actually this product sounds like it'd be perfect for your situation. the ARM can handle all of the "housekeeping" thats taking so long and you can have a real software guy write that code while the hardware guys can focus on the filtering on the DSP chip.
if not, PPCs are being used to run DSP code nowadays using Altivec libraries. although, if your software guys have trouble coding DSP software, it won't matter if it runs on a DSP chip or a general purpose chip and you'll still have the hardware guys trying to implement the algorithms. i'm assuming you were able to write C code for the DSP and had DSP libraries at your disposal on the project you worked on.
yea but that example's compiler dependent. while the GP's example will result in an error on every C/C++ compiler. well, any "correct" one anyways. Visual C++'s compiler didn't give me a warning when I compiled your example..
Which meant countless Anonymous Cowards trying to continue the dead joke weren't invented yet, now those were the days..
says the life-long AC poster who, as of a few days ago, didn't even have an account. Now THOSE were the days...
god works for IBM???
OTOH, if i WAS that guy, should that be enough of a reason for me to believe there is NO god?
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a4_065.html been hashed out at the straight dope for a while now..
actually this product sounds like it'd be perfect for your situation. the ARM can handle all of the "housekeeping" thats taking so long and you can have a real software guy write that code while the hardware guys can focus on the filtering on the DSP chip. if not, PPCs are being used to run DSP code nowadays using Altivec libraries. although, if your software guys have trouble coding DSP software, it won't matter if it runs on a DSP chip or a general purpose chip and you'll still have the hardware guys trying to implement the algorithms. i'm assuming you were able to write C code for the DSP and had DSP libraries at your disposal on the project you worked on.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mace
kick ass, takes names
i think he's talking about the 4.x.x chain.
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=gcc
3.4.4-r1 and 3.4.3-r1 are the only stable gcc's for amd64
yea but that example's compiler dependent. while the GP's example will result in an error on every C/C++ compiler. well, any "correct" one anyways. Visual C++'s compiler didn't give me a warning when I compiled your example..
if i had mod points, i'd mod you up.. but i don't =/
perfect example of why GP post was a joke...
raven also made games using the q3 engine, like the elite forces series and others. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven_Software
yea i just use the onboard audio on my epox nforce3 board.. i think the last sound card i bought was the SB Live! Value back in 2000
or vice versa apparently
Reasearcher 3: Let's wait a year before doing any of this.
pictures were taken in September 2004
Which meant countless Anonymous Cowards trying to continue the dead joke weren't invented yet, now those were the days.. says the life-long AC poster who, as of a few days ago, didn't even have an account. Now THOSE were the days...