"...wherein the sanity level of the game character is increased if the game character locates a mind aid during game play. "
dammit, i was just about to release my debut game, "Insanity Check", where the main character is insane, and his/her sole mission was to locate mind aids to increase his/her sanity level.
so if you had possession of said pin (number) letter.... you could just open it!? if you were trying to be discrete about it, a computer savvy thief could also repackage the contents.
Jonathan: A quick browse over your book left me wondering about chapter 10. You stress the importance of continuity when testing a corpus of messages.
Others have presented the following method to testing:
shuffle ham and spam,
use some defined percentage of each to train, rest to test,
calculate results...,
delete database,
repeat,
average results.
Obviously, continuity is lost. Could you give some more support to why continuity is so important?
Ok, quick and easy question.
For my master's thesis,
I am testing some additions and tweaks to the common bayesian spam filter.
Without revealing my plans...
what are some tweaks or additions you would like to see tested?
Thanks.
And were the people that lived there welcoming?
Did they offer a room to stay in?
seriously, the parent should be modded troll.... anybody who takes 3 hours to install a cdrw has bigger problems to take care of.
but... anybody who buys an 'eMachines' is also slightly off
"...wherein the sanity level of the game character is increased if the game character locates a mind aid during game play. "
dammit, i was just about to release my debut game, "Insanity Check", where the main character is insane, and his/her sole mission was to locate mind aids to increase his/her sanity level.
seriously, this is yet another retarded patent.
"The promoter, Alfredo Romeo,..."
did anybody else read this as Alfa Romeo?
so if you had possession of said pin (number) letter.... you could just open it!?
if you were trying to be discrete about it, a computer savvy thief could also repackage the contents.
Jonathan:
A quick browse over your book left me wondering about chapter 10.
You stress the importance of continuity when testing a corpus of messages.
Others have presented the following method to testing:
shuffle ham and spam,
use some defined percentage of each to train, rest to test,
calculate results...,
delete database,
repeat,
average results.
Obviously, continuity is lost.
Could you give some more support to why continuity is so important?
;-) oh no, Word is unacceptable. I deal only with LaTeX. Thanks.
Ok, quick and easy question. For my master's thesis, I am testing some additions and tweaks to the common bayesian spam filter. Without revealing my plans... what are some tweaks or additions you would like to see tested? Thanks.