No, once a packet leaves your machine you have no control over where it goes. Furthermore packets are something like 1.5k in size max with only something like 0.5k for actual application data IIRC; there's no room for lists of IPs...
Because the point of the crazy schemes is that they CAN'T tell, at least not until the copy the pirate THOUGHT was fully cracked has been widely disseminated. Users who download it will be fed up with the glitches and buy the full game to fix them, in theory.
"copied drugs" may not necessarily contain what they are advertised to. They may pose a health risk, or may not have as much active ingredient as they claim to.
Plus I don't think most of the people getting them have had the legitimate alternatives prescribed to them by a doctor.
"The Parasite". Sniffs the local wireless traffic for your bank account details when the wallet queries for your balance...
Seriously though, they better secure these things properly, because it sounds cool and people won't care until it's too late. And because I won't let myself get anything like this until I know it's secure, but I want one!
Google obfuscates its JavaScript all the time, in order to keep page sizes low and load times fast (and perhaps to keep people from stealing their code).
Uninstalled it when I figured out it was responsible for Team Fortress 2 breakage, even when I disabled the networking components (I found out that doesn't actually disable them, you have to choose not to install them at install time) and was happy when my whole computer sped up as a bonus.
This is why modern browsers ignore such directives. Remember the window.open parameter that allowed you to hide the url bar? Yeah, only IE8 respects that switch now, all modern browsers ignore it and show the bar anyway.
Remember the Windows Tutorial from Windows 3.1? We need something like that. An environment that throws common scenarios at a user in the form of a fake/simulated Windows desktop, and then grades them based on how they handled it and told them what they did right/wrong and why.
Not to mention that they will be unable to ensure the entire route between stations is secure. Why risk being caught boarding a train with a bomb when you can plant a bomb next to the track?
Firesheep never used login credentials. It never needed to. Session cookies were enough to impersonate another user... so any visit to any HTTP page on any site allowed a Firesheep user to impersonate you on that site in theory (of course if you're logged out this is of limited use, but if you're logged in they can impersonate you without login details).
Ah, but you can only watch one channel at a time!
No, once a packet leaves your machine you have no control over where it goes. Furthermore packets are something like 1.5k in size max with only something like 0.5k for actual application data IIRC; there's no room for lists of IPs...
I got a notice right in my freaking New Tab Page about the program.
Developers can get root by compiling the OS themselves. Normal users using a precompiled OS cannot AFAIK.
Because the point of the crazy schemes is that they CAN'T tell, at least not until the copy the pirate THOUGHT was fully cracked has been widely disseminated. Users who download it will be fed up with the glitches and buy the full game to fix them, in theory.
It's all answered in TFA. You're welcome. :)
"copied drugs" may not necessarily contain what they are advertised to. They may pose a health risk, or may not have as much active ingredient as they claim to.
Plus I don't think most of the people getting them have had the legitimate alternatives prescribed to them by a doctor.
Installer crashes and burns, at least when run under VirtualBox, it complains one of the packages is malformed and then crashes.
Not sure if the installed OS is runnable after this, it might be but I didn't want to mess around with it, I'll wait for Alpha 2.
"The Parasite". Sniffs the local wireless traffic for your bank account details when the wallet queries for your balance...
Seriously though, they better secure these things properly, because it sounds cool and people won't care until it's too late. And because I won't let myself get anything like this until I know it's secure, but I want one!
You shouldn't even need to go that far, Mozilla plugged most of the leak. I'm not sure if this made it into 3.6 though... might want to wait for 4.0?
Oh! So it does! Maybe the Chrome team fixed this like Firefox has.
Google obfuscates its JavaScript all the time, in order to keep page sizes low and load times fast (and perhaps to keep people from stealing their code).
...using Chrome in incognito mode. It determined I had visited...
...startpanic.com
So yeah, use incognito/private browsing mode.
Uninstalled it when I figured out it was responsible for Team Fortress 2 breakage, even when I disabled the networking components (I found out that doesn't actually disable them, you have to choose not to install them at install time) and was happy when my whole computer sped up as a bonus.
I think it's the "Block all cookies from facebook.com" option in your browser.
According to this guy it uses the same APIs as the Windows phone developer tools do.
This is why modern browsers ignore such directives. Remember the window.open parameter that allowed you to hide the url bar? Yeah, only IE8 respects that switch now, all modern browsers ignore it and show the bar anyway.
Minecraft
Remember the Windows Tutorial from Windows 3.1? We need something like that. An environment that throws common scenarios at a user in the form of a fake/simulated Windows desktop, and then grades them based on how they handled it and told them what they did right/wrong and why.
Not to mention that they will be unable to ensure the entire route between stations is secure. Why risk being caught boarding a train with a bomb when you can plant a bomb next to the track?
Yeah, THIS site is a respectable, trustworthy source of news.
Firesheep never used login credentials. It never needed to. Session cookies were enough to impersonate another user... so any visit to any HTTP page on any site allowed a Firesheep user to impersonate you on that site in theory (of course if you're logged out this is of limited use, but if you're logged in they can impersonate you without login details).
Then how can you say it doesn't evoke any feelings?
They just posted this today.
Let's check out some other benchmarks/parts of Sunspider IE9 does good on and tweak them similarly to see if the performance suddenly suffers.