Slashdot Mirror


Driving Away Teens With High Frequency Noise

ars writes "The New York Times is reporting on a device called the Mosquito invented by Howard Stapleton designed to drive teens away by emitting a high frequency noise at 75db. Apparently most older people can not hear the sounds, but teens can not stand it. Reports are that it works quite well, but some older people can hear it too. He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children."

1,035 comments

  1. FP by ZX81 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone driven away?

    --
    -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
    1. Re:FP by ZX81 · · Score: 1

      How is that offtopic? Did you even RTFA?

      --
      -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
    2. Re:FP by Ixne · · Score: 1

      Anybody who saw Suburbia (the punk movie) knows that this was invented in the 80's and was called "muzak."

    3. Re:FP by d3funct · · Score: 1

      Can I get one to keep the sk8rs away from the front of my building?

      --
      ASCII a stupid question, get a stupid ANSI!
    4. Re:FP by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Muzak has been around since 1936.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:FP by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Informative
      All you need to do are install anti-grind plates on the curbs. I used to skate, but never in a place where I shouldn't have been. If they're not bothering anyone and they're being somewhat safe, let them be. If they're a nuisance blocking the entrance and bothering people, then go on the roof and urinate or toss water balloons or stale loaves of bread at them.

      Sand, cat litter, and rock salt are also excellent passive skater deterrents.

    6. Re:FP by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 0, Troll
      Muzak has been around since 1936.

      Quite true. I suspect the OP was thinking of the modern version, Nu Metal; equally repellant.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    7. Re:FP by ThJ · · Score: 0, Troll

      At least do a Wiki lookup before you post. Saves you some embarassment.

    8. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a troll, damn it! I'm giving the gentleman here a suggestion!

  2. What's was wrong with... by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 5, Funny

    sitting on the porch yelling and shaking a cane?

    1. Re:What's was wrong with... by DataPath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      Inconceivable!
    2. Re:What's was wrong with... by dethl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Calling them "whippersnappers" just doesn't do it anymore.

      --
      "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    3. Re:What's was wrong with... by KeyboardMonkey · · Score: 1, Funny

      What?

    4. Re:What's was wrong with... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 5, Funny

      You might be violating my grandfather's patent.

    5. Re:What's was wrong with... by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

      By the sounds of this guy it should be his "reaching broom"

      --
      "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
    6. Re:What's was wrong with... by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I find waving the gun around does a better job.
      But it's harder to get away with. :)

    7. Re:What's was wrong with... by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Old people can get away with just about anything.

    8. Re:What's was wrong with... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Piped classical music seems to work here at railway stations and shopping centres, and isn't as obnoxious as a high-pitched noise.

    9. Re:What's was wrong with... by BigCheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I prefer the shotgun filled with rock salt or a fire hose.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    10. Re:What's was wrong with... by bsartist · · Score: 2, Funny

      sitting on the porch yelling and shaking a cane?

      In Korea, only old people...

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    11. Re:What's was wrong with... by AndyChrist · · Score: 3, Funny

      " Calling them "whippersnappers" just doesn't do it anymore."

      Wear a bloody apron, wave a cleaver instead of a cane. Growl "Ah, fresh meat!"

      Also, I am 100 percent positive something like this device would affect me in my old age (curse my high-frequency hearing)

    12. Re:What's was wrong with... by Columcille · · Score: 3, Funny

      how do you fill a shotgun with a water hose?

      --
      I love my sig.
    13. Re:What's was wrong with... by lee7guy · · Score: 1

      Vaseline.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
    14. Re:What's was wrong with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in the UK, where the reverse is true.

    15. Re:What's was wrong with... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      A definite case of prior fart?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    16. Re:What's was wrong with... by brainburger · · Score: 2, Funny

      How so? - Anything can get away with old people?

    17. Re:What's was wrong with... by hobbit · · Score: 1


      Your grasp of statistics is unfortunately lacking.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    18. Re:What's was wrong with... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Old people can get away with just about anything.

      Actually, this is the first insightful comment I've seen thus far in the entire discussion. It's sadly true.

      Recall when that old man drove through a marketplace and killed several people? I actually heard people on the pundit shows that felt sorry for him. They thought it was an outrage that he was likely going to be criminally charged.

      Care to venture a guess as to what the outrage would be if a 17 year old drove through that same marketplace and mowed down a few people? "They are too young to drive! Take away their license! Try him as an adult!" God help that 17 year old if he had a sip of communion wine before driving and hit a 0.01-0.02 BAC.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    19. Re:What's was wrong with... by jeeperscats · · Score: 1

      So I guess I'm not the only one who loves the butcher scene from Diablo I.

    20. Re:What's was wrong with... by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Or a hammer. You can fix anything with a big enough hammer.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    21. Re:What's was wrong with... by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but then when they took away old people's licenses, Grandpa Marsh called the AARP and they stormed the town. If it hadn't been for quick-thinking children blockading the doors at the Country Kitchen Cafe, we'd all be in big trouble right now.

    22. Re:What's was wrong with... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Ah, that episode was a classic. Homage to one of the best Cold War movies ever. Gotta love South Park :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    23. Re:What's was wrong with... by dawhippersnapper · · Score: 1

      We're too proud =)!

      --
      Freedom is fragile and must be protected. To sacrifice it, even as a temporary measure, is to betray it.
  3. it's been around for years... by theheff · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's called 60's music.

  4. g0t d3af? by ZX81 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't this just going to make the kids as deaf as the adults?

    --
    -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
    1. Re:g0t d3af? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wha??

    2. Re:g0t d3af? by toastydeath · · Score: 2, Informative

      75 db isn't going to make anyone deaf. Personally having owned a 140 db subwoofer system (metered) in my vehicle, I can attest that 75 db is not going to do any particular damage to my ears past what I've already done.

    3. Re:g0t d3af? by ZX81 · · Score: 1

      The difference is between peak and sustained noise.

      When I was in USA as a kid, I was punk and hung out with a few people in a square in Santa Rosa.

      The local authorites believed we were an eyesore and so tried to get rid of us by playing classical music from the trees. Obviously it didn't work.

      But any sustained noise at high frequency can't be good for you...(speaking as a 28 year old who still does Sound Engineering) :)

      --
      -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
    4. Re:g0t d3af? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mummy rang for you.
      She wants her Honda Civic back, and if you could take that thing on the back (a wing?) off, that would be good too.
      People laugh at her when she's driving it.

    5. Re:g0t d3af? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What? Say that again?

    6. Re:g0t d3af? by TheGSRGuy · · Score: 1

      Frankly it doesn't matter. Hearing loss is cumulative. Even for a few seconds, 75dB will damage your hearing. Is it measureable? Probably not. But being exposed to this for a few seconds every day adds up over time. Having hearing problems by age 40 is not fun. My mother is an audiologist and sees the trouble deaf people have to put up with...it's a pretty rough life.

    7. Re:g0t d3af? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't this just going to make the kids as deaf as the adults?

      I seriously doubt it. This just takes advantage of high frequency sounds that you can hear when you're younger, but don't necessarily find yourself completely unable to stand. A perfect example of this sound was the high pitched whine of the old televisions.

      Can I get a show of hands for every person here who couldn't stand the bloody noise from the things? Sure, you got used to the sound (since you wanted to watch your favorite show), but it was never the most pleasent. Anyone here ever ask their parents if they could hear the sound? How many of you had your parents answer, "What sound?" (/Me raises hand)

      With luck, your hearing will be acute enough at an older age to still hear the whine of those old televisions. However, the majority of people lose the ability to hear the extreme ranges through a natural amount of hearing degradation with age. At least, I've never heard a link between those old televisions and loss of hearing. So I wouldn't be too worried about this guy's invention.

      Unless, that is, you happen to be a teenager or an old fogie with exceptional hearing. ;-)

    8. Re:g0t d3af? by saskboy · · Score: 1

      If they choose to sit in the presence of the noise for hours every day I'm certain it would cause a bit of hearing loss, but chances are in my non-expert opinion, that the damage most adults suffer is from attending a few concerts with insanely loud "music".

      I take ear plugs to any concert where I'll be within 50 meters of a speaker, and I've tried wearing an ear plug in one ear and not the other, and after the concert, the difference in sound on either side is profound.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    9. Re:g0t d3af? by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not, but those damned iPods and such will render such devices useless in a few years - the most antisocial ratbag teenagers are likely the ones listening to their earphones at the loudest volume, and will suffer hearing loss to high frequencies much earlier in life.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    10. Re:g0t d3af? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Damage is cumulative, yes, but depending on the frequency, the amplitude, and the duration, brief exposure may not actually cause any damage even when extended exposure would. If the exposure is sufficiently brief and the ear is allowed to fully recover before reexposure, damage would not be expected.

      And, of course, 75 dB is just barely over the threshold for temporary threshold shift, which is generally considered to be somewhere in the 70-75 dB range....

      Source:
      http://www.safetyline.wa.gov.au/institute/level2/c ourse18/lecture102/l102_02.asp

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:g0t d3af? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm 29 and NEW televisions still bother me, high def sets with higher scan rates notwithstanding. I can hear my TV set right now, and it's about ten feet away. 15 kHz is audible for me even at relatively low volume. At sufficient levels, I can hear 23 kHz. Not perceive. Not feel. Hear. It's a very annoying squeal if you have the "pleasure" of hearing it. I haven't been able to produce enough volume to hear frequencies any higher than that. Speaker roll-off kind of bites you in the backside above about 18kHz.

      Heaven help me if I'm in a room with a TV where the flyback is really whining because of a missing sync signal.... The light dimmers at work piss me off because they hurt my ears. Many of my friends (even some younger ones) can barely hear them. Defective computer monitors? Torture. I'm told the lowest sync rate on VGA is 30 kHz, so I figure there must be a frequency divider somewhere, but I'm starting to wonder if I'm a bat or something. After my last job (slight flicker and lots of whine, with near-daily migraines), I now refuse to use any non-LCD displays when working with computers.

      I'll say this: as someone who takes care of my ears, if a store I shopped at regularly put one of these things in, I can be fairly certain that it would bother me well into my 40s. And I would choose to shop elsewhere. Companies should take into serious consideration that doing this sort of thing -will- undoubtedly drive away some of their actual customers....

      For now, I'll just stay away from people with dogs. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:g0t d3af? by jambarama · · Score: 1

      My former flatmate's grandfather had something like this to scare away stray cats and dogs. We could hear it just fine though, and it was mighty irritating. He'd forgot that he even had it until he saw us grimacing.

      Though this one is clearly different (more powerful) than the one I ran into, I bet it'll still keep away any animals around. The strange thing was, after a few hours, you forgot it was there. You could hear it if you listened for it, but if you didn't think about it you didn't hear it at all.

      What I'd like to do with it, is put it outside someone's house. The kids will go nuts, the parents will think they're making it up!

    13. Re:g0t d3af? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that the inverter in those LCD monitors doesn't bother you.

    14. Re:g0t d3af? by Limecron · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. Thank goodnesss for LCDs.

      My parents used to have one of those "ultra-sonic" pest deterents. Yikes, that thing would drive me crazy.

    15. Re:g0t d3af? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Who said that adults are deaf. I am in my late thirties and I still hear all the way to 18+ KHz. I know people who are 50+ years old and can hear to 17.5KHz and higher.

      I know that we are a minority, but I would much rather prefer if stores used conventional weapons like "Carmina Burana" or "Beethoven 9th" cranked to the max. Even small guns fire with Beach Boys will do. Clears louts nicely.

      That is unless they break the broadcast system the next night.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    16. Re:g0t d3af? by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Not your ears you need to worry about if you play loud stuff in the car:
      Keeping breathing could be more of an issue than hearing.

    17. Re:g0t d3af? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'm also in my late 20's, and I've always been able to hear high frequencies extremely well.

      Oddly enough, I damaged the hell out of my hearing while playing music in high school, and I'm usually the first person in the room to say "what?"

      Yet, things like TVs and bug repellers annoy the living crap out of me. People think I'm crazy... ohh well, screw them.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    18. Re:g0t d3af? by computerjunkie · · Score: 1

      I'm 38 and I can hear a TV with no signal and I attended some really loud head banging concerts back in the day! Go figure! I don't know anyone else that can hear those high pitch sounds, although I don't think I have it as bad as you.

      Oh, and 60hz refresh monitors kill me and other people don't understand that just like they don't understand my bionic dog hearing.

    19. Re:g0t d3af? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm 29 and NEW televisions still bother me, high def sets with higher scan rates notwithstanding.

      Don't get me wrong, it's not that I can't hear the signal anymore. It's just that I've been using an LCD computer monitor as a television for so long that I've practically forgot about the problem. Quite a few people (who are less weird than I) have moved to LCD and Plasma TVs, again requiring me to point to "old" TVs.

      I can still hear other frequencies from my computer, but nothing quite as annoying as a television. Though it always seems so amazingly quiet the few times I shut my computer off altogether. ;-)

    20. Re:g0t d3af? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At sufficient levels, I can hear 23 kHz.

      no, no you can't, your ear cannot physically respond that quickly,
      what you can hear though is the first harmonic of 23khz = 11.5khz which is more believable, i have done aural sweep tests on various subjects and you will be suprised at the sounds you think you can hear over 18k, in reality though you are listening to the harmonics of the sound not the actual fundamental

    21. Re:g0t d3af? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      what you can hear though is the first harmonic of 23khz = 11.5khz which is more believable,



      No, it's not. The first harmonic of 23 kHz is at 46 kHz. Harmonics increase in frequency.

    22. Re:g0t d3af? by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 1

      It seems there are quite a few of us on here that still have a problem with TV's. We're the ones who, when walking past the electronics section of a Walmart/Target, are gritting our teeth due to the sensory overload of 50 brand new TV's emitting in the 16khz range.

    23. Re:g0t d3af? by Technician · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. The first harmonic of 23 kHz is at 46 kHz. Harmonics increase in frequency.

      You are both wrong. The first harmonic is the fundemental or 23 KHz. The second harmonic is 46KHZ

      Clip "
      There are a variety of patterns which could be produced by vibrations within a string, slinky, or rope. Each pattern corresponds to vibrations which occur at a particular frequency and is known as a harmonic. The lowest possible frequency at which a string could vibrate to form a standing wave pattern is known as the fundamental frequency or the first harmonic. The second lowst frequency at which a string could vibrate is known as the second harmonic; the third lowst frequency is known as the third harmonic; and so on. An animation of a string vibrating with the second harmonic is shown below.


      from website http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/mmedia/ waves/harm2.html

      The loud noise in many older sets and monitors is not the scan frequency. It may be the switch mode power supply. Many of these run in the 15 - 30 KHZ range. They try to run them high enough so most people can not hear them, but low enough so less expensive capacitors and powdered iron cores can be used, so many are right on the margin of some people's hearing.

      These power supplies have the full power the set uses, not just the scan and HV power, so they can be as loud or louder than scan circuits.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    24. Re:g0t d3af? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      We're the ones who, when walking past the electronics section of a Walmart/Target, are gritting our teeth due to the sensory overload of 50 brand new TV's emitting in the 16khz range.

      *shrug* I've found two things to be true of the stores I go to:

      1. It's usually noisy enough to distract my attention away from the annoying whine.

      2. Most of the stores I go to these days are trying to sell LCD and Plasma screens rather than the old CRTs. Sure, Walmart puts a few CRTs out. But few enough to avoid and ignore.

      Of course, since I use my computer screen as a television, I haven't exactly been looking for a new TV either. :-)

    25. Re:g0t d3af? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For now, I'll just stay away from people with dogs. :-D

      At least now our dogs won't get mange, fleas or ticks.

    26. Re:g0t d3af? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      One more reason to get rid of CRTs.

      I just got rid of the last glass tube in our house, and it's a wonderful improvement.

      (In mid 30s, still capable of hearing TV whine.)

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    27. Re:g0t d3af? by cakesy · · Score: 1

      I remember, I used to hear the tv when i was a kid. I forgot all about it.... Seems going to all those raves wasn't all detrimental. (Of course, I am a raving, drug addicted loon, but that is a whole other article.)

    28. Re:g0t d3af? by hankwang · · Score: 1
      No, it's not. The first harmonic of 23 kHz is at 46 kHz. Harmonics increase in frequency.

      OTOH, many sine wave sources create distortions that are audible at lower frequencies. E.g. a cheap sound card that internally resamples from 44.1 to 48 kHz may create all kinds of new frequency components; even without resampling, cheap DACs could have an inferior reconstruction filter (if you sample a 20 kHz sine wave at 44 kHz, you only have 2.2 points per oscillation period. It requires some heavy signal processing to reconstruct the original sine wave). Even in analog electronics, the amplifiers may make a bit more noise when they are dealing with high amplitude signals.

    29. Re:g0t d3af? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Going downward, that might be true. Sounds don't have harmonics at fractions of the frequency. That isn't electrically or mechanically possible. With digital sampling, it's possible to have aliasing, but even that isn't possible in the analog realm. You might be able to generate some sort of sidebands if you overdrive an amplifier, but that's starting to push the limits of believability.

      Tiny hairs in your ears do move enough to generate an electrical signal, even at extremely high frequencies, assuming sufficient amplitude. Human hearing, under optimal conditions, at sufficient volume, can hear sounds -well- above 20kHz. Human hearing becomes highly nonlinear above a certain threshold frequency, however. Thus, the amount of volume needed to actually hear it begins to increase rapidly once the frequency exceeds that threshold.

      For me, that threshold is about 18 or 19kHz. I forget exactly. That is the -official- limit of my hearing. That doesn't mean I can't hear sounds above that limit, and at 75 dB SPL, people with good ears can hear significantly above that limit. That's freaking loud. That's so loud that if an audiologist turns up the output (within normal voice frequencies) to that level and you don't hear it, you are nearly legally deaf. It's about the level of someone shouting at your ear from just a few feet away.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    30. Re:g0t d3af? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use a CRT, but run at a high resolution and high refresh rate. This (usually) pushes the whine out of the range I can hear.

  5. Yet another way for parents to avoid... by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yet another way for parents to avoid spending time with their kids. Seriously why the heck would anyone come up with this sort of thing? As someone who works with teenagers a lot already, I have to say I'm a bit annoyed. Tons of the kids I work with through our church have parents who I swear can't be bothered to give their kids the nurture and self respect they need. Instead they just buy them things. At least an iPod nano to an unloved kid makes the kid cool at school. This'll just drive them to try more medications designed for chemical imbalances that won't fix depression brought on by these sorts of situations.

    1. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by blastwave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I don't get it. I can achieve the same effect by simply asking them to take out the trash.

      Honestly, I was just over at the server room with my teenage step-son and he is totally cool. He washed the white board, helped me install some servers, then I let him drive the Jeep around the parking lot and even go off road. I don't understand all his stuff and he doesn't understand all mine but we have fun together and thats all the counts. Hey, we even played HALO for an hour after school.

      A high freqency buzz to drive away teens? Something seriously wrong with this invention. Yet another examply of soulless empty technology. I am happy that God watches over my family and both my teenage kids are a gift. I would never drive them away. If we keep and hold the communication channel open then we will never have them feel that they can't talk and we can't listen.

      Dennis Clarke
      Director Blastwave.org
      http://www.blastwave.org/

    2. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kudos on getting some dumb shits to mod you up. Amazing.

    3. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Draveed · · Score: 4, Informative

      What are you talking about? This is just a device to stop teenagers from loitering. No one said anything about parents using this to get rid of their own kids.

      --
      Oh, Edmund, can it be true? that I hold here, in my mortal hand, a nugget of purest green?
    4. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by jcostantino · · Score: 1
      Huh? This device is designed to stop kids from loitering.. maybe to send them home?


      I would put up with the noise this thing generates (I'm 29 but my hearing is still well above average) to walk in to a 7-11, buy my stuff and leave without having to worry about the intentions (if any) of the people hanging around out front.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    5. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      Did you actually RTFA? This is to help prevent teenagers from loitering in front of stores and harassing the other customers. Apparantly "...surly teenagers used to plant themselves on the railings just outside the door, smoking, drinking, shouting rude words at customers and making regular disruptive forays inside."

      The owner actually had originally planned to pipe loud classical music outside for the same effect, but the inventor of the device in question supplied some for free.

      How you got from that to poor parenting I can't even begin to guess.

    6. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by blastwave · · Score: 1

      You are defending the logic of this? At any level?

      Firstly, we have problems with teens because of the attitude that we can herd them like animals and treat them as such. You seem to suggest that planting a device to annoy them in a targetted fashion is reasonable and somehow that "poor parenting" is not involved?

      I hope you are not a parent.

    7. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Munk · · Score: 1

      Why is it that when I actually want to mod a comment up, that I have no mod points. Oh well. Great point anyway.

    8. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, its a shame it would stop being effective on them when they get to the age that you WANT them to leave the house.

    9. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Draveed · · Score: 1

      Fine, maybe poor parenting is the root cause but why does the shop keeper have to concern himself with how others raise their kids? His worry is about keeping the front of his store open and inviting to customers.

      --
      Oh, Edmund, can it be true? that I hold here, in my mortal hand, a nugget of purest green?
    10. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 2, Funny

      > No one said anything about parents using this to get rid of their own kids.

      hell, it's an idea though....

      --
      Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
    11. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      So the stores that deploy this will end up having a run on earplugs for a day or two - then its back to the same problem, kids hanging around outside, except now when the store owners give up on their "newfangled kid repeller" and try to tell the kids to leave, the kids won't hear them, so they'll have to make physical contact to get their attention:

      Then watch what happens:

      Hey, old man, why you be putting your hands on me for?
      Ain't nobody be putting their hands on me.
      What you say there, old man?
      I can't hear you.
      You talking to me?
      You talking to ME?
      Get the fuck away before I call the cops and have you charged with assault.
      Ain't NOBODY touchin' me.
      You some sort of faggot or somethin'?
      You like young guys?
      Do I get you all hot an' shit?
      That why you be puttin' your pervert hands on me?
      You stop talking to me now, I don' want none of your homo shit, y'here?
      You just take your faggoty hands, and your faggoty mouth, you faggoty little creep, and go back in your faggoty little store and play with your faggoty Apple computer.
      Ain't NOBODY touch me, y'here?
    12. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahah. There was a flip over this kind of thing in Seattle a few years back. Apparently, one of the downtown McDonald's stores had realized that they could repel unwanted blacks from the storefront by playing country music at a moderate level. It was still going on when I left - here is the article: http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=431 6/.

      Does anyone know if they are still doing this? It is rather eerily amusing, and I can sympathize with both sides, although I do of course find the foodchain's aims less noble.

    13. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put up with it. I can probably hear this thing too, and I'm over 30, my hearing is weird. Would you put up with lights designed to burn the skin of certain people if that was possible?

      If you don't want people loitering, tell them to leave, if they don't that what the police are for. Another invention to let people avoid dealing with people.

    14. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by FlameboyC11 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The main reason for this is chavs, don't understand it, look it up. These are roving gangs of teens in England that like to fuck with people for no reason at all. Oh, and look up happy slapping while you're at it (honestly).

    15. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
      You seem to suggest that planting a device to annoy them in a targetted fashion is reasonable and somehow that "poor parenting" is not involved?
      The only poor parenting involved here is the parenting that prompted these teenagers to loiter around in front of a store, drinking, smoking, and harassing customers. This device is not an issue for anyone who is simply shopping at the store. It's only an issue for teenager who are breaking the law by loitering. And frankly, if these particular teens feel compelled to show a lack of respect to their fellow human beings by "...shouting rude words as customers," for no apparent reason other than that they find it amusing, then they deserve just as little respect in return.
    16. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God watches over my family...
      When will you Americans join the developed world?

    17. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy slapping is a terrific idea, and I've been doing it in the US for years.

    18. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I hope your car insurance company rep doesn't read /.

      then again, you'd probably save 15% if you switched to Geico

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    19. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Informative

      People *are* animals, and we *can* herd them around as such. People put a lot of research into the layout of stores to get people to impulse-buy things or to go in a particular direction. Research dictates where you put doors and railings to keep people from stampeding and blocking an emergency exit in the event of an actual emergency. Where there is a lack of "people control", people will trample over each other to get inside a Wal-Mart the day after Thanksgiving, or surge forward at a soccer (football, for the non-Yanks) match, crushing people into the front railing. They'll go rioting through your favorite large college town, burning and flipping cars, breaking into stores, looting, and throwing rocks at cops.

      Yes, parents need to step up and control their children. But just because there's a "should" out there that would prevent most teens from displaying antisocial behavior doesn't mean that shop owners should sit back and let the kids whose "shoulds" are unfulfilled go rampaging through their shops. This is a great idea meant to solve huge problems of vandalism, theft, and assault because the parents who should don't. By your logic, people should just stand around and get victimized, mumbling, "Where are these kids' parents?" under their breath.

    20. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be serious here. TFA says that this is meant to keep teens from loitering, but really, it's meant to keep black people from loitering. Your idea is a good one, except for the fact that it would make it blatantly obvious to everyone that you're specifically targetting black people with your nigger-seeking-heat-lamp. People will happily deal with unobvious forms of discrimination, but if you make it too obvious, everyone (including white people) will get up in arms about it.

    21. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I don't get it. I can achieve the same effect by simply asking them to take out the trash.

      Then again you're talking about your own kids living in your house, and not hooligans smoking cigarettes in front of your store and harassing your customers.

      Honestly, I was just over at the server room with my teenage step-son and he is totally cool.

      That's wonderful. He's also not the target of this type of device.

      A high freqency buzz to drive away teens? Something seriously wrong with this invention.

      Why?

      I own a gun. If a criminal enters my house to do me harm, I will have no choice but to kill him with this gun. That doesn't mean I want to kill everyone with this gun.

      Yet another examply of soulless empty technology.

      You mean like those servers you and your son installed? Or the Jeep you let him drive around in circles? Or the video game system you two played? What exactly is "soulless empty technology"? Technology is what it is.

      I am happy that God watches over my family and both my teenage kids are a gift.

      This thinking always bothers me. This is like the guy who comes out of his house after an earthquake, looks over at his dead neighbors, and says, "Thank God we survived!"

      I don't think God has anything to do with your kids, I think it may be that you're just a good parent.

      I would never drive them away. If we keep and hold the communication channel open then we will never have them feel that they can't talk and we can't listen.

      Again, great advice for parents, terrible advice for store owners.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    22. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone needs their own delusions. If you really knew what life was about you would not be living now. You do realize that there is no point to life. Culture, however, brings meaning to life. Humans in a sense of transending their biological contiuum and entered a phase of artificial abstraction. Our constructs our based off from our understanding of the world at the present time. Religion at one time was very sensible.

      Myths

      #1 There are gods and they created the Earth, moon, and stars.
      #2 There is a God and (s)he created the universe.
      #3 There is no God or gods but humans are the pinnacle of evolution.
      (not just another organism - anthropology, well at least Evolution was correct if it was
      not so focused on how superior we are to all other life.)
      #4 There is no God or gods so I shall become a God. (transhumanism)

      It really is a sad, sad pointless life, but you already knew that. Do not mistake the debate of what is American by watching our media. No one seriously questions the role of evolution in the states.

    23. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      They never said it was to drive your own kids away. If you feel the need to chase your own offspring away with this device, maybe you should have thought about that before having kids in the first place. The greatest problem with this generation is careless/mindless parents. S'funny, but when I was in my teens I didn't loiter in mall entrances yelling my stupid little head off, or wreaking random vandalism, stealing cars or evangelizing about getting high every goddamned moment of my worthless life.

      Maybe that's because I had an education and an actual life to get started. Today's kids are so disaffected and confused, makes me wonder why they're even brought into the world. Kids having kids, that's the problem!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    24. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      That's why God invented Mace.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by KronicD · · Score: 1

      What i'm trying to understand here is why would a shop owner want to use this device? Yes having youths standing around stealing shit is an issue, however youths have MONEY, the 16-25 demographic is a huge money source.

      old enough to have jobs, often still living at home, shitloads of cash, no responsibility. Why on earth would you want to lose that market?

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    26. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by blastwave · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_slapping

      OKay, well. Now I have nothing but a sad feeling in my gut. On the one hand I am terribly aware of how much of a back woods middle of nowhere sort of family guy that I am. I have no clue about the context of all this. I live in a small town in Canada where the big problem is that the local library group took down a large framed picture of a founder and chipped the wood on the frame. Now someone needs to fix the frame. Front page news.

      On the one hand I want to thank you for the education and on the other, well, perhaps ignorance would have been better.

      I'll go back to hanging Christmas lights now and just hoping the raccoons will stop tipping over my trash cans.

      Dennis

    27. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I own a gun. If a criminal enters my house to do me harm, I will have no choice but to kill him with this gun. That doesn't mean I want to kill everyone with this gun.

      Wha? Are you sure your choices aren't being determined by your tools?

    28. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does the device know which teenager is there to loiter and which is there to spend money? And how exactly does it manage to direct this hearing-damaging sound to only the loitering teenagers?

      According to the article it works by emitting sounds that more or less deaf old people can't hear, not by having any notion about customers versus loiterer.

    29. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by kosmicki · · Score: 1

      Murp.... Err.. Taco's Law.

    30. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Largely because that market drives away other markets, one would assume.

    31. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by m50d · · Score: 1
      I own a gun. If a criminal enters my house to do me harm, I will have no choice but to kill him with this gun. That doesn't mean I want to kill everyone with this gun.

      But you wouldn't set up a sentry gun to shoot everyone who approached your house - or more accurately everyone in some group, say all black people - which is what this amounts to. It's not the owner playing noise at specific people who are doing bad things, it's indiscriminate.

      --
      I am trolling
    32. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by jeremymiles · · Score: 1

      RTFA. The device was used in Wales. You've never been to Wales, have you?

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    33. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by jeremymiles · · Score: 1
      If you don't want people loitering, tell them to leave, if they don't that what the police are for.
      So the police come, and they don't leave. There is no law against standing around. The police are not going to sit and wait for them to harass a customer.
      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    34. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Don't be too despondent. I've lived in some pretty destitute areas in the UK, seen plenty of abuse (including happy slapping), but there is still a lot of good here too. Never start thinking of groups of people as some outside group to yourself and the human race (chavs, unemployed, rich people, whatever). Stereotypes get us nowhere and are false anyway. Don't see a dozen 14-17 year olds hassling people and start thinking "kids today." Think - "there's a dozen kids out of how many in this urban area?"

      Ignorance ain't bliss and we can always use one more helping hand.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    35. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I own a gun. If a criminal enters my house to do me harm, I will have no choice but to kill him with this gun. That doesn't mean I want to kill everyone with this gun.

      You could always try running away. Unless you're targetted by assassins, then they're after your iPod not you. Better to get you and your familiy (if any) out of there than go after an intruder who is just as likely to be able to shoot you in return.

      Besides this device isn't aimed at people in the store - it's aimed at the streets outside, so it's a bad analogy.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    36. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Kids having kids, that's the problem!

      Which section of the population has children earliest and most frequently in life? Those without employment or education.

      Everyone needs some meaning and purpose in their lives. If having children is the only purpose left to you, then you do. You say yourself that you had an education and an actual life to get started. Provide these and children will grow up with something else to do than sit around and breed.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    37. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      Yet another examply of soulless empty technology.

      Yet another example of a weepy clod.

      I am happy that God watches over my family and both my teenage kids are a gift.

      Tell Rod and Todd if they come over I'll shatter their eardrums.

    38. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely - I had this argument with someone who said they would shoot to kill anyone who crossed the threshold of their walls, 'to protect their children from pedophiles'. As you say - people break into homes, for the very most part, to take your ipod/dvd/laptop/flat screen/jewellery, not to sexually assault your child - as a 'general' statement.

    39. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      I've been in the position of this store owner - way back when the dot com thing stopped, I did a six month stint in an off-licence.

      We had a lot of theft, from smash and grab to stealthy shoplifting to the safety-in-numbers crowd the shop, intimidate the cashier, threaten violence, everybody grab something and run for it, approach. We'd call the police, show them the videos, they'd do absolutely sweet fanny adams about it. It was before the era of the ASBO, and the police really didn't have many options apart from waiting until the little bastards reached the sainted age of adulthood, whereupon their next offence would lead to prosecution. The situation isn't unusual - every shop in the area with stock of any interest to teenagers had similar problems, and some had worse.

      So we did a number of things. Firstly, we banned under-18s from the shop altogether, which was surprisingly effective, especially given that we had no real means of enforcing it other than yelling at the kids. It made almost no difference to the bottom line, as the teens never bought anything but cheap crisps anyway. Secondly, we identified the parents of brats caught on camera and provided them with the video evidence, a step which ought to have worked but generally didn't - many proud parents are actually proud of their repellent spawn's initiative. Some go so far as to threaten violence against anybody attempting to curtail their child's right to commit crime on demand.

      I don't know if we'd have used a device like this had it been around - I suspect not. It's not really specific enough, it's not really necessary, and in fact the blanket-ban approach was effective enough for us as it was. We did have a problem with kids hanging around outside, but I'm not sure we'd have bothered with techie measures to fix that, although it was a problem on a number of levels. First, they tended to upset the customers, if not put them off visiting the shop at all (why bother with all that, if you can just drive to the nice quiet supermarket in the industrial estate?). Second, we had to watch carefully to ensure that they didn't persuade any adults to buy them cigarettes, etc, as supplying cigarettes/alcohol to minors even indirectly is, if knowingly done, a criminal offence in its own right.

      However, I have a problem with the assertion that "we have problems with teens because of the attitude that we can herd them like animals and treat them as such." As far as my experience goes, troubled teens often have troubled/troubling parents, or are suffering from hanging out in bad company; creating social change by treating teenagers as responsible individuals may work in Sister Act or something, but it's not an approach which works well in the real world. Shop owners don't generally get much quality time with troublemaking brats, nor do they have the position or authority to fix anything. If it's a choice between accepting shoplifting and disruptive behaviour, or "herding kids like animals", which in practice it is, thank you very much but I'll go with the herding. Most people here do - the local store refuses to serve school-age kids during school hours, the local post office allows a maximum of two school-age kids into the store on the (accurate) principle that teenagers act up in large groups, and so on. Pragmatic, simple and effective.

    40. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Hm...

      two different markets, to be honest. 16 is nothing like 25 in this case, and that's what makes this a pretty ineffective tech fix.

      However, here are a few hopefully illuminating details from a UK perspective (I ran a store for a while):

      1) Kids below 16 have a real urge to smoke, but can't buy cigarettes. So they tend to hang out outside shops that sell them, waylaying customers on the way in and promising improbable cash rewards if said customer will buy them cigarettes. Should the customer agree to do so, this would put the shopkeeper and the customer into legal trouble (they committed the illegal act - supplying cigarettes to minors - not the minor). Shopkeepers do not wish to be caught this way.

      2) Same scenario as above, only this time with alcohol and a different age limit (18).

      3) This is a Spar convenience store. They do not typically sell much of interest to the 16-18 demographic aside from alcohol and cigarettes. 16-18s generally still live with their parents, which is usually why they're outside hanging out in front of a convenience store in the first place. Sure, they have money, but they don't want to buy jam or frozen chicken wings or paper towel with it, so their spending power hardly matters in this instance since Spar typically do not sell computer games, cds, and so forth. We banned under-18s completely - our sales actually went up.

      4) You mentioned it: "no responsibility". The little details that (hopefully) stop you and I from disruptive and pointless activities have not yet become relevant to these kids. If they steal a packet of crisps, it isn't because they want crisps and can't afford them. If they steal cigarettes, it's not down to a honest enjoyment of the odour of Benson and Hedges or whatever. It's because they're bored. This is forbidden, and therefore cool. Successfully stealing something is one-up on the shop owner, who presumably deserves it for being part of that pathetically boring adult world.

      Shop owners generally don't want to be part of this sort of thing. Who can blame them?

      Note: you do get adult shoplifters, so it's not as though this thing would be a solution to shoplifting. You do get occasional disruptive adults, too, although it's relatively rare. But the whole gangs hassling you and your customers act is pretty specifically a youth problem, which is incredibly tiresome for shopkeepers to deal with day-in, day-out. He's actually picked a rather peaceful solution... I used to know one guy who'd wait until they'd gathered outside the store then sprint out, grab some kid or other (male, though), twist the kid's arm behind his back, push him down on a car bonnet and explain the error of his ways. Not a recommended solution, but I could understand his frustration.

    41. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I applaud you sir.

      For one, it's nice to hear someone who tries to connect with their kid by understanding them, or at least cutting them some slack and embracing the differences.

      For two, it's also relatively rare these days to hear a person say a rational, well thought statement involving genuine belief in a god.

      I wonder if age differential between kid and parent plays into the interaction and development? My wife and I are 24, and we have an 18 month old... I didn't think we were particularly young to have kids, but we take our little one to the park, and we see all kinds of people who look to be 30, 35, near 40 with kids the same age as ours. I wonder how those people are going to connect with their kids when the kids are 16 - I'm worried enough about how I'll do it, about whether or not I'll be able to remember my life at that age enough to connect... I can't imagine being almost 60 with a high schooler...

      ~W

      --
      sig?
    42. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the one hand I am terribly aware of how much of a back woods middle of nowhere sort of family guy that I am. I have no clue about the context of all this.

      Indeed. However, that didn't stop you offering a bizarre yet strongly-expressed opinion based on the nutzoid assumption that the entire rest of the world lives like you before, and I bet it won't stop you again.

    43. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      This is why I'm glad to live in a place where the gun ownership and concealed-carry rate is very high. Assaulting a random stranger would be basically akin to playing russian roulette.

      You don't see this kind of crap happening except in places where you can guarantee that your victim is going to be unarmed.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    44. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But you wouldn't set up a sentry gun to shoot everyone who approached your house - or more accurately everyone in some group, say all black people - which is what this amounts to. It's not the owner playing noise at specific people who are doing bad things, it's indiscriminate."

      So you're saying that all black people are loud and obnoxious?

      You racist f***! :-p

    45. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by m50d · · Score: 1

      And yet it's somehow acceptable to say all teenagers are loud and obnoxious.

      --
      I am trolling
    46. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by ab762 · · Score: 1
      Did you RTFA? The objective is to make convenience store parking lots not teen hangouts. (Playing grand opera has previously been tried, and works.) How is that a "way for parents to avoid spending time with their kids"?

      Since it's a known frequency and pattern, some modification of the noise-cancelling headset should be countermeasure. iPod app, anyone?

    47. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Problem is, you just don't know why they are there. If it happens to be that one in whatever (hundred? thousand? doesn't really matter, some percentage are NOT just thieves) who really is a rapist/pedophile/random sicko. Sympathy for ordinary thieves should not take precendence over your family's safety.

      And no, I don't own a gun.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    48. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      people break into homes, for the very most part, to take your ipod/dvd/laptop/flat screen/jewellery, not to sexually assault your child

      But that's just part of the cost of doing business for a burglar... they have to know that their intentions cannot be deduced as they cut through your back door's window, etc. In fact, many in-house injuries/deaths from intruders happen when a burglar is surprised to discover that someone is home, and reacts violently. They may not be there to assault someone, but assaults sometimes stem from the fact that they're trespassing and have just been caught. Asking them to leave is not always effective, and it's reasonable to err on the side of assuming that a caught-off-guard burglar may be or become violent.

      One of the major benefits of living in a community where more houses are occupied by rational gun owners isn't a higher number of dead burglars (nice as that would be), it's the reduced number of burglary attempts. Your average B&E specialist is generally a coward, and tend to leave high dog/gun-frequency neighborhoods alone. But it's important for that aspect of the local culture to be well known, and people who case such houses when they know nobody is home also have know that the local custom is to keep valuables (especially firearms) in a safe.

      All that being said: I know that my wife, confronted with a stranger in the house, would absolutely show them the business end of a shotgun. And if that person didn't run out the door at full throttle (no doubt with 150 pounds of our dogs hot on his tail/trail), she'd use it. When you're 5'-2", 115 pounds, you don't take a lot of time to wonder if the strange person who broke into your house is or isn't going to respect your personal space. She's experienced someone (in total, drug-addled maniac mode) trying to pound his way through our back door at 2:00AM, and doesn't appreciate wondering about motives. You break into someone's house, you waive all rights to any claim that you weren't there to hurt someone.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    49. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      And then look up "Daily Mail" and "moral panic".

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    50. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chavs, you say... Is that anything like Spanish chaval?

    51. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      You could always try running away.

      You're right. I could also shoot to kill.

      Unless you're targetted by assassins, then they're after your iPod not you.

      No, there are plenty of people that would also like to kidnap you or your family for ransom, rape/kill your women, people that are under the influence of narcotics and will think nothing of killing you even if there is no need to do it, etc.

      Better to get you and your familiy (if any) out of there than go after an intruder who is just as likely to be able to shoot you in return.

      First of all, it is a hell of a lot easier to tell my family to stay in the back room and call 911, while I aim a shotgun towards the front window being busted through by an intruder, versus gathering my family and trying to sneak out of the house and hoping the intruder doesn't have any friends waiting out in that direction. There are too many risks. Intruders don't want to get caught, if they see a family fleeing, and they have a chance to stop them before they can alert others, don't you think they will?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    52. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Enoch+Zembecowicz · · Score: 1

      As the son of a (former) burglar I can tell you a burglar does not want anyone to be home. They may mistakenly believe a home to be unoccupied, but the more steps that you take to make it obvious that you are home the less likely they are to believe you aren't.
      On the other side of the coin you have home invasion robbers. These are the people who you hear about raping and killing the occupants of homes.
      If someone breaks into my house when I'm not home I have insurance. If someone wants to break into my house when I am home I have a light with a motion sensor in it and a dog. If those things aren't enough of a deterrant I have a shotgun as a last resort. I know using it on someone would certainly do me some psychological damage. I'd also rather deal with that then die.

      --
      "Who's going to believe a talking head?" - Herbert West
    53. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Dennis -

      I just wanted to say that this is the sweetest post I've ever read on Slashdot. The world needs more parents like you.... and I hope to be this good when my kids are teenagers.... and all throughout their lives. Yes, I know this was a goofy response, but your post really touched my heart, and made me remember just *why* I do want kids.

      They're actually useful! :P:P:P:P

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    54. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      I own a gun. If a criminal enters my house to do me harm, I will have no choice but to kill him with this gun. That doesn't mean I want to kill everyone with this gun.

      You must be American. I wish you a speedy recovery from that affliction.

    55. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a perfectly good reason why they do it -- self-defense is effectively illegal in England.

      Try that shit anywhere in Florida, and it will likely get you shot.

    56. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      It's always good to have more than one option and to ensure that the choice of which to take is up to you, not them. If you grab a gun and go intruder hunting, what on Earth makes you think the dice are loaded in your favour not theirs? And even if for some reason you thought you had an edge, don't you think the stakes are a little high?

      You may say that there are plenty of people out there who are breaking in to "rape/kill your women" but in a dangerous situation you weigh up the odds and take your best chance. I'd say that the large majority of people breaking into a house are there because they want to steal something - they're not hunting you. In that scenario, keeping out of their way is a lot less likely to get you killed than going looking for them. You could also say that keeping out of their way is a lot less likely to get you killed in the "Assassin" scenario too. Someone breaks into the front of your house, you run out of the back and keep running. Vice versa for the front. If you're trapped upstairs, you push the stereo round the bedroom door and brace the bed against it while you wait for the sirens. If they turn out to be a Hollywood Movie psycho-killer that breaks down the door... well at least you know where they're coming at you from and you can fall back to Plan B(low them away) then, rather bumbling down the stairs at them.

      If you read my post again, you'll see that what I am advocating is (a) keep your options open (b) choose the one that has lowest risk of being killed. Your 'nobody rapes my woman attitude' is all very touching, but I would sooner loose my PC / TV / whatever, than be grieving for a dead boyfriend or spending the rest of my days looking after someone stuck in a wheelchair because their spine was damaged.

      If you want to argue that there's a greater chance of people lying in wait for you outside, than of an intruder being a burglar, then you can argue that if you like. But the original poster said "I would have no choice but to shoot the intruder." The OP is wrong and if there's a choice between confronting the intruder and running away, I am very much advising you leg it just as fast as you can (though I don't mind if you want to trot along behind your women in case of stray shots).

      My £0.02.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    57. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by mikefe · · Score: 1

      So the stores that deploy this will end up having a run on earplugs for a day or two

      More like they won't be able to talk to their friends in low tones anymore. There is a lot of non-verbal communication going on in a tight nit group, but you still need to be able to hear each other.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    58. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      If you grab a gun and go intruder hunting, what on Earth makes you think the dice are loaded in your favour not theirs?

      Because I'm not intruder HUNTING, I'm ROOM DEFENDING. A huge difference.

      Who has a bigger advantage, someone in a hidden position with a firearm aimed at a door, window, or hallway where an intruder is entering? Especially when the intruder is unfamiliar with the layout and surroundings?

      And even if for some reason you thought you had an edge, don't you think the stakes are a little high?

      Wait, the stakes are high to defend myself with a weapon, but the stakes AREN'T high to gather my entire family and try to run out of the house?

      Clearly the stakes are high. Our house is being broken into by a criminal.

      If you read my post again, you'll see that what I am advocating is (a) keep your options open (b) choose the one that has lowest risk of being killed. Your 'nobody rapes my woman attitude' is all very touching, but I would sooner loose my PC / TV / whatever, than be grieving for a dead boyfriend or spending the rest of my days looking after someone stuck in a wheelchair because their spine was damaged.

      No, you're advocating that I try to avoid violence even though your "better idea" of running out of the house is actually not the safer choice.

      Obviously I am not going to shoot a criminal in every instance. There are too many variables. The guy walks in and has kevlar on, or we happen to be standing next to an unlocked door exiting into a safer environment, or my gun isn't loaded and the bullets are far away. Etc.

      And I'm not saying shoot the guy because it's "romantic" to protect the women folk.

      All I'm saying is, assuming a person breaking into your house is just their for "your ipod" is a ridiculous assumption to risk your life over. In this instance, I consider arming myself the safer choice.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    59. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      Oh, and look up happy slapping while you're at it (honestly).

      People can't "happyslap" if they have broken legs...

    60. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by elknco1 · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mace
      kick ass, takes names

    61. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by KronicD · · Score: 1

      Hmm! Interesting comment, I can see where your coming from here.

      I've never been to "spar" (I don't live in the US), most convience stores here sell things that teenagers would like to buy (nachos), and the legal age for purchasing both booze and cigarettes here is 18, but nobody seems to check id, ever. I've seen 10 year olds purchasing smokes.

      But as you said, its not an ideal solution, but I'm sure the guy that invented it will make some money, and thats what really matters :P

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    62. Re:Yet another way for parents to avoid... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      In fact I'm sure of the opposite. If I did not have a gun handy, then I have no choice to kill an intruder who backs me into a corner. If I have a gun handy I have the choice to kill an intruder.

      When someone is intruding on my home I have no idea what his intentions are. Perhaps he just wants my iPod, perhaps he wants to rape my family. The former is more likely, but I cannot discount the latter. I have to take action based on limited information.

      If I have the opportunity to retreat I will, but I do not know in advance that I have that chance. In fact I do not know in advance that my house will be broken into. If I knew 100% that someone would break into my house today I would hire 10 security guards (per person breaking in), to make sure that nothing bad happens to me. I have no reason to believe that my house will ever be broken into, so I do not have any security guards.

      I enjoy target shooting, so I have the gun anyway, therefore I may as well keep it handy just in case.

  6. I need this for my stores! by dada21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We sell skateboards and paintball shit. We aren't in the mall.

    1. Hide a few dozen of these in the mall shops
    2. ???
    3. Profit!!!

    1. Re:I need this for my stores! by RedWizzard · · Score: 0
      We sell skateboards and paintball shit.
      Why would you want to drive away your target audience?
    2. Re:I need this for my stores! by dogwelder99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll look you up when my new product is ready for market - a voice disguiser that lets kids talk shit in front of their parents at 16 KHz.

    3. Re:I need this for my stores! by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      re-read GP post.. he wants to drive biz OUT of the mall, therefore INTO his store (not at the mall)

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    4. Re:I need this for my stores! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes. I just tune out those stupid "...profit" jokes these days.

    5. Re:I need this for my stores! by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      Dude... I'm not into paintball... But where is your store? Paintball *shit* I would definitely buy! Think of the possibilities.

    6. Re:I need this for my stores! by mek2600 · · Score: 1

      Yet you still find time to comment on them?

    7. Re:I need this for my stores! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Dude, just get a rabbit and a monkey. Rabbit for the ammo, monkey for the throwing arm. Do I have to think of everything?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:I need this for my stores! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      He has obviously found the true Zen of Slashdot.

    9. Re:I need this for my stores! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Yet you still find time to comment on them?
      No, I didn't comment on it all - I didn't even read it. I commented on the first line, on my incorrect belief that the OP was saying they needed one of these things to drive teenagers away from their skateboard store.

      It's not that I lack time to read and/or comment on "...profit" jokes. I just find they're so rarely funny anymore that they're not worth the effort of reading. It was hilarious on South Park, but 7 years later it's a bit stale.

    10. Re:I need this for my stores! by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Better get two monkeys. A well fed rabbit can make a LOT of ammo.

  7. TVs by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    This noise must be in the same range that TVs make when turned on. But I'll be 20 in a few months, does that mean I won't hear it anymore?

    1. Re:TVs by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I'm 31 and I have ultra high frequency sensitivity still. I wear custom ear plugs whenever there is a loud ambient noise and the lady never did and she can never hear half of what I can.

      Best $150 ever spent.

    2. Re:TVs by ilovepolymorphism · · Score: 1

      Nope.... I'm 20 and I still hear the annoying TV sound... and no I'm not just talking about the sound it supposed to make...

    3. Re:TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find the sound is worse when there's only one colour on the screen? Like if the TV's muted I can hear it, but as I'm switching channels if I pass over one that makes the TV go blue (no signal on that channel) the sound seems to get unbearably louder.

    4. Re:TVs by Octorian · · Score: 0

      While I've always been able to hear that high-frequency noise made by TVs, that reminds me of something... Back when I lived with my parents, it never used to bother me that much. Then I went off to college, and spent months at a time never being exposed to anything closely but computer monitors (which have higher-quality CRTs that don't emit the same sort of whine). All of the sudden, when I went home on break, the TV noise became unbearable and excessively annoying like it never had before.

    5. Re:TVs by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only one who can here this. I can tell if a muted television is on or off from several rooms away, but no one believes me.

      Oh, and I'm 31. So no, you're probably going to hear it awhile.

    6. Re:TVs by magadass · · Score: 0

      Actually I hear this on CRT's at work all the time and if you actually pay attention to it, it can get quit annoying but for the most part I let it be a passive part of my hearing much like road noise in a car, its there but who cares?

      I have LCD's at home and a DLP for my TV now and I no longer hear those annoying as hell high pitched whines, well except from those power adaptors for electronic devices...Some of those can be irritating if you sit next to one for a while in a quiet room eventually you will start to get aggrevated by that noise...

      But something on topic, seriously I dont think an irritating noise would cause a human being to not go into a store. I mean irritating smell and irritating lighting dont stop people from going to bars do they?

      --
      "If I was smarter I could rule the world!"
    7. Re:TVs by ZX81 · · Score: 1

      LOL, I once went to a television manufacturing plant in Wales and asked about the noise. He said it could happen from old TVs with bad transformers.

      I asked why I could hear it from the TVs in front of me and he said I couldn't :D

      --
      -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
    8. Re:TVs by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this while muting TVs during commercials. I'll be looking at my magazine (or whatever) and notice the noise changing a bit if the color goes from mostly dark to bright white or something. I don't really know what's the "worst" color, but yeah, I've noticed a similar effect.

    9. Re:TVs by LadyVirharper · · Score: 1
      I'm 22, and I can hear the annoying high-pitched noise of cheap TVs.

      It's annoying when you're going TV shopping; I was looking for a small, cheap TV so I could catch Battlestar Galactica (otherwise I don't watch TV) and the SOUND in one electronics department drove me batty, and gave me a headache.

      Must be the same frequency this device is working on.

    10. Re:TVs by E8086 · · Score: 1

      While on the subject TVs, what effects does his contraption have on those four legged furry things we call dogs? There is a reason our parents and the older folks still call the TV remote a "clicker". They used to make high frequency clicks to relay simple commands, volume up/down and channel up/down. Then some people noticed that something was making their dogs go crazy, yes the high frequency "click". We'll just have to wait until the local kennel club installs one to keep those damn kids away. I wonder if he bothered to figure out what the youngest effected age is. Think of parents trying to make their infant stop crying, but unable to hear the teen-away driving their baby crazy, unless stores are required have clearly visable "Teen-Away in Use" signs, if for some unknown reason this thing becomes popular.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    11. Re:TVs by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      I thought I was just crazy... anyone know why this happens? There's some days I can't stand to go into the TV section in Wal-Mart or Best Buy... just drives me nuts.

    12. Re:TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This noise must be in the same range that TVs make when turned on. But I'll be 20 in a few months, does that mean I won't hear it anymore?

      I'm 27 and that sound drives me BATFUCK.

    13. Re:TVs by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean irritating smell and irritating lighting dont stop people from going to bars do they?

      They still come in, they just don't sit next to me.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    14. Re:TVs by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I'm 24 and I can still hear TVs just fine. I find it's not nearly so bad when the TV is playing something, but if it's muted or at a really low volume, it will drive me crazy after a while, and I'll turn it off.

    15. Re:TVs by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Care to provide more info about the plugs? Did you buy them online or went to a doctor to have them prescribed?

      For some reason, the older I get the more sensitive my ears seem to be (or maybe my patience is not what it used to be)

      --
      No sig
    16. Re:TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Batfuck... that sounds a little uncomfortable. Especially for the bat.

    17. Re:TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 35. From my bed, I can hear when my kids tv's are left on in their rooms. I used to be able to hear tv's from a few rooms away or as soon as I walked into a house with one on about 15 years ago. That noise comes from the high voltage flyback/line output transformer. It is used to generate the high voltage required for the CRT. A "sligthly" overloaded switching power supply can also generate a similar frequency but that frequency drops rapidly as it gets overloaded more and more until it shuts itself down (hopefully).

    18. Re:TVs by thogard · · Score: 1

      What you hear is the flyback transformer rattling at a very high frequency and a solid color means it will have a more consistent A/C load so it vibrates with less noise so its louder. When the colors change, the color guns introduce a small amount of noise into the power supply.

    19. Re:TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flyback transformer and horizontal retrace in a CRT based television (NTSC) runs at 15kHz. This is in the upper range of human hearing. I'm 31 and the noise from the horizontal circuit in a single CRT television is enough to drive me out of the room. (Lets not talk about the pain induced by an entire showroom full of TVs.) So much for this high frequency technique only being effective on teenagers!

    20. Re:TVs by ian_mackereth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in my mid-40s and still hear that 16kHz whine from many TVs and monitors when the PC's turned off. I learned to protect my hearing when I was in the (Royal Australian) Air Force. While the young d00ds were being macho and enduring the loud noises as jets flew overhead, the brass who'd been around awhile had no qualms about wearing earplugs or putting their fingers in their ears as appropriate. My fellow (then) teenagers probably ended up cool, but deaf.

    21. Re:TVs by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      It's not bad transformers, it's normal transformers.
      You just put a glob of epoxy on the transformer - it messes up the frequency of the vibration, or dampens the vibration.

      Monitors and TVs that suddenly start making the noise generally do so because the glob of epoxy has broken off.

    22. Re:TVs by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      TVs don't make that noise anymore. I'm 45 and I haven't heard that noise in years.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    23. Re:TVs by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Any ear doctor can hook you up with them. The custom silicone ones are decent, but the more you spend the more they'll last and the better they'll work.

      More recently I've found the need to replace mine as they have newer versions that can let through the midrange better. When I go to a concert I always wear non-custom ones that just block almost all sound across the board. I once lost one of my custom plugs at a show and it sucked balls.

      If you go to the doctor for your impression, always request the long full canal impression. It will cost more but the plugs will be better suited to you. I've had to have my plugs remolded once as I knew they didn't work perfectly, but the second remold was fine.

      You'd be amazed at the sound levels of regular life. I know some street noise can hit 115db without even seeming painful! My church band can hit 105db with regularity, so even at church I wear plugs.

  8. So... by Psionicist · · Score: 1

    The New York Times is reporting on a device called the Mosquito invented by Howard Stapleton designed to drive teens away by emitting a high frequency noise at 75db.

    So... He invented Jazz music.

  9. I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Teens have rights too, you can't discriminate on the basis of age.

    1. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not according to politicians.

    2. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by raoul666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Teens have rights too, you can't discriminate on the basis of age.

      You must be new here. And by here, I mean society. It's one of the few things that not only are people still discriminated against for, it's one that no one complains about, or really even thinks about.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    3. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Godman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, you must be kidding me! I didn't sign up for that...

      Can I revoke my membership to society?

      --
      I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    4. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Tore+S+B · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a teen, having gone through very frustrating and annoying shit just because of my age, I'd love to know why the fuck this was modded funny.

      This *is* discrimination. If the guys are annoying, call the cops on the fuckers. Don't take it out on everyone who just happen to be the same age. It's no better than racism.

      --
      toresbe
    5. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      They are just being annoyed if they hang around near the entrance of the store. Just like they annoy actual customers of the store.

      This isn't discrimination.

    6. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, teenagers are considered minors, therefore are not considered full citizens, and therefore have very limited rights. Age discrimination is nothing new. After all, teenager do commit many crimes and are generally irritating.

    7. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *checks numbers*

      That's funny. 18 and 19 are still part of the teens.

      Huh.

    8. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Joe+Random · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As a teen, having gone through very frustrating and annoying shit just because of my age, I'd love to know why the fuck this was modded funny.
      Probably for several reasons, one of which being that discrimination against teens is legal and state-sponsored. Can a 13-year-old drive a car? Buy a handgun? Drink alcohol? Buy cigarettes? Vote? There you go, state-sponsored and, many would argue, valid age discrimination. So there's a certain amount of humor for someone to say, obviously tongue-in-cheek, that you can't discriminate against teens.
      If the guys are annoying, call the cops on the fuckers. Don't take it out on everyone who just happen to be the same age.
      The sound is only annoying with constant exposure, and the only way someone is going to be constantly exposed is if they're loitering around outside the store. It will have no effect on people who are legitimate customers entering or leaving the store. No one, regardless of age, should be loitering outside this guy's store. And if there's a simply way to encourage a group not to loiter, especially when the loiterers are pretty much exclusively composed of that group, then I say "go for it!"
    9. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Last I checked, teenagers are considered minors, therefore are not considered full citizens, and therefore have very limited rights. Age discrimination is nothing new. After all, teenager do commit many crimes and are generally irritating."

      Claims:
      A) teenagers are minors
      B) not "full" citizens
      C) have limited rights
      D) discrimination is not new
      E) teenagers commit many crimes
      F) teenagers are generally irritating

      Response:
      A) 19% of them are legally adults
      B) What? WHAT??
      C) They can't buy beer and vote? So?
      D) SO??
      E) Who doesn't?
      F) Ok, you're right. But again -- SO??

      Your stream of consciousness has dried up to a few murky, unrelated puddles. Consider selling your keyboard.

    10. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Calling the police for something like loitering is going to have exactly zero result. The police can't do anything much more than shoo the offending youth away, and will get rapidly annoyed at being called out repeatedly to the same location.

      Not to mention whatever might happen in retaliation for your calling the police on the kids.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    11. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by zygote · · Score: 1

      "...can't discriminate on the basis of age."

      Yes, they can and do.

      Drinking age limit (& buying tobacco)
      Voting age limit
      Driving age limit
      Joining the military
      Child labor law include age limits
      child support ends (usually) at 18

      Teens have some rights. When you're a teen, it sucks. When you're an oldster responsible for teens, notsomuch.

      Cheers,
      Cranky McOldster

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
    12. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by LordEd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since you are a teen, I don't suppose you can tell me what is the draw behind hanging out in the parking lot of 7/11 stores late at night? I can never figure out what the point is.

    13. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by MasterPi · · Score: 1

      Just because its accepted doesn't make it right.

      --
      ( I
    14. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      I might not be a teenager, but I have been bothered by constant, high-piched noises before, and they aren't "only annoying with constant exposure". They are always annoying.

    15. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by strider44 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can vote, drive a car, drink alcohol, look at porn and buy cigarettes. (I can't buy a handgun but alas I live in Australia where handguns are illegal without a license) I make my own money. I can still hear these noises and I'll be damned if I'm going to shop at a store that treats me like shit.

    16. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Joe+Random · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd rather have to listen to a high-pitched squeal for the 5 seconds it takes to enter the store than have a bunch of punks yell obscenities at me. And based on the article, this would be exactly the choice this quy was faced with.

    17. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Probably for several reasons, one of which being that discrimination against teens is legal and state-sponsored. Can a 13-year-old drive a car? Buy a handgun? Drink alcohol? Buy cigarettes? Vote? There you go, state-sponsored and, many would argue, valid age discrimination. So there's a certain amount of humor for someone to say, obviously tongue-in-cheek, that you can't discriminate against teens.

      You should know full well that these restrictions have nothing in common with a device designed exclusivly to annoy and frustrate a given demographic. As a 22 year old who hears high frequencies very loudly (I can hear almost all screens whistle) I can imagine the havoc this will cause not just with teenagers, but with parents that have babies (who have even higher auditory ranges), with children wating outside while their mother shops and with people walking their dogs on the footpath. There are many legitimate uses for the public land outside this store and the public has the right to use it for things like waiting and pedestrian transport regardless of their age. I've met store owners that believe that they own the public land around where they are, such as one particually charitable gentleman who demanded my spastic uncle be moved from near his shop to improve the ambience, but they are invariably wrong. Public land belongs to the public, at least where I live.

      I find the public's callous attitudes towards teenagers to be disgusting. Sure, teenagers are stupid, boring to talk to and nearly everything they do is pointless, but this also applies to people who are mentally handicapped. Yet if someone was to invent the Retard-Prod(tm) that jabs everyone with an IQ less than 60, the inventor would be lynched within a day. I was a teenager 2 years ago, I was pretty stupid back when I was 15, in the same way I'll discover I'm stupid now in another six or seven years, but generally I didn't hurt anyone and only wanted to mind my own buisiness and have other people mind theirs, most teenagers are like that. Picking on kids because you don't like their demographic is not cool and it never will be.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    18. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by brpr · · Score: 1

      No one, regardless of age, should be loitering outside this guy's store.

      Why the hell shouldn't they? Is standing around in a public space illegal these days or something? If the store owner doesn't wan't people standing in a particular place, that's too bad for him unless he owns the space in question. Of course, there are some obvious exceptions (you can't stand just outside his door physically blocking people from entering, for example), but if people are standing around in the general area outside his store, too bad for him.

      --
      Freedom is not increased by mere diminuation of government. Anarchy is freedom for the strong and slavery for the weak.
    19. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      The sound is only annoying with constant exposure, and the only way someone is going to be constantly exposed is if they're loitering around outside the store. [...] No one, regardless of age, should be loitering outside this guy's store.

      Why not pick a sound in a range that everyone can hear? Since, you know, you want to drive away loiters of any age and it's only annoying to loiters.

    20. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
      Why the hell shouldn't they [loiter]? Is standing around in a public space illegal these days or something?
      I don't know about the UK (which this aricle is about), but in the US the answer to your question would be, "Yes, loitering is, in many jurisdictions, illegal."

      Oh, and IANAL.
    21. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Catnapster · · Score: 1
      Teens have some rights. When you're a teen, it sucks. When you're an oldster responsible for teens, notsomuch.
      So what you're saying is, discrimination against a fairly wide swathe of the population based solely on age is okay as long as it makes your life a little easier?

      "Back in the 60s, Negroes had some rights. If you were a Negro, it sucked. If you were a white man responsible for Negroes, notsomuch."
      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    22. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Hey, guess what? EVERY adult was once a teenager! This isn't like racism because it's discrimination against our OWN younger kind. You don't (and won't) understand it now, but in twenty years you will.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    23. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a 22 year old who hears high frequencies very loudly

      Same here; I can hear tons of very high frequency whistles that nobody else seems to hear. Just because the rest of the world is half-deaf doesn't mean those frequences shouldn't also be regulated by laws against noise polution.

    24. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      If the guys are annoying, call the cops on the fuckers.

      "Hi Sherrif? There's some teens outside my house and they are really annoying me..."

      "Stay right there Sir, we'll send a S.W.A.T. team over right now"

    25. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Yet if someone was to invent the Retard-Prod(tm) that jabs everyone with an IQ less than 60, the inventor would be lynched within a day.

      Actually, the inventor was jabbed to death by the device.

      Seriously though; this device doesn't discriminate against teens, it discriminates against anybody with a good enough hearing, which just happens to be mostly teens. It doesn't discriminate against age; it discriminates against physical conditions.

      One other thing; couldn't this device be undone simply by listening to an iPod whilst loitering?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    26. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon get a grip. Haven't you been in those clothing stores where they play that "DOOF-DOOF" music? They do that so that only their target market will go near the place. Only in that case their target market is you. It isn't always you. Get over it.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    27. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      This *is* discrimination. If the guys are annoying, call the cops on the fuckers.

      This isn't a very useful solution as, in the main, minors typically are not held accountable for all but the most henious of acts. In other words, as a minor, you can get away with just about anything short of rape and manslaughter and there's not a danm thing the cops can do about it.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    28. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by famebait · · Score: 1

      the Retard-Prod(tm) that jabs everyone with an IQ less than 60

      I think we should change the name to "Retard-O-Prod". More friendly ring to it. But apart from that, we're definitely interested. I'll have my people call your people.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    29. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny


      I'm going to take this inventor to court for discrimination against the abled.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    30. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Age discrimination preventing them from getting into bars. ;) If you lived with your parents and couldn't go to pubs or clubs, where would you go to be with your friends?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    31. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picking on kids because you don't like their demographic is not cool and it never will be.

      I agree with much of what you say, but the part your missing here is that it's not because you don't like their demographics, it's because you have genuine trouble with them (from FTA, the teens they try to get rid off sound like criminals). If old people were mocking customers and assaulting them or whatever, he would probably just as likely want to get rid of them too. But they don't.

    32. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's pretty much the size of it. Deal with it.

    33. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If pubs and clubs are the only choices there are, that's quite limited. I'd get bored pretty soon.

      I find it quite strange since I'm sure teens in the west do have a fair bit of spending power. Are the youth there really too ill-behaved for most businesses to want to attract? I find that hard to believe.

      Over here in Malaysia in most cities there are numerous food places which are "youth friendly", many of which are open for 24 hours. There are the muslim indian food places (mamak), the hong kong/taiwan style places, and open-air food courts.

      Many young people hang out at these places with their friends, drinking tea/coffee or various expensive fruit/dessert concoctions (smoothies, bubble tea, etc), eating all sorts of food/snacks.

      Of course over here there's no winter, so some of these places typically put out plastic tables and chairs by the road and even in front of other shops (which are closed by then), and so expand their business area (somewhat illegally), while paying the rent for only one shoplot.

      Then there are cybercafes where the youth can play computer games with each other.

      I hear such businesses are typically quite profitable.

      An example evening would be dinner (with friends/family), play games with friends at cybercafe, supper/snacks (at mentioned places), back home before parents get upset and ground them. Alternatively they could go watch a movie, or just hang out at those places for hours talking about whatever...

      Something is wrong with a society if its common for its youth to hang out in front of stores and scream obscenities at random people. Aren't there far more fun things to do as a teenager? Where are their parents and what are they doing?

      --
    34. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > in the same way I'll discover I'm stupid now in another six or
      > seven years, but generally I didn't hurt anyone

      Except, maybe, by calling them "spastics" and "retards"?

    35. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoth OP: "Oh, you must be kidding me! I didn't sign up for that...

      Can I revoke my membership to society?"

      Yeah, by fucking off somewhere else. We'll, erm, let you know when we need you.

    36. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's one that no one complains about, or really even thinks about"...

      Except for those billions of people who arn't old enough to meet the age-requirement...

    37. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Spastic (n.b. always an adjective, never a noun) is a technical term for someone who has cirtain nervous damage that cause reduced muscular control and spasms. My uncle that I mentioned is spastic and lives in a place called the spastic centre. He has cerabral paulsy, thus he is spastic, a technical term.

      Retarded (n.b. also never a noun) is a euphamism for slow, it is a technically correct term in the United States but derogatory everywhere else. You will notice I used the term "mentally handicapped" where a technical definition was used, but "Retard-Prod" when describing a device that was deliberately meant to illustrate a point by being morally reprehensable.

      I don't really think I hurt anyone with either of these conditions. A person who is spastic probably knows its a fine term when used in the correct context and someone who is mentally handicapped probably woudn't be reading slashdot (though to be honest I think the parent comes close).

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    38. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Federal anti-discrimination laws apply only to those over 40. Yes, teenagers have no rights. Otherwise, how can their parents take care of them, as they are legally required to do?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    39. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Diamon · · Score: 1
      This *is* discrimination.

      No, it's not. Teens aren't being subjected to anything than everyone else it. Everyone is being subjected to the same sound waves. The only difference is in general older people cannot hear them. If there were a bunch of 30 something slackers hanging outside the stores all day and not buying anything they would be the targets of the device instead of the teen. Age has nothing to do with it. Teens are being targeted because they're loitering, not because they're teens.
    40. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Spastic (n.b. always an adjective, never a noun) is a technical
      > term for someone who has cirtain nervous damage that cause
      > reduced muscular control and spasms. My uncle that I mentioned
      > is spastic and lives in a place called the spastic centre. He
      > has cerabral paulsy, thus he is spastic, a technical term.
      Okay, I didn't know that.

      > You will notice I used the term "mentally handicapped" where a
      > technical definition was used, but "Retard-Prod" when
      > describing a device that was deliberately meant to illustrate a
      > point by being morally reprehensable.
      Fair enough. Thanks for the explanation. (There are those who would take offence at the exaggeration itself though, and personally I found that growing older and hopefully less stupid made me more reluctant to give any kind of offence)

      > someone who is mentally handicapped probably woudn't be reading
      > slashdot (though to be honest I think the parent comes close).
      Gee, this remark kinda detracts somewhat from your "down with the mentally handicapped" line, don'tcha think? Fuck you too, kid! Hope you go deaf soon!

    41. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by greysky · · Score: 1

      I can assure you that if a bunch of 40-somethings were hanging out in convenience store parking lots, harassing customers, the store owners would call the cops a LOT sooner than they do for teenagers.

    42. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Loitering is not a right - it's a crime. You don't have the "Right" to commit a crime. The shopkeeper is not preventing them from coming into his store.

    43. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by 241comp · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're allowed to discriminate by skin color and gender too. But only if you're discriminating against whites or males. And especially if you are discriminating against white males.

    44. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Tom · · Score: 1

      If the guys are annoying, call the cops on the fuckers.

      One of the things that's fucked up with society is that nobody can handle the small things on their own anymore. Instead we call the police on a few teens, or drag our neighbours to court (a huge part of the civil suits in most western countries are disputes between neighbours).

      Doesn't work that way. A couple of years ago, a few teens on public transport harassed a girl about their age. Yours truly went over, sat down next to the girl and told the guys to fuck off. They did. End of story.
      You would've called the cops? You're insane. Responsibility is acting yourself, not calling someone else to do it for you.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    45. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Chrontius · · Score: 1
      The sound is only annoying with constant exposure, and the only way someone is going to be constantly exposed is if they're loitering around outside the store. It will have no effect on people who are legitimate customers entering or leaving the store. No one, regardless of age, should be loitering outside this guy's store. And if there's a simply way to encourage a group not to loiter, especially when the loiterers are pretty much exclusively composed of that group, then I say "go for it!"
      Bullshit. You can hear this stuff well enough, and it feels like your bones are resonating and your teeth are going to shake loose, one pane of safety glass isn't going to do squat about it. All loiterers are teens =! all teens are loiterers.
    46. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Gee, this remark kinda detracts somewhat from your "down with the mentally handicapped" line, don'tcha think? Fuck you too, kid! Hope you go deaf soon!
      I take comfort in the fact that if someone cared what I thought about them, they would have logged in and refrained from commenting about my choice of words before doing reaserch into what they mean and how they are used.
      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    47. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      I really should know better than to respond to flamebait comments that have modded into the stoneage... but sometimes it's irresistible:

      > someone who is mentally handicapped probably woudn't be reading
      > slashdot (though to be honest I think the parent comes close).

      Gee, this remark kinda detracts somewhat from your "down with the mentally handicapped" line, don'tcha think? Fuck you too, kid! Hope you go deaf soon!

      I was going to mod this as +1 Funny, but what it REALLY deserves is -1 Grumpy Old Man.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    48. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure whether loitering is exactly illegal but the police do have various powers to stop people congregating in groups of more than about 3 and will generally ask groups causing the kind of nuisance this device is designed for to "Move On". The problem is the group just moves somewhere else and makes a nuisance of it's self there instead.

      I don't know what it's like in the US but in the UK most housing estates have small rows of shops, usually a group of convienence store, off licence and chip shop/takeaway. You can pretty much guarantee that by around 8pm there will be a group of kids hanging around outside these shops, usually trying to get people to buy them cigarettes and alcohol.

      A lot of the time these groups probably aren't causing any trouble but some of the time they will be vandalising things, harassing people walking past or to and from the shops, arguing and fighting with each other and in a lot of cases taking drugs. Generally groups of teenagers are quite loud and noticable anyway and because people know that these groups do behave illegally and cause them problems some of the time they anticipate they will be doing those things whenever they see them.

      Being able to turn on this device for short periods, long enough to make the group outside your shop seems like a good idea but will most probably lead to some vandalism of your premises by disgruntled teenagers. I don't see why shopkeepers would need the device on all the time - just long enough to cause the problem to go elsewhere.

    49. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by pcgabe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yet if someone was to invent the Retard-Prod(tm) that jabs everyone with an IQ less than 60, the inventor would be lynched within a day.

      If someone were to invent the Retard-O-Prod that jabs everyone with an IQ of less than X, the inventor would be hailed as a conquering hero.

      If you give me a working Retard-O-Prod (with variable IQ tolerance dial; crank that baby UP!), I will give you a cool $1,000,000 cash.

      Keep one by the doorway to your house to drive away solicitors! Put one at the entrance to your finer discriminating stores! Sorry, Billy, you must be at least this smart to shop here. I won't even bother getting into the obvious possibilities (putting them in voting booths, the DMV, et cetera).

      If you can make a wearable version, that would be even better. That way, I wouldn't constantly feel the need to shout YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS everywhere I go. I'll let the Retard-O-Prod do the shouting for me. ^_^ We can call it the iProd!

      Of course, considering the number of annoyingly foolish conversations I've heard among alleged 'geniuses', we'd really need to turn it up to 140 or 150...

      If you ask me, there's too much discrimination based on race, gender, religion, age, et cetera, and NOT ENOUGH discrimination against stupidity.

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    50. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Technician · · Score: 1

      Teens have rights too, you can't discriminate on the basis of age.

      He wasn't discriminating by age. If they were customers who came in for a few convience items, paid for them and left, there would not be a problem.

      He discriminated against non-paying people who hung out near the shop and discouraged real customers. He understood the demographics of the problem people and used it to his advantage. Targeting a group by demographic and direct obversation is not age discrimination. Placing a sign, "No Minors" on a place that is not selling open alcholic beverages or adult entertainment such as a casino would be age discrimination.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    51. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      In a mall around here they use high frequency devices to repell pigeons. I can hear them and I get headaches just from a few seconds... exactely those few seconds it takes me to walk by.

      I don't know about you but Lot's of people AND those irritating noises make Kokuyo go crazy! Would you like me shopping at a mall near your kids that has those devices? Jokes aside this is just a stupid idea.

    52. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      If they are harrassing people by asking them to buy them illegal thing, then the cops need to put on street clothes and walk past them, and arrest their ass when asked to buy those things.

      This isn't a failure of store owners, or of society, or the law. It's a failure of police.

      The police are supposed to keep the peace. If there are roving groups of people standing around on public land harrassing people, they need to fix the problem. This is exactly what loitering laws are designed for, although, like I said, underaged drinking laws might be better.

      Don't start harrassing people yourself to fix the problem.

      And, no, the 'only' possible response to a loitering complaint isn't to shoo them away. Take their names first. If they keep showing up on loitering complaints, give them tickets. Loitering is an actual crime.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    53. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DarkSarin · · Score: 0

      In hiring situations, there are restrictions on age-based discrimination--but ONLY if it hurts folks over 40! So while a firm may easily say you MUST be over 40 for this job, they cannot say you MUST be under 50 (except in a few strange circumstances).

      As a youngish person (29 in a few days), this is really frustrating. The assumption that an older person is smarter or better at something than a younger person (based on experience) is foolish. The only way to know is to check. Unfortunately it is generally a better use of resources to use experience than to test every aspect of a person's development, and the minds of many folks age==experience.

      Age discrimination is a problem, however. It has been heavily studied in terms of hiring for older folks, but little has been done to examine the problem of pay as it relates to younger folks. I would bet that if you were 21, had a graduate degree, and even a couple years of experience, you would make less than someone with comparable experience even five years older. This is as much a problem in my mind as gender-based discrimination.

      Oh, and contrary to what folks think, it is TECHNICALLY illegal to discriminate against white males (the laws mention only gender and race, not which gender or race). There have even been a few cases of a white male suing an organization for discrimination (and winning). It isn't easy, and most of the time the judges and juries are less than sympathetic. More cases would be nice though, since it would put the idea in folks minds that when you are hiring you need to be racially BLIND! If I were to ever be passed over for someone who is less qualified but is either female or a minority race, you had better believe that I would sue (if I could prove it). Why? Because an organization that is willing to discriminate against me based on race or gender would do it to the minority if they thought they could get away with it.

      LESSON? If you are white male, don't let organizations pass you over for that reason in order to hire/promote a minority. The way to do this is to be the best employee you can. If they do the best they can and are better than you, then they deserve the promotion, but ONLY if they are more qualified or do objectively better work.

      FWIW, I hate folks that discriminate against anyone.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    54. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blanket statements are almost always blatantly wrong. I for one don't want two-year-olds driving cars, nor do I want my eighty-year-old grandpa operating my computer.

    55. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, how can their parents take care of them, as they are legally required to do?

      Yeah, like that happens... we're too busy blaming GTA for screwing our kids up, if you hadn't noticed.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    56. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by kabocox · · Score: 1


      You must be new here. And by here, I mean society. It's one of the few things that not only are people still discriminated against for, it's one that no one complains about, or really even thinks about.


      Ah, but we young ones, can force them old ones to early retirement. Of course, then we'd have to worry about the same thing. We could actually vote to remove the entire SS system. It would actually kill off old folks if they found out 80%-90% of the 18-30 age group voted to remove the entire system. They'd all panic and have heart attacks. Young ones (those under 18) have always been held back by being called minors and childern by anyone that is older than them. The oldest folks that should have one foot in the grave have always tried to hold society to what they thought life was like when they were young. ;) And most actual adults, would wish that their parnets would shut up and stop trying to run their life now that they are marrieed with kids while also wishing that their kids would do what they want.

      We really need to have all elected offices held by one those under 2 years of age. (Babies couldn't possibly do a worse job and well middle age folks wouldn't stand a chance of winning against a cute kid. ;)

    57. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      Teens have rights too, you can't discriminate on the basis of age.

      How the above assinine comment got modded up so high is beyond me.

      In the U.S., we legally discriminate on the basis of age all the time:

      • You can't drive until you're 16 in most states.
      • You can't enter a bar/nightclub that serves alcohol until you're 21.
      • You can't vote until you're 18.
      • You can't watch a movie rated "R" legally, without a parent or guardian, until you're 17.
      • Those over 65 get discounted pricing in many restaurants.
      • Kids under 5 eat free in many restaurants.
      • You can't play little league if you're under 9 years old or over 12.
      • You can't marry, in most states, until you're of a defined legal age.

      The list could go on forever.

      Businesses and governments discriminate on the basis of age all the time.

      People, please don't mod up comments that lack all logic and common sense. Age discrimination is one of the last forms of legal discrimination available to businesses and governments in this country.

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    58. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teens are discriminated against because they are not legally adults, and are thus the property of their parents.

    59. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by kabocox · · Score: 1

      The sound is only annoying with constant exposure, and the only way someone is going to be constantly exposed is if they're loitering around outside the store. It will have no effect on people who are legitimate customers entering or leaving the store. No one, regardless of age, should be loitering outside this guy's store.

      And as grandmama takes her grand kids into this guy's shop, they all start yelling and screaming after about 30 min. saying grandmama can't you hear that horrible noise? I don't know where it is coming from but it just suddenly started.

      Or, as the store next do that is trying to attract this age demographic as customers, I'd be royally pissed to find that this neighbor is doing everything possible to drive away my loyal customers.

      Oh, how about as just some one that lives a block away, but happens to jog around the block and passes that store a couple of time? Or a delievery driver? What is consant 30 seconds or 5 mins? What business is this guy in any way that doesn't have any teenage customers huh, selling porn, smokes, and/or liquor?

    60. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it's not illegal for them to be buying Alcohol or Cigarettes but it is illegal for people to sell those things to them so it's not the kids committing a crime but the shops or the people they have talked into buying the stuff for them.

      It is a failure of society in so much as these kids parents should be making their kids take part in more productive activities than hanging around on street corners trying to get drunk and it's only a failure of the police insomuch as they don't have sufficient policemen/women and resources to police every shopping arcade throughout every night.

      The police will take the kids names and attempt to disperse them but I don't think loitering is actually in crime in the UK and the time and effort required to process it as a crime would probably be prohibitive. The police can now issue ASBOS against persistant trouble makers or nuisances but these aren't a magic bullet and there are always more kids in search of places to hang around.

    61. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Yeah that might be the case but as a white male I can assure you that the immediate status afforded me far out weighs any discrimination. Society isn't perfect and some things are not strictly "fair" but the idea is to move towards a level playing field so if I get discriminated against a bit in order for the playing field to be tilted slightly less in my favor that's not such a bad thing.

    62. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by vertinox · · Score: 1

      It will have no effect on people who are legitimate customers entering or leaving the store.

      If you mean by feeling an uncontrollable urge to relieve their bowels upon hearing the noise, then yes it has no affect on legitimate customers.

      But seriously, I believe this device was concocted in order to deceive store owners out of their money. People who shout obscenities or harass customer won't be stopped by a high pitched noise.

      Upon finding out that this is being done, its only a matter of those teens wearing earplug or headphones and the harassment continues making the store owners wonder what they paid this company for.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    63. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Molt · · Score: 1

      This sounds like it's being deployed in a small village in Wales, not a city. There's probably this Spar shop, a pub (Which the teenagers aren't allowed into anyway), and maybe something like a chip shop (Quite likely with no seating) in the entire village.

      To get to anywhere with places which may cater for teenagers will probably involve getting a once-an-hour-and-never-on-time bus to a nearby town, and good luck getting back after 9pm when the bus stops.

      I grew up in a place not entirely unlike this and, whilst I wasn't one of the ones who used to hang out in front of the newsagents, I can well understand now why those who did such did it. Nothing to do, nowhere to do it.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    64. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who used to work for one of the major plane building manufacturers in the United States. He started working there as a senior in college and after a year out was supervising the same position he started in; he was getting paid about 60% of the money to do the exact same job as some guy in his 30's. Needless to say, he left the company.

    65. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by mikael · · Score: 1

      There isn't anywhere else for them to hang out together. There might not be any space for them at home with the parents in the living-room watching TV (probably Songs of Praise) and a bedroom only big enough for a bed, some shelves and nothing else. Nightclubs and bars want to charge 20 pound entry fee, and other sources of entertainment are closed after 9pm due to fear of drunk teenagers. Maybe the community centre is only open a couple of nights a week because they can't get volunteers.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    66. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Coffee shop, restaurant with appies, a house (with or without parents)... other local entertainment (rec center, movies, hockey game/sport event)?

    67. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by evilviper · · Score: 1
      No one, regardless of age, should be loitering outside this guy's store. And if there's a simply way to encourage a group not to loiter, especially when the loiterers are pretty much exclusively composed of that group, then I say "go for it!"

      This is not teen-ager repellant, it's a weapon. It's the equivalent of having electrodes that only seriously shock the young.

      You know, I know many shop-keepers that would like a device like this if it could be used to keep black people or mexicans out of their stores, since they do statistically make up a much higher percentage of thefts, and a very low percent of sales. That doesn't make it legal or right to do so.

      If this ever makes it's way into wider use, you can expect the shit to hit the fan. Not only are kids/teens going to avoid the store, they will continue to do so for the rest of their lives, and the store will go out of business. And that's the BEST CASE. The worst case (and not too unlikely) is that these teens are going to be very, very angry at the management of the store, and retaliate, with anything from knives, to firebombs, to riots through the store.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    68. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DarkSarin · · Score: 0

      That's the kind of situation that really ticks me off. Companies know that they can get away this, however, because it is NOT illegal in any way, shape, or form.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    69. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Most of the times I see them hanging around 7/11, there are usually a few with cars. That breaks the bus theory for me locally.

    70. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      If this ever makes it's way into wider use, you can expect the shit to hit the fan. Not only are kids/teens going to avoid the store, they will continue to do so for the rest of their lives, and the store will go out of business

      As a former teenager myself who used to "hate the man", and now in my late 30s, I can tell you that the exact OPPOSITE will occur.

      Once the "transformation" occurs... after college, marriage, kids... these former troublesome teens will turn around and FREQUENT the very same establishments that they loathed as teenagers. Why? Because they will become the group that whines about the "kids today".

      Trust me... you'll find out. I used to wear T-shirts saying "if it's too loud, you're too old" and "sex, drugs, and rock and roll" when I was 17. As a 38 year old with pre-teen daughters now, my perspective has changed.

      I used to think, when I was a teen, that my father was the dumbest S.O.B. in the world.

      It is amazing how every year since, his I.Q. has gone up.

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    71. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Can you please elaborate?

      I'm white and male and I've gone through all sorts of discrimination. In college I was turned down for a research opportunity because the institute in question "was only accepting women and minorities at this time". After college I twice had my resume rejected by companies because they were "seeking to add diversity to the workplace". Hell, just a couple of weeks ago I asked a white girl out, and she told me she "doesn't date white guys".

      I see all the doors closing, and I've heard time and again that it's more than off-set by some of the other stuff. Seems like you've had a similar experience so I was wondering:

      When does all this other stuff come in that gives me a net advantage? I'm pushing 30, and I still see no sign of it. Frankly I'm beginning to wonder if I'm not just one of the people destined to be screwed over so some bureaucrat can decide that things are now statistically balanced out. Has our society really given up on the goal of being color blind to the point where the best we can hope for is to screw everybody to a comparable degree?

    72. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      you can't discriminate on the basis of age.

      I agree. This is why it is legal for toddlers to drive cars and drink booze. (Just as long as they don't do both at the same time.)

      Anyway. This isn't discrimination based on age, it's discrimination based on how much hearing loss a person has experienced. The frequency will be just as irritating to a 45-year-old with perfect hearing, and it will be unnoticed by 14-year-olds who have damaged their ears listening to music too loud.

      Fortunately for the inventor, it is well known that teenagers never listen to music too loud.

    73. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Lew+Payne · · Score: 1

      "Teens have rights too, you can't discriminate on the basis of age."

      Yes, and older people have rights too! If a high-pitched sound is our preferred form of music, then we have a right to play it ON OUR PREMISES. If you don't like the sound (music) you hear, I suggest you visit another premise that plays the kind of crap you like.

    74. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Molt · · Score: 1

      In the UK (Where the shop is) you need to be seventeen to drive but only sixteen to buy cigarettes, it really wouldn't make sense for people who can buy them on their own to harrass passers-by to buy them for them. If it was alcohol they're after that's available to eighteen year olds and a group with a few cars but none of them yet eighteen doesn't sound that likely.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    75. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "This isn't a failure of store owners, or of society, or the law. It's a failure of police"

      No, it's a failure of the teens to control themselves and by extension the parents.

      Put the blame where it belongs.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    76. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "Teens have rights too, you can't discriminate on the basis of age."

      I wonder if you'd be spouting the same line if we were about to sentence your 4 year old as an adult.

      As soon as a child is willing to accept adult responsibility, then they've earned adult treatment. But as long as mommy and daddy still clean up your messes, you have nothing to bitch about.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    77. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "I find the public's callous attitudes towards teenagers to be disgusting. Sure, teenagers are stupid, boring to talk to and nearly everything they do is pointless, but this also applies to people who are mentally handicapped."

      I agree. Teenagers do act retarded.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    78. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by ktappe · · Score: 1
      Picking on kids because you don't like their demographic is not cool

      Except we're not picking on them because they're teens, we're picking on them because they're loitering. If they continue to loiter into their 30's, we'll pick on them then too using some other device. Their age is irrelevant; their actions are what's relevant.

      -Kurt

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    79. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Random832 · · Score: 1

      area denial is not a legitimate response to loitering - this also prevents legitimate shopping, and being accompanied by parents, etc, etc.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    80. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Well, then it is a failure of your laws.

      In the US, it is illegal for underaged people to attempt to buy things they aren't allowed, or to ask adults to do so for them.

      Granted, it's just a misdemeanor, and it's usually waived and the cops just tell the parents. But if that's not working, a few 50 dollar (or 20 pound, or whatever) fines should discourage it, especially if they're doing it enough to be annoying. Delibrately walking into a store in case kids will ask you do something illegal is not entrapment.

      And loitering is almost always an actual crime. Police just never do anything about it, as loitering only kicks in after people are asked to disperse and they do not do so.

      However, like I said, it can be culmulative. You can't be asked to disperse and your group just walk to the other side of the street, or dispense and then reform two minutes later. You do that, you are loitering, you don't get to move slightly and get another warning.

      So if the police can determine that person X has been a member of the groups at X, Y, and Z that were all asked to disperse in a single day, he can write that person a ticket without having to ask them to disperse again.

      Now, in court, if they fought it, the person might be able to get that ticket thrown out, on the grounds he didn't know he was loitering each time. Loitering is a very hard crime to actually prove beyond a reasonable doubt, mainly because it requires a lack of lawful purpose, and there are plenty of lawful reasons to be standing in any particular spot.

      However, if it really is such a big problem, he won't be able to get away with that reasoning in front of a jury. And parents having to haul their kids in and out of court, and/or pay a large fine every few days, will quickly get the message they need to stop their kid from that sort of behavior.

      Anyway, this sort of crap is exactly what 'loitering' is, and exactly why there are laws against it.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    81. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I didn't say it wasn't a failure of those people.

      However, it is additionally a failure of the police to stop people who have started operating outside of society's rules, which is the job of police.

      Policemen aren't just there to find and capture lawbreakers. They are there to keep the peace.

      The peace is not being kept. They have failed.

      Sometimes this failure is the fault of society, or other people, or of the law itself. That isn't true in this case. There are laws to discourage this sort of behavior that are not being used, and society disapproves of this behavior, and store owners are calling the police.

      The original failure is at the level of the parents. The failure to stop the first failure is at the police level.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    82. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I find the public's callous attitudes towards teenagers to be disgusting. Sure, teenagers are stupid, boring to talk to and nearly everything they do is pointless, but this also applies to people who are mentally handicapped"

      Way to contradict yourself there...

      YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME

    83. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "I didn't say it wasn't a failure of those people."

      Yes you did, right here.

      "This isn't a failure of store owners, or of SOCIETY"

      That's EVERYONE my man, so whether you meant it or not, you certainly did say it.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    84. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by tallguy81 · · Score: 1

      you can't discriminate on the basis of age.

      Can and do. Unfair, yes, but happens all the time. Teenagers are told at what point they can drive and even then that their driving privileges are limited. Teenagers are told, even after becoming full citizens, that they are not allowed a freedom other citizens are (such as imbibing alcohol). Teenagers are discriminating against HUGELY in the case of insurance. Completely unfair, I agree (I'm 24), but still a fact of life.

      Back to the topic... I grew up in the country where mice were a problem. My parents bought a sound emitter to drive them away that worked in the 17Khz range. It drove my brother and me nuts to the point where we'd just unplug it. I believe it cost $10. Nothing new.

    85. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I make my own money.

      I don't think it very smart to be admitting to such illegal activities in a public forum.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    86. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      The best thing I've read all thread, honestly. I love you... and your signature too. :D It scares me to think that stores would do this, but apparently, after some footage I saw on TV from the malls this weekend, they have to do something, and they're just too cheap to hire security, or enforce rules for themselves. *sigh*

      And at least you realize that we are all growing up. :) Hell, sugar... I'm 10 years older than you, and *I'm* still a child. And give it a while before you decide you're stupid... you may find that you are now smarter than you'll ever be again! :P

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    87. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Chris+G+in+D.C. · · Score: 1

      I think the "given demographic" -- and the thing that damn near everyone here has lost sight of -- is teens who loiter, not all teens. I'm not offended by the concept behind this device. If you can hear this device, and it drives you crazy, don't loiter in front of the store.

    88. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DougInthezoo · · Score: 1

      Why did this get modded funny? Insightful, interesting... but not funny.

      Now, having known people from both sides of the fence, I would like my device to be dual-band. Everyone above, say 160, blast away, they are just too annoying.

      Oh, if I could have had one of these when I was single! Turn that IQ way down...

    89. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Doesn't work that way. A couple of years ago, a few teens on public transport harassed a girl about their age. Yours truly went over, sat down next to the girl and told the guys to fuck off. They did. End of story.

      Couldn't agree with you more... And well done for the above!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    90. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      By that logic, I was including the police in there, as police are part of society.

      And thus my statement was rather paradoxical.

      As are store owners, rendering my statement redundent.

      Or you could realize that when someone says 'Action X is not the fault of society', they mean society as a whole, and not 'Action X is not the fault of any member of society.', which would only make sense in the case of acts of God or alien invasions.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    91. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by bugg · · Score: 1
      Oh no, not loiters! Heaven forbid people stand around, instead of constantly working to make their boss richer!

      99% of loitering cases are complete and utter bullshit. Loitering is the charge you give someone who is hanging around when you aren't comfortable with them there because of their (race, class, religion, sexual orientation, age, etc.) and they haven't done anything wrong.

      I guarantee you a group of 3 heterosexual white men and 3 heterosexual white women, with all of them well dressed and drinking starbucks, could stand pretty much anywhere in the western world and not get charged with loitering.

      --
      -bugg
    92. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by nakly · · Score: 1

      Since you are black, I don't suppose you can tell me what is the draw behind raping every white girl you see? I can never figure out what the point is.

    93. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1
      I find the public's callous attitudes towards teenagers to be disgusting. Sure, teenagers are stupid, boring to talk to and nearly everything they do is pointless

      My hypocrisy-o-meter just went off the scale :)

      Please insert a "most" before teenagers, and I'd happily agree. But then again, most adult people are stupid, boring to talk to and nearly everything they do is pointless.

      --
      toresbe
    94. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      Teens aren't being subjected to anything than everyone else it. Everyone is being subjected to the same sound waves.

      Yeah, but only the teens (and the dogs and the babies) hear it. Thus, you're only subjecting teens to an annoying sound.

      Teens are being targeted because they're loitering, not because they're teens.

      So all teens are loiterers? As a teen, I'm offended.

      --
      toresbe
    95. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      That is a very insightful point, and I fully agree with it. But my recommendation of calling the cops was based on the assumption that the store proprietors had already tried that. The teens had been inside the store and harrassed customers. I'm betting someone inside the store had either spoken up against them, or been (understandably) afraid to because his or her car might get keyed or whatever, in which case bringing law enforcement into the picture is a valid action, IMHO.

      --
      toresbe
    96. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      Can a 13-year-old drive a car? Buy a handgun? Drink alcohol? Buy cigarettes? Vote? There you go, state-sponsored and, many would argue, valid age discrimination.

      That's a matter of responsibility, not ethics. A 13-year-old shouldn't be able to drive because his brain hasn't yet developed to a point where it would be responsible to let him. That doesn't mean that he's not a human, and deserves to be treated as such!

      So there's a certain amount of humor for someone to say, obviously tongue-in-cheek, that you can't discriminate against teens.

      I was still offended by it.

      The sound is only annoying with constant exposure, and the only way someone is going to be constantly exposed is if they're loitering around outside the store.

      That's flat out wrong - When I enter the informatics library (where me, the useless teen, hangs out), past the theft detectors, I get a loud high-pitched squeal in my earphones for under a second. It's still very annoying, and the noise for several seconds would be intolerable, especially when caused by a false overgeneralization of my age group.

      And if there's a simply way to encourage a group not to loiter, especially when the loiterers are pretty much exclusively composed of that group, then I say "go for it!"

      Now that's just silly - he could shoot at them, that would discourage them, but it would still be inhumane. And that's my objection with this thing, reducing me to an animal, being shooed away like any other insect by a high-pitched, frustrating squeal. Go after the loiterers, not just the age group they happen to belong to. Most teens don't loiter, and the implication that we do is offensive.

      --
      toresbe
    97. Re:I hope it doesn't get widely deployed by webhat · · Score: 1

      Retard-Prod(tm), you say it like it's a bad thing. Get them back to work!!! ;)

      --
      'I am become Shiva, destroyer of worlds'
  10. Protractor holes by Ossifer · · Score: 5, Funny

    We used to rebel in the 5th grade by blowing air through the small holes in our proctractors. Teacher nearing retirement had no clue. Sometimes the din was so loud that we couldn't hear teacher clearly...

    1. Re:Protractor holes by npietraniec · · Score: 5, Funny

      We used to make little whistles out of the metal parts holding the eraser in on the end of pencils. The teacher used to stop the class everyday and walk around looking for the wistles that we assured her that we didn't hear. She thought she was going insane.

    2. Re:Protractor holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to run a program on every computer in our lab in QBasic that was pretty much

      Do
      Beep
      Loop

      it didn't go down well.

    3. Re:Protractor holes by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once the whole class started humming quitely; and convinced the teacher there was a swarm of bees around. God we could be little shitheads. Then again, so could the teachers.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    4. Re:Protractor holes by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
      God we could be little shitheads. Then again, so could the teachers.

      I would size up the age of the teacher, stare at them, and say "Do you realize in X years, you'll probably be dead?"

      What can I say, I was fascinated with mortality at that age. The irony is that it wouldn't bother me one bit if done to me.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    5. Re:Protractor holes by Rastan_B2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Our classic was during grade 9 science classes...

      We sat behind desks in the middle of the classroom surrounded by 'lab benches' which had gas taps for the bunsen burners. Let out a (preferably stinky and somewhat silent) fart, then tell the teacher that you could 'smell something funny, and maybe one of the gas taps is leaking'.

      The teacher comes over and gives the air a real good sniff, while we laugh under our breath... ahhh fart jokes they will never die...

    6. Re:Protractor holes by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      We used to run a program on every computer in our lab that emulated a keyboard click. But not just any constant-volume keyboard click.

      The program knew the timetable of when classes would start and stop, and it was set in such a way that at the beginning of class, the click was barely noticeable. Then over the course of the hour, it got louder and louder, and each click was got longer and longer.

      Given that the mess started progressively, nobody really noticed when it started. But at the middle of the hour, it was just a huge jumbled mess of annoying beeeeeeps whenever somebody typed something...

    7. Re:Protractor holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you were a creepy little shithead. Congratulations.

    8. Re:Protractor holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We did that at my school too (Libertyville, IL)
      I have vauge memories of us convincing one of the teachers it was the lights that were causing the humming, and of course as soon as she turned off the light the humming mysteriously stopped :)

    9. Re:Protractor holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah. Our class did the same thing. One teacher actually broke down and cried. I'm not proud of it today.

    10. Re:Protractor holes by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Kids can be cruel. We had this teacher in 8th grade, a little old lady, short, had white fuzzy hair. Students used to draw pictures of goats and put them on the front of her desk, or make "baaaaaahh" sounds. One time, she was standing over a kid yelling at him about something and he kept twitching every few seconds. After she walked away he commented that her nose hairs were tickling his face. I'm not sure if she caught on to that. She was a nice teacher though.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    11. Re:Protractor holes by Snaller · · Score: 1

      What are proctractors?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    12. Re:Protractor holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have tried the same thing but with butts instead of protractors. I wonder if the old teachers would have noticed...

    13. Re:Protractor holes by BillX · · Score: 1

      Two words: Raisin box

      Not too long ago I had one of those little boxes of raisins for the first time since I was a young 'un, and it still works..

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  11. Proper use. by Irvu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In another article this would be called a "nonlethal weapon". Do we really want a world where people deploy such things to drive select non customers away? Legal or not I find the idea of such a system being used not only insulting but sad.

    1. Re:Proper use. by loucura! · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do we really want a world where people deploy such things to drive select non customers away?

      Yes, first they have the freedom to associate with whomever they wish. Second, they have the right to defend their property as they see fit, would you rather they put rock-salt in the arse of the offending hoodlums?

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    2. Re:Proper use. by cagle_.25 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      However, it hasn't yet been legally tested whether or not he can blast loud noises into the neighborhood. What if someone is standing on the sidewalk and is bothered by the noise? Public nuisance or not? Judge Judy will decide.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    3. Re:Proper use. by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, first they have the freedom to associate with whomever they wish. Second, they have the right to defend their property as they see fit,

      Legal or not, it does show quite a bit of contempt towards people to install it. I'd rather not associate with a shopkeeper or his store if they so obviously divide people only into those that give them money and those that do not. It may be their right to do so, but it's mine not to give such a sad excuse for a human being any of my money.

      As other posters have pondered, where's the metal grating to keep walkers and walking stick out? Old people don't spend much money, after all, and they take a lot of time and space in the store. Some nicely arranged tripwires should take care of the blind and a few well-trained dogs should be able to scare away the mexicans and the black people, all less likely to spend heavily than the middle-aged middle-class white people that are the sweet spot this merchant obviosuly should be optimizing his store for.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Proper use. by Martix · · Score: 1

      Some of the subway stations in Toronto use LOUD classical music for the same purpose. keeps the younger kids from hanging out at the station. But also I can see them not liking the style at all, because of this.... Think this puts classical music in a negative way. you can like it or not. but it should not be used like this.

    5. Re:Proper use. by woolio · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else see the irony in the parent post?

      While this sound may be a "nonlethal weapon", fast-food burgers are anything but. While I don't normally condone what the article is proposing, anything that causes young kids to associate something negative with fast-food places is truly a blessing.

      If you haven't already, I highly recommend you check out the "Supersize Me!" video.. (Best $4 at Blockbuster that you will ever spend).

      If the doctor reports aren't convincing, then make sure you see the very end... All fries and burgers are not created equal!

    6. Re:Proper use. by VMSBIGOT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Would typical noise ordinance laws have any effect on the use of something like this? Also, alot of gas stations are located close to residental areas, and I could imagine the outcry from neighbors who have to listen to this all day/night.

      Not to mention that alot of gas stations/fast food joints have a high % of teenagers working there.

    7. Re:Proper use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guy had a serious problem. From TFA:
      "On the low end of the scale, it would be intimidating for customers," said Robert Gough, who, with his parents, owns the store. "On the high end, they'd be in the shop fighting, stealing and assaulting the staff."

      Sounds to me as if a nonlethal weapon was exactly what was needed. I doubt the man cares whether you're insulted and/or saddened. I wouldn't. Would you prefer that he kept a pistol handy, behind the counter? That could certainly solve the assaults on staff problem, but could have some very adverse consequences all around.

      I've a feeling you'd be against that too. So what's the guy supposed to do? Let people be intimidated, perhaps assaulted, let mass theft (also in the article) of his merchandise continue, etc? Don't think for a moment this doesn't in many places. It's not as if it were just in Wales.

      I wish people would get the fuck over themselves, and quit competing in the eternal Most Sensitive Being in Known Universe contest. Something about Slashdot seems to attract them.

    8. Re:Proper use. by ross.w · · Score: 1

      A lot of stores use loud music for that exact purpose already - in reverse to what's being talked about here.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    9. Re:Proper use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, that's muzak, not music at all.

    10. Re:Proper use. by Sapphon · · Score: 1
      it hasn't yet been legally tested whether or not he can blast loud noises into the neighborhood.


      From the same story in The Age:
      Mr Stapleton chose a noise "which can be broadcast at 75 decibels, within government safety limits" (emphasis added)
      --
      Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
    11. Re:Proper use. by loucura! · · Score: 1

      Legal or not, it does show quite a bit of contempt towards people to install it. I'd rather not associate with a shopkeeper or his store if they so obviously divide people only into those that give them money and those that do not.

      And that's the beauty of freedom of association, no one says that you should be required to patronize this shopkeeper's store. You're free to spend your money elsewhere. If enough people agree with you, he'll go out of business - or he'll take it down.

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    12. Re:Proper use. by Molt · · Score: 1

      Actually I would rather he kept a handgun under the counter- this is being used in Wales, where handguns are highly illegal. I'd like to see him get arrested and the shop get managed by someone who comes complete with a clue.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    13. Re:Proper use. by anothy · · Score: 1

      i don't normally respond to sigs, but i'm making an exception here. your definition of "human being" is, um, crap. please now define: "genetically human" in a way that includes, minimally, xxy folks and doesn't include eggs and sperm; "genetically distinct" in a way which, minimally, doesn't have identical or conjoined twins being one person (or not a person); and "functioning organism" in a way that doesn't exclude people with auto-imune disorders or degenerative illnesses.

      i don't have a definition i'm perfectly happy with, but it's a harder question than one-line definitions allow for.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    14. Re:Proper use. by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I've considered using such things in my house as an intruder deterrent, the problem is that MN laws protect the intruder before the homeowner. If you set up a "booby trap" (I kid you not, it's in the state laws) you lose your rights faster than that SOB who thought it was his moral obligation to relieve you of some of your worldly possesions.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    15. Re:Proper use. by Random832 · · Score: 1

      Not all noise regulations are based on safety conerns.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    16. Re:Proper use. by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Sad it may be, but what does it say about today's youth that store owners have to resort to such drastic measures to get them to stop being a nuisance?

      Jw

    17. Re:Proper use. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Old people, the blind and Mexicans don't hang about outside shops every evening intimidating people.

      Here's a fact: these scumbags who hang around outside shops DESERVE contempt towards them.

      I'd rather not associate with a shopkeeper or his store if they so obviously divide people only into those that give them money and those that do not.

      On the other hand, the people who actually spend money there would appreciate it. A 90-year old granny with a walking stick would love to be able to go to the shops without being spat at and sworn at.

      Installing something like this will only see business increase. These criminal youths don't spend any money there anyway, they just ask everyone going in to buy drinks and fags for them, then swear at them when they refuse.

    18. Re:Proper use. by cagle_.25 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ... but it's a harder question than one-line definitions allow for.

      Agreed. And the cases you posit are reasonable boundary cases to try. Nevertheless:

      (1) Sperm, egg, and people with XXY, X, XYY, or XXX genetic makeup are all genetically human. However, sperm and egg are not organisms (a fairly standard definition can be found in the Wiki under Lifeform). The others are.

      (2) Identical twins are separate organisms and therefore not a point of confusion. Conjoined twins are, OTOH, a problem. At this point, I'm willing to accept that a very small number of rare situations will be difficult to determine and might require the drawing of an arbitrary line. How would you want to sort out conjoined twins?

      (3) Persons with autoimmune or degenerative disorders are still functioning as organisms. The boundary case would be someone who is brain-dead.

      your definition of "human being" is, um, crap.

      Thanks for the support. It's the best I have for now, and it seems to be more clear than some vague notion of a soul, or of mental function.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    19. Re:Proper use. by PolarBear3 · · Score: 1
      Seems that acoustic weapons are up and coming. This reminds me of the LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) that cruise ships are using to drive away pirates. I saw of demo of one of these and it sends a very directed loud noise in a beam much like an acoustic laser. Drives away the pirates.

      I wonder how long it will be until teenagers and pirates start wearing earplugs or noise cancelling headphones to counter these non-lethal weapons.

    20. Re:Proper use. by anothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      calling your definition crap was overly harsh, and just not civil. i'm not normally quite such a jerk, even online; i appreciate you not getting steamed over it. now on with it:

      1) "Sperm, egg, and people with XXY, X, XYY, or XXX genetic makeup are all genetically human." why? chromosome count is a pretty standard method in definitions i've heard before. i'll agree that sperm and eggs are not lifeforms/organisms; good point.

      2) i'll agree identical twins aren't a problem given a re-reading of your sig (i'd previously parsed it as (genetically human && genetically distinct && functioning organism) whereas i think you mean it as ((genetically human && genetically distinct && functioning ) organism); simple english ambiguity). conjoined twins are still a problem. i think cognitive function and personality distinctness are the logical constraints, although they're difficult to know for some time, and it's slightly trick to exclude things like MPD or get into minimum cognitive function levels, which is a scary place to be.

      3) i'm not convinced you're right here in all cases. given, for example, one of the fundamental functions of an organism is turning food into energy, would someone who's body has stopped doing that (which would obviously cause them to die pretty soon if uncorrected) stop being human with the onset of the disease (rather than with death)? clearly these are fringe cases again, and i wasn't intending to lump all degenerative or autoimmune diseases in with each other, but illnesses where the body is literally attacking itself make definitions of "function" tricky.

      i don't have a better definition. my initial reaction was based on an (apparently inappropriate) assumption that, given the definition's placement in your sig and how that space is most commonly used, you were dogmatically putting it forward as a settled fact; your willingness to discuss the matter and admit flaws says pretty loudly that i was off the mark on that one.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  12. I doubt this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I actually have tried high-frequncy sound "bombs" for insect and rodent control before. Ramsey Electronics sells a kit that does similarly (and it's better-buiult than my old hacks).

    Various waveforms at frequencies from 19 kHz to 26 kHz were tried, along with changing waveforms and amplitudes, plus some minor modulation. I used both conventional drivers as well as piezo units. Only limited results were had.

    One thing that DID work (well, sort of) was a flyback transformer from a defunct Sony TV set. That annoyed women, but not men. Weird.

    Maybe I was doing something wrong, but, I doubt it. I just think the whole 'dog whistle' idea is overblown as to utility, and it's not like I wasn't trying.

    1. Re:I doubt this works by segment · · Score: 3, Informative
      Maybe you should have read more then dabbled:

      • Landström reports that exposure to infrasound (6-16 Hz) has an impact on fatigue and wakefulness even with exposures as short as 20 minutes. [1] However, Slarve and Johnson report no long-term impact from exposure to infrasound at levels up to 144 dB. [2]

        1. U. Landström, "Noise and Fatigue in Working Environments," Environment International 16, 471476 (1990).
        2. R. N. Slarve and D. L. Johnson, "Human Whole-Body Exposure to Infrasound," Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 428431 (April 1975)

      I'm unsure about the age significances though. Elder people tend to lose their hearing quite frequently. Maybe they can pick up other frequencies. Who knows maybe Grandpa did pick up Aliens' conversations.

    2. Re:I doubt this works by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      6-16 Hz

      That's at the other (lower) end of the frequency spectrum. You know, bass sound you can feel, but not hear.

      And there was an entry in the old Borland Turbo C manual (under the sound function) that mentioned as a side note (pardon the pun) that 7hz was the resonant frequency of a chicken skull, and that a nearby stamping plant was causing chicken heads to explode. Now THOSE were the days of interesting programers' manuals.

    3. Re:I doubt this works by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      Your quote is about infrasound - low frequency, sound you can feel; this is about ultrasound - high frequency which healthy ears can hear, older ears and those damaged by loud noices can't.

    4. Re:I doubt this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something around 7Hz is the resonant frequency of the human ribcage.

      Sure, 144dB of that won't cause any long-term effects, as long as you don't count death as a long-term effect.

  13. Better Idea... by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't he just turn Tony Blair up full blast? That would also work for anyone under 30.

    --
    "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
    1. Re:Better Idea... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Used to do this at parties in college. When you wanted all the strangers to leave, you just started playing some grindcore music real loud. Works a lot faster than saying "You don't have to go home but you can't stay here"

  14. Legality? by Giometrix · · Score: 1

    I don't see how a product like this could ever be sold legally. Talk about discriminatory!

    --
    Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
    1. Re:Legality? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      This is kind of like saying you can't sell stairs because it discriminates against wheelchair-bound people. Or selling cats discriminates against people allergic to cats. Etc, etc.

    2. Re:Legality? by Giometrix · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think its more like a dog trainer advertising that he can train your dog to only bark at black people. Stairs are built so that people can move between floors, not to keep wheelchair-bound people out. I think there's a big difference. Just my 2c...

      --
      Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
    3. Re:Legality? by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many forms of discrimination are illegal for government agencies and many/most public businesses and services. Private discrimination is a different matter. I could keep black people, hispanic people, white people, blind left-handed people, or people who voted for Bush off of my private property simply because I wanted to. The government couldn't do anything about it. On that note, I could keep teens out, as well. No matter the inventor's intended use, there are plenty of "non-infringing" uses for this device. Suggesting it's would be illegal because it discriminates against teens shows a gross misunderstanding of (American) law.

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    4. Re:Legality? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      It was invented by a store owner and is being sold to store owners. The point of the device is to keep teens from loitering in and around the shops.

      That's the illegal part. If people want to put it on their private property, well, fine.

      Of course, there is the question about how legal it is to blare audio at 75db at all hours of the day and night. I would imagine that if enough people complained about the noise, the police would make somebody shut the thing off, if only at night.

      Being 20, my opinion of anybody that uses one of these things is that they are idiots. I mean, how else am I supposed to react to somebody using a device to selectively annoy people my age? I'm hoping these things get banned in civilized countries.

    5. Re:Legality? by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
      Being 20, my opinion of anybody that uses one of these things is that they are idiots. I mean, how else am I supposed to react to somebody using a device to selectively annoy people my age?
      Well, people your age are selectively annoying this shopkeeper's customers, so what do you expect him to do? If he were having problems with retirees loitering outside his store and harassing his clientele, would you be upset if he blared rap music to encourage them to disperse?
    6. Re:Legality? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      In the case of the store, I think discrimination laws would come into effect, preventing it outright. You can't discourage somebody from entering your store based on their age (Unless of course a law is involved, in the case of sex and alcohol). You also can't put up a sign in your window that says "No coloreds" and discourage non-caucassians to leave even if you serve them. Discrimination laws exist for a reason.

      What if people my age are among his customers? The article mentions teens coming in to buy things and leaving as soon as possible. Why should it be harder to buy something at the shop for a teen than somebody in their 40s? I know that if I ran into a shop using this system, I'd take my business elsewhere. Why should I give money to somebody trying to drive me off?

      I would suggest the other solution the article mentions as working very effectively to discourage teens from loitering; playing classical music in and around the store.

    7. Re:Legality? by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
      You can't discourage somebody from entering your store based on their age
      But this device is outside the store. If anything, it's encouraging teens to stop loitering (which is illegal) and either go away or come inside and shop. In other words, it's not discriminating against anyone who isn't already breaking the law.
    8. Re:Legality? by blue85 · · Score: 1
      Private discrimination is a different matter. I could keep black people, hispanic people, white people, blind left-handed people, or people who voted for Bush off of my private property simply because I wanted to. The government couldn't do anything about it.
      A store may be private property but that doesn't mean that you can discriminate freely. I seem to recall during the civil rights era that blacks would enter restaurants or other businesses that refused to serve them and they eventually won. When you open a store to the public you are opening it to all the public.
    9. Re:Legality? by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      I am surprised that you could even get away with such "private" discrimination - I have found, much to my dismay, that the region I live in does not allow it. I have been told by local law officers that I cannot keep other people's children off my property, even with fences. They will just flat-out not arrest persons for trespassing, nor even for vandalism of property (unless either I have video tape of it, or if the police witness it.)

      This is the age of "entitlement". Parents cannot enforce reasonable standards of behavior with corporal punishment without fear of prosecution as child abusers. Many parents, sadly, don't even care to teach their children to respect other people or their property. And with the lawsuit-happy civilization we find ourselves in today, you pretty much cannot even protect your property with watch dogs. If you do try that, watch how quickly your insurance company will drop your homeowner's policy when they find out. The result, I fear, is going to be a generation or more of absolutely uncontrollable disrespect and riot.

      They used to hang horse thieves from the nearest tree. These days, juvenile delinquent gang-banger wannabes can steal you auto at gun-point and wind up in the revolving door of juvenile justice, or even merely placed back into the custody of their legal guardians. Our civilization will reap what it has sown.

    10. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd read TFA, it's in Wales, though they oughtn't to be discriminating against young people in general anyway, rather chavs.

    11. Re:Legality? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Parents cannot enforce reasonable standards of behavior with corporal punishment without fear of prosecution as child abusers.

      If they're incapable of enforcing reasonable standards of behavior without resorting to physical violence, maybe they shouldn't have had kids in the first place.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    12. Re:Legality? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Age discrimination laws, at least in the US, generally only apply to ages 45 and up. Pretty convenient, huh? You can't decline a job applicant for being too old, but you can for being too young.

      Imagine the outrage if the racial discrimination laws only applied to certain races!

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    13. Re:Legality? by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      It's too late to get back to the original point, but on a different note, where on Earth do you live where you can't legally force people off your private property even with fencing?

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    14. Re:Legality? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      This is where nuance is important.

      You can refuse to serve anyone you want, you just need to avoid giving a reason.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    15. Re:Legality? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "You can't discourage somebody from entering your store based on their age"

      What the hell are you talking about, of course you can.

      Now, here's the part I find funny. While ranting about all the things you think you're entitled you, you never once asked why the shopowner should be forced to serve you.

      Do you realize that's what you're doing? Placing your "right" to be a customer over his "right" to conduct business in the (legal) manner of his choosing.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    16. Re:Legality? by dangitman · · Score: 1
      They used to hang horse thieves from the nearest tree.

      Well, thank goodness those barbaric days are over in most parts of the world. I don't really want to return to a world of lynching, violence and vigilante justice.

      These days, juvenile delinquent gang-banger wannabes can steal you auto at gun-point and wind up in the revolving door of juvenile justice, or even merely placed back into the custody of their legal guardians. Our civilization will reap what it has sown.

      Well, that's good. Much better than stringing them up. We will reap what we sow. There is less violence and bigotry in most countries today, compared to the "frontier justice" days. We have come a long way from stringing up people who are black or jewish. People live longer and healthier, violent crime is declining. We all benefit from not being sadistic bastards.

      The legal system is not perfect, but it's a lot better than mob justice. Yes, too many people sue each other - but in the old days things would have been settled by violent family feuds or revenge lynchings.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:Legality? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      True. I realized this like 2 minutes after I posted. :-/

  15. Right by StarKruzr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because today's teenagers hate 60's music.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Right by George+Beech · · Score: 2, Funny

      He obviously forgot the '18' in front of that '60'

    2. Re:Right by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      ...huh? Ever met a teenager? No? You DO know that the 80s, and thus the 60s, are coming back, right?

    3. Re:Right by teaserX · · Score: 4, Informative

      A McDonald's near me runs off the teenagers with a ~60db loop of the 1812 Overture. I love watchin' em try to talk on the cell outside with an index finger jammed in their other ear up to the second knuckle.

      Near Halloween they switch it to Bach's Toccatta and Fuge in D Minor. Really cool for 90 seconds and then you know what Manuel Noriega must have felt like and need to flee.


      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    4. Re:Right by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Do they manage to work in the cannon blasts?
      I've read that they make speakers explode.

      I used to be able to hear them... now I just have to watch the subwoofer vibrate.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Right by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You DO know that the 80s, and thus the 60s..."

      I might be misunderstanding your post. It sounds like you claiming the "greed is good" era (80's) was similar to the "flower power" era (60's)? If so, were you actually alive to participate in either of them?

      "Ever met a teenager?" - I kept two of them until they grew into adults, the last one without female assistance. I released them both into the wild at age 18-19. They both lead usefull lives and have been sucessfull in finding a mate. I am now waiting to see if they breed.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Right by De+Lemming · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Ever met a teenager?" - I kept two of them until they grew into adults, the last one without female assistance. I released them both into the wild at age 18-19. They both lead usefull lives and have been sucessfull in finding a mate. I am now waiting to see if they breed.

      Glad you're a biologist - most of the computer geeks here wouldn't get past the design document.

    7. Re:Right by smchris · · Score: 1

      Minneapolis has tried much the same -- playing classical music through crappy over-modulated outdoor speakers on downtown corners they target as heavy centers of drug trafficing. That's pretty annoying to everyone so I suppose the buzz would be an improvement.

    8. Re:Right by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "the "flower power" era (60's)?"

      I thought most of the "1960's" actually took place during the early 1970's.

    9. Re:Right by IngramJames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Glad you're a biologist - most of the computer geeks here wouldn't get past the design document.

      It's not the design document I object to, so much as some parts of the initial spec.

      1.13 Maintenence (part 1)
      In the Model I, there will be lots of poo-poo and other bodily excretions. These can be cleaned easily, using Tissue (tm), available from most high street stores. We are not planning to add any extra functionality to deal with this - the users haven't complained yet, so it can't be a huge issue.

      12.4.9 (c) Sport
      After a few years, the Model XII will abandon previous sporting loyalties which have been carefully installed over a number of years, and adopt new loyalties for teams who are currently successful. There is no known workaround for this behaviour at the present time; seems to be an inherant design flaw. Note - Model XII-F may choose whichever team whose members have the best thighs.

      13.3.4.5 (a) Randomness
      The new adolescent Model XIII will be designed to adopt new ideas and concepts at the fastest rate ever. Sometimes a new concept will be adopted before the end of the sentence explaining the old concept. Proof, justification and coherance modules may be provided as an optional extra, but only on the luxury models.

      79.1 Memory Leaks
      Older models will start to suffer memory leaks, resulting in a slowing of perfromance. Either replace with a newer model, or simply store in a suitable warm place with lots of tea. But let's face it, by the time that happens, it will be obsolete anyway.

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    10. Re:Right by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      I love watchin' em try to talk on the cell outside with an index finger jammed in their other ear up to the second knuckle.

      All your McDonald's needs is a cell phone jammer. When the kids find that they can't make or recieve calls, they will run screaming into the night.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    11. Re:Right by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      I thought most of the "1960's" actually took place during the early 1970's.

      Oddly enough, it turns out that none of the 1960's took place during the 1970's. It's a conspiracy of chronographers.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    12. Re:Right by SpinJaunt · · Score: 1
      I am now waiting to see if they breed.
      You're not alone as there are plenty of people on the net that would pay top $ to see the action.

      A webcam is such a cheap investment.
      --
      /. is good for you.
    13. Re:Right by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      So much for taking obnoxious cell-phone calls outside. Are they going to put on a 90-second loop of 1812 inside when schmucks start talking really loud on their cellphone inside the restauraunt?

    14. Re:Right by engineerofsorts · · Score: 1

      You folks have it all wrong--kids could really get to enjoying classical music, along with all our old favorites from Lawrence Welk, Guy Lombardo, vintage Wayne Newton (his pre-puberty voice), etc., but the kids just haven't been able to get a player which will track from corner to corner of these CDs.

      --
      Life is tough. Life is even tougher when you're stupid.
    15. Re:Right by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      well, if the ,ummm, resturant(?!?!) in question is in the U.S., a cell jammer would be illegal unless the F.C.C has changed the rules recently.

    16. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and then you know what Manuel Noriega must have felt like and need to flee

      Except the military's musical palette didn't extend to classic, rather David Bowie's 'Let's Dance'.

    17. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Design document?!?! At the age of 41 and still single with no kids - I'm haven't finished the functional requirements. ;-)

    18. Re:Right by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      O.o

      The 80's was nothing like the 60's.

      The 90's, on the other hand, was the first derivative reincarnation of 60's and 70's styles.

      The present Naughties seems to be a resurrection of 80's and 90's styles. So, no. The 60's aren't coming back. f'(80's,f'(60's,70's)) is coming into style.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    19. Re:Right by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 0

      I thought that cell jammers were legal as long as emergency calls remained unhindered within the affected area.

    20. Re:Right by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Wayne Newton (his pre-puberty voice)

      There was a difference?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    21. Re:Right by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      thought that cell jammers were legal as long as emergency calls remained unhindered within the affected area
      cell phone jammer fcc
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    22. Re:Right by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Glad you're a biologist - most of the computer geeks here wouldn't get past the design document.

      We're still waiting for requirements.

    23. Re:Right by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 1

      So...lemme get this straight. I could build a giant faraday cage around a theater that blocks all calls, including emergency ones, but buying one of these little devices is illegal?

      Wow. "Welcome to america, the most technologically advanced 3rd world nation on earth," I guess...

    24. Re:Right by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, it's a case of us being among the first to write the legislation way back when and never getting around to updating it.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    25. Re:Right by jZnat · · Score: 1

      What are you saying? I'm still compiling it! (Gentoo user)

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    26. Re:Right by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      I could build a giant faraday cage around a theater that blocks all calls, including emergency ones, but buying one of these little devices is illegal?
      Yep, you can do anything you like with your building (as long as it's still in compliance with building codes), but these jammers don't care about property rights, or public space. For example, I don't have a land line, if I happen to live next door to a restaurant, movie theater, or just an mean neighbor, a jammer such as that would prevent me from making calls from within my own home. Would that be right?
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  16. LOL by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    Now thats what you call an original Idea. Maybe the police start using it a usual teen street fight hangouts. But It reminds of that Arthur C clarke novel where they invented a device which would disable all guns within the effective radius. Soon that device is used to kill people based on their DNA. What happens if somebody uses a 10 time more powerful device at a teen concert. No doubt the band music would be loud, but having such a device would cause a literal eardrum carnage.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  17. I beg to differ by IAstudent · · Score: 3, Funny

    The teen population today is growing up with the voices of "pop music". If they can survive that drivel and keep it on the Top 20, what chances does this gadget have?

    1. Re:I beg to differ by Flower · · Score: 1
      Yeah, because Lord knows that back when we were growing up we didn't have pop drivel. I'd hit the AM dial and get the likes of ABBA or the BeeGees.... Oh wait....

      Nevermind.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  18. Hey, man! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the buzz?

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Hey, man! by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tell me what’s a happening!

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:Hey, man! by VernonNemitz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I think chirps are for the birds (the article says the device emits chirps). He should have started with recordings of fingernails scratching on a chalkboard, and simply jacked up the frequency.

    3. Re:Hey, man! by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I guess someone with mod points isn’t exactly an Andrew Lloyd Webber fan. Oh well. Maybe I’ll try something from Phantom next time.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    4. Re:Hey, man! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Why should you want to know?
      Don't you mind about the future, don't you try to think ahead?
      Save tomorrow for tomorrow, think about today instead.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    5. Re:Hey, man! by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Personally, I want one of these devices that works on senior citizens. There's a gang of grannies who hang out near my store, harassing young people and keeping the town in a constant state of fear.

      And don't even get me started on that vicious gang of "keep left" signs.

    6. Re:Hey, man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you obsessed with fighting
      Times and fates you can't deny?
      If you knew the path we're riding
      You'd understand it less than I.

    7. Re:Hey, man! by onwardknave · · Score: 1

      What's with all these music posts? JESUS CHRIST.

    8. Re:Hey, man! by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop that, it's silly.

    9. Re:Hey, man! by Creepy · · Score: 2, Funny

      sneak up on them and turn their hearing aids waaay up, then start scratching a chalkboard.

      Grandma hates it when I do that.

    10. Re:Hey, man! by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Just... just.... just.... GROAN. That's all. GROAN.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    11. Re:Hey, man! by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think of the Hell's Grannies sketch, from Monty Python:

      http://orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/grannies.ht m

      --
      -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    12. Re:Hey, man! by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Why should you want to know? Don't you mind about the future?
      Don't you try to think ahead?
      Save tomorrow for tomorrow; think about today instead.

    13. Re:Hey, man! by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Personally, I want one of these devices that works on senior citizens

      It's called a "radio tuned to a rap station", and it's quite effective. I understand there's even a pocket version, although the difficulty of projecting the noise through the supplied headphones is an issue. Based on evidence I collected on my last bus trip, though, I can assure you that there a a *lot* of research being done in this area.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    14. Re:Hey, man! by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Probobly because thats the sketch he was referring to. ;)

      (Well, unless gangs of keep left signs really are roving the streets...)

    15. Re:Hey, man! by RamblerRandy · · Score: 1

      You mean jacked up the VOLUMN! That sound IS high frequency!

      --
      I'll think of a really good SIG just before I die.
    16. Re:Hey, man! by instarx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Personally, I want one of these devices that works on senior citizens. There's a gang of grannies who hang out near my store, harassing young people and keeping the town in a constant state of fear.

      Oh that's easy. It's called Rap Music.

    17. Re:Hey, man! by Trotsky311 · · Score: 1

      meh, I'll just drown out his sound with my car stereo.........*blasts banjos*....

  19. Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Treat teens with about the same respect you reserve for a mosquito and wonder why they go around shooting each other, or killing themselves. Oh yeah it's the violence in video games and the availability of porn on the internet that causes this. Nothing to do with the increasing contempt modern society shows for both the very young and the very old.

    Idiot.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Wonderful by Jjeff1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem is, kids AREN'T going around shooting and killing each other, at least not in the US.
      The FBI reports that crime overall has gone down steadily since 1994. The most recent stats show that 2004 had the lowest level of violence in over 3 decades.

      I wish I could find the specific graphs on this, but here's the raw data for each year... and if you take the time to look at it, it also shows that juvenile crime specifically is at it's lowest level in over a decade.

    2. Re:Wonderful by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      When teens loiter in front of a store, they are the ones showing contempt.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:Wonderful by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree, it's not modern society at all. Society IN GENERAL, throughout time, has had contempt for the very young and the very old.

    4. Re:Wonderful by tourvil · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Now that I'm 41, oooooooh geez, I now realize what a typical arrogant ... young punk I was.

      ...

      If someone who is relatively young (i.e., under, say, 25-30) is reading this and thinks I'm full of crap, then you're not qualified to have an opinion. Your brain hasn't finished developing yet. Sorry.

      And if someone disagrees with me who is older than that, then you must've not grown up yet. :)

      Glad to see you've gotten over that arrogance problem... ;)

    5. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I couldn't hear your blatant deiscrimination, could you turn that down?

    6. Re:Wonderful by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      As correct or truthfull as you have attempted to be, you've only made the situation worse.

      Thanks, Asshat, for increasing the divide between the youth and adults.

      Male, 25, teacher.

    7. Re:Wonderful by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

      What about teenagers that, you know, actually don't act like pricks? Or should they be punished for simply being an age where some other people the same age do bad things?

    8. Re:Wonderful by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you over the whooshing of the cane you are swinging in front of my face ;) /I kid

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    9. Re:Wonderful by Jjeff1 · · Score: 1

      Oh yea, and since the point here is to contribute to the discussion... You reap what you sow. When those kids become adults, where will they shop?

    10. Re:Wonderful by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Glad to see you've gotten over that arrogance problem... ;)

      LOL. Ha, you should've seen me as a teenager. I've mellowed a lot over the years. :D

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:Wonderful by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the other reply said, I wouldn't say you're totally over that arrogance just yet. However, even supposing that everything in your post is God's own truth, do you really think that the best way to encourage teenagers to develop into worthwhile adults is by chasing them around with high pitched noises?

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    12. Re:Wonderful by lamasquerade · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So now that you're old, you don't like the way young people act? Wow, insightful isn't the word.

      How about instead of looking down on youth for acting the way you admittedly acted, try to remember why you acted that way and understand them. Then maybe you won't react with fear followed by reactionary measures like this ridiculous device which further alienate youth.

      You may even remember that for all your youthful posturing, you weren't so dangerous and evil, that you loitering around a store wasn't so threatening. Next time you see a bunch of youths and you feel some emotional response (fear, disgust, derision, etc.) try looking for the root of that response and see if it's reall well founded, or if it's just there because you watch too many 60 Minutes stories about our out of control youth, or in your case, maybe you're just too entrenched in this clash-of-the-generations psyche.

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    13. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And if someone disagrees with me who is older than that, then you must've not grown up yet. :)

      You jest, but you're being serious. If someone disagrees with you, there's something wrong with their brain! It's an appealing thought, but one that doesn't carry much weight as an argument. Ad hominem attacks on your teenage self are still logical fallacies.

      You're right that teenagers aren't qualified to have an opinion, but you're wrong that you are. What is an opinion? One dictionary says it's "a belief or conclusion held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof". That's a pretty low burden.

      If you just plain don't like young'uns, that's your right, and no one wants to change your mind. If you want to buy a device that will keep teenagers as far away from you as possible, that's your right too. I'm not worried about discrimination here; teenagers have too much money to ever be systematically excluded from the economic world.

      But if you want to argue that society doesn't actually show contempt for the young, then you need some evidence. You're commenting on a story about a device invented for the sole purpose of annoying young people. The burden of proof is on you.

    14. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've reached a new state of enlightenment. People disagreeing with you will only (in your mind) further prove you right. This is called 'stubborn' and is generally associated with the elderly, meaning you.

      If someone relatively old is reading this and thinks I'm full of crap then you're not qualified to have an opinion. Your brain decayed a long time ago. Sorry.

      </sarchasm>. Seriously folks, judge people for their opinions, not their age. It doesn't matter whether a five-year-old-kid says "the grass is purple" or if the 80-year-old man who fought in three wars and has seven doctorate degrees says "the grass is orange". They're both equally wrong: the grass is fscking green. You can be wrong when you're 8 and when you're 108. What we should be doing is focusing on the quest for truth, not to whom it belongs. Fact isn't owned by our age/sex/race/whatever group. It's public domain. Get over it.

    15. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Treat teens with about the same respect you reserve for a mosquito and wonder why they go around shooting each other, or killing themselves.

      A puzzlement, that. You'd think they'd go around shooting more old people. Clearly, our hyper-violent video games haven't appropriately directed anyone's youthful impotent rage. All the kids seem to want to kill is each other, martial artists, and zombies.

    16. Re:Wonderful by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll
      As correct or truthfull as you have attempted to be, you've only made the siuation worse. [...] Thanks, Asshat, for increasing the divide between the youth and adults.

      On the contrary, I think I make the situation better when I tell my kids the truth, and that I understand. I've specifically tried really hard to remember what it was like as I've gotten older, because I knew it's all too easy to forget what it was like to be young and think one has all the answers.

      Not that they'll listen to me; if they're anything like me, they'll be sure I'm full of crap. But I'll be able to understand why they think I'm full of crap, and I'll be able to pick my spots and steer them as necessary.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    17. Re:Wonderful by oGMo · · Score: 1
      Now that I'm 41, oooooooh geez, I now realize what a typical arrogant, idiotic, irritating, annoying, ignorant young punk I was.

      And because you were, everyone else is also. At least you've gotten over "young punk". However, you should have taken a course in logic along the way.

      And if someone disagrees with me who is older than that, then you must've not grown up yet. :)

      "Anyone who disagrees doesn't count" isn't a very convincing argument.

      Part of what you're saying may be correct for a lot of people... but there are six billion people on the planet right now, in many cultures, and we've got recorded history going back for thousands of years. I think it's a bit arrogant to assume everyone of those trillions and trillions of people are just the same as you. In this day and age, many people lead a very sheltered life; in other times and cultures, people have been forced to "grow up" at a much earlier age.

      We should strive to grow until the day we die.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    18. Re:Wonderful by KanSer · · Score: 0, Troll
      Homey, regardless of my brain development, had you said this to my face
      If someone who is relatively young (i.e., under, say, 25-30) is reading this and thinks I'm full of crap, then you're not qualified to have an opinion. Your brain hasn't finished developing yet. Sorry.

      I would fucking knock your overweight ass into next week. I'd also stay around long enough for the police to show up so I could explain myself. Lucky for you, you only have the balls to say this from behind a keyboard.

      I wonder, have you ever approached my contemporaries and engaged them respectfully as to the volume of their voice? As it's a free country you have no business in _what_ they say, but who's to deny someone who respectfully asks you only to lower the volume. Perhaps some would, others may even tell you to fuck off, but even that is not license for random aural invasion.

      And while we're on the subject, who is actually at fault for society's current situation? Who's to blame for our crushing debt and rampant tyranical government? The politicians? No, that's silly, politicians do what politicians do. To not see our current situation coming would be folly. The media? Puh-lease, they don't even hide the fact that they only care about t3h moneh. Nope, it was the 40 somethings. You guys were all 100% fucking complacent, and you all have blood on your hands.

      In closing, Bush is over 40. So was Hitler. And Osama! And now that I think about it, probably every single war criminal on record is over 40. Perhaps I should deploy devices that stop you crazy old plunderers from working your hardest together to destroy _MY_ future???

      The only threats I see are podgy old farts like you, so weak in will that you've already given up at a relatively young age. "Fuck ideals, give me a mini-van and 2 McLifes." I still believe in the planet you fuckers are doing your best to loot and destroy, and I plan on doing my best to stop all the 40+ from careening us towards a most unpleasant fate. Teenagers at the mall... _TALKING?!_ You are such a pussy.

      In short, get fucked. You're just gonna brush this off anyways. "Damn kids wouldn't know reality if it bit them," Right?

      GP is so right. "Treat teens with about the same respect you reserve for a mosquito and wonder why they go around shooting each other... Nothing to do with the increasing contempt modern society shows for both the very young and the very old. ...

      Idiot."
      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    19. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that I'm 41, oooooooh geez, I now realize what a typical arrogant, idiotic, irritating, annoying, ignorant young punk I was. I completely sympathize with this guy creating the anti-teenager device. And I was much smarter and more mature than most people my age, but I was still an idiotic twit. There is nothing more annoying than a bunch of noisy teenagers hanging around a store saying stupid things at twice the necessary volume.

      If someone who is relatively young (i.e., under, say, 25-30) is reading this and thinks I'm full of crap, then you're not qualified to have an opinion. Your brain hasn't finished developing yet. Sorry.

      From your post, you don't really sound anymore mature now then you did then, not everyone is cut from the same cloth.

      I'm just curious, would it be ok to discrimate against all african-americans "just cause they commit more crimes you know, ayup"?

      On the off chance your post was meant in a -humorous- context... it's really not.

    20. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And I was much smarter and more mature than most people my age

      Looking at your posting history, that seems to have changed. You certainly aren't now, unless you're about sixteen of course.

    21. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Ask the french how this attitude towards youth has helped over the last month.

    22. Re:Wonderful by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Young people are jerks. It's not up to the owner of a convenience store to teach kids manners and how to behave. If he didn't have this mosquito thing, he would have just walked out there every few minutes and yelled at the kids, and they'd just get the reinforcement they're looking for by annoying the actual customers.

      So, blame the parents for raising kids with no manners.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    23. Re:Wonderful by Joe+Random · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Homey, regardless of my brain development, had you said this to my face

      If someone who is relatively young (i.e., under, say, 25-30) is reading this and thinks I'm full of crap, then you're not qualified to have an opinion. Your brain hasn't finished developing yet. Sorry.

      I would fucking knock your overweight ass into next week.
      I don't exactly agree with the GP, but you seem to be doing your best to prove his point for him. I could never understand the whole "you insulted me so I'll respond with physical violence" mentality. Sure, if it's in self defense then physical force may be necessary. But in response to a (poorly thought out) verbal insult?! Grow the fuck up! It's not that the GP is a glowing beacon of rationality, but attitudes like yours are exactly the reason that people like the GP have such a low opinion of the younger generation.
    24. Re:Wonderful by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Did you RTFA?
      "So far, the Mosquito has been road-tested in only one place, at the entrance to the Spar convenience store in this town in South Wales.
      Evans and a 12-year-old friend who did not want to be interviewed were once part of a regular gang of loiterers, said Gough's father, Philip. "That little girl used to be a right pain, shouting abuse and bad language," he said of the 12-year-old. "Now she'll just come in, do her shopping and go."
      These kids in England are acting like monsters.

      Its one thing to have a knee jerk reaction to a group of youths, it's another thing to have a reaction to a horde of insult spewing, object throwing assholes.

      This tool is being used to deal with specific & localized problem, namely abusive & loitering youths. If you had RTFA you'd realize that this is behavior anyone would find abhorrent, not just the older generation.

      Shit like that reminds me of all those hate-spewing pre-teens on Xbox Live. They have the most vile mouths you've ever heard. If the Xbox controller had a button allowing me to send an ear splitting squeal of pain into the little prick's headphones, I'd do it.

      Why? Not because he's 11 years old and hasn't hit puberty, but because the bastard is calling me a cocksucking nigger jew.

      I think maybe you're the one having a knee jerk reaction here.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    25. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Andd so your comments prove the need for the device, i.e. I'm a punk and if you say something I don't like I'll kick you a55. Brilliant.

      Yeah, I've approached a few youngin's who were being VERY LOUD, and they quieted down for about 5 seconds showing proper scorn on the world the whole time. A friend of mine was outside at a coffee shop, on the phone, when some nearby kids (18-20) got very loud. He asked them to be a little quiter, and when he turned to resume his call, one of the punks picked up a chair and hit him with it. The kid was lucky the 6'3" Bosnian dude showed restraint and only hit him back a few times.

      Sure, most kids aren't that bad, but the few who are spoil it for the rest. So rather than piss and moan about how unfair it is, which it is, feel free to 'police' your peers.
      As if THAT will ever happen.

    26. Re:Wonderful by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from, only this article takes place in Britain, where youth crime has apparently become a bit of a problem in some areas.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    27. Re:Wonderful by lamasquerade · · Score: 1
      You're right I didn't RTFA, but I was replying to Reality Master 101's more general anti-youth post.

      As for that specific case of the girl using abusive language etc. when doing her shopping, why wouldn't the proprieter just ban her from the shop? And if she wouldn't respect such a ban then call the police. Aren't these the steps you take in such a situation? The age of the person causing trouble is not the issue (as you note in your comments about X-box live players).

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    28. Re:Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 1

      When teens loiter in front of a store, they are the ones showing contempt.

      Funny, I thought if they were in a public place they were entitled to be there. Tell me would you tell a group to move on if it consisted of a minister, a police officer and the town mayor? Would they be showing contempt.

      Gimme a break!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    29. Re:Wonderful by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      ...I was still an idiotic twit.

      So now you're an arrogant prig! Congratulations!

    30. Re:Wonderful by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Now that I'm 41

      I'm no neuroscientist, but by that age, isn't your brain losing synapses faster than it is creating new ones? Would that not mean that somebody a bit younger than you (Say, 35) would have a brain that is in better condition?

      I guess you're not qualified to have opinions, your decrepit brain can't be trusted. Sorry.

    31. Re:Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you're either a teenager, or not much into your twenties.

      You'd be guessing wrong. I'm 30. I just don't hold contempt for someone because they're young.

      I was young once, and when I was a teenager I probably would have made the same post you made.

      Probably just to make trouble rather than as a solidly held view.

      There is nothing more annoying than a bunch of noisy teenagers hanging around a store saying stupid things at twice the necessary volume.

      How about an arrogant and annoying 41 year old hanging around on an Internet message board?

      Now that I'm 41, oooooooh geez, I now realize what a typical arrogant, idiotic, irritating, annoying, ignorant young punk I was.

      Bzzz. Past tense is incorrect.

      I completely sympathize with this guy creating the anti-teenager device.

      Of course you do. I know your type. You're never content unless you're whinging about something or someone else. Doesn't matter if you were that 25 years ago, you're not now and you're much better now. I bet you still live with your parent's basement too.

      And I was much smarter and more mature than most people my age,

      Bzzzt. Wrong. Play again.

      but I was still an idiotic twit.

      Bzzzt. Past tense is incorrect.

      And if someone disagrees with me who is older than that, then you must've not grown up yet. :)

      You must be using "grown up" in some strange venacular I haven't heard yet that actually means having a lobotomy.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    32. Re:Wonderful by icleprechauns · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As bad as it may sound, Steven J. Levitt, author of the award-winning Freakonomics, said that the lowering crime rate is because of the legalization of abortion about 2 decades before. Teens that otherwise would have been neglected and possibly would turn to the streets were aborted instead, so syousef may actually be pretty correct.

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    33. Re:Wonderful by ThaFooz · · Score: 1

      I would fucking knock your overweight ass into next week. I'd also stay around long enough for the police to show up so I could explain myself. Lucky for you, you only have the balls to say this from behind a keyboard.

      Thats awful tough talk for someone that's just saying it 'from behind a keyboard', isn't it?

      I wonder, have you ever approached my contemporaries and engaged them respectfully as to the volume of their voice? As it's a free country you have no business in _what_ they say, but who's to deny someone who respectfully asks you only to lower the volume. Perhaps some would, others may even tell you to fuck off, but even that is not license for random aural invasion.

      Why is it that a bunch of loud people (I couldn't care less if they're kids or not) is ok, because its "a free country", but a high pitch noise is "aural invasion"? I would consider both of them offensive to my ears.

      And while we're on the subject, who is actually at fault for society's current situation? Who's to blame for our crushing debt and rampant tyranical government?...it was the 40 somethings. You guys were all 100% fucking complacent, and you all have blood on your hands.

      It's rather easy to criticize monumental change in the right direction as not being good enough. In the past 60 years our 'tyrannical' government has reconstructed and reunited post-war Europe & Japan, stepped in to prevent atrocites (Gulf War #1, Yugoslavia, Serbia, Israli peace process, etc), led an information/communication revolution, and largely erased the race/gender barriers at home.

      Typicaly when a young person today rants about the 'tyrannical' government they're specificaly referring to Bush & co. and his Iraqi war and PATRIOT act. I'm certainly not fond of him, but being involved in the Dean (and later Kerry) campaigns, I blame young people the most for Bush's re-election. Young, mostly college-age city kids (a group with notoriously poor voter turnout) were taking an interest in politics like never before, and were supposed to turn the tide in the '04 election. But they never showed up at the polls. The Christian right (of all ages) did though.

      In closing, Bush is over 40. So was Hitler. And Osama! And now that I think about it, probably every single war criminal on record is over 40.

      What a brilliant argument. But I wonder, how do you account for the fact that despite these criminals being 'old', the soldiers who carried out their orders were not? Don't soldiers tend to be 17-25 years old? Let me try that logic - how about "JFK, Martin Luther King, Mother Teresa, and the Dali Lama are all over 40. Come to think of it, probably every single great leader in history was over 40. Therefore young people have no value in society"

      I'm 23 by the way, in case you were wondering.

    34. Re:Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 1

      I was much smarter and more mature than most people my age

      No, you weren't.

      He still isn't.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    35. Re:Wonderful by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm almost 20 and I disagree with you. You say because of my age I'm an arrogant, idiotic, irritating, annoying and ignorant young punk? Well isn't that spiffy. Nice to know in this era of knowledge we're judging people by their age and not on themselvs.

      Never mind that I can sit and talk to 40 year olds on the same level, or feel contempt for the idiots in my age group who make the most noise. Lets totally forget the fact that I'm polite in public and will do my best to help someone out.. No, I'm just some ignorant teenager who doesn't have a clue about anything. I should still be in school because clearly at 19 I'm not safe to walk around on my own.

      People mature differently, I know 25-30 year olds who act like complete children. They throw hissy fits and have no sense of money but, these people are allowed an opinion in your magical little world.. yet I'am not because I was born in 1986 instead of 1981?

      You sonny boy need to grow up. Get the stick out of your arse and start to understand people cannot be judged by gender, age or skin colour. Every person is a stand alone process and you should give them a chance.

      But then if you're going to attack teenagers maybe I should attack you "old people"? You know the way you're bitter that you're stuck in a dead end job, half your life is over, you're going to die soon and in 20 years, you'll be left munching on apple sauce because you'll have no teeth, reduced brain function and hips so fragile you'll wish they were made of glass.

      Signed - The disrespectful youth who don't like you because you're still arrogant, stuck up and in short irritatingly idiotic.

      --
      I like muppets.
    36. Re:Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 1

      What are you smoking exactly?

      The correct way to deal with this is to show the abusive little girl the error of her ways by scaring the crap out of her. A night in a jail cell would probably do the trick (either that or prepare her for future experiences).

      Making a crappy noise that drives her away so she can go pester someone else isn't solving a problem, even for the shop owner. The half wit is probably driving away business. But instead of having the sense to deal with a human problem in a human way he takes the easy way out by configuring a gadget to piss her off so she can grow up to be a nice crim. Oh she won't loiter. She'll be the one in 5 years who's shot him dead for the 200 pounds in the till.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    37. Re:Wonderful by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      You must have forgotten about the average age of the /. moderators.

      However, to "grandparent": Teens, like everyone else, get the respect they earn. If a group of adults behaved as the teens in the story did, they'd be equally unwelcome. Age has nothing at all to do with it.

      If anything, teens have an advantage here, or didn't you read the story? The inventor of the device was considering developing one with a "panic button" that would emit painfully loud noise to drive out teens who might invade a store en masse for a shoplifting spree. In the UK this is apparently common enough that there's a slang term for it, "steaming". Teens who do this are treated as nuisances. Adults who might do this are treated as criminals.

      FWIW, I'm 42 and I'd probably be very annoyed by this device. I'm the only one in my office who's irritated by the sound of a monitor going bad. I don't know what frequency they put out, but it's loud and piercing.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    38. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you're not teaching my kids. I prefer someone who knows how to spell "truthful" and who doesn't think "asshat" is a proper noun.

    39. Re:Wonderful by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      It's not the store owner's job to "encourage teenagers to develop into worthwhile adults". He has a business to run and they're interfering with it. The parents are the ones who should be raising their kids.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    40. Re:Wonderful by devinjones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, it is the rise of industrialization and the expansion of childhood that drives teens crazy. 13 - 16 year olds used to be valuable farm workers or craft apprentices, learning skills and doing work that was valued by society. Now they are largely un-employable. While trying to leave childhood behind, teens find they have no meaningful work and thus no value to adults other than as consumers.

    41. Re:Wonderful by firewrought · · Score: 1
      Kids AREN'T going around shooting and killing each other, at least not in the US. The FBI reports that crime overall has gone down steadily since 1994.

      Overall crime rate is very tenuously linked to the homicide rate of a specific age group. A better metric would be to list, for each age group, the number of homicides offenses per 10,000 people of that same age group. The DOJ gets us part way there, but their stats don't address the shifting age of the population (e.g., are youth being less violent or are there simply less youth per overall population?). You could probably cross-reference it with page 12 of census data and get a good idea.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    42. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit using paper plates and cups. Lazy ass...help your father with the dishes.
      Quit burning up fossil fuels and polluting by playing all of those damned video games on all of that power sucking electronic equipment. Lazy ass...go get your ass back on that exercycle that runs the generator so that your Mom can watch Criminal Intent after busting her ass all day for you.
      Quit burning up 30 gallons of fuel a week cruising.
      In fact, completely speak with actions instead of words. Move to the mountains, make yourself some clothes out of maple leaves, plant yourself a vegetable garden, don't use fire, don't bother civilization. Live what you talk.

      I remember some punk asses from my generation that got busted by 60 minutes. They were all crazy and evangelical about recycling and saving the environment and such. They were heavily trashing and cursing the common folk for their waste. 60 minutes showed up at the leader's and a couple of the other folk's residences. The leader was driving a large, new vehicle that got about 12 mpg. The trash was filled with paper plates and styrofoam, TV dinners, et cetera. The reams of paper they used for classes were NOT recycled. They cried and whined that they were poor college students that couldn't afford dishes, didn't have time to wash them if they could buy them, didn't have time to cook dinner, and couldn't afford to pay a premium for recycled paper. Oh, and my Dad bought me this 12 mpg rock'in beast! (I could have tolerated them preaching the ideals and not living them because they didn't have the time or money. But, they lost all respect by slamming the folks that did not do what they preached--you know, the folks with less time and money to use on ideals.)

      This is the youthful, naive ignorance of which the other gentleman you cursed speaks of.

      When you are 30, have two kids, you and your wife work, you are paying a baby sitter, have one decent car, one gas guzzler that busts at the most inconvenient times, car payments, insurance, mortgage, food for four, Christmas presents to buy -- really, do you think you are in a better position than those dipshit college students to pay more to recycle? Oh, you are a "priviledged" individual...your wealthy parents paid off the admission clerk and you cheated on your bar exam...good...you go ahead and make sure you recycle and aren't wasteful. I don't want to see you draining the aquifer on your 5 acre lawn that is saturated with poisonous fertilizer, throwing away 3/4s of every meal because "you don't do leftovers!", driving an H2, lighting up your 5 acres with 4,000 watts of lighting...but wait, if you do all that, you'll be just like a Hollywood poliactor!

      By the way, if you are wealthy, my current vehicle gets 18 mpg (which is BAD these days) and is starting to leak oil. I can not afford to replace this beast until it dies (which hopefully doesn't happen before it starts leaking 2 quarts a day (OMG...your generation and the liberals of mine think we are killing Iraqi's to replace that oil leaking from my car!) What an enviromental travesty!! If you, or any of your wealthy, idealistic friends happen to have an environmental fetish, I strongly urge you to donate $40,000 to assist me in lowering my enviromental damage quotient (put your money where your mouth is.) I promise to buy the most fuel efficient vehicle that I can that can comfortably seat four on short and long trips, hold luggage, and, most importantly, accelerate from 0 - 60 mph in under 7.5 seconds (we have lots of short highway entrance ramps around here.) Maybe, if you are wealthy enough, you can pay the State to widen the Interstate to 8 lanes and make the entrance ramps 3/4s of a mile (3 miles if you want us driving Priuses(sp?)) instead of 300 feet.

    43. Re:Wonderful by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Gee, for the past five years the gov't has been telling us that inflation has been minimal. It must be, computer hardware keeps getting cheaper and more capable every year. Yet some reason, food, gas, housing, and electricity doesn't keep dropping in price. Too bad I can't eat silicon chips. But it MUST be true, because the gov't wouldn't lie to the public.

      Statistical accuracy is inversely proportional to the cooking. There has been a big drive to manipulate crime statistics across the country, particularly in sophisticated law enforcement environments like NYC. I don't sleep believing violent crime is going down, or the prices of critical staples are not rising.

      As for juvenile violent crime, speculation on the drop can be as simple as less kids implies more eyes to watch them, and after the shooting sprees in places like Columbine, parents are finally being a little more careful with their firearms. Who knows, maybe doping kids with Ritalin at a preschool age produces a brain damaged, docile adolescent.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    44. Re:Wonderful by gobbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      The older I grow
      The more I recall
      How little I knew
      When I knew it all

      Seen on a tacky plaque in Uncle Zip's hallway, out in the country.

    45. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 34.

      Back in the day:

      My friends and I did not walk out into a busy road right in front of traffic causing 16 vehicles to lock all four and then have the audacity to flip off, curse, and moon the traffic. I have seen second graders exhibiting this behaviour recently. When I was in the second grade, you would likely be installed in a padded room for this type of behaviour and your parents would be humiliated for their obvious major failure.

      We didn't walk 8 across (blocking the whole road) and flip off the car honking at us that has been creeping along at 1.2 mph for the past 300 feet behind us...we got off the fucking road as soon as we heard/saw a car coming.

      A sober 17 year old drives 75 mph, swerving back and forth down a 20 mph residential road that is barely wider than an alley and misses my son by about 3 feet. I go for a drive and find the dumb shits car and he is standing by it. 20 other little shits are standing around and it was pretty close to getting ugly...they were all supporting him despite knowing what he did (including a half dozen girls.) In my day, I saw idiots do the maniac driving. In a crowd of 14 of his male friends and 6 female friends...he might have 1 male supporter. The girls would disassociate with him completely.

      I digress though. It isn't just the kids. The parents suck these days. The principal can't use the board. The pizza shop burns your pizza to a crisp and doesn't feel like they owe you anything. The cops are not interested in much less than murder.

    46. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, kids AREN'T going around shooting and killing each other, at least not in the US.

      I don't know, that was just asking to be taken out of context...

    47. Re:Wonderful by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      O RLY?

      So, if a group of teenagers wants to remain on public property, they're displaying contempt for the property owner?

      There are already plenty of laws covering any actual damages that loitering teenagers may cause. Vandalism, for instance, is a crime, as is harassment [of storegoers]. Going in and stealing from the store is prosecuted as shoplifting. Smoking when underage is also a crime. If the teenagers are standing in front of a store and are not otherwise committing any crimes, what harm are they doing?

      And with regard to the "hoodlums" these devices are supposedly intended to repel... what makes you think they're going to care any more than if the store employees come out and tell them to leave? I imagine a lot of stores are going to have their teenager repellants smashed with baseball bats or 2x4s if these see widespread use.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    48. Re:Wonderful by VENONA · · Score: 1

      "Problem is, kids AREN'T going around shooting and killing each other, at least not in the US."

      The real question is whether or not we can teach them to.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    49. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Next time you see a bunch of youths and you feel some emotional response (fear, disgust, derision, etc.) try looking for the root of that response and see if it's reall well founded, or if it's just there because you watch too many 60 Minutes stories about our out of control youth, or in your case, maybe you're just too entrenched in this clash-of-the-generations psyche."

      Introspect like mad, though I'm little exposed to the media, and if I don't magically agree with you, then the problem may still be mine, because I'm "...just too entrenched in this clash-of-the-generations psyche." While we're talking 'maybe', how about the possibility that our society is yielding a generation after generation of children who are less and less controllable. You can't even get the majority of them to learn in school any more.

      That's a really good 'maybe'. And yes, children should be controllable. They're less legally responsible for their actions for good reasons. I'm sure the control bit offends many people here. I bet many in that same group are all for the lowered legal responsibility, though. The net result being less control _and_ less responsibility. Imagine that.

    50. Re:Wonderful by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      They're too busy fucking and killing hookers in GTA :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    51. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would fucking knock your overweight ass into next week. I'd also stay around long enough for the police to show up so I could explain myself. Lucky for you, you only have the balls to say this from behind a keyboard."

      GP was right, in your case. Your brain hasn't finished developing. What happens when you try to knock some forty year old's ass into next week, and _then_ discover that he's ex Special Forces, or something? He'd likely fuck you up completely while operating on autopilot. The other extreme can be just as dangerous--the guy that knows he can't fight, so he buys a little 9mm pocket gun.

      But let's leave out the gun. Afterwards, you then wait for the police so you could explain yourself. No doubt you expect them to be impressed with your studly self. OK, now you're in jail, and the civil suit is also gonna suck.

      If your brain hasn't finished developing, you have some excuse. If it has finished, I mean, if the way you think now is as good as it's ever gonna get, your life is gonna be teh suck.

    52. Re:Wonderful by m50d · · Score: 1
      But in response to a (poorly thought out) verbal insult?! Grow the fuck up!

      Verbal insults are long-term far more harmful than physical violence. Since I have more ability with the latter I'm inclined to use it in response to the former.

      --
      I am trolling
    53. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      41? Your brain, after "full development", is running down the hill, my friend.

    54. Re:Wonderful by malkavian · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree with that.
      Society in general (and still in a goodly many places outside the 'western' world that's so into making a fast buck off everything, and screw it if it's not profitable) has held that the young need to be trained and led. This isn't contempt; its maybe contrary to what the young person wants to do, but if they're going to be functional in the wider scope of society, they need to understand how to fit into it (and no, this isn't just a "perpetuate the current system in stagnation" post; if you know the system, and can work it, you can change it. If you rail against it in ignorance, you haven't a hope in hell).
      The old have been held in high regard as sources of knowledge and wisdom. After all, they had to live a whole lot of life to reach where they got to.

      Sadly, the system is now highly skewed (discipline a kid to behave, and you'll have the CPA called on you). The young have the rights and politicians, in an attempt to grab the slice of the demographic as it is developing, pander to their every whim.
      The old are pretty much ignored, as they're not going to be a changing vote, and you're not going to make more of a profit off them now. The store of whatever knowledge and wisdom they have is deemed irrelevant, as it has no monetary value.

      So, it's really only contemporary, western society that has the issues, and they're not exactly as you couched it.

    55. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe this is *exactly* why someone would want to use that sound device : no constant "would you please leave" requests, and no more getting the cold shoulder (you can't *make* us go, so there !) ,rude responses ("You old fart ! We've got the *right* to stand here in front of your store I tell you") or (vailed or not) threats ("What do you want old man ? Go back into your store and don't bother us again").

      Yes, a high-pitched whine would forgo all that and make the store-owners (or anyone who has those loitering and sometimes menacining youngsters in front of their (home) windows) life a lot less stressfull and/or dangerous ...

    56. Re:Wonderful by OwlWhacker · · Score: 1

      Treat teens with about the same respect you reserve for a mosquito and wonder why they go around shooting each other, or killing themselves.

      That sounds like, "If I don't get my way I'll throw a tantrum and disrupt other people's lives".

      You make it sound as if teens have such a hard life in this modern age. Actually, kids have more 'rights' now than ever before, and are almost 'untouchable'. This has lead to kids having less respect for authority, and demanding more and more respect for themselves. This is why people look at kids as some kind of pest.

      It's not all kids that are like this, but most kids are going to be treated as if they are - it's human nature. Just like most teenagers see adults as some kind of pest, even though there are some adults who are sympathetic to the needs of teenagers.

      We live in a society that is becoming more and more selfish, irresponsible, and where 'everybody' is lacking respect for others. If we address this, the root of the problem, there should be no need to go around emitting high pitched noises.

    57. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that is that most people remember the reason they acted like that was because they were behaving like selfish children.

    58. Re:Wonderful by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Verbal insults are long-term far more harmful than physical violence.

      Repeated verbal insults over a protracted period of time (eg bullying), yes. The odd insult in the heat of the moment, no.

      The OP is right - in the vast majority of cases, violence simply isn't an appropriate response to being insulted.

    59. Re:Wonderful by Devistater · · Score: 1

      Think about what you said lol. Inflation mean things take more dollars to buy because the dollar's purchasing power decreases as the money supply inflates.

      Hence stuff costs more dollars (it appears to get more "expensive")

      The reason why technology stuff drops in price is because technology is improving so fast, that the cost of manufacturing these kinds of devices falls.

      So yeah there's been inflation, which means it takes more dollars to purchase.

      In addition to the increasing dollar cost being evidence of inflation, you can simply take a look at various loan or bank interest rates. These also have a relationship with inflation. So its not just the government cooking the books.

      To summarize: Minimal inflation does not mean falling dollar amounts to purchase stuff. That would be deflation. So you will always see stuff increasing in dollar amounts as long as we have any sort of inflation, even minimal.

      And of course you have cases like medical insurance and college tuition thats rising at a much faster rate than the inflation rate, but there's a whole slew of reasons for that.

      (Note that I'm NOT disagreeing that the goverment can and sometimes does cook the books. I'm just disagreeing that they are doing it in the case of our inflation rate).

    60. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't exactly agree with the GP, but you seem to be doing your best to prove his point for him. I could never understand the whole "you insulted me so I'll respond with physical violence" mentality. Sure, if it's in self defense then physical force may be necessary. But in response to a (poorly thought out) verbal insult?! Grow the fuck up! It's not that the GP is a glowing beacon of rationality, but attitudes like yours are exactly the reason that people like the GP have such a low opinion of the younger generation.

      You're exactly right. Why, who in their right mind would use corporal punishment to train an individual that verbal insults are wrong (besides the police, parents, teachers, prison guards, athletes, a significant fraction of the men at bars, sporting events, and political protests...).

      It's too bad that the kids of today are so degenerate that they eagerly seek out contests of ritualized combat to the death (a.k.a. dueling) in response to practically any perceived insult. If only this most recent immature and self-centered generation would not have sunk so low.

    61. Re:Wonderful by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      >>"That little girl used to be a right pain, shouting abuse and bad language,"

      >These kids in England are acting like monsters.

      You should really watch A Clockward Orange to get some real perspective on what acting like a monster is. A reality check is that there's a vocal minority of adults who are a bunch of pussies because either they fear that kids will be like they were as a kid or they fear that kids will be as bad as media/fiction depicts kids can be.

      Personally, hearing some kid shouting out profanities might at first offend me, but then I'd quickly get over it. There's more reason to fear adults, who have the physical might to do physical harm, than kids. But even then, I'm laughing more because I don't tend to hear kids cursing up a storm. Eventually, though, I'd probably just tell them off and ignore them; certainly, I wouldn't really think much us about it after a while.

      I do wonder what the stores would do if this were 30 year olds doing the same. I guess they'd look less evil trying to have 30 year olds locked up than 12 year olds for loitering and hence be a lot more willing to call the police.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    62. Re:Wonderful by Twylite · · Score: 1

      Or possibly the rise of industrialization and the contraction of childhood? Children have always been expected to do chores, but in previous generations have had much more leisure time and far less expectations to be adults.

      Children as young as 7 are having their day packed with 8 hours of school and homework. Leisure time makes way for structured leisure activities and sports. Chores stay much as they always have been. And the child is acutely aware that they must decide what to be when they grow up, and if the don't get good grades right now they'll never get to university and that's pretty much the end of existance as we know it.

      Children just don't have time to be children anymore.

      Oh, and the age of consent used to be a lot lower.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    63. Re:Wonderful by MrWim · · Score: 1

      Incase you havn't noticed, saying "I would fucking knock your overweight ass into next week" is a verbal insult as the GP actually said it rather than did it.

      Try that again and I'll fuck you up

    64. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they need to stand up for their rights and fight back, or else they will be bullied forever by those mean jocks!

    65. Re:Wonderful by khallow · · Score: 1
      Or possibly the rise of industrialization and the contraction of childhood? Children have always been expected to do chores, but in previous generations have had much more leisure time and far less expectations to be adults.

      IMHO, childhood is longer, but you have less leisure time.

    66. Re:Wonderful by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      I take serious offence to your post. I am a young male, 26 in 15 days. I remember my youth very well because it was a very short time ago. A simple generalization is always going to be wrong. A simple stero type you used in your post is also very wrong. Just because a person may be young compaired to you...does not mean that they are immature, ignorant, arrogant, or annoying. I must admit to being the last, usually on purpose. I would suggest that you keep any stereotypes that you have formed based upon youself to the source. I am not you. I have always been respected by my peers and my superiors (both in age in position). You may actually have known just about everything you know now when you about 30 (that age when your brain wasn't fully developed) but your personal experience colors your decisions more now. This may or maynot make your decisions better. I have on numerous occasions proven that age alone does not make you smarter, neither does expierence alone.

      I hope I could be called mature for my age. I haven't had the go to college and get drunk every night, I must party till I die expierence of most of my peers. I instead went to Iraq. A persons world expierence is what makes them who they are. A teenager may or may not have the expierence to make dicisions as well thought out as you can, but they may just. Please keep your generalizations to a minimum. Your now fully developed brain may not be as developed (or may be decaying) as you think. They say hindsight is 20-20, but I know I remeber things either worse or better than they were. Maybe you are makeing the same mistake.

      If I some how misunderstood your post, please disreguard this one.
      DaemoN128

      Old age and trechory will overcome youth and vigor any day (my old man)

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
    67. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good and well thought-out message, but you really are arrogant.

    68. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen, brother
       
      /among the signed

    69. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently read "Freakanomics" by S Levitt (skews spelling). Which made the link between abortion being legalised in the early seventies(?) in the US and the subsequent drop in crime rates as a huge part of the demographic just isn't there any more. Very interesting.

    70. Re:Wonderful by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      I'd strongly disagree. My experience has been that, whilst older people may on average be less idiotic than younger people, the rate of accumulation of smarts varies massively from person to person. Once you get past a certain age, there is absolutely no guarantee that you'll be more clueful than those ten years younger than you. Beyond this point, brain development is a non-issue and personality development comes to the fore. And that can go either way.

      I'm 20, and I've met:
      A) Teenagers who are great, intelligent, mature human beings
      B) Adults who are idiotic, arrogant assholes

      Any store driving away the former in the interests of retaining the latter is presumably run by members of type B. I wouldn't be interested in shopping there. I can fully understand them wanting to drive away dickheads of whatever age, but this is probably not the best way to do it. I quite like the playing-classical-music idea - loathing of Bach in my (fairly limited) experience correlates almost perfectly with being a complete chav, almost regardless of age.

      Incidentally, is this device even legal in the UK? I thought we had quite strict noise pollution laws. For which I am eternally grateful - I have excellent hearing in the higher frequencies and have great trouble even walking down a street where everyone has those bloody cat scarers.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    71. Re:Wonderful by Tom · · Score: 1

      I could never understand the whole "you insulted me so I'll respond with physical violence" mentality.

      It's understandable, really. If someone uses a tool to attack you that you don't have available, would you say "bad luck" and try to do with what you have, or would you aim to level the playing field, even if it means going somewhat beyond your opponent?

      i.e. someone grabs a piece of wood to smash your head in. Would you take the lead pipe that's next to you to defend yourself, or would you say "damn, no wood, and that lead pipe would be unfair, so I'll just take the beating like a man" ?

      So, if someone insults you in a witty way you can't properly reply to due to lack of wit on your part (and wit isn't the same as intelligence!), you have the same two options...

      Honestly, I also think that violence is overhyped, but that's a result of escalation. When I was a kid, or even more when my father was young, then getting beaten up wasn't such a serious matter. It hurt, especially the pride, but hey. Today, unfortunately, beating someone up can easily mean one leads to the other and in the end someone draws a knife or a gun. Even if that doesn't happen, too often kids actually try to inflict serious harm.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    72. Re:Wonderful by Politburo · · Score: 1

      There has been a big drive to manipulate crime statistics across the country, particularly in sophisticated law enforcement environments like NYC.

      The problem is that government keeps a lot of data. In NYC, the police said the crime rate was going down. However, the hospitals and NYC Health said that there were more victims of assault and other violent crimes turning up at the ER. Turns out that the police were changing their definition of what gets counted as an assault, etc., to make it look like crime was decreasing. Many assaults were classified as 'harrassment' and therefore were no longer violent crimes. Viola.. crime's gone!

    73. Re:Wonderful by JBHarris · · Score: 1

      I was born in 1981 you insensitive clod!

    74. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably you can't imagine the kind of trouble that is like to be brewing when you have those kind of people loitering. Guess what if the 3 of them were drunk (reducing their behavior to that of teenagers) and annoying customers you can bet your ass I'd tell them to "move on".

    75. Re:Wonderful by DarkSarin · · Score: 0


      what does a _viola_ have to do with this?

      Oh, you meant voila! That's different. Sorry.

      I hate being a grammar nazi, but that one is too obvious. Of course, I will be nice and assume that you meant to type it right, but your fingers got moving faster than you brain.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    76. Re:Wonderful by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. I've had the same gripes about inflation. The stuff I want might be dropping, but the stuff I need is going up like a rocket.

      Regarding crime: My city has had 116 homocides this year. That averages a killing every 3.15 days! That's just the fatalities. There are also shootings/stabbings/assaults that aren't fatal. Also, my city didn't even make the Top 20 list of most dangerous cities!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    77. Re:Wonderful by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      So was my brother and he's a complete and utter twat.. the above "childish people" were him exactly.. :/

      --
      I like muppets.
    78. Re:Wonderful by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I just have to interject to say:

      What the HELL is wrong with kids that won't get off the road anymore?

      When I was a kid, getting off the road was The Most Important Thing In Existence. If we didn't instantly get off the road the millisecond we heard a car coming, we weren't allowed get on the road for a week!

      We'd hear a car, look up, see one hundreds of feet away, and grab everything we had and sprint off the road, standing there for a good twenty seconds until the car passes. It was so important we didn't even consider there were options.

      Nowadays either kids have gone deaf (Even, like, 7 year olds.), or their parents are morons.

      Seriously, people. Teach your kids.

      The neighbors have put up a 'Caution, children at play' sign aimed at me because I often come up behind their kids and have to idle down the damn road. (As opposed to other people, who stop their car entirely and wait for the kids to blithely wander off the road, whcih they do after about three minutes.) I have been tempted to go over there and say 'I go about 15 mph down this road. The speed limit, as this road doesn't have one, is the default 25 mph. Maybe your kids should learn to get off the road when cars come?.'

      Granted, I grew up in a moderately busy Atlanta neighborhood, whereas this is a dead-end road and thus isn't busy at all. But that just means they have to get out of the way less often, not that they should just assume that all cars will park in the road and wait for them to wander out of the way. (When I use wander, I really do mean 'wander'.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    79. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been
      *cue cheerleader style speaking*
      T R O L L E D
      Trrrrrrrrrrrrooooooooollllllllleeeeeeeeeddddddddd!
      Learn to spot it.

    80. Re:Wonderful by ultima · · Score: 1

      Finished developing yet, eh...

      Quite a bit of the most influential discoveries to date have been done by people under 25. Your brain is constantly developing throughout your entire life if you play it right. And brain cells are constantly dying. While teenagers may not have the experience and sense of causality that older adults do, you can't deny that many of the most focused scholars and athletes did amazing things as teenagers and young adults (and then faded into obscurity). Young people do have a level of focus and creativity that is rarely seen amongst older people with brains atrophied by a blue collar job followed by a night of TV and drinking (not to mention age; as soon as you're born you start dying). Fact is, while you may have more experience at 30, you were probably smarter and more focused at 20.

      The brain is never "fully developed", the body never "matures", except in a relativistic sense defined by biologists to make their lives easier. Living is a process, growing old is a process, and there is no destination other than the grave. There's no summit or valley anyone reaches as they age or grow in experience; to think otherwise is a wishful appeal to the authority of age we bow to and desire as children.

    81. Re:Wonderful by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I would argue that Mr Levitt's claim is a bit larger than the pool of evidence he has to back it up. In statistics they say that "Correlation does not imply causation" and I think Levitt fell victim to this with his book; moreover I think he needed an absurd claim to help sell the book. It was kind of like when Kanye West said "Bush doesn't care about black people", the only way someone will pay attention now a days is if you say something completely over the top.

    82. Re:Wonderful by Kylere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People in their teens are "arrogant, idiotic, irritating, annoying and ignorant" you may not feel as if YOU are, but that is the arrogant part. Idiotic may be a little strong, but lacking any worthwhile world experience (no matter what you think, you DO lack it) but it makes you appear that way to people possessing a clue(tm). Irritating is due to all the other factors. Annoying is because you fail to realize the level of your arrogance, and ignorance. Lastly, you do not have the breadth of experience needed to recognize this simple fact which is the ignorant part.

    83. Re:Wonderful by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

      So, as a Libertarian, you're saying the shop owner does NOT have the right to set rules on his own property?

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
    84. Re:Wonderful by alienmole · · Score: 1

      The claim "Bush doesn't care about black people" can be justified by the evidence. Although to be fair to Mr. Bush, it's more like "Bush doesn't care about poor people".

    85. Re:Wonderful by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Have you ever talked to a policeman about loitering?

      My opinion is worthless if you disagree with it. Instead, go talk to some store owners who have a problem with teenagers loitering. Then find some friendly police officers and have a chat with them about the general topic.

      You'll get more out of those conversations than anything I can say to you on /.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    86. Re:Wonderful by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      From my reading of the article, the girl isn't just being a pain in the shop, but outside the shop, which is where people tend to loiter.

      As for calling the police, I suggest you talk to store owners who have a problem with loitering and then you talk to a police officer or two about the matter..

      You'll get more out of those conversations than anything I can say to you on /.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    87. Re:Wonderful by jafac · · Score: 1

      if you take the time to look at it, it also shows that juvenile crime specifically is at it's lowest level in over a decade.

      You say it's gone down since 1994?

      I suppose if I had a computer and internet (pr0n) access when I was a teen, I would have spent a lot less time out drinking and smoking and shooting pool with my buddies.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    88. Re:Wonderful by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > How about instead of looking down on
      > youth for acting the way you admittedly
      > acted, try to remember why you acted
      > that way and understand them.

      I don't care why they act that way. I care THAT they act that way. I have a right to require specific behavior at my place of business. I can post a "no loitering" sign. I can post a "no smoking" sign. I can even post a "no public bathrooms" sign. If I can forbid bathroom usage at my place of business, I think I can forbid pretty much anything I want. So if I don't like the way you behave, I can tell you not to behave that way.

      And even if you aren't really a threat, I don't know that. How do you tell the difference between the Trenchcoat Mafia at Columbine and the average punks at any high school? You don't. You can't. They are indistinguishable, even though they are indeed very different. And that's why we treat all the "outsider" kids in public school like felons.

      If you want to fix some sort of moral outrage, I suggest you start there. Keeping kids from loitering in front of stores is a silly cause to fight; fight the system that is destroying our creative original thinkers before they have the educational foundation to start thinking anything valuable. The eventual cost to society is simply inestimable.

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    89. Re:Wonderful by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
      The problem is that government keeps a lot of data.

      While I thought the "grammar" nazi was being an OCD dork, I must take exception to your argument construction. (Call me a communication or context nazi.) What is the "problem" with the gov't keeping a lot of data? It was because of the data collection that a discrepancy in reporting was caught between the police and the hospitals. Are you suggesting if the gov't collected less data, the problem with statistics cooking will go away? Are you suggesting all problems can be solved by keeping oneself in blissful ignorance? Or is the fact that the police brass was "caught" with a discrepancy in calculating crime the actual problem?

      Interesting factoid, and I don't think you meant it the way I'm portraying it. BUT what you actually wrote is how it can be interpreted.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    90. Re:Wonderful by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
      I've had the same gripes about inflation

      And did you notice the inflation was creeping up for the past four years, even before the fuel crisis caused by Katrina?

      Friend, let me creep out out some more. Look at what the Fed is about to do: M3 report discontinuation

      I consider 116 homicides in NYC relatively good news in a city with 8 million residents, that triples in population during a workday. 116 homicides in Pahrump, NV on the other hand... So what size city are we talking about?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    91. Re:Wonderful by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get that? I was talking about the social factors involved in the situation. Just as store owners will put pornographic magazines behind the counter to appease a vocal minority, they too will look for a way to appease the vocal minority who are so offended by loiterers to no longer shop there. At the same time, they have to appease everyone else, who, while annoyed with said loiterers, don't like the idea of seeing the cops dragging 12 year olds away simply for being annoying. The person I was responding to tried to call them monsters to justify, socially, why it was okay to use such a device. I was simply pointing out the bullshit of that suggestion.

      If I was actually concerned about the whole legality of the situation, I would have asked where the loiterers were standing (possibly on public property) and tried to justify why they had a right standing there. The invention, however, is focused on trying to create a PR-friendly approach, regardless of legality. Personally, I'd assume it is legal. But I'd certain welcome moves to boycott such shops.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    92. Re:Wonderful by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I live in Kansas City, MO with about a million people. I don't know what the record number of homicides are, but 2005 is quite a bit worse than 2004, and it seems like there's another almost daily.

      BTW, does Pahrump, NV even have 116 people? :)

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    93. Re:Wonderful by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
      Think about what you said lol.

      (Note to self: nuanced sardonic wit is wasted on the /. reader.)

      In addition to the increasing dollar cost being evidence of inflation, you can simply take a look at various loan or bank interest rates. These also have a relationship with inflation. So its not just the government cooking the books.

      Since when does private banks set interest rates independent of the Federal Reserve? Since they don't, that falsehood doesn't support your contention that banks cook the books. (Not that I would disagree with that conclusion; although its pretty irrelevant to the discussion here.) Good thing you're not a bank director. As a reporter, you would be one sorry assed yellow journalist, but apparently you'd fit in well.

      To summarize: Minimal inflation does not mean falling dollar amounts to purchase stuff. That would be deflation. So you will always see stuff increasing in dollar amounts as long as we have any sort of inflation, even minimal.

      Gee pal, thanks. Like I've never heard of deflation. Why am I supposed to believe the gov't, when they are saying "there is no signficant inflation", and my cost of living jumps 10% above what they claim is the inflation rate? (This is well before the fuel crunches this year.) I didn't fall off the turnip truck, unlike you.

      (Note that I'm NOT disagreeing that the goverment can and sometimes does cook the books. I'm just disagreeing that they are doing it in the case of our inflation rate).

      Then why is the Fed about to do this? Do you even understand the significance?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    94. Re:Wonderful by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Exactly, that's why I felt it was over the top; not that Kanye's statement didn't contain a very real element of truth it was just an oversimplification of the issue at hand. Bush loves rich black people, just not poor people...white, black or otherwise.

    95. Re:Wonderful by dangitman · · Score: 1
      You make it sound as if teens have such a hard life in this modern age. Actually, kids have more 'rights' now than ever before, and are almost 'untouchable'.

      But "rights" are meaningless if you don't have things like freedom, respect and self-worth. The kids never seem to get to exercise whatever rights they supposedly have, because they are on a tether. Many kids lead a constantly shut-in life by parents who don't want them to go out in the world, and they are kept in houses and in SUVs while in transit to some other room. Many aren't allowed to just go outside and ride bikes around freely.

      But the bigger issue is that raised by another poster - there is little value in the work, skill or intelligence of young people. They are seen just as consumers. There is almost no "craft" or "art" or "philosophy" or anything meaningful to modern life. Scientists have gone from being daring explorers and philosophers, to techno-geeks or workers for an oil company. Artists are kept churning out lookalike commercial junk. Good design is not appreciated.

      This doesn't just affect the young, but everybody. Our human works are being increasingly undervalued in a world of massive reproduction and mechanization. We worship efficiency and cheap prices - not good work or ethical thinking. For example: Why build your own balsa model plane (or spend time supervising your child making one), when you can get the GeeWhiz3000 FreedomFighter for half the price, ready made from plastic parts, including radio gear!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    96. Re:Wonderful by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
      Also, my city didn't even make the Top 20 list of most dangerous cities!

      And do you really, really think it should? Your homicide rate is 0.012%. You have less than a 1/10000 chance of being murdered. Let me guess, you're also outraged you haven't won the lottery yet either. The key to being a competent adult is to properly evaluate threats and issues of concern to yourself. If you're really willing to make an active effort to avoid being murdered, this is my advice to you:

      Do not go into a profession that involves violence. (Whether drug dealer or law enforcement)
      Do not go into the taxi/limo or quikiemart profession.
      Do not be a patriot and enlist in the US Armed Forces.
      Do not have a girlfriend or get married.
      Do not live in close proximity with relatives.
      Do not live or be caught in a high crime area.
      Do not practice or vocally support homosexuality.

      Also, homicide is not necessarily an accurate indicator of violent crime by strangers. (Because the majority of homicides are committed by people the victim knew. Then again, I thought KC, MO was on the watchlist of higher crime areas.) If you really want to be alive two years from now, this will VASTLY improve your odds more than the above suggestions:

      Do not drive/ride in a passenger vehicle.
      Do not live at a private residence.

      I commend you for having the sense to not bend over for soap in the prison shower, but one needs to realize humans on a biological level will mentally make up sensory information for something that's not there, tend to take anecdotal information and presume a trend that does not exist, and don't realize the news media exists to keep you glued to their (entertainment) service, not tell the truth.

      You sense an increase in crime because that's what you see on the TV and what other people yap about (because the TV yaps about it). It doesn't mean that crime represents a significant physical threat to you. The bankruptcy bill, Iraq occupation, and Walmart are a much more significant threats to you, because they generate the poor starving people that have a motivation to mug you, or get involved in the drug trade.

      My original objections about crime statistics as to do with the fact that raw data does not mean one can make relevant conclusions. It needs to be analyzed, validated, and put into context. Throwing out raw data and making an assertion is pretty much what people refer to using statistics to lie. Also, once an organization is shown to be subverting the methodology used to make a conclusion, you pretty much cannot be confident about anything they assert, like low crime rate.

      I live in a neighborhood in the Bronx where people have had their eyes pop out when I mention it. But I know I have no significant chance of harm as long as I don't do something incredibly stupid to present an attractive target. On the other hand, I would rather move to a more "happening" neighborhood, but part of my reluctance (laziness) is that I do not know the relative security change that will occur, and the damn NYPD won't release its GPS colllated data.

      As for Pahrump, I'm pretty darn sure its population is over 116. Its all Art Bell's fault....

      Normally, I'd say, don't lose sleep over the crime in KC, MO. But then again, you guys will be getting all thsoe New Orleans refugees that can't go back to the Big Easy. Hooboy, will the hurricane fallout hit the fan in the next few years. God bless GWB.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    97. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think the phrase "George W. Bush doesn't care about black people" is over the top?

      Frankly I coudn't care less who Kayne West is, but he sure has a knack for stating the obvious.

    98. Re:Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah I'll just waltz up to my local friendly policeman and say "Hello, I'd like to discuss loitering, because you see someone on slashdot thinks I don't know what I'm talking about".

      Still smoking stuff I see.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    99. Re:Wonderful by syousef · · Score: 1

      My friends and I did not walk out into a busy road right in front of traffic causing 16 vehicles to lock all four and then have the audacity to flip off, curse, and moon the traffic. I have seen second graders exhibiting this behaviour recently

      If you run over a few, their friends get off the road pretty quickly.

      Kidding of course. (No responsibility taken for anyone trying this at home!)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    100. Re:Wonderful by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The fact is, the crime IS getting worse. I don't cower under the bed because of it, but it does bother me. Part of the problem is that I do live in a fairly high crime area, though not the worst area. Probably about 90 of the killings are in a certain area, and most of the rest are within a mile of my house. And some of those are random, though probably not as many as it sounds since those get more press than the much more common drug/gang shootings. I suppose if it got to the point where I do feel unsafe I could move to a "good" area, but the houses there probably cost 2-3X what I could sell mine for, and anything I could afford probably wouldn't be as good as my present house.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    101. Re:Wonderful by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Yes, given your circumstances, I can see why you feel that way. Then again, I live in a neighborhood where the "common" wisdom is that I should be mugged or a casualty. (Its a lie, I think I'm reasonably safe.) I guess you're keen on staying in KC, MO. I don't think your "mansion" is a "good" one, if it means living in an area where you have to be concerned about your safety. I think you need to get into local politics to improve your situation. Or, if you think the cops will look the other way, mount an counter-insurgency operation with likeminded neighbors.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    102. Re:Wonderful by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

      "Just as store owners will put pornographic magazines behind the counter to appease a vocal minority ..."

      What? The last time I checked, no one was protesting the lack of pornography at my local convenience store. Typically, shopkeepers stock porn because it sells and it's behind the counter because putting it in easy reach of children is just asking for trouble.

      The teenagers in question may not be monsters, but they are definitely an annoyance to someone. Having a device that gets rid of the annoyance in a relatively peaceful manner is certainly preferable to less-peaceful, although far more satisfying, methods.

      You are right about public property, though. If they're on it, it's legal for them to be there, barring other circumstances (truancy, etc.). However, the article stated that several shop owners have had problems with the kids coming into the store and stealing or harassing other customers. This provides a reasonable solution to possibly stop such actions by removing the teens before the problem starts.

      If I had teens hanging out in my parking lot causing problems within and without the store, I would certainly hope for such a device.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
  20. Next best thing will be... by segment · · Score: 1

    "military's intent to use every possible thought-influencing technology. This technology is largely classified but there are leaks, like this article. We involuntary test subjects can tell you from first hand experience that far more invasive devices now exist." Welcome to ... Silent Sound...

    1. Re:Next best thing will be... by tindur · · Score: 1

      Time to upgrade your tin foil hats.

  21. No Effect by eosp · · Score: 1

    Teens are used to teachers. When used in terms of climate, this is called "acclimati[z|s]ation".

  22. Great Scott! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.21 gigahertz!

  23. prefect. just prefect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children.

    Too bad ScuttleMonkey and arse (oops, ars) couldn't find the time to proofread their emission (oops, submission).

  24. It's true by caese · · Score: 1

    when I was a kid we had a similar device up at the farm that apparently kept raccoons and squirrels away, my grandparents were avid birdwatchers. I cant vouch for it actually working to that effect.

    None the less, the noise was not noticeable to the older people but annoyed the hell out of me and the other children, it's kinda like leaving a tv on mute in a really quite room, but way more intense.

    --
    I could see the truth if I was blind.
  25. OUTGOING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HELLO WORLD
    16491 16491
    HELLO WORLD
    45500 45500 58736 58736 83113 83113 63228 63228 24143 24143
    63684 63684 33322 33322 98341 98341 28562 28562 23658 23658
    38667 38667 82268 82268 40076 40076 20675 20675 19709 19709
    21489 21489 61784 61784 70268 70268 15745 15745 41487 41487
    20535 20535 67031 67031 06108 06108 66637 66637 11827 11827
    05729 05729 06724 06724 78581 78581 61855 61855 22558 22558
    33079 33079 80157 80157 34840 34840 77058 77058 51843 51843
    69724 69724
    K-BYE

  26. WTF by eklitzke · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while you run across a Slashdot story that just makes you wonder WTF?!?! This, ladies (?) and gentleman, is one of those stories.

    --
    #include ".signature"
  27. Hahaha!! by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is EXACTLY what I pulled in my undergraduate 'Modern Electronics' class. When we used small speakers I could adjust the frequency to a positively epilepsy inducing sound (especially if you ran the speakers on square wave functions with slight frequency scanning) that caused most of my classmates considerable discomfort but my professor (a fan of loud and live rock shows) could hear nothing. The best part is that he was proud that he was "immune" even though it indicates the beginnings of hearing loss.

    1. Re:Hahaha!! by akgoatley · · Score: 0, Informative

      > The best part is that he was proud that he was "immune" even though it indicates the beginnings of hearing loss.

      No it doesn't; the upper frequency limit on human hearing naturally decreases from around the onset of adolescence. It doesn't mark the onset of hearing loss at all, at any normal frequency.

      Ashton

      --
      (-(friend^2))^(1/2)
      Incoming mod-bombing for having a different viewpoint, 2 o'clock! Heads up!
    2. Re:Hahaha!! by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

      well I guess I should have said that it marks the gradual and very nautural hearing loss that makes all of this possible.... as we get older the finer 'hairs' in our inner ears that detect high pitched frequencies wear out first. This is why teens hear sounds many oldsters dont.

    3. Re:Hahaha!! by voidware · · Score: 1

      I TA an electronics lab with lax attendance policy. Just yesterday, I pulled this stunt to get the stragglers to leave early. Worked like a charm. Those function generators can really put out a lot of power.

  28. Corey Doctorow Already Did This by FireWyrm · · Score: 1

    In chapter 3 of his story "Themepunks."
    Link to chapter 3 of themepunks on Salon.com

    Unfortunately, you have to watch ads to read salon.

  29. Biological or Environmental? by ajax0187 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does this really work because they're teenagers, or because they just haven't lost the upper levels of their hearing? I remember reading that we can (originally) hear up to 30,000 Hz, but as we get exposed to loud noises, we gradually get more and more deaf as our ears lose more and more of their capability. Something like the first concert you go to cuts out the upper 2000 Hz of your hearing. Which brings up an interesting point - will this work on teens exposed to so much loud noises (music, lots of concerts, construction, trains, etc.) that it just won't work on them?

    By the way, a great role model for fathers everywhere:

    "Okay honey, how much does this hurt?"

    BZZZZT!!!!

    "Ah, turn it off, turn it off!!"

    "In a second honey. Daddy has to hurt you to show how much he loves you. Now, how about this?"

    BZZZZT!!!

    "AHHHHHH!"

    --
    "By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth." - George Carlin
    1. Re:Biological or Environmental? by jhines · · Score: 3, Informative

      A little of both. The horizontal scanning frequency is 15,750 Hz (I think) and some but not all teens could hear it. I could, and going into a TV store would drive me nuts. Time and lots of rock and roll has cured that problem, and I no longer hear the TV sound.

      So yes sound wave could be tuned so that some, but not all could hear it. You might annoy some adults, and be ignored by other kids.

    2. Re:Biological or Environmental? by uc_nuhrd · · Score: 1

      Which brings up an interesting point - will this work on teens exposed to so much loud noises (music, lots of concerts, construction, trains, etc.) that it just won't work on them?

      That's a good question. Mr. Bush, do you think you could field this one?

    3. Re:Biological or Environmental? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      "Since our goal is to have every person in the middle east using big loud guns against the gawdless infidels who threaten our national security and oil supply, we don't think high frequency noises and noise pollution will be much of a threat in our vision for the future."

      -- G.Dubbyah Shrub

    4. Re:Biological or Environmental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they havnt lost hearing in the upper levels. At home we've got a device that pulses electronic signals through our wall sockets, its supposed to keep bugs and small animals away (seems every time I rip it out of the wall a possum dies under the house :p). Annoys the fuck out of me and my friends, but my parents dont seem to notice it at all.

    5. Re:Biological or Environmental? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's children and young women who on the average can hear the highest frequencies, testosterone causes hearing decline for males starting at age 17. 22KHz is usually given for upper limit of human hearing, but some people can hear sounds much higher than even the 30KHz you mention. My hearing used to go into upper 20KHz until about age 30, I worked at national lab that tested hearing periodically. Even now in my early 40's I can hear shriek of vibration of horizontal sweep transformers in TVs and whine of little fans they put in some small network switches though top of my range is less than 20Khz now.

    6. Re:Biological or Environmental? by eh2o · · Score: 1

      AFAIK 20khz is about the upper limit for human hearing at any age. Animals such as cats can hear up to about 30khz. According to some experimental data, lab animals exposed to noise causing a temporary hearing loss (e.g., fully recovered after one week) suffered severe loss much later in life. This would tend to imply that teens exposed to excessive noise will not suffer the consequence until many years later.

    7. Re:Biological or Environmental? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      20kHz is the accepted limit of human hearing.

      In reality most people only precieve up to 18k and can barely hear about 14k or 16k or so.

      At birth the average upper range of hearing is anywhere between 18k-22k.

      Not all people that are deaf are deaf due to noise induced hearing loss.

      The fluid in the basilier membrane can sometimes harden prematurely but more often than not it simply hardens with age. This is behind the choclea deep inside the ear. I am sure there is more research you can do on this if you are interested.

      While I was in college studying as an audio engineer I was a memeber of the Audio Engineering Society. We would have frequent guests come in and once we had an audiologist. Here is some of the information she gave us:

      Smokers are twice as likely to suffer from hearing loss as smoking reduces the oxygen levels in and around the ears.

      Beer, salt, chocolate, and caffeine are the worst types of food that can be eaten in terms of its affect on the ears.

      Caffeine is a stimulant and speeds up blood pressure and the effects from caffeine intake usually subside after about 3 days of absence. This of course includes sodas, coffee, tea, etc etc

      Aspirin, anti-inflammatory agents, and any type of steroids can be detrimental in the long run as well. She suggests ibuprofen over anything if something must be taken for pain or headaches. Aspirin will significantly increase the possibility for tinnitus also.

      Most hearing damage occurs in the range of 2-4k as 2.7k is near the resonant frequency of the ear canal. Speech reception is not impaired until there is about a 30dB loss of hearing

      Usually 4-43% of classical musicians usually experience loss throughout the course of their professional careers. 13-50% of rockers usually experience hearing loss.

      She also mentioned a phenomenon known as Temporary Threshold Shift (TTS). TTS occurs when repeated exposure to high SPLs tend to increase our threshold for intelligibility. In other words after a show with high SPL's, people generally have to speak louder to be heard. If TTS is repeated often enough it can become permanent.

      TTS will usually dissipate after 3 or 4 days however along with TTS high SPLs increase heart rate thus possibly leading to headaches and irritation.

      Of course she says never use a "Q-Tip" to clean the ears as anyone with more than 2 brain cells is aware of. She actually has patients that have punctured their ear drums with these things before. As a matter of fact she has a large sign in her office with a photo of a "Q-Tip" and an X through it.

      This is her website:
      http://hearubetter.com/about1.htm

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    8. Re:Biological or Environmental? by cory_p82 · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what this post was supposed to be... but it contains quite a number of factual inaccuracies. While the audiologist identified here is an expert, the notes you have are rather inaccurate. A few corrections are noted here: 1. The fluid in the scala media (endolymphatic fluid) and scala tympani (perilymphatic fluid), which house the basilar membrane within the cochlea, does NOT harden. Sensory hearing loss is caused by damage/loss of hair cells due to a variety of different causes. 2. "Smokers are twice as likely to suffer from hearing loss as smoking reduces the oxygen levels in and around the ears." -- This has not been substantiated by ANY research. It is pure speculation... and is wildly inaccurate. 3. Beer, salt, caffeine and chocolate are agents which have an impact on the ear. They do not have an impact on hearing, except for in some people with a certain disorder (Meniere's syndrome secondary to endolymphatic hydrops of the cochlea). They may have some influence on tinnitis. 4. Large doses of aspirin are ototoxic (dangerous to the ear). Think on the order of 8 aspirin per day. It is a temporary toxicity, with hearing restoring following the termination of the drug. Tinnitus may be permanent. 5. Temporary threshold shifts (TTS) resolve within 12 hours of noise exposure.

    9. Re:Biological or Environmental? by cory_p82 · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what this post was supposed to be... but it contains quite a number of factual inaccuracies. While the audiologist identified here is an expert, the notes from her sessions are rather inaccurate. A few corrections are noted here:

      1. The fluid in the scala media (endolymphatic fluid) and scala tympani (perilymphatic fluid), which house the basilar membrane within the cochlea, does NOT harden. Sensory hearing loss is caused by damage/loss of hair cells due to a variety of different causes.

      2. "Smokers are twice as likely to suffer from hearing loss as smoking reduces the oxygen levels in and around the ears." -- This has not been substantiated by ANY research. It is pure speculation... and is wildly inaccurate.

      3. Beer, salt, caffeine and chocolate are agents which have an impact on the ear. They do not have an impact on hearing, except for in some people with a certain disorder (Meniere's syndrome secondary to endolymphatic hydrops of the inner ear). They may have some influence on tinnitis.

      4. Large doses of aspirin are ototoxic (dangerous to the ear). Think on the order of 8 aspirin per day. It is a temporary toxicity, with hearing restoring following the termination of the drug. Tinnitus may be permanent.

      5. Temporary threshold shifts (TTS) resolve within 12 hours of noise exposure.

    10. Re:Biological or Environmental? by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      Although teens are mentioned specifically, I imagine this would work on young children too. But that's not as good of a selling point.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    11. Re:Biological or Environmental? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      #1 - You might be correct... perhaps it is the basilar membrane itself that hardens and not the fluid inside. It has been a while since I have studied this and my memory is shady.

      #2 - Those were the words straight out of the mouth of the audiologist. I am not a medical expert so I cannot intelligently debate this point.

      #3 and #4 - Wouldn't some of these items increase the blood pressure or in the case of aspirin thin your blood? And with my understanding of tinnitis it is this increased bloodflow near the ear drum which causes the ringing, or beating sensation? If that is the case, then it will absolutely increase the effects of tinnitis.

      I am curious as to your education on this subject. Mine is secondary as my focus wasn't specifically hearing, but audio engineering which is not the same subject obviously. To work with sound you do not have to have a complete understanding of how hearing works, simply a fundamental grasp of the concepts involved. I am of course always interested in learning more.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    12. Re:Biological or Environmental? by cory_p82 · · Score: 1

      Sorry... I guess I wasn't totally clear... I'm a Ph.D. student in Audiology, meaning that I have background in physiology/hearing science as well as clinical aspects (hearing loss, treatment). I do research specifically in noise-induced hearing loss. I'm working on MP3 player output levels at the moment...

      As to your question about #3,4... that is a current speculation as to the additive properties of aspirin to tinnitus. However, tinnitus is typically idiopathic, meaning that it has no cause. Aspirin is related, but not causal at all. If you sever the auditory nerve, for example, tinnitis usually remains, indicating that it is central (brain). As to bloodflow, we're typically talking near the cochlea, not near the eardrum. You can have tinnitis caused by vascular problems in the middle ear (glomus tumor, for example)... which is real and caused, essentially, by hearing your own heart beat.

      Unfortunately, tinnitis is a ridiculously difficult subject. I recommend the American Tinnitis Association's website for more info...

      Some other links...

      There are many more on the web, too!

    13. Re:Biological or Environmental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am amazed to hear so many people remark that they can hear TV and computer screens squealing. I have never met anyone else who could besides myself. Plenty of people seemed to think I was crazy; and I sometimes wondered myself.
      I am 44 and can still hear computer screens squeal; when I am the last one left at work and one computer is still on almost anywhere on the floor it just about drives me crazy. When everyone is there and there is lots of background noise it doesn't bother me, but if all else is quiet and one bloody computer is squealing away I have to hunt the bastard down and turn it off.
      I guess that this system would probably prevent me from actually shopping at the store which is probably not what they wanted to achieve. The description of the noise sounds intolerable, even for a short time, to me.

    14. Re:Biological or Environmental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are actually two forms of tinnitis. As the other poster mentioned, the most common one is ideopathic, and no physical changes will change anything. The other is due to physical defects in the ear (the cause of cases where other people can hear the tinnitis as well) and can be affected by changes in blood flow.

  30. What's next by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Grating's in front keep out the old people?

    people old enough may recall the unfortunate IBM dumb-terminals that had a 15Khz flyback transformer. The over-30 crowd could no hear it, but I couldn't stand to be in the same room with one. Some early color TVs were the same way.

    But of course you could do this with your laptop. Might be handy at airports to keep those unwashed roaming children from sliming your precious personal space. Or for torturing the whiney brat kicking your chair in the next row of the air plane.

    Hey maybe you could use this during exams in class set it at a sub audible level and sub consciously increase everyones anxiety level three notches. Supposedly church pipe organs have some stops to produce the same effect in the worshippers. Be sure to wear your noise canceling head phones tuned to that frequency.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:What's next by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Early color TVs? Try a lot of current TVs too. Don't forget CRT monitors. Some days it was hell working in the electronics department. If the customers weren't making enough background noise or it was a slow day the sound would nearly drive me nuts. I'm over 20 now but I can still hear most of this stuff because I'm not a big fan of loude music or loud noises.

  31. Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats next? Electric child prods? Shock collars?

  32. useless by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will have no effect on the metal heads and punk fans who go to loud shows who also happen to be the people buying it want to drive away anyways.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:useless by dartarrow · · Score: 1

      So nightwish fans are safe from this? We get loud music and high Frequency vocals.... :D

      --
      I love humanity, it is people I hate
    2. Re:useless by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? Most if not all metalheads I've met (and I've met quite a bunch) were among the most mellow, meek, polite and tolerant people I've ever met.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    3. Re:useless by leobh · · Score: 1

      Actually, if this is in Britain, which it is, the people who will have been causing the shop owner trouble would be chavs; absolutely no doubt about it. Chavs don't listen to metal or punk, rather house or drum and bass, which funnily enough is probably even more likely to render the listener incapable of hearing high frequencies. Metalheads and punks aren't antisocial though; not very sociable, granted, but that just means they're even less likely to be hanging around a shop. Such people are few in number. Chavs on the otherhand, for whom a generation is 15-20 years, are not. :)

    4. Re:useless by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i'm not saying metalheads are actually bad, just that they embody what the anti-youth blue hairs want to go away

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  33. erm... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of radio stations that could have the exact same effect: oldies, big band, country... :-)

    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
  34. Reminds me of a guy I knew... by ChePibe · · Score: 5, Funny

    This reminds me of a guy I knew once who kept an opera CD in his far-too-tricked-out-for-an-old-man car stereo. Only he optimized his stereo for treble rather than bass.

    Everytime a low-rider came next to his car at a stop light thumping away, he opened his windows and cranked some good ol' Italian opera out to screw with them. He told me he never could quite drown them out, but quite a few did turn down their stereos to try and figure out what the crazy old man next to them was doing...

    1. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    2. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local shopping centre ("mall", sorry) had a problem with youth loitering near one of the entrances at one time. I noticed they started piping classical music to that area. Solved the loitering problem (and didn't offend anyone with an ounce of taste).

    3. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Only he optimized his stereo for treble rather than bass.

      And this guy is far more likely to get fined by your local police because most of those car noise ord. have something stating if the car audio is clearly audible at X amount of feet. A thumping bass truck, you can't hear the lyrics instead or a few feet from the car, any car that has treble optimized than you should be able to hear that a good long distance away, which means that you ought to warn your friend that he should tune into what ever his local cops like to hear. ;)

    4. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      When I was stationed in San Diego in the early 90s, my roommate had a early-80s Chrysler Fifth Avenue - gold, with tinted windows - sporting a ridiculous amount of audio wattage. We used to cruise through the bad neighborhoods (that is, the ones near the crappy apartment we could afford) blasting George Strait.

      People never really knew how to react to two clean-cut white kids in a ghetto cruiser, shaking the ground with country anthems. I guess they figured we were stupid, crazy, or incredibly bad-ass (answer: the first one).

      Some people liked it, though. We'd get smiles and shouts of "turn it up, white boy!" fairly often.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done that! I think I'm the only teen who actually LIKES Classical and Opera. Whenever my dormmates thump out the rap, I reply with "O Fortuna" "The Great Gate at Kiev" or maybe the "Anvil Chorus". There's nothing like turning up the bass and down the treble and making people FEEL Verdi (willing or not).

    6. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by Ranger · · Score: 1

      I want a car mounted directional EMP device. Next time I sit at a stoplight next to one of those thumpers, I would point it at their vehicle, press the button and their car would go dead. I'd zap em just as the light turned green and I started accelerating. I would also mount one on the roof of the house. It would only zap them once they were well past the house. It would be better if it could just selectively fry their stereo system but leave the car running.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    7. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Dorm-based musical retaliation? One word.

      Bagpipes.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    8. Re:Reminds me of a guy I knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be easy, as the radio has an antenna and the engine computer doesn't.
      Or SHOULD be easy, since many modern cars have wires between (OEM) radio and engine computer.

      However, in my area, the people with the booming stereos are usually the ones who DESERVE a fried car.

      This has long been on my drawing board...

  35. HELLO? RTFA!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good idea is to RTFA before you post (although I should know better then to tell someone to RTFA on slashdot). Give it a try sometime.

  36. Horrible and Disgusting by JustinCEO · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is a morally repugnant and disgusting device. Think of the implications of this device: an entire age group of people, both good and bad, ambitious and aimless, hardworking and lazy, are, irrespective of who they are, and entirely based on their age, are being treated like animals or pests to be driven away. Not to mention it apparently doesn't work very well according to the summary. I can only wonder if technology had advanced in our society a little faster than our morality did if hucksters would have been marketing "Negro Repellent Devices" to the discriminating and gullible bastards of an earlier era. Shameful.

    1. Re:Horrible and Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point. This is about teenagers. NOBODY likes teenagers - just ask the emo kids.

    2. Re:Horrible and Disgusting by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      It's not really based on age. It's more based on "haven't blown out their hearing yet".

    3. Re:Horrible and Disgusting by yoda133113 · · Score: 1

      No it really isn't, the teenagers who aren't a problem are most likely not the ones that are loitering outside of the store, they just get a second of this tops as they walk inside, and as they leave, so it doesn't prevent anything as far as law abiding teens go, just the ones that loiter are really affected.

      And just a note, I am 21 so I am in the age group that is potentially affected.

  37. this country is strange by hansoloaf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is this country so anti-teenager? We got the "coveted marketing demographics" of late teen to young adult that the tv networks and pretty much a lot of companies go for. Yet as a group, teenagers sure are very ostracized, looked down, and picked on. I'm sure there are some bad seeds but for the vast majority, I'm sure there are good kids. You got all these anti-cruising laws, school crackdowns, and now this. Shouldn't we be cherishing and nuturing them instead? I'm sure the Army would like to use this device to get them shepherded to the nearest recuriting office.

    1. Re:this country is strange by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is this country so anti-teenager?

      They don't buy enough CDs or go to enough movies.

    2. Re:this country is strange by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      That's the thing. The teenagers are ostracized. And then the media -- who gets a hundred times the exposure to their malleable brains that their parents do -- tells them that they can fit in by being consumerist whores. Their minds aren't yet ready to reject that hollow twist of logic, so they spend everything they earn.

      This is a relatively new thing. In the past, a young man or woman would have saved every penny they could make so they could start their married life with property, or at least a little savings. Now, they can spend 100% of their income from working at the pretzel stand as if it were discretionary. I've known a lot of people (including a younger version of myself) who have had a hard time saving money because of these habits encouraged by corporate america.

      By the way, I'm 25, and I've recently outgrown a lot of the consumerism, started saving more money, and living financially responsibly... Now, if I could just break free of the gadget-buying habits!

      Jasin Natael
      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    3. Re:this country is strange by Sithech · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is this country so anti-teenager?

      Uh, more correctly, why is society so anti-males-between-age-10-and-30?

      The extreme concentration of crime and other antisocial behavior in that demographic might be relevant.

      The US in particular does a lousy job of handling the maturing of its males as shown by a number of measures - including grades, incarceration rate, mortality rate, and vulnerability to military recruiting pitches. However, it's not politically viable to treat them as a vulnerable population. (Not to just pick on the US, the Brits have plenty of trouble with yobs n hoodies, and the French have had very public problems with the Muslem young male population recently)

      An 18 and 19 year old pair of chums just got arrested in Northern California for throwing baseball sized rocks from their car window into oncoming traffic while driving home drunk from a casino at 60 mph. One of the victims is still having surgery on his face, being treated for a broken jaw, and has lost an eye. A couple dozen cars were damaged as well. Sorry, but 50 year old women aren't nearly as likely to do crap like this as 10-30 year old males.

    4. Re:this country is strange by Frozentech · · Score: 1

      If by "this country" you meant Wales, then I guess I'll agree, though I've never been there. You were talking about the country in the article, yes ?

    5. Re:this country is strange by shoolz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If a group of 45 year-olds start hanging around a storefront cursing, drinking, stealing, and deterring the attendance of honest paying customers, and the shop owner takes steps to deter the presence of those 45 year-olds, would you be claiming that the shop owner is anti-adult?

    6. Re:this country is strange by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      would you be claiming that the shop owner is anti-adult?

      If he's basing his treatment of ALL 45 year olds based on 1% of the population of 45 year olds that come by his store, then yes, the owner is anti-adult and a jackass. Next?

    7. Re:this country is strange by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the media for this one. Any parent worth his or her salt will do their best instill a sense of monetary responsibility in their offspring. Some kids catch on, and some don't. Myself, I've always saved money; even as a kid I'd think long and hard about spending any money I received as a gift. As long as I've been employed, I've never had my monetary outflow exceed my income (with the exception of car and student loans). In short, I know how to save money.

      Now take my brother. Same parents, same media influence, but he spends money like it's burning a hole in his pocket. I've lost track of the number of times he's overdrawn his checking account. So the big question is, how much is nature, and how much is nurture?

    8. Re:this country is strange by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      Um, how often are siblings exactly the same though? This "we had the same parents so we had the same life" thing makes no sense. My sister's led quite a different life from me even excluding the fact that I'm an introverted geek and shes a Miss Popularity dancing queen.

    9. Re:this country is strange by sugarboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Shouldn't we be cherishing and nuturing them instead?
      First time I read this I read "Shouldn't we be chasing them an neutering them instead?"
    10. Re:this country is strange by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      I was merely pointing out that if it were simply a case of external influences, then we wouldn't have ended up with such different attitudes. So saying that the media, an external influence, is to blame is just plain wrong. Media may have some influence, but the question I posed at the end of my post was, "how much?"

    11. Re:this country is strange by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What country? The story takes place in Wales.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    12. Re:this country is strange by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      The owner is not taking steps to deter the presence of loiters. He's taking steps to deter the presence of teens. If in your example, he did take steps to get rid of 45 year-olds, he'd be facing a discrimenation suit.

    13. Re:this country is strange by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the media for consumerism?! Are you completely dumb, or just partially? Marketing is an entire subject dedicated to getting the average person hyped up to buy just about anything. Companies employ armies of salespeople and marketing gurus in order to convince you that you can't possibly live without brand x. Kids grow up in this overenergized, spend-crazy culture which parents can not block out. The media is to blame for this.

    14. Re:this country is strange by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      When the issue in question is teenagers blowing all of their money on stuff that they don't really need just because they think that they need all of the stuff to be "cool", then no, I don't blame the media. I blame the teenagers for not engaging their brains, and I blame the parents for not teaching their kids how to handle money.

      Of course advertisements are going to present their product in the best possible light. They're going to do their best to convince you that you need "brand x", as you said. But advertisers aren't brainwashing people into buying stuff, for crying out loud. It's not like television commercials are some sort of irresistible force. Anyone who is so thoroughly convinced to buy whatever is being advertised, to the point that they end up spending all of their money while setting none aside for later, is someone who, quite frankly, is either an idiot, or who has absolutely no willpower, neither of which is the fault of the media.

    15. Re:this country is strange by LionKimbro · · Score: 1
      Good question. So, what do you think?

      Quick guesses:

      • After 2nd wave feminism, men & the patriarchy were considered bad guys. And not entirely without reason, considering relative crime rates and what not.
      • Perhaps there is little to no place for male sexuality, until the age of, say, 22 years old. Perhaps women have an easier time at having sex at 15 than men do, regardless of law. Speaking of law, a 15 year old male will suffer rape charges, a 15 year old female will not. I think we just pretty much expect that men are criminals. Is this not unjustified?
      • Lack of positive role models? I think not: Movies are full of positive role models for males. That said, these positive role models usually feature violence.


      Perhaps men have been violent for the last 100+ years, and nothing has changed. Perhaps there hasn't been a positive role for men for the last 100+ years. Perhaps we males are just suffering from karmic balancing.

      What do we want males to be? What would you, as a male, want to be?

      ("Respected," my mind shouts out.) Not being portrayed as an idiot would be a nice start. I'm afraid that the stereotypes are working against us.

      I can conceive of a sub-culture forming it's own vision, it's own ideals, of what men would be. Or rather, a set of options for men- it couldn't be just 1 thing, realistically. We need archetypes.

      But speaking for myself, I'm just glad I had a daughter; So that-- I don't have to think about these things.

      Boys can just shoot each other, for all I care. (..!) Strange that I should be so callous about it. But then, isn't that a big part of what being a man is all about?
    16. Re:this country is strange by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      As I live in the city, I see this all the time. Of course, here we call the 45 year old cursing, drinking, stealing customer-deterrents bums. ;)

    17. Re:this country is strange by m50d · · Score: 1

      No. But if the shop owner deploys a water cannon that shoots anyone over 45 who hangs around too long but ignores anyone under that age, I would certainly call that anti-adult. And I've seen shops accused of being anti-OAP over far less than this.

      --
      I am trolling
    18. Re:this country is strange by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      45 year-old loiters in front of a store. Store owner calls the police. Cop comes by, talks to the loiterer. If he doesn't leave, cop puts loiterer in the back of his car, takes him to the station where there is the potential of having to show up for Big Peoples' Court, where the punishment will probably be fines, maybe community service, or at worst a few days a in jail.

      15 year-old loiters in front of a store. Store owner calls the police. Cop comes by, talks to the loiterer. If he doesn't leave, cop puts loiterer in the back of his car, takes him to the station where he will catch flack from parents who couldn't be bothered until they started getting calls from the police, when said parents start screaming about the mistreatment of their "baby" or their "little angel." There is the potential of having to show up for Little Peoples' Court, where the punishment will probably be writing an essay.

      Which one do you think the cop will be more likely to bother bringing back to the station, the one for whom there is potential for actual punishment, or the one for whom the worst punishment possible is the cop showing up?

      If people here are going to complain about the separate standard used for teenagers as opposed to legal adults, then you should also complain about the way they are coddled by law enforcement until day #6574.

    19. Re:this country is strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame the media for consumerism?! Are you completely dumb, or just partially?

      If you are old enough to read, and still believe the media, you are the one who is dumb.
      Please quit blaming everyone and everything except yourself for your failings.*

      *Offer void in Kalifornia, where "blame others" is the state motto.

    20. Re:this country is strange by SpinJaunt · · Score: 1
      They don't buy enough CDs or go to enough movies.
      Be alright if half the stuff was worth listening to or worth watching.

      So fed-up with tired old re-makes/re-releases of old classics.
      --
      /. is good for you.
    21. Re:this country is strange by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      That "coddling" is, unfortunately, the fairest thing to do. If you want to treat them as legal adults, fine - let them vote. Then they'll have a say in the laws and you can hold them 100% accountable for their violations. But as long as they're subjects instead of citizens, it's nothing short of barbaric to hold them fully accountable for breaking laws made by a government that doesn't care about their consent.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    22. Re:this country is strange by Sapphon · · Score: 1
      Why is this country so anti-teenager?

      They don't buy enough CDs or go to enough movies.


      You are kidding, right? Who do you think buys the crap manufactured pop acts puts out? It isn't the discerning 20-something, no; it's the 14-year old teenybopper with "pester power". Young children and teenagers have an incredible amount of control over purchasing decision, even if they don't make the purchases themselves.

      Who buys those god-awful ringtones and associated bollocks for their mobiles? Who racks up (their parents') phone bills voting on reality shows? Who floods in to the formulaic summer movies every year? It's not the post-teens, no-sirree. It's the teens with their young, malleable minds that are open to simple suggestive techniques and mass marketing - as applied by CD and Movie distributors.

      A valid point in relation to the article would be that the owners of most shops are anti-teenager, because teens don't frequent Bob's Bait Store or Tyrone's Kitchen Emporium with any intent to buy. But CD's and movies? No way.
      --
      Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
    23. Re:this country is strange by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Why is this country so anti-teenager?

      And why do people still ask this question, generation after generation? Nothing new to see here. Go back 20,000 years and you'd find and older caveman bitching about the new blood.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:this country is strange by Snaller · · Score: 1

      They are anti assholes - if that happens to be teenagers, then so be it. RTFA they hang around and harass customers.

      Pity its illegal to just shoot them!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    25. Re:this country is strange by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      But it's not just about *those* 45 year-olds, is it? It's about *all* 45 year-olds. If a bunch of people hang out in front of your store and interfere with your legitimate business, by all means, get rid of them, no matter what age they are, but don't go around claiming that *all* people of the same age group are like that. That's just age-ism, for lack of a better word.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    26. Re:this country is strange by vrai · · Score: 2, Informative
      Except that in most of the UK's small towns it isn't 1% of teenager population that are the problem, it's nearer to 50%. They've been brought up without any attempt to discipline them and with an excessive focus on their "rights". As such they believe that they have the right to do anything and the right to assault anybody who tries to stop them.

      I've witnessed a gang of kids being herded in to a Police van after being arrested for dropping concrete blocks on to a busy motorway. You've never seen a more angry bunch; they were livid that the Police had put an end to their little game. Their complaints alternated between "You can't do this!" and, comically, "I've got rights!". Sadly, despite attempting to murder a number of motorists, they were probably released with a caution.

      Thanks to these poor, oppressed little dears the centre of many UK towns are no-go areas after 10pm. Anything that allows law abiding, tax paying citizens to protect their business from these little shits is to be applauded.

    27. Re:this country is strange by CFTM · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite simple, teens arn't allowed to vote thus they have no say. Why are issues like Social Security and Medicaid/Medicare always talked about during election years? Because it is proven that older people, particularly retirees, take an aggressive interest in politics and make sure their voice is heard. It's a sticky situation because some might argue that giving teens a vote simply enables the parents to have another chance to vote along their politcal lines plus I hardly care about politcs now and I'm 24 I can't imagine a situation where at 15 I would have been the least bit interested in politics. They have no votes so they have no champions, welcome to a democracy.

    28. Re:this country is strange by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      Why is this country so anti-teenager?

      Which country? The device in the article is being used in the UK.

    29. Re:this country is strange by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      But advertisers aren't brainwashing people into buying stuff, for crying out loud.

      Have you seen commercials? They're everywhere on TV, radio, billboards, products, the web, and email. By the time a person is old enough to become a teenager, they've literally been inundated with millions of these product messages. The advertisers are, in effect, brainwashing society. The Propaganda Minister of the Third Reich, Dr Joseph Goebbels, said, "Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth." That lie only becomes more ingrained repeated a million times over decades.

      Anyone who is so thoroughly convinced to buy whatever is being advertised, to the point that they end up spending all of their money while setting none aside for later, is someone who, quite frankly, is either an idiot, or who has absolutely no willpower, neither of which is the fault of the media.

      Given the current, almost nonexistant savings rate of the US, we must be surrounded by idiots. That may certainly be possible and I've certainly thought that on occasion.

      Or, it could be that all the trillions of dollars that companies poured into marketing their products over the last 100 years actually worked... No, it couldn't possibly be that. No, everyone in America must be an idiot or weak-willed. Companies are not out to get our every dollar... How could I possibly think that?!

      Geez... quit drinking the kool-aid, open your eyes, and see reality for what it actually is.

    30. Re:this country is strange by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      I've witnessed a gang of kids being herded in to a Police van after being arrested for dropping concrete blocks on to a busy motorway. You've never seen a more angry bunch; they were livid that the Police had put an end to their little game. Their complaints alternated between "You can't do this!" and, comically, "I've got rights!". Sadly, despite attempting to murder a number of motorists, they were probably released with a caution.
      Exactly !

      And there are moves afoot to raise the age of criminal responsibilty too ! I can't imagine anyone over the age of 10 not knowing that chucking a rock through a shop window is wrong, likewise murder, theft etc etc.(ie criminal offences)

      Yet, of course they do have rights and so we have to treat them like children even though they disrespect the law and us simultaneously.

      There are still attempts to ban parents smacking their children. Firstly, obviously I wouldn't condone beating a child to any degree. That's why it's called smacking. Used judiciously at a fairly early age (say 5 or 6 ), it can prevent a lot of later problems. Also, because the kids are young, (a) you don't have to smack very hard at all, it's all mental effect and (b) the child associates the action and punishment in a much simpler way, no simmering anger to take out on someone else later.

      An example I would give for useful smacking is when for instance, you find the kid has partially worked loose an electrical plug and is sticking things in the gap. A surprise attack (laugh, it's funny) and quick smack would scare them silly, and that's what I would want. Together with an explanation of why you did it of course.

      Being young and impressionable, hopefully the kid would associate electrical sockets with being hurt and very surprised. A lot less painful than doing it the hard way, and when they are old enough to understand why its a dumb thing to do, they will have forgotten the original smack anyway. Seems a sensible approach to me.

      Basically, if the kid does something that scares me silly, and I see it happening, then they should learn right then, while they are doing it. Giving them a telling off later, just spreads the bad feelings around when it's no longer fresh and relevant. They should only be in fear of punishment if they are doing something wrong, not their whole lives.

      Which brings me back to the original point. Instead of fucking with peoples hearing, why don't they just call the police. The police can get the names and addresses of the kids involved, phone the parents, and inform them that they can collect their kids from the police station. Few kids will be able to live with that for too long. Of course we are talking about the UK where the police are far too busy to actually attend such a small incident, even though we pay them to do exactly that.

    31. Re:this country is strange by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

      So you're saying to hell with the other 50+% who aren't a problem? They should be forced away from public sidewalks and stores by painful noises just because they're the same age as the troublemakers?

      If there are too many teenagers causing problems, the laws ought to be toughened and the police ought to crack down. Punish the ones who are committing the crimes, not innocent people.

      What other groups are we going to start to penalize for sharing some nominal characteristics with the bad apples? Do we ban all poor people from stores because crime is more prevalent amongst the poor? Do we ban all older people from driving an automobile because plenty of the elderly can't see so well anymore? No - we target the ones who have proven themselves to be a problem (arrests or failed vision tests, in these two examples). And that's as it should be. Punishing whole categories of people for the actions of a subset is not justice - it's an assault on, yes, the *rights* of law-abiding citizens.

    32. Re:this country is strange by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite simple, teens arn't allowed to vote thus they have no say....They have no votes so they have no champions, welcome to a democracy.

      What makes this pathetic is that kids aren't responsible enough to vote, but they are held as responsible as adults for crime. Complete BS.

    33. Re:this country is strange by gmkeegan · · Score: 1

      I've witnessed a gang of kids being herded in to a Police van after being arrested for dropping concrete blocks on to a busy motorway. You've never seen a more angry bunch; they were livid that the Police had put an end to their little game. Their complaints alternated between "You can't do this!" and, comically, "I've got rights!". Sadly, despite attempting to murder a number of motorists, they were probably released with a caution.

      Is it just me, or did anyone else flash back to Clockwork Orange when reading this? I had thought all these years that it was just a strongly exaggerated work of fiction, but now I'm not so sure...

      "I flipped out years ago, I only look sane."

    34. Re:this country is strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nuturing?"

      Ahh, neutering. That could work. . .

  38. TTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Toronto, we used to have a problem with teen gangs hanging around the Kennedy subway station. The solution to this? The TTC started playing classical music over the loudspeakers. Pow, the gangs were gone, plus it was actually quite nice for those of us that enjoy classical music.

    The only thing to watch out for now would be gangs that listen to classical music. Care for a bit of Ludwig Van?

    1. Re:TTC by loraksus · · Score: 1

      The CBC had a pretty good documentary that aired in August-ish that took a look at the subway musicians in areas that don't have the classical music playing. You actually have to audition for spots and there are some excellent musicians who make some nice coin for playing (and from refferals from side gigs)
      I can't find a link (although it should still be available if you look through a couple documentary binary newsgroups if you have 14 day retention) but the ttc has information about it here.

      You may of have heard of Subway Elvis - archive footage from the 70's

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:TTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      The only thing to watch out for now would be gangs that listen to classical music.


      That East Coast classical is weak shit. I only blast J-$trau$$, Big Daddy Brahmzz & the Eastside Quartet, and The Notorious M.O.Z. in my ride.

      Rest in peace, 2-Bach.

    3. Re:TTC by kavau · · Score: 1

      Congratulations to the TTC. They have replaced a gang of harmless good-for-nothing teenagers with a bit of the old ultra-violence.

    4. Re:TTC by gotw · · Score: 1

      My local train station always used to play classical music at night, and I always wondered why. It was rather remeniscent of Auschwitz, though.

    5. Re:TTC by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is being used over here in Germany in several cities. Apparently it not only keeps gangs away, but also drug dealers, bums and other folks who loiter around at train and subway stations.

      I wonder if that says more about these people or about the music.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:TTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You need to watch "A Clockwork Orange"

    7. Re:TTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Score: -1, Duh!

      You really think he used the phrase "Care for a bit of Ludwig Van?" without it being a blatant reference to Clockwork Orange?

      Moron.

  39. Re:LOL by Wizarth · · Score: 1

    Your talking about eardrum carnage, at a teen concert?

    Why would they bother using a device, just use the concerts sound system to carry the sound. The device itself isn't anything special.

  40. Small mammal repellent by AdamTrace · · Score: 1

    My parents have a noise emitting device under their deck to keep away skunks and possums. It also keeps me away, because I can hear the very high pitched whine and they can't.

    I'm 30 years old, so hardly a teenager. Maybe I just have good hearing?

    1. Re:Small mammal repellent by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      Can I ask how tall you are? Perhaps you just classify as a "small mammal"? Try putting on weight, and see if you still have a problem. :)

  41. No problem by JanneM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just shoplift some earplugs.

    Seriously, this shopkeeper exhibits a view of people that would make me very hesitant to be a customer at his store. He is saying, effectively, that "My interest in you is in your money and nothing else. If you spend money, I love you. If not, you're a creep and should not be in my sight." And, really, that is not the kind of person I'd like to be in any kind of relationship with, be it business of personal.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get of my lawn, pothead.

      No, if you RTFA you'd know that it's to keep kids from loitering outside his store. As a paying customer, I do not appreciate having to walk through/past a crowd of loitering/stoned teenagers.

      He's doing a public service. The guy deserves a medal.

    2. Re:No problem by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Would you want a group of people hanging out in front of your house hurling abuse at you everytime you came home? Or tried to go out?

      That's what these kids are doing to the store owner. There is a reason that there are anti-loitering laws. People don't want to wade through a pack of kids just to get into or out of a store/mall/movie theater/etc.

      My local Barnes and Noble used to have benches out in front of the store, but they quickly became the favorite hangout of the local punk/skater types. Eventually the store removed the benches and posted no loitering signs.

      BTW - It works both ways. Go into some local punk clothing store wearing a pink button down shirt and khakis.. I garauntee you'll get stared at, mostly because everyone will be wondering "wtf is that person doing in here."

      Hang out where you're wanted. It usually works better for everyone.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:No problem by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Would you want a group of people hanging out in front of your house hurling abuse at you everytime you came home? Or tried to go out?

      Of course not. I'm not defending the loitering, just pointing out that I feel the approach to dealing with is not one I am comfortable with (not to disregard the fact that it just tries to deal with a consequence, not its cause).

      There's a couple of aspects to this (including what constututes public space), but the most important, I think, is the one of social dynamics. People want to be where other people are. This goes for adolescents as much as for full adults and children; indeed if anything, it goes for adolescents more than any other. This is not a learned thing; it seems to be pretty much hardwired into us. Gathering is how we learn about each other and about our status in the community - way too important to ignore.

      "Everybody" adult is at work, and within the work environment you have the same dynamic; but children and adolescents - or anybody not an employee - is typically not welcome to "hang around" there. "Everybody" other adolescent is typically at school during weekdays which is a major reason even the most anti-everything screwups usually still choose to sniff their glue at or near the school, not somewhere else. The lure of social dynamics attracts them all. And "everybody" is at the mall/shopping center/downtown (depending on your community structure).

      Of course, the point of malls is to buy things, usually. And adolescents don't as a rule have all that much spending power; certainly not enough to actually go around shopping for hours every day. At the same time, that's the place the social community is centered, where adults do go to shop for groceries, quick after-work meal or whatever.

      So what you get are a lot of teens that want and need to be there (in a quite deep, non-volitional kind of way), but do not have the money (or, really, the inclination) to spend the entire time shopping. This is a fact, and as long as the community structure makes the shopping mall the place where "people" are, this is not going to change. You can try, and you will fail.

      What the mall/high street/whatever store owners should do is make sure there are places in the thick of things, where people - adolescents and pensioners, in different places obviously - can hang without being too much in the way of everybody else. They _are_ going to hang around somewhere in the immediate area no matter what you do, after all. "Natural" streets tend to be better at this; there's usually more in the way of park benches, cheap cafés where you can watch people for hours and so on, but renovated shopping areas, and malls especially, tend to lose it in order to streamline shopping to the exclusion of the other functions of public spaces.

      What this guy is doing (apart from the more personal moral aspects of how to treat people) is just shuffle these teens over to the next store with any kind of potential for doing nothing in particular at. Bruce Schneier has been taling about this approach in terms of security, where you're not making anything more secure, you're just shuffling the problem around.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:No problem by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      Seriously, this shopkeeper exhibits a view of people that would make me very hesitant to be a customer at his store.

      I'm sure you'd prefer to frequent his store when it has teenage thugs at the front door harassing you, your wife, and your children. They also come into the store and steal things, which drives the prices up. But for you, I'm guessing that the higher prices are worth the social experience you'd be enjoying.

    5. Re:No problem by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you lived in the area and had to put up with abusive youths outside shops, you'd have a different opinion. He is saying, effectively, that "I don't want louts hanging around outside my shop, I want my customers to be able to come here without the fear of intimidation and violence."

      But I'm sure he cares more about the opinion of some self-righteous, sanctimonious, middle-class, liberal do-gooder who lives a thousand miles away.

  42. Hey you kids... by geekee · · Score: 1

    Why not just build a device that says "Hey you kids, get the hell off of my lawn!"

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  43. Yay for science, age and guile! by SysKoll · · Score: 1
    At last, something for the old geezer geek!

    Thank you, thank you, Mr. Stapleton! Now these damn kids will finally get off my lawn! And I can at last get even with these young idiots playing rap music at a windows-rattling volume.

    Forget mad science, Stapleton perfected crusty science!

    I have a new hero.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  44. This is not to discriminate against teens... by mybadluck22 · · Score: 0
    The purpose of this is to repel people who are actually causing trouble. A store for teens would obviously not use one of these. The article mentions a story where teens loiter outside and intimidate customers. It says that teens can still go in the store unbothered, but do not tend to stay nearby for more than a few minutes.

    By the way, this is not "discriminating" at all. Also, I can not see how this breaks any laws. What sort of crazy law would it be? "Everyone must be able to hear every sound that someone decides to broadcast" ? Some adults can hear the sound, some teens cannot. What is the issue?

    --
    If I could rearrange the keyboard, I'd put U and I together.
    1. Re:This is not to discriminate against teens... by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1
      Also, I can not see how this breaks any laws.

      Try "noise pollution"
  45. Disgusting by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    What kind of sick, evil cur do you have to be to even concieve of such a thing? How do they know this isn't causing long-term hearing damage? How do they know that the range is only in the area defined...what if some people can hear it miles away? And my hearing for high-frequency noises has lasted to my mid-30s...what if I can hear it, too? And I had a friend one time who was deaf, but his hearing aide sometimes translates mere whistles to a physically painful noise - what would this do to hearing aide users? And why discriminate against young people - maybe these kids should get smart and send round a bunch of aged street winos to hang out in front of the store? What about pets, how does it affect them? And how long until the kids wise up and buy a $2 pair of earplugs?

    Now, you'd think I'd identified all the ways this was wrong. But no, the corker is he used his own kids as lab rats for this! Why does this sick bastard still have custody of them?

    1. Re:Disgusting by mybadluck22 · · Score: 1
      "How do they know that the range is only in the area defined...what if some people can hear it miles away?"

      Sound does not work like this, especially in the daytime.

      "And my hearing for high-frequency noises has lasted to my mid-30s...what if I can hear it, too?"

      You will be forced to deal with mild annoyance! Hurry up and get your shopping overwith and don't hang around the front of these stores!

      "And I had a friend one time who was deaf, but his hearing aide sometimes translates mere whistles to a physically painful noise - what would this do to hearing aide users?" What frequency is the speaker on the hearing aide even capable of producing? Regardless, if you can't hear it now, you likely won't hear it then.

      "And why discriminate against young people - maybe these kids should get smart and send round a bunch of aged street winos to hang out in front of the store? What about pets, how does it affect them?"

      The teenage hooligans, winos, and pets are in cahoots. Many stores do not even allow pets, and why would winos just decided to hang around a store because some teens told them to? What difference does it make?

      "And how long until the kids wise up and buy a $2 pair of earplugs?"

      I don't think that most people would really sit around with earplugs just to be infront of a store. Even if you had a place you liked to hang out, would you seriously sit there with earplugs screaming to your friends for more than five minutes?

      "Now, you'd think I'd identified all the ways this was wrong. But no, the corker is he used his own kids as lab rats for this! Why does this sick bastard still have custody of them?"

      I don't think it's illegal to bother your children with annoying noises, as long as you do not cause them physical harm or pain. The point of this is that it is annoying, but does not cause pain.

      --
      If I could rearrange the keyboard, I'd put U and I together.
    2. Re:Disgusting by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      Boy, science class must have *SUCKED* for you?

  46. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decibel is a logarithmic measure of intensity. That is to say, the difference between 75 and 85 dB is a factor of 10. Since most rock concerts play at around 125 dB, I don't know if anyone would notice.

  47. Terrible idea by Raindance · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think this is a terrible idea for any number of reasons, one being that supposedly "inaudible" noises effect people subconsciously. Even if the people involved don't report hearing anything.

    Relevant link with EEG results-
    http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~boyk/spectra/spectra.h tm

    1. Re:Terrible idea by Raindance · · Score: 1

      effect-->affect. I was a bit too quick to push send.

      Anyway, for those who haven't clicked through and read the linked story (or rather, the "Significance of the results" section), here's the relevant information:

      "Given the existence of musical-instrument energy above 20 kilohertz, it is natural to ask whether the energy matters to human perception or music recording. The common view is that energy above 20 kHz does not matter, but AES preprint 3207 by Oohashi et al. claims that reproduced sound above 26 kHz "induces activation of alpha-EEG (electroencephalogram) rhythms that persist in the absence of high frequency stimulation, and can affect perception of sound quality." [4]
                  Oohashi and his colleagues recorded gamelan to a bandwidth of 60 kHz, and played back the recording to listeners through a speaker system with an extra tweeter for the range above 26 kHz. This tweeter was driven by its own amplifier, and the 26 kHz electronic crossover before the amplifier used steep filters. The experimenters found that the listeners' EEGs and their subjective ratings of the sound quality were affected by whether this "ultra-tweeter" was on or off, even though the listeners explicitly denied that the reproduced sound was affected by the ultra-tweeter, and also denied, when presented with the ultrasonics alone, that any sound at all was being played.
                  From the fact that changes in subjects' EEGs "persist in the absence of high frequency stimulation," Oohashi and his colleagues infer that in audio comparisons, a substantial silent period is required between successive samples to avoid the second evaluation's being corrupted by "hangover" of reaction to the first."

      So one would assume the constant presence of high frequencies could affect peoples' moods or thought patterns adversely, whether they report being able to hear them or not. Setting aside the other problems inherent in this approach, I wouldn't recommend operating one of these devices at ones place of business for this reason alone.

    2. Re:Terrible idea by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that frequencies above 20kHz have been almost completely ignored since the CD standard of a 44.1kHz sampling rate was introduced (encoding frequencies up to 22k). The latest high-end audio gear can sample at 192kHz, so would be able to encode almost all of the high frequency energy mentioned in the article, if there was a way of delivering it to the consumer, which is looking less and less likely as the likes of mp3 become standards.

      I've wondered for a long time if exposure to high frequency audio could do harm. Even if your ears can't pick it up, the energy is there in the air, and it could be turned up very loud without you realising it. On the other hand, people don't seem to go crazy in televizsion shops.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    3. Re:Terrible idea by Raindance · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see that. Though I would imagine doing it "right" would be expensive for studios. A stopgap measure could be an amp module that added a harmonizing 20kHz+ signal to go along with the 20kHz- signal.

      High-energy supersonics are, to my knowledge, being used as non-lethal weapons by the U.S. military in Iraq. I'm not positive they're technically supersonic, as I'm pretty sure that, once you get into *very* high-frequency audio, not much of it penetrates the ear canal, but they're at least very high-pitched. Luckily, high-frequency sound isn't nearly as damaging to ears as low-frequency sound. I doubt if anyone has (publicly) studied whether supersonics can cause any sort of brain damage, temporary or permanent.

  48. tool to cheat with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be a great way to cheat in a college exam, 1 beep for a two for b and so on or morse code that only the students could hear! Try bellcurving that!!!

  49. Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by segment · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Severe to profound losses range from PTAs of 75 dB and greater. At this level, hearing aids provide limited benefit and consideration of cochlear implants is generally given. Statistics about Hearing Disorders, Ear Infections, and Deafness

    1. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who has had a 70-75 dB hearing loss in the 500-4000 Hz (i.e. voice) band since age 5, I can vouch for this. Funny thing is, I didn't lose my high frequency hearing, so for years I could hear the 17.5 kHz squeal from our old TV's flyback transformer.

      Hearing aids are no fun. Modern technology has yet to make them better than pathetic. I've got an all-digital (DSP) set that set me back $5K and in a restaurant I hear all the other tables better than the one I'm sitting at. Hard to avoid that; like all people, my ears point sideways, not forward. Then there's the self-oscillation ("feedback"); since these things use IIR filters instead of FIR filters, they tend to go unstable at odd times, usually as a result of some sound that is barely audible, or a pure sinusoidal sound, like many computer beeps and alarm sounds. Solution? Cycle power on the devices. It's a Windows world, and these don't even run Windows.

      Some folks think that hearing aids are convenient because you can just turn them off when you don't want to listen to some blowhard. I think that's worked exactly twice in my life; the other times, the teacher gave me a demerit or whatever. On the flip side, because they don't help you dig out speech as well as they should (it's like having 25% of the consonants you hear be wrong), you have to ask people to repeat themselves, which not only makes you look ignorant, but instead of actually repeating themselves, people will say, "Oh, nevermind" or "It's not important." Bull; if it weren't important, you wouldn't have bothered to say it, and I still want to know what you said. People quickly learn that you're no fun to have a conversation with, because conversations start feeling like work. Of course, how well would the Internet work if UDP was all you had, and packet loss was around 10%?

      My hearing loss has done far more to end my social life than my being a geek and/or nerd ever could.

      Now, a device like this will likely make me effectively deaf. How? The hearing aids set their overall gain based on the sound level in the room, regardless of band. Thus, they will sense the loud HF sound and cut the gain way down, so, from my point of view (hearing?), the world will suddenly get really quiet.

      Do not screw with what little hearing I have left.

    2. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFL. It doesn't say that listening to sounds at 75 dB can cause hearing loss, it describes a hearing loss of PTA 75 dB as basically deaf. If sounds at 75 dB caused hearing loss, we would all go deaf from the sound of our own crying as babies long before we learned to speak.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    3. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by iamacat · · Score: 1

      I am sure you already gave your problems a lot of thought, but did you try asking people to type on your notebook/PDA or write notes instead of talking. Meaningful talk over IM is very doable and for me it would be much less annoying than repeating the same thing many times. Alternatively, did you try to learn reading lips?

    4. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      Severe to profound losses range from PTAs of 75 dB and greater.

      I think you may have mixed up your measurements. The 75dB referred to in TFA is the noise level. The 75dB in your linked page is the level of hearing loss - that is, the threshold at which the person can hear a sound of that pitch.
      The standard TWA for industrial noise is 85dB for 8 hours, so it's unlikely this device would cause any problems.

      In fact, many years ago, I used to make little devices with two 555 CMOS chips (or one 556), a photocell and a hearing aid speaker coil. They'd put out this high-pitched heterodyning whine that sounded a lot like a mosquito circling. The trick was to hide one in a dark area like a cupboard or under furniture so when someone opened the cupboard, or let light under the furniture, the photocell would cut the noise. There was no way they could locate it by sound, and you could fit the whole thing in a matchbox. As far as I'm aware, we never sent anyone deaf. Insane perhaps, but they could definitely still hear...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by OneFix · · Score: 1

      From what you say, I can actually see how the use of this device would help society....how you say???

      Well, once the folks affected by age-related hearing loss (mostly retirees) start being exposed to this, the store may quickly find that a good chunk of those customers they may otherwise want to keep are not returning and will see the error of their ways...

      This should in turn make these people think when using these methods in the future...

    6. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      Re-read the part where the article mentions that the sounds would only be played in front of stores.

      Combined with the fact that high frequency sounds are very directional, this isn't going to bother patrons once indoors, hearing aided or not.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    7. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Coeurderoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thanks for the explanation, from somebody that has an acceptable level of hearing, this is quite interesting.

      I do hope that at least once you have filtered out the people that do not like to "work" (have a meaningfull conversation) it leaves you with enough interesting people that you can meet at some quite place.

      It also points to some interesting suggestion for hearing aid maker, since the level of computing power available is going up, I would guess that two improvements should be possible either now or soon.
      1) compare the sounds that are comming in from both side of the head and boost up what is "similar" (i.e either in front or directly behind you)
      and boost down the rest (what is not in your sphere of direct interest)
      2) provide some level of environment profiling that enables you to "say" I'm at a disco, or at home, or ..., and choose which sound bands should be filtered, and which should be increased.

    8. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of social isolation, I know how you feel but I am having difficulty on the other side of the communication channel. I stutter and that pretty much isolated me as a child growing up and as a teenager. I was one of the nerds and they didn't seem to mind waiting for me to try to say a word 5 times, while all the "cool" and "popular" kids made fun of me which honestly I think was a blessing in disguise as that kept me from doing drugs and helped me focus more on academic performance.

    9. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by magefile · · Score: 1

      I have a loss of 80-90 dB pretty much across the board - the speech banana on my audiogram is intact, it's just moved down a lot. I have to say, I've had much better luck with my aids than you have, and I have been wearing them since the early 90s. My digital set, like all aids, does have problems with background noise, but in most restaurants, it's not impossible to communicate (knowing which local restaurants have shitty acoustics is half the battle, heh). I get feedback occasionally, but I've never had to power cycle my hearing aid (popping it in and out to deal with wax and drainage buildup interfering with the pressure is a different story). Lip reading also is very helpful, especially in social situations.

      I don't know you, so I can't comment on your specific case, but in general, one's ability to function with hearing aids is largely a matter of coping strategies. Do you (speaking in generalities here) know how to lip read? Do you make sure people know you're lip reading them, and that they're positioned so it's possible, both in terms of them facing you and in terms of lighting? Do you pay attention to the acoustic environment you're in, and make an attempt to go elsewhere with your group when there's too much background noise, echoing, etc? Do you know how to effectively ask someone to repeat themselves, or use different words? I could go on and on, but that's a decent start.

    10. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by magefile · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've posted elsewhere that I think the GP's comments are a bit overdone, but for the record: lip reading only gives you 30-50 percent of the content under ideal conditions (lighting, where the person is facing, whether they lip speak well, etc), and even then it's very tiring. Definitely a useful skill, but it's not as great as people think.

    11. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Solution? Cycle power on the devices. [hearing aids] It's a Windows world, and these don't even run Windows.
      Windows? No, power cycling has been standard troubleshooting for electronic devices for decades.

      Besides, how else are you going to reset/reboot the electronics on something so small. Cycling power is a perfectly reasonable UI choice.

    12. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      So this is to be used to control access to public areas, then? Sounds like I'd be perfectly justified in smashing one of these devices to bits if it was causing me distress in an area I had a right to be in. Besides - what's wrong with teenagers? Whoever invented this device (if it worked) is a frightened individual.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    13. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your suggestions have been addressed a long time ago.

      One of the problems associated with the first generation of hearing aids (besides unstability) was that the 'cocktail-party effect'. If you are at a gathering of many people (such as a cocktail party), people with normal hearing are able to focus on a nearby conversation and block out the others. Initially hearing aids could not do this but more recent models have an increased sensitivity in the direction right in front of you.

      To achieve this multiple microphones are used. Even wireless communication between the left-ear hearing aid and the right-ear hearing aid is now being investigated. Also denoising, dereverberation (removal of room effects to make sound more clear) are investigated. I work in signal processing myself and this is a very active area of research.

      One step further are cochlear implants. For people with total hearing loss but intact nerves in the inner ear it is possible to attach electronic contacts (obviously through an operation as these contacts are inside their skull!). Apparently sensitivity to signals of different frequency resides at different areas in the ear, therefore the incoming sound is decomposed into a number of frequency bands, the output is which is sent to the appropriate area. This technology can really make (some) deaf people hear and have conversations. However, the dynamic range is very limited iirc, 8 dBs or so.

      Google for 'cochlear implant'...

    14. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by IdntUnknwn · · Score: 1

      If you can tell me how to build such a circuit, I will worship you :D I don't quite have the knowledge yet on how to design such a circuit myself.

    15. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Worship's not necessary - these chips are about as simple as it gets, and they're a lot of fun to play with. It's amazing how many things you can make with a chip that's nothing more than a simple timer.

      I don't remember the exact design of my circuit, but it was based on a sweeping tone generator circuit from an electronics magazine, and used a CdS photoresistor from a light meter to cut the sound. The best approach would be to look at a few existing designs and modify one. Sites like this have plenty of starter material. http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/LM555.html

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    16. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Cederic · · Score: 1


      My digital hearing aids make a massive difference to me.

      Then again, I can hear reasonably well without them. They just fill in the gaps.

      You can get directional aids btw - that will pull more sound from in front than the side/behind.

      My hearing loss has definitely hurt my social life, but I've also done constructive things to deal with it. Anyway, there's always the internet..

    17. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, because they don't help you dig out speech as well as they should (it's like having 25% of the consonants you hear be wrong), you have to ask people to repeat themselves, which not only makes you look ignorant, but instead of actually repeating themselves, people will say, "Oh, nevermind" or "It's not important." Bull; if it weren't important, you wouldn't have bothered to say it, and I still want to know what you said.

      As someone who has a hearing-imparing sibling, please do not take such comments as "oh nevermind" personally. It usually isn't that they're bored with you or are sick of repeating themselves. Usually it is that what they said just honestly wasn't worth repeating. They said it just to fill a gap of silence, and when asked to repeat it they honestly feel silly because it was such a vacuous comment. I know it can be frustrating, but try and let it go when this happens. Usually, when they say it isn't important, it really isn't. For people you talk to on a more regular basis, just let them know that you'd appreciate them actually repeating things when you ask them to. If they're half-way decent people, they should be more than happy to.

    18. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by hardie · · Score: 1

      I have a 45dB loss in a similar frequency range to yours. I have worn a hearing aid in one ear for about ten years. My experience is quite different from yours. My aid is fairly effective in a room full of people, I never have oscillation problems (admittedly, my loss is not as sharp as yours).

      Over time I have tried several different aids, going from "advanced analog" to a couple of different digital aids. Clearly you and I need an aid with multiple frequency bands, such as a digital one. What I have found makes the single largest difference, however, is who fits your aid. For some time I went to a guy who, it turns out, just doesn't know what he's doing. Finding someone who does is the trick. I don't know how to do it except word of mouth.

      Steve

    19. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by know1 · · Score: 1

      as someone who is a hobbyist musician and someone who has tinkered with various audio programs (reason, audacity etc) and even occasionally had a go with real hardware, your description of a hearing aid astounds me at how badly designed they are. you have to powercycle it to stop feedback? i can't imagine why someone hasn't just put a simple volume gate that would stop this. or at the very least a volume control for the input to cycle instead of the power. i would have imagined it would be a simple task to have a gate set up to automatically do this. i strongly suggest writing to the manufacturer, maybe with a few signitures of like-minded people you may know who have first hand experience in this to try and nudge them into improving the product. unfortunately, as many big businesses have shown, if you buy their stuff and it is unreliable, they tend not to improve to much over time without considerable public response or exposure. but then again, i may be wrong and am not a hearing aid specialist...surely they would have considered all this

    20. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny
      As far as I'm aware, we never sent anyone deaf. Insane perhaps, but they could definitely still hear.

      Bless you. Being insane is just plain boring if you can't hear the voices.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    21. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't have a "right" to be there. If you don't like the music the store is playing LEAVE, don't just go and vandalize their equiptment.

    22. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Caesious · · Score: 1

      I have no experience with hearing aids but this seems like a simple solution. Why not shift the 500-4000Hz range to a range that you can still hear?

      "Then there's the self-oscillation ("feedback"); since these things use IIR filters instead of FIR filters, they tend to go unstable at odd times, usually as a result of some sound that is barely audible, or a pure sinusoidal sound, like many computer beeps and alarm sounds. Solution? Cycle power on the devices. It's a Windows world, and these don't even run Windows. "

      Right. No feedback but more processing power and memory.

      "Now, a device like this will likely make me effectively deaf. How? The hearing aids set their overall gain based on the sound level in the room, regardless of band. Thus, they will sense the loud HF sound and cut the gain way down, so, from my point of view (hearing?), the world will suddenly get really quiet. "

      I don't understand why a hearing aid would even be that sensitive to a range of frequencies that you can hear. I have no experience in hearing aid design but it seems to me that a manufacturer would map your range of good frequencies and customize a hearing aid from that data.

    23. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Yes I do have a right to be there.

      You seem confused on several points. Firstly, this is aimed outside the shop into a public area. Secondly, it is not music, but a device designed to cause discomfort to me which it is entirely reasonable to counter somehow (i.e. make the equipment disfunctional).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    24. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I have no experience with hearing aids but this seems like a simple solution. Why not shift the 500-4000Hz range to a range that you can still hear?



      Because doing a pitch shift in real-time is one helluva computing task (basically, in a primitive form, it involves a Fourier transform, a bunch of additions, and an inverse Fourier transform). And no, you don't want CPUs with 100W heat dissipation anywhere in your ear canal. Also, the results would still be very, very incomprehensible. Use some freeware .wav editor and try it someday.



    25. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Hey, let's follow that logic to another conclusion. When I'm walking down the public street, it would be perfectly within my rights to walk up to a car with a loud, thumping bass and destroy the speakers. I think you're mistaken that your right to be in a public venue gives you the right to alter or detroy the property of others.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    26. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the ear models are far superior to in the ear models as they offer better directional control and rear noise canceling with an extra mic facing back. Unfortunately the majority of people prefer the in the ear models, due to fashion more than function and the marketing has responded. My early 70's over the ear model aid works better than any modern in the ear model, in my case at least.

      That being said. I'm 50 now. I have had hearing loss in both ears all my life and only use my aid for things like classwork, meetings etc., where the invironment is more controlled. I have always founnd aids annoying and useless for pretty much anything else. Basically I never wear the damn thing and prefer the peace and quiet.

    27. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do not screw with what little hearing I have left."

      Why do you find it necessary to make the world conform to your defect?

    28. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      My hearing loss has done far more to end my social life than my being a geek and/or nerd ever could.

      Now, a device like this will likely make me effectively deaf. How? The hearing aids set their overall gain based on the sound level in the room, regardless of band. Thus, they will sense the loud HF sound and cut the gain way down, so, from my point of view (hearing?), the world will suddenly get really quiet.

      Do not screw with what little hearing I have left.


      I hate to say it, but this is a really, really good thing. Why? Because I would think that seniors would have the same problem and be even more pissed than you are. Some like me would just never ever shop there and tell the shops around the guy why, but not the guy that is doing it. Guys like you, might actually complain to the store manager or sue the guy under Americans with disabilities equal access laws.

      I have high pitch hearing loss in one ear and have also had difficulty hearing conversations all my life. My office is even worse though I'm in a computer room with 3 switchs and 2 servers going behind me. The white noise that the fans generate makes conversations 6 ft away difficult for me hear. I treat it as a good reason to actually pay attention and listen. If I don't, I will not hear half the conversation at all. I never had to have hearing aids, just sitting on the front row was always enough (and it helped with being able to see as well.) Of course, kids trying to whisper to me, I couldn't hear at all. No wonder I was such a good student.

    29. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Well at least unlike the previous poster, you have conceded that I have a right to be on a public street. Now to address the other point - my right to smash a car's speakers.

      Important differences between a device designed to drive me away through discomfort and a car with heavy bass.
      1. Intent - the device is intended to harrass people. This certainly constitutes a deliberate attempt to harras me which the car does not. 2. Duration - a car (except on the M25) is generally moving along and is a very temporary nuisance compared to a shop that is deploying this irritating noise all day every day and claiming a permanent part of the public street for itself. 3. Discrimination - the device is designed to target certain people based on their age, causing discomfort to people that the deployer has decided that they don't like. 4. Culpability. The nature of the discomfort is such that this could upset small children and babies without a parent being aware of the distress. Imagine trying to quieten your distressed child all the time being unaware that it was being targeted with some sort of sonic device that you couldn't detect. At least a thumping car bass is something that you can be aware of and identify the source of, rather than some mysterious irritation that you can't conciously identify.

      There are laws in the UK about noise pollution that cars with thumping bass violate routinely. However, they escape prosecution for the fact that they are a temporary and passing nuisance, not normally aimed at people deliberately. This would change rapidly if someone parked their car outside your house and stayed there, pumping out that noise. In the latter case, someone would ask them to turn it down, call the police or, as you say, rip out their speakers. If you must bring analogy into this discussion, then that would be a much closer one to the situation we are discussing than you "walking down a public street, passing a car you thought was too loud." If they were deliberately parking these cars outside the houses of a segment of society they didn't like, then it would be an even better analogy.

      But of course, the best analogy is one where someone deploys a device in a public area designed to drive away people he unilaterally didn't approve of. Like we're talking about.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    30. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 0

      The implication here is that this will be used everywhere always. Stop and think about what this is good for. Where will it be used? Really. Think about the best places for adoption of this technology?

      The short answer is "everywhere you aren't."

    31. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure you already gave your problems a lot of thought, but did you try asking people to type on your notebook/PDA or write notes instead of talking.

      A couple times. I have a friend with a speech impediment who routinely uses notepads to say what she wants. From my experience, this makes conversation even more difficult than asking people to repeat themselves. She has less of a social life than I do. But on IRC, she's prolific. Factor in the average person's poor handwriting and the poor handwriting recognition available these days, and this plan goes south really fast. Sorry, but thanks for trying.

      Alternatively, did you try to learn reading lips?

      I read lips, but as another respondent pointed out, it's not as good as the movie 2001 makes it out to be. Also, I live in Texas, and we slur our speech, meaning lip movements have less variety... it's not a good mix.

    32. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Well, you could have a two-part system. The mic and speaker could be in the hearing aids, and they would normally work in "dumb" mode, but could be switch to a "smart" mode where they communicate wirelessly with a remote processor that you could wear like a pager. This would then open the door to a lot more processing capabilities. For example, typicall lossy audio compression that is tuned to speech also does a fairly reasonable job of filtering out non-speech sounds. As far as changing the pitch, there is a smipler method. I've used audio tools that change the speed of a sample without changing the pitch, they work by duplicating / removing select audio samples from the input. Then take that output and do a normal speedup / slowdown on the resultant waveform (it's not perfect, but quiet acceptable sound).

      Another trick you can do by having an external processing unit would be to have local storage on it, so that instead of asking someone "can you repeat that", you can hit a button on your box to replay the last 10 seconds.

    33. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My hearing aid fitter wants to fit me with a pair of these new, multi-microphone units ($6500 for the pair, which BTW is not covered by any available insurance plan). However, there are a couple disadvantages: They are over-the-ear models, which are much larger, interfere with my glasses, and are vulnerable to sweat coming off my scalp and channeled down my hair via capillary action. This leads to the undesirable choice of leaving them in when biking and shortening their lifespan, or taking the aids out so they survive, but not being able to hear that car coming.

      I work in DSP for Navy sonars (ah, the irony; I can't swim, either), so I've been keeping up with the tech. It's justreally hard to make a useful circuit that runs on 1.3V at a few mA.

      Cochelar implants are not recommended for me since, even though the docs don't know exactly what caused my loss, the odds are on nerve damage. Thanks for the support, though.

    34. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by sankeld · · Score: 0

      WHAT?!?

    35. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

      Would the parent poster or others in this thread mind visiting SaveYourHearing.org and sharing some of your experiences? I'd like to grow this site into a place where people can go to get information on hearing, hearing loss - the unfortunate effects thereof especially, and hearing protection.

      Do tell your stories please, if you might, so that others can learn how debilitating such a loss can be to one's life (and those of others who need to shout in order to maintain a conversation).

      Please - make it yours. CONTENT CREATION IS CURRENTLY OPEN TO ANONYMOUS USERS so that I may "seed" this beast without people being reluctant to login. (This will probably last until I start receiving spam posts.) Create an account if you'd like though, and post your experiences. If you have references on hearing loss, hearing aid types, DSP software or settings, etc. please pass them along so others may enjoy them as well.

      Tell your horror stories or how your hearing loss has affected you so that others may potentially avoid the same fate! (Please try to suppress your jealousy towards those still retaining their HF or voiceband response.....)

      Many thanks. (yes - it's very new. I came up with the idea after spending $20 at a recent concert to buy earplugs from the bar and hand them out to people standing right near the speakers. I wanted a place where I could direct them to find information on protection and the effects of permanant (mostly high-frequency) hearing loss). Please express interest if you'd like to donate to such a fund. I'd like to give away or subsidize hearing protection distribution at music clubs.

      If you have an SPL meter and would like to report on your findings at various music clubs across the planet, please do so!! I'd like to build a database of peak readings and then try and convince the audio engineers at these places to turn the volume down. I think "self regulation" is best and if we can convince club owners to keep the environment safe for the good of their customers, we all will benefit. I try to bring my protection every time, and often a few pair for friends.

      Ever try having a conversation with a bass player or drummer who doesn't realize you're not wispering when you talk to them??? Please help me save people's hearing. Donate. Contribute. Tell your stories. Show people where they can buy earplugs cheaply online. Subsidize protection for others that wouldn't normally carry it themselves.

      Do you have anyt tips or tricks for protecting your ears? Know a good way to fold up some material to place it in your ear for a makeshift plug? A good way to carry earplugs so they stay clean (and they're there when you need them - I think wallet based storage would be good but can't figure out a good way...). Do tell!

      Thank you for any help or contact you can provide. If you'd like to contact me to help (with a SPL-survey, links for the site or suggestions, etc.) please do not hesitate to send me an email! "cyrus+saveyourhearing *at* 80d.org" (that's eight-zero-dee.org)

      Once again - thank you. Spread the word, link to me or post whatever you can that you think might be helpful.

      Cyrus

    36. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done most of that. It's hard for me to judge acoustics. I'm a perfectionist; everything sounds bad after a while. I don't actively lip read; it's something I just do without really thinking about it. That said, I haven't asked others to change their behaviors to acommodate me, since that is placing a large burden on what should be just casual conversation at lunch.

      And sometimes I repeat a person's sentence back to them, pausing wherever there was a word I simply couldn't make out; this usually works, but sometimes induces ROFL in the other person because what they said got transmogrified into something completely absurd and hilarious at the same time. It's a gift, I guess...

    37. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. That way I wouldn't have to have any goddam stupid useless conversations with anybody. If anybody wanted to tell me something, they'd have to write it on a piece of paper and shove it over to me. They'd get bored as hell doing that after a while, and then I'd be through with having conversations for the rest of my life."
      The Catcher in the Rye
    38. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      It may be out in the open, but that doesn't make it public. Their parking lot is most likely THEIR PROPERTY. If they have a storefront right on the street, and you get harrassed by the music while walking by then that's a completely different story, but I don't think that's the kind of stores we're talking about.

    39. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      It may be out in the open, but that doesn't make it public. Their parking lot is most likely THEIR PROPERTY.

      I refer you back to the article which makes no mention of limiting its use to carparks. In fact it says that it was deployed in front of a Spar shop in Wales. These seldom have carparks. In Britain we tend to walk to shops. Additionally, it says that it is intended for general use by shops - no expressed willingness to limit it to car parks. Additionally, car parks dedicated to shops in the UK are usually for the general use of multiple shops - not just one, hence public place again. Additionally, we are discussing sound here - it does not magically stop at the borders of your property and you're kidding yourself if you think you can keep this at an effective level within your property without it spilling beyond the bounds of your property.

      I think that will do for now.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    40. Re:Can you hear me... Can you hear me now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have very sensitive high frequency hearing and can almost always hear TV sets (and some computer monitors, in some modes). This is the sort of device that would prompt me to start carrying an EMP unit. Directional, of course (wouldn't want to fry some innocent bystander's hearing aid, or worse, pacemaker), but paired with a direction finder (high frequency sound is almost line-of-sight), it could nullify such public nuisances easily. Added benefit, presumably the idiot who installed such a device can't hear it and thus can't know that its fried.

      A simpler answer could be specially rigged earmuffs.

  50. This is wrong! They should attract them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With some of that pseudo punk that's all the rage on MTV and perhaps some pleasing purple neon undercarriage and krunk dubs and then zap them with an electric grid.

  51. 33hz orgasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    75db may make em go away, but 33hz brings the ladies back. Even more links here.

  52. Alternative Hypothesis by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was a kid I built a variable frequency tone generator. Once I got it up above the range I could hear, I could make my dog go batshit. Not as in running around yelping, but scratching and chewing himself with a passion. Turns out it was the fleas that were going batshit; against his white fur, I could clearly see them start jumping incessanctly when I hit that certain range.

    So maybe his kids are just nasty.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Alternative Hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn, you were like a mad scientist!

    2. Re:Alternative Hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of kid were you?! :D

    3. Re:Alternative Hypothesis by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Were?

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    4. Re:Alternative Hypothesis by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      shouldn't the fleas have been jumping off the dog then? Maybe you could have killed them from exaustion if you took the dog out to the park while the tone generator ran for an hour.

  53. downtown here by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    near a big bus stop area, next to a mall, where lots of homeless and/or punk kids like to congregate and piss/shit/sell drugs/panhandle, the stores play classical music on their storefront.

    It didnt actually work, until some geniuses tried to break the speakers, somewhat unsuccessfully, resulting in classical music heavily distorted by feedback noise, which then really drove away pretty much everyone within hearshot.

    Couldn't have been good for business.

    Last time I was around the area, they fixed the speakers, and now the classical music plays normally, and the punks are back

  54. I ran across something like this once by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

    I remember walking around the house while my mom was in the living room. I walked into the living room and heared a constant and really high pitch noise. It was loud enough that it was almost hurt my ears. So I asked my mom what it is and she said "what? I can't hear anything." So I looked around the house and tracked it down a gym bag that was in the kitchen. I picked it up and brought it to her so she could hear it, being right next to it really did hurt my ears. So she puts it right next to ear and just shrugs. We open the bag to find a camera with a charged flash.

    I thought it was funny because the volume was really loud but because of the frequency she couldn't hear it at all.

  55. One for the elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only we could come up with a noise frequency to ATTRACT the elderly. Then we could lead a merry dance of baby boomers straight off a cliff into the ocean and watch them all drown :)

    1. Re:One for the elderly by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

      They do have such a sound. Wayne Newton or Celine Dion. Attracts the moldy oldies like flies, guaranteed to repel everyone who isn't half-senile.

      Of course, Vegas latched onto them for just that reason. See the following:

      Q: What has 80 balls and fucks little old ladies?
      A: Keno
    2. Re:One for the elderly by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I heard that was Cheney's idea to fix social security....

      --
      ymmv
    3. Re:One for the elderly by AgentPhunk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Q: How do you get an old lady to say 'FUCK'? A: Yell "Bingo!"

    4. Re:One for the elderly by szrachen · · Score: 1

      Is this your solution to fix Social Security?

    5. Re:One for the elderly by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      That's why the Bird Flu is a good thing.

    6. Re:One for the elderly by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

      They do have such a sound. Wayne Newton or Celine Dion
       
      I wouldn't go that far, but instead of an annoying noise maker can't this guy just play opera at the teens to make them run off?

    7. Re:One for the elderly by TCFOO · · Score: 0

      That still won't replace all of the IOU's we have in the social security trust fund, or will the IOU's pay for this device?

    8. Re:One for the elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a noise frequency to get all you twentysomething pieces of pigshit to disembowel yourselves with rusty spoons instead? At one stroke, we could eliminate libertarianism, reduce the crime rate, and generall make the world a far better place. That would be fabulous. >;-)

    9. Re:One for the elderly by RamblerRandy · · Score: 1

      Celine Dion? Who's that? Wayne Newton has been around since I was a kid (I was born 1959 - 46yrs old now) so I know him all to well. Repellent? How about my favorites: Andre Kostelanetz, Percy Faith, or Mantovani? They did pop music that would send ANYONE today running away, or put them to sleep at least! Love 'em! Will you please watch the foul language on this old fuddy duddy!

      --
      I'll think of a really good SIG just before I die.
    10. Re:One for the elderly by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      You wouldn't be a Barry Manilow fan, would you? I thought they were extinct. I think I can get good bucks on eBay if I capture one.

      Lets see, "ACME GUIDE TO TRAPPING A BMF (Barry Manilow Fan)"

      a bad haircut
      lounge lizard outfit
      poor taste
      8x11 black and white photos

      directions:

      start an argument saying Tom Jones is "teh best evah"
      wait for Barry Manilow fan to come out of hiding
      ... and wait ...
      ... and wait ...
      ... and wait ...
      ... because there ain't no such animal, dummy! See the "ACME GUIDE TO FOSSILS (Living and Dead)"
    11. Re:One for the elderly by RamblerRandy · · Score: 1

      I'm PRE-Manilow kid! HE is too new to me! So was Julio Iglesias! And I never liked either (at least after a short while).

      --
      I'll think of a really good SIG just before I die.
    12. Re:One for the elderly by icbkr · · Score: 1

      This got modded to funny 5? sad.

  56. Totally Absurd by Darkshot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is ridiculus. They talk about using something like this to drive away 'bad teens' who hang around their store. Did they ever stop to consider that not all teens are bad, and what if some young person is actually going to their store to buy something legitimately. They need to stop stereotyping and realize most teens arent like that. I'm 17 and I do nothing of the sort. They are not only driving away these occassional trouble makers but also some of their own customers...

    1. Re:Totally Absurd by log0 · · Score: 1
      but also some of their own customers

      Especially those who are teenagers now but will be "ideal" customers very soon. They won't be going back. People hold grudges against those who discriminate against them. And even if they don't hold a grudge, they'll still remember it as "the place that sounds bad".

    2. Re:Totally Absurd by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Obviously this would be used in a situation where teens make up a small part of the customer base... or where teen trouble makers drive away far more people than teenage customers. Not everyplace would use it.

    3. Re:Totally Absurd by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1

      As a rapidly aging hipster, I can tell you that teen grudges are worth the Mead spiral bound they are written on. I was an angry teen once, but I would gladly drive all the cell phone using under-20s from whichever movie theatre I happen to be sitting in.

    4. Re:Totally Absurd by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      Did they ever stop to consider that not all teens are bad, and what if some young person is actually going to their store to buy something legitimately.

      Yes, they did. If you RTFA, you'll find that the noise is simply annoying, not painful, not damaging, and that once you go into the store you can no longer hear the noise. Similar to classical music being played outside the store, those teens that actually wish to enter the store can, and don't find the noise to be a deterrent.

    5. Re:Totally Absurd by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Did they ever stop to consider that not all teens are bad, and what if some young person is actually going to their store to buy something legitimately.

      Then that young person can just enter the store and do their business. Are you saying you can't walk past an irritating noise? It's annoying, not lethal. Don't be a wimp.

      They are not only driving away these occassional trouble makers but also some of their own customers...

      If the number of customers who were being driven away by the unruly teens exceeds the number who are now being driven away by the noise, then it's a net win.

  57. Let's face it, this is revenge by TheNucleon · · Score: 2, Funny
    Teenagers have been driving adults away for years with loud noise. This is just one guy's attempt to get even.

    Revenge is a dish best served at high frequencies.

    --
    My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of my employer, my spouse, my children, or my cats.
  58. Or, a lower frequency alternative by dave-tx · · Score: 1
    I use a Brown Note Generator to keep the teens away.

    --

    >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

  59. Wow, this is pretty stupid. by loraksus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least, it seems like it to me.
    Back in the days of dos, pascal and c programming in a text based ide, I used to run high pitched noises out through the pc speaker. I believe I specified something between 21,000 and 24,000 hz - although I'm fairly sure that the speaker wasn't exactly tuned (although it did go a bit higher (27,000-ish hz), although only a few of us were able to hear it - we had the computer randomly play these high pitched tones and the monitor would change color about 5 seconds after the tone started, so it was sort of a double blind test)
    Yeah, high school was tons of fun.
    Anyways... Even though the old folks might not be able to hear it consciously, it still affects them. People become moody, short tempered, and in general, quite bitchy. I honestly can't say that it is due to the effects of the sound - or the effects of interacting with people who are able to consciously hear it, but - to me, at least - it doesn't really matter, because chances are that if you have teens hanging around your business, they probably spend money there and you're going to have to interact with them.

    And as for whether this bothers teens immensely, I call bullshit. Most of the older TVs out there put out a high pitched noise and it isn't like teens don't spend a ton of time sitting in front of one. Of course, old people enjoy buying crap like this, so it isn't to say there isn't a market.

    Also, the sensitivity seems to go away after being exposed to the sounds of gunfire (anecdotal evidence based on my experiences, so take with a grain of salt) and other loud noises, so gangbangers and punkheads probably won't be affected ;)
    And please, 75db? feh.

    (feel free to use this as a perfect example of how to not write an argumentative essay btw)

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Wow, this is pretty stupid. by segment · · Score: 0

      Yet again...

      A convenient summary of the audiogram is the pure-tone average (PTA) of the cardinal speech frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, 3000 Hz). As the PTA increases, the hearing ability decreases. Normal hearing for speech is observed for people with PTAs of 25 dB or less. At a PTA of around 40 dB in both ears, most people are functionally handicapped and benefit from amplification. Severe to profound losses range from PTAs of 75 dB and greater. At this level, hearing aids provide limited benefit and consideration of cochlear implants is generally given.

      An accurate assessment of hearing includes laterality (one or both ears affected), degree of threshold loss (PTA), and best ability to understand speech (either with hearing aids or loud presentation levels). Other factors include the rapidity of loss onset/progression (people often adapt to slowly progressive losses more than sudden losses), associated symptoms such as tinnitus, hyperacusis and recruitment (intolerance to loud sounds), and type of treatment options (surgery, hearing aids, aural rehabilitation, speech reading, assistive listening devices).

      Hearing loss may be estimated in terms of societal burden, effect on the person, and treatment needs. For purposes of estimating the societal burden of hearing loss, age-specific rates of self (or family) report are essential. For estimating the impact of hearing loss on the person, a PTA of 25 dB generally requires adaptive listening strategies. Active treatment is generally required at PTA of 40 dB or greater in both ears. Deafness is generally applied to people with severe bilateral loss (PTA > 75 dB). Because modern cochlear implants are helpful to people with severe losses of relatively short duration (10 years), duration of hearing loss has become another important factor in describing hearing loss.

      www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/hearing.asp

    2. Re:Wow, this is pretty stupid. by thogard · · Score: 1

      Even though the old folks might not be able to hear it consciously, it still affects them. People become moody, short tempered, and in general, quite bitchy.
      I think this is because the brain is not exempt from Nyquist's Theorem and the ear does detect sounds above 20,000 kHz but the brain doesn't hear them. Some studies have show there are parts of the ear that may be sensitive to nearly 60,000 kHz and the size of things inside the cochlea would be tuned for frequencies much higher than what people can hear.

    3. Re:Wow, this is pretty stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Segment, wtf are you trying to prove? You keep quoting the if someone has 75dB PTA hearing loss, that they're severely disabled. However, you apparently don't understand that a 75dB signal does not cause 75dB hearing loss. In fact, it's not even loud. 75dB is the level of a "noisy office", and it's quieter than a busride. To get 75dB hearing loss, you need to attend a rock concert or work construction/airport runway without earplugs, or just get really old so your eardrums lose their elasticity.

      Here's a clue: someone with 75dB hearing loss at a given frequency is incapable of hearing a 75dB signal (that means they probably won't year you at all, even if you get up in their face and scream at the top of your lungs). To them, a loud car horn at 115dB would sound like background noise sounds to you (i.e. very quiet), and a jet taking off at 140dB (which would cause you PAIN) would be the equivalent of you hearing normal conversation. In short, "deaf as a doornail."

      See this SPL table:

      140dB = Jet taking off, 25 meters
      115dB = Loud car horn, nearby
      100dB = Inside N.Y. subway
        85dB = Inside motor bus
        75dB = Noisy office
        60dB = Conversational speech
        50dB = Private office
        45dB = Background noise, city home
        30dB = Library
        20dB = Whisper, leaves rustling
        15dB = Good recording studio


      In conclusion, hearing loss != SPL. They're both expressed in dB, but they're not the same thing. Hearing loss is subtracted from SPL.
    4. Re:Wow, this is pretty stupid. by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this, I was basically going to to the same post but had to head out.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    5. Re:Wow, this is pretty stupid. by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1
      Also, the sensitivity seems to go away after being exposed to the sounds of gunfire

      That's because gunshots are up around 160dB - loud enough to damage hearing instantly.
  60. hmmm by IceSt0rrm · · Score: 1

    Can they get something like this in MMOGs?

  61. Does the inventor live around Palo Alto, ca? by xiaomonkey · · Score: 1

    Over here, there's this weird, loud, high pitch sound that's always emanating from this one house.

    The sound drives me nuts when ever I'm running/jogging through the area and pass by the place, and I've always wondered how people could actually live there with such a constant noise nuisance....I guess now I at least know it might be because the residents are too old to hear it.

    1. Re:Does the inventor live around Palo Alto, ca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the story comes from Barry, Wales and the convience store for the trial was in South Wales and the reference to the factory in London suggests to me he just might live in the UK.

  62. I hate high pitched noises by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    I walk into any room, and I can hear all of the computer monitors with ease. Even a lot of LCD's give off high pitched noises. Even some computers themselves, and occasionally lightbulbs. It drives me crazy. I'm not a teen.

  63. It's just too bad... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    ...that we can't use it on Slashdot. This place needs a good cleaning.

  64. hmm... by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

    *checks date* Not April first... WTF?!?

    --
    This sig is false.
  65. ACLU? by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    Come on... this is age discrimination! The ACLU needs to demand that this weapon drive away people of all ages. Equale rights for everyone!

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    1. Re:ACLU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's in Wales..the ACLU doesn't have much pull there... I think what you meant to say is that it violates the European Convention on Human Rights and therefore needs to be indiscriminate about who it annoys

  66. An alternative by loraksus · · Score: 1

    He is considering introducing a much louder unit that can be switched on in emergencies with a panic button. It would be most useful when youths swarm into stores and begin stealing en masse, a phenomenon known in Britain as steaming. The idea would be to blast them with such an unacceptably loud, high noise
    Why doesn't he just wave a gun around or hire someone to break some legs?

    --a noise inaudible to older shoppers--that they would immediately leave
    Wouldn't it be funny if the panic button broke all the windows in the store?

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  67. target: teens? by wakingrufus · · Score: 1

    designed to drive teens away by emitting a high frequency noise at 75db probably sounds like the popular altrnative music im guessing, them and their trance and their techno, and their radiohead.... you call that noise? just sounds like music to me!

  68. Way cool! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children.

    I have a new hero.

  69. This is new? by stox · · Score: 1

    I sure remember avoiding the jewelry section of major department stores when I was a child due to the whining sound of the alarm system. Is this just being re-discovered?

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  70. Age Discrimination by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

    Why is it okay to make a devices that singles out young people but not okay to make single out old people. Not to mention that it is a pretty crude device that is actively generating noise pollution.

    I wonder how a low frequency sound device, for the purposes of keeping old people from loitering on my storefront, would fly? Old people mind sounds loud enough to physically agitate them far more than young people, so you would have a crude analogy to this device, except it discriminates in reverse. The sound would be similar to playing drums really loud, except only sub-acoustical frequencies are used.

    1. Re:Age Discrimination by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Why is it okay to make a devices that singles out young people but not okay to make single out old people.

      Dude... Older people are singled out all the fucking time. Ever see a 45 year old woman in a nightclub in a major city? It's not that nobody that age would like to, it's that they'd be stared at, ridiculed, and laughed out of the place.

      And when you get old enough, you can look forward to getting stuffed into a retirement home or convalescent center by your selfish children and forgotten like a worn out pair of shoes.

      Yeah, you sure have it tough, having to deal with annoying sounds and such. I'm still young enough to be able to hear sounds in this range, and you know what I would do if I encountered a device like this? Walk past it.

    2. Re:Age Discrimination by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      You didn't answer my question. Why can't I legally make a device to repel old people and keep them out of my store (or nightclub) but I can make a device to keep young people (and myself) out of my shop?

      The nightclub wouldn't have to resort to dirty looks if it could legally card anyone who looked like they might possibly be over 45.

    3. Re:Age Discrimination by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Why can't I legally make a device to repel old people and keep them out of my store (or nightclub) but I can make a device to keep young people (and myself) out of my shop?

      Uhh.. I have no idea. What makes you think you can't?

    4. Re:Age Discrimination by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      The civil rights act.

    5. Re:Age Discrimination by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The civil rights act.

      The Civil Rights Act has nothing to do with it. These devices annoy people. It is not illegal to annoy people. If people choose to stay away because they are annoyed, that is their decision to make. There is a huge difference between that, and forcibly excluding people of a certain class from an establishment.

      It is easy to exclude most black people from an establishment by playing Aryan or White Power music. If what you say were true, it would be illegal to play such music in a public place of business.

      Try again.

  71. Wait, I'm 17... by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

    But what's wrong with country?

  72. That's okay. by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Because the teenagers will just respond by turning up their System of a Down or Linkin' Park to drive away the old people.

    Or, heaven forbid, something hip hop.

  73. In only by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    The French could really have used this technology a few weeks ago. It would have saved them thousands of cars going up in flames.

    Muahaha...MUAHAHAHAHahhahaahahaa

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  74. High pitched noise by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    So I can drive them away with an Ashlee Simpson CD?

  75. The bad seeds... by alakazam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...are the ones who are doing the loitering, bothering customers, etc., as explained in the article. It's an "anti-loitering" device, not anti-teenager -- it's just that teenagers have more time to hang out and make a nuisance of themselves.

    Teenagers don't want to be cherished and nurtured -- they want freedom without responsibility. (Generalization, not applicable for every teenager.)

    1. Re:The bad seeds... by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's just teenagers that want freedom without responsibility...

      For instance, I want freedom without responsibility, too.

      It's like: What's the point of a freedom, if all you get for it is some lame responsibility?

      "We bestow upon ye... The power of flight!"

      (rock on!)

      "But, you can only use it to ship these rocks from here to there."

      (oh...)

      I just want to fly.

    2. Re:The bad seeds... by arron_nz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's an "anti-loitering" device, not anti-teenager


      No, it's anti-teenager. A 45 year old loiterer won't be affected. Only teenagers are affected by this device. It's comparable to a gun that only shoots black people.
      Where is my right as a non-loitering teenager to walk past a store undisturbed by a device that could be potentially damaging and incredibly annoying?
      --
      garble
    3. Re:The bad seeds... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Teenagers don't want to be cherished and nurtured -- they want freedom without responsibility. (Generalization, not applicable for every teenager.)

      Adults don't want to be cherished and nurtured -- they want freedom without responsibility. (Generalization, not applicable for every adult.)

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    4. Re:The bad seeds... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Shit. I'm 24 and I want freedom without responsibility. Know anybody who can hook me up with that?

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    5. Re:The bad seeds... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      Try the career paths of politician or manager. Even better, they're freedom and money without responsibility.

  76. Classical music. by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

    Dont they already use bright lights and classical music to stop teens loitering in malls and parks?

    --
    serenity now!
    1. Re:Classical music. by boarsai · · Score: 1

      That failed... It resulted in an increase of school choire/band boys and girls turning up and getting violent with their trumpets/violins.

  77. Possible Area of Deployment by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1

    I see real promise in this technology - Require all Registered Sex Offenders to install the system in their homes...

    Oh, Almost forgot. And vans...

    --
    Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
  78. Potential for "protecting" kids? by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

    Although I don't entirely like the concept of age discimination, such a product might be useful in at least covering the legal asses of adult entertainment companies.

    Want to ensure that kids won't sneak into your XXX store/website/movie theater? Set up something like this and you'll have one more thing to bring up in court when the kids inevitably -do- get in and you get called on it.

  79. Strange coincidence.... by lukedukekiwi · · Score: 1

    I think management may have brought the new cubicle slave in my department cpu fan from the same place. They arn't getting rid of me that easily though, got some $1 airplugs at lunch time.

  80. Wrong target by msbsod · · Score: 1

    There is nothing wrong with teens and children, even if they make noise. It is just natural for children to make noise. But I think this is a wonderful idea to hit those idiots who drive with the extra-large subwoofers through our neighborhoods and terrorize everybody, even at night.

  81. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a teenager and I find this product HIGHLY offensive!

  82. Lisa, I'd like to buy your negro repellent device! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simpsons reference, for the uninitiated.

  83. What's the matter with... by bmo · · Score: 1

    Opera or Classical music? It probably works just as well or probably even better than a single frequency. Being "not cool" works better than being annoying. Someone has to invent a newfangled device that has to annoy _everyone_ including old farts like me who still has his hearing?

    Fer crissakes, I can hear a flyback transformer whine. Now I have to listen to more noise pollution?

    "You kids! Next time you cut through my yard, go 'round!"

    --
    BMO - Throw me up the stairs, my shoes.

  84. babies by maxzilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if only the young can hear it, why do I think mothers with young children and babies will get peeved because it will wake up sleeping kids or provoke tantrums?

  85. Load of bull by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    "Teens listening to loud music can damage hearing. Make sure they don't listen to loud music!"
    Oh yeah, but this other device doesn't damage their hearing because.....ummm...... we say so.

    Interesting, adults spend millions of dollars on research for studies that tell them that teens shouldn't listen to loud music.
    Yet, They're willing to throw all the data completely out the window when it doesn't work in the favor of the adults.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  86. My experience by glitch0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I frequently whip out my tone generator in class and put it at high frequencies very loud. Gets hilarious when half the class is yelling about a noise and the teacher thinks they're crazy.

    On another note, would those neat Bose active noise cancelling headphones remedy this problem? I know it's rather easy to build active noise cancelling headphones, and if this happened anywhere in my town I would make pairs of these for everyone just to spite them.

    Also, I tend to have worse hearing than most of my peers due to the fact that I play drums rather extensivly. Would this stop me from hearing the sound?

    --
    -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
  87. Better idea by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    You know, I just though of something. If adults are going to use these devices on teenagers. They they shouldn't be allowed to complain about insanely profane, loud, annoying, music being blasted from stereos.

    Teenagers, you find one of these devices being used, go get a portable stereo, come back to where said device is being used, pop in an AC/DC disc, turn to full volume and air guitar for a few hours.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    1. Re:Better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC/DC? Are we aging ourselves again? LOL

  88. A little experiment... by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 1

    Try and substitute each of the following words in the headline and article text in place of the word "teenager". Some additional creative liberty may be needed to make it fit, but the idea should be the same. Of each of these words, which outcomes are acceptable to you?

    - Female (or Male)
    - Black (or White, or...)
    - Homosexual
    - Poor

    I was a teenager once (okay, quite some time ago!), as were many of you. I hated how I was treated then, both by my "peers" and the "responsible adults". True, there are bad apples, but that's the case at every age (think some CEOs, lawyers, politicos).

    Why is it acceptable to give teenagers a hard time, because of a few bad apples?

  89. Built one of these in the late 80's by x_man · · Score: 1

    This device is the famous Pocket Pain Field Generator. You used to be able to buy the schematics from Information Unlimited, which was a mail-order shop for very interesting gadgets like tesla coils and lasers.

    I built one of these babies in the late 80's and raised holy kane in high school because none of the teachers could hear the device. Another property of these devices is that the sound seems to be coming from all directions. It's virtually impossible to determine the source - like say if somebody were to place the device in a library somewhere :)

    I grew up to become a electrical engineer, btw

    X

  90. Huntington metro station in northern Virginia by orangepeel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This just looks like an ultrasonic animal repeller to me. Here's an easy Google Search that shows how common they are. The thing is, anyone with decent hearing will hear these ultrasonic devices too -- and yes, they are extremeley irritating, to the point of being painful. My parents live way out in the country and use one to keep deer away from their garden, and another one to keep their neighbor's cats away from their parked cars. Having to suffer around 2 of those things any time I visit my folks, I can easily recognize the high-pitched agony-inducing devices now.

    And as a result, I suspect there is a powerful one in use at the Huntington metro station. It's cranked way up, frankly to the point that I worry about hearing damage when I walk through the protected area. I can hear the sound just inside the entrance, aimed right at the turnstyles (slightly stronger at the side near the fare card machines). In this case, I imagine they're using it to keep birds and squirrels out of the station. The station itself is in a surprisingly wooded area, nestled into the side of a small hill. I'm sure they found an ultrasonic animal repeller was the only thing that worked at keeping critters out of the station. It nearly keeps me out too ... it actually makes me feel slightly nauseous if I hang around in that entrance area too long.

    --
    Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    1. Re:Huntington metro station in northern Virginia by orangepeel · · Score: 1

      I always forget that there are two levels to the Huntington station. I never use the upper one -- it's the lower one I'm referring to. And now that I think about it I can't remember if both sides of the station have fare card machines or not. It's the right-hand side turnstyles as you go in where the sound seems to be the most intense, although it's barely any better on the left-hand side.

      I wish I knew someone who could corroborate what I hear in that entrance. Unfortunately I don't have any friends who use the yellow line. Even if I did, I doubt any of the people I know these days are sufficiently geeky to be interested in it anyway. An ultrasonic device sure would make sense though, given how many birds and squirrels wander around that station entrance.

      I'd say it's a bit higher in frequency than that high-pitched, sizzling whine that most people with decent hearing can hear when a CRT-based television is turned on in a quiet room. It's high enough that with my mediocre hearing it almost comes across as a pressure more than a sound. But as soon as I start focusing in on the sound, it gets really unpleasant. And I'm not kidding about the nausea. If anyone reading happens to use that metro station, sometime at an off-peak period (don't get yourself trampled during rush hour), try waiting near those turnstyles at the lower level for 30 seconds or so and just pay attention to how your head feels, along with anything you can hear. It would help convince me that I'm not just imagining it if I could spot a device somewhere up on one of the walls, but honestly I don't hang around in there any longer than I have to. I figure loud sounds at the border of my hearing might be a bit like UV light -- you might not be able to sense much of it, but stick around long enough and you're causing damage anyway.

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    2. Re:Huntington metro station in northern Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt the DC metro is smart enough to deploy sonic weapons, they can't even keep their trains running smoothly, or do metal detection. More than likely some kind of EMI. Is there a loitering problem at Huntington?

    3. Re:Huntington metro station in northern Virginia by pontyficator · · Score: 1

      Well, the device for humans can't have a frequency higher than around 22khz but I imagine it is around 2okhz as loudness and frequency are not linearly related. I have actually been more interested in cancelling out the noise emitted from booming car stereos. I think this will make me rich!

    4. Re:Huntington metro station in northern Virginia by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's a bit higher in frequency than that high-pitched, sizzling whine that most people with decent hearing can hear when a CRT-based television is turned on in a quiet room.

      I think that one's around 16 KHz. It's related to the sweep frequency of the electron beam. 30 fps times 525 lines = 15.75 KHz. (Those numbers aren't exactly right, as Wikipedia explains, but they're close enough.)

    5. Re:Huntington metro station in northern Virginia by kabocox · · Score: 1

      This just looks like an ultrasonic animal repeller to me.

      Um, I don't know if I should be mentioning this on /. Oh, heck. My wife and I bought 3-4 of these when we were living out in the country in Arkansas. (I couldn't really tell that they were keeping any insects way but it was a good tech. symbol to believe in.) Well, warnings of these things was in very big and bold letters do not use if you have a pace maker or have guests that may have a pace maker. This device may disrupt the function of a pace maker causing death. These things were fun to listen to. It sounded like a very small click every now and again. I got a small glimmer of happiness thinking that bugs ought to be driven of by that ultrasonic noise. Of course, I always wondered about the pace maker thing...

  91. Home Made Version by rossz · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's easy enough for me to create a home made high pitched squeal. Just take the phone away from my teenage daughter. From what I have been able to ascertain, the telephone is permanently attached to her ear. Taking it away causes her physical pain which results in her emitting an extremely loud high pitched squeal.

    I try not to do that anymore because the neighbors complain.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Home Made Version by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Your insight implies a better way to keep teenagers away from store fronts - block cellphone reception there!

  92. Can't walk the dog past 7-11 by Supurcell · · Score: 1

    Looks like you can forget about walking your dog past the 7-11. It would be even worse for a blind man and his guide dog. I don't think the squirrels or birds will be too happy either.

  93. A hearing aid works too by BlindSpot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I belong to a club that's made up of mostly seniors, so I'm one of just a few people there under 40. A few years ago (I was 25 or 26 then) I was playing with one of our long-time members when I began hearing this really high-pitched whining noise, right on the high edge of my auditory range. Wasn't super loud, but definitely loud enough to notice if you could indeed hear it. After determining to my satisfaction that I wasn't crazy, I deduced the noise was coming from some definite source. I asked my opponent if she could hear it, and she said no but wondered if it was her hearing aid. She turned it down and sure enough, the noise went away! Apparently I was the only one who could hear it.

    Two more occasions I heard the noise and immediately asked her to turn it down and it went away, so that pretty much confirmed the first time wasn't a fluke. I dunno exactly what was happening, but I figure the hearing aid was generating feedback when turned up too loud. After all they are just compact microphones and speakers.

    I tell you, when I heard this noise and I couldn't figure out what it was, I started to get really agitated. The agitation was to the point that where if someone heard it for a sustained long time they could seriously go insane or even try to kill themselves. It was bad. The sense of relief I felt when the noise was turned off was quite profound.

    So anyhow, I didn't RTFA but if they're talking about using this device on a long-term basis to keep teens away from somewhere, this is tantamount to torture. I think anybody considering using this for anything other than security in imminent danger (e.g. teens harassing you) deserves to lose the rest of their hearing too.

    1. Re:A hearing aid works too by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
      So anyhow, I didn't RTFA but if they're talking about using this device on a long-term basis to keep teens away from somewhere, this is tantamount to torture. I think anybody considering using this for anything other than security in imminent danger (e.g. teens harassing you) deserves to lose the rest of their hearing too.
      First of all, if this is being used on someone's property, and you can just walk away, then it's not torture. Second, the very reason this is being used is because of teens harassing people.
    2. Re:A hearing aid works too by jambarama · · Score: 1

      All the device will do is make sure teens spend a shorter amount of time by the store. How long does it take to vandalize a store again?

    3. Re:A hearing aid works too by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      So anyhow, I didn't RTFA but if they're talking about using this device on a long-term basis to keep teens away from somewhere, this is tantamount to torture.
      Then maybe you should RTFA and UYFB (use your effing brain). The teens in question won't be standing around hearing the noise - that's the bloody idea of the device. They hear it, and they go away from a place they don't really have any business hanging about in the first place. The situation is entirely different from yours.
    4. Re:A hearing aid works too by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      If the teen in question doesn't voluntarily leave and has hearing damage, they can sue the owner of the device, 'duh'.

      Here's an idea, why not put spike belts on your front door-step so that people get pain in their feet when they walk up your steps so people stop knocking on your front door? Because injuring people to keep them away is illegal.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    5. Re:A hearing aid works too by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      "How long does it take to vandalize a store again?"

      This is a very good point. If I was the type, I would deliberatly egg any store that had this device, and stop egging stores that don't.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    6. Re:A hearing aid works too by metamatic · · Score: 1
      The agitation was to the point that where if someone heard it for a sustained long time they could seriously go insane or even try to kill themselves. It was bad. The sense of relief I felt when the noise was turned off was quite profound.

      That's basically how I feel about CNN in airport departure lounges.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:A hearing aid works too by BlindSpot · · Score: 1
      So anyhow, I didn't RTFA but if they're talking about using this device on a long-term basis to keep teens away from somewhere, this is tantamount to torture.

      Then maybe you should RTFA and UYFB (use your effing brain). The teens in question won't be standing around hearing the noise - that's the bloody idea of the device. They hear it, and they go away from a place they don't really have any business hanging about in the first place. The situation is entirely different from yours.


      I read the article and I stand by my comment. You think shop owners will post warning signs? Or take steps to ensure it can't be heard outside the shop (e.g. in a mall)? Or only turn it on when there's trouble?

      No, they'll turn it on and leave it on. And the laugahable thing is that they still expect and want teens to patronize their shops! SO we're not even talking about keeping teens away, we're talking about letting them in and annoying the hell out of them so they don't stay long! That seems like a funny way to get business. And if you're a small convenience store owner with whose primary customers come from the nearby school, you'll miss that business a lot more than you think. May as well close up shop now and save your money while you have it.

      But the thing that bothers me the most however is that the use of such a device is vehemently prejudicial. You don't want teens in your store or to stay for very long, that's your right - so post a sign saying "NO ADMITTANCE TO THOSE UNDER xx YEARS OF AGE" or "MAXIMUM TIME IN STORE x MINUTES" and then have the decency to turn people away face-to-face. Don't torture everybody capable of hearing the noise. Like I said, you'll lose a lot of business that way.

      If teens give you trouble at that point then maybe you can use the protection version that the article mentioned. Like I said before, at least that's a legitimate use of the thing.

      If it were confined to stores that'd be one thing, but I just know this thing is gonna end up in some public place sooner or later. If they tried this kind of device in a public place, I'd be the first in line to file a lawsuit. I have the right to be in a public place for legitimate reasons and not have my senses fucked with.

      Another post mentioned playing classical music. That was tried here, in the public transit system. (Where I am, public transit is still owned and run by the city.) They no longer do it, though. Not sure why, but probably they realized (via many complaints) that any music played loudly through third-rate PA speakers will annoy anybody that can hear it. Not to mention, it violates the local noise bylaw. I can only hope something similar will happen with this blasted device.
    8. Re:A hearing aid works too by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      If the teen in question doesn't voluntarily leave and has hearing damage, they can sue the owner of the device, 'duh'.
      Not very likely - as the owner can demonstrate, easily, that the teen in question was not forced to stay, but did so voluntarily. Thus, the teen in question chose to recieve the injury rather than avoiding it.
      Here's an idea, why not put spike belts on your front door-step so that people get pain in their feet when they walk up your steps so people stop knocking on your front door? Because injuring people to keep them away is illegal.
      If the shop owner in question was injuring people - you'd have a point. Don't confuse your strawman with reality.
    9. Re:A hearing aid works too by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I read the article and I stand by my comment.
      Then you didn't UYFB as instructed - at least not to actually think, preferring to burn strawmen instead.
    10. Re:A hearing aid works too by mikefe · · Score: 1

      No, throwing spark plugs would be better.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    11. Re:A hearing aid works too by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Then this business will go out of business or change.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    12. Re:A hearing aid works too by BlindSpot · · Score: 1
      I read the article and I stand by my comment.
      Then you didn't UYFB as instructed - at least not to actually think, preferring to burn strawmen instead.


      I have used my fucking brain and deduced that you are not interested in actually reading what I write but instead simply trying to insult me.
  94. Today by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    Today: Miracle Hypersonic siren drives away teens and children. Tomorrow: Modern teens going deaf.

    1. Re:Today by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Loss of hearing in teens blamed on video games and evil music".

  95. Today by Jozer99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Today: Miracle Hypersonic siren drives away teens and children. Tomorrow: Modern teens going deaf, lets blame iPods.

  96. Please, for God's sake by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    someone put these things all around Michael Jackson's house.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Please, for God's sake by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Forget Michael Jackson. I want to bribe someone at Blizzard to make WoW emit that sound periodically...

  97. I think it's rude by memeplex · · Score: 0

    ... to irritate Prefects. Now you kids get off'n my lawn or I'll call the Prefect of Police!

  98. Earplugs: The Tools of The London Underworld by narcc · · Score: 1
    It would be most useful when youths swarm into stores and begin stealing en masse, a phenomenon known in Britain as steaming. The idea would be to blast them with such an unacceptably loud, high noise

    Thieves
    When earplugs are outlawed ... only outlaws will have earplugs
    1. Re:Earplugs: The Tools of The London Underworld by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      Even though these teenage street thugs are usually not particularly bright I think they may yet discover earplugs. Cheap foam ones will easily keep out the whine. Cheap musician plugs will even allow conversation - in fact they'll get more annoying because they'll talk louder.

      I wouldn't put it past the intrusive UK government to try to implement some measure to keep earplugs out of the hands of the teens.

  99. Far more effective... by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some good classical music with maybe a little John Tesh thrown in for good measure. Just don't make me haul out the "big guns" and start playing some Celine Dion!

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Far more effective... by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe this will spark an arms war where kids start carrying around ghetto-blasters playing rap music to drive those pesky adults away.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    2. Re:Far more effective... by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used to live in downtown Long Beach, Ca, and would often find guys on our porch smoking, drinking and cussing. Asking them to leave got old after a while, and wasn't really effective. We finally got a hymn CD, that worked better than anything else we tried.

    3. Re:Far more effective... by prichardson · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As a classical musician and theorist I'm really offended that you put Celine and John Tesh on the same list as classical music.

      I'm really really fucking offended, actually.

      Get some taste.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    4. Re:Far more effective... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds like so much drama in the LBC, it must be hard to be Snoop D O double g.

    5. Re:Far more effective... by Komarosu · · Score: 1

      Woah, take it on the chin, after all this is slashdot. If we can't bash someone what can we do?

      --

      "What do you mean you have no ice? Do you expect me to drink this coffee hot?" - Random Customer, Clerks
    6. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      taste is relative. classical may be worse than celine dion to celine dion fans for example...just because you yourself cant stand our queen doesnt mean the op didnt have taste....

    7. Re:Far more effective... by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Somebody please check this man's HMO plan, and see if he's eligible for a humor transplant, because by god he needs it.

    8. Re:Far more effective... by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 1

      Don't they do that already?

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    9. Re:Far more effective... by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Death Metal works better, and unlike (c)rap it actually takes talent to make...

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    10. Re:Far more effective... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with taste, Celine Dion just isn't classical according to any definition I'm aware of.

      That said - it was a joke. He was saying that playing Celine Dion would drive the kids away, as would John Tesh or classical music. He wasn't saying that Celine is classical, he was saying that Celine is awful...

    11. Re:Far more effective... by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Jesus man, why do all classical musicians and theorists need to be such fucking wanks? Chill out.

    12. Re:Far more effective... by indytx · · Score: 1
      Maybe this will spark an arms war where kids start carrying around ghetto-blasters playing rap music to drive those pesky adults away.

      I miss the '80's.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
    13. Re:Far more effective... by adam1234 · · Score: 1

      Death Metal ... actually takes talent to make...

      Yeah. Right.

    14. Re:Far more effective... by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      Death Metal works better, and unlike (c)rap it actually takes talent to make...

      (c)rap. That's clever. No, really, it is. Novel too.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    15. Re:Far more effective... by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, that is right. Listen to some Opeth, Children of Bodom, Trivium, Lamb of God, or Killswitch Engage. It takes many years to reach those levels of playing, rhythmic talking (rap) doesn't.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    16. Re:Far more effective... by Chrontius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly, I'm pretty sure that this is turning my stomach (though that may be the pizza from last night) -- in the course of my high school career, I developed a very high pain threshold because every day of every week of every... I had a monster, killer splitting headache by the time I got home due to the countless TVs left on, tuned to a blank station.

      This strikes me as somewhere between sadistic and evil and I think this is going to backfire long-run -- if your future customers associate your shop with pain now, they'll go elsewhere later.

    17. Re:Far more effective... by Kitsuneymg · · Score: 1

      So wait...
      He copyrighted rap?

    18. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh... my... god... what great examples of untalented metal bands, at least listen to some megadeth! Furthermore, how dare you make claims against the talent of artists within an entire genre of music. A lot of death metal sucks TOTAL ass, and there are rapper with more talent than you in their little finger. When I hear people say "I hate , it takes no talent" it sounds the same to me as "I hate black people, they are stupid."

    19. Re:Far more effective... by slapout · · Score: 4, Funny

      NO! Don't play any Celine Dion! You might get a rootkit on your PC and then you'll need those kids to help you get it off!

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    20. Re:Far more effective... by Siberwulf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some good classical music with maybe a little John Tesh thrown in for good measure. Just don't make me haul out the "big guns" and start playing some Celine Dion! Note the bold. It means "in addition to" not "including". He never said they were classical. As an English professor, I'm really offended by your inability to read. Reall, I'm offended.

    21. Re:Far more effective... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Hmm... good idea. I should patent the concept of rythmic speech spoken over rythm and blues-based music samples. Wouldn't cover the whole of the rap world, but enough of it to get rich over unfairly induced royalties.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    22. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's easy to shield yourself from high frequencies. Low frequencies, however, can go right through concrete walls. You can't even have peace and quiet in your own fucking home anymore.

      They should outlaw those fucking subwoofers. And the next car that has some fucking low frequency shit (BOOM-BOOM-BOOM isn't music, assholes) next to me at a red light better be insured.

    23. Re:Far more effective... by Kitsuneymg · · Score: 1

      or you could use your powers for good and just not let anyone produce rap at all.

    24. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a classical musician and theorist I'm really offended that you put Celine and John Tesh on the same list as classical music."

      Of course you are.

      Classical music simply doesn't hold up to those two juggernauts.

      Maybe "Dog diarrhea, rotting fruit, and classicl music" is closer.

    25. Re:Far more effective... by Wellspring · · Score: 2, Funny


      Use of John Tesh is against the Geneva Accords. I'd take Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings's work over his any day.

    26. Re:Far more effective... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      offended by your inability to read. Reall, I'm offended.
      As a college student, I'm rather offended at your lack of proofreading. I should expect English processors to catch their own simple spelling mistakes and typos.

      As long as we're harping on everyone ;)

    27. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (+1, HHGTTG)

    28. Re:Far more effective... by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The whole 1980's notion of "keep those damn kids outta my store" is passe. This would be great to keep teens out of industrial areas, warehouses, and the alley behind the store after hours. It wouldn't be turned on during the day. After all, you want teens to come to your store. 15 to 18 year olds with an income source often don't have many financial responsibilities and, as a result, have a relatively high percentage of disposable income.

      And yes. I agree with you. Shooing teens from my store during the day is a bad thing. I want them to spend as much of their cash as they can, preferably in my store.

    29. Re:Far more effective... by Mr.+Marabou+Man · · Score: 1

      They did just that that at Copenhagen Central Station at the back entrance, to keep junkies and alcoholics away .... and it works pretty good too.
      Classical, that is. Not Celine Dion ... is that even legal ? X-/

    30. Re:Far more effective... by Siberwulf · · Score: 1

      I guess I forgot my SML tags (Sarcasm Markup Language)

    31. Re:Far more effective... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 0, Troll

      Blah. That's what old people like. Get over it.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    32. Re:Far more effective... by shroompicker · · Score: 1

      I'm 32, and I'm sure that sound would drive me away as well. I wouldn't be able to stroll that sidewalk in peace.

    33. Re:Far more effective... by crabpeople · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I had a monster, killer splitting headache by the time I got home due to the countless TVs left on, tuned to a blank station."

      that sentance makes no sense. Why was this guy modded up? why were "tvs left on" on your way home? did you live in the entertainment section of a department store? were there like a tonne of tv shoppes on the block where you lived? that piped the sound of static into the street?

      do people even read the posts they mod up?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    34. Re:Far more effective... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      Right. *goes practicing his Scooby Doo monster singing*

    35. Re:Far more effective... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      US PATENT APPLICATION This application describes: Means of "fat beatz" by using "da groove machine" to "funk da houz". Wutz needid: - da lean mean groove machine - hot bitches yo - vinyl (fo' tha playah, not da bitches) - mixar Dat's it! Ya' got sum hot shit!

    36. Re:Far more effective... by psm321 · · Score: 1

      How about you actually read the post before criticizing the moderation? He obviously was referring to TVs left on at school, which is a pretty common practice.

    37. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's pretty obvious he meant all the TVs in all the school rooms that were left on in the building. As he walked the halls throughout the day, it gave him a migraine by the time he went home. Apparently, his ears are good at hearing very high frequencies.

      I have a similar problem, I can hear electronic components "whine". The solution for me is to turn on some music, it helps. Also, when a TV is turned on, I can hear the static field forming. I can also see the capacitated energy in the phosphors fade away when the TV is turned off, though others say they cannot. And, it's hard to sleep at night sometimes, because I can hear clocks ticking away as if they were knuckles cracking.

      On the bright side, I can hear silent whispering conversations from across the room at my job even though they think no one can hear them. And, I can hear sounds at a pretty large distance outside with crystal clarity.

      What is amusing is that in high school they thought I was deaf one time, because they gave me a hearing test in the cafeteria of all places. Usually, they give it to you in the nurses office, but for some reason they couldn't at that time. At any rate, I could hear every single conversation, chairs smacking the floor, backpacks slipping off arms, mouths crunching food, people laughing and it distracted me from listening to the high pitched tones.

      Oh, that reminds me, if you have good hearing listening to people eat food is stomach turning. The sound of it isn't so bad if I am also eating food at the time because it distracts me from the sound.

    38. Re:Far more effective... by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Some others have already pointed this out but, in simpler terms, I can swat a fly with either "War and Peace" or the "National Enquirer". This in no way means that I consider them to be equivalent works of literature.

      Now can I get back to listening to my Barry Manilow album?

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    39. Re:Far more effective... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      If you want some real sonic torture, walk into a Best Buy or something... if I stay in one of those places for more than about 15 minutes, I need some aspirin and a nap.

    40. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandpa?

    41. Re:Far more effective... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "profit" and "for the good of humanity" don't often go in the same sentence.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    42. Re:Far more effective... by psylew · · Score: 1

      Seems like you've made the common mistake of trying to listen to death metal for the lyrics. Not such a good idea. It's usually the instrumental portion that takes a great deal of skill to pull off.

      One of the most impressive sights I've been afforded was to see truly well trained musicians performing 2 hours straight of speed & death metal.

    43. Re:Far more effective... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You're showing your youth child. Notice how you always hear the oldies playing Celine? Notice how high pitched her voice is? You think we listen to that $hite all the time? Clueless whippersnapper! We only turn it on when YOU come around. We can't even hear it! We're just using it to drive you away. Once we're sure you're gone, it's back to PeeDiddy and 50cents.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    44. Re:Far more effective... by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      I like other stuff, Queensrych is one of my favorites. I like some Iron Maden, and some Judas Priest, though I don't like the vocals (Geoff Tate kicks ass, though).

      Also, I don't hate black people. In fact three of my favorite musicians are black, Jimi Hendrix, Wes Montgomery, and B.B. King. Yes, I like blues and jazz. I just don't like modern rap, though some of the old stuff is pretty good (De La Soul, for example).

      BTW, why was my post marked as flamebait? Really, if you want to scare old people blast out some Cannibal Corpse or Six Feet Under. Marilyn Manson also works quite well.

      Also, if you think screaming is easy, try doing a few songs. It takes training to do it properly, for me it's harder to do than singing.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    45. Re:Far more effective... by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention, my band used to cover "Fuck The Police" by NWA and a few Rage songs. I can rap, it's easy compaired to singing or screaming.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    46. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize he meant the countless TVs left on at the school he attended (most likey the ones in the classrooms used for shoving "Channel 1" or other "News" shows that serve little point beyond advertising), correct?

    47. Re:Far more effective... by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      Shoot them for trespassing.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    48. Re:Far more effective... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      What lyrics? Thought it was just growling.

    49. Re:Far more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, there's a good idea. Anger their posse, that will surely keep your home safe.

    50. Re:Far more effective... by prichardson · · Score: 1

      Pot, meet Kettle...

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    51. Re:Far more effective... by prichardson · · Score: 1

      This is a flawed analogy because in my case it was the content that was being compared, not the vehicle of the content (in your case the book/waste paper). A better analogy would be killing the fly by reading aloud to it from these respective texts.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    52. Re:Far more effective... by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      Real rap (sung by African-American slaves) is good. It's the fake rap that kids listen to that's crap.

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
    53. Re:Far more effective... by bh_doc · · Score: 1

      "Hey you rootkits! Get off my PC!"

    54. Re:Far more effective... by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1
      A better analogy would be killing the fly by reading aloud to it from these respective texts.
      I disagree. The content was simply a means to an end not an end in itself. Replace "War and Peace" in my previous posting with "Human Action" (von Mises) and "The National Enquirer" with say "People" and I am just as happy with it. The specifics aren't the point.

      In the original post, I just picked the first two current artists I could think of who wouldn't be "appreciated" by the "target audience" as well as classical music. The whole point was that they were all indistinguishable by the "target audience." Just like the fly doesn't really care which work it gets hit with; only that it gets hit. You request that the fly suddenly appreciate the artistic value of what is being use to kill it.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    55. Re:Far more effective... by animale · · Score: 1

      But I, somehow, some way, keep coming up with funky ass slashdot like every single day.

      --
      _____ Computers are so complicated... I thought I never learn how. Then I found out there was Free Pornography on them.
    56. Re:Far more effective... by psylew · · Score: 1

      Eh. They try (usually unsuccessfully) to approximate words. Perhaps a better word choice would have been "vocals". :-)

  100. Instal it in schools ASAP by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    1. Loud screeching sounds are known to improve teachers' authority.
    2. Most kids deserve it, one way or another.
    3. And we could reward the good kids - by turning the device off (briefly).
    4. Inventing new and terrifying ways of turning food into slop would become obsolete.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  101. WHAT'S THE FREQUENCY??? by Palal · · Score: 1

    I want to know the frequency, so I can try this!

    --
    -Palal
    1. Re:WHAT'S THE FREQUENCY??? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      Ah...so that was what the REM song was about: two old guys running a liquor store:

      "Hey Jesse, go turn on the de-teenulator to get rid of them there varmints."

      "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:WHAT'S THE FREQUENCY??? by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      I want to know the frequency, so I can try this!

      All I know is that I stopped watching TV since our old TV makes a high-pitch noise, which my parents cannot hear at all. It comes from the high voltage transformer, which operates at around 15kHz. From what I heard, when the transformer gets old, the threads in the transformers coil will have a slight slack and vibrate at that frequency, producing the noise.

      I found that noise highly annoying, so you might want to start around there :)

  102. WHAT by Neillparatzo · · Score: 1
    Congratulations, that has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.

    The question was: Will a 75dB sound cause hearing damage?

    What you pasted says: If you cannot hear sounds below 75dB, then you are deaf.

    But it's got fancy scientifical words like "cochlear" so I guess that means it's important, am I rite?

  103. Turnabout is fair play, I guess by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 1

    How ironic. Older people discovering (?) that high pitched sounds annoy teenagers. Teenagers use low pitched sounds (boom cars playing overamped bass-heavy music) to annoy old people. So who speaks for the mid-range?

    --
    "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
  104. Stupidest thing ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the dumbest idea I ever heard. I am a teen, and I suppose I can appreciate the need to get rid of the bad ones in the world. But, making an annoying sound..thats just plain rude.
    I know even myself, I am very annoyed be high pitched sounds, even more so than my friends. I can hear things that are way out there. This would be an extremely annoying piece of work for me.
    If I ever saw a shop that had one of these I would definitally complain to the manager/owner and not shop there again.. that is, if I didnt rip the thing off the wall beforehand.

    Whoever invented this device obviously has no respect for the younger folk of the world good/bad, and perhaps has something against his kids.

  105. Motivation?! by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Funny

    by experimenting on his children

    I didn't considered *that* when I decided I shall have no children...

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  106. TV Noise by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Yes - I know EXACTLY what you mean.

    There have been times when I will walk into a room where the TV is supposedly off, just a blacks creen (no LED indicators on the front) and I will mention that the TV is on, walk up to it, and turn it off. The other people in the room will be like "how did you know that"

    This really suprises me because I am an audio engineer and I OFTEN times listen to music at 110+ dB A SPL. I would've thought my hearing would have been shot by my ripe old age of 23 ;-)

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:TV Noise by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      I'm the only person in my household that can hear it, so it bugs me when we're all, say, walking out and I know the TV is still on but muted (behind a closed cabinet). Constantly astonishes them.

      I'd have figured I'd have lost it by now, but it's still as noticeable as when I was young.

  107. Read tomorrow's Slashdot on today's FARK by hemp · · Score: 1

    Isn't there anything original to post these days?

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
  108. iPod = Mosquito Repellant ... by rewinn · · Score: 1

    Teens can easily defeat the "Mosquito" by just crankin' up their iPod ...

    ... now a REALLY effective Teen-Repelling device would wirelessly infect their iPods, so that they played [ insert anti-teenager music joke here ]

  109. Two can play at that game: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Funny
    The Teenagers have Rap Music - it drives old people away.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Two can play at that game: by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

      That's an oxymoron

      --
      I see 57005 people
    2. Re:Two can play at that game: by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      That's funny. Because Rap has been around for so long now, that old people are listening to it.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  110. I've heard it!!! by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I am a teen, 18 to be exact, and I have relatively unabused ears for now. I've noticed every once in a while a high pitched noice comming from CRT screens, both my monitor and tv screens do it. Basicly, I hear the noise, 'feel' it a little in the back of my throat, and have the urge to go into a murderous rampage and/or vomiting spell whenever I hear it. I can honestly see this noise (if its the same one) being a quite effective mode of crowd control, or perhaps a new path to superhero-dom? I think there was a (new) Twilight Zone episode about this, alien signal saved the world and such. Anyhoo, happy hacking.

    --
    -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    1. Re:I've heard it!!! by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble but if you're 18 and just "feel" the TV line sync (about 16kHz in Europe and only 15kHz in US), then your hearing is pretty lousy.

      For a typical young, undamaged ear drum, the "feeling" reaches easily 20kHz (e.g. you can not only feel but hear as well the 19kHz stereo signal carrier of a cheap FM radio).

  111. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny part is that can't legally consume alcoholic beverage.

    1. Re:No... by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live. Here in Manitoba, if you're 18, you can drink, smoke, buy porn, or do just about anything else that is legal.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    2. Re:No... by Molt · · Score: 1

      The funny part is this story is from a place called Wales, which as part of the UK has eighteen as it's age limit for consuming alcoholic beverages.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
  112. Arms Race by izomiac · · Score: 1

    If this became wide spread then it wouldn't be hard to guess how teenagers would respond... louder and louder car stereos, which would result in more of these devices being use and so on and so forth. So there goes any sembalance of peace and quite in populated areas. Seriously though, if some business that I had to walk by implemented this I would go rather far out of my way just to avoid it. Turning on old TVs is bad enough, but a continuous, loud, high pitched, intentionally annoying sound? Since I'm probably not alone in that regard I can only imagine the impact on the surrounding businesses. No more cheap teenage labor, and no more customers under thirty. If I had no choice but to walk by these devices then I'd probably result to vandalism.

  113. Strange that the frequency... by therufus · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...happens to be the vocal range of Celene Dion.

    Laugh people - its funny.

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    1. Re:Strange that the frequency... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean: Celine Dion

  114. Kids have already developed this technology by kongjie · · Score: 1
    It's called the whine. Few parents are able to tune it out and most give in to it eventually.

    But seriously, this reminds me of another news items several years ago, I think. Someone came up with a streetlight whose color accentuated skin flaws like acne and generally made skin (probably light-colored skin, but perhaps all shades) extremely unattractive. The idea was that it would discourage teenage loitering, since they're so image-conscious.

  115. Open Season by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    The police can't do anything much more than shoo the offending youth away

    I'm telling you, police need cattle prods (or maybe, them newfangled tasers) exactly for this reason.

    Maybe when all the asshats smell like jerky, the rest of us teens will be left alone.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  116. When I was a young man... by Urusai · · Score: 1

    ...we didn't have all this hippin' and the hoppin' and eXtreme sports and we didn't smugly hold products at arms length toward cameras while listening to our eye-pods.

    But seriously, the lack of youth crime tells me not that things are peachy, but that 25 years of conformist oppression has created a generation of vapid drones. I want youth rebelling, it means they give a damn. Gen X was cynical and nominally apathetic, but Gen Y is just pathetic. They don't even realize how fucked up this country has become, because it has always been this way to them. When they eventually vote (probably around their late 20s), woe betide us. I mean, moreso. Geez, I really need to emigrate.

    1. Re:When I was a young man... by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least Gen X got better music--Nirvana, Soundgarden, Rage Against the Machine, and Gen Y got Backstreet Boys and nu-metal? Barf.

  117. wake me up by croto · · Score: 1

    when someone invents a gadget to atract teens, preferably girls ;)

    Oh, wait, you're right. I guess I should stop the cheap p0rn movies

  118. Idiots by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    You know what else teens hate? If you spread a thick layer of fresh pig manure all over the parking lot of your establishment. You see, their noses respond to the smell. Can't stand it. You know for sure that Satan laughed the day that leaf-blowers were invented. This, while evil, probably only gave him a slight chuckle.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  119. Music by phorm · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're just trying to keep away younger audiences from your venue, then one could assume that you're trying to attract the older audiences. In this case, such things as old German oompah music would do quite a good job of attracting older customers and sending the young packing.

    What, you thought only the younger generation's music was annoying to the older?

  120. MOD PARENT UP by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1

    And mod grandparent down.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  121. Teens are scary, because... by figgypower · · Score: 1

    they have sex, they rebel, and they think and talk all the time! Dag nab teenagers...

  122. Gimme sample! by antonme · · Score: 1

    Where is a sample? I wanna hear it!

  123. That's nothing... by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funniest thing I ever did was steal every telephone (minus no more than 10) on the second floor of my middle school on April Fools Day. The phones snapped into a bracket on the wall, so just unplug the cord and pull them out, and POW! you're in business. Sad thing, I walked around with them for two classes until someone asked me what the heck I was doing.

    Hey, what are you doing?

    Oh, nothing much. You?

    Looks around Where's my telephone?

    Gestures at stack of telephones Second one from the bottom.

    Why did you take all the phones?

    Why didn't you take the phones? I shouldn't be the one who has to.

    ...and all I had to do was put them back! Which took the rest of the hour.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  124. What part of this country? (overgeneralization) by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The teenagers aren't anti-teenager (duh!). So who are you talking about?
    Yet as a group, teenagers sure are very ostracized, looked down, and picked on.
    You might have noticed that teenagers are less well-socialized, less acquainted with work (as illegal aliens have taken many of the jobs once performed by teenagers as professionals-in-training), and otherwise contemptuous of the virtues of the society which makes their comfortable lives possible.

    Call it anti-boorishness, anti-hypocrisy, anti-jerk. But until kids get sneered at for saying "Yes, sir" and helping old ladies across the street, don't call this country anti-teenager.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:What part of this country? (overgeneralization) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing with teenagers is that as they mature and become socialized, they see parts of society that they don't like and therefore resist that part of socialization. Like automatically addressing adult men as "sir." Carries connotations of prostrating your peasant ass before the nobility to me.

      As for being less acquainted with work because illegal immigrants fill the positions we would have otherwise... what the fuck? Is it somehow our fault for not being illegal immigrants who Wal-Mart can pay less than minimum wage to?

      And to address your last point: I'm 17 now. I used to hold doors for people; people in general, not just women or the elderly. For some reason, when I was about fourteen, people started glaring at me when I did so. (And no, I do not dress strangely, nor do I have any piercings or dye my hair or any of that.) I'll still hold a door for someone whose arms are full, but the rest of the ingrates can open their own door.

    2. Re:What part of this country? (overgeneralization) by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
      Is it somehow our fault for not being illegal immigrants who Wal-Mart can pay less than minimum wage to?
      I fear you've mis-attributed responsibility here. The flood of illegals and the gutting of the INS is due more to business interests. However, the effect on teenagers doesn't depend on how the illegals got the jobs (just that they did).

      And log in. Being a teenager doesn't mean you can't establish a worthwhile reputation by being insightful.

      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  125. Us perminent teenagers ... by opencity · · Score: 1

    ... use 808 kick drum sounds (low hiphop bass) to drive old folks away.

    I remember my mother not liking the name of a band. My stepfather said, "you're not supposed to, you're a mom" and then she understood (and approved: that's showbusiness)

    Reading slashdot you'd almost think there was a generation gap coming. Just wait'll we start drafting them.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  126. Hack it! by HeliumHigh · · Score: 1

    Just wait untill they start modding them to emit sound so that the store clerks and older customers go away.

    That, or maybe the next trend will be earmuffs. Or lawsuits over injured hearing, and how it emotionally scared (more than regualr) 'my sweet little boy!'.

  127. fran drescher? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    Reports are that it works quite well, but some older people can hear it too. He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children.

    Wait, so you're saying most adults can't hear Fran Drescher?

  128. frickin ennoying, but effective by Maglos · · Score: 1

    I heard something fitting this description in a tokyo mall not to long ago, it was annoying as hell, and it did make we want to leave. I it would be useful if you where to turn it on, when their is a problem,and have security manage it.

  129. I think David Jones is already doing this by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    The David Jones store in Perth City has an annoying high-pitched sound near their main doors. Most people don't seem to notice. I thought it might be an insect repellent, but this idea sounds very likely. Certainly drives me away from the store, pity for them I'm 30-something.

  130. Resonant frequencies... by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 3, Funny
    We had one classroom that happened thanks to some accidental miracle of 1960s construction technology to have the unique acoustic property that it would amplify a certain frequency. If one or more of us started humming at that special note, the whole classroom would start to resonate. The beauty was that it was totally non-directional, making nearly impossible to figure out who was doing it.

    Not that we abused this or anything...

    1. Re:Resonant frequencies... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Funny


      I did a short stint as a Maths teacher. The hardest part was trying to remember I was on the other side now (I was trouble at school). We had some construction work going on at the school and there was some sort of crane-mounted pile driving going on so that every five seconds or so, the entire classroom would shake and rattle. Just in one perfect lull in the general chaos that was the bottom year 11 maths set, one kid calls out to another: "'Ere, Darren! Yer mama's coming!"

      I have never had to try so hard not to laugh in my life.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:Resonant frequencies... by macwarriorny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a student music teacher long ago and taught in a classroom (school was built in the mid 60s) that had the same type of acoustics, in fact, the particular note was A above middle C. The first time I had a choir of about 40 junior high kids sing that note in unison I thought the blackboard was going to vibrate off the wall. It was very weird.

      --
      Life is such a sweet insanity. The more you learn, the less you know.
  131. This reminds me... by CriminalNerd · · Score: 1

    ...of the Bush administration's new arsenal of "non-lethal" weapons.

  132. Fuck you, ya bald headed ol' fart by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm actually a balding ol' fart but I loathe the very thought of ever fuckin' mellowing out.

    I'm angrier now than I ever was but its a cold and calculating anger. Its the steely edge of the knife.

    I have outgrown the fugues and tirades of youth, when I'd wax elequent with rage and make the most grandeloquent speeches any man could ever regret, if he could regret anything, but I don't.

    John Tesh can swallow and kiss my lil' pink ass after I take a dump right in his fuckin' gob.

    Me mellow?

    Like A-fuckin'-lexis Sayles...

    I'm driven and driven to drink by "mellow people." I'm a man with a mission, touched with a little madness, or is it genius that pushes, prods and make me reach beyond myself?

    I HATE having become a cripple. Fuck.

    I used to be a dancer.

    I used to be a musician.

    I used to be the guy a mother warned her daughter about.

    I used to be the guy a daughter didn't tell her mother about.

    And I HATE fuckin' growing old.

    So I'M NOT FUCKIN' DOING IT.

    (A little catharsis is good every now and then.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Fuck you, ya bald headed ol' fart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of shit.

    2. Re:Fuck you, ya bald headed ol' fart by Gleng · · Score: 1

      This post is fantastic if you read it in the voice of Zed from Police Academy.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    3. Re:Fuck you, ya bald headed ol' fart by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Yo, Pops, you forgot your medication. Here, take this and come back to your couch before you throw out your hip again.

  133. Absolutely Idiotic by strider44 · · Score: 1

    How the hell does this make economical sense. Apart from the fact that you're driving away the teenagers who might actually spend money at the store, along with any adults (like me) who can hear these sorts of high frequency noises, which pretty much eliminates most people under 25, but you're driving away any parents (and believe it or not a lot of people have children now-a-days!) whose children can't stand to go inside, which cuts down most of the 25-50 year old bracket. Are they only going to sell to people over 50 or something? Why don't they just require that a pensioners card be shown before allowing entry on the premesis?

    1. Re:Absolutely Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you own a shop, that most of your customers are don't like to go in, as it involves suffering abuse from a bunch of teenagers (who don't spend monney in your shop, but do steal goods), would you want to
      A) Keep the theifing chavs?
      B) Keep the good customers, and get rid of the theifing chavs?

  134. Projector Squeel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can attest to high frequency noises -- there was a projector in our distance learning class for calculus that put off this loud, EXTEMELY high-pitched noise. It is one of the reasons I ended up dropping the class.

    The professor couldn't hear it, and myself being one of the younger students, heard it much better than the older ones. I wished I had realised the usefulness of driving teens crazy and making the connection to the loitering problem.

  135. Am I the only one by Silkejr · · Score: 1

    Who thinks that experimenting on one's children is pretty fucked-up?

    1. Re:Am I the only one by obrienslalom · · Score: 1

      i was waiting for that comment

  136. We don't need no Though Control by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    This sound appears all the time on eMpTyV2 when they announce concerts. I seem to find more concerts in a copy of the St. Louis Riverfront Times in these places called "local venues". Secondly, what's to keep the establishment from using it as a disciplinary weapon in schools? It's bad enough we have tasers. (Help you that you don't get tazed in the spine!)

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  137. Is anyone worried... by shimavak · · Score: 1

    about actually damaging the hearing of the people being driven away by this device. If memory serves me correctly, 75 dB is pretty darn intense sound, though it is a very high frequency. Is there no discussion of what damage it will cause to those listening. After a long time hearing this very loud, very high frequency sound, I would imagine that those subjected to it will no longer be able to hear in that range. It seems patently absurd that this can be considered moral.

    Is there to be culpability for destroying the hearing of the youth? I wonder how this plays out in the courts? Is it the listeners fault for being close enough to the sound source to have their ears damaged, or is it the originators fault for intentionally creating a noise which could be potentially destructive of hearing?

    To me it shoudn't matter if they don't realize it would harm hearing; ignorance is not a defense. At the very least it could be considered neglegence.

    --
    "[Physics] has nothing to do directly with defending our country, except to make it worth defending." -- Robert Wilson
  138. Believe the neurophysiologist quoted... by cory_p82 · · Score: 1

    The article itself quotes Dr. Andrew King...

    Andrew King, a professor of neurophysiology at Oxford University, said in an e-mail interview that while the ability to hear high frequencies deteriorates with age, the change happens so gradually that many non-teenagers might well hear the Mosquito's noise. "Unless the store owners wish to sell their goods only to senior citizens," he wrote, "I doubt that this would work."

    So, essentially, all this does is make shopping at the store more annoying for everyone, especially those 20-somethings with disposable income. I think I would avoid a store that had an obnoxious high frequency pulsating sound. The store owners are trading their sales for having fewer teenagers hanging around.

  139. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  140. Revenge by Explodicle · · Score: 1

    Is it wise to piss off a group of immature people with too much time on their hands?

  141. Driving away teens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd imagine the young people of today (say that with a heavy Yorkshire accent) have hearing too damaged from loud music to be able to hear high frequency noise - when was the last time you ever saw teenager complain about a squealing computer monitor?

    Naw, if you want to drive them away, play Bobby Goldsborough songs on the PA... ("...and Honey, I miss you, and I'm being good"...AAAIIIEIIIE!!!!!)

  142. ZIT Lamp!??? by Chingatch · · Score: 1

    This cracked me up for a minute or two!
    "Some shops, for example, use "zit lamps," which drive teenagers away by casting a blue light onto their spotty skin, accentuating any whiteheads and other blemishes."

  143. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  144. Classical music works too by jebiester · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A cinema in my town had the same problem with large groups of teenagers loitering at the entrance. Once they started playing nice classical music (not even loudly) they all dissappeared. I guess it was no longer a "cool" place to hang out any more. I think the makers of this device should have tried their first option, at least it's less iritating to customers.

    1. Re:Classical music works too by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've read about that somewhere also. It seems very successful. Plus, it is not nearly as irritating as buzzes or squeals.

    2. Re:Classical music works too by mlk · · Score: 1

      The Tube in Athens (Greece) plays Classical music, it is much nicer to travel in than the one in London.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Classical music works too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for this. I'm 19, and classical music does the trick for me.

  145. Yes... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    ...but will the sound be reproduced properly over VOIP? It'd be great to use on a game server to get all the kiddies off. :P Too bad you can't use it on IRC...

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  146. Are you sure it's not right? by Carl+T · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here I was hoping that that they'd found a way to drive off prefects of various kinds. Not that I dislike the one we have around here, but sometimes it could be useful.

    --

    This signature is not in the public domain.
    1. Re:Are you sure it's not right? by s-meister · · Score: 1

      I think you're some kind of deviated prefect. And I think General Ripper found out about your prefection, and that you were organizing some kind of mutiny of prefects. Now, move!

  147. Another method by f4phaedrus · · Score: 1


    It has been discovered that a punch in the face drives away techies who have nothing better to do with their time than create technology that causes pain and controls people.

  148. This thread is useless... by Atario · · Score: 1

    ...without lots of annoying .WAV files.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  149. Now all we need is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    something to repel Americans and make the world a safer place!

  150. Social problems need social solutions by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

    Well an individual shop owner should certainly not have to carry a whole society's guilt.

    But why is such a thing needed anyway ? if not because there is nothing else interesting to do for teenagers.

    Or even worse they probably do not have the mental tools necessary to imagine something else to do.

    -- waza doing, nothun chilling it out, nyou, nothun -- 20 years later encephalogram still pretty much flat --

    Our society has spent so much time transforming us into consumer that if we do not have the money to consume we feel the need to be "near the consomation opportunity", we have made consomation a "spectator sport" for thouse that cannot (just like sport is a spectator sport for the 'sportively challenged'".

    So the solution is PAY MORE TAXES, and use them to provide better public education, particularly for the kids that would not get "good parenting".
    And create places that are "fun to hang out" for teens, with things to do (and places to be while doing nothing except maybe shmoosing).

  151. the story of hercules and the hydra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we alienate teens from society to the point that they have nothing better to do than loiter outside of stores. Then someone creates a device to drive the kids away from the stores. I don't understand how this is going to solve any problem without leading to the same exact problem in a different location.

  152. Ineffective decibel levels, quack argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The frequency of a television whine is roughly 16kHz. This pitch is not terribly annoying, unless at very high decibel levels. FWIW I am 33 and I can still hear it fine. 75dB is not going to be enough, that's about conversation level. Plenty of teens attend concerts which center around distorted instruments like the guitar, which commonly have an excess of these high harmonics, and you don't see teens fleeing these concerts.

    Damaging sound is damaging sound, regardless of age, annoyance is not a compelling argument.
    This dude is talking out his ass.

  153. I HATE THE TV NOISE by KylePflug · · Score: 1

    I can't tell you how much I hate the TV noise. I'm only 19, so it probably explains it, but I work at Best Buy and every time I have to help someone out in the CRT aisles I feel like my brain is going to explode. Hundreds of crappy TVs all tuned to the exact resonant frequency of my BRAIN, FORCING IT TO SHATTER MY SKULL... YEEAAARGHHH.

    So yeah. I hate the TV noise. If rock concerts will fix it, then to rock concerts I will go.

    1. Re:I HATE THE TV NOISE by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      And then they brought out 60Hz mode in games, which makes them look a little smoother, but cranks the whine up to an even more annoying level. Danm my ears!!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:I HATE THE TV NOISE by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm 30 and I still hear it. It's a disgusting sound. I can hear it throughout a house with a television. It hits you at a subconcious level too... like a fan running or other sources of white noise... I feel relieved when the thing is turned off and the sound stops.

      Computer monitors with higher refresh rates and LCD displays are so nice.

  154. if you can hear it... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    If you can hear it, it's not ultrasonic.

    I'm serious. Age doesn't matter, hearing quality doesn't matter.

    TV remotes used to be ultrasonic, operating at 38KHz, 40KHz or 44KHz. No one could hear these. It's just not possible. If you can hear this thing, then it's only near-ultrasonic.

    Additionally, note that ultrasonic bug repellers don't work. http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/ultrarat.html Or you can check The Straight Dope.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:if you can hear it... by orangepeel · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're right. But I'm also sure there's no government oversight agency dedicated to ensuring that products labelled as "ultrasonic" really do generate sounds between 38KHz and 44KHz (or whatever the range is for true ultrasonic frequencies). The companies that produce these things use the term for marketing. I'm sure you'd find some company out there that would be willing to sell foghorns described as "ultrasonic".

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    2. Re:if you can hear it... by mikefe · · Score: 1

      I went to a house that used a sound based remote controlled tv and could hear the sounds it made.

      I wonder what frequencies it used...

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  155. Hmmm by snookumz · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because most of them are born out of wedlock today, or have inattentive or completely absent father figures due to divorce. Of course no good liberal would buy that. They've just been deprived of opportunities. Being deprived of character and mentorship, doesn't hurt anyone.

  156. Wimpy whippersnappers by Quirk · · Score: 1
    Back in the day when men were men and children were chattles, teenagers were treated like dogs off the leash. My grandfather told me when he was a kid trying to steal an apple or two, farmers would run them off with blasts from a double barrel shotgun, the shells packed with rocksalt. He said the rocksalt wouldn't break their skin but stung horribly.

    I've never seen rocksalt, but I imagine it's just outsized chunks of salt. Fired from a 12 gauge the impact must smart bad. So even if driving away teens with high frequency sounds is discriminatory and wrong, teenagers today get it served up much more humanely than our forefathers.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  157. A loud noise at a Sears store in Arizona in 1972 by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

    A Sears store in Scottsdale Arizona back about 1972 had an unbearably loud noise that no one else noticed. It was loudest in the center of the store near the escalators. I went up to a salesman at the counter and complained about the loud noise. He said "what noise?" He refused to believe that the loud noise existed. The noise went on for about two years at that Sears store. Los Arcos mall and the Sears store no longer exist now. I never encountered anyone else who had noticed the noise. I also ran into that same very loud high-pitched noise a library somewhere. What was that noise?

    We should all take better care of our hearing to avoid hearing loss. Several years ago a few friends persuaded me to go dancing at a local bar. It had unbearably loud music and I wished I had remembered to bring my ear plugs. Afterwards, it took about three weeks for my hearing to return to normal. All of us thought the music was unusually loud but I was the only one that had experienced hearing problems for several weeks afterwards.

    What about loud movie theatres? Why are they frequently so loud? I usually bring ear plugs to movie theaters just in case I need them.

    I was recently walking around my neighborhood with my cousin and her husband. It was during the time of the year that the cicadia insects are so loud. I commented to my cousin about the loud noise and she said that her husband could not hear the noise. He is a construction worker. Cicadias are amazingly loud and even most old people can hear.

    Back in the 1970s, I worked for a few months at a styrofoam cup factory in which most of the equipment used loud compressed air. May ears would always ring for several hours afterwards. I was one of the few people in the plant who spoke English. Almost no one in the plant wore ear plugs. If I had stayed longer at that job, I wonder how much hearing loss I would have had?

  158. That's nothing new. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    he New York Times is reporting on a device called the Mosquito invented by Howard Stapleton designed to drive teens away by emitting a high frequency noise at 75db.



    Haven't these contraptions been around for years ? Our next-door neighbor has one that's supposed to drive away the cats that have been pooping on her lawn. My wife can hear it squeal, and it drives her nuts.

    He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children.



    Only a total sicko would do things like that.

  159. More than just irritating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A wide deployment of these will probably cause an unexpected rise in the amount of vandalism. I know I'd break one.

    By the way, I'm 21.

  160. teens aren't so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just anecdotal evidence, but...
    I help run an extremely large retail store, with a customer count of between 3000 and 7000 transactions a day. It is a college town, so 'kids' are the main consumer. We do have dumb kids come in that mess with our stuff or harrass our other shoppers... about once a month. One out of approx. 150,000 shoppers is a 'bad egg' then... seems like a waste to spend money to solve this non-problem, since when you tell them to behave they usually do.

  161. Too bad this only works on teens... by cogito+ergo+blog · · Score: 1

    ...because alot of oldsters would pay good money to install them in their basements to drive their 40 year old never-left-home kids away!

    --
    "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
  162. Zak McKracken by plams · · Score: 1

    Maybe he got this idea while listening to a 55-cycle hum.

  163. Audio assault? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a form of audio based assault? I'm serious by the way.

  164. save the children by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    attach these devices to all convicted pedophiles!

  165. Classical music works just as well by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    ...at least in the town where I live.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  166. Bad for animals by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    Obviously the guy who invented this thing is not a dog owner. If teens can hear it, then dogs, cats and birds will be affected by it as well.

    1. Re:Bad for animals by joto · · Score: 1

      Which is kind of the point, isn't it. If you're a shopowner, you obviously don't want dogs, cats are birds right outside your shop either... You simply want your entrance clean and inviting...

  167. What worries me is... by where's+alderaan · · Score: 0

    ...that the use of a device like this is completely subjective. As a teenager and a semi-professional musician, hearing is one of my most important assets next to sight. If I wear baggy pants and am waiting out front of a 7-11 for a friend of mine to pick me up, what right does a part-time employee (who may be even younger than me) have to "blast" this thing. How could one judge when it is okay and not okay to use this? Purely on appearances? This tool seems like it could easily be abused and misued.

    1. Re:What worries me is... by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They have the right to because "the 7-11" is neither a bus stop or public property.

      So as long as this device passes a health safety muster it is OK to use it to broadcast that annoying sound 24 hours a day 365 days a year. In addition property owners or agents acting on behalf of the property owner are free to turn it up (with in the limits of health safety) and direct it at whom ever they want.

      If you don't want to be treated like a hooligan don't appear as one and don't treat private property as either yours or as public property. You have no real need or right to treat a business's private property as a bus stop. It's really that simple...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  168. That's why... by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's why laws keep getting passed that restrict teenagers. How are we going to keep convincing each other that teenagers are evil if they don't commit crimes. So, we work towards creating a society that puts 18 year olds out on the street with never having held a job, no drivers license, never having had sex, and no experience with keeping things like drinking in moderation. Add on to that laws that prevent parents from teaching kids that there are reprecussions for your actions, and you just might turn this decline in youth crime around.

    Just remember these are the people that will decide if the plug should be pulled. Needlessly making enemies of them is not a good idea.

  169. Greed is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    currently a big electronics outlet in Germany has "greed is good" as their slogan ("Geiz ist Geil"). So Germany really is 20 years behind.

    1. Re:Greed is Good by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Informative
      currently a big electronics outlet in Germany has "greed is good" as their slogan ("Geiz ist Geil").



      Get yourself a frigging dictionary (or go dict.leo.org ) and look up "Geiz". It has lots of translations, but none of them is "greed". Closest one is probably "stinginess".



      "Greed" refers to "want to have a lot of (usually money)", while "Geiz" implies "not wanting to spend a lot of (usually money)".

    2. Re:Greed is Good by samjam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would suggest "thrift" as an alternate rendering which is to aoid unneccessary spending and taking care of what has been bought.

      Sam

    3. Re:Greed is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well check out avarice then (dict.leo.org)
      translates both to "Geiz" and "Gier"

      while you're at it, lookup "Klugscheisser"

    4. Re:Greed is Good by stevejobsjr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geil has a few translations, too, if yaknowwhattamean...

    5. Re:Greed is Good by SamSim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thrift?

    6. Re:Greed is Good by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Like "growing towards the light". I like it how the current colloquial use of "geil" is a colloquial version of a colloquial version of the original meaning.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  170. Off topic: physical security by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >I own a gun. If a criminal enters my house to do me harm, I will have no choice but to kill him with this gun.

    As Picard said, "in a crisis it is always best to have more than one option".

    You can escape from "no choice" land with several techniques that are no more expensive than a gun. Start with passive measures which, unlike a gun, work even if you're asleep. Rip out the useless piece of garbage hollow core door to your bedroom and replace it with something solid. Install a deadbolt. Absolutely, this part is not optional, install a reinforced strike plate in the door frame and secure it with wood screws long enough to reach structural framing. 3" or 4" #10 screws are good.

    That door will buy you time which will be very welcome.

    A dog isn't always practical but can do triple duty as alarm, deterrent, and defense system. You can't treat it as an appliance though. You're adding a family member for ten or fifteen years.

  171. Americans with Disabilities Act by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Now just what would be the legal implications of a business deliberately installing equipment certain to interfere with access by the disabled?

  172. Two Words... by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 1


    Yoko Ono

    --
    -- Mace only makes me hornier.
  173. AKA techno by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

    So has Dave Clarke released a new track then????

    --
    We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  174. Just install a local cell phone cell @ $9.00/min. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Just install a local cell phone cell @ $9.00/min.; it'd be a microcell, so it would effectively be premises-only; anyone loiters around and uses their cell phone, you're talking $$$. Hell, you can sit on my front porch, if you're willing to pay me $9.00/min. for the privilege... I'll even let you borrow a cane and yell "get out of my yard!" at all your friends.

    I've considered suggesting this to various movie theaters as well - would you have your phone on in a movie if every time it rang or you got a text message, it cost you $9.00?

    Another option is a ring generator - just make any phone that roams into the micro-cell ring periodically. Works for movie theaters (maybe ring them on the way in the door, or three times during the previews, etc.); also works for drugstores where kids with cell phones loiter, etc.: no signal = no loiter.

    -- Terry

  175. The Anecdote of the Facist Sub by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1, Funny

    Had a substitute teacher in the 10th grade that was a complete bitch. The scoop:

    I took alot of "Office" courses in high school, and (being the computer geek that I am) was the go-to guy for all of those classes. So, one day we get this sub-from-hell. No speaking during class. Noone was allowed to help anyone out. Business-as-WTF?!?!!

    We didn't believe she meant it. People asked me questions, I continued to answer them. She eventually snapped at me, "Shut Up. I don't care if you have friends here. Now your only friend is your computer." So, I started having a conversation with the monitor... I told it how to enable the outline view in Word 2000, how to disable clippy... Needless to say, she didn't appreciate my humor. Before I could really piss her off, the period ended.

    Later that week I'm in a similar class and she shows up again. At this point I know the score, but noone else in the class does. *Of course* they all start asking me questions. The sub prompty writes "NO TALKING" across the whiteboard. Soon after, she decides she is going to appoint a "class helper". So, she chooses someone from the room (seemingly at random; I believe she was avoiding me intentionally).

    The dude she chose had no clue how to use the program. He did the logical thing, and asked me. She got pissed--I shit you not, beet-red pissed. And this is where the *real* fun began.

    See, she went from being a thorn-on-my-side to a royal-pain-in-the-ass. To alleviate some of the pressure, I asked why she didn't let me help everyone out. I was obviously the most qualified person to do so. She tells me to stuff it... The class laughs... I proceed to belittle her ability to manage the class.

    She asks my name, then threatens to call security. The class giggles some more.

    See, the very concept of this substitute calling security to remove me from a classroom was so alien to them... I'm sure many of you know the drill. (Generally) Quiet, geeky kid, 100 lbs at most, non-violent, straight-edge. etc etc.

    At this point, it has ceased to be entertaining. I walk out of the classroom, and go to the department office. I explain the situation to the Department Head. Then the Head and I walk calmly back to the classroom, where the Head asks the sub to leave the classroom.

    She was fired the next day.

  176. Calculate the freq... by yroJJory · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can actually calculate what the audible frequency is of a TV.

    For NTSC in North America:

    • 60 Hz (refresh rate) * 525 (# of lines) / 2 (interleaved, ya know!) = 15,750 Hz (15.75kHz)

    For PAL in the UK:

    • 50 Hz (refresh rate) * 625 (# of lines) / 2 (interleaved, too!) = 15,625 Hz (15.625 kHz)

    And yes, the sound drives me crazy, too. I'm 30 and an audio engineer. And I'm the only one in my household who can hear the damn TVs whining. :-)

    --
    Jory
    1. Re:Calculate the freq... by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 1

      I'm glad the parent and grandparent got modded up. It's incredibly difficult to convince people that you can actually hear the high pitch sound that the refresh rate of TV's emit-- they tend to look at you like you have two heads. It's so intense for me that I ended up having to give up watching TV's about 7 or 8 years ago.

    2. Re:Calculate the freq... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      My grandmother occaisionally turns off her cable box without turning off her TV. She never seems to understand how I can tell from another room that her TV is still on.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:Calculate the freq... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      I can hear the TV whine too.. In fact, I noticed I can tell which TVs are on from almost anywhere in my apartment. It seems that each TV has its own unique sound.

      I consider myself an audiophile - but one that cannot afford anything nice. So, I get something considered 'decent' and live with it. I find that any 'live' (meaning actual air from the instrument and not amplified shit) sounds so much more smooth to me. I can't stand old music since it's recorded horribly.. and I cannot stand new music because it all sounds harsh to me.. Even Enya sounds harsh in a way I can't explain. Though, I still listen to music and enjoy it very much..

      Anyway.. the TV whine annoys the hell out of me. I often leave the TV on, though, with a channel like PBS (since it doesn't have annoyingly loud commercials) just as a 'noise buffer' for the rest of sounds that annoy the hell out of me... computer fans, refrigerator, air conditioner (especially annoying since it emits like 3 different-pitched whistles at the same time).. hell.. even my AC adapter for my battery charger annoys me. So, I need that buffer sound.

      With noise-eliminating technology found in headphones, couldn't one theroetically eliminate TV noise... or better yet, invent a TV that eliminates its own produced whine through its own speakers!! OMG I'm gonna go get a patent.. Damn I come up with good ideas when I'm rambling..

      A business I used to work closely with (Tropicana) had offices with speakers built-in that emitted white noise at a low volume. This was used to increase privacy and make phone calls easier to hear with cubicle chatter.. I found the white noise to have a soothing effect on me. But then stepping into the server room (where I had to do the majority of my work) was like extra fooking hell since servers have lots and lots of annoying fans! GRR..

      Stupid noise pollution.. I need therapy.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    4. Re:Calculate the freq... by unknown51a · · Score: 0

      The noise from TV sets here in the UK has driven me and most of my friends nuts before.
      Yet another reason to get an LCD display

      --
      I had an imaginary sig once, he said I was a loser and ran off.
    5. Re:Calculate the freq... by fuzznutz · · Score: 1
      And yes, the sound drives me crazy, too. I'm 30 and an audio engineer. And I'm the only one in my household who can hear the damn TVs whining. :-)

      When I lived at home, I had an old color TV that had an occasional high pitched squeal that drove me crazy. I discovered that a proper application of percussive maintenance would quiet it down. One day my mother was watching something in my room and it began its squeal. I got up and walked over to the set and slapped it hard on the side. I turned around to go back to my chair and my mother's mouth was hanging open.

      She thought I was nuts. I'll never forget the look on her face. It took me some time to convince her that I was fixing the set.

      We also had an old princess phone with a mechanical bell ringer in the living room. When a call circuit was made, there was enough energy in the line to make the clapper touch the bell. I could hear the slight noise and I would announce that we had a call. A second or two later, the phone would ring. Mom would always look at me, astonished at my powers, and ask me how I did it.

      By the way, neither of my younger sisters could hear the phone or the TV set.

  177. RTFA - Wales not England by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I think you could get sworn at by a whole range of generations if you went round Wales telling people they were in England, you'd certainly get some vile language thrown at you.

  178. I am the only one that feels it disturbing? by SillyCON · · Score: 1

    We are not talking about dogs or cockroaches but people, young people. Persons who can speak, feel, talk and (I hope) think. Cannot we just argue with them? People that tomorrow will be adults and rule the show, all their life have been treated like beasts.
    Is this the way USA educates its people?

    1. Re:I am the only one that feels it disturbing? by mlk · · Score: 1
      Is this the way USA educates its people?

      Nope, Wales, in the UK. I know they look alike.
      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:I am the only one that feels it disturbing? by SillyCON · · Score: 1

      Theres nothing like RTFA :/

  179. all ppl suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What's with all this 'embrace your fellow man' nondiscrimatorily garbage? So that's gonna make ppl suck less. whatever. Now 'teens suck' is somehow hateful? They'll never again feel any incentive to stop sucking if we start sucking up. IMNSOHO

    How does the /slashdot/ crowd manage to get so pussywhipped?

  180. Everybody has a responsibility by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    In a civilized society, it's everybody's business to educate and raise the children.

    The parents have a lot of influence, and I fully agree they have the main responsibility over their children. However to lay the total burden on the parents, is simply insane. Anyone can easily come up with excuses. That's the easy cop-out, which helps nobody. How many hours are parents and children together these days?

    The children will meet many people in their young years. The time spent with these people will be more than with their parents. These involve:
    Relatives
    Babysitters
    Teachers
    Peers
    Trainers
    Shop owners
    Bus drivers
    Any random person

    The more people neglecting and behaving like robots, as is very common in the big cities, the more alienated teens you will get. It's very nice to behave like a human, and treat others like humans even if you're probably never going to see them again too.

    Treat people (children / teens are certainly no exception!) like crap, then don't expect anything else than crap back. It has always been that you get more crap from teens than anyone else, but that's part of their nature. That's why we're the adults to see them through a difficult period and love them for who they are anyways.

    1. Re:Everybody has a responsibility by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      Treat people (children / teens are certainly no exception!) like crap, then don't expect anything else than crap back.

      Well that works both ways, doesn't it? It's not as if using the "Mosquito" is an unprovoked act of child-hatred, and one assumes that the shop owner has exhausted other more reasonable means for fixing the situation. These teens are treating the shop owner and his customers like crap. They shouldn't expect anything else in return.

      No, the full burden of raising them is not on the parents, but without support from the parents it's generally not possible to improve a teen's behavior, and a shop owner can't be expected to cope with an entire crowd of them on the most reasonable of terms anyway. One assumes that these children are being either neglected or allowed such free rein that it's nearly criminal.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    2. Re:Everybody has a responsibility by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the "Mosquito" indiscriminately targets most people under 18-ish (including, as an aside, young children, a point that I don't think has really been discussed in this article). As others have said, the appropriate response is to ban the individuals engaging in disruptive behavior. If they return, call the police.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:Everybody has a responsibility by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      That sounds reasonable, but depending on local culture it may or may not be an option.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  181. how useless by Anthrox · · Score: 1

    wicked get rid of the teenages from the convenience store what about the the poor teenages that work there?

    I hate company allready that play the same CD over and over for 10weeks straight thats why i quit Kmart
    and if they install this places like this and i happen to work there i will go postal
    so big company man have kids outside store or have to pay someone older that cost more?

  182. Driving them away!? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Looking through the responses it seems that I am the only one that find it deeply disturbing that somebody wants to 'drive away teenagers'. Teenagers are our children - I can see how they may be annoying from time to time, but they shouldn't be driven away, they should be taken care of, integrated into society. I mean, why do you think teenagers in deprived areas end up in gangs, crime and drugs? It's certainly not because their parent have too much time or other resources for them.

  183. Teenagers by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I have a 6yo boy and my baby-girl will be born next April.
    IMHO, teenagers are less well-socialized because parents don't bother to know what's happening in school, and high-school officials are very, very lazy. Good schools make well-socialized kids.
    Teenagers are less acquainted with work because parents fill them with money. I was the son of a low-to-middle-class blue-collar worker (my father started his career as a dairy products manufacturing worker) and I work since I was 14. If the economics are bad, buy some scrap wood and make a boat together with your children -- they can do the heavy work while you are at the job.
    So, yes, it's all the parents' fault. I intend firmly to apply everything my parents taught me and no "hanging around" for my kids, sorry. And like me, I know they will beat the crap out of anyone who think they're nerdy. But then again, I'm posting here...

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  184. High Frequency vs Low Frequency... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its an amazing coincidence.. the high pitch noises irritate and drive away teens, and low frequency resonating bass noises irritate and drive away old people too ;)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  185. Stoopid owners by houghi · · Score: 1

    Why would they want to scare away Jay and Silend Bob?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  186. Making millions off of this.... by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    1. Increase the frequency to "attract" young preteens. 2. Sell it to Michael Jackson. 3. ????? 4. Profit!!

  187. By teenagers, for teenagers by medgooroo · · Score: 1

    Lets get this straight, this company will sell you a product which might work, depending on the individual and you personally cant hear if its doing anything? Its an empty box. Teenagers of the world unite! lets start selling these things :)

    --
    Brain(s): 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.1% nice, 98.6% idle
  188. Can you hear television? by Make · · Score: 1

    I mean, when the sound is muted. When asking my friends (teenagers and up to 30), only very few can. I can (age 26), though I suffer from Tinnitus. At child's age I could hear when my sister secretly watched TV in the other room, doors closed, sound too silent to hear... Interestingly, I can also hear when you switch channels and what the quality of the picture is, and what kind of interferences there might be (diagonal stripes, snowy picture, ...)... btw. I don't own a TV. Not only because I find the noise annoying, but also because it's boring...

    1. Re:Can you hear television? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Interesting! I can also hear the high pitched squeal of a TV, and I'm 32. I have always wondered why I am often the only one in the room who can. Now I know! It seems that any store who used the device in the article might drive away some of their older customers too!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  189. The annoying steady high-pitched TV noise by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, I remember how I used to absolutely hate that steady high-pitched noise that came from TVs. I had to put up with that when watching TV back in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. Once I got into my 40s and 50s I stopped noticing the TV noise. Did I become deaf at that frequency or do TVs no longer make that noise? When I was younger, I would complain to my parents or other people about the noise but they couldn't hear it.

    Didn't any of the television manufacturers ever care? What about modern HDTVs with Digital Dolby sound? What do they sound like? Have they fixed the high-pitched noise problem yet? Now that I am in my 50s, I can't tell if TVs still produce that steady annoying high-pitched TV noise or not.

    1. Re:The annoying steady high-pitched TV noise by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      CRTs always have and always will. Computer monitors do the same thing. LCDs don't have the scanning electron gun, so they don't produce the same sort of noise.

      What I want to know is, does anybody ever hear the electricity in the walls when it's quiet in the house? All the time when I was a kid, if I was alone in my room I would know if somebody turned on an appliance of any kind (not just the TV) because I could hear the frequency change in the wall. I always wondered if it was actually coming from the conducting wires or if somehow the wall was transferring some sort of sound from elsewhere in the house. It seems more likely to be the wires though.

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
  190. NoMoreNoise by NoMorePoints.com · · Score: 1

    If I have it right, Old people can't hear it, and young people don't want to listen to it? Humm, What is Barry Manalow's Greatest Hits? NoMorePoints.com

  191. Re:Protractor holes and more by Necro+Spork · · Score: 1

    I have never told anyone of this prank before now.
    In 8th grade I was riding on the school bus behind our teacher who was driving. When we started up a hill I softly started tapping my feet. I changed the pace of my tapping with the speed of the bus. After about three miles he told everyone to shut up and stopped the bus in the middle of the road, it was great. Not hearing the noise anymore he slowly crept forward and on we went and if nothing happened.

    --
    120 chars of filth!
  192. Tivvy Squeel by StarkRG · · Score: 1

    I guess that would count me in, I can hear TVs squeel (squeel tivvy squeel!!). An interesting side note: for some reason a TV sounds different depending on what's on the screen, if it's just the static fuzz then it's one tone, pure white is another, etc. Theoretically you should be able to recreate what's on the screen simply by listening to the sounds it makes... or perhaps just figure out what the mean color is (no, mean as in average, not as in nasty...).

    There's one flaw in that guy's reasoning: listening to loud bass will reduce one's ears' ability to hear high pitched sounds. Yes age will do that too, but don't most teenagers that they'd want to repel listen to loud bass?

  193. This already happens by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Granted with a slightly older age group but according to some dutch newspaper stories (not the most reliable newssource) there are problems with senior citizens sitting around shopping areas, blocking passage with their rollaters and stuff, oggling shoppers and loudly gossiping (making hatefull remarks), etc etc etc. Almost to a point the problems caused by teenagers.

    It seems these two age groups just represent people with too much time to spend and nothing anyone wants them to do.

    Before I start sounding like a leftie I think that both groups a largely made up of pathetic whiners would should be taken out back by security and fed to the guard dogs.

    Then again I am a nerd and have never found myself in a position where I had nothing to do. Shopping areas are to me, and every red blooded male, a place of horrors that you visit for as short a time as possible to get the bare essentials needed for survival before you go back to your hobbies.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:This already happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shopping areas" would include retailers that sold electronics, power tools, auto parts, and other things of masculine interest.

  194. High Frequency Country Music by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Funny

    "He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children."

    I saw the same effect at a local mcDonalds a few years back in downtown Seattle. They started to play country music on the outside speakers and you wouldn't believe how fast some of the seedier teen traffic cleared out... To across the street, but hey, it worked :p

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  195. ASFAR by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1
    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  196. I built one of these when I was 12 by fasteddie203 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The high pitched sound is impossible to track and very annoying :)

    Plans to build one:
    http://www.linuxsavvy.com/staff/jgotts/underground /boxes/pandora.html

  197. What? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    I can't hear anything

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  198. As one of the elders that can hear it... by Jeremy+Singer · · Score: 1

    Please turn it off. Ever go to a museum with one of those alarm systems? I can't stay to look at the art for more than a few minutes because of the annoyance of these high frequency sounds. Mention it to the staff, they just don't hear it. It is obnoxious to create a nuisance and deny that it is a nuisance just because you can't sense it.

  199. Earplugs by lipi · · Score: 1

    They cost a quarter and the higher the frequency the more they attenuate it, so speech (low-mid frequencies) intelligibility is not affected.

  200. I wonder... by martinultima · · Score: 0

    Maybe that's the reason why I seem to be the only person who can hear when a TV is on from all the way across the house (and in class – drives my teachers nuts...) I've always heard this high-pitched whining noise that just annoys me to no end, and so far it's never failed at finding the offending TV.

    Oh, and the trick works for any CRT-based screen in fact, and no, it has nothing to do with if the sound's muted or not. A thousand little electron guns kind of do make a little bit of noise.

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  201. The Real Story by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    He found the prefect irritating sound by experimenting on his children.

    Actually, it looks like he got the idea from a fellow from a small planet in the neighborhood of Betelgeuse, and not from his children after all.

  202. it's not for trespassers ... by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    I could keep black people, hispanic people, white people, blind left-handed people, or people who voted for Bush off of my private property ...

    By definition, if you're talking about an area where you can exclude people arbitrarily, that's also an area where you can arrest those people for trespassing. If the problem was teens coming into my *home*, I wouldn't need a mosquito box. This device has its only substantial use in places where you *cannot* call the police and forcibly remove people you don't like. In places like that, discrimination laws (often) apply.

    Of course, I have no idea if age is a protected class in the first place ...

  203. Dumb and Dumber by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

    Lloyd: Hey, wanna hear the most annoying sound in the world?
    Lloyd: aaiaiaiaghghhhghghiaaahhhiiiiiaghghghghg!!!!!

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  204. as a composition major, I have to say... by supersocialist · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering the samn damn thing for like four years, now.

  205. This is a new thing? by islanduniverse · · Score: 1

    This is not new. It was on the regional news a couple of months ago here in the UK. It was a constant high pitched noise and the idea is that as you get older, your hearing deteriates such that you can't hear it.

  206. High frequency noise by yoey · · Score: 1

    Probably goes all the way up to eleven....

  207. Life imitates The Far Side by Nerdposeur · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anybody else think this sounds exactly like a Far Side concept?

    (Man in labcoat stands on front porch next to a goofy-looking contraption as a couple of slackers with cigarettes run away covering their ears) Responding to the outcry of the neighborhood, Dr. Norman Finkhouser worked by night for months to perfect his invention: the Teen-B-Gone 5000.

  208. Data is right, Your interpetation is wrong by spineboy · · Score: 1

    The percentage of crimes committed by teens is going down, because thee are less teens, and more adults, now that we have finished the mini-baby boom. What one needs to do, is to look at the RATES that teens commit crimes - i.e. numer of crimes committed y teens, per 1000 teens, and this is probably strongly linked to the unemployment rate. In order to judge weather societies actions have an efect on teen behavior (one m,easurement would be crime), one needs to look at the change of RATE, , since this measures the actions of teens only. Overall percentage of crimes committed will fluctuate merely on the overall percent of teens in the popluation, which will give a false measurement.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  209. Try it with polka by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    My friends and I were not typical teenagers. Once, having taken a break from making a home movie to consume large capppuccinos, we decided to cruise through downtown with some German polka-sounding folk music cranked up and the windows down. We got some weird looks from the slacker kids and laughed about it for weeks.

  210. Classical music by ke4roh · · Score: 1

    I've read of using classical music to ward off the unwanted teen crowd at convenience stores. It seems a bit more humane and appropriately selective - in that it can serve as a cultural experience for those who don't mind it, and one might think those people would be more socially acceptable than those who loathe classical music.

    --
    I hate call waitin`~+~~~
    NO CARRIER
  211. Psst! by Gleng · · Score: 1

    Heh, we used to take turns going "PSST!" really loud whenever the teacher's back was turned, so it sounded like a can of Coke being opened (food and drink in the classrooms was forbidden).

    That used to drive them mental. :)

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  212. OT: stuttering by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

    Friended you. Fellow stutterer :)

    --
    I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
  213. Update: yes it is illegal by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    The Environmental Protection Act (1990), Chapter 43, section 79(1)(a), describes Statutory Nuisances as including "noise emitted from premises so as to be prejudicial to health or a nuisance". This would certainly cover the Mosquito - it's specifically designed to be, and marketed as, an annoying noise producer. The other pertinent subsections (particularly (9)) boil down to "unless we've specifically said you can do this".

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  214. graph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it is http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/viort.htm you are looking for.

  215. Sorry by ylikone · · Score: 1

    The frequency is classified information.

    --
    Meh.
  216. Re:Off topic: physical security - additional rant by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
    A dog isn't always practical but can do triple duty as alarm, deterrent, and defense system. You can't treat it as an appliance though. You're adding a family member for ten or fifteen years


    When I was robbed, everyone told me "Get a dog". They couldn't seem to understand that I don't like dogs! For me to get a dog just for security doesn't make sense. It would suck for me, and it would suck for the dog.
    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  217. loud classical music by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Merchants who dont want teenagers, street people, and street "merchants" hanging out on their doorsteps play booming classical music in our city. It seems to be working. If everyone does it, it will probably be ignored noise.

  218. Apparently neither you nor the shop can "compete" by ianscot · · Score: 1
    I wish people would get the fuck over themselves, and quit competing in the eternal Most Sensitive Being in Known Universe contest.

    Way to set the example for this brave new world you're advocating. Trying to live like a decent person and think about others isn't a competition, it's kind of a moral imperative. Little thing called a conscience.

    I doubt the man cares whether you're insulted and/or saddened. I wouldn't.

    I'm a potential customer. I can hear high-frequency sounds, and so can my two 12-year-olds. You think I'll be telling my kids to go down to this man's store? Not a chance. As a solution, this bites hard, whatever the problem it intended to solve may have been. All it did was escalate the thing it was trying to remedy, in a way that demeaned and repelled people the shop owner was supposedly trying to protect.

    But maybe following that mistake would require the shop owner to put himself in his customers' shoes -- just like he plainly couldn't manage with the kids.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  219. I want one of these for just one kid: by Hasai · · Score: 1

    The vicious little spoiled brat that my best friend somehow managed to spawn.
    :(

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  220. Re:Just install a local cell phone cell @ $9.00/mi by Hasai · · Score: 1

    That would be great, except most of the precious darlings I have the pleasure of dealing with have 'Daddy' footing the bill.
    :(

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  221. OFFFFFFENDEDDDDDD by buanzo · · Score: 1

    And I'm offended at people that study classical piano at the convservatory, and never, EVER write a single note of their own. Done, I said it :P

    --
    Buanzo Consulting - 15 Years of GNU/Linux experience, for you.
    1. Re:OFFFFFFENDEDDDDDD by prichardson · · Score: 1

      Conservatories in general creep me out, especially for things like composition. I think it's really important to have a grasp of the liberal arts before the extreme specialization that conservatories seem to endorse. We tend to get musical robots with no depth.

      If you ever want to really piss off someone from a conservatory, just describe it as vocational school for musicians.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
  222. "pronounced GUFF" by millennial · · Score: 1

    Notice that they put in a pronunciaton guide for one man's name. Looks like this reporter is paid by the word!

    Apart from that, this doesn't surprise me. I've always been able to hear a high-pitched whine given off by most electrical equipment; my parents can't hear it.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  223. Ageism! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    Does nobody else recognize that this is discrimination against teenagers for no good or valid reason? They have every right to go anywhere an adult does, except maybe into a liquor store.

  224. MOD UP, PLEASE by Chrontius · · Score: 1

    First time I ever did this, and it's for good reason. Can anyone spare a +1 Insightful?

  225. my television makes such a noise by pomakis · · Score: 1

    Sometimes my television is left on by accident because when I turn off the video source, the screen of the TV goes black as if it's off, and the only visual indication that the TV is still on is a small green LED that's not always easy to see. However, the moment I walk into my apartment, I can tell that the TV is on, because I can hear a very audible high-pitched whine coming from it. It always amazes my friends, because nobody else can seem to hear it at all, even those that are several years younger than me. (I'm 35.) So I guess my ability to hear high-pitched sounds is better than average. I suspect, then, that the entrance to the convenience store mentioned in the article would be as annoying to me as it is to the teens they're trying to drive away. That would suck.

  226. "prefect irritating sound" by rjshields · · Score: 1

    I find school prefects irritating too, but I wouldn't go this far!

    --
    In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  227. are you guys nuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    afaik, its illegal on some countries
    by using that you're causing serious damage to the person
    there's also the alarm that was developed by the swedish army, it makes normal people get sick .. thats your car alarm

  228. Fun with Cool Edit Pro by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    I know a guy who in high school (~2 years ago) had his laptop with him nearly every day. He used Cool Edit Pro's tone generator to make this noise where the frequency occelated but occelated faster and faster, and trended higher and higher in frequency. So he'd start it way below the laptop's speakers frequency response (~5Hz) and it would take almost 15 seconds for the frequency to top out before going back down. In the next cycle, it would top out just a little higher in frequency and take just a little less time to get there. Eventually, it would get to where it was ~16KHz and changing very rapidly (very annoying) but since it took so long and was so gradual getting that way, nobody in a quiet library really notices. What's funny is it creates tension in a quiet room, while most people don't consciously notice it. So he'd let it get to it's most annoying point, and release all that unconscious tension by slamming a stack of books down on a table. There wasn't a single person in the library that didn't gasp. :-D

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  229. :P by stavromueller · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something my noise cancelling headphones would screen out. Problem solved.
    Besides, I'd be hard pressed to find a teenager who can hear such a frequency. Most of us youngens arleady listen to the music in our car that loud, and probably have worse hearing than the older generations.

    --
    I kill harmless processes for sport
  230. f**k in peace by hernyo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and to keep your parents away while you're f**king!!!

    ha hahaaaa

    1. Re:f**k in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh you're *obviously* new here...

  231. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  232. I have a similar "invention" by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    I can drive away door-to-door missionaries with a garden hose!

  233. Now.... by Krojack · · Score: 1

    all we need is the right frequency to drive liberals away :p

  234. TV whine sucks...ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate TV whine. I'm the only one in my house that can hear it, too.

    My siblings always turn the TV on with no volume...and then wonder why I want to kill them.

  235. Brown Noise? by Mike+Keester · · Score: 1

    It'd be way too cool if this device emitted the brown noise.

    A whole bunch of teenagers crapping their pants. Hilarious.

    Of course it wouldn't affect the elderly since they're already crapping their pants.

  236. You're not a real punk unless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I have been told by some pretty hard core dudes that, "You're not a real punk unless you've had scabies".

  237. Ear plugs? by JLS-UK · · Score: 1

    "It's very difficult to shoplift, Stapleton said, when you have your fingers in your ears."

    Would Ear plugs not be an easy work-around for the more determined teen theif?

  238. The perfect gift! by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Funny

    The perfect gift foy your favorite teen: linky

    1. Re:The perfect gift! by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah! I made one of those with a 555 timer and a sonalert and some other parts a few years back.

      It produces a very short high frequency beep. And it's very hard to determine the direction the beep is coming from because it's too short to get a fix on it. Plus, it only beeps once evey several minutes.

      Hide it above the ceiling tiles in your boss's office and enjoy...

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  239. Pavarotti must come in @ that frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bet you it's "pavarotti"...

    (that'd do it, for sure... well, that or Lawrence Welk)

    * :)

    APK

  240. So... by sean.peters · · Score: 1
    Taking it away causes her physical pain which results in her emitting an extremely loud high pitched squeal.

    So, does your teenager repel herself?

    Sean

  241. HOH- READ THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an HOH Person who got kicked around by the biz for a long time, until I found solutions, I know where you're coming from. I have been programming my own aids for about four years now. First off, the people that sell the aids don't now how to program digitals, so they sound bad. It's not the aids, but the EQ. Go to this website www.americahears.com and read what they have there. I have a pair, and they sell an aid that has the best programming of all, but, best of all, the give you everything you need to program them your self. I'm not a shill, but a person who is speaking from expereince and teh experience of many other Ah aid owners.
    Also, go to hohadvocates.org, for a HOH community.

  242. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow, when did /. get taken over by users with 14XXXXXX user ID's it's all going down hill...

    /. moderators desserve it tho so its ok! :)

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't, you're looking at the comment IDs. The user IDs are just to the right of their name.

  243. Obviously discriminatory by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    I would think this device would be illegal. It's designed to drive teenagers away since they all "hang around being rude" and adults don't.

    Why not make a machine that reacts with melanin to drive away "those trouble-making negroes"? It's the same damn concept.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  244. Guns don't help here. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    FYI, the way most of these attacks work is by utter and complete surprise. It's kind of a thuggish candid camera. By the time you recover from the hit and recognize what's going on, you've just got a bunch of stupid kids laughing at and taunting you. If you then drew your gun and shot, you'd be convicted of first- or second-degree murder in practically any jurisdiction -- yes, even Florida and Texas.

    Being armed does nothing to prevent this sort of nonsense unless you want to send a powerful message at the expense of your freedom and some stupid kid's life.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Guns don't help here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is that the threat of the victim potentially being armed is the key here.

      That is, would the idiots be less likely to pull those stunts if they knew there was an increased chance of being shot by a not-happy slappee?

      -not the OP

    2. Re:Guns don't help here. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      How long would taking out his kneecaps get you?

      Seriously, these people don't learn until they piss off someone who's absolutely nuts and doesn't care about the consequences.

      "You see what happens, Larry?!"

    3. Re:Guns don't help here. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > FYI, the way most of these attacks work is by utter and complete
      > surprise. It's kind of a thuggish candid camera. By the time you
      > recover from the hit and recognize what's going on, you've just
      > got a bunch of stupid kids laughing at and taunting you.

      Sounds like a way for the kids to get hurt. Some of us have old conditioned reflexes.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  245. I can imagine some teens liking it. by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1

    Like my former teenage self from years ago. Back then, I actually got slashed outside of a convenience store by a bunch of kids that always hung out there (Brooklyn, yo). Being of the pasty, unarmed, physically non-threatening nerd variety, I might actually have shopped *more* at a place that had one of these.

  246. True story by metamatic · · Score: 1

    My parents moved to a house where the neighbor had a still-living-at-home loser 20s son who kept blasting reggae music. On my first return from college, I got out a couple of my favorite industrial music CDs and cranked up the amplifier. That was it, no more reggae.

    Same thing worked at college against inconsiderate nearby students. In particular, Cabaret Voltaire's remix of "Sensoria" sounds great at high volume, and will drown out almost anything. If that fails, Lou Reed's "Metal Machine Music" can clear buildings. I generally prefer headphone listening, but if someone starts a hifi war, by god I'll finish it.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  247. soon by thisislee · · Score: 1

    A few more years and I can loiter all I want.

  248. not *that* absurd. by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    I posted this somewhere above as well, but I feel that it should be restated that not all teens would consider this unwelcome - especially if you live in a bad/rough neighborhood, as I did. When I was in my teens, I got slashed (following a brief period of harassment) outside of a convenience store by... other teens who were the type that always hung around there, and who obviously weren't keen to my ethnicity. Now that I'm older, I know how to stand up to idiots. But when you're young, you might not (I sure as heck didn't). So I might have appreciated a device like that back then.

    This device could benefit the different, the tubby, the nerdy, the pasty, the scrawny, the thick-spectacled, and yes, even the *perfectly normal*, nonviolent good kids who just want to buy a Pepsi without getting stared down, mocked, or threatened by hooligans at the door.

    Please keep that in mind.

  249. Good News, Bad News... by objekt · · Score: 1

    "And yes, the sound drives me crazy, too. I'm 30 and an audio engineer. And I'm the only one in my household who can hear the damn TVs whining. :-)"

    Good news: within about 5 years your hearing will degrade won't hear them anymore!

    Bad news: within about 5 years your hearing will degrade and you may have to find another job!

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Good News, Bad News... by yroJJory · · Score: 1

      Good news: within about 5 years your hearing will degrade won't hear them anymore!

      Bad news: within about 5 years your hearing will degrade and you may have to find another job!


      I'm not looking forward to that.

      --
      Jory
  250. Info @ saveyourhearing.org by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    Would the parent poster or others in this thread mind visiting SaveYourHearing.org and sharing some of your experiences? I'd like to grow this site into a place where people can go to get information on hearing, hearing loss - the unfortunate effects thereof especially, and hearing protection.

    Do tell your stories please, if you might, so that others can learn how debilitating such a loss can be to one's life (and those of others who need to shout in order to maintain a conversation).

    Please - make it yours. CONTENT CREATION IS CURRENTLY OPEN TO ANONYMOUS USERS so that I may "seed" this beast without people being reluctant to login. (This will probably last until I start receiving spam posts.) Create an account if you'd like though, and post your experiences. If you have references on hearing loss, hearing aid types, DSP software or settings, etc. please pass them along so others may enjoy them as well.

    Tell your horror stories or how your hearing loss has affected you so that others may potentially avoid the same fate! (Please try to suppress your jealousy towards those still retaining their HF or voiceband response.....)

    Many thanks. (yes - it's very new. I came up with the idea after spending $20 at a recent concert to buy earplugs from the bar and hand them out to people standing right near the speakers. I wanted a place where I could direct them to find information on protection and the effects of permanant (mostly high-frequency) hearing loss). Please express interest if you'd like to donate to such a fund. I'd like to give away or subsidize hearing protection distribution at music clubs.

    If you have an SPL meter and would like to report on your findings at various music clubs across the planet, please do so!! I'd like to build a database of peak readings and then try and convince the audio engineers at these places to turn the volume down. I think "self regulation" is best and if we can convince club owners to keep the environment safe for the good of their customers, we all will benefit. I try to bring my protection every time, and often a few pair for friends.

    Ever try having a conversation with a bass player or drummer who doesn't realize you're not wispering when you talk to them??? Please help me save people's hearing. Donate. Contribute. Tell your stories. Show people where they can buy earplugs cheaply online. Subsidize protection for others that wouldn't normally carry it themselves.

    Do you have anyt tips or tricks for protecting your ears? Know a good way to fold up some material to place it in your ear for a makeshift plug? A good way to carry earplugs so they stay clean (and they're there when you need them - I think wallet based storage would be good but can't figure out a good way...). Do tell!

    Thank you for any help or contact you can provide. If you'd like to contact me to help (with a SPL-survey, links for the site or suggestions, etc.) please do not hesitate to send me an email! "cyrus+saveyourhearing *at* 80d.org" (that's eight-zero-dee.org)

    Once again - thank you. Spread the word, link to me or post whatever you can that you think might be helpful.

    Cyrus

  251. It's very difficult to herd potatoes by Medievalist · · Score: 1
    People *are* animals, and we *can* herd them around as such
    I used to think that too, but recently I've realized that some people are actually vegetables.
  252. Hey you kids! Get off of my lawn! by Ranger · · Score: 1

    You know you are getting old when you can appreciate a device like that. No more having to yell "Hey you kids! Get off of my lawn!"

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  253. Re:LOL by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    What happens if somebody uses a 10 time more powerful device at a teen concert.

    So that's 85 dN - who'd even hear it?

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  254. USians as usual prefer violent means. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Europeans, have always the humane solution for your degustation.

    Jokes aside, I am entrely serious.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  255. Guess who's gonna win ... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    ... the Ignobel Prize for Human Engineering next year.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  256. Why do people keep assuming this is for shop owner by orichter · · Score: 1

    I'm a parent of a teenager, and I want 1 for my house. Anyone who has teenagers knows that they are like locusts. If they congregate at your house, your fridge will be empty, and your furnature and carpets distroyed. A little selective usage could ensure that they congregate at the other kids houses. I half expect to get modded as Funny on this, but I'm thinking it should be modded insightful.

  257. Wait? Experimenting on HIS children?! by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    This guy wasted his time trying to discipline HIS kids with this aweful device? Couldn't 40 inches of rawhide leather be just as effective? Oh, that's right. Beating children with belts is much worse that a high frequency sound that could damage the ears or say a tazer which could put holes in in your clothing and cause neurologocial damage if you get tazed in the spine.

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  258. What's fair is fair by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
    The teenagers in my neck of the woods have these infernal car stereos that, when combined with their sound recordings (I can't in good conscience call it music), produces this loud bass thumpity-thump sound that can be heard indoors from the distance of a quarter-mile. So if they find a high-pitched whine annoying and leave, perhaps that's not such a bad thing.

    Of course, I can remember the good old days when we had an 8-track or cassette player, a good amp and speakers, and my folks complaining about how loud the kids are "these days". And they didn't call The Who, Rolling Stones, etc., music, either.

    Someone asked why adult Americans have it in for teenagers. It's because we all were teenagers ourselves, and we're sore about the fact that our parents' wish, "I hope your kids turn out to be just like you", came true. Either that, or we're jealous that we know what we'd do if we were their age, now that we're older and wiser.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  259. A high frequency noise that drives away teens? by RoboOp · · Score: 1

    My dad called it a lawnmower.

    Nuff said.

    --
    "First you get the Linux, then you get the power, THEN you get the women"
  260. The old Bait and Switch by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 0

    From TFA "It's small and annoying," Stapleton said

    I thought this article was about a device to "repel" teenagers. Once I read it, it became obvious that it is talking about Ross Perot.

    --
    Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
  261. Karma generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod grandparents UP!

  262. Oh! great... by riprjak · · Score: 1

    ...Drive the teens away from loitering on the streets.

    Where do they go?? home to play online games, thats where! We do NOT need more fuckwits dicking around on the aircraft carrier, disobeying orders and trying to fly the blackhawk into the wet deck in BF2.

    If anything, install these sounds in games to drive the kids onto the street and away from our internt :)

  263. Similar devices used in Japan for years now... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Just go to Takadanobaba station on the Yamanote line, head out to the Big Box building right there, and stand in the doorway closest to the Yamanote train and Tozai subway entrances. Sure is bloody annoying, and no, it doesn't do much to drive the teens away, they still cluster there. But then TVs drive me nuts, and many people I talk to think I'm crazy as they hear nothing, so maybe the kids hanging out at Big Box simply can't hear the sound. Which begs the question of exactly how effective this Mosquito device will be...

    ¥2 for the interested.

    Cheers,
    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  264. Say that again. Loud and often. by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    fight the system that is destroying our creative original thinkers before they have the educational foundation to start thinking anything valuable. The eventual cost to society is simply inestimable.
    Amen to that.
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  265. Not exactly by bluGill · · Score: 1

    20kHz is the upper limit of continuous hearing. Most people (even those almost deaf) can hear a few discrete frequencies much higher than that. This depends on how the resonant frequencies, and your particular inner ear arrangement come together.

  266. Try this exercise by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Try this lip reading exercise on someone: Mouth the phrase "Island view" and ask them what you said. Nearly everyone will answer "I love you".

    Lip reading is handy if you can do it, but isn't useful for communication. I know some deaf people, so I've always wanted to learn sign language so I can talk with them (that is we hang out in the same circles, but since we don't share a language we only communicate when there is an interpreter - formal situations where we are addressing everyone).

  267. Music to shoo the savage beast? by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

    A couple shopping malls found out that classical music drives away younger shoppers. But that's only useful if your store happens to be Needless Markup, Saks, or some other store which caters to older women trying to look like their daughters.

    Other marketers (A&F being the current champ) learned that heavy techno beats are a good way to lubricate the wallets of younger shoppers, and lesser retailers can only stand in awe of otherwise intelligent 20-year-olds willingly forking over $24 for a pre-aged T-shirt, without even having to hand over licensing fees to some other company.

  268. Been doing this in Seattle for years. by jerunamuck · · Score: 1

    The Mc Donalds in downtown Seattle has been doing this for years. Except they play music inside and outside at high volume.

    "The sidewalk outside the McDonald's at Third Avenue and Pike Street has always been a popular spot to loiter, and six years ago, its owner, Rick Barrett, decided to do something about it. First, he took the lead of several other cities and began piping MUZAK out onto the corner. The kids stayed put, so Barrett switched tactics by blasting country music, a racially acute bit of target marketing that garnered noise complaints from the neighbors."

    http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0545/051109_ music_24hours.php

    Funny thing was. it worked! all the teens went down to the Public Market to hang out. Barrett reported record profits that month.

  269. No problem at all! by tcgroat · · Score: 1

    I checked all my LPs, and not a single one has a root kit.

  270. A radio is cheaper by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

    When I was about 16 (I'm 19 now), there were some kids in the campground I camp in that I was not allowed to be around. When I wanted to use the playground to be with my friends (it is the only common area that was close to my camper), I simply pulled out an AM radio (dating myself here) and turned it to the local 50's/60's station, if that was off air for the evening, I tried to get WKBW out of Bufflo, NY. I love that kind of music, but they don't. Another idea is if the kids are acting all Gansta (rap language I don't understand) switch to a country station, they hate that. Be sure to stay within local noise laws otherwise, they will call the cops on you.

    --
    sudo mod me up
  271. You sure that's it? by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

    Maybe the crime rate decreased because less teens were getting illegal abortions, and the doctor's weren't being charged with a crime for aborting a child? Just a thought.

  272. Age discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be classified as age discrimination?