is no such thing as external, non-human-projected good or evil.

      Kudos for being very, very open-minded.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    4. Re:Why we punish, why we forgive by b0ttle · · Score: 1

      I agree there's no good or bad, those are just concepts created by men. Think of the death of a star, it kills all planets orbiting it and anything living on them. That's good or bad? It's just the way things are, good or bad depends on the point of view. It is bad for any living beings habitating a planet, they will cease to exist. But it's good for the other solar systems that will be created by this event. And that's just my point of view, you could come up with an infinity of different points, and you probably wouldn't be wrong.

      'Self' and 'external reality' are not the same thing, self is an aspect of reality, but not the same thing. Again, 'self' and 'external reality' are concepts and it all depends on points of view. 'Self' or 'will' cannot be separated from reality, nothing can, by definition everything is included in reality.

      We created words when the gestures and screams became too ineffective to communicate, but reality is so complex that it is impossible to describe it for good with words. Words are vague and subject to interpretation, of course they do a much better work than gestures alone, but even so it's so far away from a perfectly description of reality. This process of looking for new ways of doing something when the old way is not effective anymore, we chose to call evolution. We are not better than animals, but by definition we are certainly more evolved, that's what I meant in my past reply.

      Anyway, that's my point of view and it's not immutable, hearing (reading in this case) other person's point of view is a good way to learn. But if the sense of self is just another track in the movie, who is the movie?

    5. Re:Why we punish, why we forgive by spun · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean, who is watching the movie? No one is. Look inside your mind for the watcher, you will not find it. All there are are sense impressions. Who is having them? No one is, they just exist. Thoughts, feelings, intuitions, the sense of self: these are all just kinds of sense impressions. The only difference between those internally generated sense impressions and ones generated from external sources is that your mind has privileged access to the internally generated ones. Other people can see what you are looking at, but no one else can sense your thoughts (that I know of.)

      I know this is a hard concept to wrap one's head around, it goes against common sense, perception OF something must be BY something, right? Well, in some sense that is true, but the thing doing the sensing is an emergent phenomenon, it is just a kind of feedback loop in the brain. There is no central locus of consciousness, at least this is what I understand from talking with my friends in neuroscience. (Though they admit the matter is far from settled with certainty)

      The way I understand it, the brain has a mental model of the universe that generates the same type of output stream that the senses themselves create. The output from the model is compared with the actual sense data, and when there is a discrepancy, the sense impression is raised to the level of conscious processing. At that level it becomes important for the system to model itself as well, and it is from this mental model of the self that the sense of self comes, but it is as I said, just another sense impression that the system can act on.

      You ARE the movie, there is no one watching it.

      I get what you mean when you say we are more evolved, and I agree with what I think you mean. If you mean, more capable of quick adaptation, better at sensing and representing external reality, and so forth. However, evolution is not a heirarchy, there are no 'more' or 'less' evolved creatures. There are creatures that are currently well adapted to their environment, and those that are not.

      If you want to judge the level of evolution of a creature, what criteria do you use? For instance, some would say ants are the most evolved creatures. They are certainly the most successful in terms of shear biomass: ants make up ten percent of all living things on earth, by weight.

      But we are arguing fine points here, I think we agree on the basics :)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  148. supreme cowardice!!! by jmvbxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I consider myself a very passive /. lover insomuch that I read it religiously but rarely, very rarely, post anything. But upon reading today's tragic stopy of the Spam King's murder/suicide I feel compelled to write. I am sure that I am not alone in this crowd when I say that I've done some incredibly stupid things in my life and at many times I have wished for a quick out or an easy solution but what this man has chosen to done is unforgivable! The supreme cowardice required to run from a prison camp (is there an easier sentence?) but then to murder your spouse, who has chosen to share her life with you, and finally your children who did not ask for life yet had theirs stolen from them by their own father!!! Absolutely disgusting and this offends me to core of soul!

  149. we are all to blame. by dbizzle · · Score: 1

    why do people make such big deal about spam anyway? sure its annoying and it accounts for most of the traffic on the net, but seriously, is your inbox really being bloated by spam everyday to a point where your time is wasted for hours?? please dont throw the "wasted resources" bit at me either, cause in reality, the only thing wasted is some server cycles and maybe some hard disk space that is eventually recovered anyway, oh and maybe a few minutes of your time. with services like gmail and all these advanced spam filters available for free or otherwise, how many spam emails does everyone really have to deal with on a daily basis?

    secondly, how is spam any different than all the bullshit snail mail your get in your mailbox? coupons, missing children, targeted advertising and whatever else you can imagine. you dont look at any of that stuff, and if you say you do, your probably lying. you dont see coupon makers being jailed for sending out millions of coupons for stores that aren't even in your area. it takes more energy to *physically* remove email from your actual mailbox than it does clicking a few checkboxes or selecting many and hitting delete, not to mention all the natural resources wasted when compared to a few electronic pulses.

    it seems when it comes to using computers, people are just more inherently lazy and unwilling to accept annoyances than they are in their day to day lives. if you dont want spam, dont throw you email address out in every form that asks for it. if the place your giving your email address is legitimate, then you generally have the abilty to opt out of soliciation emails.

    personally, the whole spam phenomenon can really just be correlated back to peoples general ignorance and curiosity than anything else. i'm saddened by these tragic events, but honestly i think general society is more to blame than anyone else.

    1. Re:we are all to blame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your arguments about spam make me wonder if you're just ignorant, clueless, or a troll.

      Where do you think all those spam filters and programs come from in the first place? The tooth fairy?

      I work for a company that makes a spam filtering product for large companies. The company employs about 400 people worldwide, and has revenues somewhere in the $500mil. range. Many of our customers are on the Fortune 500.

      Yes, that's $500mil. A year. Spent by our customers. To stop spam from adversely affecting their network and employees' mailboxes.

      We have a department of about 20 people who do nothing but write new regex's to help improve the performance of our product in the field. The idea being hopefully we get the new rules implemented before our customers even know there's been a new spam attack.

      Aggregated statistics from our customers show that over 95% of all attempted email connections ARE SPAM. Of the 5% that make it through for scanning, 90% of those ARE ALSO SPAM.

      Some of our customers are processing over 3 million messages a day. You do the math.

      But, you're right. Who cares about a few hundred million spam mails slamming into your network? After all, just hitting delete takes a few seconds per mail per employee, and I'm sure you won't mind paying your employees to do such a simple chore each day.

      So, let's do a little math, shall we? Acme Inc. employs 10,000 people, with an average salary of $40k/year, or $20/hr. Acme Inc. also gets 2,000,000 spams a day. Let's say that's divided evenly amongst all 10,000 employees, so that's 200 spams a day. Say it takes 5 seconds to "hit delete" per spam. This means your average employee is now spending 1000 seconds, or just over 15 minutes, of their work day "just hitting delete."

      This comes out to over FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS A DAY IN WASTED PRODUCTIVITY. Or, over $18.25 MILLION A YEAR. Even if this eddie asshole only accounted for 0.1% of all spam on the internet, that still means he owes Acme Inc. $1825 a year for his spamming antics. This doesn't even take into account the extra bandwidth server equipment and sys-admins that Acme Inc. now has to use just to support the spammy habits of assholes like eddie.

      Obviously anti-spam products cost less than that, but for a company Acme Inc.'s size, you're still looking at about $50,000-100,000 a year in licensing costs.

      Spammers are money sucking assholes, plain and simple. The fact that this asshole also murdered his wife, and tried to murder his daughter, just makes him a murderer and an asshole. I have no sympathy for assholes.

    2. Re:we are all to blame. by dbizzle · · Score: 1

      good point, but all we've done is accepted spam as a fact of life and are creating ways to filter it or "deal" with it..unsolicted mail, advertisements and anything else you can imagine have been around since, well, people had something to sell. its only until now, that such things can be delivered to all over the world instantly have people begun to notice and make an issue out of it. although once you have products like yours in place, then yes, all thats left is licensing costs and support, which in any IT environment exists anyway.

      i work for one of said "acme" companies. our monthly spam volume is in tens of millions. yes, we probably even have the product you gratefully work on so dilligently. though the numbers based on salary and time it takes to delete is more corporate jargon than anything.. a sales pitch if you will...created by the type of company you work for to sell their product to companies like mine. you pay your employee's much more everyday to go to lunch or take a smoke break than you do to delete spam... and how about the emails they actually read but have nothing to do with work... there is money lost everywhere, its "the cost of business."

      i'm also not really arguing the statistics. i know the statistics and now, thanks to your insight, i know a little bit more. since we all know how much network bandwidth is consumed by just spam and viruses, what do we do about it? we offer larger pipes and more bandwidth to, sadly, the consumer markets where most of these spam bots and abusers are.

      perhaps instead of creating technology products that filter spam and ultimately keep you in your current job, how about making a better, more reliable, more cost effective mail server or protocol that can help eliminate the NEED for spam filtering? but that wont happen because there is too much money to be made all around, in all sectors of IT.

      seriously, its not just the spammers that are responsible, its everyone.

  150. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  151. Wow. by NuSkooler · · Score: 1

    I can in no way justify a father killing his family over _anything_. However, as already stated the prospect of long term prison time is extremely damaging to anyone's psych. I love how everyone is quick to jump on the guy as "he's a criminal & deserves it!", etc. The guy was a spammer... he sent you know, electronic emails. This has disrupted your life's so much that you feel a) someone deserves to be locked up away from society and even b) death? It is you who is sick. I wouldn't doubt in any way that word of what people like you all think about the guy at least highly contributed to his suicide.

  152. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The child, I feel for.

    The woman -- she knowingly married a criminal. She was "on his side" in every way, and a spam enabler at the very least. She is even responsible for exposing her child to him, and for not protecting the girl in this way.

  153. Re:Good by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    He must be confusing Slashdot with Reddit. I used to see that kind of post there all the time. It's why I stopped going there. :|

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  154. Re:Good by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "You can't deny the world would be a better place if all spammers would kill themselves and their snowflakes."

    Yeah, the number next to my spam folder would say (0) instead of (30). I really want to spend human lives to change that. /sarcasm.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  155. Re:Let me be the first to say by skulgnome · · Score: 1

    Except when killing children is rejoiced over in a Iraq War thread. Then it's +5, Funny.

    Poor taste, perhaps. Tagging it as "troll" is most definitely censorship however: trolling is a different matter altogether, which entirely excludes honest poor taste.

    Anyway, those kids were only Americans. Those lives will be like, a dozen for ten euros in ten years' time. Chickenboner white trash. You won't see me crying over their passing.

  156. Defending CEOs by mi · · Score: 1

    So what does this statement say about the majority of CEOs in corporate America. Keep in mind, several studies have show CEOs sociopathic behaviors in regard to their decisions.

    It says the same thing, the GP was saying about spammers: if a CEO is convicted, escapes prison, and is about to commit suicide, he is more likely to (try to) take his family with him. I'm not sure, that's true, but that's what GP was saying.

    On behalf of CEOs across America (I'm not just a CEO — I also own my company), however, I'm quite outraged of your attempts to equate us with spammers and other criminals.

    Something tells me, you never met a regional First (or Second) Secretary of Communist Party...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Defending CEOs by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I own my own company too. To clarify, the studie(s) were actually targeted at fortune 500. Since you're posting here, it's not likely you're including in that bunch. Needless to say, neither am I.

      Besides, I said, "majority", not all. In hindsight, that's clearly not accurate. It should read, "majority of fortune 500 CEOs".

    2. Re:Defending CEOs by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you own your own company, then you're not a "CEO" in the sense that most people use that word. They're referring to the grossly overpaid CEOs of large, publicly-owned corporations. People who own their own small businesses are an entirely different breed. Remember, small businesses is what makes our economy strong. Big business is what's destroying our country.

    3. Re:Defending CEOs by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Most small businesses aren't corporations, ergo don't really CEOs...

    4. Re:Defending CEOs by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      A "big business" is just a very successful "small business". So you are saying very successful small businesses are destroying our country??

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    5. Re:Defending CEOs by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's true. Unfortunately, a fair number of small businessmen like to inflate their egos by calling themselves CEOs, even though their company only has a handful of people. There's a lot of "job title inflation" going on these days.

    6. Re:Defending CEOs by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. A big business may have started out as a small business, but it's no longer small, by the definitions of "big" and "small". Your argument is like claiming a chicken is just a successful egg, or a human is a successful monkey.

      Even MS started out as a small business, and a non-monopoly. They only started seriously destroying our country (and other businesses, and the state of computing in general) when they became not only big, but a monopoly. A poorly-run (or evilly-run) small business is very limited in the damage it can do to society, but large businesses have a much greater impact.

    7. Re:Defending CEOs by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for clearing up the definitions of "big" and "small" for me.
      But seriously, at what point does a successful small business earn the "big and evil" moniker in your book? How do you propose limiting the success of small businesses fairly? And in your eyes, can a "big business" exist without being evil? Because in your original post, you claimed "big business is what's destroying our country" and not "evil big business is what's destroying our country".

      And yes, I would consider a chicken a successful egg. Because unsuccessful eggs is what I had for breakfast.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  157. Hi Kevin! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    I have been to real prisons in California. And I can tell you, I would have loved to be in one of those federal camp snoopy's. Oh yeah, I was not allowed next to an uncontrolled computer for about 5 years ;P.

    That's so sweet! Kevin's found Slashdot!

  158. Re:Woo! by Trigun · · Score: 0, Troll

    Heh, I could have responded as an AC as well. So what if I didn't put a lot of thought into the name of a slashdot account. 'PunkOfLinux' is soooo much better. As is Mewshi.

    And speaking of immigrating to japan, http://www.mewshi.com/test/index.php?page=imagedisplay&gallery=Colored&image=ghost
    Nice little manga picture. A budding young artist?

    Let me guess. You're a twenty-something web designer who can't even approach a girl. You're not a freak, you're just misunderstood. You like the emo scene, but you don't classify yourself as emo. You're not a closeted homosexual, but you have been mistaken as one.

    You can't even post a proper insult. You stick to the tried and true "parent's basement", wapanese, and masturbation shtick. To top it all off, you use the word twat because you think that it makes you edgy, possibly because you've watched a few Guy Ritchie movies.

    You sir, if you're even old enough to be called that, are merely a whelp who thinks that you're special because bad things happened to people you know. Guess what. Nobody fucking cares. Now crawl back into that two-bedroom apartment and let the adults talk.

  159. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that you would endorse torturing and killing a child -- regardless of what that child's parents did -- shows that you should really be the first to die. Slowly, and painfully. On national television. With people placing bets on when, exactly, your heart would stop. You fucking sub-human asshole.

  160. I'm pretty shocked.. and maybe a different take.. by log0n · · Score: 1

    I don't really know much about this guy or what he did, so I'm taking 'spam king' at face value.

    I find it kind of appalling that there are people who are pleased with what the guy did. It says a lot about the state of our society, our legal/prison system and how self-centered both this spam king and society at large are. The guy was sentenced to 'pound in the a$$' prison to which he ultimately killed himself and his family - all over the nuisance of email spam.

    I don't know.. to me, that's really kind of depressing. Not at what he did (which was horrible - don't want that to be understated), but that he felt he had no recourse or chance at living life later. His only option was murder/suicide. It really speaks volumes.

  161. too bad for the family, but..... by drew_92123 · · Score: 1

    it's one less spammer to worry about... personally I wouldn't mind seeing spammers executed... but that's just me...

  162. he's not making a racial statement by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    He's just providing the data. The data is what the data is - you are drawing your own conclusions. How would you personally like to characterize this data? Maybe it's just that non-Caucasians love their family more and don't fall into this depression trap.

  163. Nope, not really by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Trash logic. First of all, joining the army is voluntary, right? That makes a hell of a difference. Hopefully the people who volunteer know what they are getting into and are motivated enough to stand it. Quite probably a lot of criminals do not make such deliberate considerations, and fuck the clichés a about heat and kitchen and so on.

    1. Nope, most of the world does practice conscription.

    2. I don't think most criminals ended criminals by mistake and without any consideration. It's not like the guy was just minding his own business, and suddenly realizes, "oops, I spammed tens of millions of people and got paid millions for it, without even knowing I was doing it." I'm sorry, but just because he's too fucking stupid to think about consequences too, doesn't make him exempt from them.

    Second reason it's crap thinking is that just because something else is in a comparable way, doesn't mean it's a *good* way. So *even* if life in the army is living in a hell hole and you *didn't* make an informed choice to join, (conscript or whatever) that's does NOT per se mean it *has* to be like that.

    3. It's not supposed to be a "good" thing, lemming. The fact may have escaped your attention that he's a convicted criminal. We're not giving him a _reward_ for it.

    Yes, society could have sent him on a luxury vacation in Malorca or Hawaii, instead, with an army of servants to catter to his every whim and keep him comfortable and entertained. But that would have been a bit of a reward, wouldn't it?

    It's supposed to be a _punishment_. It's supposed to be a _deterrent_. I.e., it's supposed to make the next idiot think twice about breaking the law.

    So, yes, it'll be a bit inconvenient and will have some downsides. It won't be the ideal, happy place to be. That's the whole point.

    So my point isn't that it's a "good" place to be. It's that it's actually a rather mild punishment. As punishment goes. In fact, so mild that millions of people go through that or worse without it being called a punishment. (Heck, for about a billion people on this Earth, that would actually be one step up from their life as hard-working, law-abiding citizens of some third-world nation.) It won't kill him. It's not hell, it's an inconvenience. That's what I'm saying.

    Or in other words, there are shades of grey between "it's good" and "it's hell." Roll that concept around a bit in your head.

    And considering that he _is_ a convicted criminal, and that the law _is_ supposed to include a _punishment_, I'm not moved to tears by his being a little inconvenienced there.

    (I wonder why I cared about this, it's not like I'm going to get any kind of intelligent reply anyway. :/ )

    Well, maybe if you started by posting something intelligent. If you start with something as stupid as, basically, "OMG they're slightly inconveniencing a criminal", well, you're not much in a position to be picky about the answers ;)

    Don't get me wrong, if someone were to tell me that they were doing some genuine evil or degrading stuff to him there, I might show some sympathy. But, basically, "OMG, we're so evil as to make a convicted criminal sleep in a barracks and occasionally work in the kitchen," because that's the general impression I'm left with... heh. Just heh.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Nope, not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thank you for confirming my suspicion. You're talking about something entirely different, and putting what I said not only out of context, but in the entirely wrong one. Way to go. Let's read what I said together, shall we?

      1. "joining the army is voluntary,"
      Yes, I know most countries practice conscription, I was one myself once. Believe it or not, it wasn't hell in any way, shape or form, so it doesn't *have* to be that way, even if that concept might be hard to grasp for some. But the poster I replied to, who compared with the military, is most probably living in a country with a voluntary army.

      2. "I don't think most criminals ended criminals by mistake and without any consideration"
      Here you are making two mistakes in the same section.

      First of all, yes most crimes are committed by people acting on impulse. In fact research shows that highly impulsive persons are more prone to commit crimes, which explains why harsher punishments generally doesn't keep crime down, just more people behind bars.

      Secondly, I am *neither* talking about the specific criminal in this case, but rather criminals in general - since that's how the parent was looked at it - *nor* did I say he should be exempt from responsibility from his actions. I'm just saying that comparing prison to army does not wash. But thanks for the nice demonstration of a prime straw-man.

      3. "It's not supposed to be a "good" thing, lemming."
      And here, I present you strawman #2. In the future it would be nice if you even bothered with reading the stuff you're replying to, *before* you resort to "ad-hominems", (you might want to look that up) because it really makes you look like a jackass with your trousers down around your feet. *IF* you had read properly, you would have realized that I was referring to life in the army, since the argument from the parent was that it was "ok if life in prison sucked since it sucks in the army" - which I have already demonstrated is not true. At least not if you mind people going crazy.

      [Leaving out crap about Hawaii, etc, since it's obviously retarded.]

      "So my point isn't that it's a "good" place to be."
      Dude, nobody said it should be "a great place to be". It would be suitable for you to apologize for repeatedly trying to make the argument that anyone said so. The issue was that comparing to military lifestyle does not wash. It might, in some countries, but it doesn't *have* to.

      "It's that it's actually a rather mild punishment." So, if the punishment makes the prisoner go nuts, kill a few people and himself, while the punishment still isn't matching up to your arbitrary standard of "harsh", it's A-OK? IIRC he was punished with some time in prison and paying fines, not becoming a crackpot and going postal. Prisoners are humans too. You might need to reflect on that.

      "As punishment goes. In fact, so mild that millions of people go through that or worse without it being called a punishment."

      How do you know that for a fact? Have you tried it? Did you ask anyone who tried this "step up" in living standard? If life in prison is so great, why is history full of people *dying* just to get out of jail so they could live like chased animals for the rest of their lives?

      "It won't kill him. It's not hell, it's an inconvenience."

      Well, apparently the mere thought of going back there, or most likely to a worse place since he escaped, was enough to make him kill himself. Seems like *he* - you know the guy with the first hand experience - considered it hellish enough to prefer death.

      [Cutting out stupid insults that shows that you really had no idea what I was talking about.]

      "he _is_ a convicted criminal,"

      Well, was.

      "and that the law _is_ supposed to include a _punishment_, I'm not moved to tears by his being a little inconvenienced there."

      Again, such a hugely simplified view on crime and punishment. The entire point of his sentence wasn't to move you to tears, you know. It was to make him repent his crimes, and hopefully return

    2. Re:Nope, not really by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know most countries practice conscription, I was one myself once. Believe it or not, it wasn't hell in any way, shape or form, so it doesn't *have* to be that way, even if that concept might be hard to grasp for some. But the poster I replied to, who compared with the military, is most probably living in a country with a voluntary army.

      So from the start, your argument is based on _assuming_ where I live, and how conscription works in a particular place. A false assumption too. May I point you to the False Premise fallacy? Not even a particularly skilled one, I might add.

      In other words, please address what was actually said, not your own convenient assumptions.

      Here you are making two mistakes in the same section.

      First of all, yes most crimes are committed by people acting on impulse. In fact research shows that highly impulsive persons are more prone to commit crimes, which explains why harsher punishments generally doesn't keep crime down, just more people behind bars.

      This particular spammer, because the talk was about him and his punishment all the time, didn't spam on an impulse.

      Second, the judicial system does try to determine the degree of Mens Rea (evil intent) that went into a crime. We already distinguish between crimes done on an impulse, and what this guy did over several years. So, no, we don't lump everyone equally behind bars.

      Third, you're setting up a falsehood as premise _again_: we already have ample evidence that laws like the three-strike systems for the repeat offenders, i.e., sharply increasing punishments past a point, did have a rather massive effect on crime rate. So the whole thing just isn't as simple as you try to mis-represent it.

      But, anyway, the point is irrelevant to the main discussion, which was whether sleeping in the barracks and occasionally working in the kitchen in that white-collar prison counts as inhuman or not.

      Secondly, I am *neither* talking about the specific criminal in this case, but rather criminals in general - since that's how the parent was looked at it - *nor* did I say he should be exempt from responsibility from his actions. I'm just saying that comparing prison to army does not wash. But thanks for the nice demonstration of a prime straw-man.

      Since I'm that parent and know pretty well what I was saying, it seems to me like you're the one trying to set up a convenient straw-man by pretending it was something else. Lame.

      And here, I present you strawman #2. In the future it would be nice if you even bothered with reading the stuff you're replying to, *before* you resort to "ad-hominems", (you might want to look that up) because it really makes you look like a jackass with your trousers down around your feet. *IF* you had read properly, you would have realized that I was referring to life in the army, since the argument from the parent was that it was "ok if life in prison sucked since it sucks in the army" - which I have already demonstrated is not true. At least not if you mind people going crazy.

      1. I quote from your own message: "Second reason it's crap thinking is that just because something else is in a comparable way, doesn't mean it's a *good* way" Note the emphasis there, because it's yours. That's what I'm answering to: and I didn't say it has to be good.

      But nah, you have to do the number one forum-troll trick: pretend you said something different. Nice try, no banana. It wasn't a straw man, if was an answer to what you wrote.

      2. No matter how I read that message, I don't see you referring explicitly or even reasonably implied to army life. If it's not trying to change topic in mid-flight, well, then you should learn to write more clearly. If you're referring to army life, then say so.

      Dude, nobody said it should be "a great place to be". It would be suitable for you to apologize for repeate

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:Nope, not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rofl, you really crack me up. Seeing you defend your own strawmen, broken logic and repeated, blatant misrepresentations of what I actually said, hilarious. And just to top it off, you are complaining about insults? Indeed, that's rich. Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time on you. Stew in your own jucie, retard.

    4. Re:Nope, not really by nCnt++ · · Score: 1
      AC: Anyway, I'm not going to waste any more time on you. Stew in your own jucie, retard.

      Game, set and match to Moraelin

      --
      Have you ever noticed the best /. comments are long and the best Chuck Norris jokes are short?
    5. Re:Nope, not really by Graff · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that he thoroughly demolished all of your arguments and left you looking very foolish. Ahh well, you posted anonymously so at least your friends don't know just how badly he owned you...

  164. I'm glad the son of a whore is dead. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I'm glad he's dead, and not wasting my tax dollars sitting a 8x10 cell with his dick in his hand. It's unfortunate that, on his way out, he also killed his wife and kids, but you've got to take the good with the bad: one dead spammer, thousands more to go.

  165. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awww, did somebody's widdle feelings get hurt? What are you going to do, run off and murder a few kids to feel better?

  166. Wrong Framework by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sociopathy is not a disease like flu with a cause and exact symptoms; it is a disease of the psyche, which itself is a virtual reality in that we do not interface with the world except through the psyche as medium. As Bruno Bettelheim said, "personality is perception".

    If a person believes it is OK to do anything for money -- that money, itself, is the entire meaning of life, and if that person marries another who feels the same then they might delay having children until their futures could be secured. And if that security was taken away then that sick individual, always working rationally from a mistaken perception (that money is all) might feel it was his responsibility to relieve them of a future filled with poverty.

    It is not fun getting into the mind of sociopaths/psychopaths, so I'm just saying....

  167. Horrible assholes on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't understand why there are so many complete assholes on Slashdot. A man was imprisoned for spamming, not for a real crime, mind you. I've read that a lot of you complain about spam. "Boo hoo, I'm a system administrator and my life is so dreadful because I have to deal with spam!". No, your life is dreadful, period. And you're conveying your self-loathing onto this poor chap. Maybe he read all the comments from yesterday and you cyber-bullied him into killing himself and his family. You are all wretched assholes. No wonder so many of you are in dead-end jobs. This community has taken the place of 4chan as the sphincter of the Internet.

  168. Life on a submarine by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    is pretty much like this. Only without the sunshine - I did that for 8 years. In other words, I have absolutely no sympathy for someone that commits a crime and then bitches about how uncomfortable prison is.

  169. Legal murder agencies... like Planned Parenthood? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Ouch. You say that murder agencies will pop up left and right if the money is right... I have to agree.

        1) Planned Parenthood.
        2) School for the Americas-generated hit squads in S. America
        3) Iraq/Afghanistan (no, I don't mean the war, I mean the suicide bombers outside police recruitment agencies)
        4) Iraq/Afghanistan (now I mean the war)
        5) Mafia (well, in the mafia governmental system, it *is* legal)
        6) Putin's media/espionage branch offices in Britain and other locations (Litvenenko, for example).
        7) Californian farmers' treatment of the Okies back in the dust bowl era.
        8) Recent treatment of illegal aliens on the border
        9) Oil companies hiring militias in Sudan

    Yeah, I have to agree. Which is why our country's situation is a bit disturbing.

    (Just so nobody think's I'm particularly anti-American in this, this list is compiled by an American who is more aware of American issues than other issues)

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  170. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by debest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is the characteristics that enable the behavior of a spammer that mark him as an antisocial psychopath.

    One of my favorite documentaries, The Corporation, shows that companies (under the implicit direction of its board of directors) also show all the characteristics of unfeeling psychopaths. Laws are broken all the time, if it can be shown that the risk is considered minimal and the payoff is great.

    Lots of "entrepreneurs" fall into the category as well.

    I think that if you were to give the death penalty to every amoral asshole who cares about nobody but themselves, and causes harm (but not kill) to a lot of people, you would certainly have a more pleasant place to live, but one that entirely undervalues human life.

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
  171. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And no, I don't have nor want offspring of my own, there's way to many of the little buggers already.

    Well, thank frigging God for that. Advocating the death of innocent children puts you way, way lower on the sociopathic scale than spammers.

  172. The survivors by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 1

    Court documents said he was supporting 3 children, so I assume the teen and baby were his own (or his girlfriend's). I don't know why news reports haven't identified their relation to him either way. Nothing I can really add other than that. I just want to say... what a fucking douchebag. I'm glad he's dead.

  173. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you're on the moral high ground for suggesting that he should die in that manner? LMAO.

  174. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  175. Some laws can be seen as unjust by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    Maybe you mean "mentally ill" instead of "morally corrupt"? To me a criminal is morally corrupt (or there's something very wrong with the laws that gouvern us), but he's not necessarily a schizo.

    Aside from this case, is it unconceivable that some people break laws that in their morality can be seen as unjust? Or do you feel that it is mentally ill to disregard laws in general? Was Rosa Parks mentally ill when she refused to move to the back of the bus?

    1. Re:Some laws can be seen as unjust by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Was Rosa Parks mentally ill when she refused to move to the back of the bus?

      I think you missed the part about 'or there's something very wrong with the laws that govern us'.

    2. Re:Some laws can be seen as unjust by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss it, he said "laws" not "some laws". But I think we are on the same page regardless.

  176. If it is illegal and makes a boat load of money... by bodland · · Score: 1

    there are more people behind the scenes. he probably ratted some out for his 21 month sentence. Found out he was a deadman at that facility and bolted. Got caught by the folks he ratted. bang bang bang bang...put gun in his hand.

  177. Re:Good by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Spoken like someone who will never have "crotch fruit" themselves. At least I hope so.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  178. I know. Havn't you seen the professional? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    havn't you seen ANY movies lately? The hitman takes the child and raises them to be a tiny little hitman. DUH..

  179. Wow by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 1

    He was sent to a minimum security prison because he was considered a non-violent "white-collar" criminal. Yet he escaped and became a vicious murderer. I don't think the criminal justice system did this to him. I think he had it in him to begin with.

  180. Spam Laws Kill by TonyXL · · Score: 1

    So the do-gooders pass a law that criminalizes sending e-mail, wreck a guy's life, and 3 people end up dead. Congratulations to everyone who supported this spam law.

    P.S. Yes, he put false header information in the e-mails. So? You want to make lying a crime?

  181. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I draw the line here on the assumption that the death penalty is acceptable for any crime.

    If a society makes it illegal for members of said society to kill people, it is hypocritical and immoral for the society to kill people.

  182. To the spammer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BURN IN HE....oh, he killed his wife and kid too. My bad.

  183. After that... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    So, when the wife revealed that the cops were giving her $1,000,000 to turn him back in, he snapped, saying "WHY DO YOU THINK I SOLD MY SOUL FOR MY SPAM-SUPERPOWERS? YOU'RE ALREADY RICH!!!!"

  184. Why don't these people take my advice by geekoid · · Score: 1

    When going on a killing rampage, always start with yourself.

    I can't even imagine what it takes to kill a 3 year old child.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  185. Coward by HeatingEngineer · · Score: 1

    Coward.

    1. Re:Coward by tru24rm · · Score: 1

      "What in the name of science (thank you, South Park!)" DO you shove into your hole, then?

      Isn't ANYTHING going into there just a replacement for a penis that is absent?

    2. Re:Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A vagina is not shaped to be a receptical for a penis, a penis was shaped to fit the vagina. Men weren't meant to receive pleasure from women, they were meant to pleasure women. Anything round and cylendrical (or just fingers and tongue if you want to get technical and non-gender specific) are enough.

      Discuss.

  186. OT: not sure how many would actually like Valhalla by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Mind you, I do make just that kind of jokes about the Norse religion too, so please don't take this as a lecture or anything.

    But I have to wonder just how many people, if a Valkyrie took them to Odin's hall to become Einherjar, would actually think it's great.

    For a start, it's a bit like wishing you were in the Marines, as your idea of fun. The Einherjar would just train all day for Ragnarok. They'd then get a copious meal in the evening, go to bed, wake up tomorrow to train some more with their weapons and armour. All day. Every day. For all eternity.

    Basically already taken in that simplified form, it was the underachieving "heaven" of some people who had become mercenaries or pirates (and had a rather short life expectancy at that) just so they don't starve. Only the eldest son would inherit the parents' farm, the others were kicked out with no means of subsistence. There weren't any jobs on another farm for them either, and the small Scandinavian towns only had jobs for so many. So they join some private army or pirate group just so they don't starve. And, of course, they had to believe there's higher meaning to that hellish life, and some god who appreciates that. And the grand reward they aspired for was... well, just the same. That some great warlord in the sky would let them sign up in exchange for food and shelter.

    But it gets better than that, when you look at how they were supposed to train in Valhalla: by hacking at each other with real, deadly weapons. By the end of the day, most Einherjar would be dead and/or dismembered, having bled to death on those training grounds. Then they'd get magically resurrected and/or healed, fed, sent to sleep, and next day they'd start again.

    It was a promised eternity of _pain_ and stress.

    I mean, think telling someone about it, but without mentioning which religion and whether it's supposed to be a reward or punishment. See, there was this old religion where after death you could be cut, bled, dismembered and killed daily, made whole again, and next day chopped up again. Then ask them if they think it's the heaven or hell of that religion. I'm betting on the latter.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  187. In memory of Edward 'Eddie' Davidson by sarysa · · Score: 2, Funny

    V1ag@ra and Ci@li5 now half priice!

    --
    Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
  188. Re:Woo! by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    The P is an idiot. I agree that the GP is an idiot too, but he was certainly not celebrating someone killing their family, he was obviously celebrating death of the very annoying criminal.

    He could have been chastised for the lack of feeling for the family, but not for celebrating death of the family. /. is best in moderation among other such sites, but once in a time there is an idiotic fluctuation in the moderation Force, when suddenly idiotic and irrelevant comments get promoted to +5 by some other emotional idiots.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  189. Wait..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got an email from him!

    Dear Recipient,

    I would like you to know that through careful researches, that I have chosen you as the heir to my fortune. To claim my fortune you just need to send me your full name, address, date of birth, social security number and bank account information for verification purposes. Once I receive your informations I will make you the heir to my fortune of over 3 Million USD.

    Sincerely,

    E.D.

  190. The McNaughton Rule and after by westlake · · Score: 1
    If he was still alive and having to defend himself in court, he'd probably plead temporary insanity.
    Insanity means without reason or utterly foolish.

    .

    You cannot plead insanity simply because the motive or impulse which lead to your crime makes no sense.

    The legal issues are defined as moral judgment and self-control:

    In 1972, the American Law Institute developed a new rule for insanity as part of the Model Penal Code. This rule says that a defendant is not responsible for criminal conduct where (s)he, as a result of mental disease or defect, did not possess "substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law." Forensic Psychiatry and Medicine: The McNaughton rule

    Reagan era Federal law marked a return to the McNaughton rule, with its Victorian English roots, requiring a defendant to show clearly and convincingly that he did not not understand what he was doing or could not comprehend the wrongfulness of his actions.

  191. Re:OT: not sure how many would actually like Valha by Skye16 · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like an FPS to me, but with, you know, repercussinos

  192. What a fucking asshole by gregbot9000 · · Score: 1

    Could there be a more selfish person on earth?

  193. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Oh stop it.

    Tnis person had problems. Many spammers just send out emails. They don't create botnets, hack peoples computer, and so on.

    This is like saying IT people are DANGEROUS people.
    Stupid.

    Mass murders require some sort of Dissocial personality disorder, spammer do not.

    This guy did something horrible, his career choice is irrelevant.

    Death penalty on spammers? what and ass.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  194. Thursday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    A convicted spammer and his wife, who were being sought after she helped him escape prison, were found slain along with their young daughter Thursday in an apparent murder-suicide, authorities said.

    Did this take place on Thursday or was the daughter's name Thursday?

  195. Wait a second........ by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where the hell is all the Tinfoil-hat suspicion I usually see around here?

    The guy more then likely had money stashed. He more then likely went to others for help once he escaped. Doesn't anyone think its possible that he was killed for this money by someone even sleazier then himself?

    Nobody questions that there is an unrelated teenage FEMALE and a BABY involved? WTF?

    C'mon /.

    Escape, THEN kill yourself and family? Why not just fucking bedsheet yourself at the first "lights-out"?

    This sounds HIGHLY suspect to me. Cheeeerist! I can think of dozens of scenarios that would explain this just as well as the scenario posited by the "authorities". And none of them as cheery as a murder/suicide.

  196. haha by geekoid · · Score: 1

    He claims to be a Buddhist. Perhaps the worst Buddhist ever.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=619015&cid=24252739

    Just goes to show all religions twist your mind.
    And if his other posts are an indicator, he's a general ass of mediocre IQ.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  197. a sociopath recognizes the existence of others outside self in so far that pleasure can be derived from their pain and manipulation

    but a narcissism so consuming like this isn't even aware of others outside self

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  198. Unpopular honest opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A scumbag is dead.

    He was nice enough to remove the rest of his genetic material from the planet as well.

    The sad thing is that a child survived.

    Don't breed no assholes. Won't be no spam.

    1. Re:Unpopular honest opinion. by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked eugenics is categorized under the "pseudo-science" section - it is possible that a perfectly good pair of parents can breed an asshole offspring, and a criminal pair of parents can breed a perfectly good offspring.

      Add that to the many "I hope he'll burn in Hell" comments here, I feel there's too much hatred in our society already. There's no crime worth putting someone in eternal pain.

  199. Re:OT: not sure how many would actually like Valha by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    More of a hack-and-slash action-rpg, actually ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  200. One Last Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your post advocates a

    ( ) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (x) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. your idea will not work. here is why it won't work. (one or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

    ( ) spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    ( ) no one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) it is defenseless against brute force attacks
    ( ) it will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) users of email will not put up with it
    ( ) microsoft will not put up with it
    (x) the police will not put up with it
    ( ) requires too much cooperation from spammers
    ( ) requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
    ( ) spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    (x) anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

    specifically, your plan fails to account for

    (x) laws expressly prohibiting it
    ( ) lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    ( ) open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    (x) asshats
    ( ) jurisdictional problems
    ( ) unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) huge existing software investment in smtp
    ( ) susceptibility of protocols other than smtp to attack
    ( ) willingness of users to install os patches received by email
    ( ) armies of worm riddled broadband-connected windows boxes
    ( ) eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    ( ) extreme profitability of spam
    ( ) joe jobs and/or identity theft
    ( ) technically illiterate politicians
    ( ) extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    ( ) dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    ( ) outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
    ( ) any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    ( ) smtp headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) blacklists suck
    ( ) whitelists suck
    ( ) we should be able to talk about viagra without being censored
    ( ) countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    ( ) countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) sending email should be free
    ( ) why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    ( ) feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    ( ) i don't want the government reading my email
    (x) killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    furthermore, this is what i think about you:

    ( ) sorry dude, but i don't think it would work.
    (x) this is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    ( ) nice try, assh0le!

  201. This could have been completely avoided by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

    Spam, even if is tied to the manipulation of stock market prices was unreasonably promoted to the status of a criminal charge. His initial crime should have been a civil crime with financial penalties and perhaps some community service.

    The criminal charge just pushed him into greater crimes, and this is one of the few cases I truly believe that the system is more at fault than he is.

    1. Re:This could have been completely avoided by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Get real. He was a criminal, that's why he was in the spamming business in the first place.

      If you don't think so, try working as a postmaster, especially at an ISP. Better still, go from there to working for an email security vendor, as I have for the past four years. You'll get quite an education in just what kind of people we're dealing with. I'm shocked by the barbarity of what he did, but not all that surprised. Those innocent people were not the first to be murdered by a spammer (although maybe the first in this country) and will almost certainly not be the last.

    2. Re:This could have been completely avoided by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

      The punishment doesn't fit the crime. You get real.

      If you don't like the mail coming in, you can whitelist your domains and deny all.

      Any admin worth their pay knows how to lock down their network. Its dramatic slackers like you who have made spam become the "gateway crime" to homicide.

    3. Re:This could have been completely avoided by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the mail coming in, you can whitelist your domains and deny all.

      With all due respect, this may work for times when you know what address stuff is coming from, but it really makes things a bit of a pain when you want to do business.

      For instance, what about when you have some kind of email-back verification you need to receive from a web site? sure, most of the time, you could guess and say "ok, allow this domain" but unless the site in question provides the exact address that the verification is coming from (not all do), you've either got to open it up for the whole domain or everyone long enough to receive it... White-listing is not a practical method for everyone.

      Even if good admins take reasonable steps to protect their systems, the spammers are getting more and more skilled as well as more and more aggressive with the tactics they take. A criminal only needs to find one way in to a system, but the admin has to try and defend all of the ways in. Many of these defenses have serious down-sides with respect to usability, required resources, or practicality, and at some point, you have to draw the line as to what is and isn't a reasonable amount of extra work / expense (the "cost" of spam to your organization), and hold the spammers accountable for their share.

      Let's go back to your whitelist for a second... let's assume that I set one up at my company. Now, how do sales people and engineers and all the others let folks get ahold of them via email? Bug the admin to add an exception for each person who they gave their card to? Set up an automated system to let individuals whitelist folks to their accounts themselves? sure, but that depends on the users being active and informed. I'd argue that the admins will be getting lots of calls on the helpdesk asking why emails won't go through. You forget that the vast majority of users within an organization are non-IT folks who may or may not be very savy with regard to technology.

      Ok, so maybe the admins can also build a web-based system to proxy communications (a "send us a message" kind of thing), but spammers are constantly poking at those trying to find holes and abuse them. Even with best practices and careful input validation, someone who wants in badly enough will find a way past it or find a way to misuse it to send spam. The admin's got to spend an awful lot of time and effort keeping on top of it and still deal with all the other day-to-day issues.

      I'm not saying that I think you're completely wrong - certainly, an admin should be paying attention and taking steps to protect their networks... but I do think that you're oversimplifying a bit (so am I for the record).

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    4. Re:This could have been completely avoided by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      You're right, the punishment doesn't fit the crime. It should have been a life sentence.

      No, this is not a troll. I really believe that.

    5. Re:This could have been completely avoided by notes+rules · · Score: 1

      I agree that civil penalties would be better. Spamming is illegal money making. Follow the money and retrive the ill-gotten gains. Use this spammer as an informant to find the chain of spammers, and freeze their bank accounts. The FBI and related agencies have the clout. They had an opportunity to not only stop this guy but lots of others. Follow the money. http://blog.maysoft.org/

  202. OTOH... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of murderers that would never dream of spamming anyone.

  203. Would you kill your kids if killing yourself? by zetetikos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wish someone would do a study of folks who think it makes sense to kill their kids if they decide to kill themselves. It's seems like it would lead to a good way to identify people for whom some preventive counseling would be a great benefit to society. I did a little googling about it without any luck.

    I get so tired of seeing these stories about parents killing themselves and their kids and just can't imagine the mindset where this makes sense to them. The evil in our world that is done to kids seems boundless, but this stuff seems different and in some ways more incomprehensible since it's usually folks who are not normally violent criminals.

    1. Re:Would you kill your kids if killing yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish someone would do a study of folks who think it makes sense to kill their kids if they decide to kill themselves.

      I would have thought it was obvious: he knew that life, generally, isn't worth living but he didn't want his family to experience the emotional pain caused by his death. Killing everyone solved the problem (since life, generally, isn't worth living there wasn't anything inherently wrong with killing his family).

    2. Re:Would you kill your kids if killing yourself? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      You'd have to find people who are parents and have attempted suicide, but were brought closer to the mind of the living. I'm guessing that reason no longer functions when facing the prospect of destroying yourself, so perhaps all bets are off when other people are in the room, particularly those who have close connections to the parent. Although many man-hours and piles of money were spent researching the mindset of a killer, I would hazard a guess that if we really understood what goes through their mind, or what motivates them to take someone's life, we could reform murderers or prevent people from being killed. But that's probably naive of me; knowing what happens in the mind is one thing, trying to get it to do something differently is another thing altogether.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    3. Re:Would you kill your kids if killing yourself? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      I actually knew a man who did this same thing. For reference http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1995_1294608

      The guy, Hugo, in the story I linked was fired from his job for sexual molestation of a co-worker. Apparently he had been doing it for years. People that worked with him said that because he was such a good salesperson and made the company so much money that they helped cover for him. Apparently, he did it to the wrong person and his company finally fired him.

      I know about this man from two different angles. First, my father and my father's girlfriend worked with him. An incident where this bastard tried to molest my father's girlfriend eventually led to his firing.

      Second, in a strange twist of events, I worked with the guy as well. When he was fired he came to work at my company. At that time I had no idea of his involvement with my father and his girlfriend, nor the circumstances that led to his leaving his previous job. He mentioned layoffs, large oil and gas comapny, etc. He, however, had to know who I was because my father and I have the same name. In addition Hugo revealed he worked at the same installation my father worked at. I even described my father to him in hopes that they knew eachother. He feined ignorance of course.

      Hugo and I worked together for a few months before he killed his wife, 2 young children, and babysitter. It wasn't till then that I learned of my father's involvement in his firing (my dad led the charge to get him fired, for obvious reasons) and the conduct that led to his firing. My impression of him after hearing all the details was that he was an egomaniacal control freak that had little regard for those around him, especially women. However, he maintained a well-meaning facade for the public by being active in his church and community. Eventually I came to the conclusion that his disregard for women was actually rooted in a sociopathic disregard of all people. I think he ultimately viewed his family as posessions he could do whatever he wanted with.

      Before he got fired he was pretty much king of his domain. There was a constant stream of young women to pick from at work, he made phenomenal amounts of money, had the traditional wife and kids, and, according to some in the know, a 19 year old babysitter to have sex with whenever he wanted. Maybe he felt life was not living anymore without being able to get his way whenever he wanted. Whatever the reason, the scariest part is that I and many others worked right beside this powderkeg for months and he was able to pass among us and appeared to be a well adjusted, intelligent, humble, nice guy.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  204. Blame education, I guess by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Before I start, note that I'm very reluctant to blame society as a nebulous whole, and definitely not instead of the guy who pulled the trigger. But in this case methinks culture may bave played a role, IMHO.

    There was this study some time ago -- IIRC even linked on Slashdot -- and made by a woman at that. It showed that girls who grew up on fairy tales like Beauty And The Beast and Cinderella have a higher chance to end up in an abusive relationship, with them as the abused spouse.

    Her hypothesis was that they just don't know when to get out of it, and keep hoping that, just like they got told all their childhood, the beast will turn into a handsome and gentle prince.

    But just so I don't pick on women alone, there are plenty of stories and (Japanese) CRPGs for boys too, who teach the same false lesson: that if you run into the biggest jerk, he's probably just a traumatized guy hiding behind a tough facade, and you can change him back into a nice guy by just enough support and being there for him.

    At any rate, both illustrate the point, that most people don't fully understand sociopaths. Most people seem to assume that everyone is the same, and that you can simply appeal to a sociopath's humanity to make him realize the error of his ways and renounce it. And again, we have everything from short stories to novels preaching just that and making just that point. Not to mention that, depending on the part of the world, you might even have whole hordes of apologists of the great white predator, presenting him like the modern day hero and benefactor of the community.

    Where this long rant is going is: she's not the only one. Most people have trouble recognizing a psychopath, and even more trouble wrapping their mind around the very concept. And again, we teach girls from early childhood that it's OK to mary a "beast", he'll turn human later.

    Basically it's a bit like condemning someone for falling for the old Road Runner trick of painti1ng a tunnel on a rock. If she's the only one, sure, blame her. But if it turns out that 9 out of 10 people mistake it for a real tunnel, well, maybe she deserves some compassion after all.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  205. Got off Easy by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

    This guy got off easy.

    He could have done his time in the minimum security prison (21 months) and pay his 712K to the IRS.

    And kept the rest of his fortune (3.5 million in deposits).

    What a sleaze bag.

    Words can't describe people like this.

    Complete Trash.

  206. mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omg that was funny

    oi! btw

  207. Re:Good by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    I work in Chicago. Let me know if you'd like to meet and tell me that in person.

    Okay; my mistake- you really *are* a sociopathic fuck!

    By the way, I look forward to hearing the results of you loudly declaring your views in a public bar ("in person") that a three-year-old got what she deserved because her Dad was a spammer.

    Out of curiosity, do you think that Hans Reiser's kids deserve the same fate because their father was a murderer?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  208. Re:Good by mythz · · Score: 1

    Really mine says (3096), and I cleaned it out last week. I'm really ok with being one less spammer in the world - they feed/profit off people's insecurities and depression filling them with false-hope, lies and deceiption. In my mind they are a lower class than scum. The fact that he decided to take the negative sentiment towards him against his own family just illustrate the scum that spammers are.

  209. G. K. Chesterton on Suicide by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 1

    "With murder, you kill an individual. Suicide is the greater crime... you're effectively trying to murder the whole universe." This guy did both... it simply doesn't get any more evil.

  210. RBN in the house by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

    Those guys don't like their mules kicking the wrong direction.

    Seriously. :-(

  211. It is not about Punishment by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Prison is a practical matter; people who can not play with others are not allowed to play, for the benefit of those who know how to behave.

    It is secondary to teach them how to play with others; some people will not learn so they should be banned from the game for life. Clearly such people are mentally ill and should be treated as such. Its stupid to rotate nutcases in and out of the prison system. It warps how normal people are treated at every level of the system. One size does not fit all.

    This applies generally to crimes big and small.

    Serial rapists can function in society minus their offending part; except that allowing such solutions would open a Pandora's box.

    What can anyone expect from a country of conformists that tortures people unlike themselves.

  212. Narcissistic much? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    That way, he can prevent them from dealing with the consequences of his failings and his suicide.

    Wow, I can't think of anything more narcissistic than feeling that another human being would be better off dead than without me. I mean, it's clear now that his daughter would have been better off without him, and she would have gotten by just fine.

    I wonder what kind of headjob he did on his wife to get her to break him out. Crazy mofo.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Narcissistic much? by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      Narcissism is actually a good term for it. From what I've read about mass murderers, that's an excellent descriptor. Shortly after the Virginia Tech shootings, there was an editorial in Newsweek (not the most reliable magazine, I know) that discussed that our culture has failed to understand the shooters in these cases. We often want to try and understand their conduct by imagining them to be tortured, depressed loners. While there is an element of truth to that (in that there is some indication that they tend toward the depressive), this analysis overlooks the narcissistic traits that drive their behavior. It is not enough for these people to kill themselves. Anyone can commit suicide. They feel the compulsion to commit their suicide in a way that will force others to have to confront it. As a result, they commit suicide by killing others first. This may explain why Cho, Harris, and Klebold took such great efforts to document what they were doing. If you don't leave a detailed enough "suicide note," you won't make the national news.

      --AC

    2. Re:Narcissistic much? by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

      Correction: It was Time (a much more reliable source). Here's the link: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1612688,00.html.

      --AC

  213. It wasn't really a suicide. by darkonc · · Score: 1
    One of his enraged spam victims forged the source-address of the bullets.

    (yeah, I know -- it's tastless... .but Randy Pausch and this spam slime died today. Guess who gets my respects.

    "It's not that the good die young -- it's just that we don't care as much when the slimeballs die".

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  214. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...and an infant was found alive in the car...along with a russian business card. Police are treating this as a suicide..."

  215. Re:Good by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Really mine says (3096), and I cleaned it out last week. I'm really ok with being one less spammer in the world - they feed/profit off people's insecurities and depression filling them with false-hope, lies and deceiption. In my mind they are a lower class than scum. The fact that he decided to take the negative sentiment towards him against his own family just illustrate the scum that spammers are.

    I don't like spammers either. But they're paid to send unsolicited email. Really, that's the extent of it. You have to stretch things to a ridiculous point to make their actions execution-worthy.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  216. get out side the box by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Mental examination test (possibly find nuts like this)

    Use crimes: drugs. Its more than idiotic... its Bushthink. Take non-criminals who just use or abuse a controlled substance and send them to crime school. How about controlled legal free access to the drugs? (kill the black market; lower over all crime by more than half.)

    Crazy people DO NOT belong in prison it warps the whole system.

    Non-prison crimes: Cut down the corporate immunity loopholes for management. Monitoring. Alcohol testers in cars. BAN any government involvement for life if convicted of certain crimes. Creative "punishments" etc.

    FAIR prosecution of police crime; they should have to video everything they do just to protect themselves.

    "Communes" for certain types who need a more authoritarian environment; not as punishment. Just an idea, seems to be many that crave to drive us all into such a society.

    EVERY CITIZEN VOTES. No exceptions. $ penalty for skipping (to do it, you make voting a flat $ tax write off.)

    Death penalty for declaration of war; if you love the country so much you should be willing to sacrifice yourself when the need arises; why should the troops be the only ones?

    1. Re:get out side the box by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      EVERY CITIZEN VOTES. No exceptions. $ penalty for skipping (to do it, you make voting a flat $ tax write off.)

      That's a terrible idea.

      Suppose your choice is between Saddam Hussein and some other guy, and of course Saddam gets 100% of the vote every election. Is there really a point to having everyone vote? It's the same way here in America. We have two choices, both bad. It's like this every election, though it's gotten particularly bad recently. What exactly is the point of voting? Personally, I'm going to write in someone, but I can certainly understand someone who doesn't want to even bother wasting their time showing up at the polls. If we had a system where it was much easier for other Parties to get elected (through instant runoff voting or some other method), then I'd be more in favor of incentives to get people to take part. But we're never going to have a system like that, short of a violent revolution, because that won't benefit the two Parties in charge.

  217. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did you give a shit about his wife and kids? Their life and death is absolutely nothing to you other than a moments though that will be drowned out on the next post.

  218. spam kills by Kashell · · Score: 1

    I wonder how these headlines are taken in Hawaii, where Spam happens to be very popular.

  219. Shifting the blame... by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    You are so right about this blame-shifting. And could someone please tell me how an unregulated capitalist free-market economy is supposed to solve this one? There is a fundamental conflict between the concept of "limited liability" and "free market" that has not been addressed except by government regulation.

    Meanwhile on a road leading back to the main topic: there's a nice little kerfuffle between el Reg and l'Inq based on some commentary in the Inquirer regarding the murder-suicide.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  220. positive spin... by whopub · · Score: 1

    Yep, tragic. But some good can still come from it if, for instance, from now on authorities start shooting spammers on sight, just in case...

  221. Re: motive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ditto.

    after reading a bunch of comments, waiting for it to creep out, yet no cigar so far, thus I humbly suggest the following:

    Past the idea of it, past the ugliness of it, the fact remains that we have very little in terms of retaliatory measures against the likes of him.

    So we should totally re-spin this in a mis-information campaign to make it appear as though there was some form of vigilantism involved here...

    adding food for thought to anyone wondering if there are any consequences to spam-ing.

  222. Modded funny for a reason by againjj · · Score: 1

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=624513&cid=24317949
    People were not actually supposed to ACT on the suggestion!

    (P.S.: The above is my poor attempt at a bit of black humor, and is not a troll or flamebait.)

  223. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he ran from custody, i told myself:

    "It's not like this guy is a murderer, so even if he gives the cops a good run, I don't really care."

    Turn out I was wrong.

  224. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    If you see major differences between the mentalities of the two (spammers and mass murderers) please detail them here.

    Uh, spammers don't kill people? Murder and espionage are the only two crimes worth of the death penalty (as the law stands now).

  225. It is a tragedy but THINK and learn from it. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    What we can learn from this is that we need to THINK about the consequences of our actions.

    Would he have kept doing this if he had stopped for a second and considered "what's the worst thing that can happen if I keep doing this?"

    Stop for a second and consider something you are doing that might turn out badly. This is slashdot so none of you are having affairs that could get you or someone else killed but perhaps you are thinking of cheating on a test (death to your degree) or actively disengaged from work (which is bad with the recession that's coming).

    Poor woman. Poor little 3 year old. Poor grandparents. Was it worth it? Is what you may be doing worth the possible consequences?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  226. Get the trash out of the gene pool. by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

    Natural selection works.

  227. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a lot to be said of the value of human life. It is priceless. It is a gift.

    Such ignorant twaddle.

    Value is a measure of scarcity. People are a dime a fucking dozen, hence not priceless. Not even of much value. We turn out a million a day.

    Now you'll probably say that I'm like Hitler and Stalin and other idiotic comparisons like that but that's nonsense.
    I don't think people should be beaten tortured or murdered at will, but phrasing it in such a fucking retarded way which is blatantly false just makes an actual discussion leading to actual valid ethical principles very unlikely.

  228. i hope he got raped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was only in for 4 month but I hope he was raped many times before his escape. Suicide is too good for spammers.

  229. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Ummmmmm, I think I speak for everyone when I say that those rules appear to have just changed.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  230. No tragedy, only evolution. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    Besides, there is nothing wrong with laughing at a good joke, even if it's about someones dead.

    The most horrible things in life are the ones we have to learn to laugh at.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  231. Re:Woo! by Darby · · Score: 1

    Go fuck yourself. That 'humor' is irresponsible, reprehensible, and, above all, unfunny.

    Don't you think you should pick a nick without "Punk" in it if you're just going to be a whiny little bitch with a sandy vagina?

    Seriously.

  232. Re:Woo! by brkello · · Score: 1

    It is amazing to me how people on Slashdot who play cracked video games, download mp3s of music they don't own, speed over the speed limit, etc. etc. decide that a guy who sends out a bunch of e-mail for profit should die. And that people who love that person must also be guilty of something. Seriously, get over yourself. How the hell can you say "she knew what kind of relationship she was getting into when she started it"? She knew this guy was going to kill her. This is the second dumbest thing I have read that was moderated up this week. But that one was colossally stupid...any other week you would win.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  233. Re:Good by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if you're aware of this but you weren't the victim in this story. I know, I know, it's very hard to consider other people but there is a 3 year old girl dead, a middle aged woman dead and an injured teen. All of them (to our knowledge) completely innocent.

    The children are most certainly innocent. Children can't choose their parents. However, the wife is not innocent. She made a choice to stay with this slimeball, knowing his profession. Is the wife of a Mafia hitman innocent? No. And neither was this woman.

    This doesn't mean she deserved to die, but I do want to point out that she's not "innocent", not in the same way as the children. In fact, she bears much of the blame for this, because 1) she married this sociopathic jerk, and had kids with him, and 2) she helped him escape from prison, and brought him to the children where he then killed and injured them. She's as much to blame for this act as he is, in my opinion. It's just like cases where a woman has a violent boyfriend who abuses and kills her child. These days, not only does he go to prison for murder, she does too because she stood there and did nothing, and failed to protect her children from him. A mother has a high obligation to protect her children from danger, including her male lovers, and this woman completely failed.

  234. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Spamming IS a dissocial personality disorder. Lack of empathy, a generally antisocial attitude, lack of honesty, possibly even a sadistic streak.

    If you look at it from a statistical level, a good deal of people working in the tech industry are, with apologies, nerds. People who tend to think differently from the established norm also tend to have certain psychological problems (as the old saying goes, there's a thin line between genius and madness).

    Steve Jobs: Narcissistic egotism and antisocial behavior (well documented).
    Bill Gates: Possible asperger syndrome (watch his videos).
    Steve Balmer: Just plain nuts (ditto).
    Terry Childs: Probable paranoid schizophrenia.

    The list could easily be expanded to celebrities like Tom Cruise, and inventors, Henry Ford (paranoid with racist qualities), all the way down to people in government (from J Edgar Hoover up through the presidents themselves).

    While I've gone off track a little, to imply that spammers are just blameless, mischevious, kind hearted elves is a bit off track. With their criminal ties, the mob and like profiting from their work, every mob hit is directly funded in part from spammers.

    Considering how many mission critical systems are frequently attacked and even turned into botnets for spammers, how long until a hospital system gets messed up and a patient dies because the pharmacy system orders V1@Gr@ for everybody? Think about it, won't we? Thank you.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  235. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry that you have so little value for a human life. Please don't misunderstand; I'm pro death penalty.

    So what you mean to say is that you are a whiny hypocritical douchebag who can't even maintain simple principles in your own head without leading to massive internal contradictions?

    How much does anybody want to bet that this sociopathic dickhead calls himself a Christian?

  236. Re:Legal murder agencies... like Planned Parenthoo by Repossessed · · Score: 1

    You do realize that ou destroy your credibility with half the population by putting planned parenthood at the top of he murder list?

    Also, how are suicide bombers a murder agency? I don't see how it benefits anyone financially.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  237. Re:Woo! by Tano · · Score: 1

    Ok, i didn't actually want to get into this discussion, as it's basically an invite to get your karma kicked - but do you really, honestly, consider spamming to be a crime worthy of death ?

    Yes, spamming is definitely a crime, yes it's bloody annoying (oh, i know...), yes the people doing it should be punished for it.

    But is it such a serious crime ?

    Can you actually compare a flood of emails into your inbox, something you can set as "Not Spam" and not see again if the filters are holding, or something you can get away from, at least temporarily by switching email addresses - something that only affects an email address, which is only a small part of your life - to being beaten in the street to within an inch of your life, or getting robbed of your most favorite possessions, or getting killed, or any other really awful crimes that you cannot ignore when they happen to you, as they affect your entire life ?

    It's just a question of scale...

  238. Murder suicide? by KnowledgeEngine · · Score: 1

    I feel the case very well could have been someone tracking him down and trying to set a example for spammers worldwide by going after the family as well. I imagine even murderers and terrorists are peeved about getting spam, and they have the means to take justice into their own hands.

  239. You are a good dad by Charbax · · Score: 1

    I hope for you and for your children that you are a good parent. Though try to consider a situation where you would have been sent to jail for some stupid little thing as some weed or that you had downloaded some music on BitTorrent. That the judge wanted to make an example out of you, that you were totally ridiculed infront of all your family and friends cause they didn't really know what your job was really about. The IRS then takes posession of your home and all your money (fair enough in a certain way if you took that money from people doing spam). Imagine a situation where you were in some crappy prison (like most prisons in the USA, be it minimum or maximum security, they are mostly extremely crappy). Your wife visits you and you see an opportunity to speed off with the car. Maybe your wife comes and tells you that she wants to leave you or something. Now you took the car and left not really thinking about the consequences. You're considering escaping to Mexico or something. But then, you find out by switching on the TV or logging onto the Internet that the FBI, U.S. Marshals, the IRS and the Rocky Mountain Safe Streets Task Force is after you, which makes it practically impossible to escape. And they have shotguns, they might even know where you are. While logging on the Internet you see that Slashdot and a thousand other blogs are making fun of you, the whole Internet is making fun of you. You see, bad circumstances and bad luck can always lead to bad situations and atrocious behavior under very unusual stressful conditions.

  240. Re:Good by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 0

    Hans is an ass, but at least I can explain what Hans did. Spammers have no right to exist.

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
  241. He read the last article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he read the comments of the last slashdot article about him and extrapolated that loathing out to all of society.That would make someone snap.

  242. Re:Legal murder agencies... like Planned Parenthoo by jcr · · Score: 1

    Also, how are suicide bombers a murder agency? I don't see how it benefits anyone financially.

    Saddam Hussein used to pay sizeable chunks of cash to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. Don't know if Hezbollah or Hamas has the money to continue the practice or not.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  243. Re:Good by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

    they feed/profit off people's greed, idiocy, and lack of common sense.

    There, fixed that for you. 99.99999% of all spam is immediately recognizable as BULLSHIT by anyone with half a brain. Anyone who buys any of the crap from a bulk email quite frankly deserves to lose their money. They made a conscious and voluntary choice to get that cheap v1agra and rolexes, and they chose poorly.

    I have no love for spammers, and I wouldn't mind not having to empty out my Junk mail folder everyday. But the sheer amount of raw hatred you and everyone else has for them - why? Seriously, is it THAT big a deal to filter out some junk mail? There are far worse crimes in the world being perpetrated every day.

    --
    Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  244. Re: God Damn Atheist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, atheists say "god damn it" and "go to hell". They are English idioms like any other.

    The "rule of thumb" refers to wife beating tools. Nobody thinks of it that way anymore.

    Other languages have similar idioms. Spanish has many Arabic words in it. Yet, the Spanish are Catholic, and fought the Arabic Moors.

    "Ojala que calle!" literally means "may Allah shut you up!"

  245. Stop spamming the slashdot with your book by Charbax · · Score: 1

    Stop spamming the slashdot with your unsolicited 2076 novel URL. I did not ask for it, it is totally unrelated to the discussion. Putting that link in your profile is despicable, I hope your wife doesn't know about it.

    1. Re:Stop spamming the slashdot with your book by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      I'm speechless. I can't tell if you are trying to be funny or if you are genuinely annoyed?

      Given the context of the conversation, I have to hope that it is the former. But you raise a valid point... I've had the link up for a good year and haven't made any strides to publish a better edited version of the story.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    2. Re:Stop spamming the slashdot with your book by Charbax · · Score: 1

      My point is that we are all spammers to a certain degree. And you have to be a good spammer if you want to get a good job no matter your qualifications, you would always want to have the best job possible, so you have to spam.

      This guy found a way to make a few hundred thousand dollars spamming for penny stocks. This shouldn't warrant him being sent to prison. It's not going to deter any other spammer. Especially not the russian mafia that is spamming about a million times more then this guy, that control about 300 million zombie computer which they use to automatically relay spam. Spam is international, so really there is no point in trying to set some examples in the USA on this thing.

      The Government should rather focus on implementing strategies to block spam.

    3. Re:Stop spamming the slashdot with your book by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      My point is that we are all spammers to a certain degree.

      Okay, I will bite once more to respond to this. I like your arguments and your logic. I agree that personal promotion often takes the form of unsolicited advertisements.

      Hell, I got the idea of linking to my book after seeing others do it. To a larger extent, I've seen obscure novelists on Slashdot in the last year get Mainpage articles linking back to their websites. This type of self-promotion is (almost) necessary for anybody to gain any significant amount of fame.

      Though, I think there are two things that demonstratively differentiate the types of harmless self-promotion spamming that we all do from the deplorable spamming of the Spam King and the Russian Mafia (though I don't specifically know any details, I take your word that they are "bad spammers").

      The first difference is money. No dollars change hands as the result of my harmless spamming. There is no requirement on the clicker of my "spam link" to pay a cent in order to access the content on the other side of the link. There is only a beggarly, "If you enjoy this, please donate." link once you get into that other page. Suffice it to say, advertisements for content that is provided free-of-charge is much different then the ads for Viagra or Pennystocks that you get in your Inbox everyday.

      The second difference is tact. For my link on Slashdot to have any effect at all, I need to get modded up. If you look at my posting history, I take unconventional positions and make very little attempt to "game the system" by posting stuff just to see it modded up. So, knowing that I am not simply trying to whore-karma (because I have better things to do with my time), then you can rest easy knowing that you'll never see my link unless I actually make a positive contribution to a conversation in a different context.

      And a third, indirect, reason that the link to the novel webpage isn't harmless is because it doesn't represent my core business. I am a software engineer. If I were promoting a Contracting Business, then the link would be unethical. Writing is a hobby for me. Certainly, I have a right to promote this labor of love that I have undertaken? If the dynamic ever switched and I got to the point where a significant percentage of my annual income was being generated through my writing, I would certainly take my Slashdot signature link down.

      The Government should rather focus on implementing strategies to block spam.

      Here is where I will take an uncharacteristic view and say I think the government should back off and let businesses handle it. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo have a vested interest to fight spam. As long as the government ensures that no individual or corporation becomes strong enough to use Spam as their core business model, I think we'll be all right. This small bit of regulation would be a better use of my tax dollars than the Millions that could be poured into a government funding sieve in a misguided effort to "Save the Interwebs". The government need only prevent the business model from taking root.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  246. One more reason the spam problem should be solved by shanen · · Score: 1

    Sad story, even a tragedy--and yet I feel like the spammer deserved it. Actually, I'm not sure whether or not the wife was innocent. It's possible she encouraged him in his spamming ways. However, the child certainly didn't deserve such a parent.

    In one sense it's such a sick story that I don't care. However, there is something to be learned there. How about "Greed is *NOT* good" as a moral? I think it's impossible for a sane person to really imagine what is going on inside such a mind, but I'm convinced that greed for "easy" money is part of it.

    And I still feel the spammer deserved worse. I hate spammers too much?

    A suggestion to reduce spam

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  247. Re:Woo! by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, anyone that celebrates his death ignores his final crime and should be held in the utmost contempt.

    Which 'final crime' are you referring to? I celebrate the death of anyone who kills his family. If you're pro-death penalty, wouldn't the killing of his family 'warrant his death'? If not, then what crime would?

  248. m3rc3nary S3rv1ces! by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    Click here for cheap m3rc3nary S3rv1ces!

  249. Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't kill the family, they were assassinated.

    Think about it, the type of person involved with a spam business of that size is probably also involved with other shady business. Perhaps he owed some people some money?

    The guy goes to prison and is forced to hand over his profits; profits that may have been owed to someone else. He hears about an assassination plot against him and flees the prison.

    The people who issued the termination contract find out that the guy escaped and hunt him down. They take out his wife and anyone else that might know about what's been going on. They leave the 3 year-old alone since it's not a liability.

    I'm not sure yet how the teenager was involved, but the news article didn't provide any details on who they were or who's house the incident happened at.

  250. Re:Legal murder agencies... like Planned Parenthoo by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    Also, how are suicide bombers a murder agency? I don't see how it benefits anyone financially.

    Depends. What's the current purchase price of 70 virgins?

    Seriously though, if there is profit in it, it is to the people who run the operations, not the suicide bombers themselves.

  251. Re:Legal murder agencies... like Planned Parenthoo by Repossessed · · Score: 1

    Hmm, you have a source on that? It's not that I don't believe you, as much as that I assume anything related to Iraq is FUD.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  252. Penetration != Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmm....gotta disagree with you there. I can't imagine the GP AC was speaking seriously, and you are obviously trolling, but outside of a locker room 'gay' means 'a man attracted to other men.' Sexual kinks like enjoying anal penetration doesn't make a man gay. (Likewise, a woman can enjoy anal penetration without it making her some twisted kinky slut.)

    Can't imagine anyone will read this post at this point, but just figured I'd weigh in as someone who has a penis and likes women and has enjoyed anal penetration.

    1. Re:Penetration != Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise, a woman can enjoy anal penetration without it making her some twisted kinky slut.

      But it makes it sooo much better when they are!

  253. Hans shot first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hans shot first!

  254. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr morality to the rescue!!!!

  255. Re:Legal murder agencies... like Planned Parenthoo by jcr · · Score: 1

    Hmm, you have a source on that?

    Google for "Saddam suicide bombers", and you'll see CBS and the BBC in the first couple of hits.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  256. Re:Good by bhiestand · · Score: 1

    ...the only conclusion I can extract is that I hope you never breed, we need less people on this earth that act like you just did.

    I agree. That is exactly what the spam king was trying to do. Any woman who would stick with a man while he's stealing and defrauding from millions of people is a piece of trash. He realized his mistake of breeding, so he escaped from jail to end his bloodline and punish his wife for allowing him to do what he did, preventing her from finding and breeding with another guy like him. He then took his own life to benefit society.

    Disclaimer: I don't really think the child and kid deserved to die, but the irony is just too thick tonight.

    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  257. I disagree by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Election day SHOULD be a holiday; its fitting that it gets the LACK of respect that it does.

    Some countries that require it end up with similar results as people who don't care all cancel out.

    The MONEY from fines helps FUND the voting system. Think of it as a non-use tax; since its illegal to create a poll tax (Georgia brought it back.)

    Lazy who do not go vote but are informed enough to elect somebody need a push. There are other things on ballots besides federal politicians...

    I totally understand the game is rigged; more than most.

    Even if 100% corrupt (including ballot initiatives) the LEAST that should be done is to have a yearly REMINDER of how pathetic things are-- too many americans ignore the problem because its not "Disney" and they are wimps.

    The citizens get a government that reflects them as a people. We have Evil Homer (Simpson) because most the voters are Homer-- and the type who climb to the top are not often the nice (and Homer isn't a good judge of character.)

    1. Re:I disagree by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

      Stop posting until you're not an idiot.

      Thanks.

  258. Re:Just reading the comments here changed my thoug by eddeye · · Score: 1

    my previous suggestions that a death penalty be imposed for hardcore spammers.... The characteristics that indicate they have no moral boundaries to commit crimes, elude and evade security measures, hack into private computer systems and create networks of compromised computer systems used to create hell on a global scale, are the same characteristics of mass murderers.

    We don't execute people for how they think, we execute for what they do. Spam doesn't kill people. It's a huge nuisance, but at worst it disrupts communications. Hacking computers can be destructive, but we already have crimes in place to deal with that.

    You're talking about imposing death for economic loss. That goes way beyond the definition of cruel and unusual in any civilized country. Until a spammer actually kills someone, you can't possibly justify taking their life. Dangerous, sure. Lock them up, demand treatment for their mental deficiencies, ok. But taking their life for thoughtcrime? Now that's scary.

    --
    Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
  259. What a waste. by FazzMunkle · · Score: 1

    On his part, what a waste of space.

    On the part of his family, what a waste of life and potential. :(

    I hope hell reserves a special place for him.

  260. Completely agree by ODiV · · Score: 1

    This guy was scum. Just got a little bothered by the "That's something a criminal would do" tone of the post I replied to, that's all.

    I was probably reading a little too much into his response and I see someone beat me to the sentiment, so not much else to say, really.

    Shame about his family.

  261. Re:Good by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Hans is an ass, but at least I can explain what Hans did.

    You can? Please enlighten us.

    The only thing that was clear about that case was that Hans killed his wife, and even that was only after he admitted it and showed them where the body was to get more favourable parole terms. (Some considered the judicial process that convicted Reiser to be flawed even if- in retrospect- it's clear that it came to the correct conclusion).

    Beyond that, the circumstances and motivations behind the killing are still unclear. If you can explain anything beyond that, it would be very enlightening.

    Spammers have no right to exist.

    Nor do their three-year-old children, apparently.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  262. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That child had NO reason to be killed.

    The thing deserved to be killed. It was his offspring, his progeny, not to mention that it was raised under the spammer. Who's to say that it wouldn't become a spammer itself? It is certainly within it's genes. Children of rapists and murderers usually become rapists and murderers themselves. The spammer didn't deserve to have a child, and at the end, he saw the light and committed justice on himself, and his family that were accomplices to his crimes.

    I just wish that more criminals would do this. It would make the world a safer place for the rest of us.

  263. Why is this tagged sad? Tag it darwinawards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The two people he killed were his wife and daughter. This is Darwin at it's best, because his genes are gone now, and the genes of his mate too. I don't see why I should feel any sadness for a dead spammer - he showed disregard for so many people he didn't even know.

    Sad cos a kid died? Kids under the age of 4 show less self-awareness than pigs. IMHO, the only reason they are so heavily protected is because of parents distress at their harming. In this case there are no parents to grieve. Sad for his wife? She lived from profits made at the expense of the powerless rage of millions of people. Was she not aware of what he was doing?

    I'm not saying that murdering spammers and their families is acceptable - but when they do it for us, are we supposed to feel sad? I feel about as sad as he felt, when he sent another million emails.

  264. What I want to know by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    And I know this will get modded to hell and frankly don't care,is why I posted this story a good 12 hours before and it just sat in pending until Kdawson posted it? I have had submissions sit for as long as 3 days until one of the old guys bother posting the exact same story before they reject it. So WTF? Why do you keep asking for submissions if you only want the old guys to post them? And if you were going to reject it,why keep it rotting in pending until one of the old guys post the exact same thing almost word for word?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  265. Re:Good by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

    Where the fuck did I say equally?

    You don't think you inferred it when you lumped them together with the phrase "sick people both"?

    Seeing the world in absolutes, black/white, either/or instead of as various shades of gray is itself often a sign of mental illness.

    Interesting. Anyway, resorting to swearing often means you have too poor a vocabulary and insufficient intelligence to express your "thoughts" any other way. But enough about you.

    By the way 'infer', the word I used above, means to say something without saying it, to hint at it in a roundabout way. You probably get it confused with 'imply'.

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  266. Why? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    not funny.
    If you are serious: why not?

    Short posts are bound to lack information and lacks non-verbal communication, style and context of a live discussion which contributes to miscommunication; resulting in a much greater need for follow up.