Slashdot Mirror


User: Achromatic1978

Achromatic1978's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,876
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,876

  1. Re:Maybe I haven't been paying attention... on RIAA Brief Attacks Free Software Foundation · · Score: 1

    there are groups of people, like the EFF and FSF, that will fight for individual rights and protect the freedoms the masses have yet to understand.

    EFF, sure... FSF? I love how you spin it in a way such that it's not possible for someone to disagree. "You just don't understand. Poor ignorant."

    I'm not ignorant, just unimpressed.

  2. Re:Great idea on US Military Issuing iPod Touches To Soldiers · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of my friends bought his fancy $2000 digital SLR

    Canon's xD, and to a lesser extent xxD, and L lenses are weather/dust/water-sealed as a selling point. Their xxxD (Rebel blah) and consumer and mid ranges lenses, not so. Not sure how this specifically proves your point.

  3. Re:How about a remote-controlled server? on Rugged Linux Server For Rural, Tropical Environment? · · Score: 1
    LOL. "Hi, US Embassy? Do you do server hosting? I got a need for a 1RU server, quad core, 8GB, 4TB. Do you think you can do that?"

    Somehow, I doubt it.

  4. Re:Police Sting Operation on $74k Judgment Against Craigslist Prankster · · Score: 1
    Why? Is it illegal to look for a sexual partner on the internet?

    What a crappy analogy.

  5. Re:No show == guilty? on $74k Judgment Against Craigslist Prankster · · Score: 1

    The defendant is, "with all due respect", a fuckwit. He's still tooling around the internet, patting himself on the back for his "EPIC LULZ", with a small band of sycophantic followers.

  6. Re:I'd think taxes would be a better avenue. on Why Republicans Won't Retake Silicon Valley · · Score: 1

    Taxing those people making $250k+ is neither morally appropriate nor fair. What is fair in the minds of those making $20k/year (as an example: taxing the wealthy and not taxing themselves at all) is different that what is fair to those making $250k/year (as an example: taxing everybody at the exact same rate of 20%).

    I personally fall into neither the very rich nor very poor category, and I'm more inclined to follow the flat percentage tax approach. In such a situation the rich pay far more than the poor, as they should. But not unfairly so.

    You might ask yourself why the $20K'ers think that. A flat tax would be fine, if there weren't all sorts of loopholes that unfairly benefit the rich. (Buy a nice yacht for yourself, spend some money on it, be $50k, or $25M. Put a propane camp stove in it. Put a single mattress in it. Voila, you have a second home, and you get to write off the interest on your repayments as a deduction! And so on and so forth.)

    I think you'd find that a lot of people would be happier with a flat tax if it was "X% of your pre-tax income and compensation. No ifs, buts, maybes, pre-tax deductions, taxation-deferred, etc et al claims that you typically need an account or tax professional and an above median income to even consider, let alone put into action".

    People get pissy when they see someone buying a new yacht, a new Escalade, multiple homes, and then seeing that someone getting a bigger check back from the government than they might earn in a year because of all those loopholes, and personally, I don't blame them.

  7. Re:Probably intentional on Microsoft Family Safety Filter Blocks Google · · Score: 1

    The president must be natural born for security reasons, and as part of a large list of qualifications: age, and lack of criminal record some of the biggest.

    And yet our previous president freely admits to being arrested, charged, and pleading guilty to DUI offenses. Maybe in TX they don't put DUIs on your criminal record, I guess...

  8. Re:I've got your denial right here. on Zombie Macs Launch DoS Attack · · Score: 1
    Wanna know the ultimate irony?

    My UA: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032608 Firefox/3.0.8

    And yet I'll still get called a hater...

  9. Re:I've got your denial right here. on Zombie Macs Launch DoS Attack · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wanna know the ultimate irony?

    My UA: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032608 Firefox/3.0.8

    And yet I'll still get called a hater...

  10. Re:I've got your denial right here. on Zombie Macs Launch DoS Attack · · Score: 1, Troll
    I think it's fantastic that the GP points to it "not being a vulnerability because it did what it was told", and is within 30 mins "5: Insightful". A response that says "Well, by that rationale, malicious ActiveX controls aren't vulnerabilities either". Despite being only 10 minutes older, it languishes at "1".

    Ahh, Mac fanboys with mod points. Gotta love em.

  11. Re:Dont be a dumbass on Lose Your Amazon Account and Your Kindle Dies · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that this would be based on a ratio of purchases to returns/refunds. If you buy more, you shouldn't hit the threshold sooner, and I highly doubt that that is the case.

  12. Re:Yep on Lose Your Amazon Account and Your Kindle Dies · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just lucky but, if I spend about £1700 on a display, then I really DO EXPECT PERFECTION. Any dead pixels = getting returned, no question

    ProTip: If you're spending US$2,500 on an LCD display, you're not buying a consumer display. Yes, if I buy an Eizo color calibrated LCD, I'd expect perfection, too.

  13. Re:Dont be a dumbass on Lose Your Amazon Account and Your Kindle Dies · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you gotta try fairly hard to piss Amazon off... my wife and I use Amazon all the time. I use it for getting stuff for my company (I telecommute from home, simplest way)... we order thousands of dollars worth of stuff a year. I've had to return a fair amount, and never had any issue. Bu really, there's red flags in the guys story. Who calls up Amazon to speak to CS about "the lightness of the e-ink"? (and then mentions how he's returned lots of defective electronics to them)...?

  14. Re:so we're on First Look at Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Beta · · Score: 1

    Wanna know why? Because we don't have the resources or pull with Microsoft to have been testing the betas years ago.

    You couldn't afford the $375 for the MSDN Empower program, which provides all that software, including betas? Hmm.

  15. Re:striped? on First Look at Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Beta · · Score: 1
    No other vendor would do such a thing. I mean every App Developer for the iPhone is able to background their app. It's not an Apple-only API, right?

    Oh.

  16. Re:Ask and ye shall receive on First Look at Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Beta · · Score: 1
    FOSS. Unless you want tools for mass deployment (can't imagine why a company would want that), or the ability to use it in clustered or HA environments (after all, business email would never need HA)...

    No mention of what the price is there, but I'd guess "not cheap".

    Is not cheap a problem? Of course not. But let's not claim it's a FOSS panacea.

  17. Re:Hybrid would also work on NYC Wants Ideas For "Taxi Technology 2.0" · · Score: 1

    Most new cabs in Seattle these days are Prius's. Most cab drivers I've spoken to are exceptionally happy about it.

  18. Re:Electric Cabs on NYC Wants Ideas For "Taxi Technology 2.0" · · Score: 1

    (a new Tesla battery is estimated to be between 10-15,000 dollars)

    Yeah, because a NYC cab really needs the same battery pack that can power a 2700lb car from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds and sustain 130mph...

    And a new Prius battery (hybrid, yes, not fully electric) is about $3,000.

  19. Re:The E74 error was kb article on Microsoft Extends Xbox 360 Warranty To E74 Errors · · Score: 1

    Or take certain other hardware manufacturers route and deny, deny, deny, delete forum posts, deny some more, and then verrrrrry belatedly acknowledge it for a subset of users...

  20. Re:I have a feeling.... on Vista Post-SP2 Is the Safest OS On the Planet · · Score: 1

    If you want shitty cable connector, look at HDMI. Nice heavy HDMI cable, possibly with capacitor, plugged in vertically? If it stays plugged in more than a few days without some outside influence, I'd be surprised.

  21. Re:People just don't understand Linux on Linux On Netbooks — a Complicated Story · · Score: 1

    Please, I'm curious, for all the skepticals out there, including myself, what exactly were you able to do "more/easier" with the GIMP than a designer who "uses Photoshop non-stop"?

  22. Re:Apples and Oranges? on Dell Adamo Review — Macho Outside, Sissy Inside · · Score: 2, Informative
    I loved how when talking about the "minimum configuration' in respect to the MBA being "better", you only picked those attributes that the MBA was ahead in, and none of those that it was not.

    Subtle. I like it.

    I didn't see any mention of integrated EvDO. eSATA. I liked the little spin that implies "you can get an SSD with the Adamo, but it'll cost you", neglecting the fact that the Adamo's SSD retails for around $450, whereas the difference in price is $200 + $48 for the MBA's 120GB SATA drive (unless of course you bought it from Apple, who'd probably charge you $200 for it)...

  23. Re:WOW on Time Warner To Offer Unlimited Bandwidth For $150 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use Comcast Business at home. $99 a month I get 8 IP addresses, no port blocking, no throttling, 22mbps down, 5mbps up.

  24. Re:april fools? on Conficker Downloads Payload · · Score: 1
    Half the world? Wow, that's what we're calling the US, Canada, Belize, Micronesia, Kenya, Palau, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico?

    Then again, I remember the Coalition Of The Willing well, how Micronesia, Belize and Palau had sent half their military to Iraq (I think it was what, 7 soldiers between them?), so "people were for us". (One wonders if they would have if the US hadn't threatened to withhold aid, but that's getting even more off-topic...)

  25. Re:Should have used PHP. on Twitter On Scala · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd flame on, but I'm trying to compose myself after the fits of laughter that the phrase "lifestream transactions" brought on. Seriously?