Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Autos Hit the Streets in Spain

markdowling writes "BBC News has a story about electrically powered tourist cars in Cordoba which provide tourist information in French, English and Spanish as landmarks are passed. The promoter, Alfredo Romeo, calls them Blobjects which he heard described in a speech by Bruce Sterling. The car's tourist guide software is open source - Romeo's quoted reason: 'With proprietary software, innovation comes from the people in marketing. But with open source, innovation comes from the guy who is really in the market. It comes from someone who knows the city.'"

110 comments

  1. More at Global Electric Motorcars Web Site by Hulkster · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those interested in more details about the GEM car and some MUCH better pictures than the small ones in the BBC article, here's GEM's web site.

    Ironically, the Wikipedia Blobject article says it "needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality. This article has been tagged since April 2005" - you'd think that all those "hip" Blogject'ers would have made this entry super cool and happening.

    Concrete Cam is up and running.

    1. Re:More at Global Electric Motorcars Web Site by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

      Best of all, for all of its innovative design, GEM is suprisingly affordable.

      Yeah, the GEM is surprisingly affordable but it certainly doesn't have an "innovative design" as it's just about the same as any electric golf cart with a roof and seatbelts.

    2. Re:More at Global Electric Motorcars Web Site by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but it certainly doesn't have an "innovative design" as it's just about the same as any electric golf cart with a roof and seatbelts.

      Yes, it's an insult to innovation. Look, they're stealing the all-innovative car design with 4 wheels and a motor! Unbelievable.

  2. So one tiny part of the car is open source by blowdart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But that apparently means slashdot can call the whole car open source.

    Is there anything factual these days in topics, or is it just astroturfing for OSTG?

    1. Re:So one tiny part of the car is open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, I thought someone had free plans to make an electric car...

    2. Re:So one tiny part of the car is open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you figure out the parts of the car which utilize source code besides the onboard computers, you let everybody know. Until then, all parts of the car which can be open source are open source, and so the car can be called open source.

      Thanks for playing.

    3. Re:So one tiny part of the car is open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are numerous embedded systems controlling many aspects of the vehicle that are proprietary. The open source is just in the navigation system for the touch screen computer mounted in the dash.

      Prick.

  3. pun? by jshaped · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The promoter, Alfredo Romeo,..."

    did anybody else read this as Alfa Romeo?

    1. Re:pun? by Alien+Being · · Score: 0, Redundant

      His colleagues are Harvey Ford and
      Random Olds.

    2. Re:pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it as linguine alfredo.

    3. Re:pun? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      No but I wondered if the car stereo is made by Sorny or Parasonic.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    4. Re:pun? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      I know I'd rather scoot around town in one of those new 159s than a crappy little electric golf cart.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:pun? by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1
      No but I wondered if the car stereo is made by Sorny or Parasonic.
      Actually, it's a Carnivale. It comes in a plastic cabinet to prevent fall apart.
      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    6. Re:pun? by bynary · · Score: 1

      What about Magnetbox?

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    7. Re:pun? by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1

      Listen, I'm not going to lie to you. Those are all superior machines. But if you like to watch your TV, and I mean really watch it, you want the Carnivale. It features two-pronged wall plug, pre-molded hand grip well, durable outer casing to prevent fall apart.

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
  4. Bad choice of titles. by Kenja · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Bad choice of titles, should have avoided the word "hit". I just get this image of a massive car wreck as penguin feathers drift slowly to the ground. Perhaps "Open Source Autos Released in Spain" or somthing.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Bad choice of titles. by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the phrase "hit the streets" usually means a collision...

      *sigh*

    2. Re:Bad choice of titles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But just because the car has an accessory which, in turn, has some open source software, we get to call it an "Open Source Auto"?

      This is as bad as anything Microsoft's marketing people have come up with. Bad choice of titles indeed. "Misleading" would be a better description.

  5. Informative Link by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative


    The promoter, Alfredo Romeo, calls them Blobjects which he heard described in a speech by Bruce Sterling.

    Here's a link to the Bruce Sterling speech, referenced by Alfredo Romeo, courtesy of
    boingboing.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  6. Slow... by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These GEM's are really niche market. Great for little towns where its 20mph or less, but if you hold up traffic then they are in the wrong place. Just as golf carts in the USA, they are a pain in the ass when given the right of way.

    GEMcar.com even says "build the town/neighborhood around the car"..

    1. Re:Slow... by geomon · · Score: 1

      And limited range.

      I drive 30 miles to work one way. I would need a recharge just to get home - forget about cruising around to other locations.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:Slow... by bombadillo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These GEM's are really niche market. Great for little towns where its 20mph or less, but if you hold up traffic then they are in the wrong place. Just as golf carts in the USA, they are a pain in the ass when given the right of way. GEMcar.com even says "build the town/neighborhood around the car"..

      These could work in really big Cities. Traffic in big congested cities is stop and go and averages about 20MPH. Unfortunately modern U.S. cities have given up the grid patern and let the developers do the planing ad hoc with huge high ways. These GEM cars won't work in these "modern" cities.

      I could see these things working in European cities or even the older U.S. cities. Big Cities that charge congestion tolls could make exceptions for these small vehicles.

    3. Re:Slow... by bfields · · Score: 1
      These could work in really big Cities. Traffic in big congested cities is stop and go and averages about 20MPH. Unfortunately modern U.S. cities have given up the grid patern and let the developers do the planing ad hoc with huge high ways.

      The big arteries usually have more than 2 lanes, and the outer lanes (on a surface street, not a restricted-access freeway) probably already has people turning in and out of driveways, parallel parking, etc. A slow-moving vehicle in the outer lane isn't going to be a big deal.

      Even on fast two-lane streets it's usually not going to be that hard to pass a small slow-moving vehicle.

      I doubt there's really any serious problem here.

      --Bruce Fields

    4. Re:Slow... by suzerain · · Score: 1

      I was wondering what these things were, but didn't care enough to look. I've seen these going around my neighborhood for a couple of months now (East Village, New York City). It looks like the NYC Parks Department is one of their customers; they are probably good for shuttling between the various myriad of parks in the city.

      And no, since the average car speed in Manhattan is 4 MPH, I don't think theyre holding anything up. (Sometimes I will walk down a street faster than a bus gets down the same distance...forget about the bus if I'm on my bike.)

      --
      gameDB
    5. Re:Slow... by Elshar · · Score: 1

      Yea, there's a couple people in the town I live in that bought them and started driving them around. Needless to say they were driving the local populace (including me) absolutely nuts. They can only go 20-25mph or so.

      Eventually the city council passed a local ordinance banning them from any street where the speed limit is greater than 25 mph. So they're actually quite useless for driving around town.

      What GEM needs to do is make a model that can go 25-35 or so. Then they'd be recieved better by the communities that have to put up with them.

    6. Re:Slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, cause I live in the city they're made it, and they go 35mph just fine.

    7. Re:Slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must be limited or something then, cause the vehicle can do 35. Some places have limits on what speed they are ALLOWED to drive, due to impact resistance, but the cars themselves can handle it.

    8. Re:Slow... by Elshar · · Score: 1

      No they can't. They can go 0-15 in 'low' or 20-25 in 'high' gear. According to the manufacturer's specs. And the ones I've seen have never gone above 25.

    9. Re:Slow... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Great for little towns where its 20mph or less, but if you hold up traffic then they are in the wrong place.

      Sorry. Your right to use the public streets, at unsafe speeds (yes, 50km is unsafe enough to kill you, a pedestrian or someone else you hit..).

      My 20km electric car has every right on the public roadway as your speeding death-machine.

      I ride a bike in a poorly planned, sprawling Canadian city of 350,000 (metro) all year. I have a good job and pay plenty of taxes -- im becoming VERY of people rushing up to my rear, honking, driving agressive, passing-within-feet, trying to cut me off, telling me to get-the-&@(*Q#-onto-the-sidewalk (and other colorfull instruction), having crap thrown at me (batteries, pennies, garbage), etc etc etc.

      In case you hadnt noticed, gas was getting expensive. It is NEVER going to be inexpensive again - never never never. I ride my bike as a altruistic measure to lessen the burden on the planet and am harrassed.

      While auto-driving-wasters -- responsible for unmeasurable pollution, injuries, expense -- feel a self-rightious sense of entitlement to municipal planning and infrastructure.

      The Auto-age is dead. The sooner you come to realize that these niche market GEMs are not *HOLDING UP TRAFFIC* but improving your communities standard of living, the better off we'll all be.

      Oh, speaking of pain in the ass, invading foreign lands to control the oil supply is a bit of a bother too isnt it? what about the US$450Billion price tag?

      Thats just a _little_ more of a pain -- maybe?

    10. Re:Slow... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      You spend 95% of your life at two places. Home and Work.

      What would possess you to live so far away? Time to start thinking about living closer to work -- your car is an unimagined luxury, and your not going to have that leisure for long...

      the Chinease and Indians might like lightbulbs and concrete floors for their huts -- thats going to take PLENTY of gas. Your going to compete in the international marketplace for that oil.

      What do you think its going to cost you to drive your existing car 30miles in 15, 25, 35 years? What do you think that drive is going to look like? 5 passenger, steel, 4x4 suv that gets 15mpg -- or a 40mph golf-cart? I'll bet the latter.

    11. Re:Slow... by geomon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You spend 95% of your life at two places. Home and Work. What would possess you to live so far away?

      Because I can have room for my dogs (two German Shorthair) to run and my nearest neighbor is 30 meters from my house. I also have a spectacular view of the river from my house.

      Time to start thinking about living closer to work..

      Well, that is one possible way to attack the problem. I prefer to do more of my work at home, thereby not starting my internal combustion engine at all.

      -- your car is an unimagined luxury,

      Not where I live, nor in the line of work I am in. I am a geologist and the work I am in requires that I go to where the contamination is to clean it up.

      and your not going to have that leisure for long...

      You and your grandchildren's grandchildren better hope you are wrong. If I don't get to where the contamination is, you will be eating/drinking it on or in your dinner/lunch/breakfast.

      the Chinease and Indians might like lightbulbs and concrete floors for their huts -- thats going to take PLENTY of gas.

      Quite possibly. They will not, however, have to string miles of copper across their country to have nation-wide telephony. Cell phones have seen to that. And the Chinese are building out gigawatts of nuclear power, lessening their dependence on fossil fuels for electrical generation.

      Your going to compete in the international marketplace for that oil.

      Here's some news for you: I already do.

      What do you think its going to cost you to drive your existing car 30miles in 15, 25, 35 years?

      I don't plan on owning this particular vehicle in 10 years, so your question is moot.

      What do you think that drive is going to look like?

      SPACE CARS!!!

      Haven't you seen a modernist movie of the future?

      5 passenger, steel, 4x4 suv that gets 15mpg -- or a 40mph golf-cart? I'll bet the latter.

      I'll take that bet. You see there were plenty of people in 1980 who would have bet on the golf cart and lost.

      Your ability to predict the future of oil is mitigated by the behaviour a human's response to market demands.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    12. Re:Slow... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      I'll see your market demands and raise you a falling supply coupled with increased demand.

  7. bumper sticker by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    "Powered by Linux"

    Just spotted on the register: "As usual, shipments of Linux servers grew fastest. The Penguin's presence swelled by 45 per cent in terms of revenue, outpacing the 14 per cent growth of Windows servers and the 3 per cent Unix server growth."

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:bumper sticker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This car isn't powered by linux. Way to be offtopic you moron.

  8. +1 Insightful? by Rurik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'With proprietary software, innovation comes from the people in marketing. But with open source, innovation comes from the guy who is really in the market. It comes from someone who knows the city.'

    Is it possible to give a quoted source in an article +1 for Insightful?

    1. Re:+1 Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It isn't.

      And if it were, I'd mod it right back down. Geek pandering, and devoid of reality.

    2. Re:+1 Insightful? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As long as people live in the fantasy land of "OSS is the only solution", it will always remain just that - a fantasy. No matter how eloquently you write that sentiment, it always comes across as "oss rulz, proprietary drulz" or however that phrase goes. If people with domain knowledge design and write software, it can be good regardless of what licensing scheme it is released under.

    3. Re:+1 Insightful? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Well, there's something that needs mention.

      Before, only people with money could make products - the shift comes when the products are software. And ANYONE can make software now. It's not like you need an industrialized manufacturing plant or something...

      The key here is quality. It doesn't matter if it's open source or not... how good is it actually? Ah, there's the question.

    4. Re:+1 Insightful? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Insightful? That's the part of the quote I immediately rolled my eyes at -- it's incredibly stupid and ignorant. How does he think products get developed in the real world? Got news for him -- big companies with lots of resources produce most of computer innovation. I'm still waiting for something innovative to come out of Open Source. Most, if not all, of it is copying proprietary software.

      Not to say that Open Source isn't useful, I use it every day. But innovation is not (currently) what Open Source is all about.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:+1 Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully no. How can you whore otherwise?

    6. Re:+1 Insightful? by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 1

      With Open Source, innovation usually comes from the guy who is copying the feature set of some existing closed source application.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm pro-Open Source, but to suggest that OSS is generally innovative requires hitting the Kool-Aid pretty friggin' hard.

      If you disagree, post counter-examples that prove I'm wrong rather than modding me down, please.

    7. Re:+1 Insightful? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      As you've so rightly pointed out, utility and innovation are two completely different things. Open Source, while posessing lots of utility, doesn't posess much innovation.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    8. Re:+1 Insightful? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Is it possible to give a quoted source in an article +1 for Insightful?

      It's possible, but "-1, Troll" would be more appropriate.

    9. Re:+1 Insightful? by dotlin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... big companies with lots of resources produce most of computer innovation. I'm still waiting for something innovative to come out of Open Source. Most, if not all, of it is copying proprietary software.
      Your statement hinges on your definition of innovation. I find that word often used as a buzzword, usually in the same breath as patents. I'm sure if you counted all the software patents that there are more owned by proprietary software companies. If however you use the word innovation to mean "a new device or process" then I would like to see some evidence to support your claim. Other factors are at play that can help/hinder innovation besides the type of software license such as:
      • competion - monopolies don't need to innovate. An example is that Microsoft had stopped development on Internet Explorer (IE) 6 SP1 as the final standalone version in June, 2003(1) since it is just part of the Operating System. Then in Feb 2005(2) they announced they changed their mind and IE 7 will be out for Windows XP. (Surely just a coincidence that Firefox 1.0 was had been released in that time frame). Capabilities like RSS based live bookmarks and tabbed browsing in Firefox may or may not be innovative by your definition (I don't know - I'm not trying to troll or inflame) - however it has raised the bar for web browsing and helped prod Microsoft to produce a better product. Note that Microsoft sat back for years with no innovation for IE, or even proper bug fixes for CSS support and you can't say it's because of lack of resources...
      • cooperation - in particular open formats/protocols - TCP/IP ultimately begat HTTP and Mosaic.
      • market share and network effect - IRC begat Instant Messaging but that wasn't innovative until MSN Messenger came along to patent custom emoticons. (3)

      Is it possible to count all the software innovations and then make a determination of whether that innovation came from an open or proprietary software license?Maybe Microsoft can fund a study?

      References:

      1. http://www.zone-h.org/en/news/read/id=2789/
      2. http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/feb0 5/02-15RSA05KeynotePR.mspx
      3. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/23/13 8228&tid=155&tid=109
      --
      Transmitting energy without a license.
  9. Optimism by truckaxle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It costs about US$50 (£28) for a two-hour rental

    This sounds low and optimistic. I wish them luck but when you are dealing with the public you have to design for the lowest common denominator and that can be surprisingly low. Liability insurance will cost an arm and leg for this venture.

    Also there is a certain sense of entitlement and disrespect of others or common property that is engrained in the public mind. This is why projects that attempt to altrustically provide free public bicycles often (always?) fail.

    But the open source software sounds cool.

    1. Re:Optimism by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 1

      In Spain, insurance is considerably less and services on the whole are much cheaper than in the states.

    2. Re:Optimism by truckaxle · · Score: 1

      What are you saying they don't have a lottery style legal liability system where someone with deep pockets is liable for every stupid thing that happens to people. How unamerican! I say we liberate them from such tyranny.

    3. Re:Optimism by guaigean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're kidding right? I can rent a car on average in the US I can rent a full size car for a full day for ~$50. Are you telling me that $50 for two hours in a golf cart is cheap?

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    4. Re:Optimism by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      $50 is a lot, you can get an actual gasoline rental car for around $100 for a whole day, or a Zipcar for around $5 an hour.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    5. Re:Optimism by Morris+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      Um, this is in Spain, not the U.S.

      The Spanish are not sue-happy like we are.
      As far as trashing the cars, I can tell you that, as a whole, attitudes are very different.

      Oh wait, the cars *are* for tourists, many of whom will be Americans.

      Never mind.

    6. Re:Optimism by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and a street legal golf cart will run you about $5k or more; horrible value compared to a car. It's the novelty of the thing.

    7. Re:Optimism by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      You of course forget that liability laws in europer in general aren't as nuts as the U.S of A and probably wouldn't be as big a problem.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  10. Where's the source? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The computer system is based on open source software developed by a company in Seville, Spain. As with any open source software, anyone can improve and change Blobject's code, as long as those improvements and changes are shared with others.


    really? what company? where is a link to the sourcecode? I love stories devoid of information and throw around the term "open source"

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Where's the source? by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Open source" doesn't require a link to source code, let alone that a BBC article about you have a link to source code.

      Buy yourself a Blobject, request the source code and complain to us if they don't provide it. When we stop laughing at you in your silly golf cart, we'll get outraged then.

  11. Link to Alfredo Romeo's Website by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Link to the Alfredo Romeo website in English with some interesting details on these cars.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  12. Sensationalist Headline? by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "open source auto" = "a regular car with a tour guide program which is ostensibly open source".

    Big difference, there, "Scuttlemonkey".

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  13. Another version.... by PHPhD2B · · Score: 1

    They also made another version, in a factory down south to promote employment in that region. They call it the Alfredosud.

    --
    --I am Sun Tzu of the Borg. Resistance is feudal.
  14. Knowing the city... by rca66 · · Score: 1
    'With proprietary software, innovation comes from the people in marketing. But with open source, innovation comes from the guy who is really in the market. It comes from someone who knows the city.'

    Well, but they only know it from Google Maps. The guys from marketing at least can tell the dear visitor the coolest, newest and hippest clubs in town.

    1. Re:Knowing the city... by AGMW · · Score: 1

      Now, if they added a GPS to the thing, and some way for the driver to register, on returning to the vehicle, that they had had a good time at the current local, maybe even the restaurant/theatre/etc they visited, then the car could be actively feeding information about what is good in the city for future visitors.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
  15. Misleading title by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

    My chauffeur is sick, anyone know where to find a driver for this peripheral?

    Seriously, the car operating software is not open-source... it's the navigational system software that is. The owner of the company makes a valid point about marketing-driven vs. user-driven software, but I surmise that this is a great example of OS working in the market...

    It's cheaper to use open-source in some circumstances.

    However, it is very misleading to write that the car is open-source.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  16. Truer Words... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...have never been spoken. What do marketers really know anyway. Other than what's shiny... ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Truer Words... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      No, it's vapid and devoid of content, much like your post.

      Maybe I'm just a dumb slave, but the fact is I like and use some propietary software. Does that mean I am a marketing droid unable to think for myself? No, it means that I saw what was out there and made a choice, the very definition of freedom. I also use a lot of OSS tools, does that mean anything? Not really, there is a market, and I made a choice.

      The one thing I can't stand about OSS zealouts is how they scream "freedom" but get mad when freedom means a choice that isn't OSS. Choice=freedom, end of story.

    2. Re:Truer Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yet another anti-/ post. And in typical form, proceeds to bash the basher by..... bashing. Come on, at least put some effort (read: thought) into it, will ya?

      > No, it's vapid and devoid of content, much like your post.

      And 99.999% of all marketting. Well in excess of Sturgen's Law.

    3. Re:Truer Words... by 2short · · Score: 1

      Marketers may or may not know anything at all. The person quoted certainly doesn't know what they're talking about. I write proprietary software, and marketers are not the drivers of any design or technical decisions whatsoever. They just ask questions about the software after it's done, and promote it based on features that strike me as trivial or irrelevant. For example, it's no doubt a marketer who decided they should push the "open-source" nature of this car. The engineers would know that 99% of the tech in this car is proprietary, including all the fun parts. It's the dopey little tour-guide box that's open source. Ask for IP-unencumbered schematics for their electronic speed controllers and see if the car itself is "open source".

      Frankly, a disparagement of marketers is kind of funny coming from a guy who is one; as far as I can tell, fairly exclusively.

    4. Re:Truer Words... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Speed controllers! Who cares about the speed controllers!? The important content is the tour-guide box because without it how do you expect the city to market itself!!!? ;P

      I am not a marketer. I'm a musician who manages a lot of different systems (OSes, routers, switches, etc...). I do it all. Scripting, coding, configs, managing staff, working with vendors and clients, etc... ad nauseum. Yep. Not a marketer.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    5. Re:Truer Words... by 2short · · Score: 1


      I didn't mean you were a marketer, but rather Alfredo Romeo, who's seems to elsewhere be named Alfredo Romeo Molina; but I can't tell if the difference is Spanish last name conventions which I don't fully understand, or a concious effort to make his name sound like Alpha-Romeo when connected to cars. In any case, he seems to not have developed any of the tech involved, but just markets it. He also writes books that look to me like Spanish language re-hashings of English language open source boosterism. Basically, he's got "huckster" written all over him.

      In any case, though I dig at marketers, I've worked at a company that had technically savvy people moonlighting as the marketing department, and at one that had proper, competent marketers, who were technical idiots. I can only conclude that knowing what is shiny is both harder and more important than it seems.

    6. Re:Truer Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a great world we live in! Programmers can write whatever they like in proprietary software shops. Then, when they feel like they've finished a great and wonderful project that is a testament to great technology and software design, they call up the marketing department so the marketeers can ask questions and figure out how they can sell this newly born revolution in software.

      Oh wait. That's right. Programmers don't make strategic, and therefore MARKETING, decisions for proprietary companies. Product development is done by MARKETING and executive staff, NOT by programmers.

      Welcome to reality.

    7. Re:Truer Words... by 2short · · Score: 1

      Hey man, sorry you work somewhere lame. Maybe you should try working for a smaller company. Product development where I work is done by developers. Executives help identify the business problems products should help to solve. Marketers know how to sell stuff. Why should they know how to build it or what it is even possible to build? Why should this be different than any other industry? Do the people that make ads for cars design the traction-control system? Do they have anything to do with it before it's done?

  17. No regen brakes by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it difficult to believe that an EV manufacturer would product a series of EV's that don't include regenerative brakes. Another reader commented that this is "a modified golf cart," and I'd have to say he's right. I'd have *some* respect for these folks if they had regen brakes as an option, or had "regen + hydraulic backup." As it stands, it really is just a golf cart with a NEV rating. Meh ...

    1. Re:No regen brakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regen for an EV requires a more complicated, more expensive controller. From looking at the vehicles, low cost was a priority.

    2. Re:No regen brakes by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Hydraulic brakes ain't free ...

      They've already got the motor, geartrain, and controller up front. Remove the front hydraulic system and substitute the "upgraded" regen controller. I'd bet the dollars come out about even. Then opt for trailer-style electric brakes in the rear - that eliminates *all* of the hydraulic plumbing, and still allows the use of a cable operated parking brake. You may build redundancy into the system as you see fit.

      I just don't see these guys trying very hard. If they expect to be considered an EV and not a glorified golf cart, they need to behave like they're building the former. If I want a golf cart, I'll go buy a Club Car. Hey looky! The Club Car golf cart has regenrative braking ... so the GEV isn't even that good ...

    3. Re:No regen brakes by entirety · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the 2005 user manual... ----snip----- Speed Control: GE solid state controller with: * Motor thermal protection * Battery under-voltage protection * Regenerative brakes ----------Looks regenerative to me. * Top speed regulation ----end snip--

    4. Re:No regen brakes by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      If only they'd have had you on the design team! The thought must never even have entered their minds...

    5. Re:No regen brakes by evilviper · · Score: 2
      I find it difficult to believe that an EV manufacturer would product a series of EV's that don't include regenerative brakes.

      Who the hell said they don't have regenerative brakes? They DO have regenerative brakes. Not only does it say so in the docs on their website, but I've even driven one up/down hills and watched as the battery meter goes UP (a couple percent) as it is stopping.

      Another reader commented that this is "a modified golf cart," and I'd have to say he's right.

      No, it's not. They have less in-common than golf carts than they do with typical cars. They can be used as golf-carts, however, but I wouldn't recomend it. They weigh probably 3Xs as much as the heaviest golf cart you can find, and the electric motors in GEMs are monsterously powerful... probably an order of magnitude (10X) more powerful than golf carts. Even set to "turf", anyone who isn't very light on the accelerator will find themselves digging 2-inch deep holes in the ground...

      Besides that it has a very strong aluminum frame (basically a roll-cage), an impact-resistant windsheild, windsheild wipers, and headlights, all of which are probably stronger than what you've got in your car.

      Now to be fair, there certainly are some major cons. The accelrator pedal is the worst thing they could have done... You rest your entire foot on the pedal, not on the floor like in a car (and in most golf carts), so you don't have much control, and any bumps easily drive your foot to the floor, making you accelerate unintentionally. Additionally, the shocks are very rigid, and you are setting up much much higher than you would in a car or a golf cart, so the ride is very, very rough. Even at 10MPH over small bumps it feels like you're driving in a truck going offroad at 50MPH... Absolutely not smooth riding.

      As it stands, it really is just a golf cart with a NEV rating.

      Well you're just the expert then... Not having ever driven one, not bothering to read any of the information at the official web site, or even bothering to spend a few seconds doing a search.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  18. Worstest word evar! by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
    I've had a series of JE's as new candidates for Worst Word Ever emerge -- I believe that most recently "malternative" knocked off "blogmarklet".

    But "blobject" is a simply a horror of Lovecraftian proportions.

  19. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This dude has obviously never rented a car (everywhere in the US except for Enterprise requires you to be 25, and I can't imagine many /. patrons are >18). I rented a minivan for $65/day in California, this by comparison is akin to highway robbery.

  20. See more here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  21. GPL Car by kunkie · · Score: 0

    If the software in the car is licensed under the GNU GPL doesn't the car then become GPL because it is viral...

  22. Remember the GM EV-1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The prototype was known as the "Impact". Ouch.

  23. Open Source Autos Hit the Streets by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, could be worse. At least it's not a wall or something.

    I wonder if the car was windows.

    1. Re:Open Source Autos Hit the Streets by avleeuwen · · Score: 1

      It has windows, but they're called 'X-Windows'. Also, you can't open or close them without using a window widget library.

  24. As an Amuricuhn... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I wouldn't be caught dea in one of those disasters on wheels. Here is why:

    1. It's too small. I weigh about 450 Lbs due to my healthy and steady Amuricuhn diet of fast food and convenience snacks. I might be able to sit in it by myself, but I'd like to have my wife and kids with me and I don't see how that little thing is going to handle 1400 Lbs total for my family of three.

    2. Is uses electricity which is inferior to petroleum for the amount of energy produced per gallon. One gallon of electricity gets you what? Ten feet mabye? Sorry, but give me an Escalade with extra gas tanks.

    3. It looks wimpy. Just picture yourself going around full throttle at 20 MPH! When I get in a car, I want to go 0-80 in no more than 15 seconds. Again, give me an Escalade.

    4. Where's the DVD player? My son likes to ask a lot of stupid questions about stuff we're driving past when we're on vacation. Like when we drove past the Grand Canyon, he asked if we could get out and look at it. For god sakes! If god had intended for us to actually walk around natural formations like that he would have made us donkeys or billy goats instead of people. My kid needs to have his eyes locked on a DVD or video game so he doesn't ask stupid questions. That's a MAJOR flaw in the design of this thing.

    5. IF these things could hit 80-150 miles an hour, they'd also need radar detectors to keep the cops from being able to illegitimately raise revenue by ticketing me when I was well in control of the car. I guess it doesn't matter though since they TOP OUT at 20 MPH! It also doesn't matter because I won't be putting my sweet Amuricuhn ass in one of those pencil necked carts.

    6. They're open to the outside. If I want a tan, I'm going to lie on the beach, not sweat like crazy in a car. Who in their right mind would ever want a car that's open? I can count the number of times that my car windows are open here in the U.S. of A. in a year on one hand. I prefer to have my AC blasting on full if it's over 65 F because it keeps me from sweating. I also like the fact that it blows the fragrance from my car air freshener around and makes the car smell like the clean outdoors just the way mother nature intended.

    7. There's no stereo system. When I drive I like to avoid being distracted, so I put the stereo up on full volume to drown out any yammering my wife and kid might be sending my way. Whatever they have to say is unimportant and I like Kidd Rock and Eminem. They're much more entertaining.

    8. These things are funded by a communist government. I was kind of shocked to find out that Cordoba is a communist run city. I thought the only place the red menace still existed was Cuba and China. I guess we're going to have to pre-emptively strike Cordoba before they get us. They're probably getting together some terrorists to try and take down the good old U.S. of A. Our best and safest route is to probably send some troops down to South America to take care of those uppity commies in Cordoba.

    9. Open source software promotes piracy and communism. The use of open source on these "cars" probably violates IP laws in every civilized capitalist nation. If this jackass tried to start a similar business here, I can guaran-damn-tee you that he'd be face to face with CIA and FBI agents wanting to see his past affiliations.

    We've got to protect Amuricuh. Our homeland security should be the first thing on everyone's mind on the entire planet because we've got the big guns. Something goes wrong here and we get taken over by the commies, you know they'll use our firepower against all the sissy nations of the world the at turn tail at the slightest sign of trouble. Give us some respect and don't drive these monstrosities anywhere but into the ground.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:As an Amuricuhn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me this is just a lame joke.

    2. Re:As an Amuricuhn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The mis-spelling of America 50 billion or so times was a typo in a very serious post... ass.

    3. Re:As an Amuricuhn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your use of the word "ass." Such a poignant and subtle term should be used with delicacy, as you have done here. Congrats.

    4. Re:As an Amuricuhn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Our best and safest route is to probably send some troops down to South America to take care of those uppity commies in Cordoba."
      Spain is in Europe, not South America, and Cordoba is run by a leftist party, not quite a commy regime there.

  25. Affordable? Nonsense. by wsanders · · Score: 1

    These were available for about $8K in the US. Kind of overpriced for a glorified golf cart with a Mercedes-Benz logo slapped on it. Plastic sheeting for weather protection. AFAIK they run on lead-acid batteries.

    Let's see if this guy still thinks they're affordable once the touristas have trashed all his batteries in six months. Although IIRC Cordova's not that hilly.

    Here in the SF Bay Area, you can buy two used Segways and upgrade them with fresh NiMh batteries for about the same price, maybe a little more for LiIon battery upgrades. You'll have to ride in the rain, but you'll get the ability to schlep it on transit, and regen braking for the hills.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  26. What a load of baloney by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, as is noted by a few sane souls, some of the software is OSS, and who cares?

    Second, it's an electric car. Someone call Ed Begley, Jr. and wake me when they design and build one that is properly competitive with my SUV and cost effective.

    Third, innovation does NOT come from the marketing people, they merely put a glitzy name to the innovation. Innovation in software comes from astute programmers who "get it" as to what the customer is not only wanting, but actually needing and lacking the descriptive powers to convey. The cry programmers should live for is not, "oooh, cool, open source..." but "EXACTLY! This is EXACTLY what I was needing! Damn, this is EXACTLY IT!"

    And then the common know-nothing-about-the-behind-the-scenes people chalk it up to the sales and marketing people while the programmers go on to have post orgasmic depression, their having "gotten it" gone unappreciated. Such is the life of those doing the writing. Strangely, no one ascribes Stephen King's works to the marketing department of his publisher...

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:What a load of baloney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Second, it's an electric car. Someone call Ed Begley, Jr. and wake me when they design and build one that is properly competitive with my SUV and cost effective.

      Just wait dickhead, just wait.

      What is your lardarse going to do when you cannot afford to pay $100 to travel 1 mile?

      Better learn soon. Just because you have a big truck, doesn't mean you are a man - or that you are worth a shit.

  27. Cordoba? by TWX · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...electrically powered tourist cars in Cordoba..."

    WELL, my Cordoba is powered by good ol' gasoline. Chrysler four barrel 360 engines don't run on anything else. Besides, I know that mine's better. Chicks dig the Fine Corinthian Leather(tm).

    I can't believe that Ricardo Montalban went from a Cordoba to a Reliant .

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  28. Gentoo version? by prestwich · · Score: 1

    Of course Gentoos version will be a kit car; it will give you 3 options for the level you want to start with:
          * Preassembled body parts (doors, engine etc) - for the wimps.
          * Precut, cast metal ready to assemble.
          * Metal ore for the real hard cases.

  29. Blueprints by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    The "source code" of a car is called the blueprints plus whatever other instructions is needed to build and assemble the vehicle.

    Although most cars and proprietary, blueprints and engineering studies on public works projects like bridges are public record. So you could say bridges and highways are "open source".

  30. Regenerative brakes? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post a link please

    1. Re:Regenerative brakes? Where? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Here's a link to the PDF spec sheet. Note that the regen braking isn't mentioned in the "brakes" section, but rather in the "controller" section. I suppose it's appropriate to put there, but ends up being somewhat misleading.

      And here's an unsolicited link to the NHSTA's ruling on Neighborhood Electric Vehicles. It's worth a read just for some insight into the bureaucracy that's involved with manufacturing a "Low Speed Vehicle." Yuck.

  31. The communist Town Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is now a polemic in Spain, because Cordoba's Mayor has paid (with the money of all the citizens of Cordoba) a travel to visit Cuba (something about a meeting between Castro and Chavez). All the people that went there was selected exclusively in function of its communist ideology, of course.

    When they returned, a town concillor that was there said somethnig about that Cuba and Venezuela were idilic places of freedom... :-P

    Sorry for my english. (It's spanglish). My connection is slow today, I couldn't correct this post with a translator.

    1. Re:The communist Town Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P-A-Y-A-S-O (spanish word, like clown but with a contemptuous meaning)

      Greetings from Spain, that communist country :-)

      There are some continuing annoyed with last lost elections X-D

      (sorry for my ugly english too)

    2. Re:The communist Town Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy wants a communist Spain to declare the war to the United States, the enemy of the world... :P

      Spain has what it deserves... you are mistaken, PAYASOS are the guys that voted Zapatero. And Zapatero did what Al-Qaeda told him to do. And Al-Qaeda has understood that terrorist is a good way to obtain results, because it worked in Spain. So today is London, tomorrow who knows....

    3. Re:The communist Town Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's go to barrapunto and say that to me on my face, if you have balls. Rojo!. Etarra!. Enemigo de la libertad!.

    4. Re:The communist Town Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst is that is I'm affraid you are saying this seriously...

      Two posibilities:

      1)You are spanish: No more yo say. Same as above anonymous coward.

      2)You are from USA:

      It's very impressive how much brainwashed you (USA citizens) are about the left-handed european countries. We've really nothing to do with old hard-communist regimes. You'd better visiting Spain.

      Bye

  32. Gentoo is for Ricers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. Does anyone else find it amusing? by 0Seeker0 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it amusing that it doesn't come with any doors, yet there's a $695 option for an Alpine stereo system? :P

  34. No doors? by Mancat · · Score: 1

    Even on the GEM web site, there's no option for doors on this thing. I guess it doesn't rain in Treehugger Country.

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
  35. Real Open-Source Car by psychgeek · · Score: 1


    (with appologies to Crocodile Dundee...)

    That's not an Open-Source car!
    . . .
    THIS is an Open-Source Car:
    http://65.254.46.136/oscars/

  36. USD$50 per 2hours rental - ouch! by YuriGherkin · · Score: 1

    That's a fairly hefty price to pay by a tourist for 2hours in a city. I don't see the value in that. You wouldn't want to stop at any cafes/parks/restaurants along way - at USD25/hr! Perhaps these are rented to the same sorts of tourists that "do" the Louvre in 2 hours. :P

    I'd happily rent a GPS enabled PDA with all the same tourist information for USD $50/day.

    Or better still, I could buy a guide book (for all of Spain or Europe) for the same price and take a walking a tour with a local guide for a couple hours as well. At least I can interact with the local guide and I get to keep the guide book.

  37. About the code and the company who wrote it by teoruiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    To answer a couple of comments above, I'll say that the company who wrote the software is Yaco S.L., a little OpenSource company based in Sevilla, in south Spain.

    The code itself was wrote using several free technologies such as wxWidgets+Python, SQLObject+MySQL and GPS Drive. It is supossed to be available soon, as soon as possible.

    --
    "Res publica non dominetur"
  38. Crash... by Information+Architec · · Score: 1

    "Hi honey, I...er...crashed the system"