Ahem and what pretell is the c-cdoe in Awt based on perchance??
Give you a guess Unix, Windows, andother platform windows toolkit apis..
Gosling should know better thanb to spout off PR bullshit..
SWT is not based on Widnows UI kits as it plugs into not windows UI kits but systme apis.. instead..
By tossing the contribution from problem users you free up problems as the story will obviously get submitted again by a non problem user..
But I do understand its a hard choice to make and puts you into accepting tasks that you might not be prepared to accept..
People forget that when Dave Winer started his own scripting.com blog after writing for wired that he cedited the very first blog to Tim Berners-Lee
To say eh entered blogs is in fact amiss statement..maybe the term re-=awakening should have been used??
Why not use the javascript way of avoiding activeXObject calls when accessing XMlHttpRequest objects on MISE?
Its been in several ajax libraries for the past 4 months!
AJAX is all browsers with the XMlHttpRequest object not just MSIE junk..
It is in fact illegal to do what Sony did with DRM under the current computer laws passed by the Bush administration..
Now lets hold breath and see if Bush actually brings SOny o justice..
Anybody want to swet the reocrd for holding breath at 3 years?
Folks I have made changes to Linux code, Redhat code, IBm code, and etc..
At no point did I pay to be allowed to change that code..
Its about as true as the MS opinon that Eclispe lugins and using Eclipse IDe costs $100K..
I will even go further he is outright using the Same President Bush tactics to LIE!
Be carefull folks MS wans full access to your wallet without your permission..
Funny,
Internet Protocols do not seem to suport SBC CEO's claim as they do not care about his profit margins..
Changing of the guard is coming.. SBC CEO better wake up..
Is Daniel Lyons runing scared?
Remmeber folks the typical attack aginst blog post usually starts like this:
1. We want such such a post removed..
2. We will sue to hav epost removed..
3. Than when we Bloggers assert our legal rights.. no sound from the complainer is heard..
I have been attacked myself for posting apost describing a spammers actiosn agsint me..
He shut the f*ck up when I called the Washignton State Attorneys office..
Its the smae over any MS programming language and MS IDE..
Go to any college or university using that MS IDE product..
Now check any basic proejct for code validating user input..you will not find any..do you know why?
Lets see the laypersons terms..
Imagine trying to learn calculus with a computer or calculator first instead of pencil and paper..
Sure computer saves time but the basic foudnation skills are lost if introduced too early..
Are we sure Hemos that SUSe soruce is nto aviable to cusotmozie and use for free from Novell or are just guessing??
Try guessig a little harder next time
Two points, who is afraid of Oracle?
1. Are there thousands of SCO users/customers left? If so where the heck are they and why did they not sign up for newer versions of SCOware as evidence in the quarterly statments?
2. Is any gain customer share aginst the Oracle onslaught worth future reputation damage that relfects in how hard the cusotmer sales pitch might be to overcome this issue?
Surely, there is a better move aginst Oracle than this choice..no??
The prolbem I see is that Tim Bray on his own labs blog in the early 1990s did detail xml long before these patent applicaiton dates..
Can we say whoops?
Contrast withe US and other Markets where MS believes that yes you can give away free MS Software to unexperienced uses such as in USA, INdina, and etc??
MS BOLD FACE LYING AGIAIN
I would submit until he does a study with qualitive analysi fo the quality its only someone's personal belief and nto a fact..
Its well known that specific wiki foudners ar ento satisfied with the route wikipedia went and that is based on personal opinion and not factual..
Lets be blunt are you aware of that all major Encyclopedia pulbihers paid fro feedback to correct incorrect entries?
its not just a wikipedia problem but problem when you publish anything!
Be carefull of MS could support statements
when they did this with POSIX they did not go to the actual lciense holder of the IP of POSIX, Novell, but went to TSCO...
to be fair to MS was it not the saem excuse SUn gave when gving money to TSCo that they neded to make sure POSIX was supproted?
Would that be the same POSIX that they thought TSCO Group had IP lciense to when in fact Novel was the actual IP owener?
I think MS should get their IP story straight before showing up at Unix conferences..
Ths is from soemone that contributes to IPTV proejcts in the FOSS community:
1. IPTV is not MS 'owned'! IPTV is an independent standard
2. Its not technical implementations that is slowing or speedign up deployment its the content rpoviders refusing to adopt 'internet' style free-wheeling acceptance of content form all producers. Cable companeis tend to want to monopolize their content so as to prevent outsiders from competing..
Wittness the death tol of DeviceTop.com owned by Espial. Cable companei sin the USA did not want to hear from outside content providers/developrs and thus the plan by Espial to get 3rd party content into USA via IPTV failed due to cable wanting to monopolize and lock out developers to avoid facing competition.
An obvious question..
Once the RDIF chips is canned adn the data from the chip is transmitted to teh computer infrastructure is any data than transmitted back to the chip??
In every implementation I have read it is not..
I do not knwo which is worse Boston Globe readers levle of IQ after the Red Sox loss or Slashdot readers..
Go White Sox!
You know according the judges ruling the other high inducement to piracy device is in fact he music CD itself since it shighly copyable..
Does thi smean that RIAA members are required to issue only DRM protected musci CDs to comply with the judge's ruling/order?
And if so than does that RIAA members can sued for non-compliance?
What is good for the goose had better be good for the gander..
Is it not about time that the RIAa get sued with their own legal theories?
Slashdot Mirror
Ahem and what pretell is the c-cdoe in Awt based on perchance?? Give you a guess Unix, Windows, andother platform windows toolkit apis.. Gosling should know better thanb to spout off PR bullshit.. SWT is not based on Widnows UI kits as it plugs into not windows UI kits but systme apis.. instead..
By tossing the contribution from problem users you free up problems as the story will obviously get submitted again by a non problem user.. But I do understand its a hard choice to make and puts you into accepting tasks that you might not be prepared to accept..
Its Time: Impeach Bush Now Nothing more to be said..
People forget that when Dave Winer started his own scripting.com blog after writing for wired that he cedited the very first blog to Tim Berners-Lee To say eh entered blogs is in fact amiss statement..maybe the term re-=awakening should have been used??
See the David Brandt article on wiki it seems more accurate than TheRegister articles..
Why not use the javascript way of avoiding activeXObject calls when accessing XMlHttpRequest objects on MISE? Its been in several ajax libraries for the past 4 months! AJAX is all browsers with the XMlHttpRequest object not just MSIE junk..
It is in fact illegal to do what Sony did with DRM under the current computer laws passed by the Bush administration.. Now lets hold breath and see if Bush actually brings SOny o justice.. Anybody want to swet the reocrd for holding breath at 3 years?
Folks I have made changes to Linux code, Redhat code, IBm code, and etc.. At no point did I pay to be allowed to change that code.. Its about as true as the MS opinon that Eclispe lugins and using Eclipse IDe costs $100K.. I will even go further he is outright using the Same President Bush tactics to LIE! Be carefull folks MS wans full access to your wallet without your permission..
Funny, Internet Protocols do not seem to suport SBC CEO's claim as they do not care about his profit margins.. Changing of the guard is coming.. SBC CEO better wake up..
Is Daniel Lyons runing scared? Remmeber folks the typical attack aginst blog post usually starts like this: 1. We want such such a post removed.. 2. We will sue to hav epost removed.. 3. Than when we Bloggers assert our legal rights .. no sound from the complainer is heard..
I have been attacked myself for posting apost describing a spammers actiosn agsint me..
He shut the f*ck up when I called the Washignton State Attorneys office..
On its face MS Office does not handle OpenDocument format so theother claism are entirely suspect.. Do anly /. contribs actually read what they submit?
Its the smae over any MS programming language and MS IDE.. Go to any college or university using that MS IDE product.. Now check any basic proejct for code validating user input..you will not find any ..do you know why?
Lets see the laypersons terms..
Imagine trying to learn calculus with a computer or calculator first instead of pencil and paper..
Sure computer saves time but the basic foudnation skills are lost if introduced too early..
I say we hold a contest for designing Onion's Next White House seal.. I say it shoudl picture Bush on a Jackass backwards as the seal..
Are we sure Hemos that SUSe soruce is nto aviable to cusotmozie and use for free from Novell or are just guessing?? Try guessig a little harder next time
Two points, who is afraid of Oracle? 1. Are there thousands of SCO users/customers left? If so where the heck are they and why did they not sign up for newer versions of SCOware as evidence in the quarterly statments? 2. Is any gain customer share aginst the Oracle onslaught worth future reputation damage that relfects in how hard the cusotmer sales pitch might be to overcome this issue? Surely, there is a better move aginst Oracle than this choice..no??
The prolbem I see is that Tim Bray on his own labs blog in the early 1990s did detail xml long before these patent applicaiton dates.. Can we say whoops?
Contrast withe US and other Markets where MS believes that yes you can give away free MS Software to unexperienced uses such as in USA, INdina, and etc?? MS BOLD FACE LYING AGIAIN
I would submit until he does a study with qualitive analysi fo the quality its only someone's personal belief and nto a fact.. Its well known that specific wiki foudners ar ento satisfied with the route wikipedia went and that is based on personal opinion and not factual.. Lets be blunt are you aware of that all major Encyclopedia pulbihers paid fro feedback to correct incorrect entries? its not just a wikipedia problem but problem when you publish anything!
Be carefull of MS could support statements when they did this with POSIX they did not go to the actual lciense holder of the IP of POSIX, Novell, but went to TSCO... to be fair to MS was it not the saem excuse SUn gave when gving money to TSCo that they neded to make sure POSIX was supproted?
Would that be the same POSIX that they thought TSCO Group had IP lciense to when in fact Novel was the actual IP owener? I think MS should get their IP story straight before showing up at Unix conferences..
Ths is from soemone that contributes to IPTV proejcts in the FOSS community: 1. IPTV is not MS 'owned'! IPTV is an independent standard 2. Its not technical implementations that is slowing or speedign up deployment its the content rpoviders refusing to adopt 'internet' style free-wheeling acceptance of content form all producers. Cable companeis tend to want to monopolize their content so as to prevent outsiders from competing.. Wittness the death tol of DeviceTop.com owned by Espial. Cable companei sin the USA did not want to hear from outside content providers/developrs and thus the plan by Espial to get 3rd party content into USA via IPTV failed due to cable wanting to monopolize and lock out developers to avoid facing competition.
An obvious question.. Once the RDIF chips is canned adn the data from the chip is transmitted to teh computer infrastructure is any data than transmitted back to the chip?? In every implementation I have read it is not.. I do not knwo which is worse Boston Globe readers levle of IQ after the Red Sox loss or Slashdot readers.. Go White Sox!
How much coke does RIAa need before it prices itslef fully out of the music business??
You know according the judges ruling the other high inducement to piracy device is in fact he music CD itself since it shighly copyable.. Does thi smean that RIAA members are required to issue only DRM protected musci CDs to comply with the judge's ruling/order? And if so than does that RIAA members can sued for non-compliance? What is good for the goose had better be good for the gander.. Is it not about time that the RIAa get sued with their own legal theories?
Lets see they produce music but want cut of hardware sales? Can we say lik eShakespear.. Stick where the sun do not shine?